[go: up one dir, main page]

WO1998030317A1 - Membrane microfilter manufacturing process - Google Patents

Membrane microfilter manufacturing process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998030317A1
WO1998030317A1 PCT/CA1997/000016 CA9700016W WO9830317A1 WO 1998030317 A1 WO1998030317 A1 WO 1998030317A1 CA 9700016 W CA9700016 W CA 9700016W WO 9830317 A1 WO9830317 A1 WO 9830317A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
laser
membrane
pore
film
pores
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA1997/000016
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Ryan S. Raz
Gordon Rosenblatt
Daniel S. Maclean
Original Assignee
Morphometrix Technologies Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Morphometrix Technologies Inc. filed Critical Morphometrix Technologies Inc.
Priority to AU13625/97A priority Critical patent/AU1362597A/en
Priority to PCT/CA1997/000016 priority patent/WO1998030317A1/en
Publication of WO1998030317A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998030317A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0023Organic membrane manufacture by inducing porosity into non porous precursor membranes
    • B01D67/0032Organic membrane manufacture by inducing porosity into non porous precursor membranes by elimination of segments of the precursor, e.g. nucleation-track membranes, lithography or laser methods
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/50Polycarbonates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/36Removing material
    • B23K26/38Removing material by boring or cutting
    • B23K26/382Removing material by boring or cutting by boring
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/36Removing material
    • B23K26/40Removing material taking account of the properties of the material involved
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2323/00Details relating to membrane preparation
    • B01D2323/34Use of radiation
    • B01D2323/345UV-treatment
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/08Patterned membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2101/00Articles made by soldering, welding or cutting
    • B23K2101/34Coated articles, e.g. plated or painted; Surface treated articles
    • B23K2101/35Surface treated articles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2103/00Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
    • B23K2103/30Organic material
    • B23K2103/42Plastics
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2103/00Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
    • B23K2103/50Inorganic material, e.g. metals, not provided for in B23K2103/02 – B23K2103/26

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the production of membrane microfilters .
  • Micro-filtration is a process of removing from a fluid flow target particles in the size range of 0.025 to 10 microns. This is accomplished by passing the fluid through a microporous medium such as a membrane filter.
  • a membrane filter acts as a microscopically fine sieve that captures particles on its surface that are greater in size than its pores.
  • micron-sized particles can be removed by the use of non-membrane or depth filter materials, only a membrane filter can ensure proper quantitative particle retention.
  • the retention boundary provided by the membrane filter also provides several important analytical advantages . Since the target particles removed from the fluid are confined to the surface of the membrane filter they can be analyzed in variety of ways not available with depth filters. For example, in addition to clarifying and sterilizing certain fluids, the contaminating organisms may be further cultured or examined microscopically.
  • HTMF high-tolerance membrane filters
  • Ehrfeld et al . (US patent 4,872,888) describe a multi-stage procedure for creating a mold for the production of microporous membrane filters.
  • the technique is particularly suited to the production of unitary structures where the supporting structure is integrally connected to the microporous membrane filter itself.
  • the technique places limitations on the materials that may be used for the filters themselves; they must be castable in thin film form and this is not always possible or desirable.
  • the membrane filter material be preprocessed in large sheets before the pores are formed.
  • the mold itself is necessarily rather delicate in nature and is unlikely to withstand the repeated use required of a mass-production system.
  • Li (US patent 5,256,360) uses a similar technique to create a mold for membrane filter manufacture. In this technique, the mold is produced by means of a laser machining process and a liquid polymer resin is used in the casting process.
  • the result is a set of microscopic pores (see b in Figure 7) whose size can be controlled by the careful manipulation of the etch parameters and whose density is governed by the exposure time to the beam of fission fragments .
  • the typical mean pore size tolerance for commercially available track-etched membranes is between +0 % to -20 % of the rated pore size for the membrane (Costar Life Science Filtration Catalog, 1992) .
  • etching procedure though carefully controlled, must still lead to a statistical distribution of pore sizes about a mean pore size. As mentioned above, even this mean pore size is subject to a wide tolerance that can restrict the utility of the membrane filter. Moreover, the track-etch procedure requires that the film be very thin to allow the fission fragments to completely traverse the thickness, but that the film be thick enough to permit the required amount of etching without compromising its mechanical integrity, and that the film must be insulating. These requirements prevent certain types of materials from being formed into membrane filters that can offer unique advantages in filtration procedures.
  • Saunders (US patent 3,742,182) describes a technique for creating a scanning mask in a sheet material using laser light in the infrared region of the electro-magnetic spectrum. Specifically, the procedure makes use of a C0 2 laser with a wavelength of 10.6 microns to produce holes in a sheet material with dimensions of roughly 125 microns. The drawbacks of this technique can be traced to the wavelength of laser energy being used. The relatively long wavelength, 10.6 microns, places a lower limit on the size of features that can be etched into the surface of the sheet material.
  • This limit is a diftractive effect that limits the resolution of the feature to roughly the same dimension as the laser wavelength itself and thus makes it unsuited to the production of membrane micro- filters.
  • the second drawback is also associated with the laser wavelength.
  • the 10.6 micron energy is quite firmly in the heat-producing infrared region of the spectrum. This means that the material removal mechanism relies on the selective local heating of the sheet material . It is an inevitable consequence of this mechanism that there will be collateral damage to portions of the sheet that are not meant to be touched by the laser. As a consequence the mechanical properties of the sheet may be severely compromised and there may be an undesirable build-up of combustion products on the surface of the sheet after it is worked by the laser.
  • the principle of this technique lies in the incorporation of a filler material in a fluoropolymer composite that has a higher ultraviolet absorption characteristic.
  • the patent itself is limited to fluoropolymer composites and the specific application is in the production of multi-layer PCBs.
  • the problem of contamination is the chief concern of Ludden et al . (U.S. Patent 5,487,852) since even the use of ultraviolet laser radiation some small residues may be left behind on the worked material . In PCB manufacture this particulate contamination can be intolerable. Ludden et al . thus turn their attention to aromatic and/or amorphous polyamides or polymers generally with aromatic rings and aliphatic chains repeating in their polymer backbones .
  • elastomeric materials means that such components would be incapable of withstanding even moderate pressures without the gross distortion of the pores and therefore provide unpredictable filtration properties.
  • Mathiesen et al (US patent 5,486,546) use ultraviolet lasers to form microstructures in bioresorbable elements for implantation. These materials are carefully engineered for these applications and contain mixtures of aliphatic polyesters and aliphatic polycarbonates together with copolymers . These are used to selectively influence the healing process separating and guiding the tissues formed around the bioresorbable element so that regeneration is achieved. This is accomplished by the selective patterning and machining of the elastomer to produce the guiding structures .
  • WO 87/03021 mentions the use of laser ablation in connection with filtration applications.
  • the ablation is used to produce elevations and depressions in fibers . These effectively increase the surface area of the fibers and the effective porosity of any depth filter that is made up of such patterned fibers.
  • a depth filter is not at all the same as a membrane filter in either construction or separation properties.
  • HTMF high-tolerance membrane filters
  • the ultraviolet radiation being much shorter in optical wavelength, allows finer resolution for the fabrication of microscopic structures.
  • the material is removed from the workpiece by the rapid electronic excitation of molecules to bond-breaking energies . This cold working leaves little or none of the heat damage typically associated with lower wavelength lasers that rely on vibrational modes for material removal .
  • An example of an ultraviolet laser is the excimer laser, excimer standing for excited dimer. The excited dimers are formed in a high pressure plasma of a rare gas and a halogen.
  • a transient high-voltage discharge ionizes the rare gas and the subsequent recombination of electrons and rare-gas ions yields electronically-excited rare-gas atoms that react strongly with the halogen atoms to produce short-lived excited dimers. These relax into their separate atomic components through the release of an ultraviolet photon. These UV photons are then gathered and their numbers amplified through the usual stimulated emission to produce a coherent pulse of UV laser light.
  • Neodymium-doped, Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) solid state lasers are readily available producing relatively high output power levels, but typically produce laser energy at a wavelength of 1064 nm.
  • the laser energy cannot be utilized for strictly ablative working of polymers such as polycarbonate since the wavelength is firmly in the infrared region.
  • the laser photons can be used to produce pores in polycarbonate materials with a reasonable amount of precision but with some small amount of collateral damage due to local heating effects. However, these may be produced at a lower cost overall than the ultraviolet laser worked polymers .
  • a method of preparing membrane microfilters comprising generating by means of a laser at least one pulsed beam of ultraviolet or visible light radiation having pulses of an intensity sufficient to ablate synthetic resin and having a beam width less than 10 microns, directing said at least one beam onto a synthetic resin film to form by ablation at least one through pore therein, and relatively moving the film and said beam to form an array of pores in said film.
  • Figure 1 is a photomicrograph of a portion of a track-etched membrane filter
  • Figure 2 illustrates diagrammatically how optical shaping of a laser beam may be used to adjust pore wall tapers
  • Figure 3 illustrates how multiple beams may be obtained from a single laser by means of a beam splitter
  • Figure 4 illustrates a multiple lens system
  • Figure 5 illustrates use of a pattern mask with magnification
  • Figure 6 is a photomicrograph showing a polycarbonate membrane micro-filter, 8 micron pore size, 50 micron pitch, produced by use of an ultraviolet laser;
  • Figure 7 is a photomicrograph of a polycarbonate membrane micro-filter, 8 micron pore size, produced by use of a
  • Nd:YAG laser, frequency doubled; and Figure 8 is a graph comparing pore size distributions in several polycarbonate membrane filters with a nominal 8 micron pore size; curves a, b and c relate to UV laser produced membrane micro-filters having 70, 30 and 50 micron pore pitches respectively, and curve d relates to a commercial track-etched membrane microfilter.
  • a single, focused laser beam can be used to drill a single precise pore in a variety of membrane materials.
  • This technique can make use of the optical manipulation of beam widths and envelopes to manufacture, in a single laser pulse, pores with varied cross-sections. All such techniques share the need to raster-scan or translate the target material beneath the laser between pulses in order to produce complete membrane filters with an array of pores.
  • the use of a high-quality single lens for laser beam shaping and focusing allows for high precision control of pore manufacture.
  • the laser beam is produced by an UV or visible light laser, for example a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser, it is homogenized to reduce intensity variations across its profile and collimated. It is then directed onto a single lens element that brings the laser energy to a focus at or near the target material .
  • the use of lenses with varying focal lengths and numerical apertures allows control over the pore wall taper, as illustrated in Fig. 2. Lenses with long depths of focus will produce straight, cylindrical pore walls (see pore c_ in Fig. 2) . Lenses with short depths of focus will produce waisted beams which yield significant tapers to these walls (see pore d in Figure 2) .
  • the taper an be controlled by lens position or focal length and can be used to manufacture so-called anisotropic membrane filters. After a single laser pulse or a train of pulses has drilled a pore the material is translated to a new position and the procedure is repeated.
  • the pore is to be very large or if it is to have a shape that departs from that of the laser beam waist, then material can be removed in a series of precise pulses as the target material is translated beneath the laser.
  • the energy and duration of the laser pulse can be used to selectively cut away, without completely penetrating the membrane, only a. small depth of material.
  • the target material is micromachined into the proper shape and cross-section. Under computer numerical control this is repeated all over the surface of the membrane material to complete a desired pore pattern.
  • This technique lends itself to the production of complex or specialised filter designs.
  • the envelope of the pulses produced by the laser may be manipulated to improve performance. If the highest optical power is concentrated at the leading ede of a pulse, this may be used to overcome interface resistance at the surface of the material, while reduced power during the remainder of the pulse may be sufficient to sustain ablation without risking ionization of removed debris to form a plasma forming a barrier to the transmission of further energy.
  • the laser beam can be divided into several smaller beams and used to produce several pores simultaneously.
  • Many techniques are known for producing multiple focused beams from a single laser source.
  • a simple beamsplitting procedure together with several appropriate lenses can drill multiple pores using a single laser pulse as shown in Fig. 3, in which a laser beam 2 is incident on a beam splitter 4 which deflects part of its energy onto a mirror 6 such that parallel beams 8, 10 are focused by lenses 12 onto a film 14 to be ablated.
  • the laser beam 2 could instead be directed as shown in Fig. 4 onto a multiple "insect-eye" type array of lenses 12 to produce an array of focused beams for pore drilling, or a holographic lens could be used to define a multiple set of focused beams to produce pores of desired sizes and wall tapers.
  • translation of the target material 14 with respect to the laser beam would allow the entire membrane filter to be constructed in a series of laser pulses .
  • FIG. 4 Another technique for the production of membrane filters with UV or visible light lasers uses microlithographic procedures to create a suitable mask from dielectric reflectors .
  • a large and complex membrane filter pattern can be produced by illuminating the mask with the UV or Nd:YAG laser light. Where the dielectric reflectors impinge on the laser beam, the membrane material is left untouched.
  • the use of subsequent imaging optics allows the pattern to be easily and quickly enlarged or reduced depending on the requirements of the membrane filter itself.
  • Figure 4 Such an arrangement is shown in Figure 4, in which a laser beam 2 is shown impinging on a dielectric reflector mask 20 which passes multiple beams 22. The spacing of these beams may be adjusted by a lens system 24 to provide a desired pore size and spacing.
  • Such techniques may be combined with the multi-lens systems described above to increase the throughput of the manufacturing system provided that the laser energy is high enough to overcome losses and provide the necessary degree of ablation to form pores in the membrane .
  • Nd:YAG lasers The energy produced by available lasers is a consideration in the type of laser selected. While UV excimer lasers undoubtedly produce membrane filters of higher quality with fewer residues and greater precision than visible light lasers, the availability at relatively low cost of relatively high powered Nd:YAG lasers capable of producing, with frequency multiplication, high energy pulses in the visible spectrum, makes their use attractive where a lower quality product is acceptable.
  • To upconvert Nd:YAG laser energy two techniques are commonly employed. One is three way sum-difference mixing using multiple incident wavelengths, but more commonly the infrared laser energy is used to drive a non-linear crystalline material with absorptive and radiative properties which generate harmonics of the incident radiation, e.g. 1064nm > 532nm.
  • potassium dihydrogen phosphate provides a high efficiency (83%) second order frequency conversion for Nd:YAG lasers operating at a fundamental wavelength of 1064nm.
  • the non-linear crystalline material may be located either inside or outside of the lasing cavity, although the former provides greater efficiency and is preferred.
  • a series of polycarbonate membrane filters were produced by ultraviolet laser ablation using a raster-scanned mask with optical reduction, as described with reference to Figure 5. All have 8 micron pores in 10 micron thick polycarbonate sheet material . The pores were produced on a hexagonal grid and three pore spacings were manufactured, 70 microns, 50 microns (shown in Fig. 6) and 30 microns. It should be noted that the 70 micron pore spacing results in a pore density that is effectively equivalent to the rated pore density of a comparable track-etched membrane filter (100,000 per square centimeter).
  • the laser utilised was a xenon chloride excimer laser producing pulses of ultraviolet radiation at a repetition rate of 200Hz and a power of 50 watts to provide an estimated energy of 15 micro joules per pulse per pore site. 12 pulses were required to break through the film, corresponding to a duration of 0.06 seconds per set of pores .
  • a further membrane microfilter was produced from the same polycarbonate film, with the same nominal 8 micron pore diameter and a pore spacing of 50 microns, but using a frequency doubled NdrYAG laser using an intra cavity doubling medium to produce light in the visible spectrum at 532 nm wavelength, at a pulse repetition rate of 200Hz and 60 nanosecond duration.
  • the estimated energy applied per pore site was 20 microjoules, and a single pulse was sufficient to break through the film, equivalent to an applied energy of 40 joules per cm 2 .
  • the advantages of laser-produced polycarbonate membrane filters are numerous.
  • the laser allows a precise control over pore size and shape even allowing for complex geometries .
  • the method of manufacture allows the pores to be positioned any where over the surface of the membrane filter eliminating unwanted pore overlaps and allowing for complex pore arrangements and composite patterns .
  • the use of a laser system reduces restriction on the dimensions and thickness of the membrane used for manufacture opening the field to a wide variety of novel membrane materials utilizing polycarbonate as a support material, that may offer advantages in separation technology over conventionally produced membranes .
  • the manufacture of laser drilled membranes reduces or eliminates the possibility of chemical (or other) contamination of filter surfaces that may interfere with desired function.
  • the use of masked patterns to create filters is a rapid and simple technique for mass production in a single step process.
  • the regular pore geometries and sizes allow these filters to be accurately described by existing filtration theories thus yielding shorter and more effective design cycles .
  • the laser machining of the filter surface allows the membrane's cross-section to adopt complex and potentially beneficial shapes for various types of filtration procedures .
  • the method of the invention may also be used with other synthetic resin film materials, preferably thermosetting, which can be ablated utilising UV or visible light laser beams. Successful tests have been made using an UV examer laser to form pores in a 12.5 micron film of an aromatic polymide film marketed under the trade mark KAPTON.
  • the choice of laser wavelength is not critical, although shorter ultraviolet wavelengths will provide better results, and will largely depend on the availability of lasers capable of economically providing pulses of sufficient power that membranes may be prepared at an acceptable rate relative to their quality.
  • the method of the invention may be combined with other fabrication techniques: for example, pores formed by the method of the invention could be enlarged by chemical etching particularly where a visible light laser is used, undesirable residues can be removed from the membrane surface by rubbing or scrubbing.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)

Abstract

A membrane microfilter is formed by ablative drilling of an array of pores through a polycarbonate film (14) using an ultraviolet or visible light laser. Pulses of radiation from the laser (2) are formed into beams (22) of less than pore size using a lens system (12) or mask (20), the intensity of the beams (22) being sufficient to cause ablation of the film (14).

Description

Membrane Microfilter Manufacturing Process
This invention relates to the production of membrane microfilters .
Micro-filtration is a process of removing from a fluid flow target particles in the size range of 0.025 to 10 microns. This is accomplished by passing the fluid through a microporous medium such as a membrane filter. A membrane filter acts as a microscopically fine sieve that captures particles on its surface that are greater in size than its pores. Although micron-sized particles can be removed by the use of non-membrane or depth filter materials, only a membrane filter can ensure proper quantitative particle retention. The retention boundary provided by the membrane filter also provides several important analytical advantages . Since the target particles removed from the fluid are confined to the surface of the membrane filter they can be analyzed in variety of ways not available with depth filters. For example, in addition to clarifying and sterilizing certain fluids, the contaminating organisms may be further cultured or examined microscopically.
Available techniques for the commercial production of high- quality membrane filters are presently limited. There are certain molding techniques that can, in principle, allow the fabrication of high-tolerance membrane filters (HTMF) .
Ehrfeld et al . (US patent 4,872,888) describe a multi-stage procedure for creating a mold for the production of microporous membrane filters. The technique is particularly suited to the production of unitary structures where the supporting structure is integrally connected to the microporous membrane filter itself. However, the technique places limitations on the materials that may be used for the filters themselves; they must be castable in thin film form and this is not always possible or desirable. For example, it is often preferred that the membrane filter material be preprocessed in large sheets before the pores are formed. Secondly, the mold itself is necessarily rather delicate in nature and is unlikely to withstand the repeated use required of a mass-production system. In a related patent, Li (US patent 5,256,360) uses a similar technique to create a mold for membrane filter manufacture. In this technique, the mold is produced by means of a laser machining process and a liquid polymer resin is used in the casting process.
Despite the availability of these molding processes, the highest quality commercially available membrane microfilters are presently manufactured by a two step, track-etch process. These track-etched membrane filters begin as very thin polymer films that are exposed to a collimated beam of massive energetic nuclei ( for example, U235 fission fragments ) . As the nuclei pass through the polymer film they cleave the polymer's backbone bonds and leave a trail of structural defects. In the second step, the polymer film placed in a warm caustic bath where the defect trails are preferentially etched against the bulk of the material . The result is a set of microscopic pores (see b in Figure 7) whose size can be controlled by the careful manipulation of the etch parameters and whose density is governed by the exposure time to the beam of fission fragments . The typical mean pore size tolerance for commercially available track-etched membranes is between +0 % to -20 % of the rated pore size for the membrane (Costar Life Science Filtration Catalog, 1992) .
While an inherent advantage of membrane microfilters is the precise control exerted over the pore sizes and1 densities, even the best examples suffer several drawbacks . Since the fission fragment trajectories are random, there is a finite probability that two (or more) pores will merge (see a in Figure 1 ) . This compromises the filtration properties and restricts manufacture to low pore densities in an effort to reduce this probability. The overlap of pores can be reduced by two pass techniques that essentially bore into the membrane from each side and then rely on the holes from each side of the membrane to link up as is described by Toulemonde et al (US patent 4,855,049). While this can alleviate the pore overlap difficulty, it creates a tortuous path for fluid flow that tends to compromise the hydro- mechanical qualities of the filter.
The etching procedure, though carefully controlled, must still lead to a statistical distribution of pore sizes about a mean pore size. As mentioned above, even this mean pore size is subject to a wide tolerance that can restrict the utility of the membrane filter. Moreover, the track-etch procedure requires that the film be very thin to allow the fission fragments to completely traverse the thickness, but that the film be thick enough to permit the required amount of etching without compromising its mechanical integrity, and that the film must be insulating. These requirements prevent certain types of materials from being formed into membrane filters that can offer unique advantages in filtration procedures.
If the membrane material is relatively thick and/or the etching process is not carefully controlled then the pore cross-sections will be tapered rather than square to the membrane surface. Fleischer et al . (US patent 3,713,921) describe the use of a surfactant added to the etchant to control this cross-section variation. This can reduce the cone angle of the pore but can only control it in a statistical manner. Track-etched membrane filters also often fail to follow theoretical models of performance. This makes designs difficult to predict and increases uncertainty in industrial applications.
Highly-energetic photons from laser sources have long been used to work polymeric materials. Saunders (US patent 3,742,182) describes a technique for creating a scanning mask in a sheet material using laser light in the infrared region of the electro-magnetic spectrum. Specifically, the procedure makes use of a C02 laser with a wavelength of 10.6 microns to produce holes in a sheet material with dimensions of roughly 125 microns. The drawbacks of this technique can be traced to the wavelength of laser energy being used. The relatively long wavelength, 10.6 microns, places a lower limit on the size of features that can be etched into the surface of the sheet material. This limit is a diftractive effect that limits the resolution of the feature to roughly the same dimension as the laser wavelength itself and thus makes it unsuited to the production of membrane micro- filters. The second drawback is also associated with the laser wavelength. The 10.6 micron energy is quite firmly in the heat-producing infrared region of the spectrum. This means that the material removal mechanism relies on the selective local heating of the sheet material . It is an inevitable consequence of this mechanism that there will be collateral damage to portions of the sheet that are not meant to be touched by the laser. As a consequence the mechanical properties of the sheet may be severely compromised and there may be an undesirable build-up of combustion products on the surface of the sheet after it is worked by the laser.
The difficulties associated with unwanted combustion products and the specific demands of electronic printed- circuit board (PCB) manufacture are addressed by a large number of patents in the area of laser machining of polymers. Blum et al . (US patent 4,568,632) describe a technique for selectively etching polyimide films in PCB manufacture. The polyimides are valued in this area for their excellent electrical properties and high thermal stability. In this particular PCB application polyimides are preferred to polycarbonate because of the greater degree of control that can be exerted in the etching of the former. In experiments it is shown that polycarbonate etches roughly ten times faster than polyimide under the same conditions and that it is more susceptible to temperature fluctuations. This is a great concern for PCB manufacture since it is necessary to etch the polymer coating on the PCB without damaging the components or connections below. In Smyth, Jr et al . (US patent 5,066,357) ultraviolet lasers are used to make flexible circuit cards with laser-contoured vias and machined capacitors. The preferred material is again polyimide because of the control in the machining process that is offered by its reduced etch rates. Traskos et al . (US patent 4,915,981) describe a technique for creating vias in fluoropolymers with ultraviolet lasers. The application of this method is the formation of substrate materials for PCB manufacture. The vias created in this way allow electrical communication between the various layers of multi-layer PCBs . The principle of this technique lies in the incorporation of a filler material in a fluoropolymer composite that has a higher ultraviolet absorption characteristic. The patent itself is limited to fluoropolymer composites and the specific application is in the production of multi-layer PCBs. The problem of contamination is the chief concern of Ludden et al . (U.S. Patent 5,487,852) since even the use of ultraviolet laser radiation some small residues may be left behind on the worked material . In PCB manufacture this particulate contamination can be intolerable. Ludden et al . thus turn their attention to aromatic and/or amorphous polyamides or polymers generally with aromatic rings and aliphatic chains repeating in their polymer backbones . In their experiments they find that these compounds produce the least amount of physical charring and are thus well-suited to PCB manufacture. In contrast, they note that aromatic polyesters (such as polycarbonates) will produce some charring over the ultraviolet ablation wavelengths from 193 nm to 303 nm. As a consequence, they would exclude them from their process as unsuitable. Another example of laser ablation of polymers comes from the area of biomedical elastomers. Knight (US patent 5,336,554) uses ultraviolet lasers to create a stretchable, tear-resistant elastomeric film element with a desired degree of air-permeability. However, the rage of perforation size (50 microns) and the minimum perforation spacing (1 mm) render such a material entirely unsuited to micro-filtration. Moreover, the use of elastomeric materials means that such components would be incapable of withstanding even moderate pressures without the gross distortion of the pores and therefore provide unpredictable filtration properties. Mathiesen et al (US patent 5,486,546) use ultraviolet lasers to form microstructures in bioresorbable elements for implantation. These materials are carefully engineered for these applications and contain mixtures of aliphatic polyesters and aliphatic polycarbonates together with copolymers . These are used to selectively influence the healing process separating and guiding the tissues formed around the bioresorbable element so that regeneration is achieved. This is accomplished by the selective patterning and machining of the elastomer to produce the guiding structures .
WO 87/03021 mentions the use of laser ablation in connection with filtration applications. The ablation is used to produce elevations and depressions in fibers . These effectively increase the surface area of the fibers and the effective porosity of any depth filter that is made up of such patterned fibers. However, a depth filter is not at all the same as a membrane filter in either construction or separation properties.
The manufacturing procedure for membrane filters described in this application addresses the problems considered above by exerting precise control over pore production in membranes . By making use of the photoablative properties of lasers operating in the ultraviolet and visible light regions, high-tolerance membrane filters ( HTMF ) can be constructed with exact pore size dimensions ( typically to within 1 micron ) , exact pore positioning on membrane surface (typically to within 0.1 micron), ability to make use of a wide range of membrane materials including polycarbonates and polycarbonates that have been coated to render them electrically active, piezoelectrically active or biologically active, three-dimensional pore sculpting, and ability to use thicker or thinner membrane materials than with the track-etch process.
The fabrication of microscopic pores using ultraviolet lasers differs appreciably from techniques that employ much longer wavelengths. There are two principle advantages.
First, the ultraviolet radiation, being much shorter in optical wavelength, allows finer resolution for the fabrication of microscopic structures. Second, the material is removed from the workpiece by the rapid electronic excitation of molecules to bond-breaking energies . This cold working leaves little or none of the heat damage typically associated with lower wavelength lasers that rely on vibrational modes for material removal . An example of an ultraviolet laser is the excimer laser, excimer standing for excited dimer. The excited dimers are formed in a high pressure plasma of a rare gas and a halogen. A transient high-voltage discharge ionizes the rare gas and the subsequent recombination of electrons and rare-gas ions yields electronically-excited rare-gas atoms that react strongly with the halogen atoms to produce short-lived excited dimers. These relax into their separate atomic components through the release of an ultraviolet photon. These UV photons are then gathered and their numbers amplified through the usual stimulated emission to produce a coherent pulse of UV laser light.
To a lesser degree, similar advantages can be obtained using lasers producing wavelengths in the visible light band.The reduced quality of the filters obtained may be compensated by more economical manufacture using relatively higher powered and lower cost lasers. Thus Neodymium-doped, Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) solid state lasers are readily available producing relatively high output power levels, but typically produce laser energy at a wavelength of 1064 nm. In this form the laser energy cannot be utilized for strictly ablative working of polymers such as polycarbonate since the wavelength is firmly in the infrared region. However, it is possible to frequency double these laser outputs using well-known techniques to produce shorter-wavelength harmonics at the 532 nm wavelength. In this visible green range the laser photons can be used to produce pores in polycarbonate materials with a reasonable amount of precision but with some small amount of collateral damage due to local heating effects. However, these may be produced at a lower cost overall than the ultraviolet laser worked polymers .
Thus according to the invention, there is provided a method of preparing membrane microfilters, comprising generating by means of a laser at least one pulsed beam of ultraviolet or visible light radiation having pulses of an intensity sufficient to ablate synthetic resin and having a beam width less than 10 microns, directing said at least one beam onto a synthetic resin film to form by ablation at least one through pore therein, and relatively moving the film and said beam to form an array of pores in said film.
Short Description of The Drawings Figure 1 is a photomicrograph of a portion of a track-etched membrane filter;
Figure 2 illustrates diagrammatically how optical shaping of a laser beam may be used to adjust pore wall tapers;
Figure 3 illustrates how multiple beams may be obtained from a single laser by means of a beam splitter;
Figure 4 illustrates a multiple lens system;
Figure 5 illustrates use of a pattern mask with magnification;
Figure 6 is a photomicrograph showing a polycarbonate membrane micro-filter, 8 micron pore size, 50 micron pitch, produced by use of an ultraviolet laser;
Figure 7 is a photomicrograph of a polycarbonate membrane micro-filter, 8 micron pore size, produced by use of a
Nd:YAG laser, frequency doubled; and Figure 8 is a graph comparing pore size distributions in several polycarbonate membrane filters with a nominal 8 micron pore size; curves a, b and c relate to UV laser produced membrane micro-filters having 70, 30 and 50 micron pore pitches respectively, and curve d relates to a commercial track-etched membrane microfilter.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
Techniques for HTMF manufacture using ultraviolet or visible light lasers fall in two categories, focused beam and masked pattern. A single, focused laser beam can be used to drill a single precise pore in a variety of membrane materials. This technique can make use of the optical manipulation of beam widths and envelopes to manufacture, in a single laser pulse, pores with varied cross-sections. All such techniques share the need to raster-scan or translate the target material beneath the laser between pulses in order to produce complete membrane filters with an array of pores. The use of a high-quality single lens for laser beam shaping and focusing allows for high precision control of pore manufacture. After the laser beam is produced by an UV or visible light laser, for example a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser, it is homogenized to reduce intensity variations across its profile and collimated. It is then directed onto a single lens element that brings the laser energy to a focus at or near the target material . The use of lenses with varying focal lengths and numerical apertures allows control over the pore wall taper, as illustrated in Fig. 2. Lenses with long depths of focus will produce straight, cylindrical pore walls (see pore c_ in Fig. 2) . Lenses with short depths of focus will produce waisted beams which yield significant tapers to these walls (see pore d in Figure 2) . The taper an be controlled by lens position or focal length and can be used to manufacture so-called anisotropic membrane filters. After a single laser pulse or a train of pulses has drilled a pore the material is translated to a new position and the procedure is repeated.
If the pore is to be very large or if it is to have a shape that departs from that of the laser beam waist, then material can be removed in a series of precise pulses as the target material is translated beneath the laser. The energy and duration of the laser pulse can be used to selectively cut away, without completely penetrating the membrane, only a. small depth of material. In this way the target material is micromachined into the proper shape and cross-section. Under computer numerical control this is repeated all over the surface of the membrane material to complete a desired pore pattern. This technique lends itself to the production of complex or specialised filter designs.
In addition, the envelope of the pulses produced by the laser may be manipulated to improve performance. If the highest optical power is concentrated at the leading ede of a pulse, this may be used to overcome interface resistance at the surface of the material, while reduced power during the remainder of the pulse may be sufficient to sustain ablation without risking ionization of removed debris to form a plasma forming a barrier to the transmission of further energy.
If the energy of the laser pulse is sufficiently high then the laser beam can be divided into several smaller beams and used to produce several pores simultaneously. Many techniques are known for producing multiple focused beams from a single laser source. A simple beamsplitting procedure together with several appropriate lenses can drill multiple pores using a single laser pulse as shown in Fig. 3, in which a laser beam 2 is incident on a beam splitter 4 which deflects part of its energy onto a mirror 6 such that parallel beams 8, 10 are focused by lenses 12 onto a film 14 to be ablated.
The laser beam 2 could instead be directed as shown in Fig. 4 onto a multiple "insect-eye" type array of lenses 12 to produce an array of focused beams for pore drilling, or a holographic lens could be used to define a multiple set of focused beams to produce pores of desired sizes and wall tapers. As before, translation of the target material 14 with respect to the laser beam would allow the entire membrane filter to be constructed in a series of laser pulses .
Another technique for the production of membrane filters with UV or visible light lasers uses microlithographic procedures to create a suitable mask from dielectric reflectors . A large and complex membrane filter pattern can be produced by illuminating the mask with the UV or Nd:YAG laser light. Where the dielectric reflectors impinge on the laser beam, the membrane material is left untouched. Moreover, the use of subsequent imaging optics allows the pattern to be easily and quickly enlarged or reduced depending on the requirements of the membrane filter itself. Such an arrangement is shown in Figure 4, in which a laser beam 2 is shown impinging on a dielectric reflector mask 20 which passes multiple beams 22. The spacing of these beams may be adjusted by a lens system 24 to provide a desired pore size and spacing. Such techniques may be combined with the multi-lens systems described above to increase the throughput of the manufacturing system provided that the laser energy is high enough to overcome losses and provide the necessary degree of ablation to form pores in the membrane .
The energy produced by available lasers is a consideration in the type of laser selected. While UV excimer lasers undoubtedly produce membrane filters of higher quality with fewer residues and greater precision than visible light lasers, the availability at relatively low cost of relatively high powered Nd:YAG lasers capable of producing, with frequency multiplication, high energy pulses in the visible spectrum, makes their use attractive where a lower quality product is acceptable. To upconvert Nd:YAG laser energy, two techniques are commonly employed. One is three way sum-difference mixing using multiple incident wavelengths, but more commonly the infrared laser energy is used to drive a non-linear crystalline material with absorptive and radiative properties which generate harmonics of the incident radiation, e.g. 1064nm > 532nm. For example, potassium dihydrogen phosphate provides a high efficiency (83%) second order frequency conversion for Nd:YAG lasers operating at a fundamental wavelength of 1064nm. The non-linear crystalline material may be located either inside or outside of the lasing cavity, although the former provides greater efficiency and is preferred.
Example 1
A series of polycarbonate membrane filters were produced by ultraviolet laser ablation using a raster-scanned mask with optical reduction, as described with reference to Figure 5. All have 8 micron pores in 10 micron thick polycarbonate sheet material . The pores were produced on a hexagonal grid and three pore spacings were manufactured, 70 microns, 50 microns (shown in Fig. 6) and 30 microns. It should be noted that the 70 micron pore spacing results in a pore density that is effectively equivalent to the rated pore density of a comparable track-etched membrane filter (100,000 per square centimeter).
The laser utilised was a xenon chloride excimer laser producing pulses of ultraviolet radiation at a repetition rate of 200Hz and a power of 50 watts to provide an estimated energy of 15 micro joules per pulse per pore site. 12 pulses were required to break through the film, corresponding to a duration of 0.06 seconds per set of pores .
To estimate the performance of these filters in relation to a commercially-available track-etched membrane filter such as that shown in Fig. 1, a bubble point measurement (ASTM method F 316-70 (1976) ) was performed on each. Using these measurements it is possible to estimate the distribution range of pore sizes, as shown in Fig. 7 and reported in Table 1 below. In Figure 7, curves a, b and c_ relate to the 70, 50 and 30 micron filters of this example, and curve d relates to the filter of Figure 1. It is evident that the laser-ablated membrane micro-filters show a much tighter distribution range than a similar commercial track-etched polycarbonate membrane micro-filter.
Table I Pore size estimations from bubble point measurements for 8 micron nominal pore diameter membrane micro-filters
Figure imgf000016_0001
Example 2
A further membrane microfilter was produced from the same polycarbonate film, with the same nominal 8 micron pore diameter and a pore spacing of 50 microns, but using a frequency doubled NdrYAG laser using an intra cavity doubling medium to produce light in the visible spectrum at 532 nm wavelength, at a pulse repetition rate of 200Hz and 60 nanosecond duration. The estimated energy applied per pore site was 20 microjoules, and a single pulse was sufficient to break through the film, equivalent to an applied energy of 40 joules per cm2. As will be noted from Fig. 7, the quality of the resulting filter is reduced as compared with those of the preceding example, with more visible residues and less uniform pore size, but the use of less expensive equipment and increased production rate may compensate for this where the very highest performance is not required. Although it appears that the energy required to form a pore in this example was considerably lower, the pore forming technique used was different (the pores were formed one at a time) and figures for energy applied per pore site in both examples are estimates intended for guidance only.
The advantages of laser-produced polycarbonate membrane filters are numerous. The laser allows a precise control over pore size and shape even allowing for complex geometries . The method of manufacture allows the pores to be positioned any where over the surface of the membrane filter eliminating unwanted pore overlaps and allowing for complex pore arrangements and composite patterns . The use of a laser system reduces restriction on the dimensions and thickness of the membrane used for manufacture opening the field to a wide variety of novel membrane materials utilizing polycarbonate as a support material, that may offer advantages in separation technology over conventionally produced membranes . The manufacture of laser drilled membranes reduces or eliminates the possibility of chemical (or other) contamination of filter surfaces that may interfere with desired function. The use of masked patterns to create filters is a rapid and simple technique for mass production in a single step process. The regular pore geometries and sizes allow these filters to be accurately described by existing filtration theories thus yielding shorter and more effective design cycles . The laser machining of the filter surface allows the membrane's cross-section to adopt complex and potentially beneficial shapes for various types of filtration procedures .
Although the use of polycarbonate films has been exemplified and is preferred, the method of the invention may also be used with other synthetic resin film materials, preferably thermosetting, which can be ablated utilising UV or visible light laser beams. Successful tests have been made using an UV examer laser to form pores in a 12.5 micron film of an aromatic polymide film marketed under the trade mark KAPTON.
The choice of laser wavelength is not critical, although shorter ultraviolet wavelengths will provide better results, and will largely depend on the availability of lasers capable of economically providing pulses of sufficient power that membranes may be prepared at an acceptable rate relative to their quality. The method of the invention may be combined with other fabrication techniques: for example, pores formed by the method of the invention could be enlarged by chemical etching particularly where a visible light laser is used, undesirable residues can be removed from the membrane surface by rubbing or scrubbing.

Claims

CLAIMS :
1. A method of preparing membrane microfilters, comprising generating by means of a laser at least one pulsed beam of ultraviolet or visible light radiation having pulses of an intensity sufficient to ablate synthetic resin and having a beam width less than 10 microns, directing said at least one beam onto a synthetic resin film to form by ablation at least one through pore therein, and relatively moving the film and said beam to form an array of pores in said film.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the film is a polycarbonate film.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the film has a surface coating.
4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein the laser is an ultraviolet excimer laser.
5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein the laser is a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, using multiple focussed beams formed by a lens array.
7. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , using multiple beams formed by a mask.
PCT/CA1997/000016 1997-01-10 1997-01-10 Membrane microfilter manufacturing process WO1998030317A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU13625/97A AU1362597A (en) 1997-01-10 1997-01-10 Membrane microfilter manufacturing process
PCT/CA1997/000016 WO1998030317A1 (en) 1997-01-10 1997-01-10 Membrane microfilter manufacturing process

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CA1997/000016 WO1998030317A1 (en) 1997-01-10 1997-01-10 Membrane microfilter manufacturing process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998030317A1 true WO1998030317A1 (en) 1998-07-16

Family

ID=4173191

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA1997/000016 WO1998030317A1 (en) 1997-01-10 1997-01-10 Membrane microfilter manufacturing process

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU1362597A (en)
WO (1) WO1998030317A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2803237A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2001-07-06 Iniversite Catholique De Louva METHOD FOR CREATING PORES IN A POLYMER MATERIAL IN SHEETS OR A POLYMERIC LAYER SUCH AS A THIN FILM OF THICKNESS EQUIVALENT TO ONE HUNDRED NANOMETERS, PREMISELY DEPOSITED ON A METAL SUPPORT
FR2803238A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2001-07-06 Iniversite Catholique De Louva PROCESS FOR CREATING PORES AND MICROPOROUS FILM
US6260709B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2001-07-17 Parker-Hannifin Corporation Membrane filter element for chemical-mechanical polishing slurries
EP1196263A4 (en) * 1998-11-16 2004-10-27 Aradigm Corp Method of fabricating porous membrane with unique pore structure for aerosolized delivery of drugs
US7419612B2 (en) 2002-11-19 2008-09-02 Universite Catholique De Louvain Method of creating pores in a thin sheet of polyimide
DE102007048879A1 (en) * 2007-10-11 2009-04-16 Schott Ag Used fluid separation medium e.g. saw particle, recycling method for manufacturing wafer i.e. silicon wafer, involves separating fluid from saw particles via filtration e.g. cross-flow-filtration, by using track filter
DE102011017696A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-10-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Microsieve and method of making a microsieve
WO2014108863A2 (en) 2013-01-10 2014-07-17 Sabic Innovative Plastics Ip B.V. Laser-perforated porous solid-state films and applications thereof
EP3495034A1 (en) * 2017-12-11 2019-06-12 General Electric Company System and method for manufacturing a membrane filter
JP2021058880A (en) * 2019-10-02 2021-04-15 普生股▲ふん▼有限公司 Micro filter, manufacturing method, and micro filtration unit

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4032743A (en) * 1975-06-27 1977-06-28 Marvel Engineering Company Laser microperforator
GB2150038A (en) * 1983-11-15 1985-06-26 Northern Ind Systems Engineeri Filtration apparatus
JPS63248404A (en) * 1987-04-01 1988-10-14 Kuraray Co Ltd Permeable membrane for red blood cells
EP0325752A1 (en) * 1987-12-17 1989-08-02 Akzo Nobel N.V. Micro/ultrafiltration membranes of defined pore size and process for their manufacturing by means of pulsed laser irradiation
EP0327508A2 (en) * 1988-02-03 1989-08-09 Ciba-Geigy Ag Process for laser marking of pigmented systems
JPH01289588A (en) * 1988-05-13 1989-11-21 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Laser processing equipment and method
JPH03184687A (en) * 1989-12-15 1991-08-12 Mitsubishi Electric Corp laser processing equipment
WO1993011861A1 (en) * 1991-12-09 1993-06-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Microstructured membranes and methods for making same
WO1996022864A1 (en) * 1995-01-25 1996-08-01 Pi Medical Corporation Laser-machineable articles

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4032743A (en) * 1975-06-27 1977-06-28 Marvel Engineering Company Laser microperforator
GB2150038A (en) * 1983-11-15 1985-06-26 Northern Ind Systems Engineeri Filtration apparatus
JPS63248404A (en) * 1987-04-01 1988-10-14 Kuraray Co Ltd Permeable membrane for red blood cells
EP0325752A1 (en) * 1987-12-17 1989-08-02 Akzo Nobel N.V. Micro/ultrafiltration membranes of defined pore size and process for their manufacturing by means of pulsed laser irradiation
EP0327508A2 (en) * 1988-02-03 1989-08-09 Ciba-Geigy Ag Process for laser marking of pigmented systems
JPH01289588A (en) * 1988-05-13 1989-11-21 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Laser processing equipment and method
JPH03184687A (en) * 1989-12-15 1991-08-12 Mitsubishi Electric Corp laser processing equipment
WO1993011861A1 (en) * 1991-12-09 1993-06-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Microstructured membranes and methods for making same
WO1996022864A1 (en) * 1995-01-25 1996-08-01 Pi Medical Corporation Laser-machineable articles

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, vol. 111, no. 14, 2 October 1989, Columbus, Ohio, US; abstract no. 120962 *
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 8847, Derwent World Patents Index; Class A97, AN 88-334679 *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 013, no. 056 (C - 566) 8 February 1989 (1989-02-08) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 014, no. 069 (M - 0932) 8 February 1990 (1990-02-08) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 015, no. 437 (M - 1176) 7 November 1991 (1991-11-07) *
YASUHIDE NAKAYAMA ET AL: "MICROPOROUS POLYMER SURFACES PREPARED BY AN EXCIMER LASER ABLATION TECHNIQUE", ASAIO JOURNAL, vol. 40, no. 3, 1 July 1994 (1994-07-01), pages 590 - 593, XP000498247 *

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6260709B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2001-07-17 Parker-Hannifin Corporation Membrane filter element for chemical-mechanical polishing slurries
EP1196263A4 (en) * 1998-11-16 2004-10-27 Aradigm Corp Method of fabricating porous membrane with unique pore structure for aerosolized delivery of drugs
FR2803237A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2001-07-06 Iniversite Catholique De Louva METHOD FOR CREATING PORES IN A POLYMER MATERIAL IN SHEETS OR A POLYMERIC LAYER SUCH AS A THIN FILM OF THICKNESS EQUIVALENT TO ONE HUNDRED NANOMETERS, PREMISELY DEPOSITED ON A METAL SUPPORT
FR2803238A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2001-07-06 Iniversite Catholique De Louva PROCESS FOR CREATING PORES AND MICROPOROUS FILM
WO2001049402A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2001-07-12 Universite Catholique De Louvain Method for creating pores in a polymer material
WO2001049403A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2001-07-12 Universite Catholique De Louvain Method for creating pores and microporous film
US6861006B2 (en) 1999-12-29 2005-03-01 Universite Catholique De Louvain Method for creating pores in a polymer material
US7419612B2 (en) 2002-11-19 2008-09-02 Universite Catholique De Louvain Method of creating pores in a thin sheet of polyimide
DE102007048879A1 (en) * 2007-10-11 2009-04-16 Schott Ag Used fluid separation medium e.g. saw particle, recycling method for manufacturing wafer i.e. silicon wafer, involves separating fluid from saw particles via filtration e.g. cross-flow-filtration, by using track filter
DE102011017696A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-10-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Microsieve and method of making a microsieve
WO2012146500A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2012-11-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Micro-screen and method for producing a micro-screen
WO2014108863A2 (en) 2013-01-10 2014-07-17 Sabic Innovative Plastics Ip B.V. Laser-perforated porous solid-state films and applications thereof
US9209443B2 (en) 2013-01-10 2015-12-08 Sabic Global Technologies B.V. Laser-perforated porous solid-state films and applications thereof
EP3495034A1 (en) * 2017-12-11 2019-06-12 General Electric Company System and method for manufacturing a membrane filter
US10576430B2 (en) 2017-12-11 2020-03-03 General Electric Company System and method for manufacturing a membrane filter
JP2021058880A (en) * 2019-10-02 2021-04-15 普生股▲ふん▼有限公司 Micro filter, manufacturing method, and micro filtration unit
EP3799949A3 (en) * 2019-10-02 2021-07-28 General Biologicals Corporation (TW) Microfilter, manufacturing method and microfiltration unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1362597A (en) 1998-08-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR100258287B1 (en) Ultraviolet laser system and method for forming vias in multi-layered targets
Ravi‐Kumar et al. Laser ablation of polymers: a review
Meijer et al. Laser machining by short and ultrashort pulses, state of the art and new opportunities in the age of the photons
US6677552B1 (en) System and method for laser micro-machining
EP0900132B1 (en) Method employing uv laser pulses of varied energy density to form blind vias in multilayered targets
KR20010095011A (en) Method and apparatus using laser pulses to make an array of microcavity holes
JP2009512553A (en) Synthetic pulse repetition rate machining for dual-head laser micromachining systems
WO1998030317A1 (en) Membrane microfilter manufacturing process
WO1999055487A1 (en) Method and apparatus for improving the quality and efficiency of ultrashort-pulse laser machining
JP3401425B2 (en) Laser processing method and laser processing apparatus
Bäuerle Nanosecond-laser ablation
Wada et al. Direct photoetching of polymer films using vacuum ultraviolet radiation generated by high‐order anti‐Stokes Raman scattering
Karnakis et al. High power DPSS laser micromachining of silicon and stainless steel
Basting et al. Processing of polytetrafluoroethylene with high-power VUV laser radiation
KR100766300B1 (en) Laser Processing Slit and Processing Equipment
JP4147304B2 (en) Material processing using multi-wavelength ultrashort laser pulses
Meijer Laser micromachining
Schaeffer et al. Materials processing with excimer lasers
Kupfer et al. Material influence on cutting and drilling of metals using copper vapor lasers
Glover et al. Ablation threshold and etch rate measurements in high-speed ultra-violet (uv) micro-machining of polymers with uv-copper vapour lasers
Pique et al. Laser Direct-Write
Kearsley et al. Copper laser machining of ceramics
Jilludimudi Micromachining and surface build-up on borosilicate glass using excimer laser
Lopez et al. High-aspect-ratio microdrilling in polymeric materials with intense KrF laser radiation
Lan et al. Laser ablation for MEMS microfabrication on Si and Kapton substrates

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09153413

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase