[go: up one dir, main page]

WO1991005374A1 - Monopole antenna - Google Patents

Monopole antenna Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1991005374A1
WO1991005374A1 PCT/GB1990/001427 GB9001427W WO9105374A1 WO 1991005374 A1 WO1991005374 A1 WO 1991005374A1 GB 9001427 W GB9001427 W GB 9001427W WO 9105374 A1 WO9105374 A1 WO 9105374A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ground plane
antenna
sheet
substrate
conductive
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/GB1990/001427
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Michael Wah Cheung Chu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BAE Systems Electronics Ltd
Original Assignee
GEC Marconi Ltd
Marconi Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GEC Marconi Ltd, Marconi Co Ltd filed Critical GEC Marconi Ltd
Publication of WO1991005374A1 publication Critical patent/WO1991005374A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q9/00Electrically-short antennas having dimensions not more than twice the operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
    • H01Q9/04Resonant antennas
    • H01Q9/30Resonant antennas with feed to end of elongated active element, e.g. unipole
    • H01Q9/40Element having extended radiating surface

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a monopole antenna, that is, one having a radiating element extending orthogonally with respect to a surrounding ground plane.
  • the conventional monopole antenna comprising a resonant 'whip' or length of stiff wire extending vertically from a surrounding ground plane provides a useful omnidirectional radiation characteristic in the azi uthal plane above the ground plane.
  • an inherent weakness of this antenna type is its narrow impedance match bandwidth. As a result, high efficiency cannot be achieved over a wide frequency bandwidth.
  • the poor impedance match is a consequence of the reactive nature of the radiating element and generally limits the monopole antenna to use in narrowband applications. Where a broader bandwidth capability is required this is usually achieved by the use of complex impedance matching networks with the resultant extra cost and reduction in antenna efficiency.
  • a monopole antenna comprises a ground plane, a radiating element disposed orthogonally with respect to the ground plane, and a feed line, the radiating element comprising a first conductive sheet connected to the ground plane, and a second conductive sheet remote from the ground plane, and the feed line comprising a conductive strip extending from the ground plane and connected to the second sheet, the first sheet of the radiating element also constituting an associated ground plane for the feed line.
  • the first and second conductive sheets and the conductive strip are preferably carried on a common dielectric substrate.
  • the first and second conductive sheets are formed on opposite main faces of the substrate, the conductive strip forming a continuous layer with the second sheet on one main face of the substrate.
  • the first and second conductive sheets are carried on one main face of the substrate and the conductive strip is carried on the opposite main face of the substrate.
  • the conductive sheets being spaced apart in a direction orthogonal to the ground plane, the combined dimension of the first sheet, the second sheet and the spacing between the sheets in a direction orthogonal to the ground plane constitutes a quarter-wavelength at a frequency within the operating bandwidth of the antenna.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of a monopole antenna in accordance with the invention
  • FIG. 1 shows detail of the antenna of Figure 1
  • Figure 3 shows the return loss characteristics of (a) an antenna in accordance with the invention and (b) an equivalent conventional monopole antenna;
  • Figure 4 shows typical elevation radiation patterns in the two orthogonal principal planes of an antenna in accordance with the invention;
  • Figure 5 shows (a) co-polar and (b) cross-polar azimuth radiation patterns of an antenna in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is an illustration of an alternative construction of an antenna in accordance with the invention.
  • a dielectric substrate 1 is mounted orthogonally, i.e. vertically as shown, on an extensive horizontal ground plane 2 (part shown)
  • the ground plane 2 may be a sheet of aluminium or other conductive material.
  • a radiating element supported by the substrate 1 comprises a first conductive sheet and a second conductive sheet, shown respectively as lower section 5 and upper section 6 in the figure.
  • the thickness of the substrate 1 is shown exaggerated.
  • the lower section 5 (part hidden) is carried on one main face 8 of the substrate 1, with the upper section 6 being carried on the opposite main face 7.
  • Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show respective views of the main faces 7 and 8 of the substrate 1.
  • the conductive sheets are shaded for clarity.
  • the two sections 5 and 6 do not 'overlap' one another, but are spaced apart by a narrow slot 10, that is to say the sum of the length Ly of the upper section 6 and the length L ⁇ of the lower section 5 is somewhat less than the overall length L of the substrate 1.
  • the slot 10 is parallel to the ground plane 2 (not shown in Figure 2).
  • the lower section 5 of the radiating element is connected along one edge 9 ( Figure 1) to the ground plane 2.
  • the connection may be made, for example, by soldering and it may also serve to support the substrate in the vertical position.
  • a narrow conductive strip 4 which, in combination with the lower section 5, forms a 'balanced' icrostrip feed line for the antenna.
  • the lower section 5 acts as an associated ground plane for the feed stripline 4 as well as being a component of the radiating element.
  • the strip 4 is electrically connected at one end and across the slot 10 to the upper section 6 to form a continuous conductive layer on the face 7 of the substrate.
  • the other end of the strip 4 is connected through a hole (not shown) in the ground plane 2 (from which it is isolated) to the inner terminal of a coaxial-type connector (not shown) on the underside of the ground plane.
  • the outer terminal is connected to the ground plane.
  • the connector permits the coupling of a coaxial cable to feed the antenna.
  • the overall vertical length L of the radiating element is chosen to constitute a quarter-wavelength at a frequency, preferably the fundamental resonant frequency, within the operating bandwidth of the antenna.
  • the length L [ _ of the lower section 5 is chosen to produce the required impedance match to the antenna feed and is made a relatively small proportion (say, less than 20%) of the overall length L.
  • the extent of the horizontal ground plane 2 affects the radiation pattern, in particular the sidelobe levels. It is ideally infinite, but is generally made as large as practicable.
  • Figure 3 shows the return loss in dB (full line (a)) of an antenna according to the above design.
  • the bandwidth is in excess of 5:1 for VSWR less than 2.5:1, i.e. better than -7.5dB return loss.
  • F Q represents 0.5 GHz.
  • the return loss for a conventional monopole whip antenna having a similar resonant length (70mm) is also shown in Figure 3 (dashed line (b)).
  • the measurements for both antennas were made using a circular ground plane having a diameter of five wavelengths at a frequency of 1GHz.
  • Figure 4 shows the elevation radiation patterns for the same antenna design ( Figures 1 and 2) in the two principal planes orthogonal to the ground plane 2.
  • Figure 5 shows the omnidirectional radiation patterns ((a) co-polarisation and (b) cross-polarisation) for the same antenna design in the azimuth plane parallel to the ground plane 2.
  • the characteristics are centred at 0° on a line perpendicular to the plane of the substrate 1, as indicated by axis 3 in Figure 1.
  • the cross-polarisation level is in excess of 18dB.
  • the azimuthal radiation pattern particularly in the region adjacent the substrate face 7 carrying the feed strip 4, is degraded (i.e. becomes less symmetric about the plane of the substrate) by the thickness of the substrate, which should therefore be as thin as is possible while still providing a rigid support for the upper section 6 of the radiating element. Degradation of the radiation pattern also occurs at higher frequencies in the operating band due to the increase in the effective thickness of the dielectric substrate.
  • the improved impedance match bandwidth provided by the antenna is substantially due to the additional capacitance of the slot 10 at the feed point counterbalancing the inductance of the upper section 6 of the radiating element at the higher frequencies of the operating band. This effect extends the range of frequencies over which the antenna has an overall low input impedance, thus increasing the bandwidth.
  • the lower and upper sections 5, 6 of the radiating element are carried on the same face of the substrate 1, being separated as before by the narrow slot 10.
  • Figure 6 shows views of the two main faces 7 and 8 of the substrate and a view of one vertical edge.
  • the ground plane 2, which has been omitted, is the same as in Figure 1.
  • the radiating element sections are both carried on face 7, whereas the feed strip 4 is carried on the opposite face 8.
  • the feed strip 4 is connected at one end to the upper section 6 by means of a plated-through hole 11 in the substrate 1.
  • a shorting pin (not shown) may be used.
  • the connection, however formed, is made at a point on the upper section 6 close to the slot 10. Performance of this construction of the antenna is substantially the same as for the Figure 1 design.
  • the radiating element and feed line may be conveniently fabricated using microstripline circuit board.
  • the first described embodiment ( Figures 1 and 2) is preferred for its ease of fabrication, since there is no requirement here to make a connection through the substrate between the feed line strip 4 and the upper radiating section 6.

Landscapes

  • Waveguide Aerials (AREA)

Abstract

A broadband monopole antenna comprising a radiating element extending vertically with respect to a horizontal ground plane (2). The radiating element comprises upper (6) and lower (5) conductive sheets carried on opposite main faces (7, 8) of a dielectric substrate (1). The two sheets (5, 6) are separated by a narrow slot (10) parallel to the ground plane (2). The lower sheet (5) is connected along one edge (9) to the ground plane (2), whereas the upper sheet (6) is connected to a stripline feed (4) with which it forms a continuous conductive layer. The capacitance of the slot (10) at the feed point maintains a low input impedance for the antenna over a wide frequency range. The antenna produces radiation patterns substantially the same as a conventional monopole whip antenna, but offers a superior impedance match bandwidth in excess of 5:1 with VSWR less than 2.5:1. The antenna is conveniently fabricated using microstripline circuit board.

Description

Monopole Antenna
This invention relates to a monopole antenna, that is, one having a radiating element extending orthogonally with respect to a surrounding ground plane.
The conventional monopole antenna comprising a resonant 'whip' or length of stiff wire extending vertically from a surrounding ground plane provides a useful omnidirectional radiation characteristic in the azi uthal plane above the ground plane. However, an inherent weakness of this antenna type is its narrow impedance match bandwidth. As a result, high efficiency cannot be achieved over a wide frequency bandwidth. The poor impedance match is a consequence of the reactive nature of the radiating element and generally limits the monopole antenna to use in narrowband applications. Where a broader bandwidth capability is required this is usually achieved by the use of complex impedance matching networks with the resultant extra cost and reduction in antenna efficiency.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a monopole antenna having a broader bandwidth capability than known designs. According to the invention a monopole antenna comprises a ground plane, a radiating element disposed orthogonally with respect to the ground plane, and a feed line, the radiating element comprising a first conductive sheet connected to the ground plane, and a second conductive sheet remote from the ground plane, and the feed line comprising a conductive strip extending from the ground plane and connected to the second sheet, the first sheet of the radiating element also constituting an associated ground plane for the feed line.
The first and second conductive sheets and the conductive strip are preferably carried on a common dielectric substrate.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the first and second conductive sheets are formed on opposite main faces of the substrate, the conductive strip forming a continuous layer with the second sheet on one main face of the substrate.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the first and second conductive sheets are carried on one main face of the substrate and the conductive strip is carried on the opposite main face of the substrate.
In a preferred embodiment, the conductive sheets being spaced apart in a direction orthogonal to the ground plane, the combined dimension of the first sheet, the second sheet and the spacing between the sheets in a direction orthogonal to the ground plane constitutes a quarter-wavelength at a frequency within the operating bandwidth of the antenna.
A monopole antenna in accordance with the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Figure 1 is an illustration of a monopole antenna in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 shows detail of the antenna of Figure 1;
Figure 3 shows the return loss characteristics of (a) an antenna in accordance with the invention and (b) an equivalent conventional monopole antenna; Figure 4 shows typical elevation radiation patterns in the two orthogonal principal planes of an antenna in accordance with the invention;
Figure 5 shows (a) co-polar and (b) cross-polar azimuth radiation patterns of an antenna in accordance with the invention; and
Figure 6 is an illustration of an alternative construction of an antenna in accordance with the invention.
Referring to the drawings, in Figure 1 a dielectric substrate 1 is mounted orthogonally, i.e. vertically as shown, on an extensive horizontal ground plane 2 (part shown) The ground plane 2 may be a sheet of aluminium or other conductive material. A radiating element supported by the substrate 1 comprises a first conductive sheet and a second conductive sheet, shown respectively as lower section 5 and upper section 6 in the figure. The thickness of the substrate 1 is shown exaggerated. The lower section 5 (part hidden) is carried on one main face 8 of the substrate 1, with the upper section 6 being carried on the opposite main face 7.
Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show respective views of the main faces 7 and 8 of the substrate 1. The conductive sheets are shaded for clarity. As viewed in Figure 2, the two sections 5 and 6 do not 'overlap' one another, but are spaced apart by a narrow slot 10, that is to say the sum of the length Ly of the upper section 6 and the length L^ of the lower section 5 is somewhat less than the overall length L of the substrate 1. The slot 10 is parallel to the ground plane 2 (not shown in Figure 2).
The lower section 5 of the radiating element is connected along one edge 9 (Figure 1) to the ground plane 2. The connection may be made, for example, by soldering and it may also serve to support the substrate in the vertical position. On the face 7 of the substrate, there is provided a narrow conductive strip 4, which, in combination with the lower section 5, forms a 'balanced' icrostrip feed line for the antenna. Thus, the lower section 5 acts as an associated ground plane for the feed stripline 4 as well as being a component of the radiating element. The strip 4 is electrically connected at one end and across the slot 10 to the upper section 6 to form a continuous conductive layer on the face 7 of the substrate. The other end of the strip 4 is connected through a hole (not shown) in the ground plane 2 (from which it is isolated) to the inner terminal of a coaxial-type connector (not shown) on the underside of the ground plane. The outer terminal is connected to the ground plane. The connector permits the coupling of a coaxial cable to feed the antenna.
The overall vertical length L of the radiating element is chosen to constitute a quarter-wavelength at a frequency, preferably the fundamental resonant frequency, within the operating bandwidth of the antenna. The length L[_ of the lower section 5 is chosen to produce the required impedance match to the antenna feed and is made a relatively small proportion (say, less than 20%) of the overall length L. The extent of the horizontal ground plane 2 affects the radiation pattern, in particular the sidelobe levels. It is ideally infinite, but is generally made as large as practicable.
One realisation of an antenna in accordance with the invention was based on the following design parameters:
Figure imgf000006_0001
Figure 3 shows the return loss in dB (full line (a)) of an antenna according to the above design. The bandwidth is in excess of 5:1 for VSWR less than 2.5:1, i.e. better than -7.5dB return loss. On the frequency scale FQ represents 0.5 GHz. Thus, for this design the operating frequency range of the antenna extends from approximately 0.7 to 4.0 GHz. The return loss for a conventional monopole whip antenna having a similar resonant length (70mm) is also shown in Figure 3 (dashed line (b)). The measurements for both antennas were made using a circular ground plane having a diameter of five wavelengths at a frequency of 1GHz.
Figure 4 shows the elevation radiation patterns for the same antenna design (Figures 1 and 2) in the two principal planes orthogonal to the ground plane 2.
Figure 5 shows the omnidirectional radiation patterns ((a) co-polarisation and (b) cross-polarisation) for the same antenna design in the azimuth plane parallel to the ground plane 2. The characteristics are centred at 0° on a line perpendicular to the plane of the substrate 1, as indicated by axis 3 in Figure 1. The cross-polarisation level is in excess of 18dB.
It is apparent from Figures 3, 4 and 5 that the antenna described provides substantially the same omnidirectional radiation pattern as the typical conventional monopole antenna, but with a superior impedance match bandwidth which is in excess of 5:1 with VSWR less than 2.5:1.
The azimuthal radiation pattern, particularly in the region adjacent the substrate face 7 carrying the feed strip 4, is degraded (i.e. becomes less symmetric about the plane of the substrate) by the thickness of the substrate, which should therefore be as thin as is possible while still providing a rigid support for the upper section 6 of the radiating element. Degradation of the radiation pattern also occurs at higher frequencies in the operating band due to the increase in the effective thickness of the dielectric substrate. The improved impedance match bandwidth provided by the antenna is substantially due to the additional capacitance of the slot 10 at the feed point counterbalancing the inductance of the upper section 6 of the radiating element at the higher frequencies of the operating band. This effect extends the range of frequencies over which the antenna has an overall low input impedance, thus increasing the bandwidth.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the lower and upper sections 5, 6 of the radiating element are carried on the same face of the substrate 1, being separated as before by the narrow slot 10. Figure 6 shows views of the two main faces 7 and 8 of the substrate and a view of one vertical edge. The ground plane 2, which has been omitted, is the same as in Figure 1. The radiating element sections are both carried on face 7, whereas the feed strip 4 is carried on the opposite face 8. The feed strip 4 is connected at one end to the upper section 6 by means of a plated-through hole 11 in the substrate 1. As an alternative to the plated-through hole, a shorting pin (not shown) may be used. The connection, however formed, is made at a point on the upper section 6 close to the slot 10. Performance of this construction of the antenna is substantially the same as for the Figure 1 design.
In both embodiments of the invention described above, it can be seen that the radiating element and feed line may be conveniently fabricated using microstripline circuit board. However, the first described embodiment (Figures 1 and 2) is preferred for its ease of fabrication, since there is no requirement here to make a connection through the substrate between the feed line strip 4 and the upper radiating section 6.

Claims

Claims
1. A monopole antenna comprising a ground plane (2), a radiating element disposed orthogonally with respect to the ground plane (2), and a feed line, the antenna being characterised in tiiat said radiating element comprises a first conductive sheet (5) connected to the ground plane (2) and a second conductive sheet ,(6) remote from the ground plane (2), and said feed line comprises a conductive strip (4) extending from the ground plane (2) and connected to the second sheet (6), the first sheet (5) of the radiating element also constituting an associated ground plane for the feed line.
2. A monopole antenna according to Claim 1, wherein said first and second conductive sheets (5,6) and said conductive strip (4) are carried on a common dielectric substrate (1).
3. A monopole antenna according to Claim 2, wherein said first and second conductive sheets (5,6) are formed on opposite main faces (7,8) of said substrate (1), said conductive strip (4) forming a continuous layer with said second sheet (6) on one main face (7) of the substrate (1).
4. A monopole antenna according to Claim 2, wherein said first and second conductive sheets (5,6) are carried on one main face (7) of said substrate (1) and said conductive strip (4) is carried on the opposite main face (8) of the substrate.
5. A monopole antenna according to Claim 3 or Claim 4, wherein said conductive sheets (5,6) are spaced apart in a direction orthogonal to said ground plane (2), the combined dimension of said first sheet (5), said second sheet (6) and the spacing (10) between the sheets in a direction orthogonal to the ground plane (2) constituting a quarter-wavelength at a frequency within the operating bandwidth of the antenna.
6. A monopole antenna according to any preceding claim, wherein the connection between said first sheet (5) and said ground plane (2) is made along an edge (9) of the first sheet (5).
PCT/GB1990/001427 1989-09-27 1990-09-17 Monopole antenna Ceased WO1991005374A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB898921773A GB8921773D0 (en) 1989-09-27 1989-09-27 Monopole antenna
GB8921773.1 1989-09-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1991005374A1 true WO1991005374A1 (en) 1991-04-18

Family

ID=10663668

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1990/001427 Ceased WO1991005374A1 (en) 1989-09-27 1990-09-17 Monopole antenna

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (2) GB8921773D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1991005374A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995003640A1 (en) * 1993-07-21 1995-02-02 Richard Hirschmann Gmbh & Co. Aerial arrangement
WO1995006338A1 (en) * 1993-08-23 1995-03-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Folded monopole antenna for use with portable communications devices
WO1996038879A1 (en) * 1995-06-02 1996-12-05 Ericsson Inc. Printed monopole antenna
US5709832A (en) * 1995-06-02 1998-01-20 Ericsson Inc. Method of manufacturing a printed antenna
US5828342A (en) * 1995-06-02 1998-10-27 Ericsson Inc. Multiple band printed monopole antenna
KR100416883B1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2004-02-05 (주)신아정보통신 A wideband monopole antenna
CN101252218B (en) * 2008-03-04 2012-01-04 东南大学 Realizing multi-attenuation band ultra-wideband aerial based on two stage type step electric impedance resonator

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2335081B (en) * 1998-03-05 2002-04-03 Nec Technologies Antenna for mobile telephones
US20030048226A1 (en) * 2001-01-31 2003-03-13 Tantivy Communications, Inc. Antenna for array applications
US6809687B2 (en) * 2001-10-24 2004-10-26 Alps Electric Co., Ltd. Monopole antenna that can easily be reduced in height dimension
KR100846487B1 (en) * 2003-12-08 2008-07-17 삼성전자주식회사 Ultra-wideband antenna with isotropic radiation pattern
FR2867904A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-23 Thomson Licensing Sa ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE RECEIVING AND DECODING SYSTEM WITH COMPACT ANTENNA
CN201616506U (en) * 2010-03-26 2010-10-27 华为终端有限公司 Mobile communication antenna equipment and mobile communication terminal equipment
JP6150287B2 (en) * 2013-08-21 2017-06-21 国立研究開発法人情報通信研究機構 Broadband antenna

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2829348A (en) * 1952-04-02 1958-04-01 Itt Line-above-ground to hollow waveguide coupling
US3039095A (en) * 1957-01-14 1962-06-12 Josephson Bengt Adolf Samuel Broadband aircraft foil antenna
FR2388420A1 (en) * 1977-04-18 1978-11-17 Bendix Corp SYMMETRICAL AND BALANCED DIPOLE DEVICE

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2007406A1 (en) * 1970-02-12 1971-08-19 Licentia Gmbh Broadband radiator

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2829348A (en) * 1952-04-02 1958-04-01 Itt Line-above-ground to hollow waveguide coupling
US3039095A (en) * 1957-01-14 1962-06-12 Josephson Bengt Adolf Samuel Broadband aircraft foil antenna
FR2388420A1 (en) * 1977-04-18 1978-11-17 Bendix Corp SYMMETRICAL AND BALANCED DIPOLE DEVICE

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION. vol. 35, no. 12, December 1987, NEW YORK US pages 1343 - 1350; D.M.POZAR ET AL.: "A rigorous analysis of a microstripline fed patch antenna" see page 1343, right-hand column, lines 25 - 26; figure 1(c) *
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION. vol. 35, no. 6, June 1987, NEW YORK US pages 728 - 731; D.M.POZAR ET AL.: "An aperture coupled microstrip antenna with a proximity feed on a perpendicular substrate" see page 728, right-hand column, lines 3 - 24; figure 1 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995003640A1 (en) * 1993-07-21 1995-02-02 Richard Hirschmann Gmbh & Co. Aerial arrangement
US5793337A (en) * 1993-07-21 1998-08-11 Richard Hirschmann Gmbh & Company Antennas disposed on separate ground planes
WO1995006338A1 (en) * 1993-08-23 1995-03-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Folded monopole antenna for use with portable communications devices
US6054955A (en) * 1993-08-23 2000-04-25 Apple Computer, Inc. Folded monopole antenna for use with portable communications devices
WO1996038879A1 (en) * 1995-06-02 1996-12-05 Ericsson Inc. Printed monopole antenna
US5709832A (en) * 1995-06-02 1998-01-20 Ericsson Inc. Method of manufacturing a printed antenna
US5828342A (en) * 1995-06-02 1998-10-27 Ericsson Inc. Multiple band printed monopole antenna
US5844525A (en) * 1995-06-02 1998-12-01 Hayes; Gerard James Printed monopole antenna
AU708520B2 (en) * 1995-06-02 1999-08-05 Ericsson Inc. Printed monopole antenna
KR100416883B1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2004-02-05 (주)신아정보통신 A wideband monopole antenna
CN101252218B (en) * 2008-03-04 2012-01-04 东南大学 Realizing multi-attenuation band ultra-wideband aerial based on two stage type step electric impedance resonator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2236625A (en) 1991-04-10
GB8921773D0 (en) 1989-11-08
GB9020298D0 (en) 1990-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4843403A (en) Broadband notch antenna
US5828340A (en) Wideband sub-wavelength antenna
US4847625A (en) Wideband, aperture-coupled microstrip antenna
US4401988A (en) Coupled multilayer microstrip antenna
US6043785A (en) Broadband fixed-radius slot antenna arrangement
US6246377B1 (en) Antenna comprising two separate wideband notch regions on one coplanar substrate
US6281843B1 (en) Planar broadband dipole antenna for linearly polarized waves
US6292153B1 (en) Antenna comprising two wideband notch regions on one coplanar substrate
JP2009527985A (en) Slit loaded taper slot patch antenna
WO2004068634A1 (en) Low profile dual frequency dipole antenna structure
WO2001017064A1 (en) Compact planar inverted f antenna
KR20110023618A (en) Metamaterial Omni-directional Circularly Polarized Antenna
US5818397A (en) Circularly polarized horizontal beamwidth antenna having binary feed network with microstrip transmission line
JP4364439B2 (en) antenna
WO1991005374A1 (en) Monopole antenna
KR20050107881A (en) Multiple meander strip monopole antenna with broadband characteristic
US5126751A (en) Flush mount antenna
EP0989628B1 (en) Patch antenna having flexed ground plate
WO1996035241A1 (en) Antenna unit
KR101557291B1 (en) Quadrifilar Helix Antenna
US20050146467A1 (en) High performance dual-patch antenna with fast impedance matching holes
US5559523A (en) Layered antenna
Jagtap et al. Gain and bandwidth enhancement of circularly polarized MSA using PRS and AMC layers
KR100449857B1 (en) Wideband Printed Dipole Antenna
CA2596025C (en) A microstrip double sided monopole yagi-uda antenna with application in sector antennas

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LU NL SE