[go: up one dir, main page]

USRE50636E1 - Accurate molecular barcoding - Google Patents

Accurate molecular barcoding

Info

Publication number
USRE50636E1
USRE50636E1 US18/050,449 US202218050449A USRE50636E US RE50636 E1 USRE50636 E1 US RE50636E1 US 202218050449 A US202218050449 A US 202218050449A US RE50636 E USRE50636 E US RE50636E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
oligonucleotide species
barcode
unique oligonucleotide
molecule
region
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US18/050,449
Inventor
Eleen Shum
Glenn Fu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Becton Dickinson and Co
Original Assignee
Becton Dickinson and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Becton Dickinson and Co filed Critical Becton Dickinson and Co
Priority to US18/050,449 priority Critical patent/USRE50636E1/en
Assigned to BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY reassignment BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CELLULAR RESEARCH INC.
Assigned to CELLULAR RESEARCH, INC. reassignment CELLULAR RESEARCH, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FU, GLENN, SHUM, Eleen
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE50636E1 publication Critical patent/USRE50636E1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6834Enzymatic or biochemical coupling of nucleic acids to a solid phase
    • C12Q1/6837Enzymatic or biochemical coupling of nucleic acids to a solid phase using probe arrays or probe chips
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6806Preparing nucleic acids for analysis, e.g. for polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assay
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6869Methods for sequencing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6869Methods for sequencing
    • C12Q1/6874Methods for sequencing involving nucleic acid arrays, e.g. sequencing by hybridisation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2535/00Reactions characterised by the assay type for determining the identity of a nucleotide base or a sequence of oligonucleotides
    • C12Q2535/122Massive parallel sequencing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2563/00Nucleic acid detection characterized by the use of physical, structural and functional properties
    • C12Q2563/179Nucleic acid detection characterized by the use of physical, structural and functional properties the label being a nucleic acid
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2565/00Nucleic acid analysis characterised by mode or means of detection
    • C12Q2565/50Detection characterised by immobilisation to a surface
    • C12Q2565/514Detection characterised by immobilisation to a surface characterised by the use of the arrayed oligonucleotides as identifier tags, e.g. universal addressable array, anti-tag or tag complement array

Definitions

  • the present application is being filed along with a Sequence Listing in electronic format.
  • the Sequence Listing is provided as a file entitled SEQUENCEBDCRI019A.TXT, created and last modified Apr. 21, 2017, which is 32,587 bytes in size, and is replaced by a file entitled BDCRI019R1_SEQLIST.xml, created and last modified Oct. 25, 2022, which is 195,405 bytes in size.
  • the information in the electronic format of the Sequence Listing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • Embodiments herein relate generally to compositions and methods for accurate barcoding of molecules, for example nucleic acid molecules.
  • compositions comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • Each unique oligonucleotide species can comprise a barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides, in which the unique oligonucleotide species comprise different nucleic acid sequences in their barcode regions, and in which at least one of: (a) the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%; or (b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region further comprises a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid.
  • the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least two spatially isolated pools, each pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species, wherein unique oligonucleotides in the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and wherein different unique oligonucleotides of the same pool comprise a different molecule barcode sequences.
  • the sample barcode of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less.
  • the barcode region of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less.
  • the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • At least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode. In some embodiments, each oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the composition comprises at least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no two oligonucleotides of the composition are of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least 48 pools. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a discrete region of a surface, so that the surface can comprise two or more substrates. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a bead.
  • each of the unique oligonucleotide species further comprises an adapter configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide on the substrate, wherein said barcode region is 3′ of the adapter.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence.
  • the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, or a combination thereof.
  • a kit comprising the composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species is provided.
  • the kit can further comprise a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region as the target-specific region and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, so that the primer is configured to amplify the variable region in conjunction with the target-specific region.
  • the primer and target-specific region are configured to amplify a nucleic acid of at least 1 kb and comprising the variable region.
  • the primer of the kit is part of the composition comprising the unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the primer of the kit is part of an other composition that is separate from the composition comprising the unique oligonucleotide species.
  • Some embodiments include a method of specifically barcoding a plurality of nucleic acids from two or more samples. Each sample can comprising nucleic acid. The method can comprise contacting each sample with a pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, in which each sample is contacted in spatial isolation from the other samples. Each unique oligonucleotide species can comprise a barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides. The unique polynucleotide species of each pool can comprise the same sample barcode, and comprise different molecule barcodes.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%; or (b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5% can apply.
  • the method can include hybridizing target-specific regions of at least some oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species to at least some of the nucleic acids of the sample.
  • the method can include extending the hybridized oligonucleotides, thereby producing strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target, wherein for each sample, the strands comprise the same sample barcode and different molecule barcodes, and wherein for different samples, the molecule barcodes are different.
  • the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region further comprises a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • the method further comprises ascertaining nucleic acid sequences of the strands comprising the oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species and the sequence complementary to the target.
  • the at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on a given substrate comprise the same sample barcode, and different unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on the substrate comprise different molecule barcodes.
  • each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less.
  • the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, each pool consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • At least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • at least one pool comprises least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
  • no pool comprises two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode.
  • the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
  • each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, at least 48 unique samples are each contacted with a unique pool. In some embodiments, at least 99% of the samples comprise no more than one cell each. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate of the plurality.
  • the substrate comprises a spatially-isolated region of a surface, so that the substrates of different pools comprise the different spatially-isolated regions of the surface.
  • the substrate comprises a bead.
  • each of the unique oligonucleotide species further comprises an adapter configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide on the substrate, wherein said barcode region is 3′ of the adapter.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking a sequence encoding the variable region of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
  • the variable region is of a T cell receptor or B cell receptor, or a combination thereof.
  • the method further comprises contacting the extended strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target with primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region.
  • the method can comprise amplifying sequences encoding variable regions of a T cell receptor, B cell receptor, or immunoglobulin.
  • the method amplifies a sequence of at least 1 kb, which comprises the variable region coding sequence.
  • Some embodiments include a method of making a composition comprising unique oligonucleotides is provided.
  • the method can comprise providing a plurality of different sample barcodes comprising at least 3 nucleotides each.
  • the method can comprise providing a plurality of different molecule barcodes comprising at least 7 nucleotides each.
  • the methods can comprise synthesizing a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species, each unique oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region comprising a sample barcode and a molecule barcode, in which at least one of: (a) the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%; or (b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • the method can comprise disposing the unique oligonucleotide species in spatially-isolated pools, in which each pool comprises multiple unique oligonucleotide species, so that the unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and wherein different unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise different molecule barcode sequences, and in which each pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • ach unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region further comprises a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid.
  • the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • each molecule barcode has a G content of 50% or less.
  • each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less.
  • the sample barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • the plurality of the unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, at least 48 pools are made.
  • the method further comprises immobililzing the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool onto a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate of the plurality.
  • the substrates comprise discrete regions of a surface.
  • the substrates comprise beads.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools concurrent with said synthesis.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools after said synthesis.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking a variable region coding sequence of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
  • the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, or a combination thereof.
  • the kit further comprising a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region coding sequence as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, and is thus configured, in conjunction with the target-specific region, to amplify the variable region coding sequence.
  • Some embodiments include an oligonucleotide comprising a barcode region 3′ of the adapter region.
  • the barcode region can comprise a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides, in which the molecule barcode has a G content of no more than 50%.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises an adapter region 5′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking a variable region coding sequence of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
  • the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, or a combination thereof.
  • the kit further comprising a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region coding sequence as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, and is thus configured to amplify the variable region coding sequence in conjunction with the target-specific region.
  • FIG. 1 A is a schematic diagram illustrating an oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region 5′ of a uniform region, in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 1 B is a schematic diagram illustrating an oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region 5′ of an oligo dT sequence, in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 1 C is a schematic diagram illustrating an oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region 5′ of a gene-specific region, in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 2 A is a schematic diagram illustrating a barcode region comprising a molecule barcode 5′ of a sample barcode, and which can comprise a barcode region of a unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 2 B is a schematic diagram illustrating a barcode region comprising a sample barcode 5′ of a molecule barcode, and which can comprise a barcode region of a unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIGS. 3 A- 3 H are diagrams illustrating a variety of configurations of oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 3 A illustrates a baseline oligonucleotide.
  • FIG. 3 B illustrates an oligonucleotide with a base spacer 3′ of the barcode region.
  • FIG. 3 C illustrates an oligonucleotide with a 5-base spacer 3′ of the barcode region.
  • FIG. 3 D illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the positions of the molecule barcode (indicated as “NNNNNNNN”) and the sample barcode within the barcode region are switched in comparison to FIG. 3 A , so that the molecule barcode is 5′ of the sample barcode.
  • FIG. 3 A illustrates a baseline oligonucleotide.
  • FIG. 3 B illustrates an oligonucleotide with a base spacer 3′ of the barcode region.
  • FIG. 3 C
  • FIG. 3 E illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the positions of the molecule barcode (indicated as “NNNNNNNN”) and the sample barcode within the barcode region are switched in comparison to FIG. 3 A , so that the molecule barcode is 5′ of the sample barcode, and including a 3-base spacer.
  • FIG. 3 F illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the positions of the molecule barcode (indicated as “NNNNNN”) and the sample barcode within the barcode region are switched, so that the molecule barcode is 5′ of the sample barcode, and including a 5-base spacer.
  • FIG. 3 G illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the molecule barcode comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH (in which each H is an A, C, or T, and in which each H can be the same or different from any other H).
  • FIG. 3 H illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the molecule barcode comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN (in which each H is an A, C, or T, and in which each H can be the same or different from any other H).
  • FIG. 4 A is a diagram illustrating nucleotide usage in a sampling of conventional unique oligonucleotide species.
  • FIG. 4 B is a diagram illustrating nucleotide usage in a sampling of conventional unique oligonucleotide species.
  • FIG. 4 C is a diagram illustrating nucleotide usage in a sampling of conventional unique oligonucleotide species.
  • FIG. 5 A is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • the indicated SEQ ID NOs: in the right-most columns of FIGS. 5 A- 5 D refer to the polynucleotide sequence that includes the “anchor,” “1st bc,” “2nd bc,” “Spacer” (if any), and “5 to 3′ Recognition Sequence” as shown.
  • Each “anchor” in FIGS. 5 A- 5 D has the polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 97.
  • FIG. 5 B is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 5 C is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 5 D is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph of error correction by individual for an analysis using unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 7 is a graph of error correction by individual and filter MI crossover for an analysis using unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram schematically illustrating, without being limited by any theory, possible amplification errors that can result from oligonucleotides with high G-contents.
  • individual nucleic acids of a sample can be associated with a unique barcode (e.g. a “molecule barcode”), so that upon amplification and sequence analysis, individual nucleic acids of a sample can be quantified.
  • a unique barcode e.g. a “molecule barcode”
  • bias favoring or disfavoring the representation, amplification, or properties of certain kinds of barcode sequences can interference with quantification and analysis of the individual nucleic acids of a sample (possible sources of bias in some amplification events are schematically illustrated in FIG. 8 ).
  • Described in accordance with some embodiments herein are configurations and characteristics of unique oligonucleotide species comprising barcodes, in which the unique oligonucleotide species are configured to minimize barcode-related bias, and yield accurate analysis of nucleic acids.
  • barcode regions comprising features such as a guanosine (G) content below 50%, and/or no two consecutive “G's” in the barcode region can minimize bias that could otherwise confound quantification and/or analysis of nucleic acids of a sample.
  • the individual nucleic acid molecules of a given sample can also be associated with a “sample barcode”, so that barcode-associated nucleic acids can be subsequently pooled for an efficient batch analysis of nucleic acids from two or more samples, for example by next-generation sequencing.
  • oligonucleotide species, samples, and/or targets can comprise nucleic acids.
  • nucleic acid refers to a polynucleotide sequence, or fragment thereof.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise nucleotides.
  • a nucleic acid can be exogenous or endogenous to a cell.
  • a nucleic acid can exist in a cell-free environment.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of a gene or fragment thereof.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of DNA.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of RNA.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise one or more analogs (e.g. altered backgone, sugar, or nucleobase).
  • analogs include: 5-bromouracil, peptide nucleic acid, xeno nucleic acid, morpholinos, locked nucleic acids, glycol nucleic acids, threose nucleic acids, dideoxynucleotides, cordycepin, 7-deaza-GTP, florophores (e.g.
  • nucleic acid can be used interchangeably.
  • upstream refers to a position that is relatively 5′ on a nucleic acid (e.g., 5′ in comparison to reference position).
  • downstream refers to a position that is relatively 3′ on a nucleic acid (e.g., 3′ in comparison to reference position).
  • sample barcode is 3′ of the “molecule barcode” and is understood to be downstream of the molecule “barcode.”
  • sample barcode is 5′ of the “molecule barcode” and is understood to be upstream of the molecule “barcode.”
  • a nucleic acid can comprise one or more modifications (e.g., a base modification, a backbone modification), to provide the nucleic acid with a new or enhanced feature (e.g., improved stability).
  • a nucleic acid can comprise a nucleic acid affinity tag.
  • a nucleoside can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of a base-sugar combination. The base portion of the nucleoside can be a heterocyclic base. The two most common classes of such heterocyclic bases are the purines and the pyrimidines.
  • Nucleotides can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of nucleosides that further include a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside.
  • the phosphate group can be linked to the 2′, the 3′, or the 5′ hydroxyl moiety of the sugar.
  • the phosphate groups can covalently link adjacent nucleosides to one another to form a linear polymeric compound.
  • the respective ends of this linear polymeric compound can be further joined to form a circular compound; however, linear compounds are generally suitable.
  • linear compounds may have internal nucleotide base complementarity and may therefore fold in a manner as to produce a fully or partially double-stranded compound.
  • the phosphate groups can commonly be referred to as forming the internucleoside backbone of the nucleic acid.
  • the linkage or backbone of the nucleic acid can be a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise a modified backbone and/or modified internucleoside linkages.
  • Modified backbones can include those that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that do not have a phosphorus atom in the backbone.
  • Suitable modified nucleic acid backbones containing a phosphorus atom therein can include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates such as 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates, chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, phosphorodiamidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selen
  • a nucleic acid can comprise polynucleotide backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages.
  • These can include those having morpholino linkages (formed in part from the sugar portion of a nucleoside); siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH 2 component parts.
  • siloxane backbones siloxane backbones
  • sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones
  • a nucleic acid can comprise a nucleic acid mimetic.
  • mimetic includes, for example, polynucleotides wherein only the furanose ring or both the furanose ring and the internucleotide linkage are replaced with non-furanose groups, replacement of only the furanose ring can also be referred as being a sugar surrogate.
  • the heterocyclic base moiety or a modified heterocyclic base moiety can be maintained for hybridization with an appropriate target nucleic acid.
  • One such nucleic acid can be a peptide nucleic acid (PNA).
  • the sugar-backbone of a polynucleotide can be replaced with an amide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone.
  • the nucleotides can be retained and are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone.
  • the backbone in PNA compounds can comprise two or more linked aminoethylglycine units which gives PNA an amide containing backbone.
  • the heterocyclic base moieties can be bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise a morpholino backbone structure.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise a 6-membered morpholino ring in place of a ribose ring.
  • a phosphorodiamidate or other non-phosphodiester internucleoside linkage can replace a phosphodiester linkage.
  • a nucleic acid can comprise linked morpholino units (i.e. morpholino nucleic acid) having heterocyclic bases attached to the morpholino ring.
  • Linking groups can link the morpholino monomeric units in a morpholino nucleic acid.
  • Non-ionic morpholino-based oligomeric compounds can have less undesired interactions with cellular proteins.
  • Morpholino-based polynucleotides can be nonionic mimics of nucleic acids.
  • a variety of compounds within the morpholino class can be joined using different linking groups.
  • a further class of polynucleotide mimetic can be referred to as cyclohexenyl nucleic acids (CeNA).
  • the furanose ring normally present in a nucleic acid molecule can be replaced with a cyclohexenyl ring.
  • CeNA DMT protected phosphoramidite monomers can be prepared and used for oligomeric compound synthesis using phosphoramidite chemistry.
  • the incorporation of CeNA monomers into a nucleic acid chain can increase the stability of a DNA/RNA hybrid.
  • CeNA oligoadenylates can form complexes with nucleic acid complements with similar stability to the native complexes.
  • a further modification can include Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring thereby forming a 2′-C,4′-C-oxymethylene linkage thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety.
  • the linkage can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of a methylene (—CH2-), group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2.
  • a nucleic acid can also, in some embodiments, include nucleobase (often referred to simply as “base”) modifications or substitutions.
  • nucleobase can include the purine bases, (e.g. adenine (A) and guanine (G)), and the pyrimidine bases, (e.g. thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U)).
  • Modified nucleobases can include other synthetic and natural nucleobases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl (—C ⁇ C—CH3) uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil (pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guan
  • Modified nucleobases can include tricyclic pyrimidines such as phenoxazine cytidine(1H-pyrimido(5,4-b)(1,4)benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), phenothiazine cytidine (1H-pyrimido(5,4-b)(1,4)benzothiazin-2(3H)-one), G-clamps such as a substituted phenoxazine cytidine (e.g.
  • sample refers to a composition comprising targets.
  • suitable samples for analysis by the disclosed methods, devices, and systems include, but are not limited to, cells, single cells, tissues, organs, or organisms.
  • a sample comprises raw or unprocessed samples, for example a whole cell, whole population of cells, or whole tissue.
  • a sample comprises an isolated cell or cell extract, or a nucleic-acid-containing fraction thereof, for example isolated nucleic acids, or a composition comprising enriched or isolated nucleic acids.
  • a sample comprises a fixed tissue, cell, or nucleic-acid-containing fraction thereof.
  • a sample comprises a frozen tissue, cell, or nucleic-acid-containing fraction thereof. In some embodiments, a sample comprises a solution comprising nucleic acids. In some embodiments, a sample comprises a solution comprising nucleic acids. In some embodiments, a sample comprises nucleic acids in a solid format, for example lyophilized nucleic acids and the like.
  • a “unique oligonucleotide species” refers to an oligonucleotide, for example DNA or RNA, having a sequence that differs by at least one base from another unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition in accordance with some embodiments herein can share certain structural features or formats, but can have different nucleic acid sequences from each other.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species can be single-stranded or double-standed.
  • a composition can comprise two or more unique oligonucleotide species, for example a diversity of 100, 1000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species can also comprise two or more oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
  • a composition can comprise two unique oligonucleotide species: ACTT-X and TCTT-X, in which “X” is a sequence that is the same for both unique oligonucleotide species. It would be possible for the composition to comprise two copies of an oligonucleotide having the sequence ACTT-X, and one copy of an oligonucleotide having the sequence TCTT-X.
  • the oligonucleotide species of the compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides of some embodiments herein can comprise a barcode region and a uniform region as described herein.
  • the barcode regions can differ between unique oligonucleotide species, so as to provide diversity in a population of unique oligonucleotide species, while the uniform regions remain the same.
  • the barcode region can comprise a molecule index as described herein.
  • the molecule index can be configured to minimize bias, for example by minimizing G content so that no unique oligonucleotide species in a population of unique oligonucleotide species has a molecule index with a G content greater than 50%, and/or so that the sequence “GG” does not appear in the molecule index (e.g. so that there are no two consecutive G's).
  • the barcode region comprises a sample index.
  • the sample index can be configured so that the unique oligonucleotides of a given pool can have the same sample index, but different molecule indices. As such, if multiple samples are analyzed, the sample index can indicate which sample each oligonucleotide corresponds to.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species can be pooled, and sequences can be analyzed.
  • the sample index is 5′ of the molecule index.
  • the molecule index is 5′ of the sample index.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species comprises an adapter.
  • the adapter can be positioned 5′ of the barcode region.
  • the adapter is configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide species on a substrate.
  • oligonucleotides species configured in accordance with some embodiments herein can yield accurate analysis and sequencing results with reduced, minimal, or no bias, for example by minimizing G content in the molecule barcode or barcode region, and/or minimizing G content near the uniform region.
  • a reduction in bias can be ascertained by a reduction in noise and/or an increase in sensitivity for detecting the number of different molecules of a target nucleic acid in a sample (see, e.g. FIGS. 6 - 7 ).
  • the reduction in bias can be ascertained as a decrease in noise (see FIG.
  • compositions and methods yield quantification of target nucleic acid molecules in a sample with low noise, for example a relative standard error less than 30%, for example, less than 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, or 0.01%, including ranges beween any two of the listed values.
  • compositions and methods yield quantification of target nucleic acid molecules in a sample with high sensitivity, for example a sensitivity (measured as a percent of the actual number of different target nucleic acids in a sample that are detected), for example, a sensitivity of at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 85%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 99.9%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the methods or compositions described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error relative to compositions or methods comprising unique oligonucleotide species in line with FIG. 3 A .
  • FIG. 3 A illustrates a conventional oligonucleotide design.
  • the molecule index sequence NNNNNNNN in which each N is A, G, C, or T, and in which any two of the N's can be the same or different from each other
  • a subset of the population of unique oligonucleotide species in line with FIG. 3 A can be G-rich.
  • FIGS. 3 B- 3 H Another example of “baseline” molecule index that can be subject to bias is the sequence ‘BBBBBBV’ (in which B is C, G, or T, and in which V is A, C, or G).
  • B is C, G, or T
  • V is A, C, or G.
  • FIGS. 3 B- 3 H Examples of configurations for unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein are illustrated in FIGS. 3 B- 3 H .
  • addition of either TTT or TTTTT after the molecule index in accordance with some embodiments herein can reduce G-richness along the region (the length of non-G spacers can be variable, and can comprise any non-G nucleotide or nucleotides).
  • the length of non-G spacers can be variable, and can comprise any non-G nucleotide or nucleotides.
  • molecule barcodes comprise ‘HHHHHHHH’ or ‘HNHNHNHN,’ (in which H is A, C, or T, and in which any two H's can be the same or different from each other, and in which any two N's can be the same or different from each other).
  • each of a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method has a length of at least 24 nucleotides, for example at least 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 55, 60, 65, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, 125, 130, 135, or 140 nucleotides in length, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 24-140, 24-135, 24-130, 24-125, 24-120, 24-115, 24-110, 24-105, 24-100, 24-95, 24-90, 24-85, 24-80, 24-75, 24-70, 24-65, 24-60, 24-55, 24-50, 24-45, 24-40, 25-140, 25-135, 25-130, 25-125, 25-125, 25-125, 25
  • different unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method have different lengths form each other.
  • all of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method have the same length as each other.
  • some unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method are the same length as each other, while some unique oligonucleotide species are different lengths from each other.
  • the uniform region comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of a 5′ to 3′ amplification sequence for a target nucleic acid, or class of target nucleic acids (this amplification sequence may also be referred to as a “target-specific” region).
  • this amplification sequence may also be referred to as a “target-specific” region.
  • the uniform region can comprise oligo dT.
  • the uniform region can comprise sequences flanking variable regions of a T cell receptor mRNA.
  • the uniform region comprises at least 10 nucleotides that are complementary to the target nucleic acid, for example at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides complementary to the target, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 10-30, 10-29, 10-28, 10-27, 10-26, 10-25, 10-24, 10-23, 10-22, 10-21, 10-20, 11-30, 11-29, 11-28, 11-27, 11-26, 11-25, 11-24, 11-23, 11-22, 11-21, 11-20, 12-30, 12-29, 12-28, 12-27, 12-26, 12-25, 12-24, 12-23, 12-22, 12-21, 12-20, 15-30, 15-29, 15-28, 15-27, 15-26, 15-25, 15-24, 15-23, 15-22, 15-21, 15-20, 20-30, 20-29, 20-28, 20-27, 20-26, 20-25, 20-24, 20-23, 20-22, or 20-21 nucle
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region that hybridizes to a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor, for example a variable region of a T cell receptor, a B cell receptor, or immunoglobulin, for example an antibody.
  • a target-specific region that hybridizes to a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor, for example a variable region of a T cell receptor, a B cell receptor, or immunoglobulin, for example an antibody.
  • B cell receptors comprise membrane-bound immunoglobulin
  • target-specific regions specific for immunoglobulin variable region coding sequences are typically suitable for amplifying B cell receptors as well as secreted immunoglobulins (e.g. antibodies). Both options are noted herein to clarify that amplification of membrane-bound immunoglobulins (B cell receptors) and also secreted immunoglobulins (antibodies) is contemplated.
  • primers or uniform regions comprise target-specific regions that comprise “flanking sequences” (and variations of this root term, such as “sequences flanking”) of immune cell receptor and/or immunoglobulin variable regions
  • the target-specific regions will be understood to comprise at least one of (i) sequences that hybridize downstream (3′) of the sequence encoding the variable region and in particular hybridize to strand of the coding sequence, and thus are configured to produce a strand comprising the reverse complement of the variable region coding sequence upon extension in the 5′ to 3′ direction; or (ii) sequences that hybridize upstream (5′) of the sequence encoding the variable region and in particular hybridize to the strand complementary to that of the coding sequence, and thus are configured to produce a strand comprising the variable region coding sequence upon extension in the 5′ to 3′ direction.
  • flanking sequence can be configured for amplification of the variable region coding sequences in conjunction with a suitable priming partner (e.g. a flanking sequence on the other side of the variable region).
  • a flanking sequences does not necessarily need to stop or start exactly where the coding sequence starts or stops, and thus, it is permissible for there to be intervening sequences between a hybridization site of a flanking sequence and the variable region coding sequence itself.
  • variable region “flanking sequence” further comprises some sequence of the variable region itself, for example if a subset of possible variable regions is of interest.
  • a “flanking sequence” as used herein does not require a single sequence to flank both sides of the variable region. Rather, it will be understood that when flanking sequences are mentioned in conjunction with compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides of some embodiments herein, 5′ and 3′ sequences comprising suitable primer pairs to amplify the variable region coding sequence are also expressly contemplated.
  • a unique oligonucleotide species comprises a barcode region as described herein and also comprises a uniform region comprising a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor and/or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence.
  • a second oligonucleotide primer can also be provided for the other side of the variable region coding sequence, so as to amplify the variable region sequence in conjunction with the target-specific region of the uniform region.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region, positioned 3′ of the barcode region, and comprising a sequence flanking an immunoglobulin variable region (and thus flanking a B cell receptor variable region as well as a corresponding antibody variable region), for example flanking the variable region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain locus, flanking the variable region of an immunoglobulin (light chain) kappa locus, or flanking the variable region of an immunoglobulin (light chain) lambda locus.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region, positioned 3′ of the barcode region, and comprising a sequence flanking at least one of a variable region of a T cell receptor alpha chain, a variable region of a T cell receptor beta chain, a variable region of a T cell receptor gamma chain, or a T cell receptor delta chain.
  • a kit comprises a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described herein, in which the unique oligonucleotide species each comprise a uniform sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence as described herein.
  • the kit further comprises an oligonucleotide primer configured to hybridize to the opposite strand and on the other side of the variable region coding sequence compared to the uniform region, and is thus configured to amplify the variable region sequence in conjunction with the target-specific region of the uniform region.
  • the amplified sequence is at least 1 kb and comprises the variable coding sequence, for example at least 1 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, or 5 kb, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • nucleic acids encoding variable regions of some immune cell receptors or immunoglobulins can be more than 1 kb long.
  • T cell receptor variable region sequences can comprise a CDR3 coding sequence that ends more than 1 kb away from where the CDR1 coding sequence begins.
  • some conventional and next-generation sequencing approaches for example sequencing by synthesis, are limited to short reads that are typically considerably less than 1 kb. Accordingly, it is contemplated that methods and compositions and kits in accordance with some embodiments herein can be useful for barcoding and analyzing nucleic acids encoding immune cell receptor and/or immunoglobulin variable regions, which otherwise would not be amenable to single-read sequencing of less than 1 kb.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence, is configured to amplify a sequence of at least 1 kb and comprising the variable region coding sequence, for example at least 1 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, or 5 kb, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a barcode region comprises a nucleic acid sequence that is useful in identifying a nucleic acid, for example a target nucleic acid from a sample, or an amplicon or reverse-transcript derived from a single target nucleic acid of a sample.
  • a nucleic acid for example a target nucleic acid from a sample
  • an amplicon or reverse-transcript derived from a single target nucleic acid of a sample For example, two mRNA transcripts from a sample can be reverse-transcribed and barcoded so that nucleic acids corresponding to the first mRNA comprise a first barcode, and nucleic acids corresponding to the second mRNA comprise a second barcode.
  • sequencing or other analysis
  • information about the individual mRNAs in the sample for example copy number can be ascertained even after amplification.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species in a population can comprise a unique barcode region.
  • the barcode region can be, for example, positioned 5′ of a uniform region on an oligonucleotide species.
  • a barcode region comprises a molecule barcode as described herein.
  • a barcode region comprises a molecule barcode and a sample barcode as described herein.
  • a barcode region comprises a molecule barcode 5′ of a sample barcode.
  • methods or compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising molecule barcodes as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
  • a “molecule barcode” can also be referred to as a “molecular barcode,” “Molecular Index (MI)”, or Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI).
  • MI Molecular Index
  • UMI Unique Molecular Identifier
  • a “sample barcode,” can also be referred to as a “Sample Index (SI).”
  • a barcode region can comprise a molecule barcode.
  • the molecule barcode can comprise a unique sequence, so that when multiple sample nucleic acids (which can be the same and/or different from each other) are associated one-to-one with molecule barcodes, different sample nucleic acids can differentiated from each other by the molecule barcodes. As such, even if a sample comprises two nucleic acids having the same sequence, each of these two nucleic acids can be labeled with a different molecule barcode, so that nucleic acids in the population can be quantified, even after amplification.
  • the molecule barcode can comprise a nucleic acid sequence of at least 5 nucleotides, for example at least 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 5-50, 5-45, 5-40, 5-35, 5-30, 5-25, 5-20, 5-15, 5-14, 5-13, 5-12, 5-11, 5-10, 5-9, 5-8, 5-7, 5-6, 6-50, 6-45, 6-40, 6-35, 6-30, 6-25, 6-20, 6-15, 6-14, 6-13, 6-12, 6-11, 6-10, 6-9, 6-8, 6-7, 7-50, 7-45, 7-40, 7-35, 7-30, 7-25, 7-20, 7-15, 7-14, 7-13, 7-12, 7-11, 7-10, 7-9
  • the nucleic acid sequence of the molecule barcode comprises a unique sequence, for example, so that each unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprises a different molecule barcode.
  • two or more unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the same molecule barcode, but still differ from each other.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species include sample barcodes
  • each unique oligonucleotide species with a particular sample barcode can comprise a different molecule barcode.
  • a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprises a molecule barcode diversity of at least 1000 different molecule barcodes, and thus at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprises a molecule barcode diversity of at least 6,500 different molecule barcodes, and thus at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprises a molecule barcode diversity of at least 65,000 different molecule barcodes, and thus at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • a molecule barcode comprising a low G content (e.g., 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G) can minimize bias for a composition or pool of unique oligonucleotide species being used to barcode a population of nucleic acids (e.g. minimize bias that would preferentially amplify barcodes comprising a higher G content). It is noted that conventional barcoding approaches typically exhibit a bias in favor of higher G content. For example FIGS.
  • FIG. 4 A, 4 B , and 4 C illustrate samples of nucleotide usage in conventional molecule barcodes of compositions comprising numerous unique molecule barcodes for ES32, TRAC ( FIG. 4 A ), ES32 TRBC ( FIG. 4 B ), and ES32 OligodT ( FIG. 4 C ). That is, if anything, conventional molecule barcodes and barcode regions, designed without respect to certain guidance provided herein, can comprise a higher G-content that would be expected by random chance. In some embodiments, methods or compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising molecule barcodes as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
  • all of the molecule barcodes of a composition or composition used in the methods described herein comprise unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G,
  • all of the molecule barcodes of a composition of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of . . .
  • the total G content among all of molecule barcodes in the whole composition was calculated (e.g., a population of at least 10, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 6500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species), this total G content of the sum total of the barcodes would fall below the recited values or within the recited ranges.
  • the collective nucleotide content of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition would be below the indicated value or within the indicated range.
  • all of the molecule barcodes in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • all of the molecule barcodes in a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • all of the molecule barcodes in a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • all of the barcode regions of the composition as described herein collectively have a G content of less than 50% as described herein.
  • the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a molecule barcode G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-
  • the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have a molecule barcodes G content less than . . .
  • each or essentially each of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool have a molecule barcode G content below the indicated value, or outside the indicated range. That is, for a composition, population, or pool “consisting essentially of” unique oligonucleotide species that each have the indicated G content, it would be possible for an analytically insignificant portion of the unique oligonucleotides in the composition to have molecule barcodes with a G content above the indicated value or outside the recited range.
  • the analytically insignificant portion of the unique oligonucleotides can be, or can be no more than, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, or less of the unique oligonucleotide in a composition.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have the a G content of greater than 50%.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 50%.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 50%.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 25%.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 25%.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 25%.
  • none of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition collectively have a G content of greater than 50% G, for example, all of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the composition as described herein (or such a composition as used in a method) consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a barcode region G content of less than 50% as described herein.
  • the composition for a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species, the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a barcode region G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G,
  • the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have a barcode regions G content less than . . .
  • each or essentially each of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool have a barcode region G content below the indicated value, or outside the indicated range. That is, for a composition, population, or pool “consisting essentially of” unique oligonucleotide species that each have the indicated G content, it would be possible for an analytically insignificant portion of the unique oligonucleotides in the composition to have barcode regions with a G content above the indicated value or outside the recited range.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 25%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 25%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • none of the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition collectively have a G content of greater than 50% G, for example, all of the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the composition (or such a composition as used in a method) consist of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have a molecule barcode comprising the sequence of at least three repeats of the doublet “HN” (in which each “H” is any of A, C, or T, and in which “N” is any of A, G, C, or T), for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • Examples of multiple repeats of the doublet “HN” include HN, HNHN, HNHNHN, and HNHNHNHN.
  • HN describes constraints on the base content, not every H or every N has to be the same or different.
  • one molecule barcode can comprise the sequence ACTGCA, while another molecule barcode can comprise the sequence TAACTA, while another molecule barcode could comprise the sequence AGACAC.
  • any number of repeats of the doublet “HN” would have a G content of no more than 50%.
  • At least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • At least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a of composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the composition consists of or consists essentially of at least 1000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species that each have a molecule barcode comprising the sequence HNHNHN.
  • the composition consists of or consists essentially of of at least 1000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species that each has a molecule barcode comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN. In some embodiments, at least 95%, 99%, or 99.9% of the barcode regions of the composition as described herein comprise at least three repeats of the doublet “HN” as described herein.
  • molecule barcodes can be helpful when barcoding a population of target nucleic acids from a sample, for example to increase the diversity of barcodes within a given sequence length along with the probability that each target nucleic acid will be uniquely labeled, while minimizing oligonucleotide species size. It is noted that limiting the G content of molecule barcodes and/or barcode regions can limit the diversity of these barcodes and barcode regions by decreasing the number of available nucleotides from which barcodes can be constructed (and the number of available different sequences per length of nucleic acid).
  • methods or compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising molecule barcodes comprising repeated “HN” doublets as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
  • the composition (or such a composition as used in a method) comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a molecule barcode comprising at least six consecutive “H's” (in which each “H” is any of A, C, or T), for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. It is noted that while the formula “H” describes constraints on the base content, not every H has to be the same (or different).
  • one molecule barcode of a unique oligonucleotide species in a population each comprised the sequence HHHH
  • one molecule barcode of a unique oligonucleotide species could comprise ACTA
  • one molecule barcode of another unique oligonucleotide species could comprise TTAC
  • one molecule barcode of another unique oligonucleotide species could comprise ACAT.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 95% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99.9% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 95% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99.9% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 95% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99.9% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 alternating H's and N's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • At least 95% (e.g., 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more) of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition as described herein (or such a composition as used in a method) comprise barcode regions comprising at least 6 consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values as described herein.
  • At least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition as described herein comprise barcode regions comprising at least 6 consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values as described herein.
  • at least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition as described herein comprise barcode regions comprising at least 6 consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values as described herein.
  • the sample barcode of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less, for example 50% or less, 40% or less, 25% or less, 20% or less, 12.5% or less, 10% or less, or 5% or less, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the barcode region of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less, for example 50% or less, 40% or less, 25% or less, 20% or less, 12.5% or less, 10% or less, or 5% or less, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%, for example less than 12.5%, less than 10%, less than 7.5%, less than 5%, less than 2.5%, or less than 1%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%, for example less than 12.5%, less than 10%, less than 7.5%, less than 5%, less than 2.5%, or less than 1%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, for at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, for all or substantially all of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • Each barcode region can optionally comprise a sample barcode.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species in a pool can comprise the same sample barcode, but there can be two or more pools that are each associated with different sample barcodes.
  • all or essentially all of the unique oligonucleotide species in pool #1 can comprise sample barcode #1
  • all or essentially all of the unique oligonucleotide species in pool #2 can comprise sample barcode #2.
  • Nucleic acids from a first sample can be associated with the unique oligonucleotide species in pool #1, and nucleic acids from a second sample can associated with unique oligonucleotide species in pool #2, for example by hybridization and amplification.
  • all or essentially all of the amplified nucleic acids corresponding to the first sample will comprise sample barcode #1 (but can comprise different molecule barcodes), and all of the amplified nucleic acids corresponding to the second sample will comprise sample barcode #2.
  • the sample barcode can comprise a nucleic acid sequence of at least 3 nucleotides, for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 3-50, 3-45, 3-40, 3-35, 3-30, 3-25, 3-20, 3-15, 3-14, 3-13, 3-12, 3-11, 3-10, 3-9, 3-8, 3-7, 3-6, 3-5, 3-4, 4-50, 4-45, 4-40, 4-35, 4-30, 4-25, 4-20, 4-15, 4-14, 4-13, 4-12, 4-11, 4-10, 4-9, 4-8, 4-7, 4-6, 4-5, 5-50, 5-45, 5-40, 5-35, 5-30, 5-25, 5-20, 5-15, 5-14, 5-13, 5
  • a sample barcode comprising a low G content can be positioned 3′ of a sample barcode that comprises a relatively higher G content and 5′ of a uniform region (e.g. a target-specific sequence or oligo dT sequence), so as to minimize bias by separating the relatively G-rich sample barcode from the uniform region.
  • a uniform region e.g. a target-specific sequence or oligo dT sequence
  • the barcode region comprises a sample barcode comprising 50% G content or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G,
  • At least 95% of the sample barcodes of the unique oligonucleotides of the composition each have less than 50% G content, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G
  • At least 99% of the sample barcodes of the unique oligonucleotides of the composition each have 50% G content or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5
  • the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition consist of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have sample barcodes having less than 50% G content, as described herein.
  • a barcode region is positioned 5′ of the uniform region without any intervening sequences between the barcode region and the uniform region.
  • the barcode region is positioned 5′ of a spacer, which is positioned 5′ of the the uniform region, so that a spacer is between the barcode region and the uniform region.
  • the spacer has a low G content (e.g., 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G).
  • the spacer can have a length of at least 1 nucleotide, for example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 1-50, 1-45, 1-35, 1-30, 1-25, 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-9, 1-8, 1-7, 1-6, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, 1-2, 2-50, 2-45, 2-35, 2-30, 2-25, 2-20, 2-15, 2-10, 2-9, 2-8, 2-7, 2-6, 2-5, 2-4, 2-3, 3-50, 3-45, 3-35, 3-30, 3-25, 3-20, 3-15, 3-10, 3-9, 3-8, 3-7, 3-6, 3-5, 3-4, 4-50, 4-45, 4-35, 4-30, 4-25, 4-20, 4-15, 4-10, 4-9, 4-8, 4-7, 4-6, 4-5, 5-50, 5-45, 5-35, 5-30, 5
  • the spacer can comprise at least two consecutive non-G nucleotides (denoted as “H”, in which “H” is A, C, or T), for example at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2-20, 2-15, 2-10, 2-9, 2-8, 2-7, 2-6, 2-5, 2-4, 2-3, 3-20, 3-15, 3-10, 3-9, 3-8, 3-7, 3-6, 3-5, 3-4, 4-20, 4-15, 4-10, 4-9, 4-8, 4-7, 4-6, 4-5, 5-20, 5-15, 5-10, 5-9, 5-8, 5-7, 5-6, 6-20, 6-15, 6-10, 6-9, 6-8, or 6-7.
  • H non-G nucleotides
  • the nucleotides of the spacers are Ts.
  • the space can comprise a poly-T sequence, such as TT, TTT, TTTT, TTTTT, TTTTTT, TTTTTTTT, or TTTTTTTT.
  • the spacers do not necessarily provide diversity, and as such, in a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described herein, some or all of the unique oligonucleotide species can have the same spacer sequences.
  • all of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition comprise the same spacer sequence.
  • compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described in accordance with compositions and methods of some embodiments herein can be disposed in spatially isolated pools, for example so that multiple sample can be analyzed, with one sample per pool.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially isolated pools, each pool comprising a plurality of unique oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species, so that unique oligonucleotides in the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and so that different unique oligonucleotides of the same pool comprise a different molecule barcode sequences.
  • spatial isolation means that target nucleic acids of a sample can hybridize to the unique oligonucleotide species of the pool without substantially cross-reacting with other pools, and without the unique oligonucleotide species of the pool substantially hybridizing to target nucleic acids of other samples.
  • the sample barcode can identify which pool a given unique oligonucleotide species came from.
  • the sample barcode can identify which pool a barcoded target nucleic acid sequence (or reverse transcript or amplicon thereof) came from.
  • a substrate organizes the pools so that they are spatially isolated from each other.
  • a multi-well plate can organize spatially isolated pools, so that each pool is in a separate well.
  • each pool can be immobilized on a different bead.
  • each well of a multi-well plate can contain a single bead on which the pool of unique oligonucleotide species is immobilized, so that a different pool of unique oligonucleotide species is positioned in each well of the multi-well plate.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 2 pools, for example, at least 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 60, 70, 72, 96, 99, 100, 110, 120, 144, 168, or 192, pools, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 2 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 24 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 48 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 96 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
  • Unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with compositions and methods of some embodiments herein can be immobilized on substrates, for example beads, wells of multi-well plates, or arrays.
  • substrates for example beads, wells of multi-well plates, or arrays.
  • unique oligonucleotide species having the same sample barcode, but different molecule barcodes can all be immobilized on a substrate, such as on a single bead, or in a single well of a multi-well plate.
  • the immobilized unique oligonucleotide species of a particular substrate are contacted with a particular sample, such as a single cell, the immobilized unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on that substrate will be associated with target nucleic acids of the same sample.
  • the sample associated with each target nucleic acid can be readily identified (e.g. all of the unique oligonucleotide species on substrate #1 have sample barcode #1, all of the unique oligonucleotide species on substrate #2 have sample barcode #2).
  • such configurations in which unique oligonucleotide species are immobilized on a substrate can be helpful in facilitating efficiency and throughput.
  • single cells can be added to wells of a multi-well plate, so that no more than one single cell is in each well. If the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized within a given well (for example, on the well or on a bead) comprise a unique sample barcode, barcoded target nucleic acids and reverse-transcripts and amplicons thereof corresponding to the single cell can be identified and quantified, even if barcoded reverse transcripts or amplicons from multiple samples are pooled.
  • a substrate can comprise a type of solid support.
  • a substrate can refer to a continuous solid or semi-solid surface on which the methods of the disclosure may be performed.
  • a substrate can refer to an array, a cartridge, a chip, a device, and a slide, for example.
  • solid support and “substrate” can be used interchangeably.
  • a substrate or solid support in accordance with some embodiments herein can encompass any type of solid, porous, or hollow sphere, ball, bearing, cylinder, or other similar configuration composed of plastic, ceramic, metal, or polymeric material (e.g., hydrogel) onto which a nucleic acid may be immobilized (e.g., covalently or non-covalently).
  • a substrate or solid support can comprise a discrete particle that may be spherical (e.g., microspheres) or have a non-spherical or irregular shape, such as cubic, cuboid, pyramidal, cylindrical, conical, oblong, or disc-shaped, and the like.
  • a plurality of solid supports spaced in an array may not comprise a substrate.
  • a solid support may be used interchangeably with the term “bead.”
  • a plurality of substrates is provided, and the diversity of sample barcodes can be represented in the plurality of substrates, so that unique substrates can comprise unique sample barcodes.
  • each sample can comprise nucleic acids.
  • the method can comprise contacting each sample with a pool comprising a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species, as described herein. Each sample can be contacted in spatial isolation from the other samples.
  • the unique polynucleotide species of each pool can comprise the same sample barcode and comprise different molecule barcodes.
  • the method can include hybridizing target specific regions of at least some oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species to at least some of the nucleic acids of the sample.
  • the method can include extending the hybridized oligonucleotides so as to produce strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target region.
  • the produced strands can comprise the same sample barcode and different molecule barcodes.
  • the sample barcodes can be different.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist of or consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecule barcode has a G content of less than 50%.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • each pool comprises at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, for example at least 100, 500, 100, 500, 1000, 2000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • Such methods in accordance with some embodiments herein can barcode nucleic acids of two or more different samples, such as single-cell sample, so as to permit analysis and quantification of the nucleic acids of a single cell.
  • each sample is contacted with a single pool of unique oligonucleotide species in spatial isolation from the other pools and samples.
  • the pools are spatially isolated by being in unique contained spaces, for example different wells of a multi-well plate, different test tubes, different microfluidic channels, or the like.
  • the pools are spatially isolated by being on different regions of a surface, for example reaction dots on an array.
  • the oligonucleotides can be contacted with target nucleic acids of the sample under standard hybridization conditions (e.g., in standard buffers, and at a temperature lower than the Tm of a portion of the uniform region that is complementary to the target nucleic acid).
  • target nucleic acids comprise RNAs
  • the target nucleic acids of the sample are reverse-transcribed after hybridization to the unique oligonucleotide species, so as to generate DNAs (e.g. cDNAs).
  • the products of the hybridization or reverse transcription reaction are amplified, so as to generate a library of DNAs.
  • the amplification can be via PCR under standard conditions, or via other suitable methods, for example isothermal amplification, rolling circle amplification, and the like.
  • the amplification can comprise amplifying reverse-transcripts or hybridized nucleic acids with a polymerase having 5′ to 3′ activity.
  • the products of the amplification can be further analyzed, for example by sequence.
  • reverse transcripts or amplicons from different pools can be pooled for sequencing, as different sample barcodes will indicate the corresponding pool (and sample) of each individual barcoded nucleic acid.
  • methods in accordance with some embodiments herein can minimize or eliminate such bias.
  • methods comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
  • the method can further comprise ascertaining nucleic acid sequences of the strands comprising the oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species and the sequence complementary to the target.
  • reverse transcripts, amplicons, and/or cDNA libraries generated from the hybridization and extension of the unique oligonucleotide probes can be sequenced.
  • Any suitable sequencing method known in the art can be used, preferably high-throughput approaches.
  • cyclic array sequencing using platforms such as Roche 454, Illumina Solexa, ABI-SOLiD, ION Torrent, Complete Genomics, Pacific Bioscience, Helicos, or the Polonator platform, may also be utilized.
  • Sequencing may comprise MiSeq sequencing.
  • Sequencing may comprise HiSeq sequencing.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise adapters to mediate high-throughput sequencing, for example universal priming sites.
  • barcoded nucleic acids corresponding to two or more different samples e.g. from two or more different pools
  • all of the pools are combined or pooled for sequencing.
  • sample barcodes can identify the corresponding sample (or pool) of the combined barcoded nucleic acids, that combining or pooling the nucleic acids can facilitate throughput and/or resource utilization for sequencing, and that accurate barcoding in accordance with some embodiments herein can minimize or eliminate bias, even when a large number of different nucleic acids are analyzed.
  • the barcode region of each pool comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides as described herein, for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the sample barcode is positioned 3′ of the molecule barcode.
  • the molecule barcode is positioned 3′ of the sample barcode.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the same sample barcode, which can be a different sample barcode from the unique oligonucleotide species of other pools.
  • the sample barcode has a low G content as described herein, for example less than 50% G, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G.
  • at least 95%, 99%, or 99.9% of the sample barcodes have a low G content as described herein.
  • each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the molecule barcode and 5′ of the uniform region as described herein.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecule barcode has a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the molecule barcodes of at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample comprise molecule barcodes having a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the molecule barcodes of at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample comprise molecule barcodes having a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • all of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample comprise molecule barcodes having a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 50% G, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region comprises at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence (e.g., at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides complementary to the target, including ranges between any two of the listed values), and configured for 5′ to 3′ amplification of the target nucleic acid sequence.
  • the uniform region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate as described herein, so that the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on a given substrate comprise the same sample barcode, and different unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on the substrate comprise different molecule barcodes.
  • substrates can include wells in multi-well plates (e.g. 24-, 48, and 96-well plates), spots on an array, beads, and the like. In some embodiments, at least 100 unique oligonucleotides are immobilized on each substrate.
  • each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less, for example 50% or less, 40% or less, 25% or less, 20% or less, 12.5% or less, 10% or less, or 5% or less.
  • the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%, for example less than 12.5%, less than 10%, less than 7.5%, less than 5%, less than 2.5%, or less than 1%.
  • the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%, for example no more than 12.5%, no more than 10%, no more than 7.5%, no more than 5%, no more than 2.5%, or no more than 1%.
  • any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • any G in the molecule barcode can be not-adjacent to another G.
  • each pool consists of, or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • At least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 alternating H's and N's, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • 6 alternating H's and N's can be depicted as HNHNHN. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N.
  • At least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN.
  • each H can be the same as, or different from any other H
  • each N can be the same as, or different from any other N.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN.
  • At least 99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH.
  • each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HNH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HHH.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N.
  • each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • At least one pool comprises at least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no pool comprises two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the target specific region can comprise a sequence for 5′ to 3′ amplification of a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
  • the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
  • each pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • At least 48 unique samples are each contacted with a different pool of unique oligonucleotide species.
  • at least 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, or 192 samples can each be contacted with a different pool.
  • each sample can be contacted with a different pool of unique oligonucleotide species in a well of a multi-well plate.
  • At least 99% of the samples comprise no more than one cell each.
  • at least 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the samples can comprise no more than one cell.
  • a solution comprising multiple cells can be diluted to an appropriate concentration so that there is a suitably high probability that each sample comprises no more than one cell.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate.
  • each pool can be identified by a particular sample barcode.
  • different substrates and as such, different pools
  • the substrate comprises a spatially isolated region of a surface, so that the substrates of different pools comprise the different spatially isolated regions of the surface.
  • the substrate comprises a well in a multi-well plate.
  • the substrate comprises a bead.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species further comprises an adapter configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide on the substrate, wherein said barcode region is 3′ of the adapter.
  • each adapter can comprise a universal priming site, for example for use in sequencing.
  • methods of making a composition comprising unique oligonucleotides are described.
  • the method can comprise providing a plurality of different sample barcodes as described herein.
  • the method can comprise providing a plurality of different molecule barcodes as described herein.
  • the method can comprise synthesizing a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species as described herein, in which each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a barcode region comprising a sample barcode and a molecule barcode as described herein.
  • the method can comprise disposing the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species in spatially-isolated pools.
  • Each pool can comprises multiple unique oligonucleotide species, so that the unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and so that different unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise different molecule barcode sequences.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in the spatially-isolated pools concurrent with synthesis.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in the spatially-isolated pools after synthesis.
  • the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%.
  • each spatially-isolated pool comprises at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, for example, at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each spatially-isolated pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the unique oligonucleotides can be synthesized using any of a number of suitable methods.
  • the sample barcode sequences and molecule barcode sequences are generated in silico, and unique oligonucleotide species comprising the sample barcode sequences and molecule barcode sequences together are synthesized, for example using chemical oligonucleotide synthesis.
  • a plurality of oligonucleotides comprising the same sample barcode sequence are pooled in spatial isolation, and joined with a plurality of oligonucleotides comprising molecule barcodes, for example via hybridization and extension, or via ligation.
  • Such an approach can be performed in multiple spatially isolated environments in parallel, or sequentially, to achieve multiple unique oligonucleotide species.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region as described herein.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region.
  • the target-specific region comprises at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid (e.g., at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides complementary to the target, including ranges between any two of the listed values), and configured for 5′ to 3′ amplification of the target nucleic acid sequence.
  • the uniform region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the plurality of molecule barcodes (and as such, the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species) consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecular barcode has a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the molecule barcodes of at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the molecule barcodes of at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • all of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species have molecule barcodes having a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • each molecule barcode of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of no more than 50%, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 50% G, for example, less than 50%, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less as described herein, for example, less than 50%, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
  • the sample barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 50% G, for example, less than 50%, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
  • the sample barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
  • any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
  • At least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN.
  • each H can be the same as, or different from any other H
  • each N can be the same as, or different from any other N.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN.
  • At least 99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H.
  • each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HNH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HHH.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN.
  • the spacer can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
  • unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, the spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
  • At least one pool comprises least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no pool comprises two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the target-specific region can comprise a sequence for 5′ to 3′ amplification of a target nucleic acid.
  • the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the target specific region comprises a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
  • the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode.
  • each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
  • each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
  • the method further comprises immobilizing the unique oligonucleotide species of each spatially-distinct pool on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate.
  • each pool can be identified by a particular sample barcode.
  • different substrates and as such, different pools
  • the substrate comprises a discrete region of a surface, so that the substrates of different pools comprise the different discrete regions of the surface.
  • the substrate comprises a well in a multi-well plate.
  • the substrate comprises a bead.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are immobilized on the substrate by a covalent bond. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are immobilized on the substrate by a magnetic or electromagnetic force. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are imbedded in the substrate, so as to immobilize them on the substrate.
  • At least 48 spatially-distinct pools are made, for example at least 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, or 192 spatially-distinct pools.
  • the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools concurrent with said synthesis. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools after said synthesis.
  • an oligonucleotide comprising a barcode region 3′ of the adapter region.
  • the barcode region can comprise a molecule barcode as described herein, in which the molecule barcode has a G content of no more than 50%.
  • the molecule barcode can comprise at least 7 nucleotides.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises a sample barcode as described herein.
  • the sample barcode can comprise at least 3 nucleotides.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region.
  • the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid as described herein.
  • the uniform region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises an adapter region 5′ of the barcode region.
  • the oligonucleotide further comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the uniform region as described herein.
  • designs for accurate and unbiased barcoding of nucleic acid transcripts are provided.
  • These primer designs are composed of nucleic acid sequences (DNA, RNA, or LNA) that can target specific nucleic acid (DNA/RNA) transcripts via a gene-specific approach, or target a large set of nucleic acid transcripts (e.g. via poly-A tail of messenger RNAs or other consensus sequences) ( FIGS. 1 A-C ).
  • these primers include two categories of nucleic acid barcodes: 1) molecule barcodes, also called “molecular barcodes,” Molecular Index (MI) or Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI) and 2) sample barcodes, also called Sample Index (SI) ( FIGS.
  • the MI and SI barcodes are used to uniquely label for identification of its original target transcript via the MI, and its sample origin (SI) after library preparation for next generation sequencing or other sequence readout and barcode readout methods.
  • SI sample origin
  • Some embodiments detail different arrangements of MI and Sls within the primer that ensure unbiased and random labelling of barcodes to target transcripts for accurate gene expression profiling (see, e.g. FIGS. 3 A- 3 H ) (see Fu et al. 2011 PNAS 108: 9026-9032, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for discussion of random labelling).
  • designs unique primer designs that can reduce ‘barcode bias,’ which is a phenomenon that is observed in the prior art designs, whereby with barcodes with high G-nucleotide content is more oftenly used compared to other barcode compositions ( FIG. 4 ).
  • MIs with high % G content and multiple G's are preferably observed ( FIG. 4 ).
  • SIs associated with no target genes observes small amounts of PCR errors due to these primers cross reacting during a sample multiplex PCR ( FIGS. 4 - 5 ).
  • FIGS. 3 A- 3 H show the design of prior art barcode layout ( FIG. 3 A ) and novel designs to minimize bias as described ( FIGS. 3 B-H ).
  • the conventional design allows for either the MI composition of ‘BBBBBBV’ or ‘NNNNNNNN’ (B is C,G, or T; V is A,C, or G; N is A,T,G, or C).
  • a subset of the prior design MI barcode would be G-rich.
  • addition of either TTT or TTTTT after the MI to reduce G-richness along the region (length of non-G spacers can be variable, and can be any non-G nucleotide).
  • FIGS. 3 E-F SI and MI positions are switched, so that high G-rich MIs would not be adjacent to potentially G-rich gene specific target regions.
  • FIGS. 3 E-F addition of either TTT or TTTTT to FIG. 3 D design to further reduce G-rich regions (note that SIs are not G-rich, and the length of non-G spacers can be variable and can be any non-G nucleotide).
  • FIGS. 3 G-H designs MIs are designed to not be G-rich by using ‘HHHHHHHH’ or ‘HNHNHNHN,’ where H is A, C, or T.
  • Some embodiments include the use of the new primer designs in gene-specific target panels, such as T cell receptors (TCR), where primers are used to target TCR-specific sequences.
  • TCR T cell receptors
  • Designs in accordance with some embodiments herein can alleviate SI barcode crossover, thereby reducing the ‘noise’ of a TCR molecular barcoding assay.
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats B01-B12 comprised a spacer of the sequence TTT 3′ of the molecule barcode (“2nd bc”) and 5′ of the uniform region (“5 to 3′ recognition sequence”).
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats C01-C12 comprised a spacer of the sequence TTTTT 3′ of the molecule barcode (“2nd bc”) and 5′ of the uniform region (“5 to 3′ recognition sequence”).
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats D01-D12 comprised a molecule barcode (“1st bc”) 5′ of the sample barcode (“2nd bc”).
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats E01-E12 comprised a molecule barcode (“1st bc”) 5′ of the sample barcode (“2nd bc”) and a spacer of the sequence TTT 3′ of the barcode region and 4′ of the uniform region.
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats F01-F12 (SEQ ID NOs: 61-72) comprised a molecule barcode (“1st bc”) 5′ of the sample barcode (“2nd bc”) and a spacer of the sequence TTTTT 3′ of the barcode region and 4′ of the uniform region.
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats G01-G12 (SEQ ID NOs: 73-84) comprised molecule barcodes (“2nd bc”) each comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH (in which each “H” is an A, C, or T, and in which any two “H” nucleotides can be the same of different).
  • Unique oligonucleotide species formats H01-H12 comprised molecule barcodes (“2nd bc”) each comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN (in which each “H” is an A, C, or T, and in which any two “H” nucleotides can be the same of different, and in which each “N” can be A, G, C, or, T, and in which any two “N” nucleotides can be the same or different).
  • Amplification and analysis of target T cell receptor nucleic acid sequences was performed as follows: the PreciseTM TCR Encoding Plate (BD Cellular Research Inc.) was thawed at room temperature and spun briefly to collect the 5 ⁇ L reagents in each well. The plate was placed on ice in a 96 well rack and very carefully remove the seal, while avoiding disturbing reagents in the wells. Cells were sorted or added directly into the 96 well encoding plate (1 cell per well). The plate was sealed and vortexed briefly (5-10 s) to mix the reagents, and then spun briefly ( ⁇ 1000 rpm ⁇ 10 s). The sorted sample plates can optionally be stored at ⁇ 80° C. until ready to start the PreciseTM protocol. For reverse transcription, the plate was incubated at 65° C. for 3 min, cooled to 4° C., and then placed on ice for 5 min. The reaction master mix was as follows:
  • cDNA purification was performed using the following protocol: Spin the plate (1000 rpm ⁇ 10 s). Combine all reactions into a single 2 mL tube. Add 8 uL of Precise DBP Mix into the pooled cDNA tube. Vortex gently to get buffer into solution. Add an equivalent volume of AMPure XP beads to the single tube containing the pooled RT reaction product (1 ⁇ volume of pooled PCR product). Pipette up and down to mix the sample and beads. Incubate bead mix at room temperature for 5 minutes. Open the cap to make sure the beads aren't disturbed. Place tube on magnet and wait until the liquid and beads separate. The liquid should be entirely clear before it is removed. This may take up to 5 min.
  • PCR N1 amplification was performed using the following protocol: Prepare PCR mix (200 uL) in pre-amplification area according to Table 2:
  • PCR N1 amplification (adapter and indexing PCR) was performed using the following protocol: Prepare PCR mix (50 uL) according to Table 3:
  • FIG. 6 shows error correction for the average of sequence results (by individual TCRa CDR3).
  • the Y axis plots the number of different molecule barcodes detected for TCRa.
  • Results are shown for reactions with 50 pg of target RNA (denoted as “50” in FIG. 6 , e.g., A50, B50, C50, D50, E50, F50, G50) and negative controls that received 0 pg of target RNA (denoted as “0” in FIG. 6 , e.g., A0, B0, C0, D0, E0, F0, G0).
  • 0 pg serves as a negative control and detector of assay noise that is leaked from 50 pg sample.
  • B01-B12 (“B50”), C01-C12 (“C50”), D01-D12 (“D50”), E01-E12 (“E50”), F01-F12 (“F50”), G01-G12 (“G50”), and H01-H12 (“H50”) had lower error rates than conventional formats A01-A12 (“A50”).
  • format “H” had the highest sensitivity with low noise and performed better than the original barcoded primers (A).
  • compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising barcode regions, and molecule barcodes having a relatively low G content, and/or unique olignonucleotides comprising a spacer 3′ of the molecule barcode and 5′ of the uniform region as described herein yielded amplification with a lower error rate, and thus higher accuracy than compositions comprising general polynucleotide species that did not comprise such features.
  • a range includes each individual member.
  • a group having 1-3 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 cells.
  • a group having 1-5 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cells, and so forth.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

In accordance with some embodiments herein, compositions and methods for accurate barcoding of nucleic acids are described. The compositions and methods can involve a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species comprising unique molecule barcodes. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes can have a relatively low G content, and can exhibit reduced bias in amplification and analysis.

Description

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional App. No. 62/330,500 filed May 2, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING
The present application is being filed along with a Sequence Listing in electronic format. The Sequence Listing is provided as a file entitled SEQUENCEBDCRI019A.TXT, created and last modified Apr. 21, 2017, which is 32,587 bytes in size, and is replaced by a file entitled BDCRI019R1_SEQLIST.xml, created and last modified Oct. 25, 2022, which is 195,405 bytes in size. The information in the electronic format of the Sequence Listing is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
FIELD
Embodiments herein relate generally to compositions and methods for accurate barcoding of molecules, for example nucleic acid molecules.
SUMMARY
Some embodiments include a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species is provided. Each unique oligonucleotide species can comprise a barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides, in which the unique oligonucleotide species comprise different nucleic acid sequences in their barcode regions, and in which at least one of: (a) the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%; or (b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the uniform region further comprises a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least two spatially isolated pools, each pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species, wherein unique oligonucleotides in the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and wherein different unique oligonucleotides of the same pool comprise a different molecule barcode sequences. In some embodiments, the sample barcode of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less. In some embodiments, the barcode region of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. In some embodiments, each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode. In some embodiments, each oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no two oligonucleotides of the composition are of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the composition comprises at least 48 pools. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a discrete region of a surface, so that the surface can comprise two or more substrates. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a bead. In some embodiments, each of the unique oligonucleotide species further comprises an adapter configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide on the substrate, wherein said barcode region is 3′ of the adapter. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence. In some embodiments, the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, a kit comprising the composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species is provided. The kit can further comprise a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region as the target-specific region and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, so that the primer is configured to amplify the variable region in conjunction with the target-specific region. In some embodiments, the primer and target-specific region are configured to amplify a nucleic acid of at least 1 kb and comprising the variable region. In some embodiments, the primer of the kit is part of the composition comprising the unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the primer of the kit is part of an other composition that is separate from the composition comprising the unique oligonucleotide species.
Some embodiments include a method of specifically barcoding a plurality of nucleic acids from two or more samples is provided. Each sample can comprising nucleic acid. The method can comprise contacting each sample with a pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, in which each sample is contacted in spatial isolation from the other samples. Each unique oligonucleotide species can comprise a barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides. The unique polynucleotide species of each pool can comprise the same sample barcode, and comprise different molecule barcodes. In the method, at least (a) the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%; or (b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5% can apply. The method can include hybridizing target-specific regions of at least some oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species to at least some of the nucleic acids of the sample. The method can include extending the hybridized oligonucleotides, thereby producing strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target, wherein for each sample, the strands comprise the same sample barcode and different molecule barcodes, and wherein for different samples, the molecule barcodes are different. In some embodiments, the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the uniform region further comprises a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the method further comprises ascertaining nucleic acid sequences of the strands comprising the oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species and the sequence complementary to the target. In some embodiments, the at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on a given substrate comprise the same sample barcode, and different unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on the substrate comprise different molecule barcodes. In some embodiments, each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, each pool consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. In some embodiments, at least one pool comprises least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no pool comprises two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, at least 48 unique samples are each contacted with a unique pool. In some embodiments, at least 99% of the samples comprise no more than one cell each. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate of the plurality. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a spatially-isolated region of a surface, so that the substrates of different pools comprise the different spatially-isolated regions of the surface. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a bead. In some embodiments, each of the unique oligonucleotide species further comprises an adapter configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide on the substrate, wherein said barcode region is 3′ of the adapter. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking a sequence encoding the variable region of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin. In some embodiments, the variable region is of a T cell receptor or B cell receptor, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the method further comprises contacting the extended strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target with primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region. As such, the method can comprise amplifying sequences encoding variable regions of a T cell receptor, B cell receptor, or immunoglobulin. In some embodiments, the method amplifies a sequence of at least 1 kb, which comprises the variable region coding sequence.
Some embodiments include a method of making a composition comprising unique oligonucleotides is provided. The method can comprise providing a plurality of different sample barcodes comprising at least 3 nucleotides each. The method can comprise providing a plurality of different molecule barcodes comprising at least 7 nucleotides each. The methods can comprise synthesizing a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species, each unique oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region comprising a sample barcode and a molecule barcode, in which at least one of: (a) the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%; or (b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. The method can comprise disposing the unique oligonucleotide species in spatially-isolated pools, in which each pool comprises multiple unique oligonucleotide species, so that the unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and wherein different unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise different molecule barcode sequences, and in which each pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, ach unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the uniform region further comprises a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode has a G content of 50% or less. In some embodiments, each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less. In some embodiments, the sample barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%. In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, the plurality of the unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotides comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotides comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, at least 48 pools are made. In some embodiments, the method further comprises immobililzing the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool onto a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate of the plurality. In some embodiments, the substrates comprise discrete regions of a surface. In some embodiments, the substrates comprise beads. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools concurrent with said synthesis. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools after said synthesis. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking a variable region coding sequence of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin. In some embodiments, the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the kit further comprising a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region coding sequence as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, and is thus configured, in conjunction with the target-specific region, to amplify the variable region coding sequence.
Some embodiments include an oligonucleotide comprising a barcode region 3′ of the adapter region. The barcode region can comprise a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides, in which the molecule barcode has a G content of no more than 50%. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises an adapter region 5′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking a variable region coding sequence of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin. In some embodiments, the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the kit further comprising a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region coding sequence as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, and is thus configured to amplify the variable region coding sequence in conjunction with the target-specific region.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram illustrating an oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region 5′ of a uniform region, in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram illustrating an oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region 5′ of an oligo dT sequence, in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 1C is a schematic diagram illustrating an oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region 5′ of a gene-specific region, in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram illustrating a barcode region comprising a molecule barcode 5′ of a sample barcode, and which can comprise a barcode region of a unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram illustrating a barcode region comprising a sample barcode 5′ of a molecule barcode, and which can comprise a barcode region of a unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIGS. 3A-3H are diagrams illustrating a variety of configurations of oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein. FIG. 3A illustrates a baseline oligonucleotide. FIG. 3B illustrates an oligonucleotide with a base spacer 3′ of the barcode region. FIG. 3C illustrates an oligonucleotide with a 5-base spacer 3′ of the barcode region. FIG. 3D illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the positions of the molecule barcode (indicated as “NNNNNNNN”) and the sample barcode within the barcode region are switched in comparison to FIG. 3A, so that the molecule barcode is 5′ of the sample barcode. FIG. 3E illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the positions of the molecule barcode (indicated as “NNNNNNNN”) and the sample barcode within the barcode region are switched in comparison to FIG. 3A, so that the molecule barcode is 5′ of the sample barcode, and including a 3-base spacer. FIG. 3F illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the positions of the molecule barcode (indicated as “NNNNNNNN”) and the sample barcode within the barcode region are switched, so that the molecule barcode is 5′ of the sample barcode, and including a 5-base spacer. FIG. 3G illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the molecule barcode comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH (in which each H is an A, C, or T, and in which each H can be the same or different from any other H). FIG. 3H illustrates an oligonucleotide in which the molecule barcode comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN (in which each H is an A, C, or T, and in which each H can be the same or different from any other H).
FIG. 4A is a diagram illustrating nucleotide usage in a sampling of conventional unique oligonucleotide species.
FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating nucleotide usage in a sampling of conventional unique oligonucleotide species.
FIG. 4C is a diagram illustrating nucleotide usage in a sampling of conventional unique oligonucleotide species.
FIG. 5A is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein. The indicated SEQ ID NOs: in the right-most columns of FIGS. 5A-5D refer to the polynucleotide sequence that includes the “anchor,” “1st bc,” “2nd bc,” “Spacer” (if any), and “5 to 3′ Recognition Sequence” as shown. Each “anchor” in FIGS. 5A-5D has the polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 97.
FIG. 5B is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 5C is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 5D is a diagram illustrating nucleic acid sequences of oligonucleotide species that were constructed in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 6 is a graph of error correction by individual for an analysis using unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 7 is a graph of error correction by individual and filter MI crossover for an analysis using unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein.
FIG. 8 is a diagram schematically illustrating, without being limited by any theory, possible amplification errors that can result from oligonucleotides with high G-contents.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In accordance with some embodiments herein, methods and compositions for accurate barcoding and analysis of nucleic acids are described. In some embodiments, individual nucleic acids of a sample can be associated with a unique barcode (e.g. a “molecule barcode”), so that upon amplification and sequence analysis, individual nucleic acids of a sample can be quantified. Without being limited by any theory, it is contemplated that bias favoring or disfavoring the representation, amplification, or properties of certain kinds of barcode sequences can interference with quantification and analysis of the individual nucleic acids of a sample (possible sources of bias in some amplification events are schematically illustrated in FIG. 8 ). Described in accordance with some embodiments herein are configurations and characteristics of unique oligonucleotide species comprising barcodes, in which the unique oligonucleotide species are configured to minimize barcode-related bias, and yield accurate analysis of nucleic acids. Without being limited by any theory, it is contemplated that barcode regions comprising features such as a guanosine (G) content below 50%, and/or no two consecutive “G's” in the barcode region can minimize bias that could otherwise confound quantification and/or analysis of nucleic acids of a sample. Optionally, the individual nucleic acid molecules of a given sample can also be associated with a “sample barcode”, so that barcode-associated nucleic acids can be subsequently pooled for an efficient batch analysis of nucleic acids from two or more samples, for example by next-generation sequencing.
Nucleic Aids
Various nucleic acids are described in accordance with some embodiments herein. For example, oligonucleotide species, samples, and/or targets can comprise nucleic acids.
As used herein, a “nucleic acid” refers to a polynucleotide sequence, or fragment thereof. A nucleic acid can comprise nucleotides. A nucleic acid can be exogenous or endogenous to a cell. A nucleic acid can exist in a cell-free environment. A nucleic acid can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of a gene or fragment thereof. A nucleic acid can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of DNA. A nucleic acid can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of RNA. A nucleic acid can comprise one or more analogs (e.g. altered backgone, sugar, or nucleobase). Some non-limiting examples of analogs include: 5-bromouracil, peptide nucleic acid, xeno nucleic acid, morpholinos, locked nucleic acids, glycol nucleic acids, threose nucleic acids, dideoxynucleotides, cordycepin, 7-deaza-GTP, florophores (e.g. rhodamine or flurescein linked to the sugar), thiol containing nucleotides, biotin linked nucleotides, fluorescent base analogs, CpG islands, methyl-7-guanosine, methylated nucleotides, inosine, thiouridine, pseudourdine, dihydrouridine, queuosine, and wyosine. “Nucleic acid”, “polynucleotide,” “target polynucleotide”, and “target nucleic acid” can be used interchangeably.
As used herein, “upstream” (and variations of this root term) refers to a position that is relatively 5′ on a nucleic acid (e.g., 5′ in comparison to reference position). As used herein “downstream” (and variations of this root term) refers to a position that is relatively 3′ on a nucleic acid (e.g., 3′ in comparison to reference position). For example, as shown in FIG. 2A, the “sample barcode” is 3′ of the “molecule barcode” and is understood to be downstream of the molecule “barcode.” For example, as shown in FIG. 2B, the “sample barcode” is 5′ of the “molecule barcode” and is understood to be upstream of the molecule “barcode.”
A nucleic acid can comprise one or more modifications (e.g., a base modification, a backbone modification), to provide the nucleic acid with a new or enhanced feature (e.g., improved stability). A nucleic acid can comprise a nucleic acid affinity tag. A nucleoside can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of a base-sugar combination. The base portion of the nucleoside can be a heterocyclic base. The two most common classes of such heterocyclic bases are the purines and the pyrimidines. Nucleotides can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of nucleosides that further include a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside. For those nucleosides that include a pentofuranosyl sugar, the phosphate group can be linked to the 2′, the 3′, or the 5′ hydroxyl moiety of the sugar. In forming nucleic acids, the phosphate groups can covalently link adjacent nucleosides to one another to form a linear polymeric compound. In turn, the respective ends of this linear polymeric compound can be further joined to form a circular compound; however, linear compounds are generally suitable. In addition, linear compounds may have internal nucleotide base complementarity and may therefore fold in a manner as to produce a fully or partially double-stranded compound. Within nucleic acids, the phosphate groups can commonly be referred to as forming the internucleoside backbone of the nucleic acid. The linkage or backbone of the nucleic acid can be a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.
A nucleic acid can comprise a modified backbone and/or modified internucleoside linkages. Modified backbones can include those that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that do not have a phosphorus atom in the backbone. Suitable modified nucleic acid backbones containing a phosphorus atom therein can include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates such as 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates, chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, phosphorodiamidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selenophosphates, and boranophosphates having normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogs, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, a 5′ to 5′ or a 2′ to 2′ linkage.
A nucleic acid can comprise polynucleotide backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These can include those having morpholino linkages (formed in part from the sugar portion of a nucleoside); siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH2 component parts.
A nucleic acid can comprise a nucleic acid mimetic. The term “mimetic” includes, for example, polynucleotides wherein only the furanose ring or both the furanose ring and the internucleotide linkage are replaced with non-furanose groups, replacement of only the furanose ring can also be referred as being a sugar surrogate. The heterocyclic base moiety or a modified heterocyclic base moiety can be maintained for hybridization with an appropriate target nucleic acid. One such nucleic acid can be a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In a PNA, the sugar-backbone of a polynucleotide can be replaced with an amide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone. The nucleotides can be retained and are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone. The backbone in PNA compounds can comprise two or more linked aminoethylglycine units which gives PNA an amide containing backbone. The heterocyclic base moieties can be bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone.
A nucleic acid can comprise a morpholino backbone structure. For example, a nucleic acid can comprise a 6-membered morpholino ring in place of a ribose ring. In some of these embodiments, a phosphorodiamidate or other non-phosphodiester internucleoside linkage can replace a phosphodiester linkage.
A nucleic acid can comprise linked morpholino units (i.e. morpholino nucleic acid) having heterocyclic bases attached to the morpholino ring. Linking groups can link the morpholino monomeric units in a morpholino nucleic acid. Non-ionic morpholino-based oligomeric compounds can have less undesired interactions with cellular proteins. Morpholino-based polynucleotides can be nonionic mimics of nucleic acids. A variety of compounds within the morpholino class can be joined using different linking groups. A further class of polynucleotide mimetic can be referred to as cyclohexenyl nucleic acids (CeNA). The furanose ring normally present in a nucleic acid molecule can be replaced with a cyclohexenyl ring. CeNA DMT protected phosphoramidite monomers can be prepared and used for oligomeric compound synthesis using phosphoramidite chemistry. The incorporation of CeNA monomers into a nucleic acid chain can increase the stability of a DNA/RNA hybrid. CeNA oligoadenylates can form complexes with nucleic acid complements with similar stability to the native complexes. A further modification can include Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring thereby forming a 2′-C,4′-C-oxymethylene linkage thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety. The linkage can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of a methylene (—CH2-), group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2. LNA and LNA analogs can display very high duplex thermal stabilities with complementary nucleic acid (Tm=+3 to +10° C.), stability towards 3′-exonucleolytic degradation and good solubility properties.
A nucleic acid can also, in some embodiments, include nucleobase (often referred to simply as “base”) modifications or substitutions. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” nucleobases can include the purine bases, (e.g. adenine (A) and guanine (G)), and the pyrimidine bases, (e.g. thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U)). Modified nucleobases can include other synthetic and natural nucleobases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl (—C═C—CH3) uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil (pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines, 5-halo particularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl and other 5-substituted uracils and cytosines, 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine, 2-aminoadenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine. Modified nucleobases can include tricyclic pyrimidines such as phenoxazine cytidine(1H-pyrimido(5,4-b)(1,4)benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), phenothiazine cytidine (1H-pyrimido(5,4-b)(1,4)benzothiazin-2(3H)-one), G-clamps such as a substituted phenoxazine cytidine (e.g. 9-(2-aminoethoxy)-H-pyrimido(5,4-(b) (1,4)benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), carbazole cytidine (2H-pyrimido(4,5-b)indol-2-one), pyridoindole cytidine (Hpyrido(3′,4,5)pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2-one).
Samples
As used herein, the term “sample” refers to a composition comprising targets. Suitable samples for analysis by the disclosed methods, devices, and systems include, but are not limited to, cells, single cells, tissues, organs, or organisms. In some embodiments, a sample comprises raw or unprocessed samples, for example a whole cell, whole population of cells, or whole tissue. In some embodiments, a sample comprises an isolated cell or cell extract, or a nucleic-acid-containing fraction thereof, for example isolated nucleic acids, or a composition comprising enriched or isolated nucleic acids. In some embodiments, a sample comprises a fixed tissue, cell, or nucleic-acid-containing fraction thereof. In some embodiments, a sample comprises a frozen tissue, cell, or nucleic-acid-containing fraction thereof. In some embodiments, a sample comprises a solution comprising nucleic acids. In some embodiments, a sample comprises a solution comprising nucleic acids. In some embodiments, a sample comprises nucleic acids in a solid format, for example lyophilized nucleic acids and the like.
Unique Oligonucleotide Species
As used in compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides in accordance with some embodiments herein, a “unique oligonucleotide species” refers to an oligonucleotide, for example DNA or RNA, having a sequence that differs by at least one base from another unique oligonucleotide species. The unique oligonucleotide species of a composition in accordance with some embodiments herein can share certain structural features or formats, but can have different nucleic acid sequences from each other. The unique oligonucleotide species can be single-stranded or double-standed. A composition can comprise two or more unique oligonucleotide species, for example a diversity of 100, 1000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. Optionally, the composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species can also comprise two or more oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. By way of example a composition can comprise two unique oligonucleotide species: ACTT-X and TCTT-X, in which “X” is a sequence that is the same for both unique oligonucleotide species. It would be possible for the composition to comprise two copies of an oligonucleotide having the sequence ACTT-X, and one copy of an oligonucleotide having the sequence TCTT-X.
The oligonucleotide species of the compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides of some embodiments herein can comprise a barcode region and a uniform region as described herein. The barcode regions can differ between unique oligonucleotide species, so as to provide diversity in a population of unique oligonucleotide species, while the uniform regions remain the same. The barcode region can comprise a molecule index as described herein. The molecule index can be configured to minimize bias, for example by minimizing G content so that no unique oligonucleotide species in a population of unique oligonucleotide species has a molecule index with a G content greater than 50%, and/or so that the sequence “GG” does not appear in the molecule index (e.g. so that there are no two consecutive G's). Optionally, the barcode region comprises a sample index. The sample index can be configured so that the unique oligonucleotides of a given pool can have the same sample index, but different molecule indices. As such, if multiple samples are analyzed, the sample index can indicate which sample each oligonucleotide corresponds to. As such, after unique oligonucleotide species bind to target, the unique oligonucleotide species can be pooled, and sequences can be analyzed. In some embodiments, the sample index is 5′ of the molecule index. In some embodiments, the molecule index is 5′ of the sample index. Optionally, the unique oligonucleotide species comprises an adapter. The adapter can be positioned 5′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the adapter is configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide species on a substrate.
Without being limited by any theory, it is contemplated that unique oligonucleotides species configured in accordance with some embodiments herein can yield accurate analysis and sequencing results with reduced, minimal, or no bias, for example by minimizing G content in the molecule barcode or barcode region, and/or minimizing G content near the uniform region. By way of example, a reduction in bias can be ascertained by a reduction in noise and/or an increase in sensitivity for detecting the number of different molecules of a target nucleic acid in a sample (see, e.g. FIGS. 6-7 ). In some embodiments, the reduction in bias can be ascertained as a decrease in noise (see FIG. 6 ), for example a smaller standard error in the number of target nucleic acid molecules detected in the sample. In some embodiments, the reduction in bias can be ascertained as an increase in sensitivity (see FIG. 7 ), for example detecting a larger number of the different molecules of a target nucleic acid in a sample (e.g. fewer target nucleic acid molecules are “missed”. As such, in some embodiments, compositions and methods yield quantification of target nucleic acid molecules in a sample with low noise, for example a relative standard error less than 30%, for example, less than 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, or 0.01%, including ranges beween any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, compositions and methods yield quantification of target nucleic acid molecules in a sample with high sensitivity, for example a sensitivity (measured as a percent of the actual number of different target nucleic acids in a sample that are detected), for example, a sensitivity of at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 85%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 99.9%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, the methods or compositions described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error relative to compositions or methods comprising unique oligonucleotide species in line with FIG. 3A.
FIG. 3A illustrates a conventional oligonucleotide design. It is noted that the molecule index sequence NNNNNNNN (in which each N is A, G, C, or T, and in which any two of the N's can be the same or different from each other) can comprise two or more consecutive G's, and/or can have a G content greater than 50%. For example, a subset of the population of unique oligonucleotide species in line with FIG. 3A can be G-rich. Without being limited by any theory, it is contemplated that at least some unique oligonucleotide species in a population based on the configuration of FIG. 3A could be favored, leading to bias. Another example of “baseline” molecule index that can be subject to bias is the sequence ‘BBBBBBV’ (in which B is C, G, or T, and in which V is A, C, or G). Examples of configurations for unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with some embodiments herein are illustrated in FIGS. 3B-3H. As shown in FIGS. 3B-C, addition of either TTT or TTTTT after the molecule index in accordance with some embodiments herein can reduce G-richness along the region (the length of non-G spacers can be variable, and can comprise any non-G nucleotide or nucleotides). In FIG. 3D, the sample index and molecule positions are switched (so that the molecule index is 5′ of the sample index), so that possible high G-rich MIs in at least a subset of unique oligonucleotide species would not be adjacent to potentially G-rich gene specific target regions. In FIGS. 3E-F, addition of either TTT or TTTTT to the configuration illustrated in FIG. 3D can further minimize potential G-rich regions. Without being limited by any theory, it is noted that that sample barcodes frequently can have low G contents (e.g. so as to be “non-G-rich”). It is further noted that the length of non-G spacers can be variable and can be any non-G nucleotide). In the configurations of FIGS. 3G-H, molecule barcodes comprise ‘HHHHHHHH’ or ‘HNHNHNHN,’ (in which H is A, C, or T, and in which any two H's can be the same or different from each other, and in which any two N's can be the same or different from each other).
In some embodiments, each of a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species (e.g., each of the unique oligonucleotide species) in a composition or method has a length of at least 24 nucleotides, for example at least 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 55, 60, 65, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, 125, 130, 135, or 140 nucleotides in length, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 24-140, 24-135, 24-130, 24-125, 24-120, 24-115, 24-110, 24-105, 24-100, 24-95, 24-90, 24-85, 24-80, 24-75, 24-70, 24-65, 24-60, 24-55, 24-50, 24-45, 24-40, 25-140, 25-135, 25-130, 25-125, 25-120, 25-115, 25-110, 25-105, 25-100, 25-95, 25-90, 25-85, 25-80, 25-75, 25-70, 25-65, 25-60, 25-55, 25-50, 25-45, 25-40, 27-140, 27-135, 27-130, 27-125, 27-120, 27-115, 27-110, 27-105, 27-100, 27-95, 27-90, 27-85, 27-80, 27-75, 27-70, 27-65, 27-60, 27-55, 27-50, 27-45, 27-40, 30-140, 30-135, 30-130, 30-125, 30-120, 30-115, 30-110, 30-105, 30-100, 30-95, 30-90, 30-85, 30-80, 30-75, 30-70, 30-65, 30-60, 30-55, 30-50, 30-45, 30-40, 35-140, 35-135, 35-130, 35-125, 35-120, 35-115, 35-110, 35-105, 35-100, 35-95, 35-90, 35-85, 35-80, 35-75, 35-70, 35-65, 35-60, 35-55, 35-50, 35-45, 35-40, 40-140, 40-135, 40-130, 40-125, 40-120, 40-115, 40-110, 40-105, 40-100, 40-95, 40-90, 40-85, 40-80, 40-75, 40-70, 40-65, 40-60, 40-55, 40-50, or 40-45 nucleotides in length. Optionally, different unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method have different lengths form each other. Optionally, all of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method have the same length as each other. Optionally, some unique oligonucleotide species in a composition or method are the same length as each other, while some unique oligonucleotide species are different lengths from each other.
In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of a 5′ to 3′ amplification sequence for a target nucleic acid, or class of target nucleic acids (this amplification sequence may also be referred to as a “target-specific” region). For example, if the target nucleic acids comprise mRNAs, the uniform region can comprise oligo dT. For example, if the target nucleic acids comprise variable regions of a T cell receptor, the uniform region can comprise sequences flanking variable regions of a T cell receptor mRNA. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises at least 10 nucleotides that are complementary to the target nucleic acid, for example at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides complementary to the target, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 10-30, 10-29, 10-28, 10-27, 10-26, 10-25, 10-24, 10-23, 10-22, 10-21, 10-20, 11-30, 11-29, 11-28, 11-27, 11-26, 11-25, 11-24, 11-23, 11-22, 11-21, 11-20, 12-30, 12-29, 12-28, 12-27, 12-26, 12-25, 12-24, 12-23, 12-22, 12-21, 12-20, 15-30, 15-29, 15-28, 15-27, 15-26, 15-25, 15-24, 15-23, 15-22, 15-21, 15-20, 20-30, 20-29, 20-28, 20-27, 20-26, 20-25, 20-24, 20-23, 20-22, or 20-21 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region that hybridizes to a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor, for example a variable region of a T cell receptor, a B cell receptor, or immunoglobulin, for example an antibody. It is noted that because B cell receptors comprise membrane-bound immunoglobulin, target-specific regions specific for immunoglobulin variable region coding sequences are typically suitable for amplifying B cell receptors as well as secreted immunoglobulins (e.g. antibodies). Both options are noted herein to clarify that amplification of membrane-bound immunoglobulins (B cell receptors) and also secreted immunoglobulins (antibodies) is contemplated. As used herein, it will be understood that when primers or uniform regions comprise target-specific regions that comprise “flanking sequences” (and variations of this root term, such as “sequences flanking”) of immune cell receptor and/or immunoglobulin variable regions, the target-specific regions will be understood to comprise at least one of (i) sequences that hybridize downstream (3′) of the sequence encoding the variable region and in particular hybridize to strand of the coding sequence, and thus are configured to produce a strand comprising the reverse complement of the variable region coding sequence upon extension in the 5′ to 3′ direction; or (ii) sequences that hybridize upstream (5′) of the sequence encoding the variable region and in particular hybridize to the strand complementary to that of the coding sequence, and thus are configured to produce a strand comprising the variable region coding sequence upon extension in the 5′ to 3′ direction. Thus, a flanking sequence can be configured for amplification of the variable region coding sequences in conjunction with a suitable priming partner (e.g. a flanking sequence on the other side of the variable region). It will be understood that a flanking sequences does not necessarily need to stop or start exactly where the coding sequence starts or stops, and thus, it is permissible for there to be intervening sequences between a hybridization site of a flanking sequence and the variable region coding sequence itself. It will be understood that while a flanking sequence will generally hybridize to a sequence outside of the variable region coding sequence so as to amplify a broad range of possible variable region coding sequences, in some embodiments, the variable region “flanking sequence” further comprises some sequence of the variable region itself, for example if a subset of possible variable regions is of interest. However, a “flanking sequence” as used herein does not require a single sequence to flank both sides of the variable region. Rather, it will be understood that when flanking sequences are mentioned in conjunction with compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides of some embodiments herein, 5′ and 3′ sequences comprising suitable primer pairs to amplify the variable region coding sequence are also expressly contemplated.
In some embodiments, a unique oligonucleotide species comprises a barcode region as described herein and also comprises a uniform region comprising a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor and/or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence. A second oligonucleotide primer can also be provided for the other side of the variable region coding sequence, so as to amplify the variable region sequence in conjunction with the target-specific region of the uniform region. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region, positioned 3′ of the barcode region, and comprising a sequence flanking an immunoglobulin variable region (and thus flanking a B cell receptor variable region as well as a corresponding antibody variable region), for example flanking the variable region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain locus, flanking the variable region of an immunoglobulin (light chain) kappa locus, or flanking the variable region of an immunoglobulin (light chain) lambda locus. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region, positioned 3′ of the barcode region, and comprising a sequence flanking at least one of a variable region of a T cell receptor alpha chain, a variable region of a T cell receptor beta chain, a variable region of a T cell receptor gamma chain, or a T cell receptor delta chain.
In some embodiments, a kit comprises a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described herein, in which the unique oligonucleotide species each comprise a uniform sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence as described herein. In some embodiments, the kit further comprises an oligonucleotide primer configured to hybridize to the opposite strand and on the other side of the variable region coding sequence compared to the uniform region, and is thus configured to amplify the variable region sequence in conjunction with the target-specific region of the uniform region. In some embodiments, the amplified sequence is at least 1 kb and comprises the variable coding sequence, for example at least 1 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, or 5 kb, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
It is noted the nucleic acids encoding variable regions of some immune cell receptors or immunoglobulins can be more than 1 kb long. For example, T cell receptor variable region sequences can comprise a CDR3 coding sequence that ends more than 1 kb away from where the CDR1 coding sequence begins. Without being limited by theory, it is noted that some conventional and next-generation sequencing approaches, for example sequencing by synthesis, are limited to short reads that are typically considerably less than 1 kb. Accordingly, it is contemplated that methods and compositions and kits in accordance with some embodiments herein can be useful for barcoding and analyzing nucleic acids encoding immune cell receptor and/or immunoglobulin variable regions, which otherwise would not be amenable to single-read sequencing of less than 1 kb. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence, is configured to amplify a sequence of at least 1 kb and comprising the variable region coding sequence, for example at least 1 kb, 2 kb, 3 kb, 4 kb, or 5 kb, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
Barcode Regions
In accordance with compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides of some embodiments herein, a barcode region comprises a nucleic acid sequence that is useful in identifying a nucleic acid, for example a target nucleic acid from a sample, or an amplicon or reverse-transcript derived from a single target nucleic acid of a sample. For example, two mRNA transcripts from a sample can be reverse-transcribed and barcoded so that nucleic acids corresponding to the first mRNA comprise a first barcode, and nucleic acids corresponding to the second mRNA comprise a second barcode. Upon sequencing (or other analysis), information about the individual mRNAs in the sample, for example copy number can be ascertained even after amplification. However, if a large population of mRNAs is stochastically labeled and some barcodes are represented more favorably (for example due to stability, amplification efficiency, etc.), bias can result, skewing the ability to quantify nucleic acids of a sample. As such, in accordance with some embodiments herein, each unique oligonucleotide species in a population can comprise a unique barcode region. The greater the diversity of barcodes, the greater the diversity of unique oligonucleotide species, and the greater the probability that a particular barcode sequence will be associated with only one target nucleic acid of a sample. The barcode region can be, for example, positioned 5′ of a uniform region on an oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, a barcode region comprises a molecule barcode as described herein. Optionally, a barcode region comprises a molecule barcode and a sample barcode as described herein. Optionally, a barcode region comprises a molecule barcode 5′ of a sample barcode. In some embodiments, methods or compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising molecule barcodes as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error. As used herein, a “molecule barcode” can also be referred to as a “molecular barcode,” “Molecular Index (MI)”, or Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI). As used herein, a “sample barcode,” can also be referred to as a “Sample Index (SI).”
A barcode region can comprise a molecule barcode. The molecule barcode can comprise a unique sequence, so that when multiple sample nucleic acids (which can be the same and/or different from each other) are associated one-to-one with molecule barcodes, different sample nucleic acids can differentiated from each other by the molecule barcodes. As such, even if a sample comprises two nucleic acids having the same sequence, each of these two nucleic acids can be labeled with a different molecule barcode, so that nucleic acids in the population can be quantified, even after amplification. The molecule barcode can comprise a nucleic acid sequence of at least 5 nucleotides, for example at least 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 5-50, 5-45, 5-40, 5-35, 5-30, 5-25, 5-20, 5-15, 5-14, 5-13, 5-12, 5-11, 5-10, 5-9, 5-8, 5-7, 5-6, 6-50, 6-45, 6-40, 6-35, 6-30, 6-25, 6-20, 6-15, 6-14, 6-13, 6-12, 6-11, 6-10, 6-9, 6-8, 6-7, 7-50, 7-45, 7-40, 7-35, 7-30, 7-25, 7-20, 7-15, 7-14, 7-13, 7-12, 7-11, 7-10, 7-9, 7-8, 8-50, 8-45, 8-40, 8-35, 8-30, 8-25, 8-20, 8-15, 8-14, 8-13, 8-12, 8-11, 8-10, 8-9, 9-50, 9-45, 9-40, 9-35, 9-30, 9-25, 9-20, 9-15, 9-14, 9-13, 9-12, 9-11, 9-10, 10-50, 10-45, 10-40, 10-35, 10-30, 10-25, 10-20, 10-15, 10-14, 10-13, 10-12, or 10-11 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid sequence of the molecule barcode comprises a unique sequence, for example, so that each unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprises a different molecule barcode. In some embodiments, two or more unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the same molecule barcode, but still differ from each other. For example, if the unique oligonucleotide species include sample barcodes, each unique oligonucleotide species with a particular sample barcode can comprise a different molecule barcode. In some embodiments, a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprises a molecule barcode diversity of at least 1000 different molecule barcodes, and thus at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprises a molecule barcode diversity of at least 6,500 different molecule barcodes, and thus at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprises a molecule barcode diversity of at least 65,000 different molecule barcodes, and thus at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
Without being limited by any theory, it is contemplated that a molecule barcode comprising a low G content (e.g., 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G) can minimize bias for a composition or pool of unique oligonucleotide species being used to barcode a population of nucleic acids (e.g. minimize bias that would preferentially amplify barcodes comprising a higher G content). It is noted that conventional barcoding approaches typically exhibit a bias in favor of higher G content. For example FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C illustrate samples of nucleotide usage in conventional molecule barcodes of compositions comprising numerous unique molecule barcodes for ES32, TRAC (FIG. 4A), ES32 TRBC (FIG. 4B), and ES32 OligodT (FIG. 4C). That is, if anything, conventional molecule barcodes and barcode regions, designed without respect to certain guidance provided herein, can comprise a higher G-content that would be expected by random chance. In some embodiments, methods or compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising molecule barcodes as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
In some embodiments, all of the molecule barcodes of a composition or composition used in the methods described herein comprise unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G, 10-45% G, 10-40% G, 10-35% G, 10-30% G, 10-25% G, 10-20% G, 10-15% G, 10-12.5% a G, 12.5-50% G, 12.5-45% G, 12.5-40% G, 12.5-35% G, 12.5-30% G, 12.5-25% G, 12.5-20% G, 12.5-15% G, 15-50% G, 15-45% G, 15-40% G, 15-35% G, 15-30% G, 15-25% G, 15-20% G, 20-50% G, 20-45% G, 20-40% G, 20-35% G, 20-30% G, or 20-25% G. By “all of the molecule barcodes of a composition of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of . . . ”, it is meant that if the total G content among all of molecule barcodes in the whole composition was calculated (e.g., a population of at least 10, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 6500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species), this total G content of the sum total of the barcodes would fall below the recited values or within the recited ranges. While it would still be possible for an individual unique oligonucleotide species to have a molecule barcode with a G content above the indicated value or outside the indicated range, the collective nucleotide content of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition would be below the indicated value or within the indicated range. In some embodiments, all of the molecule barcodes in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, all of the molecule barcodes in a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, all of the molecule barcodes in a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, all of the barcode regions of the composition as described herein collectively have a G content of less than 50% as described herein.
In some embodiments, for a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species (or such a composition used in a method), the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a molecule barcode G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G, 10-45% G, 10-40% G, 10-35% G, 10-30% G, 10-25% G, 10-20% G, 10-15% G, 10-12.5% G, 12.5-50% G, 12.5-45% G, 12.5-40% G, 12.5-35% G, 12.5-30% G, 12.5-25% G, 12.5-20% G, 12.5-15% G, 15-50% G, 15-45% G, 15-40% G, 15-35% G, 15-30% G, 15-25% G, 15-20% G, 20-50% G, 20-45% G, 20-40% G, 20-35% G, 20-30% G, or 20-25% G. By “the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have a molecule barcodes G content less than . . . ”, it is mean that each or essentially each of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool have a molecule barcode G content below the indicated value, or outside the indicated range. That is, for a composition, population, or pool “consisting essentially of” unique oligonucleotide species that each have the indicated G content, it would be possible for an analytically insignificant portion of the unique oligonucleotides in the composition to have molecule barcodes with a G content above the indicated value or outside the recited range. For example, the analytically insignificant portion of the unique oligonucleotides can be, or can be no more than, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, or less of the unique oligonucleotide in a composition. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have the a G content of greater than 50%. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 50%. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 50%. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 25%. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 25%. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a molecule barcode having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of greater than 25%. Optionally, none of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition collectively have a G content of greater than 50% G, for example, all of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
In some embodiments, the composition as described herein (or such a composition as used in a method) consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a barcode region G content of less than 50% as described herein. In some embodiments, for a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species, the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a barcode region G content of 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G, 10-45% G, 10-40% G, 10-35% G, 10-30% G, 10-25% G, 10-20% G, 10-15% G, 10-12.5% G, 12.5-50% G, 12.5-45% G, 12.5-40% G, 12.5-35% G, 12.5-30% G, 12.5-25% G, 12.5-20% G, 12.5-15% G, 15-50% G, 15-45% G, 15-40% G, 15-35% G, 15-30% G, 15-25% G, 15-20% G, 20-50% G, 20-45% G, 20-40% G, 20-35% G, 20-30% G, or 20-25% G. By “the composition consists of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have a barcode regions G content less than . . . ”, it is mean that each or essentially each of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool have a barcode region G content below the indicated value, or outside the indicated range. That is, for a composition, population, or pool “consisting essentially of” unique oligonucleotide species that each have the indicated G content, it would be possible for an analytically insignificant portion of the unique oligonucleotides in the composition to have barcode regions with a G content above the indicated value or outside the recited range. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 50%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 25%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 50%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species in a composition, population, or pool of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotides comprise a barcode region having a G content of greater than 25%, for example less than 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.001%, or 0.0001% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content greater than 25%, including ranges between any two of the listed values. Optionally, none of the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition collectively have a G content of greater than 50% G, for example, all of the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
In some embodiments, the composition (or such a composition as used in a method) consist of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have a molecule barcode comprising the sequence of at least three repeats of the doublet “HN” (in which each “H” is any of A, C, or T, and in which “N” is any of A, G, C, or T), for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. Examples of multiple repeats of the doublet “HN” include HN, HNHN, HNHNHN, and HNHNHNHN. It is noted that while the formula “HN” describes constraints on the base content, not every H or every N has to be the same or different. For example, if the molecule barcodes of unique oligonucleotide species in a composition comprised HNHNHN, one molecule barcode can comprise the sequence ACTGCA, while another molecule barcode can comprise the sequence TAACTA, while another molecule barcode could comprise the sequence AGACAC. It is noted that any number of repeats of the doublet “HN” would have a G content of no more than 50%. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a of composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of a composition comprising at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising at least three repeats of the doublet “HN,” for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 repeats, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, the composition consists of or consists essentially of at least 1000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species that each have a molecule barcode comprising the sequence HNHNHN. In some embodiments, the composition consists of or consists essentially of of at least 1000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species that each has a molecule barcode comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN. In some embodiments, at least 95%, 99%, or 99.9% of the barcode regions of the composition as described herein comprise at least three repeats of the doublet “HN” as described herein. Without being limited by any theory, it is noted that having a relatively large number of available nucleotides sequences for molecule barcodes can be helpful when barcoding a population of target nucleic acids from a sample, for example to increase the diversity of barcodes within a given sequence length along with the probability that each target nucleic acid will be uniquely labeled, while minimizing oligonucleotide species size. It is noted that limiting the G content of molecule barcodes and/or barcode regions can limit the diversity of these barcodes and barcode regions by decreasing the number of available nucleotides from which barcodes can be constructed (and the number of available different sequences per length of nucleic acid). As such, having some G′ s in molecule barcodes or barcode regions in accordance with various embodiments herein can be helpful in increasing diversity, while limiting the G content can be helpful minimizing bias. It is noted, and has been observed (see Example 2 and FIGS. 6-7 ) that sequences comprising repeated “HN” doublets can yield low bias, while providing a compromise between reducing bias and maintaining a relatively large quantity of available nucleotide sequences, so that relatively high diversity can be obtained in a relatively short sequence, while still minimizing bias. In some embodiments, methods or compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising molecule barcodes comprising repeated “HN” doublets as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
In some embodiments, the composition (or such a composition as used in a method) comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each comprise a molecule barcode comprising at least six consecutive “H's” (in which each “H” is any of A, C, or T), for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. It is noted that while the formula “H” describes constraints on the base content, not every H has to be the same (or different). For example, if the molecule barcodes of unique oligonucleotide species in a population each comprised the sequence HHHH, one molecule barcode of a unique oligonucleotide species could comprise ACTA, one molecule barcode of another unique oligonucleotide species could comprise TTAC, and one molecule barcode of another unique oligonucleotide species could comprise ACAT. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 95% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99.9% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 95% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 6500 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99.9% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 95% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, a composition comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species, of which at least 99.9% comprise a molecule barcode that comprises at least six consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 alternating H's and N's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
In some embodiments, at least 95% (e.g., 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more) of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition as described herein (or such a composition as used in a method) comprise barcode regions comprising at least 6 consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values as described herein. In some embodiments, at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition as described herein comprise barcode regions comprising at least 6 consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values as described herein. In some embodiments, at least 99.9% of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition as described herein comprise barcode regions comprising at least 6 consecutive H's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values as described herein.
In some embodiments, the sample barcode of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less, for example 50% or less, 40% or less, 25% or less, 20% or less, 12.5% or less, 10% or less, or 5% or less, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
In some embodiments, the barcode region of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of 50% or less, for example 50% or less, 40% or less, 25% or less, 20% or less, 12.5% or less, 10% or less, or 5% or less, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%, for example less than 12.5%, less than 10%, less than 7.5%, less than 5%, less than 2.5%, or less than 1%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%, for example less than 12.5%, less than 10%, less than 7.5%, less than 5%, less than 2.5%, or less than 1%, including ranges between any two of the listed values.
In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, for at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, for all or substantially all of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
Each barcode region can optionally comprise a sample barcode. In accordance with compositions, methods, and oligonucleotides of some embodiments herein, each unique oligonucleotide species in a pool can comprise the same sample barcode, but there can be two or more pools that are each associated with different sample barcodes. As such, all or essentially all of the unique oligonucleotide species in pool #1 can comprise sample barcode #1, and all or essentially all of the unique oligonucleotide species in pool #2 can comprise sample barcode #2. Nucleic acids from a first sample can be associated with the unique oligonucleotide species in pool #1, and nucleic acids from a second sample can associated with unique oligonucleotide species in pool #2, for example by hybridization and amplification. As such, all or essentially all of the amplified nucleic acids corresponding to the first sample will comprise sample barcode #1 (but can comprise different molecule barcodes), and all of the amplified nucleic acids corresponding to the second sample will comprise sample barcode #2. In some embodiments, there are at least 24, 48, 96, or 192 pools.
The sample barcode can comprise a nucleic acid sequence of at least 3 nucleotides, for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 3-50, 3-45, 3-40, 3-35, 3-30, 3-25, 3-20, 3-15, 3-14, 3-13, 3-12, 3-11, 3-10, 3-9, 3-8, 3-7, 3-6, 3-5, 3-4, 4-50, 4-45, 4-40, 4-35, 4-30, 4-25, 4-20, 4-15, 4-14, 4-13, 4-12, 4-11, 4-10, 4-9, 4-8, 4-7, 4-6, 4-5, 5-50, 5-45, 5-40, 5-35, 5-30, 5-25, 5-20, 5-15, 5-14, 5-13, 5-12, 5-11, 5-10, 5-9, 5-8, 5-7, 5-6, 6-50, 6-45, 6-40, 6-35, 6-30, 6-25, 6-20, 6-15, 6-14, 6-13, 6-12, 6-11, 6-10, 6-9, 6-8, 6-7, 7-50, 7-45, 7-40, 7-35, 7-30, 7-25, 7-20, 7-15, 7-14, 7-13, 7-12, 7-11, 7-10, 7-9, 7-8, 8-50, 8-45, 8-40, 8-35, 8-30, 8-25, 8-20, 8-15, 8-14, 8-13, 8-12, 8-11, 8-10, 8-9, 9-50, 9-45, 9-40, 9-35, 9-30, 9-25, 9-20, 9-15, 9-14, 9-13, 9-12, 9-11, 9-10, 10-50, 10-45, 10-40, 10-35, 10-30, 10-25, 10-20, 10-15, 10-14, 10-13, 10-12, or 10-11 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid sequence of the sample barcode comprises a unique sequence, for example, so that each unique oligonucleotide species in a population comprises a different molecule barcode.
Without being limited by any theory, it is contemplated that a sample barcode comprising a low G content (e.g., less than 50% G, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G) can be positioned 3′ of a sample barcode that comprises a relatively higher G content and 5′ of a uniform region (e.g. a target-specific sequence or oligo dT sequence), so as to minimize bias by separating the relatively G-rich sample barcode from the uniform region. In some embodiments, the barcode region comprises a sample barcode comprising 50% G content or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G, 10-45% G, 10-40% G, 10-35% G, 10-30% G, 10-25% G, 10-20% G, 10-15% G, 10-12.5% G, 12.5-50% G, 12.5-45% G, 12.5-40% G, 12.5-35% G, 12.5-30% G, 12.5-25% G, 12.5-20% G, 12.5-15% G, 15-50% G, 15-45% G, 15-40% G, 15-35% G, 15-30% G, 15-25% G, 15-20% G, 20-50% G, 20-45% G, 20-40% G, 20-35% G, 20-30% G, or 20-25% G.
In some embodiments, for a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species (or such a composition as used in a method), at least 95% of the sample barcodes of the unique oligonucleotides of the composition each have less than 50% G content, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G, 10-45% G, 10-40% G, 10-35% G, 10-30% G, 10-25% G, 10-20% G, 10-15% G, 10-12.5% G, 12.5-50% G, 12.5-45% G, 12.5-40% G, 12.5-35% G, 12.5-30% G, 12.5-25% G, 12.5-20% G, 12.5-15% G, 15-50% G, 15-45% G, 15-40% G, 15-35% G, 15-30% G, 15-25% G, 15-20% G, 20-50% G, 20-45% G, 20-40% G, 20-35% G, 20-30% G, or 20-25% G.
In some embodiments, for a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species (or such a composition as used in a method), at least 99% of the sample barcodes of the unique oligonucleotides of the composition each have 50% G content or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2.5-50% G, 2.5-45% G, 2.5-40% G, 2.5-35% G, 2.5-30% G, 2.5-25% G, 2.5-20% G, 2.5-15% G, 2.5-10% G, 2.5-7.5% G, 2.5-5% G, 5-50% G, 5-45% G, 5-40% G, 5-35% G, 5-30% G, 5-25% G, 5-20% G, 5-15% G, 5-10% G, 5-7.5% G, 7.5-50% G, 7.5-45% G, 7.5-40% G, 7.5-35% G, 7.5-30% G, 7.5-25% G, 7.5-20% G, 7.5-15% G, 7.5-10% G, 10-50% G, 10-45% G, 10-40% G, 10-35% G, 10-30% G, 10-25% G, 10-20% G, 10-15% G, 10-12.5% G, 12.5-50% G, 12.5-45% G, 12.5-40% G, 12.5-35% G, 12.5-30% G, 12.5-25% G, 12.5-20% G, 12.5-15% G, 15-50% G, 15-45% G, 15-40% G, 15-35% G, 15-30% G, 15-25% G, 15-20% G, 20-50% G, 20-45% G, 20-40% G, 20-35% G, 20-30% G, or 20-25% G. That is, within the population of unique oligonucleotides, less than 1% of the sample barcodes have G content greater than 50%. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition consist of or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species that each have sample barcodes having less than 50% G content, as described herein.
In some embodiments, a barcode region is positioned 5′ of the uniform region without any intervening sequences between the barcode region and the uniform region. In some embodiments, the barcode region is positioned 5′ of a spacer, which is positioned 5′ of the the uniform region, so that a spacer is between the barcode region and the uniform region. Optionally, the spacer has a low G content (e.g., 50% G or less, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G). The spacer can have a length of at least 1 nucleotide, for example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 1-50, 1-45, 1-35, 1-30, 1-25, 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-9, 1-8, 1-7, 1-6, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, 1-2, 2-50, 2-45, 2-35, 2-30, 2-25, 2-20, 2-15, 2-10, 2-9, 2-8, 2-7, 2-6, 2-5, 2-4, 2-3, 3-50, 3-45, 3-35, 3-30, 3-25, 3-20, 3-15, 3-10, 3-9, 3-8, 3-7, 3-6, 3-5, 3-4, 4-50, 4-45, 4-35, 4-30, 4-25, 4-20, 4-15, 4-10, 4-9, 4-8, 4-7, 4-6, 4-5, 5-50, 5-45, 5-35, 5-30, 5-25, 5-20, 5-15, 5-10, 5-9, 5-8, 5-7, 5-6, 6-50, 6-45, 6-35, 6-30, 6-25, 6-20, 6-15, 6-10, 6-9, 6-8, 6-7, 7-50, 7-45, 7-35, 7-30, 7-25, 7-20, 7-15, 7-10, 7-9, 7-8, 8-50, 8-45, 8-35, 8-30, 8-25, 8-20, 8-15, 8-10, 8-9, 9-50, 9-45, 9-35, 9-30, 9-25, 9-20, 9-15, 9-10, 10-50, 10-45, 10-35, 10-30, 10-25, 10-20, or 10-15 nucleotides. In some embodiments, the spacer can comprise at least two consecutive non-G nucleotides (denoted as “H”, in which “H” is A, C, or T), for example at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 consecutive H's, including ranges between any two of the listed values, for example 2-20, 2-15, 2-10, 2-9, 2-8, 2-7, 2-6, 2-5, 2-4, 2-3, 3-20, 3-15, 3-10, 3-9, 3-8, 3-7, 3-6, 3-5, 3-4, 4-20, 4-15, 4-10, 4-9, 4-8, 4-7, 4-6, 4-5, 5-20, 5-15, 5-10, 5-9, 5-8, 5-7, 5-6, 6-20, 6-15, 6-10, 6-9, 6-8, or 6-7. In some embodiments, the nucleotides of the spacers are Ts. For example, the space can comprise a poly-T sequence, such as TT, TTT, TTTT, TTTTT, TTTTTT, TTTTTTTT, or TTTTTTTTTT. It noted that the spacers do not necessarily provide diversity, and as such, in a composition comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described herein, some or all of the unique oligonucleotide species can have the same spacer sequences. Optionally, all of the unique oligonucleotide species of the composition comprise the same spacer sequence.
Pools and Pooling
Compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described in accordance with compositions and methods of some embodiments herein can be disposed in spatially isolated pools, for example so that multiple sample can be analyzed, with one sample per pool. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially isolated pools, each pool comprising a plurality of unique oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species, so that unique oligonucleotides in the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and so that different unique oligonucleotides of the same pool comprise a different molecule barcode sequences. As used herein, “spatial isolation” (and variations of this root term) means that target nucleic acids of a sample can hybridize to the unique oligonucleotide species of the pool without substantially cross-reacting with other pools, and without the unique oligonucleotide species of the pool substantially hybridizing to target nucleic acids of other samples. As such, the sample barcode can identify which pool a given unique oligonucleotide species came from. Moreover, upon barcoding target nucleic acid sequences with unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode can identify which pool a barcoded target nucleic acid sequence (or reverse transcript or amplicon thereof) came from.
In some embodiments, a substrate organizes the pools so that they are spatially isolated from each other. For example, a multi-well plate can organize spatially isolated pools, so that each pool is in a separate well. For example, each pool can be immobilized on a different bead. Optionally, each well of a multi-well plate can contain a single bead on which the pool of unique oligonucleotide species is immobilized, so that a different pool of unique oligonucleotide species is positioned in each well of the multi-well plate.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 2 pools, for example, at least 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 60, 70, 72, 96, 99, 100, 110, 120, 144, 168, or 192, pools, including ranges between any two of the listed values. Optionally, there can be at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 2 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 24 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 48 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least 96 pools, and there are at least 100 unique oligonucleotides per pool for example at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 6500, 10,000, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species per pool.
Substrates
Unique oligonucleotide species in accordance with compositions and methods of some embodiments herein can be immobilized on substrates, for example beads, wells of multi-well plates, or arrays. For example, unique oligonucleotide species having the same sample barcode, but different molecule barcodes can all be immobilized on a substrate, such as on a single bead, or in a single well of a multi-well plate. As such, when the immobilized unique oligonucleotide species of a particular substrate are contacted with a particular sample, such as a single cell, the immobilized unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on that substrate will be associated with target nucleic acids of the same sample. If the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on the same substrate have the same sample barcode, while those on other substrates have different sample barcodes, the sample associated with each target nucleic acid can be readily identified (e.g. all of the unique oligonucleotide species on substrate #1 have sample barcode #1, all of the unique oligonucleotide species on substrate #2 have sample barcode #2).
In some embodiments, such configurations in which unique oligonucleotide species are immobilized on a substrate can be helpful in facilitating efficiency and throughput. For example, single cells can be added to wells of a multi-well plate, so that no more than one single cell is in each well. If the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized within a given well (for example, on the well or on a bead) comprise a unique sample barcode, barcoded target nucleic acids and reverse-transcripts and amplicons thereof corresponding to the single cell can be identified and quantified, even if barcoded reverse transcripts or amplicons from multiple samples are pooled.
A substrate can comprise a type of solid support. A substrate can refer to a continuous solid or semi-solid surface on which the methods of the disclosure may be performed. A substrate can refer to an array, a cartridge, a chip, a device, and a slide, for example. As such, “solid support” and “substrate” can be used interchangeably.
A substrate or solid support in accordance with some embodiments herein can encompass any type of solid, porous, or hollow sphere, ball, bearing, cylinder, or other similar configuration composed of plastic, ceramic, metal, or polymeric material (e.g., hydrogel) onto which a nucleic acid may be immobilized (e.g., covalently or non-covalently). A substrate or solid support can comprise a discrete particle that may be spherical (e.g., microspheres) or have a non-spherical or irregular shape, such as cubic, cuboid, pyramidal, cylindrical, conical, oblong, or disc-shaped, and the like. A plurality of solid supports spaced in an array may not comprise a substrate. A solid support may be used interchangeably with the term “bead.”
In some embodiments, a plurality of substrates is provided, and the diversity of sample barcodes can be represented in the plurality of substrates, so that unique substrates can comprise unique sample barcodes.
Methods of Barcoding
In accordance with some embodiments herein, methods of specifically barcoding nucleic acids from two or more samples are described. Each sample can comprise nucleic acids. The method can comprise contacting each sample with a pool comprising a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species, as described herein. Each sample can be contacted in spatial isolation from the other samples. The unique polynucleotide species of each pool can comprise the same sample barcode and comprise different molecule barcodes. The method can include hybridizing target specific regions of at least some oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species to at least some of the nucleic acids of the sample. The method can include extending the hybridized oligonucleotides so as to produce strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target region. Thus, for each sample, the produced strands can comprise the same sample barcode and different molecule barcodes. For different samples, the sample barcodes can be different. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist of or consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species wherein each molecule barcode has a G content of less than 50%. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. Optionally each pool comprises at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, for example at least 100, 500, 100, 500, 1000, 2000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. Such methods in accordance with some embodiments herein can barcode nucleic acids of two or more different samples, such as single-cell sample, so as to permit analysis and quantification of the nucleic acids of a single cell.
Optionally, each sample is contacted with a single pool of unique oligonucleotide species in spatial isolation from the other pools and samples. In some embodiments, the pools are spatially isolated by being in unique contained spaces, for example different wells of a multi-well plate, different test tubes, different microfluidic channels, or the like. In some embodiments, the pools are spatially isolated by being on different regions of a surface, for example reaction dots on an array.
The oligonucleotides can be contacted with target nucleic acids of the sample under standard hybridization conditions (e.g., in standard buffers, and at a temperature lower than the Tm of a portion of the uniform region that is complementary to the target nucleic acid). Optionally, for example if the target nucleic acids comprise RNAs, the target nucleic acids of the sample are reverse-transcribed after hybridization to the unique oligonucleotide species, so as to generate DNAs (e.g. cDNAs). Optionally, the products of the hybridization or reverse transcription reaction are amplified, so as to generate a library of DNAs. The amplification can be via PCR under standard conditions, or via other suitable methods, for example isothermal amplification, rolling circle amplification, and the like. Optionally, the amplification can comprise amplifying reverse-transcripts or hybridized nucleic acids with a polymerase having 5′ to 3′ activity. Optionally, the products of the amplification can be further analyzed, for example by sequence. Optionally, reverse transcripts or amplicons from different pools can be pooled for sequencing, as different sample barcodes will indicate the corresponding pool (and sample) of each individual barcoded nucleic acid. It is noted that there may be bias in favor of G-rich molecule barcode or unique oligonucleotide species, and methods in accordance with some embodiments herein can minimize or eliminate such bias. By way of example, when quantifying nucleic acids of the sample at the single nucleic acid level, it can be useful to minimize or eliminate such bias that could favor representation of some nucleic acids and skew quantitative results in favor of certain kinds of barcodes rather than representative target nucleic acids of the sample. In some embodiments, methods comprising unique oligonucleotide species as described herein reduce bias by increasing sensitivity, decreasing relative standard error, or increasing sensitivity and reducing standard error.
Optionally, the method can further comprise ascertaining nucleic acid sequences of the strands comprising the oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species and the sequence complementary to the target. For example, reverse transcripts, amplicons, and/or cDNA libraries generated from the hybridization and extension of the unique oligonucleotide probes can be sequenced. Any suitable sequencing method known in the art can be used, preferably high-throughput approaches. For example, cyclic array sequencing using platforms such as Roche 454, Illumina Solexa, ABI-SOLiD, ION Torrent, Complete Genomics, Pacific Bioscience, Helicos, or the Polonator platform, may also be utilized. Sequencing may comprise MiSeq sequencing. Sequencing may comprise HiSeq sequencing. If applicable, the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise adapters to mediate high-throughput sequencing, for example universal priming sites. Optionally, barcoded nucleic acids corresponding to two or more different samples (e.g. from two or more different pools) can be pooled or combined for sequencing. Optionally, all of the pools are combined or pooled for sequencing. Without being limited by any theory, it is noted that sample barcodes can identify the corresponding sample (or pool) of the combined barcoded nucleic acids, that combining or pooling the nucleic acids can facilitate throughput and/or resource utilization for sequencing, and that accurate barcoding in accordance with some embodiments herein can minimize or eliminate bias, even when a large number of different nucleic acids are analyzed.
In some embodiments, the barcode region of each pool comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides as described herein, for example at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleotides, including ranges between any two of the listed values. Optionally, the sample barcode is positioned 3′ of the molecule barcode. Optionally, the molecule barcode is positioned 3′ of the sample barcode. Optionally, the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the same sample barcode, which can be a different sample barcode from the unique oligonucleotide species of other pools. Optionally, the sample barcode has a low G content as described herein, for example less than 50% G, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G. Optionally, at least 95%, 99%, or 99.9% of the sample barcodes have a low G content as described herein. Optionally, each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the molecule barcode and 5′ of the uniform region as described herein.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample consist essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecule barcode has a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample comprise molecule barcodes having a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample comprise molecule barcodes having a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, all of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species contacted with the sample comprise molecule barcodes having a G content of less than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 50% G, for example, less than 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region. Optionally, the uniform region comprises at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence (e.g., at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides complementary to the target, including ranges between any two of the listed values), and configured for 5′ to 3′ amplification of the target nucleic acid sequence. Optionally, the uniform region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate as described herein, so that the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on a given substrate comprise the same sample barcode, and different unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on the substrate comprise different molecule barcodes. By way of example, substrates can include wells in multi-well plates (e.g. 24-, 48, and 96-well plates), spots on an array, beads, and the like. In some embodiments, at least 100 unique oligonucleotides are immobilized on each substrate. Optionally, all of the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on a given substrate (and thus in the same pool) comprise the same sample barcode. In some embodiments, each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less, for example 50% or less, 40% or less, 25% or less, 20% or less, 12.5% or less, 10% or less, or 5% or less.
In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of less than 12.5%, for example less than 12.5%, less than 10%, less than 7.5%, less than 5%, less than 2.5%, or less than 1%.
In some embodiments, the barcode regions of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%, for example no more than 12.5%, no more than 10%, no more than 7.5%, no more than 5%, no more than 2.5%, or no more than 1%.
In some embodiments, for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. For example, for at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99%, of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode can be not-adjacent to another G.
In some embodiments, each pool consists of, or consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise a sequence totaling at least 6 alternating H's and N's, for example at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 alternating H's and N's, including ranges between any two of the listed values. By way of example, 6 alternating H's and N's can be depicted as HNHNHN. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N.
In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. For example at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN.
In some embodiments, at least 99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. For example at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH.
In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HNH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HHH. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
In some embodiments, at least one pool comprises at least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no pool comprises two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
In some embodiments, the target specific region can comprise a sequence for 5′ to 3′ amplification of a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode.
In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
In some embodiments, at least 48 unique samples are each contacted with a different pool of unique oligonucleotide species. For example, at least 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, or 192 samples can each be contacted with a different pool. For example each sample can be contacted with a different pool of unique oligonucleotide species in a well of a multi-well plate.
In some embodiments, at least 99% of the samples comprise no more than one cell each. For example, at least 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the samples can comprise no more than one cell. By way of example, a solution comprising multiple cells can be diluted to an appropriate concentration so that there is a suitably high probability that each sample comprises no more than one cell.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate. As such, each pool can be identified by a particular sample barcode. It is noted that different substrates (and as such, different pools) can be associated with different sample barcodes. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a spatially isolated region of a surface, so that the substrates of different pools comprise the different spatially isolated regions of the surface. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a well in a multi-well plate. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a bead.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species further comprises an adapter configured to immobilize the unique oligonucleotide on the substrate, wherein said barcode region is 3′ of the adapter. Optionally, each adapter can comprise a universal priming site, for example for use in sequencing.
Methods of Making Compositions Comprising Unique Oligonucleotide Species
In accordance with some embodiments herein, methods of making a composition comprising unique oligonucleotides are described. The method can comprise providing a plurality of different sample barcodes as described herein. The method can comprise providing a plurality of different molecule barcodes as described herein. The method can comprise synthesizing a plurality of unique oligonucleotide species as described herein, in which each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a barcode region comprising a sample barcode and a molecule barcode as described herein. The method can comprise disposing the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species in spatially-isolated pools. Each pool can comprises multiple unique oligonucleotide species, so that the unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and so that different unique oligonucleotide species of the same pool comprise different molecule barcode sequences. Optionally, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in the spatially-isolated pools concurrent with synthesis. Optionally, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in the spatially-isolated pools after synthesis. Optionally, the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50%. Optionally, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. Optionally, the composition consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecular barcode has a G content of less than 50 and the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%. In some embodiments, each spatially-isolated pool comprises at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, for example, at least 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000, 6500, or 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each spatially-isolated pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species.
The unique oligonucleotides can be synthesized using any of a number of suitable methods. In some embodiments, the sample barcode sequences and molecule barcode sequences are generated in silico, and unique oligonucleotide species comprising the sample barcode sequences and molecule barcode sequences together are synthesized, for example using chemical oligonucleotide synthesis. In some embodiments, a plurality of oligonucleotides comprising the same sample barcode sequence are pooled in spatial isolation, and joined with a plurality of oligonucleotides comprising molecule barcodes, for example via hybridization and extension, or via ligation. Such an approach can be performed in multiple spatially isolated environments in parallel, or sequentially, to achieve multiple unique oligonucleotide species.
Optionally, each unique oligonucleotide species further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region as described herein. Optionally, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region. In some embodiments, the target-specific region comprises at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid (e.g., at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides complementary to the target, including ranges between any two of the listed values), and configured for 5′ to 3′ amplification of the target nucleic acid sequence. Optionally, the uniform region comprises an oligo dT sequence.
In some embodiments, the plurality of molecule barcodes (and as such, the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species) consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species in which each molecular barcode has a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of at least 99% of the unique oligonucleotide species have a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, all of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species have molecule barcodes having a G content of no more than 50% as described herein, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of each unique oligonucleotide species has a G content of no more than 50%, for example, less than 50% G, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 50% G, for example, less than 50%, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
In some embodiments, each sample barcode has a G content of 50% or less as described herein, for example, less than 50%, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G content, or 0% G content.
In some embodiments, the sample barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 50% G, for example, less than 50%, 45% G, 40% G, 35% G, 30% G, 25% G, 20% G, 15% G, 12.5% G, 10% G, 7.5% G, 5% G, or 2.5% G, or 0% G, including ranges between any two of the listed values. In some embodiments, the sample barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
In some embodiments, for at least 95% (e.g., at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99%) of the of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G. In some embodiments, the plurality of unique oligonucleotide species consists essentially of unique oligonucleotide species for which any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
In some embodiments, at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. For example at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HNHNHNHN.
In some embodiments, at least 99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise molecule barcodes comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T. For example at least 95%, 96%, 97,%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, or 99.99% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H. In some embodiments, each molecule barcode of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises the sequence HHHHHHHH.
In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HNH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HHH. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN. Optionally, the spacer can comprise the sequence HHHHHHHH. It is noted that each H can be the same as, or different from any other H, and that each N can be the same as, or different from any other N. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and in which each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T. In some embodiments, unique oligonucleotide comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, the spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, in which each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
In some embodiments, at least one pool comprises least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, no pool comprises two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
In some embodiments, the target-specific region can comprise a sequence for 5′ to 3′ amplification of a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, the target specific region comprises a sequence flanking a sequence encoding a variable region of an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin.
In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the molecule barcode is 3′ of the sample barcode. In some embodiments, for each unique oligonucleotide species, the sample barcode is 3′ of the molecule barcode.
In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of at least 24 nucleotides. In some embodiments, each unique oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species. In some embodiments, each pool comprises at least 65,000 unique oligonucleotide species.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises immobilizing the unique oligonucleotide species of each spatially-distinct pool on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the unique oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate. As such, each pool can be identified by a particular sample barcode. It is noted that different substrates (and as such, different pools) can be associated with different sample barcodes. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a discrete region of a surface, so that the substrates of different pools comprise the different discrete regions of the surface. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a well in a multi-well plate. In some embodiments, the substrate comprises a bead. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are immobilized on the substrate by a covalent bond. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are immobilized on the substrate by a magnetic or electromagnetic force. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are imbedded in the substrate, so as to immobilize them on the substrate.
In some embodiments, at least 48 spatially-distinct pools are made, for example at least 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, or 192 spatially-distinct pools.
In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools concurrent with said synthesis. In some embodiments, the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in spatially-isolated pools after said synthesis.
Oligonucleotides
In some embodiments, an oligonucleotide comprising a barcode region 3′ of the adapter region is described. The barcode region can comprise a molecule barcode as described herein, in which the molecule barcode has a G content of no more than 50%. The molecule barcode can comprise at least 7 nucleotides.
In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises a sample barcode as described herein. The sample barcode can comprise at least 3 nucleotides.
In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid as described herein. In some embodiments, the uniform region comprises an oligo dT sequence. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises an adapter region 5′ of the barcode region. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide further comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the uniform region as described herein.
Alternative Embodiments
In some embodiments, designs for accurate and unbiased barcoding of nucleic acid transcripts are provided. These primer designs are composed of nucleic acid sequences (DNA, RNA, or LNA) that can target specific nucleic acid (DNA/RNA) transcripts via a gene-specific approach, or target a large set of nucleic acid transcripts (e.g. via poly-A tail of messenger RNAs or other consensus sequences) (FIGS. 1A-C). Along with the target sequences, these primers include two categories of nucleic acid barcodes: 1) molecule barcodes, also called “molecular barcodes,” Molecular Index (MI) or Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI) and 2) sample barcodes, also called Sample Index (SI) (FIGS. 1A-C). The MI and SI barcodes are used to uniquely label for identification of its original target transcript via the MI, and its sample origin (SI) after library preparation for next generation sequencing or other sequence readout and barcode readout methods. Some embodiments detail different arrangements of MI and Sls within the primer that ensure unbiased and random labelling of barcodes to target transcripts for accurate gene expression profiling (see, e.g. FIGS. 3A-3H) (see Fu et al. 2011 PNAS 108: 9026-9032, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for discussion of random labelling).
In some embodiments, designs unique primer designs that can reduce ‘barcode bias,’ which is a phenomenon that is observed in the prior art designs, whereby with barcodes with high G-nucleotide content is more oftenly used compared to other barcode compositions (FIG. 4 ). In certain cases where conventional primers are used to target and label mRNA transcripts using a gene-specific sequence, MIs with high % G content and multiple G's are preferably observed (FIG. 4 ). Moreover, without being limited by any theory, in conventional designs, SIs associated with no target genes observes small amounts of PCR errors due to these primers cross reacting during a sample multiplex PCR (FIGS. 4-5 ). These crossover events often happen with primers with high % G content and multiple G's, possibly due unique secondary structure called “G-Quaduplexes” in G-rich oligonucleotides. Because these G-rich MI/SI primers can form inter- and intra-molecular complexes with one another, conventional DNA cleanup steps to remove primers (e.g. Ampure XP beads) may not be sufficient. To minimize these events from happening, this invention entails several designs that reduces primer G content to minimize ‘barcode bias’ and the primer crossover are provided (FIGS. 3A-3H).
FIGS. 3A-3H show the design of prior art barcode layout (FIG. 3A) and novel designs to minimize bias as described (FIGS. 3B-H). In FIG. 3A, the conventional design allows for either the MI composition of ‘BBBBBBV’ or ‘NNNNNNNN’ (B is C,G, or T; V is A,C, or G; N is A,T,G, or C). A subset of the prior design MI barcode would be G-rich. In panel 3B-C, addition of either TTT or TTTTT after the MI to reduce G-richness along the region (length of non-G spacers can be variable, and can be any non-G nucleotide). In FIG. 3D, SI and MI positions are switched, so that high G-rich MIs would not be adjacent to potentially G-rich gene specific target regions. In FIGS. 3E-F, addition of either TTT or TTTTT to FIG. 3D design to further reduce G-rich regions (note that SIs are not G-rich, and the length of non-G spacers can be variable and can be any non-G nucleotide). In FIGS. 3G-H designs, MIs are designed to not be G-rich by using ‘HHHHHHHH’ or ‘HNHNHNHN,’ where H is A, C, or T.
The G-rich drawbacks of conventional designs are most observed gene-specific targeting method is used. Some embodiments include the use of the new primer designs in gene-specific target panels, such as T cell receptors (TCR), where primers are used to target TCR-specific sequences. Designs in accordance with some embodiments herein can alleviate SI barcode crossover, thereby reducing the ‘noise’ of a TCR molecular barcoding assay.
Example 1: Accurate Analysis of Sample Target Nucleic Acids Using Unique Oligonucleotide Species
96 formats of unique oligonucleotide species were designed, the sequences of which are summarized in FIGS. 5A-5E (SEQ ID NOs: 1-96). Unique oligonucleotide species formats A01-A12 (SEQ ID NOs: 1-12) were provided as controls, in which the molecule barcode (“2nd bc”) was NNNNNNNN. As such, the molecule barcodes of these control unique oligonucleotide species did not have any constraints or limits on the G content. Unique oligonucleotide species formats B01-B12 (SEQ ID NOs: 13-24) comprised a spacer of the sequence TTT 3′ of the molecule barcode (“2nd bc”) and 5′ of the uniform region (“5 to 3′ recognition sequence”). Unique oligonucleotide species formats C01-C12 (SEQ ID NOs: 25-36) comprised a spacer of the sequence TTTTT 3′ of the molecule barcode (“2nd bc”) and 5′ of the uniform region (“5 to 3′ recognition sequence”). Unique oligonucleotide species formats D01-D12 (SEQ ID NOs: 37-48) comprised a molecule barcode (“1st bc”) 5′ of the sample barcode (“2nd bc”). Unique oligonucleotide species formats E01-E12 (SEQ ID NOs: 49-60) comprised a molecule barcode (“1st bc”) 5′ of the sample barcode (“2nd bc”) and a spacer of the sequence TTT 3′ of the barcode region and 4′ of the uniform region. Unique oligonucleotide species formats F01-F12 (SEQ ID NOs: 61-72) comprised a molecule barcode (“1st bc”) 5′ of the sample barcode (“2nd bc”) and a spacer of the sequence TTTTT 3′ of the barcode region and 4′ of the uniform region. Unique oligonucleotide species formats G01-G12 (SEQ ID NOs: 73-84) comprised molecule barcodes (“2nd bc”) each comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH (in which each “H” is an A, C, or T, and in which any two “H” nucleotides can be the same of different). Unique oligonucleotide species formats H01-H12 (SEQ ID NOs: 85-96) comprised molecule barcodes (“2nd bc”) each comprising the sequence HNHNHNHN (in which each “H” is an A, C, or T, and in which any two “H” nucleotides can be the same of different, and in which each “N” can be A, G, C, or, T, and in which any two “N” nucleotides can be the same or different).
Amplification and analysis of target T cell receptor nucleic acid sequences was performed as follows: the Precise™ TCR Encoding Plate (BD Cellular Research Inc.) was thawed at room temperature and spun briefly to collect the 5 μL reagents in each well. The plate was placed on ice in a 96 well rack and very carefully remove the seal, while avoiding disturbing reagents in the wells. Cells were sorted or added directly into the 96 well encoding plate (1 cell per well). The plate was sealed and vortexed briefly (5-10 s) to mix the reagents, and then spun briefly (˜1000 rpm×10 s). The sorted sample plates can optionally be stored at −80° C. until ready to start the Precise™ protocol. For reverse transcription, the plate was incubated at 65° C. for 3 min, cooled to 4° C., and then placed on ice for 5 min. The reaction master mix was as follows:
TABLE 1
Reagent Per well 1 Plate MM
Nuclease Free Water 2.7 324.0
5X Precise Reverse Transcription Buffer 2.0 240
Precise RNase Inhibitor 0.1 12.0
Precise Reverse Transcriptase 0.2 24
5 uL of RT MM were pipetted to each well. Each plate was sealed, and a reverse-transcriptase program was run: 42° C., 30 min; 80 C, 5 min; 4 C pause.
cDNA purification was performed using the following protocol: Spin the plate (1000 rpm×10 s). Combine all reactions into a single 2 mL tube. Add 8 uL of Precise DBP Mix into the pooled cDNA tube. Vortex gently to get buffer into solution. Add an equivalent volume of AMPure XP beads to the single tube containing the pooled RT reaction product (1× volume of pooled PCR product). Pipette up and down to mix the sample and beads. Incubate bead mix at room temperature for 5 minutes. Open the cap to make sure the beads aren't disturbed. Place tube on magnet and wait until the liquid and beads separate. The liquid should be entirely clear before it is removed. This may take up to 5 min. Keeping the tube on the magnet, carefully remove only the liquid and discard. Keeping the tube on the magnet stand, gently rinse the beads once using 2 mL of 70% EtOH/30% H2O. Prepare fresh EtOH solution each day to avoid evaporation. Care can be taken not to disturb or re-suspend the beads during the rinse step. Immediately remove all residual EtOH solution with a pipette. While the tube is on the magnet, tap to collect as much of the EtOH as possible at the bottom of the tube. To elute the product from the beads, remove the tube from the magnet. Transfer 68 μL of Elution Buffer into the tube containing the beads. Wet the beads with the elution buffer by tilting the tube. Vortex well to mix and wait 1 min. Return the tube to the magnet. Wait until the solution is clear, typically <5 min. Recover the purified PCR product solution by carefully pipetting the solution away from the beads. Transfer the clear liquid product (68 μL) to a new 1.5 mL tube.
PCR N1 amplification (target amplification) was performed using the following protocol: Prepare PCR mix (200 uL) in pre-amplification area according to Table 2:
TABLE 2
Reagent Per sample
RT Product 68
2X OneTaq HotStart 100
Precise TCR N1 Primer Pool 12
10 uM N1R Primer 20
Total 200
Split this 200 uL reaction mix into 4 PCR tubes. Run 20 cycles of the following PCR conditions: 3-minute annealing time at 60 C, 1-minute extension time at 68 C (About 2 hours). Combine all PCR products into one sample tube. Add 160 uL of Ampure beads (0.8×), pipette to mix well, and incubate for 5 minutes at RT. Place tube on magnet and wait until the liquid and beads separate. The liquid should be entirely clear before it is removed. This may take up to 5 min. Remove only the liquid and discard. Gently rinse the tube once while on the magnet stand with 1 mL of 70% EtOH/30% H2O. Do not re-suspend the beads during the rinse step. Immediately remove all residual EtOH with a pipette. While the tube is on the magnet, tap to collect as much of the EtOH as possible at the bottom of the tube. Elute PCR product in 50 uL Elution Buffer.
PCR N1 amplification (adapter and indexing PCR) was performed using the following protocol: Prepare PCR mix (50 uL) according to Table 3:
TABLE 3
Reagent Per sample
Water 7.75
2X OneTaq HotStart 25
Precise Indexing Primer Set (D70x) 1.25
Precise TCR N2 Primer Pool 6
PCR N1 Product 10
Run 25 cycles of the following PCR conditions: 3-minute annealing at 60 C, 1 min extension time at 68 C. Purify at 0.8× Ampure twice, elute in 30 uL of Elution Buffer.
FIG. 6 shows error correction for the average of sequence results (by individual TCRa CDR3). In FIG. 6 , the Y axis plots the number of different molecule barcodes detected for TCRa.
Results are shown for reactions with 50 pg of target RNA (denoted as “50” in FIG. 6 , e.g., A50, B50, C50, D50, E50, F50, G50) and negative controls that received 0 pg of target RNA (denoted as “0” in FIG. 6 , e.g., A0, B0, C0, D0, E0, F0, G0). As such, 0 pg serves as a negative control and detector of assay noise that is leaked from 50 pg sample. For the reactions that received target RNA, unique oligonucleotide designs in accordance with some embodiments herein B01-B12 (“B50”), C01-C12 (“C50”), D01-D12 (“D50”), E01-E12 (“E50”), F01-F12 (“F50”), G01-G12 (“G50”), and H01-H12 (“H50”) had lower error rates than conventional formats A01-A12 (“A50”). In particular, for for TRAC in this experiment, format “H” had the highest sensitivity with low noise and performed better than the original barcoded primers (A).
Thus, compositions comprising unique oligonucleotide species comprising barcode regions, and molecule barcodes having a relatively low G content, and/or unique olignonucleotides comprising a spacer 3′ of the molecule barcode and 5′ of the uniform region as described herein yielded amplification with a lower error rate, and thus higher accuracy than compositions comprising general polynucleotide species that did not comprise such features.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that, for this and other processes and methods disclosed herein, the functions performed in the processes and methods can be implemented in differing order. Furthermore, the outlined steps and operations are only provided as examples, and some of the steps and operations can be optional, combined into fewer steps and operations, or expanded into additional steps and operations without detracting from the essence of the disclosed embodiments.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to embodiments containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that virtually any disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.”
In addition, where features or aspects of the disclosure are described in terms of Markush groups, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group.
As will be understood by one skilled in the art, for any and all purposes, such as in terms of providing a written description, all ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all possible subranges and combinations of subranges thereof. Any listed range can be easily recognized as sufficiently describing and enabling the same range being broken down into at least equal halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, etc. As a non-limiting example, each range discussed herein can be readily broken down into a lower third, middle third and upper third, etc. As will also be understood by one skilled in the art all language such as “up to,” “at least,” and the like include the number recited and refer to ranges which can be subsequently broken down into subranges as discussed above. Finally, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, a range includes each individual member. Thus, for example, a group having 1-3 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 cells. Similarly, a group having 1-5 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cells, and so forth.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described herein for purposes of illustration, and that various modifications may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the various embodiments disclosed herein are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.

Claims (54)

What is claimed is:
1. A reverse transcription reaction composition comprising;:
mRNA;
a reverse transcriptase; and
at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, each unique oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region and a uniform region, the barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides and having a constraint on G content,
wherein the uniform region is 3′ of the barcode region, the uniform region comprising a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid,
wherein the unique oligonucleotide species comprise different nucleic acid sequences in their barcode regions,
wherein the constraint on G content comprises:
(a) less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode have having a G content of 50% or more:; and/or
(b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%, and
wherein the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the constraint on G content is less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode have having a G content of 50% or more.
3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the constraint on G content is the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least two spatially isolated pools, each pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species,
wherein unique oligonucleotides in the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and
wherein different unique oligonucleotides of the same pool comprise a different molecule barcode sequences.
5. The composition of claim 4, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate.
6. The composition of claim 1, wherein for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
7. The composition of claim 1, wherein at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
8. The composition of claim 1, wherein each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
9. The composition of claim 1, wherein each oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises at least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
11. The composition of claim 1, wherein the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence.
12. The composition of claim 11, wherein the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is selected from the group consisting of: a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, and a combination thereof.
13. The composition of claim 1, wherein the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of 2.5%-10%.
14. The composition of claim 1, wherein the molecule barcode is 7-9 nucleotides.
15. The composition of claim 1, comprising at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species.
16. A method of specifically barcoding cDNA from two or more samples, each sample comprising nucleic acids, the method comprising:
contacting each sample with a pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotide species, wherein each sample is contacted in spatial isolation from the other samples, each unique oligonucleotide species comprising:
a barcode region comprising;:
a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides and having a constraint on G content; and
a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides; and
a uniform region 3′ of the barcode region, the uniform region comprising a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid,
wherein the unique polynucleotide oligonucleotide species of each pool comprise the same sample barcode, and comprise different molecule barcodes, and wherein the constraint on G content comprises:
(a) less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode have having a G content of 50% or more; and/or
(b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%;
hybridizing target-specific regions of at least some oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species to at least some of the nucleic acids of the sample, wherein the nucleic acids comprise mRNA; and
extending the hybridized oligonucleotides by reverse transcription, thereby producing extended strands comprising an oligonucleotide of the unique oligonucleotide species and a sequence complementary to the target,
wherein for each sample, the extended strands comprise the same sample barcode and different molecule barcodes, wherein for different samples, the molecule barcodes are different, and
wherein a bias in representation of the unique oligonucleotide species in an amplification product of the extended strands is reduced in comparison to the use of control unique oligonucleotide species comprising control molecule barcodes without the constraint on G content.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising ascertaining nucleic acid sequences of the strands comprising the oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species and the sequence complementary to the target.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the constraint on G content is the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively having a G content of less than 12.5%.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein the molecule barcode is 7-9 nucleotides.
20. The method of claim 16, the pool comprises at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species.
21. The method of claim 16, the pool comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species.
22. A kit for amplifying barcoded cDNA comprising an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence, comprising;:
a composition comprising: at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, each unique oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region and a uniform region, the barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides and having a constraint on G content,
wherein the uniform region is 3′ of the barcode region, the uniform region comprising a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species comprise different nucleic acid sequences in their barcode regions,
wherein the constraint on G content comprises:
(a) less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode have having a G content of 50% or more; and/or
(b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%, wherein the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides, and
wherein the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence; and
a primer configured to hybridize on an opposite side of the variable region as the target-specific region, and to hybridize to a complementary strand to a strand hybridized by the target-specific region, and is thereby configured to amplify the variable region in conjunction with the target-specific region.
23. The kit of claim 22, wherein the molecule barcode is 7-9 nucleotides.
24. The kit of claim 22, wherein composition comprises at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species.
25. A composition comprising:
at least 1000 unique oligonucleotide species, each unique oligonucleotide species comprising a barcode region and a uniform region, the barcode region comprising a molecule barcode comprising at least 7 nucleotides and having a constraint on G content,
wherein the uniform region is 3′ of the barcode region, the uniform region comprising a target-specific region 3′ of the barcode region, the target-specific region comprising at least 10 nucleotides complementary to a target nucleic acid,
wherein the unique oligonucleotide species comprise different nucleic acid sequences in their barcode regions,
wherein the constraint on G content comprises:
(a) less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode having a G content of 50% or more; and/or
(b) the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%, and
wherein the barcode region further comprises a sample barcode comprising at least 3 nucleotides.
26. The composition of claim 25, wherein the constraint on G content is less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode having a G content of 50% or more.
27. The composition of claim 25, wherein the constraint on G content is the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of no more than 12.5%.
28. The composition of claim 25, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species are disposed in at least two spatially isolated pools, each pool comprising at least 100 unique oligonucleotides of the unique oligonucleotide species, wherein unique oligonucleotides in the same pool comprise the same sample barcode sequence, and wherein different unique oligonucleotides of the same pool comprise a different molecule barcode sequences.
29. The composition of claim 28, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate.
30. The composition of claim 25, wherein for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
31. The composition of claim 25, wherein at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
32. The composition of claim 25, wherein each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
33. The composition of claim 25, wherein each oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
34. The composition of claim 25, wherein the composition comprises at least two oligonucleotides of the same unique oligonucleotide species.
35. The composition of claim 25, wherein the uniform region comprises a target-specific region comprising a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence.
36. The composition of claim 35, wherein the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is selected from the group consisting of: a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, and a combination thereof.
37. The composition of claim 25, wherein the molecule barcodes of all of the unique oligonucleotide species in the composition collectively have a G content of 2.5%-10%.
38. The composition of claim 25, wherein the molecule barcode is 7-9 nucleotides.
39. The composition of claim 25, comprising at least 6,500 unique oligonucleotide species.
40. The method of claim 16, wherein the constraint on G content is less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode having a G content of 50% or more.
41. The method of claim 16, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate.
42. The method of claim 16, wherein for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
43. The method of claim 16, wherein at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
44. The method of claim 16, wherein each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
45. The method of claim 16, wherein each oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
46. The method of claim 16, wherein the target-specific region comprises a sequence flanking an immune cell receptor or immunoglobulin variable region coding sequence.
47. The method of claim 46, wherein the immune cell receptor variable region coding sequence is selected from the group consisting of: a T cell receptor variable region coding sequence, a B cell receptor variable region coding sequence, and a combination thereof.
48. The kit of claim 22, wherein the constraint on G content is the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species collectively having a G content of less than 12.5%.
49. The kit of claim 22, wherein the constraint on G content is less than 1% of the unique oligonucleotide species comprising the molecule barcode having a G content of 50% or more.
50. The kit of claim 22, wherein the unique oligonucleotide species of each pool are immobilized on a substrate, so that the sample barcodes but not the molecule barcodes are the same for the oligonucleotide species immobilized on each substrate.
51. The kit of claim 22, wherein for at least 95% of the unique oligonucleotide species, any G in the molecule barcode is not adjacent to another G.
52. The kit of claim 22, wherein at least 95% of the molecule barcodes of the unique oligonucleotide species comprise the sequence HNHNHNHN, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T, and wherein each “N” is any one of A, G, C, or T.
53. The kit of claim 22, wherein each of the unique oligonucleotide species comprises a spacer 3′ of the barcode region and 5′ of the target specific region, said spacer comprising the sequence HHHHHHHH, wherein each “H” is any one of A, C, or T.
54. The kit of claim 22, wherein each oligonucleotide species has a length of 24-140 nucleotides.
US18/050,449 2016-05-02 2022-10-27 Accurate molecular barcoding Active 2038-08-17 USRE50636E1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18/050,449 USRE50636E1 (en) 2016-05-02 2022-10-27 Accurate molecular barcoding

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662330500P 2016-05-02 2016-05-02
US15/581,914 US10822643B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2017-04-28 Accurate molecular barcoding
US18/050,449 USRE50636E1 (en) 2016-05-02 2022-10-27 Accurate molecular barcoding

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/581,914 Reissue US10822643B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2017-04-28 Accurate molecular barcoding

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE50636E1 true USRE50636E1 (en) 2025-10-14

Family

ID=59285319

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/581,914 Ceased US10822643B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2017-04-28 Accurate molecular barcoding
US18/050,449 Active 2038-08-17 USRE50636E1 (en) 2016-05-02 2022-10-27 Accurate molecular barcoding

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/581,914 Ceased US10822643B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2017-04-28 Accurate molecular barcoding

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US10822643B2 (en)
EP (2) EP4269616A3 (en)
JP (2) JP7129343B2 (en)
CN (1) CN109072288A (en)
AU (2) AU2017261189B2 (en)
CA (1) CA3019589A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2956757T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2017192387A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8835358B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2014-09-16 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
CA2865575C (en) 2012-02-27 2024-01-16 Cellular Research, Inc. Compositions and kits for molecular counting
CN110964796B (en) 2013-08-28 2024-04-05 贝克顿迪金森公司 Large-scale parallel single cell analysis
JP2017504307A (en) 2013-10-07 2017-02-09 セルラー リサーチ, インコーポレイテッド Method and system for digitally counting features on an array
ES2975332T3 (en) 2015-02-19 2024-07-04 Becton Dickinson Co High-throughput single-cell analysis combining proteomic and genomic information
EP3262192B1 (en) 2015-02-27 2020-09-16 Becton, Dickinson and Company Spatially addressable molecular barcoding
WO2016160844A2 (en) 2015-03-30 2016-10-06 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for combinatorial barcoding
WO2016172373A1 (en) 2015-04-23 2016-10-27 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for whole transcriptome amplification
US11124823B2 (en) 2015-06-01 2021-09-21 Becton, Dickinson And Company Methods for RNA quantification
CN108026524A (en) 2015-09-11 2018-05-11 赛卢拉研究公司 Method and composition for nucleic acid library standardization
EP4269616A3 (en) 2016-05-02 2024-02-14 Becton, Dickinson and Company Accurate molecular barcoding
US10301677B2 (en) 2016-05-25 2019-05-28 Cellular Research, Inc. Normalization of nucleic acid libraries
EP3465502B1 (en) 2016-05-26 2024-04-10 Becton, Dickinson and Company Molecular label counting adjustment methods
US10640763B2 (en) 2016-05-31 2020-05-05 Cellular Research, Inc. Molecular indexing of internal sequences
US10202641B2 (en) 2016-05-31 2019-02-12 Cellular Research, Inc. Error correction in amplification of samples
KR102638006B1 (en) 2016-09-26 2024-02-20 셀룰러 리서치, 인크. Measurement of protein expression using reagents with barcoded oligonucleotide sequences
CN110573253B (en) 2017-01-13 2021-11-02 赛卢拉研究公司 Hydrophilic coating for fluid channels
US11319583B2 (en) 2017-02-01 2022-05-03 Becton, Dickinson And Company Selective amplification using blocking oligonucleotides
EP4345172A3 (en) 2017-06-05 2024-07-03 Becton, Dickinson and Company Sample indexing for single cells
US11946095B2 (en) 2017-12-19 2024-04-02 Becton, Dickinson And Company Particles associated with oligonucleotides
EP4545647A3 (en) 2018-05-03 2025-07-09 Becton, Dickinson and Company Molecular barcoding on opposite transcript ends
AU2019262048B2 (en) 2018-05-03 2025-09-04 Becton, Dickinson And Company High throughput multiomics sample analysis
CN118853827A (en) 2018-10-01 2024-10-29 贝克顿迪金森公司 Determine 5' transcript sequence
CN112969789A (en) 2018-11-08 2021-06-15 贝克顿迪金森公司 Single cell whole transcriptome analysis using random priming
EP3894552A1 (en) 2018-12-13 2021-10-20 Becton, Dickinson and Company Selective extension in single cell whole transcriptome analysis
WO2020150356A1 (en) 2019-01-16 2020-07-23 Becton, Dickinson And Company Polymerase chain reaction normalization through primer titration
EP3914728B1 (en) 2019-01-23 2023-04-05 Becton, Dickinson and Company Oligonucleotides associated with antibodies
CN113454234B (en) 2019-02-14 2025-03-18 贝克顿迪金森公司 Heterozygote targeted and whole transcriptome amplification
WO2020214642A1 (en) 2019-04-19 2020-10-22 Becton, Dickinson And Company Methods of associating phenotypical data and single cell sequencing data
KR102506635B1 (en) * 2019-07-10 2023-03-07 울티마 제노믹스, 인크. RNA sequencing methods
EP4004231B1 (en) 2019-07-22 2025-11-12 Becton, Dickinson and Company Single cell chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing assay
US10927409B1 (en) 2019-10-14 2021-02-23 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Detection of sequences uniquely associated with a dna target region
CN114729350A (en) 2019-11-08 2022-07-08 贝克顿迪金森公司 Obtaining full-length V (D) J information for immunohistorian sequencing using random priming
US11649497B2 (en) 2020-01-13 2023-05-16 Becton, Dickinson And Company Methods and compositions for quantitation of proteins and RNA
EP4097228B1 (en) 2020-01-29 2024-08-14 Becton, Dickinson and Company Barcoded wells for spatial mapping of single cells through sequencing
WO2021173719A1 (en) 2020-02-25 2021-09-02 Becton, Dickinson And Company Bi-specific probes to enable the use of single-cell samples as single color compensation control
KR102482668B1 (en) * 2020-03-10 2022-12-29 사회복지법인 삼성생명공익재단 A method for improving the labeling accuracy of Unique Molecular Identifiers
US20230265484A1 (en) * 2020-03-24 2023-08-24 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplexed methods for detecting target rnas
EP4150118A1 (en) 2020-05-14 2023-03-22 Becton Dickinson and Company Primers for immune repertoire profiling
EP4407030B1 (en) 2020-06-02 2025-12-17 Becton, Dickinson and Company Oligonucleotides and beads for 5 prime gene expression assay
US11932901B2 (en) 2020-07-13 2024-03-19 Becton, Dickinson And Company Target enrichment using nucleic acid probes for scRNAseq
CN116194589A (en) 2020-07-31 2023-05-30 贝克顿迪金森公司 Single-cell assays for transposase-accessible chromatin
WO2022109343A1 (en) 2020-11-20 2022-05-27 Becton, Dickinson And Company Profiling of highly expressed and lowly expressed proteins
US12392771B2 (en) 2020-12-15 2025-08-19 Becton, Dickinson And Company Single cell secretome analysis

Citations (324)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4510244A (en) 1980-04-17 1985-04-09 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University Cell labeling with antigen-coupled microspheres
US4725536A (en) 1985-09-19 1988-02-16 Genetics Institute, Inc. Reagent polynucleotide complex with multiple target binding regions, and kit and methods
WO1989001050A1 (en) 1987-07-31 1989-02-09 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Selective amplification of target polynucleotide sequences
US5124246A (en) 1987-10-15 1992-06-23 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid multimers and amplified nucleic acid hybridization assays using same
US5149625A (en) 1987-08-11 1992-09-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplex analysis of DNA
US5200314A (en) 1990-03-23 1993-04-06 Chiron Corporation Polynucleotide capture assay employing in vitro amplification
US5424186A (en) 1989-06-07 1995-06-13 Affymax Technologies N.V. Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis
US5424413A (en) 1992-01-22 1995-06-13 Gen-Probe Incorporated Branched nucleic acid probes
US5445934A (en) 1989-06-07 1995-08-29 Affymax Technologies N.V. Array of oligonucleotides on a solid substrate
WO1996024061A1 (en) 1995-02-02 1996-08-08 Ontogen Corporation Methods and apparatus for synthesizing labeled combinatorial chemical libraries
US5604097A (en) 1994-10-13 1997-02-18 Spectragen, Inc. Methods for sorting polynucleotides using oligonucleotide tags
WO1997010365A1 (en) 1995-09-15 1997-03-20 Affymax Technologies N.V. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high density oligonucleotide arrays
US5635352A (en) 1993-12-08 1997-06-03 Chiron Corporation Solution phase nucleic acid sandwich assays having reduced background noise
US5648245A (en) 1995-05-09 1997-07-15 Carnegie Institution Of Washington Method for constructing an oligonucleotide concatamer library by rolling circle replication
US5656731A (en) 1987-10-15 1997-08-12 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid-amplified immunoassay probes
US5658737A (en) 1994-10-28 1997-08-19 Gen-Probe Incorporated Compositions and methods for the simultaneous detection and quantification of multiple specific nucleic acid sequences
EP0799897A1 (en) 1996-04-04 1997-10-08 Affymetrix, Inc. (a California Corporation) Methods and compositions for selecting tag nucleic acids and probe arrays
US5714330A (en) 1994-04-04 1998-02-03 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. DNA sequencing by stepwise ligation and cleavage
US5744305A (en) 1989-06-07 1998-04-28 Affymetrix, Inc. Arrays of materials attached to a substrate
US5759778A (en) 1993-08-10 1998-06-02 Life Technologies, Inc. Method of nucleic acid sequence selection
US5763175A (en) 1995-11-17 1998-06-09 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Simultaneous sequencing of tagged polynucleotides
US5800992A (en) 1989-06-07 1998-09-01 Fodor; Stephen P.A. Method of detecting nucleic acids
US5846719A (en) 1994-10-13 1998-12-08 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Oligonucleotide tags for sorting and identification
US5854033A (en) 1995-11-21 1998-12-29 Yale University Rolling circle replication reporter systems
US5871928A (en) 1989-06-07 1999-02-16 Fodor; Stephen P. A. Methods for nucleic acid analysis
WO1999015702A1 (en) 1997-09-24 1999-04-01 Life Technologies, Inc. Normalized nucleic acid libraries and methods of production thereof
WO1999028505A1 (en) 1997-12-03 1999-06-10 Curagen Corporation Methods and devices for measuring differential gene expression
US5925525A (en) 1989-06-07 1999-07-20 Affymetrix, Inc. Method of identifying nucleotide differences
US5935793A (en) 1996-09-27 1999-08-10 The Chinese University Of Hong Kong Parallel polynucleotide sequencing method using tagged primers
US5962271A (en) 1996-01-03 1999-10-05 Cloutech Laboratories, Inc. Methods and compositions for generating full-length cDNA having arbitrary nucleotide sequence at the 3'-end
US5968740A (en) 1995-07-24 1999-10-19 Affymetrix, Inc. Method of Identifying a Base in a Nucleic Acid
US5981179A (en) 1991-11-14 1999-11-09 Digene Diagnostics, Inc. Continuous amplification reaction
US5981176A (en) 1992-06-17 1999-11-09 City Of Hope Method of detecting and discriminating between nucleic acid sequences
US6013445A (en) 1996-06-06 2000-01-11 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Massively parallel signature sequencing by ligation of encoded adaptors
US6046005A (en) 1997-01-15 2000-04-04 Incyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nucleic acid sequencing with solid phase capturable terminators comprising a cleavable linking group
US6060596A (en) 1992-03-30 2000-05-09 The Scripps Research Institute Encoded combinatorial chemical libraries
US6064755A (en) 1996-07-05 2000-05-16 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image analyzing apparatus for producing density profile data of an image
US6114149A (en) 1988-07-26 2000-09-05 Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Amplification of mixed sequence nucleic acid fragments
US6117631A (en) 1996-10-29 2000-09-12 Polyprobe, Inc. Detection of antigens via oligonucleotide antibody conjugates
US6124092A (en) 1996-10-04 2000-09-26 The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Multiplex polynucleotide capture methods and compositions
WO2000058516A2 (en) 1999-03-26 2000-10-05 Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research Universal arrays
US6140489A (en) 1994-10-13 2000-10-31 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Compositions for sorting polynucleotides
US6194454B1 (en) * 1999-03-01 2001-02-27 Pfizer Inc. Cyano containing oxamic acids and derivatives as thyroid receptor ligands
US6197554B1 (en) 1998-11-20 2001-03-06 Shi-Lung Lin Method for generating full-length cDNA library from single cells
US6235483B1 (en) 2000-01-31 2001-05-22 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Methods and kits for indirect labeling of nucleic acids
US6265163B1 (en) 1998-01-09 2001-07-24 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Solid phase selection of differentially expressed genes
US6268152B1 (en) 1993-06-25 2001-07-31 Affymetrix, Inc. Probe kit for identifying a base in a nucleic acid
US6284485B1 (en) 1995-12-22 2001-09-04 Amgen Inc. Nucleic acids encoding osteoprotegerin
US6309823B1 (en) 1993-10-26 2001-10-30 Affymetrix, Inc. Arrays of nucleic acid probes for analyzing biotransformation genes and methods of using the same
US6309822B1 (en) 1989-06-07 2001-10-30 Affymetrix, Inc. Method for comparing copy number of nucleic acid sequences
US6326148B1 (en) 1999-07-12 2001-12-04 The Regents Of The University Of California Detection of copy number changes in colon cancer
US6355431B1 (en) 1999-04-20 2002-03-12 Illumina, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid amplification reactions using bead arrays
US6372813B1 (en) 1999-06-25 2002-04-16 Motorola Methods and compositions for attachment of biomolecules to solid supports, hydrogels, and hydrogel arrays
US20020065609A1 (en) 2000-04-10 2002-05-30 Matthew Ashby Methods for the survey and genetic analysis of populations
US20020072058A1 (en) 2000-03-24 2002-06-13 Voelker Leroy L. Method for amplifying quinolone-resistance-determining-regions and identifying polymorphic variants thereof
US6406848B1 (en) 1997-05-23 2002-06-18 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Planar arrays of microparticle-bound polynucleotides
WO2002056014A2 (en) 2000-12-22 2002-07-18 Glaxo Group Limited Methods for encoding and decoding complex mixtures in arrayed assays
WO2002059355A2 (en) 2001-01-25 2002-08-01 Tm Bioscience Corporation Polynucleotides for use as tags and tag complements, manufacture and use thereof
US6436675B1 (en) 1999-09-28 2002-08-20 Maxygen, Inc. Use of codon-varied oligonucleotide synthesis for synthetic shuffling
US6440706B1 (en) 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
WO2002070684A2 (en) 2001-01-11 2002-09-12 Lion Bioscience Ag Gene library for screening methods
US6451536B1 (en) 1990-12-06 2002-09-17 Affymetrix Inc. Products for detecting nucleic acids
US6480791B1 (en) 1998-10-28 2002-11-12 Michael P. Strathmann Parallel methods for genomic analysis
US20020168665A1 (en) 2001-03-21 2002-11-14 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Biochemical examination method
US6489114B2 (en) 1999-12-17 2002-12-03 Bio Merieux Process for labeling a ribonucleic acid, and labeled RNA fragments which are obtained thereby
US6492121B2 (en) 1999-04-20 2002-12-10 Japan Bioindustry Association Method for determining a concentration of target nucleic acid molecules, nucleic acid probes for the method, and method for analyzing data obtained by the method
US20020187480A1 (en) 2001-05-04 2002-12-12 Genomics Research Partners Pty Ltd Diagnostic method for assessing a condition of a performance animal
US20030003490A1 (en) 2000-02-07 2003-01-02 Illumina, Inc. Nucleic acid detection methods using universal priming
US20030013091A1 (en) 2001-07-03 2003-01-16 Krassen Dimitrov Methods for detection and quantification of analytes in complex mixtures
US6512105B1 (en) 1986-11-24 2003-01-28 Gen-Probe Incorporated Methods for making oligonucleotide probes for the detection and/or quantitation of non-viral organisms
US20030049616A1 (en) 2001-01-08 2003-03-13 Sydney Brenner Enzymatic synthesis of oligonucleotide tags
US6551784B2 (en) 1989-06-07 2003-04-22 Affymetrix Inc Method of comparing nucleic acid sequences
US20030082818A1 (en) 2001-07-12 2003-05-01 Automated Cell, Inc. Method and apparatus for monitoring of proteins and cells
US6600996B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2003-07-29 Affymetrix, Inc. Computer-aided techniques for analyzing biological sequences
US20030165865A1 (en) 2001-01-29 2003-09-04 Hinkel Christopher A. Methods of analysis of nucleic acids
US20030175908A1 (en) 2002-01-29 2003-09-18 Sten Linnarsson Methods and means for manipulating nucleic acid
US6629040B1 (en) 1999-03-19 2003-09-30 University Of Washington Isotope distribution encoded tags for protein identification
US20030186251A1 (en) 2002-04-01 2003-10-02 Brookhaven Science Associates, Llc Genome sequence tags
US20030207300A1 (en) 2000-04-28 2003-11-06 Matray Tracy J. Multiplex analytical platform using molecular tags
US6653077B1 (en) 1998-09-04 2003-11-25 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Method of screening for genetic polymorphism
WO2004017374A2 (en) 2002-08-16 2004-02-26 Clinical Microarrays, Inc. Reading of fluorescent arrays
US20040047769A1 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-03-11 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Biochip
US20040096892A1 (en) 2002-11-15 2004-05-20 The Johns Hopkins University Digital karyotyping
US20040096368A1 (en) 2002-06-28 2004-05-20 Igen International, Inc. Assay systems and components
US20040121342A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 Orchid Biosciences, Inc. Methods and compositions for conducting primer extension and polymorphism detection reactions
US20040157243A1 (en) 2002-11-11 2004-08-12 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US6787308B2 (en) 1998-07-30 2004-09-07 Solexa Ltd. Arrayed biomolecules and their use in sequencing
US20040191823A1 (en) 2001-10-16 2004-09-30 Carmen Virgos Universal e-tag primer and probe compositions and methods
EP1473080A2 (en) 2003-04-30 2004-11-03 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Chemical array reading
US20040253593A1 (en) 2003-06-12 2004-12-16 Hong Cai Quenching methods for background reduction in luminescence-based probe-target binding assays
US20040259118A1 (en) 2003-06-23 2004-12-23 Macevicz Stephen C. Methods and compositions for nucleic acid sequence analysis
US20050019776A1 (en) 2002-06-28 2005-01-27 Callow Matthew James Universal selective genome amplification and universal genotyping system
US6849404B2 (en) 2001-05-07 2005-02-01 Bioneer Corporation Polymerase chain reaction of DNA of which base sequence is completely unidentified
US6858412B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2005-02-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Direct multiplex characterization of genomic DNA
US20050053952A1 (en) 2002-10-02 2005-03-10 California Institute Of Technology Microfluidic nucleic acid analysis
WO2005042759A2 (en) 2003-09-10 2005-05-12 Althea Technologies, Inc. Expression profiling using microarrays
US20050105077A1 (en) 2000-08-02 2005-05-19 Aravind Padmanabhan Miniaturized cytometer for detecting multiple species in a sample
WO2005071110A2 (en) 2004-01-23 2005-08-04 Lingvitae As Improving polynucleotide ligation reactions
WO2005080604A2 (en) 2004-02-12 2005-09-01 Compass Genetics, Llc Genetic analysis by sequence-specific sorting
JP2005233974A (en) 2001-03-21 2005-09-02 Olympus Corp Biochemical inspection method
US20050250147A1 (en) 2004-05-10 2005-11-10 Macevicz Stephen C Digital profiling of polynucleotide populations
US20050287548A1 (en) 2001-06-25 2005-12-29 Gang Bao Activatable probes and methods for in vivo gene detection
US20060002824A1 (en) 2004-06-07 2006-01-05 Irm, Llc Dispensing systems, software, and related methods
US20060024690A1 (en) 2003-09-19 2006-02-02 Kao H P Normalization of data using controls
US20060035258A1 (en) 2004-08-06 2006-02-16 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US20060040297A1 (en) 2003-01-29 2006-02-23 Leamon John H Methods of amplifying and sequencing nucleic acids
US20060041385A1 (en) 2004-08-18 2006-02-23 Bauer Kenneth D Method of quantitating proteins and genes in cells using a combination of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
US20060073506A1 (en) 2004-09-17 2006-04-06 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying biological samples
WO2006071776A2 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-07-06 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp. Ligation-based rna amplification
US20060211030A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2006-09-21 Sydney Brenner Methods and compositions for assay readouts on multiple analytical platforms
WO2006102264A1 (en) 2005-03-18 2006-09-28 Fluidigm Corporation Thermal reaction device and method for using the same
US20060223197A1 (en) 2005-04-05 2006-10-05 Claus Vielsack Method and apparatus for the detection of biological molecules
US20060223122A1 (en) 2005-03-08 2006-10-05 Agnes Fogo Classifying and predicting glomerulosclerosis using a proteomics approach
US20060234234A1 (en) 2002-10-11 2006-10-19 Van Dongen Jacobus Johannes M Nucleic acid amplification primers for pcr-based clonality studies
US20060246453A1 (en) 2003-03-28 2006-11-02 Seishi Kato Method of synthesizing cdna
WO2006116127A2 (en) 2005-04-21 2006-11-02 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Compositions for use in identification of bacteria
US20060263709A1 (en) 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Process for producing resin particle liquid dispersion for electrostatic image developing toner, electrostatic image developing toner and production process thereof
US20060263789A1 (en) 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 Robert Kincaid Unique identifiers for indicating properties associated with entities to which they are attached, and methods for using
US20060280352A1 (en) 2005-06-10 2006-12-14 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Image analysis of biological objects
US20060286570A1 (en) 2003-09-09 2006-12-21 Rowlen Kathy L Use of photopolymerization for amplification and detection of a molecular recognition event
US7155050B1 (en) 1999-11-03 2006-12-26 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Ab Method of analyzing cell samples, by creating and analyzing a resultant image
US20070020640A1 (en) 2005-07-21 2007-01-25 Mccloskey Megan L Molecular encoding of nucleic acid templates for PCR and other forms of sequence analysis
US20070031829A1 (en) 2002-09-30 2007-02-08 Hideyuki Yasuno Oligonucleotides for genotyping thymidylate synthase gene
US20070042400A1 (en) 2003-11-10 2007-02-22 Choi K Y Methods of preparing nucleic acid for detection
US20070042419A1 (en) 1996-05-29 2007-02-22 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid sequence differences using coupled ligase detection and polymerase chain reactions
US20070065823A1 (en) 2003-07-05 2007-03-22 Devin Dressman Method and compositions for detection and enumeration of genetic variations
US20070105090A1 (en) 2003-08-16 2007-05-10 Andrew Cassidy Amplification method
US20070117134A1 (en) 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Kou Zhong C Method for detection and quantification of T-cell receptor Vbeta repertoire
US20070117121A1 (en) 2005-09-16 2007-05-24 Hutchison Stephen K cDNA library preparation
US20070133856A1 (en) 2005-12-09 2007-06-14 Cytyc Corporation Cross-frame object reconstruction for image-based cytology applications
US20070172873A1 (en) 2006-01-23 2007-07-26 Sydney Brenner Molecular counting
US20070178478A1 (en) 2002-05-08 2007-08-02 Dhallan Ravinder S Methods for detection of genetic disorders
WO2007087310A2 (en) 2006-01-23 2007-08-02 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Nucleic acid analysis using sequence tokens
US20070202523A1 (en) 2004-08-27 2007-08-30 Becker Michael M Methods and kits for amplifying dna
EP1845160A1 (en) 2005-02-10 2007-10-17 Riken Method for amplification of nucleotide sequence
US20070259340A1 (en) 2003-03-04 2007-11-08 Schramm Vern L Method and device for integrated nucleic acid integrity assessment and analysis
WO2007147079A2 (en) 2006-06-14 2007-12-21 Living Microsystems, Inc. Rare cell analysis using sample splitting and dna tags
US20080038727A1 (en) 2006-03-10 2008-02-14 Applera Corporation MicroRNA and Messenger RNA Detection on Arrays
US20080070303A1 (en) 2005-11-21 2008-03-20 West Michael D Methods to accelerate the isolation of novel cell strains from pluripotent stem cells and cells obtained thereby
US20080119736A1 (en) 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 General Electric Company Heart rate demodulation of periodic movement in ultrasound data for object identification
US7393665B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2008-07-01 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US20080194414A1 (en) 2006-04-24 2008-08-14 Albert Thomas J Enrichment and sequence analysis of genomic regions
WO2008096318A2 (en) 2007-02-09 2008-08-14 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Identification system
JP2008256428A (en) 2007-04-03 2008-10-23 Intec Systems Institute Inc Method for detecting block position of microarray image
US20080269068A1 (en) 2007-02-06 2008-10-30 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplex decoding of sequence tags in barcodes
US20080274458A1 (en) 2007-05-01 2008-11-06 Latham Gary J Nucleic acid quantitation methods
WO2008147428A1 (en) 2006-10-05 2008-12-04 Nanopoint, Inc. Systems and methods for active microfluidic cell handling
US20080299609A1 (en) 2007-03-12 2008-12-04 Sungkyunkwan University Foundation For Corporate Collaboration Uracil-DNA glycosylase of psychrobacter sp. HJ147 and use thereof
WO2008150432A1 (en) 2007-06-01 2008-12-11 454 Life Sciences Corporation System and meth0d for identification of individual samples from a multiplex mixture
US7476786B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2009-01-13 Intel Corporation Controlled alignment of nano-barcodes encoding specific information for scanning probe microscopy (SPM) reading
US20090061513A1 (en) 2007-05-15 2009-03-05 Picovitro Ab Cell sorting and cell cultivation methods
US20090137407A1 (en) 2006-05-18 2009-05-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Genomic library construction
US20090220385A1 (en) 2005-11-01 2009-09-03 Brown Jeffrey A Liquid dispensing for high-throughput experimentation
US20090226891A2 (en) 1995-04-25 2009-09-10 Nexus Biosystems, Inc. Encoded solid supports for biological processing and assays using same
US20090253586A1 (en) 2008-02-21 2009-10-08 Gentel Biosciences, Inc. Substrates for multiplexed assays and uses thereof
US20090252414A1 (en) 2007-01-16 2009-10-08 Olympus Corporation Fluorescent signal analyzing apparatus and fluorescent signal analyzing method
US20090283676A1 (en) 2006-04-04 2009-11-19 Sidec Technologies Ab Extended electron tomography
US20090290151A1 (en) 2008-03-03 2009-11-26 Ajjer Llc Analysis of arrays by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy
US20090298709A1 (en) 2008-05-28 2009-12-03 Affymetrix, Inc. Assays for determining telomere length and repeated sequence copy number
DE102008025656A1 (en) 2008-05-28 2009-12-03 Genxpro Gmbh Method for quantitative analysis of nicoleic acids, markers therefor and their use
WO2009148560A2 (en) 2008-05-30 2009-12-10 Board Of Regents, The Universtiy Of Texas System Methods and compositions for nucleic acid sequencing
US7635566B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2009-12-22 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Methods and compositions for isolating nucleic acid sequence variants
US20100069250A1 (en) 2008-08-16 2010-03-18 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Digital PCR Calibration for High Throughput Sequencing
WO2010030818A2 (en) 2008-09-10 2010-03-18 University Of Medicine And Dentistry Of New Jersey IMAGING INDIVIDUAL mRNA MOLECULES USING MULTIPLE SINGLY LABELED PROBES
US20100105886A1 (en) 2003-08-29 2010-04-29 Life Technologies Corporation Compositions, methods, and kits for fabricating coded molecular tags
US20100105049A1 (en) 2008-09-16 2010-04-29 Sequenom, Inc. Processes and compositions for methylation-based enrichment of fetal nucleic acid from a maternal sample useful for non invasive prenatal diagnoses
US20100120630A1 (en) 2007-01-30 2010-05-13 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and devices for biomolecular arrays
US20100159533A1 (en) 2008-11-24 2010-06-24 Helicos Biosciences Corporation Simplified sample preparation for rna analysis
US20100255471A1 (en) 2009-01-20 2010-10-07 Stanford University Single cell gene expression for diagnosis, prognosis and identification of drug targets
WO2010117620A2 (en) 2009-03-30 2010-10-14 Illumina, Inc. Gene expression analysis in single cells
US20100267028A1 (en) 2008-12-24 2010-10-21 Boris Pasche Tgfbr1 HAPLOINSUFFICIENCY MODIFIES RISK FOR CANCER
US7822555B2 (en) 2002-11-11 2010-10-26 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US20100291666A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2010-11-18 Gordon Bruce Collier Molecular diagnostics system and methods
US20100300895A1 (en) 2009-05-29 2010-12-02 Ion Torrent Systems, Inc. Apparatus and methods for performing electrochemical reactions
US20100323348A1 (en) 2009-01-31 2010-12-23 The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate Methods and Compositions for Using Error-Detecting and/or Error-Correcting Barcodes in Nucleic Acid Amplification Process
US20100330574A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2010-12-30 Whitman Douglas F Chimeric primers with hairpin conformations and methods of using same
US20110038507A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2011-02-17 Hager Environmental and Atmospheric Technologie, LLC Device and Method for Quantification of Gases in Plumes by Remote Sensing
US20110059556A1 (en) 2009-09-04 2011-03-10 The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York Rapid and Continuous Analyte Processing in Droplet Microfluidic Devices
US20110059436A1 (en) 2000-07-07 2011-03-10 Life Technologies Corporation Methods for sequence determination
US20110070584A1 (en) 2001-10-22 2011-03-24 Xdx, Inc. Methods and compositions for diagnosing and monitoring autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases
US20110072889A1 (en) 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated Bcr-abl truncation mutations
US20110160078A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2011-06-30 Affymetrix, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US20110201507A1 (en) 2010-01-19 2011-08-18 Rava Richard P Sequencing methods and compositions for prenatal diagnoses
US20110230358A1 (en) 2010-01-19 2011-09-22 Artemis Health, Inc. Identification of polymorphic sequences in mixtures of genomic dna by whole genome sequencing
US20110244455A1 (en) 2010-02-12 2011-10-06 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Digital analyte analysis
WO2011123246A2 (en) 2010-04-01 2011-10-06 Illumina, Inc. Solid-phase clonal amplification and related methods
WO2011143659A2 (en) 2010-05-14 2011-11-17 Fluidigm Corporation Nucleic acid isolation methods
US20110294689A1 (en) 2010-05-27 2011-12-01 Affymetrix, Inc Multiplex Amplification Methods
WO2011155833A2 (en) 2010-06-09 2011-12-15 Keygene N.V. Combinatorial sequence barcodes for high throughput screening
US20120014977A1 (en) 2010-02-19 2012-01-19 National University Corporation Chiba University NOVEL ALTERNATIVE SPLICING VARIANT OF OATP1B3 mRNA
US20120034607A1 (en) 2006-12-14 2012-02-09 Life Technologies Corporation Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes using large scale fet arrays
US20120040843A1 (en) 2010-08-12 2012-02-16 Dublin City University Centrifugal capture system
US20120065081A1 (en) 2009-04-30 2012-03-15 Chee Mark S Nucleic acid constructs and methods of use
US20120071331A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2012-03-22 James Casbon Increasing confidence of allele calls with molecular counting
WO2012042374A2 (en) 2010-10-01 2012-04-05 Anssi Jussi Nikolai Taipale Method of determining number or concentration of molecules
WO2012047297A2 (en) 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 Chen Gao Highly multiplexed real-time pcr using encoded microbeads
WO2012048341A1 (en) 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 President And Fellows Of Harvard College High-throughput single cell barcoding
US20120087862A1 (en) 2006-08-09 2012-04-12 Homestead Clinical Corporation Organ-specific proteins and methods of their use
US20120142018A1 (en) 2010-12-05 2012-06-07 Wenbin Jiang Rapid Single Cell Based Parallel Biological Cell Sorter
US20120149603A1 (en) 2010-12-09 2012-06-14 Akonni Biosystems Sample analysis system
US20120156675A1 (en) 2009-06-09 2012-06-21 Oxford Gene Technology Ip Limited Picowell capture devices for analysing single cells or other particles
WO2012083225A2 (en) 2010-12-16 2012-06-21 Gigagen, Inc. System and methods for massively parallel analysis of nycleic acids in single cells
US20120165219A1 (en) 2009-09-01 2012-06-28 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Devices and methods for microarray selection
US20120163681A1 (en) 2010-11-29 2012-06-28 Jesper Lohse Methods and systems for analyzing images of specimens processed by a programmable quantitative assay
US20120173159A1 (en) 2010-12-30 2012-07-05 Life Technologies Corporation Methods, systems, and computer readable media for nucleic acid sequencing
US20120190020A1 (en) 2011-01-25 2012-07-26 Aria Diagnostics, Inc. Detection of genetic abnormalities
WO2012108864A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-08-16 Illumina, Inc. Selective enrichment of nucleic acids
US20120220494A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2012-08-30 Raindance Technolgies, Inc. Compositions and methods for molecular labeling
US20120220022A1 (en) 2009-09-01 2012-08-30 Trustees Of Boston University High throughput multichannel reader and uses thereof
US20120231972A1 (en) 2009-03-19 2012-09-13 Golyshin Peter N Probe Compound for Detecting and Isolating Enzymes and Means and Methods Using the Same
WO2012129363A2 (en) 2011-03-24 2012-09-27 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Single cell nucleic acid detection and analysis
US20120252012A1 (en) 2009-05-14 2012-10-04 Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Marseille Method for detecting prokaryotic dna from a feces sample
US20120253689A1 (en) 2005-06-07 2012-10-04 Rogan Peter K Ab initio generation of single copy genomic probes
WO2012140224A1 (en) 2011-04-13 2012-10-18 Jonas Frisen Method and product for localised or spatial detection of nucleic acid in a tissue sample
WO2012142213A2 (en) 2011-04-15 2012-10-18 The Johns Hopkins University Safe sequencing system
US8298767B2 (en) 2009-08-20 2012-10-30 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Compositions and methods for intramolecular nucleic acid rearrangement
WO2012149042A2 (en) 2011-04-25 2012-11-01 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Methods and compositions for nucleic acid analysis
WO2012162267A2 (en) 2011-05-20 2012-11-29 Fluidigm Corporation Nucleic acid encoding reactions
US20120322681A1 (en) 2011-06-15 2012-12-20 Gen9, Inc. Methods for Preparative In Vitro Cloning
US20130022977A1 (en) 2004-02-27 2013-01-24 Sequenom, Inc Methods for detecting fetal nucleic acids and diagnosing fetal abnormalities
WO2013019075A2 (en) 2011-08-01 2013-02-07 연세대학교산학협력단 Method of preparing nucleic acid molecules
US20130035248A1 (en) 2011-05-20 2013-02-07 Phthisis Diagnostics Microsporidia Detection System and Method
US20130040344A1 (en) 2010-01-25 2013-02-14 Rd Biosciences Inc Self-folding amplification of target nucleic acid
US20130040847A1 (en) 2010-03-04 2013-02-14 Miacom Diagnostics Gmbh Enhanced multiplex fish
US20130040843A1 (en) 2010-02-05 2013-02-14 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Increasing Multiplex Level by Externalization of Passive Reference in PCR Reactions
US20130045994A1 (en) 2009-03-05 2013-02-21 Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited Pyridine derivative
JP2013039275A (en) 2011-08-18 2013-02-28 Olympus Corp Fluorescence observation device, fluorescence observation system and method for processing fluorescence image
US8486682B2 (en) 2008-05-08 2013-07-16 Amano Enzyme Inc. β-amylase, gene coding therefor and manufacturing method thereof
US20130190206A1 (en) 2010-07-13 2013-07-25 Dublin City University Direct Clone Analysis and Selection Technology
US20130210659A1 (en) 2012-02-10 2013-08-15 Andrew Watson Molecular diagnostic screening assay
WO2013117595A2 (en) 2012-02-07 2013-08-15 Illumina Cambridge Limited Targeted enrichment and amplification of nucleic acids on a support
US20130225418A1 (en) 2012-02-24 2013-08-29 Andrew Watson Labeling and sample preparation for sequencing
US20130225623A1 (en) 2010-10-27 2013-08-29 Mount Sinai School Of Medicine Methods of Treating Psychiatric or Neurological Disorders with MGLUR Antagonists
WO2013130674A1 (en) 2012-02-27 2013-09-06 Cellular Research, Inc. Compositions and kits for molecular counting
WO2013148525A1 (en) 2012-03-29 2013-10-03 Complete Genomics, Inc. Flow cells for high density array chips
US20130295568A1 (en) 2010-02-12 2013-11-07 Darren Roy Link Digital analyte analysis
WO2013173394A2 (en) 2012-05-14 2013-11-21 Cb Biotechnologies, Inc. Method for increasing accuracy in quantitative detection of polynucleotides
WO2013177206A2 (en) 2012-05-21 2013-11-28 Fluidigm Corporation Single-particle analysis of particle populations
WO2013176767A1 (en) 2012-05-25 2013-11-28 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Microfluidic devices, solid supports for reagents and related methods
US8603749B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2013-12-10 Biospherex, LLC Multitag sequencing ecogenomics analysis-US
WO2013188831A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Uniquely tagged rearranged adaptive immune receptor genes in a complex gene set
WO2013188872A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System High throughput sequencing of multiple transcripts of a single cell
WO2013191775A2 (en) 2012-06-18 2013-12-27 Nugen Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for negative selection of non-desired nucleic acid sequences
WO2014015084A2 (en) 2012-07-17 2014-01-23 Counsyl, Inc. System and methods for detecting genetic variation
US20140024032A1 (en) 2011-02-04 2014-01-23 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Method for Detecting Chromosome Structure and Gene Expression Simultaneously in Single Cells
WO2014015098A1 (en) 2012-07-18 2014-01-23 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. A method of normalizing biological samples
WO2014018460A1 (en) 2012-07-24 2014-01-30 Sequenta, Inc. Single cell analysis using sequence tags
WO2014028537A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-02-20 10X Technologies, Inc. Microcapsule compositions and methods
US20140065609A1 (en) * 2010-10-22 2014-03-06 James Hicks Varietal counting of nucleic acids for obtaining genomic copy number information
WO2014071361A1 (en) 2012-11-05 2014-05-08 Rubicon Genomics Barcoding nucleic acids
US20140147860A1 (en) 2011-06-27 2014-05-29 Life Technologies Corporation Acoustic Cytometry Methods and Protocols
WO2014093676A1 (en) 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 10X Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for processing polynucleotides
US20140178438A1 (en) 2011-05-24 2014-06-26 Ugur Sahin Individualized vaccines for cancer
US20140194324A1 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-07-10 Illumina Cambridge Limited Sample preparation on a solid support
WO2014108850A2 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-07-17 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. High throughput transcriptome analysis
US20140206079A1 (en) 2013-01-24 2014-07-24 Sabic Innovative Plastics Ip B.V. Microwell plate
US20140206547A1 (en) 2013-01-22 2014-07-24 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Haplotying of hla loci with ultra-deep shotgun sequencing
US20140216128A1 (en) 2013-02-01 2014-08-07 Becton Dickinson And Company Methods and systems for assessing sample behavior in a flow cytometer
US20140228255A1 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 10X Technologies, Inc. Polynucleotide barcode generation
WO2014126937A1 (en) 2013-02-14 2014-08-21 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Suspension arrays and multiplexed assays based thereon
US20140243242A1 (en) 2011-08-08 2014-08-28 The Broad Institute. Inc. Compositions and methods for co-amplifying subsequences of a nucleic acid fragment sequence
WO2014144495A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Abvitro, Inc. Single cell bar-coding for antibody discovery
US20140272952A1 (en) 2009-04-02 2014-09-18 Fluidigm Corporation Multi-primer amplification method for barcoding of target nucleic acids
US20140274811A1 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Lyle J. Arnold Methods for Amplifying a Complete Genome or Transcriptome
WO2014145992A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Uniquely tagged rearranged adaptive immune receptor genes in a complex gene set
US8841071B2 (en) 2011-06-02 2014-09-23 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Sample multiplexing
US8856410B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2014-10-07 SK Hynix Inc. Semiconductor memory apparatus
US20140303005A1 (en) 2013-04-05 2014-10-09 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Rare cell analysis after negative selection
US20140309945A1 (en) 2011-11-30 2014-10-16 Samsung Sds Co., Ltd. Genome sequence alignment apparatus and method
US20140315211A1 (en) 2011-05-26 2014-10-23 Brandeis University Methods for suppression pcr
EP2805769A1 (en) 2013-05-24 2014-11-26 European Molecular Biology Laboratory Methods for nano-scale single cell analysis
WO2014201273A1 (en) 2013-06-12 2014-12-18 The Broad Institute, Inc. High-throughput rna-seq
US20140378349A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20140378345A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20140378322A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20140378350A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
WO2014210353A2 (en) 2013-06-27 2014-12-31 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20150005200A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2015-01-01 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20150005199A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2015-01-01 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
WO2015002908A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2015-01-08 Sequenta, Inc. Large-scale biomolecular analysis with sequence tags
US20150017652A1 (en) 2012-05-08 2015-01-15 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Compositions and Method for Measuring and Calibrating Amplification Bias in Multiplexed PCR Reactions
WO2015031691A1 (en) 2013-08-28 2015-03-05 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US20150066385A1 (en) 2013-08-30 2015-03-05 10X Technologies, Inc. Sequencing methods
WO2015035087A1 (en) 2013-09-04 2015-03-12 Fluidigm Corporation Proximity assays for detecting nucleic acids and proteins in a single cell
WO2015044428A1 (en) 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Sten Linnarsson Method for capturing and encoding nucleic acid from a plurality of single cells
WO2015047186A1 (en) 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Di Wu Methods to profile molecular complexes by using proximity bar-coding
WO2015103339A1 (en) 2013-12-30 2015-07-09 Atreca, Inc. Analysis of nucleic acids associated with single cells using nucleic acid barcodes
WO2015134787A2 (en) 2014-03-05 2015-09-11 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Methods using randomer-containing synthetic molecules
US20150298091A1 (en) 2014-04-21 2015-10-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Systems and methods for barcoding nucleic acids
US20150329852A1 (en) 2012-08-08 2015-11-19 Garry P. Nolan Increasing dynamic range for identifying multiple epitopes in cells
WO2015200869A1 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-12-30 10X Genomics, Inc. Analysis of nucleic acid sequences
US20150376609A1 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-12-31 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods of Analyzing Nucleic Acids from Individual Cells or Cell Populations
US20160026758A1 (en) 2012-02-27 2016-01-28 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Methods and uses for molecular tags
US9315857B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-04-19 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse label-tags
US20160244828A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Becton, Dickinson And Company High-throughput single-cell analysis combining proteomic and genomic information
WO2016138500A1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for barcoding nucleic acids for sequencing
US20160289669A1 (en) 2015-01-22 2016-10-06 Becton, Dickinson And Company Devices and systems for molecular barcoding of nucleic acid targets in single cells
US20160289740A1 (en) 2015-03-30 2016-10-06 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for combinatorial barcoding
US20160312276A1 (en) 2015-04-23 2016-10-27 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for whole transcriptome amplification
US20160320720A1 (en) 2015-04-28 2016-11-03 Kyocera Document Solutions Inc. Image forming apparatus
US9582877B2 (en) 2013-10-07 2017-02-28 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and systems for digitally counting features on arrays
US20170073730A1 (en) 2015-09-11 2017-03-16 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for library normalization
US9727810B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2017-08-08 Cellular Research, Inc. Spatially addressable molecular barcoding
US9787810B1 (en) 2016-05-28 2017-10-10 Hong Fu Jin Precision Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Angle adjusting mechanism for telephone
US20170342405A1 (en) 2016-05-31 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Molecular indexing of internal sequences
WO2017205691A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Molecular label counting adjustment methods
US20170342465A1 (en) 2016-05-31 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Error correction in amplification of samples
US20180002738A1 (en) 2015-01-23 2018-01-04 Qiagen Sciences, Llc High multiplex pcr with molecular barcoding
US20180037942A1 (en) 2016-08-03 2018-02-08 Cellular Research, Inc. Enzyme-independent molecular indexing
US20180088112A1 (en) 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Cellular Research, Inc. Measurement of protein expression using reagents with barcoded oligonucleotide sequences
US9951386B2 (en) 2014-06-26 2018-04-24 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods and systems for processing polynucleotides
WO2018089377A1 (en) 2016-11-08 2018-05-17 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods for cell label classification
WO2018094263A1 (en) 2016-11-18 2018-05-24 Twist Bioscience Corporation Polynucleotide libraries having controlled stoichiometry and synthesis thereof
US20180251825A1 (en) 2017-02-02 2018-09-06 New York Genome Center Inc. Methods and compositions for identifying or quantifying targets in a biological sample
US20190323088A1 (en) 2017-12-08 2019-10-24 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods and compositions for labeling cells
US20200002766A1 (en) 2017-01-31 2020-01-02 Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research Ltd Enhanced immune cell receptor sequencing methods
US10669570B2 (en) 2017-06-05 2020-06-02 Becton, Dickinson And Company Sample indexing for single cells
US20200248175A1 (en) 2017-10-23 2020-08-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Calling genetic variation from single-cell transcriptomes
US20200255888A1 (en) 2019-02-12 2020-08-13 Becton, Dickinson And Company Determining expressions of transcript variants and polyadenylation sites
US10822643B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2020-11-03 Cellular Research, Inc. Accurate molecular barcoding
US20200392479A1 (en) 2017-10-23 2020-12-17 The Broad Institute, Inc. Single cell cellular component enrichment from barcoded sequencing libraries
US11124823B2 (en) 2015-06-01 2021-09-21 Becton, Dickinson And Company Methods for RNA quantification
US20220062394A1 (en) 2018-12-17 2022-03-03 The Broad Institute, Inc. Methods for identifying neoantigens
US11371076B2 (en) 2019-01-16 2022-06-28 Becton, Dickinson And Company Polymerase chain reaction normalization through primer titration

Patent Citations (456)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4510244A (en) 1980-04-17 1985-04-09 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University Cell labeling with antigen-coupled microspheres
US4725536A (en) 1985-09-19 1988-02-16 Genetics Institute, Inc. Reagent polynucleotide complex with multiple target binding regions, and kit and methods
US6512105B1 (en) 1986-11-24 2003-01-28 Gen-Probe Incorporated Methods for making oligonucleotide probes for the detection and/or quantitation of non-viral organisms
WO1989001050A1 (en) 1987-07-31 1989-02-09 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Selective amplification of target polynucleotide sequences
US5149625A (en) 1987-08-11 1992-09-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplex analysis of DNA
US5124246A (en) 1987-10-15 1992-06-23 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid multimers and amplified nucleic acid hybridization assays using same
US5656731A (en) 1987-10-15 1997-08-12 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid-amplified immunoassay probes
US6114149A (en) 1988-07-26 2000-09-05 Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Amplification of mixed sequence nucleic acid fragments
US5445934A (en) 1989-06-07 1995-08-29 Affymax Technologies N.V. Array of oligonucleotides on a solid substrate
US6576424B2 (en) 1989-06-07 2003-06-10 Affymetrix Inc. Arrays and methods for detecting nucleic acids
US6551784B2 (en) 1989-06-07 2003-04-22 Affymetrix Inc Method of comparing nucleic acid sequences
US6355432B1 (en) 1989-06-07 2002-03-12 Affymetrix Lnc. Products for detecting nucleic acids
US5925525A (en) 1989-06-07 1999-07-20 Affymetrix, Inc. Method of identifying nucleotide differences
US5800992A (en) 1989-06-07 1998-09-01 Fodor; Stephen P.A. Method of detecting nucleic acids
US6197506B1 (en) 1989-06-07 2001-03-06 Affymetrix, Inc. Method of detecting nucleic acids
US6395491B1 (en) 1989-06-07 2002-05-28 Affymetrix, Inc. Method of information storage and recovery
US5424186A (en) 1989-06-07 1995-06-13 Affymax Technologies N.V. Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis
US6309822B1 (en) 1989-06-07 2001-10-30 Affymetrix, Inc. Method for comparing copy number of nucleic acid sequences
US6440667B1 (en) 1989-06-07 2002-08-27 Affymetrix Inc. Analysis of target molecules using an encoding system
US5871928A (en) 1989-06-07 1999-02-16 Fodor; Stephen P. A. Methods for nucleic acid analysis
US5744305A (en) 1989-06-07 1998-04-28 Affymetrix, Inc. Arrays of materials attached to a substrate
US5200314A (en) 1990-03-23 1993-04-06 Chiron Corporation Polynucleotide capture assay employing in vitro amplification
US6451536B1 (en) 1990-12-06 2002-09-17 Affymetrix Inc. Products for detecting nucleic acids
US6544739B1 (en) 1990-12-06 2003-04-08 Affymetrix, Inc. Method for marking samples
US5981179A (en) 1991-11-14 1999-11-09 Digene Diagnostics, Inc. Continuous amplification reaction
US5424413A (en) 1992-01-22 1995-06-13 Gen-Probe Incorporated Branched nucleic acid probes
US6060596A (en) 1992-03-30 2000-05-09 The Scripps Research Institute Encoded combinatorial chemical libraries
US5981176A (en) 1992-06-17 1999-11-09 City Of Hope Method of detecting and discriminating between nucleic acid sequences
US6852488B2 (en) 1993-06-25 2005-02-08 Affymetrix, Inc. Identifying a base in a nucleic acid
US6284460B1 (en) 1993-06-25 2001-09-04 Affymetrix Inc. Hybridization and sequencing of nucleic acids using base pair mismatches
US6268152B1 (en) 1993-06-25 2001-07-31 Affymetrix, Inc. Probe kit for identifying a base in a nucleic acid
US5759778A (en) 1993-08-10 1998-06-02 Life Technologies, Inc. Method of nucleic acid sequence selection
US6309823B1 (en) 1993-10-26 2001-10-30 Affymetrix, Inc. Arrays of nucleic acid probes for analyzing biotransformation genes and methods of using the same
US5635352A (en) 1993-12-08 1997-06-03 Chiron Corporation Solution phase nucleic acid sandwich assays having reduced background noise
US5714330A (en) 1994-04-04 1998-02-03 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. DNA sequencing by stepwise ligation and cleavage
US6140489A (en) 1994-10-13 2000-10-31 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Compositions for sorting polynucleotides
US6138077A (en) 1994-10-13 2000-10-24 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program product for determining a set of non-hybridizing oligonucleotides
US6235475B1 (en) 1994-10-13 2001-05-22 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Oligonucleotide tags for sorting and identification
US5654413A (en) 1994-10-13 1997-08-05 Spectragen, Inc. Compositions for sorting polynucleotides
US5604097A (en) 1994-10-13 1997-02-18 Spectragen, Inc. Methods for sorting polynucleotides using oligonucleotide tags
US5846719A (en) 1994-10-13 1998-12-08 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Oligonucleotide tags for sorting and identification
US5635400A (en) 1994-10-13 1997-06-03 Spectragen, Inc. Minimally cross-hybridizing sets of oligonucleotide tags
US6172214B1 (en) 1994-10-13 2001-01-09 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Oligonucleotide tags for sorting and identification
US6600996B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2003-07-29 Affymetrix, Inc. Computer-aided techniques for analyzing biological sequences
US5658737A (en) 1994-10-28 1997-08-19 Gen-Probe Incorporated Compositions and methods for the simultaneous detection and quantification of multiple specific nucleic acid sequences
WO1996024061A1 (en) 1995-02-02 1996-08-08 Ontogen Corporation Methods and apparatus for synthesizing labeled combinatorial chemical libraries
US20090226891A2 (en) 1995-04-25 2009-09-10 Nexus Biosystems, Inc. Encoded solid supports for biological processing and assays using same
US5648245A (en) 1995-05-09 1997-07-15 Carnegie Institution Of Washington Method for constructing an oligonucleotide concatamer library by rolling circle replication
US5968740A (en) 1995-07-24 1999-10-19 Affymetrix, Inc. Method of Identifying a Base in a Nucleic Acid
WO1997010365A1 (en) 1995-09-15 1997-03-20 Affymax Technologies N.V. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high density oligonucleotide arrays
US6040138A (en) 1995-09-15 2000-03-21 Affymetrix, Inc. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high density oligonucleotide arrays
US5763175A (en) 1995-11-17 1998-06-09 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Simultaneous sequencing of tagged polynucleotides
US5854033A (en) 1995-11-21 1998-12-29 Yale University Rolling circle replication reporter systems
US6284485B1 (en) 1995-12-22 2001-09-04 Amgen Inc. Nucleic acids encoding osteoprotegerin
US5962272A (en) 1996-01-03 1999-10-05 Clontech Laboratories, Inc. Methods and compositions for full-length cDNA Cloning using a template-switching oligonucleotide
US5962271A (en) 1996-01-03 1999-10-05 Cloutech Laboratories, Inc. Methods and compositions for generating full-length cDNA having arbitrary nucleotide sequence at the 3'-end
US6458530B1 (en) 1996-04-04 2002-10-01 Affymetrix Inc. Selecting tag nucleic acids
EP0799897A1 (en) 1996-04-04 1997-10-08 Affymetrix, Inc. (a California Corporation) Methods and compositions for selecting tag nucleic acids and probe arrays
US20030104436A1 (en) 1996-04-04 2003-06-05 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods and compositions for selecting tag nucleic acids and probe arrays
US20040146901A1 (en) 1996-04-04 2004-07-29 Affymetrix, Inc. Selecting tag nucleic acids
US20070042419A1 (en) 1996-05-29 2007-02-22 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid sequence differences using coupled ligase detection and polymerase chain reactions
US6013445A (en) 1996-06-06 2000-01-11 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Massively parallel signature sequencing by ligation of encoded adaptors
US6064755A (en) 1996-07-05 2000-05-16 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image analyzing apparatus for producing density profile data of an image
US5935793A (en) 1996-09-27 1999-08-10 The Chinese University Of Hong Kong Parallel polynucleotide sequencing method using tagged primers
US6514699B1 (en) 1996-10-04 2003-02-04 Pe Corporation (Ny) Multiplex polynucleotide capture methods and compositions
US6124092A (en) 1996-10-04 2000-09-26 The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Multiplex polynucleotide capture methods and compositions
US6117631A (en) 1996-10-29 2000-09-12 Polyprobe, Inc. Detection of antigens via oligonucleotide antibody conjugates
US6468744B1 (en) 1997-01-03 2002-10-22 Affymetrix, Inc. Analysis of genetic polymorphisms and gene copy number
US6046005A (en) 1997-01-15 2000-04-04 Incyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nucleic acid sequencing with solid phase capturable terminators comprising a cleavable linking group
US6406848B1 (en) 1997-05-23 2002-06-18 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Planar arrays of microparticle-bound polynucleotides
WO1999015702A1 (en) 1997-09-24 1999-04-01 Life Technologies, Inc. Normalized nucleic acid libraries and methods of production thereof
WO1999028505A1 (en) 1997-12-03 1999-06-10 Curagen Corporation Methods and devices for measuring differential gene expression
US6265163B1 (en) 1998-01-09 2001-07-24 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Solid phase selection of differentially expressed genes
US6787308B2 (en) 1998-07-30 2004-09-07 Solexa Ltd. Arrayed biomolecules and their use in sequencing
US6653077B1 (en) 1998-09-04 2003-11-25 Lynx Therapeutics, Inc. Method of screening for genetic polymorphism
US6480791B1 (en) 1998-10-28 2002-11-12 Michael P. Strathmann Parallel methods for genomic analysis
US6197554B1 (en) 1998-11-20 2001-03-06 Shi-Lung Lin Method for generating full-length cDNA library from single cells
US6194454B1 (en) * 1999-03-01 2001-02-27 Pfizer Inc. Cyano containing oxamic acids and derivatives as thyroid receptor ligands
US6629040B1 (en) 1999-03-19 2003-09-30 University Of Washington Isotope distribution encoded tags for protein identification
WO2000058516A2 (en) 1999-03-26 2000-10-05 Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research Universal arrays
US6492121B2 (en) 1999-04-20 2002-12-10 Japan Bioindustry Association Method for determining a concentration of target nucleic acid molecules, nucleic acid probes for the method, and method for analyzing data obtained by the method
US6355431B1 (en) 1999-04-20 2002-03-12 Illumina, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid amplification reactions using bead arrays
US6372813B1 (en) 1999-06-25 2002-04-16 Motorola Methods and compositions for attachment of biomolecules to solid supports, hydrogels, and hydrogel arrays
US6326148B1 (en) 1999-07-12 2001-12-04 The Regents Of The University Of California Detection of copy number changes in colon cancer
US6440706B1 (en) 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
US7824889B2 (en) 1999-08-02 2010-11-02 The Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
US6753147B2 (en) 1999-08-02 2004-06-22 The Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
US7915015B2 (en) 1999-08-02 2011-03-29 The Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
US6436675B1 (en) 1999-09-28 2002-08-20 Maxygen, Inc. Use of codon-varied oligonucleotide synthesis for synthetic shuffling
US7155050B1 (en) 1999-11-03 2006-12-26 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Ab Method of analyzing cell samples, by creating and analyzing a resultant image
US6489114B2 (en) 1999-12-17 2002-12-03 Bio Merieux Process for labeling a ribonucleic acid, and labeled RNA fragments which are obtained thereby
US6235483B1 (en) 2000-01-31 2001-05-22 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Methods and kits for indirect labeling of nucleic acids
US20030003490A1 (en) 2000-02-07 2003-01-02 Illumina, Inc. Nucleic acid detection methods using universal priming
US20020072058A1 (en) 2000-03-24 2002-06-13 Voelker Leroy L. Method for amplifying quinolone-resistance-determining-regions and identifying polymorphic variants thereof
US20020065609A1 (en) 2000-04-10 2002-05-30 Matthew Ashby Methods for the survey and genetic analysis of populations
US20030207300A1 (en) 2000-04-28 2003-11-06 Matray Tracy J. Multiplex analytical platform using molecular tags
US20110059436A1 (en) 2000-07-07 2011-03-10 Life Technologies Corporation Methods for sequence determination
US20050105077A1 (en) 2000-08-02 2005-05-19 Aravind Padmanabhan Miniaturized cytometer for detecting multiple species in a sample
US6858412B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2005-02-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Direct multiplex characterization of genomic DNA
WO2002056014A2 (en) 2000-12-22 2002-07-18 Glaxo Group Limited Methods for encoding and decoding complex mixtures in arrayed assays
US20030049616A1 (en) 2001-01-08 2003-03-13 Sydney Brenner Enzymatic synthesis of oligonucleotide tags
WO2002070684A2 (en) 2001-01-11 2002-09-12 Lion Bioscience Ag Gene library for screening methods
WO2002059355A2 (en) 2001-01-25 2002-08-01 Tm Bioscience Corporation Polynucleotides for use as tags and tag complements, manufacture and use thereof
US20030165865A1 (en) 2001-01-29 2003-09-04 Hinkel Christopher A. Methods of analysis of nucleic acids
JP2005233974A (en) 2001-03-21 2005-09-02 Olympus Corp Biochemical inspection method
US20020168665A1 (en) 2001-03-21 2002-11-14 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Biochemical examination method
US20020187480A1 (en) 2001-05-04 2002-12-12 Genomics Research Partners Pty Ltd Diagnostic method for assessing a condition of a performance animal
US6849404B2 (en) 2001-05-07 2005-02-01 Bioneer Corporation Polymerase chain reaction of DNA of which base sequence is completely unidentified
US20040047769A1 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-03-11 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Biochip
US20050287548A1 (en) 2001-06-25 2005-12-29 Gang Bao Activatable probes and methods for in vivo gene detection
US20030013091A1 (en) 2001-07-03 2003-01-16 Krassen Dimitrov Methods for detection and quantification of analytes in complex mixtures
US7473767B2 (en) 2001-07-03 2009-01-06 The Institute For Systems Biology Methods for detection and quantification of analytes in complex mixtures
US20030082818A1 (en) 2001-07-12 2003-05-01 Automated Cell, Inc. Method and apparatus for monitoring of proteins and cells
US20040191823A1 (en) 2001-10-16 2004-09-30 Carmen Virgos Universal e-tag primer and probe compositions and methods
US20110070584A1 (en) 2001-10-22 2011-03-24 Xdx, Inc. Methods and compositions for diagnosing and monitoring autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases
US20030175908A1 (en) 2002-01-29 2003-09-18 Sten Linnarsson Methods and means for manipulating nucleic acid
US20030186251A1 (en) 2002-04-01 2003-10-02 Brookhaven Science Associates, Llc Genome sequence tags
US20070178478A1 (en) 2002-05-08 2007-08-02 Dhallan Ravinder S Methods for detection of genetic disorders
US20040096368A1 (en) 2002-06-28 2004-05-20 Igen International, Inc. Assay systems and components
US20050019776A1 (en) 2002-06-28 2005-01-27 Callow Matthew James Universal selective genome amplification and universal genotyping system
WO2004017374A2 (en) 2002-08-16 2004-02-26 Clinical Microarrays, Inc. Reading of fluorescent arrays
US7476786B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2009-01-13 Intel Corporation Controlled alignment of nano-barcodes encoding specific information for scanning probe microscopy (SPM) reading
US20070031829A1 (en) 2002-09-30 2007-02-08 Hideyuki Yasuno Oligonucleotides for genotyping thymidylate synthase gene
US20050053952A1 (en) 2002-10-02 2005-03-10 California Institute Of Technology Microfluidic nucleic acid analysis
US20060234234A1 (en) 2002-10-11 2006-10-19 Van Dongen Jacobus Johannes M Nucleic acid amplification primers for pcr-based clonality studies
US20040157243A1 (en) 2002-11-11 2004-08-12 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US7424368B2 (en) 2002-11-11 2008-09-09 Affymetix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US7822555B2 (en) 2002-11-11 2010-10-26 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US20040096892A1 (en) 2002-11-15 2004-05-20 The Johns Hopkins University Digital karyotyping
US20040121342A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 Orchid Biosciences, Inc. Methods and compositions for conducting primer extension and polymorphism detection reactions
US20060040297A1 (en) 2003-01-29 2006-02-23 Leamon John H Methods of amplifying and sequencing nucleic acids
US20070259340A1 (en) 2003-03-04 2007-11-08 Schramm Vern L Method and device for integrated nucleic acid integrity assessment and analysis
US20060246453A1 (en) 2003-03-28 2006-11-02 Seishi Kato Method of synthesizing cdna
EP1473080A2 (en) 2003-04-30 2004-11-03 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Chemical array reading
US20040253593A1 (en) 2003-06-12 2004-12-16 Hong Cai Quenching methods for background reduction in luminescence-based probe-target binding assays
US20040259118A1 (en) 2003-06-23 2004-12-23 Macevicz Stephen C. Methods and compositions for nucleic acid sequence analysis
US20070065823A1 (en) 2003-07-05 2007-03-22 Devin Dressman Method and compositions for detection and enumeration of genetic variations
US20070105090A1 (en) 2003-08-16 2007-05-10 Andrew Cassidy Amplification method
US20100105886A1 (en) 2003-08-29 2010-04-29 Life Technologies Corporation Compositions, methods, and kits for fabricating coded molecular tags
US20060286570A1 (en) 2003-09-09 2006-12-21 Rowlen Kathy L Use of photopolymerization for amplification and detection of a molecular recognition event
WO2005042759A2 (en) 2003-09-10 2005-05-12 Althea Technologies, Inc. Expression profiling using microarrays
US20050170373A1 (en) 2003-09-10 2005-08-04 Althea Technologies, Inc. Expression profiling using microarrays
US7824856B2 (en) 2003-09-10 2010-11-02 Althea Technologies, Inc. Expression profiling using microarrays
US20060024690A1 (en) 2003-09-19 2006-02-02 Kao H P Normalization of data using controls
US20070042400A1 (en) 2003-11-10 2007-02-22 Choi K Y Methods of preparing nucleic acid for detection
US20080261204A1 (en) 2004-01-23 2008-10-23 Lingvitae As Polynucleotide Ligation Reactions
WO2005071110A2 (en) 2004-01-23 2005-08-04 Lingvitae As Improving polynucleotide ligation reactions
WO2005080604A2 (en) 2004-02-12 2005-09-01 Compass Genetics, Llc Genetic analysis by sequence-specific sorting
US20130022977A1 (en) 2004-02-27 2013-01-24 Sequenom, Inc Methods for detecting fetal nucleic acids and diagnosing fetal abnormalities
WO2005111242A2 (en) 2004-05-10 2005-11-24 Parallele Bioscience, Inc. Digital profiling of polynucleotide populations
US20050250147A1 (en) 2004-05-10 2005-11-10 Macevicz Stephen C Digital profiling of polynucleotide populations
US20060002824A1 (en) 2004-06-07 2006-01-05 Irm, Llc Dispensing systems, software, and related methods
US20060035258A1 (en) 2004-08-06 2006-02-16 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying DNA copy number changes
US20060041385A1 (en) 2004-08-18 2006-02-23 Bauer Kenneth D Method of quantitating proteins and genes in cells using a combination of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
US20070202523A1 (en) 2004-08-27 2007-08-30 Becker Michael M Methods and kits for amplifying dna
US20060073506A1 (en) 2004-09-17 2006-04-06 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for identifying biological samples
EP1647600A2 (en) 2004-09-17 2006-04-19 Affymetrix, Inc. (A US Entity) Methods for identifying biological samples by addition of nucleic acid bar-code tags
WO2006071776A2 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-07-06 Ge Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp. Ligation-based rna amplification
US20100291666A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2010-11-18 Gordon Bruce Collier Molecular diagnostics system and methods
US8476018B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2013-07-02 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US8148068B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2012-04-03 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US20080318802A1 (en) 2005-02-10 2008-12-25 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
EP1845160A1 (en) 2005-02-10 2007-10-17 Riken Method for amplification of nucleotide sequence
US8168385B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2012-05-01 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US8470996B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2013-06-25 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US7393665B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2008-07-01 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US8318433B2 (en) 2005-02-10 2012-11-27 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Methods and compositions for tagging and identifying polynucleotides
US20060223122A1 (en) 2005-03-08 2006-10-05 Agnes Fogo Classifying and predicting glomerulosclerosis using a proteomics approach
US20060211030A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2006-09-21 Sydney Brenner Methods and compositions for assay readouts on multiple analytical platforms
WO2006102264A1 (en) 2005-03-18 2006-09-28 Fluidigm Corporation Thermal reaction device and method for using the same
US20060223197A1 (en) 2005-04-05 2006-10-05 Claus Vielsack Method and apparatus for the detection of biological molecules
WO2006116127A2 (en) 2005-04-21 2006-11-02 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Compositions for use in identification of bacteria
US20060263709A1 (en) 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Process for producing resin particle liquid dispersion for electrostatic image developing toner, electrostatic image developing toner and production process thereof
US20060263789A1 (en) 2005-05-19 2006-11-23 Robert Kincaid Unique identifiers for indicating properties associated with entities to which they are attached, and methods for using
US20120253689A1 (en) 2005-06-07 2012-10-04 Rogan Peter K Ab initio generation of single copy genomic probes
US20060280352A1 (en) 2005-06-10 2006-12-14 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Image analysis of biological objects
US20070020640A1 (en) 2005-07-21 2007-01-25 Mccloskey Megan L Molecular encoding of nucleic acid templates for PCR and other forms of sequence analysis
US20070117121A1 (en) 2005-09-16 2007-05-24 Hutchison Stephen K cDNA library preparation
US20090220385A1 (en) 2005-11-01 2009-09-03 Brown Jeffrey A Liquid dispensing for high-throughput experimentation
US20070117134A1 (en) 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Kou Zhong C Method for detection and quantification of T-cell receptor Vbeta repertoire
US20080070303A1 (en) 2005-11-21 2008-03-20 West Michael D Methods to accelerate the isolation of novel cell strains from pluripotent stem cells and cells obtained thereby
US20070133856A1 (en) 2005-12-09 2007-06-14 Cytyc Corporation Cross-frame object reconstruction for image-based cytology applications
US7544473B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2009-06-09 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Nucleic acid analysis using sequence tokens
US7537897B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2009-05-26 Population Genetics Technologies, Ltd. Molecular counting
US8445205B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2013-05-21 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Nucleic acid analysis using sequence tokens
WO2007087310A2 (en) 2006-01-23 2007-08-02 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Nucleic acid analysis using sequence tokens
WO2007087312A2 (en) 2006-01-23 2007-08-02 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Molecular counting
US20070172873A1 (en) 2006-01-23 2007-07-26 Sydney Brenner Molecular counting
US20080038727A1 (en) 2006-03-10 2008-02-14 Applera Corporation MicroRNA and Messenger RNA Detection on Arrays
US20090283676A1 (en) 2006-04-04 2009-11-19 Sidec Technologies Ab Extended electron tomography
US20080194414A1 (en) 2006-04-24 2008-08-14 Albert Thomas J Enrichment and sequence analysis of genomic regions
US20090137407A1 (en) 2006-05-18 2009-05-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Genomic library construction
US7985546B2 (en) 2006-05-18 2011-07-26 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Genomic library construction
WO2007147079A2 (en) 2006-06-14 2007-12-21 Living Microsystems, Inc. Rare cell analysis using sample splitting and dna tags
US20120087862A1 (en) 2006-08-09 2012-04-12 Homestead Clinical Corporation Organ-specific proteins and methods of their use
WO2008147428A1 (en) 2006-10-05 2008-12-04 Nanopoint, Inc. Systems and methods for active microfluidic cell handling
US8603749B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2013-12-10 Biospherex, LLC Multitag sequencing ecogenomics analysis-US
US20080119736A1 (en) 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 General Electric Company Heart rate demodulation of periodic movement in ultrasound data for object identification
US20120045844A1 (en) 2006-12-14 2012-02-23 Life Technologies Corporation Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes using large scale fet arrays
US20120034607A1 (en) 2006-12-14 2012-02-09 Life Technologies Corporation Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes using large scale fet arrays
US20090252414A1 (en) 2007-01-16 2009-10-08 Olympus Corporation Fluorescent signal analyzing apparatus and fluorescent signal analyzing method
US20100120630A1 (en) 2007-01-30 2010-05-13 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and devices for biomolecular arrays
US20080269068A1 (en) 2007-02-06 2008-10-30 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplex decoding of sequence tags in barcodes
WO2008096318A2 (en) 2007-02-09 2008-08-14 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Identification system
US20080299609A1 (en) 2007-03-12 2008-12-04 Sungkyunkwan University Foundation For Corporate Collaboration Uracil-DNA glycosylase of psychrobacter sp. HJ147 and use thereof
JP2008256428A (en) 2007-04-03 2008-10-23 Intec Systems Institute Inc Method for detecting block position of microarray image
US20080274458A1 (en) 2007-05-01 2008-11-06 Latham Gary J Nucleic acid quantitation methods
US20090061513A1 (en) 2007-05-15 2009-03-05 Picovitro Ab Cell sorting and cell cultivation methods
US20090105959A1 (en) 2007-06-01 2009-04-23 Braverman Michael S System and method for identification of individual samples from a multiplex mixture
WO2008150432A1 (en) 2007-06-01 2008-12-11 454 Life Sciences Corporation System and meth0d for identification of individual samples from a multiplex mixture
US8241850B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2012-08-14 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Methods and compositions for isolating nucleic acid sequence variants
US7635566B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2009-12-22 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Methods and compositions for isolating nucleic acid sequence variants
US20090253586A1 (en) 2008-02-21 2009-10-08 Gentel Biosciences, Inc. Substrates for multiplexed assays and uses thereof
US20090290151A1 (en) 2008-03-03 2009-11-26 Ajjer Llc Analysis of arrays by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy
US8486682B2 (en) 2008-05-08 2013-07-16 Amano Enzyme Inc. β-amylase, gene coding therefor and manufacturing method thereof
WO2009152928A2 (en) 2008-05-28 2009-12-23 Genxpro Gmbh Method for the quantitative analysis of nucleic acids, markers therefor and their use
US20090298709A1 (en) 2008-05-28 2009-12-03 Affymetrix, Inc. Assays for determining telomere length and repeated sequence copy number
DE102008025656A1 (en) 2008-05-28 2009-12-03 Genxpro Gmbh Method for quantitative analysis of nicoleic acids, markers therefor and their use
WO2009148560A2 (en) 2008-05-30 2009-12-10 Board Of Regents, The Universtiy Of Texas System Methods and compositions for nucleic acid sequencing
US20100069250A1 (en) 2008-08-16 2010-03-18 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Digital PCR Calibration for High Throughput Sequencing
WO2010030818A2 (en) 2008-09-10 2010-03-18 University Of Medicine And Dentistry Of New Jersey IMAGING INDIVIDUAL mRNA MOLECULES USING MULTIPLE SINGLY LABELED PROBES
US20100105049A1 (en) 2008-09-16 2010-04-29 Sequenom, Inc. Processes and compositions for methylation-based enrichment of fetal nucleic acid from a maternal sample useful for non invasive prenatal diagnoses
US20100159533A1 (en) 2008-11-24 2010-06-24 Helicos Biosciences Corporation Simplified sample preparation for rna analysis
US20100267028A1 (en) 2008-12-24 2010-10-21 Boris Pasche Tgfbr1 HAPLOINSUFFICIENCY MODIFIES RISK FOR CANCER
US20100255471A1 (en) 2009-01-20 2010-10-07 Stanford University Single cell gene expression for diagnosis, prognosis and identification of drug targets
US20100323348A1 (en) 2009-01-31 2010-12-23 The Regents Of The University Of Colorado, A Body Corporate Methods and Compositions for Using Error-Detecting and/or Error-Correcting Barcodes in Nucleic Acid Amplification Process
US20130045994A1 (en) 2009-03-05 2013-02-21 Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited Pyridine derivative
US20120231972A1 (en) 2009-03-19 2012-09-13 Golyshin Peter N Probe Compound for Detecting and Isolating Enzymes and Means and Methods Using the Same
WO2010117620A2 (en) 2009-03-30 2010-10-14 Illumina, Inc. Gene expression analysis in single cells
US20120010091A1 (en) 2009-03-30 2012-01-12 Illumina, Inc. Gene expression analysis in single cells
US20140272952A1 (en) 2009-04-02 2014-09-18 Fluidigm Corporation Multi-primer amplification method for barcoding of target nucleic acids
US20120065081A1 (en) 2009-04-30 2012-03-15 Chee Mark S Nucleic acid constructs and methods of use
US20120252012A1 (en) 2009-05-14 2012-10-04 Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Marseille Method for detecting prokaryotic dna from a feces sample
US20100300895A1 (en) 2009-05-29 2010-12-02 Ion Torrent Systems, Inc. Apparatus and methods for performing electrochemical reactions
US20120156675A1 (en) 2009-06-09 2012-06-21 Oxford Gene Technology Ip Limited Picowell capture devices for analysing single cells or other particles
US20100330574A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2010-12-30 Whitman Douglas F Chimeric primers with hairpin conformations and methods of using same
US20110038507A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2011-02-17 Hager Environmental and Atmospheric Technologie, LLC Device and Method for Quantification of Gases in Plumes by Remote Sensing
US8563274B2 (en) 2009-08-20 2013-10-22 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Compositions and methods for intramolecular nucleic acid rearrangement
US8679756B1 (en) 2009-08-20 2014-03-25 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Compositions and methods for intramolecular nucleic acid rearrangement
US8298767B2 (en) 2009-08-20 2012-10-30 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Compositions and methods for intramolecular nucleic acid rearrangement
US20120165219A1 (en) 2009-09-01 2012-06-28 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Devices and methods for microarray selection
US20120220022A1 (en) 2009-09-01 2012-08-30 Trustees Of Boston University High throughput multichannel reader and uses thereof
US20110059556A1 (en) 2009-09-04 2011-03-10 The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York Rapid and Continuous Analyte Processing in Droplet Microfluidic Devices
US20110072889A1 (en) 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated Bcr-abl truncation mutations
US20150119256A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-04-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US20150118680A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-04-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US9290808B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-03-22 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US9845502B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2017-12-19 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20180327835A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2018-11-15 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20150119258A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-04-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US20150119255A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-04-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US9315857B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-04-19 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse label-tags
US10202646B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2019-02-12 Becton, Dickinson And Company Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US9816137B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2017-11-14 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20190100798A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2019-04-04 Becton, Dickinson And Company Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US9708659B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2017-07-18 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20150119290A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-04-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US20150119257A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-04-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US20160222378A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-08-04 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US9290809B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-03-22 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20150005185A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2015-01-01 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US20160376648A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-12-29 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20160376583A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-12-29 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US8835358B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2014-09-16 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20160326584A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2016-11-10 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20110160078A1 (en) 2009-12-15 2011-06-30 Affymetrix, Inc. Digital Counting of Individual Molecules by Stochastic Attachment of Diverse Labels
US10059991B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2018-08-28 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US10047394B2 (en) 2009-12-15 2018-08-14 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse labels
US20110201507A1 (en) 2010-01-19 2011-08-18 Rava Richard P Sequencing methods and compositions for prenatal diagnoses
US20110230358A1 (en) 2010-01-19 2011-09-22 Artemis Health, Inc. Identification of polymorphic sequences in mixtures of genomic dna by whole genome sequencing
US20130040344A1 (en) 2010-01-25 2013-02-14 Rd Biosciences Inc Self-folding amplification of target nucleic acid
US20130040843A1 (en) 2010-02-05 2013-02-14 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Increasing Multiplex Level by Externalization of Passive Reference in PCR Reactions
US20130295568A1 (en) 2010-02-12 2013-11-07 Darren Roy Link Digital analyte analysis
US8535889B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2013-09-17 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Digital analyte analysis
US20110244455A1 (en) 2010-02-12 2011-10-06 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Digital analyte analysis
US9228229B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2016-01-05 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Digital analyte analysis
US20120014977A1 (en) 2010-02-19 2012-01-19 National University Corporation Chiba University NOVEL ALTERNATIVE SPLICING VARIANT OF OATP1B3 mRNA
US20130040847A1 (en) 2010-03-04 2013-02-14 Miacom Diagnostics Gmbh Enhanced multiplex fish
WO2011123246A2 (en) 2010-04-01 2011-10-06 Illumina, Inc. Solid-phase clonal amplification and related methods
WO2011143659A2 (en) 2010-05-14 2011-11-17 Fluidigm Corporation Nucleic acid isolation methods
US20110294689A1 (en) 2010-05-27 2011-12-01 Affymetrix, Inc Multiplex Amplification Methods
WO2011155833A2 (en) 2010-06-09 2011-12-15 Keygene N.V. Combinatorial sequence barcodes for high throughput screening
US20130190206A1 (en) 2010-07-13 2013-07-25 Dublin City University Direct Clone Analysis and Selection Technology
US20120040843A1 (en) 2010-08-12 2012-02-16 Dublin City University Centrifugal capture system
US8741606B2 (en) 2010-09-21 2014-06-03 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Method of tagging using a split DBR
US20130267424A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2013-10-10 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Method of tagging using a split DBR
US20130224743A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2013-08-29 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Method for accurately counting starting molecules
US8481292B2 (en) 2010-09-21 2013-07-09 Population Genetics Technologies Litd. Increasing confidence of allele calls with molecular counting
US20130237458A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2013-09-12 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Method of adding a DBR by primer extension
US20120071331A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2012-03-22 James Casbon Increasing confidence of allele calls with molecular counting
US20130210643A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2013-08-15 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Method for preparing a counter-tagged population of nucleic acid molecules.
EP2623613A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2013-08-07 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Increasing confidence of allele calls with molecular counting
US8728766B2 (en) 2010-09-21 2014-05-20 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Method of adding a DBR by primer extension
US8722368B2 (en) 2010-09-21 2014-05-13 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Method for preparing a counter-tagged population of nucleic acid molecules
WO2012038839A2 (en) 2010-09-21 2012-03-29 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Increasing confidence of allele calls with molecular counting
US8715967B2 (en) 2010-09-21 2014-05-06 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd. Method for accurately counting starting molecules
US8685678B2 (en) 2010-09-21 2014-04-01 Population Genetics Technologies Ltd Increasing confidence of allele calls with molecular counting
WO2012042374A2 (en) 2010-10-01 2012-04-05 Anssi Jussi Nikolai Taipale Method of determining number or concentration of molecules
US10246703B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2019-04-02 President And Fellows Of Harvard College High-throughput single cell barcoding
US20130274117A1 (en) 2010-10-08 2013-10-17 President And Fellows Of Harvard College High-Throughput Single Cell Barcoding
WO2012048341A1 (en) 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 President And Fellows Of Harvard College High-throughput single cell barcoding
WO2012047297A2 (en) 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 Chen Gao Highly multiplexed real-time pcr using encoded microbeads
US20140065609A1 (en) * 2010-10-22 2014-03-06 James Hicks Varietal counting of nucleic acids for obtaining genomic copy number information
US20130225623A1 (en) 2010-10-27 2013-08-29 Mount Sinai School Of Medicine Methods of Treating Psychiatric or Neurological Disorders with MGLUR Antagonists
US20120163681A1 (en) 2010-11-29 2012-06-28 Jesper Lohse Methods and systems for analyzing images of specimens processed by a programmable quantitative assay
US20120142018A1 (en) 2010-12-05 2012-06-07 Wenbin Jiang Rapid Single Cell Based Parallel Biological Cell Sorter
US20120149603A1 (en) 2010-12-09 2012-06-14 Akonni Biosystems Sample analysis system
WO2012148477A1 (en) 2010-12-15 2012-11-01 Cellular Research, Inc. Digital counting of individual molecules by stochastic attachment of diverse label-tags
WO2012083225A2 (en) 2010-12-16 2012-06-21 Gigagen, Inc. System and methods for massively parallel analysis of nycleic acids in single cells
US20140057799A1 (en) 2010-12-16 2014-02-27 Gigagen System and Methods for Massively Parallel Analysis of Nucleic Acids in Single Cells
US20120173159A1 (en) 2010-12-30 2012-07-05 Life Technologies Corporation Methods, systems, and computer readable media for nucleic acid sequencing
US20120190020A1 (en) 2011-01-25 2012-07-26 Aria Diagnostics, Inc. Detection of genetic abnormalities
US20140024032A1 (en) 2011-02-04 2014-01-23 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Method for Detecting Chromosome Structure and Gene Expression Simultaneously in Single Cells
WO2012108864A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-08-16 Illumina, Inc. Selective enrichment of nucleic acids
US9150852B2 (en) 2011-02-18 2015-10-06 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for molecular labeling
US20120220494A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2012-08-30 Raindance Technolgies, Inc. Compositions and methods for molecular labeling
US20160289670A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2016-10-06 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for molecular labeling
US20140155274A1 (en) 2011-03-24 2014-06-05 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Single Cell Nucleic Acid Detection and Analysis
WO2012129363A2 (en) 2011-03-24 2012-09-27 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Single cell nucleic acid detection and analysis
US8856410B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2014-10-07 SK Hynix Inc. Semiconductor memory apparatus
WO2012140224A1 (en) 2011-04-13 2012-10-18 Jonas Frisen Method and product for localised or spatial detection of nucleic acid in a tissue sample
US20140227705A1 (en) 2011-04-15 2014-08-14 The Johns Hopkins University Safe sequencing system
WO2012142213A2 (en) 2011-04-15 2012-10-18 The Johns Hopkins University Safe sequencing system
WO2012149042A2 (en) 2011-04-25 2012-11-01 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Methods and compositions for nucleic acid analysis
US20120316074A1 (en) 2011-04-25 2012-12-13 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Methods and compositions for nucleic acid analysis
US20160208322A1 (en) 2011-05-20 2016-07-21 Fluidigm Corporation Nucleic acid encoding reactions
US20130005585A1 (en) 2011-05-20 2013-01-03 Fluidigm Corporation Nucleic acid encoding reactions
WO2012162267A2 (en) 2011-05-20 2012-11-29 Fluidigm Corporation Nucleic acid encoding reactions
US20130035248A1 (en) 2011-05-20 2013-02-07 Phthisis Diagnostics Microsporidia Detection System and Method
US20140178438A1 (en) 2011-05-24 2014-06-26 Ugur Sahin Individualized vaccines for cancer
US20140315211A1 (en) 2011-05-26 2014-10-23 Brandeis University Methods for suppression pcr
US8841071B2 (en) 2011-06-02 2014-09-23 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Sample multiplexing
US20120322681A1 (en) 2011-06-15 2012-12-20 Gen9, Inc. Methods for Preparative In Vitro Cloning
US20140147860A1 (en) 2011-06-27 2014-05-29 Life Technologies Corporation Acoustic Cytometry Methods and Protocols
WO2013019075A2 (en) 2011-08-01 2013-02-07 연세대학교산학협력단 Method of preparing nucleic acid molecules
US20140243242A1 (en) 2011-08-08 2014-08-28 The Broad Institute. Inc. Compositions and methods for co-amplifying subsequences of a nucleic acid fragment sequence
JP2013039275A (en) 2011-08-18 2013-02-28 Olympus Corp Fluorescence observation device, fluorescence observation system and method for processing fluorescence image
US20140309945A1 (en) 2011-11-30 2014-10-16 Samsung Sds Co., Ltd. Genome sequence alignment apparatus and method
WO2013117595A2 (en) 2012-02-07 2013-08-15 Illumina Cambridge Limited Targeted enrichment and amplification of nucleic acids on a support
US20130210659A1 (en) 2012-02-10 2013-08-15 Andrew Watson Molecular diagnostic screening assay
US20130225418A1 (en) 2012-02-24 2013-08-29 Andrew Watson Labeling and sample preparation for sequencing
US20150133319A1 (en) 2012-02-27 2015-05-14 Cellular Research, Inc. Compositions and kits for molecular counting
WO2013130674A1 (en) 2012-02-27 2013-09-06 Cellular Research, Inc. Compositions and kits for molecular counting
US20160026758A1 (en) 2012-02-27 2016-01-28 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Methods and uses for molecular tags
WO2013148525A1 (en) 2012-03-29 2013-10-03 Complete Genomics, Inc. Flow cells for high density array chips
US20150203897A1 (en) * 2012-05-08 2015-07-23 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp. Compositions and method for measuring and calibrating amplification bias in multiplexed pcr reactions
US20150017652A1 (en) 2012-05-08 2015-01-15 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Compositions and Method for Measuring and Calibrating Amplification Bias in Multiplexed PCR Reactions
WO2013173394A2 (en) 2012-05-14 2013-11-21 Cb Biotechnologies, Inc. Method for increasing accuracy in quantitative detection of polynucleotides
WO2013177206A2 (en) 2012-05-21 2013-11-28 Fluidigm Corporation Single-particle analysis of particle populations
US20130323732A1 (en) 2012-05-21 2013-12-05 Fluidigm Corporation Single-particle analysis of particle populations
WO2013176767A1 (en) 2012-05-25 2013-11-28 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Microfluidic devices, solid supports for reagents and related methods
WO2013188831A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Uniquely tagged rearranged adaptive immune receptor genes in a complex gene set
WO2013188872A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System High throughput sequencing of multiple transcripts of a single cell
WO2013191775A2 (en) 2012-06-18 2013-12-27 Nugen Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for negative selection of non-desired nucleic acid sequences
WO2014015084A2 (en) 2012-07-17 2014-01-23 Counsyl, Inc. System and methods for detecting genetic variation
WO2014015098A1 (en) 2012-07-18 2014-01-23 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. A method of normalizing biological samples
US20150247182A1 (en) 2012-07-24 2015-09-03 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp. Single cell analysis using sequence tags
WO2014018460A1 (en) 2012-07-24 2014-01-30 Sequenta, Inc. Single cell analysis using sequence tags
US20150329852A1 (en) 2012-08-08 2015-11-19 Garry P. Nolan Increasing dynamic range for identifying multiple epitopes in cells
US9695468B2 (en) 2012-08-14 2017-07-04 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods for droplet-based sample preparation
US20140378345A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
WO2014028537A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-02-20 10X Technologies, Inc. Microcapsule compositions and methods
US20140155295A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-06-05 10X Technologies, Inc. Capsule array devices and methods of use
US20140378349A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20140287963A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-09-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Capsule Array Devices and Methods of Use
US20150005199A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2015-01-01 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20150005200A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2015-01-01 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20150225778A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2015-08-13 10X Genomics, Inc. Capsule array devices and methods of use
US20140378350A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20140378322A1 (en) 2012-08-14 2014-12-25 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
WO2014071361A1 (en) 2012-11-05 2014-05-08 Rubicon Genomics Barcoding nucleic acids
WO2014093676A1 (en) 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 10X Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for processing polynucleotides
US20140194324A1 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-07-10 Illumina Cambridge Limited Sample preparation on a solid support
US20150307874A1 (en) 2013-01-09 2015-10-29 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd High throughput transcriptome analysis
WO2014108850A2 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-07-17 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. High throughput transcriptome analysis
US20140206547A1 (en) 2013-01-22 2014-07-24 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Haplotying of hla loci with ultra-deep shotgun sequencing
US20140206079A1 (en) 2013-01-24 2014-07-24 Sabic Innovative Plastics Ip B.V. Microwell plate
US20140216128A1 (en) 2013-02-01 2014-08-07 Becton Dickinson And Company Methods and systems for assessing sample behavior in a flow cytometer
WO2014124338A1 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 10X Technologies, Inc. Polynucleotide barcode generation
US20140227684A1 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 10X Technologies, Inc. Partitioning and processing of analytes and other species
US20140235506A1 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-21 10X Technologies, Inc. Polynucleotide barcode generation
WO2014124336A2 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 10X Technologies, Inc. Partitioning and processing of analytes and other species
US20140228255A1 (en) 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 10X Technologies, Inc. Polynucleotide barcode generation
WO2014126937A1 (en) 2013-02-14 2014-08-21 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Suspension arrays and multiplexed assays based thereon
US20140274811A1 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Lyle J. Arnold Methods for Amplifying a Complete Genome or Transcriptome
WO2014145992A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Uniquely tagged rearranged adaptive immune receptor genes in a complex gene set
WO2014144495A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Abvitro, Inc. Single cell bar-coding for antibody discovery
US20140357500A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-12-04 Abvitro, Inc. Single cell bar-coding for antibody discovery
US20140303005A1 (en) 2013-04-05 2014-10-09 Raindance Technologies, Inc. Rare cell analysis after negative selection
EP2805769A1 (en) 2013-05-24 2014-11-26 European Molecular Biology Laboratory Methods for nano-scale single cell analysis
US20160122753A1 (en) 2013-06-12 2016-05-05 Tarjei Mikkelsen High-throughput rna-seq
WO2014201273A1 (en) 2013-06-12 2014-12-18 The Broad Institute, Inc. High-throughput rna-seq
WO2014210353A2 (en) 2013-06-27 2014-12-31 10X Technologies, Inc. Compositions and methods for sample processing
US20150259734A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2015-09-17 Sequenta, Inc. Large-scale biomolecular analysis with ssequence tags
WO2015002908A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2015-01-08 Sequenta, Inc. Large-scale biomolecular analysis with sequence tags
US9637799B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2017-05-02 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
WO2015031691A1 (en) 2013-08-28 2015-03-05 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US10253375B1 (en) 2013-08-28 2019-04-09 Becton, Dickinson And Company Massively parallel single cell analysis
US20180002764A1 (en) 2013-08-28 2018-01-04 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US20180258500A1 (en) 2013-08-28 2018-09-13 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US20180291470A1 (en) 2013-08-28 2018-10-11 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US10208356B1 (en) 2013-08-28 2019-02-19 Becton, Dickinson And Company Massively parallel single cell analysis
US9567645B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2017-02-14 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US9567646B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2017-02-14 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US10131958B1 (en) 2013-08-28 2018-11-20 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US10151003B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2018-12-11 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively Parallel single cell analysis
US9598736B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2017-03-21 Cellular Research, Inc. Massively parallel single cell analysis
US20150066385A1 (en) 2013-08-30 2015-03-05 10X Technologies, Inc. Sequencing methods
WO2015035087A1 (en) 2013-09-04 2015-03-12 Fluidigm Corporation Proximity assays for detecting nucleic acids and proteins in a single cell
WO2015047186A1 (en) 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Di Wu Methods to profile molecular complexes by using proximity bar-coding
WO2015044428A1 (en) 2013-09-30 2015-04-02 Sten Linnarsson Method for capturing and encoding nucleic acid from a plurality of single cells
US9905005B2 (en) 2013-10-07 2018-02-27 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and systems for digitally counting features on arrays
US9582877B2 (en) 2013-10-07 2017-02-28 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and systems for digitally counting features on arrays
US20170154421A1 (en) 2013-10-07 2017-06-01 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and systems for digitally counting features on arrays
WO2015103339A1 (en) 2013-12-30 2015-07-09 Atreca, Inc. Analysis of nucleic acids associated with single cells using nucleic acid barcodes
WO2015134787A2 (en) 2014-03-05 2015-09-11 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Methods using randomer-containing synthetic molecules
US20150298091A1 (en) 2014-04-21 2015-10-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Systems and methods for barcoding nucleic acids
WO2015200869A1 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-12-30 10X Genomics, Inc. Analysis of nucleic acid sequences
US9951386B2 (en) 2014-06-26 2018-04-24 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods and systems for processing polynucleotides
US20150376609A1 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-12-31 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods of Analyzing Nucleic Acids from Individual Cells or Cell Populations
US20160289669A1 (en) 2015-01-22 2016-10-06 Becton, Dickinson And Company Devices and systems for molecular barcoding of nucleic acid targets in single cells
US20180002738A1 (en) 2015-01-23 2018-01-04 Qiagen Sciences, Llc High multiplex pcr with molecular barcoding
US20160244828A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Becton, Dickinson And Company High-throughput single-cell analysis combining proteomic and genomic information
US9727810B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2017-08-08 Cellular Research, Inc. Spatially addressable molecular barcoding
US10002316B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2018-06-19 Cellular Research, Inc. Spatially addressable molecular barcoding
US20160257993A1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-09-08 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for labeling targets
WO2016138500A1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for barcoding nucleic acids for sequencing
US20160289740A1 (en) 2015-03-30 2016-10-06 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for combinatorial barcoding
US20160312276A1 (en) 2015-04-23 2016-10-27 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for whole transcriptome amplification
US20160320720A1 (en) 2015-04-28 2016-11-03 Kyocera Document Solutions Inc. Image forming apparatus
US11124823B2 (en) 2015-06-01 2021-09-21 Becton, Dickinson And Company Methods for RNA quantification
US20170073730A1 (en) 2015-09-11 2017-03-16 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods and compositions for library normalization
US10822643B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2020-11-03 Cellular Research, Inc. Accurate molecular barcoding
WO2017205691A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Molecular label counting adjustment methods
US20170344866A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Molecular label counting adjustment methods
US9787810B1 (en) 2016-05-28 2017-10-10 Hong Fu Jin Precision Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Angle adjusting mechanism for telephone
US20190119726A1 (en) 2016-05-31 2019-04-25 Cellular Research, Inc. Error correction in amplification of samples
US20170342465A1 (en) 2016-05-31 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Error correction in amplification of samples
US20170342405A1 (en) 2016-05-31 2017-11-30 Cellular Research, Inc. Molecular indexing of internal sequences
US10202641B2 (en) 2016-05-31 2019-02-12 Cellular Research, Inc. Error correction in amplification of samples
US20180037942A1 (en) 2016-08-03 2018-02-08 Cellular Research, Inc. Enzyme-independent molecular indexing
US10338066B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2019-07-02 Cellular Research, Inc. Measurement of protein expression using reagents with barcoded oligonucleotide sequences
US20180088112A1 (en) 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Cellular Research, Inc. Measurement of protein expression using reagents with barcoded oligonucleotide sequences
WO2018089377A1 (en) 2016-11-08 2018-05-17 Cellular Research, Inc. Methods for cell label classification
WO2018094263A1 (en) 2016-11-18 2018-05-24 Twist Bioscience Corporation Polynucleotide libraries having controlled stoichiometry and synthesis thereof
US20200002766A1 (en) 2017-01-31 2020-01-02 Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research Ltd Enhanced immune cell receptor sequencing methods
US20180251825A1 (en) 2017-02-02 2018-09-06 New York Genome Center Inc. Methods and compositions for identifying or quantifying targets in a biological sample
US10669570B2 (en) 2017-06-05 2020-06-02 Becton, Dickinson And Company Sample indexing for single cells
US10676779B2 (en) 2017-06-05 2020-06-09 Becton, Dickinson And Company Sample indexing for single cells
US20200392479A1 (en) 2017-10-23 2020-12-17 The Broad Institute, Inc. Single cell cellular component enrichment from barcoded sequencing libraries
US20200248175A1 (en) 2017-10-23 2020-08-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Calling genetic variation from single-cell transcriptomes
US20190323088A1 (en) 2017-12-08 2019-10-24 10X Genomics, Inc. Methods and compositions for labeling cells
US20220062394A1 (en) 2018-12-17 2022-03-03 The Broad Institute, Inc. Methods for identifying neoantigens
US11371076B2 (en) 2019-01-16 2022-06-28 Becton, Dickinson And Company Polymerase chain reaction normalization through primer titration
US20220315988A1 (en) 2019-01-16 2022-10-06 Becton, Dickinson And Company Polymerase chain reaction normalization through primer titration
US20200255888A1 (en) 2019-02-12 2020-08-13 Becton, Dickinson And Company Determining expressions of transcript variants and polyadenylation sites

Non-Patent Citations (409)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"SOLiD™ System Barcoding", Applied Biosystems (ABI) Application Note, (Apr. 2008), pp. 1-4.
"Super Smart™ PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit User Manual", Clontech Laboratories, Inc., (2007) pp. 1-39.
Achim et al., May 2015, High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin. Nature Biotechnology, 33(5):503-511.
Algae, Wikipedia.org, accessed Mar. 4, 2016, 20 pp.
Alkan et al., Oct. 2009, Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat Genet., 41(10):1061-1067.
Anderson, Feb. 11, 2014, Study describes RNA sequencing applications for molecular indexing methods, genomeweb.com, 5 pages.
Ansorge, 2009, Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. New Biotechnology, 25(4):195-203.
Applied Biosystems, Apr. 2008, SOLiD™ System Barcoding, Application Note, 4 pp.
Archaea, Wikipedia.org, accessed May 11, 2016, 26 pp.
Atanur et al., Jun. 2010, The genome sequence of the spontaneously hypertensive rat: Analysis and functional significance. Genome Res., 20(6):791-803.
Audic et al., 1997, The Significance of Digital Gene Expression Profiles. Genome Research, 7:986-995.
Begley Jun. 20, 2017, Psst, the human genome was never completely sequenced. STAT News, 7 pp.
Bendall et al., May 6, 2011, Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science, 332(6030):687-696.
Bengtsson et al., 2006, Microarray image analysis: background estimation using quantile and morphological filters, BMC Bioinformatics, 7:96.
Bionumbers, Aug. 21, 2010, Useful fundamental numbers in molecular biology, http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/KeyNumbers/aspx, 4 pages.
Bioscribe, Feb. 5, 2015, Massively parallel sequencing technology for single-cell gene expression published (press release), 3 pp.
Blainey, May 2013, The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea, FEMS Microbiol Rev., 37(3):407-427.
Bogdanova et al., Jan. 2008, Normalization of full-length enriched cDNA, Molecular Biosystems, 4(3):205-212.
Bonaldo et al., Sep. 1996, Normalization and subtraction: two approaches to facilitate gene discovery. Genome Res., 6(9):791-806.
Bontoux et al, "Integrating whole transcriptome assays on a lab-on-a-chip for single cell gene profiling", Lab on a Chip, (2008) vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 443-450.
Bose et al., Jun. 6, 2015, Scalable microfluidics for single-cell RNA printing and sequencing, Genome Biology, 16(1):120.
Brady et al., "Construction of cDNA libraries form single cells", Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press, US, (1993) vol. 225, doi:10.1016/0076-6879(93)25039-5, ISSN 0076-6879, pp. 611-623.
Braha et al., 2000, Simultaneous stochastic sensing of divalent metal ions. Nature Biotechnology, 18:1005-1007.
Bratke et al., Sep. 2005, Differential expression of human granzymes A, B, and K in natural killer cells and during CD8+ T cell differentiation in peripheral blood. Eur J Immunol., 35(9):2608-2616.
Brenner et al., 2000, Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays. Nature Biotechnology, 18:630-634.
Brenner et al., Feb. 15, 2000, In vitro cloning of complex mixtures of DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed cDNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 97(4):1665-1670.
Brinza et al., Apr. 16-20, 2016, Detection of somatic mutations at 0.1% frequency from cfDNA in peripheral blood with a multiplex next-generation sequencing assay, conference poster, AACR 107th Annual Meeting, 1 p.
Brisco et al., Jun. 25, 2012, Quantification of RNA integrity and its use for measurement of transcript number, Nucleic Acids Research, 40(18):e144.
Brodin et al., 2015, Challenges with using primer IDs to improve accuracy of next generation sequencing, PLOS One, 19(3):1-12.
Buschmann et al., Aug. 7, 2014, Enhancing the detection of barcoded reads in high throughput DNA sequencing DNA by controlling the false discovery rate, BMC Bioinformatics, 15(1):264.
Butkus, Feb. 6, 2014, Cellular research set to launch first gene expression platform using ‘molecular indexing’ technology, genomeweb.com, 5 pages.
Cai, Mar. 2013, Turning single cells in microarrays by super-resolution bar-coding, Brief Funct Genomics, 12(2):75-80.
Carr et al., Dec. 15, 2009, Inferring relative proportions of DNA variants from sequencing electropherograms. Bioinformatics, 25(24):3244-3250.
Caruccio et al., Oct. 2009, Nextera™ technology for NGS DNA library preparation: simultaneous fragmentation and tagging by in vitro transposition, 16(3), 3 pp.
Casbon et al., Jul. 2011, A method for counting PCR template molecules with application to next-generation sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res., 39(12):e81.
Castellarnau et al., Jan. 2015, Stochastic particle barcoding for single-cell tracking and multiparametric analysis, Small, 11(4):489-498.
Castle et al., Apr. 16, 2010, DNA copy number, including telomeres and mitochondria, assayed using next-generation sequencing. BMC Genomics, 11:244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-244.
Chamberlain et al., Dec. 9, 1988, Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res., 16(23):11141-11156.
Chang et al., Aug. 2002, Detection of allelic imbalance in ascitic supernatant by digital single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Clin Cancer Res., 8(8):2580-2585.
Chee et al., 1996, Accessing genetic information with high-density DNA arrays, Science, 274:610-614.
Chee, 1991, Enzymatic multiplex DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research, 19(12): 3301-3305.
Chen et al., Apr. 9, 2015, Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science Express, pp. 1-21.
Church et al., 1988, Multiplex DNA sequencing. Science, 240:185-188.
Clontech Laboratories, Inc., May 15, 2007, Super Smart™ PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit User Manual, 39 pp.
Cloonan et al., "Stem cell transcriptome profiling via massive-scale mRNA sequencing", Nature Methods, (Jul. 2008) vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 613-619.
Combined Search and Examination Report dated Feb. 21, 2017 in GB patent application No. 1609740.4.
Complaint filed in Becton, Dickinson and Company and Cellular Research Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc. on Nov. 15, 2018.
Costa et al., Aug. 22, 2012, Single-tube nested real-time PCR as a new highly sensitive approach to trace hazelnut, J. Agric Food Chem, 60(33):8103-8110.
Costello et al., Apr. 1, 2013, Discovery and characterization of artefactual mutations in deep coverage targeted capture sequencing data due to oxidative DNA damage during sample preparation. Nucleic Acids Res, 41(6):e67.
Cox. May 2001, Bar coding objects with DNA. Analyst, 126(5):545-547.
Craig et al., Oct. 2008, Identification of genetic variants using bar-coded multiplexed sequencing. Nat Methods, 5(10):887-893.
Cusanovich et al., May 7, 2014, Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science Express, pp. 1-9.
Custom Antibody Services, Precision Antibody, accessed Apr. 16, 2014, 2 pp.
Daines et al., Aug. 2009, High-throughput multiplex sequencing to discover copy number variants in Drosophila. Genetics, 182(4):935-941.
Dalerba et al., 2011, Single-cell dissection of transcriptional heterogeneity in human colon tumors, Nat Biotechnol., 29(12):1120-1127 and Supplementary Material.
D'Antoni et al., May 1, 2006, Rapid quantitative analysis using a single molecule counting approach. Anal Biochem. 352(1):97-109.
Daser et al., 2006, Interrogation of genomes by molecular copy-number counting (MCC). Nature Methods, 3(6):447-453.
De Saizieu et al., 1998, Bacterial transcript imaging by hybridization of total RNA to oligonucleotide arrays. Nature Biotechnology, 16:45-48.
Decision in Inter Partes Review Case IRP2019-00565, entered Jul. 22, 2019, 30 pp.
Decision in Inter Partes Review Case IRP2019-00566, entered Jul. 22, 2019, 13 pp.
Decision of refusal dated Apr. 22, 2024 in Japanese patent application No. 2022-106377.
Decision of Rejection dated Mar. 2, 2022 in Japanese patent application No. 2018-0557413.
Defendant 10X Genomics's Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), dated Mar. 1, 2019 in USDC District of Delaware, C.A. No. 18-1800 RGA, 101 pp.
Defendant 10X Genomics's Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), dated Apr. 12, 2019 in USDC District of Delaware, C.A. No. 18-1800 RGA, 15 pp.
Di Carlo et al., Dec. 1, 2008, Dynamic single-cell analysis for quantitative biology, Analytical Chemistry, 78(23):7918-7925.
Dirks et al., Oct. 26, 2004, Triggered amplification by hybridization chain reaction., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101(43), 15275-15278.
Eberwine et al., "Analysis of gene expression in single live neurons", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (Apr. 1992) vol. 89, No. 7, pp. 3010-3014.
European search report and search opinion dated Jul. 17, 2015 for European patent application No. 13755319.4.
Evanko, 2004, Hybridization chain reactions Nature Methods, 1:186.
Examination Report dated Apr. 10, 2017 in European patent application No. 14761937.3.
Examination report dated Apr. 26, 2019 in European patent application No. 16710357.1.
Examination report dated Aug. 5, 2024 in Canadian patent application No. 3,019,589.
Examination Report dated Dec. 12, 2018 in European patent application No. 16719706.0.
Examination Report dated Feb. 19, 2016 in Great Britain patent application No. GB1511591.8.
Examination Report dated Jan. 2, 2019 in European examination report No. 16757986.1.
Examination Report dated Jan. 3, 2018 in GB patent application No. 1609740.4.
Examination report dated Jul. 12, 2016 in European patent application No. 13755319.4.
Examination report dated Jun. 13, 2023 in European patent application No. 14786757.6.
Examination Report dated Jun. 15, 2016 in Great Britain patent application No. GB1511591.8.
Examination Report dated Jun. 8, 2016 in GB patent application No. 1408829.8.
Examination Report dated Mar. 16, 2018 in European patent application No. 13754428.4.
Examination Report dated Mar. 18, 2019 in Singapore patent application No. 1120140274W.
Examination Report dated Oct. 10, 2017 in European patent application No. 14761937.3.
Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2020 in European patent application No. 17735675.5.
Examination report dated Sep. 26, 2018 in European patent application No. 16714081.3.
Examination report dated Sep. 5, 2018 in European patent application No. 16710357.1.
Examination report No. 1 dated Nov. 8, 2024 in Australian patent application No. 2023202747.
Examination report No. 1 dated Sep. 5, 2022 in Australian patent application No. 2017261189.
Examination Report No. 1 for standard patent application, dated Jul. 20, 2018 Australian patent application No. 2014312208.
Examination Report No. 1 for standard patent application, dated Oct. 24, 2017, Australian patent application No. 2013226081.
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 15, 2015 in European patent application No. 13754428.4.
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2018 in patent application No. 17202409.3.
Extended European search report dated Jan. 15, 2024 in patent application No. 23181147.2.
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 11, 2018 in European patent application No. 16740872.3.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2019 in patent application No. 18195513.9.
Fan et al., 2000, Parallel Genotyping of Human SNPs Using Generic High-density Oligonucleotide Tag Arrays. Genome Research, 10:853-860.
Fan et al., 2009, Microfluidic digital PCR enables rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy. Am Obstet Gynecol. 200:543.e1-543.e7.
Fan et al., Feb. 6, 2015, Combinatorial labeling of single cells for gene expression cytometry. Science, 347(6222):1258367-8.
Fan et al., Jul. 19, 2012, Non-invasive prenatal measurement of the fetal genome. Nature, 487(7407):320-324.
Fan, Nov. 2010, Molecular counting: from noninvasive prenatal diagnostics to whole-genome haplotyping, doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 185 pp.
Feldhaus et al., Jan. 15, 2000, Oligonucleotide-conjugated beads for transdominant genetic experiments, Nucleic Acids Res., 28(2):534-543.
Final Decision dated Aug. 30, 2017 in Japanese patent application No. 2014-558975.
First Action Interview Office Action Summary dated Jan. 25, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/987,851.
First Action Interview Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication dated Oct. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/987,851.
First Amended Complaint filed in Becton, Dickinson and Company and Cellular Research Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc. (C.A. No. 18-1800-RGA)) on Feb. 8, 2019.
First Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2017 in Chinese patent application No. 201480061859.1.
First Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2019 in Chinese patent application No. 201480059505.3.
Fish, Wikipedia.org, accessed Nov. 2, 2014, 11 pp.
Fourth Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2017 in Chinese patent application No. 201380022187.9.
Fox-Walsh et al., Oct. 2011, A multiplex RNA-seq strategy to profile poly(A+) RNA: application to analysis of transcription response and 3′ end formation., Genomics, 98(4),266-271.
Fu et al., Feb. 4, 2014, Molecular indexing enables quantitative targeted RNA sequencing and reveals poor efficiencies in standard library preparations, PNAS, 111(5):1891-1896.
Fu et al., Mar. 18, 2014, Digital encoding of cellular mRNAs enabling precise and absolute gene expression measurement by single-molecule counting. Anal Chem., 86(6):2867-2870.
Fu et al., May 31, 2011, Counting individual DNA molecules by the stochastic attachment of diverse labels. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 108(22):9026-9031.
Fungus, Wikipedia.org, accessed Jun. 3, 2013, 28 pp.
Gerry et al., 1999, Universal DNA microarray method for multiplex detection of low abundance point mutations. Journal of Molecular Biology, 292(2): 251-262.
Gillespie, 1977, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 81(25):2340-2361.
Gong et al., 2010, Massively parallel detection of gene expression in single cells using subnanolitre wells, Lab Chip, 10:2334-2337.
Grant et al., Nov. 15, 2002, SNP genotyping on a genome-wide amplified DOP-PCR template. Nucleic Acids Res, 30(22):e125.
Gu et al., Apr. 16-20, 2016, Complete workflow for detection of low frequency somatic mutations from cell-free DNA using Ion Torrent™ platforms, conference poster, AACR 107th Annual Meeting, 1 p.
Gunderson et al., May 2004, Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays. Genome Res. 14(5):870-877.
Gundry et al., Jan. 3, 2012, Direct mutation analysis by high-throughput sequencing: from germline to low-abundant, somatic variants. Mutat Res. 729(1-2):1-15.
Gundry et al., Mar. 2012, Direct, genome-wide assessment of DNA mutations in single cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 40(5):2032-40.
Hacia et al., 1999, Determination of ancestral alleles for human single-nucleotide polymorphisms using high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nature Genetics, 22:164-167.
Haff, 1994, Improved quantitative PCR using nested primers, PCR Methods and Applications, 3:332-337.
Hamady et al., Mar. 2008, Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat Methods, 5(3):235-237.
Harbers, "The current status of cDNA cloning", Genomics, (2008) vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 232-242.
Harrington et al., 2009, Cross-sectional characterization of HIV-1 env compartmentalization in cerebrospinal fluid over the full disease course, AIDS, 23(8) 907-915.
Hartmann, "Gene expression profiling of single cells on large-scale oligonucleotide arrays", Nucleic Acids Research, (Oct. 2006) vol. 34, No. 21, p. e143.
Hashimshony et al., Sep. 27, 2012, CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification Cell Rep. 2(3):666-673.
Hensel et al., Jul. 21, 1995, Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science. 269(5222):400-403.
Hiatt et al., Feb. 2010, Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads. Nat Methods, 7(2):119-122.
Hiatt et al., May 2013, Single molecule molecular inversion probes for targeted, high-accuracy detection of low-frequency variation. Genome Res., 23(5):843-854.
Hollas et al., 2003, A stochastic approach to count RNA molecules using DNA sequencing methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2812:55-62.
How many species of bacteria are there? Wisegeek.org, accessed Jan. 21, 2014, 2 pp.
Hug et al., 2003, Measure of the number of molecular of a single mRNA species in a complex mRNA preparation, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 221:615-624.
Ingolia et al., Apr. 10, 2009, Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science, 324(5924):218-223.
International search report and written opinion dated Aug. 16, 2013 for PCT/US2013/027891.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 7, 2017 in PCT/US2017/034576.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 9, 2016 in PCT/US16/019971.
International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 19, 2014 for PCT Application No. US2014/059542.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 5, 2016 in PCT/US16/024783.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 3, 2015 in PCT/US/14/053301.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 31, 2017 in PCT/US16/050694.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 17, 2016 in PCT/US16/019962.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 20, 2016 in PCT/US16/14612.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 25, 2020 in PCT/US2020/013685.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2012 in PCT/US11/065291.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 9, 2016 in PCT/US16/022712.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 28, 2020 in PCT/US2020/017749.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 3, 2016 in PCT/US16/018354.
International search report and written opinion dated May 7, 2012 for PCT/IB2011/003160.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2016 in PCT/US16/034473.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2016 in PCT/US16/028694.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 6, 2013 in PCT/US13/028103.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2017 in PCT/US2017/030097.
Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees dated Jun. 2, 2016 in PCT/US16/019971.
Islam et al, "Highly multiplexed and strand specific single-cell RNA 5′ end sequencing", Nature Protocols, (2012) vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 813-828.
Islam et al., 2011, Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Research, 21:1160-1167.
Islam et al., 2014, Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers, Nature Methods, 11(2):163-168.
Jabara et al., Dec. 3, 2011, Accurate sampling and deep sequencing of the HIV-1 protease gene using a Primer ID, PNAS, 108(50):20166-20171.
Jabara, Apr. 23, 2010, Capturing the cloud: High throughput sequencing of multiple individual genomes from a retroviral population. Biology Lunch Bunch Series, Training Initiatives in Biomedical & Biological Sciences of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jiang et al., 2011, Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments, Genome Research, 21(9):1543-1551.
Junker et al., May 21, 2015, Single-cell transcriptomics enters the age of mass production, Molecular Cell, 58:563-564.
Kanagawa, 2003, Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR), Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 96(4):317-323.
Karrer et al., "In situ isolation of mRNA from individual plant cells: creation of cell-specific cDNA libraries.", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (Apr. 1995) vol. 92, No. 9, pp. 3814-3818.
Katzer et al., Dec. 2003, Methods for automatic microarray image segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, 2(4):202-214.
Kebschull et al., Jul. 17, 2015, Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets, Nucleic Acids Research, 15 pp.
Keys et al., Jun. 2015, Primer ID informs next-generation sequencing platforms and reveals preexisting drug resistance mutations in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase coding domain, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 31(6):658-668.
Kim et al., Jun. 8, 2007, Polony multiplex analysis of gene expression (PMAGE) in mouse hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Science, 316(5830):1481-1484.
Kinde et al., Jun. 7, 2011, Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing, Proc. Natl Acad Sci, 108(23):9530-0535.
Kivioja et al., Jan. 2012, Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. Nature Methods, 9(1):72-76.
Klein et al., May 21, 2015, Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells, Cell, 161:1187-1201.
Ko et al., "RNA-conjugated template-switching RT-PCR method for generating an Escherichia coli cDNA library for small RNAs", Journal of Microbiological Methods, (2006) vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 297-304.
Koboldt et al., Sep. 1, 2009, VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinformatics. 25(17):2283-2285.
Kolodziejczyk et al., May 21, 2015, The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing, Molecular Cell, 58:610-620.
Konig et al., Jul. 2010, iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNAP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17(7):909-916.
Kotake et al., 1996, A simple nested RT-PCR method for quantitation of the relative amounts of multiple cytokine mRNAs in small tissue samples, Journal of Immunological Methods, 199:193-203.
Kurimoto et al, "Global single-cell cDNA amplification to provide a template for representative high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis", Nature Protocols, (2007) vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 739-752.
Kurimoto et al., Mar. 17, 2006, An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis, Nucleic Acids Res., 34(5):e42.
Lamble et al., Nov. 20, 2013, Improved workflows for high throughput library preparation using the transposome-based nextera system, BMC Biotechnology, 13(1):104.
Larson et al., Nov. 2009, A single molecule view of gene expression. Trends Cell Biol. 19(11):630-637.
Leamon et al., Nov. 2003, A massively parallel PicoTiterPlate based platform for discrete picoliter-scale polymerase chain reactions, Electrophoresis, 24(21):3769-3777.
Lee et al., 2010, Large-scale arrays of picolitre chambers for single-cell analysis of large cell populations, Lab Chip, 10:2952-2958.
Lee et al., Mar. 21, 2014, Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science. 343(6177):1360-1363.
Lin et al., Feb. 2007, Self-assembled combinatoral encoding nanoarrays for multiplexed biosensing, Nano Letters, 7(2):507-512.
List of sequenced bacterial genomes, Wikipedia.org, accessed Jan. 24, 2014, 57 pp.
Liu et al., Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: recent advances and remaining challenges, F1000Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev):182, 9 pp.
Lizardi et al., Jul. 1998, Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet. 19(3):225-32.
Lockhart et al., 1996, Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nature Biotechnology, 14:1675-1680.
Lovatt et al., Feb. 2014, Transcriptome in vivo analysis (TIVA) of spatially defined single cells in live tissue. Nat Methods. 11(2):190-196.
Loy et al., Oct. 2, 2018, A rapid library preparation method with custom assay designs for detection of variants at 0.1% allelic frequency in liquid biopsy samples, undated, 1 p.
Lucito et al., 1996, Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis: A High-Resolution Method to Detect Genome Copy Number Variation. Genome Research, 13: 2291-2305.
Maamar et al., 2007, Noise in Gene Expression Determines Cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis. Science, 317:526-529.
Macaulay et al., 2015, G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nature Methods, pp. 1-7.
Macosko et al., 2015, Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets, Cell 161:1202-1214 (and supplemental information).
Maeda et al., "Development of a DNA barcode tagging method for monitoring dynamic changes in gene expression by using an ultra high-throughput sequencer", BioTechniques, (Jul. 2008), vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 95-97.
Makrigiorgos et al., Sep. 2002, A PCR-Based amplification method retaining quantities difference between two complex genomes. Nature Biotech, 20(9):936-939.
Mammal, Wikipedia.org, accessed Sep. 22, 2011, 16 pp.
Marcus et al., 2006, Microfluidic single-cell mRNA isolation and analysis, Ana. Chem. 78:3084-3089.
Mardis, "Next-generation DNA sequencing methods", Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., (2008) vol. 9, pp. 387-402.
Marguerat et al, "Next-generation sequencing: applications beyond genomes", Biochemical Society Transactions, (2008) vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 1091-1096.
Margulies et al., Sep. 15, 2005 Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors, Nature, 437:376-380.
Martinez et al., Jul. 2012, A microfluidic approach to encapsulate living cells in uniform alginate hydrogel microparticles, Macromol. Biosci, 12(7):946-951.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Overview of Illumina Chemistry, http://nextgen.mgh.harvard.edu/IlluminaChemistry.html, downloaded Dec. 31, 2018, 2 pp.
McCloskey et al., Dec. 2007, Encoding PCR products with batch-stamps and barcodes. Biochem Genet. 45(11-12):761-767.
Medvedev et al., Nov. 2010, Detecting copy number variation with mated short reads. Genome Res. 20(11):1613-1622.
Mei et al., Mar. 22, 2010, Identification of recurrent regions of Copy-Number Variants across multiple individuals. BMC Bioinformatics. 11:147.
Merriam-Webster, definition of associate,: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/associate, accessed Apr. 5, 2016.
Meyer et al., "Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform", Nature Protocols, (2008) vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 267-278.
Miller et al., 2006, Directed evolution by in vitro compartmentalization, Nature Methods, 3:561-570.
Miner et al., 2004, Molecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR, Nucleic Acids Research, 32(17):e135.
Mortazavi et al., 2008, Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods. 5:621-628.
Motion to Dismiss and Opening Brief in Support of the Motion to Dismiss filed in Becton, Dickinson and Company and Cellular Research Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc. (C.A. No. 18-1800-RGA)) on Jan. 18, 2019.
Muller et al., Oct. 17, 2018, Genome organization and DNA accessibility control antigenic variation in trypanosomes, Nature, 563(7729):121-125.
Murinae, Wikipedia.org, accessed Mar. 18, 2013, 21 pp.
Nadai et al., 2008, Protocol for nearly full-length sequencing of HIV-1 RNA from plasma, PLoS ONE, 3(1):e1420.
Nagai et al., 2001, Development of a microchamber array for picoleter PCR, Anal. Chem., 73:1043-1047.
Navin et al., 2015, The first five years of single-cell cancer genomics and beyond, Genome Research, 25(10):1499-1507.
Newell et al., Jan. 27, 2012, Cytometry by time-of-flight shows combinatorial cytokine expression and virus-specific cell niches within a continuum of CD8+ T cell phenotypes. Immunity. 36(1):142-152.
Notice of allowance dated Aug. 22, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/969,581.
Notice of allowance dated Dec. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,007.
Notice of allowance dated Dec. 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,018.
Notice of allowance dated Jan. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,526.
Notice of allowance dated Jun. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/969,581.
Notice of allowance dated Mar. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/969,581.
Notice of opposition dated Jul. 22, 2015 for European patent application No. 11810645.9.
Notice of opposition dated Jul. 9, 2015 for European patent application No. 11810645.9.
Notice of reasons for refusal dated Sep. 14, 2023 in Japanese patent application No. 2022-106377.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Apr. 2, 2018 in Japanese patent application No. 2014-558975.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Aug. 31, 2018 in Japanese patent application No. 2016-520632.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Dec. 5, 2018 in Japanese patent application No. 2017-245295.
Novak et al., Jan. 20, 2011, Single-cell multiplex gene detection and sequencing with microfluidically generated agarose emulsions, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl., 50(2):390-395.
Office action dated Apr. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,526.
Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/472,363.
Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/987,851.
Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Office action dated Aug. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,526.
Office action dated Aug. 5, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/788,221.
Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018 in Canadian patent application No. 2,865,575.
Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016 in Chinese patent application No. 201380022187.9.
Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/830,897.
Office action dated Dec. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,706.
Office action dated Dec. 31, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,526.
Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2018 in Canadian patent application No. 2,865,575.
Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2017 in Canadian patent application No. 2,865,575.
Office action dated Feb. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,007.
Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,029.
Office action dated Jan. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/217,886.
Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/219,553.
Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,445.
Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/557,789.
Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,122.
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/055,407.
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,122.
Office action dated Jan. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/217,896.
Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2017 in Chinese patent application No. 201380022187.9.
Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,122.
Office action dated Jul. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,706.
Office action dated Jul. 20, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/217,886.
Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/557,789.
Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/108,268.
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/975,441.
Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,618.
Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2016 in Chinese patent application No. 201380022187.9.
Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Office action dated Mar. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/012,584.
Office action dated Mar. 19, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,018.
Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/046,225.
Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/409,355.
Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/608,780.
Office Action dated May 1, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/557,789.
Office Action dated May 10, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Office Action dated May 10, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Office Action dated May 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/508,911.
Office Action dated May 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,307.
Office Action dated May 23, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/459,977.
Office Action dated May 3, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/046,225.
Office Action dated May 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,526.
Office Action dated May 8, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,460.
Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/667,125.
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,967.
Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,122.
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/038,790.
Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,618.
Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,460.
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/409,355.
Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/557,789.
Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,337.
Office action dated Oct. 25, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/012,584.
Office action dated Oct. 3, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/969,581.
Office action dated Oct. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,018.
Office action dated Sep. 1, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,029.
Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/743,898.
Office action dated Sep. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,007.
Office action dated Sep. 26, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/167,807.
Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,967.
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/046,225.
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,967.
Official Action dated Dec. 28, 2016 in Japanese patent application No. 2014-558975.
Official Action dated Jul. 30, 2018 in Japanese patent application No. 2016-537867.
Ogino et al., Nov. 2002, Quantification of PCR bias caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism in SMN gene dosage analysis. J Mol Diagn. 4(4):185-190.
Ozkumur et al., Apr. 3, 2013, Inertial focusing for tumor antigen-dependent and -independent sorting of rare circulating tumor cells, Sci Transl Med, 5(179):1-20.
Parameswaran et al., 2007, A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing. Nucleic Acids Res. 35(19):e130.
Park et al., May 2010, Discovery of common Asian copy number variants using integrated high-resolution array CGH and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Genet. 42(5):400-405.
Patanjali et al., Mar. 1991, Construction of a uniform-abundance (normalized) CNDA library, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88(5):1943-1947.
Peng et al., Mar. 11, 2016, Reducing amplification artifacts in high multiplex amplicon sequencing by using molecular barcodes, BMC Genomics, retrieved from the internet: url:http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/0.1186/s12864-015-1806-8, 14 pp.
Peters et al., Jan. 14, 2015, Co-barcoded sequence reads from long DNA fragments: a cost-effective solution for "perfect genome" sequencing, Frontiers in Genetics, 5(Article 466)1-8.
Pfaffl et al., Mar. 2004, Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations, Biotechnology Letters, 26(6):505-515.
Picelli et al., Jul. 30, 2014, Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects, Genome Research 24(12):2033-2040.
Pihlak et al., 2008, Rapid genome sequencing with short universal tiling probes. Nature Biotechnology, 26:676-684.
Pinkel et al., 2005, Comparative Genomic Hybridization. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 6:331-354.
Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), filed Mar. 29, 2019 in USDC District of Delaware, C.A. No. 18-1800 (RGA), 27 pp.
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant 10X Genomics's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed Feb. 15, 2019 in USDC District of Delaware, C.A. No. 18-1800 (RGA), 3 pp.
Plant, Wikipedia.org, accessed Aug. 28, 2015, 14 pp.
Pleasance et al., Jan. 14, 2010, A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure. Nature. 463(7278):184-190.
Plessy et al., Feb. 2013, Population transcriptomics with single-cell resolution: a new field made possible by microfluidics: a technology for high throughput transcript counting and data-driven definition of cell types, Bioessays, 35(2):131-140.
Poole et al., 2007, Measuring global gene expression in polyploidy; a cautionary note from allohexaploid wheat, Funct. Integr Genomics, 7:207-219.
Protozoa, Wikipedia.org, accessed May 11, 2016, 10 pp.
Qiu et al., Oct. 2003, DNA sequence-based "bar codes" for tracking the origins of expressed sequence tags from a maize cDNA library constructed using multiple mRNA sources. Plant Physiol. 133(2):475-481.
Rajeevan et al., Oct. 2003, Global amplification of sense RNA: a novel method to replicate and archive mRNA for gene expression analysis, Genomics, 82(4):491-497.
Response with allowed claims dated Mar. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/969,581.
Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/381,488.
Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/472,363.
Robinson et al., 2010, A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data, Genome Biology, vol. 11, 9 pp.
Roche Diagnostics GmbH, 2006, Genome Sequencer 20 System: First to the Finish (product brochure), 40 pp.
Sasagawa et al., 2013, Quartz-Seq: a highly reproducible and sensitive single-cell RNA sequencing method, reveals non-genetic gene-expression heterogeneity. Genome Biology, 14:R31.
Sasuga et al., Dec. 2008, Single-cell chemical lysis method for analyses of intracellular molecules using an array of picoliter-scale microwells, Anal Chem, 80(23):9141-9149.
Satija et al., May 2015, Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nature Biotechnology, 33(5):495-508.
Schmitt et al., Sep. 4, 2012, Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(36):14508-14513.
Search and Examination Report dated Aug. 26, 2015 in GB patent application No. 1511591.8.
Search and Examination Report dated Aug. 6, 2014 for GB patent application No. 1408829.8.
Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 27, 2016 in GB patent application No. 1408829.8.
Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 1, 2016 in Singapore patent application No. 11201405274W.
Sebat et al., 2004, Large-Scale Copy Number Polymorphism in the Human Genome. Science, 305:525-528.
Second Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2016 in Chinese patent application No. 201380022187.9.
Second Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2018 in Chinese patent application No. 201480061859.1.
Shalek et al., Jun. 13, 2013, Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature. 498(7453):236-240.
Shendure et al., "Next-generation DNA sequencing", Nature Biotechnology, (Oct. 2008) vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1135-1145.
Shiroguchi et al., Jan. 24, 2012, Digital RNA sequencing minimizes sequence-dependent bias and amplification noise with optimized single-molecule barcodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(4):1347-1352.
Shoemaker et al., 1996, Quantitative phenotypic analysis of yeast deletion mutants using a highly parallel molecular bar-coding strategy. Nature Genetics, 14:450-456.
Shortreed et al., Sep. 2, 2005, A thermodynamic approach to designing structure-free combinatorial DNA word sets, Nucleic Acids Research, 33(15):4965-4977.
Siegel et al., Apr. 12, 2010, Genome-wide analysis of mRNA abundance in two life-cycle stages of trypanosoma brucei and identification of splicing and polyadenylation sites, Nucleic Acids Research, 38(15):4946-4957.
Simpson et al., Feb. 15, 2010, Copy number variant detection in inbred strains from short read sequence data. Bioinformatics. 26(4):565-567.
Smith et al., 2010, Highly-multiplexed barcode sequencing: an efficient method for parallel analysis of pooled samples. Nucleic Acids Research, 38(13):e142.
Sogin et al., 2006, Microbilal diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored "rare biosphere," PNAS, 103:12115-12120.
Solomatin et al., 2009, Methods of site-specific labling of NRA with fluorescent dyes, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 469, 22 pp.
Sommer et al., Nov. 16, 1989, Minimal homology requirements for PCR primers, Nucleic Acids Research, 17(16):6749.
Song et al., 2013, Design rules for size-based cell sorting and sheathless cell focusing by hydrophoresis, Journal of Chromatography A, 1302:191-196.
Soumillon et al., Mar. 5, 2014, Characterization of directed differentiation by high-throughput single-cell RNA-Seq, bioRxiv preprint, http://bioRxiv.org/content/early/2014/03/05/003236.full.pdf, 13 pp.
Speicher et al., Oct. 2005, The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology, Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(10):782-792.
Statement of Opposition filed against European Patent No. EP2414548B1 on Jul. 21, 2016.
Statement of Opposition filed against European Patent No. EP2414548B1 on Jul. 26, 2016.
Statement of Opposition of Strawman Limited filed against European Patent No. EP2414548B1 on Jul. 19, 2016.
Stratagene 1998 Catalog, Gene Characterization Kits, p. 39.
Subkhankulova et al., "Comparative evaluation of linear and exponential amplification techniques for expression profiling at the single cell level", Genome Biology, (Mar. 2006) vol. 7, No. R18, pp. 1-16.
Submission dated Jan. 15, 2018 by Strawman Limited in preparation for upcoming oral proceedings in opposition against European Patent No. EP2414548B1.
Submission dated Jan. 15, 2018 by Vossius & Partner in preparation for upcoming oral proceedings in opposition against European Patent No. EP2414548B1.
Takahashi et al., Mar. 2006, Novel technique of quantitative nested real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 44(3):1029-1039.
Tan et al., Apr. 2013, Genome-wide comparison of DNA hydroxymethylation in mouse embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells by a new comparative hMeDIP-seq method. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(7):e84.
Tang et al, "RNA-Seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell", Nature Protocols, (2010) vol. 5, No, 3, pp. 516-535.
Taudien et al., Apr. 19, 2010, Haplotyping and copy number estimation of the highly polymorphic human beta-defensin locus on 8p23 by 454 amplicon sequencing. BMC Genomics. 11:252.
The Tibbs Times, UNC bioscience newsletter, Apr. 2010, 17 pp.
Third Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016 in Chinese patent application No. 201380022187.9.
Third Party Observation dated Jun. 14, 2018 in Japanese patent application No. 2016-537867.
Third-Party Pre-Issuance Submission filed on Jun. 11, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,752.
Third-Party Pre-Issuance Submission filed on Jun. 15, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,752.
Third-Party Pre-Issuance Submission filed on Jun. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,752.
Third-Party Pre-Issuance Submission filed on Jun. 6, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,752.
Third-Party Pre-Issuance Submission filed on May 21, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,752.
Tomaz et al., Aug. 2010, Differential methylation as a cause of allele dropout at the imprinted GNAS locus. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 14(4):455-460.
Treutlein et al., May 15, 2014, Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature. 509(7500):371-375.
Vandesompele et al., Jun. 18, 2002, Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes, Genome Biology, 3(7).
Velculescu et al., 1995, Serial Analysis of Gene Expression. Science, 270:484-487.
Velculescu et al., 1997, Characterization of the Yeast Transcriptome. Cell, 88:243-251.
Velten et al., 2015, Single-cell polyadenylation site mapping reveals 3′ isoform choice variability, Molecular Systems Biology, 11(812):1-14.
Virus, Wikipedia.org, accessed Nov. 24, 2012, 34 pp.
Vogelstein et al., 1999, Digital PCR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 96(16):9236-9241.
Vollbrecht et al., 2018, Validation and comparison of two NGS assays for the detection of EGFR T790M resistance mutation in liquid biopsies of NSCLC patients, Oncotarget, 9(26):18529-18539.
Walker et al., Jan. 1, 1992, Isothermal in vitro amplification of DNA by a restriction enzyme/DNA polymerase system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 89(1):392-396.
Walsh et al., Jul. 13, 2010, Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(28):12629-12633.
Wang et al., 2009, RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10:57-63.
Wang et al., Jan. 2012, A novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 14(1):22-29.
Wang et al., May 21, 2015, Advances and applications of single-cell sequencing technologies, Molecular Cell, 58(4):598-609.
Wang et al., Oct. 2010, iCLIP predicts the dual splicing effects of TIA-RNA interactions, PLoS Biol, 8(10):e1000530.
Warren et al., Nov. 21, 2006, Transcription factor profiling in individual hematopoietic progenitors by digital RT-PCR, PNAS, 103(47):17807-17812.
Weber et al., Sep. 15, 2003, A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for quantification of allele ratios and correction of amplification bias. Anal Biochem. 320(2):252-258.
Weiner et al., Apr. 2008, Kits and their unique role in molecular biology: a brief retrospective, BioTechniques, 44:701-704.
White et al., Aug. 23, 2011, High-throughput microfluidic single-cell RT-qPCR, PNAS, 108(34):13999-14004.
Wittes et al., 1999, Searching for Evidence of Altered Gene Expression: a Comment on Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91(5):400-401.
Wodicka et al., 1997, Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Biotechnology, 15:1359-1367.
Wojdacz et al., May 16, 2009, Primer design versus PCR bias in methylation independent PCR amplifications. Epigenetics. 4(4):231-234.
Wood et al., Aug. 2010, Using next-generation sequencing for high resolution multiplex analysis of copy number variation from nanogram quantities of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(14):e151.
Written Opinion dated Jul. 5, 2016 in PCT/US16/019962.
Written Opinion dated May 26, 2017 in Singapore patent application No. 11201405274W.
Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2016 in PCT/US16/019962.
Wu et al., Jan. 2014, Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nat Methods. 11(1):41-46.
Yandell et al., Sep. 2011, A probabilistic disease-gene finder for personal genomes. Genome Res. 21(9):1529-1542.
Ye et al., 2001, Fluorescent microsphere-based readout technology for multiplexed human single nucleotide polymorphism analysis and bacterial identification. Human Mutation, 17(4):305-316.
Yoon et al., Sep. 2009, Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res. 19(9):1586-1592.
Zagordi et al., 2010, Error correction of next-generation sequencing data and reliable estimation of HIV quasispecies, Nucleic Acids Research, 38:7400-7409.
Zhang et al., Jun. 19, 2012, DNA-based hybridization chain reaction for amplified bioelectronic signal and ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Anal Chem., 84(12),5392-5399.
Zhang et al., Mar. 20, 2011, The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. J Genet Genomics. 38(3):95-109.
Zhao et al., 2005, Homozygous Deletions and Chromosome Amplifications in Human Lung Carcinomas Revealed by Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Analysis. Cancer Research, 65:5561-5570.
Zheng et al., Feb. 2016, Haplotyping germline and cancer genomes with high-throughput linked-read sequencing, Nature Biotechnology, 34(3):303-311.
Zheng et al., Jan. 16, 2017, Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells, Nature Communications, 8:14049.
Zhou et al., 2001, Counting alleles reveals a connection between chromosome 18q loss and vascular invasion. Nature Biotechnology, 19:78-81.
Zhu et al., "Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction.", BioTechniques, (Apr. 2001) vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 892-897.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA3019589A1 (en) 2017-11-09
US20170314067A1 (en) 2017-11-02
CN109072288A (en) 2018-12-21
AU2017261189A1 (en) 2018-10-11
ES2956757T3 (en) 2023-12-27
EP4269616A2 (en) 2023-11-01
JP2022153390A (en) 2022-10-12
JP7129343B2 (en) 2022-09-01
EP3452614A1 (en) 2019-03-13
JP2019520046A (en) 2019-07-18
AU2017261189B2 (en) 2023-02-09
EP4269616A3 (en) 2024-02-14
EP3452614B1 (en) 2023-06-28
AU2023202747A1 (en) 2023-05-25
JP7607614B2 (en) 2024-12-27
US10822643B2 (en) 2020-11-03
AU2023202747B2 (en) 2025-09-04
WO2017192387A1 (en) 2017-11-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE50636E1 (en) Accurate molecular barcoding
EP3861134B1 (en) Determining 5&#39; transcript sequences
EP4055160B1 (en) Using random priming to obtain full-length v(d)j information for immune repertoire sequencing
JP7584420B2 (en) Method and kit for preparing complementary DNA
EP4150118A1 (en) Primers for immune repertoire profiling
EP2374900A1 (en) Polynucleotides for the amplification and analysis of whole genome and whole transcriptome libraries generated by a dna polymerization process
US20200385707A1 (en) Immuno-PETE
US20250257350A1 (en) Integrative DNA and RNA Library Preparations and Uses Thereof
EP3728636B1 (en) Particles associated with oligonucleotides
US9970048B2 (en) Oligonucleotides and methods for the preparation of RNA libraries
US20220017954A1 (en) Methods for Preparing CDNA Samples for RNA Sequencing, and CDNA Samples and Uses Thereof
WO2022117625A1 (en) Whole transcriptome analysis in single cells
US20240384336A1 (en) Optimized Set Of Oligonucleotides For Bulk RNA Barcoding And Sequencing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: CELLULAR RESEARCH, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHUM, ELEEN;FU, GLENN;REEL/FRAME:069882/0455

Effective date: 20160519

Owner name: BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CELLULAR RESEARCH INC.;REEL/FRAME:069882/0579

Effective date: 20180919