[go: up one dir, main page]

US3871867A - Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates - Google Patents

Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3871867A
US3871867A US320167A US32016773A US3871867A US 3871867 A US3871867 A US 3871867A US 320167 A US320167 A US 320167A US 32016773 A US32016773 A US 32016773A US 3871867 A US3871867 A US 3871867A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flotation
molybdenite
diluent
concentrate
accordance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US320167A
Inventor
Arthur W Last
George L Fraser
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kennecott Utah Copper LLC
Kennecott Corp
Original Assignee
Kennecott Copper Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kennecott Copper Corp filed Critical Kennecott Copper Corp
Priority to US320167A priority Critical patent/US3871867A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3871867A publication Critical patent/US3871867A/en
Assigned to KENNECOTT CORPORATION, 200 PUBLIC SQUARE, CLEVELAND OHIO, 44114, A CORP. OF DE. reassignment KENNECOTT CORPORATION, 200 PUBLIC SQUARE, CLEVELAND OHIO, 44114, A CORP. OF DE. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: KENNECOTT MINING CORPORATION
Assigned to KENNECOTT CORPORATION reassignment KENNECOTT CORPORATION CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). EFFECTIVE MAY 7, 1980. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS) Assignors: KENNECOTT COPPER CORPORATION
Assigned to KENNECOTT MINING CORPORATION reassignment KENNECOTT MINING CORPORATION CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). EFFECTIVE DEC. 31, 1986. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS) Assignors: KENNECOTT CORPORATION
Assigned to GAZELLE CORPORATION, C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, CORPORATION TRUST CENTER, 1209 ORANGE STREET, WILMINGTON, DE., 19801, A DE. CORP. reassignment GAZELLE CORPORATION, C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, CORPORATION TRUST CENTER, 1209 ORANGE STREET, WILMINGTON, DE., 19801, A DE. CORP. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: RENNECOTT CORPORATION, A DE. CORP.
Assigned to KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER CORPORATION reassignment KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER CORPORATION CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). JULY 5, 1989 - DE Assignors: GAZELLE CORPORATION
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/08—Subsequent treatment of concentrated product
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03B—SEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B1/00—Conditioning for facilitating separation by altering physical properties of the matter to be treated
    • B03B1/02—Preparatory heating

Definitions

  • a molybdenite flotation concentrate usually a copper sulfide concentrate containing considerable molybdenite as well as other sulfides, such as pyrite, and a relatively small amount of siliceous gangue, is upgraded by, first, adding thereto inert, particulate solid, diluent material that can be easily removed subsequent to roast-conditioning treatment of the concentrate, for example, relatively coarse sand, finely ground mica, or crushed or ground limestone, in sufficient quantity to permit abnormally high roasting temperatures without igniting the charge; then, by roasting the resulting mixture at an abnormally high temperature, usually a temperature that, but for the presence of the diluent material', would ignite the charge and oxidize the molybdenite; and, finally, by treating the roasted concentrate by flotation for recovering the molybdenite as an upgraded molybdenite concentrate.
  • inert, particulate solid, diluent material that can be easily removed subsequent to roast-conditioning treatment of the concentrate, for
  • the molybdenite is upgraded by flotation treatment of the roasted concentrate in conventional manner, such flotation treatment is facilitated by the higher than normal temperature to which the material has been subjected during the roasting step.
  • the diluent material is removed by appropriate separation steps applied either to the roasted product before flotation of some subsequent stage.
  • the invention is in the narrow but important field of upgrading flotation concentrates containing considerable quantities of molybdenite.
  • copper sulfide ores contain relatively small amount of molybdenite (M05 Both the copper sulfide minerals and the molybdenite are conventionally concentrated in common by floatation, resulting in a general flotation concentrate containing varying amounts of molybdenite, depending upon the ore and the number of cleaning steps utilized.
  • Such copper sulfide concentrate usually also contains pyrite and some gangue materials, and is normally further treated to produce a molybdenite flotation concentrate in which either copper sulfides or molybdenite predominates.
  • a common procedure for separating the molybdenite from the copper sulfides, pyrite, and gangue materials remaining in such molybdenite flotation concentrate is to filter the concentrate and deactivate the copper sulfides, pyrite, and gangue materials therein by roasting. The roasted concentrate is then repulped and subjected to flotation for upgrading the molybdenite content.
  • the common practice is to operate at a temperature below the optimum (e.g. between 450F and 550F) rather than to risk ignition of the charge in the roaster.
  • a molybdenite concentrate is mixed with a sufficient quantity of an inert, particulate solid, diluent material to enable roasting at an abnormally high temperature, i.e., above 550F.
  • the diluent material must be of a type easily recoverable at some convenient time following roasting of the mixture. Quartz sand of coarse grain size relative to the finely ground solids in an ore pulp, crushed or ground limestone, and finely ground micaceous material are ideal diluent materials.
  • the mixture of diluent material and molybdenite concentrate is usually subjected to roasting in a furnace, such as a multiple hearth roaster, at a temperature in the neighborhood of-600F. or above as high as 760 having been successfully employed) for a time sufficient to deactivate the copper and other sulfide minerals, substantially without igniting such minerals or converting the molybdenite in the concentrate to a molybdenum oxide.
  • the molybdenite is upgraded by flotation and the inert diluent material is separated for reuse in the process.
  • the manner of removing the diluent material will depend upon its nature and whether it follows the molybdenite or remains with the residue. For example, if it is coarse sand or the like, it is removed by screening of the roasted concentrate prior to flotation; if it is finely ground micaceous material, it is removed by flotation of the roasted mixture, using only a frother as a reagent; if it is crushed or ground limestone, it is removed by leaching the roasted mixture after separation of the'molybdenite therefrom.
  • the molybdenite concentrate subjected to upgrading procedures in accordance with the invention is normally a copper sulfide flotation concentrate containing considerable quantity of molybdenite.
  • the quantity may vary from 5 percent by weight to as high as percent, depending upon the mining property from which the original ore was obtained and the milling procedures applied to it.
  • the molybdenite concentrate contains from 5 to 15 percent by weight M08
  • Such molybedenite flotation concentrate is intimately mixed with an inert, particulate solid, diluent material, which, in this instance, is a coarse quartz sand having a grain size larger than the size of the particles of ore in the concentrate.
  • the quantity of the diluent material necessary to achieve the purposes of the invention will vary in accordance with the particular feed material, etc., but should be at least enough to be effective in preventing ignition of the charge and oxidation of the molybdenite therein when the abnormally high roasting temperatures (i.e., above 550F.) are employed in accordance with the invention.
  • diluent materials such as mica or crushed limestone
  • the diluent must be inert to the reaction in the roaster and physically recoverable from the roasted concentrate.
  • Part of the diluent may be naturally present in the ore material itself as gangue.
  • the resulting mixture of molybdenite concentrate and diluent material is subjected to roasting in a suitable furnace, such as a multiple hearth roaster, to deactivate the copper, iron, and various sulfides other than molydbenite, without altering the surfaces of the particles of molybdenite.
  • a suitable furnace such as a multiple hearth roaster
  • temperatures of at most between 550F. and 600F. have heretofore been attainable without ignition of the copper and iron sulfides, though in commercial practice temperatures above 550F. are not normally employed
  • the mixture containing the diluent material can be heated to usual ignition temperatures of 600F. and above, without danger of igniting the furnace charge. For example, temperatures of 650F. to 750F.
  • Such high temperatures provide for almost complete alteration of the surfaces of sulfide minerals other than molybdenite, and, therefore, permit more selective separation of the molybdenite from such sulfide minerals in subsequent separation steps.
  • the higher temperatures ensure complete removal of flotation reagents, and enhance the floatability of micaceous gangue materials in subsequent flotation steps.
  • the period of time necessary to deactivate minerals in the roaster will vary with the concentration of such minerals, the roasting temperature, and the amount of diluent material in the mixture.
  • the mixture After the mixture has been roasted, it is screened to separate the coarse grained quartz sand diluent from the relatively fine ore particles. Such diluent can then be recycled for continued use in the process.
  • the remaining roasted molybdenite concentrate is subjected to conventional gangue flotation with a frother reagent, such as an alcohol, to float the gangue materials, including any micaceous gangue that might be naturally present as a further diluent, leaving the mineral sulfides as a sink product.
  • a frother reagent such as an alcohol
  • finely ground mica or micaceous material is employed as the added diluent, it is separated from the roasted concentrate by means of the aforementioned gangue flotation procedure, the screening stage being eliminated.
  • An upgraded molybdenite final product results from subjecting the sulfide concentrate obtained from gangue flotation to the usual flotation treatment with a collector reagent, such as burner oil, for recovering molybdenite in the froth.
  • a collector reagent such as burner oil
  • Crushed or ground limestone as the diluent can be effectively eliminated from the sulfide tailings obtained from the floatation step applied to the sulfide concentrate by leaching such tailings with hydrochloric acid.
  • the dissolved lime can be precipitated from the acid leach solution by known procedures for recycling.
  • the following laboratory tests demonstrate the effectiveness of the process.
  • EXAMPLE I A 200 gram sample of molybdenite flotation concentrate was mixed with 800 grams of -+30 mesh Ottawa (quartz) sand. The mixture was then heat-treated in an open pan in a laboratory muffle furnace with rabbling. The charge was heated to a temperature of 700F. and held at temperatures between 700F. and 750F. for minutes. The charge was then cooled, the Ottawa sand removed by screening, and the recovered, heat-treated sample subjected to flotation for the removal of micaceous gangue by flotation with an alcohol frother, followed by flotation of molybdenite with burner oil as the collector. The following flotation metallurgy was achieved.
  • Example ll established that, in the heat-treatment step, the temperature could be maintained between 600F. and 630F. without developing ignition and burning ofthe sample
  • 89.3 percent of the molybdenite was recovered as a froth concentrate, nearly twice the recovery effected in Example lll in which lack of effective control pursuant to the invention resulted in ignition of the charge.
  • Example 1 established that high temperatures of 700F. to 750F. could be reached in the heattreatment step with, at the most, minor adverse effects upon subsequent flotation processing.
  • Example lll the temperature limit to which a particular mixed molybdenite-chalcopyrite-pyritesiliceous gangue mixture could be heated in an open air atmosphere was shown. In this instance, ignition was observed at 600F., temperatures increased rapidly because of burning" of the charge. In subsequent flotation, only 46.8 percent of the molybdenite could be recovered as a froth concentrate.
  • a process in accordance with claim diluent is removed from the roast product by a flotation stage in the flotation of said product.
  • the diluent is selected from one or more of the group consisting of quartz sand, micaceous material, and limestone.
  • diluent comprises quartz sand of relatively coarse particle sizefwhich is removed from the roast product by screening said material prior to flotation.
  • the diluent comprises micaceous material which is re,- moved from the roast product in a gangue flotation stage utilizing only a frother reagent.
  • the diluent comprises limestone which is removed from the roast product by chemical leaching of a flotation product containing same.
  • roasting temperature is within a range of from 550 to 760F.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

A molybdenite flotation concentrate, usually a copper sulfide concentrate containing considerable molybdenite as well as other sulfides, such as pyrite, and a relatively small amount of siliceous gangue, is upgraded by, first, adding thereto inert, particulate solid, diluent material that can be easily removed subsequent to roast-conditioning treatment of the concentrate, for example, relatively coarse sand, finely ground mica, or crushed or ground limestone, in sufficient quantity to permit abnormally high roasting temperatures without igniting the charge; then, by roasting the resulting mixture at an abnormally high temperature, usually a temperature that, but for the presence of the diluent material, would ignite the charge and oxidize the molybdenite; and, finally, by treating the roasted concentrate by flotation for recovering the molybdenite as an upgraded molybdenite concentrate. Although the molybdenite is upgraded by flotation treatment of the roasted concentrate in conventional manner, such flotation treatment is facilitated by the higher than normal temperature to which the material has been subjected during the roasting step. The diluent material is removed by appropriate separation steps applied either to the roasted product before flotation of some subsequent stage.

Description

United States Patent Last et a1.
[ Mar. 18, 1975 CONCENTRATES [75] Inventors: Arthur W. Last, Salt Lake City;
George L. Fraser, Magna, both of Utah [73] Assignee: Kennecott Copper Corporation,
New York, NY.
[22] Filed: Jan. 2, 1973 [21] Appl. No.: 320,167
[52] US. Cl 75/2, 75/7, 75/20 R, 432/27 [51] int. Cl. B03d 1/08 [58] Field of Search 75/2, 36, 37, 6, 7, 20 R; 432/27; 423/659 [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,492,818 5/1924 Thornhill 75/37 1,801,105 4/1931 Phelan et al..... 75/2 X 1,865,153 6/1932 Taplin 75/2 X 2.674612 4/1954 Murphree 75/26 X 3,427.148 2/1969 Peters ct al 75/37 X 3,585,023 6/1971 Vlnaty et al. 75/36 X 3.630.501 12/1971 Shabaker 432/27 X FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 454,695 2/1949 Canada 75/2 MOLYBENITE ROUGPg FLOTATION CONCENTRATE Primary Examiner-Allen E. Curtis Assistant Ex'aminer--Thomas A. Waltz Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Mallinckrodt & Mallinckrodt [57] ABSTRACT v A molybdenite flotation concentrate, usually a copper sulfide concentrate containing considerable molybdenite as well as other sulfides, such as pyrite, and a relatively small amount of siliceous gangue, is upgraded by, first, adding thereto inert, particulate solid, diluent material that can be easily removed subsequent to roast-conditioning treatment of the concentrate, for example, relatively coarse sand, finely ground mica, or crushed or ground limestone, in sufficient quantity to permit abnormally high roasting temperatures without igniting the charge; then, by roasting the resulting mixture at an abnormally high temperature, usually a temperature that, but for the presence of the diluent material', would ignite the charge and oxidize the molybdenite; and, finally, by treating the roasted concentrate by flotation for recovering the molybdenite as an upgraded molybdenite concentrate. Although the molybdenite is upgraded by flotation treatment of the roasted concentrate in conventional manner, such flotation treatment is facilitated by the higher than normal temperature to which the material has been subjected during the roasting step. The diluent material is removed by appropriate separation steps applied either to the roasted product before flotation of some subsequent stage.
11 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure OARSE QUARTZ SAND A5 C0 ER LFlDE l C 5-|5% AV tJ ElGHT M08 SILICEOUS GANGUE) INERT PARTlCLLATE SOLID DILUENT PHY AL TURE M YBDEN E OONCENT TE OUAR SA N D DlLLi NT FROTHER REAGENT GANGUE FLOTAT ION TD SMELTER FLOTATXON ROASTER (0.9. 550E T0 750"?) I SCREENlNG COLLECTOR REAGENT FOR MOLYBDENITE M05 FLOAT UPGRADED MOLYBDENITE I PATENIEDIIARIBIQYEI A 3.871.867
MOLYBDENITE ROUGHER FLOTATION CONCENTRATE COPPER SULFIDES PYRITE COARSE QUARTZ SAND AS 5I5% Y WEIGHT M08 SILICEOUS GANGUE) INERT PARTICULATE SOLID, DILUENT MIXER PHYSICAL MIXTURE E CONCENTRATE AND QUARTZ SAND DILUENT ROASTER (8.9. 550E TO 750FI FROTHER SCREENING REAGENT FLOAT SINK GANGUE WASTE v SULFIDE CONCENTRATE COLLECTOR REAGENT FOR MOLYBDENITE FLOTATION I COPPER SULFIDES, PYRITE etc. M082 FLOAT W UPGRADED MOLYBDENITE ROAST-FLOTATION PROCESS FOR UPGRADING MOLYBDENITE FLOTATION CONCENTRATES BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field:
The invention is in the narrow but important field of upgrading flotation concentrates containing considerable quantities of molybdenite.
State of the Art:
Many copper sulfide ores contain relatively small amount of molybdenite (M05 Both the copper sulfide minerals and the molybdenite are conventionally concentrated in common by floatation, resulting in a general flotation concentrate containing varying amounts of molybdenite, depending upon the ore and the number of cleaning steps utilized. Such copper sulfide concentrate usually also contains pyrite and some gangue materials, and is normally further treated to produce a molybdenite flotation concentrate in which either copper sulfides or molybdenite predominates. A common procedure for separating the molybdenite from the copper sulfides, pyrite, and gangue materials remaining in such molybdenite flotation concentrate is to filter the concentrate and deactivate the copper sulfides, pyrite, and gangue materials therein by roasting. The roasted concentrate is then repulped and subjected to flotation for upgrading the molybdenite content.
The effectiveness of the procedure, or similar roasting procedure applied to other types of molybdenite I concentrates, is dependent upon the temperature at which the roaster is maintained. If the temperature is too low, the copper sulfide minerals, pyrite, and gangue materials are not deactivated and, in a subsequent flotation step for the recovery of molybdenite as a froth product, will report in the froth along with the molybdenite. If the temperature is too high, the copper sulfide minerals and pyrite will ignite and cause a rapid rise in temperature which will oxidize the molybdenite and thereby prevent effective upgrading of the molybdenite values by subsequent flotation, Since it is very difficult to maintain the roasting temperature at an optimum (just below 600F) for the desired deactivation, the common practice is to operate at a temperature below the optimum (e.g. between 450F and 550F) rather than to risk ignition of the charge in the roaster.
This results in a lower concentration of molybedenite 1 in the subsequent flotation froth product.
Objectives:
It was an objective in the making of this invention to provide for roasting the molybdenite flotation concentrate concerned at abnormally high temperatures, i.e., at temperatures above the normal upper limit of 550F and often above 600F (which is usually high enough to cause the charge to ignite), so as to improve recov- -ery of the molybdenite by subsequent flotation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the invention, a molybdenite concentrate is mixed with a sufficient quantity of an inert, particulate solid, diluent material to enable roasting at an abnormally high temperature, i.e., above 550F. The diluent material must be of a type easily recoverable at some convenient time following roasting of the mixture. Quartz sand of coarse grain size relative to the finely ground solids in an ore pulp, crushed or ground limestone, and finely ground micaceous material are ideal diluent materials. The mixture of diluent material and molybdenite concentrate is usually subjected to roasting in a furnace, such as a multiple hearth roaster, at a temperature in the neighborhood of-600F. or above as high as 760 having been successfully employed) for a time sufficient to deactivate the copper and other sulfide minerals, substantially without igniting such minerals or converting the molybdenite in the concentrate to a molybdenum oxide.
Following the roasting step, the molybdenite is upgraded by flotation and the inert diluent material is separated for reuse in the process. The manner of removing the diluent material will depend upon its nature and whether it follows the molybdenite or remains with the residue. For example, if it is coarse sand or the like, it is removed by screening of the roasted concentrate prior to flotation; if it is finely ground micaceous material, it is removed by flotation of the roasted mixture, using only a frother as a reagent; if it is crushed or ground limestone, it is removed by leaching the roasted mixture after separation of the'molybdenite therefrom.
THE DRAWING DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT As shown in the accompanying flowsheet, the molybdenite concentrate subjected to upgrading procedures in accordance with the invention is normally a copper sulfide flotation concentrate containing considerable quantity of molybdenite. The quantity may vary from 5 percent by weight to as high as percent, depending upon the mining property from which the original ore was obtained and the milling procedures applied to it. In the particular procedure illustrated, the molybdenite concentrate contains from 5 to 15 percent by weight M08 Such molybedenite flotation concentrate is intimately mixed with an inert, particulate solid, diluent material, which, in this instance, is a coarse quartz sand having a grain size larger than the size of the particles of ore in the concentrate. The quantity of the diluent material necessary to achieve the purposes of the invention will vary in accordance with the particular feed material, etc., but should be at least enough to be effective in preventing ignition of the charge and oxidation of the molybdenite therein when the abnormally high roasting temperatures (i.e., above 550F.) are employed in accordance with the invention. As previously indicated, other diluent materials, such as mica or crushed limestone, can be employed either alone or in combination, but the diluent must be inert to the reaction in the roaster and physically recoverable from the roasted concentrate. Part of the diluent may be naturally present in the ore material itself as gangue.
The resulting mixture of molybdenite concentrate and diluent material is subjected to roasting in a suitable furnace, such as a multiple hearth roaster, to deactivate the copper, iron, and various sulfides other than molydbenite, without altering the surfaces of the particles of molybdenite. Whereas temperatures of at most between 550F. and 600F. have heretofore been attainable without ignition of the copper and iron sulfides, though in commercial practice temperatures above 550F. are not normally employed, the mixture containing the diluent material can be heated to usual ignition temperatures of 600F. and above, without danger of igniting the furnace charge. For example, temperatures of 650F. to 750F. and above are possible without igniting the charge or converting the molybdenite to molybdenum oxides. Such high temperatures provide for almost complete alteration of the surfaces of sulfide minerals other than molybdenite, and, therefore, permit more selective separation of the molybdenite from such sulfide minerals in subsequent separation steps. In addition, the higher temperatures ensure complete removal of flotation reagents, and enhance the floatability of micaceous gangue materials in subsequent flotation steps.
The period of time necessary to deactivate minerals in the roaster will vary with the concentration of such minerals, the roasting temperature, and the amount of diluent material in the mixture.
After the mixture has been roasted, it is screened to separate the coarse grained quartz sand diluent from the relatively fine ore particles. Such diluent can then be recycled for continued use in the process. The remaining roasted molybdenite concentrate is subjected to conventional gangue flotation with a frother reagent, such as an alcohol, to float the gangue materials, including any micaceous gangue that might be naturally present as a further diluent, leaving the mineral sulfides as a sink product.
If finely ground mica or micaceous material is employed as the added diluent, it is separated from the roasted concentrate by means of the aforementioned gangue flotation procedure, the screening stage being eliminated.
An upgraded molybdenite final product results from subjecting the sulfide concentrate obtained from gangue flotation to the usual flotation treatment with a collector reagent, such as burner oil, for recovering molybdenite in the froth.
Crushed or ground limestone as the diluent can be effectively eliminated from the sulfide tailings obtained from the floatation step applied to the sulfide concentrate by leaching such tailings with hydrochloric acid.
1 If found economical, the dissolved lime can be precipitated from the acid leach solution by known procedures for recycling. The following laboratory tests demonstrate the effectiveness of the process.
EXAMPLE I A 200 gram sample of molybdenite flotation concentrate was mixed with 800 grams of -+30 mesh Ottawa (quartz) sand. The mixture was then heat-treated in an open pan in a laboratory muffle furnace with rabbling. The charge was heated to a temperature of 700F. and held at temperatures between 700F. and 750F. for minutes. The charge was then cooled, the Ottawa sand removed by screening, and the recovered, heat-treated sample subjected to flotation for the removal of micaceous gangue by flotation with an alcohol frother, followed by flotation of molybdenite with burner oil as the collector. The following flotation metallurgy was achieved.
/r Distri- Product Weight 7r M05 bution-M05 Gangue Concentrate l4.37 3.04 5.79 Tailing 75.31 1.12 ll.l8 M05 Concentrate 10.32 60.7 83.03 Calculated Feed 100.00 7.5 100.00
EXAMPLE II This test was conducted in substantially the identical manner as that of Example I, except that the temperature during the 30 minute heat-treatment was maintained between 600F. and 630F. The following flotation metallurgy was achieved:
7: Distri- Product 71 Weight MoS bution M05 Gangue Concentrate I485 097 L79 Tailing 73.32 0.98 8.93 M08 Concentrate l 1.83 60.7 89.28 Calculated Feed 100.00 8.0 100.00
EXAMPLE III Distri- Product /1 Weight 7( M05 bution M05 Gangue Concentrate l8.48 l4,2 29.98 Tailing 73.39 2.77 23.22 M08 Concentrate 8.13 50.4 46.80 Calculated Feed l00.00 100.00
Example ll established that, in the heat-treatment step, the temperature could be maintained between 600F. and 630F. without developing ignition and burning ofthe sample In subsequent flotation, 89.3 percent of the molybdenite was recovered as a froth concentrate, nearly twice the recovery effected in Example lll in which lack of effective control pursuant to the invention resulted in ignition of the charge.
Example 1 established that high temperatures of 700F. to 750F. could be reached in the heattreatment step with, at the most, minor adverse effects upon subsequent flotation processing.
In Example lll, the temperature limit to which a particular mixed molybdenite-chalcopyrite-pyritesiliceous gangue mixture could be heated in an open air atmosphere was shown. In this instance, ignition was observed at 600F., temperatures increased rapidly because of burning" of the charge. In subsequent flotation, only 46.8 percent of the molybdenite could be recovered as a froth concentrate.
Laboratory tests have shown that the grade of a molybdenite concentrate to which the process of the invention has been applied is increased approximately percent over what it would have been if the material had been roasted at the usual safe temperature.
Whereas the invention is here illustrated and described in terms of specific details of the best mode presently contemplated for carrying it out in practice, it is to be understood that many changes can be made without departing from the inventive concepts here taught and set forth in the following claims.
We claim:
1. In a molybdenite recovery process applicable to a finely divided ore material containing molybdenite and sulfide minerals other than molybdenite, but relatively little gangue, which ore material has been previously treated by flotation and which process comprises roasting said ore material to deactivate sulfide minerals other than molybdenite and subjecting the roast product to flotation for the recovery of the molybdenite as a froth concentrate, the improvement which comprises mixing with said ore material under substantially ambient conditions a sufficient quantity of a particulate, solid diluent to prevent ignition of the roast at a temperature at which ignition would otherwise occur, said diluent being chemically inert with respect to the molybdenite and sulfide materials in said ore material; roasting the mixture of ore material and diluent at a temperature at which ignition would occur if said diluent were not present; and separating the diluent from the roasted ore material.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is removed from the roast product before said product is subjected to flotation.
3. A process in accordance with claim diluent is removed from the roast product by a flotation stage in the flotation of said product.
4. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is removed from the roast product subsequent to the flotation thereof.
5. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is selected from one or more of the group consisting of quartz sand, micaceous material, and limestone.
6. A process in accordance with claim 5, wherein the diluent comprises quartz sand of relatively coarse particle sizefwhich is removed from the roast product by screening said material prior to flotation.
7. A process in accordance with claim 5, wherein the diluent comprises micaceous material which is re,- moved from the roast product in a gangue flotation stage utilizing only a frother reagent.
8. A process in accordance with claim 5, wherein the diluent comprises limestone which is removed from the roast product by chemical leaching of a flotation product containing same.
9. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the roasting temperature is within a range of from 550 to 760F.
10. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein a portion of the total diluent content of the ore material and diluent mixture effective for the purpose specified is naturally present in the ore material itself.
11. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the ore material includes copper, sulfides, iron sulfides,
and a relatively small amount of siliceous gangue.
* l l l l, whereinthe'

Claims (11)

1. IN A MOLYBDENITE RECOVERY PROCESS APPLICABLE TO A FINELY DIVIDED ORE MATERIAL CONTANING BOLYBDENITE AND SULFIDE MINERALS OTHER THAN MOLYBDENITE, BUT RELATIVELY LITTLE GANGUE, WHICH ORE MATERIAL HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY TREATED BY FLOATATION AND WHICH PROCESS COMPRISES ROASTING SAND ORE MATERIAL TO DEACTIVATE SULFIDE MINERALS OTHER THAN MOLYBDENITE AND SUBJECTING THE ROAST PRODUCT TO FLOTATION FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE MOLYBDENITE AS A FROTH CONCENTRATE, THE IMPROVEMENT WHICH COMPRISES MIXING WITH SAID ORE MATERIAL UNDER SUBSTANTIALLY AMBIENT CONDITIONS A SUFFICIENT QUANTITY OF A PARTICULATE, SOLID DILUENT TO PREVENT IGNITION OF THE ROAST AT A TEMPERATURE AT WHICH IGNITION WOULD OTHERWISE OCCUR, SAID DILUENT BEING CHEMICALY INERT WITH RESPECT TO THE MOLYBDENITE AND SULFIDE MATERIALS IN SAID ORE MATERIAL; ROASTING THE MIXTURE OR ORE MATERIAL AND DILUENT AT A TEMPERATURE AT WHICH IGNITION WOULD OCCUR IF SAID DILUENT WERE NOT PRESENT; AND SEPARATING THE DILUENT FROM THE ROASTED ORE MATERIAL.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is removed from the roast product before said product is subjected to flotation.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is removed from the roast product by a flotation stage in the flotation of said product.
4. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is removed from the roast product subsequent to the flotation thereof.
5. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the diluent is selected from one or more of the group consisting of quartz sand, micaceous material, and limestone.
6. A process in accordance with claim 5, wherein the diluent comprises quartz sand of relatively coarse particle size, which is removed from the roast product by screening said material prior to flotation.
7. A process in accordance with claim 5, wherein the diluent comprises micaceous material which is removed from the roast product in a gangue flotation stage utilizing only a frother reagent.
8. A process in accordance with claim 5, wherein the diluent comprises limestone which is removed from the roast product by chemical leaching of a flotation product containing same.
9. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the roasting temperature is within a range of from 550* to 760*F.
10. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein a portion of the total diluent content of the ore material and diluent mixture effective for the purpose specified is naturally present in the ore material itself.
11. A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the ore material includes copper, sulfides, iron sulfides, and a relatively small amount of siliceous gangue.
US320167A 1973-01-02 1973-01-02 Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates Expired - Lifetime US3871867A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US320167A US3871867A (en) 1973-01-02 1973-01-02 Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US320167A US3871867A (en) 1973-01-02 1973-01-02 Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3871867A true US3871867A (en) 1975-03-18

Family

ID=23245174

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US320167A Expired - Lifetime US3871867A (en) 1973-01-02 1973-01-02 Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3871867A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4058395A (en) * 1973-09-28 1977-11-15 Michael John Sole Extracting copper from sulphide concentrates
US4120697A (en) * 1977-04-15 1978-10-17 Amax Inc. Segregation-separation of copper from nickel in copper-nickel sulfide concentrates
US4437884A (en) 1980-11-10 1984-03-20 Union Oil Company Of California Ore roasting with recycle of gases
US4518573A (en) * 1983-03-03 1985-05-21 Occidental Chemical Corporation Differential flotation reagent and method of preparation
CN105013616A (en) * 2015-06-26 2015-11-04 湖南有色金属研究院 Method for separating molybdenum concentrate and lead-sulfur concentrate from molybdenum-lead-sulfur mixed concentrate
CN106492993A (en) * 2016-10-30 2017-03-15 长春黄金研究院 Suppress the composite restrainer of particulate silicate gangue
CN108160340A (en) * 2017-12-02 2018-06-15 长春黄金研究院 A kind of super low concentration copper-cobalt ore method for floating
CN112871439A (en) * 2020-12-24 2021-06-01 云南迪庆有色金属有限责任公司 Industrial production method for separating fine-grained copper-molybdenum bulk concentrate by using pulsating high-gradient magnetic separation technology

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1492818A (en) * 1920-01-08 1924-05-06 Edwin B Thornhill Process of producing sponge iron
US1801105A (en) * 1926-11-03 1931-04-14 R H Channing Jr Process of sulphide ore treatment
US1865153A (en) * 1930-01-31 1932-06-28 Metals Production Of North Ame Heat treatment of copper ores or the like
US2674612A (en) * 1948-11-26 1954-04-06 Standard Oil Dev Co Controlling reaction temperatures
US3427148A (en) * 1966-10-10 1969-02-11 Bergwerksverband Gmbh Process of producing iron-coke bodies
US3585023A (en) * 1968-08-20 1971-06-15 Dravo Corp Method and apparatus for reduction of iron ore
US3630501A (en) * 1970-08-21 1971-12-28 Air Prod & Chem Thermal treatment of powder

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1492818A (en) * 1920-01-08 1924-05-06 Edwin B Thornhill Process of producing sponge iron
US1801105A (en) * 1926-11-03 1931-04-14 R H Channing Jr Process of sulphide ore treatment
US1865153A (en) * 1930-01-31 1932-06-28 Metals Production Of North Ame Heat treatment of copper ores or the like
US2674612A (en) * 1948-11-26 1954-04-06 Standard Oil Dev Co Controlling reaction temperatures
US3427148A (en) * 1966-10-10 1969-02-11 Bergwerksverband Gmbh Process of producing iron-coke bodies
US3585023A (en) * 1968-08-20 1971-06-15 Dravo Corp Method and apparatus for reduction of iron ore
US3630501A (en) * 1970-08-21 1971-12-28 Air Prod & Chem Thermal treatment of powder

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4058395A (en) * 1973-09-28 1977-11-15 Michael John Sole Extracting copper from sulphide concentrates
US4120697A (en) * 1977-04-15 1978-10-17 Amax Inc. Segregation-separation of copper from nickel in copper-nickel sulfide concentrates
US4437884A (en) 1980-11-10 1984-03-20 Union Oil Company Of California Ore roasting with recycle of gases
US4518573A (en) * 1983-03-03 1985-05-21 Occidental Chemical Corporation Differential flotation reagent and method of preparation
CN105013616A (en) * 2015-06-26 2015-11-04 湖南有色金属研究院 Method for separating molybdenum concentrate and lead-sulfur concentrate from molybdenum-lead-sulfur mixed concentrate
CN105013616B (en) * 2015-06-26 2017-09-22 湖南有色金属研究院 A kind of method that molybdenum concntrate and lead iron concentrate are separated in the lead sulfide mixed concentrate from molybdenum
CN106492993A (en) * 2016-10-30 2017-03-15 长春黄金研究院 Suppress the composite restrainer of particulate silicate gangue
CN108160340A (en) * 2017-12-02 2018-06-15 长春黄金研究院 A kind of super low concentration copper-cobalt ore method for floating
CN112871439A (en) * 2020-12-24 2021-06-01 云南迪庆有色金属有限责任公司 Industrial production method for separating fine-grained copper-molybdenum bulk concentrate by using pulsating high-gradient magnetic separation technology

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4295881A (en) Process for extraction of platinum group metals from chromite-bearing ore
WO1994006944A1 (en) A method for recovering gold and other precious metals from carbonaceous ores
CA1218961A (en) Mineral separation
AU2011335037A1 (en) Magnetic recovery of valuables from slag material
US3871867A (en) Roast-flotation process for upgrading molybdenite flotation concentrates
US2861687A (en) Flotation of heavy metal oxides
US4049444A (en) Process for treatment of lateritic ores
US3728430A (en) Method for processing copper values
US3754896A (en) Process for recovering nickel from very low grade primary nickel ores
CA1115062A (en) Purification of rutile
US3503734A (en) Beneficiation of nickel-containing lateritic ores
Krenev et al. Processes for the recovery of bismuth from ores and concentrates
US2442429A (en) Method of extracting uranium, radium, and vanadium from their ores
US3770213A (en) Process for separating carbon from iron-bearing fines in blast furnace flue dusts
US3100700A (en) Recovery of nickel and cobalt by reduction and leaching
US3834893A (en) Combined chemical treatment and flotation process for recovering relatively high grade molybdenite from off grade or low grade ore materials
US2658827A (en) Method of recovering precious and base metals
CA1174055A (en) Cyanidation of gold ores
US3630675A (en) Selective oxidation of ferrous scrap
US3232744A (en) Process for producing iron oxide with a low silica content
US3313601A (en) Recovery of metal values from oxygenated ores
US1901102A (en) Ore conditioning process
US3246748A (en) Flotation concentration of non-metallic minerals containing calcite
RU2149707C1 (en) Method of pyrite cinders processing
Chepushtanova et al. Processing of the zinc-lead-bearing flotation middlings by sulfidizing roasting with pyrrhotites production by predicted properties

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KENNECOTT CORPORATION, 200 PUBLIC SQUARE, CLEVELAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:KENNECOTT MINING CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004815/0063

Effective date: 19870320

Owner name: KENNECOTT MINING CORPORATION

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:KENNECOTT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004815/0036

Effective date: 19870220

Owner name: KENNECOTT CORPORATION

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:KENNECOTT COPPER CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004815/0016

Effective date: 19800520

AS Assignment

Owner name: GAZELLE CORPORATION, C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, C

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:RENNECOTT CORPORATION, A DE. CORP.;REEL/FRAME:005164/0153

Effective date: 19890628

AS Assignment

Owner name: KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER CORPORATION

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GAZELLE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:005604/0237

Effective date: 19890630