[go: up one dir, main page]

US3006842A - Method for reducing sludge deposition of fuel oils - Google Patents

Method for reducing sludge deposition of fuel oils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3006842A
US3006842A US828065A US82806559A US3006842A US 3006842 A US3006842 A US 3006842A US 828065 A US828065 A US 828065A US 82806559 A US82806559 A US 82806559A US 3006842 A US3006842 A US 3006842A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
oil
fuel oil
fuel oils
chilling
fuel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US828065A
Inventor
Greatorex Robert
Zalichi Demetrios The Emmanuel
Partridge William Arthur
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BP PLC
Original Assignee
BP PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BP PLC filed Critical BP PLC
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3006842A publication Critical patent/US3006842A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G31/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by methods not otherwise provided for
    • C10G31/06Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by methods not otherwise provided for by heating, cooling, or pressure treatment

Definitions

  • Residual fuel oils i.e. fuel oils consisting of or containing petroleum residues, have a tendency to deposit a waxy sludge on storage and in certain circumstances this can cause difficulties, e.g. where in use the fuel oil has to be passed through a screen or strainer. Such difiiculties arise mainly with fuels or Class E, British Standards Specification No. 2869:1957, which are intended to be handled in unheated storage.
  • the invention consists in chilling a residual fuel oil from an upper temperature of at least 110 F., preferably at least 120 F., especially at least 140 F., to a lower temperature not higher than 90 F., preferably not higher than 70 F., at a rate of at least 0.1 F., preferably at least 1 F., per minute.
  • Residual fuel oils are normally prepared by blending residual materials from distillation and cracking processes and materials discarded during the production of lubricating oils, with lighter components, such as kerosene or gas oil. This blending is carried out at an elevated temperature, usually of the order of 140 F. or higher. Where, therefore, the method of the invention is to be applied to fuel oils which have just been blended, it will not normally be necessary to preheat them.
  • the chilling may be conveniently effected by passing the fuel oil through conventional heat exchanging equipment, cooled by a flow of cold water or other suitably available cold fluid.
  • EXAMPLE 1 A fuel oil (A) having a Redwood I viscosity at 100 F. of 199 seconds and a pour point of 15 F. was used in this example. When fuel oil A was cooled at a slower rate than 0.1 F. per minute a waxy deposit or sludge was subsequently deposited and the fuel oil was not filterable. Samples of the same fuel oil when cooled according to the method of the invention were filterable and remained so after a prolonged storage at ambient It can be seen from the above results that the pour point of the oil will be no worse, and indeed may be improved, by chilling the fuel oil according to the meth- 0d of the invention and that the chilling causes no significant change in the viscosity of the oil.
  • Examples 2, 3 and 4 below were carried out in a pilot plant consisting of a 5 gallon oil reservoir connected via a 0600 gallon/hour variable stroke pump to a cooling coil encased in a 40 gallon drum with a return to the feed reservoir.
  • a /2" pipe was used throughout and the cooling coil was 18 arranged in four full turns.
  • the oil to be treated was placed in the reservoir and the 40 gallon drum was filled with a suitable cooling medium such as cold water.
  • the oil in the reservoir was heated by an immersion heater to the required upper temperature and the oil was circulated round the system.
  • the cooling rate as measured by the temperature drop in the reservoir, was adjusted by varying either the oil level in the reservoir, the circulation rate, or the cooling medium temperature.
  • EXAMPLE 2 In this example another fuel oil (B) was used having a Redwood I viscosity at F. or 214 seconds and a pour point of 25 F. This fuel oil did not pass the filtration test. When cooled at a rate slower than 0.1 F. per minute the filterability of the oil remained poor and a Waxy sludge was deposited. Samples of fuel oil B were chilled from F. to 90 F. at rates of 1 F. and 7 F. per minute. The chilled samples were filter able, contained no sludge and showed no significant change in viscosity or pour point after storage at ambient temperature for 16 weeks. The results are summarised in Table II.
  • EXAMPLE 3 In this example another fuel oil (C) was used having a Redwood I viscosity at 100 F. of 201 seconds and a pour point of 20 F.- Fuel oil C failed the filtration test. Samples of the fuel oil were chilled at various It will be seen that the treatment according to the invention in all cases resulted in an improvement in the filterability of the fuel oil although chilling rates below 1 F. did not always prevent sludge deposition. Consequently, rates of 1 F. per minute or faster are to be preferred.
  • EXAMPLE 4 In this example a fuel oil (D) was used having a viscosity at 100 F., of 212 seconds Redwood I and apour point of 25 F. The results of the treatment are given in Table IV.
  • EXAMPLE 5 Storage in all the above examples was at a temperature of 651-5 F. Parallel work has been carried out on samples stored under conditions of varying temperature in the range40 F.-95 F. to provide a more rigorous test of stability. The result are given in Table V below.
  • the oil was forced under a constant pressure of 5 psi. and at a constant temperature in the region of 65 1 5 F. through a filter element of 1 diameter, consisting of 10 layers of 200 mesh wire gauze. The taken for 4 ml. and 160 ml. of the oil to flow through the filter were measured, and the ratio of times,
  • the conditions of the test are such that any reduction in the rate of flow of the oil through the filter is due to the filter blocking propensities of the oil. Therefore a time ratio of 2 indicates that the oil was filterable whereas a time ratio substantially greater than 2 or the complete cessation of oil flow through the filter indicates that the oil was not filterable.
  • a method of reducing the tendency of a residual fuel oil to deposit a waxy sludge on storage which consists in chilling the residual fuel oil from an upper temperature of at least 110 F. to a lower temperature not higher than 90 F., at a rate of at least 0.1 E. per minute.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Description

United States Patent Ofiiice 3,006,842 Patented Oct. 31, 1961 3,006,842 METHOD FOR REDUCING SLUDGE DEPOSITION OF FUEL OILS Robert Greatorex and Demetrios Theodore Emmanuel Zalichi, Sunbnry-on-Thames, and William Arthur Partridge, London, England, assignors to The British letroleum Company Limited, London, England, a British joint-stock corporation No Drawing. Filed July 20, 1959, Ser. No. 828,065
Claims priority, application Great Britain July 23, 1958 6 Claims. (Cl. 208177) Residual fuel oils, i.e. fuel oils consisting of or containing petroleum residues, have a tendency to deposit a waxy sludge on storage and in certain circumstances this can cause difficulties, e.g. where in use the fuel oil has to be passed through a screen or strainer. Such difiiculties arise mainly with fuels or Class E, British Standards Specification No. 2869:1957, which are intended to be handled in unheated storage.
We have now found a method whereby this tendency to deposit a sludge can be reduced, Without any significant adverse effect on other desirable properties of the oil, such as pour point and viscosity.
. The invention consists in chilling a residual fuel oil from an upper temperature of at least 110 F., preferably at least 120 F., especially at least 140 F., to a lower temperature not higher than 90 F., preferably not higher than 70 F., at a rate of at least 0.1 F., preferably at least 1 F., per minute.
Residual fuel oils are normally prepared by blending residual materials from distillation and cracking processes and materials discarded during the production of lubricating oils, with lighter components, such as kerosene or gas oil. This blending is carried out at an elevated temperature, usually of the order of 140 F. or higher. Where, therefore, the method of the invention is to be applied to fuel oils which have just been blended, it will not normally be necessary to preheat them.
The chilling may be conveniently effected by passing the fuel oil through conventional heat exchanging equipment, cooled by a flow of cold water or other suitably available cold fluid.
A number of examples of the invention will now be described.
EXAMPLE 1 A fuel oil (A) having a Redwood I viscosity at 100 F. of 199 seconds and a pour point of 15 F. was used in this example. When fuel oil A was cooled at a slower rate than 0.1 F. per minute a waxy deposit or sludge was subsequently deposited and the fuel oil was not filterable. Samples of the same fuel oil when cooled according to the method of the invention were filterable and remained so after a prolonged storage at ambient It can be seen from the above results that the pour point of the oil will be no worse, and indeed may be improved, by chilling the fuel oil according to the meth- 0d of the invention and that the chilling causes no significant change in the viscosity of the oil.
The above example was carried out in the laboratory. Examples 2, 3 and 4 below were carried out in a pilot plant consisting of a 5 gallon oil reservoir connected via a 0600 gallon/hour variable stroke pump to a cooling coil encased in a 40 gallon drum with a return to the feed reservoir. A /2" pipe was used throughout and the cooling coil was 18 arranged in four full turns. The oil to be treated was placed in the reservoir and the 40 gallon drum was filled with a suitable cooling medium such as cold water. The oil in the reservoir was heated by an immersion heater to the required upper temperature and the oil was circulated round the system. The cooling rate, as measured by the temperature drop in the reservoir, was adjusted by varying either the oil level in the reservoir, the circulation rate, or the cooling medium temperature.
EXAMPLE 2 In this example another fuel oil (B) was used having a Redwood I viscosity at F. or 214 seconds and a pour point of 25 F. This fuel oil did not pass the filtration test. When cooled at a rate slower than 0.1 F. per minute the filterability of the oil remained poor and a Waxy sludge was deposited. Samples of fuel oil B were chilled from F. to 90 F. at rates of 1 F. and 7 F. per minute. The chilled samples were filter able, contained no sludge and showed no significant change in viscosity or pour point after storage at ambient temperature for 16 weeks. The results are summarised in Table II.
Table II Heat treatment of fuel 011 B Kinematic Pour Filtration test Sludge vispoint Cooling Cooling Storcosit F.
range rate F./ age at 70 F. minute time F. cs.
weeks 16 Not filterable 111 25 -65 01 4 do Present- 110-90 1 16 Filterable None 114.4 30 110-90 16 do 0 112.8 10
EXAMPLE 3 In this example another fuel oil (C) was used having a Redwood I viscosity at 100 F. of 201 seconds and a pour point of 20 F.- Fuel oil C failed the filtration test. Samples of the fuel oil were chilled at various It will be seen that the treatment according to the invention in all cases resulted in an improvement in the filterability of the fuel oil although chilling rates below 1 F. did not always prevent sludge deposition. Consequently, rates of 1 F. per minute or faster are to be preferred.
EXAMPLE 4 In this example a fuel oil (D) was used having a viscosity at 100 F., of 212 seconds Redwood I and apour point of 25 F. The results of the treatment are given in Table IV.
Table IV Heat treatment of fuel oil D Kinematic Pour Cooling Cooling Stor- Filtration test Sludge viscosity point range rate age at 70 F. F.
F. F./ time cs.
minute weeks 6 Not filterable 115. 8 25 120-65 01 3 ..do Present. 150-80 1 6 Filterable None. 117. 4 150-80 6 6 do do 121. 4
EXAMPLE 5 Storage in all the above examples was at a temperature of 651-5 F. Parallel work has been carried out on samples stored under conditions of varying temperature in the range40 F.-95 F. to provide a more rigorous test of stability. The result are given in Table V below.
The filtration test referred to in the above examples was carried out as follows:
The oil was forced under a constant pressure of 5 psi. and at a constant temperature in the region of 65 1 5 F. through a filter element of 1 diameter, consisting of 10 layers of 200 mesh wire gauze. The taken for 4 ml. and 160 ml. of the oil to flow through the filter were measured, and the ratio of times,
(Time of flow of 160 ml.) (Time of flow of 80 ml),
compared with the ratio of volumes,
The conditions of the test are such that any reduction in the rate of flow of the oil through the filter is due to the filter blocking propensities of the oil. Therefore a time ratio of 2 indicates that the oil was filterable whereas a time ratio substantially greater than 2 or the complete cessation of oil flow through the filter indicates that the oil was not filterable.
The determination of pour points according to IP 15/55 and of viscosities by IP 70/57 or 71/58 entails preheating the samples to F. and 212 F. respectively. As this procedure might destroy the effects of chilling, the determinations in the above examples were carried out without preliminary heat treatment.
We claim:
1. A method of reducing the tendency of a residual fuel oil to deposit a waxy sludge on storage, which consists in chilling the residual fuel oil from an upper temperature of at least 110 F. to a lower temperature not higher than 90 F., at a rate of at least 0.1 E. per minute.
2. A method according to claim 1, in which the rate of chilling is at least 1 F. per minute.
3. A method according to claim 1, in which the upper temperature is at least F.
4. A method according to claim 3, in which the upper temperature is at least F.
5. A method according to claim 1, in which the lower temperature is not higher than 70 F.
6. A method according to claim 1, in which the chilling is effected by passing the fuel oil through heat exchanging equipment chilled by a flow of cold liquid.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 64,855 Finn May 21, 1867 1,953,353 Lazar et a1. Apr. 3, 1934 1,957,954 Haeck May 8, 1934 2,249,884 Carney July 22, 1941 2,315,935 Child Apr. 6, 1943 2,365,256 Edv'ai'sson Dec. 19, 1944 2,572,425 Andersson Oct. 23, 1951 2,951,037 ODonnel et a1 Aug. 30,, 1960

Claims (1)

1. A METHOD OF REDUCING THE TENDENCY OF A RESIDUAL FUEL OIL TO DEPOSIT A WAXY SLUDGE ON STORAGE, WHICH CONSISTS IN CHILLING THE RESIDUAL FUEL OIL FROM AN UPPER TEMPERATURE OF AT LEAST 110*F. TO A LOWER TEMPERATURE NOT HIGHER THAN 90*F., AT A RATE OF AT LEAST 0.1*E. PER MINUTE.
US828065A 1958-07-23 1959-07-20 Method for reducing sludge deposition of fuel oils Expired - Lifetime US3006842A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB23676/58A GB851135A (en) 1958-07-23 1958-07-23 Treatment of fuel oils

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3006842A true US3006842A (en) 1961-10-31

Family

ID=10199469

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US828065A Expired - Lifetime US3006842A (en) 1958-07-23 1959-07-20 Method for reducing sludge deposition of fuel oils

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US3006842A (en)
DE (1) DE1127023B (en)
GB (1) GB851135A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB930843A (en) * 1960-11-01 1963-07-10 Burma Oil Company Ltd Process for treating crude petroleum oils
US3136711A (en) * 1961-03-27 1964-06-09 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for reducing the pour points of crude oils

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US64855A (en) * 1867-05-21 photo-litho
US1953353A (en) * 1930-08-19 1934-04-03 Associated Oil Company Process of treating hydrocarbon oils
US1957954A (en) * 1931-12-07 1934-05-08 Jean Spiltoir Process for purifying oils and for converting incombustible oils into homogeneous fuels
US2249884A (en) * 1938-12-09 1941-07-22 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for degassing liquids
US2315935A (en) * 1940-08-10 1943-04-06 Standard Oil Dev Co Stabilizing heavy fuel oil
US2365256A (en) * 1942-10-30 1944-12-19 Separator Ab Separation of emulsions and colloidal solutions
US2572425A (en) * 1947-08-28 1951-10-23 Separator Ab Centrifugal separation of heavy boiler oil
US2951037A (en) * 1953-12-30 1960-08-30 British Petroleum Co Reduction of sludge deposition from crude oils

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB768654A (en) * 1953-12-30 1957-02-20 British Petroleum Co Improvements relating to the reduction of sludge deposition from crude oils
AT192527B (en) * 1953-12-30 1957-10-25 British Petroleum Co Process for treating crude oil to reduce sludge formation during storage
DE962013C (en) * 1953-12-30 1957-04-18 British Petroleum Co Method of reducing the tendency of crude oil to form sludge deposits during storage
DE1030951B (en) * 1954-06-29 1958-05-29 British Petroleum Co Process for reducing the tendency of crude oils to form sludge deposits during storage

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US64855A (en) * 1867-05-21 photo-litho
US1953353A (en) * 1930-08-19 1934-04-03 Associated Oil Company Process of treating hydrocarbon oils
US1957954A (en) * 1931-12-07 1934-05-08 Jean Spiltoir Process for purifying oils and for converting incombustible oils into homogeneous fuels
US2249884A (en) * 1938-12-09 1941-07-22 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for degassing liquids
US2315935A (en) * 1940-08-10 1943-04-06 Standard Oil Dev Co Stabilizing heavy fuel oil
US2365256A (en) * 1942-10-30 1944-12-19 Separator Ab Separation of emulsions and colloidal solutions
US2572425A (en) * 1947-08-28 1951-10-23 Separator Ab Centrifugal separation of heavy boiler oil
US2951037A (en) * 1953-12-30 1960-08-30 British Petroleum Co Reduction of sludge deposition from crude oils

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE1127023B (en) 1962-04-05
GB851135A (en) 1960-10-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3239445A (en) Solvent dewaxing with a polystearyl methacrylate dewaxing aid
US3006842A (en) Method for reducing sludge deposition of fuel oils
US3078221A (en) Hydrogenation process for preparation of lubricating oils
US3393144A (en) Dewaxing process using a low boiling fraction of fuel oil to reduce the viscosity of a high boiling fraction of fuel oil
US3679582A (en) Flow improvement of waxy hydrocarbon with the aid of polysaccharide derivatives
US3368965A (en) Two stage slurrying
US2313940A (en) Catalytic cracking and reclamation of catalysts
US2331343A (en) Refining of mineral oils
US2422443A (en) Condensation of hydrocarbons
NO135986B (en)
US2153895A (en) Solvent and process for dewaxing mineral oils
US3503870A (en) Dewaxing solvent
US1938670A (en) Desulphurizing hydrocarbon oils
US1802942A (en) Process for the recovery and purification of lubricating oils from mineral oils
US2614065A (en) Propane dewaxing chilling procedure
US2759873A (en) Sweetening of hydrocarbon oils with raw clay followed by copper sweetening
US2030281A (en) Method for fractionating petroleum mixtures
US2440311A (en) Process of treating coal tar containing a small amount of ammonium chloride
US2422790A (en) Method of coking oils
US2151310A (en) Distillation
US2075896A (en) Oil cracking process
US2045160A (en) Process of treating fresh unused petroleum oils to produce decolorized lubricating oil stocks
US3234122A (en) Process for treating crude petroleum oils
US2162300A (en) Process for treatment of hydrocarbons
US1920125A (en) Process for the recovery and purification of lubricating oils from mineral oils