US20250000151A1

US20250000151A1 - Smoking substitute apparatus

Info

Publication number: US20250000151A1
Application number: US18/694,957
Authority: US
Inventors: Peter Lomas; Phillip Taylor; Carlos Fabrellas-Garcia
Original assignee: Imperial Tobacco Ltd; Imperial Tobacco Ltd Great Britain
Current assignee: Imperial Tobacco Group Ltd
Priority date: 2021-09-28
Filing date: 2022-09-09
Publication date: 2025-01-02
Also published as: WO2023052098A1; EP4408222A1

Abstract

Provided is a smoking substitute apparatus (150, 50a, 250) with a baffle (502, 602) provided in the vaporisation chamber (280) for improving the characteristics and flow of vapour from the chamber to the user.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present disclosure claims the benefit of priority from the following application(s), the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference:

- [ME ref: 007656929; Nerudia ref: P01273]
- European patent application no. 21199567.5 filed 28 Sep. 2021

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a smoking substitute apparatus and, in particular, a smoking substitute apparatus that is able to deliver nicotine to a user in an effective manner.

BACKGROUND

The smoking of tobacco is generally considered to expose a smoker to potentially harmful substances. It is thought that a significant amount of the potentially harmful substances are generated through the burning and/or combustion of the tobacco and the constituents of the burnt tobacco in the tobacco smoke itself.
Low temperature combustion of organic material such as tobacco is known to produce tar and other potentially harmful by-products. There have been proposed various smoking substitute systems in which the conventional smoking of tobacco is avoided.
Such smoking substitute systems can form part of nicotine replacement therapies aimed at people who wish to stop smoking and overcome a dependence on nicotine.
Known smoking substitute systems include electronic systems that permit a user to simulate the act of smoking by producing an aerosol (also referred to as a “vapour”) that is drawn into the lungs through the mouth (inhaled) and then exhaled. The inhaled aerosol typically bears nicotine and/or a flavourant without, or with fewer of, the health risks associated with conventional smoking.
In general, smoking substitute systems are intended to provide a substitute for the rituals of smoking, whilst providing the user with a similar, or improved, experience and satisfaction to those experienced with conventional smoking and with combustible tobacco products.
The use of smoking substitute systems has grown rapidly in the past few years as an aid to assist habitual smokers wishing to quit tobacco smoking. There are a number of different categories of smoking substitute systems, each utilising a different smoking substitute approach. Some smoking substitute systems are designed to resemble a conventional cigarette and are cylindrical in form with a mouthpiece at one end. Other smoking substitute devices do not generally resemble a cigarette (for example, the smoking substitute device may have a generally box-like form, in whole or in part).
One approach is the so-called “vaping” approach, in which a vaporisable liquid, or an aerosol former, sometimes typically referred to herein as “e-liquid”, is heated by a heating device (sometimes referred to herein as an electronic cigarette or “e-cigarette” device) to produce an aerosol vapour which is inhaled by a user. The e-liquid typically includes a base liquid, nicotine and may include a flavourant. The resulting vapour therefore also typically contains nicotine and/or a flavourant. The base liquid may include propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerine.
A typical e-cigarette device includes a mouthpiece, a power source (typically a battery), a tank for containing e-liquid and a heating device. In use, electrical energy is supplied from the power source to the heating device, which heats the e-liquid to produce an aerosol (or “vapour”) which is inhaled by a user through the mouthpiece.
E-cigarettes can be configured in a variety of ways. For example, there are “closed system” vaping smoking substitute systems, which typically have a sealed tank and heating element. The tank is pre-filled with e-liquid and is not intended to be refilled by an end user. One subset of closed system vaping smoking substitute systems include a main body which includes the power source, wherein the main body is configured to be physically and electrically couplable to a consumable including the tank and the heating element. In this way, when the tank of a consumable has been emptied of e-liquid, that consumable is removed from the main body and disposed of. The main body can then be reused by connecting it to a new, replacement, consumable. Another subset of closed system vaping smoking substitute systems are completely disposable, and intended for one-use only.
There are also “open system” vaping smoking substitute systems which typically have a tank that is configured to be refilled by a user. In this way the entire device can be used multiple times.
An example vaping smoking substitute system is the Myblu™ e-cigarette. The Myblu™ e-cigarette is a closed system which includes a main body and a consumable. The main body and consumable are physically and electrically coupled together by pushing the consumable into the main body. The main body includes a rechargeable battery. The consumable includes a mouthpiece and a sealed tank which contains e-liquid. The consumable further includes a heater, which for this device is a heating filament coiled around a portion of a wick. The wick is partially immersed in the e-liquid, and conveys e-liquid from the tank to the heating filament. The system is controlled by a microprocessor on board the main body. The system includes a sensor for detecting when a user is inhaling through the mouthpiece, the microprocessor then activating the device in response. When the system is activated, electrical energy is supplied from the power source to the heating device, which heats e-liquid from the tank to produce a vapour which is inhaled by a user through the mouthpiece.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

For a smoking substitute system it is desirable to deliver nicotine into the user's lungs, where it can be absorbed into the bloodstream. However, the present disclosure is based in part on a realisation that some prior art smoking substitute systems, such delivery of nicotine is not efficient. In some prior art systems, the aerosol droplets have a size distribution that is not suitable for delivering nicotine to the lungs. Aerosol droplets of a large particle size tend to be deposited in the mouth and/or upper respiratory tract. Aerosol particles of a small (e.g. sub-micron) particle size can be inhaled into the lungs but may be exhaled without delivering nicotine to the lungs. As a result the user would require drawing a longer puff, more puffs, or vaporising e-liquid with a higher nicotine concentration in order to achieve the desired experience.
It is of interest to allow the user of a smoking substitute system a degree of control over the aerosol particle size inhaled, in part to take advantage over the phenomena reported above concerning the effect of aerosol particle size on the deposition location within the user's respiratory system.
The present disclosure has been devised in the light of the above considerations.
In a general aspect, the present invention provides a smoking substitute apparatus with a baffle positioned between the vapor heater and the chimney for conveying generated vapor to the user. The baffle is positioned such that it extends across the vaporisation chamber in a long dimension (e.g. width) rather than a short dimension (e.g. depth). That is, in a cross-section taken through the longitudinal axis of the vaporisation chamber, the baffle extends transverse to the longitudinal axis of the vaporisation chamber and thus also transverse to the air flow through the vaporisation chamber during use. In that cross-section, the vaporisation chamber has a long dimension and a short dimension; in the present invention, as compared to previously known arrangements, the baffle extends across the vaporisation chamber in the long or longest dimension rather than in the short or shortest dimension. Here, these dimensions may be perpendicular to one another. For example, the shortest dimension may be the dimension with the shortest length among dimensions that can be drawn for the cross section of the vaporisation chamber; the long dimension may be perpendicular (at 90°) to that shortest dimension.
In some embodiments the vaporiser in the vaporisation chamber also extends across the vaporisation chamber in that long or longest dimension.
Therefore according to a first preferred aspect, the present invention provides a smoking substitute apparatus for delivery of an aerosol to a user drawing air through the apparatus, the apparatus comprising: an air inlet; an outlet; an air flow path between the air inlet and the outlet; a chimney in fluid communication with the air flow path; a vaporisation chamber in fluid communication with the chimney via a chimney entrance; the vaporisation chamber having an aerosol generator configured to generate an aerosol from an aerosol precursor; the chimney being positioned such that in use aerosol generated by the aerosol generator flows through the chimney to the outlet; the aerosol generator comprising an elongate heater having a major axis; the vaporisation chamber also having an elongate baffle positioned between the aerosol generator and the chimney entrance, the baffle partially occluding the chimney entrance and oriented to occlude the chimney entrance in a direction parallel to the major axis of the heater. So, for example, the vaporisation chamber may have a cross section having a longest dimension, wherein the baffle extends across the vaporisation chamber along the longest dimension. As explained above the cross-section referred to here is through the longitudinal axis, that is, transverse to the air flow direction through the vaporisation chamber.
The occlusion discussed here means that the chimney entrance is obscured by the baffle when viewed from the heater.
The present invention, in contrast to prior art arrangements, can not only in some embodiments protect the user from any potential spray or spit from the heater, it can also mean that vapor and/or air flow is advantageously smoothed by guidance to flow along the longer dimensions of the vaporisation chamber. That is, vapor flow is disturbed in the shorter dimension rather than the longer. The reduced turbulence of flow helps increase the aerosol particle size to a desired level.
Herein, the heater described may be part of a vaporisation unit or vaporiser. For example, it may be part of a vaporiser which comprises an elongate, for example cylindrical (of circular or polygonal cross-section), wick and a heater, the wick being for conveying aerosol precursor from a tank into the vaporization chamber, and the heater for heating the wick and thereby the aerosol precursor to generate vapor. The major axis of the heater is considered with respect to the heater has a whole structure. For example, where the heater element is helically wound around the wick, the ‘major axis’ of the heater corresponds to the major axis of the wick. In embodiments of the invention, the baffle may extend parallel to the major axis of the vaporiser as a whole.
There may, as part of the smoking substitute system, be provided a tank or reservoir for containing an aerosol precursor, the apparatus being provided with a part for transporting aerosol precursor from the tank to the heater. Such a part may be a wick as described herein.
In some embodiments, the baffle is shaped so as to bifurcate (that is, split into two or more parts) the air or vapor flow around the baffle, whereafter the bifurcated paths converge. That is, the baffle may extend across the vaporisation chamber such that there two or more ‘gaps’ between the baffle and the walls of the vaporisation chamber are formed. Preferably exactly two such gaps are formed. This means that a single flow from the vaporiser (in particular, from the heater where vapour is generated) is split into two while it passes the baffle, before rejoining to a single flow. This enables retention of a preferable flow rate while still protecting the user and enhancing the aerosol particle size as described herein.
In some embodiments, the baffle and heater are sized such that, when viewed from the chimney entrance, the heater is entirely obscured by the baffle. That is, there is no straight path from the heater to the chimney entrance that does not go through the baffle. This gives enhanced protection for the user from spitting (that is, expulsion of hot liquid droplets) or other unwanted hot emission from the heater. It may be that the wick of the vaporiser, if present, is also so obscured. Indeed the entire vaporiser may be so obscured.
In some embodiments, the baffle is spaced from the chimney entrance. That is, the baffle may be placed exactly at, or directly adjacent to the chimney entrance. However it may be preferable for the baffle to be positioned some way within the vaporisation chamber. In the present invention, the chimney and chimney entrance generally have a smaller cross section than the vaporisation chamber.
For example, the baffle may be positioned midway between the heater and the chimney entrance.
Suitably, though not essentially, the present invention may be implemented in embodiments without a stagnant chamber as described herein. For example, in some embodiments the air flow path connects the air inlet to the vaporisation chamber and the chimney to the outlet, such that in use air flows from the air inlet to the vaporisation chamber; from the vaporisation chamber to the chimney, and from the chimney to the outlet in that order. In such embodiments the present control of vapor flow and particle size is most effective.
The smoking substitute apparatus may be comprised by or within a cartridge configured for engagement with a main body, the cartridge and main body together forming a smoking substitute system. The smoking substitute apparatus may be removably engageable with the main body (which may also be referred to herein as the base unit).
The smoking substitute apparatus may be in the form of a consumable. The consumable may be configured for engagement with a main body. When the consumable is engaged with the main body, the combination of the consumable and the main body may form a smoking substitute system such as a closed smoking substitute system. For example, the consumable may comprise components of the system that are disposable, and the main body may comprise non-disposable or non-consumable components (e.g. power supply, controller, sensor, etc.) that facilitate the generation and/or delivery of aerosol by the consumable. In such an embodiment, the aerosol precursor (e.g. e-liquid) may be replenished by replacing a used consumable with an unused consumable.
Alternatively, the smoking substitute apparatus may be a non-consumable apparatus (e.g. that is in the form of an open smoking substitute system). In such embodiments an aerosol former (e.g. e-liquid) of the system may be replenished by re-filling, e.g. a reservoir of the smoking substitute apparatus, with the aerosol precursor (rather than replacing a consumable component of the apparatus).
In light of this, it should be appreciated that some of the features described herein as being part of the smoking substitute apparatus may alternatively form part of a main body for engagement with the smoking substitute apparatus. This may be the case in particular when the smoking substitute apparatus is in the form of a consumable.
Where the smoking substitute apparatus is in the form of a consumable, the main body and the consumable may be configured to be physically coupled together. For example, the consumable may be at least partially received in a recess of the main body, such that there is an interference fit between the main body and the consumable. Alternatively, the main body and the consumable may be physically coupled together by screwing one onto the other, or through a bayonet fitting, or the like.
Thus, the smoking substitute apparatus may comprise one or more engagement portions for engaging with a main body. In this way, one end of the smoking substitute apparatus may be coupled with the main body, whilst an opposing end of the smoking substitute apparatus may define a mouthpiece of the smoking substitute system.
The smoking substitute apparatus may comprise a reservoir configured to store an aerosol precursor, such as an e-liquid. The e-liquid may, for example, comprise a base liquid. The e-liquid may further comprise nicotine. The base liquid may include propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerine. The e-liquid may be substantially flavourless. That is, the e-liquid may not contain any deliberately added additional flavourant and may consist solely of a base liquid of propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerine and nicotine.
The reservoir may be in the form of a tank. At least a portion of the tank may be light-transmissive. For example, the tank may comprise a window to allow a user to visually assess the quantity of e-liquid in the tank. A housing of the smoking substitute apparatus may comprise a corresponding aperture (or slot) or window that may be aligned with a light-transmissive portion (e.g. window) of the tank. The reservoir may be referred to as a “clearomizer” if it includes a window, or a “cartomizer” if it does not.
The outlet may be at a mouthpiece of the smoking substitute apparatus. In this respect, a user may draw fluid (e.g. air) into and through the air flow path (herein sometimes alternatively called the passage) by inhaling at the outlet (i.e. using the mouthpiece). The passage may be at least partially defined by the tank. The tank may substantially (or fully) define the passage, for at least a part of the length of the passage. In this respect, the tank may surround the passage, e.g. in an annular arrangement around the passage.
The vaporisation chamber may be arranged to be in fluid communication with the inlet and outlet of the passage. The vaporisation chamber may be an enlarged portion of the passage. In this respect, the air as drawn in by the user may entrain the generated vapour in a flow away from heater. The entrained vapour may form an aerosol in the vaporisation chamber, or it may form the aerosol further downstream along the passage. The vaporisation chamber may be at least partially defined by the tank. The tank may substantially (or fully) define the vaporisation chamber, and thus may form the enclosure. In this respect, the tank may surround the vaporisation chamber, e.g. in an annular arrangement around the vaporisation chamber.
In use, the user may puff on a mouthpiece of the smoking substitute apparatus, i.e. draw on the smoking substitute apparatus by inhaling, to draw in an air stream therethrough.
There may be provided an air flow path (dilution air flow path) which bypasses the vaporisation chamber.
That air flow path may begin at the inlet and end at the outlet; alternatively, there may be provided a separate inlet and/or outlet for it. It may join the main air flow path for some of its length. The part of the air flow which bypasses the vaporisation chamber (dilution air flow) may combine with the other part of the air flow (main air flow) for diluting the aerosol contained therein. The dilution air flow may be directly inhaled by the user without passing through the passage of the smoking substitute apparatus.
As a user puffs on the mouthpiece, vaporised e-liquid entrained in the passing air flow may be drawn towards the outlet of the passage. The vapour may cool, and thereby nucleate and/or condense along the passage to form a plurality of aerosol droplets, e.g. nicotine-containing aerosol droplets. A portion of these aerosol droplets may be delivered to and be absorbed at a target delivery site, e.g. a user's lung, whilst a portion of the aerosol droplets may instead adhere onto other parts of the user's respiratory tract, e.g. the user's oral cavity and/or throat. Typically, in some known smoking substitute apparatuses, the aerosol droplets as measured at the outlet of the passage, e.g. at the mouthpiece, may have a droplet size, d₅₀, of less than 1 μm.
In some embodiments of the invention, the d₅₀particle size of the aerosol particles is preferably at least 1 μm, more preferably at least 2 μm. Typically, the d₅₀particle size is not more than 10 μm, preferably not more than 9 μm, not more than 8 μm, not more than 7 μm, not more than 6 μm, not more than 5 am, not more than 4 μm or not more than 3 μm. It is considered that providing aerosol particle sizes in such ranges permits improved interaction between the aerosol particles and the user's lungs.
The particle droplet size, d₅₀, of an aerosol may be measured by a laser diffraction technique. For example, the stream of aerosol output from the outlet of the passage may be drawn through a Malvern Spraytec laser diffraction system, where the intensity and pattern of scattered laser light are analysed to calculate the size and size distribution of aerosol droplets. As will be readily understood, the particle size distribution may be expressed in terms of d₁₀, d₅₀and d₉₀, for example. Considering a cumulative plot of the volume of the particles measured by the laser diffraction technique, the d₁₀particle size is the particle size below which 10% by volume of the sample lies. The d₅₀particle size is the particle size below which 50% by volume of the sample lies. The d₉₀particle size is the particle size below which 90% by volume of the sample lies. Unless otherwise indicated herein, the particle size measurements are volume-based particle size measurements, rather than number-based or mass-based particle size measurements.
The spread of particle size may be expressed in terms of the span, which is defined as (d₉₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀. Typically, the span is not more than 20, preferably not more than 10, preferably not more than 8, preferably not more than 4, preferably not more than 2, preferably not more than 1, or not more than 0.5.
The smoking substitute apparatus (or main body engaged with the smoking substitute apparatus) may comprise a power source. The power source may be electrically connected (or connectable) to a heater of the smoking substitute apparatus (e.g. when the smoking substitute apparatus is engaged with the main body). The power source may be a battery (e.g. a rechargeable battery). A connector in the form of e.g. a USB port may be provided for recharging this battery.
When the smoking substitute apparatus is in the form of a consumable, the smoking substitute apparatus may comprise an electrical interface for interfacing with a corresponding electrical interface of the main body. One or both of the electrical interfaces may include one or more electrical contacts. Thus, when the main body is engaged with the consumable, the electrical interface of the main body may be configured to transfer electrical power from the power source to a heater of the consumable via the electrical interface of the consumable.
The electrical interface of the smoking substitute apparatus may also be used to identify the smoking substitute apparatus (in the form of a consumable) from a list of known types. For example, the consumable may have a certain concentration of nicotine and the electrical interface may be used to identify this. The electrical interface may additionally or alternatively be used to identify when a consumable is connected to the main body.
Again, where the smoking substitute apparatus is in the form of a consumable, the main body may comprise an identification means, which may, for example, be in the form of an RFID reader, a barcode or QR code reader. This identification means may be able to identify a characteristic (e.g. a type) of a consumable engaged with the main body. In this respect, the consumable may include any one or more of an RFID chip, a barcode or QR code, or memory within which is an identifier and which can be interrogated via the identification means.
The smoking substitute apparatus or main body may comprise a controller, which may include a microprocessor. The controller may be configured to control the supply of power from the power source to the heater of the smoking substitute apparatus (e.g. via the electrical contacts). A memory may be provided and may be operatively connected to the controller. The memory may include non-volatile memory. The memory may include instructions which, when implemented, cause the controller to perform certain tasks or steps of a method.
The main body or smoking substitute apparatus may comprise a wireless interface, which may be configured to communicate wirelessly with another device, for example a mobile device, e.g. via Bluetooth®. To this end, the wireless interface could include a Bluetooth® antenna. Other wireless communication interfaces, e.g. WiFi®, are also possible. The wireless interface may also be configured to communicate wirelessly with a remote server.
A puff sensor may be provided that is configured to detect a puff (i.e. inhalation from a user). The puff sensor may be operatively connected to the controller so as to be able to provide a signal to the controller that is indicative of a puff state (i.e. puffing or not puffing). The puff sensor may, for example, be in the form of a pressure sensor or an acoustic sensor. That is, the controller may control power supply to the heater of the consumable in response to a puff detection by the sensor. The control may be in the form of activation of the heater in response to a detected puff. That is, the smoking substitute apparatus may be configured to be activated when a puff is detected by the puff sensor. When the smoking substitute apparatus is in the form of a consumable, the puff sensor may be provided in the consumable or alternatively may be provided in the main body.
The term “flavourant” is used to describe a compound or combination of compounds that provide flavour and/or aroma. For example, the flavourant may be configured to interact with a sensory receptor of a user (such as an olfactory or taste receptor). The flavourant may include one or more volatile substances. The flavourant may be provided in the aerosol precursor.
The flavourant may be provided in solid or liquid form. The flavourant may be natural or synthetic. For example, the flavourant may include menthol, liquorice, chocolate, fruit flavour (including e.g. citrus, cherry etc.), vanilla, spice (e.g. ginger, cinnamon) and tobacco flavour. The flavourant may be evenly dispersed or may be provided in isolated locations and/or varying concentrations.
The present inventors consider that a flow rate of 1.3 L min⁻¹is towards the lower end of a typical user expectation of flow rate through a conventional cigarette and therefore through a user-acceptable smoking substitute apparatus. The present inventors further consider that a flow rate of 2.0 L min⁻¹is towards the higher end of a typical user expectation of flow rate through a conventional cigarette and therefore through a user-acceptable smoking substitute apparatus. Embodiments of the present invention therefore provide an aerosol with advantageous particle size characteristics across a range of flow rates of air through the apparatus.
As explained above, the present baffle orientation contributes to effective control of the particle characteristics by altering air flow through the apparatus.
The aerosol may have a Dv50 of at least 1.1 μm, at least 1.2 μm, at least 1.3 μm, at least 1.4 μm, at least 1.5 μm, at least 1.6 μm, at least 1.7 μm, at least 1.8 μm, at least 1.9 μm or at least 2.0 μm.
The aerosol may have a Dv50 of not more than 4.9 μm, not more than 4.8 μm, not more than 4.7 am, not more than 4.6 μm, not more than 4.5 μm, not more than 4.4 μm, not more than 4.3 am, not more than 4.2 μm, not more than 4.1 μm, not more than 4.0 μm, not more than 3.9 am, not more than 3.8 am, not more than 3.7 μm, not more than 3.6 μm, not more than 3.5 μm, not more than 3.4 μm, not more than 3.3 am, not more than 3.2 μm, not more than 3.1 μm or not more than 3.0 μm.
A particularly preferred range for Dv50 of the aerosol is in the range 2-3 am.
The air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber is in the range 0-1.3 ms⁻¹. The average magnitude velocity of air may be calculated based on knowledge of the geometry of the vaporisation chamber and the flow rate.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber may be at least 0.001 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.005 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.01 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.05 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber may be at most 1.2 ms⁻¹, at most 1.1 ms⁻¹, at most 1.0 ms⁻¹, at most 0.9 ms⁻¹, at most 0.8 ms⁻¹, at most 0.7 ms⁻¹or at most 0.6 ms⁻¹.
The air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber is in the range 0-1.3 ms⁻¹. The average magnitude velocity of air may be calculated based on knowledge of the geometry of the vaporisation chamber and the flow rate.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber may be at least 0.001 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.005 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.01 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.05 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber may be at most 1.2 ms⁻¹, at most 1.1 ms⁻¹, at most 1.0 ms⁻¹, at most 0.9 ms⁻¹, at most 0.8 ms⁻¹, at most 0.7 ms⁻¹or at most 0.6 ms⁻¹.
When the calculated average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber is in the ranges specified, it is considered that the resultant aerosol particle size is advantageously controlled to be in a desirable range. It is further considered that the configuration of the apparatus can be selected so that the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporisation chamber can be brought within the ranges specified, at the exemplary flow rate of 1.3 L min⁻¹and/or the exemplary flow rate of 2.0 L min⁻¹.
The aerosol generator may comprise a vaporiser element, such as a wick, loaded with aerosol precursor, the vaporiser element being heatable by the heater and presenting a vaporiser element surface to air in the vaporisation chamber. A vaporiser element region may be defined as a volume extending outwardly from the vaporiser element surface to a distance of 1 mm from the vaporiser element surface.
The air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region is in the range 0-1.2 ms⁻¹. The average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be calculated using computational fluid dynamics.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at least 0.001 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.005 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.01 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.05 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at most 1.1 ms⁻¹, at most 1.0 ms⁻¹, at most 0.9 ms⁻¹, at most 0.8 ms⁻¹, at most 0.7 ms⁻¹or at most 0.6 ms⁻¹.
The air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region is in the range 0-1.2 ms⁻¹. The average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be calculated using computational fluid dynamics.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at least 0.001 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.005 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.01 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.05 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at most 1.1 ms⁻¹, at most 1.0 ms⁻¹, at most 0.9 ms⁻¹, at most 0.8 ms⁻¹, at most 0.7 ms⁻¹or at most 0.6 ms⁻¹.
When the average magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region is in the ranges specified, it is considered that the resultant aerosol particle size is advantageously controlled to be in a desirable range. It is further considered that the velocity of air in the vaporiser element region is more relevant to the resultant particle size characteristics than consideration of the velocity in the vaporisation chamber as a whole. This is in view of the significant effect of the velocity of air in the vaporiser element region on the cooling of the vapour emitted from the vaporiser element surface.
Additionally or alternatively is it relevant to consider the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region.
Therefore, the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region is in the range 0-2.0 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at least 0.001 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.005 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.01 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.05 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at most 1.9 ms⁻¹, at most 1.8 ms⁻¹, at most 1.7 ms⁻¹, at most 1.6 ms⁻¹, at most 1.5 ms⁻¹, at most 1.4 ms⁻¹, at most 1.3 ms⁻¹or at most 1.2 ms⁻¹.
The air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region is in the range 0-2.0 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at least 0.001 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.005 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.01 ms⁻¹, or at least 0.05 ms⁻¹.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 2.0 L min⁻¹, the maximum magnitude of velocity of air in the vaporiser element region may be at most 1.9 ms⁻¹, at most 1.8 ms⁻¹, at most 1.7 ms⁻¹, at most 1.6 ms⁻¹, at most 1.5 ms⁻¹, at most 1.4 ms⁻¹, at most 1.3 ms⁻¹or at most 1.2 ms⁻¹.
It is considered that configuring the apparatus in a manner to permit such control of velocity of the airflow at the vaporiser permits the generation of aerosols with particularly advantageous particle size characteristics, including Dv50 values.
Additionally or alternatively is it relevant to consider the turbulence intensity in the vaporiser chamber in view of the effect of turbulence on the particle size of the generated aerosol. As explained above, by guiding the air flow the present baffle has effects here. For example, the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that, when the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the turbulence intensity in the vaporiser element region is not more than 1%.
When the air flow rate inhaled by the user through the apparatus is 1.3 L min⁻¹, the turbulence intensity in the vaporiser element region may be not more than 0.95%, not more than 0.9%, not more than 0.85%, not more than 0.8%, not more than 0.75%, not more than 0.7%, not more than 0.65% or not more than 0.6%.
It is considered that configuring the apparatus in a manner to permit such control of the turbulence intensity in the vaporiser element region permits the generation of aerosols with particularly advantageous particle size characteristics, including Dv50 values.
Following detailed investigations, the inventors consider, without wishing to be bound by theory, that the particle size characteristics of the generated aerosol may be determined by the cooling rate experienced by the vapour after emission from the vaporiser element (e.g. wick). In particular, it appears that imposing a relatively slow cooling rate on the vapour has the effect of generating aerosols with a relatively large particle size. The parameters discussed above (velocity and turbulence intensity) are considered to be mechanisms for implementing a particular cooling dynamic to the vapour.
More generally, it is considered that the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that a desired cooling rate is imposed on the vapour. The particular cooling rate to be used depends of course on the nature of the aerosol precursor and other conditions. However, for a particular aerosol precursor it is possible to define a set of testing conditions in order to define the cooling rate, and by extension this imposes limitations on the configuration of the apparatus to permit such cooling rates as are shown to result in advantageous aerosols. Accordingly, the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that the cooling rate of the vapour is such that the time taken to cool to 50° C. is not less than 16 ms, when tested according to the following protocol. The aerosol precursor is an e-liquid consisting of 1.6% freebase nicotine and the remainder a 65:35 propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine mixture, the e-liquid having a boiling point of 209° C. Air is drawn into the air inlet at a temperature of 25° C. The vaporiser is operated to release a vapour of total particulate mass 5 mg over a 3 second duration from the vaporiser element surface in an air flow rate between the air inlet and outlet of 1.3 L min⁻¹.
Additionally or alternatively, the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that the cooling rate of the vapour is such that the time taken to cool to 50° C. is not less than 16 ms, when tested according to the following protocol. The aerosol precursor is an e-liquid consisting of 1.6% freebase nicotine and the remainder a 65:35 propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine mixture, the e-liquid having a boiling point of 209° C. Air is drawn into the air inlet at a temperature of 25° C. The vaporiser is operated to release a vapour of total particulate mass 5 mg over a 3 second duration from the vaporiser element surface in an air flow rate between the air inlet and outlet of 2.0 L min⁻¹.
Cooling of the vapour such that the time taken to cool to 50° C. is not less than 16 ms corresponds to an equivalent linear cooling rate of not more than 10° C./ms.
The equivalent linear cooling rate of the vapour to 50° C. may be not more than 9° C./ms, not more than 8° C./ms, not more than 7° C./ms, not more than 6° C./ms or not more than 5° C./ms.
Cooling of the vapour such that the time taken to cool to 50° C. is not less than 32 ms corresponds to an equivalent linear cooling rate of not more than 5° C./ms.
The testing protocol set out above considers the cooling of the vapour (and subsequent aerosol) to a temperature of 50° C. This is a temperature which can be considered to be suitable for an aerosol to exit the apparatus for inhalation by a user without causing significant discomfort. It is also possible to consider cooling of the vapour (and subsequent aerosol) to a temperature of 75° C. Although this temperature is possibly too high for comfortable inhalation, it is considered that the particle size characteristics of the aerosol are substantially settled by the time the aerosol cools to this temperature (and they may be settled at still higher temperature).
Accordingly, the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that the cooling rate of the vapour is such that the time taken to cool to 75° C. is not less than 4.5 ms, when tested according to the following protocol. The aerosol precursor is an e-liquid consisting of 1.6% freebase nicotine and the remainder a 65:35 propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine mixture, the e-liquid having a boiling point of 209° C. Air is drawn into the air inlet at a temperature of 25° C. The vaporiser is operated to release a vapour of total particulate mass 5 mg over a 3 second duration from the vaporiser element surface in an air flow rate between the air inlet and outlet of 1.3 L min⁻¹.
Additionally or alternatively, the air inlet, flow passage, outlet and the vaporisation chamber (including the baffle) may be configured so that the cooling rate of the vapour is such that the time taken to cool to 75° C. is not less than 4.5 ms, when tested according to the following protocol. The aerosol precursor is an e-liquid consisting of 1.6% freebase nicotine and the remainder a 65:35 propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine mixture, the e-liquid having a boiling point of 209° C. Air is drawn into the air inlet at a temperature of 25° C. The vaporiser is operated to release a vapour of total particulate mass 5 mg over a 3 second duration from the vaporiser element surface in an air flow rate between the air inlet and outlet of 2.0 L min⁻¹.
Cooling of the vapour such that the time taken to cool to 75° C. is not less than 4.5 ms corresponds to an equivalent linear cooling rate of not more than 30° C./ms.
The equivalent linear cooling rate of the vapour to 75° C. may be not more than 29° C./ms, not more than 28° C./ms, not more than 27° C./ms, not more than 26° C./ms, not more than 25° C./ms, not more than 24° C./ms, not more than 23° C./ms, not more than 22° C./ms, not more than 21° C./ms, not more than 20° C./ms, not more than 19° C./ms, not more than 18° C./ms, not more than 17° C./ms, not more than 16° C./ms, not more than 15° C./ms, not more than 14° C./ms, not more than 13° C./ms, not more than 12° C./ms, not more than 11° C./ms or not more than 10° C./ms.
Cooling of the vapour such that the time taken to cool to 75° C. is not less than 13 ms corresponds to an equivalent linear cooling rate of not more than 10° C./ms.
It is considered that configuring the apparatus in a manner to permit such control of the cooling rate of the vapour permits the generation of aerosols with particularly advantageous particle size characteristics, including Dv50 values.
The invention includes the combination of the aspects and preferred features described except where such a combination is clearly impermissible or expressly avoided.

SUMMARY OF THE FIGURES

So that the invention may be understood, and so that further aspects and features thereof may be appreciated, embodiments illustrating the principles of the invention will now be discussed in further detail with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a set of rectangular tubes for use in experiments to assess the effect of flow and cooling conditions at the wick on aerosol properties. Each tube has the same depth and length but different width.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic perspective longitudinal cross sectional view of an example rectangular tube with a wick and heater coil installed.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic transverse cross sectional view an example rectangular tube with a wick and heater coil installed. In this example, the internal width of the tube is 12 mm.

FIGS. 4A-4D show air flow streamlines in the four devices used in a turbulence study.

FIG. 5 shows the experimental set up to investigate the influence of inflow air temperature on aerosol particle size, in order to investigate the effect of vapour cooling rate on aerosol generation.

FIG. 6 shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of a first smoking substitute apparatus (pod 1) used to assess influence of inflow air temperature on aerosol particle size.

FIG. 7 shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of a second smoking substitute apparatus (pod 2) used to assess influence of inflow air temperature on aerosol particle size.

FIG. 8A shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of a third smoking substitute apparatus (pod 3) used to assess influence of inflow air temperature on aerosol particle size. FIG. 8B shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of the same third smoking substitute apparatus (pod 3) in a direction orthogonal to the view taken in FIG. 8A.

FIG. 9 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against calculated air velocity.

FIG. 10 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against the flow rate through the apparatus for a calculated air velocity of 1 m/s.

FIG. 11 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against the average magnitude of the velocity in the vaporiser surface region, as obtained from CFD modelling.

FIG. 12 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against the maximum magnitude of the velocity in the vaporiser surface region, as obtained from CFD modelling.

FIG. 13 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against the turbulence intensity.

FIG. 14 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results dependent on the temperature of the air and the heating state of the apparatus.

FIG. 15 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against vapour cooling rate to 50° C.

FIG. 16 shows a plot of aerosol particle size (Dv50) experimental results against vapour cooling rate to 75° C.

FIG. 17 is a schematic front view of a smoking substitute system, according to a first reference arrangement, in an engaged position;

FIG. 18 is a schematic front view of the smoking substitute system of the first reference arrangement in a disengaged position;

FIG. 19 is a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of a smoking substitute apparatus of a second reference arrangement;

FIG. 20 is an enlarged schematic cross sectional view of part of the air passage and vaporisation chamber of the second reference arrangement;

FIG. 21 shows a schematic cross sectional view of a smoking substitute apparatus of a third reference arrangement;

FIG. 22 shows a schematic cross sectional view of a smoking substitute apparatus of a fourth reference arrangement;

FIG. 23 shows a schematic partial isometric view of the chimney section of a fifth reference arrangement;

FIG. 24 is a more detailed sectional view of the vaporisation chamber of the fifth reference arrangement;

FIG. 25 shows a comparable sectional view of the vaporisation chamber of a first embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 26 shows a schematic sectional view of the vaporisation chamber of the first embodiment, and in particular the gas flow paths around the baffle;

FIG. 27 shows views of the baffle of the fifth reference arrangement, from ‘above’ (chimney entrance side), in FIG. 27(a), and from ‘below’ (heater side), in FIG. 27(b);

FIG. 28 shows views of the baffle of the first embodiment of the present invention, from ‘above’ (chimney entrance side), in FIG. 28(a), and from ‘below’ (heater side), in FIG. 28(b).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Further background to the present invention and further aspects and embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the accompanying figures. Further aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The contents of all documents mentioned in this text are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
FIGS. 17 and 18 illustrate a smoking substitute system in the form of an e-cigarette system 110. The system 110 comprises a main body 120 of the system 110, and a smoking substitute apparatus in the form of an e-cigarette consumable (or “pod”) 150. In the illustrated reference arrangement the consumable 150 (sometimes referred to herein as a smoking substitute apparatus) is removable from the main body 120, so as to be a replaceable component of the system 110. The e-cigarette system 110 is a closed system in the sense that it is not intended that the consumable should be refillable with e-liquid by a user.
As is apparent from FIGS. 17 and 18 , the consumable 150 is configured to engage the main body 120.
FIG. 17 shows the main body 120 and the consumable 150 in an engaged state, whilst FIG. 18 shows the main body 120 and the consumable 150 in a disengaged state. When engaged, a portion of the consumable 150 is received in a cavity of corresponding shape in the main body 120 and is retained in the engaged position by way of a snap-engagement mechanism. In other arrangements and some embodiments of the invention, the main body 120 and consumable 150 may be engaged by screwing one into (or onto) the other, or through a bayonet fitting, or by way of an interference fit.
The system 110 is configured to vaporise an aerosol precursor, which in the illustrated reference arrangement is in the form of a nicotine-based e-liquid 160. The e-liquid 160 comprises nicotine and a base liquid including propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerine. In the present embodiment, the e-liquid 160 is flavoured by a flavourant. In other embodiments, the e-liquid 160 may be flavourless and thus may not include any added flavourant.
It is noted that the internal design of the consumable 150 is not shown in FIGS. 17 and 18 ; their features can apply to arrangements beyond the scope of the present invention as well as embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 19 shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of a reference arrangement of the smoking substitute apparatus forming part of a smoking substitute system of the type shown in FIGS. 17 and 18 .
In FIG. 19 , the e-liquid 160 is stored within a reservoir in the form of a tank 152 that forms part of the consumable 150. In the illustrated reference arrangement, the consumable 150 is a “single-use” consumable 150. That is, upon exhausting the e-liquid 160 in the tank 152, the intention is that the user disposes of the entire consumable 150. The term “single-use” does not necessarily mean the consumable is designed to be disposed of after a single smoking session. Rather, it defines the consumable 150 is not arranged to be refilled after the e-liquid contained in the tank 152 is depleted. The tank may include a vent (not shown) to allow ingress of air to replace e-liquid that has been used from the tank. The consumable 150 preferably includes a window 158 (see FIGS. 17 and 18 ), so that the amount of e-liquid in the tank 152 can be visually assessed. The main body 120 includes a slot 157 so that the window 158 of the consumable 150 can be seen whilst the rest of the tank 152 is obscured from view when the consumable 150 is received in the cavity of the main body 120. The consumable 150 may be referred to as a “clearomizer” when it includes a window 158, or a “cartomizer” when it does not.
In some embodiments, the e-liquid (i.e. aerosol precursor) may be the only part of the system that is truly “single-use”. That is, the tank may be refillable with e-liquid or the e-liquid may be stored in a non-consumable component of the system. For example, in such embodiments, the e-liquid may be stored in a tank located in the main body or stored in another component that is itself not single-use (e.g. a refillable cartomizer).
The external wall of tank 152 is provided by a casing of the consumable 150. The tank 152 annularly surrounds, and thus defines a portion of, a passage 170 that extends between a vaporiser inlet 172 and an outlet 174 at opposing ends of the consumable 150. In this respect, the passage 170 comprises an upstream end at the end of the consumable 150 that engages with the main body 120, and a downstream end at an opposing end of the consumable 150 that comprises a mouthpiece 154 of the system 110.
When the consumable 150 is received in the cavity of the main body 120 as shown in FIG. 19 , a plurality of device air inlets 176 are formed at the boundary between the casing of the consumable and the casing of the main body. The device air inlets 176 are in fluid communication with the vaporiser inlet 172 through an inlet flow channel 178 formed in the cavity of the main body which is of corresponding shape to receive a part of the consumable 150. Air from outside of the system 110 can therefore be drawn into the passage 170 through the device air inlets 176 and the inlet flow channels 178.
When the consumable 150 is engaged with the main body 120, a user can inhale (i.e. take a puff) via the mouthpiece 154 so as to draw air through the passage 170, and so as to form an airflow (indicated by the dashed arrows in FIG. 19 ) in a direction from the vaporiser inlet 172 to the outlet 174. Although not illustrated, the passage 170 may be partially defined by a tube (e.g. a metal tube) extending through the consumable 150. In FIG. 19 , for simplicity, the passage 170 is shown with a substantially circular cross-sectional profile with a constant diameter along its length. In some embodiments, the passage may have other cross-sectional profiles, such as oval shaped or polygonal shaped profiles. Further, in other embodiments, the cross sectional profile and the diameter (or hydraulic diameter) of the passage may vary along its longitudinal axis.
The smoking substitute system 110 is configured to vaporise the e-liquid 160 for inhalation by a user. To provide this operability, the consumable 150 comprises a heater having a porous wick 162 and a resistive heating element in the form of a heating filament 164 that is helically wound (in the form of a coil) around a portion of the porous wick 162. The porous wick 162 extends across the passage 170 (i.e. transverse to a longitudinal axis of the passage 170 and thus also transverse to the air flow along the passage 170 during use) and opposing ends of the wick 162 extend into the tank 152 (so as to be immersed in the e-liquid 160). In this way, e-liquid 160 contained in the tank 152 is conveyed from the opposing ends of the porous wick 162 to a central portion of the porous wick 162 so as to be exposed to the airflow in the passage 170.
The helical filament 164 is wound about the exposed central portion of the porous wick 162 and is electrically connected to an electrical interface in the form of electrical contacts 156 mounted at the end of the consumable that is proximate the main body 120 (when the consumable and the main body are engaged). When the consumable 150 is engaged with the main body 120, electrical contacts 156 make contact with corresponding electrical contacts (not shown) of the main body 120. The main body electrical contacts are electrically connectable to a power source (not shown) of the main body 120, such that (in the engaged position) the filament 164 is electrically connectable to the power source. In this way, power can be supplied by the main body 120 to the filament 164 in order to heat the filament 164. This heats the porous wick 162 which causes e-liquid 160 conveyed by the porous wick 162 to vaporise and thus to be released from the porous wick 162. The vaporised e-liquid becomes entrained in the airflow and, as it cools in the airflow (between the heated wick and the outlet 174 of the passage 170), condenses to form an aerosol. This aerosol is then inhaled, via the mouthpiece 154, by a user of the system 110. As e-liquid is lost from the heated portion of the wick, further e-liquid is drawn along the wick from the tank to replace the e-liquid lost from the heated portion of the wick.
The filament 164 and the exposed central portion of the porous wick 162 are positioned across the passage 170. More specifically, the part of passage that contains the filament 164 and the exposed portion of the porous wick 162 forms a vaporisation chamber. In the illustrated example, the vaporisation chamber has the same cross-sectional diameter as the passage 170 (which here forms the chimney; the chimney entrance can be conceptually defined). However, in some embodiments the vaporisation chamber may have a different cross sectional profile compared with the passage 170. For example, the vaporisation chamber may have a larger cross sectional diameter than at least some of the downstream part of the passage 170 so as to enable a longer residence time for the air inside the vaporisation chamber.
No baffle is present in FIG. 19 ; it is apparent that its features can be applied to embodiments of the present invention where a baffle is provided as described herein in the region of the wick 162. FIG. 20 illustrates in more detail the vaporisation chamber and therefore the region of the consumable 150 around the wick 162 and filament 164. The helical filament 164 is wound around a central portion of the porous wick 162. The porous wick extends across passage 170. E-liquid 160 contained within the tank 152 is conveyed as illustrated schematically by arrows 401, i.e. from the tank and towards the central portion of the porous wick 162.
In this Figure a transition from the vaporisation chamber to the chimney is more clearly defined.
When the user inhales, air is drawn from through the inlets 176 shown in FIG. 19 , along inlet flow channel 178 to vaporisation chamber inlet 172 and into the vaporisation chamber containing porous wick 162. The porous wick 162 extends substantially transverse to the airflow direction. The airflow passes around the porous wick, at least a portion of the airflow substantially following the surface of the porous wick 162. In examples where the porous wick has a cylindrical cross-sectional profile, the airflow may follow a curved path around an outer periphery of the porous wick 162.
At substantially the same time as the airflow passes around the porous wick 162, the filament 164 is heated so as to vaporise the e-liquid which has been wicked into the porous wick. The airflow passing around the porous wick 162 picks up this vaporised e-liquid, and the vapour-containing airflow is drawn in direction 403 further down passage 170.
The power source of the main body 120 may be in the form of a battery (e.g. a rechargeable battery such as a lithium ion battery). The main body 120 may comprise a connector in the form of e.g. a USB port for recharging this battery. The main body 120 may also comprise a controller that controls the supply of power from the power source to the main body electrical contacts (and thus to the filament 164). That is, the controller may be configured to control a voltage applied across the main body electrical contacts, and thus the voltage applied across the filament 164. In this way, the filament 164 may only be heated under certain conditions (e.g. during a puff and/or only when the system is in an active state). In this respect, the main body 120 may include a puff sensor (not shown) that is configured to detect a puff (i.e. inhalation). The puff sensor may be operatively connected to the controller so as to be able to provide a signal, to the controller, which is indicative of a puff state (i.e. puffing or not puffing). The puff sensor may, for example, be in the form of a pressure sensor or an acoustic sensor.
Although not shown, the main body 120 and consumable 150 may comprise a further interface which may, for example, be in the form of an RFID reader, a barcode or QR code reader. This interface may be able to identify a characteristic (e.g. a type) of a consumable 150 engaged with the main body 120. In this respect, the consumable 150 may include any one or more of an RFID chip, a barcode or QR code, or memory within which is an identifier and which can be interrogated via the interface.
An apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention may be configured such that in use, at least part of the air flow drawn by a user through the apparatus from the air inlet to the outlet bypasses the vaporisation chamber defined by the enclosure. A second reference arrangement of an apparatus, shown in FIG. 21 , provides an example of how such a bypassing air flow may be created (no baffle is shown in this arrangement; clearly its features can be applied in the present invention equally were a baffle as described herein to be present). Accordingly, some embodiments of the invention may include one or a combination of the features of the second reference arrangement (and variations thereof) where such features are combinable with the present invention. This second reference arrangement is described below.
FIG. 21 illustrates a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of a second reference arrangement of the smoking substitute apparatus forming part of a smoking substitute system of the type shown in FIGS. 17 and 18 . The arrangement illustrated in FIG. 21 differs from the first reference arrangement illustrated in FIG. 19 in that the substitute smoking apparatus includes two bypass passages 180 in addition to the vaporiser passage 170. The bypass air passages extend between the plurality of device air inlets 176 and two outlets 184. In other variations of the second reference arrangement, the number of bypass passages 180 and corresponding outlets 184 may be greater or smaller than in the illustrated example. Furthermore, there may be more or fewer air inlets and there may be more or fewer outlets.
In FIG. 21 for simplicity, the bypass passage 180 is shown with a substantially circular cross-sectional profile with a constant diameter along its length. In some variations of the second reference arrangement, the bypass passage 180 may have other cross-sectional profiles, such as oval shaped or polygonal shaped profiles. Further, in some variations of the second reference arrangement, the cross sectional profile and the diameter (or hydraulic diameter) of the bypass passage 180 may vary along its longitudinal axis.
The provision of a bypass passage 180 means that a part of the air drawn through the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a when a user inhales via the mouthpiece 154 is not drawn through the vaporisation chamber. This has the effect of reducing the flow rate through the vaporisation chamber in correspondence with the respective flow resistances presented by the vaporiser passage 170 and the bypass passage 180. This can reduce the correlation between the flow rate through the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a (i.e. the user's draw rate) and the particle size generated when the e-liquid 160 is vaporised and subsequently forms an aerosol. Therefore, the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a of the second reference arrangement can deliver a more consistent aerosol to a user.
Furthermore, the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a of the second reference arrangement is capable of producing an increased particle droplet size, d₅₀, based on typical inhalation rates undertaken by a user, compared to the first reference arrangement of FIG. 19 . Such larger droplet sizes may be beneficial for the delivery of vapour to a user's lungs. The preferred ratio between the dimensions of the bypass passage 180 and the dimensions of the vaporiser passage 170, and hence flow rate in the respective passages may be determined from representative user inhalation rates and from the required air flow rate through the vaporisation chamber to deliver a desired droplet size. For example, an average total flow rate of 1.3 litres per minute may be split such that 0.8 litres per minute passes through the bypass air channel 180, and 0.5 litres per minute passes through the vaporiser channel 170, a bypass:vaporiser flow rate ratio of 1.6:1. Such a flow rate may provide an average droplet size, d₅₀, of 1-3 μm (more preferably 2-3 μm) with a span of not more than 20 (preferably not more than 10). Alternative flow rate ratios may be provided based on calculations and measurements of user flow rate, vaporiser flow rate, and average droplet size d₅₀. A bypass:vaporiser flow rate ratio of between 0.5:1 and 20:1, typically at an average total flow rate of 1.3 litres per minute may be advantageous depending on the configuration of the smoking substitute apparatus.
The bypass passage and vaporiser passage extend from a common device inlet 176. This has the benefit of ensuring more consistent airflow through the bypass passage 180 and vaporiser passage 170 across the lifetime of the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a, since any obstruction that impinges on an air inlet 176 will affect the airflow through both passages equally. The impact of inlet manufacturing variations can also be reduced for the same reason. This can therefore improve the user experience for the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a. Furthermore, the provision of a common device inlet 176 simplifies the construction and external appearance of the device.
The bypass passage 180 and vaporiser passage 170 separate upstream of the vaporisation chamber. Therefore, no vapour is drawn through the bypass passage 180. Furthermore, because the bypass passage leads to outlet 184 that is separate from outlet 174 of the vaporiser passage, substantially no mixing of the bypass air and vaporiser air occurs within the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a. Such mixing could otherwise lead to excessive cooling of the vapour and hence a build-up of condensation within the smoking substitute apparatus 150 a. Such condensation could have adverse implications for delivering vapour to the user, for example by causing the user to draw liquid droplets rather than vapour when “puffing” on the mouthpiece 154.
A further example of a bypass air flow is presented by a third reference arrangement. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the apparatus may include one or a combination of features of a third reference arrangement (and variations thereof), shown schematically in FIG. 22 , where such features are combinable with the present invention. This third reference arrangement is described below.
FIG. 22 illustrates a longitudinal cross sectional view of a consumable 250 according to a further arrangement. In FIG. 22 , the consumable 250 is shown attached, at a first end of the consumable 250, to the main body 120 of FIG. 17 and FIG. 18 . More specifically, the consumable 250 is configured to engage and disengage with the main body 120 and is interchangeable with the first reference arrangement 150 as shown in FIGS. 19 and 20 . Furthermore, the consumable 250 is configured to interact with the main body 120 in the same manner as the first reference arrangement 150 and the user may operate the consumable 250 in the same manner as the first reference arrangement 150.
The consumable 250 comprises a housing. The consumable 250 comprises an aerosol generation chamber 280 in the housing. As shown in FIG. 26 , the aerosol generation chamber 280 (vaporisation chamber) takes the form of an open ended container, or a cup, with a single chamber outlet 282 opened towards the outlet 274 of the consumable 250.
In the illustrated third reference arrangement, the housing has a plurality of air inlets 272 defined or opened at the sidewall of the housing. An outlet 274 is defined or opened at a second end of the consumable 250 that comprises a mouthpiece 254. A pair of passages 270 each extend between the respective air inlets 272 and the outlet 274 to provide flow passage for an air flow 412 as a user puffs on the mouthpiece 254. The chamber outlet 282 is configured to be in fluid communication with the passages 270. The passages 270 extend from the air inlets 272 towards the first end of the consumable 250 before routing back to towards the outlet 274 at the second end of the consumable 250. That is, a portion of each of the passages 270 axially extends alongside the aerosol generation chamber 280. The path of the air flow path 412 is illustrated in FIG. 22 . In variations of the third reference arrangement, the passages 270 may extend from the air inlet 272 directly to the outlet 274 without routing towards the first end of consumable 250, e.g. the passages 270 may not axially extend alongside the aerosol generation chamber 280.
In some other variations of the third reference arrangement, the housing may not be provided with any air inlet for an air flow to enter the housing. For example, the chamber outlet may be directly connected to the outlet of the housing by an aerosol passage and therefore said aerosol passage may only convey aerosol as generated in the aerosol generation chamber. In these variations, the discharge of aerosol may be driven at least in part by the pressure increase during vaporisation of aerosol form.
Referring back to the third reference arrangement of FIG. 22 , the chamber outlet 282 is positioned downstream from the heater in the direction of the vapour and/or aerosol flow 414 and serves as the only gas flow passage to the internal volume of the aerosol generation chamber 280. In other words, the aerosol generation chamber 280 is sealed against air flow except for having the chamber outlet 282 in communication with the passages 270, the chamber outlet 282 permitting, in use, aerosol generated by the heater to be entrained into an air flow along the passage 270. In some other variations of the third reference arrangement, the sealed aerosol generation chamber 280 may comprise a plurality of chamber outlets 282 each arranged in fluid commutation with the passages 270. In the illustrated third reference arrangement, the aerosol generation chamber 280 does not comprise any aperture upstream of the heater that may serve as an air flow inlet (although in some arrangements a vent may be provided). In contrast with the consumable 150 as shown in FIGS. 19 and 20 , the passages 270 of the consumable 250 allow the air flow, e.g. an entire amount of air flow, entering the housing to bypass the aerosol generation chamber 280. Such arrangement allows aerosol precursor to be vaporised in absence of the air flow. Therefore, the aerosol generation chamber may be considered to be a “stagnant” chamber. For example, the volumetric flowrate of vapour and/or aerosol in the aerosol generation chamber is configured to be less than 0.1 litre per minute. The vaporised aerosol precursor may cool and therefore condense to form an aerosol in the aerosol generation chamber 280, which is subsequently expulsed into or entrained with the air flow in passages 270. In addition, a portion of the vaporised aerosol precursor may remain as a vapour before leaving the aerosol generation chamber 280, and subsequently forms an aerosol as it is cooled by the air flow in the passages 270. The flow path of the vapour and/or aerosol 414 is illustrated in FIG. 22 .
In the illustrated third reference arrangement, the chamber outlet 282 is configured to be in fluid communication with a junction 290 at each of the passages 270 through a respective vapour channel 292. The junctions 290 merge the vapour channels 292 with their respective passages 270 such that vapour and/or aerosol formed in the aerosol generation chamber 280 may expand or entrain into the passages 270 through junction inlets of said junctions 290. The vapour channels form a buffering volume to minimise the amount of air flow that may back flow into the aerosol generation chamber 280. In some other variations of the third reference arrangement (not illustrated), the chamber outlet 282 may directly open towards the junction 290 at the passage, and therefore in such variations the vapour channel 292 may be omitted.
In some variations of the third reference arrangement (not illustrated), the chamber outlet may be closed by a one way valve. Said one way valve may be configured to allow a one way flow passage for the vapour and/or aerosol to be discharged from the aerosol generation chamber, and to reduce or prevent the air flow in the passages from entering the aerosol generation chamber.
In the illustrated third reference arrangement, the aerosol generation chamber 280 is configured to have a length of 20 mm and a volume of 680 mm³. The aerosol generation chamber is configured to allow vapour to be expulsed through the chamber outlet at a rate greater than 0.1 mg/second. In other variations of the third reference arrangement the aerosol generation chamber may be configured to have an internal volume ranging between 68 mm³to 680 mm³, wherein the length of the aerosol generation chamber may range between 2 mm to 20 mm.
As shown in FIG. 22 , a part of each of the passages 270 axially extends alongside the aerosol generation chamber 280. For example, the passages 270 are formed between the aerosol generation chamber 280 and the housing. Such an arrangement reduces heat transfer from the aerosol generation chamber 280 to the external surfaces of the housing.
The aerosol generation chamber 280 comprises a heater extending across its width. The heater comprises a porous wick 262 and a heating filament 264 helically wound around a portion of the porous wick 162. A tank 252 is provided in the space between the aerosol generation chamber 280 and the outlet 274, the tank being for storing a reservoir of aerosol precursor. Therefore in contrast with the reference arrangement as shown in FIGS. 19 and 20 , the tank 252 in the third reference arrangement does not substantially surround the aerosol generation chamber nor the passage 270. Instead, as shown in FIG. 22 , the tank is substantially positioned above the aerosol generation chamber 280 and the porous wick 262 when the consumable 250 is placed in an upright orientation during use. The end portions of the porous wick 262 each extend through the sidewalls of the aerosol generation chamber 280 and into a respective liquid conduit 266 which is in fluid communication with the tank 252. The wick 262, saturated with aerosol precursor, may prevent gas flow passage into the liquid conduits 266 and the tank 252. Such an arrangement may allow the aerosol precursor stored in the tank 252 to convey towards the porous wick 262 through the liquid conduits 266 by gravity. The liquid conduits 266 are configured to have a hydraulic diameter that allow a controlled amount of aerosol precursor to flow from the tank 252 towards the porous wick 262. More specifically, the size of liquid conduits 266 are selected based on the rate of aerosol precursor consumption during vaporisation. For example, the liquid conduits 266 are sized to allow a sufficient amount of aerosol precursor to flow towards and replenish the wick, yet not so large as to cause excessive aerosol precursor to leak into the aerosol generation chamber. The liquid conduits 266 are configured to have a hydraulic diameter ranging from 0.01 mm to 10 mm or 0.01 mm to 5 mm. Preferably, the liquid conduits 266 are configured to have a hydraulic diameter in the range of 0.1 mm to 1 mm.
The heating filament is electrically connected to electrical contacts 256 at the base of the aerosol generation chamber 280, sealed to prevent air ingress or fluid leakage. As shown in FIG. 22 , when the first end of the consumable 250 is received into the main body 120, the electrical contacts 256 establish electrical communication with corresponding electrical contacts of the main body 120, and thereby allow the heater to be energised.
The vaporised aerosol precursor, or aerosol in the condensed form, may discharge from the aerosol generation chamber 280 based on pressure difference between the aerosol generation chamber 280 and the passages 270. Such pressure difference may arise form i) an increased pressure in the aerosol generation chamber 280 during vaporisation of aerosol form, and/or ii) a reduced pressure in the passage during a puff.
For example, when the heater is energised and forms a vapour, it expands in to the stagnant cavity of the aerosol generation chamber 280 and thereby causes an increase in internal pressure therein. The vaporised aerosol precursor may immediately begin to cool and may form aerosol droplets. Such increase in internal pressure causes convection inside the aerosol generation chamber which aids expulsing aerosol through the chamber outlet 282 and into the passages 270.
In the illustrated third reference arrangement, the heater is positioned within the stagnant cavity of the aerosol generation chamber 280, e.g. the heater is spaced from the chamber outlet 282. Such arrangement may reduce or prevent the amount of air flow entering the aerosol generation chamber, and therefore it may minimise the amount of turbulence in the vicinity of the heater. Furthermore, such arrangement may increase the residence time of vapour in the stagnant aerosol generation chamber 280, and thereby may result in the formation of larger aerosol droplets. In some other variations of the third reference arrangement, the heater may be positioned adjacent to the chamber outlet and therefore that the path of vapour 414 from the heater to the chamber outlet 282 is shortened. This may allow vapour to be drawn into or entrained with the air flow in a more efficient manner.
The junction inlet at each of the junctions 290 opens in a direction orthogonal or non-parallel to the air flow. That is, the junction inlet each opens at a sidewall of the respective passages 270. This allows the vapour and/or aerosol from the aerosol generation chamber 280 to entrain into the air flow at an angle, and thus improving localised mixing of the different streams, as well as encouraging aerosol formation. The aerosol may be fully formed in the air flow and be drawn out through the outlet at the mouthpiece.
With the absence of, or much reduced, air flow in the aerosol generation chamber, the aerosol as generated by the illustrated third reference arrangement has a median droplet size d₅₀of at least 1 μm. More preferably, the aerosol as generated by the illustrated third reference arrangement has a median droplet size d₅₀of ranged between 2 μm to 3 μm.
Turning now to the ‘baffle’ technology which is the focus of the present invention, FIG. 23 illustrates a baffle of the type known in the prior art. A schematic, isometric view of a consumable, without showing the wick 262. An outer shell 508 defines within it a chimney for conveying vapour to the user, as for the passages described above. The baffle 502 is positioned so as to split the flow passage from the vaporisation chamber (not shown) into two passages 504, 506, which then rejoin after the baffle in the chimney defined by the shell.
It can be seen here that the vaporisation chamber in which the baffle 502 will sit in use has a cross section having a long dimension and a short dimension. The baffle 502 extends across the short dimension; that is, the air flow paths 504, 506 split air flow in the long dimension. The present invention differs from this; the orientation of the baffle is altered.
FIGS. 24 and 25 are more detailed views illustrating the difference between known baffles (FIG. 24 ) and the present invention (FIG. 25 ). In FIG. 24 , the same reference numbers from the third reference arrangement (FIG. 22 ), and from FIG. 23 , are used for simplicity.
FIG. 24 shows the vaporisation chamber 280 containing the heater 264 wound around the wick 262. The major axis of the heater here corresponds to the axis of the wick around which it is wound. A chimney entrance 508 leads to the chimney 510, which can lead to for example a chamber outlet 282 as illustrated in FIG. 22 . Electrical contacts 256 are also shown.
It can be seen that the baffle 502 extends perpendicular to that major axis or the heater, rather than in parallel to it. That is, it extends across the short (shortest) dimension of the cross section of the vaporisation chamber 280 and not the long (longest) dimension.
FIG. 25 can be contrasted with FIG. 24 . FIG. 25 shows a section perpendicular to that illustrated in FIG. 24 . The arrangement of the chimney 510, chimney entrance 508, wick 262 and heater 264 are the same. However, what differs is the extension direction of the baffle, here 602. It can be seen that it extends parallel to the extension direction of the heater major axis and the wick 262 of the vaporiser. This is extension in the long (longest) dimension of the cross section of the vaporisation chamber 280, rather than in the short (shortest) direction.
Further illustration and comparison can be seen in FIGS. 26, 27 and 28 . FIG. 26 shows vapor and air flow around the baffle 602, by arrows. From the vaporiser, including heater 264 and wick 262, it passes around the baffle, bifurcating, before rejoining to flow into the chimney 510. It can be seen that the vapour flow is bifurcated in the short dimension of the cross section of the vaporisation chamber (maintaining significant flow in the long dimension); as mentioned above, this reduces turbulence in the stream and improves the aerosol particle size generated.
FIGS. 27 and 28 are in two parts, (a) showing a view of the respective baffles from the chimney side, (b) showing a view of the respective baffles from the vaporisation chamber side. It is apparent here the different orientation of the baffle relative to the long(est) and short(est) dimensions of the cross section of the vaporisation chamber. Here the short dimension corresponds to the depth of the vaporisation chamber and the long dimension corresponds to the width of the vaporisation chamber.
In these FIGS. 27 and 28 the difference in air flow paths are readily visible. It is also clear how the turbulence generated in the vapour flow will be significantly reduced in the present invention, leading to advantageous aerosol particle characteristics.
There now follows a disclosure of certain experimental work undertaken to determine the effects of certain conditions in the smoking substitute apparatus on the particle size of the generated aerosol.
The experimental results reported here are relevant to the embodiments disclosed above in view of their demonstration of the control over particle size based on control of the conditions at the wick. In particular, the embodiments disclosed above have an effect on the air flow conditions and/or temperature in the vaporisation chamber, in view of the airflow around the baffle and within the vaporisation chamber effected by the shape and positioning of the baffle itself.

1. INTRODUCTION

Aerosol droplet size is a considered to be an important characteristic for smoking substitution devices. Droplets in the range of 2-5 μm are preferred in order to achieve improved nicotine delivery efficiency and to minimise the hazard of second-hand smoking. However, at the time of writing (September 2019), commercial EVP devices typically deliver aerosols with droplet size averaged around 0.5 μm, and to the knowledge of the inventors not a single commercially available device can deliver an aerosol with an average particle size exceeding 1 μm.
The present inventors speculate, without themselves wishing to be bound by theory, that there has to date been a lack of understanding in the mechanisms of e-liquid evaporation, nucleation and droplet growth in the context of aerosol generation in smoking substitute devices. The present inventors have therefore studied these issues in order to provide insight into mechanisms for the generation of aerosols with larger particles. The present inventors have carried out experimental and modelling work alongside theoretical investigations, leading to significant achievements as now reported.
This disclosure considers the roles of air velocity, air turbulence and vapour cooling rate in affecting aerosol particle size.

2. EXPERIMENTS

In this work, a Malvern PANalytical Spraytec laser diffraction system was employed for the particle size measurement. In order to limit the number of variables, the same coil and wick (1.5 ohms Ni—Cr coil, 1.8 mm Y07 cotton wick), the same e-liquid (1.6% freebase nicotine, 65:35 propylene glycol (PG)/vegetable glycerine (VG) ratio, no added flavour) and the same input power (10 W) were used in all experiments. Y07 represents the grade of cotton wick, meaning that the cotton has a linear density of 0.7 grams per meter.
Particle sizes were measured in accordance with ISO 13320:2009(E), which is an international standard on laser diffraction methods for particle size analysis. This is particularly well suited to aerosols, because there is an assumption in this standard that the particles are spherical (which is a good assumption for liquid-based aerosols). The standard is stated to be suitable for particle sizes in the range 0.1 micron to 3 mm.
The results presented here concentrate on the volume-based median particle size Dv50. This is to be taken to be the same as the parameter d₅₀used above.

2.1. Rectangular Tube Testing

The work reported here based on the inventors' insight that aerosol particle size might be related to: 1) air velocity; 2) flow rate; and 3) Reynolds number. In a given EVP device, these three parameters are inter-linked to each other, making it difficult to draw conclusions on the roles of each individual factor. In order to decouple these factors, experiments were carried out using a set of rectangular tubes having different dimensions. These were manufactured by 3D printing. The rectangular tubes were 3D printed in an MJP 2500 3D printer. FIG. 1 illustrates the set of rectangular tubes. Each tube has the same depth and length but different width. Each tube has an integral end plate in order to provide a seal against air flow outside the tube. Each tube also has holes formed in opposing side walls in order to accommodate a wick.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic perspective longitudinal cross sectional view of an example rectangular tube 1170 with a wick 1162 and heater coil 1164 installed. The location of the wick is about half way along the length of the tube. This is intended to allow the flow of air along the tube to settle before reaching the wick.
FIG. 3 shows a schematic transverse cross sectional view an example rectangular tube 1170 with a wick 1162 and heater coil 1164 installed. In this example, the internal width of the tube is 12 mm
The rectangular tubes were manufactured to have same internal depth of 6 mm in order to accommodate the standardized coil and wick, however the tube internal width varied from 4.5 mm to 50 mm. In this disclosure, the “tube size” is referred to as the internal width of rectangular tubes.
The rectangular tubes with different dimensions were used to generate aerosols that were tested for particle size in a Malvern PANalytical Spraytec laser diffraction system. An external digital power supply was dialled to 2.6 A constant current to supply 10 W power to the heater coil in all experiments. Between two runs, the wick was saturated manually by applying one drop of e-liquid on each side of the wick.
Three groups of experiments were carried out in this study:

- 1. 1.3 lpm (litres per minute, L min⁻¹or LPM) constant flow rate on different size tubes
- 2. 2.0 lpm constant flow rate on different size tubes
- 3. 1 m/s constant air velocity on 3 tubes: i) 5 mm tube at 1.4 lpm flow rate; ii) 8 mm tube at 2.8 lpm flow rate; and iii) 20 mm tube at 8.6 lpm flow rate.

Table 1 shows a list of experiments in this study. The values in “calculated air velocity” column were obtained by simply dividing the flow rate by the intersection area at the centre plane of wick. Reynolds numbers (Re) were calculated through the following equation:
$Re = \frac{ρ vL}{μ}$
where: ρ is the density of air (1.225 kg/m³); v is the calculated air velocity in table 1; μ is the viscosity of air (1 0.48×10⁻⁵m²/s); L is the characteristic length calculated by:
$L = \frac{4 P}{A}$
where: P is the perimeter of the flow path's intersection, and A is the area of the flow path's intersection.

TABLE 1

List of experiments in the rectangular tube study

			Calculated air
Tube size	Flow rate	Reynolds	velocity
[mm]	[lpm]	number	[m/s]

1.3 lpm	4.5	1.3	153	1.17
constant flow	6	1.3	142	0.71
rate	7	1.3	136	0.56
	8	1.3	130	0.47
	10	1.3	120	0.35
	12	1.3	111	0.28
	20	1.3	86	0.15
	50	1.3	47	0.06
2.0 lpm	4.5	2.0	236	1.81
constant flow	5	2.0	230	1.48
rate	6	2.0	219	1.09
	8	2.0	200	0.72
	12	2.0	171	0.42
	20	2.0	132	0.23
	50	2.0	72	0.09
1.0 m/s	5.0	1.4	155	1.00
constant air	8	2.8	279	1.00
velocity	20	8.6	566	1.00

Five repetition runs were carried out for each tube size and flow rate combination. Between adjacent runs there were at least 5 minutes wait time for the Spraytec system to be purged. In each run, real time particle size distributions were measured in the Spraytec laser diffraction system at a sampling rate of 2500 per second, the volume distribution median (Dv50) was averaged over a puff duration of 4 seconds. Measurement results were averaged and the standard deviations were calculated to indicate errors as shown in section 4 below.

2.2. Turbulence Tube Testing

The Reynolds numbers in Table 1 are all well below 1000, therefore, it is considered fair to assume all the experiments in section 2.1 would be under conditions of laminar flow. Further experiments were carried out and reported in this section to investigate the role of turbulence.
Turbulence intensity was introduced as a quantitative parameter to assess the level of turbulence. The definition and simulation of turbulence intensity is discussed below (see section 3.2).
Different device designs were considered in order to introduce turbulence. In the experiments reported here, jetting panels were added in the existing 12 mm rectangular tubes upstream of the wick. This approach enables direct comparison between different devices as they all have highly similar geometry, with turbulence intensity being the only variable.
FIGS. 4A-4D show air flow streamlines in the four devices used in this turbulence study. FIG. 4A is a standard 12 mm rectangular tube with wick and coil installed as explained in the previous section, with no jetting panel. FIG. 4B has a jetting panel located 10 mm below (upstream from) the wick. FIG. 4C has the same jetting panel 5 mm below the wick. FIG. 4D has the same jetting panel 2.5 mm below the wick. As can be seen from FIGS. 4B-4D, the jetting panel has an arrangement of apertures shaped and directed in order to promote jetting from the downstream face of the panel and therefore to promote turbulent flow. Accordingly, the jetting panel can introduce turbulence downstream, and the panel causes higher level of turbulence near the wick when it is positioned closer to the wick. As shown in FIGS. 4A-4D, the four geometries gave turbulence intensities of 0.55%, 0.77%, 1.06% and 1.34%, respectively, with FIG. 4A being the least turbulent, and FIG. 4D being the most turbulent.
For each of FIGS. 4A-4D, there are shown three modelling images. The image on the left shows the original image (colour in the original), the central image shows a greyscale version of the image and the right hand image shows a black and white version of the image. As will be appreciated, each version of the image highlights slightly different features of the flow. Together, they give a reasonable picture of the flow conditions at the wick.
These four devices were operated to generate aerosols following the procedure explained above (section 2.1) using a flow rate of 1.3 lpm and the generated aerosols were tested for particle size in the Spraytec laser diffraction system.

2.3. High Temperature Testing

This experiment aimed to investigate the influence of inflow air temperature on aerosol particle size, in order to investigate the effect of vapour cooling rate on aerosol generation.
The experimental set up is shown in FIG. 5 . The testing used a Carbolite Gero EHA 12300B tube furnace 3210 with a quartz tube 3220 to heat up the air. Hot air in the tube furnace was then led into a transparent housing 3158 that contains the EVP device 3150 to be tested. A thermocouple meter 3410 was used to assess the temperature of the air pulled into the EVP device. Once the EVP device was activated, the aerosol was pulled into the Spraytec laser diffraction system 3310 via a silicone connector 3320 for particle size measurement.
Three smoking substitute apparatuses (referred to as “pods”) were tested in the study: pod 1 is the commercially available “myblu optimised” pod (FIG. 6 ); pod 2 is a pod featuring an extended inflow path upstream of the wick (FIG. 7 ); and pod 3 is pod with the wick located in a stagnant vaporisation chamber and the inlet air bypassing the vaporisation chamber but entraining the vapour from an outlet of the vaporisation chamber (FIGS. 8A and 8B).
Pod 1, shown in longitudinal cross sectional view (in the width plane) in FIG. 6 , has a main housing that defines a tank 160 x holding an e-liquid aerosol precursor. Mouthpiece 154 x is formed at the upper part of the pod. Electrical contacts 156 x are formed at the lower end of the pod. Wick 162 x is held in a vaporisation chamber. The air flow direction is shown using arrows.
Pod 2, shown in longitudinal cross sectional view (in the width plane) in FIG. 7 , has a main housing that defines a tank 160 y holding an e-liquid aerosol precursor. Mouthpiece 154 y is formed at the upper part of the pod. Electrical contacts 156 y are formed at the lower end of the pod. Wick 162 y is held in a vaporisation chamber. The air flow direction is shown using arrows. Pod 2 has an extended inflow path (plenum chamber 157 y) with a flow conditioning element 159 y, configured to promote reduced turbulence at the wick 162 y.
FIG. 8A shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of pod 3. FIG. 8B shows a schematic longitudinal cross sectional view of the same pod 3 in a direction orthogonal to the view taken in FIG. 8A. Pod 3 has a main housing that defines a tank 160 z holding an e-liquid aerosol precursor.
Mouthpiece 154 z is formed at the upper part of the pod. Electrical contacts 156 z are formed at the lower end of the pod. Wick 162 z is held in a vaporisation chamber. The air flow direction is shown using arrows. Pod 3 uses a stagnant vaporiser chamber, with the air inlets bypassing the wick and picking up the vapour/aerosol downstream of the wick.
All three pods were filled with the same e-liquid (1.6% freebase nicotine, 65:35 PG/VG ratio, no added flavour). Three experiments were carried out for each pod: 1) standard measurement in ambient temperature; 2) only the inlet air was heated to 50° C.; and 3) both the inlet air and the pods were heated to 50° C. Five repetition runs were carried out for each experiment and the Dv50 results were taken and averaged.

3. MODELLING WORK

In this study, modelling work was performed using COMSOL Multiphysics 5.4, engaged physics include: 1) laminar single-phase flow; 2) turbulent single-phase flow; 3) laminar two-phase flow; 4) heat transfer in fluids; and (5) particle tracing. Data analysis and data visualisation were mostly completed in MATLAB R2019a.

3.1. Velocity Modelling

Air velocity in the vicinity of the wick is believed to play an important role in affecting particle size. In section 2.1, the air velocity was calculated by dividing the flow rate by the intersection area, which is referred to as “calculated velocity” in this work. This involves a very crude simplification that assumes velocity distribution to be homogeneous across the intersection area.
In order to increase reliability of the work, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling was performed to obtain more accurate velocity values:

- 1) The average velocity in the vicinity of the wick (defined as a volume from the wick surface to 1 mm away from the wick surface)
- 2) The maximum velocity in the vicinity of the wick (defined as a volume from the wick surface to 1 mm away from the wick surface)

TABLE 2

Average and maximum velocity in the vicinity
of wick surface obtained from CFD modelling

		Calculated	Average	Maximum
Tube size	Flow rate	velocity*	velocity**	Velocity**
[mm]	[lpm]	[m/s]	[m/s]	[m/s]

1.3 lpm	4.5	1.3	1.17	0.99	1.80
constant	6	1.3	0.71	0.66	1.22
flow	7	1.3	0.56	0.54	1.01
rate	8	1.3	0.47	0.46	0.86
	10	1.3	0.35	0.35	0.66
	12	1.3	0.28	0.27	0.54
	20	1.3	0.15	0.15	0.32
	50	1.3	0.06	0.05	0.12
2.0 lpm	4.5	2.0	1.81	1.52	2.73
constant	5	2.0	1.48	1.31	2.39
flow	6	2.0	1.09	1.02	1.87
rate	8	2.0	0.72	0.71	1.31
	12	2.0	0.42	0.44	0.83
	20	2.0	0.23	0.24	0.49
	50	2.0	0.09	0.08	0.19

*Calculated by dividing flow rate with intersection area
**Obtained from CFD modelling

The CFD model uses a laminar single-phase flow setup. For each experiment, the outlet was configured to a corresponding flowrate, the inlet was configured to be pressure-controlled, the wall conditions were set as “no slip”. A 1 mm wide ring-shaped domain (wick vicinity) was created around the wick surface, and domain probes were implemented to assess the average and maximum magnitudes of velocity in this ring-shaped wick vicinity domain.
The CFD model outputs the average velocity and maximum velocity in the vicinity of the wick for each set of experiments carried out in section 2.1. The outcomes are reported in Table 2.

3.2. Turbulence Modelling

Turbulence intensity (I) is a quantitative value that represents the level of turbulence in a fluid flow system. It is defined as the ratio between the root-mean-square of velocity fluctuations, u′, and the Reynolds-averaged mean flow velocity,
$U : I = \frac{u^{'}}{U} = \frac{\sqrt{\frac{1}{3} ({u^{'}}_{x}^{2} + {u^{'}}_{y}^{2} + {u^{'}}_{z}^{2})}}{\sqrt{{\overline{u_{x}}}^{2} + {\overline{u_{y}}}^{2} + {\overline{u_{z}}}^{2}}} = \frac{\sqrt{\frac{1}{3} [{(u_{x} - \overline{u_{x}})}^{2} + {(u_{y} - \overline{u_{y}})}^{2} ++ {(u_{z} - \overline{u_{z}})}^{2}]}}{\sqrt{{\overline{u_{x}}}^{2} + {\overline{u_{y}}}^{2} + {\overline{u_{z}}}^{2}}}$
where u_x, u_yand u_zare the x-, y- and z-components of the velocity vector, u_x , u_y and u_z represent the average velocities along three directions.
Higher turbulence intensity values represent higher levels of turbulence. As a rule of thumb, turbulence intensity below 1% represents a low-turbulence case, turbulence intensity between 1% and 5% represents a medium-turbulence case, and turbulence intensity above 5% represents a high-turbulence case.
In this study, turbulence intensity was obtained from CFD simulation using turbulent single-phase setup in COMSOL Multiphysics. For each of the four experiments explained in section 2.2, the outlet was set to 1.3 lpm, the inlet was set to be pressure-controlled, and all wall conditions were set to be “no slip”.
Turbulence intensity was assessed within the volume up to 1 mm away from the wick surface (defined as the wick vicinity domain). For the four experiments explained in section 2.2, the turbulence intensities are 0.55%, 0.77%, 1.06% and 1.34%, respectively, as also shown in FIGS. 4A-4D.

3.3. Cooling Rate Modelling

The cooling rate modelling involves three coupling models in COMSOL Multiphysics: 1) laminar two-phase flow; 2) heat transfer in fluids, and 3) particle tracing. The model is setup in three steps:

1) Set Up Two Phase Flow Model

Laminar mixture flow physics was selected in this study. The outlet was configured in the same way as in section 3.1. However, this model includes two fluid phases released from two separate inlets: the first one is the vapour released from wick surface, at an initial velocity of 2.84 cm/s (calculated based on 5 mg total particulate mass over 3 seconds puff duration) with initial velocity direction normal to the wick surface; the second inlet is air influx from the base of tube, the rate of which is pressure-controlled.
2) Set Up Two-Way Coupling with Heat Transfer Physics
The inflow and outflow settings in heat transfer physics was configured in the same way as in the two-phase flow model. The air inflow was set to 25° C., and the vapour inflow was set to 209° C. (boiling temperature of the e-liquid formulation). In the end, the heat transfer physics is configured to be two-way coupled with the laminar mixture flow physics. The above model reaches steady state after approximately 0.2 second with a step size of 0.001 second.

3) Set Up Particle Tracing

A wave of 2000 particles were release from wick surface at t=0.3 second after the two-phase flow and heat transfer model has stabilised. The particle tracing physics has one-way coupling with the previous model, which means the fluid flow exerts dragging force on the particles, whereas the particles do not exert counterforce on the fluid flow. Therefore, the particles function as moving probes to output vapour temperature at each timestep.
The model outputs average vapour temperature at each time steps. A MATLAB script was then created to find the time step when the vapour cools to a target temperature (5000 or 75° C.), based on which the vapour cooling rates were obtained (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Average vapour cooling rate obtained from Multiphysics modelling

		Cooling rate to	Cooling rate to
Tube size	Flow rate		50° C.	75° C.
[mm]	[lpm]	[° C./ms]	[° C./ms]

1.3 lpm	4.5	1.3	11.4	44.7
constant	6	1.3	5.48	14.9
flow rate	7	1.3	3.46	7.88
	8	1.3	2.24	5.15
	10	1.3	1.31	2.85
	12	1.3	0.841	1.81
	20	1.3	0*	0.536
	50	1.3	0	0
2.0 lpm	4.5	2.0	19.9	670
constant	5	2.0	13.3	67
flow rate	6	2.0	8.83	26.8
	8	2.0	3.61	8.93
	12	2.0	1.45	3.19
	20	2.0	0.395	0.761
	50	2.0	0	0

*Zero cooling rate when the average vapour temperature is still above target temperature after 0.5 second

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Particle size measurement results for the rectangular tube testing are shown in Table 4. For every tube size and flow rate combination, five repetition runs were carried out in the Spraytec laser diffraction system. The Dv50 values from five repetition runs were averaged, and the standard deviations were calculated to indicate errors, as shown in Table 4.
In this section, the roles of different factors affecting aerosol particle size will be discussed based on experimental and modelling results.

TABLE 4

Particle size measurement results for the rectangular tube testing

			Dv50 standard
Tube size	Flow rate	Dv50 average	deviation
[mm]	[lpm]	[μm]	[μm]

1.3 lpm	4.5	1.3	0.971	0.125
constant	6	1.3	1.697	0.341
flow	7	1.3	2.570	0.237
rate	8	1.3	2.705	0.207
	10	1.3	2.783	0.184
	12	1.3	3.051	0.325
	20	1.3	3.116	0.354
	50	1.3	3.161	0.157
2.0 lpm	4.5	2.0	0.568	0.039
constant	5	2.0	0.967	0.315
flow	6	2.0	1.541	0.272
rate	8	2.0	1.646	0.363
	12	2.0	3.062	0.153
	20	2.0	3.566	0.260
	50	2.0	3.082	0.440
1.0 m/s	5.0	1.4	1.302	0.187
constant air	8	2.8	1.303	0.468
velocity	20	8.6	1.463	0.413

4.1. Decouple the Factors Affecting Particle Size

The particle size (Dv50) experimental results are plotted against calculated air velocity in FIG. 9 . The graph shows a strong correlation between particle size and air velocity.
Different size tubes were tested at two flow rates: 1.3 lpm and 2.0 lpm. Both groups of data show the same trend that slower air velocity leads to larger particle size. The conclusion was made more convincing by the fact that these two groups of data overlap well in FIG. 9 : for example, the 6 mm tube delivered an average Dv50 of 1.697 μm when tested at 1.3 lpm flow rate, and the 8 mm tube delivered a highly similar average Dv50 of 1.646 μm when tested at 2.0 lpm flow rate, as they have similar air velocity of 0.71 and 0.72 m/s, respectively.
In addition, FIG. 10 shows the results of three experiments with highly different setup arrangements: 1) 5 mm tube measured at 1.4 lpm flow rate with Reynolds number of 155; 2) 8 mm tube measured at 2.8 lpm flow rate with Reynolds number of 279; and 3) 20 mm tube measured at 8.6 lpm flow rate with Reynolds number of 566. It is relevant that these setup arrangements have one similarity: the air velocities are all calculated to be 1 m/s. FIG. 10 shows that, although these three sets of experiments have different tube sizes, flow rates and Reynolds numbers, they all delivered similar particle sizes, as the air velocity was kept constant. These three data points were also plotted out in FIG. 9 (1 m/s data with star marks) and they tie in nicely into particle size-air velocity trendline.
The above results lead to a strong conclusion that air velocity is an important factor affecting the particle size of EVP devices. Relatively large particles are generated when the air travels with slower velocity around the wick. It can also be concluded that flow rate, tube size and Reynolds number are not necessarily independently relevant to particle size, providing the air velocity is controlled in the vicinity of the wick.

4.2. Further Consideration of Velocity

In FIG. 9 the “calculated velocity” was obtained by dividing the flow rate by the intersection area, which is a crude simplification that assumes a uniform velocity field. In order to increase reliability of the work, CFD modelling has been performed to assess the average and maximum velocities in the vicinity of the wick. In this study, the “vicinity” was defined as a volume from the wick surface up to 1 mm away from the wick surface.
The particle size measurement data were plotted against the average velocity (FIG. 11 ) and maximum velocity (FIG. 12 ) in the vicinity of the wick, as obtained from CFD modelling.
The data in these two graphs indicates that in order to obtain an aerosol with Dv50 larger than 1 μm, the average velocity should be less than or equal to 1.2 m/s in the vicinity of the wick and the maximum velocity should be less than or equal to 2.0 m/s in the vicinity of the wick.
Furthermore, in order to obtain an aerosol with Dv50 of 2 μm or larger, the average velocity should be less than or equal to 0.6 m/s in the vicinity of the wick and the maximum velocity should be less than or equal to 1.2 m/s in the vicinity of the wick.
It is considered that typical commercial EVP devices deliver aerosols with Dv50 around 0.5 μm, and there is no commercially available device that can deliver aerosol with Dv50 exceeding 1 μm. It is considered that typical commercial EVP devices have average velocity of 1.5-2.0 m/s in the vicinity of the wick.

4.3. The Role of Turbulence

The role of turbulence has been investigated in terms of turbulence intensity, which is a quantitative characteristic that indicates the level of turbulence. In this work, four tubes of different turbulence intensities were used to general aerosols which were measured in the Spraytec laser diffraction system. The particle size (Dv50) experimental results are plotted against turbulence intensity in FIG. 13 .
The graph suggests a correlation between particle size and turbulence intensity, that lower turbulence intensity is beneficial for obtaining larger particle size. It is noted that when turbulence intensity is above 1% (medium-turbulence case), there are relatively large measurement fluctuations. In FIG. 13 , the tube with a jetting panel 10 mm below the wick has the largest error bar, because air jets become unpredictable near the wick after traveling through a long distance.
The results clearly indicate that laminar air flow is favourable for the generation of aerosols with larger particles, and that the generation of large particle sizes is jeopardised by introducing turbulence. In FIG. 13 , the 12 mm standard rectangular tube (without jetting panel) delivers above 3 μm particle size (Dv50). The particle size values reduced by at least a half when jetting panels were added to introduce turbulence.

4.4. Vapour Cooling Rate

FIG. 14 shows the high temperature testing results. Larger particle sizes were observed from all 3 pods when the temperature of inlet air increased from room temperature (23° C.) to 50° C. When the pods were heated as well, two of the three pods saw even larger particle size measurement results, while pod 2 was unable to be measured due to significant amount of leakage.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, the results are in line with the inventors' insight that control over the vapour cooling rate provides an important degree of control over the particle size of the aerosol. As reported above, the use of a slow air velocity can have the result of the formation of an aerosol with large Dv50. It is considered that this is due to slower air velocity allowing a slower cooling rate of the vapour.
Another conclusion related to laminar flow can also be explained by a cooling rate theory: laminar flow allows slow and gradual mixing between cold air and hot vapour, which means the vapour can cool down in slower rate when the airflow is laminar, resulting in larger particle size.
The results in FIG. 14 further validate this cooling rate theory: when the inlet air has higher temperature, the temperature difference between hot vapour and cold air becomes smaller, which allows the vapour to cool down at a slower rate, resulting in larger particle size; when the pods were heated as well, this mechanism was exaggerated even more, leading to an even slower cooling rate and an even larger particle size.

4.5. Further Consideration of Vapour Cooling Rate

In section 3.3, the vapour cooling rates for each tube size and flow rate combination were obtained via multiphysics simulation. In FIG. 15 and FIG. 16 , the particle size measurement results were plotted against vapour cooling rate to 50° C. and 75° C., respectively.
The data in these graphs indicates that in order to obtain an aerosol with Dv50 larger than 1 μm, the apparatus should be operable to require more than 16 ms for the vapour to cool to 50° C., or an equivalent (simplified to an assumed linear) cooling rate being slower than 10° C./ms. From an alternative viewpoint, in order to obtain an aerosol with Dv50 larger than 1 μm, the apparatus should be operable to require more than 4.5 ms for the vapour to cool to 75° C., or an equivalent (simplified to an assumed linear) cooling rate slower than 30° C./ms.
Furthermore, in order to obtain an aerosol with Dv50 of 2 μm or larger, the apparatus should be operable to require more than 32 ms for the vapour to cool to 50° C., or an equivalent (simplified to an assumed linear) cooling rate being slower than 5° C./ms. From an alternative viewpoint, in order to obtain an aerosol with Dv50 of 2 μm or larger, the apparatus should be operable to require more than 13 ms for the vapour to cool to 75° C., or an equivalent (simplified to an assumed linear) cooling rate slower than 10° C./ms.

5. CONCLUSIONS OF PARTICLE SIZE EXPERIMENTAL WORK

In this work, particle size (Dv50) of aerosols generated in a set of rectangular tubes was studied in order to decouple different factors (flow rate, air velocity, Reynolds number, tube size) affecting aerosol particle size. It is considered that air velocity is an important factor affecting particle size—slower air velocity leads to larger particle size. When air velocity was kept constant, the other factors (flow rate, Reynolds number, tube size) has low influence on particle size.
The role of turbulence was also investigated. It is considered that laminar air flow favours generation of large particles, and introducing turbulence deteriorates (reduces) the particle size.
Modelling methods were used to simulate the average air velocity, the maximum air velocity, and the turbulence intensity in the vicinity of the wick. A COMSOL model with three coupled physics has also been developed to obtain the vapour cooling rate.
All experimental and modelling results support a cooling rate theory that slower vapour cooling rate is a significant factor in ensuring larger particle size. Slower air velocity, laminar air flow and higher inlet air temperature lead to larger particle size, because they all allow vapour to cool down at slower rates.
The features disclosed in the foregoing description, or in the following claims, or in the accompanying drawings, expressed in their specific forms or in terms of a means for performing the disclosed function, or a method or process for obtaining the disclosed results, as appropriate, may, separately, or in any combination of such features, be utilised for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
For the avoidance of any doubt, any theoretical explanations provided herein are provided for the purposes of improving the understanding of a reader. The inventors do not wish to be bound by any of these theoretical explanations.
Any section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the subject matter described.
Throughout this specification, including the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the words “have”, “comprise”, and “include”, and variations such as “having”, “comprises”, “comprising”, and “including” will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by the use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. The term “about” in relation to a numerical value is optional and means, for example, +/−10%.
The words “preferred” and “preferably” are used herein refer to embodiments of the invention that may provide certain benefits under some circumstances. It is to be appreciated, however, that other embodiments may also be preferred under the same or different circumstances. The recitation of one or more preferred embodiments therefore does not mean or imply that other embodiments are not useful, and is not intended to exclude other embodiments from the scope of the disclosure, or from the scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A smoking substitute apparatus for delivery of an aerosol to a user drawing air through the apparatus, the apparatus comprising:

an air inlet;

an outlet;

an air flow path between the air inlet and the outlet;

a chimney in fluid communication with the air flow path;

a vaporisation chamber in fluid communication with the chimney via a chimney entrance;

the vaporisation chamber having an aerosol generator configured to generate an aerosol from an aerosol precursor;

the chimney being positioned such that in use aerosol generated by the aerosol generator flows through the chimney to the outlet;

the aerosol generator comprising an elongate heater having a major axis;

the vaporisation chamber also having an elongate baffle positioned between the aerosol generator and the chimney entrance, the baffle partially occluding the chimney entrance and oriented in a direction parallel to the major axis of the heater.

2. A smoking substitute apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the baffle is shaped so as to bifurcate the air flow path around the baffle, whereafter the bifurcated paths converge.

3. A smoking substitute apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the baffle and heater are sized such that, when viewed from the chimney entrance, the heater is entirely obscured by the baffle.

4. A smoking substitute apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the baffle is spaced from the chimney entrance.

5. A smoking substitute apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the baffle is positioned midway between the heater and the chimney entrance.

6. A smoking substitute apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the air flow path connects the air inlet to the vaporisation chamber and the chimney to the outlet, such that in use air flows from the air inlet to the vaporisation chamber; from the vaporisation chamber to the chimney, and from the chimney to the outlet in that order.

7. A smoking substitute apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the vaporisation chamber has a cross section having a longest dimension, and wherein the baffle is orientated to extends across the vaporisation chamber along the longest dimension.