[go: up one dir, main page]

US20190057392A1 - Smart user feedback - Google Patents

Smart user feedback Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20190057392A1
US20190057392A1 US16/167,270 US201816167270A US2019057392A1 US 20190057392 A1 US20190057392 A1 US 20190057392A1 US 201816167270 A US201816167270 A US 201816167270A US 2019057392 A1 US2019057392 A1 US 2019057392A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
end user
interactions
application
trigger event
computer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/167,270
Inventor
Vladyslav Kulchytskyy
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sugarcrm Inc
Original Assignee
Sugarcrm Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sugarcrm Inc filed Critical Sugarcrm Inc
Priority to US16/167,270 priority Critical patent/US20190057392A1/en
Assigned to SUGARCRM INC. reassignment SUGARCRM INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KULCHYTSKYY, VLADYSLAV
Publication of US20190057392A1 publication Critical patent/US20190057392A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/01Customer relationship services
    • G06Q30/015Providing customer assistance, e.g. assisting a customer within a business location or via helpdesk
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/01Customer relationship services

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to customer support and more particularly to dynamic application end user support.
  • End user support ranges from simplistic online help to comprehensive online and printed documentation, to live telephone support provided by a call center.
  • basic modes of customer support no longer suffice. Indeed, new technologies provide intermediate, independent management of customer support functions for many software publishers.
  • third party services now act as a proxy for deployed applications, intercepting requests for customer support and providing an appropriate response through an appropriate medium. For instance, with regard to a Web deployed application, a time in which an end user lingers in a Web page without having made a selection is provided to a third party support service provider who in turn can direct the display of a dialog box prompting the end user to message a support request to the third party support service provider.
  • the messaging mechanism can range from an email to a real-time instant messaging session.
  • a voice call can be initiated between the end user and a customer service representative of the third party support service provider.
  • the end user support provided by the third party support service provider is limited to contemporaneous knowledge of the problems experienced by the end user and any record at the third party support service provider of past interactions with the end user.
  • the ability to address the actions of the end user prior to the request for support with the third party support service provider does not exist in so far as the third party support service provider is separate from the software publisher.
  • Embodiments of the present invention address deficiencies of the art in respect to customer support for a computer program and provide a novel and non-obvious method, system and computer program product for smart user feedback.
  • a method for smart user feedback is provided. The method includes loading into memory of a computer hosting execution of an application, a set of nominal end user interactions with the application. The method also includes monitoring interactions with the application by an end user and comparing the monitored interactions with the set of nominal end user interactions in order to compute a threshold variance. Finally, the method includes responding to the threshold variance computed for the monitored interactions, by displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session.
  • the method additionally includes monitoring different sequences of interactions with the application by multiple different other end users, identifying common ones of the sequences as nominal interactions for the application and storing the nominal interactions as the set of nominal end user interactions in fixed storage.
  • the method additionally includes beginning the monitoring of the interactions with the application by an end user responsive to detecting a trigger event.
  • the trigger event is the end user consuming too much time without commanding the application, the end user repeatedly aborting a command in the application or the end user repeating a same command in the application, to name a few examples.
  • a data processing is configured for smart user feedback.
  • the system includes a host computing system that includes one or more computers, each with memory and at least one processor.
  • the system also includes an application executing in the host computing system.
  • the system includes a smart user feedback module coupled to the application.
  • the module includes program code enabled to load into the memory of the host computing system a set of nominal end user interactions with the application, to monitor interactions with the application by an end user, to compare the monitored interactions with the set of nominal end user interactions in order to compute a threshold variance and to respond to the threshold variance computed for the monitored interactions, by displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session.
  • FIG. 1 is a pictorial illustration of a process for smart user feedback
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a data processing system configured for smart user feedback
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a process for smart user feedback.
  • Embodiments of the invention provide for smart user feedback.
  • a set of nominal user interactions with an application is loaded into memory and a contemporaneous set of end user interactions of an end user with the application are monitored.
  • the contemporaneous set of end user interactions is compared to the set of nominal user interactions.
  • a prompt can be displayed in the application recommending that the end user request online support, such as by transmitting a message to a customer service representative over a computer communications network, or by launching an instant messaging session between the end user and a customer service representative.
  • proactive customer support can be initiated upon first inferring the end user experiencing a usability problem with the application by detecting a threshold variance between the set of end user interactions and the set of nominal user interactions.
  • FIG. 1 pictorially illustrates of a process for smart user feedback.
  • smart user feedback logic 150 monitors user interactions 110 between an end user and an application.
  • the smart user feedback logic 150 compares the monitored user interactions 110 to a listing 140 of a nominal set of interactions.
  • the listing 140 of the nominal set of instructions are established by monitoring other end user interactions 120 comparable to one another so as to produce a set of nominal end user interactions 130 .
  • the set of nominal end user interactions 130 then are included in the listing 140 . Consequently, upon comparing the monitored user interactions 110 to those of the listing 140 , the smart user feedback logic 150 responds to a threshold difference between the monitored user interactions 110 and the listing 140 by directing the display of a prompt 190 to the end user encouraging the end user to request customer support.
  • FIG. 2 schematically shows a data processing system configured for smart user feedback.
  • the system includes a host computing system 210 that includes one or more computers, each with memory and at least one processor.
  • the host computing system 210 is communicatively coupled to different client computers 230 over computer communications network 220 .
  • the host computing system 210 supports the deployment of an application 240 to the client computers 230 over the computer communications network 220 .
  • the deployment of the application 240 can include the execution of an application instance 250 of the application 240 in each of the client computers 230
  • of the deployment of the application 240 can include the display in each of the client computers 230 only a user interface to the application 240 .
  • a smart user feedback module 300 is coupled to each of the application 240 and the application instances 250 .
  • the smart user feedback module 300 includes program code that executes either in the memory of the host computing system 210 , or in the memory of each of the client computers 230 or in both with portions of the program code executing separately in the memory of the host computing system 210 and the memory of the client computers 230 .
  • the program code is enabled to receive a set of monitored user interactions 270 from the different application instances 250 .
  • the program code determines if a threshold variance exists between the user interactions 270 of the application instance 250 and those in a listing of nominal interactions stored in data store 260 so as to indicate a behavior of a corresponding end user that differs from what is to be considered normal behavior in respect to end user utilization of the application.
  • the program code of the smart user feedback module 300 directs a display of a prompt in the corresponding one of the client computers 230 seeking to provoke the end user into engaging in a customer support transaction.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a process for smart user feedback.
  • monitoring of an end user interactions with an application are triggered in response to detecting one or more triggering events 360 , for example a repeated request to cancel an already directed command in the application, a repeated request to direct a command in the application, or an unusually long delay in receiving an directed command by the end user in the application.
  • triggering events 360 for example a repeated request to cancel an already directed command in the application, a repeated request to direct a command in the application, or an unusually long delay in receiving an directed command by the end user in the application.
  • an end user interaction with the application is received.
  • the user interaction is included in a list of already received user interactions in a state machine so as to compare the list of already received user interactions and the most recently received user interaction with a set of nominal user interactions.
  • a customer support prompt is issued in the application so as to proactively remediate a perceived usability experience of the end user.
  • the present invention may be embodied within a system, a method, a computer program product or any combination thereof.
  • the computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium or media having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.
  • the computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device.
  • the computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • a non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • EPROM or Flash memory erasable programmable read-only memory
  • SRAM static random access memory
  • CD-ROM compact disc read-only memory
  • DVD digital versatile disk
  • memory stick a floppy disk
  • a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon
  • a computer readable storage medium is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
  • Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network.
  • the network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers.
  • a network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
  • Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
  • the computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
  • the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
  • electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
  • These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • the computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
  • the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures.
  • two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)

Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention provide a method, system and computer program product for smart user feedback. In an embodiment of the invention, a method for smart user feedback is provided. The method includes loading into memory of a computer hosting execution of an application, a set of nominal end user interactions with the application. The method also includes monitoring interactions with the application by an end user and comparing the monitored interactions with the set of nominal end user interactions in order to compute a threshold variance. Finally, the method includes responding to the threshold variance computed for the monitored interactions, by displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to customer support and more particularly to dynamic application end user support.
  • Description of the Related Art
  • Successful application deployment requires the deployment of a computer program that is largely free from run-time logical errors and the ready access to the computer program by the end user. Additionally, the way in which the computer program is effectively utilized by the end user must be plain to the end user so that the end user does not experience frustration in achieving the aim of the end user in using the computer program. So much is a tall order and oftentimes, despite the flawless production of a computer program and an equally flawless deployment, the success of the computer program falters due to problems with usability.
  • To overcome usability flaws inherent to a design of a computer program, a thorough program of end user support of the computer program is required. End user support ranges from simplistic online help to comprehensive online and printed documentation, to live telephone support provided by a call center. However, basic modes of customer support no longer suffice. Indeed, new technologies provide intermediate, independent management of customer support functions for many software publishers.
  • In this regard, third party services now act as a proxy for deployed applications, intercepting requests for customer support and providing an appropriate response through an appropriate medium. For instance, with regard to a Web deployed application, a time in which an end user lingers in a Web page without having made a selection is provided to a third party support service provider who in turn can direct the display of a dialog box prompting the end user to message a support request to the third party support service provider. The messaging mechanism can range from an email to a real-time instant messaging session. In some instances, a voice call can be initiated between the end user and a customer service representative of the third party support service provider.
  • Of import, though, given the separate relationship between software publisher and the third party support service provider, the end user support provided by the third party support service provider is limited to contemporaneous knowledge of the problems experienced by the end user and any record at the third party support service provider of past interactions with the end user. The ability to address the actions of the end user prior to the request for support with the third party support service provider, however, does not exist in so far as the third party support service provider is separate from the software publisher.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Embodiments of the present invention address deficiencies of the art in respect to customer support for a computer program and provide a novel and non-obvious method, system and computer program product for smart user feedback. In an embodiment of the invention, a method for smart user feedback is provided. The method includes loading into memory of a computer hosting execution of an application, a set of nominal end user interactions with the application. The method also includes monitoring interactions with the application by an end user and comparing the monitored interactions with the set of nominal end user interactions in order to compute a threshold variance. Finally, the method includes responding to the threshold variance computed for the monitored interactions, by displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session.
  • In one aspect of the embodiment, the method additionally includes monitoring different sequences of interactions with the application by multiple different other end users, identifying common ones of the sequences as nominal interactions for the application and storing the nominal interactions as the set of nominal end user interactions in fixed storage. In another aspect of the embodiment, the method additionally includes beginning the monitoring of the interactions with the application by an end user responsive to detecting a trigger event. In this regard, the trigger event is the end user consuming too much time without commanding the application, the end user repeatedly aborting a command in the application or the end user repeating a same command in the application, to name a few examples.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, a data processing is configured for smart user feedback. The system includes a host computing system that includes one or more computers, each with memory and at least one processor. The system also includes an application executing in the host computing system. Finally, the system includes a smart user feedback module coupled to the application. The module includes program code enabled to load into the memory of the host computing system a set of nominal end user interactions with the application, to monitor interactions with the application by an end user, to compare the monitored interactions with the set of nominal end user interactions in order to compute a threshold variance and to respond to the threshold variance computed for the monitored interactions, by displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session.
  • Additional aspects of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The aspects of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The embodiments illustrated herein are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 is a pictorial illustration of a process for smart user feedback;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a data processing system configured for smart user feedback; and,
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a process for smart user feedback.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Embodiments of the invention provide for smart user feedback. In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a set of nominal user interactions with an application is loaded into memory and a contemporaneous set of end user interactions of an end user with the application are monitored. The contemporaneous set of end user interactions is compared to the set of nominal user interactions. Responsive to a computation of threshold variation between the contemporaneous set of end user interactions and a set of nominal user interactions, a prompt can be displayed in the application recommending that the end user request online support, such as by transmitting a message to a customer service representative over a computer communications network, or by launching an instant messaging session between the end user and a customer service representative. In this way, proactive customer support can be initiated upon first inferring the end user experiencing a usability problem with the application by detecting a threshold variance between the set of end user interactions and the set of nominal user interactions.
  • In illustration, FIG. 1 pictorially illustrates of a process for smart user feedback. As shown in FIG. 1, smart user feedback logic 150 monitors user interactions 110 between an end user and an application. The smart user feedback logic 150 compares the monitored user interactions 110 to a listing 140 of a nominal set of interactions. The listing 140 of the nominal set of instructions are established by monitoring other end user interactions 120 comparable to one another so as to produce a set of nominal end user interactions 130. The set of nominal end user interactions 130 then are included in the listing 140. Consequently, upon comparing the monitored user interactions 110 to those of the listing 140, the smart user feedback logic 150 responds to a threshold difference between the monitored user interactions 110 and the listing 140 by directing the display of a prompt 190 to the end user encouraging the end user to request customer support.
  • The process illustrated in connection with FIG. 1 is implemented in a data processing system. In further illustration, FIG. 2 schematically shows a data processing system configured for smart user feedback. The system includes a host computing system 210 that includes one or more computers, each with memory and at least one processor. The host computing system 210 is communicatively coupled to different client computers 230 over computer communications network 220. The host computing system 210 supports the deployment of an application 240 to the client computers 230 over the computer communications network 220. In this regard, the deployment of the application 240 can include the execution of an application instance 250 of the application 240 in each of the client computers 230, of the deployment of the application 240 can include the display in each of the client computers 230 only a user interface to the application 240.
  • Notably, a smart user feedback module 300 is coupled to each of the application 240 and the application instances 250. In particular, the smart user feedback module 300 includes program code that executes either in the memory of the host computing system 210, or in the memory of each of the client computers 230 or in both with portions of the program code executing separately in the memory of the host computing system 210 and the memory of the client computers 230. In either circumstance, the program code is enabled to receive a set of monitored user interactions 270 from the different application instances 250.
  • For each of the application instances 250 of a corresponding one of the client computers 230, the program code determines if a threshold variance exists between the user interactions 270 of the application instance 250 and those in a listing of nominal interactions stored in data store 260 so as to indicate a behavior of a corresponding end user that differs from what is to be considered normal behavior in respect to end user utilization of the application. To the extent that a threshold variance exists, the program code of the smart user feedback module 300 directs a display of a prompt in the corresponding one of the client computers 230 seeking to provoke the end user into engaging in a customer support transaction.
  • In even yet further illustration of the operation of the smart user feedback 300, FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a process for smart user feedback. Beginning in block 310, monitoring of an end user interactions with an application are triggered in response to detecting one or more triggering events 360, for example a repeated request to cancel an already directed command in the application, a repeated request to direct a command in the application, or an unusually long delay in receiving an directed command by the end user in the application. In response, in block 320 an end user interaction with the application is received.
  • In block 330, the user interaction is included in a list of already received user interactions in a state machine so as to compare the list of already received user interactions and the most recently received user interaction with a set of nominal user interactions. In decision block 340, to the extent that the state machine indicates a threshold variance between the list of already received user interactions and the most recently received user interaction, in block 350 a customer support prompt is issued in the application so as to proactively remediate a perceived usability experience of the end user.
  • The present invention may be embodied within a system, a method, a computer program product or any combination thereof. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium or media having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention. The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
  • A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
  • Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
  • Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
  • Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
  • These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
  • The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
  • Finally, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
  • The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
  • Having thus described the invention of the present application in detail and by reference to embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims as follows:

Claims (16)

1.-18. (canceled)
19. A method for smart user feedback comprising:
monitoring interactions with the application by an end user;
detecting a trigger event quantifying a number of interactions between the end user and the application; and,
responsive to the detection of the trigger event, displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session for the end user.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the interactions comprise the end user repeatedly aborting a command in the application.
21. The method of claim 19, wherein the interactions comprise the end user repeating a same command in the application.
22. The method of claim 19, wherein the trigger event is determined by comparing the monitored end user interactions with a set of nominal end user interactions of the end user.
23. The method of claim 19, wherein the trigger event is determined by comparing the monitored end user interactions with a set of nominal end user interactions of multiple different other end users.
24. A data processing configured for smart user feedback comprising:
a host computing system comprising one or more computers, each with memory and at least one processor;
an application executing in the host computing system; and,
a smart user feedback module coupled to the application, the module comprising program code enabled to:
monitor interactions with the application by an end user, detect a trigger event quantifying a number of interactions between the end user and the application and responsive to the detection of the trigger event, display a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session for the end user.
25. The system of claim 24, wherein the interactions comprise the end user repeatedly aborting a command in the application.
26. The system of claim 24, wherein the interactions comprise the end user repeating a same command in the application.
27. The system of claim 24, wherein the trigger event is determined by comparing the monitored end user interactions with a set of nominal end user interactions of the end user.
28. The system of claim 24, wherein the trigger event is determined by comparing the monitored end user interactions with a set of nominal end user interactions of multiple different other end users.
29. A computer program product for smart user feedback, the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable by a device to cause the device to perform a method comprising:
monitoring interactions with the application by an end user;
detecting a trigger event quantifying a number of interactions between the end user and the application; and,
responsive to the detection of the trigger event, displaying a prompt in a display of the application in the computer recommending an initiation of a customer support session for the end user.
30. The computer program product of claim 29, wherein the interactions comprise the end user repeatedly aborting a command in the application.
31. The computer program product of claim 29, wherein the interactions comprise the end user repeating a same command in the application.
32. The computer program product of claim 29, wherein the trigger event is determined by comparing the monitored end user interactions with a set of nominal end user interactions of the end user.
33. The computer program product of claim 29, wherein the trigger event is determined by comparing the monitored end user interactions with a set of nominal end user interactions of multiple different other end users.
US16/167,270 2015-07-10 2018-10-22 Smart user feedback Abandoned US20190057392A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/167,270 US20190057392A1 (en) 2015-07-10 2018-10-22 Smart user feedback

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/796,306 US10108964B2 (en) 2015-07-10 2015-07-10 Smart user feedback
US16/167,270 US20190057392A1 (en) 2015-07-10 2018-10-22 Smart user feedback

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/796,306 Continuation US10108964B2 (en) 2015-07-10 2015-07-10 Smart user feedback

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190057392A1 true US20190057392A1 (en) 2019-02-21

Family

ID=57730908

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/796,306 Active 2036-08-01 US10108964B2 (en) 2015-07-10 2015-07-10 Smart user feedback
US16/167,270 Abandoned US20190057392A1 (en) 2015-07-10 2018-10-22 Smart user feedback

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/796,306 Active 2036-08-01 US10108964B2 (en) 2015-07-10 2015-07-10 Smart user feedback

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US10108964B2 (en)

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030001737A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2003-01-02 Kazuhiro Shiratori Automatic alarm system
US20050114694A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2005-05-26 Openwave Systems Inc. System and method for authentication of applications in a non-trusted network environment
US20050268234A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-01 Microsoft Corporation Strategies for providing just-in-time user assistance
US20070038444A1 (en) * 2005-02-23 2007-02-15 Markus Buck Automatic control of adjustable elements associated with a vehicle
US20070152034A1 (en) * 2003-12-23 2007-07-05 Jurgen Dietz System consisting of bank note processing machines, bank note processing machine and associated operating method
US20070300174A1 (en) * 2006-06-27 2007-12-27 Microsoft Corporation Monitoring group activities
US20090083117A1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2009-03-26 Concert Technology Corporation Matching participants in a p2p recommendation network loosely coupled to a subscription service
US20110279359A1 (en) * 2010-05-12 2011-11-17 Rovi Technologies Corporation Systems and methods for monitoring motion sensor signals and adjusting interaction modes
US20110310751A1 (en) * 2010-06-21 2011-12-22 Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology Mobile Apparatus Supporting Context Monitoring, Method of Monitoring Context Using the Same and Context Monitoring System Having the Same
US20150161256A1 (en) * 2006-06-05 2015-06-11 Glen Jeh Method, System, and Graphical User Interface for Providing Personalized Recommendations of Popular Search Queries

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040187029A1 (en) * 2003-03-21 2004-09-23 Ting David M. T. System and method for data and request filtering
US7734474B2 (en) * 2004-04-23 2010-06-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Display configuration
US7707007B2 (en) * 2004-07-30 2010-04-27 International Business Machines Corporation Autonomic client migration system for service engagements
US7979889B2 (en) * 2005-01-07 2011-07-12 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus providing security to computer systems and networks
US7533339B2 (en) * 2005-12-29 2009-05-12 Sap Ag System and method for providing user help
US8024660B1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2011-09-20 Intuit Inc. Method and apparatus for variable help content and abandonment intervention based on user behavior
WO2009029940A1 (en) * 2007-08-30 2009-03-05 Channel Intelligence, Inc. Online marketing payment monitoring method and system
US20110283189A1 (en) * 2010-05-12 2011-11-17 Rovi Technologies Corporation Systems and methods for adjusting media guide interaction modes
WO2011148719A1 (en) * 2010-05-28 2011-12-01 日本電気株式会社 Information processing device, gui input assistance method, and computer-readable recording medium
US9583019B1 (en) * 2012-03-23 2017-02-28 The Boeing Company Cockpit flow training system
US9020567B2 (en) * 2013-04-05 2015-04-28 Blackberry Limited Authentication using fingerprint sensor in gesture path

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030001737A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2003-01-02 Kazuhiro Shiratori Automatic alarm system
US20050114694A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2005-05-26 Openwave Systems Inc. System and method for authentication of applications in a non-trusted network environment
US20070152034A1 (en) * 2003-12-23 2007-07-05 Jurgen Dietz System consisting of bank note processing machines, bank note processing machine and associated operating method
US20050268234A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-01 Microsoft Corporation Strategies for providing just-in-time user assistance
US20070038444A1 (en) * 2005-02-23 2007-02-15 Markus Buck Automatic control of adjustable elements associated with a vehicle
US20150161256A1 (en) * 2006-06-05 2015-06-11 Glen Jeh Method, System, and Graphical User Interface for Providing Personalized Recommendations of Popular Search Queries
US20070300174A1 (en) * 2006-06-27 2007-12-27 Microsoft Corporation Monitoring group activities
US20090083117A1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2009-03-26 Concert Technology Corporation Matching participants in a p2p recommendation network loosely coupled to a subscription service
US20110279359A1 (en) * 2010-05-12 2011-11-17 Rovi Technologies Corporation Systems and methods for monitoring motion sensor signals and adjusting interaction modes
US20110310751A1 (en) * 2010-06-21 2011-12-22 Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology Mobile Apparatus Supporting Context Monitoring, Method of Monitoring Context Using the Same and Context Monitoring System Having the Same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US10108964B2 (en) 2018-10-23
US20170010759A1 (en) 2017-01-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10546052B2 (en) Structured touch screen interface for mobile forms generation for customer relationship management (CRM)
US11119887B2 (en) Attaching metadata to lines of code for alerting to changes in the code
US20150067139A1 (en) Agentless monitoring of computer systems
US10725751B2 (en) Generating a predictive data structure
US20160173421A1 (en) Communication verification based upon message content and recipient profile
US20170126821A1 (en) Analyzing the Online Behavior of a User and for Generating an Alert Based on Behavioral Deviations of the User
US10896252B2 (en) Composite challenge task generation and deployment
US20190213098A1 (en) Application performance perception meter
US20170046719A1 (en) Social media mood processing for customer relationship management (crm)
CN110620806A (en) Information generation method and device
US11843629B2 (en) Channel to report push notifications as spam
US10645045B2 (en) Selectively unmuting electronic messaging conversations
US20190057392A1 (en) Smart user feedback
US10333950B2 (en) Defending against malicious electronic messages
US10757062B2 (en) Analysis of social interaction sentiment
US20170353465A1 (en) Handling potential service load interruptions by presenting action items for service requester to complete to increase time to address potential service load interruption
US11204856B2 (en) Adaptive performance calibration for code
US20200202230A1 (en) Cognitive device support for potentially affected devices
US20150356509A1 (en) Customer relationship management messaging integration
CN111162960B (en) Method and server for starting debugging panel
US10389830B2 (en) Device delegation of push notification distribution
US10389842B2 (en) Mobile device cache updating
US20190050338A1 (en) Prefetching data for application usage
US20170104827A1 (en) Multi-user web session handoff
US20160210056A1 (en) Determining a cause for low disk space with respect to a logical disk

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SUGARCRM INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KULCHYTSKYY, VLADYSLAV;REEL/FRAME:047268/0186

Effective date: 20150706

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION