US20140101730A1 - System and method for verifying the age of an internet user - Google Patents
System and method for verifying the age of an internet user Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140101730A1 US20140101730A1 US14/105,835 US201314105835A US2014101730A1 US 20140101730 A1 US20140101730 A1 US 20140101730A1 US 201314105835 A US201314105835 A US 201314105835A US 2014101730 A1 US2014101730 A1 US 2014101730A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- age
- information
- user
- verifying
- database
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/20—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for managing network security; network security policies in general
- H04L63/205—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for managing network security; network security policies in general involving negotiation or determination of the one or more network security mechanisms to be used, e.g. by negotiation between the client and the server or between peers or by selection according to the capabilities of the entities involved
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
- H04L63/102—Entity profiles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/62—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
- G06F21/6218—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
- G06F21/6227—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database where protection concerns the structure of data, e.g. records, types, queries
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to a system and method for age verification, and more particularly to a system and method for verifying the age of an Internet user to insure that the user seeking to gain access to an Internet application is at least of the age appropriate.
- parental control systems fall under one of two categories.
- active parental control systems prevent a child from accessing information that the parent does not want them to access.
- active parental control systems include programs such as hardware and software firewalls as well as hardware access controls tools or systems that prevent certain types of data from being presented to a user.
- passive parental control systems allow parents to audit information that their children have been accessing and activities that their children engaged in while they were online, on a computer system, or on a managed or unmanaged network.
- passive parental control systems include systems that audit user access and activity information in managed and unmanaged networks and present this information to parents.
- Sign-up is a common step with Internet based applications. The sign-up process allows users to register for services provided by Internet based applications.
- Active and passive parental control systems do not provide any support for being able to communicate and enforce parental preferences when it comes to sign-up of services on web-based and Internet enabled desktop applications.
- Broad classifications such as Entertainment Software Rating Board (“ESRB”) ratings, do not provide parents with the level of control they would like with respect to sign-up preferences for the children.
- ESRB Entertainment Software Rating Board
- COPPA Children's Online Privacy Protection Act
- COPPA requires parental notification and consent prior to an online operator's collecting, using or disclosing a child's personal information.
- COPPA does make provisions for accounts for children under 13 with certain conditions, including parental consent, being imposed on the users. Compliance with COPPA can be daunting for an online business.
- the present invention is directed to a system and method for verifying the age of an internet user that substantially obviates one or more problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art.
- An embodiment of the present invention provides a system and method for securely validating and notifying an online service provider of the age of a prospective online user.
- the system and method for verifying the age of an internet user includes a method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user, the method comprising establishing an age check account; receiving information about a user, the information including an alleged age of the user; sending the information to be verified; and receiving a notification that the information has been verified.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a local area network (LAN) 100 that is connected to the Internet and in which the inventive system method may be utilized;
- LAN local area network
- FIG. 2 illustrates the TCP/IP Layering Model in which the inventive system method may be utilized
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example process flow in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an age check match system according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a local area network (LAN) 100 that is connected to the Internet and in which the inventive system method may be utilized.
- LAN local area network
- a local area network (LAN) 100 comprises a server 102 , four computer systems 104 , 106 , 108 , 110 , and peripherals, such as printers and other devices 112 , that may be shared by components on LAN 100 .
- Computer systems 104 , 106 , 108 , 110 may serve as clients for server 102 and/or as clients and/or servers for each other and/or for other components connected to LAN 100 .
- Components on LAN 100 are preferably connected together by cable media, for example unshielded twisted pair (UTP) Category 5 copper cable, and the network topology may be an Ethernet topology 114 .
- UTP unshielded twisted pair
- Ethernet topology 114 may be an Ethernet topology 114 .
- Routers 120 , 122 create an expanded network by connecting LAN 100 to other computer networks, such as the Internet, other LANs or Wide Area Networks (WAN).
- Routers are hardware devices that may include a conventional processor, memory, and separate I/O interface for each network to which it connects.
- components on the expanded network may share information and services with each other.
- All components on the expanded network and router 304 s that connect them must adhere to a standard protocol.
- Computer networks connected to the Internet and to other networks typically use TCP/IP Layering Model Protocol. It should be noted that other internetworking protocols may be used.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the TCP/IP Layering Model in which the inventive system method may be utilized.
- the TCP/IP Layering Model includes an application layer (Layer 5) 202 , a transport layer (Layer 4) 204 , an Internet layer (Layer 3) 206 , a network interface layer (Layer 2) 208 , and a physical layer (Layer 1) 210 .
- Application layer protocols 202 specify how each software application connected to the network uses the network.
- Transport layer protocols 204 specify how to ensure reliable transfer among complex protocols.
- Internet layer protocols 206 specify the format of packets sent across the network as well as mechanisms used to forward packets from a computer through one or more routers to a final destination.
- Network interface layer protocols 208 specify how to organize data into frames and how a computer transmits frames over the network.
- Physical layer protocols 210 correspond to the basic network hardware.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example process flow in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention.
- a user logs onto a service requester (e.g., an Internet website or any other Internet based application) that requires verification of the user's age. For example, many social dating sites require that the user be over 18 years of age. Similarly, many websites where purchases can be made require that the user be over 18 years of age or require parental consent before purchases can be made.
- a service requester e.g., an Internet website or any other Internet based application
- a service requester sends a request with user information to the age check system to verify whether a user is of sufficient age to view, sign-up, or make purchases at a service requester.
- the age check system an account for which was previously created, is activated through the service requester Internet website.
- Service requesters may partner with the age check system by creating an account with the age check system.
- the account is created with data supplied by the service requester to the age check system.
- the data required to create an account may include the name, address and contact information for the service requestor as well as information about the type of business that the service requester is engaged in. It may also include payment details and notification details.
- the service requester requests that a user provide information regarding age, address, and other information that may be used by the service requester to ensure that a user may view, sign-up, or make purchases at a service requester. Some of the information may be desired for use by the service requester, and some of the information may be desired for use by the age check system. Accordingly, the information may be used by the service requester for a variety of purposes, and also may be sent to the age check system to verify a user's age.
- the age check system may request many types of information including demographic information, such as full name, address, quoted age, form of government issued identification including passport or driving license number.
- demographic information such as full name, address, quoted age, form of government issued identification including passport or driving license number.
- the user inputs the information into a form provided by a service requester. Then, the information is sent to the age check system at operation 303 . Thus, all communication with a user is performed through the service requester such that the user is blind to the age check system.
- the service requester may request that the age check system perform a manual check of a user's inputted information. As shown in FIG. 3 , if a manual check is requested, the age check service performs a manual check, which will be described later.
- the age check system performs an automated checking process at operation 305 .
- the process includes checking a user's input information with information from partner sites.
- the age check system has secure access to third party sites that also acquire information from users regarding age, address, etc.
- the age check system may obtain the information from the various partner sites to verify that the same user is inputting the same age and address information, and that all information can be validated, as shown at operation 306 . If the information between the age check system and third party system match, the user passes, at operation 307 . Accordingly, and the age check system recommends to a service requester that a user be allowed access to the service requester at operation 308 .
- the service requester may request that the age check system perform a manual check of the user's inputted information at operation 304 .
- a manual request may be made if the service requester prefers a more thorough age verification procedure that includes manual checks.
- the age check system may access public records that contain information about a prospective user to verify the age of a user at operation 309 . Such a manual check may be performed in compliance with COPPA, state, and country regulations.
- the manual check verifies that the input information is accurate, the user passes and the age check system recommends that the user be connected with the website at operation 311 .
- the check fails at operation 312 , and the age check service recommends to the service requester that the user be denied access to the website.
- the age check system may aggregate all of the information that it obtains from a service requester, partner website, public record, or any other source for further use. If the service requester requires that the validations be stored, the age check system will store all information with a record of the user.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an age check match system according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
- the age check system 500 includes an age check server 501 , one or more user computers 502 and 503 , one or more service requesters 504 , and one or more partner service requesters.
- the age check server 501 may include a persistent software system and service that provides a rapid secure checking mechanism to determine and/or validate a person's age before the person is allowed on a certain service requester.
- the age check system determines whether setup information that was supplied by a person is correct.
- the system provides an application programming interface (API) that exposes software functions that other websites, web services and Internet enabled desktop applications can use to enforce age checks when a person attempts to create an online account and/or gain access to an age-sensitive website.
- API application programming interface
- a service requester 504 such as a website, web service, Internet enabled desktop applications, or any Internet based application may partner with the present age check system, and a service requester account may be established with the age check system.
- Each of the user computers 502 and 503 may be a desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet or portable computer, smartphone, mobile phone, or other portable computing device.
- Service requester 504 may include any Internet based application, such as a website, web application, or an Internet enabled desktop application, etc.
- a partner service requester may include any Internet based application, such as a website, web application, or an Internet enabled desktop application, etc.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Bioethics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
- Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
A method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user comprises establishing an age check account; receiving information about a user, the information including an alleged age of the user; sending the information to be verified; and receiving a notification that the information has been verified.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/991,063 filed on Nov. 4, 2010, which is a National Stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/047796 filed on Sep. 3, 2010, which claims the benefit of the provisional patent application no. 61/272, 235 filed on Sep. 3, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference, which claims the priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,232, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,233, U.S. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,234, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,235, all of which were filed on Sep. 3, 2009. The entire disclosure of each of these is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes as of set forth fully herein.
- This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/991,059, identified by Attorney Docket No. 101035-5003-US, which claims the priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,232, which was filed on Sep. 3, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.
- This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/991,053, identified by Attorney Docket No. 101035-5001-US, which claims the priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,233, which was filed on Sep. 3, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.
- This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/991,057, identified by Attorney Docket No. 101035-5002-US, which claims the priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/272,234, which was filed on Sep. 3, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field
- The present disclosure relates to a system and method for age verification, and more particularly to a system and method for verifying the age of an Internet user to insure that the user seeking to gain access to an Internet application is at least of the age appropriate.
- 2. Discussion of the Related Art
- Children today have never known a world without the Internet. Children see their friends interacting and playing online and there is ever-increasing pressure on parents from their children to allow the children to be online. In numerous instances, children are not protected by media companies and are being placed in extreme danger posed by online predators. Until measures are taken to provide a secure online environment for younger age groups, the online safety of children is compromised.
- Generally, parental control systems fall under one of two categories. First, active parental control systems prevent a child from accessing information that the parent does not want them to access. For example, active parental control systems include programs such as hardware and software firewalls as well as hardware access controls tools or systems that prevent certain types of data from being presented to a user. Second, passive parental control systems allow parents to audit information that their children have been accessing and activities that their children engaged in while they were online, on a computer system, or on a managed or unmanaged network. For example, passive parental control systems include systems that audit user access and activity information in managed and unmanaged networks and present this information to parents.
- With the increased penetration of the Internet, parents are more interested in knowing what their children are doing when they use a computer, including the websites they visit and the individuals with whom they are communicating. While active and passive controls help parents manage and control some of this information, there are no provisions for parents to control the types of services their children may sign up for on the Internet. Sign-up is a common step with Internet based applications. The sign-up process allows users to register for services provided by Internet based applications.
- Active and passive parental control systems do not provide any support for being able to communicate and enforce parental preferences when it comes to sign-up of services on web-based and Internet enabled desktop applications. Broad classifications, such as Entertainment Software Rating Board (“ESRB”) ratings, do not provide parents with the level of control they would like with respect to sign-up preferences for the children.
- Using the Internet has become extremely easy, and one aspect of this ease is that children of very young ages are able to gain access to Internet websites of all kinds Juxtaposed with this ease is the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which lays out specific guidelines for how website operators and online businesses must interact with children 13 year old and younger. In general, COPPA requires parental notification and consent prior to an online operator's collecting, using or disclosing a child's personal information. COPPA does make provisions for accounts for children under 13 with certain conditions, including parental consent, being imposed on the users. Compliance with COPPA can be daunting for an online business. While some online businesses are taking steps to comply with COPPA, many of the new media companies, including Facebook are choosing to avoid COPPA compliance by restricting their sites to over 13's and foregoing a significant business opportunity in interacting with the under 13 market segment. Moreover, it has become increasingly difficult to determine if a person is telling the truth when he or she enters their age or date of birth to gain access to a website. Thus, a system is needed that will enable an online service provider to accurately determine the age of a user before the user is allowed to actually enter and use the site.
- Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a system and method for verifying the age of an internet user that substantially obviates one or more problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art.
- An embodiment of the present invention provides a system and method for securely validating and notifying an online service provider of the age of a prospective online user.
- Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
- To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described, the system and method for verifying the age of an internet user includes a method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user, the method comprising establishing an age check account; receiving information about a user, the information including an alleged age of the user; sending the information to be verified; and receiving a notification that the information has been verified.
- It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are example and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
- The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a local area network (LAN) 100 that is connected to the Internet and in which the inventive system method may be utilized; -
FIG. 2 illustrates the TCP/IP Layering Model in which the inventive system method may be utilized; -
FIG. 3 illustrates an example process flow in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 4 illustrates an age check match system according to an example embodiment of the present invention. - Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
- In the following detailed description, numerous non-limiting specific details are set forth in order to assist in understanding the subject matter presented herein. It will be apparent, however, to one of ordinary skill in the art that various alternatives may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention and the subject matter may be practiced without these specific details. For example, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the subject matter presented herein can be implemented by any type of user (i.e., not limited to parent and child) and on any type of standalone system or client-server compatible system containing any type of client, network, server, and database elements. Wherever possible, like reference numbers will be used for like elements.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a local area network (LAN) 100 that is connected to the Internet and in which the inventive system method may be utilized. - As shown in
FIG. 1 , a local area network (LAN) 100 comprises aserver 102, four 104, 106, 108, 110, and peripherals, such as printers andcomputer systems other devices 112, that may be shared by components onLAN 100. 104, 106, 108, 110 may serve as clients forComputer systems server 102 and/or as clients and/or servers for each other and/or for other components connected toLAN 100. Components onLAN 100 are preferably connected together by cable media, for example unshielded twisted pair (UTP)Category 5 copper cable, and the network topology may be an Ethernettopology 114. It should be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other media, for example, fiber optic or wireless radio frequency media, may also connectLAN 100 components. It should also be apparent that other network topologies, such as Token Ring, may be used. - Data may be transferred between components on
LAN 100 in packets, i.e., blocks of data that are individually transmitted overLAN 100. 120, 122 create an expanded network by connectingRouters LAN 100 to other computer networks, such as the Internet, other LANs or Wide Area Networks (WAN). Routers are hardware devices that may include a conventional processor, memory, and separate I/O interface for each network to which it connects. Hence, components on the expanded network may share information and services with each other. In order for communications to occur between components of physically connected networks, all components on the expanded network and router 304 s that connect them must adhere to a standard protocol. Computer networks connected to the Internet and to other networks typically use TCP/IP Layering Model Protocol. It should be noted that other internetworking protocols may be used. -
FIG. 2 illustrates the TCP/IP Layering Model in which the inventive system method may be utilized. - As shown in
FIG. 2 , the TCP/IP Layering Model includes an application layer (Layer 5) 202, a transport layer (Layer 4) 204, an Internet layer (Layer 3) 206, a network interface layer (Layer 2) 208, and a physical layer (Layer 1) 210.Application layer protocols 202 specify how each software application connected to the network uses the network.Transport layer protocols 204 specify how to ensure reliable transfer among complex protocols.Internet layer protocols 206 specify the format of packets sent across the network as well as mechanisms used to forward packets from a computer through one or more routers to a final destination. Networkinterface layer protocols 208 specify how to organize data into frames and how a computer transmits frames over the network.Physical layer protocols 210 correspond to the basic network hardware. By using TCP/IP Layering model protocols, any component connected to the network can communicate with any other component connected directly or indirectly to one of the attached networks. -
FIG. 3 illustrates an example process flow in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention. - At
operation 301, a user logs onto a service requester (e.g., an Internet website or any other Internet based application) that requires verification of the user's age. For example, many social dating sites require that the user be over 18 years of age. Similarly, many websites where purchases can be made require that the user be over 18 years of age or require parental consent before purchases can be made. - Next, at
operation 302, a service requester sends a request with user information to the age check system to verify whether a user is of sufficient age to view, sign-up, or make purchases at a service requester. The age check system, an account for which was previously created, is activated through the service requester Internet website. - Service requesters may partner with the age check system by creating an account with the age check system. The account is created with data supplied by the service requester to the age check system. The data required to create an account may include the name, address and contact information for the service requestor as well as information about the type of business that the service requester is engaged in. It may also include payment details and notification details.
- At
operation 303, the service requester requests that a user provide information regarding age, address, and other information that may be used by the service requester to ensure that a user may view, sign-up, or make purchases at a service requester. Some of the information may be desired for use by the service requester, and some of the information may be desired for use by the age check system. Accordingly, the information may be used by the service requester for a variety of purposes, and also may be sent to the age check system to verify a user's age. - The age check system may request many types of information including demographic information, such as full name, address, quoted age, form of government issued identification including passport or driving license number. The user inputs the information into a form provided by a service requester. Then, the information is sent to the age check system at
operation 303. Thus, all communication with a user is performed through the service requester such that the user is blind to the age check system. - At
operation 304, the service requester may request that the age check system perform a manual check of a user's inputted information. As shown inFIG. 3 , if a manual check is requested, the age check service performs a manual check, which will be described later. - If no manual check is requested, the age check system performs an automated checking process at
operation 305. The process includes checking a user's input information with information from partner sites. The age check system has secure access to third party sites that also acquire information from users regarding age, address, etc. The age check system may obtain the information from the various partner sites to verify that the same user is inputting the same age and address information, and that all information can be validated, as shown atoperation 306. If the information between the age check system and third party system match, the user passes, atoperation 307. Accordingly, and the age check system recommends to a service requester that a user be allowed access to the service requester atoperation 308. - As discussed above, the service requester may request that the age check system perform a manual check of the user's inputted information at
operation 304. A manual request may be made if the service requester prefers a more thorough age verification procedure that includes manual checks. If a manual check is requested, the age check system may access public records that contain information about a prospective user to verify the age of a user atoperation 309. Such a manual check may be performed in compliance with COPPA, state, and country regulations. - At
operation 310, the manual check verifies that the input information is accurate, the user passes and the age check system recommends that the user be connected with the website atoperation 311. Alternatively, if the information acquired by the age check system does not match the information input by the user, the check fails atoperation 312, and the age check service recommends to the service requester that the user be denied access to the website. - The age check system may aggregate all of the information that it obtains from a service requester, partner website, public record, or any other source for further use. If the service requester requires that the validations be stored, the age check system will store all information with a record of the user.
-
FIG. 4 illustrates an age check match system according to an example embodiment of the present invention. - As shown in
FIG. 4 , theage check system 500 includes anage check server 501, one or 502 and 503, one ormore user computers more service requesters 504, and one or more partner service requesters. Theage check server 501 may include a persistent software system and service that provides a rapid secure checking mechanism to determine and/or validate a person's age before the person is allowed on a certain service requester. The age check system determines whether setup information that was supplied by a person is correct. The system provides an application programming interface (API) that exposes software functions that other websites, web services and Internet enabled desktop applications can use to enforce age checks when a person attempts to create an online account and/or gain access to an age-sensitive website. Aservice requester 504, such as a website, web service, Internet enabled desktop applications, or any Internet based application may partner with the present age check system, and a service requester account may be established with the age check system. Each of the 502 and 503 may be a desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet or portable computer, smartphone, mobile phone, or other portable computing device.user computers Service requester 504 may include any Internet based application, such as a website, web application, or an Internet enabled desktop application, etc. Similarly, a partner service requester may include any Internet based application, such as a website, web application, or an Internet enabled desktop application, etc. - It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the system and method for verifying the age of an internet user of the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (12)
1. A method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user, comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium including a program and a computer executable program code, the method comprising:
establishing, by a user at a user client computer, an age check account in an alleged identity and age server computer comprising a first database;
receiving information, from a service requester client computer via an Internet application, about a user, the information including an alleged age of the user;
storing the information in the first database in the alleged identity and age server computer;
requesting information from a partner requester client computer, the partner requester client computer comprising a second database, the second database including information about the user, the information being previously provided by the user;
comparing the user information in the alleged identity and age server computer comprising the first database with information received from the partner service requester client computer comprising the second database;
the comparison verifying that information previously provided by the user, from the partner service requester, corresponds to the information from the service requester client computer, including the alleged age of the user;
sending a notification to the service requester from the age check system that the alleged age of the user has been verified; and
the service requester requiring aggregation, in the first database, of the information from the partner requester client computer with the information in the alleged identity and age server computer, including the alleged age of the user,
wherein the information from the service requester is received by the alleged identity and age database through an application programming interface accessed by the user via the Internet application.
2. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , wherein the service requester establishes the age check account with an Internet-accessible age check system.
3. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , wherein the information includes demographic information.
4. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , wherein the sending the information to be verified is performed automatically.
5. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , wherein the notification is either a pass or fail notification.
6. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , further comprising verifying the information manually.
7. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 6 , wherein the verifying the information manually includes checking public records.
8. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , further comprising the aggregating the information of a plurality of users.
9. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , wherein the information from the user is sent via a mobile telephone.
10. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , further comprising establishing an information comparison database, the information comparison database including information about a particular user accumulated from a plurality of partner service requester databases and public records.
11. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 10 , wherein the information comparison database is updated for each user each time the information about the particular user is received from the plurality of partner service requester databases.
12. The method of verifying the age of a prospective Internet user according to claim 1 , wherein the user's alleged age is stored in a database of the service requestor.
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US27223209P | 2009-09-03 | 2009-09-03 | |
| US27223309P | 2009-09-03 | 2009-09-03 | |
| US27223509P | 2009-09-03 | 2009-09-03 | |
| US27223409P | 2009-09-03 | 2009-09-03 | |
| PCT/US2010/047796 WO2011028992A2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2010-09-03 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
| US12/991,063 US8650621B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2010-09-03 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
Related Parent Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/991,063 Continuation US8650621B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2010-09-03 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
| PCT/US2010/047796 Continuation WO2011028992A2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2010-09-03 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20140101730A1 true US20140101730A1 (en) | 2014-04-10 |
Family
ID=43649982
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/991,063 Active US8650621B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2010-09-03 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
| US14/105,835 Abandoned US20140101730A1 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2013-12-13 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/991,063 Active US8650621B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2010-09-03 | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US8650621B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP2473945A2 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2010289350A1 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR112012008150A2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2772396A1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE112010003539T5 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2011028992A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9208337B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2015-12-08 | Denise G. Tayloe | Systems, methods, and software applications for providing and identity and age-appropriate verification registry |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE112010003539T5 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2012-10-18 | Virtual Piggy Inc. | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING THE AGE OF AN INTERNET USER |
| BR112012004974A2 (en) * | 2009-09-03 | 2016-05-03 | Virtual Piggy Inc | virtual piggy bank system and method |
| WO2011028989A2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2011-03-10 | Moogle Inc. | Parent match |
| US8812395B2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2014-08-19 | Virtual Piggy, Inc. | System and method for virtual piggybank |
| US8762230B2 (en) | 2011-11-02 | 2014-06-24 | Virtual Piggy, Inc. | System and method for virtual piggy bank wish-list |
| US20140179419A1 (en) * | 2012-12-06 | 2014-06-26 | Dennis Nadeau | System and method for verification of identification and residence in an online gaming environment |
| US10861116B1 (en) * | 2014-03-13 | 2020-12-08 | James Onstad | System and methods to facilitate student data privacy compliance and management for schools |
| US10095876B2 (en) | 2016-02-09 | 2018-10-09 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for allowing a user to access blocked media |
| US20240045987A1 (en) * | 2022-08-04 | 2024-02-08 | Snap Inc. | Data privacy preserving age gating service |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090043747A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2009-02-12 | Digital River, Inc. | Remote segmentation system and method |
Family Cites Families (80)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5262943A (en) * | 1991-10-15 | 1993-11-16 | National Computer Systems, Inc. | System and process for information management and reporting |
| US7653595B2 (en) * | 1996-04-16 | 2010-01-26 | Restricted Spending Solutions LLC | Controlled entertainment spending account |
| US6173269B1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2001-01-09 | Zowi.Com, Inc | Method and apparatus for executing electronic commercial transactions with minors |
| US6397256B1 (en) * | 1999-01-27 | 2002-05-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Monitoring system for computers and internet browsers |
| US6785824B1 (en) | 1999-09-03 | 2004-08-31 | Geoffrey J. Grassle | System for character-child interaction with adult character control |
| US8073772B2 (en) * | 1999-11-05 | 2011-12-06 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Systems and methods for processing transactions using multiple budgets |
| US20020049806A1 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2002-04-25 | Scott Gatz | Parental control system for use in connection with account-based internet access server |
| US7171382B2 (en) | 2000-07-24 | 2007-01-30 | Beacham Susan P | Method and system of enabling minors to make stock market transactions via the Internet with adult authorization |
| US7140045B2 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2006-11-21 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for user information verification |
| KR20020021515A (en) | 2000-09-15 | 2002-03-21 | 김영덕 | Cyber credit card system |
| WO2002037383A2 (en) | 2000-11-06 | 2002-05-10 | Electronic Warfare Associates | A system and method for controlling online purchases using an online account |
| US20030233296A1 (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2003-12-18 | Wagner Brad H. | System and method for automated form generation and comparison |
| US20020074397A1 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2002-06-20 | Matthews Frederick L. | Vending machine with age verification means |
| US7571466B2 (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2009-08-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Parental consent service |
| JP2004527162A (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2004-09-02 | トムソン ライセンシング ソシエテ アノニム | System and method for creating a user profile |
| US7562387B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2009-07-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for selective disabling of tracking of click stream data |
| US20040153421A1 (en) * | 2001-09-21 | 2004-08-05 | Timothy Robinson | System and method for biometric authorization of age-restricted transactions conducted at an unattended device |
| US20030097337A1 (en) | 2001-11-16 | 2003-05-22 | George Brookner | Secure data capture apparatus and method |
| WO2003046784A1 (en) | 2001-11-29 | 2003-06-05 | Niel Eben Viljoen | Method and system for operating a banking service |
| WO2003060637A2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-07-24 | Aristotle International, Inc. | Identification verification system and method |
| US8135621B2 (en) | 2002-04-26 | 2012-03-13 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for supporting anonymous transactions |
| US7302488B2 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2007-11-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Parental controls customization and notification |
| KR100374296B1 (en) | 2002-09-11 | 2003-03-03 | Itgen Co Ltd | System for developing application program for mobile terminal and mobile terminal including application program developed by the same |
| US7640336B1 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2009-12-29 | Aol Llc | Supervising user interaction with online services |
| US7657457B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2010-02-02 | Razumov Sergey N | Graphical user interface for product ordering in retail system |
| ATE441994T1 (en) | 2003-04-03 | 2009-09-15 | Nokia Corp | MANAGING CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION WITH A MOBILE STATION |
| US20040215534A1 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2004-10-28 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and system for network-based allowance control |
| US6931539B2 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2005-08-16 | Guri Walia | Methods and system for improved searching of biometric data |
| KR100620585B1 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2006-09-13 | 주식회사 국민은행 | Family Financial Management Method and System Using Representative Account |
| KR100539547B1 (en) | 2003-08-20 | 2005-12-29 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | System and Control Method for Assent Internet Connection |
| RU2349950C2 (en) | 2003-09-26 | 2009-03-20 | Дисней Энтерпрайзес Инк. | Method of parental control of cellular telephone use |
| EP1692614A2 (en) | 2003-11-06 | 2006-08-23 | intuwave Limited | A method of rapid software application development for a wireless mobile device |
| US7594019B2 (en) | 2003-11-12 | 2009-09-22 | Intel Corporation | System and method for adult approval URL pre-screening |
| US7828652B2 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2010-11-09 | Igt | Player verification method and system for remote gaming terminals |
| US20060069627A1 (en) | 2004-09-24 | 2006-03-30 | Laurel Petersen | Gift registry system |
| US20060173792A1 (en) * | 2005-01-13 | 2006-08-03 | Glass Paul H | System and method for verifying the age and identity of individuals and limiting their access to appropriate material |
| US7827148B2 (en) * | 2005-01-17 | 2010-11-02 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Medical equipment having audit log managing function |
| US20080307339A1 (en) * | 2006-03-20 | 2008-12-11 | Kidzui, Inc. | Child-oriented computing system |
| KR20060103363A (en) | 2005-03-26 | 2006-09-29 | 김순범 | How to buy cyber money |
| US7734779B1 (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2010-06-08 | Gregory Alexander Piccionelli | Password protection system and method |
| US20090235086A1 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2009-09-17 | Lai Yau S | Server-side biometric authentication |
| US7693832B2 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2010-04-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Rich set of synchronization rules across multiple accounts with multiple folder and consent types |
| US20080033740A1 (en) * | 2006-08-04 | 2008-02-07 | Robert Cahn | On-line anonymous age verification for controlling access to selected websites |
| US20070245152A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-18 | Erix Pizano | Biometric authentication system for enhancing network security |
| US8099329B2 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2012-01-17 | Uc Group Limited | Systems and methods for determining taxes owed for financial transactions conducted over a network |
| US8131763B2 (en) * | 2006-05-03 | 2012-03-06 | Cellco Partnership | Age verification and content filtering systems and methods |
| US8793164B2 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2014-07-29 | Mark Sendo | System and method enabling children to shop on-line |
| KR100873363B1 (en) | 2006-07-22 | 2008-12-10 | 주식회사 신한은행 | Game account operation method and system |
| US20100223184A1 (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2010-09-02 | Visa International Service Association | Sponsored Accounts For Computer-Implemented Payment System |
| US20080148362A1 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2008-06-19 | Nbc Universal, Inc. | Digital rights management backup and restoration system and method |
| US7853535B2 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2010-12-14 | Colella Brian A | System for secure internet access for children |
| US20080168548A1 (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2008-07-10 | O'brien Amanda Jean | Method For Automatically Controlling Access To Internet Chat Rooms |
| ATE527604T1 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2011-10-15 | Research In Motion Ltd | TEMPORARY NOTIFICATION PROFILE CHANGE ON AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE |
| US7945512B2 (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2011-05-17 | Ebay Inc. | Spending and savings secondary linked accounts |
| US20080228638A1 (en) * | 2007-03-14 | 2008-09-18 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system of controlling linked accounts |
| US8116726B2 (en) | 2007-08-30 | 2012-02-14 | Motorola Mobility, Inc. | Parent and child mobile communication devices with feature control and call-back |
| US8249985B2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2012-08-21 | Bank Of America Corporation | Sub-account mechanism |
| US20110047629A1 (en) * | 2008-02-29 | 2011-02-24 | Ian Mitchell | Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Age Verification and Activity Management of Internet Users |
| US8312484B1 (en) | 2008-03-28 | 2012-11-13 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for blocking selected commercials |
| US20090281937A1 (en) | 2008-05-09 | 2009-11-12 | Embarq Holdings Company, Llc | System, Method and Apparatus for Associating a Credit Card Account with Sub-Account Codes |
| US10296920B2 (en) * | 2008-05-21 | 2019-05-21 | Wenxuan Tonnison | Online E-commerce and networking system/generating user requested sponsor advertisements to centralize siloed and distributed user data in the internet and business systems |
| US20100042912A1 (en) | 2008-06-12 | 2010-02-18 | Eva Whitaker | Reminder and notification system for a parent |
| WO2010027985A2 (en) | 2008-09-02 | 2010-03-11 | Michael Huegel | Enhanced television services |
| US8065190B2 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2011-11-22 | BillMyParents, Inc. | Party payment system |
| US8127982B1 (en) | 2009-01-09 | 2012-03-06 | Apple Inc. | Parental controls |
| WO2011028989A2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2011-03-10 | Moogle Inc. | Parent match |
| DE112010003539T5 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2012-10-18 | Virtual Piggy Inc. | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING THE AGE OF AN INTERNET USER |
| DE212010000138U1 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2012-06-04 | Virtual Piggy Inc. | Parents play |
| BR112012004974A2 (en) | 2009-09-03 | 2016-05-03 | Virtual Piggy Inc | virtual piggy bank system and method |
| US8219542B2 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2012-07-10 | Boku, Inc. | Systems and methods to provide access control via mobile phones |
| US20120123865A1 (en) * | 2010-11-12 | 2012-05-17 | Cellco Partnership D/B/A Verizon Wireless | Enhanced shopping experience for mobile station users |
| US8700524B2 (en) | 2011-01-04 | 2014-04-15 | Boku, Inc. | Systems and methods to restrict payment transactions |
| US9916619B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2018-03-13 | Paypal, Inc. | Payment system with location restrictions |
| US20120209772A1 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2012-08-16 | Ebay Inc. | Payment system with time restrictions |
| US20120259768A1 (en) | 2011-04-05 | 2012-10-11 | Ebay Inc. | System and method for providing proxy accounts |
| US20120278202A1 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2012-11-01 | Virtual Piggy, Inc. | Virtual piggybank having quick connect |
| US20120278233A1 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2012-11-01 | Virtual Piggy, Inc. | Virtual piggybank having dashboard and debit card |
| US20130080323A1 (en) | 2011-09-26 | 2013-03-28 | Ebay, Inc. | Restricted funding source |
| US20130110716A1 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2013-05-02 | Ebay Inc. | System and method for utilizing student accounts |
| US8762230B2 (en) | 2011-11-02 | 2014-06-24 | Virtual Piggy, Inc. | System and method for virtual piggy bank wish-list |
-
2010
- 2010-09-03 DE DE112010003539T patent/DE112010003539T5/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-09-03 AU AU2010289350A patent/AU2010289350A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-09-03 CA CA2772396A patent/CA2772396A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-09-03 WO PCT/US2010/047796 patent/WO2011028992A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-09-03 US US12/991,063 patent/US8650621B2/en active Active
- 2010-09-03 BR BR112012008150A patent/BR112012008150A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2010-09-03 EP EP10814551A patent/EP2473945A2/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2013
- 2013-12-13 US US14/105,835 patent/US20140101730A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090043747A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2009-02-12 | Digital River, Inc. | Remote segmentation system and method |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9208337B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2015-12-08 | Denise G. Tayloe | Systems, methods, and software applications for providing and identity and age-appropriate verification registry |
| US10469503B1 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2019-11-05 | Denise G. Tayloe | Systems, methods, and software applications for providing an identity and age-appropriate verification registry |
| US11165782B1 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2021-11-02 | Denise G. Tayloe | Systems, methods, and software applications for providing an identity and age-appropriate verification registry |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2010289350A1 (en) | 2012-03-22 |
| US20110185400A1 (en) | 2011-07-28 |
| BR112012008150A2 (en) | 2016-03-01 |
| WO2011028992A3 (en) | 2011-07-07 |
| EP2473945A2 (en) | 2012-07-11 |
| DE112010003539T5 (en) | 2012-10-18 |
| US8650621B2 (en) | 2014-02-11 |
| WO2011028992A2 (en) | 2011-03-10 |
| CA2772396A1 (en) | 2011-03-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8650621B2 (en) | System and method for verifying the age of an internet user | |
| US7340770B2 (en) | System and methodology for providing community-based security policies | |
| US8505077B2 (en) | Acquisition of authentication rules for service provisioning | |
| US10469503B1 (en) | Systems, methods, and software applications for providing an identity and age-appropriate verification registry | |
| US8589440B1 (en) | Authentication mechanisms to enable sharing personal information via a networked computer system | |
| US9311679B2 (en) | Enterprise social media management platform with single sign-on | |
| CN103827883B (en) | Methods used to control access to users' personal data | |
| US20140089189A1 (en) | System, method, and apparatus to evaluate transaction security risk | |
| US20090260072A1 (en) | Identity ownership migration | |
| TW201329767A (en) | Social device security in a social network | |
| US20230396445A1 (en) | Multi-signature wallets in public trust ledger actions via a database system | |
| US10282461B2 (en) | Structure-based entity analysis | |
| KR20140050607A (en) | Virtual piggybank having dashboard and debit card | |
| CN104468553A (en) | Method, device and system for login of public account | |
| AU2020318446A1 (en) | Safe logon | |
| US20090165098A1 (en) | method of and system for conducting a trusted transaction and/or communication | |
| US20110219110A1 (en) | System and Method for Managing the Delivery of Targeted Content | |
| US9239936B2 (en) | System, method, and apparatus to mitigaterisk of compromised privacy | |
| US20160171613A1 (en) | Backing management | |
| EP2084645A2 (en) | Authentication system for service provisioning | |
| Schön | Trust Made Simple: Establish Trust with Anyone Online Using TruPal | |
| EP2073140A1 (en) | A method and system of conducting a communication | |
| CN118643482A (en) | User information verification method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Sonntag et al. | Personalization of Web-based interfaces for humans and agents | |
| Schön | Trust Made Simple |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: REGO PAYMENT ARCHITECTURES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:VIRTUAL PIGGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:044960/0813 Effective date: 20170228 |