US20140093924A1

US20140093924A1 - Biofilm Photobioreactor System And Method Of Use

Info

Publication number: US20140093924A1
Application number: US13/631,478
Authority: US
Inventors: Benjamin Moll; Benjamin McCool; William Drake; William Porubsky; Ryan Adams
Original assignee: Algenol Biofuels Switzerland GmbH
Current assignee: Algenol Biofuels Switzerland GmbH
Priority date: 2012-09-28
Filing date: 2012-09-28
Publication date: 2014-04-03
Anticipated expiration: 2032-09-28
Also published as: US8691538B1

Abstract

Flat panel biofilm photobioreactor systems with a photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism that forms a biofilm and methods for using the same to make metabolic intermediate compound(s) through photosynthesis and to convert metabolic intermediate compound(s) into chemical product(s) such as a biofuel or a feedstock through autofermentation.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Not applicable.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.

REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING, A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING COMPACT DISC APPENDIX

This application includes a Sequence Listing submitted electronically as a text file named “Biofilm_Photobioreactor_System.txt”, created on Sep. 28, 2012, with a size of 44 KB. The sequence listing consists of 16 sequences and is incorporated by reference into the specification in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

The possibility of using algae for the production of fuel and chemicals has attracted the interest of researchers, government and business for many years. Efforts to commercialize the production of fuel from algae have brought to light problems that must be solved to make this approach practical. The present invention is a novel approach to avoid or mitigate certain problems.
Under conventional approaches to algal biofuels, algal biomass is accumulated in open ponds or photobioreactors and harvested for conversion to fuel. The composition of the biomass may be altered to some extent through manipulation of the organism genetics or of the environment in which the organism is cultured, but generally there is a trade-off between optimizing composition and maximizing accumulation of biomass.
Under an alternative approach, the genetics and environment of a photosynthetic organism are manipulated to force the flux of carbon through photosynthesis into a desired product instead of toward accumulation of biomass. In the present invention, photosynthetic organisms are cultured as a biofilm inside a photobioreactor and maintained in stationary phase, and the environmental conditions in the photobioreactor are manipulated to induce the organisms to make a biofuel product, such as ethanol.
Obligate photosynthetic organisms require CO₂as a feedstock to make a product or to accumulate biomass. One problem is that, if a photosynthetic organism is cultured in a body of water in a photobioreactor or pond that is exposed to CO₂contained in air, then passive diffusion of carbon from air into water across the gas/liquid interface generally is not as efficient in sustaining maximal rates of photosynthesis. Accordingly, supplemental CO₂usually must be added to cultures of photosynthetic organisms that are highly productive. The use of supplemental CO₂significantly increases capital costs and operating costs, thereby reducing the profitability and rate of return of CO₂-supplemented systems.
Limited diffusion may be ameliorated by increasing the exposure of the culture of photosynthetic organisms to air, beyond the degree of exposure found with a culture contained in a body of water. Diffusion of CO₂into a culture increases as the surface area of the culture that is in contact with air increases. In addition, many organisms express carbonic anhydrase at the cell surface, which catalyzes the conversion of carbon dioxide and water to bicarbonate and protons and thereby increases the rate of diffusion of CO₂from the gas phase into the liquid phase:
As a result, an air-exposed culture of an appropriate organism can achieve high productivity without CO₂supplementation.
In many circumstances, gas phase delivery of CO₂is preferred over other delivery modes. Because the concentration of CO₂in air is typically less than 0.1% by volume, sustained elevated productivity by a culture requires considerable air throughput. The present invention provides a photobioreactor with a short airflow path and sufficiently low resistance to airflow that the necessary throughput of air can be achieved without high capital or operating costs. In some circumstances, the most economical delivery of CO₂may be from a concentrated source instead of from the air. In some circumstances the most economical delivery of CO₂may be as a solution of bicarbonate. The present invention provides a photobioreactor compatible with all of these modes of CO₂delivery.
Another problem is that highly productive photosynthetic cultures tend to accumulate oxygen, which is a product of oxygenic photosynthesis. High oxygen concentrations in the culture can reduce productivity both by competing for photosynthetically produced electrons and through the effects of oxygen toxicity.
In a conventional photobioreactor containing a liquid suspension culture, oxygen may be removed from the culture by vigorous gas sparging, but high energy costs may be involved. This consideration militates in favor of gas phase exchange a preferred method of removing excess oxygen from the culture. The present invention facilitates gas phase exchange by providing a very short diffusion path for oxygen removal from the culture to the air stream.
Another problem is that an organism that channels photosynthetic energy primarily into making a fuel or chemical product, instead of accumulating biomass, severely disadvantaged compared to a competing organism that does not make the fuel product, and instead channels photosynthetic energy toward growth. This disparity reduces the stability of a culture of organisms that make a fuel product, since the culture may be invaded and outcompeted by other species that do not make the fuel product. Also, the organism ill undergo mutations that reduce the tendency to make the fuel product, thereby conferring a selective advantage over the productive, non-mutant type. As a result, the non-productive mutants will take over the culture, reducing or eliminating the productive organisms. This problem can be mitigated if production of the fuel or chemical product is beneficial to the organism.
If the organism makes the fuel product through fermentation, then production of the fuel product is necessary for the metabolism of the organism under anaerobic conditions and consequently the culture is more stable against mutation of the organism or invasion by non-fermenting species. The present invention facilitates fermentation to make a fuel product.
Product stability can be problematic if the fuel or chemical product is present in the culture and oxygen is present in the culture. The growth of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria that consume the product and that are present in the culture as contaminants is enabled by the availability of both oxygen and the product.
To address this problem, conventional photobioreactor or pond cultures must either incorporate unbreachable sterility barriers or must use antibiotics or other means so they are tolerant of some degree of contamination. The present invention minimizes the effect of contamination by heterotrophs on product stability and net productivity by substantially removing the product so that it is not present when oxygen is present in the culture.
Toxic effects of products such as ethanol on the organism of interest may also present problems. While product toxicity increases with productivity and product concentration, product toxicity can be mitigated by limiting the duration of exposure of the organism to the maximum product concentration. Further, exposure of the culture to product can be limited to the fermentation period, which may be conducted in darkness, in order to avoid toxicity responses that result from an interaction with photosynthetic processes.
Product purification costs are usually sensitive to concentration of the product that is extracted from a culture in a photobioreactor. It is desirable for fermentation to occur in a small fluid volume that yields elevated product concentration. The present invention provides a photobioreactor in which the fermentation volume is very small.
Capital costs must be kept within reasonable bounds for a fuel production system or method to be economically feasible. Materials, construction methods and supporting infrastructure must be chosen or designed with low cost in mind. A system of the present invention can have low material costs and a simplified infrastructure, and may be made using simple construction methods suitable for mass production. A system of the present invention may be light weight, minimizing mounting costs.
Because photosynthetic organisms in photobioreactors require exposure to sunlight, the culture in a photobioreactor may be exposed to high temperatures that are inimical to culture health and productivity. The present invention allows the management of culture temperature at low cost.
The considerations outlined above illustrate that the productivity of organisms that are cultured in a photobioreactor to make biofuel through metabolic processes may be restricted severely by limitations on uptake of CO₂by the culture, removal of oxygen from the culture, genetic stability of the culture, stability of the product made by the culture, toxicity effects of the product on the culture and temperature effects on the culture.
US 2009/0181434 A1 to Aikens et al. discloses transgenic bacteria engineered to accumulate carbohydrates and a photobioreactor for cultivating photosynthetic microorganisms comprising a non-gelatinous, solid cultivation support suitable for providing nutrients and moisture to photosynthetic microorganisms and a physical barrier covering at least a portion of the surface of the cultivation support.
Aikens does not provide for the possibility of anoxic fermentation in the reactor structure or mode of operation. The photobioreactor proposed by Aikens is very different in detail from the present invention, using a different medium delivery system, a different product harvest system, and a completely different mode of operation. It does have in common with the present invention the use of a photosynthetic biofilm. The advantages of the present invention are that (1) periodic immersion provides a much more reliable uniform hydration than water seeping or dripping from a header; (2) the complexity and cost of a reactor design of the present invention are much lower; and (3) a reactor design of the present invention design lends itself to easily establishing conditions suitable for fermentation.
US 2008/0160591 A1 to Wilson at al. discloses a photobioreactor system for production of photosynthetic microorganisms that includes the use of extended surface area and an external water basin. Wilson et al. is related to the present invention in that Wilson at al. teaches the use of plastic film and similar construction techniques to produce a pattern of heat sealed welds between opposite panels. This reflects the concern of Wilson at al. with reactor cost, which is a concern also addressed by the present invention. Wilson et al. provides a photobioreactor design that is suited for the cultivation of organisms suspended in water medium Wilson et al. is not suitable for cultivation of a photosynthetic biofilm, and hence it does not provide the separation of retained biomass from a secreted or soluble product, and it is not suitable for operation with an autofermentation cycle.
US 20090258404 A1 to Mikkelsen at al. discloses production of fermentation products such as ethanol and lactic acid in biofilm reactors by microorganisms immobilized on sterilized granular sludge. Mikkelsen et al. is similar to the present invention in that Mikkelsen at al. uses a biofilm and anoxic fermentation. The apparatus and method of Mikkelsen at al. are not suitable for a photosynthetic biofilm or for an alternation of photosynthesis and autofermentation conditions essential to the present invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,595,893 to Pometto at al. discloses a solid support made of a synthetic polymer for immobilization of microorganism cells to form a biofilm reactor or use in fermentation, in streams for bioremediation of contaminants, and in waste treatment systems. It is possible that the support specified by Pometto et al. would be useful in a photobioreactor of the present invention. The reactor design used by Pometto et al. and the method of use are not compatible with a photosynthetic biofilm and an alternation of photosynthesis and autofermentation conditions essential to the present invention.
These references do not teach an optimized biofilm photobioreactor system of he present invention that resolves the limitations discussed above.

SUMMARY

An object of the present invention is a photobioreactor system that supports environmental conditions in which suitable organisms form biofilms on support substrates inside the photobioreactor, make metabolic intermediate compounds through photosynthesis and convert the metabolic intermediates into chemical products such as biofuels or feedstocks through autofermentation. According to the present invention, the design of the photobioreactor system enables increased uptake of carbon dioxide by the biofilm, increased removal of oxygen improved genetic stability of the biofilm and improved stability of the chemical product, while mitigating toxicity effects of the chemical product on the biofilm and temperature effects on the biofilm. Further according to the present invention, the photobioreactor system advantageously maintains a low cost basis.
A biofilm photobioreactor system of the present invention comprises flexible film that defines a photobioreactor enclosure. The photobioreactor enclosure has a flat panel shape and at least one portion of the flexible film is translucent.
Channels defined by at least one partition are disposed in the photobioreactor enclosure. The channels are in fluid communication.
A suitable photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism cultured to form a biofilm in the photobioreactor enclosure. The suitable microorganism makes one or more metabolic intermediate compounds during a photosynthesis phase and converts the metabolic intermediate compound(s) to chemical product(s) during an autofermentation phase
The suitable microorganism forms a biofilm on a support substrate. The support substrate is disposed in the channels and is fixed to the flexible film, the at least one partition forming the channels or a combination of both.
The photobioreactor enclosure of the biofilm photobioreactor system incorporates at least one port formed in the flexible film for adding and removing liquid and adding gas to the photobioreactor enclosure, and at least one gas exhaust vent formed in the flexible film.
A gas comprising carbon dioxide flows through the photobioreactor enclosure intermittently and contacts the biofilm during the photosynthesis phase. The gas enters the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one port and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure through the gas exhaust vent.
A first liquid at least partially fills the photobioreactor enclosure intermittently and contacts the biofilm during the photosynthesis phase. The first liquid enters the photobioreactor enclosure and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure through the port.
A second liquid at least partially fills the photobioreactor enclosure and contacts the biofilm during the autofermentation phase. The second liquid enters the photobioreactor enclosure and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure through the port. The chemical product made by the biofilm during the autofermentation phase enters the second liquid
A further object of the present invention is a method of making a biofuel through providing carbon dioxide and light to a biofilm of a suitable organism that is cultured in a photobioreactor of the present invention, such that the biofilm makes a metabolic intermediate compound through photosynthesis, and then removing light and electron acceptors such as oxygen, such that the biofilm converts the metabolic intermediate compound into a chemical product through autofermentation.
In a method of the present invention, a biofilm comprising a suitable photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism is exposed to light. The biofilm is disposed on a support substrate that is disposed in channels of a biofilm photobioreactor and is fixed to inner surfaces of the biofilm photobioreactor
The channels of the biofilm photobioreactor are at least partially filled alternately with a flow of gas comprising carbon dioxide and with a first liquid. The gas and the first liquid contact the biofilm and the suitable microorganism snakes a metabolic intermediate compound from light and carbon dioxide by photosynthesis.
The biofilm is deprived of light and the channels of the biofilm photobioreactor are at least partially filled with a second liquid, which contacts the biofilm and expels the gas from the biofilm photobioreactor through outlets. The suitable microorganism converts the metabolic intermediate compound(s) into chemical product(s) by autofermentation, and the chemical product(s) enters the second liquid. The second liquid containing the chemical product(s) may be extracted from the biofilm photobioreactor.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will become further apparent from the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiments, read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The detailed description and drawings are merely illustrative of the invention, rather than limiting the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING

Embodiments of the invention will be described below with reference to the following figures.

FIG. 1 shows a plan view of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor design.

FIG. 2 shows a side sectional view of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor design.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor with gas and media supply.

FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of steps of operating a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor.

FIG. 5 shows a frequency diagram of steps of operating a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor.

FIG. 6 shows a plan view of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor design with a partition.

FIG. 7 shows a plan view of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor design with multiple channels for flow of air and water.

FIG. 8 shows a plan view of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor design with multiple channels for flow of air and water.

FIG. 9 shows a perspective view of a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor design with multiple channels for flow of air and water.

FIG. 10 shows a perspective view of an array of at panel photobioreactors and a mounting system.

FIG. 11 shows organic acid production rates.

FIG. 12 shows organic acid production rates.

FIG. 13 shows final ethanol concentration achieved in a flat panel biofilm photobioreactor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to biofilm photobioreactor systems and a method for using a biofilm-forming microorganism in a photobioreactor of the present invention to make metabolic intermediate(s) through photosynthesis and convert the metabolic intermediates) into chemical product(s) through autofermentation. The primary chemical product preferably is a biofuel, such as ethanol, hydrogen, propanol or butanol, or a chemical feedstock such as acetate, lactate or formate.
As used herein, the term “suitable organism” means a microorganism that is able to attach to and form a biofilm on a surface and also to make metabolic intermediate compounds through photosynthesis and chemical products such as biofuels or feedstocks through fermentation. Non-limiting examples of suitable organisms within the meaning of the present invention are Geitlerinema Lyngbya, Chroococcidiopsis, Calothrix, Cyanothece, Oscillatoria, Gloeothece, Microcoleus, Microcystis, Nostoc, Anabaena and Spirulina species. One of ordinary ski II in the art will recognize that other suitable organisms are within the scope of the present invention.
For commercial production of chemical products, it is preferable to use a suitable organism that produces only a single product. While such organisms are known, generally a mix of products is produced. It is possible, using classical genetics or genetic engineering techniques, to eliminate pathways that lead to undesired chemical products, thereby leaving only a pathway that leads to the desired chemical product. If the suitable organism does not produce the desired chemical product, the required genes can be introduced using genetic engineering techniques. It is possible in principal to begin with an organism that does not perform autofermentation and introduce the necessary genes to confer the ability to autoferment. The development of enhanced organisms is not essential to the utility of this invention, but the development of such organisms will clearly greatly enhance the commercial value of this invention.
As used herein, the term “biofilm” means an aggregate of suitable organisms in which cells adhere to each other on or within a surface, frequently embedded within a self-produced matrix of exopolysaccharide or extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Formation of a natural biofilm begins with free-floating microorganisms attaching to a surface through real, reversible adhesion via van der Waals forces, followed by anchoring themselves sing cell adhesion structures such as pili. Biofilms are often found on solid substrates submerged in or exposed to an aqueous solution. Artificial biofilms can also be made, using a flocculating agent such as sodium silicate, or an immobilizing agent such as alginate.
As used herein, the terms “exopolysaccharide” and “extracellular polymeric substance” mean a polymeric conglomeration generally composed of extracellular polysaccharides and proteins that hold together and protect a biofilm in matrix form.
As used herein, the term “oxic” means a concentration of dissolved oxygen in water greater than about 30% saturation.
As used herein, the term “hypoxia” means a concentration of dissolved oxygen in water in the range of from about 1% to about 30% saturation.
As used herein, the term “anoxia” means a concentration of dissolved oxygen in water less than about 1% saturation.
As used herein, the term “anaerobic” refers to cellular metabolism in which oxygen is not used as an electron acceptor.
As used herein, the term “fermentation” means the process of extracting energy from metabolic intermediate compounds that are organic compounds, such as carbohydrates or osmoprotectants, under hypoxic or anoxic conditions without the use of a terminal electron acceptor such as oxygen, sulfate or nitrate. Fermentative microorganisms typically hydrolyze complex organic polymers (e.g., glycogen) to monomers (e.g., glucose), which are further converted to lower molecular weight organic acids and alcohols. For example, fermentation may include the process of glycolysis, in which glucose is metabolically converted into pyruvate, followed by conversion of pyruvate into ethanol The concentration of oxygen or another electron acceptor below which a suitable organism will begin fermenting depends on the metabolic profile of the particular organism.
As used herein, the term “dark fermentation” means the fermentation of metabolic intermediate compounds such as organic substrates to hydrogen in the absence of light.
As used herein, the term “autofermentation” means that metabolic intermediate compounds that are made anabolically by the cells during photosynthesis and stored internally are catabolized under hypoxic or anoxic conditions to yield energy that may be used by the cell. Without using supplemental organic compounds, autofermenting cells produce carbon dioxide, chemical products such as biofuels and feedstocks, and energy used to regenerate adenosine triphosphate.
Photobioreactors and methods in accordance with the present invention are useful for producing a wide range of chemical products including acids, alcohols, ketones and hydrogen, and more specifically chemical products such as ethanol, butanol, propanol, methanol, propanediol, butanediol, lactate, proprionate, acetate, succinate, butyrate, formate and acetone.
As used herein, the term “metabolic intermediate compound” means an organic compound made by a microorganism through photosynthesis. Non-limiting examples of metabolic intermediate compounds are carbohydrates and osmoprotectants.
As used herein, the term “carbohydrate” means an organic compound that consists only of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Non-limiting examples of carbohydrates are glycogen and glucose.
As used herein, the term “osmoprotectant” means a small molecule that acts as an osmolyte and helps organisms survive osmotic stress. Non-limiting examples of osmoprotectants are trehalose and glucosyl-glycerol.
As used herein, the term “osmolyte” means a compound that plays a rode in maintaining fluid balance and volume of a microorganism cell.
As used herein, the term “chemical product” means an organic compound made by a microorganism through fermentation or autofermentation. Non-limiting examples of chemical products are biofuels and feedstocks.
As used herein, the term “biofuel” means a type of fuel that derives energy from biological carbon fixation. Biofuels include fuels derived from biomass conversion or from cell metabolism, as well as solid biomass, liquid fuels and various biogases. Biologically produced alcohols such as ethanol may be produced by the action of microorganisms and enzymes through the fermentation of sugars or starches. Non-limiting examples of biofuels are ethanol, hydrogen, propanol and butanol.
As used herein, the term “feedstock” means a chemical compound that can be used as the starting material to make other products of interest, where such products are made using means other than the biofilm photobioreactor of the present invention. Non-limiting examples of feedstocks are acetate, lactate and formate.
As used herein, the term “biofilm photobioreactor” means a device or system used to support a biologically active environment for the cultivation of photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganisms. The biofilm photobioreactor may be constructed of flexible film that may be translucent. A biofilm photobioreactor of the present invention may be semi-closed against the exchange of gases and contaminants with the outside environment while permitting penetration of light through walls of the biofilm photobioreactor, or otherwise incorporating a light source, to provide photonic energy input for the photosynthetic culture of microorganisms contained in the biofilm photobioreactor. Cells of the photosynthetic microorganism are immobilized in layers on a support substrate inside the biofilm photobioreactor and the cell layers accumulate over time, forming a biofilm.
As used herein, the term “flexible film” means a thin continuous polymeric material or coating. Non-limiting examples of materials that can be used in flexible films suitable for use with the present invention are polyolefins, polyesters and vinyl copolymers thereof.
As used herein, the term “translucent” means allowing light to pass through, with or without scattering of photons.
As used herein, the term “support substrate” means a surface upon which a suitable organism is able to adhere and form a biofilm, Non-limiting examples of substrates within the meaning of the present invention that may be used with suitable organisms to form biofilms are films, filters, fabrics, foams and felts of polyesters, polyolefins, polyurethanes, polyamides, polyimides, polycarbonates, polydienes and polyacrylics adhered to the plastic film of the photobioreactor. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the use of other substrates is contemplated within the scope of the present invention.
As used herein, the term “sparging” means a process whereby a chemically inert gas is bubbled through a liquid.
As used herein, the term “electron acceptor” means a chemical entity that accepts electrons transferred to it from another compound. An electron acceptor is an oxidizing agent that by virtue of its accepting electrons, is itself reduced in the process. An electron acceptor can, be a chemical entity such as ferric iron, sulphate, nitrate or nitrite, for example. A terminal electron acceptor is a compound such as oxygen, that receives or accepts an electron during cellular respiration.
As used herein, the term “substantially depleted of electron acceptors” describes an environment in which the partial pressures of oxygen, nitrate, sulphate, ferric iron, nitrite and other electron acceptors are love enough to facilitate anaerobic metabolism.
As used herein, the term “medium” means a liquid or gel designed to support the growth of microorganisms.
As used herein, the term “BG-11” means a standard cultivation medium for cyanobacteria that is well known to those of skill in the art. BG-11 contains all of the nutrients required for growth of many species of cyanobacteria. BG-11 is sold by, for example, Sigma-Aldrich Co LLC as the product “Cyanobacteria BG-11 Freshwater Solution” under SKU C3061.
The term “about” is used herein to mean approximately, in the region of, roughly, or around. When the term “about” is used in conjunction with a numerical value/range, it modifies that value/range by extending the boundaries above and below the numerical value(s) set forth. In general, the term “about” is used herein to modify a numerical value(s) above and below the stated value(s) by a variance of 20%
FIGS. 1 and 2 show an embodiment of a biofilm photobioreactor 100 configured as a flat panel photobioreactor enclosure 110 with an internal void volume. The photobioreactor enclosure 110 is oriented more or less vertically, with a port 120 for inlet of gas flow 230 and a port 122 for inlet and outlet of liquid flow 240, and an exhaust vent 130 for gas flow 230. Gas flow 230 and liquid flow 240 through the inlet and outlet ports 120 and 122 may be controlled by valves, pumps 330, fans 190 or other suitable devices. The exhaust vent 130 for gas flow 230 may be passive, such that gas flow 230 inside the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is forced through the exhaust vent 130 by the pressure head inside the photobioreactor enclosure 110.
Positioning the inlet port 120 for gas flow 230 and the exhaust vents 130 near the top edge 180 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 eliminates the need to use valves or other potentially costly devices that would be required to prevent liquid flow 240 out of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 through ports 120 positioned lower on the photobioreactor enclosure 110. Alternatively, the inlet port 120 for gas flow 230 can be positioned near the bottom edge 182 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110, with external protection against backflow. If desired, the photobioreactor enclosure 110 can have a single port 124 for both gas flow 230 and liquid flow 240, as shown in FIG. 8.
The biofilm photobioreactor 100 may be inoculated with a suitable organism that forms a biofilm 140 on a support substrate 150 inside the photobioreactor enclosure 110. The support substrate 150 may be fixed in place by adhering the support substrate 150 to at least one wall 160 or edge 180 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. In some embodiments, one or more pieces of support substrate 154 extend vertically and horizontally between the edges 180 of the internal void volume of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. As depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2, the support substrate 150 lies underneath, and is covered by, the biofilm 140 growth.
In preferred embodiments, the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is made from flexible film. Exemplary properties of a suitable flexible film for use in the present invention are translucency, tolerance to UV radiation, low oxygen diffusivity, low cost, light weight and acceptable durability. Flexible film edges 180 are bonded together, preferably through heat sealing, to form the photobioreactor enclosure 110.
At least one flexible film wall 160 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is translucent so that the biofilm 140 on the support substrate 150 contained within the photobioreactor enclosure 110 may be exposed to light from the sun or another source that provides photosynthetically active radiation having wavelengths from 400 to 700 nanometers. If only one flexible film wall 160 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is translucent, then the support substrate 150 preferably is adhered to the non-translucent wall 160. Suitable organisms in the biofilm 140 utilize the light to make metabolic intermediate compounds through photosynthesis.
Operation of a biofilm photobioreactor 100 of the present invention may be understood with further reference to FIGS. 3, 4 and 5. The biofilm photobioreactor 100 is inoculated 340 with a suitable organism that forms a biofilm 140. Internal environmental conditions are established that allow the biofilm 140 to first conduct photosynthesis, then autofermentation.
To initiate a photosynthesis period 450, the biofilm 140 is exposed 350 to light, and carbon is supplied to the suitable organisms by contacting 360 a gas, such as air, comprising carbon dioxide with the biofilm 140. Gas flow 230 to the photobioreactor enclosure 110 can be supplemented with carbon dioxide, but preferably will be air that is not supplemented. Suitable organisms in the biofilm 140 utilize the carbon dioxide to make a metabolic intermediate compound through photosynthesis. The metabolic intermediate compound is stored in the biofilm 140.
Gas flow 230 through the photobioreactor enclosure 110 can be created by using, for example, a fan 190. Gas flow 230 enters the photobioreactor enclosure 110 through a port 120 and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure 110 through the exhaust vents 130. In some embodiments, gas flow 230 from a gas source 200 is moved to a gas manifold 210, which splits the gas flow 230 among multiple biofilm photobioreactors 100 configured in an array 220. One of skill in the art will appreciate that gas and liquid flows among the components shown in FIG. 3 can be established using tubing, hoses or other means comprising any materials suitable for accommodating gas and liquid flows.
The biofilm 140 will tend to become dehydrated as a result of exposure to gas flow 230 that contains less than 100% relative humidity, and as a result of exposure to light, which raises the temperature in the photobioreactor enclosure 110. Dehydration of the biofilm 140 will result in reduced productivity, so water, culture medium or another suitable liquid 250 is added 360 periodically to the photobioreactor enclosure 110 to immerse and hydrate the biofilm 140. In some embodiments, the liquid 250 is a freshwater medium. The photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with the liquid 250 to a level below the exhaust vents 130, which expels gas flow 230 from the photobioreactor enclosure 110.
During the photosynthesis period 450, gas flow 230 through the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is periodically alternated with liquid flow 240 that fills the photobioreactor enclosure 110 at least partially. In some embodiments, the liquid 250 is a photosynthesis medium 280 that is split by a manifold 270 among multiple biofilm photobioreactors 100 configured in an array 220.
The optimal time periods of gas flow 230 and liquid flow 240 can be determined experimentally by monitoring carbon dioxide concentration in the gas flow 230 exiting the photobioreactor enclosure 110 through the exhaust vents 130, which indicates the rate of consumption of carbon dioxide and the rate of productivity by the biofilm 140. Generally, liquid flow 240 to immerse the biofilm 140 should occur frequently enough to maintain a relatively constant rate of carbon dioxide consumption by the biofilm 140.
In some embodiments, each period of gas flow 230 continues for any length of time in the range of from about five minutes to about four hours. In some embodiments, the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is quickly filled with liquid 250 and then drained, with the total period of liquid flow 240 to fill and drain the photobioreactor enclosure 110 taking about 10 seconds. In some embodiments, the total period of liquid flow 240 continues for about 20 minutes, or for any period in the range of from about 10 seconds to about 20 minutes.
The photosynthesis period 450 may continue for the length of diurnal sunlight, or otherwise for any length of time that is sufficient for the biofilm 140 to make and accumulate metabolic intermediate compound(s). Subsequently, an autofermentation period 460 is initiated in order to force the biofilm 140 to convert the metabolic intermediate compound(s) into chemical product(s) through autofermentation.
The autofermentation period 460 may continue for the length of diurnal darkness, or otherwise for any length of time that is sufficient for the biofilm 140 to convert the accumulated metabolic intermediate compound(s) into chemical product(s). A highly active biofilm 140 may convert accumulated metabolic intermediate compound(s) in a shorter period of time. In some embodiments, the autofermentation period 460 continues for any period of time in the range of from about one hour to about 18 hours.
To induce an autofermentation period 460, the biofilm 140 is deprived 370 of light, and the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is at least partially filled 370 with liquid 250 to exclude gas flow 230 from the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and deprive the biofilm 140 of terminal electron acceptors such as oxygen. The suitable organisms that comprise the biofilm 140 produce oxygen when exposed to light, and the initiation of n autofermentation period 460 is hindered when the biofilm 140 is producing oxygen. Accordingly, depriving 370 the biofilm 140 of exposure to light facilitates the initiation of an autofermentation period 460.
In some embodiments, the liquid 250 is a fermentation medium 300 that is split by a manifold 290 among multiple biofilm photobioreactors 100 configured in an array 220.
The liquid 250 remains in the photobioreactor enclosure 110 for the duration of the autofermentation period 460. Gas flow 230 through the photobioreactor enclosure 110 during the photosynthesis period 450 is expelled through the exhaust vents 130 when the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with the liquid 250 at the beginning of the autofermentation period.
FIG. 5 further exemplifies the sequence and relative duration of events in the operation of the biofilm photo bioreactor 100. Time increases from left to right along the horizontal scale. Light periods 390 and dark periods 400 of the diurnal cycle 402 are color-coded. The occurrence of “Photosynthesis Liquid Fill” 410, “Photosynthesis Liquid Drain” 420, “Gas Flow” 230, “Autofermentation Liquid Fill” 430 and “Autofermentation Liquid Drain” 440 are indicated by the placement of vertical lines or bars, with the height of each line or bar indicating the velocity of gas flow 230 or liquid flow 240 and the width of each line or bar indicating the duration of non-zero flow velocity. The opposition of “Photosynthesis Liquid Fill” 410 with “Photosynthesis Liquid Drain” 420, and “Autofermentation Liquid Fill” 430 with “Autofermentation Liquid Drain” 440 additionally indicate directionality of non-zero flow velocity. FIG. 5 accordingly shows that photosynthesis 450 occurs in the biofilm 140 during light periods 390, during which there are periods of gas flow 230 through the photobioreactor enclosure 110 alternating with shorter periods of liquid flow 240 filling and then draining the photobioreactor enclosure 110. The photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with liquid 250 for the duration of the dark periods 400, during which autofermentation 460 occurs.
After an autofermentation period 460 ends, the liquid 250 containing chemical product(s) may be removed 380 from the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and processed using suitable means known to one of skill in the art to extract chemical product(s) from the liquid. In some embodiments, liquid 250 containing chemical product(s) from multiple biofilm photobioreactors 100 configured in an array 220 is combined by a product manifold 310 and stored in a product reservoir 320. it is desirable to remove and store the liquid containing the chemical product(s) under anaerobic conditions in order to suppress the growth of heterotrophic microorganisms that may consume chemical product(s) and reduce yield.
The liquid 250 used to fill the photobioreactor enclosure 110 during the autofermentation period 460 may be a freshwater medium that is substantially depleted of terminal electron acceptors before it is added to the photobioreactor enclosure 110. In some embodiments, the medium used during an autofermentation period 460 contains a dissolved oxygen concentration of less than about 15% saturation.
When an autofermentation medium 300 is prepared, the concentration of dissolved oxygen may be reduced by sparging the autofermentation medium 300 with a gas such as nitrogen or by vacuum degasing the autofermentation medium 300, for example. The autofermentation medium 300 is preferably stored outside the photobioreactor enclosure 110 under anoxic conditions in order to prevent the absorption of oxygen.
As an alternative to using sparging or other pre-treatments, the concentration of dissolved oxygen and other terminal electron acceptors in the autofermentation medium 300 may be reduced by adding the autofermentation medium 300 to the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and using the biofilm 140 to consume residual or ambient oxygen and other terminal electron acceptors through respiration. The time required for the respiratory activity of the biofilm 140 to create hypoxic or anoxic conditions that are suitable for autofermentation will be determined by factors such as the respiratory rate of the biofilm 140 the volume of autofermentation medium 300 and the initial concentrations of oxygen and other electron acceptors in the autofermentation medium 300.
One of skill in the art will appreciate that the biofilm photobioreactor 100 can be appropriately designed by sizing the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and selecting the biofilm 140 organism and autofermentation medium 300 such that the biofilm 140 will consume residual or ambient oxygen and other terminal electron acceptors and begin an autofermentation period 460 within a practical time period. In some embodiments, creation of autofermentation conditions and conversion of accumulated metabolic intermediate compound(s) to the chemical product(s) may be accomplished by the biofilm photobioreactor 100 in about one hour.
It may also be desirable to minimize the concentration of terminal electron acceptors present in the liquid 250 that is used to moisten the biofilm 140 during the photosynthesis period 450. This treatment may help increase the efficiency and speed of the transition from photosynthesis period 450 to autofermentation period 460 by reducing the quantity of terminal electron acceptors that carries over from the photosynthesis period 450 to the autofermentation period 460. The optimal concentration of terminal acceptors in the liquid 250 during the photosynthesis period 450 would provide sufficient nutrients to support the productivity of the biofilm 146.
Exposure of the biofilm 140 to oxygen that diffuses into the photobioreactor enclosure 110 could retard the onset of the autofermentation period 460. To prevent oxygen diffusion, the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is constructed using flexible film that is substantially impermeable to oxygen. Film fabrication methods and film compositions that minimize oxygen diffusion are commercially available and known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Examples of substantially oxygen-impermeable flexible films that are commercially available are polyethylene, polyester, and barrier films such as 3M HB-P 69731, which comprises a polyester base film, a heat sealable ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer layer and a ceramic oxide coating.
The path of gas flow 230 through the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is primarily from the inlet part 120 to the exhaust vent 130, such that positioning the inlet port 120 and the exhaust vent 130 near the top edge 180 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 may contribute to incomplete gas flow 230 through lower portions of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and uneven distribution of carbon dioxide to the biofilm 140. Low concentrations of carbon dioxide in gas flow 230 used in the photobioreactor enclosure 110 may require delivery of large volumes of gas to the photobioreactor enclosure 110, resulting in significant energy costs. The combination of these effects may be mitigated by introducing one or more partitions 470 that channel gas flow 230 more evenly throughout the photobioreactor enclosure 110.
FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of a biofilm photobioreactor 100 that incorporates a partition 470 that directs gas flow 230 from the top edge 180 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 toward the bottom edge 182, and back toward the top edge 180, where gas flaw 230 is expelled through the exhaust vent 130. The partition 470 and channels 480 may be created by the pattern of bonding plastic film in the body of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. This embodiment increases the uniformity of distribution of gaseous carbon dioxide in contact with the biofilm 140.
FIG. 7 shows an embodiment of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 with multiple partitions 470 creating multiple U-shaped channels 480, a gas port 120 along the top edge 180 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and a liquid port 122 along the bottom edge 182 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. The ports 120 and 122 direct gas flow 230 and liquid flow 240 to each channel 480. In this embodiment, the biofilm 140 is disposed on support substrates 150 positioned in the channels 480. The opposing walls 160 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 are sealed together in a pattern forming the channels 480.
Biofilm 140 formation in the longer U-shaped channels 480 illustrated in FIG. 7 may be unevenly more dense closer to the gas port 120 and less dense closer to the exhaust vents 130. This effect occurs because the suitable organisms in the biofilm 140 consume most of the carbon dioxide in the gas flow 230 exiting the gas port 120 and produce a denser biofilm 140 in that location, while concentration of carbon dioxide in the gas flow 230 close to the exhaust vents 130 is significantly decreased providing less feedstock for suitable organisms in that location. Additionally, entering gas flow 230 may have low water content, resulting in drying of the biofilm 140 close to the gas port 120.
FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 with multiple partitions 470 creating multiple linear channels 480 that are greater in number and have shorter path lengths for gas flow 230 compared with the embodiment shown in FIG. 7. A combined port 124 located along the bottom edge 182 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 supplies gas flow 230 and liquid flow 240 to the channels 480.
A biofilm 140 is disposed on support substrates 150 positioned in the channels 480. The support substrate 150 may be adhered to a wall 160 and/or edge 180, 182, 184 or 186 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. Alternatively, the support substrate 150 may be attached to and suspended between the partitions 470 that form the channels 480 in the photobioreactor enclosure 110.
Biofilm 140 formation in the embodiment shown in FIG. 8 is more uniform, since the distribution of gas and carbon dioxide to more channels 480 and the shorter path lengths for gas flow 230 minimize discrepancies in the concentration of carbon dioxide between the combined port 124 and the exhaust vents 130, allowing the microorganisms to consume carbon dioxide and form a biofilm 140 that is distributed more evenly along the height of each channel 480. The increased number of channels 480, shorter gas flow 230 path lengths and increased exposure of the biofilm 140 to gas flow 230 help to increase uptake of carbon dioxide by the biofilm 140 and increase the removal of oxygen from the biofilm 140. Gas flow 230 enters the channels 480 at the bottom, so that liquid draining from the upper portions of the biofilm 140 helps to keep the biofilm 140 hydrated near the combined port 124.
Pressure inside the photobioreactor enclosure 110 increases when gas flow 230 is added to the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and when the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with liquid 250. The internal gas or liquid pressure causes the walls 160 to deform outward. There may be distortion of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 shape so that exterior areas of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 are no longer substantially flat but instead exhibit creases formed in the flexible film. Such creases introduce resistance in the path of gas flow 230 through the channels 480 and necessitate the use of higher pressure to maintain satisfactory gas flow 230. This effect is more pronounced with plastic film that is thicker and less flexible. Such distortion and creasing may be lessened or prevented by heat sealing the opposing walls 160 at intermittent points to prevent outward deformation under pressure.
The increase in total weight when the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with liquid 250 may require the use of sturdier and potentially more expensive materials to construct the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and/or use of a mounting system 510. The biofilm photobioreactor 100 may need to be mounted on a frame. The strength required of the frame depends on the weight of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 and the amount of tension that develops when the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with gas or liquid. The determination of suitable designs and identification of materials based on biofilm photobioreactor 100 weight, wind loading and tension is well known to those skilled in the art.
FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment in which the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is attached to side supports 500. Exemplary side supports 500 are made of wood or any other material that is suitably rigid, lightweight and inexpensive. The photobioreactor enclosure 110 may be attached to side supports 500 by stapling any other suitable means of bonding or adhering.
Generally, a biofilm photobioreactor 100 of this design will retain its shape if it is held at the left and right edges 184 and 186 while the top and bottom edges 180 and 182 are left free. The internal pressure holds the channels 480 open and gives the structure sufficient stiffness to be self-supporting.
Photosynthetic microorganisms tend to operate best in a certain range of light intensity. Photosynthesis is most productive when the microorganisms are exposed to as much light as they can readily tolerate. Excessive light exposure can cause photoinhibition, leading to loss of productivity. Light exposure also raises the temperature in a photobioreactor enclosure 110, which can cause loss of efficiency or cell death.
The rate of gas flow 230 within the photobioreactor enclosure 119 can also be adjusted to provide cooling, for example by controlling the voltage of the power source for the fan 190. In order to avoid expenses associated with providing liquid and moving gas, it is preferable to use a microorganism that tolerates and performs well at elevated temperatures, but it is possible to use the aforementioned methods to reduce peak temperatures so the microorganism used need not withstand such extremes of temperature as would be the case without heat management.
A biofilm photobioreactor 100 must be mounted in a position that allows exposure of the biofilm 140 to light. In a preferred embodiment, a biofilm photobioreactor 100 set up outdoors is mounted so that its position can be adjusted on at least one axis to track the position of the sun and control exposure to incoming solar radiation and radiant energy input. For example, a biofilm photobioreactor 100 set up in the Northern Hemisphere can be mounted so that the translucent wall 160 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 faces south and the angle of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 can be adjusted. Alternatively, the biofilm photobioreactor 100 can face east, and its angle can be adjusted as the sun moves during the day so that a more or less constant light intensity is maintained by controlling the angle with respect to the sun.
FIG. 10 shows a mounting system 510 for an array 220 of biofilm photobioreactors 100 that incorporates a motor 520 to control the positions of adjustment arms 530. The mounting system 510 and adjustment arms 530 permit the angle of the biofilm photobioreactors 100 to be adjusted in order to optimize light exposure and photobioreactor 100 temperature. The angular disposition of the array 220 of biofilm photobioreactors 100 can be controlled in parallel, so individual mechanical mounting and controls are not required.
The mounting system 510 may allow adjustment of the angle of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 such that the photobioreactor enclosure 110 can be made substantially horizontal when it is filled with liquid, in order to limit deformation of the shape of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. Alternatively or in addition, the biofilm photobioreactor 100 can be mounted on a frame that exerts tension on the biofilm photobioreactor 100 if the shape of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 deforms excessively.
The mounting system 510 allows vertical orientation of the biofilm photobioreactor 100, which increases culture surface area that is exposed to sunlight per reactor ground footprint area and the culture per volume is exposed to sunlight. Vertical orientation of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 enhances distribution of culture within the light field and may be used to optimize light adaption and utilization by the biofilm 140 through ensuring that the biofilm 140 is consistently exposed to the same amount of light at each position in the photobioreactor enclosure 110.
The degree of deformation of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 shape relates to internal pressure in the photobioreactor enclosure 110 and the width of the channels 480. In general, narrow channels 480 prevent the biofilm photobioreactor 100 walls 160 from deforming excessively. Very narrow channels 480 require a greater internal pressure to open.
The degree of deformation of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 also relates to the distance between the left and right edges 184 and 186 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. The distance between the left and right edges 184 and 186 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is maximal when it is completely flat, so if the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is mounted with this maximal distance between its left and right edges 184 and 186, deformation will be largely prevented. If the photobioreactor enclosure 110 does not deform, the channel 480 cross-section will be very small and gas will not flow freely. Furthermore, if there is any irregularity in the photobioreactor enclosure 110, some channels 480 or parts of channels 480 may not open at all, resulting in failure of gas flow 230 and loss of productivity in the affected channels 480. As a result, there is an optimal spacing of the left and right edges 184 and 186 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 so that channels 480 open reliably and allow uniform gas flow 230.
During cycles in which the photobioreactor enclosure 110 fills with liquid, channels 480 must also open enough to allow uniform flow. It is not desirable for the channels 480 to open excessively, which would necessitate pumping more liquid to fill the channels 480. Further, during the autofermentation period, it is desirable to have a small volume of liquid in the channels 480 so that the change in concentration of the chemical product in the liquid is relatively large.
Given these considerations, a biofilm photobioreactor 100 can be mounted so that the distance between the left and right edges 184 and 186 can be adjusted by exerting a pulling force that is perpendicular to the longitudinal axes of the chambers. Stretching the biofilm photobioreactor 100 laterally in this manner will decrease the depth and volume of the channels 480 such that liquid volume in the channels 480 is reduced and product concentration is increased.
This embodiment provides a variation in the method of operating the biofilm photobioreactor 100. At the beginning of the autofermentation period 460, the photobioreactor enclosure 110 may be stretched laterally to increase the distance between the left and right edges 184 and 186, after which the channels 480 of the biofilm photobioreactor 100 are at least partially filled with liquid 250. The reduction in volume of liquid 250 needed to fill the stretched channels 480 during autofermentation 460 increases concentration of the chemical product in the liquid 250, which can facilitate recovery of the chemical product from the liquid 250. The reduction in volume of liquid 250 also reduces the quantity of dissolved oxygen and other electron acceptors that must be consumed by the biofilm 140 before conditions for autofermentation exist, which can decrease the time needed for autofermentation to begin. The reduction in volume of liquid 250 also reduces the total weight of liquid 250 in the photobioreactor enclosure 110. Decreased liquid 250 weight permits the use of lighter materials for construction of the biofilm photobioreactor 100, which helps reduce capital costs, and also helps reduce operating costs for liquid 250 and energy consumption.
The volume of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 that is not occupied by the biofilm 140 and the support substrate 150 can be adjusted. When the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is filled with gas or liquid 250, the fluid exerts pressure on the walls 160 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110, forcing them outward so each channel 480 has a rounded configuration. This outward deformation of the walls 160 of the channels 480 results in lateral contraction of the photobioreactor enclosure 110, bringing its left and right edges 184 and 186 closer together. In contrast, because the partitions 470 between channels 480 run from top to bottom, there is very little change in the distance between the top and bottom edges 180 and 182 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 when it is filled with fluid 250.
The structure of the photobioreactor enclosure 110, regardless of how it is mounted, sets an upper limit on the degree to which the channel 480 volume can be increased and the photobioreactor enclosure 110 width (distance between left and right edges 184 and 186) can be decreased. In practice, it is preferable to mount the photobioreactor enclosure 110 in such a way that the left and right edges 184 and 186 of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 are constrained so that the decrease in photobioreactor enclosure 110 width, and hence the increase in photobioreactor enclosure 110 volume, is limited.
The preferred volume for the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is not necessarily the same for all phases of its operation. In particular, the opening of the channels 480 after draining the liquid 250 and initiating gas flow 230 is most reliable when the photobioreactor enclosure 110 volume is at least about two liters per square meter of photobioreactor enclosure 110 surface area.
During the period of autofermentation 460, the chemical product concentration that can be reached in a single night depends on the productivity of the biofilm 140 and the liquid 250 volume. The desired chemical product concentration depends on the economics of purification and the tolerance of the microorganism to the chemical product. Chemical product concentration must be high enough that the chemical product can be economically recovered, but low enough to avoid an unacceptable level of stress to the organism.
As an example, assume that ethanol can be economically purified from liquid 250 that is at least 0.5% ethanol by weight, and the microorganism used is tolerant of nightly exposure to ethanol of at most 1%. If the nightly conversion of carbohydrate to ethanol is 10 grams of carbohydrate per square meter, or about 5.1 grams of ethanol per square meter, then the total liquid 250 volume should be in the approximate range of 500 ml to 1 liter.
Table 1 shows chemical product concentration as a function of productivity and liquid 250 volume.

	TABLE 1

	Total liquid volume per square meter

	0.25 L	0.5 L	1 L	2 L	3 L	4 L	5 L

Ethanol	2 g	0.41%	0.20%	0.10%	0.05%	0.03%	0.03%	0.02%
productivity	5 g	1.02%	0.51%	0.26%	0.13%	0.09%	0.06%	0.05%
per	10 g	2.04%	1.02%	0.51%	0.26%	0.17%	0.13%	0.10%
square	15 g	3.07%	1.53%	0.77%	0.38%	0.26%	0.19%	0.15%
meter	20 g	4.09%	2.04%	1.02%	0.51%	0.34%	0.26%	0.20%
per day	25 g	5.11%	2.56%	1.28%	0.64%	0.43%	0.32%	0.26%
	30 g	6.13%	3.07%	1.53%	0.77%	0.51%	0.38%	0.31%
	35 g	7.16%	3.58%	1.79%	0.89%	0.60%	0.45%	0.36%
	40 g	8.18%	4.09%	2.04%	1.02%	0.68%	0.51%	0.41%

Desirable chemical product concentration values preferably are in the range of from about 0.50% to about 1.00%. The chemical product concentration values presented in Table 1 are exemplary, based on reasonable ranges for ethanol production. Chemical product concentration values will differ for other chemical products, other microorganisms, and other separation technologies; suitable calculations can be made by one of ordinary skill.
The total liquid 250 volume includes both the added medium and the liquid 250 bound in the biofilm 140 and the support substrate 150, so the added medium will be smaller than the total liquid 250 volume. If the volume of liquid 250 in the biofilm 140 is a large fraction of the total liquid 250 volume, it may be necessary to include a wash step after the autofermentation period 460 to recover an acceptable fraction of the chemical product.
The liquid 250 volume can also be reduced by withdrawing liquid 250, which allows the channels 480 to collapse so that the opposing walls 160 contact each other. This normally occurs every time the photobioreactor enclosure 110 is drained. The channels 480 open when gas flow 230 resumes.
The reliability of channel 480 collapse depends on the material chosen for construction of the photobioreactor enclosure 110. Flexible films are preferred to allow for reliable channel 480 collapse.
The liquid 250 volume that remains after channel 480 collapse generally is smaller than the desired volume described above, so this method is most appropriate if the desired volume is unusually small. Alternatively, the photobioreactor enclosure 110 can be oriented approximately horizontally. The channels 480 will collapse when gas flow 230 ceases and can be filled with liquid 250 in this position, but the fill volume is considerably less than the fill volume of a vertical photobioreactor enclosure 110.
If a microorganism has a high tolerance for the chemical product, or if productivity is low, it may not be convenient to reduce the liquid 250 volume sufficiently to achieve an economically desirable concentration of chemical product in a single night of autofermentation. If this is the case, it is possible to reuse the autofermentation medium 300 several times so the chemical product concentration is increased to the desired level.
If a microorganism has a low tolerance for the chemical product, or if productivity is very high, it may not be convenient to increase the liquid 250 volume sufficiently to prevent damage to the microorganism. If this is the case, the liquid 250 can be withdrawn after a limited time period to avoid excess chemical product concentration and new medium can be added to continue autofermentation.
A separate advantage of a low fermentation volume is that the period of time required for the biofilm 140 to reduce the oxygen concentration sufficiently to induce autofermentation is decreased. For example, if an organism uses carbohydrate at the rate of 1 gram per square meter hour, it will consume oxygen at a rate of about 1 gram per square meter hour. A 1 liter volume will only have about 10 milligrams of oxygen, so the time to anoxia in this example is less than 1 minute.
In most cases, the considerations noted previously are more significant than time to anoxia in determining the optimal water volume. Time to anoxia may be important if it is necessary to use large volumes and respiratory rates are low. Time to anoxia may also be reduced by pretreatment of the fermentation medium by degassing, for example by vacuum degassing or heat degassing, by chemical oxygen scavenging, by sparging, for example with nitrogen, or by biological processes such as bacterial growth in a closed container without aeration.
When autofermentation medium is stored, either between fermentations that reuse the same medium or if it is necessary to hold the product containing medium before it goes on to a product separation step, the fermentation medium can be held in conditions in which the amount of oxygen that can enter the stored medium is insufficient to allow a significant amount of biological degradation of the product to occur, for example in a closed tank with a limited or zero headspace.
Internal pressure stresses portions of flexible film that are sealed together, such as partitions 470, and potentially can induce mechanical failure. Accordingly, the film used to construct the photobioreactor enclosure 110, the size of the channels 480 and the operating pressure of the photobioreactor enclosure 110 must be selected to ensure that mechanical failure does not occur.
Another design consideration is that ports 120, 122 and 124 must be sized to avoid excessive head loss during periods of gas and liquid movement.
The biofilm photobioreactor 100 incorporates a control system to operate pumps 330, fans 190 and similar equipment for the purpose of adding and removing gas and liquid to and from the photobioreactor, as well as to operate motors 520 used to adjust a mounting system 510 if it is adjustable. The control system can use inputs such as wind speed, air temperature and light intensity to adjust the angle of the photobioreactors to achieve optimal biofilm photobioreactor 100 performance with respect to photosynthetic rate, biofilm photobioreactor 100 temperature and avoidance of mechanical failure due to wind loading.
It is advantageous for the biofilm 140 to have a high specific rate of fermentation. The rate of fermentation can be affected by medium constituents. Generally, the medium used during photosynthesis will be chosen to facilitate high photosynthetic efficiency and photosynthate accumulation, while the fermentation medium will be chosen to facilitate high fermentation rate. The fermentation medium will also be chosen to facilitate extraction of the chemical product from the medium.
The rate of fermentation is also determined by the characteristics of the microorganism in the biofilm 140 and its specific fermentation rate. Generally, fermentation rate in autotrophic microorganisms is related to the energy demands of the microorganism and the availability of food reserves. In order to obtain the greatest productivity for a given biomass, it is desirable for the specific fermentation rate to be high.
The process of fermentation can adversely affect the medium and cause accumulation of chemical products that are toxic to the biofilm 140 at elevated concentrations. Depending on the fermentation rate and the tolerance of the microorganism for accumulated chemical product(s), the liquid used during autofermentation may be extracted periodically from the photobioreactor enclosure 110 to harvest chemical product(s), and then the photobioreactor enclosure 110 may be refilled with fresh liquid. For example, if a biofilm 140 measuring 1 square meter has accumulated 20 grams of carbohydrate that it ferments to ethanol in 500 milliliters of water, then the resulting ethanol concentration will be slightly over 2%. If the organism tolerant of exposure to 1% ethanol but not 2%, then it is necessary to extract the medium containing the ethanol.
Medium in which chemical product is collected may be used in more than one autofermentation period before it is processed to extract the chemical product. The medium stored under anaerobic conditions prior to processing in order to protect the accumulated chemical product from aerobic heterotrophic microorganisms. After the medium is processed and the chemical product is extracted, the medium may be reused in successive autofermentation periods.
Autofermentation will not necessarily occur during every dark period.
Instead of adding autofermentation liquid, the dark cycle can comprise flowing gas at a low flow rate through the photobioreactor enclosure 110, alternated with periodic, brief submersion of the biofilm 140 to assure sufficient hydration, similar to the daytime cycle. For example, if accumulation of metabolic intermediate compound(s) in the biofilm 140 is only 5 grams per square meter per day, the autofermentation medium volume is 500 milliliters of water, and the microorganism can tolerate 2% ethanol, then it is desirable to permit up to 4 days of accumulation of metabolic intermediate compound(s) before autofermentation is induced so that the autofermentation medium will reach the tolerance limit of the microorganism. Achieving a higher ethanol concentration before harvesting the ethanol is desirable because higher product concentration reduces purification costs.
Autofermentation also does not need to occur during the initial growth of the biofilm 140. Gas flow 230 may be maintained during dark conditions at a low rate with periodic immersion if necessary for hydration. Once the biofilm 140 is mature and ready to be productive, chemical product can be harvested by inducing autofermentation.

Example 1

Two biofilm photobioreactors, PBR 1 and PBR 2, were fabricated out of 3M Scotchpak HB-P 69731 Translucent High Barrier Film. This film was chosen due to its resistance to oxygen permeability and ease of use in prototype construction.
The photobioreactor enclosures each incorporated a gas port positioned near the top edge of the photobioreactor enclosure, a liquid port positioned near the bottom edge of the photobioreactor enclosure and partitions creating four “U” shaped channels, similar to the design shown in FIG. 7. Ambient air was introduced into the channels via the gas port using an aquarium pump with flow capacity of 2.25-4.50 liters per minute. The channels were fashioned so that air entered into the “U” via the gas port, flowed down through the “U” and then back up to an 18-20 gauge gas exhaust vent. Media were introduced and removed via the liquid port.
Support substrate fabric of woven polyester was seamed into each photobioreactor enclosure and acted as a substrate for biofilm development. Total surface area of each photobioreactor enclosure was 0.1428 square meters and the volume of each photobioreactor enclosure was 0.415 liters.
Operation of the biofilm photobioreactors consisted of a photosynthesis cycle during which glycogen was produced and stored, and an autofermentation cycle during which glycogen was catabolized. In photosynthesis cycles, a freshwater photosynthesis medium was pumped through the liquid port, filling the photobioreactor enclosure, and then the medium was immediately pumped through the liquid port from the photobioreactor enclosure to a storage reservoir.
In the autofermentation cycle, a nitrogen-sparged, freshwater autofermentation medium was pumped through the liquid port, filling the photobioreactor enclosure, and remained in the photobioreactor enclosure until just before the beginning of the photosynthesis cycle. The autofermentation medium was depleted of SO₄and other terminal electron acceptors. No air was introduced into the photobioreactor enclosures during the autofermentation period. The process of regularly exchanging media and delivering air to the photobioreactors was automated using proprietary software that controlled peristaltic pumps and air pumps.
PBR 1 and PBR 2 were each inoculated with 15 mL culture of Chroococcidiopsis sp. into a 500 ml reservoir of marine BG-11, made with filtered seawater containing about 1-3% dissolved salts. The biofilm photobioreactors were mounted in front of cool white fluorescent lamps providing about 75 μmol photons per square meter per second at each photobioreactor surface. The photobioreactor enclosures were filled and immediately drained every 20 minutes.
Regular photosynthesis cycles were initiated every 30 minutes. The biofilm photobioreactors were maintained at about 27° C. with a 24-hour photoperiod at an irradiance of 75 μmol photons per square meter per second. The BG-11 medium was incrementally changed to the freshwater photosynthesis medium over the course of 12 days. After the media exchange was completed, light was adjusted to a 16-hr photoperiod.
Autofermentation cycles were initiated. The autofermentation cycles and nitrogen sparging were automated to provide nitrogen gas flow to the autofermentation medium reservoir for 1.5 hours before the autofermentation cycle was initiated by flooding the photobioreactor enclosure with the autofermentation medium. After several hours, the autofermentation medium was pumped out of the photobioreactor enclosure, and the photosynthesis cycle resumed. Automated autofermentation cycles occurred each day, with the photobioreactor enclosure placed in darkness through shading with black cloth.
After the autofermentation medium was pumped into each photobioreactor enclosure, initial samples for organic acids, ethanol, oxygen and pH were taken by gravity draining a small autofermentation medium aliquot from the photobioreactor enclosure. Organic acid samples (in duplicate) were filtered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter and stored at −80° C. until analysis. Ethanol samples (in duplicate) were aliquoted into gas chromatography (GC) vials and stored at −20° C. until analysis. Organic acid and ethanol samples were quantified less than 7 days from sampling. Dissolved oxygen and pH measurements were taken immediately using bench top probes. At the end of the autofermentation cycle, final samples were obtained as described above. Prior to automation, photobioreactors were sampled each time an autofermentation cycle was attempted. Once the photobioreactors were automated, sampling occurred three times per week.

TABLE 2

Autofermentation Cycle Data for PBR 1 and PBR 2

Beginning of Autofermentation Cycle

End of Autofermentation Cycle

PBR

Cycle

O₂

Lactate

Acetate

Formate

O₂

Lactate

Acetate

Formate

No.

(hrs)

Number

pH

(mg/L)

(ppm)

pH

(mg/L)

(ppm)

1	6.5	1		0.86	1.0	7.2	0.2		0.58	12.0	24.8	1.8
1	6.2	2		0.23	<0.2	1.1	<0.2		0.13	2.0	4.3	0.2
1	21.5	3		0.71	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2		0.65	14.6	21.4	2.5
2	21.5	4		0.66	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2		0.49	20.5	24.7	2.6
1	4.5	5		0.42	<5	<5	—	9.17	0.42	5.7	7.3	—
2	4.5	6		0.39	<5	—	—	9.13	1.44	<5	<5	—
1	5.5	7	7.65	0.64	<5	<5	—	6.92	0.76	7.2	9.8	—
2	5.5	8	9.11	0.65	<5	<5	—	7.90	0.63	<5	5.9	—
1	6	9	7.32	0.50	<5	—	—	6.50	1.05	8.7	7.3	—
2	6	10	9.06	0.75	—	—	—	7.91	1.42	<5	5.8	—

Autofermentation cycle length varied from 4.5 to 21.5 hours. Oxygen ranged from 0.23 to 0.86 mg/L at the start of the autofermentation cycle. Initial concentrations of organic acids, lactate, acetate, and formate ions were very low or below detection limits in the medium at the beginning of the autofermentation cycle. At the end of the autofermentation cycles, oxygen ranged from 0.13 to 1.44 mg/liter. Organic acids were present at the end of the autofermentation cycle in all but one experimental trial, confirming autofermentation by Chroococcidiapsis sp. in biofilm photobioreactors. Organic acid yields, expressed as concentrations at the autofermentation cycle end, were highest in the longest duration cycle. Medium pH was variable but declined following autofermentation.
Acetate was typically the most abundant organic acid produced during autofermentation, although both lactate and acetate were present at the autofermentation cycle end with concentrations ranging from 2 to 20.5 ppm. Formate was only detected in three trials in very low concentrations.
Assuming that concentrations reported as below the quantification limits ere effectively zero, organic acid production rates as a function of illuminated culture surface area (single sided illumination) were calculated using the following equation:
P=(C _final −C _initial)/t×PBR _volume/PBR_{illuminated area} Eq. (1)
where P is the production rate, C_finaland C_initialare the final and initial organic acid concentrations, PBR_volumeis the biofilm photobioreactor volumetric capacity, PBR_illuminatedarea is the biofilm photobioreactor surface area that is exposed to light (single-sided illumination) and t is time. Organic acid production rates were similar, with average values of 3.26 mg per square meter per hour for lactate and 3.93 mg per square meter per hour for acetate (FIG. 11). Formate production was extremely low,
Ethanol was measured on each occasion and was not detected in any sample.

Example 2

Two biofilm photobioreactors, PBR 3 and PBR 4, were fabricated out of 3M Scotchpak HB-P 69731 Translucent High Barrier Film. Each photobioreactor enclosure incorporated a combination port for gas and liquid flow positioned near the bottom edge of the photobioreactor enclosure and partitions creating eight “l” shaped channels, similar to the design shown in FIG. 8, Ambient air was introduced into each channel via the combination port using an aquarium pump with flow capacity of 2.25-4.50 liters per minute. Air entered each channel from the bottom through the combination port and flowed up to an 18-20 gauge gas exhaust vent Media entered each channel and were removed via the combination port.
Support substrate fabric of woven polyester was seamed into each photobioreactor enclosure and acted as a substrate for biofilm development. Total surface area of each photobioreactor enclosure was 0.1428 square meters and the volume of each photobioreactor enclosure was 0.415 liters.
Operation of the biofilm photobioreactors consisted of a photosynthesis cycle during which glycogen was produced and stored, and an autofermentation cycle during which glycogen was catabolized. Photosynthesis cycles were initiated by flushing each photobioreactor enclosure with freshwater photosynthesis medium. After the photobioreactor enclosures were filled and immediately drained through the combination port using the freshwater photosynthesis medium, ambient air was pumped through each photobioreactor enclosure using aquarium air pumps. Air exchange was the primary method of oxygen management. The freshwater photosynthesis medium flush occurred every 30 minutes during the 18-hr photosynthesis cycle.
Autofermentation cycles were initiated by turning off air flow to the photobioreactor enclosures, then pumping nitrogen-sparged, freshwater autofermentation medium into the photobioreactor enclosures through the combination port. The autofermentation medium was depleted of SO₄and other terminal electron acceptors. The autofermentation medium was held in each photobioreactor enclosure for the duration of the 6-hr autofermentation cycle. The process of regularly exchanging media and delivering air to the photobioreactor enclosures was automated using proprietary software that controlled peristaltic pumps and air pumps.
PBR 3 and PBR 4 were each inoculated with 500 mL culture of Geitlerinema sp. into a 500 ml reservoir of marine BG-11. The biofilm photobioreactors were mounted in front of cool white fluorescent lamps providing about 75 μmol photons per square meter per second at each photobioreactor surface. The photobioreactor enclosures were filled and immediately drained every 30 minutes.
The biofilm photobioreactors were maintained at about 27° C. with a 16-hour photoperiod at an irradiance of 75 μmol photons per square meter per second. The marine BG-11 medium was incrementally changed to the freshwater photosynthesis medium over the course of 16 days.
Daily six-hour autofermentation cycles were initiated. One 24-hour autofermentation cycle was also completed,
After the autofermentation medium was pumped into each photobioreactor enclosure, initial samples for organic acids, ethanol, oxygen and pH were taken by gravity draining a small autofermentation medium aliquot from the photobioreactor enclosure. Organic acid samples (in duplicate) were filtered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter and stored at −80° C. until analysis. Ethanol samples (in duplicate) were aliquoted into gas chromatography (GC) vials and stored at −20° C. until analysis. Organic acid and ethanol samples were quantified less than 7 days from sampling. Dissolved oxygen and pH measurements were taken immediately using bench top probes. At the end of the autofermentation cycle, final samples ere obtained as described above.
Four autofermentation cycles were attempted in each of PBR 3 and PBR 4 (Table 3). During a 24-hour autofermentation cycle in PBR 4, the photobioreactor system developed a leak in the pump tubing and autofermentation medium drained from the photobioreactor enclosure. Consequently, no data are presented in Table 3 for that cycle.

TABLE 3

Autofermentation Cycle Data for PBR 3 and PBR 4

Beginning of Autofermentation Cycle

End of Autofermentation Cycle

PBR

Cycle

O₂

Lactate

Acetate

Formate

O₂

Lactate

Acetate

Formate

No.

(hrs)

Number

pH

(mg/L)

(ppm)

pH

(mg/L)

(ppm)

3	6	1	9.82	2.71	1.05	1.01	—	9.06	1.0	0.78	12.51	0.44
4	6	2	9.15	1.05	1.22	0.95	—	8.58	1.28	7.27	33.21	1.90
3	6	3	9.74	0.96	1.06	1.04	—	9.13	0.81	3.28	10.20	0.88
4	6	4	9.43	0.83	0.78	1.02	—	8.82	1.20	3.67	28.73	0.88
3	24	5	9.53	1.21	—	1.32	—	8.55	0.4	2.14	21.77	4.62
3	6	6	9.11	1.24	0.98	—	1.26	8.66	0.81	—	—	3.05
4	6	7	9.02	0.96	3.20	—	1.36	8.51	0.78	1.29	2.51	3.52

Production rates (standardized to illuminated area) were highest for acetate, with the exception of cycle 6 (FIG. 12). Lactate consumption was observed in cycles 1, 6 and 7. Formate production rates averaged 0.52 mg per square meter per hour ±0.27 mg per square meter per hour and 0.80 mg per square meter per hour ±0.33 mg per square meter per hour, respectively, for PBR 3 and PBR 4. Production rates for organic acids were higher in PBR 4 for all autofermentation cycles.
Ethanol was not detected in any samples at the start of any of the autofermentation cycles. However, low concentrations of ethanol were measured at the end of autofermentation cycles 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 (FIG. 13). Final concentrations of ethanol in PBR 3 and PBR 4 ranged from 0.0002 to 0.0020% v/v.

Example 3

SEQ ID NO: 1-16 disclosed herein identify DNA sequences and protein sequences for a Geitlerinema sp. that is similar to the Geitlerinema sp. described in Examples 1 and 2, wherein the DNA sequences and protein sequences encode for enzymes that potentially are used to make ethanol from pyruvate through autofermentation.

TABLE 4

SEQ ID NO	Sequence Type	Enzyme

1	DNA	Pyruvate dehydrogenase,
		E1-α
2	Encoded protein	Pyruvate dehydrogenase,
		E1-α
3	DNA	Pyruvate dehydrogenase,
		E1-β
4	Encoded protein	Pyruvate dehydrogenase,
		E1-β
5	DNA	Pyruvate dehydrogenase,
		E2
6	Encoded protein	Pyruvate dehydrogenase,
		E2
7	DNA	Alcohol dehydrogenase
8	Encoded protein	Alcohol dehydrogenase
9	DNA	Bifunctional alcohol
		dehydrogenase

10	Encoded protein	Bifunctional alcohol
		dehydrogenase
11	DNA	Acetyl-CoA synthetase
12	Encoded protein	Acetyl-CoA synthetase
13	DNA	Acetaldehyde
		dehydrogenase

14	Encoded protein	Acetaldehyde
		dehydrogenase
15	DNA	Acetatekinase
16	Encoded protein	Acetatekinase

While the embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are presently considered to be preferred, various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is indicated in the appended claims, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalents are intended to be embraced therein.

Claims

1. A biofilm photobioreactor system comprising:

a) a flexible film defining a photobioreactor enclosure;

b) channels defined by at least one partition disposed in the photobioreactor enclosure, wherein the channels are in fluid communication;

c) a support substrate suitable for the formation of a biofilm thereon by a microorganism, wherein the support substrate is disposed in the channels and is fixed to the flexible film, the at least one partition or a combination of the flexible film and the at least one partition;

d) a photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism forming a biofilm on the support substrate, wherein the photosynthetic, fermentative microorganism makes at least one metabolic intermediate compound during a photosynthesis phase and converts the at least one metabolic intermediate compound to at least one chemical product during an autofermentation phase;

e) at least one port formed in the flexible film that is in fluid communication with the photobioreactor enclosure;

f) at least one gas exhaust vent formed in the flexible film that is in fluid communication with the photobioreactor enclosure;

g) gas comprising carbon dioxide that flows through the photobioreactor enclosure intermittently during the photosynthesis phase, wherein the gas enters the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one port, contacts the biofilm and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one gas exhaust vent;

h) a first liquid that at least partially fills the photobioreactor enclosure intermittently during the photosynthesis phase, wherein the first liquid enters the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one port, contacts the biofilm and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one port; and

i) a second liquid that at least partially fills the photobioreactor enclosure during the autofermentation phase, wherein the second liquid enters the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one port, contacts the biofilm and leaves the photobioreactor enclosure through the at least one port and wherein the at least one chemical product made by the biofilm during the autofermentation phase enters the second liquid;

wherein the photobioreactor enclosure has a flat panel shape and at least one portion of the flexible film is translucent.

2. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the at least one metabolic intermediate is selected from the group consisting of carbohydrates and osmoprotectants.

3. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 2 wherein the carbohydrate is glycogen.

4. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 2 wherein the osmoprotectant is selected from the group consisting of trehalose and glucosylglycerol.

5. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the at least one chemical product is selected from the group consisting of biofuels and feedstocks.

6. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 5 wherein the biofuel is selected from the group consisting of ethanol, hydrogen, propanol and butanol.

7. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 5 wherein the feedstock is selected from the group consisting of acetate, lactate and formate.

8. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 further comprising a mounting system that provides external support for at least one biofilm photobioreactor.

9. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 8 wherein the mounting system is adapted to adjust the position of the at least one biofilm photobioreactor between vertical and horizontal.

10. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the orientation of the biofilm photobioreactor is substantially vertical.

11. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the photosynthetic, fermentative microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Geitlerinema, Lyngbya, Chroococcidiopsis, Calothrix, Cyanothece, Oscillatoria, Gloeothece, Microcoleus, Microcystis, Nostoc, Anabaena and Spirulina species.

12. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the support substrate comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of films, filters, fabrics, foams and felts of polyesters, polyolefins, polyurethanes, polyamides, polyimides, polycarbonates, polydienes and polyacrylics.

13. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the first liquid is a freshwater medium.

14. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the second liquid is a freshwater medium that is substantially depleted of electron acceptors.

15. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the second liquid is a freshwater medium that is sparged with nitrogen gas.

16. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the flexible film comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of polyolefins, polyesters and vinyl copolymers thereof.

17. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the at least one port is positioned near the bottom edge of the photobioreactor enclosure when the biofilm photobioreactor is vertical.

18. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the at least one gas exhaust vent is positioned near the top edge of the photobioreactor enclosure when the biofilm photobioreactor is vertical.

19. The biofilm photobioreactor system of claim 1 wherein the gas is air.

20. A flat panel biofilm photobioreactor system comprising:

a) a plurality of channels in fluid communication that are adapted to admit light;

b) inlets and outlets adapted to admit flow of a gas comprising carbon dioxide and flow of a liquid into and out of the channels;

c) a formation surface disposed in the channels; and

d) a photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism that makes a chemical product through autofermentation and forms a biofilm on the formation surface;

wherein the channels are formed in an enclosure enclosed by a flexible film, the formation surface is fixed to the flexible film, the gas comprising carbon dioxide and the liquid contact the biofilm and the chemical product enters the liquid.

21. A method of making at least one chemical product comprising the steps of:

a) exposing a biofilm comprising a photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism to light, wherein the biofilm is disposed on a support substrate that is disposed in channels of a biofilm photobioreactor and wherein the support substrate is fixed to inner surfaces of the biofilm photobioreactor,

b) alternately flowing a gas comprising carbon dioxide through the channels and at least partially filling the channels with a first liquid, wherein the gas comprising carbon dioxide and the first liquid contact the biofilm and the photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism makes at least one metabolic intermediate compound by photosynthesis;

c) depriving the biofilm of light; and

d) at least partially filling the channels of the biofilm photobioreactor with a second liquid, wherein the second liquid contacts the biofilm, the photosynthetic, autofermentative microorganism converts the at least one metabolic intermediate compound into the at least one chemical product and the at least one chemical product enters the second liquid.

22. The method of claim 21 further comprising the step of exerting a pulling force perpendicular to the longitudinal axes of the chambers before at least partially filling the chambers of the biofilm photobioreactor with a second liquid.

23. The method of claim 21 further comprising the step of extracting the second liquid containing the at least one chemical product from the biofilm photobioreactor.

24. The method of claim 21 further comprising the step of separating the at least one chemical product from the second liquid.

25. The method of claim 21 wherein the gas comprising carbon dioxide flows through the chambers for at least one time period of from about 5 minutes to about 4 hours.

26. The method of claim 21 wherein the chambers are at least partially filled with the first liquid for at least one time period of from about 10 seconds to about 20 minutes.

27. The method of claim 21 wherein the chambers are at least partially filled with the second liquid for a time period of from about 1 hour to about 18 hours.

28. The method of claim 21 wherein the second liquid is substantially depleted of electron acceptors.

29. The method of claim 21 further comprising the step of sparging the second liquid with nitrogen gas prior to at least partially filling the chambers of the biofilm photobioreactor with the second liquid.