US20120111122A1 - Method and device for determining the properties of a pressure-manipulable test sample - Google Patents
Method and device for determining the properties of a pressure-manipulable test sample Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120111122A1 US20120111122A1 US13/266,018 US201013266018A US2012111122A1 US 20120111122 A1 US20120111122 A1 US 20120111122A1 US 201013266018 A US201013266018 A US 201013266018A US 2012111122 A1 US2012111122 A1 US 2012111122A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- test
- test sample
- test body
- radially
- sample
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 143
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000007542 hardness measurement Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002985 plastic film Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920006255 plastic film Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009661 fatigue test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/40—Investigating hardness or rebound hardness
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/08—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces
- G01N3/16—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces applied through gearing
- G01N3/165—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces applied through gearing generated by rotation, i.e. centrifugal force
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/003—Generation of the force
- G01N2203/0032—Generation of the force using mechanical means
- G01N2203/0037—Generation of the force using mechanical means involving a rotating movement, e.g. gearing, cam, eccentric, or centrifuge effects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/02—Details not specific for a particular testing method
- G01N2203/04—Chucks, fixtures, jaws, holders or anvils
- G01N2203/0464—Chucks, fixtures, jaws, holders or anvils with provisions for testing more than one specimen at the time
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 and to a device for carrying out said method.
- testing equipment is dimensioned completely differently. In order that the measurement is not corrupted, the test equipment must be able to withstand several times the level of test forces, i.e. it must have an adequate system rigidity.
- This test always involves the testing of a sample using a penetrating stamp with a special geometry (e.g. Vickers, Brinell, Knoop, Berkovich, Rockwell, cube vertex, “flat punch” e.g. in the form of a cylinder).
- a penetrating stamp with a special geometry (e.g. Vickers, Brinell, Knoop, Berkovich, Rockwell, cube vertex, “flat punch” e.g. in the form of a cylinder).
- Both the sample and the penetrating stamp in the test head must be locked in a fixed position during the test. Two holding devices are therefore necessary (for the sample and the penetrating stamp with the test head). This requires a certain adjustment effort (fixed locking of the sample and the penetrating stamp to the test head and their alignment relative to each other), in particular if multiple samples are to be tested comparatively or with different penetrating stamps (where changing of the test head is necessary).
- Hardness testing at high or low temperatures or under aggressive environmental conditions is only possible at great expense, because the sample environment would have to be specially screened for the purpose, which due to the holding devices for the sample and test head is not completely possible. If on the other hand the whole test device is exposed to the test atmosphere, it would need to be resistant against it. In each case however the system rigidity varies with temperature. De facto therefore, hardness testing under aggressive environmental conditions is currently not possible.
- testing has previously been carried out exclusively using tensile testing machines in which the material to be tested must be clamped on both sides and then the tensile force is successively increased until the material being tested cracks.
- tensile testing machines are equipped with instrumentation and the entire stress-strain diagram is recorded (elastic region, plastic region, flow, fracture).
- different test conditions should be easily produced, for example based on increased or reduced temperatures or an aggressive atmosphere.
- the compressive force is a centrifugal force generated by rotating the test body about an axis, and in order to apply the compressive force the test body is guided so that it is radially moveable and arranged in relation to the radially fixed test sample between this and the axis, the following deficits of previous hardness testing with pressure testing machines can be eliminated:
- testing process becomes significantly faster, more reliable and more repeatable, while simultaneously allowing an extended testing range.
- the above embodiments relating to hardness testing apply analagously to the testing of breaking strain, tear strength and shear strength (e.g. of films).
- breaking strain and tear or shear strength in the region of the guide for the test head the test sample is at least partly unsupported (e.g. by a corresponding hole in the test sample holder).
- test sample is a sheet made of plastic for example, this can be compressed up to its elastic limit in order to obtain desired information about the material properties.
- a (standardised) penetrating stamp (Vickers, Brinell, etc.) is always located on the test head, in testing for breaking strain, tear and shear strength by contrast the test head is fitted with a smooth pressure surface, wherein it is preferably designed e.g. in the form of a cylinder in the case of shear strength, or preferably a hemisphere in the case of breaking strain and tear strength.
- the test head diameter is to be matched to the diameter of the hole in the test sample holder, so that the test head acting radially from the inside can optimally load the test sample.
- test range can also be controlled.
- FIG. 1 a device for testing the breaking strain of a film in a schematic representation
- FIG. 2 a device for testing the hardness of a rigid test sample in a schematic representation.
- FIG. 1 shows the rotational axis of a drum rotor, not shown, for example of a bench centrifuge.
- a clamping device 2 On the inner wall of the drum rotor a clamping device 2 is fixed with two annular clamping jaws, between which a plastic film 3 is clamped. The clamping is effected around a circular region of the film 3 . The film 3 is clamped in such a manner that it extends parallel to the rotational axis 1 .
- multiple clamping devices 2 can be fixed next to each other circumferentially as well as above each other. They must be arranged in such a manner that no imbalance occurs during rotation of the drum rotor.
- each clamping device 2 in the unclamped region of the respective test sample, on the side facing towards the rotational axis 1 , a sleeve 4 is placed which extends in the radial direction of the drum rotor.
- the sleeves 4 are fixed inside the drum rotor such that their longitudinal axis extends horizontally.
- the end of each sleeve 4 pointing towards the associated clamping device 2 is open.
- the sleeves 4 are each used for holding a test body which is matched to the inner diameter of the respective sleeve 4 such that it can move freely, but without a large amount of play, in its longitudinal direction.
- the test body consists of a test head 5 , the shape of which is matched to the respective test sample or the type of test. In the present case the breaking strain of the plastic film 3 is to be determined.
- the surface of the test head 5 facing towards the film is therefore smooth over its entire diameter and has roughly the shape of the shell of a hemisphere.
- the film 3 can therefore be stretched until it reaches its tearing extension, without it first being cracked by a sharp edge in the test head surface.
- a cylindrical test head is preferably used.
- the test body additionally has a cylindrical test stamp 6 , which is radially arranged on the inside of the test head 5 and serves to increase the mass of the test body and therefore the centrifugal force, and also to stabilize the guided motion of the test body in the sleeve 4 .
- the test stamp 6 has the same shape for all test samples and all types of test.
- the material of the test stamp 6 can however be chosen differently, in order to increase the range of the centrifugal forces being generated.
- a locking device 7 for the test body On the end of the sleeve 4 facing the rotational axis 1 a locking device 7 for the test body is located.
- the test body is held by the locking device 7 in its inner position and only released from this after reaching a selectable rotation rate, so that it springs outwards and presses against the film 3 .
- the force acting on the film 3 can be increased up to its tearing point.
- test body is then held by gravity or friction in its position in the sleeve, and even at low rotation rates moves towards the test sample.
- Sensors mounted on the sleeve 4 can detect the respective position of the test body in the sleeve 4 .
- the corresponding signals are wirelessly transmitted to an analysis unit.
- the device according to FIG. 4 differs from that of FIG. 1 essentially in that the test sample is not a film but a plate-shaped rigid body 8 , the hardness of which is to be measured.
- the clamping device 2 can be changed so that the remaining free region of the body 8 in FIG. 2 is also supported on the side facing away from the sleeve 4 .
- the test body is fitted with a test head 9 , which on the end facing towards the body 8 carries a, for example, conical or pyramid-shaped penetrating body 10 . After the release of the test body through the locking device 7 this penetrates into the body 8 and from the penetration depth obtained at a specific rotation rate, the hardness of the body 8 can be determined.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 and to a device for carrying out said method.
- In the field of automated materials testing, to determine the plasto-elastic properties under loading by pressure (also known as hardness testing) the only testing techniques which are used around the world at present are ones in which the application of force is achieved by means of mechanical drive systems, e.g. by hydraulic means (large forces) or using e.g. piezo-actuators (small forces).
- Of necessity the testing equipment is dimensioned completely differently. In order that the measurement is not corrupted, the test equipment must be able to withstand several times the level of test forces, i.e. it must have an adequate system rigidity.
- This test always involves the testing of a sample using a penetrating stamp with a special geometry (e.g. Vickers, Brinell, Knoop, Berkovich, Rockwell, cube vertex, “flat punch” e.g. in the form of a cylinder). Both the sample and the penetrating stamp in the test head must be locked in a fixed position during the test. Two holding devices are therefore necessary (for the sample and the penetrating stamp with the test head). This requires a certain adjustment effort (fixed locking of the sample and the penetrating stamp to the test head and their alignment relative to each other), in particular if multiple samples are to be tested comparatively or with different penetrating stamps (where changing of the test head is necessary).
- Both of the holding devices and their fixed mechanical connection must safely withstand the maximum test forces.
- At high test forces (hardness testing in the macroscopic range) the absolute test forces necessary (kN to MN) make it essential to over-dimension the testing equipment. For small test forces (hardness testing in the microscopic range) the test forces are, it is true, considerably lower (mN to N), but at the same time considerably higher requirements are made towards the absolute accuracy of the test (μN to mN), which in turn requires over-dimensioning of the test equipment. A force-dependent correction to the measurement relative to the system rigidity is often necessary, wherein force and travel dynamometers are used. This makes the test equipment expensive.
- Hardness testing at high or low temperatures or under aggressive environmental conditions (e.g. corrosive gases) is only possible at great expense, because the sample environment would have to be specially screened for the purpose, which due to the holding devices for the sample and test head is not completely possible. If on the other hand the whole test device is exposed to the test atmosphere, it would need to be resistant against it. In each case however the system rigidity varies with temperature. De facto therefore, hardness testing under aggressive environmental conditions is currently not possible.
- In the field of breaking strain and tear resistance testing, in particular of films, testing has previously been carried out exclusively using tensile testing machines in which the material to be tested must be clamped on both sides and then the tensile force is successively increased until the material being tested cracks. Typically, such testing machines are equipped with instrumentation and the entire stress-strain diagram is recorded (elastic region, plastic region, flow, fracture).
- It is the object of the present invention therefore to specify a method for determining the plasto-elastic properties of a test sample which can be affected by the action of pressure, in which a test body is pressed against a surface of the test sample with a defined force and the resulting plasto-elastic changes in the surface during and/or after the application of pressure are recorded, and a device for carrying out this method which facilitate the testing of a relatively large number of test samples within a short time with low equipment costs, wherein the forces to be applied can be varied within a wide range. Also, different test conditions should be easily produced, for example based on increased or reduced temperatures or an aggressive atmosphere.
- This object is achieved according to the invention by a method with the features of claim 1 or device with the features of
claim 8. Advantageous extensions of the method and the device arise from the respectively assigned dependent claims. - Because the compressive force is a centrifugal force generated by rotating the test body about an axis, and in order to apply the compressive force the test body is guided so that it is radially moveable and arranged in relation to the radially fixed test sample between this and the axis, the following deficits of previous hardness testing with pressure testing machines can be eliminated:
-
- 1. The centrifugal force renders mechanical drive systems for generating the force redundant. This considerably simplifies the test device.
- 2. With the use of centrifuge technology, a unified test system for small forces (low rotation rates) and large forces (high rotation rates) is available for the first time.
- 3. With the use of centrifuge technology, a test system is available for the first time which facilitates the simultaneous testing of multiple test samples (also with different penetrating body geometries such as Vickers, Brinell, etc.).
- 4. With the use of centrifuge technology, only a single and markedly simplified holding device is now required (i.e. that for the test sample). The test body only needs to run in one guide. A fixed mechanical connection between test sample and test body, which must absorb the testing force, can be dispensed with.
- 5. Load cells are no longer necessary. The testing force is produced only from the rotation speed of the rotor, the distance from the effective centre of mass of the test body to the rotational axis and the mass of the freely moveable test body.
- 6. In a centrifuge tests at increased or reduced temperatures and in special, e.g. aggressive, environmental conditions are easily realised, since the rotor chamber is an encapsulated system or one that can easily be encapsulated.
- 7. The rotation rate control of the centrifuge moreover allows almost arbitrary test profiles (rate of force increase or force changes) and programmable test cycles to be implemented in a very simple manner, which is an inestimable advantage, in particular for long-term testing and fatigue testing.
- Due to the method according to the invention therefore both the testing process and the test device are considerably simplified. The testing process becomes significantly faster, more reliable and more repeatable, while simultaneously allowing an extended testing range.
- The above embodiments relating to hardness testing apply analagously to the testing of breaking strain, tear strength and shear strength (e.g. of films). In contrast to hardness testing, in testing of breaking strain and tear or shear strength, in the region of the guide for the test head the test sample is at least partly unsupported (e.g. by a corresponding hole in the test sample holder).
- Instead of being strained up to its yield point in the case of thin films, if the test sample is a sheet made of plastic for example, this can be compressed up to its elastic limit in order to obtain desired information about the material properties.
- In hardness testing a (standardised) penetrating stamp (Vickers, Brinell, etc.) is always located on the test head, in testing for breaking strain, tear and shear strength by contrast the test head is fitted with a smooth pressure surface, wherein it is preferably designed e.g. in the form of a cylinder in the case of shear strength, or preferably a hemisphere in the case of breaking strain and tear strength. The test head diameter is to be matched to the diameter of the hole in the test sample holder, so that the test head acting radially from the inside can optimally load the test sample.
- With the matching of test head or test stamp mass to the respective task, the test range can also be controlled.
- In the following the invention is explained in more detail by means of exemplary embodiments illustrated in the figures. They show:
-
FIG. 1 a device for testing the breaking strain of a film in a schematic representation, and -
FIG. 2 a device for testing the hardness of a rigid test sample in a schematic representation. -
FIG. 1 shows the rotational axis of a drum rotor, not shown, for example of a bench centrifuge. On the inner wall of the drum rotor aclamping device 2 is fixed with two annular clamping jaws, between which aplastic film 3 is clamped. The clamping is effected around a circular region of thefilm 3. Thefilm 3 is clamped in such a manner that it extends parallel to the rotational axis 1. On the inner wall of the drum rotor,multiple clamping devices 2 can be fixed next to each other circumferentially as well as above each other. They must be arranged in such a manner that no imbalance occurs during rotation of the drum rotor. - Opposite each
clamping device 2 in the unclamped region of the respective test sample, on the side facing towards the rotational axis 1, asleeve 4 is placed which extends in the radial direction of the drum rotor. Thesleeves 4 are fixed inside the drum rotor such that their longitudinal axis extends horizontally. The end of eachsleeve 4 pointing towards the associatedclamping device 2 is open. - The
sleeves 4 are each used for holding a test body which is matched to the inner diameter of therespective sleeve 4 such that it can move freely, but without a large amount of play, in its longitudinal direction. The test body consists of atest head 5, the shape of which is matched to the respective test sample or the type of test. In the present case the breaking strain of theplastic film 3 is to be determined. The surface of thetest head 5 facing towards the film is therefore smooth over its entire diameter and has roughly the shape of the shell of a hemisphere. Thefilm 3 can therefore be stretched until it reaches its tearing extension, without it first being cracked by a sharp edge in the test head surface. To determine the shear strength of the film 3 a cylindrical test head is preferably used. - The test body additionally has a
cylindrical test stamp 6, which is radially arranged on the inside of thetest head 5 and serves to increase the mass of the test body and therefore the centrifugal force, and also to stabilize the guided motion of the test body in thesleeve 4. Thetest stamp 6 has the same shape for all test samples and all types of test. The material of thetest stamp 6 can however be chosen differently, in order to increase the range of the centrifugal forces being generated. - On the end of the
sleeve 4 facing the rotational axis 1 alocking device 7 for the test body is located. During the start-up phase of the drum rotor the test body is held by thelocking device 7 in its inner position and only released from this after reaching a selectable rotation rate, so that it springs outwards and presses against thefilm 3. By subsequently increasing the rotation rate of the drum rotor the force acting on thefilm 3 can be increased up to its tearing point. - It is also possible however to dispense with the locking device. The test body is then held by gravity or friction in its position in the sleeve, and even at low rotation rates moves towards the test sample.
- Sensors mounted on the
sleeve 4 can detect the respective position of the test body in thesleeve 4. The corresponding signals are wirelessly transmitted to an analysis unit. - The device according to
FIG. 4 differs from that ofFIG. 1 essentially in that the test sample is not a film but a plate-shapedrigid body 8, the hardness of which is to be measured. Theclamping device 2 can be changed so that the remaining free region of thebody 8 inFIG. 2 is also supported on the side facing away from thesleeve 4. In addition the test body is fitted with atest head 9, which on the end facing towards thebody 8 carries a, for example, conical or pyramid-shaped penetratingbody 10. After the release of the test body through thelocking device 7 this penetrates into thebody 8 and from the penetration depth obtained at a specific rotation rate, the hardness of thebody 8 can be determined. - When using a standard commercial bench centrifuge a force range between ON and a few 10s of kN can be covered.
Claims (17)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102009019303 | 2009-04-24 | ||
| DE102009019303A DE102009019303B4 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2009-04-24 | Method and device for determining pressure-influenceable properties of a test object |
| DE102009019303.0 | 2009-04-24 | ||
| PCT/EP2010/002614 WO2010121837A1 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2010-04-21 | Method and device for determining the pressure-manipulatable properties of a specimen |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20120111122A1 true US20120111122A1 (en) | 2012-05-10 |
| US8757015B2 US8757015B2 (en) | 2014-06-24 |
Family
ID=42536295
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/266,018 Active 2031-03-20 US8757015B2 (en) | 2009-04-24 | 2010-04-21 | Method and device for determining the properties of a pressure-manipulable test sample |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US8757015B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP2422180A1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE102009019303B4 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2010121837A1 (en) |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3736501A (en) * | 1971-03-25 | 1973-05-29 | Automation Ind Inc | Rotatable test device having diametrically opposed sensors and counterweights interlinked for radial movement by centrifugal force |
| US4061019A (en) * | 1976-03-16 | 1977-12-06 | Blasetti David H | Apparatus for generating forces in a specimen |
| US4325910A (en) * | 1979-07-11 | 1982-04-20 | Technicraft, Inc. | Automated multiple-purpose chemical-analysis apparatus |
| SU1439453A1 (en) * | 1987-06-18 | 1988-11-23 | Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт горной геомеханики и маркшейдерского дела | Centrifugal installation for testing specimens of materials |
| US4886419A (en) * | 1988-09-30 | 1989-12-12 | The Boeing Company | Elastomeric bearing for helicopter rotor having lead-lag damping |
| US20030177840A1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2003-09-25 | Silvio Corrias | Tribological test apparatus |
| US6935159B2 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2005-08-30 | University Of Waterloo | Centrifugal permeameter |
| JP2006343125A (en) * | 2005-06-07 | 2006-12-21 | Shimizu Corp | Penetration testing equipment |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU1490574A1 (en) * | 1987-08-19 | 1989-06-30 | Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт горной геомеханики и маркшейдерского дела | Centrifugal installation for impact tests of material specimens |
| SU1478091A1 (en) * | 1987-10-05 | 1989-05-07 | Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт горной геомеханики и маркшейдерского дела | Centrifugal apparatus for impact testing of material specimens |
| JP2000131201A (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2000-05-12 | Sumikin Kansai Kogyo Kk | Centrifugal force load device capable of shot impact experiment |
| DE102004055621B4 (en) * | 2004-11-11 | 2017-08-31 | BAM Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung | Method and device for testing the strength of a connection |
-
2009
- 2009-04-24 DE DE102009019303A patent/DE102009019303B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-04-21 WO PCT/EP2010/002614 patent/WO2010121837A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-04-21 US US13/266,018 patent/US8757015B2/en active Active
- 2010-04-21 EP EP10719911A patent/EP2422180A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3736501A (en) * | 1971-03-25 | 1973-05-29 | Automation Ind Inc | Rotatable test device having diametrically opposed sensors and counterweights interlinked for radial movement by centrifugal force |
| US4061019A (en) * | 1976-03-16 | 1977-12-06 | Blasetti David H | Apparatus for generating forces in a specimen |
| US4325910A (en) * | 1979-07-11 | 1982-04-20 | Technicraft, Inc. | Automated multiple-purpose chemical-analysis apparatus |
| SU1439453A1 (en) * | 1987-06-18 | 1988-11-23 | Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт горной геомеханики и маркшейдерского дела | Centrifugal installation for testing specimens of materials |
| US4886419A (en) * | 1988-09-30 | 1989-12-12 | The Boeing Company | Elastomeric bearing for helicopter rotor having lead-lag damping |
| US20030177840A1 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2003-09-25 | Silvio Corrias | Tribological test apparatus |
| US6776048B2 (en) * | 2002-02-08 | 2004-08-17 | C.R.F. Societa Consortile Per Azioni | Tribological test apparatus |
| US6935159B2 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2005-08-30 | University Of Waterloo | Centrifugal permeameter |
| JP2006343125A (en) * | 2005-06-07 | 2006-12-21 | Shimizu Corp | Penetration testing equipment |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE102009019303A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 |
| DE102009019303B4 (en) | 2013-07-04 |
| US8757015B2 (en) | 2014-06-24 |
| WO2010121837A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 |
| EP2422180A1 (en) | 2012-02-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105814433B (en) | A kind of device and method for the elastic characteristic characterizing friction material | |
| US9719901B2 (en) | Impact tester device | |
| JP2010256195A (en) | Friction and wear testing machine | |
| WO2010038952A3 (en) | Centrifugal-based microfluid apparatus, method of fabricationg the same, and method of testing samples using the microfluidic apparatus | |
| US10883908B2 (en) | Stage for high temperature indentation test | |
| CN106959270B (en) | Method for testing cementing strength of cementing interface | |
| US8757015B2 (en) | Method and device for determining the properties of a pressure-manipulable test sample | |
| CN106872284B (en) | For detecting the device and method of rock toughness under simulation stratum condition | |
| Sormana et al. | High-throughput mechanical characterization of free-standing polymer films | |
| Rietz et al. | Centrifugal adhesion testing technology (catt)-a valuable tool for strength determination | |
| GB2525857A (en) | Apparatus for testing the hardness of a material | |
| RU2515188C2 (en) | Bench for fatigue tests of sample groups at cyclic bend | |
| EP1631815B1 (en) | Materials testing | |
| JP4956098B2 (en) | Deterioration diagnosis apparatus for lubricant and viscous material and deterioration diagnosis method thereof | |
| CN110514689B (en) | Method for testing glass transition temperature of butylated hydroxytoluene propellant | |
| WO2009027097A3 (en) | Sample analysis system | |
| RU2542613C1 (en) | Unit for study of material sample on abrasion with ice | |
| CN203465168U (en) | Hardness testing device for rope | |
| RU2698738C1 (en) | Apparatus for testing samples for uniaxial compression of materials mainly of vegetable origin | |
| CN113820130A (en) | A device for neutron in-situ measurement of bearing fatigue strain | |
| US6729188B1 (en) | Crimp strength destructive test module | |
| US3113449A (en) | Flat specimen wear tester | |
| Tsiafis et al. | Experimental-computational determination of epoxy resin mechanical properties, used in assembly applications | |
| CN113834642A (en) | Supporting plate nut installation quality detection tool and detection method thereof | |
| Prakash et al. | Evaluation of fatigue data through miniature specimen test techniques |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BAM BUNDESANSTALT FUER MATERIALFORSCHUNG UND -PRUE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BECK, UWE;REEL/FRAME:027201/0028 Effective date: 20111028 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551) Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |