US20110264935A1 - System And Method For Dynamic Utilization-Based Power Allocation In A Modular Information Handling System - Google Patents
System And Method For Dynamic Utilization-Based Power Allocation In A Modular Information Handling System Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110264935A1 US20110264935A1 US13/175,346 US201113175346A US2011264935A1 US 20110264935 A1 US20110264935 A1 US 20110264935A1 US 201113175346 A US201113175346 A US 201113175346A US 2011264935 A1 US2011264935 A1 US 2011264935A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- power
- information handling
- handling system
- modular
- modular information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F1/00—Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
- G06F1/26—Power supply means, e.g. regulation thereof
- G06F1/32—Means for saving power
- G06F1/3203—Power management, i.e. event-based initiation of a power-saving mode
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F1/00—Details not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00 and G06F21/00
- G06F1/26—Power supply means, e.g. regulation thereof
- G06F1/32—Means for saving power
- G06F1/3203—Power management, i.e. event-based initiation of a power-saving mode
- G06F1/3234—Power saving characterised by the action undertaken
- G06F1/3287—Power saving characterised by the action undertaken by switching off individual functional units in the computer system
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J1/00—Circuit arrangements for DC mains or DC distribution networks
- H02J1/14—Balancing the load in a network
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J2310/00—The network for supplying or distributing electric power characterised by its spatial reach or by the load
- H02J2310/10—The network having a local or delimited stationary reach
- H02J2310/20—The network being internal to a load
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J2310/00—The network for supplying or distributing electric power characterised by its spatial reach or by the load
- H02J2310/50—The network for supplying or distributing electric power characterised by its spatial reach or by the load for selectively controlling the operation of the loads
- H02J2310/56—The network for supplying or distributing electric power characterised by its spatial reach or by the load for selectively controlling the operation of the loads characterised by the condition upon which the selective controlling is based
- H02J2310/58—The condition being electrical
- H02J2310/60—Limiting power consumption in the network or in one section of the network, e.g. load shedding or peak shaving
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to the field of information handling system power allocation, and more particularly to a system and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system.
- An information handling system generally processes, compiles, stores, and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or other purposes thereby allowing users to take advantage of the value of the information.
- information handling systems may also vary regarding what information is handled, how the information is handled, how much information is processed, stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the information may be processed, stored, or communicated.
- the variations in information handling systems allow for information handling systems to be general or configured for a specific user or specific use such as financial transaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage, or global communications.
- information handling systems may include a variety of hardware and software components that may be configured to process, store, and communicate information and may include one or more computer systems, data storage systems, and networking systems.
- a chassis has multiple slots with each slot configured to accept an information handling system module.
- Each module typically has one or more processors, memory and firmware to run an operating system and desired applications; however, power and cooling for the modules is typically provided by resources within the chassis which are distributed to the modules.
- One example of such a modular configuration is a blade information handling system which has a chassis having slots to accept plural blade modules.
- a chassis management controller associated with the chassis has firmware and processing resources to manage the distribution of power resources to the various blade modules.
- a blade module controller associated with each blade module manages the operation of each blade within constraints set by the chassis management controller.
- chassis management controller power management firmware typically manages a power budget for each information handling system module to balance power allocation based on power requirements and priority. Total available power from the chassis power supply is allocated based upon a worst case sustained power need (power max ) and worst case throttled power requirements (power min ) determined by the blade module controllers. The information handling system module power requirements are used in combination with user-configurable module priorities to determine the power allocation for each module. Thus, if available power is restricted then information handling system modules having more critical functions are allocated adequate power to operate unthrottled while other modules having less critical functions operate in throttled modes.
- the information handling system modules that have maximum power available typically do not use maximum power for extended simultaneous time periods.
- allocated but unutilized power typically remains available from the power supply but unavailable for use by all of the information handling system modules.
- some information handling system modules run in throttled modes even though the chassis power supply has additional power available to operate the information handling system modules unthrottled at least some of the time.
- a system and method are provided which substantially reduce the disadvantages and problems associated with previous methods and systems for allocation of power between information handling system modules of a modular information handling system.
- Power from a chassis power supply that is allocated to priority information handling system modules but not used by those modules is selectively and dynamically re-allocated to lower priority information handling system modules to support more complete utilization of the lower priority information handling system modules without impact to the operation of higher priority information handling system modules.
- a modular information handling system has a chassis with plural slots and with plural information handling system modules populating at least some of the slots.
- a power manager associated with the chassis allocates a maximum power to the modules based on the available power, the priority of the modules and the power consumption at the modules.
- a power monitor at each information handling system module monitors power consumption at the associated module to keep power consumption below the maximum power allocated by the power manager. If additional power is needed at a module, the associated power monitor requests the power from the chassis power manager.
- the power manager first dynamically allocates power that is available at the power supply and not allocated to other modules. The power manager then identifies power allocated to modules that is not in use by the modules for reallocation to the requesting module.
- a lower priority module is throttled to create additional power for allocation to the requesting module.
- higher priority information handling system modules operate with their power needs met while lower priority modules operate at improved power consumption levels by allocating excess power from the higher priority modules when those modules do not need all of the power that they could otherwise use.
- the present invention provides a number of important technical advantages.
- One example of an important technical advantage is that allocated but unused power from a chassis power supply is dynamically re-allocated so that information handling system modules in the chassis have available a greater portion of the power supply's capacity.
- Information handling system modules having greater power allocations due to higher priority functions release increments of their power allocations as their power consumption allows so that other information handling system modules having lower priority functions will have additional power available.
- Re-allocation of power dynamically between modules improves the processing capacity of the modules without impacting higher priority functions since the modules having higher priority functions reacquires power allocations as warranted by power consumption at the modules.
- FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a modular information handling system having dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules
- FIG. 2 depicts a flow diagram of a process for dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules.
- an information handling system may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes.
- an information handling system may be a personal computer, a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price.
- the information handling system may include random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of the information handling system may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a video display. The information handling system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
- RAM random access memory
- processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic
- ROM read-only memory
- Additional components of the information handling system may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a video display.
- I/O input and output
- the information handling system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
- FIG. 1 a block diagram depicts a modular information handling system 10 having dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules 12 .
- Information handling system modules 12 couple into slots 14 of a modular chassis 16 to receive power from a power supply 18 .
- Power supply 18 may comprise a plurality of power supplies that each provide power when operational so that the total available power depends upon the number of operational power supplies.
- Each information handling system module 12 includes a number of processing components that cooperate to process information, such as a CPU 20 , RAM 22 , a hard disk drive 24 , a network interface card 26 and a chipset 28 .
- Chipset 28 includes a module controller 30 , such as a baseboard management controller which provides out-of-band management of its associated information handling system module 12 , such as remote start-up and shut down of module 12 .
- Module controllers 30 interface with a chassis management controller 32 , which controls the operation of information handling system modules 12 , including the power made available to each information handling system module 12 by a power manager 34 .
- power manager 34 ensures that adequate power exists from power supply 18 to run the modules and assigns a maximum power for each module to use. For example, power manager 34 adjusts power available to modules based on the number of power supplies that are operational. If adequate power does not exist to power up a module 12 , power manager 34 references a priority table 36 in order to allocate power to the information handling system modules 12 having higher priorities by throttling or shutting down modules having lower priorities.
- Power manager 34 applies the available power from power supply 18 and the priorities of priority table 36 to establish a maximum power for each information handling system module 12 and communicates the maximum power to each module controller 30 .
- the maximum power is set so that, if each information handling system module 12 operates at its assigned maximum power, then the total power drawn from power supply 18 will not exceed the capacity of power supply 18 .
- a power monitor 38 associated with each information handling system module 12 monitors power consumption by its associated module 12 to ensure that the maximum power allocated by power manager 34 is not exceeded.
- power monitor 38 tracks historical power consumption ranges for its associated information handling system module 12 in a power use table 40 . For example, the average power consumption range during time x is a greater portion of the allocated maximum power than is the average power consumption range during time y.
- a power monitor 34 of an information handling system module 12 looks up the historical power consumption range for the current time period from power use table 40 and requests a power allocation from power manager 34 that will support operations within that power consumption range, such as a power allocation having a maximum power of a predetermined amount over the maximum used in the power consumption range. If adequate power is available from power supply 18 , power manager 34 allocates the requested maximum power. If adequate power is not available, such as due to other allocations to other information handling system modules, then power manager 34 determines the maximum power to allocate based on the priority of the information handling system module 12 , as is explained in greater depth below.
- power manager 34 and power monitors 38 coordinate dynamic allocation of power to information handling system modules 12 base on priority and power use. If a power monitor 38 detects an increased power consumption at a module 12 , such as a power consumption within a predetermined amount of the maximum power allocated to that module, then the power monitor 38 communicates a request to power manager 34 for an additional power allocation. Power manager 34 attempts to secure an additional power allocation in response to the request by identifying an information handling system module 12 that has an excess power allocation, such as a maximum power allocation that is a predetermined amount over actual power consumption by that module. If power manager 34 identifies such an excess power allocation, then incremental unused slices of power are allocated from the module 12 having excess power allocation to the module 12 requesting an additional power allocation.
- power manager 34 compares the priority of the requesting module 12 with the other modules 12 to determine if another module should be throttled to provide excess power for the requesting module 12 . If throttling is commanded due to the higher priority of the requesting module 12 , then, after throttling provides excess power allocation at a throttled module 12 , the excess power allocation is re-allocated to the requesting module 12 .
- a flow diagram depicts a process for dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules, such as between blades of a blade information handling system.
- the process begins at step 42 with a request by a blade module for an additional power allocation of W Watts for its maximum power allowance.
- the chassis management controller receives the request and, at step 46 , determines if adequate power is available to meet the request for W Watts. For example, reclaimable power is the power that can be reclaimed from other blade modules by performing throttling operations via the management controller. If at step 46 adequate power to meet the request is not available, the process continues to step 48 to deny the request.
- step 46 If at step 46 adequate power is available to meet the request, the process continues to step 50 to determine if the re-allocation of maximum power settings for each module should occur.
- step 50 if the power available from the chassis power supply is greater than the power W requested by the blade module, the process continues to step 52 to reallocate power to the requesting blade module without adjusting other blade modules. If available power is less than the power requested by the blade module, the process continues to step 54 to communicate that the request is pending to the requesting blade module.
- unutilized power and priority-based blade module throttling are performed to free up power for re-allocation in response to the power request.
- the power budget meaning the available power consumption range, for another blade module is reduced by a predetermined increment.
- the power available for allocation to blade modules is updated and the requesting blade module is granted the additional power.
- the re-allocated power is added to the power budget of the requesting blade module to increase that modules maximum allowed power consumption.
- the re-allocated power is released from the requesting blade module should the power consumption be reduced at that module so that, at step 66 , the available and reclaimable chassis power is updated to address future power requests as needed.
- the requesting blade relinquishes user-configurable slices of power and monitors the peak consumption (MAX) in the last user-configurable time-period.
- the requesting blade is monitoring historical power consumption over the last 15 minutes. For example, if the max consumption in that time period is 200 Watts and the budget allocated is 300 Watts a difference of 100 Watts is available for allocation in incremental slices of 10 slices of 10 W.
- the modular information system may, as an example, relinquish 3 of those 10 slices to the chassis management controller.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates in general to the field of information handling system power allocation, and more particularly to a system and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- As the value and use of information continues to increase, individuals and businesses seek additional ways to process and store information. One option available to users is information handling systems. An information handling system generally processes, compiles, stores, and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or other purposes thereby allowing users to take advantage of the value of the information. Because technology and information handling needs and requirements vary between different users or applications, information handling systems may also vary regarding what information is handled, how the information is handled, how much information is processed, stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the information may be processed, stored, or communicated. The variations in information handling systems allow for information handling systems to be general or configured for a specific user or specific use such as financial transaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage, or global communications. In addition, information handling systems may include a variety of hardware and software components that may be configured to process, store, and communicate information and may include one or more computer systems, data storage systems, and networking systems.
- Business enterprises often rely on a number of information handling systems to perform information processing for enterprise functions. In order to save space and reduce cost, enterprises sometimes use information handling systems deployed in a modular configuration. For example, a chassis has multiple slots with each slot configured to accept an information handling system module. Each module typically has one or more processors, memory and firmware to run an operating system and desired applications; however, power and cooling for the modules is typically provided by resources within the chassis which are distributed to the modules. One example of such a modular configuration is a blade information handling system which has a chassis having slots to accept plural blade modules. A chassis management controller associated with the chassis has firmware and processing resources to manage the distribution of power resources to the various blade modules. A blade module controller associated with each blade module manages the operation of each blade within constraints set by the chassis management controller. An advantage to modular information handling system configurations, such as blade systems, is that an enterprise can add processing resources as needed by adding blade modules to the blade chassis. By sharing power and cooling resources through a common chassis, overall cost is reduced.
- One difficulty that arises with modular information handling system configurations is that the chassis power system is typically not capable of operating an information handling system module in each chassis slot at maximum power consumption level. To address this difficulty, the chassis management controller power management firmware typically manages a power budget for each information handling system module to balance power allocation based on power requirements and priority. Total available power from the chassis power supply is allocated based upon a worst case sustained power need (powermax) and worst case throttled power requirements (powermin) determined by the blade module controllers. The information handling system module power requirements are used in combination with user-configurable module priorities to determine the power allocation for each module. Thus, if available power is restricted then information handling system modules having more critical functions are allocated adequate power to operate unthrottled while other modules having less critical functions operate in throttled modes. However, the information handling system modules that have maximum power available typically do not use maximum power for extended simultaneous time periods. Thus, allocated but unutilized power typically remains available from the power supply but unavailable for use by all of the information handling system modules. As a result, some information handling system modules run in throttled modes even though the chassis power supply has additional power available to operate the information handling system modules unthrottled at least some of the time.
- Therefore a need has arisen for a system and method which provides dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system.
- In accordance with the present invention, a system and method are provided which substantially reduce the disadvantages and problems associated with previous methods and systems for allocation of power between information handling system modules of a modular information handling system. Power from a chassis power supply that is allocated to priority information handling system modules but not used by those modules is selectively and dynamically re-allocated to lower priority information handling system modules to support more complete utilization of the lower priority information handling system modules without impact to the operation of higher priority information handling system modules.
- More specifically, a modular information handling system has a chassis with plural slots and with plural information handling system modules populating at least some of the slots. A power manager associated with the chassis allocates a maximum power to the modules based on the available power, the priority of the modules and the power consumption at the modules. A power monitor at each information handling system module monitors power consumption at the associated module to keep power consumption below the maximum power allocated by the power manager. If additional power is needed at a module, the associated power monitor requests the power from the chassis power manager. The power manager first dynamically allocates power that is available at the power supply and not allocated to other modules. The power manager then identifies power allocated to modules that is not in use by the modules for reallocation to the requesting module. In the event that the requesting information handling system module has a higher priority than other modules, a lower priority module is throttled to create additional power for allocation to the requesting module. In this way, higher priority information handling system modules operate with their power needs met while lower priority modules operate at improved power consumption levels by allocating excess power from the higher priority modules when those modules do not need all of the power that they could otherwise use.
- The present invention provides a number of important technical advantages. One example of an important technical advantage is that allocated but unused power from a chassis power supply is dynamically re-allocated so that information handling system modules in the chassis have available a greater portion of the power supply's capacity. Information handling system modules having greater power allocations due to higher priority functions release increments of their power allocations as their power consumption allows so that other information handling system modules having lower priority functions will have additional power available. Re-allocation of power dynamically between modules improves the processing capacity of the modules without impacting higher priority functions since the modules having higher priority functions reacquires power allocations as warranted by power consumption at the modules.
- The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference number throughout the several figures designates a like or similar element.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a modular information handling system having dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules; and -
FIG. 2 depicts a flow diagram of a process for dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules. - Dynamic allocation of power between information handling system modules of a modular information handling system protects priority systems from throttling while supporting more full utilization of systems having lower priority. For purposes of this disclosure, an information handling system may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, an information handling system may be a personal computer, a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. The information handling system may include random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of the information handling system may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a video display. The information handling system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
- Referring now to
FIG. 1 , a block diagram depicts a modularinformation handling system 10 having dynamic power allocation between informationhandling system modules 12. Informationhandling system modules 12 couple intoslots 14 of amodular chassis 16 to receive power from apower supply 18.Power supply 18 may comprise a plurality of power supplies that each provide power when operational so that the total available power depends upon the number of operational power supplies. Each informationhandling system module 12 includes a number of processing components that cooperate to process information, such as aCPU 20,RAM 22, ahard disk drive 24, anetwork interface card 26 and achipset 28.Chipset 28 includes amodule controller 30, such as a baseboard management controller which provides out-of-band management of its associated informationhandling system module 12, such as remote start-up and shut down ofmodule 12.Module controllers 30 interface with achassis management controller 32, which controls the operation of informationhandling system modules 12, including the power made available to each informationhandling system module 12 by apower manager 34. As informationhandling system modules 12 request power up,power manager 34 ensures that adequate power exists frompower supply 18 to run the modules and assigns a maximum power for each module to use. For example,power manager 34 adjusts power available to modules based on the number of power supplies that are operational. If adequate power does not exist to power up amodule 12,power manager 34 references a priority table 36 in order to allocate power to the information handlingsystem modules 12 having higher priorities by throttling or shutting down modules having lower priorities. -
Power manager 34 applies the available power frompower supply 18 and the priorities of priority table 36 to establish a maximum power for each information handlingsystem module 12 and communicates the maximum power to eachmodule controller 30. The maximum power is set so that, if each information handlingsystem module 12 operates at its assigned maximum power, then the total power drawn frompower supply 18 will not exceed the capacity ofpower supply 18. Apower monitor 38 associated with each information handlingsystem module 12 monitors power consumption by its associatedmodule 12 to ensure that the maximum power allocated bypower manager 34 is not exceeded. In addition, power monitor 38 tracks historical power consumption ranges for its associated information handlingsystem module 12 in a power use table 40. For example, the average power consumption range during time x is a greater portion of the allocated maximum power than is the average power consumption range during time y. Power use table 40 includes other information, such as user-configurable time periods for monitored power use (e.g. 15 minutes), maximum monitored power consumption in that time period (e.g. 300 W), and the number of available slices of power (e.g. 10 slices of 10 Watts=100 W). For example, with a power budget set at 400 W, 300 W of consumption leaves 100 W of available power giving ten 10 W slices to allocate to other blade modules (Power Budget−Max Consumption=Number of available slices of power). At an initial power up request, apower monitor 34 of an informationhandling system module 12 looks up the historical power consumption range for the current time period from power use table 40 and requests a power allocation frompower manager 34 that will support operations within that power consumption range, such as a power allocation having a maximum power of a predetermined amount over the maximum used in the power consumption range. If adequate power is available frompower supply 18,power manager 34 allocates the requested maximum power. If adequate power is not available, such as due to other allocations to other information handling system modules, thenpower manager 34 determines the maximum power to allocate based on the priority of the information handlingsystem module 12, as is explained in greater depth below. - During operation of plural information handling
system modules 12,power manager 34 and power monitors 38 coordinate dynamic allocation of power to information handlingsystem modules 12 base on priority and power use. If apower monitor 38 detects an increased power consumption at amodule 12, such as a power consumption within a predetermined amount of the maximum power allocated to that module, then thepower monitor 38 communicates a request topower manager 34 for an additional power allocation.Power manager 34 attempts to secure an additional power allocation in response to the request by identifying an informationhandling system module 12 that has an excess power allocation, such as a maximum power allocation that is a predetermined amount over actual power consumption by that module. Ifpower manager 34 identifies such an excess power allocation, then incremental unused slices of power are allocated from themodule 12 having excess power allocation to themodule 12 requesting an additional power allocation. Ifpower manager 34 cannot identify amodule 12 having an excess power allocation, thenpower manager 34 compares the priority of the requestingmodule 12 with theother modules 12 to determine if another module should be throttled to provide excess power for the requestingmodule 12. If throttling is commanded due to the higher priority of the requestingmodule 12, then, after throttling provides excess power allocation at a throttledmodule 12, the excess power allocation is re-allocated to the requestingmodule 12. - Referring now to
FIG. 2 , a flow diagram depicts a process for dynamic power allocation between information handling system modules, such as between blades of a blade information handling system. The process begins atstep 42 with a request by a blade module for an additional power allocation of W Watts for its maximum power allowance. Atstep 44, the chassis management controller receives the request and, atstep 46, determines if adequate power is available to meet the request for W Watts. For example, reclaimable power is the power that can be reclaimed from other blade modules by performing throttling operations via the management controller. If atstep 46 adequate power to meet the request is not available, the process continues to step 48 to deny the request. If atstep 46 adequate power is available to meet the request, the process continues to step 50 to determine if the re-allocation of maximum power settings for each module should occur. Atstep 50, if the power available from the chassis power supply is greater than the power W requested by the blade module, the process continues to step 52 to reallocate power to the requesting blade module without adjusting other blade modules. If available power is less than the power requested by the blade module, the process continues to step 54 to communicate that the request is pending to the requesting blade module. Atstep 56, unutilized power and priority-based blade module throttling are performed to free up power for re-allocation in response to the power request. Atstep 58, the power budget, meaning the available power consumption range, for another blade module is reduced by a predetermined increment. Atstep 60, the power available for allocation to blade modules is updated and the requesting blade module is granted the additional power. Atstep 62, the re-allocated power is added to the power budget of the requesting blade module to increase that modules maximum allowed power consumption. At step 64, the re-allocated power is released from the requesting blade module should the power consumption be reduced at that module so that, atstep 66, the available and reclaimable chassis power is updated to address future power requests as needed. The requesting blade relinquishes user-configurable slices of power and monitors the peak consumption (MAX) in the last user-configurable time-period. For instance, the requesting blade is monitoring historical power consumption over the last 15 minutes. For example, if the max consumption in that time period is 200 Watts and the budget allocated is 300 Watts a difference of 100 Watts is available for allocation in incremental slices of 10 slices of 10 W. The modular information system may, as an example, relinquish 3 of those 10 slices to the chassis management controller. - Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/175,346 US20110264935A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2011-07-01 | System And Method For Dynamic Utilization-Based Power Allocation In A Modular Information Handling System |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/018,853 US7996690B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2008-01-24 | System and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system |
| US13/175,346 US20110264935A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2011-07-01 | System And Method For Dynamic Utilization-Based Power Allocation In A Modular Information Handling System |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/018,853 Continuation US7996690B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2008-01-24 | System and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20110264935A1 true US20110264935A1 (en) | 2011-10-27 |
Family
ID=40900434
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/018,853 Active 2030-05-06 US7996690B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2008-01-24 | System and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system |
| US13/175,346 Abandoned US20110264935A1 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2011-07-01 | System And Method For Dynamic Utilization-Based Power Allocation In A Modular Information Handling System |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/018,853 Active 2030-05-06 US7996690B2 (en) | 2008-01-24 | 2008-01-24 | System and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US7996690B2 (en) |
Cited By (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20110236024A1 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for picocell distributed radio heads providing macrocell capabilities |
| US20110237178A1 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. | Method and system for cpri cascading in distributed radio head architectures |
| US20110246807A1 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2011-10-06 | Dell Products L.P. | Demand based power allocation |
| US20120059532A1 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2012-03-08 | Gip Ag | Method and device for the directional transmission of electrical energy in an electricity grid |
| US8792930B1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2014-07-29 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Power management for wireless transmissions |
| US8989792B1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2015-03-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Using inertial sensors to trigger transmit power management |
| US20150177813A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-25 | Dell, Inc. | Global throttling of computing nodes in a modular, rack-configured information handling system |
| US9647489B2 (en) * | 2014-08-26 | 2017-05-09 | Apple Inc. | Brownout avoidance |
| US10365701B2 (en) * | 2012-08-30 | 2019-07-30 | Dell Products L.P. | Information handling system configuration for power system output capability |
| US10983588B2 (en) | 2014-08-06 | 2021-04-20 | Apple Inc. | Low power mode |
| US11363133B1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2022-06-14 | Apple Inc. | Battery health-based power management |
Families Citing this family (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8244918B2 (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2012-08-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource sharing expansion card |
| US8375228B2 (en) * | 2008-08-06 | 2013-02-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multiple-node system power utilization management |
| US8065538B2 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2011-11-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Network element power management |
| JP4743293B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2011-08-10 | 日本電気株式会社 | Power distribution system and method |
| US8892911B2 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2014-11-18 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Variable power systems for computers |
| US8327166B2 (en) * | 2009-05-21 | 2012-12-04 | Lsi Corporation | Power managment for storage devices |
| US20100318827A1 (en) * | 2009-06-15 | 2010-12-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Energy use profiling for workload transfer |
| US9130400B2 (en) | 2009-09-24 | 2015-09-08 | Apple Inc. | Multiport power converter with load detection capabilities |
| WO2011066823A2 (en) * | 2009-12-05 | 2011-06-09 | Jens Mehnert | Method and device for analyzing the energy use during the operation of a production system |
| US8868936B2 (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2014-10-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic power balancing among blade servers in a chassis |
| CN103998596B (en) | 2011-10-10 | 2016-05-18 | 德国达斯其普信息与程序技术有限公司 | Method and the bioreactor system of controlled operation biotechnology device |
| JP2013149093A (en) * | 2012-01-19 | 2013-08-01 | Toshiba Corp | Control device, control method, program, and electronic apparatus |
| US9170627B2 (en) | 2012-08-20 | 2015-10-27 | Dell Products L.P. | Power management for PCIE switches and devices in a multi-root input-output virtualization blade chassis |
| US9568966B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2017-02-14 | Dell Products L.P. | Dynamic power budget allocation |
| US9529398B2 (en) * | 2012-09-10 | 2016-12-27 | Apple Inc. | Managing and revoking power allocated through bus interfaces |
| US10114438B2 (en) * | 2014-08-04 | 2018-10-30 | Dell Products, Lp | Dynamic power budgeting in a chassis |
| US20160062449A1 (en) * | 2014-08-27 | 2016-03-03 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Computing platform power consumption level adjustment |
| US10169104B2 (en) * | 2014-11-19 | 2019-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual computing power management |
| CN107850926B (en) * | 2015-05-26 | 2021-09-07 | 昕诺飞控股有限公司 | Adaptive power supply apparatus and method for supplying power |
| AU2018254614A1 (en) * | 2017-04-21 | 2019-10-03 | Ideal Industries, Inc. | Low voltage power distribution system |
| CN108932049A (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2018-12-04 | 鸿富锦精密工业(武汉)有限公司 | Host slot power supply circuit |
| US10423217B1 (en) * | 2017-07-14 | 2019-09-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic power capping of multi-server nodes in a chassis based on real-time resource utilization |
| US10459733B2 (en) | 2018-01-25 | 2019-10-29 | Dell Products, Lp | Power budgeting in an information handling system |
| US10747286B2 (en) * | 2018-06-11 | 2020-08-18 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic power budget allocation in multi-processor system |
| US11188142B1 (en) * | 2018-12-11 | 2021-11-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Power management network for communication between racks in a data center |
| US11036277B2 (en) * | 2019-08-15 | 2021-06-15 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus to dynamically throttle compute engines |
| CN110429712B (en) * | 2019-08-16 | 2020-12-18 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | DC load response control method and device based on voltage change and DC electrical appliance |
| US11977426B2 (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2024-05-07 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation | Control apparatus, control method and program |
| US11580610B2 (en) * | 2021-01-05 | 2023-02-14 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling electrical power consumption |
| US20250004535A1 (en) * | 2023-06-29 | 2025-01-02 | Red Hat, Inc. | Optimized power management for computer systems |
Family Cites Families (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5396635A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1995-03-07 | Vadem Corporation | Power conservation apparatus having multiple power reduction levels dependent upon the activity of the computer system |
| EP1182548A3 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2003-10-15 | Texas Instruments France | Dynamic hardware control for energy management systems using task attributes |
| US6990593B2 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2006-01-24 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for diverting power reserves and shifting activities according to activity priorities in a server cluster in the event of a power interruption |
| US7043647B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2006-05-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Intelligent power management for a rack of servers |
| US7043650B2 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2006-05-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System and method for intelligent control of power consumption of distributed services during periods when power consumption must be reduced |
| US7213065B2 (en) | 2001-11-08 | 2007-05-01 | Racemi, Inc. | System and method for dynamic server allocation and provisioning |
| US6986069B2 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2006-01-10 | Newisys, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for static and dynamic power management of computer systems |
| US7546475B2 (en) * | 2003-05-13 | 2009-06-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Power-aware adaptation in a data center |
| AU2003236882A1 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2004-12-03 | 3Com Corporation | System and method for the management of power supplied over data lines |
| US7051215B2 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2006-05-23 | Intel Corporation | Power management for clustered computing platforms |
| US7237130B2 (en) * | 2003-08-04 | 2007-06-26 | Inventec Corporation | Blade server performance management method and system |
| US7424624B2 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2008-09-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Rack equipment power purchase plan supervision system and method |
| US7353415B2 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2008-04-01 | Dell Products L.P. | System and method for power usage level management of blades installed within blade servers |
| JP4591185B2 (en) * | 2005-04-28 | 2010-12-01 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Server device |
| US7581125B2 (en) * | 2005-09-22 | 2009-08-25 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Agent for managing power among electronic systems |
| US7793120B2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2010-09-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Data structure for budgeting power for multiple devices |
| US7793126B2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2010-09-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Using priorities and power usage to allocate power budget |
-
2008
- 2008-01-24 US US12/018,853 patent/US7996690B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-07-01 US US13/175,346 patent/US20110264935A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (22)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20110246807A1 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2011-10-06 | Dell Products L.P. | Demand based power allocation |
| US8381000B2 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2013-02-19 | Dell Products L.P. | Demand based power allocation |
| US9337655B2 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2016-05-10 | Gip Ag | Method and device for the directional transmission of electrical energy in an electricity grid |
| US20120059532A1 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2012-03-08 | Gip Ag | Method and device for the directional transmission of electrical energy in an electricity grid |
| US8989792B1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2015-03-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Using inertial sensors to trigger transmit power management |
| US9307499B2 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2016-04-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Using sensors to trigger transmit power management |
| US9295004B2 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2016-03-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Duty cycling to reduce average transmit power |
| US8792930B1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2014-07-29 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Power management for wireless transmissions |
| US8934937B1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2015-01-13 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Using sensors to trigger transmit power management |
| US8965441B1 (en) * | 2010-01-22 | 2015-02-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reducing wireless interference with transmit power level management |
| US8422884B2 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2013-04-16 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and apparatus for picocell distributed radio heads providing macrocell capabilities |
| US8467823B2 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2013-06-18 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and system for CPRI cascading in distributed radio head architectures |
| US20110236024A1 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for picocell distributed radio heads providing macrocell capabilities |
| US20110237178A1 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. | Method and system for cpri cascading in distributed radio head architectures |
| US10365701B2 (en) * | 2012-08-30 | 2019-07-30 | Dell Products L.P. | Information handling system configuration for power system output capability |
| US20150177813A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-25 | Dell, Inc. | Global throttling of computing nodes in a modular, rack-configured information handling system |
| US9625974B2 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2017-04-18 | Dell Products, L.P. | Global throttling of computing nodes in a modular, rack-configured information handling system |
| US10551898B2 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2020-02-04 | Dell Products, L.P. | Global throttling of computing nodes in a modular, rack-configured information handling system |
| US10983588B2 (en) | 2014-08-06 | 2021-04-20 | Apple Inc. | Low power mode |
| US9647489B2 (en) * | 2014-08-26 | 2017-05-09 | Apple Inc. | Brownout avoidance |
| US11088567B2 (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2021-08-10 | Apple Inc. | Brownout avoidance |
| US11363133B1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2022-06-14 | Apple Inc. | Battery health-based power management |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US7996690B2 (en) | 2011-08-09 |
| US20090193276A1 (en) | 2009-07-30 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7996690B2 (en) | System and method for dynamic utilization-based power allocation in a modular information handling system | |
| US8156358B2 (en) | System and method for dynamic modular information handling system power distribution | |
| US8060760B2 (en) | System and method for dynamic information handling system prioritization | |
| US8032768B2 (en) | System and method for smoothing power reclamation of blade servers | |
| US8713334B2 (en) | Demand based power allocation | |
| US8065541B2 (en) | Server power consumption controller, and method and computer program for controlling server power consumption | |
| US8499178B2 (en) | System and method for managing information handling system power supply capacity utilization based on load sharing power loss | |
| US8843772B2 (en) | Systems and methods for dynamic power allocation in an information handling system environment | |
| US7831843B2 (en) | Apparatus and methods for managing power in an information handling system | |
| US9329910B2 (en) | Distributed power delivery | |
| US7975123B2 (en) | Computer system, management computer and storage system, and storage area allocation amount controlling method | |
| US20060156041A1 (en) | System and method for power management of plural information handling systems | |
| US9494991B2 (en) | Energy allocation to groups of virtual machines | |
| US9021290B2 (en) | Systems and methods for dynamic power management in a blade server | |
| US10423217B1 (en) | Dynamic power capping of multi-server nodes in a chassis based on real-time resource utilization | |
| CN106681835A (en) | Resource allocation method and resource manager | |
| EP3392736B1 (en) | System and method for dynamic power capping and load balance management for a multi-node system | |
| EP4528429A1 (en) | Dynamic power-aware workload scheduler | |
| HK1095180B (en) | System and method for power management of plural information handling systems |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, TE Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (ABL);ASSIGNORS:DELL INC.;APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC.;ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031898/0001 Effective date: 20131029 Owner name: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS FIRST LIEN COLLATERAL AGENT, TEXAS Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES);ASSIGNORS:APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC.;ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;BOOMI, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031897/0348 Effective date: 20131029 Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (TERM LOAN);ASSIGNORS:DELL INC.;APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC.;ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031899/0261 Effective date: 20131029 Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, TEXAS Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (ABL);ASSIGNORS:DELL INC.;APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC.;ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031898/0001 Effective date: 20131029 Owner name: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS FI Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES);ASSIGNORS:APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC.;ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;BOOMI, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031897/0348 Effective date: 20131029 Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (TERM LOAN);ASSIGNORS:DELL INC.;APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC.;ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031899/0261 Effective date: 20131029 |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DELL MARKETING L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: SECUREWORKS, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: COMPELLANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL USA L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL SOFTWARE INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0216 Effective date: 20160907 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: SECUREWORKS, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL MARKETING L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL USA L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL SOFTWARE INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040040/0001 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL SOFTWARE INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL PRODUCTS L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL USA L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: SECUREWORKS, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: DELL MARKETING L.P., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 Owner name: APPASSURE SOFTWARE, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:040065/0618 Effective date: 20160907 |