US20100181201A1 - Electrolytic passivated tin plated steel - Google Patents
Electrolytic passivated tin plated steel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100181201A1 US20100181201A1 US12/427,443 US42744309A US2010181201A1 US 20100181201 A1 US20100181201 A1 US 20100181201A1 US 42744309 A US42744309 A US 42744309A US 2010181201 A1 US2010181201 A1 US 2010181201A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- acid
- tin plated
- composition
- hydroxyl
- plated steel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tin Chemical compound [Sn] ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 108
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- -1 phenol organic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 235000005985 organic acids Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000003973 paint Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 claims abstract 5
- TUSDEZXZIZRFGC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-O-galloyl-3,6-(R)-HHDP-beta-D-glucose Natural products OC1C(O2)COC(=O)C3=CC(O)=C(O)C(O)=C3C3=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=C3C(=O)OC1C(O)C2OC(=O)C1=CC(O)=C(O)C(O)=C1 TUSDEZXZIZRFGC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000001263 FEMA 3042 Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- LRBQNJMCXXYXIU-PPKXGCFTSA-N Penta-digallate-beta-D-glucose Natural products OC1=C(O)C(O)=CC(C(=O)OC=2C(=C(O)C=C(C=2)C(=O)OC[C@@H]2[C@H]([C@H](OC(=O)C=3C=C(OC(=O)C=4C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=4)C(O)=C(O)C=3)[C@@H](OC(=O)C=3C=C(OC(=O)C=4C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=4)C(O)=C(O)C=3)[C@H](OC(=O)C=3C=C(OC(=O)C=4C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=4)C(O)=C(O)C=3)O2)OC(=O)C=2C=C(OC(=O)C=3C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=3)C(O)=C(O)C=2)O)=C1 LRBQNJMCXXYXIU-PPKXGCFTSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N citric acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CC(O)(C(O)=O)CC(O)=O KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- 235000015523 tannic acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 18
- LRBQNJMCXXYXIU-NRMVVENXSA-N tannic acid Chemical compound OC1=C(O)C(O)=CC(C(=O)OC=2C(=C(O)C=C(C=2)C(=O)OC[C@@H]2[C@H]([C@H](OC(=O)C=3C=C(OC(=O)C=4C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=4)C(O)=C(O)C=3)[C@@H](OC(=O)C=3C=C(OC(=O)C=4C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=4)C(O)=C(O)C=3)[C@@H](OC(=O)C=3C=C(OC(=O)C=4C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=4)C(O)=C(O)C=3)O2)OC(=O)C=2C=C(OC(=O)C=3C=C(O)C(O)=C(O)C=3)C(O)=C(O)C=2)O)=C1 LRBQNJMCXXYXIU-NRMVVENXSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- 229940033123 tannic acid Drugs 0.000 claims description 18
- 229920002258 tannic acid Polymers 0.000 claims description 18
- AEMRFAOFKBGASW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycolic acid Chemical compound OCC(O)=O AEMRFAOFKBGASW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 17
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phenol Natural products OC1=CC=CC=C1 ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphoric acid Chemical group OP(O)(O)=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- LNTHITQWFMADLM-UHFFFAOYSA-N gallic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC(O)=C(O)C(O)=C1 LNTHITQWFMADLM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000021317 phosphate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- ARCGXLSVLAOJQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N trimellitic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=C(C(O)=O)C(C(O)=O)=C1 ARCGXLSVLAOJQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 9
- XAEFZNCEHLXOMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium benzoate Chemical compound [K+].[O-]C(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 XAEFZNCEHLXOMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 8
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000004111 Potassium silicate Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910000147 aluminium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 150000003013 phosphoric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 6
- NNHHDJVEYQHLHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium silicate Chemical group [K+].[K+].[O-][Si]([O-])=O NNHHDJVEYQHLHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052913 potassium silicate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 235000019353 potassium silicate Nutrition 0.000 claims description 6
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 6
- 159000000032 aromatic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000004515 gallic acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 229940074391 gallic acid Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000004760 silicates Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- WXTMDXOMEHJXQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC(O)=CC=C1O WXTMDXOMEHJXQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-SQOUGZDYSA-N D-gluconic acid Chemical compound OC[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C(O)=O RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-SQOUGZDYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-gluconic acid Natural products OCC(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)=O RGHNJXZEOKUKBD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Orthosilicate Chemical compound [O-][Si]([O-])([O-])[O-] BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000015165 citric acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000012208 gluconic acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 229950006191 gluconic acid Drugs 0.000 claims description 4
- WPYMKLBDIGXBTP-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 WPYMKLBDIGXBTP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 3
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims 3
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 claims 3
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 2
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000005028 tinplate Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 84
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 54
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 21
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 18
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000012956 testing procedure Methods 0.000 description 18
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 15
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- XUJNEKJLAYXESH-UHFFFAOYSA-N cysteine Natural products SCC(N)C(O)=O XUJNEKJLAYXESH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 235000018417 cysteine Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000001488 sodium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 11
- RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K trisodium phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 11
- 229910000406 trisodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 235000019801 trisodium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- MBMLMWLHJBBADN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ferrous sulfide Chemical compound [Fe]=S MBMLMWLHJBBADN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 10
- 229910001887 tin oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 10
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 9
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 8
- XOLBLPGZBRYERU-UHFFFAOYSA-N tin dioxide Chemical compound O=[Sn]=O XOLBLPGZBRYERU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- AFNRRBXCCXDRPS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tin(ii) sulfide Chemical compound [Sn]=S AFNRRBXCCXDRPS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- GCAIEATUVJFSMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzene-1,2,3,4-tetracarboxylic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=C(C(O)=O)C(C(O)=O)=C1C(O)=O GCAIEATUVJFSMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004383 yellowing Methods 0.000 description 3
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- ZCDOYSPFYFSLEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromate(2-) Chemical class [O-][Cr]([O-])(=O)=O ZCDOYSPFYFSLEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- JOPOVCBBYLSVDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromium(6+) Chemical compound [Cr+6] JOPOVCBBYLSVDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000008199 coating composition Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000002484 inorganic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron oxide Inorganic materials [Fe]=O UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000013980 iron oxide Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(2+);oxygen(2-) Chemical class [O-2].[Fe+2] VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- XNGIFLGASWRNHJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phthalic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1C(O)=O XNGIFLGASWRNHJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000011253 protective coating Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012192 staining solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- LWIHDJKSTIGBAC-UHFFFAOYSA-K tripotassium phosphate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[K+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O LWIHDJKSTIGBAC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- UIAFKZKHHVMJGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1O UIAFKZKHHVMJGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000012790 adhesive layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012670 alkaline solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003637 basic solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007739 conversion coating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002161 passivation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000007965 phenolic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000009048 phenolic acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000002989 phenols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012286 potassium permanganate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000160 potassium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011009 potassium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910000029 sodium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000015393 sodium molybdate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008719 thickening Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
- QHGNHLZPVBIIPX-UHFFFAOYSA-N tin(ii) oxide Chemical class [Sn]=O QHGNHLZPVBIIPX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010891 toxic waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004222 uncontrolled growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000080 wetting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D5/00—Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
- C25D5/34—Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated
- C25D5/36—Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated of iron or steel
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D11/00—Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
- C25D11/02—Anodisation
- C25D11/34—Anodisation of metals or alloys not provided for in groups C25D11/04 - C25D11/32
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D5/00—Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
- C25D5/48—After-treatment of electroplated surfaces
Definitions
- This invention relates to an electrolytic coating composition for tin plated steel articles which provides the tin plated steel with a protective coating and improved paint adhesion.
- the present invention provides a tin plated steel coating composition having as its essential ingredients organic hydroxyl acids, both saturated and unsaturated, and phenol organic acids; the method of coating the surface of the tin plated steel articles; and the tin plated steel article electrolytically coated with the composition having as its essential ingredients organic hydroxyl acids, both saturated and unsaturated, and phenol organic acids; and the coated articles painted.
- the natural oxide film on a tin plated steel surface provides a protective barrier and acts to improve paint adhesion. Maintaining this oxide film while at the same time preventing the rapid and uncontrolled growth of the oxide to a thick, yellow and non-adhesive layer has always been the primary goal of tin plated steel producers. In addition, foods high in sulfur will stain tin plated steel surfaces not properly passified.
- Pat. No. 2,312,076 obtained patents on a process which used dichromates mixed with phosphates to passivate tin plated steel surfaces. Since that time new patents (U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,327,127 and 2,357,970) involving inorganic compounds have been issued, but they have all involved the use of dichromates or chromium in the plus three oxidation state which will naturally oxidize itself to the plus six oxidation state (U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,714) when exposed to humid conditions in the open atmosphere. The hexavalent chromium present in all of these compositions is extremely toxic and as such is banned in Europe and in many areas of the United States.
- My invention eliminates the need for hexavalent chromium and/or trivalent chromium compositions which, due to their extreme toxicity, are being removed from the work place environment.
- my process will provide the same level of sulfide stain resistance and coating adhesion as the chromium based compositions. At the same time this process is less expensive and requires no toxic waste disposal.
- this invention is directed towards providing a protective coating for tin plated steel surfaces which has as its essential ingredients, organic hydroxyl acids, saturated and unsaturated, and phenol organic acids.
- This process uses the electrolysis of various solutions of the salts of organic hydroxyl acids, saturated and unsaturated, and the salts of phenol organic acids to deposit these materials and at the same time cause them to chemically react with the steel itself and/or the tin plated on the steel.
- concentration and more specifically the current density used will determine the actual amount of material applied and the degree to which these materials react with the steel and/or the tin they are attracted to during the operation of the electrolytic cell.
- the most suitable PH range extends from a PH of 7.0 to a PH of 10.0.
- the preferred PH is one of 8.0 to 9.5.
- Temperature is of no concern to the process.
- the voltage must of necessity be above the reduction potential of the materials in the water based solutions.
- Various other materials may be added to these solutions to act as wetting agents, increase conductivity, control the PH (buffers) or prevent biological attack as long as these materials do not act to prevent the reaction of the steel and/or tin with the materials in the solution in question.
- the distribution of the tin on tin plated steel, the uniformity of its thickness and its corresponding density will differ from one batch of tin plated steel to another as will the iron.
- Tin plated steel with a “matt” finish will have a greater surface area and as a result more non uniformity in the distribution of tin over the surface of the tin plated steel.
- a tin plated steel sheet was cleaned of oils and/or unwanted inorganic compounds (i.e. tin and/or iron oxides) by use of a non ionic detergent.
- the tin plated steel sheet was made the cathode of a 12 volt electrolytic cell having a current density of about 15 amps per square foot in a solution consisting of 3.0 grams per liter sodium carbonate in D.I. water for thirty seconds.
- the cleaned surface was then rinsed in D.I. water and treated the cleaned tin plated steel was made the cathode in a 7.5 volt electrolytic cell having a current density of 50 amps per square foot and a solution of organic hydroxyl acids and phenol organic acids.
- the organic hydroxyl acids preferentially form a strong protective chemical bond to the tin while the phenol organic acids prefer to bond to the iron and serve to passivate the surface of the iron.
- the following Examples 1, 2, and 3 will serve to illustrate this tendency and thus the need for a mixture of phenol based compounds and non phenol based organic compounds working together with each other.
- Examples 13 and 17 show that the hydroxyl organic acids and/or phenolic acids continue to be essential to the process.
- the tin plated steel panels were three inches by five inches.
- the organic hydroxyl acid is selected from C 2 -C 6 hydroxyl acids which are preferably selected from hydroxyl acetic acid, D-gluconic acid, citric acid and lactic acid.
- the organic phenol acids are preferably selected from hydrolysable tannic acid, gallic acid and dihydroxy benzoic acid.
- the phosphates, silicates and aromatic acid salts are preferably selected from phosphoric acid or its salt, potassium silicate and potassium salt of 1,3,4 benzenetricarboxylic acid
- a five percent solution of acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- a six percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid and 0.5% phthalic acid was adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- the second tin plate panel was first rinsed with a one percent hydroxyl acetic acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion.
- a seven percent solution of citric acid was added to a 1.0% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- a seven percent solution of citric acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- One of the tin plated panels was placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- the second tin plated panel was first rinsed with a one percent hydroxyl acetic acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion.
- a twelve percent solution of “D-Gluconic” acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- One tin plated panel was placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- the second tin plated panel was first rinsed with a one percent hydroxyl acetic acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion.
- a twelve percent solution of “D-Gluconic” acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- a twelve percent solution of “D-Gluconic” acid was added to a 0.5% solution of pure gallic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- Lactic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of 2,4 dihydroxyl benzoic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel.
- a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds.
- the tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”.
- the matt finish panel showed traces of yellow tin oxide while the polished panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid containing 0.5% phosphoric acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel.
- a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds.
- the tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panels showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- a five percent solution of acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid containing 0.5% phosphoric acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel.
- a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds.
- the tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. Both panels showed extensive amounts of yellow tin oxide.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- To this solution was added 0.5% potassium silicate and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel.
- a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,3,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,2,3,4 Benzenetetracarboxylic acid and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,3,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I.
- a five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide.
- To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,2,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid, 0.5% potassium phosphate and 0.5% of a potassium silicate solution and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0.
- This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which three tin plated matt finish steel panels and three polished tin plated steel panels were made the anode. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds.
- the tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- One polished tin plated steel panel and one matt tin plated steel panel were placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There were no signs of any black iron sulfide formation or tin sulfide formation on either panel after one hour of exposure to this solution.
- one of the matt finished panels and one of the polished steel panels were coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion on either panel.
- One matt finish panel and one polished steel panel were baked for one half hour at 400 degree F. in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. Both panels showed no signs of yellow tin oxides or black iron oxides due to this baking procedure.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Electroplating Methods And Accessories (AREA)
- Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
An electrolyte composition for passifying tin plated steel wherein the essential ingredient consists of a mixture of organic hydroxyl acids and phenol organic acids; a method of passifying tin plate steel articles with the composition by electrolysis with a pH of about 7.0-10.0 and preferably a pH of 8.0-9.5; and providing the passified tin plated steel article produces by the method along with the passified articles having an appropriate paint thereon.
Description
- This invention relates to an electrolytic coating composition for tin plated steel articles which provides the tin plated steel with a protective coating and improved paint adhesion.
- More particularly, the present invention provides a tin plated steel coating composition having as its essential ingredients organic hydroxyl acids, both saturated and unsaturated, and phenol organic acids; the method of coating the surface of the tin plated steel articles; and the tin plated steel article electrolytically coated with the composition having as its essential ingredients organic hydroxyl acids, both saturated and unsaturated, and phenol organic acids; and the coated articles painted.
- The natural oxide film on a tin plated steel surface provides a protective barrier and acts to improve paint adhesion. Maintaining this oxide film while at the same time preventing the rapid and uncontrolled growth of the oxide to a thick, yellow and non-adhesive layer has always been the primary goal of tin plated steel producers. In addition, foods high in sulfur will stain tin plated steel surfaces not properly passified.
- Initial attempts at passification all centered around the thickening of the tin's natural oxide film with an inorganic oxidant while at the same time leaving a corrosion resistant conversion coating on the surface of the metal to retard further oxide growth and prevent sulfide stains. In 1931 S. R. Mason (U.S. Pat. No. 1,827,204) patented an electrolytic process which used chromates to both thicken the oxide film and leave a film of reduced chromic oxides to retard further oxide growth and prevent sulfide stains. In 1935 a French patent (French patent 777,314) detailed a process which used sodium molybdates, an inorganic oxidant and various heavy metals to produce a passive film on the metal's surface. In the same year U.S. Pat. No. 2,024,951 described a process which used potassium permanganate to both stabilize the oxide film and reduce sulfide staining. In 1940 U.S. Pat. No. 2,215,165 described an electrolytic process which oxidized and then reduced the oxide to give a more dense oxide film and produce a more passive tin oxide. That same year R. Kerr (Kerr, R., “Protective Films on Tin Plate by Chemical Treatment”, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 59, 259, 1940) published the results of his investigations which showed that an alkaline solution of chromates would passivate tin plated steel surfaces. In 1943 W. O. Cook and H. E. Romine (U.S. Pat. No. 2,312,076) obtained patents on a process which used dichromates mixed with phosphates to passivate tin plated steel surfaces. Since that time new patents (U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,327,127 and 2,357,970) involving inorganic compounds have been issued, but they have all involved the use of dichromates or chromium in the plus three oxidation state which will naturally oxidize itself to the plus six oxidation state (U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,714) when exposed to humid conditions in the open atmosphere. The hexavalent chromium present in all of these compositions is extremely toxic and as such is banned in Europe and in many areas of the United States.
- A totally organic electrolytic process of increasing paint adhesion, controlling the rate of oxidation and providing resistance to sulfide staining was described by J. W. Bibber in U.S. Pat. No. 6,830,821. Since that patent was issued, the amount of tin applied to the steel in tin plating applications has fallen off significantly due to the cost of the tin itself and competition from glass and plastic containers. In addition the stain resistant requirements and adhesion requirements of tin plated steel have all been increased.
- My invention eliminates the need for hexavalent chromium and/or trivalent chromium compositions which, due to their extreme toxicity, are being removed from the work place environment. In addition my process will provide the same level of sulfide stain resistance and coating adhesion as the chromium based compositions. At the same time this process is less expensive and requires no toxic waste disposal.
- Accordingly, this invention is directed towards providing a protective coating for tin plated steel surfaces which has as its essential ingredients, organic hydroxyl acids, saturated and unsaturated, and phenol organic acids. This process uses the electrolysis of various solutions of the salts of organic hydroxyl acids, saturated and unsaturated, and the salts of phenol organic acids to deposit these materials and at the same time cause them to chemically react with the steel itself and/or the tin plated on the steel. The concentration and more specifically the current density used will determine the actual amount of material applied and the degree to which these materials react with the steel and/or the tin they are attracted to during the operation of the electrolytic cell. Below 5.0 grams per liter it is not economically feasible to deposit these materials in sufficient quantity for them to be effective in preventing sulfide stain resistance or to improving the adhesion of the tin plated steel surface. Coil coating lines used to plate out tin on steel will generally not allow for more then about five seconds of exposure to any given electrochemical cell used to passivate the tin plated steel. The upper limit is the solubility limits imposed on the materials being applied. In theory any PH may be used, but tin and/or steel will dissolve in strongly acid or strongly basic solutions and the hydrogen ions must of necessity be dissociated from the acids being used to provide for the proper conductivity of the solution being employed in the electrochemical cell. The most suitable PH range extends from a PH of 7.0 to a PH of 10.0. The preferred PH is one of 8.0 to 9.5. Temperature is of no concern to the process. The voltage must of necessity be above the reduction potential of the materials in the water based solutions.
- Various other materials may be added to these solutions to act as wetting agents, increase conductivity, control the PH (buffers) or prevent biological attack as long as these materials do not act to prevent the reaction of the steel and/or tin with the materials in the solution in question. The distribution of the tin on tin plated steel, the uniformity of its thickness and its corresponding density will differ from one batch of tin plated steel to another as will the iron. As an example, Tin plated steel with a “matt” finish will have a greater surface area and as a result more non uniformity in the distribution of tin over the surface of the tin plated steel. As a consequence the distribution of phenolic acid salts and/or hydroxyl organic acids salts will of necessity differ from one batch of tin plated steel to another. We find that we are able to obtain more consistent overall results by the addition of phosphates, silicates and aromatic acid salts to our hydroxyl organic acid compositions.
- In the following examples a tin plated steel sheet was cleaned of oils and/or unwanted inorganic compounds (i.e. tin and/or iron oxides) by use of a non ionic detergent. The tin plated steel sheet was made the cathode of a 12 volt electrolytic cell having a current density of about 15 amps per square foot in a solution consisting of 3.0 grams per liter sodium carbonate in D.I. water for thirty seconds. The cleaned surface was then rinsed in D.I. water and treated the cleaned tin plated steel was made the cathode in a 7.5 volt electrolytic cell having a current density of 50 amps per square foot and a solution of organic hydroxyl acids and phenol organic acids. The organic hydroxyl acids preferentially form a strong protective chemical bond to the tin while the phenol organic acids prefer to bond to the iron and serve to passivate the surface of the iron. The following Examples 1, 2, and 3 will serve to illustrate this tendency and thus the need for a mixture of phenol based compounds and non phenol based organic compounds working together with each other. Examples 13 and 17 show that the hydroxyl organic acids and/or phenolic acids continue to be essential to the process. The tin plated steel panels were three inches by five inches.
- The organic hydroxyl acid is selected from C2-C6hydroxyl acids which are preferably selected from hydroxyl acetic acid, D-gluconic acid, citric acid and lactic acid.
- The organic phenol acids are preferably selected from hydrolysable tannic acid, gallic acid and dihydroxy benzoic acid.
- The phosphates, silicates and aromatic acid salts are preferably selected from phosphoric acid or its salt, potassium silicate and potassium salt of 1,3,4 benzenetricarboxylic acid
- A five percent solution of acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The outer tin layer quickly turned a tin sulfide yellow in color indicating that it was not passivated.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The outer tin layer did not yellow after one hour of exposure to the sulfide staining solution indication that a hydroxyl organic acid was needed to passivate the tin.
- A six percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid and 0.5% phthalic acid was adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. Within a five minute period of time, the outer edges of the panel became a dark black which then spread to the rest of the panel while the outer layer of tin remained silvery in color and then began to slowly turn yellow in color. An analysis to the panel showed the presence of a thick film of iron sulfide under a thin film of tin mixed with tin sulfide. This clearly indicates that a phenol organic acid was required to passivate the iron in the tin plated steel.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- One of tin plated panels was placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- The second tin plate panel was first rinsed with a one percent hydroxyl acetic acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion.
- A seven percent solution of citric acid was added to a 1.0% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no yellowing of the tin due to the formation of tin sulfide after one hour and only a minor quantity of iron sulfide formed indicating the passivation of both the iron and the tin.
- A seven percent solution of citric acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- One of the tin plated panels was placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- The second tin plated panel was first rinsed with a one percent hydroxyl acetic acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion.
- A twelve percent solution of “D-Gluconic” acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried.
- One tin plated panel was placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- The second tin plated panel was first rinsed with a one percent hydroxyl acetic acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion.
- A twelve percent solution of “D-Gluconic” acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no yellowing of the tin due to the formation of tin sulfide after one hour and only a minor amount of iron sulfide was detected on the surface of the iron attached to the tin.
- A twelve percent solution of “D-Gluconic” acid was added to a 0.5% solution of pure gallic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. 7.5 volts and a current density of about 50 amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no yellowing of the tin due to the formation of tin sulfide after one hour.
- A five percent solution of Lactic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of 2,4 dihydroxyl benzoic acid and the PH of the mixture was then adjusted to a PH of 9.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which the tin plated steel was made the anode and a high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panel was then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The outer tin layer did not yellow after one hour of exposure to the sulfide staining solution and only minor amounts of iron sulfide were found on the iron attached to the tin.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The matt finish panel showed traces of yellow tin oxide while the polished panel showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid containing 0.5% phosphoric acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. The panels showed no traces of yellow tin oxide.
- A five percent solution of acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid containing 0.5% phosphoric acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were placed in an oven at 400 degrees F. for thirty minutes in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. Both panels showed extensive amounts of yellow tin oxide.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. To this solution was added 0.5% potassium silicate and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. Both of them were first rinsed with mild acid solution to remove any unwanted alkalinity and then coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion on either panel. Repeating this procedure with the exception of leaving out the silicate, resulted in a loss of adhesion to the matt finish panel.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,3,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There were no signs of any black iron sulfide formation on either panel after one hour of exposure to this solution. Repeating the above experiment but leaving out the 1,3,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid resulted in traces of black iron sulfide on the matt finished panel.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,2,3,4 Benzenetetracarboxylic acid and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There were no signs of any black iron sulfide formation on either panel after one hour of exposure to this solution. Repeating the above experiment but leaving out the 1,2,3,4 Benzenetetracarboxylic acid resulted in traces of black iron sulfide on the matt finished panel.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,3,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which two tin plated steel panels were made the anode, one panel had a matt finish while the other was polished steel. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water, dried and then placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There were extensive signs of any black iron sulfide formation on both panels after one hour of exposure to this solution.
- A five percent solution of hydroxyl acetic acid was added to a 0.5% solution of food grade hydrolysable tannic acid and the pH of the mixture was then adjusted to a pH of 8.0 by the addition of potassium hydroxide. To this solution was added 1.0% of the potassium salt of 1,2,4 Benzenetricarboxylic acid, 0.5% potassium phosphate and 0.5% of a potassium silicate solution and the pH was again adjusted to 8.0. This solution was then used in an electrolytic cell in which three tin plated matt finish steel panels and three polished tin plated steel panels were made the anode. A high grade stainless steel panel was used as the cathode. Seven point five volts and a current density of about fifty amps per square foot were passed through the cell for three seconds. The tin plated steel panels were then removed, rinsed in D.I. water and dried. One polished tin plated steel panel and one matt tin plated steel panel were placed in a 0.6% cysteine solution adjusted to a PH of 7.0 by the use of tri sodium phosphate and boiled for one hour to remove all oxygen in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There were no signs of any black iron sulfide formation or tin sulfide formation on either panel after one hour of exposure to this solution. one of the matt finished panels and one of the polished steel panels were coated with “Valspar 6256054 GLDEPOXY” according to manufactures specifications and then tested for dry and wet adhesion according to the testing specifications outlined in ASTM D3359 and those outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. There was no loss of adhesion on either panel. One matt finish panel and one polished steel panel were baked for one half hour at 400 degree F. in accordance with testing procedures outlined by “Mittal Steel USA”. Both panels showed no signs of yellow tin oxides or black iron oxides due to this baking procedure.
- While this invention has been illustrated and described in the preceding disclosure, it is recognized that variations and changes may be made therein without departing from the invention as set forth in the claims.
Claims (20)
1. A tin plated steel passificating composition wherein the essential ingredient consists of a mixture of organic hydroxyl acids and phenol organic acids.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the organic hydroxyl acid is selected from C2-C6hydroxyl acids.
3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the C2-C6hydroxyl acids are selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl acetic acid, D-gluconic acid, citric acid and lactic acid; and the phenol organic acids are selected from the group consisting of hydrolysable tannic acid, gallic acid and dihydroxy benzoic acid.
4. The composition of claim 3 wherein the composition is an electrolyte composition having a pH of 7.0 to 10.0 and preferably a pH of 8.0-9.5.
5. The composition of claim 4 wherein the composition contains less than 4.0 % of a compound or mixture of compounds selected from the group consisting of phosphates, silicates and aromatic acid salts.
6. The composition of claim 5 wherein the phosphate is phosphoric acid or its salt, the silicate is potassium silicate and the aromatic acid is potassium salt of 1,3,4 benzenetricarboxylic acid.
7. A passified tin plated article which has been passified by a composition wherein the essential ingredient of the composition is selected from a mixture consisting of mixture of organic hydroxyl acids and phenol organic acids.
8. The passified tin plated article claim 6 wherein the organic hydroxyl acid is selected from C2-C6hydroxyl acids.
9. The passified tin plated article claim 6 wherein the C2-C6hydroxyl acids are selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl acetic acid, D-gluconic acid, citric acid and lactic acid;
and the phenol organic acids are selected from the group consisting of hydrolysable tannic acid, gallic acid and dihydroxy benzoic acid.
10. The passified tin plated article claim 7 wherein the composition is an electrolyte composition having a pH of 7.0-10.0 and preferably a pH of 8.0-9.5.
11. The passified tin plated article claim 10 wherein the composition contains less than 4.0 % of a compound or mixture of compounds selected from the group consisting of phosphates, silicates and aromatic acid salts.
12. The passified tin plated article of claim 11 wherein the phosphate is phosphoric acid or its salt, the silicate is potassium silicate and the aromatic acid is potassium salt of 1,3,4 benzenetricarboxylic acid.
13. The passified tin plated steel article of claim 10 , wherein the article has a layer of an appropriate paint to provide a paint protected zinc, zinc plated, or steel article that passes the ASTM-D3359 paint adhesion test.
14. A method of preparing a passified tin plated steel article comprising electrolytically passifating a cleaned tin plated steel article with an electrolyte composition wherein the essential ingredient consists of a mixture of organic hydroxyl acids and phenol organic acids.
15. The method of claim 10 wherein the organic hydroxyl acid is selected from C2-C6hydroxyl acids.
16. The method of claim 11 wherein the C2-C6 hydroxyl acids are selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl acetic acid, D-gluconic acid, citric acid and lactic acid; and the phenol organic acids are selected from the group consisting of hydrolysable tannic acid, gallic acid and dihydroxy benzoic acid.
17. The method of claim 12 wherein the electrolyte composition having a pH of 7.0-10.0 and preferably a pH of 8.0-9.5.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the composition contains less than 4.0% of a compound or mixture of compounds selected from the group consisting of phosphates, silicates and aromatic acid salts.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the phosphate is phosphoric acid or its salt, the silicate is potassium silicate and the aromatic acid is potassium salt of 1,3,4 benzenetricarboxylic acid.
20. The method of claim 17 , comprising the further steps of drying the passified tin plated steel article, and painting the dried article to provide paint protected tin plated steel article that will pass the ASTM-D3359 paint adhesion test.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/427,443 US20100181201A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2009-04-21 | Electrolytic passivated tin plated steel |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/356,125 US20100181203A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2009-01-20 | Electrolytic passivating of tin plated steel surfaces |
| US12/427,443 US20100181201A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2009-04-21 | Electrolytic passivated tin plated steel |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/356,125 Continuation-In-Part US20100181203A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2009-01-20 | Electrolytic passivating of tin plated steel surfaces |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20100181201A1 true US20100181201A1 (en) | 2010-07-22 |
Family
ID=42336080
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/427,443 Abandoned US20100181201A1 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2009-04-21 | Electrolytic passivated tin plated steel |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20100181201A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012097926A1 (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2012-07-26 | Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa | Pretreatment of tinplate prior to the coating thereof with lacquer |
| WO2014006031A1 (en) * | 2012-07-02 | 2014-01-09 | Tata Steel Ijmuiden Bv | Method for producing tinplate and product produced therewith |
| US10011915B2 (en) | 2011-01-18 | 2018-07-03 | Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa | Multistage pretreatment of tinplate prior to the coating thereof with lacquer |
| CN111926332A (en) * | 2020-07-16 | 2020-11-13 | 深圳市点石源水处理技术有限公司 | Tin surface protective agent and preparation method and application thereof |
Citations (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1827247A (en) * | 1927-10-18 | 1931-10-13 | Western Electric Co | Method of protecting metal surfaces |
| US2024951A (en) * | 1932-06-09 | 1935-12-17 | American Sheet & Tin Plate | Package |
| US2215165A (en) * | 1936-06-06 | 1940-09-17 | Crosse & Blackwell Ltd | Process for treating tin-plate containers |
| US2312076A (en) * | 1939-04-29 | 1943-02-23 | Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp | Method of treating tin |
| US2314818A (en) * | 1939-04-29 | 1943-03-23 | Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp | Surface treatment of tinned material |
| US2327127A (en) * | 1940-02-26 | 1943-08-17 | Frank E Rath | Stain and corrosion resistant tin surface and method of producing the same |
| US2450508A (en) * | 1945-09-12 | 1948-10-05 | Crown Cork & Seal Co | Tin plate treatment |
| US2503217A (en) * | 1944-12-15 | 1950-04-04 | Republic Steel Corp | Process for treating brightened electrotinplate |
| US2606866A (en) * | 1948-10-27 | 1952-08-12 | United States Steel Corp | Method of treating tin plate |
| US2775535A (en) * | 1952-03-14 | 1956-12-25 | Bethlehem Steel Corp | Treatment of tinplate |
| US4719036A (en) * | 1984-05-11 | 1988-01-12 | Ciba-Geigy Corporation | Compositions containing heterocyclic corrosion inhibitors |
| US5614268A (en) * | 1994-12-15 | 1997-03-25 | Varley; Michael J. | Coating composition |
| US6217674B1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2001-04-17 | Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. | Compositions and process for treating metal substrates |
| US20020197505A1 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2002-12-26 | Kawasaki Steel Corporation | Tin-plated steel sheet |
| US6830821B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2004-12-14 | Sanchem, Inc. | Passivating of tin, zinc and steel surfaces |
| US20050022907A1 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2005-02-03 | Claffey William J. | Universal aqueous coating compositions for pretreating metal surfaces |
| US20080226891A1 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2008-09-18 | Kansai Paint Co. Ltd. | Method for making multilayer coating film |
-
2009
- 2009-04-21 US US12/427,443 patent/US20100181201A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1827247A (en) * | 1927-10-18 | 1931-10-13 | Western Electric Co | Method of protecting metal surfaces |
| US2024951A (en) * | 1932-06-09 | 1935-12-17 | American Sheet & Tin Plate | Package |
| US2215165A (en) * | 1936-06-06 | 1940-09-17 | Crosse & Blackwell Ltd | Process for treating tin-plate containers |
| US2312076A (en) * | 1939-04-29 | 1943-02-23 | Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp | Method of treating tin |
| US2314818A (en) * | 1939-04-29 | 1943-03-23 | Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp | Surface treatment of tinned material |
| US2327127A (en) * | 1940-02-26 | 1943-08-17 | Frank E Rath | Stain and corrosion resistant tin surface and method of producing the same |
| US2503217A (en) * | 1944-12-15 | 1950-04-04 | Republic Steel Corp | Process for treating brightened electrotinplate |
| US2450508A (en) * | 1945-09-12 | 1948-10-05 | Crown Cork & Seal Co | Tin plate treatment |
| US2606866A (en) * | 1948-10-27 | 1952-08-12 | United States Steel Corp | Method of treating tin plate |
| US2775535A (en) * | 1952-03-14 | 1956-12-25 | Bethlehem Steel Corp | Treatment of tinplate |
| US4719036A (en) * | 1984-05-11 | 1988-01-12 | Ciba-Geigy Corporation | Compositions containing heterocyclic corrosion inhibitors |
| US5614268A (en) * | 1994-12-15 | 1997-03-25 | Varley; Michael J. | Coating composition |
| US6217674B1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2001-04-17 | Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. | Compositions and process for treating metal substrates |
| US20020197505A1 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2002-12-26 | Kawasaki Steel Corporation | Tin-plated steel sheet |
| US20050022907A1 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2005-02-03 | Claffey William J. | Universal aqueous coating compositions for pretreating metal surfaces |
| US6830821B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2004-12-14 | Sanchem, Inc. | Passivating of tin, zinc and steel surfaces |
| US20080226891A1 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2008-09-18 | Kansai Paint Co. Ltd. | Method for making multilayer coating film |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2012097926A1 (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2012-07-26 | Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa | Pretreatment of tinplate prior to the coating thereof with lacquer |
| CN103298982A (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2013-09-11 | 汉高股份有限及两合公司 | Pretreatment before coating tinplate with varnish |
| JP2014506625A (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2014-03-17 | ヘンケル・アクチェンゲゼルシャフト・ウント・コムパニー・コマンディットゲゼルシャフト・アウフ・アクチェン | Pre-treatment method for tinplate before coating |
| CN103298982B (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2016-09-14 | 汉高股份有限及两合公司 | Pretreatment before coating tinplate with varnish |
| US9909227B2 (en) | 2011-01-18 | 2018-03-06 | Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa | Pretreatment of tinplate prior to the coating thereof with lacquer |
| US10011915B2 (en) | 2011-01-18 | 2018-07-03 | Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa | Multistage pretreatment of tinplate prior to the coating thereof with lacquer |
| WO2014006031A1 (en) * | 2012-07-02 | 2014-01-09 | Tata Steel Ijmuiden Bv | Method for producing tinplate and product produced therewith |
| CN111926332A (en) * | 2020-07-16 | 2020-11-13 | 深圳市点石源水处理技术有限公司 | Tin surface protective agent and preparation method and application thereof |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11248298B2 (en) | Chromium-free surface-treated tinplate, production method and surface treating agent therefor | |
| US20080274363A1 (en) | Passivating of tin, zinc and steel surfaces | |
| EP0713541A1 (en) | Composition and method for treatment of phosphated metal surfaces | |
| US5756218A (en) | Corrosion protective coating for metallic materials | |
| US3929514A (en) | Composition and method for forming a protective coating on a zinc metal surface | |
| Li et al. | Structure and corrosion performance of a non-chromium process (NCP) Zr/Zn pretreatment conversion coating on aluminum alloys | |
| WO2016116949A1 (en) | A process for the preparation of corrosion resistant sealed anodized coatings on aluminum alloy | |
| Lu et al. | Investigation on the composition and corrosion resistance of cerium-based conversion treatment by alkaline methods on aluminum alloy 6063 | |
| CA2124977C (en) | Non-chromium passivation method and composition for galvanized metal surfaces | |
| US20100181201A1 (en) | Electrolytic passivated tin plated steel | |
| US6451443B1 (en) | Chromium-free conversion coating | |
| JPWO1998032895A1 (en) | Steel surface treatment agents and surface-treated steel | |
| CN101525747A (en) | Clean rare-earth salt passivation solution | |
| JPS6039168A (en) | Improved accelerator for phosphate coating finish on metal surface and use thereof | |
| US20100181203A1 (en) | Electrolytic passivating of tin plated steel surfaces | |
| JP3792054B2 (en) | Metal surface treatment method | |
| CN101824615B (en) | Chromium-free passivator for electrolytic manganese metal surface treatment and preparation method thereof | |
| US6569498B2 (en) | Passification of zinc surfaces | |
| JP5424555B2 (en) | Method for forming corrosion-resistant film on zinc metal surface | |
| US7144599B2 (en) | Hybrid metal oxide/organometallic conversion coating for ferrous metals | |
| US10752996B2 (en) | Surface treatment agent, surface treatment method, and surface treated metal material | |
| CA1197674A (en) | Composition and process for the treatment of phosphatized metal surfaces | |
| US20160002804A1 (en) | Process for corrosion protection of iron containing materials | |
| EP3704286B1 (en) | Process and composition for treating metal surfaces using trivalent chromium compounds | |
| Di Sarli et al. | Corrosion Performance of Conversion Treatments for Electrogalvanised Steel Sheet |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |