US20060273625A1 - Automatic rear airfoil for vehicle - Google Patents
Automatic rear airfoil for vehicle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060273625A1 US20060273625A1 US11/127,600 US12760005A US2006273625A1 US 20060273625 A1 US20060273625 A1 US 20060273625A1 US 12760005 A US12760005 A US 12760005A US 2006273625 A1 US2006273625 A1 US 2006273625A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- rigid
- bags
- airfoil
- lateral
- vehicle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009432 framing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003134 recirculating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007665 sagging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003019 stabilising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
- B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
- B62D35/00—Vehicle bodies characterised by streamlining
- B62D35/001—For commercial vehicles or tractor-trailer combinations, e.g. caravans
- B62D35/004—Inflatable nose or rear cones
Definitions
- the present invention uses rigid shelves to bridge the gap that exists between the trailer's trailing edge and the inflated bags when the bags are mounted onto the doors away from the edges and door hinges.
- This arrangement is also advantageous in eliminating undesirable surface contours due to the inflatable bag's surface bulge that occurs in the transition zone where the airfoil meets the trailer.
- the device not impede door operation, but it must get out of the way of the doors without any significant dismantling effort on the part of the operator.
- the device operates in a physically hostile environment, it must not vibrate to a degree that causes premature wear of its structural components.
- the present design comprises dual ram-air inflated bags as a framing structure for the overlying airfoil surfaces.
- the force of the inflated bag internal pressure against the trailer doors is counterbalanced by the hingedly attached hardware that attaches the airfoil to the trailer, thereby drawing the hardware tight and minimizing its' vibration during airfoil operation.
- the inflation/deflation cycle occurs slowly and calmly over several minutes. Both of these aspects relating to the inflated bags minimize wear on the attachment hardware which is necessary for such a device to last several years without need for major structural maintenance.
- An inflatable however, requires surface shape control and stiffening in order to remain stable during operation, and avoid surface vibration and wear.
- the present disclosure describes a series of staggered interrupted ribs attached along the inflated bags surfaces that provides surface stability during inflation, while accommodating complex folding for stowage.
- Transport trailers operate in conditions of cross wind creating an angle of yaw at which the air attacks the trailer, typically in the 5-10 degree range.
- Boattail surfaces tend to perform aerodynamically better in cross-wind (higher yaw) conditions, however the backlight loses its' drag reducing function as the angle of yaw rises.
- the present device provides for a vertical fin to redirect trailer roof air flow directly behind the trailer where it can contribute to pressure recovery as it would in the zero yaw condition.
- the present device overcomes practical operating difficulties of a fin such as structural integrity(flexibility) during high cross-wind conditions while still allowing for automatic deployment and stowage.
- the transport trailer is a road vehicle
- drag relating to underbody airflow as well as flow around the rear wheels near the ground figures significantly in overall drag.
- the present device overcomes difficulties in practically cleaning up the airflow in this domain in order to approach theoretical minimum drag.
- the present disclosure further describes a set of panels that provide for ground domain streamlining of airflow.
- a major difficulty in the deployment of rigid or semi-rigid panels as airfoil surfaces behind a trailer is the weight and complexity of adequate structural reinforcement, particularly if the panels are large enough to perform well aerodynamically and are not collapsed automatically when the trailer stops, thereby exposing them to severe ambient wind gusts.
- the present device overcomes these problems by anchoring the panels to the inflated bags, and by using bag surface tension to lift and lock panel support members into position and dampen their vibration.
- Graham U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,788 B1 has used radially oriented collapsible tension bearing struts to stabilize the boattail surfaces. These struts are disposed and function in a manner similar to the radially oriented cords inside the inflatable bags of Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,252 B1), the difference being that Graham creates boattail surface tension (that offsets strut tension) by bending semi-rigid flexible sheets for boattail surfaces, whereas Andrus uses air pressure within the inflatable bags.
- the panel support members of the present disclosure differ from the tension bearing radially oriented cords/struts of Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,252 B1) and Graham (U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,788 B1) in that they are rigid folding struts that lock into position when the boattail panels are deployed thus fixing the panels against movement both laterally and medially, and therefore do not depend upon boattail surface tension to be stiffened.
- Graham U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,788 B1
- the main advantage of this approach over that of Graham is that the panels can be easily collapsed automatically when the airfoil is not in use without having to open the trailer doors.
- the panels as disclosed herein therefore do not depend on trailer door closure in order for them to assume an aerodynamically effective angle relative to the side of the trailer.
- Examples of scenarios in which automatic collapse of the panels would be preferable include stopping or city driving when severe ambient winds prevail in order to avoid wind damage, parking in a trailer yard in order to avoid parking damage and space usage, and having a damaged airfoil during long distance delivery such that it is not safe to deploy yet not near repair shop.
- the invention relates to rigid panels, ribs and fins for an inflatable trailer airfoil. While the inflatable approach provides size and vibration tolerance with minimum weight and easy collapsibility, there are airflow surface domains that are better treated with a relatively rigid sheet.
- the panels are deployed in three domains. The first are shelves that bridge the airfoil surface gap that occurs between the trailing edges of the trailer and the inflated bags because of door hinging and other hardware mounting restrictions for the bags, as well as practical considerations relating to inflatable shape control in the transition zone where the trailer meets the airfoil.
- Another set of shelf panels bridge the gap between the two bags' top surfaces, and support a fin that corrects for the undesirable effects of crosswind (yaw) on drag reduction by the backlight (top) surface of the airfoil.
- the last set of panels extends the airfoil surface below the lowest level to which the bags can extend due to trailer door handle access requirements and practical limitations in the extent to which the bags hang when deflated. This last set of panels also plays a role in the orderly method of deflation and stowage such that the airfoil is resistant to severe wind and weather while stowed.
- a series of interrupted ribs are attached along the inflatable surfaces. The rib interruptions allow the bags to fold for stowage. A flexible surface skin is then added to cover the ribs and provide a smooth airflow surface.
- the components may be grouped into those working in the boattail (side surface) domain and those working in the backlight (top surface) domain, as each of these could work independently of the other.
- a cheaper and lesser performing version of the present invention could be constructed using only the boattail aspects, or alternatively only the backlight aspects.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the airfoil fully deployed.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view with the airfoil's outer skin removed from the left bag to expose the underlying framing structures.
- FIG. 3 is a rear view of the airfoil fully deployed with the internal elastic and inelastic cord arrangements schematically depicted within the left bag.
- FIG. 4 is a rear view of the airfoil when collapsed with the outer skin removed from the right bag and the internal cord arrangements shown within the left bag.
- the device is comprised of a pair of inflatable bags 10 that are inflated upon forward motion of the trailer 11 by ram air intake scoops 12 that extend above the trailer roof line 13 from each bag 10 .
- the bags 10 are pressed together along a central cleft 14 when inflated, and this union has a stabilising effect on the apparatus.
- the boattail 15 and backlight 16 surfaces are reinforced by a series of staggered interrupted ribs 17 to create rigidity during inflation, while enabling complex folding during deflation.
- a boattail shelf 18 is fixed to the boattail surface 15 and extends forwardly to meet the trailer side 19 .
- the boattail surface 15 is anchored to the medial edge 20 of the base of each bag via a series of cords 21 that extend radially from the medial edge 20 to the boattail surface 15 .
- a backlight shelf 22 is fixed to the backlight surface 16 and extends forwardly to meet the trailer roof line 13 , and medially to meet the opposite shelf.
- a yaw control fin 23 is hingedly attached to one of the backlight shelves 22 , and to the medial surface 24 of one bag within the central cleft 14 .
- the fin 23 is thereby firmly yet flexibly held in a vertical orientation during inflation, but collapses during deflation. Air approaching the trailer at an angle of yaw shown as ⁇ is redirected by the fin 23 to flow parallel to the fin (and the trailer 11 ).
- Rigid boattail panels 25 are attached to and extend downward from the lower boattail surface 15 of each bag to the bottom of the trailer 11 , and if desired down further down towards the road.
- the panels are held stiffly in their deployed position by hinged rods 26 that extend from the lower trailer door 27 to the panels 25 .
- the rods 26 are lifted and held firmly in their deployed positions by cords 28 that insert into the lower surface 29 of each bag 10 .
- Vertically oriented cords 30 within each bag extend from the lower 29 to the backlight 16 surfaces.
- the backlight surface 16 is thereby anchored to the hinged rods 26 (via the vertical cords 30 ) so that the backlight surface 16 is not variably lifted by the backlight airflow. While the hinged rods 26 bear the lift load, the more dominant internal pressure load upon the underside of the backlight surface 16 is evenly offset by the internal pressure on the lower surface 29 via the vertical cords 30 .
- the arrangement of the combined vertical 30 and radial 21 cord arrays ensures a symmetrical static force balance which prevents shape distortions in the bag such as sagging during inflation.
- This system is disclosed in Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,252 B1).
- the combined vertical 30 and radial 21 cord arrays in conjunction with the staggered interrupted ribs 17 allow for substantially planar (gently curved) boattail 15 and backlight 16 surfaces while avoiding deep surface dimpling which would weaken surface stability when inflated.
- Elastic cords 31 are attached to the radial cords 21 (and by extension to the boattail surfaces 15 ) in a semicircular orientation during inflation, so that when internal bag pressure drops, the elastic cords 31 contract and draw the boattail surfaces 15 into a flatly folded condition.
- This system is a refined version of that disclosed in Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,347).
- a covering skin. 32 extends from the boattail 18 and backlight 22 shelves to be fixed under tension along its' trailing edge 33 at the rearward end of each row of interrupted ribs 17 .
- the air drag can by further reduced by treating the underbody airflow by either adding side trailer skirts, or by adding a shroud 34 around the rear wheel apparatus.
- the boattail panels 25 may then be extended below the lower edge 35 of the trailer 11 towards road level so that this domain is optimally treated as well with respect to its' aerodynamic drag.
- a recirculating zone 36 of airflow is created behind the panels 25 and over the lower surface 29 of the bag 10 .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Devices Affording Protection Of Roads Or Walls For Sound Insulation (AREA)
- Fittings On The Vehicle Exterior For Carrying Loads, And Devices For Holding Or Mounting Articles (AREA)
Abstract
A twin bag inflatable rear airfoil for truck or transport trailer with attached shelves that bridge the surface gap between the trailer side and top surfaces, and the corresponding side and top surfaces of the inflatable bags. Shelves also bridge the upper surface gap between the two bags and provide a platform to deploy a collapsible yaw control fin. Another set of panels provide airfoil surfaces in the ground domain and are integral to the organised automatic folding and stowage of the apparatus. Interrupted ribs stiffen the inflatable surfaces while allowing them to fold in an orderly manner.
Description
- The reduction in aerodynamic drag resulting from the addition of a boattail shaped appendage to a boxed shaped vehicle has been well examined. Drag reductions of 30% are realistically possible (NASA/TP-1999-206574, “A Reassessment of Heavy-Duty Truck Aerodynamic Design Features and Priorities”), and would correspond to fuel savings of 15% for a transport truck. There are however several practical requirements that pose difficulties to implementing such a device on a working transport trailer. The device must not impede the operation of the trailer doors, typically swinging double doors on trailers used for long-distance haulage. The device must present a smooth, gently tapering set of boattail (side) and backlight (top) surfaces that connect tightly to the trailer sides and top respectively for optimum aerodynamic performance. Given practical difficulties in tightly fitting an inflatable to the hardware laden trailer door perimeter, the present invention uses rigid shelves to bridge the gap that exists between the trailer's trailing edge and the inflated bags when the bags are mounted onto the doors away from the edges and door hinges. This arrangement is also advantageous in eliminating undesirable surface contours due to the inflatable bag's surface bulge that occurs in the transition zone where the airfoil meets the trailer. Not only must the device not impede door operation, but it must get out of the way of the doors without any significant dismantling effort on the part of the operator. Given that the device operates in a physically hostile environment, it must not vibrate to a degree that causes premature wear of its structural components. It should automatically collapse when the trailer stops so that it is not battered by high winds which could attack it directly from the side while stopped, unlike its' relatively wind sheltered position while travelling at highway speed. The present design comprises dual ram-air inflated bags as a framing structure for the overlying airfoil surfaces. The force of the inflated bag internal pressure against the trailer doors is counterbalanced by the hingedly attached hardware that attaches the airfoil to the trailer, thereby drawing the hardware tight and minimizing its' vibration during airfoil operation. The inflation/deflation cycle occurs slowly and calmly over several minutes. Both of these aspects relating to the inflated bags minimize wear on the attachment hardware which is necessary for such a device to last several years without need for major structural maintenance. An inflatable however, requires surface shape control and stiffening in order to remain stable during operation, and avoid surface vibration and wear. To this end, the present disclosure describes a series of staggered interrupted ribs attached along the inflated bags surfaces that provides surface stability during inflation, while accommodating complex folding for stowage.
- Transport trailers operate in conditions of cross wind creating an angle of yaw at which the air attacks the trailer, typically in the 5-10 degree range. Boattail surfaces tend to perform aerodynamically better in cross-wind (higher yaw) conditions, however the backlight loses its' drag reducing function as the angle of yaw rises. In order to preserve backlight performance in yaw, the present device provides for a vertical fin to redirect trailer roof air flow directly behind the trailer where it can contribute to pressure recovery as it would in the zero yaw condition. The present device overcomes practical operating difficulties of a fin such as structural integrity(flexibility) during high cross-wind conditions while still allowing for automatic deployment and stowage.
- Given that the transport trailer is a road vehicle, drag relating to underbody airflow as well as flow around the rear wheels near the ground figures significantly in overall drag. The present device overcomes difficulties in practically cleaning up the airflow in this domain in order to approach theoretical minimum drag. To this end the present disclosure further describes a set of panels that provide for ground domain streamlining of airflow. A major difficulty in the deployment of rigid or semi-rigid panels as airfoil surfaces behind a trailer is the weight and complexity of adequate structural reinforcement, particularly if the panels are large enough to perform well aerodynamically and are not collapsed automatically when the trailer stops, thereby exposing them to severe ambient wind gusts. The present device overcomes these problems by anchoring the panels to the inflated bags, and by using bag surface tension to lift and lock panel support members into position and dampen their vibration. Graham (U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,788 B1) has used radially oriented collapsible tension bearing struts to stabilize the boattail surfaces. These struts are disposed and function in a manner similar to the radially oriented cords inside the inflatable bags of Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,252 B1), the difference being that Graham creates boattail surface tension (that offsets strut tension) by bending semi-rigid flexible sheets for boattail surfaces, whereas Andrus uses air pressure within the inflatable bags. The panel support members of the present disclosure differ from the tension bearing radially oriented cords/struts of Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,252 B1) and Graham (U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,788 B1) in that they are rigid folding struts that lock into position when the boattail panels are deployed thus fixing the panels against movement both laterally and medially, and therefore do not depend upon boattail surface tension to be stiffened. The main advantage of this approach over that of Graham (U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,788) is that the panels can be easily collapsed automatically when the airfoil is not in use without having to open the trailer doors. The panels as disclosed herein therefore do not depend on trailer door closure in order for them to assume an aerodynamically effective angle relative to the side of the trailer. Examples of scenarios in which automatic collapse of the panels would be preferable include stopping or city driving when severe ambient winds prevail in order to avoid wind damage, parking in a trailer yard in order to avoid parking damage and space usage, and having a damaged airfoil during long distance delivery such that it is not safe to deploy yet not near repair shop.
- The invention relates to rigid panels, ribs and fins for an inflatable trailer airfoil. While the inflatable approach provides size and vibration tolerance with minimum weight and easy collapsibility, there are airflow surface domains that are better treated with a relatively rigid sheet. The panels are deployed in three domains. The first are shelves that bridge the airfoil surface gap that occurs between the trailing edges of the trailer and the inflated bags because of door hinging and other hardware mounting restrictions for the bags, as well as practical considerations relating to inflatable shape control in the transition zone where the trailer meets the airfoil. Another set of shelf panels bridge the gap between the two bags' top surfaces, and support a fin that corrects for the undesirable effects of crosswind (yaw) on drag reduction by the backlight (top) surface of the airfoil. The last set of panels extends the airfoil surface below the lowest level to which the bags can extend due to trailer door handle access requirements and practical limitations in the extent to which the bags hang when deflated. This last set of panels also plays a role in the orderly method of deflation and stowage such that the airfoil is resistant to severe wind and weather while stowed. In order to stiffen the majority of the airfoil surface with a minimum of weight and materials, a series of interrupted ribs are attached along the inflatable surfaces. The rib interruptions allow the bags to fold for stowage. A flexible surface skin is then added to cover the ribs and provide a smooth airflow surface. With respect to aerodynamic or fuel saving function, the components may be grouped into those working in the boattail (side surface) domain and those working in the backlight (top surface) domain, as each of these could work independently of the other. A cheaper and lesser performing version of the present invention could be constructed using only the boattail aspects, or alternatively only the backlight aspects.
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the airfoil fully deployed. -
FIG. 2 is a perspective view with the airfoil's outer skin removed from the left bag to expose the underlying framing structures. -
FIG. 3 is a rear view of the airfoil fully deployed with the internal elastic and inelastic cord arrangements schematically depicted within the left bag. -
FIG. 4 is a rear view of the airfoil when collapsed with the outer skin removed from the right bag and the internal cord arrangements shown within the left bag. - The device is comprised of a pair of
inflatable bags 10 that are inflated upon forward motion of thetrailer 11 by ramair intake scoops 12 that extend above thetrailer roof line 13 from eachbag 10. Thebags 10 are pressed together along acentral cleft 14 when inflated, and this union has a stabilising effect on the apparatus. Theboattail 15 andbacklight 16 surfaces are reinforced by a series of staggeredinterrupted ribs 17 to create rigidity during inflation, while enabling complex folding during deflation. Aboattail shelf 18 is fixed to theboattail surface 15 and extends forwardly to meet thetrailer side 19. Theboattail surface 15 is anchored to themedial edge 20 of the base of each bag via a series ofcords 21 that extend radially from themedial edge 20 to theboattail surface 15. Abacklight shelf 22 is fixed to thebacklight surface 16 and extends forwardly to meet thetrailer roof line 13, and medially to meet the opposite shelf. Ayaw control fin 23 is hingedly attached to one of thebacklight shelves 22, and to themedial surface 24 of one bag within thecentral cleft 14. Thefin 23 is thereby firmly yet flexibly held in a vertical orientation during inflation, but collapses during deflation. Air approaching the trailer at an angle of yaw shown as ψ is redirected by thefin 23 to flow parallel to the fin (and the trailer 11).Rigid boattail panels 25 are attached to and extend downward from thelower boattail surface 15 of each bag to the bottom of thetrailer 11, and if desired down further down towards the road. The panels are held stiffly in their deployed position by hingedrods 26 that extend from thelower trailer door 27 to thepanels 25. Therods 26 are lifted and held firmly in their deployed positions bycords 28 that insert into thelower surface 29 of eachbag 10. Vertically orientedcords 30 within each bag extend from the lower 29 to thebacklight 16 surfaces. Thebacklight surface 16 is thereby anchored to the hinged rods 26 (via the vertical cords 30) so that thebacklight surface 16 is not variably lifted by the backlight airflow. While the hingedrods 26 bear the lift load, the more dominant internal pressure load upon the underside of thebacklight surface 16 is evenly offset by the internal pressure on thelower surface 29 via thevertical cords 30. The arrangement of the combined vertical 30 and radial 21 cord arrays ensures a symmetrical static force balance which prevents shape distortions in the bag such as sagging during inflation. This system is disclosed in Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,252 B1). The combined vertical 30 and radial 21 cord arrays in conjunction with the staggered interruptedribs 17 allow for substantially planar (gently curved) boattail 15 andbacklight 16 surfaces while avoiding deep surface dimpling which would weaken surface stability when inflated.Elastic cords 31 are attached to the radial cords 21 (and by extension to the boattail surfaces 15) in a semicircular orientation during inflation, so that when internal bag pressure drops, theelastic cords 31 contract and draw the boattail surfaces 15 into a flatly folded condition. This system is a refined version of that disclosed in Andrus (U.S. Pat. No. 5,236,347). A covering skin. 32 extends from theboattail 18 andbacklight 22 shelves to be fixed under tension along its' trailingedge 33 at the rearward end of each row of interruptedribs 17. The air drag can by further reduced by treating the underbody airflow by either adding side trailer skirts, or by adding ashroud 34 around the rear wheel apparatus. In either case theboattail panels 25 may then be extended below thelower edge 35 of thetrailer 11 towards road level so that this domain is optimally treated as well with respect to its' aerodynamic drag. Arecirculating zone 36 of airflow is created behind thepanels 25 and over thelower surface 29 of thebag 10.
Claims (7)
1. An inflatable airfoil adapted to be mounted on the rear surface of a transport vehicle, said vehicle having side and top surfaces, said airfoil comprising a pair of flexible enclosed bags, said bags having lateral and lower surfaces wherein said lateral surfaces have attached rigid shelves oriented parallel to said lateral surfaces, said shelves extending forwardly to meet said side vehicle surfaces.
2. An inflatable airfoil adapted to be mounted on the rear surface of a transport vehicle, said vehicle having side and top surfaces, said airfoil comprising a pair of flexible enclosed bags, said bags having lateral and lower surfaces wherein a rigid panel extends from the lower part of said lateral bag surface downwardly towards the ground and forwardly to meet said side vehicle surface, said rigid panel having a rigid support member extending from said rigid panel to the lower portion of said rear vehicle surface, said rigid support member having a hinged interruption along the length of said rigid support member, said rigid support member having one or more cords attached along the length of said rigid support member, said cords attaching to the lower surface of said bag such that upon inflation of said bag, said rigid support member is lifted and unfolded while said rigid panel is positioned parallel to said lateral surface.
3. An inflatable airfoil as recited in claim 1 wherein a series of inelastic cords extent from said lateral surface to attach at substantially equally spaced points along the length of an elastic cord such that upon inflation of said airfoil, said elastic cord is stretched into an arced or semicircular orientation, and such that upon deflation of said airfoil said elastic cord relaxes and shortens into a more linear orientation while said inelastic cords pull said lateral surface into a folded collapsed state.
4. An inflatable airfoil adapted to be mounted on the rear surface of a transport vehicle, said vehicle having side and top surfaces, said airfoil comprising a pair of flexible enclosed bags, said bags having upper surfaces wherein said upper surfaces each have a rigid shelf oriented parallel to said upper surfaces, said rigid shelves extending forwardly to meet said top vehicle surface and medially to approach the rigid shelf that extends medially from the other of the two bags, one of said rigid shelves having a rigid fin attached along the medial edge of said rigid shelf, said rigid fin oriented substantially perpendicular to said rigid shelves when said bags are inflated, said rigid fin extending upwards above the level of the rigid shelves when said bags are inflated such that air flowing over the upper surface of said bags is directed to flow parallel to said fin.
5. An inflatable airfoil as recited in claim 4 wherein said rigid fin is hingedly attached along the medial edge of said rigid shelf such that said fin collapses to be oriented substantially parallel to said rigid shelves when said bags are deflated.
6. An inflatable airfoil adapted to be mounted on the rear surface of a transport vehicle, said vehicle having side and top surfaces, said airfoil comprising a pair of flexible enclosed bags, said bags having upper and lateral surfaces wherein a series of rigid members are attached along the length of said upper and lateral surfaces such that said lateral surfaces are stiffened horizontally and said upper surfaces are stiffened medially when said bags are inflated.
7. An inflatable airfoil as recited in claim 6 wherein one or more of said rigid members along said lateral surfaces has an interruption along the length of said rigid member such that said lateral surface folds at said interruption when said bag is deflated.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/127,600 US7147270B1 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2005-05-13 | Automatic rear airfoil for vehicle |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/127,600 US7147270B1 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2005-05-13 | Automatic rear airfoil for vehicle |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20060273625A1 true US20060273625A1 (en) | 2006-12-07 |
| US7147270B1 US7147270B1 (en) | 2006-12-12 |
Family
ID=37493443
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11/127,600 Expired - Fee Related US7147270B1 (en) | 2005-05-13 | 2005-05-13 | Automatic rear airfoil for vehicle |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US7147270B1 (en) |
Cited By (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090189414A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-07-30 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic trailer skirts |
| WO2009139642A1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Tecama Holding As | Inflatable drag reduction device for vehicles |
| US20120086234A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2012-04-12 | Clarkson University | Sealed aft cavity drag reducer |
| WO2013044216A1 (en) * | 2011-09-23 | 2013-03-28 | Aerofab Llc | Vehicle drag reduction assembly |
| WO2013043890A1 (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2013-03-28 | Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. | Rear-mounted retractable aerodynamic structure for cargo bodies |
| US20150274220A1 (en) * | 2012-06-19 | 2015-10-01 | Aerovolution Corporation | Apparatuses, assemblies, and methods for drag reduction of land vehicles |
| US9333993B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2016-05-10 | Aerovolution Corporation | Self-deploying apparatuses, assemblies, and methods for drag reduction of land vehicles |
| US9346496B2 (en) | 2005-12-01 | 2016-05-24 | Stemco Lp | Aerodynamic drag reducing apparatus |
| US9440689B1 (en) | 2011-09-20 | 2016-09-13 | Stemco Lp | Aerodynamic structures secured to the underbody of cargo bodies |
| US9457847B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-10-04 | Stemco Lp | Rear-mounted aerodynamic structures for cargo bodies |
| US9545960B2 (en) | 2007-05-17 | 2017-01-17 | Stemco Lp | Rear-mounted aerodynamic structure for truck cargo bodies |
| US9971356B2 (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2018-05-15 | Stemco Products, Inc. | Retractable aerodynamic structures for cargo bodies and methods of controlling positioning of the same |
| US10124840B2 (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2018-11-13 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Deployable vehicle air drag reduction mechanism and system |
| US10220889B2 (en) | 2007-05-17 | 2019-03-05 | Stemco Products, Inc. | Rear-mounted aerodynamic structure for truck cargo bodies |
| US10384728B2 (en) | 2016-03-28 | 2019-08-20 | Transtex Llc | Beam connector and method of installation thereof |
| US10414448B2 (en) | 2015-09-07 | 2019-09-17 | Transtex Llc | Support system for aerodynamic skirt assembly and method of installation thereof |
| US10569815B2 (en) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-02-25 | Transtex Inc. | Vehicle air drag reducing apparatus and method of use thereof |
| US10589802B2 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2020-03-17 | Transtex Inc. | Automatically actuated rear air drag reducing system and method of use thereof |
| US10974771B1 (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2021-04-13 | William Leo Gross | System for reducing aerodynamic drag forces on a trailer |
| US11433954B1 (en) * | 2020-10-16 | 2022-09-06 | William Leo Gross | System for reducing aerodynamic drag forces on a tractor-trailer vehicle |
Families Citing this family (32)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7380868B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2008-06-03 | Thomas Scott Breidenbach | Aerodynamic drag reducing apparatus |
| US7845708B2 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2010-12-07 | Adaptive Aerodynamic, Llc | Aerodynamic drag reducing apparatus |
| WO2007007342A2 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2007-01-18 | Doron Neuburger | Drag reducing system |
| US7585015B2 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2009-09-08 | Solus Solutions And Technologies, Llc | Frame extension device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles |
| US8007030B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2011-08-30 | Richard Wood | Frame extension device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles |
| US7740303B2 (en) | 2006-06-19 | 2010-06-22 | Richard Wood | Mini skirt aerodynamic fairing device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles |
| US7497502B2 (en) | 2006-06-19 | 2009-03-03 | Solus Solutions And Technologies, Llc | Mini skirt aerodynamic fairing device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles |
| US8287030B2 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2012-10-16 | Airodynamic Trailer Systems, LLC | Drag reducing apparatus for a vehicle |
| WO2009102695A2 (en) * | 2008-02-12 | 2009-08-20 | Aero Industries, Inc. | Self-deploying drag reducing device |
| US7857376B2 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2010-12-28 | Adaptive Aerodynamic, Llc | Aerodynamic drag reducing apparatus |
| US8382194B2 (en) | 2008-03-21 | 2013-02-26 | Richard M. Wood | Outboard wake stabilization device and method for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles |
| USD595195S1 (en) * | 2009-02-27 | 2009-06-30 | James P Fitzgerald | Aerodynamic performance enhancing semi-trailer component |
| US7866734B2 (en) * | 2009-03-13 | 2011-01-11 | Mracek Milo F | Inflatable shaping system reducing the aerodynamic drag upon the rear of a vehicle |
| US8177286B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2012-05-15 | Wabash National, L.P. | Side skirt system for a trailer |
| US8402242B2 (en) | 2009-07-29 | 2013-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Write-erase endurance lifetime of memory storage devices |
| GB2480454B (en) * | 2010-05-18 | 2015-02-11 | Cbt Developments Ltd | A Display Apparatus and Method for a Vehicle |
| US9004575B2 (en) | 2010-08-03 | 2015-04-14 | Gary Alan Grandominico | Aerodynamic skirt assembly |
| US8414064B2 (en) | 2011-04-14 | 2013-04-09 | Lonnie Litchfield | Apparatus for reducing drag on a vehicle |
| US8783758B2 (en) | 2012-03-21 | 2014-07-22 | Wabash National, L.P. | Folding side skirt system for a trailer |
| US8550539B1 (en) * | 2012-08-05 | 2013-10-08 | Lawrence Everett Anderson | Aerodynamic drag reducer for vehicles |
| US10953932B2 (en) | 2012-11-07 | 2021-03-23 | Ekostinger, Inc. | Multicomponent improved vehicle fuel economy system |
| US8985677B2 (en) | 2012-11-07 | 2015-03-24 | StormBlok Systems, Inc. | Vehicle fuel economy system |
| US9919750B2 (en) | 2013-08-15 | 2018-03-20 | Wabash National, L.P. | Side skirt system for reducing drag |
| US9409610B2 (en) | 2014-03-11 | 2016-08-09 | Wabash National, L.P. | Side skirt system for a trailer |
| US10029745B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2018-07-24 | Wall Global, LLC. | Inflatable panel for an aerodynamic fairing assembly |
| US9873467B2 (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2018-01-23 | Wall Global, LLC. | Aerodynamic fairing assembly for tractor-trailers |
| US10000245B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2018-06-19 | Wall Global, LLC. | Inflatable panel housing for an aerodynamic fairing assembly |
| US9688320B2 (en) | 2014-10-29 | 2017-06-27 | Wabash National, L.P. | Side skirt system for a trailer |
| US10343731B2 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2019-07-09 | Wabash National, L.P. | Skirt system mount bracket assembly |
| US10549797B2 (en) | 2017-04-20 | 2020-02-04 | Wabash National, L.P. | Side underride guard |
| MX2018011178A (en) | 2017-09-13 | 2019-06-12 | Wabash National Lp | Side underride guard. |
| US10940817B2 (en) | 2018-02-21 | 2021-03-09 | Wabash National, L.P. | Side underride guard |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4311334A (en) * | 1979-10-25 | 1982-01-19 | Jenkins Maurice A | Universal towed vehicle wind umbrella |
| US5057891A (en) * | 1985-05-20 | 1991-10-15 | Nec Corporation | Planar heterojunction avalanche photodiode |
| US6409252B1 (en) * | 2001-09-24 | 2002-06-25 | Paul Guy Andrus | Truck trailer drag reducer |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE2550726A1 (en) * | 1975-11-12 | 1977-05-18 | Maschf Augsburg Nuernberg Ag | AIR DIRECTION SYSTEM |
| GB2065047B (en) * | 1979-11-16 | 1984-10-03 | Caldwell K | Streamlining vehicles |
-
2005
- 2005-05-13 US US11/127,600 patent/US7147270B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4311334A (en) * | 1979-10-25 | 1982-01-19 | Jenkins Maurice A | Universal towed vehicle wind umbrella |
| US5057891A (en) * | 1985-05-20 | 1991-10-15 | Nec Corporation | Planar heterojunction avalanche photodiode |
| US6409252B1 (en) * | 2001-09-24 | 2002-06-25 | Paul Guy Andrus | Truck trailer drag reducer |
Cited By (48)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120086234A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2012-04-12 | Clarkson University | Sealed aft cavity drag reducer |
| US8641126B2 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2014-02-04 | Clarkson University | Sealed aft cavity drag reducer |
| US9346496B2 (en) | 2005-12-01 | 2016-05-24 | Stemco Lp | Aerodynamic drag reducing apparatus |
| US9545960B2 (en) | 2007-05-17 | 2017-01-17 | Stemco Lp | Rear-mounted aerodynamic structure for truck cargo bodies |
| US10220889B2 (en) | 2007-05-17 | 2019-03-05 | Stemco Products, Inc. | Rear-mounted aerodynamic structure for truck cargo bodies |
| US7887120B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-02-15 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic trailer skirts |
| US20100096883A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2010-04-22 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic skirt shape |
| US20100096880A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2010-04-22 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic skirt panel |
| US20100096881A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2010-04-22 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic skirt wheel interface |
| US7938475B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-05-10 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt wheel interface |
| US7942471B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-05-17 | Trnastex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt shape |
| US7942470B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-05-17 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt opening |
| US7942468B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-05-17 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt securing mechanism |
| US7942469B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-05-17 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt panel |
| US7942467B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2011-05-17 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt support member |
| US20100096882A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2010-04-22 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic skirt opening |
| US20090189414A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2009-07-30 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic trailer skirts |
| US8292351B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2012-10-23 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Resilient strut for aerodynamic skirt |
| US8678474B1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2014-03-25 | Transtex Composite Inc. | Self-repositioning aerodynamic skirt |
| US20100187856A1 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2010-07-29 | Mathieu Boivin | Aerodynamic skirt support member |
| US8449017B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2013-05-28 | Transtex Composites Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt resilient member |
| AU2009247049B2 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2014-02-27 | Tecama Holding As | Inflatable drag reduction device for vehicles |
| US8162381B2 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2012-04-24 | Tecama Holding As | Inflatable drag reduction device for vehicles |
| US20110101730A1 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2011-05-05 | Tecama Holding As | Inflatable drag reduction device for vehicles |
| WO2009139642A1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Tecama Holding As | Inflatable drag reduction device for vehicles |
| WO2013043890A1 (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2013-03-28 | Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. | Rear-mounted retractable aerodynamic structure for cargo bodies |
| US10625793B2 (en) | 2011-09-20 | 2020-04-21 | Stemco Products, Inc. | Rear-mounted retractable aerodynamic structure for cargo bodies |
| US9440688B2 (en) | 2011-09-20 | 2016-09-13 | Stemco Lp | Rear-mounted retractable aerodynamic structure for cargo bodies |
| US9440689B1 (en) | 2011-09-20 | 2016-09-13 | Stemco Lp | Aerodynamic structures secured to the underbody of cargo bodies |
| US8851554B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2014-10-07 | AeroFab, LLC | Vehicle drag reduction assembly |
| WO2013044216A1 (en) * | 2011-09-23 | 2013-03-28 | Aerofab Llc | Vehicle drag reduction assembly |
| US9637182B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2017-05-02 | AeroFab, LLC | Vehicle drag reduction assembly |
| US9457847B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-10-04 | Stemco Lp | Rear-mounted aerodynamic structures for cargo bodies |
| US20150274220A1 (en) * | 2012-06-19 | 2015-10-01 | Aerovolution Corporation | Apparatuses, assemblies, and methods for drag reduction of land vehicles |
| US9505449B2 (en) * | 2012-06-19 | 2016-11-29 | Aerovolution Corporation | Apparatuses, assemblies, and methods for drag reduction of land vehicles |
| US9971356B2 (en) | 2012-07-11 | 2018-05-15 | Stemco Products, Inc. | Retractable aerodynamic structures for cargo bodies and methods of controlling positioning of the same |
| US10059384B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2018-08-28 | Aerovolution Corporation | Self-deploying apparatuses, assemblies, and methods for drag reduction of land vehicles |
| US9333993B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2016-05-10 | Aerovolution Corporation | Self-deploying apparatuses, assemblies, and methods for drag reduction of land vehicles |
| US10414448B2 (en) | 2015-09-07 | 2019-09-17 | Transtex Llc | Support system for aerodynamic skirt assembly and method of installation thereof |
| US10640156B2 (en) | 2015-09-07 | 2020-05-05 | Transtex Inc. | Strut portion with buckling capability for aerodynamic skirt |
| US11420690B2 (en) | 2015-09-07 | 2022-08-23 | Transtex Inc. | Aerodynamic skirt securing connector with angular assembly capability |
| US10384728B2 (en) | 2016-03-28 | 2019-08-20 | Transtex Llc | Beam connector and method of installation thereof |
| US10689043B2 (en) | 2016-03-28 | 2020-06-23 | Transtex Inc. | Securing mechanism for aerodynamic skirt-securing member and method of installation thereof |
| US10124840B2 (en) * | 2016-10-20 | 2018-11-13 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Deployable vehicle air drag reduction mechanism and system |
| US10569815B2 (en) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-02-25 | Transtex Inc. | Vehicle air drag reducing apparatus and method of use thereof |
| US10589802B2 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2020-03-17 | Transtex Inc. | Automatically actuated rear air drag reducing system and method of use thereof |
| US10974771B1 (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2021-04-13 | William Leo Gross | System for reducing aerodynamic drag forces on a trailer |
| US11433954B1 (en) * | 2020-10-16 | 2022-09-06 | William Leo Gross | System for reducing aerodynamic drag forces on a tractor-trailer vehicle |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US7147270B1 (en) | 2006-12-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7147270B1 (en) | Automatic rear airfoil for vehicle | |
| RU2481992C2 (en) | Automotive aerodynamic device | |
| US9789915B2 (en) | Device for reducing vehicle aerodynamic resistance | |
| US8025329B1 (en) | Collapsible airfoil for trucks and trailers | |
| EP1870320B1 (en) | System for completely closing the space between the cab and semi-trailer of an industrial or commercial vehicle, to improve the aerodynamics of the vehicle | |
| US8506004B1 (en) | Gap fairing and drag reduction method | |
| CN112218787B (en) | Active rocker aerodynamic panel integrated into an automatic pedal | |
| US8182020B2 (en) | Aerodynamic transformable truck cap assembly | |
| US4462628A (en) | Guide for collapsible drag reducer | |
| US7207620B2 (en) | Aerodynamic drag reducing system with retrofittable, selectively removable frame | |
| CN103298690B (en) | Rear-mounted pneumatic structure for truck cargo box | |
| US9637182B2 (en) | Vehicle drag reduction assembly | |
| CA1192932A (en) | Drag reducer for tractor trailer | |
| EP3842323B1 (en) | Deployable fairing for transport vehicle | |
| US9079622B2 (en) | Gap fairing for a tractor-trailer | |
| NL2011492C2 (en) | Drag reducing device. | |
| JP2015515410A (en) | An underbody that is dynamically supported and movable in an automobile and generates downforce | |
| US8820817B1 (en) | Tractor trailer rear door air drag reduction system to reduce fuel consumption | |
| CA1201467A (en) | Support for collapsible drag reducer | |
| US4784424A (en) | Rooftop drag reducing device for multi-truck shipment when mounted | |
| AU2011377850A1 (en) | Hail guard for cars | |
| US4919472A (en) | Rooftop drag reducing device for multi-truck shipment when mounted | |
| US10639979B1 (en) | Retractable canopy assembly | |
| WO2016120597A1 (en) | Retractable deflector | |
| CN103112666B (en) | Packing box arranged on transporting platform and transporting platform |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| SULP | Surcharge for late payment | ||
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.) |
|
| LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
| STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
| FP | Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20181212 |