US20060076321A1

US20060076321A1 - Ultrasonic in-process monitoring and feedback of resistance spot weld quality

Info

Publication number: US20060076321A1
Application number: US11/221,545
Authority: US
Inventors: Roman Maev; Andriy Chertov; John Paille; Frank Ewasyshyn
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Tessonics Corp; FCA US LLC
Priority date: 2004-09-30
Filing date: 2005-09-08
Publication date: 2006-04-13
Also published as: US20170021446A1; US9296062B2; US20130269439A1; EP1688738A1; CA2521472C; EP1688738B1; CA2521472A1

Abstract

A method and apparatus for ultrasonic in-process monitoring and feedback of resistance spot weld quality uses at least one transducer located in the electrode assembly transmitting through a weld tip into an underway weld. Analysis of the spectrum of ultrasonic waves provides the operator with an indication of the size, thickness, location, dynamics of formation and quality of the spot weld. The method presents a fundamentally new physical approach to the characterization of the spot weld quality. Together with transmission mode it includes new modes of operation of ultrasonic probes such as a reflection mode and simultaneous use of transmission and reflection modes, and a new physical interpretation of the signal analysis results.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/614,572, filed Sep. 30, 2004.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an ultrasonic transducer associated with an electrode for real-time monitoring and feedback in a welding process.
2. Description of Related Art
The nondestructive testing of spot welds in real time using ultrasound has many advantages over other nondestructive approaches. Prior art arrangements include the insertion of the ultrasonic probe into the weld electrodes, with the acoustic energy sent through the weld subject. Then the analysis of the transmitted and/or reflected signal is performed in order to make some conclusions about the quality of the weld.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,726,130 discloses a probe glued to the back surface of the welding electrode. The probe generates a shear wave and receives a reflection from the primary solid-liquid interface of the weld. This method allows the determination of the penetration depth of the liquid zone into the subject. However, this method only gives information about one side of the weld, telling nothing about the opposite side. Also, as weld electrodes must be frequently changed or refreshed, this arrangement of the probe on the surface of the removable electrode can make it impractical or susceptible to damage in an industrial setting.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,099,045 discloses an acoustic wave undergoing multiple reflections within a weld subject. Evaluation of the degree of attenuation of the wave provides some information about the spot weld. This is an empirical approach which requires a collection of data for each particular case. The method enables prediction of the quality of the weld by comparison with previous results.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,467 discloses an electrode assembly incorporating ultrasonic probes and its basic principles of operation, and is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
It would be advantageous to provide a method of using acoustic waves to directly measure the dynamics of formation of weld and critical parameters which define the weld quality without comparing weld characteristics with previously tabulated results.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In an embodiment of the present invention, a spot welder has either two electrode assemblies containing ultrasonic probes (for transmission mode or for combination of transmission and reflection modes) or just one electrode assembly (for purely reflection mode). During welding the ultrasonic probe from first electrode assembly generates a burst of acoustic energy. In transmission mode, one portion of this acoustic energy passes through a weld zone and then is picked up by the second probe located in the second electrode assembly. In reflection mode, another portion is reflected by the weld subject and is received by the first ultrasonic probe. The third option includes simultaneous operation of transmission and reflection modes. Both ultrasonic probes in the electrode assemblies then emit an output electrical signal to the computer. The computer processes the received signals and outputs the information about the weld geometry and the “time history” of the weld. This information is used by the computer software to make a decision whether it is necessary to change welding parameters in real time to provide the quality output. This comprises the feedback stage of ultrasonic in-process welding quality control.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an apparatus for ultrasonic in-process monitoring and feedback of resistance spot weld quality according to the invention.
FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of an electrode assembly of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is an enlarged representation of reflected waves within the weld zone of FIGS. 1-2.
FIG. 4 is an oscillogram of reflected waves within the system of FIGS. 1-3.
FIG. 5 is a side view of a three-layer weld subject.
FIG. 6 is a dynamic graphing of the oscillograms representing the welding process.
FIG. 7 is a pair of graphs showing a time of flight for good quality weld, comparing actual results with a model. A good weld is indicated by a change of slope highlighted by the circle on the right graph.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an apparatus 100 for ultrasonic in-process monitoring and feedback according to the invention includes a computer 110, analog-digital converter (ADC) 120, pulser-receiver 130, monitor 140, weld controller 150 and acoustic transmitter- receiver probes 166, 176 mounted within weld electrodes 160, 170.
Each of the electrodes 160, 170 includes a probe 166, 176 capable of emitting and receiving acoustic waves 10, 20 and 30. The computer 110 sends commands to the weld controller 150 and the pulser-receiver 130. The weld controller 150 clamps the electrodes 160, 170 and starts welding. Simultaneously, the pulser-receiver 130 sends electrical pulses to a probe 166 located in one of the electrodes. The electrical energy is converted into mechanical energy in the form of acoustic waves 10.
The waves 10 propagate through the first and second metal layers 60, 80 and the weld zone 70 as long as the metal is transparent to sound waves. The weld zone 70 includes a liquid metal zone and adjacent areas.
The probe 166 emits incident wave 10. Part of the wave 10 is reflected by the weld zone 70 and shown as reflected wave 20. Reflected wave 20 is received by the same probe 166, and received by the pulser-receiver 130. A portion of wave 10 shown as wave 30 passes through weld zone 70 and is picked up by probe 176. The received acoustic wave 30 is also sent to the pulser-receiver 130. Pulser-receiver 130 forwards the signals to the ADC 120. The digitized signal is sent to the computer 110 and processed with special signal processing software. The results of signal processing and signal analysis can be output to the monitor 140 or stored as a computer file.
Referring to the FIG. 2, the incident and reflected waves 10, 20 (shown in FIG. 1) pass through the several media. The incident wave 10, generated by the probe 166, propagates through a cooling water column 40 which works as a couplant for the acoustic waves. The wave 10 propagates through the body of the electrode 160 and enters the first metal sheet 60. Part of the wave 10, as wave 30, passes through the weld zone 70, body of the second electrode 170 and water column 42. The weld zone 70 is defined as a bulk volume of the welded metal sheets located between the tips of the two electrodes and the volume of the dynamic molten region including all interfaces between all substances in this zone. Then the wave 30 induces electrical signals in the piezoelectric crystal of the probe 176 that are returned to the pulser-receiver 130.
Wave 20, a portion of the wave 10, reflects from the weld zone 70. Referring to FIG. 3, the incident wave 10 reflects from the interface of the electrode 160 and sheet-metal 60 as ray 13. The reflection of wave 10 from the interface of the first sheet-metal 60 and liquid zone 75 is shown as ray 14. The reflection from the interface of first sheet-metal 60 and second sheet-metal 80 is shown as ray 15. The reflection from the interface of liquid zone 75 and second sheet-metal is shown as ray 16. The reflection from the interface of second sheet-metal 80 and electrode 170 is shown as ray 17. All these reflected rays 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 come back to the probe 166 as reflected wave 20. Wave 20 generates the electrical signal in the piezoelectric crystal of the probe 166.
All of the received signals come to the pulser-receiver 130, and then are forwarded to the ADC 120 and then to the computer 110.
FIG. 4 depicts an oscillogram of the reflected wave 20, showing each of the reflected components illustrated as rays 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. Using the oscillogram, it is possible to determine the geometry and position of the liquid portion of the weld zone 70 at given moment during welding. Signals 13 and 17 are used as the reference points to locate the position of the upper interface of the first plate and the lower interface of the second plate.
Signal 14 inverts its phase when the wave strikes solid-liquid interface. The impedance of the liquid is lower than that of the solid metal. Such kind of impedance mismatch gives rise to the phase inversion of the reflected signal 14.
Signal 16 is reflected from liquid-solid interface. Its phase is always inverted with respect to signal 14 because phase inversion happens only when impedance of second medium is less than that of the first.
Signal 15 comes from the interface of the two sheet-metals. The greater the lateral size of the molten region the weaker this signal is due to the reduced reflecting area within the range of the main lobe of the wave generated by the probe 166.
The phase inversion of the reflected signal is the crucial feature which allows say that one really deals with the solid-liquid interface and not with some artifact. Calculation of the distance between the reflected signal peaks 14 and 16, on the time scale t, provides information about the thickness of the liquid zone 75. The positioning, on the time scale t, of the peak 14 with respect to peak 13, and the peak 16 with respect to peak 17, gives an indication of the position of the liquid zone relative to the outer surfaces of the sheet- metal 60, 80. Position of the peaks 14, 16 with respect to peak 15 further provides an indication of the position of the liquid zone relative to the interface between sheet- metal 60, 80. This information is of particular importance in the welding of high strength steel, when position of the nugget is not symmetrical with respect to the central contact interface.
The comparison of the amplitude of peak 15 and peak 14 provides information about the lateral size of the liquid zone 75. The smaller the amplitude of peak 15 the bigger area is covered by the weld liquid zone 75 in lateral directions. Disappearance of the peak 15 indicates that the liquid zone 75 is equal to or bigger than the main lobe width of the incident wave 10. When the width of the main lobe is known, it is possible to calculate a minimum lateral size of the liquid zone 75 by evaluation of the amplitude of peaks 14, 15.
A similar analysis can be applied to the composition of three and more sheets put together. An example of such an arrangement is shown in FIG. 5.
Specially designed signal processing software allows the removal of unwanted noise, helping to distinguish the reflections from all interfaces. With the waves 10 sent through the weld 70 during the whole process of welding, the resultant data stream illustrates the dynamic picture of liquid zone growth and its position with respect to the outer interfaces of the sheet- metal 60, 80.
Referring to FIG. 6, the arrival time of signals reflected from different interfaces at different moments of welding is presented. Before welding started, only signals 13, 15, 17 are visible. When welding starts, the velocity of wave propagation in the metal decreases. This leads to the increase of propagation time of the wave in the metal. When melting begins, two additional interfaces appear, a solid-liquid interface 14 and liquid-solid interface 16. The moment of appearance 18 of these signals is the moment of the beginning of melting of metal. The elapsed time from the moment of appearance 18 until the weld current is turned off at the moment 19 is the time of growth of the liquid zone.
After the current is turned off, the liquid zone shrinks until the sheet-metal has re-solidified. The weld nugget is formed in place of the liquid zone. The weld nugget is defined as the volume of metal which used to be liquid zone during welding. At the moment of re-solidification 20, the interfaces 14, 16 disappear. The elapsed time 19-20 is the solidification time, a further indicator of the weld nugget strength.
A further method of in-process monitoring is based on using the transmission mode and is characterized in FIG. 7. FIG. 7 the time of flight (TOF) of the series of signals 30 through the weld subject of FIG. 1. Referring to the FIG. 7, this delay is not linear throughout the welding process. As the material warms up, the sound velocity decreases through the material so that the delay of the transmitted signal increases. The melting of the liquid zone, the change in phase from solid to liquid, results in a discontinuous change of the physical properties of the material. These properties include resistivity and, notably, sound velocity, as is reflected in the discontinuity of the TOF graphs of FIG. 7.
This abrupt change of the properties can be monitored by measuring the delay of the wave passing through the weld before and after melting moment. The moment of the beginning of melting is seen on the time of flight curve shown on FIG. 7 as a change of the slope of the curve to the higher values. The abrupt increase of the signal delay at a certain moment of welding corresponds to the beginning of melting of the welded plates. The computer 110 determines the exact moment of the start of melting. The time from this moment up to the end of welding is the time of liquid pool growth. The time of liquid pool growth characterizes the weld nugget size. The computer 110 uses the time of the beginning of melting to instruct the weld controller 150 to discontinue the current at an appropriate time for adequate weld growth.
This time of flight (TOF) jump does not occur in a stick weld. In stick weld the mating surfaces are weakly bonded in the weld zone—when the sheets are peeled apart there is no nugget present. Thus this technique is capable of distinguishing stick weld from one in which the weld nugget has formed. It can also qualitatively characterize the weld by measuring the time between the start of melting and the moment the current is off. The through transmission mode distinguishes between a stick weld and a proper weld based on the exact duration of liquid zone growth.
While the invention has been described in the specification and illustrated in the drawings with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment illustrated by the drawings and described in the specification as the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. An apparatus for monitoring welding in a resistance welder, the resistance welder including first and second electrodes, the apparatus comprising

an ultrasonic probe disposed within the first electrode that generates a burst of acoustic energy that is directed to a weld subject, receives acoustic energy reflected from the weld subject and generates an output signal in response to the reflected acoustic energy; and

a computer that receives the output signal, the computer determining a characteristic of a liquid zone that forms during welding based on a phase inverted acoustic wave reflected from an interface between the liquid zone and a solid portion of the weld subject proximal to the ultrasonic probe; the liquid zone solidifying into a weld nugget after welding current is turned off

2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the computer determines that the liquid zone formed based on the presence of the phase inverted acoustic wave in the reflected acoustic energy.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the weld subject includes at least two metal sheets, the two metal sheets disposed between the first and second electrodes, the computer determining a thickness of the liquid zone based upon a distance between a peak of the phase inverted acoustic wave and a peak of a second acoustic wave reflected from an interface between the liquid zone and a solid portion of the metal sheet distal to the ultrasonic probe.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the computer determines the distance between the peaks of the phase inverted acoustic wave and the second acoustic wave based on a time difference between the peaks of the phase inverted acoustic wave and the second acoustic wave as received by the ultrasonic probe.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the weld subject includes at least two metal sheets disposed between the first and second electrodes, the computer determining a position of the liquid zone relative to outer surfaces of the metal sheets based on a time difference between a peak of an acoustic wave reflected from an outer surface of the metal sheet proximal to the ultrasonic probe and a peak of the phase inverted acoustic wave and upon a time difference between a peak of an acoustic wave reflected from an interface of the liquid zone to a solid portion of the metal sheet distal to the ultrasonic probe and a peak of an acoustic wave reflected from an outer surface of the metal sheet distal to the ultrasonic probe.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the characteristic of the liquid zone includes at least one of size and position of the liquid zone.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 and further including the computer evaluating the characteristic of the liquid zone and determining whether to adjust a weld parameter to achieve a desired weld nugget based on its evaluation and upon determining to adjust the weld parameter, communicating an adjustment to the weld parameter to the weld controller.

8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the weld parameter includes at least one of weld time and weld current.

9. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the weld subject includes at least two metal sheets, the two metal sheets disposed between the first and second electrodes, and the characteristic of the liquid zone includes at least one of width, height, position relative to surfaces of the metal sheets, temperature, melting time, and solidification time.

10. The apparatus of claim 2 further including a second ultrasonic probe disposed in the second electrode, the second ultrasonic probe producing a second output signal in response to acoustic energy transmitted through the weld subject indicative of a time of flight (TOF) of acoustic waves of the acoustic energy transmitted through the weld subject.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 further including the computer determining whether a TOF jump occurred and determining that a stick weld occurred based the absence of a TOF jump during welding.

12. The apparatus of claim 10 further including the computer determining whether a TOF jump occurred and upon determining that a TOF jump occurred, determining that the liquid zone began forming at the time that the TOF jump occurred.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the computer determines a time to instruct the weld controller to turn off welding current welding based upon a time that the liquid zone began forming.

14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the computer determines a size of the weld nugget based on a time that the liquid zone began forming and when welding current is turned off.

15. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the computer determines a duration of liquid zone growth based on a time that the liquid zone began forming and when welding current is turned off, the computer determining whether a stick weld occurred based on the duration of liquid zone growth.

16. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the computer displays on a display at least one of graphical and numerical representations of the characteristic of the liquid zone.

17. In a resistance welder having a first electrode and a second electrode, a method of monitoring welding of a weld subject with the resistance welder, comprising:

a. generating bursts of acoustic energy with an ultrasonic probe disposed in the first electrode;

b. generating an output signal with the ultrasonic probe in response to acoustic energy reflected from the weld subject;

c. determining based on the output signal whether the reflected acoustic energy includes a phase inverted acoustic wave reflected from an interface between a liquid zone and a solid portion of the weld subject proximal to the ultrasonic probe; and

determining a characteristic of the liquid zone based on the phase inverted acoustic wave, the liquid zone solidifying into a weld nugget after welding current is turned off.

18. The method of claim 18 further including determining that the liquid zone formed based on the determination that the phase inverted acoustic wave is present in the reflected acoustic energy.

19. The method of claim 17 wherein the weld subject includes at least two metal sheets, the two metal sheets disposed between the first and second electrodes, the method further including determining a thickness of the liquid zone based upon a distance between a peak of the phase inverted acoustic wave and a peak of a second acoustic wave reflected from an interface between the liquid zone and a solid portion of the metal sheet distal to the ultrasonic probe.

20. The method of claim 19 further including determining the distance between the peaks of the phase inverted acoustic wave and the second acoustic wave based on a time difference between the peaks of the phase inverted acoustic wave and the second acoustic wave as received by the ultrasonic probe.

21. The method of claim 17 wherein the weld subject includes at least two metal sheets disposed between the first and second electrodes, the method further including determining a position of the liquid zone relative to outer surfaces of the metal sheets based on a time difference between a peak of an acoustic wave reflected from an outer surface of the metal sheet proximal to the probe and a peak of the phase inverted acoustic wave and upon a time difference between a peak of an acoustic wave reflected from an interface of the liquid zone to a solid portion of the metal sheet distal to the ultrasonic probe and a peak of an acoustic wave reflected from an outer surface of the metal sheet distal to the ultrasonic probe.

22. The method of claim 17 wherein the characteristic of the liquid zone includes at least one of size and position of the liquid zone.

23. The apparatus of claim 17 and further including determining based upon an evaluation of the characteristic of the liquid zone whether to adjust a weld parameter to achieve a desired weld nugget, and upon determining to adjust the weld parameter, adjusting the weld parameter.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein the weld parameter includes at least one of weld time and weld current.

25. The method of claim 17 wherein the weld subject includes at least two metal sheets, the two metal sheets disposed between the first and second electrodes, and the characteristic of the liquid zone includes at least one of width, height, position relative to surfaces of the metal sheets, temperature, melting time, and solidification time.

26. The method of claim 17 further including determining a time of flight (TOF) of acoustic energy transmitted through the weld subject based on a second output signal produced by a second ultrasonic probe disposed in the second electrode.

27. The method of claim 26 further including determining that a stick weld occurred based on the absence of a TOF jump during welding.

28. The method of claim 26 further including determining whether a TOF jump occurred and determining that the liquid zone began forming at the time that the TOF jump occurred.

29. The method of claim 28 including determining a time to turn off welding current based upon the time that the liquid zone began forming.

30. The method of claim 28 including determining a size of the weld nugget based on the time that the liquid zone began forming and when welding current is turned off.

31. The method of claim 28 including determining a duration of liquid zone growth based on the time that the liquid zone began forming and when welding current is turned off and determining whether a stick weld occurred based on the duration of liquid zone growth.

32. The method of claim 17 including displaying on a display at least one of graphical and numerical representations of the characteristic of the liquid zone.