US20050051078A1 - Anti-mine protective coating for ships and marine structures - Google Patents
Anti-mine protective coating for ships and marine structures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050051078A1 US20050051078A1 US10/655,425 US65542503A US2005051078A1 US 20050051078 A1 US20050051078 A1 US 20050051078A1 US 65542503 A US65542503 A US 65542503A US 2005051078 A1 US2005051078 A1 US 2005051078A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- oxide
- coating
- vessel
- magnetic
- copper
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000011253 protective coating Substances 0.000 title abstract 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 230000005291 magnetic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 claims description 12
- XLOMVQKBTHCTTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc monoxide Chemical compound [Zn]=O XLOMVQKBTHCTTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000003139 biocide Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229920000915 polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000004800 polyvinyl chloride Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- XMTQQYYKAHVGBJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(3,4-DICHLOROPHENYL)-1,1-DIMETHYLUREA Chemical compound CN(C)C(=O)NC1=CC=C(Cl)C(Cl)=C1 XMTQQYYKAHVGBJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper oxide Chemical compound [Cu]=O QPLDLSVMHZLSFG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000005751 Copper oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000005510 Diuron Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 125000001931 aliphatic group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 5
- 125000003118 aryl group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- BRPQOXSCLDDYGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium oxide Chemical compound [O-2].[Ca+2] BRPQOXSCLDDYGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000292 calcium oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium oxide Inorganic materials [Ca]=O ODINCKMPIJJUCX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910000420 cerium oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910000431 copper oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- BQVVSSAWECGTRN-UHFFFAOYSA-L copper;dithiocyanate Chemical compound [Cu+2].[S-]C#N.[S-]C#N BQVVSSAWECGTRN-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 5
- WURGXGVFSMYFCG-UHFFFAOYSA-N dichlofluanid Chemical compound CN(C)S(=O)(=O)N(SC(F)(Cl)Cl)C1=CC=CC=C1 WURGXGVFSMYFCG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- HDHLIWCXDDZUFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N irgarol 1051 Chemical compound CC(C)(C)NC1=NC(SC)=NC(NC2CC2)=N1 HDHLIWCXDDZUFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000395 magnesium oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N magnesium oxide Inorganic materials [Mg]=O CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- AXZKOIWUVFPNLO-UHFFFAOYSA-N magnesium;oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[Mg+2] AXZKOIWUVFPNLO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- TWNQGVIAIRXVLR-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxo(oxoalumanyloxy)alumane Chemical compound O=[Al]O[Al]=O TWNQGVIAIRXVLR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- BMMGVYCKOGBVEV-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxo(oxoceriooxy)cerium Chemical compound [Ce]=O.O=[Ce]=O BMMGVYCKOGBVEV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- OGIDPMRJRNCKJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N titanium oxide Inorganic materials [Ti]=O OGIDPMRJRNCKJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- PIILXFBHQILWPS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tributyltin Chemical compound CCCC[Sn](CCCC)CCCC PIILXFBHQILWPS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011787 zinc oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229940043810 zinc pyrithione Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- PICXIOQBANWBIZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N zinc;1-oxidopyridine-2-thione Chemical compound [Zn+2].[O-]N1C=CC=CC1=S.[O-]N1C=CC=CC1=S PICXIOQBANWBIZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl urethane Chemical compound CCOC(N)=O JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001944 Plastisol Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004999 plastisol Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 125000000391 vinyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])=C([H])[H] 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000005292 diamagnetic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000696 magnetic material Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 abstract description 9
- 241000237988 Patellidae Species 0.000 description 16
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000003373 anti-fouling effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005474 detonation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- -1 aliphatic isocyanates Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002987 primer (paints) Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229960000074 biopharmaceutical Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012948 isocyanate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920005862 polyol Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 241000238586 Cirripedia Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000007058 Halophila ovalis Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000005058 Isophorone diisocyanate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004721 Polyphenylene oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000131858 Siboglinidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002542 deteriorative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005294 ferromagnetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003302 ferromagnetic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002457 flexible plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- NIMLQBUJDJZYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N isophorone diisocyanate Chemical compound CC1(C)CC(N=C=O)CC(C)(CN=C=O)C1 NIMLQBUJDJZYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000570 polyether Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 150000003077 polyols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011527 polyurethane coating Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005488 sandblasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000167 toxic agent Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G9/00—Other offensive or defensive arrangements on vessels against submarines, torpedoes, or mines
Definitions
- Mine warfare includes acts of laying floating or submerged explosive devices in harbors, shipping lanes, or strategic choke points to preserve or deny the use of the seas. Mine warfare also includes placing explosive mines on the hulls of shipping vessels to sink or damage the vessel.
- mines used in mine warfare There are several different types of mines used in mine warfare. These types of mines include contact mines, magnetic influence mines, acoustic mines, pressure mines and limpet mines. Contact mines explode when a ship strikes a spine extending from the mine. Acoustic and pressure mines detonate when a particular sound signature or a pressure wave from a ship passing above the mine occurs, respectively.
- Magnetic influence mines comprise detonator circuitry that detects an electric or magnetic field of a ship passing over the mine.
- these mines are equipped with a search coil or magnetometer that senses a change in the earth's magnetic field caused by the presence of a moving ship.
- the detonator circuit analyzes magnetic inputs through a preprogrammed firing circuitry such that when the magnetic field reaches a preset threshold, the detonator circuitry explodes the mine.
- Limpet mines are explosive charges that are used to disable or destroy vessels and ships during war.
- a limpet mine is attached below the water line of a vessel near the engine and detonated via a timed fuse or remote control. The blast created from the detonation rips an opening into the ship sinking or disabling it.
- a limpet mine typically comprises a PVC outer shell filled with plastic explosives and having a base plate.
- the base plate includes magnets that attach the mine to a ferrous surface. Since the magnets that secure the limpet mine to the hull of the target vessel are small in size and weak in magnetic field strength, they can be defeated by providing a sufficiently thick layer of non-ferrous material on the exterior surface of the hull of the vessel.
- a magnetic field results from a source of magnetic flux, which is a term of art that refers to the total amount of magnetic field.
- Sources of magnetic fields include the earth, magnets, motors, and large ferrous objects such as vessels or ships.
- Magnetic fields are measured in units of gauss and oersted. Magnetic flux density is measured in gauss, whereas magnetic field strength is measured in oersteds. The ratio of magnetic flux in gauss to magnetic field in oersteds in a material is defined as permeability.
- Permeability is a measure of the properties of a material to absorb a magnetic field.
- the permeability of ferromagnetic and ferromagnetic materials is high; whereas the permeability of air is one. No known material totally blocks magnetic fields. However, some materials may attenuate or lessen the amount, force, magnitude, or value of the magnetic field. These materials cause the lines of flux to move farther apart, resulting in a decrease in magnetic flux density compared with a vacuum, are called diamagnetic.
- the present invention is directed towards a coating that attenuates a magnetic field created by a magnet that secures a limpet mine to a ferrous surface.
- the anti-fouling coating comprises copper and extends from the bow of the vessel to the stern. Since copper exhibits high magnetic properties, coating a ship's hull with an anti-fouling coating, as mentioned above, may increase the magnetic signature of the ship. Moreover, the copper is a toxicant that leaches into the ocean and represents an environmental hazard that is subject to ever-increasing regulations. Thus, there is a need for a coating that can control growth of biologicals on submersed surfaces of vessels.
- Polyurethane coatings have excellent hardness, abrasion and chemical resistance and are very durable. When these coatings are applied to a ferrous surface, they provide attenuation of magnetic flux thereby reducing the total magnetic field and flux linkage between a magnet and the ferrous surface. If applied in sufficient thicknesses, the coatings can prevent magnets from attaching to the ferrous surface. Moreover, when the coating is impregnated with a biocide, then it also exhibits antifouling properties.
- the biocides used may include one or more of the following: calcium oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, copper oxide, tributyltin, diuron, copper thiocyanate, Irgarol 1051, zinc pyrithione and dichlofluanid.
- polyurethanes including aliphatic and aromatic polyurethanes, acrylic epoxy, acrylic/urethane blends, nylon, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, vinyl plastisols or any combination thereof.
- Aliphatic polyurethanes are based on aliphatic isocyanates (HDI and IPDI) and polyester and/or acrylic polyols; whereas aromatic polyurethanes are based on aromatic isocyanates (MDI and TDI) and polyether polyols. It should be noted that any coating with a high permeability might be used to coat the submersed surface.
- the present invention is a counter-measure for magnetic influence and limpet mines and includes a coating that reduces the magnetic influence from a ship.
- the coating prevents magnets that are typically used to secure limpet mines and to hulls of ships and ferrous support structures, from attaching to the ships or structures. Thus, the explosives cannot be seated properly using magnetic fastening means.
- An added benefit of the present invention is the reduction of electrolysis created when the metal hull of a vessel contacts salt water. Since, the hull is coated below the water line, it is not exposed to the deteriorative effects of electrolysis. Additionally, the potential of a reduced acoustic and magnetic signature is highly probable thereby lessening the threat of triggering a bottom mine.
- the present invention relates to an anti-magnetic exterior coating for a ferrous surface that prevents explosives secured with magnets from attaching to the ferrous surface. More specifically, the invention relates to polyurethane or other non-ferrous coating and having a low permeability that reduces the magnetic flux that links the magnets to the ferrous surface. Thus, the total magnetic field is reduced, thereby preventing the magnets from being attached to the ferrous surface.
- FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a prior art limpet type mine.
- FIG. 2 is an elevation view of a prior art mine of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the coating and underlying substrate.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 show a limpet-type mine 10 that may be planted on a vessel or support member of a marine structure.
- the mine 10 is hemispherical in shape and includes a flat base-plate 12 equipped with four magnets 14 . Magnetic attraction holds the mine in place for deployment.
- a PVC outer casing 16 encloses an electronics chamber for housing the arming and detonation circuitry as well as the explosive materials.
- the mine 10 is equipped with an anti-lift plunger 18 that prevents the mine 10 from being removed after being attached.
- An arming pin 20 extends through a sidewall 22 of the casing 16 and through the anti-lift plunger 18 .
- FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional elevation view of the coating 1 shown deposited onto a ferrous magnetic metal surface 2 .
- polyurethane is deposited onto the metal surface in a thickness no less than 0.0625′′. However, it should be noted that this thickness may vary according to the permeability of the coating material selected from the group of materials listed above.
- the process for applying the anti-mine coating is now discussed.
- the metal surface onto which the coating is applied is cleaned, preferably by stripping off all loose materials and coatings. It is important that the surface must be free of contaminants.
- the stripping process may include known methods readily recognizable by those of ordinary skill in the art and may include sand blasting, pressure washing etc.
- the metal surface is allowed to dry.
- a primer coating is applied to the metal surface.
- the anti-mine coating is then applied to the metal surface and allowed to dry. Ships and vessels may be placed into dry dock during the application process.
- structural support members for marine structures may have the coating applied while in a marine environment.
- a waterproof membrane such as a sheet of flexible plastic, is place around the support member. Water is evacuated from within the membrane.
- the metal surface of the structural support is stripped as mentioned above and allowed to dry.
- a primer is applied to the metal surface if necessary and the anti-mine coating is applied and allowed to dry before the membrane is removed.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Paints Or Removers (AREA)
Abstract
A protective coating applied to the underside of vessels, ships or ferrous marine structures prevents explosives or limpet-type mines that attach via magnets from attaching below the waterline. The coating provides shielding and attenuates the field strength of the magnetic flux created by magnets that hold the explosives or mines in place.
Description
- Mine warfare includes acts of laying floating or submerged explosive devices in harbors, shipping lanes, or strategic choke points to preserve or deny the use of the seas. Mine warfare also includes placing explosive mines on the hulls of shipping vessels to sink or damage the vessel.
- There are several different types of mines used in mine warfare. These types of mines include contact mines, magnetic influence mines, acoustic mines, pressure mines and limpet mines. Contact mines explode when a ship strikes a spine extending from the mine. Acoustic and pressure mines detonate when a particular sound signature or a pressure wave from a ship passing above the mine occurs, respectively.
- Magnetic influence mines comprise detonator circuitry that detects an electric or magnetic field of a ship passing over the mine. Typically, these mines are equipped with a search coil or magnetometer that senses a change in the earth's magnetic field caused by the presence of a moving ship. The detonator circuit analyzes magnetic inputs through a preprogrammed firing circuitry such that when the magnetic field reaches a preset threshold, the detonator circuitry explodes the mine.
- Limpet mines are explosive charges that are used to disable or destroy vessels and ships during war. In use, a limpet mine is attached below the water line of a vessel near the engine and detonated via a timed fuse or remote control. The blast created from the detonation rips an opening into the ship sinking or disabling it. A limpet mine typically comprises a PVC outer shell filled with plastic explosives and having a base plate. The base plate includes magnets that attach the mine to a ferrous surface. Since the magnets that secure the limpet mine to the hull of the target vessel are small in size and weak in magnetic field strength, they can be defeated by providing a sufficiently thick layer of non-ferrous material on the exterior surface of the hull of the vessel.
- Most modern limpet mines incorporate an anti-removal triggering device that increases the probability of a detonation once planted. Typically, a limpet mine remains undiscovered until after detonation of the mine. This occurs because the mines are easy to deploy against targets. To counter the threat of limpet mines, navies currently put divers in the water or remotely operated vehicles to inspect the hulls of vessels. Even if a mine is located after it has been planted, the likelihood of successful removal is minimal, since removing and disarming it is unreliable. These mine removal techniques are time consuming, very costly procedures to implement and extremely dangerous to the divers.
- Since, magnets secure limpet mines to metal structures, if the strength of the magnetic fields produced by these magnets is reduced, the magnets may fail to properly secure the limpet mine to a metal structure. A magnetic field results from a source of magnetic flux, which is a term of art that refers to the total amount of magnetic field. Sources of magnetic fields include the earth, magnets, motors, and large ferrous objects such as vessels or ships. Magnetic fields are measured in units of gauss and oersted. Magnetic flux density is measured in gauss, whereas magnetic field strength is measured in oersteds. The ratio of magnetic flux in gauss to magnetic field in oersteds in a material is defined as permeability.
- Permeability is a measure of the properties of a material to absorb a magnetic field. The permeability of ferromagnetic and ferromagnetic materials is high; whereas the permeability of air is one. No known material totally blocks magnetic fields. However, some materials may attenuate or lessen the amount, force, magnitude, or value of the magnetic field. These materials cause the lines of flux to move farther apart, resulting in a decrease in magnetic flux density compared with a vacuum, are called diamagnetic.
- Thus, the present invention is directed towards a coating that attenuates a magnetic field created by a magnet that secures a limpet mine to a ferrous surface.
- Since an underwater portion of a hull is subjected to the corrosive salt water environment and under constant attack by biological marine growth, many modern ships, such as those used in the U.S. Navy, include an exterior, underwater coating of an anti-corrosive primer covering top coated with an anti-fouling coating. Fouling occurs when biologicals such as barnacles, tubeworms and sea grasses attach to a ship's hull and continue to grow there. A fouled hull can reduce a ship's speed by as much as 5 percent and increase fuel consumption by 40 percent.
- Typically, the anti-fouling coating comprises copper and extends from the bow of the vessel to the stern. Since copper exhibits high magnetic properties, coating a ship's hull with an anti-fouling coating, as mentioned above, may increase the magnetic signature of the ship. Moreover, the copper is a toxicant that leaches into the ocean and represents an environmental hazard that is subject to ever-increasing regulations. Thus, there is a need for a coating that can control growth of biologicals on submersed surfaces of vessels.
- Polyurethane coatings have excellent hardness, abrasion and chemical resistance and are very durable. When these coatings are applied to a ferrous surface, they provide attenuation of magnetic flux thereby reducing the total magnetic field and flux linkage between a magnet and the ferrous surface. If applied in sufficient thicknesses, the coatings can prevent magnets from attaching to the ferrous surface. Moreover, when the coating is impregnated with a biocide, then it also exhibits antifouling properties. The biocides used may include one or more of the following: calcium oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, copper oxide, tributyltin, diuron, copper thiocyanate, Irgarol 1051, zinc pyrithione and dichlofluanid.
- Other types of materials that may be used as an alternative coating may include one-component and two-component polyurethanes including aliphatic and aromatic polyurethanes, acrylic epoxy, acrylic/urethane blends, nylon, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, vinyl plastisols or any combination thereof. Aliphatic polyurethanes are based on aliphatic isocyanates (HDI and IPDI) and polyester and/or acrylic polyols; whereas aromatic polyurethanes are based on aromatic isocyanates (MDI and TDI) and polyether polyols. It should be noted that any coating with a high permeability might be used to coat the submersed surface.
- The present invention is a counter-measure for magnetic influence and limpet mines and includes a coating that reduces the magnetic influence from a ship. The coating prevents magnets that are typically used to secure limpet mines and to hulls of ships and ferrous support structures, from attaching to the ships or structures. Thus, the explosives cannot be seated properly using magnetic fastening means. An added benefit of the present invention is the reduction of electrolysis created when the metal hull of a vessel contacts salt water. Since, the hull is coated below the water line, it is not exposed to the deteriorative effects of electrolysis. Additionally, the potential of a reduced acoustic and magnetic signature is highly probable thereby lessening the threat of triggering a bottom mine.
- Generally, the present invention relates to an anti-magnetic exterior coating for a ferrous surface that prevents explosives secured with magnets from attaching to the ferrous surface. More specifically, the invention relates to polyurethane or other non-ferrous coating and having a low permeability that reduces the magnetic flux that links the magnets to the ferrous surface. Thus, the total magnetic field is reduced, thereby preventing the magnets from being attached to the ferrous surface.
- It is an object of the invention to provide an exterior coating for preventing limpet type mines from being deployed against vessels coated with the anti-magnetic coating of the present invention.
- It is a further object of the invention to provide a coating for ferrous support members of a marine structure that prevents magnets from being attached thereto.
- It is an object of the invention to provide a method for protecting sea-going vessels from having limpet type mines from being attached thereto.
- It is an object of the invention to provide a process for applying the anti-magnetic coating to ferrous surfaces.
- It is another object of the invention to provide a coating having a high permeability and being impregnated with biocides. This coating replaces both the anti-fouling and anti-corrosive coatings currently used on hulls of vessels.
-
FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a prior art limpet type mine. -
FIG. 2 is an elevation view of a prior art mine ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the coating and underlying substrate. -
FIGS. 1 and 2 show a limpet-type mine 10 that may be planted on a vessel or support member of a marine structure. Themine 10 is hemispherical in shape and includes a flat base-plate 12 equipped with fourmagnets 14. Magnetic attraction holds the mine in place for deployment. A PVCouter casing 16 encloses an electronics chamber for housing the arming and detonation circuitry as well as the explosive materials. Themine 10 is equipped with ananti-lift plunger 18 that prevents themine 10 from being removed after being attached. An armingpin 20 extends through asidewall 22 of thecasing 16 and through theanti-lift plunger 18. -
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional elevation view of thecoating 1 shown deposited onto a ferrousmagnetic metal surface 2. In the preferred embodiment, polyurethane is deposited onto the metal surface in a thickness no less than 0.0625″. However, it should be noted that this thickness may vary according to the permeability of the coating material selected from the group of materials listed above. - The process for applying the anti-mine coating is now discussed. The metal surface onto which the coating is applied is cleaned, preferably by stripping off all loose materials and coatings. It is important that the surface must be free of contaminants. The stripping process may include known methods readily recognizable by those of ordinary skill in the art and may include sand blasting, pressure washing etc. The metal surface is allowed to dry. Depending upon the type of coating material to be used, a primer coating is applied to the metal surface. The anti-mine coating is then applied to the metal surface and allowed to dry. Ships and vessels may be placed into dry dock during the application process.
- However, structural support members for marine structures may have the coating applied while in a marine environment. In this instance, a waterproof membrane, such as a sheet of flexible plastic, is place around the support member. Water is evacuated from within the membrane. The metal surface of the structural support is stripped as mentioned above and allowed to dry. A primer is applied to the metal surface if necessary and the anti-mine coating is applied and allowed to dry before the membrane is removed.
Claims (9)
1. An anti-magnetic coating for a vessel having a hull, said anti-magnetic coating covering at least a portion of said hull that extends below a water line and having diamagnetic properties.
2. The anti-magnetic coating of claim 1 consisting of one or more selected from the following:
aliphatic polyurethanes, aromatic polyurethanes, acrylic epoxy, acrylic/urethane blends, nylon, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, and vinyl plastisols.
3. The anti-magnetic coating for a vessel of claim 2 further including one or more of a biocide selected from the group consisting of: calcium oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, copper oxide, tributyltin, diuron, copper thiocyanate, Irgarol 1051, zinc pyrithione and dichlofluanid.
4. The anti-magnetic coating for a vessel of claim 1 further including one or more of a biocide selected from the group consisting of: calcium oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, copper oxide, tributyltin, diuron, copper thiocyanate, Irgarol 1051, zinc pyrithione and dichlofluanid.
5. The anti-magnetic coating of claim 1 having a thickness of not less than 0.0625″.
6. A vessel comprising:
a propulsion means for driving said vessel through water;
a metal hull surrounding at least a portion of said propulsion means; and,
an exterior coating on said metal hull consisting of one or more selected from the following: aliphatic polyurethanes, aromatic polyurethanes, acrylic epoxy, acrylic/urethane blends, nylon, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, and vinyl plastisols
7. The vessel of claim 6 further comprising:
one or more of a biocide selected from the group consisting of: calcium oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, copper oxide, tributyltin, diuron, copper thiocyanate, Irgarol 1051, zinc pyrithione and dichlofluanid.
8. A ferrous magnetic support member for a marine structure comprising:
a ferrous magnetic material; and
a coating on an exterior surface of said ferrous magnetic material, said coating consisting of one or more selected from the following: aliphatic polyurethanes, aromatic polyurethanes, acrylic epoxy, acrylic/urethane blends, nylon, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, and vinyl plastisols.
9. The ferrous magnetic support member of claim 8 further including:
including one or more of a biocide selected from the group consisting of: calcium oxide, cerium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, copper oxide, tributyltin, diuron, copper thiocyanate, Irgarol 1051, zinc pyrithione and dichlofluanid.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/655,425 US20050051078A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 | 2003-09-04 | Anti-mine protective coating for ships and marine structures |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/655,425 US20050051078A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 | 2003-09-04 | Anti-mine protective coating for ships and marine structures |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20050051078A1 true US20050051078A1 (en) | 2005-03-10 |
Family
ID=34226134
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/655,425 Abandoned US20050051078A1 (en) | 2003-09-04 | 2003-09-04 | Anti-mine protective coating for ships and marine structures |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20050051078A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120171272A1 (en) * | 2009-06-17 | 2012-07-05 | Raman Premachandran | Stabilized biocidal dispersion via sub-micronized carrier particles, process for making the same and composition thereof |
| EP3211255A1 (en) | 2016-02-25 | 2017-08-30 | Etablissements Emile Vanhulen | Carabiner |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2910952A (en) * | 1955-08-26 | 1959-11-03 | Technical Res Company | Marine vessel propulsion system seals and paste methods of fabricating same |
| US3639583A (en) * | 1968-06-28 | 1972-02-01 | Goodrich Co B F | Biocidal elastomeric compositions |
| US3990381A (en) * | 1971-01-14 | 1976-11-09 | National Patent Development Corporation | Hydrophilic polymer coating for underwater structures |
| US5814172A (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1998-09-29 | Cox; Arthur R. | Thermoplastics sheets for protecting sub-marine structures |
-
2003
- 2003-09-04 US US10/655,425 patent/US20050051078A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2910952A (en) * | 1955-08-26 | 1959-11-03 | Technical Res Company | Marine vessel propulsion system seals and paste methods of fabricating same |
| US3639583A (en) * | 1968-06-28 | 1972-02-01 | Goodrich Co B F | Biocidal elastomeric compositions |
| US3990381A (en) * | 1971-01-14 | 1976-11-09 | National Patent Development Corporation | Hydrophilic polymer coating for underwater structures |
| US5814172A (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1998-09-29 | Cox; Arthur R. | Thermoplastics sheets for protecting sub-marine structures |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120171272A1 (en) * | 2009-06-17 | 2012-07-05 | Raman Premachandran | Stabilized biocidal dispersion via sub-micronized carrier particles, process for making the same and composition thereof |
| EP3211255A1 (en) | 2016-02-25 | 2017-08-30 | Etablissements Emile Vanhulen | Carabiner |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8056461B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for marine deployment | |
| US7946241B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for marine deployment | |
| TWI417221B (en) | Weapon clearance appliance for clearance of weapons, such as underwater mines, an unmanned underwater vehicle having a weapon clearance appliance such as this, and method for this purpose | |
| US20050051078A1 (en) | Anti-mine protective coating for ships and marine structures | |
| Grant | U-boats destroyed | |
| Karau | Submarines and submarine warfare | |
| Warren et al. | ROV Investigations of the DKM U-166 Shipwreck site to document the archaeological and biological aspects of the wreck site: final performance report | |
| Sayers | US Navy Minecraft: A History and Directory from World War I to Today | |
| Cohen | The Erosion of surface naval power: Foreign Affairs, January 1971 | |
| Slocombe | Australia's future sea mine countermeasures | |
| Truver | UNDERWATER: Mines, improvided explosives: a threat to global commerce? | |
| McCartney | Lost Patrols: Submarine Wrecks of the English Channel | |
| Hackmann | Asdics at war [underwater acoustics] | |
| Brennan et al. | Documenting WWII shipwrecks in the Gulf | |
| Holmes | Exploitation of Magnetic Signatures by Naval Mines | |
| Hosty et al. | Death by a thousand cuts: The sad fate of HMAS Perth | |
| Fowler | Mine Countermeasures at the Operational Level of War | |
| Konstam | Tirpitz in Norway: X-craft midget submarines raid the fjords, Operation Source 1943 | |
| Konstam | U-47 in Scapa Flow: The Sinking of HMS Royal Oak 1939 | |
| Dienesch | Radar and the American Submarine War, 1941-1945: A Reinterpretation | |
| Spooner | Minewarfare—Policy or Palsy? | |
| Slocombe | The RNZN'S new dive and hydrographic vessel | |
| Hunter et al. | HMAS Perth Project 2017, Sunda Strait, Republic of Indonesia | |
| Bell-Davies | The Silent Enemy Below | |
| Chifor et al. | MINE COUNTERMEASURES IN THE ACTUAL GEOSTRATEGIC SITUATION |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |