US20040065998A1 - Game board for playing legal game - Google Patents
Game board for playing legal game Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040065998A1 US20040065998A1 US10/644,190 US64419003A US2004065998A1 US 20040065998 A1 US20040065998 A1 US 20040065998A1 US 64419003 A US64419003 A US 64419003A US 2004065998 A1 US2004065998 A1 US 2004065998A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- game
- board
- gavel
- legal
- plaintiff
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003340 mental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63F—CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- A63F3/00—Board games; Raffle games
- A63F3/04—Geographical or like games ; Educational games
- A63F3/0457—Geographical or like games ; Educational games concerning science or technology, e.g. geology, chemistry, statistics, computer flow charts, radio, telephone
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a board game, and, more particularly to a board game that involves players in a “mock” judicial experience playing the roles of Judge, Plaintiff and Defendant.
- a board game comprises a board, game cards, rules, means for determining the legal discipline for the game and means for determining the hierarchy of players.
- the game board has thereon a plurality of areas with each area representing a particular legal discipline.
- Means are provided for determining the hierarchy of players, and means are provided for selecting a particular legal discipline for the game.
- Dividing the game board surface into a plurality of areas triangular in configuration facilitates assigning an area of the game board to different areas of the law for play, for example, contracts, domestic relations, intellectual property, labor relations, landlord/tenant, torts, etc.
- each said of the plurality of areas of the board can have a distinct color with scenario cards in a matching color.
- the number of pluralities of game cards is equal in number to the number of areas of the game board.
- Each plurality of game cards has scenarios pertaining to a particular area of law, such as contracts or domestic relations for example.
- the discipline of law to be the subject of the game is determined by spinning a gavel, preferably attached to a central location of the board.
- the hierarchy of players is determined by rolling a die.
- the present invention provides a legal board game for amusement, entertainment and excitement that allows the players to dream of being a lawyer advocate or Judge and to play such role. It is an alternative recreational activity that allow the players to relate to real life circumstances and examine possible outcomes and appreciate various legal consequences.
- FIG. 1 is top view of preferred embodiment of a game board according to the present.
- FIG. 2 illustrates stacks of game cards containing various legal scenarios.
- FIG. 3 is a side view of a gavel having a series of bores according the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a side view of miniature gavels according to the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is top view of the gavel of FIG. 1 rotated upward into the page 90° with miniature gavels of FIG. 3 inserted into the apertures.
- FIG. 6 is a die.
- FIG. 7 is a front view of an hour glass.
- game board 10 is rectangular in configuration with a circular area thereon representing the actual game surface.
- the game surface has at its center an object, such as a gavel 14 , capable of spinning and coming to rest on one of several areas of the circle.
- the circular game surface is divided into a number of triangular sections 16 .
- there are six triangular sections 16 with four sections labeled to reflect disciplines of law, such as torts, contracts, employment, and property for example, and two sections labeled et al. to reflect various areas of law.
- the sections labeled et al. may be positioned diametrically opposite one another on the game surface.
- the triangular sections of the game surface may be color coded so that each triangular section is a different color except for the et al. sections which are the same color.
- Each of the triangular sections may have a descriptive drawing or symbol located thereon representative of the particular area of law. Placing the drawing near the center of the triangular shaped section allows room for game cards to be placed on corresponding sections of the game surface without obscuring the drawing.
- each stack there are six stacks of game cards 18 with each stack colored to correspond to the color of the associated triangular section 16 of the game surface.
- the rear face of each game card is labeled to correspond to one of the triangular sections.
- the front face of each game card provides a legal scenario, language representing opposing positions for the plaintiff and lawyer, and resolution statements for the judge.
- the other gavel 20 has a plurality of bores or apertures 22 for receiving miniature gavels 24 .
- There are at least two gavels 20 one for the plaintiff and one for the court.
- a die 26 is used to determine the hierarchy of players. The player rolling the highest number of the die get first choice of the three roles, judge, plaintiff and liability.
- a minute timer 28 is used to limit discussion and maintain timeliness of game rounds.
- a one-minute timer is preferred for a fast paced game, but longer time periods can be used.
- the plaintiff chooses the area of law by spinning the rotating gavel in the center of the game board. After the rotating gavel stops spinning, plaintiff selects a game card from the top of the stock where the rotating gavel points. The plaintiff hands the game card face down to the judge. Alternatively, instead of plaintiff or lawyer spinning the gavel wheel on the board game to select the area of law, the judge could to spin the gavel wheel and make the legal category selection in addition to reading the game cards.
- the judge reads aloud the brief facts of the case beginning by reading the plaintiff's claim allegations and the court's defense. If witnesses are required, court first then plaintiff chooses witnesses among the other players. Witnesses are determined based on the game card scenario.
- the judge places the timer on the board and gives the plaintiff one-minute to add or expound on the facts of the case. After one minute, the judge turns the timer over and gives the lawyer one-minute to add or expound on the facts of the case. After one minute, the judge turns the time over and asks plaintiff and lawyer questions for one minute each and allows both parties to wholeheartedly argue their case (the judge may have to use the gavel during this session if plaintiff and lawyer both speak at the same time).
- Each game card provides a ruling that should be made in favor of either the plaintiff or lawyer, if during the one-minute exposition given to each plaintiff and lawyer, the judge hears a similar argument put forth. The judge is the final authority.
- An optional method of play is, at the outset, two or more teams of three players could be selected and each team would follow the same procedures set forth above.
- Scoring is calculated on a point system with one miniature gavel representing one point.
- the plaintiff earns one miniature gavel or point for having a verdict in his/her favor.
- the court earns one miniature gavel or point for having a case decided in his/her favor.
- the plaintiff could earn two miniature gavels for having a verdict in his/her favor.
- the lawyer could earn two miniature gavel points for having a case decided in his/her favor.
- an optional scoring method after either court or plaintiff or both have attained five miniature gavel points, the court and plaintiff could begin to loose points for having a case decided against him/her. For example, if after plaintiff has attained five points, the next case is decided in favor of the court, the plaintiff would then loose one miniature gavel point. Likewise if after court has attained five points, the next case is decided in favor of the plaintiff, the court would then loose one miniature gavel point. The first player to fill his/her gavel with seven miniature gavels is the winner of the game.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
Abstract
A board game has a board divided into different areas representing legal disciplines of law. Game rules, pieces and cards are provided. A spinning gavel pivotally connect to the game board is used to determine the legal discipline for the game. The hierarchy of the players is determined by rolling a die. There is a plurality of game cards for each area of the board with scenarios relating to the legal discipline for the area of said board. The areas of the board ay be colored with game cards color coded to match the particular area of law.
Description
- This application is a continuing application of provisional application Serial No. filed Aug. 22, 2002.
- The present invention relates to a board game, and, more particularly to a board game that involves players in a “mock” judicial experience playing the roles of Judge, Plaintiff and Defendant.
- Almost everyone enjoys viewing a good legal movie and most would like, if just for a moment, to play the part of the Judge, Plaintiff or even Defendant. It is desirable to have a board game that allows the players to participate in a brief judicial hearing, more akin to a small claims court, where lawyers, rules of evidence, motions and discovery are all left to real life.
- Conventional board games, prior to introduction of personal computers and the worldwide web, were usually educational in nature. U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,922 discloses a legal board game. The main objective of the game is to teach legal subject matter that takes a player through the fundamentals of law including legal terminology, legal strategy and various court systems. U.S. Pat. No. 6,416,055 which issued Jul. 9, 2002 is also an educational board game whose main objective is a method for teaching fundamental aspects of advocacy, debating, negotiation and judicial decision-making.
- Today's television programs seem to surround the courtroom which brings legal issues directly into our living rooms, and with the pressures of life, most popular games today provide an escape from daily doldrums and are a way for the players to have fun with minimum mental effort. It will be appreciated that it would be highly desirable to have a legal board game for amusement, entertainment and excitement that allows the players to perhaps realize a dream of being a lawyer advocate or Judge. It is also desirable to have a board game environment that would function as an alternative recreational activity and allow the players to relate to real life circumstances and examine possible outcomes and appreciate various legal consequences.
- The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above. According to the present invention a board game comprises a board, game cards, rules, means for determining the legal discipline for the game and means for determining the hierarchy of players. The game board has thereon a plurality of areas with each area representing a particular legal discipline. There is a plurality of game cards for each area of the board with scenarios relating to a legal discipline for the area of said board. Means are provided for determining the hierarchy of players, and means are provided for selecting a particular legal discipline for the game.
- Dividing the game board surface into a plurality of areas triangular in configuration facilitates assigning an area of the game board to different areas of the law for play, for example, contracts, domestic relations, intellectual property, labor relations, landlord/tenant, torts, etc. For visual appeal, each said of the plurality of areas of the board can have a distinct color with scenario cards in a matching color.
- The number of pluralities of game cards is equal in number to the number of areas of the game board. Each plurality of game cards has scenarios pertaining to a particular area of law, such as contracts or domestic relations for example.
- There are a plurality of game pieces, such as a gavel with a number of miniature gavels to fit into openings in the regular gavel so that when a predetermined number of miniature gavels is collected, the player wins the game.
- The discipline of law to be the subject of the game is determined by spinning a gavel, preferably attached to a central location of the board. The hierarchy of players is determined by rolling a die.
- The present invention provides a legal board game for amusement, entertainment and excitement that allows the players to dream of being a lawyer advocate or Judge and to play such role. It is an alternative recreational activity that allow the players to relate to real life circumstances and examine possible outcomes and appreciate various legal consequences.
- These and other aspect, objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from a study of the detailed description of the invention and by reference to the accompanying drawings.
- FIG. 1 is top view of preferred embodiment of a game board according to the present.
- FIG. 2 illustrates stacks of game cards containing various legal scenarios.
- FIG. 3 is a side view of a gavel having a series of bores according the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a side view of miniature gavels according to the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is top view of the gavel of FIG. 1 rotated upward into the page 90° with miniature gavels of FIG. 3 inserted into the apertures.
- FIG. 6 is a die.
- FIG. 7 is a front view of an hour glass.
- Referring to FIG. 1,
game board 10 is rectangular in configuration with a circular area thereon representing the actual game surface. The game surface has at its center an object, such as agavel 14, capable of spinning and coming to rest on one of several areas of the circle. Preferably, the circular game surface is divided into a number oftriangular sections 16. Preferably, there are sixtriangular sections 16 with four sections labeled to reflect disciplines of law, such as torts, contracts, employment, and property for example, and two sections labeled et al. to reflect various areas of law. The sections labeled et al. may be positioned diametrically opposite one another on the game surface. The triangular sections of the game surface may be color coded so that each triangular section is a different color except for the et al. sections which are the same color. - Each of the triangular sections may have a descriptive drawing or symbol located thereon representative of the particular area of law. Placing the drawing near the center of the triangular shaped section allows room for game cards to be placed on corresponding sections of the game surface without obscuring the drawing.
- Referring to FIG. 2, there are six stacks of
game cards 18 with each stack colored to correspond to the color of the associatedtriangular section 16 of the game surface. The rear face of each game card is labeled to correspond to one of the triangular sections. The front face of each game card provides a legal scenario, language representing opposing positions for the plaintiff and defendant, and resolution statements for the judge. - Referring to FIGS. 3-5, there are two gavels. One gavel (not shown) is used only by judge to maintain order and deliver a final decision. The
other gavel 20 has a plurality of bores orapertures 22 for receivingminiature gavels 24. There are preferably sevenapertures 22 with eachaperture 22 receiving a miniature gave 24 for a total of seven miniature gavels to win the game. There are at least twogavels 20, one for the plaintiff and one for the defendant. - Referring to FIG. 6, a die 26 is used to determine the hierarchy of players. The player rolling the highest number of the die get first choice of the three roles, judge, plaintiff and defendant.
- Referring to FIG. 7, a
minute timer 28 is used to limit discussion and maintain timeliness of game rounds. A one-minute timer is preferred for a fast paced game, but longer time periods can be used. - Operation of the present invention is believed to be apparent from the foregoing description and drawings, but a few words will be added for emphasis. Each player rolls the dice. The highest roller gets to choose to play one role for him/herself as either plaintiff, defendant or judge. The second highest roller gets to choose to play one of the two remaining roles for him/herself. The plaintiff and defendant each are given a gavel with apertures while the judge is given a regular gavel. Alternatively, instead of the high roller choosing one role, the high roller could choose all of the roles choosing from among the players who will play plaintiff, defendant and judge.
- The plaintiff chooses the area of law by spinning the rotating gavel in the center of the game board. After the rotating gavel stops spinning, plaintiff selects a game card from the top of the stock where the rotating gavel points. The plaintiff hands the game card face down to the judge. Alternatively, instead of plaintiff or defendant spinning the gavel wheel on the board game to select the area of law, the judge could to spin the gavel wheel and make the legal category selection in addition to reading the game cards.
- The judge reads aloud the brief facts of the case beginning by reading the plaintiff's claim allegations and the defendant's defense. If witnesses are required, defendant first then plaintiff chooses witnesses among the other players. Witnesses are determined based on the game card scenario.
- The judge then places the timer on the board and gives the plaintiff one-minute to add or expound on the facts of the case. After one minute, the judge turns the timer over and gives the defendant one-minute to add or expound on the facts of the case. After one minute, the judge turns the time over and asks plaintiff and defendant questions for one minute each and allows both parties to wholeheartedly argue their case (the judge may have to use the gavel during this session if plaintiff and defendant both speak at the same time).
- If witnesses are testifying, the judge will give both plaintiff and defendant an additional one-minute to present their witnesses. After the laughter stops the judge uses the gavel to render the verdict, either in favor of the plaintiff or in favor of the defendant by pounding the gavel.
- Each game card provides a ruling that should be made in favor of either the plaintiff or defendant, if during the one-minute exposition given to each plaintiff and defendant, the judge hears a similar argument put forth. The judge is the final authority.
- If the judge finds in favor of the plaintiff the judge states “I feel that the plaintiff has proven his/her case and rule in favor of the plaintiff”. If the judge finds in favor of the defendant the judge states “I feel that the defendant has more that adequately defended his position and I rule in favor of the defendant.
- An optional method of play is, at the outset, two or more teams of three players could be selected and each team would follow the same procedures set forth above.
- Scoring is calculated on a point system with one miniature gavel representing one point. The plaintiff earns one miniature gavel or point for having a verdict in his/her favor. Likewise, the defendant earns one miniature gavel or point for having a case decided in his/her favor. Alternatively, the plaintiff could earn two miniature gavels for having a verdict in his/her favor. Likewise, the defendant could earn two miniature gavel points for having a case decided in his/her favor.
- As, an optional scoring method, after either defendant or plaintiff or both have attained five miniature gavel points, the defendant and plaintiff could begin to loose points for having a case decided against him/her. For example, if after plaintiff has attained five points, the next case is decided in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff would then loose one miniature gavel point. Likewise if after defendant has attained five points, the next case is decided in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant would then loose one miniature gavel point. The first player to fill his/her gavel with seven miniature gavels is the winner of the game.
- While the invention has been described with particular reference to the preferred embodiments, it is evident that certain aspects of the invention are not limited to the particular details of the examples illustrated, and it is therefore contemplated that other modifications and applications will occur to those skilled in the art. It is accordingly intended that the claims shall cover all such modifications and applications as do not depart from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (8)
1. A board game, comprising:
a board having thereon a plurality of areas with each said area representing a legal discipline;
a plurality of game cards for each said area of said board with scenarios relating to a legal discipline for said area of said board;
means for determining hierarchy of players;
means for selecting a legal discipline; and
rules for playing said board game.
2. A board game, as set forth in claim 1 , wherein each said of said plurality of areas of said board is triangular in configuration.
3. A board game, as set forth in claim 1 , wherein each said of said plurality of areas of said board has a distinct color.
4. A board game, as set forth in claim 1 , including a number of pluralities of game card equal in number to the number of areas of said game board wherein each of said pluralities of game cards is color coded to match the color of a related area of said game board.
5. A board game, as set forth in claim 1 , including a plurality of game pieces, said game pieces including a gavel for each player and a plurality of miniature gavels, said gavel having a predetermined number of aperture each adapted to receive one of said miniature gavels.
6. A board game, as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said means for determining hierarchy of players includes at least one die.
7. A board game, as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said means for selecting a legal discipline includes a gavel pivotally connected to said game board.
8. A board game, as set forth in claim 7 , wherein said gavel is connected at the intersection of said plurality of areas of said game board.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/644,190 US20040065998A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2003-08-19 | Game board for playing legal game |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US40563602P | 2002-08-22 | 2002-08-22 | |
| US10/644,190 US20040065998A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2003-08-19 | Game board for playing legal game |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20040065998A1 true US20040065998A1 (en) | 2004-04-08 |
Family
ID=32045212
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/644,190 Abandoned US20040065998A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2003-08-19 | Game board for playing legal game |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20040065998A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20060273508A1 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2006-12-07 | Mattel, Inc. | Collection board games |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4012045A (en) * | 1975-05-05 | 1977-03-15 | Vail James N | Jurisprudence -educational game |
| US4045031A (en) * | 1976-02-24 | 1977-08-30 | William Brenton Arnold | Board game apparatus |
| US4273337A (en) * | 1979-10-11 | 1981-06-16 | Carrera Michael A | Family sex education board game |
| US4509922A (en) * | 1984-05-14 | 1985-04-09 | Battle Carl W | Legal educational game and method of teaching legal subject matter |
| US4706960A (en) * | 1985-11-18 | 1987-11-17 | Nowacki Robert S | Fields of law and legal process card and board game apparatus |
| US5087050A (en) * | 1991-05-02 | 1992-02-11 | Donovan Thomas D | History game apparatus utilizing fiber optic cable segments |
| US6416055B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2002-07-09 | Kenneth Shaw, Sr. | Board game and method for teaching fundamental aspects of advocacy, debating, negotiation and judicial decision-making |
-
2003
- 2003-08-19 US US10/644,190 patent/US20040065998A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4012045A (en) * | 1975-05-05 | 1977-03-15 | Vail James N | Jurisprudence -educational game |
| US4045031A (en) * | 1976-02-24 | 1977-08-30 | William Brenton Arnold | Board game apparatus |
| US4273337A (en) * | 1979-10-11 | 1981-06-16 | Carrera Michael A | Family sex education board game |
| US4509922A (en) * | 1984-05-14 | 1985-04-09 | Battle Carl W | Legal educational game and method of teaching legal subject matter |
| US4706960A (en) * | 1985-11-18 | 1987-11-17 | Nowacki Robert S | Fields of law and legal process card and board game apparatus |
| US5087050A (en) * | 1991-05-02 | 1992-02-11 | Donovan Thomas D | History game apparatus utilizing fiber optic cable segments |
| US6416055B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2002-07-09 | Kenneth Shaw, Sr. | Board game and method for teaching fundamental aspects of advocacy, debating, negotiation and judicial decision-making |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20060273508A1 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2006-12-07 | Mattel, Inc. | Collection board games |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Nardi et al. | Learning conversations in World of Warcraft | |
| Loy | The nature of sport: A definitional effort | |
| US7744091B2 (en) | Identity guessing game and methods of playing | |
| Loland | 5 Fair play: historical anachronism or topical ideal? | |
| Sniderman | Unwritten rules | |
| US7044467B1 (en) | Sentence forming game and its associated method of play | |
| Whalen | Cyberathletes’ lived experience of video game tournaments | |
| Hao et al. | Conquering gender stereotype threat in “digit sports”: effects of gender swapping on female players’ continuous participation intention in eSports | |
| US6224056B1 (en) | Educational board game and method for teaching occupational skills | |
| Flack et al. | Battlespace Next (TM): developing a serious game to explore multi-domain operations | |
| Bahari et al. | Prophetic leadership: Islamic psychology studies in leadership management in mobile legend games | |
| US11786804B2 (en) | Therapeutic customizable game board system | |
| Hochstetler | Using narratives to enhance moral education in sport | |
| US10518166B1 (en) | Board game—match | |
| US20040065998A1 (en) | Game board for playing legal game | |
| Anderson et al. | Increase team cohesion by playing cooperative video games | |
| US20090020948A1 (en) | Democracy based political board game | |
| Hoffman et al. | Video games go to college | |
| Duffy | Teaching with a Mallet: Conveying an Understanding of Systemic Perspectives on International Relations Intuitively—Croquet as Experiential Learning | |
| West | E-Sports in Academia: A Comparative Analysis of Secondary and Post-Secondary E-Sports Athletes’ Experiences | |
| Zvereva et al. | Gameful Experience in Game-Based Ethics Learning: Comparison between Intransigent and Compromise Types of Ethics Sense-Making Activities | |
| US20230415027A1 (en) | Digital therapeutic customizable game board system | |
| Russo et al. | What makes a'good'mathematical game? | |
| LOY JR | 3. THE NATURE OF SPORT: A DEFINITIONAL | |
| Chelonis | Preferred Leadership Style and Competitive Motivation of Esports Players in Higher Education |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |