[go: up one dir, main page]

US12106467B2 - Inspection apparatus and inspection method for coke oven construction, and coke oven construction method - Google Patents

Inspection apparatus and inspection method for coke oven construction, and coke oven construction method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US12106467B2
US12106467B2 US17/598,062 US202017598062A US12106467B2 US 12106467 B2 US12106467 B2 US 12106467B2 US 202017598062 A US202017598062 A US 202017598062A US 12106467 B2 US12106467 B2 US 12106467B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
work
coke oven
refractories
laying
oven construction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US17/598,062
Other versions
US20220254010A1 (en
Inventor
Yuki TAKAKI
Junichi Yotsuji
Taku Watanabe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Assigned to JFE STEEL CORPORATION reassignment JFE STEEL CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: YOTSUJI, JUNICHI, WATANABE, TAKU, TAKAKI, Yuki
Publication of US20220254010A1 publication Critical patent/US20220254010A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US12106467B2 publication Critical patent/US12106467B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B11/24Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring contours or curvatures
    • G01B11/25Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring contours or curvatures by projecting a pattern, e.g. one or more lines, moiré fringes on the object
    • G01B11/2518Projection by scanning of the object
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10BDESTRUCTIVE DISTILLATION OF CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS FOR PRODUCTION OF GAS, COKE, TAR, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS
    • C10B29/00Other details of coke ovens
    • C10B29/02Brickwork, e.g. casings, linings, walls
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10BDESTRUCTIVE DISTILLATION OF CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS FOR PRODUCTION OF GAS, COKE, TAR, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS
    • C10B45/00Other details
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B11/24Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring contours or curvatures
    • G01B11/25Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring contours or curvatures by projecting a pattern, e.g. one or more lines, moiré fringes on the object
    • G01B11/2545Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring contours or curvatures by projecting a pattern, e.g. one or more lines, moiré fringes on the object with one projection direction and several detection directions, e.g. stereo
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0004Industrial image inspection
    • G06T7/0006Industrial image inspection using a design-rule based approach
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/20Analysis of motion
    • G06T7/215Motion-based segmentation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/70Determining position or orientation of objects or cameras
    • G06T7/73Determining position or orientation of objects or cameras using feature-based methods
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/60Type of objects
    • G06V20/64Three-dimensional objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/88Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S17/89Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10016Video; Image sequence
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10016Video; Image sequence
    • G06T2207/10021Stereoscopic video; Stereoscopic image sequence
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10028Range image; Depth image; 3D point clouds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/20Special algorithmic details
    • G06T2207/20021Dividing image into blocks, subimages or windows
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30108Industrial image inspection
    • G06T2207/30132Masonry; Concrete
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V2201/00Indexing scheme relating to image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V2201/06Recognition of objects for industrial automation

Definitions

  • This application relates to an inspection apparatus and an inspection method for coke oven construction, and also relates to a coke oven construction method using the inspection apparatus and the inspection method.
  • Metallurgical coke used in steelmaking is produced by carbonizing coal in a chamber coke oven.
  • the chamber coke oven has carbonization chambers and firing chambers that supply heat to the carbonization chambers.
  • the carbonization chambers and the firing chambers are alternately arranged in the oven width direction to form the chamber coke oven.
  • Heat is supplied from the firing chambers to the carbonization chambers through refractories, such as refractory bricks, which separate adjacent ones of the carbonization and firing chambers.
  • Some chamber coke ovens have a hundred or more oven chambers.
  • Such chamber coke ovens which are as large as 100 m or more in overall length and 10 m or more in height, may be regarded as very large brick structures.
  • Refractories constituting a coke oven are gradually damaged, because they are subjected not only to high temperatures exceeding 1000° C., but also to friction caused by horizontally pushing out coke obtained by carbonizing coal.
  • the coke oven is used while being repaired by a simple process, such as thermal spraying, or by laying some refractories again mainly at the oven entrance.
  • Coke ovens are generally said to have a life of 40 to 50 years. Aging coke ovens need to be updated or replaced with new ones.
  • construction of a coke oven is typically carried out by oven construction workers by manually laying shaped refractories, such as bricks.
  • the work process is carried out in the following way.
  • a coke oven has a complex structure, but is designed such that the mating surfaces of upper and lower shaped refractories are horizontal and level with each other throughout the structure.
  • the shaped refractories are laid in the first layer, second layer, and so on, in order from bottom to top.
  • a coke oven is newly created or a shaped refractory structure is updated, several dozen out of a total of several hundred oven construction workers are assigned to each predetermined range, so that one or two layers of shaped refractories per day are laid in order from the bottom of the oven.
  • shaped refractories such as bricks
  • shaped refractories to be used are brought in at a work height in advance, and placed near construction points.
  • a mortar is produced by a kneading machine, put into a container, brought into the work area by means of for example a crane, and distributed in small quantities near the construction points.
  • an oven construction worker applies mortar with a trowel to a predetermined joint thickness, picks up a shaped refractory placed nearby, and lays the shaped refractory onto the mortar in such a manner as to prevent entry of air.
  • the oven construction worker horizontally moves it to the position where the next shaped refractory is to be laid.
  • the inspection work for checking whether the required accuracy is met involves, for example, stretching a string in a straight line to visually determine the distance to the string, or placing a straight rod of about 1 m against a row of laid shaped refractories to visually check for unevenness. If there is a gap of 2 mm or more, for example, the worker hits the corresponding area with a hammer for fine adjustment. If the adjustment fails, the corresponding bricks are removed and laid again.
  • This inspection work is performed for each gate by workers, every time laying of the top layer in the oven height direction is completed. The inspection needs to be performed with a pitch of 1 mm across the length. The results of the inspection are filled in an inspection table.
  • the manual inspection work described above is an extensive and very complex operation. Moreover, when the inspection work is performed at the coke oven construction site, the inspection work and the laying work need to take place at the same time. Working at the construction site where a plurality of workers come and go is inefficient, because it is necessary to avoid interference with workers working on other processes. That is, since there are workers with various roles at the oven construction site, the inspection work for checking whether required accuracy is met needs to be timed to avoid interference with other operations. This requires working while moving in a large area, and inevitably results in inefficient operation.
  • blocks are produced by laying a plurality of shaped refractories at a separate location from the coke oven construction site.
  • This technique improves work efficiency at the oven construction site, and also contributes to improved efficiency in that inspection work for checking whether required accuracy is met is performed at a separate location from the oven construction site.
  • inspection work since the inspection work is not performed at the oven construction site, it may be difficult to satisfy required accuracy.
  • an object of the disclosed embodiments is to provide an inspection apparatus and an inspection method for coke oven construction that are capable of automatically performing inspection work after laying of refractories at an oven construction site, without interference with other processes, and to also provide a coke oven construction method.
  • the disclosed embodiments provide (1) to (11) below.
  • An inspection apparatus for coke oven construction the inspection apparatus being an apparatus that checks laying accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke
  • the inspection apparatus including an image capturing device configured to acquire an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress; measurement region determining means configured to identify a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing device, the measurement region determining means being configured to determine the identified work-completed area as a measurement region; and a refractory position measuring device configured to check laying accuracy by measuring positions of laid refractories in the measurement region determined by the measurement region determining means.
  • the inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to (1) or (2) further including a moving mechanism configured to move the refractory position measuring device above the work area.
  • An inspection method for coke oven construction being a method for checking laying accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the inspection method including the steps of acquiring an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress; identifying a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area, and determining the identified work-completed area as a measurement region; and checking laying accuracy by measuring positions of laid refractories in the determined measurement region.
  • step of determining the measurement region includes the steps of dividing the work area into a plurality of subareas; extracting flow lines of workers from the image of the work area; determining, from the extracted flow lines of workers, whether the subarea is the work-completed area or a work-in-progress area where laying work is in progress; and determining the work-completed area as the measurement region.
  • a coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke including repeating the steps of laying refractories; and checking laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to any one of (7) to (12).
  • a measurement region to be subjected to measurement by the refractory position measuring device is determined on the basis of the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing device. Inspection work after laying refractories is thus automatically performed at the oven construction site without interference with other processes.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a coke oven construction facility that includes an inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining a first step of an exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining a second step of the exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining a third step of the exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a fourth step of the exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining sub-steps of flow line analysis in step 2 .
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating sub-steps of laying accuracy checking in step 4 , along with sub-steps of flow line analysis in step 2 .
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a coke oven construction facility that includes an inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to an embodiment.
  • the coke oven construction facility includes an oven construction plant building 1 .
  • An image capturing device 2 and a refractory position measuring device 3 that constitute an inspection apparatus 10 are housed in the oven construction structure building 1 .
  • the image capturing device 2 is installed on a wall of the oven construction plant building 1 .
  • a crane 4 is installed in the oven construction plant building 1 , and the refractory position measuring device 3 is attached to the crane 4 .
  • the crane 4 is an overhead traveling crane that is horizontally movable along a rail 11 .
  • the crane 4 functions as a moving mechanism for moving the refractory position measuring device 3 .
  • a work area 6 is below the refractory position measuring device 3 in the oven construction plant building 1 .
  • refractories 5 are laid by workers 7 to construct a coke oven.
  • a main part of the coke oven has a structure in which a plurality of gates are arranged at predetermined intervals in the oven width direction.
  • Each of the gates is formed by refractories 5 laid in the oven length direction and stacked in the height direction.
  • the refractories 5 may either be shaped refractories, such as bricks, or monolithic refractories.
  • the refractories 5 are laid in one horizontal direction by the workers 7 .
  • the laying accuracy is checked after completion of laying work for one layer of the refractories 5 . If a problem is found by the checking, the corresponding part is laid again to correct the problem. Then, laying work for the next layer begins.
  • the coke oven construction is completed by repeating this process.
  • the image capturing device 2 is for acquiring an image of the work area where oven construction work is in progress.
  • the image capturing device 2 is preferably one that is capable of capturing information about the entire work area 6 with high precision.
  • a 4K camera is suitable for use here.
  • the image capturing device 2 may be an infrared laser sensor, a 3D stereo camera, or any other device capable of acquiring image information with resolution which is sufficient for use in flow line analysis.
  • a video control unit 8 that performs, for example, image processing is connected to the image capturing device 2 .
  • the video control unit 8 functions as a measurement region determining means for automatically determining a measurement region for checking of laying accuracy, and performs, for example, flow line analysis.
  • the video control unit 8 may be incorporated in the image capturing device 2 .
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 is configured to measure a distance to the upper surface and/or side surface of the laid refractory 5 at multiple points.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 includes a control unit that determines refractory laying accuracy from the results of measurement.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 measures the positions of refractories at a distance of about 10 m to 100 m therefrom, it is preferable to use, for example, a 3D scanner, a stereo camera, or a TOF camera as the refractory position measuring device 3 .
  • a 3D scanner which is most preferable among them, is a three-dimensional shape measuring device (sensor) that measures the distance to each point, and is capable of using, for example, laser, electromagnetic radar, or ultrasound.
  • a laser type 3D scanner is most preferable in that it is capable of setting a large measurement region, and has a high point-to-point resolution and high distance resolution.
  • adjusting the point-to-point distance involves, for example, reducing the height of the 3D scanner (i.e., distance or range to the measurement point), as well as adjusting the settings of the 3D scanner (sampling speed, oscillation speed, and laser intensity). Accordingly, there may be provided a mechanism that is capable of lowering the 3D scanner, for example, about 10 m from the crane 4 .
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 such as a 3D scanner, is attached to the moving mechanism, such as a crane.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 can thus be moved to a position directly above the area for checking the laying accuracy.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 may, however, be secured in place above the work area.
  • the image capturing device 2 acquires an image of the work area 6 where laying work is being carried out by the workers 7 in order from an end (step 1 ).
  • the video control unit 8 performs flow line analysis on the acquired image to identify a work-completed area where the laying work has been completed (step 2 ).
  • the video control unit 8 thus determines the identified work-completed area as a measurement region for which laying accuracy is to be measured.
  • the details of the flow line analysis will be described later on below.
  • reference numeral 12 in FIG. 3 denotes a flow line of a moving object.
  • the crane 4 automatically moves the refractory position measuring device 3 to the measurement region on the basis of the result of the flow line analysis (step 3 ).
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 checks the laying accuracy in the measurement region (step 4 ).
  • the image capturing device 2 acquires an image of the work area 6 in step 1 . This is to determine the measurement region for which measurement is to be made by the refractory position measuring device 3 . The actual determination of the measurement region is made by flow line analysis performed on the acquired image by the video control unit 8 . In the flow line analysis of laying work for a firing chamber of the coke oven, since it takes about 30 minutes to 1 hour to complete the laying work for one gate, the time required for the image capturing device 2 to acquire the image may be adjusted to the range of about 1 minute to 20 minutes, and preferably to the range of about 5 minutes to 10 minutes.
  • step 2 The flow line analysis in step 2 is performed by sub-steps illustrated in FIG. 6 .
  • the work area 6 is divided into a plurality of subareas 21 (sub-step 1 ).
  • the work area 6 is divided in any manner into the subareas 21 , which are set to any size that facilitates the analysis.
  • the video control unit 8 extracts flow lines 22 a to 22 d of moving objects from the image of the work area 6 captured by the image capturing device 2 for a predetermined period of time (sub-step 2 ).
  • the video control unit 8 identifies, as illustrated in FIG. 6 ( c ) , flow lines 23 a and 23 b of the workers (oven construction workers) 7 currently at laying work, on the basis of the patterns of movement of the moving objects, or by using markers attached to helmets worn by the workers 7 (sub-step 3 ).
  • the flow lines of workers are identified from among the flow lines of moving objects in sub-steps 2 and 3 , the flow lines of workers may be directly extracted on the basis of positioning devices, such as GPS devices, carried by the workers.
  • the video control unit 8 determines whether the flow line of the worker 7 included in a subarea is longer than or equal to a threshold. If the flow line of the worker 7 at work in the subarea is longer than or equal to the threshold, the video control unit 8 determines, as illustrated in FIG. 6 ( d ) , that the subarea is a work-in-progress area 24 (sub-step 4 ).
  • the video control unit 8 repeats sub-steps 2 to 4 . If, as illustrated in FIG. 6 ( e ) , the flow line of the worker 7 at laying work in the subarea has changed from being longer than or equal to the threshold to being shorter than the threshold, the video control unit 8 determines that the subarea is a work-completed area 25 (sub-step 5 ).
  • a laying accuracy checking step (described below) is performed in a concurrent manner. If one of the plurality of work-completed areas 25 (subareas) is an area for which information about completion of laying accuracy determination (described below) has been received from the control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 , the video control unit 8 determines that the subarea is an inspection-completed area 26 , as illustrated in FIG. 6 ( f ) . The video control unit 8 then determines whether all the subareas are inspection-completed areas 26 (sub-step 6 ). The analysis ends when all the subareas become inspection-completed areas 26 .
  • step 4 The checking of laying accuracy in step 4 is carried out by sub-steps illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 7 .
  • the sub-steps of the flow line analysis illustrated in FIG. 6 are also shown in FIG. 7 .
  • the control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 receives information about a subarea that has become a work-completed area.
  • the control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 determines the order in which a plurality of work-completed areas are to be subjected to measurement of laying accuracy, and determines the work-completed areas as measurement regions sequentially in the determined order (sub-step 11 ).
  • the order described above, may be the order in which the subareas became work-completed areas, or may be determined in such a manner as to minimize the distance traveled by the crane 4 .
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 measures the positions of refractories laid in the work-completed area determined as a measurement region, and acquires measurement data (3D data) (sub-step 12 ).
  • the control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 compares the measurement data to a design value to determine laying accuracy (sub-step 13 ).
  • the subarea (work-completed area) becomes an inspection-completed area and is marked (sub-step 14 ).
  • Information about the subarea for which the determination of laying accuracy has been completed is transmitted to the video control unit 8 connected to the image capturing device 2 .
  • Sub-steps 11 to 14 are repeated to determine whether all subareas have become inspection-completed areas (sub-step 15 ). If it is determined that all subareas have become inspection-completed areas, the measurement made by the refractory position measuring device (3D scanner) 3 ends.
  • the refractory position measuring device (3D scanner) 3 measures the positions of refractories in multiple areas and combines past measurement data with the latest measurement data.
  • the data is combined by setting reference points (markers) in a structure secured in the oven construction work area and adding the positions of the reference points to the set reference points. Three or more reference points are set here.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 remotely measures the laying accuracy of refractories. This prevents interference between the measurement of laying accuracy and other processes, and allows highly efficient and accurate checking of laying accuracy at the oven construction site. It is thus possible to improve efficiency of oven construction work.
  • the video control unit 8 On the basis of the image of the work area 6 acquired by the image capturing device 2 , the video control unit 8 performs, for example, flow line analysis to automatically determine the progress of oven construction work, and automatically measure the area where the laying work has been completed. It is thus possible to automatically determine the area (measurement region) for which the laying accuracy is to be checked by the refractory position measuring device 3 .
  • Examples of a known technique that measures and inspects a large structure without requiring manual work include (though not in the same field as the disclosed embodiments) a technique in which a distance measuring device mounted on a mobile robot measures the dimensions of an object (see, e.g., Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 10-227639), and a technique which involves using a portable near-infrared electro-optical distance measuring device to remotely measure the dimensions of an object (see, e.g., Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 5-120413).
  • the mobile robot performs measurement in a work area. This leads to inefficient operation, because the measurement needs to be timed to avoid interference with other processes.
  • the technique described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 5-120413 does not cause interference with other processes.
  • the distance measuring device needs to be installed at a different location for each measurement, and this requires additional workers.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 is capable of remote measurement which does not cause interference with other processes, and is also capable of automatic measurement which does not require additional workers.
  • Disclosed embodiments described above are merely for illustrative purposes and are not meant to be limiting.
  • the embodiments described above may be omitted, replaced, or changed in various forms without departing from the scope of the disclosed embodiments.
  • a three-dimensional shape measuring device such as a 3D scanner
  • the refractory position measuring device is not limited to this.
  • a distance measuring device such as a two-dimensional laser displacement meter
  • a crane installed in the plant is used as the moving device 4 for moving the refractory position measuring device.
  • the moving mechanism is not limited to the crane, and any means is applicable as long as it is movable in a horizontal plane in the oven construction plant building.
  • a parallel wire mechanism used in indoor and outdoor stadiums and gymnasiums may be used.
  • the refractory position measuring device 3 includes the control unit that determines the refractory laying accuracy in the embodiments described above, a separate determining device, including a computer, may be provided which determines refractory laying accuracy.
  • the video control unit 8 may be a computer that determines refractory laying accuracy.
  • a 4K camera was used as the image capturing device, and a laser type 3D scanner (3D laser scanner) was used as the refractory position measuring device. As illustrated in FIG. 1 , the 4K camera was installed on the wall of the building, and the 3D laser scanner was attached to the overhead traveling crane. The 4K camera captured an image of the oven construction work area where monolithic refractories were laid as the refractories. The video control unit performed flow line analysis on the image captured for the past five minutes to determine, every five minutes, whether there was a worker.
  • 3D laser scanner 3D laser scanner
  • the video control unit determined, on the basis of characteristics such as moving speed and arm movement, whether the worker was an oven construction worker who performs laying work, an arranging worker who transports refractories, or a jointing worker who repairs joints and performs cleaning.
  • the overhead traveling crane was moved to the opposite side three to five gates off the point directly above the work-completed area, so as to make another measurement.
  • the height from the monolithic refractories to the overhead traveling crane was about 15 m.
  • Points obtained by measuring the surfaces of refractories for which the laying positions were to be measured were extracted from measurement points in the combined data. Then the distances to brick surfaces in CAD data (design values) were measured, and average values were calculated to measure the positions of laid refractories. The measurement was performed on monolithic refractories (A to E) for five gates each at three points, including both ends (north end and south end) and center, and deviation from the design value was evaluated. The results are shown in Table 1. For comparison, Table 2 shows values obtained by manual measurement made at the same points as above by a measurer.
  • Table 1 shows that when the measurement was performed in accordance with the disclosed embodiments, a deviation from the design value was from ⁇ 1.3 mm to 1.4 mm.
  • Table 2 shows that in the manual measurement, a deviation from the design value was from ⁇ 2.0 mm to 0.5 mm.
  • the difference between the example of the disclosed embodiments and the manual measurement was a maximum of 1.6 mm. This shows that with the disclosed embodiments, the distance to refractories can be measured with relatively high accuracy, and laying accuracy checking can be made.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Coke Industry (AREA)

Abstract

An inspection apparatus for coke oven construction that is configured to check accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke. The inspection apparatus includes an image capturing device configured to acquire an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress, measurement region determining means configured to identify a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing device, and determine the identified work-completed area as a measurement region, and a refractory position measuring device configured to check laying accuracy by measuring positions of laid refractories in the measurement region determined by the measurement region determining means.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
This application relates to an inspection apparatus and an inspection method for coke oven construction, and also relates to a coke oven construction method using the inspection apparatus and the inspection method.
BACKGROUND
Metallurgical coke used in steelmaking is produced by carbonizing coal in a chamber coke oven. The chamber coke oven has carbonization chambers and firing chambers that supply heat to the carbonization chambers. The carbonization chambers and the firing chambers are alternately arranged in the oven width direction to form the chamber coke oven. Heat is supplied from the firing chambers to the carbonization chambers through refractories, such as refractory bricks, which separate adjacent ones of the carbonization and firing chambers. Some chamber coke ovens have a hundred or more oven chambers. Such chamber coke ovens, which are as large as 100 m or more in overall length and 10 m or more in height, may be regarded as very large brick structures.
Refractories constituting a coke oven are gradually damaged, because they are subjected not only to high temperatures exceeding 1000° C., but also to friction caused by horizontally pushing out coke obtained by carbonizing coal. The coke oven is used while being repaired by a simple process, such as thermal spraying, or by laying some refractories again mainly at the oven entrance. Coke ovens are generally said to have a life of 40 to 50 years. Aging coke ovens need to be updated or replaced with new ones.
Construction of a coke oven (oven construction) is typically carried out by oven construction workers by manually laying shaped refractories, such as bricks. For example, the work process is carried out in the following way.
A coke oven has a complex structure, but is designed such that the mating surfaces of upper and lower shaped refractories are horizontal and level with each other throughout the structure. The shaped refractories are laid in the first layer, second layer, and so on, in order from bottom to top. When a coke oven is newly created or a shaped refractory structure is updated, several dozen out of a total of several hundred oven construction workers are assigned to each predetermined range, so that one or two layers of shaped refractories per day are laid in order from the bottom of the oven.
In the technique described above, shaped refractories, such as bricks, are manually laid by oven construction workers at the coke oven construction site. Another technique which offers higher workability and efficiency than the aforementioned one, has also been proposed. In this technique, blocks are produced by laying a plurality of shaped refractories at a separate location from the coke oven construction site. The blocks are then transported to the coke oven construction site and installed (see, e.g., Patent Literature 1).
For either construction technique, it is required that shaped refractories be laid with a high degree of accuracy.
The following techniques are used to lay shaped refractories, such as bricks, at the coke oven construction site with high accuracy. First, for example, by means of a crane, shaped refractories to be used are brought in at a work height in advance, and placed near construction points. Also, a mortar is produced by a kneading machine, put into a container, brought into the work area by means of for example a crane, and distributed in small quantities near the construction points. At a position where a shaped refractory is to be laid, an oven construction worker applies mortar with a trowel to a predetermined joint thickness, picks up a shaped refractory placed nearby, and lays the shaped refractory onto the mortar in such a manner as to prevent entry of air. After adjusting the position of the shaped refractory, for example, with a level guide, the oven construction worker horizontally moves it to the position where the next shaped refractory is to be laid. By repeating the process described above, a layer of shaped refractories is laid. After completion of laying work for one layer of shaped refractories, inspection work (shape measurement) is performed to check whether required accuracy is met. If a problem is found, the corresponding part is laid again to correct the problem. Then, laying work for the next layer begins.
The inspection work for checking whether the required accuracy is met involves, for example, stretching a string in a straight line to visually determine the distance to the string, or placing a straight rod of about 1 m against a row of laid shaped refractories to visually check for unevenness. If there is a gap of 2 mm or more, for example, the worker hits the corresponding area with a hammer for fine adjustment. If the adjustment fails, the corresponding bricks are removed and laid again. This inspection work is performed for each gate by workers, every time laying of the top layer in the oven height direction is completed. The inspection needs to be performed with a pitch of 1 mm across the length. The results of the inspection are filled in an inspection table.
CITATION LIST Patent Literature
  • PTL 1: Japanese Patent No. 6008071
SUMMARY Technical Problem
The manual inspection work described above is an extensive and very complex operation. Moreover, when the inspection work is performed at the coke oven construction site, the inspection work and the laying work need to take place at the same time. Working at the construction site where a plurality of workers come and go is inefficient, because it is necessary to avoid interference with workers working on other processes. That is, since there are workers with various roles at the oven construction site, the inspection work for checking whether required accuracy is met needs to be timed to avoid interference with other operations. This requires working while moving in a large area, and inevitably results in inefficient operation.
In the technique described in Patent Literature 1, blocks are produced by laying a plurality of shaped refractories at a separate location from the coke oven construction site. This technique improves work efficiency at the oven construction site, and also contributes to improved efficiency in that inspection work for checking whether required accuracy is met is performed at a separate location from the oven construction site. However, since the inspection work is not performed at the oven construction site, it may be difficult to satisfy required accuracy.
Accordingly, an object of the disclosed embodiments is to provide an inspection apparatus and an inspection method for coke oven construction that are capable of automatically performing inspection work after laying of refractories at an oven construction site, without interference with other processes, and to also provide a coke oven construction method.
Solution to Problem
To solve the problems described above, the disclosed embodiments provide (1) to (11) below.
(1) An inspection apparatus for coke oven construction, the inspection apparatus being an apparatus that checks laying accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the inspection apparatus including an image capturing device configured to acquire an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress; measurement region determining means configured to identify a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing device, the measurement region determining means being configured to determine the identified work-completed area as a measurement region; and a refractory position measuring device configured to check laying accuracy by measuring positions of laid refractories in the measurement region determined by the measurement region determining means.
(2) The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to (1), wherein the measurement region determining means performs flow line analysis on the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing device to identify the work-completed area and determine the measurement region.
(3) The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to (1) or (2), further including a moving mechanism configured to move the refractory position measuring device above the work area.
(4) The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to (3), wherein the moving mechanism is an overhead traveling crane.
(5) The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the refractory position measuring device is a 3D scanner.
(6) The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to any one of (1) to (5), wherein the refractory position measuring device measures a distance to an upper surface and/or a side surface of a laid refractory at multiple points to determine positions of laid refractories.
(7) An inspection method for coke oven construction, the inspection method being a method for checking laying accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the inspection method including the steps of acquiring an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress; identifying a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area, and determining the identified work-completed area as a measurement region; and checking laying accuracy by measuring positions of laid refractories in the determined measurement region.
(8) The inspection method for coke oven construction according to (7), wherein the step of determining the measurement region performs flow line analysis on the image of the work area to identify the work-completed area.
(9) The inspection method for coke oven construction according to (8), wherein the step of determining the measurement region includes the steps of dividing the work area into a plurality of subareas; extracting flow lines of workers from the image of the work area; determining, from the extracted flow lines of workers, whether the subarea is the work-completed area or a work-in-progress area where laying work is in progress; and determining the work-completed area as the measurement region.
(10) The inspection method for coke oven construction according to (9), further including the steps of determining, as an inspection-completed area, the measurement region for which the checking of laying accuracy has been completed; and determining whether all the subareas in the work area are inspection-completed areas, wherein the measurement is terminated upon determining that all the subareas are inspection-completed areas.
(11) The inspection method for coke oven construction according to any one of (7) to (10), wherein the checking of laying accuracy involves using a refractory position measuring device configured to measure positions of laid refractories in the measurement region, and after the work-completed area is identified, the refractory position measuring device is moved to the identified work-completed area to check laying accuracy.
(12) The inspection method for coke oven construction according to any one of (7) to (11), wherein the checking of laying accuracy includes the steps of measuring positions of laid refractories in the measurement region to acquire measurement data; and comparing the measurement data to a design value to determine laying accuracy.
(13) A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method including repeating the steps of laying refractories; and checking laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to any one of (7) to (12).
Advantageous Effects
In the disclosed embodiments, a measurement region to be subjected to measurement by the refractory position measuring device is determined on the basis of the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing device. Inspection work after laying refractories is thus automatically performed at the oven construction site without interference with other processes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a coke oven construction facility that includes an inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to an embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining a first step of an exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining a second step of the exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining a third step of the exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a fourth step of the exemplary inspection method performed, for coke oven construction, by the inspection apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1 .
FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining sub-steps of flow line analysis in step 2.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating sub-steps of laying accuracy checking in step 4, along with sub-steps of flow line analysis in step 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Disclosed embodiments will now be described with reference to the attached drawings.
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a coke oven construction facility that includes an inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to an embodiment.
The coke oven construction facility includes an oven construction plant building 1. An image capturing device 2 and a refractory position measuring device 3 that constitute an inspection apparatus 10 are housed in the oven construction structure building 1. The image capturing device 2 is installed on a wall of the oven construction plant building 1.
A crane 4 is installed in the oven construction plant building 1, and the refractory position measuring device 3 is attached to the crane 4. The crane 4 is an overhead traveling crane that is horizontally movable along a rail 11. The crane 4 functions as a moving mechanism for moving the refractory position measuring device 3.
A work area 6 is below the refractory position measuring device 3 in the oven construction plant building 1. In the work area 6, refractories 5 are laid by workers 7 to construct a coke oven.
A main part of the coke oven has a structure in which a plurality of gates are arranged at predetermined intervals in the oven width direction. Each of the gates is formed by refractories 5 laid in the oven length direction and stacked in the height direction. The refractories 5 may either be shaped refractories, such as bricks, or monolithic refractories.
For construction of the coke oven, the refractories 5 are laid in one horizontal direction by the workers 7. The laying accuracy is checked after completion of laying work for one layer of the refractories 5. If a problem is found by the checking, the corresponding part is laid again to correct the problem. Then, laying work for the next layer begins. The coke oven construction is completed by repeating this process.
The image capturing device 2 is for acquiring an image of the work area where oven construction work is in progress. The image capturing device 2 is preferably one that is capable of capturing information about the entire work area 6 with high precision. For example, a 4K camera is suitable for use here. The image capturing device 2 may be an infrared laser sensor, a 3D stereo camera, or any other device capable of acquiring image information with resolution which is sufficient for use in flow line analysis.
A video control unit 8 that performs, for example, image processing is connected to the image capturing device 2. The video control unit 8 functions as a measurement region determining means for automatically determining a measurement region for checking of laying accuracy, and performs, for example, flow line analysis. The video control unit 8 may be incorporated in the image capturing device 2.
The refractory position measuring device 3 is configured to measure a distance to the upper surface and/or side surface of the laid refractory 5 at multiple points. The refractory position measuring device 3 includes a control unit that determines refractory laying accuracy from the results of measurement.
Since the refractory position measuring device 3 measures the positions of refractories at a distance of about 10 m to 100 m therefrom, it is preferable to use, for example, a 3D scanner, a stereo camera, or a TOF camera as the refractory position measuring device 3. A 3D scanner, which is most preferable among them, is a three-dimensional shape measuring device (sensor) that measures the distance to each point, and is capable of using, for example, laser, electromagnetic radar, or ultrasound. A laser type 3D scanner is most preferable in that it is capable of setting a large measurement region, and has a high point-to-point resolution and high distance resolution.
For measurement of positions, even when there is some distance to the measurement points, it is desirable that the distance between points be adjusted to 20 mm or less. When a 3D scanner is used as the refractory position measuring device 3, adjusting the point-to-point distance involves, for example, reducing the height of the 3D scanner (i.e., distance or range to the measurement point), as well as adjusting the settings of the 3D scanner (sampling speed, oscillation speed, and laser intensity). Accordingly, there may be provided a mechanism that is capable of lowering the 3D scanner, for example, about 10 m from the crane 4.
As described above, the refractory position measuring device 3, such as a 3D scanner, is attached to the moving mechanism, such as a crane. The refractory position measuring device 3 can thus be moved to a position directly above the area for checking the laying accuracy. The refractory position measuring device 3 may, however, be secured in place above the work area.
An exemplary inspection method for coke oven construction will now be described.
First, as illustrated in FIG. 2 , the image capturing device 2 acquires an image of the work area 6 where laying work is being carried out by the workers 7 in order from an end (step 1).
Next, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , the video control unit 8 performs flow line analysis on the acquired image to identify a work-completed area where the laying work has been completed (step 2). The video control unit 8 thus determines the identified work-completed area as a measurement region for which laying accuracy is to be measured. The details of the flow line analysis will be described later on below. Note that reference numeral 12 in FIG. 3 denotes a flow line of a moving object.
Next, as illustrated in FIG. 4 , the crane 4 automatically moves the refractory position measuring device 3 to the measurement region on the basis of the result of the flow line analysis (step 3).
Next, as illustrated in FIG. 5 , the refractory position measuring device 3 checks the laying accuracy in the measurement region (step 4).
As described above, the image capturing device 2 acquires an image of the work area 6 in step 1. This is to determine the measurement region for which measurement is to be made by the refractory position measuring device 3. The actual determination of the measurement region is made by flow line analysis performed on the acquired image by the video control unit 8. In the flow line analysis of laying work for a firing chamber of the coke oven, since it takes about 30 minutes to 1 hour to complete the laying work for one gate, the time required for the image capturing device 2 to acquire the image may be adjusted to the range of about 1 minute to 20 minutes, and preferably to the range of about 5 minutes to 10 minutes.
The flow line analysis in step 2 is performed by sub-steps illustrated in FIG. 6 .
First, as illustrated in FIG. 6(a), the work area 6 is divided into a plurality of subareas 21 (sub-step 1). The work area 6 is divided in any manner into the subareas 21, which are set to any size that facilitates the analysis.
Next, as illustrated in FIG. 6(b), the video control unit 8 extracts flow lines 22 a to 22 d of moving objects from the image of the work area 6 captured by the image capturing device 2 for a predetermined period of time (sub-step 2).
From among the flow lines 22 a to 22 d of the moving objects, the video control unit 8 identifies, as illustrated in FIG. 6(c), flow lines 23 a and 23 b of the workers (oven construction workers) 7 currently at laying work, on the basis of the patterns of movement of the moving objects, or by using markers attached to helmets worn by the workers 7 (sub-step 3). Although the flow lines of workers are identified from among the flow lines of moving objects in sub-steps 2 and 3, the flow lines of workers may be directly extracted on the basis of positioning devices, such as GPS devices, carried by the workers.
Next, the video control unit 8 determines whether the flow line of the worker 7 included in a subarea is longer than or equal to a threshold. If the flow line of the worker 7 at work in the subarea is longer than or equal to the threshold, the video control unit 8 determines, as illustrated in FIG. 6(d), that the subarea is a work-in-progress area 24 (sub-step 4).
The video control unit 8 repeats sub-steps 2 to 4. If, as illustrated in FIG. 6(e), the flow line of the worker 7 at laying work in the subarea has changed from being longer than or equal to the threshold to being shorter than the threshold, the video control unit 8 determines that the subarea is a work-completed area 25 (sub-step 5).
Next, a laying accuracy checking step (described below) is performed in a concurrent manner. If one of the plurality of work-completed areas 25 (subareas) is an area for which information about completion of laying accuracy determination (described below) has been received from the control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3, the video control unit 8 determines that the subarea is an inspection-completed area 26, as illustrated in FIG. 6(f). The video control unit 8 then determines whether all the subareas are inspection-completed areas 26 (sub-step 6). The analysis ends when all the subareas become inspection-completed areas 26.
The checking of laying accuracy in step 4 is carried out by sub-steps illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 7 . The sub-steps of the flow line analysis illustrated in FIG. 6 are also shown in FIG. 7 .
From the video control unit 8 connected to the image capturing device 2, the control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 receives information about a subarea that has become a work-completed area. The control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 then determines the order in which a plurality of work-completed areas are to be subjected to measurement of laying accuracy, and determines the work-completed areas as measurement regions sequentially in the determined order (sub-step 11). The order, described above, may be the order in which the subareas became work-completed areas, or may be determined in such a manner as to minimize the distance traveled by the crane 4.
Next, the refractory position measuring device 3 measures the positions of refractories laid in the work-completed area determined as a measurement region, and acquires measurement data (3D data) (sub-step 12). The control unit of the refractory position measuring device 3 then compares the measurement data to a design value to determine laying accuracy (sub-step 13). After the determination of laying accuracy, the subarea (work-completed area) becomes an inspection-completed area and is marked (sub-step 14). Information about the subarea for which the determination of laying accuracy has been completed is transmitted to the video control unit 8 connected to the image capturing device 2.
Sub-steps 11 to 14 are repeated to determine whether all subareas have become inspection-completed areas (sub-step 15). If it is determined that all subareas have become inspection-completed areas, the measurement made by the refractory position measuring device (3D scanner) 3 ends.
The refractory position measuring device (3D scanner) 3 measures the positions of refractories in multiple areas and combines past measurement data with the latest measurement data. The data is combined by setting reference points (markers) in a structure secured in the oven construction work area and adding the positions of the reference points to the set reference points. Three or more reference points are set here.
In the present embodiment, the refractory position measuring device 3 remotely measures the laying accuracy of refractories. This prevents interference between the measurement of laying accuracy and other processes, and allows highly efficient and accurate checking of laying accuracy at the oven construction site. It is thus possible to improve efficiency of oven construction work. On the basis of the image of the work area 6 acquired by the image capturing device 2, the video control unit 8 performs, for example, flow line analysis to automatically determine the progress of oven construction work, and automatically measure the area where the laying work has been completed. It is thus possible to automatically determine the area (measurement region) for which the laying accuracy is to be checked by the refractory position measuring device 3.
Examples of a known technique that measures and inspects a large structure without requiring manual work include (though not in the same field as the disclosed embodiments) a technique in which a distance measuring device mounted on a mobile robot measures the dimensions of an object (see, e.g., Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 10-227639), and a technique which involves using a portable near-infrared electro-optical distance measuring device to remotely measure the dimensions of an object (see, e.g., Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 5-120413).
In the technique described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 10-227639, the mobile robot performs measurement in a work area. This leads to inefficient operation, because the measurement needs to be timed to avoid interference with other processes. The technique described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 5-120413 does not cause interference with other processes. However, the distance measuring device needs to be installed at a different location for each measurement, and this requires additional workers.
In the present embodiment, the refractory position measuring device 3 is capable of remote measurement which does not cause interference with other processes, and is also capable of automatic measurement which does not require additional workers.
Disclosed embodiments described above are merely for illustrative purposes and are not meant to be limiting. The embodiments described above may be omitted, replaced, or changed in various forms without departing from the scope of the disclosed embodiments.
For example, although a three-dimensional shape measuring device, such as a 3D scanner, is used as the refractory position measuring device in the embodiments described above, the refractory position measuring device is not limited to this. For example, a distance measuring device, such as a two-dimensional laser displacement meter, may be used. In the example described above, a crane installed in the plant is used as the moving device 4 for moving the refractory position measuring device. However, the moving mechanism is not limited to the crane, and any means is applicable as long as it is movable in a horizontal plane in the oven construction plant building. For example, a parallel wire mechanism used in indoor and outdoor stadiums and gymnasiums may be used. Although the refractory position measuring device 3 includes the control unit that determines the refractory laying accuracy in the embodiments described above, a separate determining device, including a computer, may be provided which determines refractory laying accuracy. Alternatively, the video control unit 8 may be a computer that determines refractory laying accuracy.
EXAMPLE
A 4K camera was used as the image capturing device, and a laser type 3D scanner (3D laser scanner) was used as the refractory position measuring device. As illustrated in FIG. 1 , the 4K camera was installed on the wall of the building, and the 3D laser scanner was attached to the overhead traveling crane. The 4K camera captured an image of the oven construction work area where monolithic refractories were laid as the refractories. The video control unit performed flow line analysis on the image captured for the past five minutes to determine, every five minutes, whether there was a worker. If a worker was found, the video control unit determined, on the basis of characteristics such as moving speed and arm movement, whether the worker was an oven construction worker who performs laying work, an arranging worker who transports refractories, or a jointing worker who repairs joints and performs cleaning. An area where an oven construction worker was present for three or more minutes, out of five minutes, was determined to be a work-in-progress area. Then, after the oven construction worker left the area (or work-completed area), an operator moved the overhead traveling crane having the 3D laser scanner attached thereto to a location three to five gates off the point directly above the work-completed area, so as to carry out measurement. Since each measurement allows only one side of monolithic refractories to be measured, the overhead traveling crane was moved to the opposite side three to five gates off the point directly above the work-completed area, so as to make another measurement. The height from the monolithic refractories to the overhead traveling crane was about 15 m.
For point group information obtained by the two separate measurements, data was combined to make three reference points coincide. Since point group data has a measurement error of about 1 mm, it is difficult to make the three reference points perfectly coincide. Accordingly, a least-squares method was used to combine the data in such a manner as to minimize the displacement between reference points.
Points obtained by measuring the surfaces of refractories for which the laying positions were to be measured, were extracted from measurement points in the combined data. Then the distances to brick surfaces in CAD data (design values) were measured, and average values were calculated to measure the positions of laid refractories. The measurement was performed on monolithic refractories (A to E) for five gates each at three points, including both ends (north end and south end) and center, and deviation from the design value was evaluated. The results are shown in Table 1. For comparison, Table 2 shows values obtained by manual measurement made at the same points as above by a measurer.
Table 1 shows that when the measurement was performed in accordance with the disclosed embodiments, a deviation from the design value was from −1.3 mm to 1.4 mm. Table 2 shows that in the manual measurement, a deviation from the design value was from −2.0 mm to 0.5 mm. The difference between the example of the disclosed embodiments and the manual measurement was a maximum of 1.6 mm. This shows that with the disclosed embodiments, the distance to refractories can be measured with relatively high accuracy, and laying accuracy checking can be made.
TABLE 1
Monolithic Refractories
A B C D E
Example Measurement North End 1.0 mm 0.3 mm −0.7 mm 0.8 mm −0.2 mm
Location Center −1.3 mm −0.9 mm −0.6 mm −0.4 mm 1.4 mm
South End 0.3 mm 1.1 mm 0.5 mm −1.2 mm 1.2 mm
TABLE 2
Monolithic Refractories
A B C D E
Manual Measurement North End −0.5 mm −1.0 mm −1.0 mm −0.5 mm −1.0 mm
Measurement Location Center −2.0 mm −1.0 mm −2.0 mm −2.0 mm 0.0 mm
South End −1.0 mm −0.5 mm 0.5 mm −2.0 mm 0.0 mm

Claims (17)

The invention claimed is:
1. An inspection apparatus for coke oven construction, the inspection apparatus configured to check a laying accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the inspection apparatus comprising:
an image capturing sensor configured to acquire an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress;
a video processor configured to identify a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing sensor, and to determine the identified work-completed area as a measurement region; and
a 3D scanner configured to check the laying accuracy by measuring positions of laid refractories in the measurement region determined by the video processor.
2. The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to claim 1, wherein the video processor performs flow line analysis on the image of the work area acquired by the image capturing sensor to identify the work-completed area and determine the measurement region.
3. The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to claim 1, further comprising a moving mechanism configured to move the 3D scanner above the work area.
4. The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to claim 3, wherein the moving mechanism is an overhead traveling crane.
5. The inspection apparatus for coke oven construction according to claim 1, wherein the 3D scanner measures a distance to at least one of an upper surface and a side surface of each laid refractory at multiple points to determine the positions of the laid refractories.
6. An inspection method for coke oven construction, the inspection method being a method for checking a laying accuracy after refractories are laid in oven construction work for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the inspection method comprising:
acquiring an image of a work area where oven construction work is in progress;
identifying a work-completed area where laying work has been completed on the basis of the image of the work area, and determining the identified work-completed area as a measurement region; and
checking the laying accuracy, using 3D scanner, by measuring positions of laid refractories in the determined measurement region.
7. The inspection method for coke oven construction according to claim 6, wherein the step of determining the measurement region includes performing flow line analysis on the image of the work area to identify the work-completed area.
8. The inspection method for coke oven construction according to claim 7, wherein the step of determining the measurement region includes:
dividing the work area into a plurality of subareas;
extracting flow lines of workers from the image of the work area;
determining, from the extracted flow lines of workers, whether each subarea is the work-completed area or a work-in-progress area where laying work is in progress; and
determining the work-completed area as the measurement region.
9. The inspection method for coke oven construction according to claim 8, further comprising:
determining, as an inspection-completed area, the measurement region for which the checking of the laying accuracy has been completed; and
determining whether all of the subareas in the work area are inspection-completed areas,
wherein the measurement is terminated upon determining that all of the subareas are inspection-completed areas.
10. A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method comprising repeating:
laying refractories; and
checking the laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to claim 9.
11. A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method comprising repeating:
laying refractories; and
checking the laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to claim 7.
12. A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method comprising repeating:
laying refractories; and
checking the laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to claim 8.
13. The inspection method for coke oven construction according to claim 6, wherein the checking of the laying accuracy involves using the 3D scanner configured to measure positions of the laid refractories in the measurement region, and after the work-completed area is identified, the 3D scanner is moved to the identified work-completed area to check the laying accuracy.
14. A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method comprising repeating:
laying refractories; and
checking the laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to claim 13.
15. The inspection method for coke oven construction according to claim 6, wherein the checking of the laying accuracy includes:
measuring positions of the laid refractories in the measurement region to acquire measurement data; and
comparing the measurement data to a design value to determine the laying accuracy.
16. A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method comprising repeating:
laying refractories; and
checking the laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to claim 15.
17. A coke oven construction method for updating or newly creating a coke oven that produces coke, the coke oven construction method comprising repeating:
laying refractories; and
checking the laying accuracy of the laid refractories by using the inspection method according to claim 6.
US17/598,062 2019-03-26 2020-03-24 Inspection apparatus and inspection method for coke oven construction, and coke oven construction method Active 2040-12-23 US12106467B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019-058447 2019-03-26
JP2019058447 2019-03-26
PCT/JP2020/013036 WO2020196527A1 (en) 2019-03-26 2020-03-24 Inspection device and inspection method upon construction of coke oven, and coke oven construction method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20220254010A1 US20220254010A1 (en) 2022-08-11
US12106467B2 true US12106467B2 (en) 2024-10-01

Family

ID=72609435

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/598,062 Active 2040-12-23 US12106467B2 (en) 2019-03-26 2020-03-24 Inspection apparatus and inspection method for coke oven construction, and coke oven construction method

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US12106467B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3922700B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6809654B1 (en)
KR (1) KR102567594B1 (en)
CN (1) CN113614205B (en)
TW (1) TWI768311B (en)
WO (1) WO2020196527A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114854435B (en) * 2022-06-10 2023-05-30 山西深蓝海拓智能机电设备有限公司 Method and device for checking whether furnace door is accurately aligned in coking operation process
CN117050760B (en) * 2023-10-13 2023-12-15 山西中科冶金建设有限公司 Intelligent coal charging and coke discharging system

Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000180162A (en) 1998-12-11 2000-06-30 Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd Work analyzer
JP2001003058A (en) * 1999-06-16 2001-01-09 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Wall inspection method and wall inspection device for coke oven carbonization room
EP1167919B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2005-10-12 Nippon Steel Corporation Wall surface observing device with y movement
US20050263945A1 (en) 2002-05-24 2005-12-01 Speciality Minerals (Michigan) Inc. Method for repairing a protective lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel
US7174787B2 (en) * 2003-03-13 2007-02-13 Andec Manufacturing Ltd. System and method for inspecting an industrial furnace or the like
JP2009521630A (en) * 2005-12-30 2009-06-04 ゴールドウィング ノミニーズ ピーティーワイ リミテッド Automatic brick laying system for building buildings with multiple bricks
CN201680823U (en) 2010-05-21 2010-12-22 中国矿业大学 Dynamic measuring device for roadway surrounding rock deformation
CN105644124A (en) 2016-02-26 2016-06-08 三汽车制造有限公司 Tiling method
CN105778934A (en) 2016-04-06 2016-07-20 中国五冶集团有限公司 Three-dimensional control masonry method based on oven body masonry construction of coke oven
CN205426167U (en) 2016-04-01 2016-08-03 四川建筑职业技术学院 Multi -functional masonry quality swashs optical detector
JP6008071B1 (en) 2015-03-30 2016-10-19 Jfeスチール株式会社 Coke oven construction method
CN107064149A (en) 2017-05-27 2017-08-18 中国冶集团有限公司 Coke oven recovery project wall working face detection means and method
WO2018002900A1 (en) 2016-06-30 2018-01-04 Centre De Pyrolyse Du Charbon De Marienau Device for measuring a shape of a wall portion of a coke oven
JP2018111804A (en) 2017-01-10 2018-07-19 Jfeスチール株式会社 Shaped refractory stacking method, and shaped refractory stacking system
JP2018136285A (en) 2017-02-24 2018-08-30 国際航業株式会社 Travelling tunnel lining photographing device and travelling tunnel lining photographing method
CN108871210A (en) * 2017-09-28 2018-11-23 浙江大学 Ladle flame retardant coating measurement method based on infrared image
JP2019123784A (en) 2018-01-15 2019-07-25 Jfeスチール株式会社 An inspection method at furnace building of a coke oven and a furnace building method of the coke oven
JP2019184225A (en) 2018-04-03 2019-10-24 Jfeスチール株式会社 Furnace construction method
US11237124B2 (en) * 2019-09-26 2022-02-01 Harbisonwalker International, Inc. Predictive refractory performance measurement system

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS608071B2 (en) 1979-04-05 1985-02-28 松下電器産業株式会社 Method for producing zinc sulfide phosphor
JPS608071U (en) 1983-06-29 1985-01-21 富士通株式会社 ink ribbon
JPH05120413A (en) 1991-10-28 1993-05-18 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd Measurement and analysis device for large structures
JPH10227639A (en) 1997-02-13 1998-08-25 Komatsu Ltd Vehicle for structural measurement
JP4016334B2 (en) * 2003-02-03 2007-12-05 株式会社安川電機 Robot controller
JP4892602B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2012-03-07 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 Manufacturing method of semiconductor integrated circuit device
JP5722049B2 (en) * 2011-01-06 2015-05-20 オリンパス株式会社 Board inspection system
JP2016157357A (en) * 2015-02-26 2016-09-01 株式会社日立製作所 Worker quality control method and worker quality control device
CN206459611U (en) * 2017-01-17 2017-09-01 中建一局集团建设发展有限公司 A kind of high-rise building high-precision deformation monitoring system based on big-dipper satellite

Patent Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000180162A (en) 1998-12-11 2000-06-30 Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd Work analyzer
EP1167919B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2005-10-12 Nippon Steel Corporation Wall surface observing device with y movement
JP2001003058A (en) * 1999-06-16 2001-01-09 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Wall inspection method and wall inspection device for coke oven carbonization room
US20050263945A1 (en) 2002-05-24 2005-12-01 Speciality Minerals (Michigan) Inc. Method for repairing a protective lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel
US7174787B2 (en) * 2003-03-13 2007-02-13 Andec Manufacturing Ltd. System and method for inspecting an industrial furnace or the like
JP2009521630A (en) * 2005-12-30 2009-06-04 ゴールドウィング ノミニーズ ピーティーワイ リミテッド Automatic brick laying system for building buildings with multiple bricks
CN201680823U (en) 2010-05-21 2010-12-22 中国矿业大学 Dynamic measuring device for roadway surrounding rock deformation
JP6008071B1 (en) 2015-03-30 2016-10-19 Jfeスチール株式会社 Coke oven construction method
CN105644124A (en) 2016-02-26 2016-06-08 三汽车制造有限公司 Tiling method
CN205426167U (en) 2016-04-01 2016-08-03 四川建筑职业技术学院 Multi -functional masonry quality swashs optical detector
CN105778934A (en) 2016-04-06 2016-07-20 中国五冶集团有限公司 Three-dimensional control masonry method based on oven body masonry construction of coke oven
US20190219389A1 (en) * 2016-06-30 2019-07-18 Centre De Pyrolyse Du Charbon De Marienau Device for Measuring a Shape of a Wall Portion of a Coke Oven
WO2018002900A1 (en) 2016-06-30 2018-01-04 Centre De Pyrolyse Du Charbon De Marienau Device for measuring a shape of a wall portion of a coke oven
JP2018111804A (en) 2017-01-10 2018-07-19 Jfeスチール株式会社 Shaped refractory stacking method, and shaped refractory stacking system
JP2018136285A (en) 2017-02-24 2018-08-30 国際航業株式会社 Travelling tunnel lining photographing device and travelling tunnel lining photographing method
CN107064149A (en) 2017-05-27 2017-08-18 中国冶集团有限公司 Coke oven recovery project wall working face detection means and method
CN108871210A (en) * 2017-09-28 2018-11-23 浙江大学 Ladle flame retardant coating measurement method based on infrared image
CN108871210B (en) * 2017-09-28 2020-05-05 浙江大学 Steel ladle fire-resistant layer measuring method based on infrared image
JP2019123784A (en) 2018-01-15 2019-07-25 Jfeスチール株式会社 An inspection method at furnace building of a coke oven and a furnace building method of the coke oven
JP2019184225A (en) 2018-04-03 2019-10-24 Jfeスチール株式会社 Furnace construction method
US11237124B2 (en) * 2019-09-26 2022-02-01 Harbisonwalker International, Inc. Predictive refractory performance measurement system

Non-Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Aug. 5, 2024 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202080024310.0 (with partial translation).
Fan Jinzhu "Several Main Technical Problems Must Be Solved In Order To Ensure The Quality Of Masonry In Coke Oven", Inner Mongolia Science and Technology and Economy, No. 16, pp. 95-96, Aug. 31, 2011.
Feb. 16, 2022 Extended Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 20776784.9.
Jin Rui et al. "Building construction enterprise BMI application basic course", Gongshang University Press, pp. 114-115, May 31, 2016.
Jul. 3, 2023 Office Action issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7030005.
Jul. 7, 2021 Office Action issued in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 109110080.
Jun. 16, 2020 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2020/013036.
Mar. 29, 2024 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202080024310.0 (with partial translation).
Nov. 27, 2020 Office Action issued in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 109110080.
Oct. 28, 2023 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202080024310.0.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112021018732A2 (en) 2021-12-21
TWI768311B (en) 2022-06-21
JP6809654B1 (en) 2021-01-06
EP3922700A4 (en) 2022-03-16
EP3922700B1 (en) 2023-01-11
US20220254010A1 (en) 2022-08-11
CN113614205B (en) 2025-05-30
JPWO2020196527A1 (en) 2021-04-30
CN113614205A (en) 2021-11-05
KR20210124481A (en) 2021-10-14
EP3922700A1 (en) 2021-12-15
KR102567594B1 (en) 2023-08-16
WO2020196527A1 (en) 2020-10-01
TW202038190A (en) 2020-10-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6950542B2 (en) Inspection method at the time of coke oven construction and coke oven construction method
CN108104834B (en) Shield segment automatic assembly method and system
CN104661944B (en) Method in the management of data relating to an elevator
US12106467B2 (en) Inspection apparatus and inspection method for coke oven construction, and coke oven construction method
KR100933329B1 (en) Tunnel mapping automation device and method
JP5987605B2 (en) Coke oven wall diagnosis method and coke oven wall repair method
CN111473734A (en) System and method for monitoring stability of clamped rock in small-clear-distance tunnel
CN208887632U (en) Construction detection system and monitoring computer equipment based on 3 D laser scanning
JP5867449B2 (en) Coke oven wall diagnosis method and coke oven wall repair method
JP5078296B2 (en) Photogrammetry apparatus and photogrammetry system
CN104563459A (en) Wall plastering machine and leveling method thereof
JP7287319B2 (en) Inspection system and inspection method for building coke oven, and method for building coke oven
CN105371773A (en) Thickness measurement method
CN114704275A (en) Multipoint attitude measurement system and deformation monitoring method for rectangular pipe jacking machine
JP6197837B2 (en) Coke oven length measurement method and coke oven furnace deterioration evaluation method
CN119083971A (en) A simple shaft measurement method based on Leica AT403
BR112021018732B1 (en) INSPECTION APPARATUS AND INSPECTION METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COKE OVEN, AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION OF COKE OVEN
CN208607226U (en) Concrete free swelling rate and shrinking percentage test device
JP2016001151A (en) Wall image acquisition device
Gan et al. Tunnel deformation monitoring based on laser distance measuring and vision assistant
CN119877337B (en) An automatic measurement and smoothing system and method for subway base plates
JP7047289B2 (en) Furnace wall repair system and furnace wall repair method
US10502566B2 (en) Method for examining object properties of an object in a substrate
RU2472930C1 (en) Method for determining vertical displacements and deformations
JP7215450B2 (en) Air gap inspection device, air gap inspection method, and structure manufacturing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: JFE STEEL CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TAKAKI, YUKI;YOTSUJI, JUNICHI;WATANABE, TAKU;SIGNING DATES FROM 20210610 TO 20210615;REEL/FRAME:057602/0106

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

ZAAA Notice of allowance and fees due

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: NOA

ZAAB Notice of allowance mailed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: MN/=.

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP., ISSUE FEE NOT PAID

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

ZAAA Notice of allowance and fees due

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: NOA

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE