RU2816166C1 - Assembly with non-tightening taranov loop - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: structural elements, assemblies and auxiliary devices.

SUBSTANCE: invention can be used in climbing equipment, in industrial fishing implements, in sea and land towing, during rescue operations, as well as in animal husbandry, in particular horse breeding.

Nodes according to options 1 and 2 with a non-tightening working loop include: a peg element superimposed on the root end from above, a working loop, a running end inserted into the peg element from the root end, circled around the place where the peg element is superimposed on the root end and back removed from the peg element above the outline, in order to increase the strength of the node and to eliminate the possible creep of the node under high variable loads, after tightening the node, a non-tightening working loop is formed according to option 1 of the formula and two non-tightening working loops according to option 2.

EFFECT: untying the nodes is performed quite easily.

2 cl, 2 dwg

Description

The invention can be used in mountaineering equipment, in industrial fishing tools, in sea and land towing, during rescue operations, as well as in livestock farming, in particular horse breeding.

The “Kalmyk” or “Cossack” knot is known (Skryagin L.N. Marine knots, pp. 81-82, M. Transport. 1984), accepted as an analogue, it contains: a peg element placed on top of the root end, a working loop, a running end inserted into the peg from the side of the running end, circled around the root end below the overlay of the peg from right to left, and brought back out of the peg above the insertion. After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop is formed.

The disadvantage of this analogue knot is the lack of reliability due to the creep of the knot under large variable loads and, as a consequence, the need to knit a control knot on a branch of the working loop or at the root end.

The features common to the proposed unit and its analogue are as follows:

- a peg element placed on top of the root end;

- the running end is inserted into the peg;

- working loop.

The closest to the proposed knot “Konovyazny Taranova” is the well-known “King of Knots”, the “Besedochny” or “Bowlin” knot (Skryagin L.N. Sea knots, pp. 67-69, M. Transport. 1984), adopted The prototype contains: a peg element placed on top of the root end, a working loop, the running end is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the root end above the peg from right to left and brought back out of the peg below the insertion. After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop is formed.

The disadvantage of this prototype knot is the lack of reliability due to the creep of the knot under large variable loads and, as a consequence, the need to knit a control knot on the branch of the working loop.

The features common to the proposed unit and the prototype are as follows:

- a peg element placed on top of the root end;

- the running end is inserted into the peg from the root end and circled around the root end;

- working loop.

Option 1. The distinctive features that determine the compliance of the proposed unit with the “novelty” criterion are as follows:

- the running end, inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, is circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and taken out of the peg above the circle;

- the running end is circled a second time around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and pulled out of the peg above the circle.

The technical result achieved in the proposed unit is to increase reliability due to an increase in the strength of the unit and the elimination of possible creep of the unit under heavy loads.

The technical result is achieved by the fact that the knot contains: a peg placed on the root end from above, a working loop, the running end is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and taken out of the peg above the outline, circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and removed from the peg above the outline.

After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop is formed, see Fig. 1.

Option 2. The distinctive features that determine the compliance of the proposed unit with the “novelty” criterion are as follows:

- the running end, inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, is circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and taken out of the peg above the circle;

- the running end, after tracing the place where the peg is placed on the root end, repeats the shape of the working loop;

- the running end, then inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, is circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and brought out of the peg above the circle.

The technical result achieved in the proposed unit is an increase in reliability due to an increase in the strength of the unit, without possible changes in the size of the working loops under load, and the elimination of possible creep of the unit under heavy loads.

The technical result is achieved by the fact that the knot contains: a peg placed on the root end from above, a working loop, the running end is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg is applied to the root end and pulled out of the peg above the outline, then the running end repeats the shape of the working end loops and inserted into the peg from the root end, circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and brought out of the peg above the circle.

After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop is formed, see Fig. 2.

We tie knots every day. Nowadays, even in space, people could not do without a rope (it was a safety rope when astronauts exited the ship into outer space), as soon as we pick up a rope, we immediately begin to think about how to tie it. Most of us do not know how to tie a simple and reliable knot, which, if necessary, could be easily and quickly untied; there are so many knots, useful and interesting nonetheless.

To justify the compliance of the proposed unit with the “inventive step” criterion, an analysis of known solutions was carried out based on literary sources. The distinctive features of the proposed solution, which together with the known features give the above technical result, have not been found in the literature, therefore, in the opinion of the author, the proposed design of the bracket meets the criterion of “inventive step”.

Option 1. The design of the proposed unit is shown in Fig. 1 and contains: the root end 1, a peg 2 placed on top of the root end, the running end, which forms a working loop 3, is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg is applied to the root end and taken out of the peg above the outline, circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and is removed from the peg above the outline.

An example of a specific implementation of the proposed unit.

On the root end 1, a peg 2 is placed on top, a working loop 3 of sufficient size is formed with the running end, the running end is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg is applied to the root end and taken out of the peg above the outline, in order to increase the strength of the knot, then it is circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end again and taken out of the peg above the circle, in order to eliminate possible creep of the node under large variable loads.

After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop is formed. Untying the knot is quite easy.

Knitting a knot option 1 may have a different look and purpose (for tying a wild horse or other animal).

Take a rope in your left hand, release a sufficient amount of the running end forward, form a peg around the fingers of the hand with the root end and squeeze your hand, with your right hand throw the running end over the neck of a wild horse and hold it with your left and right hands, forming a fairly tight loop around the horse’s neck, catching moment, pass the running end with your right hand into the peg (between the rope and the fingers of your left hand) from right to left two or three times, tighten the knot first with the running end, and then with the main one, removing the fingers from the peg.

After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop and a knot without possible creep are formed. Untying the knot is quite easy. In this form, the knot is directly “HIPPING”.

Option 2. The design of the proposed unit is shown in Fig. 2 and contains: a root end 1, a peg 2 placed on top of the root end, the running end which forms a working loop 3 is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg is applied to the root end and pulled out of the peg above the outline, then the running end repeats the shape of a working loop and inserted into the peg from the root end, circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and removed from the peg above the circle.

An example of a specific implementation of the proposed unit.

A peg 2 is placed on top of the root end 1, a working loop 3 of sufficient size is formed with the running end, the running end is inserted into the peg from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg is placed on the root end and pulled out of the peg above the outline, then the running end repeats the shape of the working loop and inserted into the peg from the root end, the area where the peg is placed on the root end is circled and removed from the peg above the circle, in order to eliminate possible changes in the size of the working loops under load and eliminate possible creep of the assembly under large variable loads.

After tightening the knot, a non-tightening loop is formed. Untying the knot is quite easy.

Claims (2)

1. A knot with a non-tightening working loop, including a peg element placed on the root end; working loop; a running end inserted into the peg element, circled around the root end and brought back out of the peg element, characterized in that the peg element is placed on the root end from above, and the running end is inserted into the peg element from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg element is applied to the root end and brought out of the peg element upwards, then circled around the place where the peg element overlaps the root end again and brought out of the peg element. 2. A knot with a non-tightening working loop, including a peg element placed on the root end; working loop; a running end inserted into the peg element, circled around the root end and brought back out of the peg element, characterized in that the peg element is placed on the root end from above, and the running end is inserted into the peg element from the side of the root end, circled around the place where the peg element is applied to the root end is brought up from the peg element and repeats the shape of the working loop, then inserted into the peg element from the side of the root end and circled around the place where the peg element is applied to the root end again and taken out of the peg element.

Images