RU2533090C2 - System for situation-analytical centres of organisational system - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: physics; control.

SUBSTANCE: invention relates to a system of situation-analytical centres of an organisational system. The system comprises a telecommunication network, a control centre, situation-analytical centres, control points of departments of the organisational system, two-way communication means, means of monitoring surveillance objects, which affect the state of operations of the organisational system, and enables automated generation of scenarios using computer systems of the control centre, situation-analytical centres and control points of departments of the organisational system, storage of data on the scenarios in a system for storing data for auditing operations of the organisational system, which is part of the control centre, transmission of data on the scenarios via equipment interfaces of the control centre, situation-analytical centres, control points of departments of the organisational system and over the telecommunication network to computer networks of the control centre, situation-analytical centres and control points of departments of the organisational system, to video systems and a computer for setting up the video system of the control centre and situation-analytical centres, to multimedia screens of the control centre, situation-analytical centres and control points of departments of the organisational system to make decisions based on the generated scenarios.

EFFECT: high efficiency of the decision-making process owing to automated generation of scenarios for solving problem situations.

21 cl, 1 tbl, 30 dwg

Description

This technical solution relates to the management of organizational systems, the subject area is decision support systems.

The known technical solution [1] RU 57481 U1 comprises a module for receiving records of typical plans, a module for receiving requests from users, a module for receiving records of plans from the server database, a module for selecting a reference address of a recording, a module for selecting a reference address for reading, a module for selecting a address of a request source, a generating module the actual recording address, two adders, a module for generating a time period address, a module for generating database addresses, a module for writing and reading data, and a data output module.

The disadvantage of this technical solution is the lack of automated support for the simultaneous development of plans for resolving several problem situations that arise in a complex organizational system and related to its various types of activities, or a plan for resolving a number of problem situations generated by one problem with different degrees of influence on organizational activities system.

The well-known technical solution [2] RU 57919 U1 contains a data bank from separate databases, a decision preparation module, a storage device for reference situations, a module for selecting methods of influence on the implementation of a decision, an analysis module for decisions made, a module for generating strategic goals and objectives, a forecasting module , block selection of methods of influence on the implementation of the decision. At the same time, the Databank contains information on natural resources and state property, on other entities that affect the socio-economic development of the state.

The disadvantage of this technical solution is the limited use of means of displaying information presented to the decision maker by the capabilities of computer monitors and printers. This circumstance complicates the operational development of a collegial decision.

The well-known technical solution [3] RU 105031 U1 comprises a unit for measuring the environment of an object, a block for information models, a block for information support, a unit for issuing a result, a block for measuring an analyst, a unit for protocol support and a unit for subject-system integration.

The disadvantage of this technical solution is the lack of information models in it, taking into account the specialization of the organizational system units for which this technical solution is intended, by type of activity, taking into account the degree of influence on these types of problem situations. This circumstance requires additional, outside the subject area of this technical solution, information and analytical work to develop an objective solution to resolve problem situations.

The well-known technical solution [4] RU 28927 U1 contains an objective control center, control means located at the objects of observation, and two-way communication means connecting the control means with the equipment interface of the objective control center, the objective control center contains at least a working room and situational a room, while the equipment of the working room contains at least one computer, at least one multimedia projector with a screen, at least one wall screen connected with the possibility visualization of incoming information, the equipment of the situational room contains an individual screen connected to the equipment of the working room, and means of two-way communication with the working room, control means include at least a telemetric digital information generation unit, and / or a unit for indicating the coordinates of the observation object, and / or a monitored portion of the object of observation, a unit for indicating the actual time for monitoring the state of the object of observation, as well as a unit for creating a video image of the object of observation.

The disadvantage of this technical solution is the limited capabilities of it by automated support of two levels of control - at the first level, non-critical problems are solved based on well-known techniques, and at the second level, critical problems that require the development of a concept to eliminate the problem. At the same time, personnel and their equipment intended for work at the first level of management, and specialists and their equipment intended for work at the second level of management, are located in neighboring rooms - the work room and the situation room. This circumstance does not allow to quickly resolve problem situations in relation to the territorial-distributed units of the organizational system, which is supported by the given technical solution.

Currently, information and control technical systems for various purposes are being created, aimed at improving the efficiency of management processes in various types of organizational systems. At the same time, almost all types of activities of organizational systems are automated - enterprises, organizations, corporations, government agencies. One of the most acute problems that need to be addressed during the creation and further functioning of such systems is the constant increase in the amount of information necessary to solve various problems. How to ensure effective use of all available technical capabilities and accumulated information resources? How to quickly and fairly accurately solve emerging problems through the use of an integrated information resource? There are a lot of similar questions, all of them are related to the search for the necessary information, its analysis, development of scenarios for making a decision, choosing the most effective of them, taking into account the assessment of possible risks and making a decision on its implementation, providing conditions for a high-quality and timely implementation of the decision. To get answers to these and other similar questions related to improving the efficiency of management processes, technical solutions such as “situational center”, “analytical center”, “objective control system for the situation”, “automated decision support system” “Information-analytical system of the decision-maker” and others, which can be attributed to one area of technology - the system of situational-analytical centers of the organizational system. The systems of situational and analytical centers of organizational systems are a concentration of modern information technologies designed for automated support in managing the activities of organizational systems as a whole - ministries and departments, corporations, enterprises, banks, and, in particular, in managing the types of activities of organizational systems units located in stationary as well as in mobile facilities.

A common drawback of the well-known technical solutions [1-4] in the considered field of technology - systems of situational-analytical centers of organizational systems - is the inability to automatically support the activities of the organizational system while developing plans for resolving several problem situations related to various types of activities of its units, and / or a plan for resolving a number of problem situations generated by one problem, with different degrees of influence on the types of activities organizations of the organizational system.

The technical problem, the solution of which the present technical solution is aimed at, which was carried out taking into account the above, is to propose a new and improved system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system that can reduce the time to resolve complex problem situations.

Technical solution - a system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system (SSAC OS) contains a control center (CC), a telecommunications network, R situational and analytical centers (CAC), M control points of organizational system divisions (PU POS), K monitoring facilities located in K objects of observation in a controlled space and / or outside the objects of observation, with the possibility of observation over them, K means of two-way wired and / or wireless communication. Objects of observation are such entities, tangible and intangible objects of the organizational system and the external environment, which affect the state of the organizational system.

Control means include at least a telemetric digital information generation unit, and / or a unit for indicating the coordinates of the object of observation, and / or a monitored portion of the object of observation, a unit for indicating the actual time of monitoring the state of the object of observation, a unit for creating a video image of the object of observation, data generating units indicators of observed objects represented by dimensionless numbers and / or units.

The telecommunication network is connected to the equipment of the control center, the equipment of the CAC, the equipment of the POS POS and to the information networks of external organizational systems.

Two-way communication means are connected, on the one hand, with means of control over the objects of observation in the controlled space and, on the other hand, with the equipment of the control center, or with the equipment of the CAC, or with the equipment of the control panel of the PIC.

The system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system is designed in such a way that the following technological data are formed, stored and displayed on the screens of computer monitors, and / or on the screens of multimedia, and / or on the screens of video systems:

- data D on the required state of activity of the organizational system as a whole (target activity of the organizational system);

- data D _n about the required state of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, n = 1, 2, ..., N;

- data α _n on the assigned priority for the n-th activity of the organizational system;

- data S _nm about the required state of the nth activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, m = 1, 2, ..., M;

- data β _nm on the priority of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system;

- data S _nm are formed as follows:

- V _nmk - data on the required state of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, k = 1, 2, ..., K;

- data γ _nmk on the priority of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system;

о требуемом l-ом показателе состояния k-го объекта наблюдения, l=1, 2, …, L_k $$\left(L_k^l\right)$$

, где L_k $$L_k^l$$

- число показателей, которые применяются для характеристики состояния k-го объекта наблюдения;- data $$V_k^l$$

about the required l-th state indicator of the k-th observation object, l = 1, 2, ..., L_k $$\left(L_k^l\right)$$

where L_k $$L_k^l$$

- the number of indicators that are used to characterize the state of the k-th observation object;

представляются безразмерными числами, временными, метрическими, весовыми, стоимостными и другими единицами измерений; в состав данных о требуемых показателях объекта наблюдения входят данные о требуемых показателях физических, логических, информационных, территориальных, конструктивных, организационных и других типов связи k-го объекта наблюдения с другими объектами наблюдения;- data $$V_k^l$$

are represented by dimensionless numbers, time, metric, weight, cost and other units of measurement; the data on the required indicators of the object of observation includes data on the required indicators of physical, logical, informational, territorial, constructive, organizational and other types of communication of the k-th object of observation with other objects of observation;

о приоритете l-ого показателя состояния k-го объекта наблюдения;- data $${\mu }_k^l$$

on the priority of the l-th state indicator of the k-th observation object;

о требуемом l-ом показателе состояния k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы;- data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

about the required l-th state indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system;

формируются следующим образом: $$V_{nmk}^l=V_k^l$$

, если k-ый объекта наблюдения оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы; $$V_{nmk}^1=0$$

, - data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

are formed as follows: $$V_{nmk}^l=V_k^l$$

if the k-th observation object affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system; $$V_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}=0$$

,

- otherwise

V _nmk data are generated as follows:

о фактическом l показателе k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, где l=1, 2, …, L_k; k=1, 2, …, K; n=1, 2, …, N; m=1, 2, …, М. Данные $$V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

представляются безразмерными числами, временными, метрическими, весовыми, стоимостными и другими единицами измерений. После формирования и сохранения данных $$V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

формируются, сохраняются и отображаются на экранах следующие данные:The system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system is designed in such a way that it uses the means of control to measure the indicators of the objects of observation, their conversion to digital form and data generation $$V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

about the actual l indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, where l = 1, 2, ..., L_k; k = 1, 2, ..., K; n = 1, 2, ..., N; m = 1, 2, ..., M. Data $$V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

are represented by dimensionless numbers, time, metric, weight, cost and other units. After the formation and storage of data $$V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

The following data is generated, saved and displayed on the screens:

об абсолютном значении отклонения данных $$V{*}_{nmk}^l$$

о фактическом l показателе k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, от данных $$V_{nmk}^l$$

о требуемом l показателе k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы: $$\Delta V_{nmk}^{*l}=\left|V_{nmk}^l-V_{nmk}^{*l}\right|$$

;- data $$\Delta V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

about the absolute value of the data deviation $$V{*}_{nmk}^l$$

about the actual l indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, from the data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

the required l indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system: $$\Delta V_{nmk}^{*l}=|\; |\; |V_{nmk}^l-V_{nmk}^{*l}|\; |\; |$$

;

о фактическом состоянии k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, при этом

- data $$V_{nmk}^{*}$$

about the actual state of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, while

о фактическом состоянии n-го вида деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, при этом

- data $$S_{nm}^{*}$$

about the actual state of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, while

о фактическом показателе эффективности n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, при этом $$\Delta S_{nm}^{*}=S_{nm}^{*}/S_{nm}$$

;- data $$\Delta S_{nm}^{*}$$

about the actual performance indicator of the n-th type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, while $$\Delta S_{nm}^{*}=S_{nm}^{*}/S_{nm}$$

;

- data ΔS _{nm crit.} on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it ;

- data ΔS _nm-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need for taking actions to prevent the appearance of a threat.

- data D _n about the required state of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, while

- data D * _n on the actual state of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, while

- data ΔD * _n on the actual performance indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, while ΔD * _n = D * _n / D _n ;

- data ΔD _n-crit. a critical performance indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need for action to eliminate it;

- data ΔD _n-add. on a permissible efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to prevent the appearance of a threat;

- data D on the required state of activity of the organizational system as a whole, while

- D * data on the actual state of the activities of the organizational system as a whole, while

- data ΔD * on the actual performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole, with ΔD * = D * / D;

- data ΔD _crit. a critical indicator of the effectiveness of the organizational system as a whole, a decrease, compared with which, the actual indicator ΔD * of the effectiveness of the organizational system as a whole means that there is a threat to the activities of the organizational system as a whole and the need for action to eliminate it;

- data ΔD _add. on the acceptable performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole, a decrease, in comparison with which, the actual indicator ΔD * of the performance of the organizational system as a whole means the possibility of a threat to the activities of the organizational system as a whole and the need to take actions to prevent the emergence of a threat.

The system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system is designed in such a way that the following scenarios are formed, stored and displayed on screens:

- data Q _crit. the number of critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole;

, - data W _crit. about a variety of critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole, provided 0≤ΔD * <ΔD _crit. , wherein $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}=\left\{W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\right\}$$

,

- данные о q1-ом критическом сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятия решения по устранению угрозы для деятельности организационной системы в целом, где q1 - данные о приоритете критического сценария, q1=1, 2, …, Q_крит., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{q1}\right)\ge P\left(W_{крит.}^{q1-1}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q1=1}^{Q_{крит.}}P\left(W_{крит.}^{q1}\right)=1}$$

, Where $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}$$

- data q1-th critical scenarios, designed to support the decision to eliminate the threat to the performance of the institutional system as a whole, where q1 - the priority data is a critical scenario, q1 = 1, 2, ..., Q _crit. , while the condition $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}\right)\ge P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q\mathrm{one}=\mathrm{one}}^{Q_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}}P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

,

и $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{q1-1}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора критического сценария $$W_{крит.}^{q1}$$

и критического сценария $$W_{крит.}^{q1-1}$$

, $$P\left(W_{крит.}^0\right)=0$$

;Where $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}$$

and critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^0\right)=0$$

;

- data Q _prev. the number of warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole;

, - data W _prev. about a variety of warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole, provided ΔD _crit. ≤ΔD * <ΔD _add. , wherein $$W_{PRed.}=\left\{W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{PRed.}^2...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}\right\}$$

,

- данные о q2-ом предупреждающем сценарии, q2 - данные о приоритете этого сценария, q2=1, 2, …,Q_пред., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{q2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{пред.}^{q2-1}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q2=1}^{Q_{пред.}}P\left(W_{пред.}^{q2}\right)=1}$$

где $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{q2}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{q2-1}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора предупреждающего сценария $$W_{пред.}^{q2}$$

и предупреждающего сценария $$W_{пред.}^{q2-1}$$

, $$P\left(W_{пред.}^0\right)=0$$

;Where $$W_{PRed.}^{q2}$$

- data on the q2nd warning scenario, q2 - data on the priority of this scenario, q2 = 1, 2, ..., Q _before. , while the condition $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="q"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">q</figure-callout>}2=\mathrm{one}}^{Q_{PRed.}}P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

Where $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="q"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">q</figure-callout>}2}$$

and warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{q2-\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^0\right)=0$$

;

, где $$W_{план.}^{q3}$$

- данные о q3-ом плановом сценарии, q3 - данные о приоритете этого сценария, q3=1, 2, …, Q_план., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{план.}^{q3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{план.}^{q3-1}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q3=1}^{Q_{план.}}P\left(W_{план.}^{q3}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{план.}^{q3}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{план.}^{q3-1}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора планового сценария $$W_{план.}^{q3}$$

и планового сценария $$W_{план.}^{3-1}$$

, $$P\left(W_{план.}^0\right)=0$$

;- data Q _plan. the number of planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole; W _plan data _. about the set of planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole, provided ΔD _add. ≤ΔD * <1, while $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}=\left\{W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3}$$

- data on the q3th planned scenario, q3 - data on the priority of this scenario, q3 = 1, 2, ..., Q _plan. , while the condition $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="3"\; label="q"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">q</figure-callout>}3=\mathrm{one}}^{Q_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}}P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

- accordingly, the data on the predicted probabilities for choosing a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="3"\; label="q"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">q</figure-callout>}3}$$

and planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{3-\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^0\right)=0$$

;

- data U _n-crit. the number of critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the nth type of activity of the organizational system;

о множестве критических сценариев, предназначенных для поддержки принятия решения по устранению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности организационной системы при условии $$0\le \Delta D_n^{*}<\Delta D_{n-крит.}$$

, при этом $$W_{крит.}^n=\left\{W_{крит.}^{n1}илиW_{крит.}^{n2}\dots илиW_{крит.}^{nUn-крит.}\right\}$$

, где $$W_{крит.}^{nu1}$$

- данные об u1-ом критическом сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятия решения по устранению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности организационной системы, где u1 - данные о приоритете критического сценария, u1=1, 2, …, U_n-крит., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{nu1}\right)\ge P\left(W_{крит.}^{n\left(u1-1\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u1=1}^{U_{n-крит.}}P\left(W_{крит.}^{nu1}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{nu1}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{n\left(u1-1\right)}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора критического сценария $$W_{крит.}^{nu1}$$

и критического сценария, $$W_{крит.}^{n\left(u1-1\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

;- data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^n$$

on the set of critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the nth activity of the organizational system, provided $$0\le \Delta D_n^{*}<\Delta D_{n-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

, wherein $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^n=\left\{W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="n"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n</figure-callout>}2}...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}$$

- data on the u1th critical scenario, designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the n-th type of activity of the organizational system, where u1 is the priority scenario data, u1 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-crit. , while the condition $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}\right)\ge P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u\mathrm{one}=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{n-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}}P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}$$

and critical scenario, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

;

- data U _n-pred. the number of warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the nth activity of the organizational system;

о множестве предупреждающих сценариев, предназначенных для поддержки принятия решения по предотвращению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности организационной системы при условии $$\Delta D_{n-крит.}\le \Delta D_n^{*}<\Delta D_{n-доп.}$$

, при этом $$W_{пред.}^n=\left\{W_{пред.}^{n1}илиW_{пред.}^{n2}\dots илиW_{пред.}^{nUn-пред.}\right\}$$

, где $$W_{пред.}^{nu2}$$

- данные об u2-ом предупреждающем сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятая решения по предотвращению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности организационной системы, где u2 - данные о приоритете предупреждающего сценария, u2=1, 2, …, U_n-пред., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{nu2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{пред.}^{n\left(u2-1\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u2=1}^{U_{n-пред.}}P\left(W_{пред.}^{nu2}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{nu2}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{n\left(u2-1\right)}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора предупреждающего сценария $$W_{пред.}^{nu2}$$

и предупреждающего сценария $$W_{пред.}^{n\left(u2-1\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

;- data $$W_{PRed.}^n$$

about a variety of warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the nth activity of the organizational system, provided $$\Delta D_{n-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\le \Delta D_n^{*}<\Delta D_{n-d\mathrm{about}P.}$$

, wherein $$W_{PRed.}^n=\left\{W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="n"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n</figure-callout>}2}...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{PRed.}^{nu2}$$

- data on the u2-th warning scenario, designed to support the decision to prevent threats to the n-th type of activity of the organizational system, where u2 - data on the priority of the warning scenario, u2 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-prev. , while the condition $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nu2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="u"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">u</figure-callout>}2=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{n-PRed.}}P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nu2}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nu2}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="u"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">u</figure-callout>}2}$$

and warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

;

- data U _n-plan. the number of planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth type of activity of the organizational system;

о множестве плановых сценариев, предназначенных для поддержки принятия решения по повышению эффективности n-го вида деятельности организационной системы при условии $$\Delta D_{n-доп.}\le \Delta D_n^{*}<1$$

, при этом $$W_{план.}^n=\left\{W_{план.}^{n1}илиW_{план.}^{n2}\dots илиW_{план.}^{nUn-план.}\right\}$$

, где $$W_{план.}^{nu3}$$

- данные о u3-ом плановом сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятия решения по повышению эффективности n-го вида деятельности организационной системы, где u3-данные о приоритете планового сценария, u3=1, 2,…, U_n-план., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{план.}^{nu3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{план.}^{n\left(u3-1\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u3=1}^{U_{n-план.}}P\left(W_{план.}^{nu3}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{план.}^{nu3}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{план.}^{n\left(u3-1\right)}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора предупреждающего сценария $$W_{план.}^{nu3}$$

и предупреждающего сценария $$W_{план.}^{n\left(u3-1\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{план.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

;- data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^n$$

on the set of planning scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, provided $$\Delta D_{n-d\mathrm{about}P.}\le \Delta D_n^{*}<\mathrm{one}$$

, wherein $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^n=\left\{W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="n"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n</figure-callout>}2}...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nu3}$$

- data on the u3th planning scenario, intended to support decision-making on increasing the efficiency of the n-th type of activity of the organizational system, where u3-data on the priority of the planning scenario, u3 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-plan. , while the condition $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nu3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="3"\; label="u"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">u</figure-callout>}3=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{n-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}}P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nu3}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nu3}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a warning scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="3"\; label="n\; u"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n\; </figure-callout>}u3}$$

and warning scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

;

- data Y _{nm crit.} the number of critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system;

о множестве критических сценариев, предназначенных для поддержки принятия решения по устранению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы при условии $$0\le \Delta S_{nm}^{*}<\Delta S_{nm-крит.}$$

, при этом $$W_{крит.}^{nm}=\left\{W_{крит.}^{nm1}илиW_{крит.}^{nm2}\dots илиW_{крит.}^{nmYnm-крит.}\right\}$$

, где $$W_{крит.}^{nmy1}$$

- данные о y1-ом критическом сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятия решения по устранению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, где y1 - данные о приоритете критического сценария, y1=1, 2, …, Y_nm-крит., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{nmy1}\right)\ge P\left(W_{крит.}^{nm\left(y1-1\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y1=1}^{U_{nm-крит.}}P\left(W_{крит.}^{nmy1}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{nmy1}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{nm\left(y1-1\right)}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора критического сценария $$W_{крит.}^{nmy1}$$

и критического сценария $$W_{крит.}^{nm\left(y1-1\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{крит.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

;- data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm}$$

on the set of critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, provided $$0\le \Delta S_{nm}^{*}<\Delta S_{nm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

, wherein $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm}=\left\{W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="n\; m"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n\; </figure-callout>}m2}...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}$$

- data on the y1th critical scenario designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat for the nth activity in the mth division of the organizational system, where y1 is the priority scenario data, y1 = 1, 2, ..., Y _{nm -Crete.} , while the condition $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}\right)\ge P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y\mathrm{one}=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{nm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}}P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}$$

and critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

;

- data Y _nm-pred. the number of warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on the prevention of threats to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system;

о множестве предупреждающих сценариев, предназначенных для поддержки принятия решения по предотвращению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы при условии $$\Delta S_{nm-крит.}\le \Delta S_{nm}^{*}<\Delta S_{nm-доп.}$$

, - data $$W_{PRed.}^{nm}$$

about the set of warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, provided $$\Delta S_{nm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\le \Delta S_{nm}^{*}<\Delta S_{nm-d\mathrm{about}P.}$$

,

, где $$W_{пред.}^{nmy2}$$

- данные о y2-ом предупреждающем сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятия решения по предотвращению угрозы для n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, где y2 - данные о приоритете предупреждающего сценария, y2=1, 2,…, Y_nm-пред., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{nmy2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{пред.}^{nm\left(y2-1\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y2=1}^{U_{nm-пред.}}P\left(W_{пред.}^{nmy2}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{nmy2}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{nm\left(y2-1\right)}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора предупреждающего сценария $$W_{пред.}^{nmy2}$$

и предупреждающего сценария $$W_{пред.}^{nm\left(y2-1\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{пред.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

;wherein $$W_{PRed.}^{nm}=\left\{W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="n\; m"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n\; </figure-callout>}m2}...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}$$

- data on the y2-th warning scenario designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, where y2 is the priority information on the warning scenario, y2 = 1, 2, ..., Y _{nm -pred.} , while the condition $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y2=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{nm-PRed.}}P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

- respectively, data on the predicted probabilities for the selection of a warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}$$

and warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

;

- data Y _nm-plan. the number of planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system;

о множестве плановых сценариев, предназначенных для поддержки принятия решения по повышению деятельности n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы при условии $$\Delta S_{nm-доп.}\le \Delta S_{nm}^{*}<1$$

, при этом $$W_{план.}^{nm}=\left\{W_{план.}^{nm1}илиW_{план.}^{nm2}\dots илиW_{план.}^{nmYnm-план.}\right\}$$

, где $$W_{план.}^{nuy3}$$

- данные о y3-ом плановом сценарии, предназначенном для поддержки принятия решения по повышению эффективности n-го вида деятельности в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, где y3 - данные о приоритете планового сценария, y3=1, 2, …, Y_nm-план., при этом выполняется условие $$P\left(W_{план.}^{nmy3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{план.}^{nm\left(y3-1\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y3=1}^{U_{nm-план.}}P\left(W_{план.}^{nmy3}\right)=1}$$

, где $$P\left(W_{план.}^{nmy3}\right)$$

и $$P\left(W_{план.}^{nm\left(y3-1\right)}\right)$$

- соответственно данные о прогнозируемых вероятностях для выбора планового сценария $$W_{план.}^{nmy3}$$

и планового сценария $$W_{план.}^{nm\left(y3-1\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{план.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

;- data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm}$$

about the set of planning scenarios intended to support decision-making on increasing the activity of the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, provided $$\Delta S_{nm-d\mathrm{about}P.}\le \Delta S_{nm}^{*}<\mathrm{one}$$

, wherein $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm}=\left\{W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{<figure-callout\; id="2"\; label="n\; m"\; filenames="00000279.png,00000280.png"\; state="\{\{state\}\}">n\; </figure-callout>}m2}...\mathrm{and}l\mathrm{and}{W}_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}\right\}$$

where $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nuy3}$$

- data on the y3-th planning scenario, designed to support decision-making on increasing the efficiency of the n-th type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, where y3 - data on the priority of the planning scenario, y3 = 1, 2, ..., Y _{nm- plan.} , while the condition $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmy3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y3=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{nm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}}P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmy3}\right)=\mathrm{one}}$$

where $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmy3}\right)$$

and $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

- accordingly, the data on the predicted probabilities for choosing a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmy3}$$

and planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

;

The technological data listed above is stored in the audit data storage system of the analytical center in the CCAC OS control center. They are periodically audited, updated and used at the operational stage of the SSAC OS in the interests of the central control center, central control center and control center of the PIC.

The essence of the technical solution is illustrated by drawings.

The following is a list of figures.

Figure 1 - Structural diagram of a system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system (SSAC OS).

Figure 2 - Structural diagram of a control center SSAC OS.

Figure 3 - Structural diagram of a situational analysis center SSAC OS.

Figure 4 - Structural diagram of a control point of the organizational unit of the SSAC OS system.

Figure 5 - the Algorithm of the SSAC OS when managing the resolution of the problem in the controlled area (example 1).

Fig.6 - Relationships of scenarios and performance indicators for the control center of the SSAC OS (example 2).

Fig.7 - The ratio of scenarios and performance indicators for the CAC, CACAC OS (example 3).

Fig - Relationships of scenarios and performance indicators for PU PIC SSAC OS (example 4).

Fig.9 - Data transmission paths between the computing complexes of the control center and the CAC (example 5).

Figure 10 - Data transmission paths between the computing complexes of the control center and the control panel of the PIC (example 6).

11 - Data transmission paths between the computer complex of the control center and the information networks of external organizational systems (example 7).

Figure 12 - Data transmission paths with quantifiable indicators between the computing complex of the control unit and the means of control over the objects of observation (example 8).

Fig. 13 - Data transmission paths with video images between the computer complex of the control center and means of monitoring the objects of observation (example 9).

Fig. 14 - Data transmission paths with video images between the computing complex and the video system of the situation room (Example 10).

- о требуемом l-ом показателе состояния k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, где l=1, 2, …, L_k; n=1, 2, …, N; m=1, 2, …, М; k=1, 2, …, K (пример 11).Fig - Graph-diagram of algorithm 1 (GAW 1). Data Block Formation $$V_{nmk}^l$$

- about the required l-th state indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, where l = 1, 2, ..., L _k ; n = 1, 2, ..., N; m = 1, 2, ..., M; k = 1, 2, ..., K (example 11).

Fig - Graph diagram of algorithm 2 (GAW 2). The formation of a data block V _nmk is about the required state of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, where n = 1, 2, ..., N; m = 1, 2, ..., M; k = 1, 2, ..., K (example 12).

Fig is a Graph diagram of algorithm 3 (GAW 3). The formation of a data block S _nm - about the required state of the nth activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, n = 1, 2, ..., N; m = 1, 2, ..., M (example 13).

Fig. 18 is a Graph diagram of Algorithm 4 (GAW 4). The formation of a data block D _n - o the required state of the n activity of the organizational system, where n = 1, 2, ..., N (example 14).

Fig - Graph diagram of algorithm 5 (GAW 5). The formation of the data block D - o the required state of the organizational system as a whole (example 15).

фактического l показателя k-го объекта наблюдения, который оказывает влияние на n-ый вид деятельности, осуществляемой в m-ом подразделении организационной системы, от требуемых данных $$V_{nmk}^l$$

(пример 16).Figure 20 is a Graph diagram of Algorithm 6 (GAW 6). Generation of data on the absolute value of data deviation $$V_{nmk}^{*l}$$

the actual l indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, from the required data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

(example 16).

Fig - Block diagram of a data storage system, built on the basis of Network Attached Storage technology (example 17).

Fig - Diagram of a configuration management process (example 18).

Fig - Scheme of the scanning process (example 19).

Fig - Scheme of the inventory process (example 20).

Fig - Device for collecting information on and.with. SU 1742834.

Fig - Multichannel digital communication system for AS SU 1800 631 A1.

Fig.27 - Device for the exchange of information on and.with. SU 1821802 A1.

Fig - Diagram of the relative position of the moving object and stationary objects, indicating a possible change in the direction of movement of the moving object.

Fig - Timing diagram with a change in the duration of the transmitted signals when moving a moving object from a stationary object.

Fig - Timing chart with a change in the duration of the transmitted signals when approaching a moving object to a stationary object.

Below is a brief description of the drawings with explanations of what is shown on them.

Figure 1 shows the structural diagram of a system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system, where 1 is the control center (TS); 2 - telecommunication network; 3.1-3.R - situational and analytical centers (CAC); 4.1-4.M - control points of the organizational system divisions (PU POS); 5.1.1-5.1.K ₁ - objects of observation in a controlled space, included in the area of responsibility of the control center; 5.1.1.1 - 5.1.K ₁ .1 - means of control over the objects of observation in a controlled space that are part of the responsibility zone of the control center; 5.3.r.1 - 5.3.rK _3r - objects of observation in a controlled space that are part of the CAC responsibility zones, r = 1, 2, ..., R; 5.3.r.1.1 - 5.3.rK _3.r .1 - means of control over the objects of observation in a controlled space that are part of the CAC responsibility zones; 5.4.m.1-5.4.mK _4m - objects of observation in a controlled space included in the areas of responsibility of the PIC POS, m = 1, 2, ..., M; 5.4.m.1.1-5.4.mK _4m .1 - means of control over the objects of observation in the controlled space included in the areas of responsibility of the PIC POS; 6.1.1-6.1.K ₁ - means of two-way wired and / or wireless communication of the responsibility zone of the control center; 6.3.r.1-6.3.rK _3r - means of two-way wired and / or wireless communication of the CAC responsibility zone; 6.4.m.1-6.4.mK _4m - means of two-way wired and / or wireless communication of the zone of responsibility of the PIC POS; 7.1-7.N - information networks of external organizational systems. Wherein:

-

- the first inputs and outputs (1-1, ..., 1-K ₁ ) of the equipment of the control center 1 are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding means of two-way communication 6.1.1, ..., 6.1.K ₁ , the second inputs and outputs of which are connected respectively with the first exits and entrances of the corresponding means of control 5.1.1.1, ..., 5.1.K ₁ .1 observation objects in the controlled space 5.1.1, ..., 5.1K ₁ ; the second input and output of the equipment of the control center 1 are connected respectively to the first output and input of the telecommunication network 2;

- the second inputs and outputs (2-1, ..., 2-R) of the telecommunication network 2 are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the equipment of the corresponding CAC 3.1, ..., 3.R; the third inputs and outputs (3-1, ..., 3-M) of the telecommunications network 2 are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the equipment of the respective control systems POS POS 4.1, ..., 4.M; the fourth inputs and outputs (4-1, ..., 4-H) of the telecommunications network 2 are connected respectively to the outputs and inputs of the corresponding information networks of external organizational systems 7-1, ..., 7-H;

- the second inputs and outputs (2-1, ..., 2-K _{3, r} ) of the equipment of each CAC 3.1, ..., 3.r (r = 1, ..., R) are connected to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding means of two-way communication 6.3. r.1, ..., 6.3.rK _3.r , the second inputs and outputs of which are connected respectively with the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding control devices 5.3.r.1.1, ..., 5.3.rK _{3, r} .1 objects of observation in the controlled space 5.3 .r.1, ..., 5.3.rK _{3, r} ;

- the second inputs and outputs (2-1, ..., 2-K _{4, m} ) of the equipment of each POS POS 4.1, ..., 4.m (m = 1, ..., M) are connected each with the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding means of two-way communication 6.4.m.1, ..., 6.4.mK _4.m , the second entrances and exits of which are connected respectively with the first exits and inputs of the corresponding control means 5.4.m.1.1, ..., 5.4.mK _{4, m} .1 objects of observation in the controlled the space 5.4.m.1, ..., 5.4.mK _{4, m} .

Figure 2 shows the structural diagram of the control center 1, the equipment of which contains the equipment of the analytical center 1.1 and the equipment of the center of objective control 1.2. The equipment of the analytical center 1.1 contains the computing complex 1.1.1 and the storage system for the audit data of the activities of the organizational system (SH AD AD) 1.1.2. The equipment of the objective control center 1.2 includes: the equipment interface 1.2.1, the equipment of the working room 1.2.2 and the equipment of the situation room 1.2.3. The working room equipment 1.2.2 contains a computer network 1.2.2.1 and a multimedia projector with a screen 1.2.2.2. The equipment of the situational room 1.2.3 contains the video system 1.2.3.1 and the computer for adjusting the video system 1.2.3.2. Wherein:

- the input and output of the computer complex 1.1.1, the input and output of the storage system of the AD OS are connected respectively with the first output and input, the second output and input of the equipment interface 1.2.1;

- the third, fourth, fifth and sixth inputs and outputs of the equipment interface 1.2.1 are connected respectively to the output and input of the computer network 1.2.2.1, to the output and input of a multimedia projector with a screen 1.2.2.2, to the first output and input of the video system 1.2.3.1 , with the first output and input of the computer settings of the video system 1.2.3.2, the second input and output of which are connected respectively with the second output and input of the video system 1.2.3.1;

- the seventh input, output and inputs, outputs from the eighth group of inputs and outputs (8-1, ..., 8-K ₁ ) of the equipment interface 1.2.1 are respectively the second input, output (2nd input / output of the equipment of the control center 1 on figure 1) and the inputs and outputs of the first group of inputs and outputs (inputs / outputs 1-1, ..., 1-K ₁ equipment of the control center 1 in figure 1) equipment of the control center 1 and are connected respectively to the first output, the input of the telecommunication network 2 and the first outputs, inputs of the corresponding means of two-way communication 6.1.1-6.1.K ₁ .

Figure 3 shows the structural diagram of the situational analysis center (CAC) 3.r (r = 1, ..., R), the equipment of which contains the equipment of the analytical center 3.r.1 and the equipment of the center for objective control 3.r.2. The equipment of the analytical center 3.r.1 contains a computer complex 3.r.1.1. The equipment of the objective control center 3.r.2 includes: the interface of equipment 3.r.2.1, the equipment of the working room 3.r.2.2 and the equipment of the situation room 3.r.2.3. The equipment of the working room 3.r.2.2 contains a computer network 3.r.2.2.1 and a multimedia projector with a screen 3.r.2.2.2. The equipment of the situational room 3.r.2.3 contains the video system 3.r.2.3.1 and the computer for adjusting the video system 3.r.2.3.2. Wherein:

- the input and output of the computer complex 3.r.1.1 are connected respectively to the third output and input of the equipment interface 3.r.2.1, the first input and output of which are the first input and output of the SAC equipment 3.r respectively and are connected to the second (2- r) the output and input of the telecommunications network 2;

- the second inputs and outputs (2-1, ..., 2-K _3.r ) of the equipment interface 3.r.2.1 are respectively the second inputs and outputs of the CAC equipment 3.r and are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding means of two-way communication 6.3 .r.1-6.3.rK _3.r ;

- the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh inputs and outputs of the equipment interface 3.r.2.1 are connected respectively to the output and input of the computer network 3.r.2.2.1, with the output and input of a multimedia projector with a screen 3.r.2.2.2 , with the first output and input of the video system 3.r.2.3.1, with the first output and input of the computer settings of the video system 3.r.2.3.2;

- the second input and output of the computer settings of the video system 3.r.2.3.2 are connected respectively with the second output and input of the video system 3.r.2.3.1.

Figure 4 shows the structural diagram of the control point of the unit of the organizational system (PU POS) 4.m (m = 1, ..., M), the equipment of which contains the equipment of the server room 4.m.1 and the equipment of the workroom 4.m.2. The equipment of the server room 4.m.1 contains the computing complex 4.m.1.1 and the equipment interface 4.m.2.1. The equipment of the working room 4.m.2.2 contains a computer network 4.m.2.1 and a multimedia projector with a screen 4.m.2.2. Wherein:

- the input and output of the computer complex 4.m.1.1 are connected respectively to the third output and input of the equipment interface 4.m.1.2, the first input and output of which are the first input and output of the equipment of the POS 4.m equipment and are connected respectively to the third (3 -m) output and input of telecommunication network 2;

- the second inputs and outputs (2-1, ..., 2-K _4.m ) of the equipment interface 4.m.1.2 are respectively the inputs and outputs of the second group of inputs and outputs of the POS POS 4.m equipment and are connected respectively to the first outputs and the inputs of the corresponding means of two-way communication 6.3.m.1-6.4.mK _4.m ;

- the fourth, fifth inputs and outputs of the equipment interface 4.m.1.2 are connected respectively with the output and input of the computer network 4.m.2.1, with the output and input of a multimedia projector with a screen 4.m.2.2.

The above description of the structural diagrams (figure 1 - figure 4) explains the essence of the operation of the SSAC OS. The system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system works as follows.

In the initial state, in the computer complexes of the central control center, CAC, and the POS POS CCAC OS, technological data is generated and stored. The list of data is given in the “Description of the technical solution” section.

At the stage of operation of the SSAC OS, the means of control over the objects of observation in the controlled space collect data on the state of these objects, these data are transferred using the two-way communication tools and equipment interfaces to the control center, the control center and the control center of the control system, including:

- data transmission with video images of the objects of observation to the monitors of computers connected to computer networks, and to multimedia screens in the working rooms of the central control center, CAC, and the POS POS;

- transfer of data on the actual indicators of the observed objects, represented by dimensionless numbers and / or units of measurement, to the computer systems TsU, SATS and POS POS.

According to the areas of their responsibility, the data processing centers on the actual and required indicators of the objects of observation in a controlled space and the generation of data on the actual state of activity of the organizational system as a whole, types of activity, and the state of the objects of observation are processed in the computer complexes of the central control centers, CAC, and the POS POS. The processing order is given in the "Description of the technical solution" section of the application description.

Depending on the results of data processing, the following scenarios are generated:

- to eliminate threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole;

- to eliminate threats to certain types of activities of the organizational system;

- to eliminate threats to the activities of organizational units;

- to prevent threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole;

- to prevent threats to certain types of activities of the organizational system;

- to prevent threats to the activities of units of the organizational system;

- to improve the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole;

- to improve efficiency for certain types of activities of the organizational system;

- to improve the efficiency for the activities of organizational units.

The composition of the data on the scenarios includes at least: data on the objects of observation in a controlled space with which the necessary actions must be taken; data on the forces and means that must be attracted to carry out these actions; data on the procedure for conducting actions. And other data that is necessary to carry out actions to eliminate threats of various kinds, to prevent them or to carry out planned work, including information about the addressees of organizational units and external organizational systems involved in the work.

Data on scenarios and, if necessary, data with video images of objects of observation in a controlled space are transmitted using the interfaces of the equipment of the central control center, automatic control center, and POS POS and via the telecommunication network, depending on the purpose:

- to computers connected to computer networks in the working rooms of the Central Administration, CAC, and the POS POS;

- in the video system and in the computer, the video system settings of the situational rooms of the central office and the CAC, while the computer settings ensures the distribution of the screen surface into separate segments with measurement parameters, depending on the number and priorities placed on the data surface;

- on multimedia screens in the working rooms of the Central Administration, CAC, and POS POS.

Thus, the equipment of the control center 1 is made with the possibility of forming in the computer complex 1.1.1, saving the audit of the activities of the organizational system 1.1.2 in the data storage system, using it in its work and transferring it to the situation-analytical centers 3.1, ..., 3.R and to control points of organizational system divisions 4.1, ..., 3.M data for hardware administration, data for software configuration and data for administration of protection against dangerous programs but the technical effects of the composition of the assets supporting the activities of the organizational system. The data listed above differ in the following categories: data on critical scenarios intended to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole; data on warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on the prevention of threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole; data on planned scenarios intended to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole; data on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to certain activities of the organizational system; data on warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on the prevention of threats to certain types of activities of the organizational system; data on planned scenarios intended to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of certain types of activities of the organizational system; data on critical scenarios intended to support decision-making on elimination of threats for certain types of activities in organizational system units, data on warning scenarios intended to support decision-making on prevention of threats for certain types of activities in organizational unit divisions, data on planned scenarios intended to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of certain types of activities in organizational units.

The algorithms, diagrams, and diagrams shown in FIGS. 5 to FIG. 30 are examples of how the invention can be implemented (industrial applicability of the claimed technical solution, confirmation of its feasibility).

The operation algorithm of SSAC OS shown in Fig. 5 illustrates the operation of the SAC (or CC) in managing the resolution of a problem in the area of responsibility of the CAC (or CC).

To transfer data to SSAC OS, the following data transmission paths are formed - information paths:

- data transmission paths between the computing complexes of the control center and the CAC are shown in Fig. 9 (example 5);

- data transmission paths between the computing complexes of the control center and the control panel of the PIC are shown in FIG. 10 (example 6);

- data transmission paths between the computer complex of the control center and the information networks of external organizational systems are shown in Fig. 11 (example 7);

- data transmission paths with quantifiable indicators between the computer complex of the control unit and the means of control over the objects of observation are shown in Fig. 12 (example 8);

- data transmission paths with video images between the computer complex of the control unit and the means of control over the objects of observation are shown in Fig. 13 (example 9);

- data transmission paths with video images between the computing complex and the video system of the situation room are shown in Fig. 14 (example 10).

Fig - Fig.20 are examples of graph diagrams of algorithms constructed in accordance with the claimed technical solution and show the possibility of their implementation using simple operations of the computing complex - logical and arithmetic operations.

The implementation of computer systems, computer networks and video systems with a configuration computer included in the SSAC OS can be performed on the basis of well-known industrial hardware and software for computer technology and video. By analogy with the graph diagrams of the algorithms shown in the drawings, graph diagrams of the algorithms are constructed to generate other data of the claimed technical solution, shown below in table 1.

The above examples in FIGS. 5 to 20 relate primarily to the processing of monitoring data on indicators of objects of observation represented by dimensionless numbers and numbers in various measurement units: measurement of signal transmission time, their delays, calendar time, atmospheric pressure, temperature, density of liquid, metal, distance, etc.

Other examples, including those shown in FIGS. 21-30, show the feasibility of implementing the claimed technical solution in other areas of presentation of indicators of observed objects.

So, in [5], the technology of processing control data on indicators of ground and surface observation objects is considered. These data are transmitted for analysis in real time from sources of generalized information for situational centers of information and telecommunication systems. The sources of generalized information themselves operate on the basis of information from technical means of observation.

In [6], geographic information systems are considered that provide various tools for working with spatial information, allowing it to be processed digitally and visualized on monitors and video systems.

The implementation of the audit data storage system for the activities of the organizational system that is part of the control center can be performed on the basis of any of the known technologies for constructing such systems, for example, based on NAS technology (network storage subsystems, Network Attached Storage).

On Fig shows a structural diagram of a storage system based on NAS technology. NAS technology [7] is developing as an alternative to universal servers that carry many functions (printing, applications, fax server, email, etc.). In contrast, NAS devices perform only one function - the file server.

NASs connect to the local network and access data for an unlimited number of heterogeneous clients (clients with different operating systems) or other servers. Currently, almost all NAS devices are focused on use in Ethernet networks (Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet) based on TCP / IP protocols. Access to NAS devices is made using special file access protocols. The most common file access protocols are CIFS, NFS and DAFS. Inside these servers are specialized OSs such as MS Windows Storage Server.

Currently, NAS solutions such as PowerVault NF100 / 500/600, built on the basis of Dell's massive 1 and 2 processor servers, are optimized for rapid deployment of NAS services. They allow you to create file storage up to 10 TB (PowerVault NF600) using SATA or SAS disks and connecting this server to a local network. There are also more high-performance integrated solutions, for example, PowerVault NX1950, accommodating 15 disks and expandable to 45 by connecting additional MD1000 disk shelves.

In Fig.22, Fig.23 and Fig.24, respectively, examples of diagrams of processes for managing configurations of a database of configuration units (BDEC), scanning and inventory of infrastructure are presented. These processes can be used as a logical basis for data preparation. The formation, storage and use of data in the storage system of audit data of the activities of the organizational system can be performed, for example, on the basis of industrially produced specialized programs, for example, a software package [8]. A description of the above processes is given in [9].

In Fig.25 - Fig.30 presents examples of technical solutions for the implementation of a telecommunications network, exchange interfaces, two-way communications and means of monitoring the objects of observation in a controlled space that are part of the SSAC OS.

On Fig is a diagram of a device for collecting information [10]. This device implements a method of monitoring indicators of timely delivery of information. Preparation of the device is carried out by administering the settings and control units (using the information input, mode inputs and settings input). As a result, the system implements a plan of interaction between the elements of the system and adjusts their functionality.

The device operates as follows. Information is collected from control points; in our example, at one point the interval of employment of one resource is measured. Interrogation blocks provide software control of measurement processes, processing of statistical data; data samples are entered and stored in drives. There is an opportunity to analyze this data using an automated system for managing the levels of availability of IT services. Depending on the compliance of the measured values with the specified criteria, the control system provides the necessary information for making a decision.

On Fig is a diagram of a multi-channel digital communication system [11]. This system is designed for computer networks in which paths are built between units of the organizational system that operate in different time zones. The technical result is the automatic control of the data rate in the information paths depending on the time of day. The goal is achieved by controlling the frequency of clock generators in transmission and in reception. A multi-channel digital communication system with speed control of data transmission in information paths works as follows.

In the initial state, command codes are written to the memory block. Code changeability is ensured over time upon receipt of pulses from the output of the divider to the input of the memory unit.

Putting the system into operation by submitting a command code (a combination of control signals):

- to the switching unit of the transmitting part of the system;

- to the command receiver (via the group path).

The command codes recorded in the memory block set:

- the transmission rate (reception) of signals in the group path;

- the speed of transmission (reception) of signals through each transmitting and receiving individual unit.

The establishment of the transmission rate (reception) of signals is as follows. At the output of the memory block under the influence of pulses from the divider, a combination of control signals appears, which is received:

- on the transmitting part of the system: to the control inputs of the switching unit, to the first inputs of AND elements, as well as to the information inputs of the control unit;

- through the nth transmitting individual unit, the transmitting group unit, the group path, the receiving group unit, and the nth receiving individual unit to the command receiver.

The signal inputs of the switching unit of the transmitting part of the system receive pulses from the transmitting group unit, which, depending on the state of the switches, determined by the combination of control signals, are transmitted to the transmitting individual blocks.

The combination of control signals from the output of the command receiver is transmitted to the second inputs of the switching unit of the receiving part of the system. This ensures the operation of the transmitting and receiving parts of the system, agreed upon:

- by the speed of entering information into transmitting individual blocks;

- by the speed of information output from receiving individual blocks.

The coordinated operation of the control unit and the command receiver is ensured by applying identical sequences of clock pulse signals to the clock input of the control unit and to the second input of the command receiver.

Thus, using combinations of control signals coming from the output of the memory unit and varying depending on the time of day, the corresponding frequency of clock pulses is generated for reading information signals, which determines:

- the speed of transmission and reception of signals in the group path of the system;

- and proportionally changed transmission and reception speeds in individual information paths formed with the help of transmitting and receiving individual blocks.

By analyzing the load on the information paths of the organizational system at different time intervals and recording the corresponding command codes according to the analysis results in the memory unit, it is possible to establish signal transmission rates that are optimal in terms of the maximum system throughput for various time intervals.

On Fig is a diagram of a device for exchanging information [12]. This device provides the possibility of formation (destruction and / or switching) of information paths at predetermined points in time. Providing such an opportunity in practice allows you to automate the processes of information exchange between computer systems, computers and two-way communications.

A device for exchanging information works as follows. In the initial state, the following information is recorded:

- in block 1 of the memory of inputs and outputs are recorded the numbers of inputs / outputs of the first switching unit participating in the planned sessions;

- in block 2 of the memory of inputs and outputs are recorded the numbers of inputs / outputs of the second switching unit participating in the planned communication sessions. Recording is carried out in conjunction with the corresponding inputs / outputs of the first switching unit;

- time stamps T _{1 of the} beginning of sessions are recorded in the memory block of the beginning of the session, in relation to the corresponding pairs of inputs and outputs of the first and second switching units;

- the time stamp T _{2 of the} end of the sessions is recorded in the memory block of the end of the session, in conjunction with the corresponding pairs of inputs / outputs of the first and second switching units.

Recording is made from the corresponding installation inputs, and initially the memory is reset, then information is recorded.

The inputs / outputs of the server complexes (personal computers) involved in the exchange processes in various sessions are connected to the inputs / outputs of the switching units.

The state counter and trigger are set to zero by applying a pulse to their trigger inputs.

Under the influence of the zero combination arriving at the address inputs of all memory blocks, the following connections are made:

- the input / output of the first switching unit, which is planned to participate in the first session, is connected to the first input / output of the key unit;

- the input / output of the second switching unit, which is planned to participate in the first session, is connected to the second input / output of the key unit;

- at the first input of the timer, the start of the session receives the time stamp T _{1 the} beginning of the first session. The second input of the session start timer receives actual time signals from the state counter;

- at the first input of the timer, the end of the session receives the time stamp T _{2 the} end of the first session. The second input of the session end timer receives actual time signals from the state counter.

Session start and end timers change their state under the influence of pulses from a clock generator.

If the actual time stamp coincides with the time stamp T _{1 of the} beginning of the first session, an impulse appears at the output of the session start timer, which flips the trigger. The trigger includes a key block and its first input / output is connected to its second output / input. This ensures the exchange of packets of information signals between server systems (personal computers) participating in the first session.

If the actual time stamp coincides with the time stamp T _{2 of the} end of the first session, an impulse appears at the output of the end session timer. This impulse throws the trigger again, resulting in:

- the connection of its first input / output and second output / input of the key block is broken;

- the first input is connected to the first output, the second input is connected to the second output, forming loops. This stops the exchange of packets of information signals between server systems (personal computers) participating in the first session;

- the state counter is set to the next state in which the exchange device is preparing for the second session.

Similarly, all scheduled sessions go through. Then, after the timers pass the maximum values, the processes are repeated until new information about the sessions is recorded.

On Fig - Fig shows a diagram and diagrams explaining the method of transmitting discrete signals to a moving object [13], where it is indicated:

L is the distance over which the moving object is moving;

V is the speed of the moving object;

f _cp is the initial duration of information signals;

T - the period of following information signals;

T _ISM - period of change in the duration of information signals;

t _min - the value by which the duration of the information signals changes through the period T _ISM ;

t ₀ - the moment of beginning of the transmission of information signals.

This method of transmitting information signals to a moving object provides increased noise immunity of the functioning of the information path with moving objects and is as follows.

At a stationary facility:

- generate information signals with an initial duration of t _cp and a repetition period T. The duration of t _{cp of} information signals is set in accordance with the middle of the path along which the moving object is moving.

Signals modulate and emit;

- in the case of moving the moving object from the stationary, the duration of the signals transmitted between them increases over time (Fig. 29) by t _min through the periods T _ISM defined by the following relation:

- in the case of a moving object approaching a stationary one, the duration of the signals transmitted between them decreases with time (Fig. 30) also by the value of t _min through the same periods T _ISM defined by relation (2);

- change (decrease or increase) in duration stops after the time t = L / V.

At a moving object, signals are received and demodulated.

Changing the duration of the signals allows maintaining a constant power at the receiver input, which increases the noise immunity of the information path. An increase in noise immunity is achieved by increasing the reception time for analyzing the presence of an information signal (when moving a moving object).

The technical result provided by the above set of features is to increase the efficiency of the decision-making process due to the automated development of scenarios (plans) for solving problem situations.

A positive effect is achieved by using the capabilities of computer systems in the control center, in situational-analytical centers and in control centers of organizational system units: (a) based on the data obtained from monitoring the monitoring objects, analyze the activities of the organizational system, including analysis of the activities of organizational units, analysis of certain types of activities of the organizational system and analysis of the activities of the organizational system as a whole; (b) based on the results of this analysis and pre-formed scenarios for resolving problematic (critical) situations, scenarios for preventing these situations and scenarios for conducting planned work in the subject area of the organizational system, select and submit for execution to the organizational system units an optimal scenario for resolving a problem situation, and / or to prevent it, and / or to increase the efficiency of the organizational system units, certain types of in the activities or activities of the organizational system as a whole. A positive effect is the ability to simultaneously perform the above work options.

Information sources

1. RU 57481 U1, G05F 12/00 (2006.01), publ. 10/10/2006.

2. RU 57919 U1, G05B 15/00 (2006.01), publ. 10/27/2006.

3. RU 105031 U1, G05B 19/00 (2006.01), publ. 05/27/2011.

4. RU 28927 U1, G05B 19/00, publ. 04/20/2003.

5. "Information technology for monitoring the state based on the collection of information from technical surveillance equipment." // Collection of articles "Methods of construction and technology of functioning of situational centers" - M .: IPI RAS, 2011, p.124-135.

6. "The use of geographic information technology as part of a situational center." // Collection of articles "Methods of construction and technology for the functioning of situational centers" - M .: IPI RAS, 2011, p.89-111.

7. "The main storage systems and their features." // http://www.anti-malware.ru/data_storage_technologies_review, publ. 03/30/2009.

8. "Navy Atrium". // http://www.bmc.com/products/atrium/atrium.html.

9. "Situational centers: information - processes - organization." // Telecommunications, 2011, No. 6, p. 42-46.

10. SU 1742834 A1, cl. H04M 3/22, publ. 06/23/92 in bull. Number 23.

11. SU 1800631 A1, cl. H04J 3/24, publ. 03/07/93 in bull. No. 9.

12. SU 1821802 A1, cl. G06F 13/00, publ. 06/15/93 in bull. Number 22.

13. SU 1769367 A1, cl. H04B 7/26, publ. 10/15/92 in bull. No. 38.

Claims (21)

1. The system of situational and analytical centers of the organizational system, characterized in that it contains a telecommunication network, a control center, situational and analytical centers, control points of organizational system divisions, two-way communication facilities, monitoring facilities for monitoring objects, and the monitoring objects are such subjects and objects organizational system and the external environment, which affect the state of the organizational system; control tools contain blocks for generating data on indicators of observation objects represented by dimensionless numbers and / or other units of measurement, including a block for generating telemetric digital information, and / or a block for indicating coordinates of the observation object, and / or a controlled section of the observation object, a block for indicating the current time control over the state of the object of observation, the unit for creating a video image of the object of observation; the inputs and outputs of the first group of inputs and outputs of the control center are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding two-way communication means, the second inputs and outputs of which are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding means of control of the objects of observation; the second input and output of the control center are connected respectively to the first output and input of the telecommunication network; the inputs and outputs of the second group of inputs and outputs of the telecommunications network are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the respective situational analysis centers; the inputs and outputs of the third group of inputs and outputs of the telecommunications network are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding control points of the organizational system units; the inputs and outputs of the fourth group of inputs and outputs of the telecommunications network are connected respectively to the outputs and inputs of the corresponding information networks of external organizational systems; the inputs and outputs from the second group of inputs and outputs of each situational-analytical center are connected to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding two-way communication means, the second inputs and outputs of which are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding monitoring means of the monitoring objects; the inputs and outputs of the second group of inputs and outputs of each control point of the organizational system unit are connected to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding two-way communication means, the second inputs and outputs of which are connected respectively to the first outputs and inputs of the corresponding means of monitoring the objects of observation in the controlled space; providing the ability to automatically generate scenarios using the computer systems of the control center, situational and analytical centers and control points of the organizational system units; storing scenario data in the audit data storage system of the organizational system that is part of the control center; transmitting actual data on the status of activities and on the state of objects of observation for generating scenarios from computer systems that are part of situational-analytical centers and control points of organizational system units, through a telecommunication network to the computer complex of the control center; transmitting actual data about the objects of observation for generating scenarios from the control means through the means of two-way communication to the computer complex of the control center; transfer of data on scenarios from the computer complex of the control center via the telecommunication network to the computer systems of situational-analytical centers and control points of organizational unit divisions; transfer of data about scenarios using the interfaces of the control center equipment, situational and analytical centers, control points of organizational unit divisions and using a telecommunication network to the computer networks of the control center, situational and analytical centers and control points of organizational unit divisions, in a video system and computer for adjusting the center’s video system management and situational analysis centers, on the screens of a multimedia control center, situational analysis centers and point s management units of the organizational system for making decisions based on the developed scenarios; at the same time, automated production of scenarios in the computer systems of the control center, situational-analytical centers and control points of organizational system units is carried out by processing data on the actual and required indicators of the objects of observation and generating data on the actual status of the activities of the organizational system as a whole, types of activities and the state of objects observations, depending on the results of data processing, scenarios are developed to eliminate the threat, to prevent threat and to improve the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole, certain types of activities of the organizational system and the activities of units of the organizational system; the generated data on the scenarios that are to be stored in the audit data storage system of the organizational system that is part of the control center includes data on monitoring objects with which necessary actions must be taken, data on the forces and means that need to be attracted to conduct of these actions, data on the order of actions, data on the recipients of the organizational system units and external organizational systems involved in the work, data on priorities and forecasts the probable probabilities for choosing a scenario when making a decision, other data that is necessary to carry out actions to eliminate threats, to prevent them and to carry out planned work, and the data stored in the audit data storage system of the organizational system is periodically audited and updated; the composition of the actual data on the status of activities and on the state of the objects of observation that are to be transmitted to generate scenarios from the computer systems that are part of the situational-analytical systems and control points of organizational unit divisions through the telecommunication network to the computer complex of the control center includes data on the actual condition of the objects of observation that affect the types of activities carried out in the organizational unit, about salutary deviations of data on actual indicators from data on required indicators of objects of observation that affect the types of activities carried out in the organizational system unit, on the actual status of activities carried out in the organizational system unit, on actual indicators of the types of activity in the organizational system unit , on the actual state of activities of the organizational system, on actual performance indicators in rows of other organizational systems; the composition of the actual data on the objects of observation, which are to be transferred for the development of scenarios from the control means through the means of two-way communication, to the computer complex of the control center, includes data on the actual indicators of the objects of observation that affect the types of activities carried out in units of the organizational system, and these the data are represented by dimensionless numbers, time, metric, weight, cost and other units of measurement, then in the computer complex e of the control center by processing these data, data is generated on the deviation of the actual data from the required data on the indicators of the objects of observation and based on them, the actual data on the state of these objects of observation is generated; The data on scenarios that are to be transferred from the computer complex of the control center via the telecommunication network to the computer complexes of situational-analytical complexes and control points of organizational system divisions includes data for the administration of hardware, data for setting up software tools and data for administering protection against dangerous software and hardware impacts from the composition of the means ensuring the activity of the organizational system, moreover, e about scenarios are divided into critical, warning and planning scenarios, designed to support decision-making on the elimination of threats, on the prevention of threats and on increasing the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole, certain types of activities of the organizational system and certain types of activities in units organizational system; it is possible to transmit data with video images of monitoring objects using the interfaces of the equipment of the control center, situational and analytical centers, control points of organizational unit divisions and using the telecommunication network in the video system and on the multimedia screens of the control center and situational and analytical centers, on the multimedia screens of control units organizational system. 2. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the control center contains an analytical center and an objective control center, while the analytical center contains a computer complex and a storage system for audit data of the organizational system, the objective control center contains an equipment interface, a computer network, one multimedia -projector with screen, video system and computer video system settings; the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth inputs and outputs of the equipment interface are connected respectively to the outputs and inputs of the computer complex, the audit data storage system of the organizational system, computer network, multimedia projector with a screen, the first output and input of the video system, the first output and the input of the computer settings of the video system, the second input and output of which are connected respectively with the second output and input of the video system; the seventh input, output and inputs, outputs from the eighth group of inputs and outputs of the equipment interface are, respectively, the second inputs, outputs and inputs, outputs from the first group of inputs, outputs of the control center. 3. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the situational-analytical center contains a computer complex and an objective control center that contains an equipment interface, a computer network, one multimedia projector with a screen, a video system, and a video system configuration computer; the first inputs, outputs and inputs, outputs from the second group of inputs and outputs of the equipment interface are, respectively, the first inputs, outputs and inputs, outputs from the second group of inputs, outputs of the situation-analytical center, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh inputs and outputs of the interface equipment are connected respectively to the outputs and inputs of the computer complex, computer network, multimedia projector with a screen, the first output and input of the video system and the first output and input of the computer, the video system settings, second input and output of which are respectively connected to the second output and the input video. 4. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the control unit of the organizational system contains a computer complex, equipment interface, computer network and one multimedia projector with a screen; the first inputs, outputs and inputs, outputs from the second group of outputs, inputs of the equipment interface are respectively the first inputs, outputs and inputs, outputs from the second group of inputs, outputs of the control point of the organizational system unit, the third, fourth and fifth inputs and outputs of the equipment interface are connected respectively with outputs and inputs of a computer complex, a computer network and a multimedia projector with a screen. 5. The system according to claim 2, characterized in that the control center is configured to compose in the computer complex, save the audit of the organizational system in the data storage system, use it in its work and transfer it to the situation-analysis centers and points for use in work management units of the organizational data system for the administration of hardware, data for configuring software and data for the administration of protection against dangerous software and hardware Exposure to the composition of the assets supporting the activities of the organizational system; the data listed above are divided into critical scenario data, which are designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole; data on warning scenarios that are intended to support decision-making on preventing threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole; data on planned scenarios that are intended to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole; data on critical scenarios that are designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to certain activities of the organizational system; data on warning scenarios that are intended to support decision-making on the prevention of threats to certain types of activities of the organizational system; data on planned scenarios that are intended to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of certain types of activities of the organizational system; data on critical scenarios that are intended to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to certain types of activities in organizational units, data on warning scenarios that are intended to support decision-making on threat elimination for certain types of activities in organizational units, data on planned scenarios that are designed to support decision-making on improving the effectiveness of certain types of activities in organizational units insulating system. 6. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that it is capable of generating, storing and displaying on the screens data D about the required state of activity of the organizational system as a whole, data D _n about the required state and data α _n about the assigned priority for the nth type of activity of the organizational system, n = 1, 2, ..., N, data S _nm on the required state and data β _nm on the priority of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, m = 1, 2, ..., M, V _nmk data on the required condition and data γ _nmk the priority of the k-th object nab adjust it, which has an impact on the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, k = 1, 2, ..., K, L_k data on the number of indicators that are used to characterize the state of k-th object observation data $$V_k^l$$

about the required l-th status indicator and data $${\mu }_k^l$$

on the priority of the l-th state indicator of the k-th observation object, data $$V_{nmk}^l=V_k^l$$

about the required l-th state indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, or data $$V_{nmk}^l=0$$

if the required l-th indicator of the state of the k-th monitoring object does not affect the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, l = 1, 2, ..., L_k, and the data S _nm = γ _nm1 V _nm1 + γ _nm2 V _nm2 + ... + γ _nmK V _nmK , and the data $$V_{nmk}={\mu }_k^{\mathrm{one}}{V}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}+{\mu }_k^2{V}_{nmk}^2+...+{\mu }_k^{L\_k}{V}_{nmk}^{L\_k}$$

, the composition of the data on the required indicators of the objects of observation includes data on the required indicators of physical, logical, informational, territorial, constructive, organizational and other types of communication of the k-th object of observation with other objects of observation. 7. The system according to claim 6, characterized in that it is configured to collect, store and display data on screens $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

about the actual l indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, represented by dimensionless numbers and / or units, and / or video images, with n = 1, 2, ..., N, m = 1, 2, ..., M, k = 1, 2, ..., K, l = 1, 2, ..., L_k; the data on the actual indicators of the objects of observation include data on the actual indicators of physical, logical, informational, territorial, constructive, organizational and other types of communication of the k-th object of observation with other objects of observation. 8. The system according to claim 7, characterized in that it is configured to, after collecting and storing data $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

on the actual l indicator of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, to generate, save and display data on screens $$V{*}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}=|\; |\; |V_{nmk}^l-V^{*}{}_{nmk}^l|\; |\; |$$

about the absolute value of data change $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

on the actual l indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, compared with the data $$V_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

about the required l indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data $$V{*}_{nmk}={\mu }_k^{\mathrm{one}}\left(V_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}-\Delta V{*}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)+{\mu }_k^2\left(V_{nmk}^2-\Delta V{*}_{nmk}^2\right)+...+{\mu }_k^{L\_k}\left(V{*}_{nmk}^{L\_k}-V{*}_{nmk}^{L\_k}\right)$$

on the actual state of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data S * _nm = γ _nm1 V * _nm1 + γ _nm2 V * _nm2 + ... + γ _nmK V * _nmK on the actual state of the nth activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data ΔS * _nm = S * _nm / S _nm on the effectiveness of the n-th activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data D * _n = β _n1 S * _n1 + β _n2 S * _n2 , + ... + β _nM S * _nM on the actual state of the nth activity of the organizational system, data D _n = β _n1 S _n1 + β _n2 S _n2 + ... + β _{n M} S _nM about the required state of the nth activity of the organizational system, data D * _n = D * _n / D _n about the effectiveness of the nth activity of the organizational system, data D * = α ₁ D * ₁ + α ₂ D * ₂ , + ... + α _N D * _N about the actual state of activity of the organizational system as a whole, data D = α ₁ D ₁ + α ₂ D ₂ , + ... + α _N D _N about the required state of activity of the organizational system as a whole, data ΔD * = D * / D about the performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole. 9. The system of claim 8, characterized in that it is configured to form, save and display on the data screens ΔD _crit. on the performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole, a decrease, compared with which, the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the activities of the organizational system as a whole and the need for action to eliminate it, data ΔD _add. on the performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole, a decrease, in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the activity of the organizational system as a whole and the need to take actions to prevent the appearance of a threat, data ΔD _n-crit. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it, data ΔD _n-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to prevent the appearance of a threat, data ΔS _nm-crit. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it , data ΔS _nm-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need for taking actions to prevent the appearance of a threat. 10. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to form, save and display data on screens $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

about critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole, provided 0≤ΔD * <ΔD _crit. , data on the number of Q _crit. and data q1 = 1, 2, ..., Q _crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}\right)\ge P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^0\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q\mathrm{one}=\mathrm{one}}^{Q_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}}P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{q\mathrm{one}}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 11. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole, provided ΔD _crit. ≤ΔD * <ΔD _add. , data on the number Q _prev. and data q2 = 1, 2, ..., Q _prev. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^2\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^2$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^0\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q2=\mathrm{one}}^{Q_{PRed.}}P\left(W_{PRed.}^{q2}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 12. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole, provided ΔD _add. ≤ΔD * <1, data on the number of Q _plan. and data q3 = 1, 2, ..., Q _plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3-\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^0\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{q3=\mathrm{one}}^{Q_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}}P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{q3}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 13. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to form, save and display data screens $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the nth type of activity of the organizational system under the condition 0≤ΔD * _n <ΔD _n-crit. , data on the number U _n-crit. and data u1 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}\right)\ge P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u\mathrm{one}=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{n-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}}P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nu\mathrm{one}}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 14. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity of the organizational system under the condition ΔD _n-crit. ≤ΔD * _n <ΔD _n-add. data on the number U _n-pred. and data u2 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-pred. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nu2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u2=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{n-PRed.}}P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nu2}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 15. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, provided ΔD _n-add. ≤ΔD * _n <1, data on the number U _n-plan. and data u3 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nu3}\right)\ge P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n0}\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{u3=\mathrm{one}}^{U_{n-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}}P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nu3}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 16. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system under the condition 0≤S * _nm <ΔS _nm-crit. , data on the number of Y _nm-crit. and data y1 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}\right)\ge P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y\mathrm{one}=\mathrm{one}}^{Y_{nm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}}P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmy\mathrm{one}}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 17. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system under the condition ΔS _nm-crit. ≤ΔS * _nm <ΔS _nm-add. , data on the number Y _nm-pred. and data y2 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-pred. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y2=\mathrm{one}}^{Y_{nm-PRed.}}P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nmy2}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

. 18. The system according to claim 9, characterized in that it is configured to generate, save and display data on screens $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on increasing the efficiency of the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, provided ΔS _nm-add. ≤ΔS * _nm <1, data on the number of Y _nm-plan. and data y3 = 1, 2, ... Y _nm-plan . about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

, and $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmy2}\right)\ge P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm0}\right)=0$$

, $${\displaystyle \sum _{y3=\mathrm{one}}^{Y_{nm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}}P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmy3}\right)}=\mathrm{one}$$

19. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the control center is configured to generate, save and display on the screens data D about the required state of activity of the organizational system as a whole, data D _n about the required state and data α _n about the assigned priority for n -th type of activity of the organizational system, n = 1, 2, ..., N, data S _nm on the required state and data β _nm on the priority of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, m = 1, 2, ..., M, V _nmk data on the required condition and data γ _nmk of priority k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, k = 1, 2, ..., K, data L_k on the number of indicators that are used to characterize the state of the k-th object observation data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

about the required l-th state indicator and data µ _nmkl about the priority of the l-th state indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th division of the organizational system, l = 1, 2, ... , L_k, with the ability to receive data $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

about the actual l indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data $$\Delta V{*}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

about the absolute value of data change $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

compared to data $$V_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

data V * _nmk on the actual state of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data S * _nm on the actual state of the n-th type of activity carried out in m- th division of the organizational system, data ΔS * _nm on the performance indicator of the nth activity in the mth division of the organizational system, with the ability to form, save and display data ΔD _crit. on the performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole, a decrease, compared with which, the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the activities of the organizational system as a whole and the need for action to eliminate it, data ΔD _add. on the performance indicator of the organizational system as a whole, a decrease, in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the activity of the organizational system as a whole and the need to take actions to prevent the appearance of a threat, data ΔD _n-crit. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it, data ΔD _n-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to prevent the appearance of a threat, data ΔS _nm-crit. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it , data ΔS _nm-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, compared with which, of the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need for preventive threat data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

about critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole, provided 0≤ΔD * <ΔD _crit. , data on the number of Q _crit. and data q1 = 1, 2, ..., Q _crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^2$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{Q\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the activities of the organizational system as a whole, provided ΔD _crit. ≤ΔD * <ΔD _add. , data on the number Q _prev. and data q2 = 1, 2, ..., Q _prev. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^2\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^2$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{QPRed.}$$

data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the organizational system as a whole, provided ΔD _add. ≤ΔD * <1, data on the number of Q _plan. and data q3 = 1, 2, ..., Q _plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^2$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{QPl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the nth type of activity of the organizational system under the condition 0≤ΔD * _n <ΔD _n-crit. , data on the number U _n-crit. and data u1 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity of the organizational system under the condition ΔD _n-crit. ≤ΔD * _n <ΔD _n-add. data on the number U _n-pred. and data u2 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-pred. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, provided ΔD _n-add. ≤ΔD * _n <1, data on the number U _n-plan. and data u3 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system under the condition 0≤S * _nm <ΔS _nm-crit. , data on the number of Y _nm-crit. and data y1 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system under the condition ΔS _nm-crit. ≤ΔS * _nm <ΔS _nm-add. , data on the number of Y _nm-pred. and data y2 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-pred. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on increasing the efficiency of the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, provided ΔS _nm-add. ≤ΔS * _nm <1, data on the number of Y _nm-plan. and data y3 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

, with the ability to transfer data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, ΔD _n-crit. , ΔD _n-add. , ΔS _{nm crit.} , ΔS _nm-add. , U _n-crit. , u1, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, U _n-pred. , u2, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, U _n-plan. , u3, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

to situational-analytical centers from the system of situational-analytical centers of the organizational system, with the possibility of data transfer $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}$$

, ΔS _{nm crit.} , ΔS _nm-add. , Y _{nm crit.} , y1, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, Y _nm-pred. , y2, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

, Y _{nm plan.} , y3, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

to control points of organizational system divisions from the system of situational and analytical centers. 20. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the number R of situational-analytical centers is equal to the number N of types of activity, while each situational-analytical center is configured to receive, save and display data D _n about the required state and data α _n о assigned priority for one of the activities of the organizational system, where ∀n∈1, 2, ..., N, data $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^l$$

about the actual l indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data $$\Delta V{*}_{nmk}^l$$

about the absolute value of data change $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^l$$

in comparison with the data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

data V * _nmk on the actual state of the k-th monitoring object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data S * _{nm the} actual state of the n-th type activity carried out in the m-th organizational unit, ΔS * _nm data on the performance indicator of the nth activity in the m-th organizational unit, where m = 1, 2, ..., M, k = 1, 2, ..., K, l = 1, 2 , ..., L_k, to generate, store and display data D * _n of the actual state of the n-th type of activity org nizatsionnoy system ΔD * _n data on the performance of n-th activity of the organizational system, to transmit ΔD * _n and ΔD * _n data to the control center to receive, store and display ΔD _{n-critical data.} on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it, data ΔD _n-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to this type of activity of the organizational system and the need to take actions to prevent the appearance of a threat, data ΔS _nm-crit. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it , data ΔS _nm-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, compared with which, of the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need for preventive threat data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating threats to the nth activity of the organizational system, data on the number U _n-crit. and data u1 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-crit. data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\left(u\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nUn-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making on preventing threats to the nth activity of the organizational system, data on the number U _n-prev. and data u2 = 1, 2, ... U _n-pred. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{n\left(u2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nUn-PRed.}$$

data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios designed to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth activity of the organizational system, data on the number U _n-plan. and data u3 = 1, 2, ..., U _n-plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\left(u3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{n2}$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nUn-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

. 21. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that the control point of the m-th unit of the organizational system is configured to receive, save and display S _nm data about the required state and β _nm data about the priority of the nth activity carried out in m- th division of the organizational system, data V _nmk on the required state and data γ _nmk on the priority of the kth monitoring object, which affects the nth type of activity carried out in the mth division of the organizational system, data L_k on the number of indicators that are used to characterize the state of the k-th observation object, data $$V_{nmk}^l$$

about the required l-th state indicator and data µ _nmkl about the priority of the l-th state indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th division of the organizational system, with the possibility of formation, storage and display data $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

about the actual l-th indicator of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, with the possibility, in case of data changes $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

formation, storage and display on data screens $$\Delta V{*}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

about the absolute value of data change $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

compared to data $$V_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

data V * _nmk on the actual state of the k-th observation object, which affects the n-th type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data S * _nm on the actual state of the n-th type of activity carried out in m- th division of the organizational system, data ΔS * _nm on the performance of n-th kind of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, with the possibility of data transfer $$V^{*}{}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$V{*}_{nmk}^{\mathrm{one}}$$

, V * _nmk , S * _nm and ΔS * _nm to the control center and situational-analytical centers from the system of situational-analytical centers of the organizational system, with the possibility of receiving, saving and displaying data ΔS _nm-crit. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, in comparison with which, of the actual indicator means the existence of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need to take actions to eliminate it , data ΔS _nm-add. on the efficiency indicator of the nth type of activity carried out in the m-th unit of the organizational system, a decrease, compared with which, of the actual indicator means the possibility of a threat to the nth type of activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system and the need for preventive threat data $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

on critical scenarios designed to support decision-making on eliminating the threat to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data on the number of Y _nm-crit. and data y1 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-crit. about data priorities $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\left(y\mathrm{one}-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the critical scenario $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}^{nmYnm-\mathrm{to}R\mathrm{and}t.}$$

data $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

about warning scenarios designed to support decision-making to prevent threats to the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data on the number of Y _nm-prev. and data y2 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-pred. about data priorities $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{PRed.}^{nm\left(y2-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

on the predicted selection probabilities when deciding the warning scenario $$W_{PRed.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{PRed.}^{nmYnm-PRed.}$$

data $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

about planned scenarios intended to support decision-making on improving the efficiency of the nth activity in the m-th unit of the organizational system, data on the number of Y _nm-plan. and data y3 = 1, 2, ..., Y _nm-plan. about data priorities $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, ..., $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

data $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}\right)$$

, $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}\right)$$

, ..., $$P\left(W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\left(y3-\mathrm{one}\right)}\right)$$

about predicted selection probabilities when deciding on a planned scenario $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm\mathrm{one}}$$

, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nm2}$$

, …, or $$W_{Pl\mathrm{but}n.}^{nmYnm-Pl\mathrm{but}n.}$$

where n = 1, 2, ..., N; m = 1, 2, ..., M; k = 1, 2, ..., K; l = 1, 2, ..., L_k.

Images