[go: up one dir, main page]

JP5777201B2 - Steel projection material - Google Patents

Steel projection material Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5777201B2
JP5777201B2 JP2010286792A JP2010286792A JP5777201B2 JP 5777201 B2 JP5777201 B2 JP 5777201B2 JP 2010286792 A JP2010286792 A JP 2010286792A JP 2010286792 A JP2010286792 A JP 2010286792A JP 5777201 B2 JP5777201 B2 JP 5777201B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
ratio
life
shot
steel
life ratio
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2010286792A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2012131002A (en
Inventor
政行 石川
政行 石川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sintokogio Ltd
Original Assignee
Sintokogio Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sintokogio Ltd filed Critical Sintokogio Ltd
Priority to JP2010286792A priority Critical patent/JP5777201B2/en
Priority to CN201110219373.4A priority patent/CN102534397B/en
Publication of JP2012131002A publication Critical patent/JP2012131002A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5777201B2 publication Critical patent/JP5777201B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)

Description

本発明は品質(硬さ、密度、金属組織)のバラツキが小さく研掃能力が安定したスチール系投射材に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a steel-based projection material that has small variations in quality (hardness, density, metal structure) and has a stable scouring ability.

スチール系投射材は約1%Cからなる鋳鋼を用いて、一般に広く製造され、鋳物の砂落しをはじめとして、主に鉄系金属素材のバリ取り、付着物除去、酸化膜除去など幅広い用途に使用されている。
こうした用途に用いられる投射材としては、他に硬鋼線材を切断したカットワイヤやステンレス鋼線を切断して製造されるステンレスカットワイヤ、ステンレス鋳鋼を水などによってアトマイズして製造されるステンレスショットなどがあるが、スチールショットは最も低コストで製造可能な投射材であり、最も普及している。
しかし、例えばカットワイヤは線材という均一な素材を切断して製造されるため成分、硬さ、金属組織などのバラツキが小さいという特徴を有するが、スチールショットの場合は溶解した高温の溶湯を水などの冷却媒体によって粒子に破砕して製造するため、個々の粒子(ショット)の冷却履歴にバラツキが生じると共に、焼入れ、焼き戻しといった熱処理工程においても同様のバラツキが発生する問題があった。このため、カットワイヤと比較してブラスト処理した面の仕上りにムラが生じたり、ショットの消耗が早いという問題があった。
Steel-based projectiles are generally manufactured using cast steel consisting of about 1% C, and are widely used for deburring of iron-based metal materials, removal of deposits, and removal of oxide films, including casting sand removal. It is used.
Other projection materials used for such applications include cut wires cut from hard steel wires, stainless cut wires manufactured by cutting stainless steel wires, stainless shots manufactured by atomizing stainless cast steel with water, etc. However, steel shot is the most widely used blasting material that can be manufactured at the lowest cost.
However, for example, a cut wire is manufactured by cutting a uniform material such as a wire, so it has the feature that there is little variation in components, hardness, metal structure, etc. Since the particles are crushed into particles by the cooling medium, the cooling history of individual particles (shots) varies, and the same variation occurs in the heat treatment process such as quenching and tempering. For this reason, there are problems in that the finish of the blasted surface is uneven as compared with the cut wire, and the shot is consumed quickly.

従来としては、質量%で、C:0.6〜1.4%、Si:0.3〜1.6%、Mn:0.3〜1.3%、P:0.05%以下、S:0.05%以下を含有し、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなる化学組成を有するブラスト処理用投射材が用いられていた。これだけ広い成分のバラツキがあっても、鋳物の砂落しや鋼板の酸化物除去といった処理目的に対しては十分機能を果たしたが、個々のショットの金属組織、硬さなどバラツキが大きいため、ブラスト面の仕上りにムラが生じたり、投射材の消耗が早いという問題があった。 Conventionally, in mass%, C: 0.6 to 1.4%, Si: 0.3 to 1.6%, Mn: 0.3 to 1.3%, P: 0.05% or less, S : A blasting projection material containing 0.05% or less and the balance having a chemical composition composed of Fe and inevitable impurities was used. Even with such a wide variation in components, it performed well for processing purposes such as removing sand from castings and removing oxides from steel sheets, but due to the large variations in the metal structure and hardness of individual shots, blasting There are problems that the surface finish is uneven and that the projection material is consumed quickly.

本発明は微量成分(不純物)の含有量を含む化学成分を適正化することによって、品質(硬さ、密度、金属組織)のバラツキが小さく研掃能力が安定した投射材を提供することを目的とする。 It is an object of the present invention to provide a projection material in which the variability in quality (hardness, density, metal structure) is small and the cleaning ability is stable by optimizing chemical components including the content of trace components (impurities). And

本発明は、上記の目的を達成するために成されたものである。
本発明のブラスト処理用投射材は、質量%で、C:0.96〜1.0%、Si:0.82〜0.88%、Mn:0.92〜0.99%、Al:0.08〜0.11%、Cr:0.22〜0.68%、P:0.02〜0.04%、S:0.02〜0.04%、B:0.003〜0.04%を含有し、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなる化学組成を有することを特徴とする。
The present invention has been made to achieve the above object.
The blast treatment projection material of the present invention is in mass%, C: 0.96 to 1.0%, Si: 0.82 to 0.88%, Mn: 0.92 to 0.99%, Al: 0 0.08-0.11%, Cr: 0.22-0.68%, P: 0.02-0.04%, S: 0.02-0.04%, B: 0.003-0.04 % , With the balance having a chemical composition consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities.

_ _

_ _

_ _

上記説明から明らかのように本発明は、質量%で、C:0.96〜1.0%、Si:0.82〜0.88%、Mn:0.92〜0.99%、Al:0.08〜0.11%、Cr:0.22〜0.68%、P:0.02〜0.04%、S:0.02〜0.04%、B:0.003〜0.04%を含有し、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなる化学組成を有することにより、各元素の組成範囲をより狭くすることにより、品質バラツキの低減が可能となった。 As is apparent from the above description, the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.96 to 1.0%, Si: 0.82 to 0.88%, Mn: 0.92 to 0.99%, Al: 0.08-0.11%, Cr: 0.22-0.68%, P: 0.02-0.04%, S : 0.02-0.04 %, B: 0.003-0. By containing 04% and the balance having a chemical composition composed of Fe and inevitable impurities, the compositional range of each element was narrowed, thereby making it possible to reduce quality variations.

また、質量%で、Al:0.080.11%を含有することにより、形状を改善し、内部欠陥(空孔)を低減することができる。さらに、質量%で、Cr:0.220.68%を含有することにより焼入れ性を改善することができる。また、質量%で、B:0.003〜0.04%を含有することによりさらに焼入れ性を向上することができる。 Further, by containing Al: 0.08 to 0.11 % by mass%, the shape can be improved and internal defects (vacancies) can be reduced. Furthermore, hardenability can be improved by containing Cr: 0.22 to 0.68 % by mass%. Moreover, hardenability can be improved further by containing B: 0.003-0.04% by mass%.

また質量%で、C:0.961.0%、Si:0.820.88%、Mn:0.92〜0.99%、P:0.02〜0.04%、S:0.02〜0.04%を含有することにより、機械的強度の低下を防止できる。 In addition mass%, C: 0.96 ~ 1.0% , Si: 0.82 ~ 0.88%, Mn: 0.92~0.99%, P: 0.02~0.04%, S : By containing 0.02 to 0.04 %, a decrease in mechanical strength can be prevented.

_ _

_ _

_ _

以下に、本発明の効果を確認するために行った、試験例(実施例・比較例)について説明する。
<試験例1>
Hereinafter, test examples (Examples / Comparative Examples) performed for confirming the effects of the present invention will be described.
<Test Example 1>

本試験例ではC、Si、Mn、P、S、Al、Cr、Bの影響を調査するため、スチールスクラップ、Fe−Si、Fe−Mn、Fe−Cr、Fe−B、純アルミニウム、加炭材等を原材料として所望の成分になるように原料配合を調整し、鉄換算溶解量100kgの実験用高周波溶解炉を使用して溶解した。溶解温度は1640〜1680℃として、水アトマイズ法によってスチールショットを製作した。得られたショットを乾燥し850℃に加熱して1時間保持した後、水焼入れを行い、さらに、ショットの硬さがHv440〜460となるように焼戻しした。熱処理を実施したショットを篩い分けしてφ1mm(1.18mmの篩を通過し、1.00mmの篩に残ったもの)のサイズを取り出し、品質等を評価した。その結果を表1に示す。     In this test example, steel scrap, Fe-Si, Fe-Mn, Fe-Cr, Fe-B, pure aluminum, carburized to investigate the effects of C, Si, Mn, P, S, Al, Cr, B The raw material composition was adjusted so as to be a desired component using the raw material as a raw material and melted using an experimental high-frequency melting furnace with an iron equivalent melting amount of 100 kg. The melting temperature was 1640-1680 ° C., and steel shots were produced by the water atomization method. The obtained shot was dried and heated to 850 ° C. and held for 1 hour, followed by water quenching, and further tempered so that the shot had a hardness of Hv440 to 460. The shots subjected to the heat treatment were sieved and a size of φ1 mm (passed through the 1.18 mm sieve and remained on the 1.00 mm sieve) was taken out and evaluated for quality and the like. The results are shown in Table 1.

空孔率、非球状粒子率、硬さについては、JIS−Z0311に定められた方法により測定した。
空孔率については、ショット粒子を樹脂中に埋め込んで研磨し、拡大鏡によって粒子断面を観察した時に、その断面積に対して空孔が占める面積が10%以上のショット粒子の割合を求めた。観察したショット粒子の数は100とした。
非球状粒子率については、ショット粒子をガラス平板に広げて拡大鏡によって観察した時に、ショット粒子の長径が短径の2倍以上の粒子の割合を求めた。観察したショット粒子の数は100とした。
硬さについては、ショット粒子を樹脂中に埋め込んで研磨し、粒子断面のビッカース硬さを測定した。試験荷重は9.8N、荷重負荷時間は12秒とし、有効な20個の測定値の平均値を求めた。
The porosity, non-spherical particle ratio, and hardness were measured by the methods defined in JIS-Z0311.
Regarding the porosity, when shot particles were embedded in a resin and polished, and the cross section of the particles was observed with a magnifier, the ratio of shot particles in which the area occupied by the voids was 10% or more with respect to the cross sectional area was obtained . The number of shot particles observed was 100.
Regarding the non-spherical particle ratio, when the shot particles were spread on a glass flat plate and observed with a magnifying glass, the ratio of the particles having the major axis of the shot particle twice or more the minor axis was determined. The number of shot particles observed was 100.
Regarding the hardness, shot particles were embedded in a resin and polished, and the Vickers hardness of the particle cross section was measured. The test load was 9.8 N, the load time was 12 seconds, and an average value of 20 effective measured values was obtained.

ショットの寿命に関しては、SAE(Society of Automotive Engineers,Inc.)J−445に定められた衝撃破砕試験を行った。即ち、上記φ1mmのショット100gを試験装置に投入し、60m/sの速度で耐摩耗鋳鉄製のターゲットに繰り返し衝突させ、一定衝突回数毎に破砕したショットを篩別除去すると共に残留ショットの重量を測定し、残留ショットが最初の30%以下となるまで試験を行った。この試験により得た衝突回数と残留ショット重量割合の関係を示す曲線を積分して求められる数値を寿命値とした。表1に示す寿命比とは、一般的な組成である実施例3の寿命値を100とした場合の比率で表しており、寿命比の値が大きいほど耐久性が良好であることを示している。
化学組成については、発光分光分析法によって、試作したショットそのものの分析を行った。
With respect to the life of the shot, an impact crushing test defined by SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.) J-445 was performed. That is, 100 g of the above-mentioned φ1 mm shot is put into a test apparatus, and repeatedly collided with a wear-resistant cast iron target at a speed of 60 m / s. Measurements were made until the residual shot was below the initial 30%. The value obtained by integrating the curve showing the relationship between the number of collisions and the residual shot weight ratio obtained by this test was defined as the life value. The life ratio shown in Table 1 is a ratio when the life value of Example 3, which is a general composition, is set to 100. The larger the life ratio value, the better the durability. Yes.
Regarding the chemical composition, the shots themselves were analyzed by emission spectroscopy.

実施例1〜3は、P、Sを0.04〜0.05%となるように調整し、特にC、Si、Mnの影響を調査したものである。実施例1〜3の試料は空孔率、非球状粒子率、寿命比について、いずれも大きな差は無かった。     In Examples 1 to 3, P and S are adjusted to 0.04 to 0.05%, and in particular, the influence of C, Si and Mn is investigated. The samples of Examples 1 to 3 were not significantly different in terms of porosity, non-spherical particle ratio, and life ratio.

これに対して、比較例1では、空孔率、非球状粒子率が増加し、寿命比が大きく低下した。これは、C、Si、Mnが低いために、溶解時の脱酸効果が不十分で空孔等の欠陥が増加したためである。また、比較例2では、特に寿命比が大きく低下した。これは、C量が多いため、水アトマイズ時に炭化物(Fe3C)が形成されやすく、焼入れ時の加熱で分解できなかった炭化物が残留した粒子が混在しているためである。     On the other hand, in Comparative Example 1, the porosity and non-spherical particle ratio increased, and the life ratio was greatly reduced. This is because, since C, Si, and Mn are low, the deoxidation effect at the time of dissolution is insufficient, and defects such as vacancies increase. Moreover, in the comparative example 2, especially the life ratio fell significantly. This is because, since the amount of C is large, carbides (Fe3C) are easily formed during water atomization, and particles in which carbides that could not be decomposed by heating during quenching are mixed.

実施例4はAlの影響を調査したもので、空孔率、非球状粒子率が顕著に低下し、寿命比も若干向上した。これは、Alよる脱酸効果によるものと考えられる。     In Example 4, the influence of Al was investigated. The porosity and non-spherical particle ratio were significantly reduced, and the life ratio was slightly improved. This is considered to be due to the deoxidation effect by Al.

これに対して、比較例3では、空孔率は低いものの非球状粒子率が増加し、寿命比も低下した。これは、Alが過剰な場合には溶湯表面に形成される酸化物が増加し、表面張力を阻害して形状を悪化させた結果と考えられる。     On the other hand, in Comparative Example 3, although the porosity was low, the non-spherical particle ratio increased and the life ratio also decreased. This is considered to be a result of the oxide being formed on the surface of the molten metal when Al is excessive, which deteriorates the shape by inhibiting the surface tension.

実施例5はCrの影響を調査したもので、空孔率、非球状粒子率が顕著に低下し、寿命比も若干向上し良好な結果が得られた。     In Example 5, the influence of Cr was investigated, and the porosity and non-spherical particle ratio were remarkably reduced, and the life ratio was slightly improved, and good results were obtained.

これに対して、比較例4では、実施例5と比較して非球状粒子率が増加し、寿命比が低下した。Crが過剰な場合にはAlの場合と同様に溶湯表面に形成される酸化物が増加して形状が悪化すると共に、Crの炭化物が形成されやすくなって靭性を低下させるものと推定される。     On the other hand, in Comparative Example 4, the non-spherical particle ratio increased and the life ratio decreased compared to Example 5. When Cr is excessive, it is presumed that, as in the case of Al, oxides formed on the surface of the molten metal are increased and the shape is deteriorated, and Cr carbides are easily formed and the toughness is lowered.

実施例6はBの影響を調査したもので、空孔率、非球状粒子率が最も低くなり、寿命比は最も高く最も良好な結果が得られた。     In Example 6, the influence of B was investigated, and the porosity and non-spherical particle ratio were the lowest, the life ratio was the highest, and the best results were obtained.

これに対して、比較例5においても、実施例6に近い結果となったが、コストを考慮すると実施例6のB量で十分効果を得ることが可能である。 On the other hand, in Comparative Example 5, the result was close to that of Example 6. However, considering the cost, it is possible to obtain a sufficient effect with the B amount of Example 6 .

<試験例2> <Test Example 2>

本試験例ではC、Si、Mn、P、SおよびMo、W、V、Nb、Tiの影響を調査した。
試料の作製方法、評価方法は試験例1と同様である。結果を表2に示す。
なお、試験例1において、各元素が空孔率と非球状粒子率に及ぼす影響を確認できたため、本試験例では寿命比の結果だけを示す。
In this test example, the influence of C, Si, Mn, P, S and Mo, W, V, Nb, and Ti was investigated.
The sample preparation method and evaluation method are the same as in Test Example 1. The results are shown in Table 2.
In Test Example 1, since the influence of each element on the porosity and non-spherical particle ratio could be confirmed, this test example shows only the result of the life ratio.

実施例7〜8は、P、Sを0.03%以下となるように調整したうえで、C、Si、Mnの影響を調査したものである。実施例7〜8の試料の寿命比はいずれも100を超え、鋼にとって有害な元素であるP、Sを減少すると共にC、Si、Mnをさらに好ましい範囲とした効果が認められた。     Examples 7-8 investigate the influence of C, Si, and Mn after adjusting P and S to be 0.03% or less. The life ratios of the samples of Examples 7 to 8 all exceeded 100, and the effects of reducing P and S, which are elements harmful to steel, and making C, Si and Mn more preferable ranges were observed.

実施例9は、Alの影響を調査したもので、表1の実施例4よりも寿命比が向上している。これは、P、Sを低く調整した影響と推定される。
一方、比較例6では、表1の比較例3の場合と同様に寿命比が低下した。
In Example 9, the influence of Al was investigated, and the life ratio was improved as compared with Example 4 in Table 1. This is estimated to be the effect of adjusting P and S low.
On the other hand, in Comparative Example 6, the life ratio decreased as in Comparative Example 3 in Table 1.

実施例10はCrの影響を調査したもので、寿命比が若干向上し良好な結果が得られた。     In Example 10, the influence of Cr was investigated, and the life ratio was slightly improved, and good results were obtained.

これに対して、比較例7では、実施例10と比較して寿命比が低下した。
Crが過剰な場合にはAlの場合と同様に溶湯表面に形成される酸化物が増加して形状が悪化すると共に、Crの炭化物が形成されやすくなって靭性を低下させるものと推定される。
On the other hand, in Comparative Example 7, the life ratio was lower than that in Example 10.
When Cr is excessive, it is presumed that, as in the case of Al, oxides formed on the surface of the molten metal are increased and the shape is deteriorated, and Cr carbides are easily formed and the toughness is lowered.

実施例11はBの影響を調査したもので、寿命比が向上し最も良好な結果が得られた。     In Example 11, the influence of B was investigated. The life ratio was improved and the best result was obtained.

これに対して、比較例8においても、実施例11に近い結果となったが、コストを考慮すると実施例11のB量で十分効果を得ることが可能である。 On the other hand, in Comparative Example 8, the result was close to Example 11, but it is possible to obtain a sufficient effect with the amount of B of Example 11 in consideration of the cost.

実施例12はMo、Wの影響を調査したもので、実施例11よりも寿命比がさらに向上し最も良好な結果が得られた。     In Example 12, the influence of Mo and W was investigated, and the life ratio was further improved as compared with Example 11, and the best result was obtained.

これに対して、比較例9においても、実施例12と比較して寿命比が多少低下する程度であったが、コストを考慮すると実施例12に示す組成範囲で十分効果を得ることが可能である。     On the other hand, in Comparative Example 9, the life ratio was somewhat reduced as compared with Example 12, but it is possible to obtain a sufficient effect in the composition range shown in Example 12 in consideration of cost. is there.

実施例13はV、Nb、Tiの影響を調査したもので、最も高い寿命比が得られ最も良好な結果が得られた。適切な量のV、Nb、Tiを含むことにより、金属組織が微細化し靭性が向上したと推定される。     In Example 13, the effects of V, Nb, and Ti were investigated. The highest life ratio was obtained and the best result was obtained. By including appropriate amounts of V, Nb, and Ti, it is presumed that the metal structure is refined and the toughness is improved.

これに対して、比較例10では、実施例13と比較して寿命比が大幅に低下した。
V、Nb、Ti が過剰な場合には、これらの元素が粗大な炭化物を形成し、寿命比を低下させることが確認された。
On the other hand, in Comparative Example 10, the life ratio was significantly reduced as compared with Example 13.
It was confirmed that when V, Nb, and Ti are excessive, these elements form coarse carbides and reduce the life ratio.

Claims (1)

質量%で、C:0.96〜1.0%、Si:0.82〜0.88%、Mn:0.92〜0.99%、Al:0.08〜0.11%、Cr:0.22〜0.68%、P:0.02〜0.04%、S:0.02〜0.04%、B:0.003〜0.04%を含有し、残部はFeおよび不可避不純物からなる化学組成を有することを特徴とするブラスト処理用投射材。
C: 0.96-1.0%, Si: 0.82-0.88%, Mn: 0.92-0.99%, Al: 0.08-0.11%, Cr: 0.22 to 0.68%, P: 0.02 to 0.04%, S: 0.02 to 0.04% , B: 0.003 to 0.04%, the balance being Fe and inevitable A blasting projection material, characterized by having a chemical composition comprising impurities.
JP2010286792A 2010-12-23 2010-12-23 Steel projection material Active JP5777201B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010286792A JP5777201B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2010-12-23 Steel projection material
CN201110219373.4A CN102534397B (en) 2010-12-23 2011-07-28 steel projection material

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010286792A JP5777201B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2010-12-23 Steel projection material

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012131002A JP2012131002A (en) 2012-07-12
JP5777201B2 true JP5777201B2 (en) 2015-09-09

Family

ID=46342411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2010286792A Active JP5777201B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2010-12-23 Steel projection material

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5777201B2 (en)
CN (1) CN102534397B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3363592A4 (en) * 2016-01-26 2019-06-05 Sintokogio, Ltd. MOLDED STEEL PROJECTION MATERIAL

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103014563B (en) * 2012-12-27 2014-11-19 杨继会 Multi-element micro-alloy strengthening steel shot/sand and preparation process thereof
US20150231763A1 (en) * 2014-02-14 2015-08-20 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Shot Material and Shot Peening Method
JPWO2020174676A1 (en) * 2019-02-28 2021-11-04 新東工業株式会社 Shot manufacturing method, shot
CN112708853B (en) * 2020-12-22 2023-01-31 安徽工业大学 Machining method for improving performance of AlCrN coating cutter through microparticle shot blasting post-treatment
CN116555661A (en) * 2023-03-13 2023-08-08 江苏通略金属制品有限公司 A kind of high chromium alloy reinforced cast steel shot and its manufacturing method

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02228448A (en) * 1989-02-28 1990-09-11 Daido Steel Co Ltd High strength and high toughness steel shot
JPH03253544A (en) * 1990-03-01 1991-11-12 Daido Steel Co Ltd High-hardness wire steel for shot grains
JP2926397B2 (en) * 1997-06-11 1999-07-28 明久 井上 Impact-resistant iron-based alloy spherical particles
JP2004148414A (en) * 2002-10-28 2004-05-27 Seiko Epson Corp Abrasive material and method and apparatus for producing abrasive material
CN1827823A (en) * 2006-04-13 2006-09-06 李宁 High-carbon alloy steel wearable steel ball and production method thereof
CN101492793B (en) * 2009-02-21 2011-06-15 丁起 Medium-lower alloy abrasion resistant steel
CN101899624A (en) * 2010-08-06 2010-12-01 常熟市龙特耐磨球有限公司 High-carbon low-alloy large size wearable forged mining steel ball and manufacture method thereof

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3363592A4 (en) * 2016-01-26 2019-06-05 Sintokogio, Ltd. MOLDED STEEL PROJECTION MATERIAL
US10731238B2 (en) 2016-01-26 2020-08-04 Sintokogio, Ltd. Cast steel projection material

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2012131002A (en) 2012-07-12
CN102534397A (en) 2012-07-04
CN102534397B (en) 2017-03-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5777201B2 (en) Steel projection material
JP5250609B2 (en) Steel for high strength spring, method for producing high strength spring, and high strength spring
JP5725416B2 (en) Low carbon cast steel shot
KR101126151B1 (en) Brake disk excellent in temper softening resistance and toughness
KR20170026220A (en) Steel for mold and mold
JP6468402B2 (en) Case-hardened steel, method for producing the same, and method for producing gear parts
JP6191118B2 (en) Mold steel with excellent thermal conductivity, mirror polishability and toughness
JP6661896B2 (en) Age hardening steel
JP5653020B2 (en) Spring steel and springs with excellent corrosion fatigue strength
CN108367413B (en) Cast Steel Projection Material
JPH02228448A (en) High strength and high toughness steel shot
JP5766476B2 (en) Powder for shot peening projection material and shot peening method thereof
JP7205535B2 (en) Shot used for blasting
JP3507723B2 (en) Bi free cutting steel
JP7649308B2 (en) Stainless steel blasting abrasives
JP6193040B2 (en) Projection material for shot peening with high hardness and long life
JPS6230858A (en) Stainless shot
JPH07278737A (en) Preharden steel for plastic molding and its production
JP6312120B2 (en) Powdered high speed tool steel and manufacturing method thereof
TWI900465B (en) Impact ball for jet processing
JP2002317203A (en) Martensitic stainless steel particles
JP2024150339A (en) Metal powder for projection
KR20180095557A (en) Wasted gate parts including novel alloys
JP2022180207A (en) Die casting mold steel
JP2004076104A (en) High-toughness non-heat treated forged steel product and its production method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20130323

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20140122

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140207

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140224

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20140620

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140829

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140912

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20140918

A912 Re-examination (zenchi) completed and case transferred to appeal board

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A912

Effective date: 20141010

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20150520

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20150703

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5777201

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250