JP2007186764A - Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel - Google Patents
Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2007186764A JP2007186764A JP2006006651A JP2006006651A JP2007186764A JP 2007186764 A JP2007186764 A JP 2007186764A JP 2006006651 A JP2006006651 A JP 2006006651A JP 2006006651 A JP2006006651 A JP 2006006651A JP 2007186764 A JP2007186764 A JP 2007186764A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- less
- stainless steel
- phase
- cutting
- steel material
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 41
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 229910052761 rare earth metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 29
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 abstract description 27
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 abstract description 27
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 abstract description 11
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 abstract description 4
- 150000002910 rare earth metals Chemical class 0.000 abstract 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 17
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006911 nucleation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 3
- KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fluorane Chemical compound F KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052745 lead Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052758 niobium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010828 elution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001651 emery Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000765 intermetallic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000001050 lubricating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005461 lubrication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005554 pickling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006104 solid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000037303 wrinkles Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、優れた耐食性および被削性が要求される機械部品素材に適したフェライト系快削ステンレス鋼材に関する。 The present invention relates to a ferritic free-cutting stainless steel material suitable for a machine part material that requires excellent corrosion resistance and machinability.
精密機械工業の著しい発達や、耐食性が要求される家電製品・家具調度品等の需要増により、従来ステンレス鋼が使用されていなかった部分にもステンレス鋼が使用されるようになってきた。なかでも工作機械の自動化・省力化に伴い、切削加工を必要とする機器や部品等の生産性向上のため、被削性に優れたステンレス鋼材の要求が高まっている。 Due to the remarkable development of the precision machine industry and the increase in demand for home appliances and furniture furnishings that require corrosion resistance, stainless steel has come to be used even where stainless steel has not been used. In particular, with the automation and labor saving of machine tools, there is an increasing demand for stainless steel materials with excellent machinability in order to improve the productivity of equipment and parts that require cutting.
これまで、被削性向上元素としてS、Pb、Se、Bi、Ti、Zr等を含有させた快削ステンレス鋼が開発され使用されている。 Up to now, free-cutting stainless steel containing S, Pb, Se, Bi, Ti, Zr or the like as a machinability improving element has been developed and used.
被削性元素として有効なSは、添加量が多いと熱間加工性、延性および耐食性を著しく低下させ、機械的性質に異方性を生じさせる原因にもなる。このためSの添加量は最小限に抑えたい。Pb添加により被削性を向上させた快削ステンレス鋼は使用中に有害なPbの溶出を生じることがあり、また環境保護の観点からリサイクル利用しにくいことから、Pbを実質的に含有しない快削ステンレス鋼が求められている。その他、Seは鋼中への添加歩留りが悪く、また有害な元素であるため環境対策上で問題となる。BiはPbと同様に被削性向上に有効であるが、添加量が多くなると熱間加工性を著しく低下させる。 S, which is effective as a machinable element, causes a significant decrease in hot workability, ductility and corrosion resistance, and causes anisotropy in mechanical properties when added in a large amount. For this reason, the amount of S added is desired to be minimized. Free-cutting stainless steel with improved machinability by adding Pb may cause harmful Pb elution during use, and is difficult to recycle from the viewpoint of environmental protection. There is a need for machined stainless steel. In addition, Se has a poor yield in addition to steel, and is a harmful element, which causes problems for environmental measures. Bi is effective for improving the machinability like Pb, but the hot workability is remarkably lowered when the addition amount is increased.
本発明は、有害な被削性元素を含まず、かつ耐食性の良好な快削ステンレス鋼材を開発し提供しようというものである。 The present invention seeks to develop and provide a free-cutting stainless steel material that does not contain harmful machinable elements and has good corrosion resistance.
発明者らは詳細な検討の結果、Cu相と特定のTi系化合物相とがマトリクス中に共存したフェライト系ステンレス鋼において、快削性が顕著に向上することを見出した。
すなわち本発明では、質量%で、C:0.01〜0.5%、Si:1.0%以下、Mn:1.0%以下、S:0.005〜0.05%未満、Cr:10〜30%、Ni:0.6%以下、Cu:0.5〜4.0%、Ti:0.02〜1.0%であり、さらに必要に応じて、Nb:1.0%以下、Mo:3.0%以下、Zr:1.0%以下、Al:1.0%以下、V:1.0%以下、希土類元素(REM):0.05%以下の1種以上を含有し、残部実質的にFeの組成を有し、Cu相、およびSとCを構成元素に含むTi系化合物相がマトリクス中に分散した金属組織を有するフェライト系快削ステンレス鋼材が提供される。
As a result of detailed studies, the inventors have found that in a ferritic stainless steel in which a Cu phase and a specific Ti-based compound phase coexist in a matrix, free machinability is significantly improved.
That is, in the present invention, by mass%, C: 0.01 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0% or less, Mn: 1.0% or less, S: 0.005 to less than 0.05%, Cr: 10-30%, Ni: 0.6% or less, Cu: 0.5-4.0%, Ti: 0.02-1.0%, Nb: 1.0% or less as required , Mo: not more than 3.0%, Zr: not more than 1.0%, Al: not more than 1.0%, V: not more than 1.0%, rare earth element (REM): not less than 0.05% A ferritic free-cutting stainless steel material having a metal structure in which the balance is substantially Fe and has a Cu phase and a Ti-based compound phase containing S and C as constituent elements dispersed in a matrix is provided.
ここで、「残部実質的にFe」とは、本発明の効果を阻害しない元素の混入が許容されることを意味し、「残部がFeおよび不可避的不純物からなる」ものが含まれる。Cu相は金属Cuを主体とする析出相であり、いわゆるε−Cuがこれに含まれる。 Here, “the balance is substantially Fe” means that an element that does not impair the effects of the present invention is allowed, and includes “the balance is made of Fe and inevitable impurities”. The Cu phase is a precipitated phase mainly composed of metal Cu, and includes so-called ε-Cu.
前記Cu相は、鋼材の断面組織において、粒径0.01μm以上のものが面積率で0.2%以上を占める分布状態で分散していることが好ましい。また、前記Ti系化合物相は、鋼材の断面組織において、粒径0.1〜10μmのものが面積率で1%以上を占める分布状態で分散していることが好ましい。 The Cu phase is preferably dispersed in a distribution state in which the cross-sectional structure of the steel material has a particle size of 0.01 μm or more occupying 0.2% or more in area ratio. The Ti-based compound phase is preferably dispersed in a distribution state in which the grain size of 0.1 to 10 μm occupies 1% or more of the area ratio in the cross-sectional structure of the steel material.
このような金属組織をもつ鋼材は、熱間圧延後または冷間圧延後の鋼板を800超え〜1100℃の温度域に加熱する最終焼鈍に供することによって製造できる。ただし、その加熱温度が800超え〜900℃のときは当該温度域に保持する時間として少なくとも1hrを超える保持時間を確保する。 A steel material having such a metal structure can be produced by subjecting the steel sheet after hot rolling or cold rolling to final annealing in which the steel sheet is heated to a temperature range of 800 to 1100 ° C. However, when the heating temperature is over 800 to 900 ° C., a holding time exceeding at least 1 hr is secured as the time for holding in the temperature range.
本発明によれば、Cu相とTi系化合物相とをマトリクス中に分散させる手法によりフェライト系ステンレス鋼の被削性を向上させた。そのため従来被削性元素として多量に添加されていたSの添加量を大幅に低減することが可能になり、耐食性が顕著に改善された。また、人体に有害なPb、Se等の被削性元素を添加しておらず、Bi等の特殊元素の添加も必要ないので、環境問題やリサイクル性、さらには材料コストの面でも従来の快削ステンレス鋼に比べ有利である。本発明の快削ステンレス鋼材は耐食性が要求される切削加工部品の材料として好適であり、広範な分野での使用が期待される。 According to the present invention, the machinability of the ferritic stainless steel is improved by the technique of dispersing the Cu phase and the Ti-based compound phase in the matrix. Therefore, the amount of S that has been conventionally added in large amounts as a machinable element can be greatly reduced, and the corrosion resistance is remarkably improved. In addition, since no machinable elements such as Pb and Se harmful to the human body are added, no special elements such as Bi are required, so that environmental problems, recyclability, and material costs have been improved. It is advantageous compared to machined stainless steel. The free-cutting stainless steel material of the present invention is suitable as a material for machining parts that require corrosion resistance, and is expected to be used in a wide range of fields.
ステンレス鋼は一般的に被削性が悪く、広く普及している金属材料の中でも難削材の一つに数えられている。被削性が悪い原因として、熱伝導率が低いこと、加工硬化の程度が大きいこと、凝着しやすいこと等が挙げられる。 Stainless steel is generally poor in machinability and is counted as one of difficult-to-cut materials among widely used metal materials. Causes of poor machinability include low thermal conductivity, high degree of work hardening, and easy adhesion.
被削性を改善する手段として、比較的脆性な介在物あるいは析出物をマトリクス中に分散させることが有効である。しかし、従来から採用されているS系の介在物あるいは析出物による被削性向上手段は、ステンレス鋼の耐食性を低下させるという弊害を生じ、ステンレス鋼本来の高耐食性が十分に活かされないという問題を伴っていた。 As a means for improving machinability, it is effective to disperse relatively brittle inclusions or precipitates in the matrix. However, the machinability improving means using S-based inclusions or precipitates that have been conventionally used has the disadvantage of reducing the corrosion resistance of stainless steel, and the high corrosion resistance inherent in stainless steel cannot be fully utilized. It was accompanied.
そこで発明者らは種々の析出相について被削性の向上効果を検討した。その結果、ε−Cu等のCu相が被削性向上に利用できることを知見した。
Cu相はステンレス鋼の析出強化手段として従来からも利用されている(特許文献3)。しかし、強度向上に有効なCu相は非常に微細に分散した析出物であり、これによって被削性を大幅に向上させることは困難である。ところが、析出強化能にはやや劣る程度に成長したCu相、あるいは析出強化には十分寄与しない程度に粗大化したCu相が分散して存在すると、被削性の顕著な向上が可能になることがわかった。このようなCu相は、切削時において工具すくい面上での潤滑、熱伝導作用に基づく減摩により、切削抵抗を低減させるとともに工具寿命を延ばし、被削性が向上に大きく寄与するものと考えられる。
Therefore, the inventors examined the machinability improvement effect for various precipitated phases. As a result, it was found that a Cu phase such as ε-Cu can be used for improving machinability.
Cu phase has been conventionally used as a precipitation strengthening means for stainless steel (Patent Document 3). However, the Cu phase effective for improving the strength is a very finely dispersed precipitate, and it is difficult to greatly improve the machinability. However, if a Cu phase grown to a slightly inferior precipitation strengthening capacity or a Cu phase coarsened to a degree that does not sufficiently contribute to precipitation strengthening is dispersed, the machinability can be remarkably improved. I understood. Such Cu phase is considered to contribute to the improvement of machinability by reducing the cutting resistance and extending the tool life by the lubrication on the rake face of the tool at the time of cutting and the friction based on the heat conduction action. It is done.
ただし、単に上記のようなCu相を分散させるだけでは被削性を十分に向上させることはできない。Cu相は軟質であるため、切削時の亀裂の起点となりうる硬質な粒子がさらに必要である。研究の結果、そのような硬質な粒子として、SとCを構成元素に含むTi系化合物相を分散させることが極めて効果的であることがわかった。このTi系化合物相は、組成式Ti4S2C2で表される化合物を主体とするものと考えられる。Ti系化合物相は切削時に亀裂の起点となり、切削抵抗の低減および工具寿命の向上に寄与する。 However, the machinability cannot be sufficiently improved by simply dispersing the Cu phase as described above. Since the Cu phase is soft, hard particles that can be the starting point of cracks during cutting are further required. As a result of research, it has been found that it is extremely effective to disperse a Ti-based compound phase containing S and C as constituent elements as such hard particles. This Ti-based compound phase is considered to be mainly composed of a compound represented by the composition formula Ti 4 S 2 C 2 . The Ti-based compound phase becomes a starting point of cracks during cutting, and contributes to reduction of cutting resistance and improvement of tool life.
このように、本発明の快削ステンレス鋼材は、軟質なCu相と硬質なTi系化合物相とを複合析出させた組織を有するものである。切削時においてSとCを構成元素に含む硬質なTi系化合物相が亀裂起点となり、その亀裂が軟質なCu相に伝播するとともにCu相の潤滑作用が発揮され、切削抵抗が低減するとともに工具寿命が延び、結果的に被削性の顕著な向上がもたらされるものと考えられる。 Thus, the free-cutting stainless steel material of the present invention has a structure in which a soft Cu phase and a hard Ti-based compound phase are combined and precipitated. During cutting, a hard Ti-based compound phase containing S and C as constituent elements serves as a crack starting point, the crack propagates to the soft Cu phase, and the lubricating action of the Cu phase is exhibited, cutting resistance is reduced and tool life is reduced. It is thought that this results in a significant improvement in machinability as a result.
被削性を向上させる上でCu相は比較的粗大なものがマトリクス中に分散している必要がある。種々検討の結果、Cu相は、鋼材の断面組織において、粒径0.01μm以上のものが面積率で0.2%以上を占めるような分布状態で分散していることが望ましい。しかし、あまり粗大なCu相が多量に存在するとCu相同士の距離が大きくなりすぎて亀裂のスムーズな伝播が起こりにくくなるとともに、鋼材の脆化にも繋がるので、Cu相の粒径は1μm以下であることが好ましい。 In order to improve machinability, a relatively coarse Cu phase needs to be dispersed in the matrix. As a result of various studies, it is desirable that the Cu phase is dispersed in a distribution state in which the grain size of 0.01 μm or more occupies 0.2% or more of the area ratio in the cross-sectional structure of the steel. However, if there is a large amount of a very coarse Cu phase, the distance between the Cu phases becomes too large and smooth propagation of cracks is difficult to occur, and the steel material becomes brittle. It is preferable that
Ti系化合物相については、鋼材の断面組織において、粒径0.1〜10μmのものが面積率で1%以上を占めるように分散していることが望ましい。 Regarding the Ti-based compound phase, it is desirable that the cross-sectional structure of the steel material is dispersed so that the particle size of 0.1 to 10 μm occupies 1% or more in terms of the area ratio.
これらの析出相の粒径は、鋼材の断面組織中に観察される個々の粒子の最も長い部分の直径によって表される。析出相の粒径や面積率は、鋼材の断面を研磨した試料を観察することにより求められるが、透過型電子顕微鏡を用いて例えば加速電圧200kVで観察することにより測定することもできる。なお、Cu相およびTi系化合物相の存在量(面積率)の上限については後述する化学組成により必然的に制約されるので特に規定する必要はない。 The particle size of these precipitated phases is represented by the diameter of the longest part of the individual particles observed in the cross-sectional structure of the steel material. The particle size and area ratio of the precipitated phase can be determined by observing a sample obtained by polishing a cross section of a steel material, but can also be measured by observing at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV using a transmission electron microscope, for example. Note that the upper limit of the abundance (area ratio) of the Cu phase and the Ti-based compound phase is inevitably restricted by the chemical composition described later, and thus need not be specified.
Cu相およびTi系化合物相を生成させるための熱処理としては、比較的粗大なCu相が十分に生成する条件に設定することが必要である。すなわち、鋼材を800℃を超え1100℃以下の温度域に加熱保持する熱処理が採用できるが、加熱温度が800℃超え〜900℃である場合は当該温度域に鋼材を1hrを超えて保持することが望ましい。加熱後の冷却は、例えば800〜300℃の間の平均冷却速度が5℃/min以下であるように徐冷することが被削性の向上に有効な脆性的なCu相を十分に生成させるうえで有利である。Cu相の析出は、炭窒化物や析出物を形成しやすいNb、Ti、Mo、Zr等の元素を添加することによっても促進される。
Ti系化合物相については、Cu相の適正な析出を優先的に考慮した上記の熱処理条件を採用することによって適正に析出させることができる。
As the heat treatment for generating the Cu phase and the Ti-based compound phase, it is necessary to set the conditions such that a relatively coarse Cu phase is sufficiently generated. That is, a heat treatment can be employed in which the steel material is heated and held in a temperature range of more than 800 ° C. and not more than 1100 ° C. When the heating temperature is over 800 ° C. to 900 ° C., the steel material is held in the temperature range for more than 1 hr. Is desirable. Cooling after heating sufficiently generates a brittle Cu phase that is effective for improving machinability, for example, by slowly cooling so that the average cooling rate between 800 and 300 ° C. is 5 ° C./min or less. This is advantageous. Precipitation of the Cu phase is also promoted by adding elements such as Nb, Ti, Mo, Zr, etc., which easily form carbonitrides and precipitates.
The Ti-based compound phase can be properly precipitated by adopting the above heat treatment conditions in consideration of proper precipitation of the Cu phase.
本発明のフェライト系快削ステンレス鋼材は一般的なステンレス鋼板の製造プロセスに従って製造できる。例えば、後述する組成の鋼を溶製し、目標板厚に応じて「熱間圧延→最終焼鈍」の工程、あるいは「熱間圧延→(焼鈍)→冷間圧延→最終焼鈍」の工程により製造できる。その際、最終焼鈍において上記の熱処理を実施する。なお、熱間圧延後あるいは焼鈍後には必要に応じて酸洗が施される。目標板厚は1.5〜5mmの範囲で設定すれば、鋼板を素材にした種々の切削部品用途に幅広く適用できる。 The ferritic free-cutting stainless steel material of the present invention can be manufactured in accordance with a general stainless steel sheet manufacturing process. For example, a steel having the composition described later is melted and manufactured by the process of “hot rolling → final annealing” or “hot rolling → (annealing) → cold rolling → final annealing” according to the target plate thickness. it can. At that time, the above heat treatment is performed in the final annealing. In addition, after hot rolling or after annealing, pickling is performed as necessary. If the target plate thickness is set in the range of 1.5 to 5 mm, it can be widely applied to various cutting parts using a steel plate as a raw material.
以下、成分元素について説明する。
Cは、被削性を向上させるTi系化合物相を構成する重要な元素であり、被削性向上効果を発現させるためには0.01質量%のC含有が必要であるが、0.01質量%を超えて含有させることが効果的であり、特に0.02質量%以上を含有させることが好ましい。0.03質量%を超えるC含有量を確保することが一層好ましい。しかし、過剰なC含有は製造性や耐食性を低下させる要因になるので、C含有量の上限は0.5質量%に制限され、0.15質量%以下の範囲で添加することが一層好ましい。
Hereinafter, the component elements will be described.
C is an important element constituting a Ti-based compound phase that improves machinability. In order to exhibit the machinability improving effect, 0.01% by mass of C is necessary. It is effective to contain more than mass%, and it is particularly preferable to contain 0.02 mass% or more. It is more preferable to ensure a C content exceeding 0.03 mass%. However, since excessive C content causes a decrease in manufacturability and corrosion resistance, the upper limit of the C content is limited to 0.5% by mass, and it is more preferable to add in the range of 0.15% by mass or less.
Siは、耐食性の改善に有効な元素であり、鋼の脱酸剤として添加することができる。しかし、Si含有量が過大となると固溶強化により鋼が硬質化し、製造性や加工性の低下を招く。また、熱間加工性を低下させる要因にもなる。したがってSi含有量は1.0質量%以下に制限される。 Si is an element effective for improving corrosion resistance, and can be added as a deoxidizer for steel. However, if the Si content is excessive, the steel becomes hard due to solid solution strengthening, which leads to a decrease in manufacturability and workability. Moreover, it becomes a factor which reduces hot workability. Accordingly, the Si content is limited to 1.0% by mass or less.
Mnは、製造性を改善すると共に、鋼中のSをMnSとして固定する作用を有する。MnSは被削性の向上には有効であるが、耐食性を劣化させる要因になるので、本発明ではMnSの生成を抑制する方が好ましい。このため、Mn含有量は1.0質量%以下に制限される。 Mn improves the manufacturability and has the effect of fixing S in steel as MnS. Although MnS is effective in improving machinability, it is a factor that degrades corrosion resistance. Therefore, in the present invention, it is preferable to suppress the formation of MnS. For this reason, Mn content is restrict | limited to 1.0 mass% or less.
Sは、Cと共にTi系化合物相を構成する重要な元素であり、その被削性向上効果を得るためには0.005質量%以上のS含有が必要である。しかし、過剰なS含有はステンレス鋼本来の耐食性を劣化させるので、本発明ではS含有量を0.05質量%未満に制限する。 S is an important element that forms a Ti-based compound phase together with C, and 0.005% by mass or more of S is necessary to obtain the effect of improving machinability. However, since excessive S content deteriorates the inherent corrosion resistance of stainless steel, the S content is limited to less than 0.05% by mass in the present invention.
Crは、耐食性を維持するための必須元素であり、少なくとも10質量%の含有量が必要である。しかし、過剰なCr含有は熱間加工性の低下および靱性の低下を招くので、30質量%以下の含有量とする。 Cr is an essential element for maintaining corrosion resistance, and a content of at least 10% by mass is necessary. However, excessive Cr content causes a decrease in hot workability and a decrease in toughness, so the content is 30% by mass or less.
Niは、耐食性の向上に有効であるが、オーステナイト形成元素であるため過剰な含有は好ましくない。本発明ではNi含有量を0.6質量%以下に制限する。 Ni is effective for improving the corrosion resistance, but is excessively undesirable because it is an austenite-forming element. In the present invention, the Ni content is limited to 0.6% by mass or less.
Cuは、本発明において耐食性と被削性を向上させるために重要な元素である。上述のようにCu相による被削性向上効果を得るためには0.5質量%以上のCu含有が必要である。0.7質量%以上のCu含有量を確保することがより好ましく、1.0質量%以上とすることが一層好ましい。ただし、過剰なCu含有は熱間加工性を劣化させ、製造性や加工性等に悪影響を及ぼすので、Cu含有量の上限は4.0質量%に制限される。特に良好な加工性が要求される場合は3.0質量%以下の範囲でCuを含有させることが好ましい。 Cu is an important element for improving corrosion resistance and machinability in the present invention. As described above, in order to obtain the effect of improving the machinability by the Cu phase, it is necessary to contain 0.5% by mass or more of Cu. It is more preferable to ensure a Cu content of 0.7% by mass or more, and it is more preferable to set the Cu content to 1.0% by mass or more. However, excessive Cu content deteriorates hot workability and adversely affects manufacturability, workability, and the like, so the upper limit of Cu content is limited to 4.0 mass%. When particularly good workability is required, it is preferable to contain Cu in the range of 3.0% by mass or less.
Tiは、脱酸、脱窒剤であるとともに、本発明では上述のように切削時の亀裂基点となるTi系化合物相を生成させるために重要な元素である。Ti系化合物相による被削性向上効果を得るには少なくとも0.02質量%のTi含有が必要であるが、0.05質量%以上のTi含有量を確保することがより効果的であり、0.1質量%以上のTi含有量とすることが一層好ましい。しかし、過剰なTi含有は製造性や加工性を劣化させ、また製品表面に疵を発生させやすくする原因となるので、Ti含有量は1.0質量%以下の範囲に制限される。通常、0.5質量%以下のTi含有量範囲で良好な被削性改善効果が得られる。 Ti is a deoxidizing and denitrifying agent and, in the present invention, is an important element for generating a Ti-based compound phase that becomes a crack base point during cutting as described above. In order to obtain the machinability improving effect by the Ti-based compound phase, at least 0.02% by mass of Ti is necessary, but it is more effective to secure a Ti content of 0.05% by mass or more, More preferably, the Ti content is 0.1% by mass or more. However, excessive Ti content deteriorates manufacturability and workability, and easily causes wrinkles on the product surface, so the Ti content is limited to a range of 1.0% by mass or less. Usually, a good machinability improving effect is obtained in a Ti content range of 0.5 mass% or less.
Nbは、Cu相の均一分散に寄与する。すなわちCu相はNb系析出物の周囲に析出する傾向が強いので、Cu相を均一に分散させるには、Nbを添加して高温でNb系析出物を微細に析出させた組織を得ておくことが有利である。その際、Nb含有量を0.01質量%以上確保するとより効果的である。しかし、過剰のNb添加は製造性や加工性に悪影響を及ぼすので、Nbを添加する場合は1.0質量%以下の範囲で行う。 Nb contributes to uniform dispersion of the Cu phase. That is, since the Cu phase has a strong tendency to precipitate around the Nb-based precipitate, to uniformly disperse the Cu phase, a structure in which Nb is added and the Nb-based precipitate is finely precipitated at a high temperature is obtained. It is advantageous. At that time, it is more effective to secure Nb content of 0.01 mass% or more. However, excessive addition of Nb adversely affects manufacturability and workability. Therefore, when Nb is added, the addition is performed in the range of 1.0% by mass or less.
Moは、耐食性を向上させるとともに、Cu相の核生成サイトとして有効なFe2Mo等の金属間化合物として析出する。これらの効果を十分に発揮させるためには0.5質量%以上のMoを含有量させることが好ましい。ただし、過剰のMo含有は製造性や加工性に悪影響を及ぼすので、Moを添加する場合は3.0質量%以下の範囲で行う。 Mo improves corrosion resistance and precipitates as an intermetallic compound such as Fe 2 Mo effective as a nucleation site for the Cu phase. In order to fully exhibit these effects, it is preferable to contain 0.5 mass% or more of Mo. However, excessive Mo content adversely affects manufacturability and workability, so when adding Mo, it is performed in the range of 3.0% by mass or less.
Zrは、Cu相の核生成サイトとして有効な炭窒化物となって析出する。その効果を十分に得るためには0.1質量%以上のZr含有量を確保することが望ましい。ただし、過剰のZr含有は製造性や加工性に悪影響を及ぼすので、Zrを添加する場合は1.0質量%以下の範囲で行う。 Zr precipitates as carbonitrides effective as Cu phase nucleation sites. In order to sufficiently obtain the effect, it is desirable to ensure a Zr content of 0.1% by mass or more. However, excessive Zr content adversely affects manufacturability and workability, so when Zr is added, it is performed in the range of 1.0% by mass or less.
Alは、Moと同様、耐食性を改善するとともに、Cu相の核生成サイトとして有効な化合物として析出する。その効果を十分に得るためには0.01質量%以上のAl含有量を確保することが望ましい。ただし、過剰のAl含有は製造性や加工性に悪影響を及ぼすので、Alを添加する場合は1.0質量%以下の範囲で行う。 Al, like Mo, improves corrosion resistance and precipitates as an effective compound as a nucleation site for the Cu phase. In order to sufficiently obtain the effect, it is desirable to secure an Al content of 0.01% by mass or more. However, excessive Al content adversely affects manufacturability and workability. Therefore, when Al is added, it is performed in the range of 1.0% by mass or less.
Vは、Zrと同様にCu相の核生成サイトとして有効な炭窒化物となって析出する。その効果を十分に得るためには0.1質量%以上のV含有量を確保することが望ましい。ただし、過剰のV含有は製造性や加工性に悪影響を及ぼすので、Vを添加する場合は1.0質量%以下の範囲で行う。 V precipitates as a carbonitride that is effective as a nucleation site for the Cu phase in the same manner as Zr. In order to sufficiently obtain the effect, it is desirable to ensure a V content of 0.1% by mass or more. However, excessive V content adversely affects manufacturability and workability, so when V is added, it is performed in the range of 1.0% by mass or less.
希土類元素(REM)は、熱間加工性を改善する作用があり、0.001質量%以上含有させることが効果的である。また、Cu相の析出に有効な析出物となってマトリクス中に分散する。しかし、過剰のREM添加は逆に熱間加工性を低下させる原因になるので、REMを添加する場合は0.05質量%以下の範囲で行う。 Rare earth elements (REM) have the effect of improving hot workability, and it is effective to contain 0.001% by mass or more. Moreover, it becomes a precipitate effective for precipitation of the Cu phase and is dispersed in the matrix. However, excessive addition of REM, on the other hand, causes a decrease in hot workability. Therefore, when REM is added, the addition is performed in the range of 0.05% by mass or less.
その他、Bは、Nを固定し耐食性や加工性を改善する元素であり、その作用は0.0005質量%以上のB含有によって顕在化する。しかし、過剰のB含有は熱間加工性に悪影響を及ぼす。したがってBの添加は0.01質量%以下の範囲で許容される。Pは少ない方がよく、0.1質量%以下に規制することが望ましい。Ca、Mg、Co等も原料から混入することがあるが、過剰に含まれない限り耐食性や被削性には特に悪影響を及ぼさない。これらの元素は本発明の効果を阻害しない範囲(例えば0.1質量%以下)で含有が許容される。 In addition, B is an element that fixes N and improves the corrosion resistance and workability, and its action is manifested by containing 0.0005% by mass or more of B. However, excessive B content adversely affects hot workability. Therefore, the addition of B is allowed in the range of 0.01% by mass or less. It is better that the P content is small, and it is desirable to regulate it to 0.1 mass% or less. Ca, Mg, Co and the like may also be mixed from the raw materials, but unless they are excessively contained, they do not particularly adversely affect the corrosion resistance and machinability. These elements are allowed to be contained within a range not inhibiting the effects of the present invention (for example, 0.1% by mass or less).
表1に示す組成のフェライト系鋼を30kg真空溶解炉で溶製し、得られたインゴットを1200〜900℃温度範囲で板厚3mmまで熱間圧延した。その後、熱延板を800超え〜1100℃の温度範囲に加熱したのち炉冷する条件で最終焼鈍を行った。その際、800℃超え〜900℃の加熱温度を採用した試料では、当該温度域での加熱保持時間として1hrを超える時間を確保した。また、最終焼鈍での冷却速度は800〜300℃の平均冷却速度が約0.5℃/minとなるようにコントロールした。最終焼鈍後の鋼板の両面を研削して、板厚2.5mmの供試鋼板を得た。 Ferritic steel having the composition shown in Table 1 was melted in a 30 kg vacuum melting furnace, and the obtained ingot was hot rolled to a plate thickness of 3 mm in a temperature range of 1200 to 900 ° C. Thereafter, the hot-rolled sheet was heated to a temperature range exceeding 800 to 1100 ° C., and then subjected to final annealing under the condition of furnace cooling. In that case, in the sample which employ | adopted the heating temperature exceeding 800 degreeC-900 degreeC, time exceeding 1 hr was ensured as the heating holding time in the said temperature range. Further, the cooling rate in the final annealing was controlled so that the average cooling rate of 800 to 300 ° C. was about 0.5 ° C./min. Both surfaces of the steel plate after the final annealing were ground to obtain a test steel plate having a thickness of 2.5 mm.
〔組織観察〕
各供試鋼板から切り出した試験片について、圧延方向に垂直な断面(C断面)を研磨し、フッ硝酸によりエッチングしたのち、この面を走査型電子顕微鏡(SEM)で観察し、Cu相とTi系化合物相のサイズおよび面積率を調べた。Cu相とTi系化合物相の同定はSEMに付属のEDS装置によって行った。
その結果、本発明例の鋼はいずれも、Cu相については粒径0.01μm以上のものが面積率で0.2%以上を占める分布状態であり、かつTi系化合物相については粒径0.1〜10μmのものが面積率で1%以上を占める分布状態であることが確認された。また、当該Ti系化合物相中にはSおよびCの存在が確認され、定量分析結果からTi系化合物相は組成式Ti4S2C2で表される化合物を主体とするものであると考えられた。
[Tissue observation]
About the test piece cut out from each test steel plate, the cross section perpendicular to the rolling direction (C cross section) was polished and etched with hydrofluoric acid, and then this surface was observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the Cu phase and Ti The size and area ratio of the system compound phase were examined. The identification of the Cu phase and the Ti-based compound phase was performed by an EDS apparatus attached to the SEM.
As a result, all the steels of the examples of the present invention have a distribution state in which the Cu phase has a particle size of 0.01 μm or more and occupies 0.2% or more in area ratio, and the Ti-based compound phase has a particle size of 0 It was confirmed that the distribution of 0.1 to 10 μm occupied 1% or more in area ratio. In addition, the presence of S and C is confirmed in the Ti-based compound phase, and it is considered from the quantitative analysis results that the Ti-based compound phase is mainly composed of a compound represented by the composition formula Ti 4 S 2 C 2. It was.
〔被削性試験〕
各供試鋼板について以下のようにして被削性を調べた。
供試鋼板から切削試験片を切り出し、横型フライス盤を用いて切削試験に供した。切削条件は以下のとおりである。
乾式、切削工具:3.5mmφハイスエンドミル、周速:10〜30m/min、送り速度:10〜50mm/min、切込み深さ:0.5mm
[Machinability test]
Each test steel sheet was examined for machinability as follows.
A cutting specimen was cut from the test steel sheet and subjected to a cutting test using a horizontal milling machine. Cutting conditions are as follows.
Dry type, cutting tool: 3.5 mmφ high speed end mill, peripheral speed: 10-30 m / min, feed rate: 10-50 mm / min, cutting depth: 0.5 mm
試験片はロードセルに固定し、上記条件で切削を行ったときに試験片に発生する主分力を測定した。その測定値を切削抵抗とした。切削抵抗が10N以下のものを◎(極めて良好)、10N超え〜15Nのものを○(良好)、15Nを超えるものを×(不良)と評価し、○評価以上のものを合格と判定した。
また、切削後の試験片の表面(切削面)について仕上面粗さを測定した。仕上面粗さは触針式表面粗さ計を用いてJIS B0601に規定される算術平均粗さRaを切削方向に対して直角方向に測定することにより求めた。Raが0.5μm以下のものを◎(極めて良好)、0.5超え〜1.0μmのものを○(良好)、1.0μmを超えるものを×(不良)と評価し、○評価以上のものを合格と判定した。
さらに、切削試験で生じた切粉の形状を目視観察し、形状が丸まって破砕性が良好なものを○、破断形状が悪く破砕性に劣るものを×と評価し、○評価のものを合格と判定した。
結果を表2に示してある。
The test piece was fixed to a load cell, and the main component force generated in the test piece when cutting was performed under the above conditions was measured. The measured value was defined as cutting resistance. A cutting resistance of 10N or less was evaluated as ◎ (very good), a value exceeding 10N to 15N was evaluated as ◯ (good), a value exceeding 15N was evaluated as × (defective), and a value exceeding ◯ evaluation was determined to be acceptable.
Further, the finished surface roughness of the surface (cut surface) of the test piece after cutting was measured. The finished surface roughness was determined by measuring the arithmetic average roughness Ra defined in JIS B0601 in a direction perpendicular to the cutting direction using a stylus type surface roughness meter. When Ra is 0.5 μm or less, ◎ (very good), 0.5 to 1.0 μm is evaluated as ◯ (good), and more than 1.0 μm is evaluated as × (defect). The thing was determined to be acceptable.
Furthermore, visually observe the shape of the chips produced in the cutting test, evaluate that the shape is round and has good crushability, and that the fracture shape is poor and inferior in crushability is evaluated as x It was determined.
The results are shown in Table 2.
〔耐食性試験〕
JIS Z2371に準拠した塩水噴霧試験を行った。
供試鋼板から切り出した腐食試験片(50×100mm)の表面をエメリー紙により#600まで研磨し、脱脂洗浄したの後、35℃の5質量%塩化ナトリウム水溶液噴霧環境に72時間暴露させた。試験後の試験片表面を目視観察し、発生が全く認められなかったものを○(良好)、発生が認められたものを×(不良)と評価し、○評価のものを合格と判定した。
結果を表2に示してある。
[Corrosion resistance test]
A salt spray test based on JIS Z2371 was performed.
The surface of the corrosion test piece (50 × 100 mm) cut out from the test steel plate was polished to # 600 with emery paper, degreased and washed, and then exposed to a 5 mass% sodium chloride aqueous solution spraying environment at 35 ° C. for 72 hours. The surface of the test piece after the test was visually observed. The case where no occurrence was observed was evaluated as ◯ (good), the case where the generation was observed was evaluated as x (defect), and the case where the evaluation was evaluated was determined as pass.
The results are shown in Table 2.
表2からわかるように、本発明例のフェライト系ステンレス鋼材はいずれも優れた被削性を有しており、また耐食性も良好であった。
これに対し、比較例であるNo.21はS含有量が高すぎたため耐食性に劣り、Cu含有量が不足したため本発明例のものより切削抵抗が高かった。No.22はS含有量が高すぎたため耐食性に劣り、Ti含有量が不足したため本発明例のものより切削抵抗が高かった。No.23はS含有量が高すぎたため耐食性に劣り、Cu、Tiともに含有量が不足したためCu相およびTi系化合物相による被削性向上作用が得られず、被削性が悪かった。No.24はS含有量とTi含有量が低すぎたためTi系化合物相による被削性向上作用が発揮されず、被削性に劣った。No.25はS含有量が低すぎたためTi系化合物相による被削性向上作用が発揮されず、被削性に劣り、またCr含有量が不足したため耐食性も悪かった。
As can be seen from Table 2, all of the ferritic stainless steel materials of the examples of the present invention have excellent machinability and good corrosion resistance.
On the other hand, No. 21, which is a comparative example, was inferior in corrosion resistance because the S content was too high, and the cutting resistance was higher than that of the present invention example because the Cu content was insufficient. No. 22 was inferior in corrosion resistance because the S content was too high, and the cutting resistance was higher than that of the present invention example because the Ti content was insufficient. No. 23 was inferior in corrosion resistance because the S content was too high, and since the Cu and Ti contents were insufficient, the machinability improving effect by the Cu phase and the Ti-based compound phase could not be obtained, and the machinability was poor. In No. 24, since the S content and the Ti content were too low, the effect of improving the machinability by the Ti compound phase was not exhibited and the machinability was inferior. In No. 25, since the S content was too low, the effect of improving the machinability by the Ti-based compound phase was not exhibited, the machinability was inferior, and the Cr content was insufficient, and the corrosion resistance was also poor.
Claims (5)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006006651A JP2007186764A (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2006-01-13 | Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006006651A JP2007186764A (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2006-01-13 | Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2007186764A true JP2007186764A (en) | 2007-07-26 |
Family
ID=38342128
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006006651A Pending JP2007186764A (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2006-01-13 | Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2007186764A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2012162760A (en) * | 2011-02-04 | 2012-08-30 | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Stainless Steel Corp | Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel and method for producing the same |
| CN103255347A (en) * | 2013-04-18 | 2013-08-21 | 沈阳维越利电力设备有限公司 | Wear-resistant alloy and application thereof in millstone tile |
| RU2650353C1 (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-04-11 | Юлия Алексеевна Щепочкина | Steel |
| JP2020509217A (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2020-03-26 | ポスコPosco | Ferritic stainless steel excellent in strength and acid resistance and method for producing the same |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002285288A (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2002-10-03 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Ferritic stainless steel for structural members |
| WO2002092869A1 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2002-11-21 | Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | Ferritic stainless steal and martensitic stainless steel both being excellent in machinability |
-
2006
- 2006-01-13 JP JP2006006651A patent/JP2007186764A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002285288A (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2002-10-03 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Ferritic stainless steel for structural members |
| WO2002092869A1 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2002-11-21 | Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | Ferritic stainless steal and martensitic stainless steel both being excellent in machinability |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2012162760A (en) * | 2011-02-04 | 2012-08-30 | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Stainless Steel Corp | Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel and method for producing the same |
| CN103255347A (en) * | 2013-04-18 | 2013-08-21 | 沈阳维越利电力设备有限公司 | Wear-resistant alloy and application thereof in millstone tile |
| JP2020509217A (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2020-03-26 | ポスコPosco | Ferritic stainless steel excellent in strength and acid resistance and method for producing the same |
| RU2650353C1 (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-04-11 | Юлия Алексеевна Щепочкина | Steel |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3918787B2 (en) | Low carbon free cutting steel | |
| EP2138597B1 (en) | Hot-worked steel material having excellent machinability and impact value | |
| JP6379282B2 (en) | Ferritic / austenitic stainless steel sheet with excellent corrosion resistance on the shear end face | |
| EP3026138B1 (en) | High-strength steel material for oil well use, and oil well pipe | |
| JP7188466B2 (en) | Bolts and steel materials for bolts | |
| JP6489254B2 (en) | Material for stainless cold-rolled steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
| KR20100087225A (en) | High-purity ferritic stainless steel excellent in corrosion resistance and workability and process for production of the same | |
| WO1998023784A1 (en) | Steel having excellent machinability and machined component | |
| EP0260022B1 (en) | Stainless steel having good corrosion resistance and good resistance to corrosion in seawater and method for producing the same | |
| KR102560819B1 (en) | High-strength hot-rolled steel with excellent scale adhesion and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP5307729B2 (en) | Lead free free cutting steel | |
| JP2011105973A (en) | Duplex stainless steel having excellent alkali resistance | |
| JP7560714B2 (en) | Steel bars for machine structures | |
| JP2011256440A (en) | Ferritic stainless steel sheet excellent in ridging-resistant characteristic and method for producing the same | |
| JP2007186764A (en) | Free-cutting ferritic stainless steel | |
| JP7464832B2 (en) | Bolts and bolt steel | |
| US10106873B2 (en) | Hot-rolled steel sheet and manufacturing method for same | |
| JP5073966B2 (en) | Age-hardening ferritic stainless steel sheet and age-treated steel using the same | |
| JP7164032B2 (en) | Bolts and steel materials for bolts | |
| JP7469612B2 (en) | Steel bar for machine structure and cutting method thereof | |
| JP2000129393A (en) | Martensitic bainite type non-heat treated steel excellent in machinability and method for producing the same | |
| WO2018198835A1 (en) | Material for cold-rolled stainless steel sheet, and production method therefor | |
| JP3489376B2 (en) | High-strength, high-toughness free-cut non-heat treated steel | |
| KR20180096782A (en) | High tensile strength steel sheet excellent in low temperature toughness | |
| JP4900251B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of nitrided parts |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Effective date: 20081205 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20101222 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Effective date: 20120221 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 |
|
| A02 | Decision of refusal |
Effective date: 20120619 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 |