[go: up one dir, main page]

EP4200085B1 - Plaque de tamis de dispositif de séparation pour classer des matériaux en vrac - Google Patents

Plaque de tamis de dispositif de séparation pour classer des matériaux en vrac Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP4200085B1
EP4200085B1 EP20761555.0A EP20761555A EP4200085B1 EP 4200085 B1 EP4200085 B1 EP 4200085B1 EP 20761555 A EP20761555 A EP 20761555A EP 4200085 B1 EP4200085 B1 EP 4200085B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
circle
profile
screen plate
separating
sieve plate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20761555.0A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP4200085A1 (fr
Inventor
Thomas Aigner
Franz Bergmann
Andreas Schneider
Jonas KILLERMANN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wacker Chemie AG
Original Assignee
Wacker Chemie AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wacker Chemie AG filed Critical Wacker Chemie AG
Publication of EP4200085A1 publication Critical patent/EP4200085A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP4200085B1 publication Critical patent/EP4200085B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B1/00—Sieving, screening, sifting, or sorting solid materials using networks, gratings, grids, or the like
    • B07B1/46—Constructional details of screens in general; Cleaning or heating of screens
    • B07B1/4609—Constructional details of screens in general; Cleaning or heating of screens constructional details of screening surfaces or meshes
    • B07B1/4654—Corrugated Screening surfaces
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
    • B07B13/04—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices according to size
    • B07B13/07—Apparatus in which aggregates or articles are moved along or past openings which increase in size in the direction of movement
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B1/00—Sieving, screening, sifting, or sorting solid materials using networks, gratings, grids, or the like
    • B07B1/12—Apparatus having only parallel elements
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
    • B07B13/04—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices according to size

Definitions

  • the subject of the invention is a sieve plate for a separating device for mechanically classifying bulk material, in particular polycrystalline silicon fragments.
  • Polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon) is commonly produced using the Siemens process - a chemical vapor deposition process.
  • Thin filament rods (thin rods) made of silicon are heated in a bell-shaped reactor (Siemens reactor) by direct current passage, and a reaction gas containing a silicon-containing component (e.g. monosilane or halosilane) and hydrogen is introduced.
  • the surface temperature of the filament rods is usually more than 1000°C. At these temperatures, the silicon-containing component of the reaction gas decomposes, and elemental silicon separates from the gas phase as polysilicon on the rod surface, increasing the rod diameter. After a predetermined diameter is reached, the deposition is stopped and the silicon rods obtained are removed.
  • Polysilicon is the starting material in the production of single-crystalline silicon, which is produced, for example, using the Czochralski process (crucible drawing). Furthermore, polysilicon is required for the production of multicrystalline silicon, for example using ingot casting processes. For both processes, the polysilicon rods must be crushed into fragments. These are usually classified according to size in separators. The separating devices are usually screening machines that mechanically sort or classify the polysilicon fragments into different size classes.
  • Polysilicon can also be produced in the form of granules in a fluidized bed reactor. This is done by fluidizing silicon seed particles using a gas flow in a fluidized bed, which is heated using a heating device. By adding a silicon-containing reaction gas, a deposition reaction occurs on the hot particle surface, whereby elemental silicon is deposited on the seed particles with an increase in diameter.
  • the polysilicon granulate is also usually divided into two or more fractions using a screening system (classification).
  • the smallest fraction (undersized sieve) can then be processed into germ particles in a grinding plant and fed to the reactor.
  • the target fraction product grain is usually packaged and transported to the customer.
  • Sieving machines are generally used to separate solids according to grain sizes. Depending on the movement characteristics, a distinction can be made between vibrating screen machines and vibrating screen machines.
  • the screening machines are usually driven electromagnetically or by unbalanced motors or gears.
  • the movement of the sieve lining serves to further transport the feed material in the longitudinal direction of the sieve and to allow the sieve undersize to pass through the sieve openings.
  • vibrating screen machines have both horizontal and vertical screen acceleration.
  • Multi-deck screening machines can fractionate several grain sizes at the same time.
  • the drive principle in multi-deck flat screen machines is based on two counter-rotating unbalance motors that generate a linear vibration, with the broken material moving in a straight line over a horizontal separating surface.
  • a large number of screen decks can be put together to form a screen stack. This means that different Grain sizes can be produced in a single machine without the need to change screen decks.
  • WO 2016/202473 A1 describes a profiled sieve plate with a V-profile, which has enlarging openings on one removal side.
  • the tapered depressions and elevations can cause jamming of product grain (jammed bulk material can also be referred to as stuck grain) in the product flow and in the opening area.
  • stuck grain jamming of product grain
  • This can lead to a deterioration in the classifying quality, as the undersize fraction to be separated passes through the plug grain into the target grain. To prevent this, the plug grain must also be removed regularly, which results in longer service life.
  • WO 2018/108334 A1 represents an improvement in WO 2016/202473 A1 described sieve plate.
  • the openings on the removal side had an additional widening.
  • the sieve plate has rather poor separation of coarse grain/target grain and fine grain (selectivity). Due to the sieve geometry, large particles can push the undersize ahead of them and prevent the undersize from being separated.
  • EP1079939 A1 discloses a sieve plate for a separating device according to the preamble of claims 1 and 5.
  • this rounded profile enables the undersize fraction (fines to be separated) to separate even better from the product grain.
  • the profiled area causes larger amounts of undersized particles to collect in the rounded depressions. Larger fragments are transported away on the sieve plate above the undersize fraction in the depressions, usually without coming into contact with the undersize fraction. This leads to a high separation quality.
  • the profile prevents larger fragments from getting stuck in the recesses due to jamming.
  • the widened opening edge on the one hand, prevents large fragments from jamming, and on the other hand, it ensures unhindered separation of the undersize fraction if a larger fragment gets jammed.
  • the sieve plate according to the invention is a further development of the one in WO 2018/108334 A1 described sieve plate.
  • the circles K1 and K2 may touch at a point T0, or they may be connected to each other by a common tangent, the tangent touching the circle K1 at a point T1 and the circle K2 at a point T2. Accordingly, the tangent describes the profile with the circular arcs if necessary.
  • the circles K1 and K2 are preferably arranged next to one another with the proviso that the depressions of the profile always widen upwards (cf. Fig. 2B ).
  • the circular arc of the circle K1 describing the elevations of the profile extends from the apex of the elevation to point T0 or T1.
  • the circular arc of the circle K2 describing the depressions of the profile extends from the apex of the depression to the point T0 or T2.
  • the two circles K1 and K2 can also be connected to one another via the points T1 and T2 by a higher-order function, a hyperbola or an elliptical arc; However, taking into account the proviso that the depressions in the profile always widen upwards.
  • the bulk material can be broken polysilicon material, for example crushed polysilicon rods from the Siemens process.
  • the bulk material can also be polysilicon granules.
  • the bulk material is placed in a feed area, which lies opposite the removal area, is placed on the sieve plate.
  • the opening edge is preferably concave, i.e. curved into the interior of the sieve plate or in the direction of the feed area, and has a depth t, where t is 0 ⁇ t ⁇ 5*r2, preferably r2 to 5*r2, particularly preferably r2 to 4 *r2, especially 2*r2 to 3*r2. (see. Fig. 4A ).
  • the opening edge is rectangular and has a depth t, where t is 0 ⁇ t ⁇ 5*r2, preferably r2 to 5*r2, particularly preferably r2 to 4*r2, in particular 2*r2 to 3*r2 . (see. Fig. 4B ).
  • the profile of the sieve plate can preferably have the two configurations described below.
  • Small-sized bulk material should be understood to mean a subset of the quantity of bulk material fed in, which is to be separated using the sieve plate. The small-sized bulk material therefore corresponds to the fraction to be separated.
  • ⁇ is an angle that defines the position from M2 to M1 in a Cartesian coordinate system when M1 and M2 are vertices of a right-angled triangle and e corresponds to the hypotenuse of the triangle (cf. Fig. 5 ).
  • r2 ⁇ r1 applies to the sieve plate, where 0 ⁇ r2 / r1 ⁇ 1, preferably 0.2 ⁇ r2 / r1 ⁇ 0.4. Furthermore, r1 + r2 > e, where e corresponds to the distance between the center of the circle M1 from K1 and M2 from K2, and the circles K1 and K2 do not touch each other.
  • ⁇ is an angle that defines the position from M2 to M1 in a Cartesian coordinate system , if M1 and M2 are vertices of a right-angled triangle and e corresponds to the hypotenuse of the triangle, where the circular arcs (or the circles K1 and K2) are connected to one another by a common tangent through the points T1 of K1 and T2 of K2 (cf. Fig. 6 ).
  • the profile of the sieve plate can preferably have the two configurations described below.
  • Large-scale bulk material should be understood to mean a subset of the quantity of bulk material fed in, which is to be separated using the sieve plate. The large bulk material therefore corresponds to the fraction to be separated. Oversize particles can clog individual recesses or damage the sieve plate.
  • the profile of the sieve plate for removing oversized particles is r2 > r1, where 0 ⁇ r1/r2 ⁇ 1, preferably 0.2 ⁇ r1/r2 ⁇ 0.4.
  • r1 + r2 e, where e corresponds to the distance between the circle center M1 of K1 and the circle center M2 of K2, and K1 and K2 touch each other at a point T0 in which the circular arcs merge into one another.
  • r2 > r1 applies to the sieve plate, where 0 ⁇ r1/r2 ⁇ 1, preferably 0.2 ⁇ r1/r2 ⁇ 0.4.
  • r1 + r2 > e where e corresponds to the distance between the circle center M1 of K1 and the circle center M2 of K2, and the circles K1 and K2 do not touch each other.
  • e corresponds to the distance between the circle center M1 of K1 and the circle center M2 of K2, and the circles K1 and K2 do not touch each other.
  • the sieve plate is made of a material selected from the group consisting of plastic, ceramic, glass, diamond, amorphous carbon, silicon, metal and combinations thereof.
  • the sieve plate or at least the part of the sieve plate that comes into contact with the bulk material can be lined or coated with a material selected from the group consisting of plastic, ceramic, glass, diamond, amorphous carbon, silicon and combinations thereof.
  • the sieve plate can have a coating made of titanium nitride, titanium carbide, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, aluminum titanium nitride or DLC (Diamond Like Carbon).
  • the plastic can be, for example, PVC (polyvinyl chloride), PP (polypropylene), PE (polyethylene), PU (polyurethane), PFA (perfluoroalkoxy polymer), PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) and PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene).
  • PVC polyvinyl chloride
  • PP polypropylene
  • PE polyethylene
  • PU polyurethane
  • PFA perfluoroalkoxy polymer
  • PVDF polyvinylidene fluoride
  • PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
  • the sieve plate preferably consists of a hard metal.
  • a further aspect of the invention relates to a separating device for classifying bulk material, comprising at least one of the sieve plates described and at least one separating element with a separating edge arranged below the removal area of the sieve plate.
  • the length of the separating element preferably corresponds to the length of the removal side of the sieve plate.
  • the distance of the separating element from the removal area is preferably variable.
  • the separating element is used to separate undersized or oversized particles from the target fraction.
  • the separating element is static and does not vibrate with the sieve plate.
  • the separating element preferably has a triangular side profile, in particular the side profile of an acute-angled triangle.
  • the separating edge of the separating element preferably has the same profile as the sieve plate.
  • the separating edge can also be designed to be straight, so that the separating element has the contour of a rectangle in front view.
  • FIG. 1A a section of a sieve plate 10 according to the invention with a profile area 11 and a removal area 12 is shown.
  • the profile area 11 has alternating elevations 14 and depressions 16.
  • the depressions 16 merge into openings 18 in the removal area 12, through which the bulk material can fall depending on its size.
  • the transition between recess 16 and opening 18 is formed by an opening edge 17, which is based on the 3 and 4 is described in more detail.
  • the openings 18 widen towards a removal side 19 (dashed line).
  • the profiling is basically maintained in the removal area 12, with the openings 18 preferably being punched or milled into a profile area.
  • the projections 15 formed in this way are correspondingly curved and form a continuation of the elevations 14.
  • the removal area 12 basically lies between the opening edges 17 and the removal side 19. If necessary, it may be preferred that the opening edges 17 are not at the same height.
  • the Figure 1B shows a front view of the sieve plate 10.
  • the removal area 12 cannot be distinguished from the profile area 11 from this perspective.
  • the sieve plate is arranged in a holder 13, the holder 13 extending maximally up to the opening edges 17.
  • the Figure 2A shows how the profile of the sieve plate 10 (cf. Fig 1 ) can be written with the help of two circles K1 and K2 arranged next to each other, which touch each other at a point T0.
  • the elevations 14 are described by a circular arc of the circle K1 shown in bold with the radius r1.
  • the Depressions 16 are described with a circular arc of the circle K2 shown in bold with the radius r2, the circular arcs merging into one another at the contact point T0.
  • K1 and K2 are arranged next to one another in such a way that the depressions 16 always widen.
  • This expansion is in Fig 2B shown as an example. It should preferably apply to the depressions 16 that l 0 ⁇ l n ⁇ l 1+n .
  • the Figure 3 shows a detailed view of the opening edge 17 in a top view.
  • the opening edge 17 has a width that corresponds to twice the radius r2 of the circle K2 (cf. Fig. 2 ). Also shown is the radius r1 of the circle K1.
  • FIG. 4 shows two configurations of the sieve plate 10, where Fig. 4A an embodiment with a concave opening edge 17 and Fig. 4B represents an embodiment with a rectangular opening edge 17.
  • the Figure 5 illustrates a profile of the sieve plate 10, which is particularly suitable for separating small-sized bulk material (undersized particles).
  • the position of the circles K1 and K2 relative to each other, which touch each other at a point T0, can be described by a right-angled triangle, where the hypotenuse is the connecting line e between the circle centers M1 and M2 and where the adjacent a is parallel to the x-axis of a Cartesian Coordinate system runs.
  • the angle ⁇ (to the countercathete) significantly determines the profile course of the sieve plate 10.
  • ⁇ is approximately 30°, which results in the profile course indicated in the form of the bold line .
  • the Figure 6 shows the profile of a sieve plate 10, which is also particularly suitable for separating undersized particles.
  • K1 and K2 do not touch each other, but are connected via a common tangent through the points T1 and T2.
  • the angle ⁇ here is approx. 25°.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 each show a profile of a sieve plate 10, which is particularly suitable for separating oversize particles.
  • the main difference compared to the separation of undersized particles is that the circle K1 has a smaller radius r1 than the circle K2.
  • the Figure 9A shows a separating device 100 with a sieve plate 10 and a separating element 30, which is arranged below the removal area 12 and is intended to separate the target fraction from oversize or undersize particles.
  • the separating element 30 has a profiled separating edge 32, the profiling being in the Figure 9B can be recognized.
  • the profiling of the separating edge 32 preferably corresponds to the profiling of the sieve plate 10.
  • the separating element can be pivoted through an angle ⁇ .
  • On the side of the sieve plate 10 opposite the removal area 12 is a feed area 20, which directly adjoins the profile area, but does not necessarily have to have a profiling. If necessary, the bulk material is brought to the feed area using a conveyor belt (not shown).
  • the Figure 10 shows a further embodiment of a separating device 100, which has two sieve plates 10A, 10B arranged one after the other.
  • the first separating element 30A is located after the first sieve plate 10A.
  • the separating element 30A can be pivoted through an angle ⁇ .
  • the sieve undersize is separated and collected in the collecting container 40A.
  • the undersize separation is supported by a blower 50, which can change its direction of action by an angle ⁇ .
  • the product grain is further conveyed to the second sieve plate 10B, and there the oversize is separated from the product grain by means of a second separating element 30B.
  • the product grain is collected in the collecting container 40B, the oversize in the collecting container 40C.
  • the angle ⁇ of the separating element 30A can be 80°.
  • the angle ⁇ of the fan 50A can be 30°.
  • the angle ⁇ of the separating element 30A can be 90°.
  • the Figures 11 and 12 each show a further embodiment of the separating device 100.
  • Two separating elements 30 are arranged directly after a sieve plate 10. This makes it possible to use a sieve plate 10 to separate the oversize fractions (collection container 40C) and fines (collection container 40A) in just one step.
  • the Figure 12 shows a similar variant as Figure 10 . In Figure 12 However, the arrangement is reversed and first the oversize (collection container 40C) and then the fine fraction (collection container 40A) are separated using a second sieve plate 10A.
  • Figures 10 to 12 can be expanded or changed as desired.
  • the polysilicon material delivered in a bag by a polysilicon manufacturer may also contain smaller fragments and an undersize fraction (undersize).
  • undergrain especially with grain sizes smaller than 4 mm, has a negative influence on the drawing process in the production of single-crystalline silicon and for this reason must be removed before use.
  • Polysilicon with fracture size 2 (BG 2) was used for the test.
  • the size class of polysilicon fragments is defined as the longest distance between two points on the surface of a silicon fragment (equivalent to the maximum length): BG 0 0.1 to 5mm BG 1 3 to 15mm BG2 10 to 40mm BG 3 20 to 60mm BG 4 45 to 120mm BG 5 100 to 250mm
  • the separated undersize fraction (undersize) was collected and weighed.
  • test material 10 kg (without undersize fraction ⁇ 4 mm) were placed on a conveyor unit.
  • the test material is preferably added via a funnel.
  • the container to be filled is positioned at the end of the screening section above the first conveyor unit so that the test material can be conveyed into the container without any problems.
  • the undersize fraction separated in advance is used for this test.
  • 2 g of undersize fraction are added to every 2 kg of test material, so that a total of approx. 10 g of undersize fraction was added.
  • the delivery rate was set to 3 kg ⁇ 0.5 kg per minute before the test run.
  • the removed undersize fraction was collected and weighed.
  • the experiments were carried out five times per setting.
  • the separating edge of the separating element had no profile.
  • the separating edge of the separating element had no profile.
  • the separating edge of the separating element had no profile.
  • the separating edge of the separating element had the same profiling as the sieve plate.
  • the separating edge is arranged in relation to the profile of the sieve plate in such a way that the elevations of the separating edge point towards the recesses of the sieve plate.
  • Table 1 shows the mean results compared to the results from the WO 2018/108334 A1 .
  • Table 1 test Test material [kg] Addition of undersize [g] Removed undersize [g] Removal rate [%] WO2018/108334 (1) 10 10 8.3 83 1 10 10 9.5 95 2 10 10 9.0 90 3 10 10 9.2 92 4 10 10 9, 6 96
  • the polysilicon material delivered in the bag by the polysilicon manufacturer must not contain any excessively large fragments (oversize particles).
  • the oversize can cause blockages and damage and must therefore be removed before use.
  • the BG 2 was used for the test.
  • the container to be filled is positioned at the end of the screening section above the first conveyor unit so that the test material can be conveyed into the container.
  • the delivery rate was set to 15 kg ⁇ 1 kg per minute before the test run.
  • the removed oversize was collected and weighed.
  • the experiments were carried out five times per setting.
  • Table 2 shows the average results for oversize separation: Table 2 test Test material [kg] Addition of oversize [g] Removed oversize [g] Removal rate [%] 1 10 500 380 76 2 10 500 440 88 3 10 500 500 100 4 10 500 300 60

Landscapes

  • Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
  • Silicon Compounds (AREA)
  • Crushing And Grinding (AREA)

Claims (11)

  1. Plaque de tamisage (10) destinée à éliminer les déclassés trop petits, ladite plaque de tamisage étant destinée à un dispositif de séparation (100) pour classer un produit en vrac et comprenant une zone profilée (11) qui comporte un profilé pourvu de dépressions (16) et de saillies (14) qui s'étendent dans la direction d'un côté de retrait (19), le profilé pouvant être décrit par un arc de cercle d'un premier cercle K1 et un arc de cercle d'un deuxième cercle K2, et les cercles K1, K2 étant disposés l'un à côté de l'autre, l'arc de cercle du premier cercle K1 de rayon r1 décrivant les saillies (14) et l'arc de cercle du deuxième cercle K2 de rayon r2 décrivant les dépressions (16), chaque dépression (16) dans une zone de retrait (12) se transformant en une ouverture (18) qui s'élargit en direction du côté de retrait (19), la transition entre la dépression (16) et l'ouverture (18) étant formée par un bord d'ouverture (17) dont la largeur correspond à la longueur du rayon r2 à 2*r2, ou bien
    - r1 + r2 = e, e correspondant à la distance entre le centre de cercle M1 de K1 et le centre de cercle M2 de K2, et K1 et K2 se touchant en un point T0 où les arcs de cercle se confondent, et 0° < α < 65°, α étant un angle qui définit la position de M2 à M1 dans un repère cartésien, si M1 et M2 sont des sommets d'un triangle rectangle et e correspond à l'hypoténuse du triangle ; ou bien
    - r1 + r2 < e et K1 et K2 ne se touchant pas, les arcs de cercle étant reliés entre eux par une tangente commune passant par un point T1 de K1 et un point T2 de K2, et -65° < α < 65°, caractérisé en ce que r2 < r1 s'applique au profilé, avec 0 < r2/r1 < 1.
  2. Plaque de tamisage selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que, lorsque r1 + r2 = e, on a pour l'angle α 0° < α < 25°, de préférence 5° < α < 20°.
  3. Plaque de tamisage selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que, lorsque r1 + r2 < e, on a pour l'angle α -25° < α < 10°, de préférence -10° < α < 5°.
  4. Plaque de tamisage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que pour r2/r1 on a 0,2 < r2/r1 < 0,4.
  5. Plaque de tamisage (10) destinée à éliminer les déclassés trop gros, ladite plaque de tamisage étant destinée à un dispositif de séparation (100) pour classer un produit en vrac et comprenant une zone profilée (11) qui comporte un profilé pourvu de dépressions (16) et de saillies (14) qui s'étendent dans la direction d'un côté de retrait (19), le profilé pouvant être décrit par un arc de cercle d'un premier cercle K1 et un arc de cercle d'un deuxième cercle K2, et les cercles K1, K2 étant disposés l'un à côté de l'autre, l'arc de cercle du premier cercle K1 de rayon r1 décrivant les saillies (14) et l'arc de cercle du deuxième cercle K2 de rayon r2 décrivant les dépressions (16), chaque dépression (16) dans une zone de retrait (12) se transformant en une ouverture (18) qui s'élargit en direction du côté de retrait (19), la transition entre la dépression (16) et l'ouverture (18) étant formée par un bord d'ouverture (17) dont la largeur correspond à la longueur du rayon r2 à 2*r2, ou bien
    - r1 + r2 = e, e correspondant à la distance entre le centre de cercle M1 de K1 et le centre de cercle M2 de K2, et K1 et K2 se touchant en un point T0 où les arcs de cercle se confondent, et 0° < α < 65°, α étant un angle qui définit la position de M2 à M1 dans un repère cartésien, si M1 et M2 sont des sommets d'un triangle rectangle et e correspond à l'hypoténuse du triangle ; ou bien
    - r1 + r2 < e et K1 et K2 ne se touchant pas, les arcs de cercle étant reliés entre eux par une tangente commune passant par un point T1 de K1 et un point T2 de K2, et -65° < α < 65°, caractérisé en ce que r2 < r1 s'applique au profilé, avec 0 < r2/r1 < 1.
  6. Plaque de tamisage selon la revendication 5, caractérisée en ce que pour rl/r2 on a 0,2 < r1/r2 < 0,4.
  7. Plaque de tamisage selon la revendication 5 ou 6, caractérisée en ce que pour l'angle α on a - 20° < α < 0°.
  8. Plaque de tamisage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le bord d'ouverture (17) est concave et a une profondeur t pour laquelle on a 0 < t ≤ 5*r2, de préférence r2 à 5*r2, de manière particulièrement préférée r2 à 4*r2, notamment 2*r2 à 3*r2.
  9. Plaque de tamisage selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisée en ce que le bord d'ouverture (17) est rectangulaire et a une profondeur t pour laquelle on a 0 < t ≤ 5*r2, de préférence r2 à 5*r2, de manière particulièrement préférée r2 à 4*r2, notamment 2*r2 à 3*r2.
  10. Dispositif de séparation (100) destiné à classer un produit en vrac, ledit dispositif de séparation comprenant au moins une plaque de tamisage (10) selon l'une au moins des revendications 1 à 9 et au moins un élément de séparation (30) disposé au-dessous de la zone de retrait (12) de la plaque de tamisage (10) et comprenant un bord de séparation (32), caractérisé en ce que le bord de séparation (32) de l'élément de séparation (30) comporte un profilé comme plaque de tamisage (10).
  11. Dispositif de séparation selon la revendication 10, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de séparation (30) est apte à pivoter d'un angle δ.
EP20761555.0A 2020-08-24 2020-08-24 Plaque de tamis de dispositif de séparation pour classer des matériaux en vrac Active EP4200085B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2020/073597 WO2022042815A1 (fr) 2020-08-24 2020-08-24 Plaque de tamis de dispositif de séparation pour classer des matériaux en vrac

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4200085A1 EP4200085A1 (fr) 2023-06-28
EP4200085B1 true EP4200085B1 (fr) 2024-01-10

Family

ID=72240427

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20761555.0A Active EP4200085B1 (fr) 2020-08-24 2020-08-24 Plaque de tamis de dispositif de séparation pour classer des matériaux en vrac

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US11904361B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP4200085B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP7622204B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR102800362B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN116096509B (fr)
MY (1) MY210121A (fr)
TW (1) TWI808472B (fr)
WO (1) WO2022042815A1 (fr)

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2243480A1 (fr) * 1996-01-18 1997-07-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Dispositif de dechargement
DE19822996C1 (de) * 1998-05-22 1999-04-22 Siemens Ag Abscheidevorrichtung für langgestreckte Feststoffteile
DE19945037A1 (de) * 1999-09-20 2001-03-29 Hubertus Exner Vorrichtung zum Ausrichten und gegebenenfalls Sortieren von länglichen Partikeln
DE102012220422A1 (de) 2012-11-09 2014-05-15 Wacker Chemie Ag Verpackung von polykristallinem Silicium
DE102013218003A1 (de) * 2013-09-09 2015-03-12 Wacker Chemie Ag Klassieren von Polysilicium
DE102015206849A1 (de) * 2015-04-16 2016-10-20 Wacker Chemie Ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Klassierung und Entstaubung von Polysiliciumgranulat
DE102015211351A1 (de) * 2015-06-19 2016-12-22 Siltronic Ag Siebplatte für Siebanlagen zum mechanischen Klassieren von Polysilicium
DE102016225248A1 (de) * 2016-12-16 2018-06-21 Siltronic Ag Abscheidevorrichtung für Polysilicium
JP6588937B2 (ja) 2017-04-28 2019-10-09 株式会社ミツワ 莢入り豆選別装置
CN207605973U (zh) 2017-11-10 2018-07-13 苏州鸿博斯特超净科技股份有限公司 多晶硅震动筛分装置
CN208494950U (zh) * 2018-04-08 2019-02-15 江苏亿亿和华筛分设备有限公司 一种湿法分级筛板

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11904361B2 (en) 2024-02-20
CN116096509B (zh) 2025-09-02
US20230311165A1 (en) 2023-10-05
TW202212002A (zh) 2022-04-01
CN116096509A (zh) 2023-05-09
JP2023542482A (ja) 2023-10-10
JP7622204B2 (ja) 2025-01-27
KR20230038788A (ko) 2023-03-21
WO2022042815A1 (fr) 2022-03-03
TWI808472B (zh) 2023-07-11
EP4200085A1 (fr) 2023-06-28
KR102800362B1 (ko) 2025-04-23
MY210121A (en) 2025-08-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3310499B1 (fr) Procédé pour le calibrage mécanique du polysilicium
EP3043929B1 (fr) Classification de silicium polycristallin
EP1842595B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour broyer et trier de polysilicium
EP2001607B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de classification souple de fragments de silicium polycristallin
EP2666750B1 (fr) Silicium polycristallin
EP2903755B1 (fr) Dispositif et procede pour la classification de materiaux polydisperses
EP1645333A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour casser, avec faible contamination, des fragments de silicium
EP2730510B1 (fr) Méthode pour emballer du silicium polycristallin
EP3554723B1 (fr) Dispositif de séparation pour du polysilicium
EP4200085B1 (fr) Plaque de tamis de dispositif de séparation pour classer des matériaux en vrac
DE69315519T2 (de) Verfahren zur Herstellung und Verpacken von Filterzigaretten
DE19850885C1 (de) Verfahren zum Herstellen von Granulaten aus polymeren Werkstoffen
DE102011107643A1 (de) Zigarettenzerlegevorrichtung für Filterzigaretten und Zigarettenzerlegemaschine und Verfahren zur Zerlegung einer Filterzigarette
DE102023102854B3 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur flexiblen Klassierung von poly- und/oder monokristallinem Silizium
DD154069A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur klassierung von metallspaeneschrott und heterogenen schuettguetern

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20230131

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20231011

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20231110

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502020006704

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240411

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240410

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240410

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240510

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240411

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240510

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: WACKER CHEMIE AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502020006704

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: WACKER CHEMIE AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: WACKER CHEMIE AG, 81737 MUENCHEN, DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240510

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502020006704

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20241011

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240824

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20240824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20240831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20240824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240110

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250820

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20250826

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20251020

Year of fee payment: 5