EP3900849B1 - Système de tri optique destiné au tri des particules granulaires - Google Patents
Système de tri optique destiné au tri des particules granulaires Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3900849B1 EP3900849B1 EP21167660.6A EP21167660A EP3900849B1 EP 3900849 B1 EP3900849 B1 EP 3900849B1 EP 21167660 A EP21167660 A EP 21167660A EP 3900849 B1 EP3900849 B1 EP 3900849B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- conveyor belt
- granulate
- particles
- granulate particles
- sorter system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
- B07C5/34—Sorting according to other particular properties
- B07C5/342—Sorting according to other particular properties according to optical properties, e.g. colour
- B07C5/3425—Sorting according to other particular properties according to optical properties, e.g. colour of granular material, e.g. ore particles, grain
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C5/00—Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
- B07C5/02—Measures preceding sorting, e.g. arranging articles in a stream orientating
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
- B07B2201/00—Details applicable to machines for screening using sieves or gratings
- B07B2201/04—Multiple deck screening devices comprising one or more superimposed screens
Definitions
- optical sorting systems for the sorting of granule particles are known, with granule particles supplied by means of the sorting systems being able to be divided or sorted at least into a first and second granule fraction.
- the optical sorting systems known from the prior art usually have a metering chute for transferring the granulate particles to be sorted onto a conveyor belt, via which the particles to be sorted can be applied to the conveyor belt using gravity.
- sorting systems for bulk materials with a conveyor belt and at least one electrical or electromagnetic excitation device or a magnetic device in the area of a The end of the conveyor belt is known.
- the aforementioned sorting systems use the properties of different electrical conductivity inherent in the sorted goods in order to use the excitation device or magnet device to cause different forces to separate the bulk goods into different fractions.
- optical sorting systems known from the prior art have the disadvantage that an uncontrolled amount of granulate particles is fed onto the conveyor belt, such that it is not ensured that only a monolayer of granulate particles is applied to the conveyor belt by means of the metering chute.
- discharge devices known from the prior art which are implemented using air pulses and shovel devices, are inaccurate and do not enable precise discharge of deviating particles.
- the object of the present invention is to improve the known optical sorting systems in such a way as to enable reliable detection and discharge of the granulate particles to be rejected, as well as to reduce the required installation space of the optical sorting system and to increase its sorting speed.
- an optical sorting system for sorting granulate particles into at least a first and second granule fraction with the features of claim 1, wherein, among other things, the optical sorting system has a dosing device, a conveyor belt, an optical sensor device, a discharge device, a control device and comprises at least a first and second granule fraction outlet.
- the granulate particles are applied to the conveyor belt in a monolayer via the metering device, accelerated to a defined speed by means of the conveyor belt, thrown off the conveyor belt at a discharge end and transferred into a first free trajectory
- the optical Sensor device generates optical recordings of the granulate particles in the area of the discharge end, preferably after the discharge, and transmits them to the control device, the control device using the optical recordings and evaluating at least one detection criterion to assign the granulate particles to the at least one first or second granule fraction and when assigning a granulate particle a control pulse is transmitted to the discharge device for the second granule fraction, wherein in the area of the free flight path of the granulate particles is arranged at a defined distance from the discharge end of the first granule fraction outlet, and wherein at By transmitting a control pulse, the discharge device transfers the granule particles assigned to the at least one second granule fraction into at least a second trajectory before reaching the first granule fraction outlet
- the granulate particles are applied to the conveyor belt at a first end opposite the discharge end.
- the granulate particles are applied to the conveyor belt via a metering device, by means of which a defined amount of granulate particles is applied to the conveyor belt per unit of time.
- the amount of granulate particles applied via the metering device per unit of time is controlled in such a way that a monolayer of granulate particles is applied to or produced on the conveyor belt.
- a monolayer is understood to mean a distribution of the granulate particles on the conveyor belt in which there are no overlaps between the granulate particles on the conveyor belt.
- the granulate particles therefore do not lie one above the other on the conveyor belt, but rather are spaced apart from one another or touch one another.
- the granulate particles are pre-screened by an upstream sieving device before being applied to the conveyor belt, that metallic foreign particles in the granules are removed by means of a metal separator and, if necessary, that the granulate particles are electrostatically discharged by means of at least one ionizer before being applied to the conveyor belt. Furthermore, it can be provided that the granulate particles are freed from dust particles by means of a countercurrent wind separator before they are applied to the conveyor belt.
- the aforementioned pretreatment steps ensure that only granulate particles pass through the detection area of the optical sorting system, which can be reliably detected and do not leave any damage or contamination in the area of the optical sensor device and the discharge device.
- the granulate particles When thrown off the conveyor belt, the granulate particles are transferred into a first free trajectory with an idealized theoretical free throwing parabola.
- the granulate particles transition from the conveyor belt into the free flight path, they initially only have the conveyor belt speed, which at the same time represents the initial flight speed of the particles.
- two forces influencing the trajectory act on the granulate particles along the first free trajectory: air resistance and, in addition, the force of gravity or gravity - which causes the theoretical or idealized parabolic trajectory of the granulate particles after being thrown off the conveyor belt.
- this embodiment has the Advantage of a low scattering of the trajectory of the granulate particles at the detection point, so that the depth of field of the sensor device is given while at the same time optimal lighting over the background.
- the intended conveyor belt extends as a revolving, quasi-endless conveyor belt along the running direction of the conveyor belt from a first deflection device in the area of the end at which the granulate particles are fed onto the conveyor belt to a second deflection device at the discharge end at which the granulate particles are removed from the The conveyor belt is transferred into a free flight path and thus thrown off.
- Below the second deflection device offset in the direction of the first deflection device, there is a third deflection device, which enables an oblique belt return.
- the conveyor belt essentially has a flat conveyor belt surface with a flat surface course in the conveyor belt direction.
- the conveyor belt can be delimited laterally by opposing belts in order to prevent the granulate particles from being thrown off or lost to the side and to allow the granulate particles to rebound on the belt surfaces.
- the two opposite side conveyor belt edges run at a short distance from the side plates.
- the distance between the side plates and the edge of the conveyor belt creates an air gap through which a fluid stream can flow or be expelled.
- the opposing bands which laterally delimit the conveyor belt, are arranged parallel to the plane of the conveyor belt surface at a small distance above the conveyor belt surface.
- the two opposite bands are each arranged at a distance from the two opposite side plates via corresponding spacers.
- the distance between the respective side plate and the band can be adjusted using a movable spacer, such that the resulting Transport belt width can be adjusted or finely adjusted via the spacers.
- the provision of fastening the bands via the spacers enables the air flow, which is carried out between the conveyor belt and the side panels, to be carried out to the area above the respective bands or the conveyor belt.
- the conveyor belt In the area of the deflection device on the discharge side, the conveyor belt is transferred from the flat course in the running direction into a surface course that is convex in the running direction of the conveyor belt.
- the transition between the flat and convex course forms a transition line transversely or orthogonally to the running direction of the conveyor belt, which is referred to as the discharge line, at which the granulate particles transition from the state resting on the conveyor belt into a free trajectory.
- the conveyor belt surface therefore essentially curves downwards away from the horizontal running direction in the area of the discharge end.
- the discharge device can deflect at least one granule particle from the free trajectory by emitting at least one air pulse, or give it a desired speed vector with a defined speed amount and a defined direction.
- the resulting velocity vector is chosen such that it deviates from the velocity vector of the granulate particle along the free trajectory and directs or transfers the at least one particle into a second trajectory, which deviates from the first trajectory.
- the use of air pulses in the area of the discharge device to deflect the granulate particles from the free trajectory has the advantage that particles can be repeatedly deflected by the discharge device at very short time intervals without influencing the subsequent particles during ejection.
- the at least one particle to be discharged is accelerated by the discharge device compared to the current speed on the first free trajectory and, after application of the air pulse, has a speed that is increased or at least the same as the speed on the first free trajectory.
- the magnitude of the speed can be accelerated in the direction of the trajectory of the granulate particle. The acceleration of the ejected particles compared to the flight speed on the free flight path prevents subsequent particles from impacting the ejected particle, which means that a build-up of the particles due to the particle ejection can be avoided.
- the transport path along the conveyor belt and in particular the conveyor belt surface can run essentially along a flat plane which is approximately orthogonal to the vector of the earth's gravity or gravity and thus essentially horizontally aligned.
- the alignment of the conveyor belt or the conveyor belt surface essentially along a flat plane, which is essentially orthogonal to the vector of gravity, has the advantage that the particles fed onto the conveyor belt can calm down relatively quickly after being fed onto the conveyor belt . can reduce their kinetic energy relatively quickly due to the task on the conveyor belt, such that the particles only have the conveyor belt speed, at least in the area of the discharge end. In particular, it is avoided that the particles slide down from the conveyor belt at the discharge end due to their own weight and thus have an uncontrolled additional amount of speed.
- the granulate particles are transported along the transport path from the first end of the conveyor belt, at which the granulate particles are placed on the conveyor belt, to the discharge end accelerated to the sorting speed, which corresponds to the conveyor belt speed.
- the at least one granule particle is deflected by the discharge device by means of at least one air pulse in such a way that the granule particle, which was assigned to the at least one second granule fraction, is discharged into the at least one second fraction outlet.
- the granulate particles to be sorted are sorted into a first and a second granule fraction.
- the first granulate fraction is preferably the so-called good fraction, into which the granulate particles are sorted, which correspond to the required quality criteria and therefore have no defects.
- the first granule fraction arrives along the parabola of the free flight path after being thrown off the conveyor belt into the first granule fraction outlet without additional intervention.
- the second granule fraction is the so-called rejection fraction, which does not meet the required quality criteria and, for example, has defects such as color deviations, inclusions or shape deviations.
- the granulate particles that do not meet the required quality criteria are assigned to the second granule fraction by means of the sensor device by evaluating at least one detection criterion and are then transferred by means of the discharge device into a second trajectory that deviates from the first free trajectory, the granule particle being assigned to the rejection fraction , is transferred to the second granulate fraction outlet.
- the granulate particles can continue to be assigned to a plurality of first or second granule fraction outlets based on a plurality of detection criteria.
- the optical sensor device generates recordings of the granulate particles in the area of the free flight path, the recordings being at a horizontal distance relative to a discharge line of the conveyor belt, on which the granulate particles are discharged, in the range of 5 mm to 40 mm, preferably in the range from 5 mm to 15 mm.
- it can also be provided to generate recordings of the granulate particles resting on the conveyor belt in the transport direction in front of the discharge line in the area of the discharge end of the conveyor belt by means of the optical sensor device, the recordings preferably being at a horizontal distance in the range of 5 mm to 40 mm, preferably in the range of 5 mm to 15 mm, generated from the discharge end.
- the arrangement of the optical sensor device for generating the recording immediately behind the discharge line of the conveyor belt has the advantage that the granulate particles to be detected in the above-described detection range only have small scatters in the trajectory, such that the sensor device focuses very precisely on the trajectory of the granulate particles or can be aligned.
- the generation of the optical recordings lying on the conveyor belt directly in the area in front of the discharge line has the advantage that the particles are guided in a defined detection plane, such that the optical detection device can be aligned and focused precisely on the particles to be detected.
- Another advantage in detecting the granulate particles lying on the conveyor belt is that the particles have a defined background in the form of the conveyor belt or the conveyor belt surface.
- the sensor device comprises a central visual axis, wherein the visual axis with the tangent of the free flight path at the intersection of the visual axis with the free flight path forms an angle in the range of 75 ° to 115 °, preferably in Range from 85° to 95°.
- the central visual axis of the sensor device is defined by the sensor elements of the sensor device in connection with the optical beam path through an optics of the sensor device located in front of the sensor elements.
- the sensor device can be designed as a line sensor with a large number of individual sensors arranged in a row or alternatively as a two-dimensional surface sensor with a large number of individual sensors, which are arranged next to one another in columns and rows in a sensor matrix.
- the individual sensors can be referred to as pixels.
- the central visual axis in the area of the individual sensors is defined as a straight line which runs orthogonally to the plane of the individual sensors and intersects it at the center of the individual sensors. The visual axis can be redirected and influenced accordingly by the optics in front of the individual image sensors.
- the sensor device can be a CMOS sensor or a CCD sensor, which is focused on a specific detection area by means of optics in front of the sensor.
- the visual axis runs from the focus area through the optics to the sensor elements of the sensor device.
- the sensor elements of the sensor device are formed by several commercially available CMOS sensors or CCD sensors.
- the angle between the visual axis and the tangent of the free flight path is measured in a plane transverse to the direction of flight or trajectory of the granulate particles, with the angle on the side facing away from the discharge end between the visual axis and the tangent being determined.
- the sensor device can generate recordings of the thrown granulate particles at a frequency in the range of 36 kHz to 150 kHz.
- the design of the sensor device with a frequency in the range from 36 kHz to 150 Khz enables a stream of granulate particles at a very high speed over the to detect optical sensor device and thus make it accessible to optical sorting.
- the image recorded by the sensor device has a resolution in the range of 10 ⁇ m to 50 ⁇ m, preferably 15 ⁇ m or 25 ⁇ m, per pixel or individual image sensor. Due to the high resolution, it is possible to resolve and examine very small errors (artifacts) using the optical detection device.
- the discharge device is arranged in the area of the free trajectory of the granulate particles at a horizontal distance relative to the detection line in a distance range of 2 cm to 9 cm, preferably in the range of 2 cm to 5 cm is.
- the arrangement of the discharge device in the areas described and therefore very close behind the discharge end has the advantage that the free trajectory of the granulate particles in this area still has a relatively small scatter, such that the granulate particles still approximately have the idealized theoretically calculated trajectory and so that the location of each granulate particle can be reliably determined via the flight speed and the distance of the discharge device relative to the detection line. This in turn makes it possible to prevent incorrect discharge of the discharge device and to safely eject the detected particles with errors or deviations without affecting further particles.
- a lighting device is arranged in the area of the discharge end above and/or below the free trajectory of the granulate particles for illuminating the granulate particles.
- the lighting device comprises at least one light source, in particular a light-emitting diode. Furthermore, it can be provided to actively adjust and change the illumination intensity and the illumination color, in particular the wavelength or the color spectrum of the illumination device, using control electronics. By controlling the illumination intensity or the illumination color or the wavelength of the emitted light, the optical sorting system according to the invention can be adapted to the granulate particles to be sorted and their color or their optical properties.
- the lighting device can be arranged at a distance in the horizontal direction from the discharge line of the conveyor belt in the range of -40 to 40 mm, preferably in the range -40 to 15 mm, particularly preferably centrally above the detection line.
- the negative values correspond to a distance in front of the drop line in the transport direction
- positive values correspond to a distance behind the drop line in the direction of flight.
- an illumination background is arranged opposite in the direction of the light rays emitted by the lighting device relative to the free trajectory of the granulate particles.
- the illumination background makes it possible to photograph optical images of the granulate particles to be detected with a known and defined background, in particular a known background color or known background structure. This makes it possible to reliably detect color deviations or other artifacts in the particles to be detected.
- the arrangement of the lighting background when generating the optical images prevents the particle from capturing additional scattered light from the environment and thus optical artifacts from being reflected in the granule particle to be detected, which in turn could lead to optical misinterpretations.
- the lighting background can also be designed as a passive background area, which is preferably adapted to the color of the granulate particles.
- At least one separating blade is arranged behind the discharge end in the discharge direction of the granulate particles between the first free trajectory and the at least one second trajectory, wherein the separation sword can comprise an end face that tapers to a point relative to the discharge end in the form of a sharp knife edge .
- a tapered end face in the form of a knife edge ensures that granules hitting there are deformed (energy absorption) and thus granulate particles do not rebound too directly into the first free trajectory, which could disrupt the sorting process or lead to a particle jam in the area of the granule outlets or optical sorting.
- the at least one separating blade is essentially designed as a partition and can comprise a flat or curved surface course in the plane of the discharge corridor, which preferably runs parallel to the first flight path, wherein the at least one partition is preferably arranged at a defined distance below the flight path.
- a longitudinal axis of the separating blade is relative to the tangent to the first idealized trajectory of the granulate particles Intersection point between the longitudinal axis of the separating blade of the first trajectory is arranged to enclose an angle in the range of 5 ° to 45 °.
- the separating blade is arranged to be displaceable along its longitudinal axis in order to adapt to the trajectory of the granules.
- the end face of the separating blade can have a horizontal distance relative to the detection line in the range of 10 to 80 mm.
- the metering device comprises at least a first and a second sieve deck, the granulate particles being passed over the sieve decks, with the granulate particles above a second average particle diameter being separated by means of the first sieve deck and the granulate particles below a first average particle diameter being separated through the second sieve deck are separated, in such a way that granulate particles with an average particle diameter between the first and second particle diameters are fed to the conveyor belt.
- the two sieve decks ensure that only granulate particles with an average particle diameter in a defined area between a first and second diameter are fed to the conveyor belt.
- the metering device further comprises at least one metering channel, via which the granules are applied after passing through the sieve decks and via which the granules are fed onto the conveyor belt.
- the dosing channel can be designed as a flat surface and is essentially horizontally aligned and also has a small distance, preferably in the vertical direction a distance that is smaller than the average particle diameter, relative to the conveyor belt surface.
- the metering device which runs along a horizontal plane and has a small distance in the vertical direction from the conveyor belt or the conveyor belt surface, has the advantage that the granulate particles fed onto the conveyor belt via the metering device only have a low initial energy (potential energy and kinetic energy). , which makes it possible to quickly calm down the granulate particles on the conveyor belt.
- the metering trough at a discharge end of the metering trough, at which the granulate particles are fed from the metering trough onto the conveyor belt essentially has the width of the conveyor belt.
- it can also be provided to provide several metering channels across the width of the conveyor belt.
- the metering device additionally comprises a vibration device, via which the sieve decks and/or the metering trough can be set in vibration.
- the oscillation amplitude, the shape and orientation of the oscillation amplitude as well as the frequency of the oscillation amplitude of the vibration device can be flexibly adjusted.
- two ionization devices arranged offset from one another are provided in the metering device, with the granulate particles to be fed onto the conveyor belt being passed through the two offset ionization devices before being fed onto the conveyor belt.
- the longitudinal axes of the ionization devices are essentially orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the conveyor belt. Due to the ionization devices arranged offset from one another, any electrical charges that may still be present on the granulate particles can be removed from them in such a way that they are released from the metering device onto the conveyor belt essentially uncharged in order to avoid possible repulsion or attraction effects of the granulate particles due to existing electrical charges on the acceleration belt and to prevent free flight.
- the ambient air is locally ionized or electrically charged, such that electrical charges of the granulate particles can be derived from the granulate particles through the ionized air.
- the discharge device is formed by a large number of individual nozzles, which are arranged above or below the free trajectory of the particles.
- an air guide device or several air guide devices can be arranged in front of the individual nozzles of the discharge device, with the air flow ejected by the individual nozzles being redirected in a defined direction via the air guide device.
- the air flow ejected from the individual nozzle and redirected via the air guide device has a horizontal speed of at least 1.5 m/s.
- the horizontal speed component is adapted to the conveyor belt speed or the current particle flight speed at the time of passing the discharge device.
- a compensating air duct extending from the second fraction outlet in the horizontal direction is arranged in the area of the at least one second fraction outlet, the compensating air duct being formed by a base plate and two opposite side plates is formed as a channel that is open at the top and the bottom plate is designed to fall in the direction of the second fraction outlet.
- the base plate has an angle in the range of 0 to 25° relative to a horizontal.
- the at least one second fraction outlet comprises a lateral opening in a wall of the outlet, the opening being covered with an air-permeable filter device.
- the conveyor belt is formed from an electrostatically conductive belt material or that the conveyor belt comprises electrostatically conductive belt material.
- the conveyor belt can have a deflection edge at the discharge end with a radius of the conveyor belt surface of less than 20 mm, in particular less than 10 mm.
- the conveyor belt comprises a belt material in which reinforcing fibers, such as in particular carbon fibers, are embedded in the running direction of the conveyor belt.
- the conveyor belt is designed as a revolving endless belt, the conveyor belt comprising two belt ends which have a toothed weld seam are connected to one another and wherein the weld seam has an angle in the range of 35 to 55 °, particularly preferably an angle of 45 °, relative to the running direction of the conveyor belt.
- the conveyor belt comprises a conveyor belt surface for transporting the particles, the conveyor belt surface having a low surface roughness, particularly preferably of 0.2 ⁇ m.
- the absolute numerical value of the length of the transport path of the granulate particles along the conveyor belt corresponds to the absolute numerical value of the running speed of the conveyor belt, measured in m/s.
- the conveyor belt is driven at a running speed in the range of 1 m/s to 3 m/s, particularly preferably in the range of 1.5 m/s to 2.5 m/s.
- optical sorting system according to the invention is explained in more detail below with reference to the attached figures using exemplary embodiments.
- the Fig. 1 shows a schematic side sectional view of an exemplary embodiment of a sorting system according to the invention.
- the granulate particles 100 to be sorted are fed to the optical sorting system at an upper end of the optical sorting system via a material inlet 1 and are sorted into two granule fractions 1 by the exemplary optical sorting system shown.
- the first granule fraction is the so-called good fraction, whereby the granule particles 100 in the first granule fraction correspond to the set quality criteria and are removed from the optical sorting system via the first granule fraction outlet 21, whereas the granule particles 100, which do not correspond to the required quality criteria, are removed the second granulate fraction outlet 22 is removed from the optical sorting system.
- a countercurrent air classifier 2 is arranged downstream of the material inlet 1 for pre-sorting the granulate particles 100 before they are placed on the conveyor belt 7, via which possible dust particles can be separated from the granulate particles 100 to be sorted. Furthermore, an all-metal separator 3 is arranged downstream of the countercurrent air classifier 2, via which possible metal particles can be removed from the granulate particles 100 supplied.
- the metering device 4 is arranged downstream of the all-metal separator 3, via which, according to the invention, the granulate particles 100 are fed onto the conveyor belt 7.
- an optical sensor device 9 as well as a lighting device 10 and a discharge device 12 are arranged.
- a separating blade 11 was arranged in the area of the free flight path 201 of the granulate particles 100 to separate the first granule fraction outlet 21 and the second granule fraction outlet 22.
- one of the second Fraction outlet 22 is provided with a compensating air duct 221 extending essentially in the horizontal direction, the compensating air duct 221 being delimited laterally and downwards by a base plate 222 and two opposite side plates 223.
- the compensating air channel 221 is designed as a channel that is open at the top and from which air can escape.
- the compensating air channel 221 serves to reduce the volume and air speed of the air expelled by the discharge device 12 so that no dynamic pressure arises in the second fraction channel 22.
- the bottom plate 222 is designed to slope down in the direction of the second fraction outlet 22 or to rise as the distance from the second fraction outlet 22 increases.
- the base plate 222 has an angle ⁇ relative to an imaginary horizontal.
- the second fraction outlet 22 has a side opening 220, which is provided in a wall of the outlet 22, the opening 220 being covered with an air-permeable filter device 224.
- the air-permeable filter device 224 By means of the air-permeable filter device 224, it is possible for the air flow emitted via the discharge device 12 to be discharged in the area of the second outlet 22 via the side opening 220.
- the air-permeable filter device 224 prevents granule particles 100 from being discharged in the area of the second granule fraction outlet via the side opening 220 and from being introduced into it, in particular when a compensating air duct 221 is arranged.
- the conveyor belt 7 runs in the upwardly open compensating air duct 221, with the side edges of the conveyor belt 7 running at a distance from the side plates 223. Through the gap between the side plates 223 and the conveyor belt 7, the air introduced into the equalizing air duct 221 is discharged laterally upwards on the conveyor belt.
- This embodiment has the advantage that air volumes introduced by the discharge device 12 can be removed, so that no back pressure arises.
- Bands can be arranged on the two side plates 223 via spacers (not shown), which laterally delimit the conveyor belt surface of the conveyor belt 7 and prevent the transported granulate particles 100 from being thrown off to the side.
- the conveyor belt 7 can be designed as a revolving endless belt, with a conveyor belt surface 7s being provided for the transport of the granulate particles 100, which preferably has a low surface roughness.
- the Fig. 2 shows a schematic view of an exemplary embodiment of a metering device 4 according to the invention and its arrangement in the area of the feed end 7a of a conveyor belt 7 of an optical sorting system according to the invention.
- Dosing device 4 shown has an upper material feed 40, in which the granulate particles 100 are transferred to the dosing device.
- the metering device 4 shown has a first screen deck 41 and a second screen deck 42 arranged underneath, as well as a base plate 43 and a metering channel 45.
- the granulate particles 100 fed to the metering device via the material feed 40 first pass through the first screen deck 41, by means of the first screen deck 41 the granulate particles 100 are separated above a second average particle diameter and the particles that are too large are removed from the optical sorting system via an ejection 41a in such a way that they are no longer fed to the conveyor belt 7.
- the granulate particles 100 which have an average diameter below the second average particle diameter, fall through the openings of the first sieve deck 41 onto the second sieve deck 42 underneath, the granulate particles 100 being separated below a first average particle diameter by means of the second sieve deck 42 and via an ejection 43a in the base plate 43 are removed from the metering device 4.
- the particles with a diameter that is too small and removed via the ejection 43a are also removed from the optical sorting system in such a way that they are no longer fed to the conveyor belt 7.
- the two sieve decks 41 and 42 ensure that only granulate particles 100 with an average particle diameter d in a range between a first lower diameter d1 and a second upper diameter d2 Conveyor belt 7 is fed. This ensures that only granulate particles 100 with a defined size range reach the area of the sensor device 9 in order to keep the resulting deviations in the first free trajectory 201 within a defined framework and thus limit the flight corridor due to the scattering of the trajectory of the granulate particles 100 .
- the metering device 4 shown also has two ionization devices 44 arranged oppositely offset, between which the granulate particles 100, which are discharged from the second sieve deck 42 onto the metering trough 45, are electrically discharged in such a way that only electrically uncharged granule particles 100 are released by means of the metering trough 45 the task end 7a of the conveyor belt 7 is abandoned.
- the metering channel 45 is designed as a flat surface, which runs essentially horizontally.
- the metering channel 45 is arranged at a small vertical distance a457 from the surface 7s of the conveyor belt 7.
- the vertical section a457 is preferably designed to be smaller than the average particle diameter d of the granulate particles 100.
- the metering device 4 shown is further connected to a vibration device 46 in such a way that vibrations generated by the vibration device 46 can be transmitted at least to the two sieve decks 41, 42 and/or the metering trough 45.
- the metering device 46 can also be arranged in such a way that all elements of the metering device are caused to vibrate.
- the vibrations generated by the vibration device 46 can be adjustable, in particular with regard to their vibration amplitude, the shape and orientation of the vibration amplitude as well as the frequency of the vibration amplitude of the vibration device 46.
- the illustrated section of the conveyor belt 7 in the area of the feed end 7a illustrates the arrangement of the exemplary metering device 4 in the area of the feed end 7a of the conveyor belt 7.
- the conveyor belt 7 has via a belt material 72, which has a conveyor belt surface 7s for the transport of the granulate particles 100 and in the transport direction 70 the fed granulate particles to an in Fig. 2 discharge end 7b of the conveyor belt 7, not shown, is transported.
- the granulate particles 100 are applied to the conveyor belt 7 via the metering device 4 and in particular via the metering channel 45 to the conveyor belt 7 at a first end of the conveyor belt 7a, the so-called feed end of the conveyor belt 7, which is opposite the discharge end 7b.
- a defined amount of granulate particles 100 per unit of time are fed onto the conveyor belt 7 via the metering channel 45 by means of the metering device 4.
- the amount of granulate particles 100 per unit of time applied via the metering device 4 is controlled in such a way that a monolayer of the granulate particles 100 is applied to the conveyor belt 7.
- a monolayer is understood to mean a distribution of the granulate particles 100 on the conveyor belt 7 in which there are no overlaps between the granulate particles 100 on the conveyor belt 7.
- the granulate particles 100 therefore do not lie one above the other on the conveyor belt 7, but are preferably spaced next to one another or touch one another and are essentially distributed over the entire conveyor belt width.
- the Fig. 3 shows a section of an exemplary optical sorting system in the area of the discharge end 7b of the conveyor belt 7.
- a lighting device 10 and a sensor device 9 are arranged in the area of the discharge end 7b above the first free flight path 201 of the granulate particles 100.
- a discharge device 12 is arranged along the direction of flight of the granulate particles 100 on the free flight path 201 following the lighting device 10.
- the optical sensor device 9 is arranged in such a way that it generates the optical images of the granulate particles 100 thrown off the conveyor belt 7 at the discharge line 71 and transmits them to the control device 13.
- the control device 13 is designed in such a way that it is based on the optical recordings of the sensor device 9 and the evaluation of at least one detection criterion assigns the thrown granulate particles 100 to the at least one first or second granule fraction and transmits a control pulse to the discharge device 12 when a granule particle 100 is assigned to the second granule fraction.
- a control pulse is present, the discharge device 12 pushes an air stream 120 via an air nozzle 121, whereby the granule particle 100, which was assigned to the second granule fraction, is deflected from the first free trajectory 201 onto a second trajectory 202.
- the air flow 120 of the individual nozzle 121 is directed in a specific direction by means of at least one deflection device 122, such as a deflection plate.
- the first granule fraction outlet 21 is arranged in the area of the free trajectory 201 of the granule particles 100 at a defined distance from the discharge end 7b and when a control pulse is transmitted, the discharge device 12 moves the granule particles 100 assigned to the at least one second granule fraction into at least a second trajectory before reaching the first granule fraction outlet 202 transferred and discharged into at least one second granule fraction outlet 22.
- the optical sensor device 9 generates recordings of the thrown granulate particles 100 in the area of their free trajectory 201.
- the course of an exemplary free trajectory 201 is in the Fig.
- the lighting device 10 is arranged above the free trajectory 201 of the granulate particles 100, which can alternatively also be arranged below the free trajectory 201.
- the exemplary lighting device 10 shown has several light sources, in particular a light-emitting diode. In particular, it can be provided that the lighting intensity and the lighting spectrum of the lighting device are actively controlled and adapted to the granulate particles 100 to be sorted. As in Fig.
- FIG. 3 shown is the lighting device 10 in the direction of the lighting device 10
- An illumination background 14 is arranged opposite the emitted light rays relative to the free trajectory 201 of the particles 100. It can also be provided to actively illuminate the lighting background 14, whereby the lighting intensity and lighting color can also be actively changed.
- the first fraction outlet 21 and the second fraction outlet 22 are separated from each other in their upper area by a separating sword 11.
- the separating sword 11 is arranged behind the discharge end 7b in the discharge direction of the granulate particles 100 between the first free trajectory 201 and the at least one second trajectory 202, the separating sword 11 having a tapering end face 111 in the form of a knife edge that is directed relative to the discharge end 7b includes.
- the longitudinal axis 112 of the separating blade 11 is arranged relative to the tangent 201t to the first idealized trajectory 201 of the granulate particles at the intersection x between the longitudinal axis 112 of the separating blade 11 and the first trajectory 201 in such a way that the longitudinal axis 112 is one Angle ⁇ in the range of 40-60° or preferably 45°.
- the separating sword 11 can be designed to be linearly displaceable along its longitudinal axis 112, as shown by double arrow 113 in the Fig. 3 shown.
Landscapes
- Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
Claims (19)
- Installation de triage optique pour le triage de particules de granulat (100) dans au moins une première et une seconde fraction de granulat (101,102), comprenant :- un dispositif de dosage (4) ;- une bande transporteuse (7) ;- un dispositif formant capteur (9) optique ;- un dispositif d'évacuation (12) ;- un dispositif de commande (13) ; et- au moins une première et une seconde sortie de fraction de granulat (21,22),- dans laquelle les particules de granulat (100) sont amenées sur la bande transporteuse (7) en monocouche par l'intermédiaire du dispositif de dosage (4), accélérées à une vitesse définie au moyen de la bande transporteuse (7), éjectées de la bande transporteuse (7) au niveau d'une extrémité d'éjection (7b) et transférées dans une première trajectoire de vol (201) libre ;- dans laquelle le dispositif formant capteur (9) optique génère des enregistrements optiques des particules de granulat (100) éjectées et les transmet au dispositif de commande (13) ;- dans laquelle le dispositif de commande (13) attribue les particules de granulat (100) éjectées à respectivement l'au moins une première ou seconde fraction de granulat (101,102) à l'aide des enregistrements optiques en évaluant au moins un critère de détection et, lors de l'attribution d'une particule de granulat (100) à la seconde fraction de granulat (102), transmet une impulsion de commande au dispositif d'évacuation (12) ;- dans laquelle, dans la zone de la trajectoire de vol (201) libre des particules de granulat (100), la première sortie de fraction de granulat (21) est disposée à une distance définie par rapport à l'extrémité d'éjection (7b) ;- dans laquelle, lors de la transmission d'une impulsion de commande, le dispositif d'évacuation (12) transfère les particules de granulat (100) associées à l'au moins une seconde fraction de granulat (102) dans au moins une seconde trajectoire de vol (202) avant d'atteindre la première sortie de fraction de granulat (21) et les envoie dans au moins une seconde sortie de fraction de granulat (22),- caractérisée en ce que- au moins une lame de séparation (11) est disposée derrière l'extrémité d'éjection (7b) dans la direction d'éjection des particules de granulat (100) entre la première trajectoire de vol (201) libre et l'au moins une seconde trajectoire de vol (202), dans laquelle la lame de séparation (11) comprend une face frontale (111) en forme de lame de couteau s'étendant de manière effilée par rapport à l'extrémité d'éjection (7b).
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que le dispositif formant capteur (9) optique génère des enregistrements des particules de granulat (100) dans la zone de la trajectoire de vol (201) libre, dans laquelle les enregistrements sont générés à une distance horizontale (h719) par rapport à une ligne d'éjection (71) de la bande transporteuse (7), sur laquelle ligne d'éjection les particules de granulat (100) sont éjectées, dans la plage allant de 5 mm à 40 mm, de préférence dans la plage allant de 5 mm à 15 mm.
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 1 ou 2,
caractérisée en ce que le dispositif formant capteur (9) comprend un axe de visée (91) médian, dans laquelle l'axe de visée (91) présente, avec la tangente (201t) de la trajectoire de vol (201) libre, un angle dans la plage allant de 75° à 115°, de préférence dans la plage allant de 85° à 95°, au niveau du point d'intersection (X) de l'axe de visée (91) avec la trajectoire de vol (201) libre. - Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le dispositif d'évacuation (12) est disposé dans la zone de la trajectoire de vol (201) libre des particules de granulat (100) à une distance horizontale (h719) par rapport à une ligne d'éjection (71) de la bande transporteuse (7), sur laquelle ligne d'éjection les particules de granulat (100) sont éjectées, dans une plage de distance allant de 2 cm à 9 cm, de préférence dans la plage allant de 2 cm à 5 cm.
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que, dans la zone de l'extrémité d'éjection (7b), un dispositif d'éclairage (10) est disposé au-dessus et/ou en dessous de la trajectoire de vol (201) libre des particules de granulat (100) afin d'éclairer les particules de granulat (100).
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 5, caractérisée en ce que le dispositif d'éclairage (10) est disposé à une distance (h719) dans la direction horizontale par rapport à la ligne d'éjection (71) de la bande transporteuse (10) dans la plage allant de 5 mm à 40 mm, de préférence dans la plage allant de 5 mm à 15 mm.
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 5 ou 6,
caractérisée en ce que, dans la direction des rayons lumineux (10l) émis par le dispositif d'éclairage (10), un fond d'éclairage (14) est disposé à l'opposé de la trajectoire de vol (201) libre des particules (100). - Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce qu'un axe longitudinal (112) de la lame de séparation (11) est disposé de manière à former un angle (α) dans la plage allant de 40° à 60°, de préférence de 45°, par rapport à la tangente (201t) au niveau de la première trajectoire de vol (201) idéalisée des particules de granulat (100) au point d'intersection (X) entre l'axe longitudinal (112) de la lame de séparation (11) et la première trajectoire de vol (201).
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 8, caractérisée en ce que la lame de séparation (11) est disposée de manière à pouvoir coulisser le long de son axe longitudinal (112).
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 8 ou 9,
caractérisée en ce que la face frontale (111) de la lame de séparation (11) présente une distance horizontale dans la plage allant de 10 mm à 50 mm. - Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le dispositif de dosage (4) comprend au moins un premier et un second tamis (41,42), dans laquelle les particules de granulat (100) sont conduites sur les tamis (41,42), dans laquelle, au moyen du premier tamis (41), des particules de granulat (100) au-dessus d'un second diamètre de particule (d2) moyen sont séparées et les particules de granulat (100) en dessous d'un premier diamètre de particule (d1) moyen sont séparées par le second tamis (42), de telle sorte que seules des particules de granulat (100) comportant un diamètre de particule moyen (d) entre le premier et le second diamètre de particule (d1, d2) sont amenées à la bande transporteuse (7).
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce qu'un conduit d'air de compensation (221) partant de la seconde sortie de fraction (22) dans la direction horizontale est disposé dans la zone de l'au moins une seconde sortie de fraction (22), dans laquelle le canal d'air de compensation (221) est formé par une tôle de fond (222) et deux tôles latérales opposées (223) en tant que canal ouvert vers le haut et dans laquelle la tôle de fond (222) est formée en pente en direction de la seconde sortie de fraction (22).
- Installation de triage selon la revendication 12, caractérisée en ce que la tôle de fond (222) forme un angle (β) dans la plage allant de 0° à 25° par rapport à une horizontale.
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que l'au moins une seconde sortie de fraction (22) comprend une ouverture latérale (220) dans une paroi de la sortie (22), dans laquelle l'ouverture (220) est recouverte par un dispositif de filtrage (224) perméable à l'air.
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la bande transporteuse (7) comprend un matériau en bande (72) conducteur de manière électrostatique.
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la bande transporteuse (7) présente, au niveau de l'extrémité d'éjection (7b), un bord de renvoi (73) comportant un rayon de la surface de bande transporteuse (7s) inférieur à 20 mm, en particulier de 10 mm.
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la bande transporteuse (7) comprend un matériau en bande (72) dans lequel des fibres de renforcement, en particulier des fibres de carbone, sont incorporées dans le sens de déplacement (70) de la bande transporteuse (7).
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la bande transporteuse (7) est réalisée sous la forme d'une bande sans fin continue, dans laquelle la bande transporteuse (7) comprend deux extrémités de bande qui sont reliées l'une à l'autre par l'intermédiaire d'un cordon de soudure denté et dans laquelle le cordon de soudure présente, par rapport au sens de déplacement (70) de la bande transporteuse (7), un angle dans la plage allant de 35° à 55°, de préférence un angle de 45°.
- Installation de triage selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la bande transporteuse (7) comprend une surface de bande transporteuse (7s) pour le transport des particules (100), dans laquelle la surface de bande transporteuse (7s) présente une faible rugosité de surface.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102020110976.8A DE102020110976B4 (de) | 2020-04-22 | 2020-04-22 | Optische Sortieranlage für die Sortierung von Granulatpartikeln |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3900849A2 EP3900849A2 (fr) | 2021-10-27 |
| EP3900849A3 EP3900849A3 (fr) | 2021-12-29 |
| EP3900849B1 true EP3900849B1 (fr) | 2024-02-07 |
Family
ID=75441810
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP21167660.6A Active EP3900849B1 (fr) | 2020-04-22 | 2021-04-09 | Système de tri optique destiné au tri des particules granulaires |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP3900849B1 (fr) |
| DE (1) | DE102020110976B4 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN118751543A (zh) * | 2024-06-26 | 2024-10-11 | 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 | 一种用于种子分选设备的分体式上料器 |
| CN119588638A (zh) * | 2025-02-10 | 2025-03-11 | 天津美腾科技股份有限公司 | 一种离析布料智能干选机 |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB455628A (en) | 1935-04-23 | 1936-10-23 | Edward Joseph Winkleman | Vibratory screen and method of screening |
| US3939983A (en) | 1972-03-16 | 1976-02-24 | Asfour Emil S | Apparatus for sorting tobacco leaves |
| JP3275280B2 (ja) * | 1994-10-07 | 2002-04-15 | 株式会社サタケ | 粒状物色彩選別機における原料供給装置 |
| US6003681A (en) | 1996-06-03 | 1999-12-21 | Src Vision, Inc. | Off-belt stabilizing system for light-weight articles |
| AU1310901A (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2001-04-30 | Stork Screens B.V. | Endless belt made from fibre-reinforced plastics material |
| JP2005538914A (ja) | 2002-09-17 | 2005-12-22 | ハバシット アクチエンゲゼルシャフト | 突合わせ接合式コンベヤベルト |
| DE102009007481A1 (de) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-09-02 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Fördersystem zum Transport von Materialien, insbesondere von Schüttgut |
| CN102310998A (zh) | 2011-09-24 | 2012-01-11 | 合肥美亚光电技术股份有限公司 | 一种用于履带式色选机的物料输送装置 |
| EP3233312B1 (fr) * | 2014-12-15 | 2021-02-17 | Ost - Ostschweizer Fachhochschule | Procédé et dispositif de tri pour matériau en vrac |
| DE102016210482A1 (de) | 2016-06-14 | 2017-12-14 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Optisches Sortiersystem sowie entsprechendes Sortierverfahren |
| AT520710B1 (de) * | 2017-11-24 | 2022-07-15 | Ife Aufbereitungstechnik Gmbh | Magnetscheider |
-
2020
- 2020-04-22 DE DE102020110976.8A patent/DE102020110976B4/de active Active
-
2021
- 2021-04-09 EP EP21167660.6A patent/EP3900849B1/fr active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP3900849A3 (fr) | 2021-12-29 |
| DE102020110976B4 (de) | 2023-12-21 |
| EP3900849A2 (fr) | 2021-10-27 |
| DE102020110976A1 (de) | 2021-10-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP3436374B1 (fr) | Dispositif de séparation | |
| EP0982081B1 (fr) | Classification pneumatique de polysilicium | |
| EP3967413B1 (fr) | Appareil et procédé de tri doté d'un dispositif laser libs | |
| EP2859963A1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé destinés à trier des produits en vrac | |
| EP0983804A1 (fr) | Dispositif de classification | |
| EP3900849B1 (fr) | Système de tri optique destiné au tri des particules granulaires | |
| EP2366461B1 (fr) | Séparateur pneumatique doté de plateaux de distribution | |
| EP1930090B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif d'élimination de corps étrangers | |
| DE3611926A1 (de) | Verfahren zur trockenen sortierung miteinander vermischter produkte sowie vorrichtung zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens | |
| EP0022945A1 (fr) | Procédé et appareil pour la séparation de matières hétérogènes dans un courant horizontal | |
| DE10196605B3 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Sortieren von Holzschnitzel in separate Fraktionen | |
| DE102014113280B4 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum chargenweisen Entfernen von Staub aus einem Granulat | |
| DE20320957U1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Sortieren von Schüttgütern mit zweistufiger Vereinzelungseinrichtung | |
| DE4019203A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum sortieren von altglas | |
| EP2800619B1 (fr) | Séparateur du type cyclone, en particulier pour la gestion des déchets | |
| AT412148B (de) | Vorrichtung zum sortieren von holzspänen in getrennte teilmengen | |
| DE102014011401B3 (de) | "Ausblasvorrichtung zum selektiven Ausblasen von Fördergutteilen aus einem Fördergutstrom" | |
| DE4413288C2 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Selektion von Bauschutt | |
| EP1584380A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif d'élimination de corps étrangers d'un flux de matière | |
| DE202011109982U1 (de) | Verteilvorrichtung mit Verteilertellern | |
| DE2642884A1 (de) | Verfahren zum dispergieren und pneumatischen zufuehren feinkoernigen gutes in die sichtzone eines windsichters | |
| DE102012010030B4 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur trennung eines heterogenen materialstroms in mindestens zwei materialfraktionen | |
| EP1275770B1 (fr) | Dispositif de séparation de matières fibreuses et procédé de séparation de matières légères | |
| WO2024037824A1 (fr) | Système d'analyse et de tri d'une pièce de matériau | |
| EP3571146B1 (fr) | Procédé de tri pour corps creux et dispositif de tri |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B07C 5/02 20060101ALI20211122BHEP Ipc: B07C 5/342 20060101AFI20211122BHEP |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20220308 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20230817 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20231227 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502021002624 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240607 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240508 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240507 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240607 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240508 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240607 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240607 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502021002624 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240409 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240409 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20241108 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240430 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240409 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240207 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250314 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20250423 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20250422 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20250422 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20250721 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20210409 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20210409 |