[go: up one dir, main page]

EP3821036A1 - Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d'une population cellulaire - Google Patents

Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d'une population cellulaire

Info

Publication number
EP3821036A1
EP3821036A1 EP19736386.4A EP19736386A EP3821036A1 EP 3821036 A1 EP3821036 A1 EP 3821036A1 EP 19736386 A EP19736386 A EP 19736386A EP 3821036 A1 EP3821036 A1 EP 3821036A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cell
cell population
plasmid
clone
population
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP19736386.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Christel AEBISCHER-GUMY
Pierre MORETTI
Martin Bertschinger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ichnos Sciences SA
Original Assignee
Ichnos Sciences SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ichnos Sciences SA filed Critical Ichnos Sciences SA
Publication of EP3821036A1 publication Critical patent/EP3821036A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6881—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for tissue or cell typing, e.g. human leukocyte antigen [HLA] probes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/156—Polymorphic or mutational markers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods for determining the monoclonality of a cell population by the identification of genetic signatures, the determination of the presence of these genetic signatures in cells of this cell population and the application of statistical analysis to determine the probability that the cell population is monoclonal.
  • a monoclonal cell population is a population of cells all descending from a single parental progenitor.
  • the use of monoclonal cell populations is often required for the industrial production of polypeptides and proteins such as enzymes, hormones, growth factors and antibodies in order to assure structural and functional homogeneity of the product.
  • polypeptides and proteins such as enzymes, hormones, growth factors and antibodies
  • the use of monoclonal cell lines is required to ensure consistent quality throughout the life cycle of a product (Frye et al., 2016; Walsh, 2014; Zhu, 2012).
  • one key point requested by regulatory agencies is to demonstrate the monoclonality of the cell banks, i.e. providing evidence that the entire cell population is derived from a single cell progenitor (ICH Q5D).
  • the present invention relates to methods for determining the monoclonality of a cell population.
  • Monoclonal cell populations are often used in the industrial production of polypeptides and proteins to assure homogeneity of the product.
  • monoclonality of production cell lines is required to generate a robust process ensuring product consistency and safety (Walsh, Nature Biotechnology, 32(10), 992-1000,2014; Zhu,Biotechnol Adv, 30(5), 1158-1170, 2012).
  • monoclonal cell lines which are expected to be homogeneous, respond in a reproducible manner to minor process changes.
  • subpopulations within a polyclonal cell line may react differently and this may lead to measureable and unexpected differences in product quality attributes.
  • Monoclonality can be ensured by the cloning procedure (e.g. by two rounds of limiting dilution with a seeding density ⁇ 1 cell/well). If the cloning procedure is not sufficient to ensure the monoclonality of the cell line, a demonstration of the homogeneity of the cell line is required.
  • the present invention discloses methods to demonstrate the monoclonality of a cell population by identifying genetic signatures that link the cells forming said population to a single same progenitor.
  • the present invention also relates to methods to demonstrate the monoclonality of a cell population generated from a host cell which has undergone transfection of nucleic acid material encoding the polypeptide of interest.
  • the genetic signatures may result from the integration of the transfected nucleic acid material in the host cell genome.
  • the disclosed methods are independent to the process of generation of the cell population. Given that assuring monoclonality is crucial to the manufacturing of protein products, such as therapeutic biologies, the present invention represents a valuable response to the necessity and the interest of the industry, especially when demonstration of compliance with regulatory agencies requests is needed.
  • the present invention discloses a method for determining the monoclonality of a cell population comprising a plurality of cells that express a polypeptide of interest, wherein said method is characterized by the steps of:
  • the genetic signature is associated to a locus comprising the coding sequence of the polypeptide of interest. According to a different aspect of the present invention, the genetic signature is not associated to a locus comprising the coding sequence of said polypeptide of interest.
  • the predetermined value is equal to or greater than 0.05% and equal to or less than 2%.
  • the predetermined confidence interval is equal to or greater than 90% and equal to or less than 98%.
  • the number clones analyzed is between 5 and 10000.
  • the polypeptide of interest is encoded by a coding sequence naturally present into the genome of said cell population. Accordingly, the genetic signature is selected from the group comprising deletions, insertions, duplications and substitutions.
  • the cell population is produced starting from a host cell which has undergone transfection of nucleic acid material comprising the coding sequence of said polypeptide of interest, and wherein said nucleic acid material integrates in the genome of said host cell.
  • the genetic signature results from the integration of the transfected nucleic acid material into the host cell genome and said genetic signature is selected from the group comprising the integration sites, concatemer junctions and mutations, wherein said integration site include but are not limited to the sites of insertion of the genetic material in the host cell genome; said concatemer junctions include but are not limited to the fused ends of two or more of transfected nucleic acid material; and wherein said mutations include but is not limited to deletion, insertions, duplications and substitutions.
  • the cell population and/or host cell is selected from the group comprising insect, plant and mammalian cells.
  • the host cell is a mammalian cell. More preferably the host cells are CHO cells.
  • the polypeptide of interest is a protein; preferably an antibody or an antibody fragment.
  • the present invention also relates to a cell population subjected to the disclosed method.
  • cell population indicates a group of cells; in particular a group of cells that express one or more polypeptides of interest.
  • a cell population may derive from a single clone, namely a group of cells descending from the same single cell, or from more than one clone. Based on the origin, said cell population may be monoclonal or polyclonal.
  • the term “monoclonal” refers to a cell population which is exclusively composed by descendants of a defined single parental progenitor. The term “monoclonality” therefore indicates the characteristic of a cell population of descending from a single parental progenitor.
  • polyclonal refers to a cell population which is composed by descendants of more than one parental progenitor.
  • the cell population is a population of cells where no exchange of genetic material with the outside environment occurs unless the cells undergo transfection.
  • the cell population may be a population of higher eukaryote cells comprising insect cells, plant cells and mammalian cells.
  • the cell population may be a cell line derived multicellular organisms. Examples of invertebrate cells include insect cells such as Spodoptera frugiperda (caterpillar), Aedes augypti (mosquito), Aedes albopictus (mosquito), Drosophila melanogaster (fruitfly) and Bombyx mori., Examples of plant cell cultures include cotton, corn, potato, soybean, petunia, tomato, and tobacco.
  • Cell populations for expressing the antibodies are preferably mammalian cells which include Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, NSO mouse myeloma cells, human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells, COS cells, SP2 cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells.
  • CHO Chinese hamster ovary
  • HeLa human cervical carcinoma
  • COS COS cells
  • SP2 cells human embryonic kidney
  • polypeptide in the present invention, are used interchangeably to include a series of amino acid residues connected to the other by peptide bonds between the alpha-amino and carboxy groups of adjacent residues.
  • polypeptide of interest is used herein to indicate a single amino acid chain constituting the polypeptide as well as proteins consisting of more than one amino acid chain.
  • Non limiting examples of polypeptides of interest produced by a cell population comprise enzymes, hormones, regulatory proteins, antigens, antibodies.
  • the polypeptide of interest expressed by the cell population may be encoded by a coding sequence naturally present in the cells genome.
  • the polypeptide of interest may be expressed by a cell population generated starting from a host cell which has undergone transfection of nucleic acid material comprising the coding sequence of said polypeptide of interest.
  • the polypeptide of interest may be a naturally occurring polypeptide or the product of genetic engineering, e.g. the polypeptide of interest may be produced by recombinant DNA techniques or artificially synthetized.
  • polypeptide of interest is a therapeutic protein; more preferably the polypeptide of interest is a therapeutic antibody.
  • antibody as referred to herein includes whole antibodies and any antigen binding fragments or single chains thereof.
  • An “antibody” refers to a glycoprotein comprising at least two heavy (H) chains and two light (L) chains inter-connected by disulfide bonds, or an antigen binding fragment thereof.
  • Each heavy chain is comprised of a heavy chain variable region (abbreviated herein as VH) and a heavy chain constant region.
  • the heavy chain constant region is comprised of three domains, CHI, CH2 and CH3.
  • Each light chain is comprised of a light chain variable region (abbreviated herein as VL) and a light chain constant region.
  • the light chain constant region is comprised of one domain, CL.
  • VH and VL regions can be further subdivided into regions of hypervariability, termed complementarity determining regions (CDR) which are hypervariable in sequence and/or involved in antigen recognition and/or usually form structurally defined loops, interspersed with regions that are more conserved, termed framework regions (FR or FW).
  • CDR complementarity determining regions
  • FR framework regions
  • Each VH and VL is composed of three CDRs and four FWs, arranged from amino- terminus to carboxy- terminus in the following order: FW1, CDR1, FW2, CDR2, FW3, CDR3, FW4.
  • full length antibody as used herein includes the structure that constitutes the natural biological form of an antibody, including variable and constant regions.
  • the full length antibody of the IgG class is a tetramer and consists of two identical pairs of two immunoglobulin chains, each pair having one light and one heavy chain, each light chain comprising immunoglobulin domains VL and CL, and each heavy chain comprising immunoglobulin domains VH, CHI (Cyl), CH2 (Cy2), and CH3 (Cy3).
  • IgG antibodies may consist of only two heavy chains, each heavy chain comprising a variable domain attached to the Fc region.
  • Antibody fragments include, but are not limited to, (i) the Fab fragment consisting of VL, VH, CL and CHI domains, including Fab' and Fab'-SH, (ii) the Fd fragment consisting of the VH and CHI domains, (iii) the Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single antibody; (iv) the dAb fragment (Ward ES et al, (1989) Nature, 341 : 544-546) which consists of a single variable, (v) F(ab')2 fragments, a bivalent fragment comprising two linked Fab fragments (vi) single chain Fv molecules (scFv), wherein a VH domain and a VL domain are linked by a peptide linker which allows the two domains to associate to form an antigen binding site (Bird RE et al, (1988) Science 242: 423-426; Huston JS et al, (1988) Proc.
  • host cells include any cells which are capable of growing in culture and expressing the polypeptide of interest.
  • the host cell line may belong to the cell population types specified above.
  • cell lines suitable for the expression of the antibody include and are not limited to mammalian, insect, plant cells.
  • Cell lines often used for the expression and production of therapeutic antibodies are mammalian cells lines such as Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, NSO mouse myeloma cells, human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells.
  • cell transfection refers to the introduction of exogenous nucleic acid material into a host cell.
  • the introduced nucleic acid can be DNA or RNA.
  • techniques commonly used for introducing exogenous nucleic acid into the host cells include chemical-based methods, where the transfection is mediated by transfection reagents such as calcium-phosphate, liposomes, cationic polymers or dendrimers; physical-based method such as electroporation and microinjection; and virus-based methods where virus infection mediates gene delivery. Using these techniques, transient or stable transfection can be achieved.
  • the nucleic acid sequence does not integrate into the genome of the host cell, therefore the expression of the protein codified by the exogenous genetic material is limited in time, while stable transfection is achieved when the cells integrate the foreign genetic material in their genome, giving rise to a stable transfected cell line.
  • the transfected nucleic acid material comprises at least a polynucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest, here referred as "coding sequence".
  • the nucleic acid material that encode the polypeptide of interest of the present invention may be incorporated into a vector, preferably an expression vector in order to express the polypeptide of interest.
  • expression vector as used herein includes an isolated and purified DNA molecule which upon transfection into an appropriate host cell provides for a high-level expression of a recombinant gene product within the host cell.
  • the expression vector comprises regulatory DNA sequences that are required for an efficient transcription of the DNA coding sequence into mRNA and for an efficient translation of the mRNAs into proteins in the host cell line.
  • a variety of expression vectors may be utilized for protein expression.
  • Expression vectors may comprise self-replicating extra-chromosomal vectors or vectors which integrate into a host genome. Expression vectors are constructed to be compatible with the host cell type. Non limiting examples of expressing vectors include plasmid vectors, viral vectors and cosmids.
  • the expression vector may contain a selectable marker, such as a gene for antibiotic resistance.
  • a selectable marker such as a gene for antibiotic resistance.
  • host cells may be subjected to selection pressure, for instance by introducing such antibiotic in the cell culturing medium. This selection step allows selecting cells where the vector has been successfully transfected.
  • Selected cells may be further su bjected to at least one single cell cloning step.
  • single cell cloning indicates the process of creating clones from single cells that have been separated one from the other one.
  • the single cell cloning step may be carried out using different techniques that allow single cell isolation, non-limiting examples of such techniques include one or more rounds of limiting dilutions (i.e. seeding cells at density ⁇ 1 cell/well), cell sorting or growing the cell on semi-solid media.
  • the nucleic acid material may integrate into the host cell genome.
  • Upon transfection host cell may have been subjected to at least one selection step, and to at least one cloning step.
  • genetic signature refers to any genetic feature that can be specifically associated to a clone, therefore unique for said clone.
  • a genetic signature may be the result of accumulation of random mutations in the cellular genome.
  • mutation refers to any change in a polynucleotide sequence, e.g. in the DNA of a cell.
  • Mutations include but are not limited to substitutions, wherein at least a nucleotide base is replaced by another one or wherein more than one a nucleotide bases are replaced; deletions, wherein at least a nucleotide base is removed; insertions, wherein at least a nucleotide base is added; duplications, wherein at least a nucleotide base is copied one or more times; repeat expansions, wherein the number of times in which normally a short DNA sequence is repeated, increases.
  • genetic signatures may be genetic features resulting from the integration event. Genetic signatures resulting from the integration event include but are not limited to integration sites, concatemer junctions and mutations. As used herein the term "integration sites" refers to one or more sites of insertion of the genetic material in the host cell genome, e.g. plasmid-host cell DNA fusion sites.
  • concatemer junctions refers to one or more junctions resulting from the assembly of concatemers; when more than one copy of the transfected genetic material, such as DNA, is present in the nucleus of the host cell, DNA repair mechanisms may lead the joining of said copies and the formation of concatemers, which is followed by the integration of the concatemers is single or multiple locations in the host genome.
  • concatemers junctions include but are not limited to vector-vector junctions such as plasmid-plasmid junctions.
  • mutations as specified above refers to any change in a polynucleotide sequence, such as in the transfected nucleic acid sequence.
  • the genetic signatures associated to a locus which encodes the polypeptide of interest are identified by Target Locus Amplification (TLA) technology followed by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
  • TLA Target Locus Amplification
  • NGS Next Generation Sequencing
  • techniques known in the art such as inverted PCR followed by Sanger sequencing, whole genome sequencing approaches, FISH or Southern Blot could be used for genetic signature determination.
  • single cell cloning step is applied to generate clones of the cell population.
  • the term "single cell cloning step" as used inhere refers to the step of producing clones derived from single cells, such as the single cells forming the cell population.
  • Various methods can be used for the single cell cloning step as specified above.
  • the clones generated upon the single cell cloning step are analyzed by qPCR for the presence of said genetic signatures.
  • Alternative techniques to detect the clones wherein the genetic signatures are present include but are not limited to FISH, Southern Blot, whole genome sequencing approaches and TLA followed by NGS.
  • the binomial "contaminating population detected/no contaminating population detected" score method of confidence interval (Chapter 2.2 in (Wallis, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(3), 178-208, 2013)) is applied using SAS/JMP ® software. To evaluate the population of cells that are potentially not monoclonal sample sizes from 10 to 8000 cells are evaluated and the one-sided probability of monoclonal and not monoclonal are calculated using the following formula derived from Wallis, 2013:
  • predetermined value refers to the upper limit of the confidence interval that the probability said cell population is not monoclonal. In a certain embodiment said predetermined value approaches 0%. In another embodiment said predetermined value is equal to or greater than about 0.01% and equal to or less than about 5%; or equal to or greater than about 0.05% and equal to or less than about 2.5%; or equal to or greater than about 0.5% and equal to or less than about 2%; or is equal or less about 1.5%. More specifically the predetermined value is selected from the group comprising about 0.01%, about 0.05%, about 0.1%, about 0.5%, about 1%, about 1.5%, about 2%, about 2.5% and a bout 5%. The present invention also includes predetermined value at intervals of 0.01%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9% and 1% between the a bove said values.
  • predetermined confidence interval refers to the probability that the upper limit of said confidence interval is equal to or less than the predetermined value.
  • predetermined confidence interval is equal to or greater than about 80% and equal to or less than about 99,9%; or is equal to or greater than about 85% and equal to or less than about 99%; is equal to or greater than about 90% and equal to or less than about 96%; is about 95%. More specifically, predetermined confidence interval is selected from the group comprising about 80%, about 85%, about 90%, about 95% about 98%, about 99%.
  • the present invention also includes predetermined confidence interval at intervals of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9% between the above said values.
  • the number of clones analyzed to determine said confidence interval is equal to or greater than 5 and equal to or less than 10000; or equal to or greater than 10 and equal to or less than 8000. In another embodiment number of clones analyzed to determine said confidence interval is greater than 10000. In particular the number of clones analyzed to determine said confidence interval is selected from the group comprising 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 180, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 10000, more than 10000. The present invention also includes clones analyzed to determine said confidence interval at intervals of 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 between the above said values.
  • Figure 1 Schematic overview of cell line development and monoclonality demonstration.
  • Figure 2 Theoretical redistribution of cell populations. Assuming clone CHO-S[mAb] was deposited in the same well as Clone CHO-S[BEAT-slow] during the limiting dilution step, a difference of 13% in growth rate would lead to rapid overgrow of CHO-S[BEAT] (open triangles) over CHO-S[BEAT-slow] (full circles). The dashed line represents the time-point where the RCB of the CHO-S[BEAT] was frozen after limiting dilution step.
  • FIG. 3 Three plasmid-plasmid fusions of special interest were detected in clone CHO-S[BEAT], Junction 1 (A) and Junction 2 (B) contained non-plasmid DNA stretches between the two plasmid ends.
  • Junction A (C) was the result of a complex rearrangement of the plasmid sequences before fusion. Sequences of the plasmid-plasmid fusions are depicted as well as the alignment of these sequences to the plasmid maps.
  • the restriction sites depicted on the plasmid maps correspond to the restriction enzymes used for linearization of the plasmid prior to transfection.
  • FIG. 4 Assessment of cell population homogeneity by TLA/NGS using a specific deletion identified in clone CHO-S[mAb].
  • A TLA/NGS results for the CHO-S[mAb] RCB (top panel) and for the corresponding parental pool (bottom panel).
  • B Mixture experiment with increasing amount of contaminating cell line not bearing the deletion. The coverage at three different points was determined and plotted as "total number of reads”.
  • FIG. 5 Growth rate in LD3s emm : A total of 120 plates were analyzed for clone CHO-S[mAb] (A) and clone CHO-S[BEAT] (B), respectively. With a seeding density of 0.1 cell/ 96 well, an efficiency of 100% corresponds to 10 wells (9.6) showing growth.
  • Figure 6 Design of the qPCR assays.
  • Plasmid-plasmid fusions qPCR based on a hydrolysis probe spanning the junction between the two plasmid sequences, including the inserted nucleotides if present.
  • Genome plasmid fusion qPCR based on SYBR green incorporation: the same reverse primer is used for both the Tg and the WT assay, resulting in an amplification for the Tg assay from the chromosome having integrated the transgene, and the an amplification for the WT assay from the intact chromosome(s).
  • Figure 7 Normalized signals of qPCR performed on 219 sub-clones of CHO-S[mAb] (without P2B01 and P2H07 in which either Tg or WT signal was missing). For all samples, signal is below the LOD for a secondary subpopulation having lost the genetic feature.
  • Figure 8 Normalized signals of qPCR performed on 207 sub-clones of CHO-S[BEAT] for (A) Junction 1 and (B) Junction A. Junction 2 assay did not allow quantification. For Junction A, all signals are below the LOD for contaminating subpopulation. For Junction 1, one sample (P8FI10) is a bove the LOQ (duplicate value, the triplicate was an outlier) with 71% of contaminant sub-population having lost this specific plasmid- plasmid junction.
  • Figure 9 The graph shows the upper limit of the one sided 95% confidence interval for probability of not monoclonal and monoclonal based on the number of samples analyzed.
  • the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval is 1.22% and 1.29% respectively. Decreasing the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval below 0.2% would have required the analysis of more than 1350 sub-clones (C).
  • the cellular genome is prone to accumulate random mutations over time and the accumulation of these acquired mutations makes each clone genetically unique.
  • a specific genetic feature can be associated specifically to a clone (in contrast to the parental cell population), it can be considered to be an identifying characteristic of this clone (a "signature") and can be used to evaluate the homogeneity of the cell bank.
  • a signature an identifying characteristic of this clone
  • the integration of the transgene in the host cell genome is a special case of mutation that occurred in the first ancestor of the cell line.
  • DNA repair mechanisms may be involved in concatemerization of plasmids and integration in a single or in multiple random locations in the host genome.
  • plasmids usually are linearized at specific sites outside the expression cassette prior to transfection.
  • DNA repair mechanisms may introduce modifications of plasmid sequences during concatemerization, e.g. deletion of bases at the ends of the plasmids or insertion of stretches of non plasmid related DNA nucleotides between two plasmid sequences. Some even more dramatic modifications of plasmid sequences can also occur, such as deletions of large portions of the plasmid sequence.
  • the cells usually are selected for high and stable expression of the transfected transgenes.
  • Cells selected in this manner have the transgene DNA stably integrated in their genome.
  • a stable clone is thus characterized by a specific transgenic DNA integration event, itself unique with regards to the precise integration site(s) of the plasmid DNA in the host genome (except in the case of targeted integration), variations in the assembly of the integrated concatemers (plasmid- plasmid fusions) or in sequence integrity (re-arrangements or mutations in plasmid backbones).
  • plasmid- plasmid fusions variations in the assembly of the integrated concatemers
  • sequence integrity re-arrangements or mutations in plasmid backbones.
  • the methods disclosed by the present invention to determine the monoclonality of cell lines are independent of the process used for their generation, based on an analysis of the integrated transgenes.
  • the methods includes the use of target locus amplification (TLA) followed by next generation sequencing (NGS), which allows a detailed analysis of the transgene locus and the identification of unique genetic features in a specific clone, and analysis of sub-clones generated from the cell banks, followed by statistical analysis, which allows the assessment of the homogeneity of the cell bank based on the presence or absence of the genetic features identified in the clone.
  • TLA target locus amplification
  • NGS next generation sequencing
  • CHO-S[mAb] The cell line CHO-S[mAb] is derived from the CHO-S (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) parental cell line. It expresses a monoclonal antibody of the IgGlK format and was generated by the co-transfection of four different plasmids expressing the light chain, heavy chain and two resistance genes for antibiotics used as selection agents, respectively.
  • CHO-S[BEAT] is also derived from CHO-S and expresses a bispecific antibody of the BEAT ® format. It was generated by the co-transfection of five different plasmids expressing the light chain, heavy chain, single chain Fv and two resistance genes, respectively.
  • the two cell lines underwent two rounds of limiting dilution that were performed in a chemically defined medium without supplementation of FCS (Fetal Calf Serum).
  • LD1 limiting dilution 1
  • the cells were seeded in 96 well plates at a density of 4000-10,000 cells/well, which in the presence of selection pressure (2 different antibiotics) led to ⁇ 20% of wells showing growth.
  • the resulting cell populations underwent a second limiting dilution (LD2).
  • the cells were seeded at a density of 0.1 cells/well in 96 well plates leading to cell populations that were frozen in a first bank named the research cell bank (RCB).
  • the master cell bank (MCB) was generated by thawing and expanding a vial of the RCB.
  • a cell line development process can ensure monoclonality if at least 2 limiting dilution steps with a seeding density ⁇ 1 cell/well have been performed prior the establishment of the cell bank.
  • LD1 seeding density > 1 cell / well the cell population frozen in the RCB cannot be considered monoclonal.
  • an additional round of limiting dilution (LD3) was performed on the RCB with a seeding density of 0.1 cells/well in 96 well plates.
  • the samples used for monoclonality demonstration of the RCB were generated by an additional LD3 (LD3s e rum) on the RCB with a seeding density of 0.1 cells/well in 96 well plates in the presence of 10% FCS. Growing wells were amplified in 96 deep well plates and cell pellets were frozen for further analysis by qPCR.
  • LD3s e rum LD3s e rum
  • TLA followed by NGS, as well as bioinformatic analysis were performed by Cergentis (Utrecht, The Netherlands). Primer sequences can be found in Tables 1 and 2.
  • PCR products were sequenced on an lllumina, lllumina Miseq or llluminal Miniseq sequencer (lllumina NexteraXT protocol for library preparation). Mapping was performed using BWA-SW (Smith Waterman alignment tool) with CriGri_1.0 (GCA_000419365.1) as reference genome.
  • Table 1 Primers used for TLA reactions for both cell lines. Each transgene is targeted by one specific primer set. One additional primer set targeting the backbone sequence common to all the transgenes was also used for TLA reactions.
  • the qPCR assays for CHO-S[BEAT] were performed on the LightCycler 48011 instrument and on the Rotorgene 6000 instrument using Quantifast Multiplex Mastermix.
  • Table 4 Primers used for qPCR analysis of sub-clones, targeting integration sites or plasmid-plasmid junctions identified by TLA/NGS.
  • the specific growth rate m for the clone CHO-S[BEAT] was determined to have a mean of 0.038 h-1 (monitored over ⁇ 80 generations).
  • a slower growing clone (“CHO-S[BEAT-slow]”) derived from the same transfection was found to have a specific growth rate of 0.033 h-1 (monitored over 36 generations).
  • Figure 2 shows the tremendous population reorganization over time by the overgrowth of CHO-S[BEAT] over CHO-S[BEAT-slow], assuming that one cell of each of the two clones were distributed in the same well during the limiting dilution.
  • TLA was identified to be the most suitable approach to analyze the integration site.
  • the enrichment of the DNA flanking the integrated transgenes before the generation of NGS data allowed to generate a high sequence coverage specifically in the genomic region of the integrated plasmid DNA.
  • RCB samples from both cell lines were subjected to TLA followed by NGS in order to determine the genomic integration site(s) including plasmid - host cell DNA fusions and the architecture of the plasmids concatemer(s), i.e. plasmid - plasmid fusions and plasmid sequence integrity.
  • Table 5 Analysis of genomic integration sites in 47 cell populations generated in several cell line development campaigns. No cell populations shared the same integration sites except when they were derived from the same parental pool ("clone family").
  • plasmid concatemers were integrated into the host cell genome at 4 different sites (Table 5). The same integration sites were found in the parental pool of this clone, as well as in 10 control sub-clones of this clone obtained after LD3. The parental pool contained several additional integration sites, revealing a genetic heterogeneity of the cell population at the pool level. The presence of exactly the same integration sites in the 10 control sub-clones demonstrated a certain level of homogeneity of the cell population in the RCB.
  • plasmid-plasmid junction sequences in the plasmids concatemer(s) could be determined using the TLA/NGS data.
  • Three plasmid-plasmid junctions were of special interest in the cell line CHO-S[BEAT] as they represented unique combinations of DNA sequences resulting from DNA repair.
  • Junction 1 and Junction 2 contained stretches of non-plasmid related nucleotides and Junction A was the result of a recombination event between two plasmid parts distant from the linearization site ( Figure 3).
  • genomic integration sites and plasmid-plasmid junctions are defined by precise DNA sequences (two fusions sequences between host cell genomic DNA and plasmid DNA - one at each end of the plasmid concatemer - for genomic integration site, and one fusion sequence for plasmid-plasmid junctions).
  • genomic DNA was isolated and standard PCR were performed, targeting the fusions sequences. Size (agarose gels) and sequence (Sanger sequencing) of the resulting PCR products were confirmed which demonstrated that the sequences identified by NGS were indeed present in the cell samples (data not shown).
  • Example 5 Monoclonality assessment by qPCR and statistical analysis
  • the most suitable way to analyze the composition of a population of cells is to generate sub-clones and analyze the resulting clonal populations.
  • the sub-cloning procedure was chosen in order to assure regulatory compliant monoclonality of the resulting population.
  • the limiting dilution LD3s e mm was performed in the presence of FCS in order to ensure that the resulting clones were representative of the starting population.
  • the median value of the resulting survival rates was considered sufficiently high to make a preferential survival of specific sub-populations highly unlikely (Figure 5).
  • a total of 458 clones for CHO-S[mAb] and 767 clones CHO-S[BEAT] were generated.
  • TLA/NGS is not suited for high-throughput analysis
  • the genomic insertion site and plasmid-plasmid junctions can be detected and quantified using qPCR which allows high-throughput analysis.
  • qPCR assays Jl, J2 and JA were designed with a hydrolysis probe spanning the actual junction site between the two plasmid sequences to ensure enough specificity for the assays.
  • the reference DNA sequence (WT assay) for CHO-S[BEAT] was a randomly chosen suitable location in the genome ( Figure 6A).
  • qPCR based on SYBR green incorporation was found sufficiently specific for CHO-S[mAb].
  • One of the primers was designed to bind the genomic DNA sequence on one side of the integration site B.
  • Two other primers were designed to bind on the integrated DNA (for the transgene assay, Tg) and on the genomic DNA on the other side of the integration site (for the reference gene assay, WT), respectively.
  • the first reaction would result in product amplification only if the transgene was present.
  • the WT assay resulted in product amplification in the presence or absence of the transgene, as the cells contain at least 2 copies of each chromosome (see Figure 6B).
  • the normalization of the transgene signal (Tg or Junction) with the reference signal (WT) allowed the estimation of the abundance of the transgene in the cell genome and the detection of a potential contaminant cell lines.
  • the qPCR assays were qualified and LOD and LOQ were determined for each assay using a mixture of the clone of interest and an unrelated clone generated during the same transfection but not bearing the specific feature (Table 6). For Junction 2, neither LOD nor LOQ could be determined because of the lack of overall efficacy of the reaction. Nevertheless, the assay was considered suitable to determine the presence or absence of the plasmid-plasmid junction in the cell samples.
  • the binomial (“contaminating population detected”/"no contaminating population detected”) score method of confidence interval was used to determine the probability that the parental cell line is monoclonal using SAS/JMP ® software. To evaluate the population of cells that are potentially not monoclonal sample sizes from 10 to 8000 cells were evaluated and the one-sided probability of monoclonal and not monoclonal were calculated (Table 7) using the following formula derived from Wallis, 2013:
  • Table 7 Calculation of One sided 95% confidence interval for Monoclonality.
  • the binomial ("contaminating population detected"/"no contaminating population detected") score method of confidence interval was used to determine the probability that the parental cell line is monoclonal using SAS/JMP ® software. To evaluate the population of cells that are potentially not monoclonal sample sizes from 10 to 8000 cells were evaluated and the one-sided probability of monoclonal and not monoclonal were calculated.
  • a monoclonal cell line is expected to be homogeneous and thus to respond in a reproducible manner when confronted with minor process changes. Subpopulations within a polyclonal cell line may react differently when confronted with minor process changes, which may lead to measureable and unexpected differences in product quality attributes.
  • Monoclonality can be ensured by the cloning procedure (e.g. two rounds of limiting dilution with a seeding density ⁇ 1 cell/well). If the cloning procedure is not sufficient to ensure the monoclonality of the cell line, a demonstration of the homogeneity of the cell line is required. However, in case of a contamination, the difference in the specific growth rate of different clones may lead to rapid overgrow of one clone over the other. Therefore the demonstration of initial monoclonality becomes more and more challenging with every generation following the cloning step, until it becomes virtually impossible. For this reason the assessment of cell bank homogeneity has to be performed as early as possible after the cloning step in cell line development.
  • the cloning procedure e.g. two rounds of limiting dilution with a seeding density ⁇ 1 cell/well.
  • the analysis was performed using the first cell bank frozen with the respective clones. It can be speculated that potentially present undetected subpopulations are likely to be further reduced or to even completely disappear in the following cell banks (e.g. MCB or WCB).
  • TLA Targeted locus amplification
  • NGS next generation sequencing
  • the TLA/NGS signal of a specific integration site may not be suitable for a direct monoclonality assessment.
  • the integration site is known, not all subpopulations may carry a detectable integration site (e.g. no integration site could be determined by CHO-S[BEAT]) and would therefore not be detected in the assay. Therefore preferably clearly defined and detectable genomic features, ideally a deletion in the genomic region (which may allow detection of all contaminating populations) or in the plasmid backbone (which may allow detection of contaminating populations carrying plasmids) should be considered for direct monoclonality determination.
  • a more general and cost-effective approach to determine the monoclonality of an existing cell line is to analyze sub-clones using qPCR for the presence of specific genetic features, followed by a statistical analysis.
  • the genetic feature may be the bridging region of the transfected plasmid in the host cell genome, plasmid-plasmid fusions or any other genetic feature that is unique for a particular clone. If the assay is sufficiently sensitive, even the presence of subpopulations in the sub-clones not bearing the genetic feature may be detected.
  • the analysis of over 200 sub-clones per clone allowed us to establish the monoclonality of both cell lines.
  • the analysis detected 0% of contaminating population with an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of 1.22%. This means that the upper limit of the confidence interval is at 1.22% with 95% probability. This upper confidence interval is above the calculated lower level of the potentially remaining contaminant (0.2%) in the overgrowth example provided ( Figure 1).
  • An upper limit of the confidence interval below 0.2% in order to exclude a contamination at the clonality determining process step would have required the analysis of more than 1350 sub-clones (Supplementary Figure 2C). While qPCR allows high-throughput analysis, the generation, freezing and handling of more than 1350 subclones would be very labor intensive and may not be practical.
  • the analysis of more than 200 sub-clones in this study allowed us to confirm the homogeneity of the existing cell bank with an acceptably small upper limit of the confidence interval of the monoclonality assumption of ⁇ 1.5%, while representing a reasonable experimental effort

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne des procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d'une population cellulaire par l'identification de signatures génétiques, la détermination de la présence de ces signatures génétiques dans des cellules de cette population cellulaire et l'application d'une analyse statistique pour déterminer la probabilité que la population cellulaire soit monoclonale.
EP19736386.4A 2018-07-09 2019-07-09 Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d'une population cellulaire Withdrawn EP3821036A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP18182516 2018-07-09
PCT/EP2019/068345 WO2020011759A1 (fr) 2018-07-09 2019-07-09 Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d'une population cellulaire

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3821036A1 true EP3821036A1 (fr) 2021-05-19

Family

ID=62916451

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19736386.4A Withdrawn EP3821036A1 (fr) 2018-07-09 2019-07-09 Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d'une population cellulaire

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3821036A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2020011759A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112683738B (zh) * 2021-01-29 2023-06-23 上海睿钰生物科技有限公司 一种待鉴定细胞单克隆源性的鉴定方法、系统及其应用

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK0672142T3 (da) 1992-12-04 2001-06-18 Medical Res Council Multivalente og multispecifikke bindingsproteiner samt fremstilling og anvendelse af disse
WO2012014208A2 (fr) * 2010-07-27 2012-02-02 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Procédés et systèmes d'estimation de la clonalité de cultures cellulaires
US9209965B2 (en) 2014-01-14 2015-12-08 Microsemi Semiconductor Ulc Network interface with clock recovery module on line card
PL3384045T3 (pl) * 2015-12-03 2021-07-12 Ares Trading S.A. Sposób określania klonalności komórek

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2020011759A1 *
WELCH JOEL: "Tilting at clones: a regulatory perspective on the importance of ''clonality'' of mammalian cell banks", FDA PRESENTATON, 24 April 2017 (2017-04-24), pages 1 - 26, XP055939648, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.slideshare.net/IanTaylor50/joel-welchpdf-amsterdam-april-2017> [retrieved on 20220707] *
WU PAUL ET AL: "Tools and methods for providing assurance of clonality for legacy cell lines", ENGINEERING CONFERENCES INTERNATIONAL, ECI DIGITAL ARCHIVES, CELL CULTURE ENGINEERING XVI, 1 January 2018 (2018-01-01), XP055939636, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://dc.engconfintl.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=ccexvi> [retrieved on 20220707] *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2020011759A8 (fr) 2021-04-22
WO2020011759A1 (fr) 2020-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2021203220B2 (en) Simultaneous, Integrated Selection and Evolution of Antibody/Protein Performance and Expression in Production Hosts
US12129462B2 (en) Single cell bar-coding for antibody discovery
EP3596216B1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés d&#39;analyse combinatoire massivement parallèle de cellules uniques
Tiller Single B cell antibody technologies
JP7411016B2 (ja) 免疫レパートリー発掘
WO2011109726A9 (fr) Anticorps homologues multispécifiques
US12404552B2 (en) Methods of selecting antibodies and antibody fragments
WO2021092204A1 (fr) Méthodes et compositions associées à un criblage de ciblage de cellule nucléase guidée par un acide nucléique
US20220033808A1 (en) Methods and compositions for nucleic acid-guided nuclease cell targeting screen
CN111566262A (zh) 动态人抗体轻链文库
EP3821036A1 (fr) Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d&#39;une population cellulaire
WO2021094519A1 (fr) Procédés pour déterminer la monoclonalité d&#39;une population cellulaire
CN119325508A (zh) 着陆垫细胞系的生成
RU2849601C1 (ru) Получение рекомбинантной линии клеток китайского хомячка, характеризующейся высоким продуцированием, для продуцирования терапевтических белков
HUSSAIN et al. Recombinant DNA Technology
AU2018226408B2 (en) Novel methods of protein evolution
HK40026409B (en) Simultaneous, integrated selection and evolution of antibody/protein performance and expression in production hosts
HK40026409A (en) Simultaneous, integrated selection and evolution of antibody/protein performance and expression in production hosts
HK1230231B (en) Simultaneous, integrated selection and evolution of human protein performance and expression in production hosts
HK1236221B (en) Simultaneous, integrated selection and evolution of antibody/protein performance and expression in production hosts
HK1236221A1 (en) Simultaneous, integrated selection and evolution of antibody/protein performance and expression in production hosts
HK1185661A (en) Novel methods of protein evolution
HK1185661B (en) Novel methods of protein evolution

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210209

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20220829

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20240409