[go: up one dir, main page]

EP3886718B1 - Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses - Google Patents

Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3886718B1
EP3886718B1 EP19808625.8A EP19808625A EP3886718B1 EP 3886718 B1 EP3886718 B1 EP 3886718B1 EP 19808625 A EP19808625 A EP 19808625A EP 3886718 B1 EP3886718 B1 EP 3886718B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ultrasound
ultrasound image
bone
focus area
fracture
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP19808625.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3886718A1 (fr
Inventor
Jingping Xu
Balasundar Iyyavu Raju
Anthony M. GADES
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koninklijke Philips NV
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from EP19151811.7A external-priority patent/EP3682811A1/fr
Application filed by Koninklijke Philips NV filed Critical Koninklijke Philips NV
Publication of EP3886718A1 publication Critical patent/EP3886718A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3886718B1 publication Critical patent/EP3886718B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/08—Clinical applications
    • A61B8/0875—Clinical applications for diagnosis of bone
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/08—Clinical applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/08—Clinical applications
    • A61B8/0833—Clinical applications involving detecting or locating foreign bodies or organic structures
    • A61B8/085—Clinical applications involving detecting or locating foreign bodies or organic structures for locating body or organic structures, e.g. tumours, calculi, blood vessels, nodules
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/46—Ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic diagnostic devices with special arrangements for interfacing with the operator or the patient
    • A61B8/467—Ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic diagnostic devices with special arrangements for interfacing with the operator or the patient characterised by special input means
    • A61B8/469—Ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic diagnostic devices with special arrangements for interfacing with the operator or the patient characterised by special input means for selection of a region of interest
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/54—Control of the diagnostic device

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to ultrasound imaging, and more particularly to an apparatus and method for detecting bone fracture on basis of ultrasound images.
  • Bone fractures are quite common from traumatic injury (injuries from trauma). For example, rib fractures are the most common injuries resulting from blunt check(chest) trauma.
  • diagnosis of bone fractures including physical examination, conventional radiography such as diagnostic x-ray, advanced medical imaging modalities such as CT, MRI or SPECT(not often recommend for this task), and ultrasound imaging.
  • physical examination and conventional radiography are the main diagnostic tools used in daily clinical practice, but cannot detect all bone fractures. For example, only around 49% of rib fractures are detected upon precise physical examination and conventional radiographs.
  • CT and MRI can provide most detailed information of bone fractures, including localization, fragment dislocation and others.
  • these more advanced medical imaging modalities are not always available at resource-limited situations such as prehospital and some small hospitals in developing countries, and they are not suitable for evaluating fracture reduction that needs repeated serial imaging during the whole treatment process.
  • Ultrasound imaging has been recognized as a good first-line alternative for the diagnosis of bone fractures in adults as well as especially children and pregnant women. Ultrasound imaging allows identification of the precise rib fracture location to help determine the site for surgical incision before rib fixation surgery which eliminates the potential for having to extend the incision. Ultrasound imaging has shown its advantages in pediatric fracture assessment owing to children•s relative thinner chest wall (soft tissue) compared with that of adults. More advantages of ultrasound imaging include its portable, noninvasive and inexpensive cost-effective, as well as repeated examinations at bedside to evaluate fracture reduction during the whole treatment process.
  • the manual detection of bone fractures in ultrasound images is highly operator-dependent, time-consuming process. It is always a challenging task for inexperienced users, especially when the examination time is critical. For example, the examination time for the whole chest of 12-paired ribs is preferably less than 12 minutes in emergency room, but shorter is better.
  • some approaches using intensity and gradient information or morphologic features were proposed in automatic bone segmentation from ultrasound B-mode image. For example, I. Hacihaliloglu et.al.
  • US 2007/043290 A1 on which the preamble of claim 1 is based, discloses a device for detecting bone fracture by comparing certain parameters of the waves reflected off of the bone to a threshold condition.
  • an apparatus for detecting bone fracture of a subject on basis of ultrasound images as defined in claim 1.
  • the apparatus comprises a first fracture detector configured to receive a first ultrasound image of a region of the subject and to identify a bone in the first ultrasound image.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to identify at least one focus area within the region on basis of the identified bone, to generate focus area information indicating position of the at least one focus area, to instruct an acquisition of a second ultraound image based on the generated focus area information.
  • the at least one focus area can comprise at least a portion of the identified bone.
  • the apparatus further comprises a second fracture detector configured to receive the second ultrasound image and to detect bone fracture on basis of the second ultrasound image, and the second ultrasound image is acquired based on the generated focus area information and has a higher resolution in the at least one focus area than in the rest of the region.
  • the resolution of the at least one focus area in the second ultrasound image is higher than the resolution of the at least one focus area in the first ultrasound image.
  • the first ultrasound image is firstly used to identify a bone within the region, the at least one focus area is identified as one or more sub-regions of the region which is nearby the bone surface and cover at least a portion of the identified bone, and then the second ultrasound image is acquired in such a way that the resolution of the at least one focused area is higher than the rest of the region and the resolution of the at least one focus area in the second ultrasound image is higher than the resolution of the at least one focus area in the first ultrasound image, and is used to detect bone fracture.
  • Ultrasound images having almost the fixed resolution across the imaged region are used for bone fracture detection in conventional approaches.
  • the second ultrasound image having higher axial and lateral resolutions in one or more sub-regions comprising the bone is acquired and used for bone fracture detection, and higher axial and lateral resolutions would result in a finer appearance of bone surface for more accurate detection.
  • the first ultrasound image is firstly used to identify one or more focus area, and the second ultrasound image is then acquired in such a way to zoom (high-resolution) in to the identified at least one or more focus area.
  • some fractures undetectable in the first ultrasound image such as subtle fracture, can be detected on basis of the second ultrasound image which has a high resolution.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired by performing additional signal processing on the first ultrasound image only in the at least one focus area. That is, the second ultrasound image is acquired by performing signal processing on the first ultrasound image without transmitting any additional ultrasound signal into the at least one focus area.
  • Advanced signal processing can improve the image quality and/or the accuracy of the bone fracture detection at the cost of more computational time and or effort. Moreover, the more large area to be processed, the more computational time or effort it will cost. Hence, it can reduce computational time and/or effort by performing additional signal processing only in the at least one focus area.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired by transmitting additional ultrasound beams at least toward the at least one focus area.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to instruct an ultrasound image acquisition unit to acquire the second ultrasound image by transmitting additional ultrasound beams at least toward the at least one focus area, and the second fracture detector is further cofigured to receive the second ultrasound image acquried by the ultrsound image acquistion unit.
  • the proposed apparatus can be communicatively connected to the ultrasound image acquisition unit, either directly or indirectly. The apparatus can send the generated focus area information to the ultrasound image acquisition unit, the ultrasound image acquisition unit can then acquire the second ultrasound image based on the received focus area information and send the acquired second ultrasound image to the apparatus, particularly to the second fracture detector of the apparatus.
  • the first ultrasound image is acquired using a first ultrasound beam setting
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired using a second ultrasound beam setting at least in the at least one focus area
  • the second ultrasound beam setting is different from the first ultrasound beam setting.
  • the first fracture detection can be configured to instruct the ultrasound image acquisition unit to acquire the second ultrasound image using the second ultrasound setting at least in the at least one focus area.
  • the second ultrasound beam setting may be different from the first ultrasound beam setting in various way.
  • the first ultrasound beam setting and the second ultrasound beam setting are different in at least one of the following: (a) focal zone, (b) transmit frequency; (c) transmit pulse length; (d) steering angle.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to detect hematoma adjacent to the identified bone on basis of the second ultrasound image, and the at least one focus area is generated on basis of the detected hematoma.
  • the at least one focus area comprises at least a portion of the detected hematoma.
  • the at least one focus area can cover only the portion of the identified bone adjacent to which hematoma is detected, rather than covering all the identified bone. In this way, the at least one focus area can be even smaller.
  • the smaller the at least focus area the higher resolution of the at least one focus area in the second ultrasound image can be, and/or the less effort is required to acquire the same level of resolution for the at least one focus area.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to detect bone fracture on basis of the first ultrasound image.
  • the resolution of the first ultrasound image is lower than that of the second ultrasound image at least in the at least one focus area, some bone fractures such as displaced fracture can be detected on basis of the first ultrasound image.
  • the first fracture detector is configured to firstly detect bone fracture on basis of the first ultrasound image, and subsequently to identify the at least one focus area. In some further embodiments, the first fracture detector is configured to identify the at least one focus area if no bone fracture is detected by the first fracture detector on basis of the first ultrasound image, and/or not to identity detect the at least one focus area if bone fracture is detected by the first fracture detector on basis of the first ultrasound image. In some further embodiments, the second fracture detector can be configured to receive the second ultrasound image of the region and to detect bone fracture on the basis of the second ultrasound image only if no bone fracture is detected by the first fracture detector on basis of the first ultrasound image.
  • the detection of bone fracture can be stopped once at least one bone fracture (such as a major bone fracture) is detected. It is especially advantage if a large area of the subject is to be scanned. For example, in the case of rib fracture detection, some or all of 12-pair ribs are to be examined.
  • the apparatus further comprises a controller.
  • the controller is configured to switch between a first detection mode and a second detection mode, and to control, in the first detection mode, an ultrasound image acquisition unit to acquire the first ultrasound image and to control, in the second detection mode, the ultrasound image acquisition unit, either to acquire the second ultrasound image or to acquire both the first and second of ultrasound images.
  • the controller is further configured to switch between the first detection mode and the second detection mode on basis of a user input received from a user interface.
  • the user input can be in various forms, including physical contact with the user interface (such as operating a physical button, touching a touch panel etc.) or contactless input (such as audio input, gesture input, etc.).
  • the apparatus can enable a more flexible detection mode or workflow to meet various situations.
  • the first detection mode might be applicable for time-urgent cases when small bone fracture is not very critical, or in other words, when it is more important to detect major bone fracture.
  • the clinician may firstly use the first detection mode to do a fast, coarse exam, and then if needed, switch to the second detection mode to do a detailed detection.
  • the apparatus in the first detection mode, can be configured to present any detected bone and/or any identified focus area such as those comprising hematoma.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to receive a plurality of first ultrasound images acquired when an ultrasound transducer is moving relative to the subject, and a first positional information on the ultrasound transducer relative to the subject corresponding to each of the plurality of first ultrasound images.
  • the position information on the ultrasound transducer relative to the subject corresponding to a particular first ultrasound images is the information about the position relative to the ultrasound transducer at which position the particular first ultrasound images is acquired.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to identify a bone, to detect the presence of hematoma adjacent to the bone in each of the plurality of first ultrasound images, and identify a subset of the plurality of first ultrasound images in which the hematoma adjacent to the bone is present.
  • the first fracture detector is further configured to generate second positional information on ultrasound transducer relative to the subject corresponding to each of the subset of the plurality of first ultrasound images.
  • the plurality of first ultrasound images are acquired when the ultrasound transducer is moved along the chest of the subject or along the ribs of the subject.
  • a user interface is configured to present the second positional information.
  • an ultrasound system for detecting bone fracture of a subject.
  • the ultrasound system comprises an ultrasound image acquisition unit comprising an ultrasound transducer, the above apparatus for detecting bone fracture coupled to the ultrasound image acquisition unit, and the ultrasound image acquisition unit is configured to acquire the first ultrasound image and the second ultrasound image.
  • the ultrasound transducer is configured to transmit an ultrasound signal to a region of the subject and to receive an ultrasound echo signal from the region.
  • the method comprises steps of receiving a first ultrasound image of a region of the subject, and identifying a bone in the first ultrasound image identifying at least one focus area within the region on basis of the identified bone.
  • the at least one focus area comprises at least a portion of the identified bone.
  • the method further comprises a step of instructing an acquisition of a second ultrasound image of the region and a step of receiving the acquired second ultrasound image, wherein the second ultrasound image has a higher resolution in the at least one focus area than in the rest of the region, and the resolution of the at least one focus area in the second ultrasound image is higher than the resolution of the at least one focus area in the first ultrasound image.
  • the method further comprises a step of detecting bone fracture on the basis of the second ultrasound image.
  • a computer-readable medium comprising executable instructions, which when executed, cause a computer processor to perform the above method.
  • FIG.1 illustrates an ultrasound system 100 for detecting bone fracture of a subject in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG.2 illustrates a method 200 of detecting bone fracture of a subject on basis of ultrasound images in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
  • the ultrasound system 100 comprises an apparatus 110 for detecting bone fracture of a subject, an ultrasound image acquisition unit 110, and a user interface 130.
  • the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 can be an ultrasound probe.
  • the apparatus 120 is communicatively connected to the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 and the user interface 130 in various ways, including wired or wireless connections, local or remote connections, etc.
  • the user interface 130 may optionally be communicatively connected to the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 as well.
  • the apparatus 120, the ultrasound image ultrasound image acquisition unit 110, and the user interface 130 can be integrated into a single device, or can be physically separated from one or another.
  • Each of the apparatus 120, the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 and the user interface 130 can comprise one or more devices.
  • the ultrasound system 100 can comprise an ultrasound probe connectable to a computer system, and the computer system comprises a processor and a memory.
  • the computer system can be a personal computer, a smart phone, a tablet.
  • the apparatus 120 comprises the processor and the memory of the computer system, wherein the memory comprises executable instructions, which when executed, cause the computer processor to perform the method 200.
  • the user interface 130 can be part of the computer system as well or is connectable to the ultrasound probe and/or the computer system.
  • the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 can be any kind of device that comprises an ultrasound transducer capable of transmitting and/or receiving ultrasound signals.
  • the ultrasound image acquisition 110 is configured to both transmit ultrasound signals toward a region of interest and receive echoes of the transmitted ultrasound signals from the region of interest.
  • the ultrasound image acquisition 110 can be configured to acquire two dimensional (2D) or three dimensional (3D) ultrasound images.
  • the ultrasound transducer can comprise an array of transducer elements and thus be capable of scanning a 2D plane.
  • ultrasound transducer can comprise a matrix of transducer elements and thus be capable of directly scanning a 3Dvolume.
  • the ultrasound transducer comprises an array of transducer elements, the array of transducers is re-positioned and/or re-oriented to scanning multiple, different planes, either automatically or manually, and the two dimensional ultrasound data of multiple planes can be assembled into three dimensional ultrasound data of a volume of interest.
  • the ultrasound image acquisition 110 can comprise a mechanical three-dimensional ultrasound probe.
  • ultrasound echo signals received by the transducers will be beamformed, the beamformed signals are processed by various signal processing, such as bandpass filtering, decimation, I and Q component separation, harmonic signal separation, speckle reduction, signal compounding, and/or noise elimination, and the processed signals can be further processed to obtain B-mode data, Doppler data, strain data, motion data, etc.
  • Various ultrasound data can be further processed to form different kinds of ultrasound images. These signal and/or image processing can be performed by the same device, or by multiple devices.
  • an ultrasound probe can comprise the ultrasound transducer and one or more components configured to generate ultrasound images.
  • an ultrasound probe can comprise the ultrasound transducer and one or more components for performing some of the processing, and then a further device is configured to perform the rest to generate ultrasound images based on the output of the ultrasound probe.
  • a further device is configured to perform the rest to generate ultrasound images based on the output of the ultrasound probe.
  • Such as device can be a standalone device, or can be part of a computer system.
  • the apparatus 120 comprises a first fracture detector 122, a second fracture detector 124, and optionally, a controller 126.
  • the first fracture detector 122 is configured to receive a first ultrasound image of a region of the subject.
  • the region of the subject is sometimes called imaged region here.
  • the first ultrasound image can be 2D image or 3D image.
  • the region of the subject can be a 2D plane of the subject, or a 3D volume of the subject.
  • the region of the subject can be pre-selected in accordance with pre-knowledge on the skeleton of the subject.
  • the region of the subject can be selected as the region including the particular bone of interest in accordance with the pre-knowledge of the skeleton of the subject.
  • the region of the subject can be a part of the chest of the subject if the ribs are the bones of interesting, or the region of the subject can be the a part of the upper arm of the subject if humerus is the bone of interesting.
  • the first ultrasound image is acquired in accordance with one or more predetermined anatomical parameters of the subject.
  • the first ultrasound image can be acquired by setting the focus zone at the depth of the bone of interesting so as to enhance the resolution at that depth.
  • the anatomical parameter comprises a parameter indicative the depth between the chest skin surface and the top of the rib.
  • Such parameter can be determined as the thickness of the chest wall (CWT) minus a pre-determined value (such as 0.5 cm) indicative the typical distance between the pleural line and the rib for human beings.
  • the CWT can be a value determined on basis of the body mass index or extracted from historical medical examinations such as a previously acquired ultrasound image of the particular people. Additionally or Alternatively, several different acquisition modes can be automatically or manually selected on basis of the CWT.
  • a penetration mode in which the focus zone is set at a pre-determined large depth value, is selected for large CWT (such as 4-6.2 cm)
  • a general mode in which the focus zone is set at a pre-determined medium depth value, is selected for intermediate CWT (such as 2-4 cm)
  • a resolution in which the focus zone is set at a pre-determined small depth value, can be selected for small CWT (such as 0.5-2 cm).
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to identify any bone in the received first ultrasound image.
  • the identification of the bone can be implemented in any suitable way.
  • the identified bone can be presented to the user, e.g. via the user interface 130.
  • the first ultrasound image is displayed and the identified bone is delineated in the displayed first ultrasound image.
  • the ultrasound B-mode image 310 is an example of the first ultrasound image received by the first fracture detector.
  • the ultrasound B-mode image 310 is the ultrasound B-mode image 310 overlaid with a solid line delineating the identified bone 322.
  • the y axis extends along the depth direction
  • the x axis extends along the lateral direction.
  • an alert signal can be generated.
  • the first fracture detector 122 may be configured to receive user input indicating a bone manually identified by the user, and/or user input assisting the bone detection, such as seed points, and to identify the bone on basis of the user input.
  • the user input can indicate one or more seed points and the first fracture detector can be configured to identify a bone on basis of the indicated seed points.
  • the user input can indicate a spatial region, and the first fracture detector can be configured to identify a bone on basis of the indicated spatial region.
  • the first fracture detector can be configured to identify a bone within the spatial region, or to identify a bone with the spatial region and regions adjacent thereto.
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to identify at least one focus area within the region on basis of the first ultrasound image, and to generate focus area information indicating position of the at least one focus area.
  • the at least one focus area comprises at least a portion of the identified bone.
  • FIGs. 4A-4C illustrate the at least one focus area of an imaging area in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention.
  • the at least one focus area can be any regular or irregular shape.
  • the at least one focus area 430 can be a rectangular region including or covering the identified bone 420.
  • the at least one focus area 430 can be a belt region centered at the identified bone 420.
  • the focus area information can indicate the position of the at least one focus areas along at least one dimension.
  • the focus area information can indicate the depth of the at least one focus area, or the focus area information can indicate both the lateral position and the depth of the at least one focus area in a two-dimension imaged region.
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to detect hematoma adjacent to the identified bone on basis of the detected hematoma.
  • the at least one focus area can be so generated to include or cover the portion of the identified bone adjacent to the detected hematoma.
  • a hematoma 440 is detected adjacent to the identified bone 420, and the at least one focus area 430 is identified as a region covering the hematoma 440 and the portion of the bone beneath the hematoma 440.
  • the at least one focus area may include the portion of the identified bone whose distance to the detected hematoma is less than a predetermined threshold.
  • one or more focus area can be defined by the user via the user interface, or in other words, the first fracture detector can be further configured to receive user input indicative one or more focus areas and to identify the at least one focus area on basis of the user input.
  • the user input can indicate a spatial point
  • the first fracture detector can be configured to identify a focus area to be an area having a predetermined shape and size and centered at the spatial point indicated by the user input.
  • the user input can indicate a spatial region by means of points, lines etc.
  • the first fracture detection can be configured to identify a focus area based on the spatial region indicated by the user input,
  • the identified focus area can be exactly corresponding to the indicated spatial region, or can be an area of a predetermined shape which cover the indicated spatial region.
  • the hematoma adjacent to the bone can be detected in any suitable ways, for example by means of texture analysis.
  • a sub-region of the imaged region can be selected to perform the texture analysis.
  • the sub-region can be a region above the identified bone.
  • the term • above refers to be more superficial or shallow along the depth direction.
  • the sub-region can be selected as the region between the two curves 322 and 324, where the curve 322 illustrates the identified bone, and the curve 324 is distant away to the curve 322 by a predetermined value.
  • Texture analysis can comprise computing any of co-occurrence matrices and their properties such as correlation, entropy, contrast, energy, and homogeneity.
  • Energy is defined as square sum of each matrix element, reflects the grayscale distribution homogeneity of images and texture crudeness. Same values of all co-occurrence matrix resulted in small energy profiles; while high energy might be expected in case of unequal values among co-occurrence matrix values.
  • Contrast reflects the sharpness of images and the depth of texture grooves. Deeper texture grooves were associated with high contrast and better visual sharpness while low contrast are due to shallow grooves and blurred images. Higher number of pixels with high difference in grayscale (e.g. contrast profile) is associated with higher values of contrast.
  • Entropy reflects the non-uniformity and complexity of image texture. Correlation reflects the consistency of image texture. Homogeneity reflects the homogeneity of image textures and scaled the local changes of image texture. High values of homogeneity denote the absence of intra-regional changes and locally homogen
  • FIG. 7A illustrates a region selected from the sub-region between the two curves 322 and 324 in ultrasound B-mode image 320 of FIG. 3B.
  • FIGs. 7B-7F illustrates five different texture analysis of the region illustrated in FIG. 7A .
  • the x-axis represents the lateral direction
  • the y-axis represents the amplitude of the corresponding texture property.
  • the five texture properties are entropy in FIG.7B , correlation in FIG. 7C , contrast in FIG. 7D , energy in FIG. 7E , and homogeneity in FIG. 7F .
  • FIGs. 7B-7F At least the entropy values in FIG.7B , the energy values in FIG. 7E , and the homogeneity values in FIG. 7F show distinguishable changes around the lateral position 200 where the hematoma is located.
  • the entropy values are low for normal sub-periosteal soft tissue and high for the sub-periosteal hematoma. It can be noted that the user settings such as gain and TGC may affect some parameters (for examples: contrast and energy). However, these settings have less effect on parameters such as correlation and entropy.
  • the entropy reflects the non-uniformity and complexity of image texture, and therefore, high entropy indicated more random within the image.
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to send out an instruction for acquiring a second ultrasound image of the region based on the generated focus area information
  • the second fracture detector 124 is configured to receive the acquired second ultrasound image of the region, and to detect bone fracture on the basis of the second ultrasound image.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired based on the generated focus area information, the second ultrasound image has a higher resolution in the at least one focus area than in the rest of the region, and the resolution of the at least one focus area in the second ultrasound image is higher than the resolution of the at least one focus area in the first ultrasound image.
  • the second fracture detector 124 can be configured to detect bone fracture by combining the first and second ultrasound images.
  • the bone fracture can be detected in any suitable ways.
  • the bone surface is firstly detected and then features, such as smoothness and continuity, of the detected bone is extracted.
  • other features such as the detected hematoma, or texture features, strains of the tissues adjacent to the bone can be also used for detect the bone fracture.
  • artificial intelligent based algorithm can be used to detect the bone fracture.
  • the detection of the bone fracture can be assisted by one or more user inputs. For example, if the user detects a fracture by observing the ultrasound image, the user may indicate the location of the detected fracture via the user interface.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired by performing additional signal processing on the first ultrasound image only in the at least one focus area.
  • the first fracture detector can be configured to perform signal processing on the first ultrasound to acquire the second ultrasound image by itself, or can be configured to instruct a further processing unit for performing signal processing to acquire the second ultrasound image.
  • the first fracture detector can send the generated focus area information to the further processing unit, and the further processing unit is configured to perform additional signal processing on the first ultrasound image only in the at least one focus area based on the generated focus area information.
  • This further processing unit can be part of the apparatus 120 or can be communicatively connected to the apparatus 120.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired by transmitting additional ultrasound beams at least toward the at least one focus area.
  • the first fracture detector 122 can be communicatively connected to an ultrasound image acquisition unit 110, and can be configured to instruct the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 to acquire the second ultrasound image by transmitting additional ultrasound beams at least toward the at least one focus area.
  • the first ultrasound image is acquired using a first ultrasound beam setting
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired using a second ultrasound beam setting at least in the at least one focus area, wherein the second ultrasound beam setting is different from the first ultrasound beam setting.
  • the second ultrasound beam setting may be different from the first ultrasound beam setting in various way.
  • the first ultrasound beam setting and the second ultrasound beam setting are different in at least one of the following: (a) focal zone, (b) transmit frequency; (c) transmit pulse length; (d) steering angle.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired by focusing the transmitted and/or receive ultrasound beams on the at least one focus area, e.g. on the depth of the at least one focus area.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired by automatically setting the focal zone of the ultrasound beam to the at least one focus area.
  • Ultrasound focusing is a well-known technology.
  • the phased-array transducer is capable of adjusting the narrowest point in the ultrasound beam anywhere along its length. This is called the focal zone and it is typically within 2-4 cm portion of the ultrasound beam that the highest resolution is achieved.
  • Some existing ultrasound machines are able to effectively focus in multiple focal zones along the ultrasound beam, however, at the cost of affecting other factors such as frame rate since more than one scan or pulse is needed. More details of this technology can be referred to existing prior art such as • Power drive circuits for Diagnostic Medical Ultrasound, by B. Haider in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, June 4-8, 2006 .
  • the apparatus 120 is able to automatically identify at least one focus area and automatically set the focal zone at the at least one focus area without the need of user intervention. Hence, an ultrasound image with higher resolution at desired focus area can be acquired without the need of any user input.
  • the transmit frequency in the second ultrasound beam setting, can be increased and/or the transmit pulse length can be reduced so as to achieve a higher resolution.
  • multiple steering angles can be used. Additionally, one or more steering angles can be dynamically decided. For example, one or more multiple steering angles can be decided on basis of an orientation of the detected bone.
  • the first fracture detector 122 can be further configured to detect bone fracture on basis of the first ultrasound image. Although the resolution of the first ultrasound image is lower than that of the second ultrasound image at least in the at least one focus area, some bone fractures such as displaced fracture can be detected on basis of the first ultrasound image.
  • the controller 126 is configured to switch between a first detection mode and a second detection mode, and to control, in the first detection mode, the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 to acquire the first ultrasound image and to control, in the second detection mode, the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110, either to acquire the second ultrasound image or to acquire both the first and second of ultrasound images.
  • the apparatus 120 can be configured to firstly operate in the first detection mode, and then to operate in the second detection mode. Since the second ultrasound image has a higher resolution than the first ultrasound image at least in the at least focus area, certain bone fracture that is not detectable in the first mode can be detected in the second mode.
  • the second ultrasound image is acquired based on the focus area information generated in the first mode.
  • a first ultrasound image is firstly acquired to generate the focus area information and then a second ultrasound image is acquired based on the focus area information.
  • the controller 126 is further configured to switch between the first detection mode and the second detection mode on basis of a user input received from a user interface 130. For example, the user can firstly do a relatively coarse scanning by selecting the first detection mode, and then switch to a relatively fine scanning by selecting the second detection mode.
  • the method 200 of detecting bone fracture of a subject on basis of ultrasound images In step 210, a first ultrasound image of a region of the subject. In step 220, a bone is identified in the first ultrasound image. In step 240, at least one focus area within the region is identified on basis of the identified bone. In step 250, a second ultrasound image of the region is received, wherein the second ultrasound image has a higher resolution in the at least one focus area than in the rest of the region. In step 260, bone fracture is detected on the basis of the second ultrasound image.
  • step 240 hematoma adjacent to the identified bone is detected in the first ultrasound image, and the at least one focus area within the region can be identified on basis of the detected hematoma.
  • the method 200 may further comprise a step 230.
  • step 230 bone fracture is detected on the basis of the first ultrasound image.
  • the method 200 may continuous in various way after the step 230.
  • the method 200 if no bone fracture is detected in step 230, the method 200 continues with step 240, and if bone fracture is detected in step 230, the method 200 will skip the steps 240 to 260.
  • the detection can stop once any bone fracture is detected.
  • the method 200 continues with step 240 no matter whether any bone fracture is detected in step 230 or not.
  • the field of view of an ultrasound transducer is normally smaller as compared to the region to be scanned or examined for bone fracture detection, and thus typically, the ultrasound transducer is swept across the region of interest, such as across the chest region when detecting rib fracture.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a plurality of ultrasound images 540 acquired when an ultrasound transducer is moving relative to a subject in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a bone 510 with fractures 530 underneath the skin 520.
  • a plurality of ultrasound images F 1 , " , F n is acquired at corresponding positions P 1 , ,, , P n when the ultrasound transducer is sweeping over a region of the subject.
  • the movement of the ultrasound transducer relative to the subject can be directly controlled by a user.
  • the ultrasound transducer can be connected to a driving device capable of moving the ultrasound transducer relative to the subject.
  • the ultrasound transducer can freely sweep over the subject, and so the plurality of positions P 1 , ,, , P n where the ultrasound images are acquired can be any position, and two or more ultrasound images may be acquired at the same positon if the ultrasound transducer is kept at the same position for a while. These positions can be recorded by tracking the position of the ultrasound transducer in various ways, such as EM-sensors, motion sensor, acceleration sensor, etc..
  • the method illustrated in FIG. 2 can be performed. For example, a first ultrasound image of a corresponding region of the subject is acquired, a bone is identified in the first ultrasound image, at least one focus area within the region is identified on basis of the identified bone, a second ultrasound image of the region is then acquired, and then bone fracture is detected on the basis of the second ultrasound image.
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to receive a plurality of first ultrasound images acquired when an ultrasound transducer is moving relative to the subject, and a first positional information on the ultrasound transducer relative to the subject corresponding to each of the plurality of first ultrasound images.
  • the first positional information of an ultrasound image F i indicates the corresponding position P i .
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to identify a bone, to detect the presence of hematoma adjacent to the bone in each of the plurality of first ultrasound images, and identify a subset 550 of the plurality of first ultrasound images in which the hematoma adjacent to the bone is present.
  • the first fracture detector 122 can be further configured to detect bone fracture bone, and different subsets of the plurality of first ultrasound images can be identified.
  • a first subset comprises first ultrasound images in which bone fracture is detected
  • a second subset comprising first ultrasound images in which bone fracture is not detected by the first bone fracture detector but hematoma is detected.
  • the first fracture detector 122 is further configured to generate second positional information on ultrasound transducer relative to the subject corresponding to the subset of the plurality of first ultrasound images.
  • Such second positional information can be presented via a user interface. Given such second positional information, the user may operate the ultrasound image acquisition unit 110 to scan one or more of those positions. In some examples, the user can trigger the apparatus 120 to switch from the first detection mode to the second detection mode, and to scan one or more of those positions in the second detection mode.
  • FIG.6 illustrates an exemplary view 600 of a display 600 of a user interface in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
  • the view 600 may comprise a portion 610 which presents an image 612 of the bone(s) on which bone fracture is to be detected, such as ribs as illustrated in FIG.6 .
  • the image 612 can be a general anatomical model of the bones, or it can be an image of the bones of a particular subject such as a reconstructed 3D image from previously acquired CT, MR, or ultrasound images.
  • the second positional information can be presented as markers 614 in the image 612.
  • the view 600 may comprise a portion 620 which presents an ultrasound image.
  • the ultrasound image can be a real-time image, or an ultrasound image previously acquired at a position selected by the user.
  • the detected bone fracture and/or the detected hematoma can be presented in the ultrasound image.
  • the view 600 may comprise one or more additional portions 630 for presenting various information and/or receiving various user inputs.
  • the sizes and the arrangements of the portions 610-630 are only for illustrative purpose. Any suitable size and arrangement can be implemented.
  • the view 600 can be dynamic and/or user-configurable.
  • the apparatus 120 can further comprise a reporting creator which is configured to record the detected bone fractures and/or the detected hematoma and optionally together with the position information, and generate a report on basis of the recorded information.
  • the report can comprise one or more of the following information:
  • the technique processes described herein may be implemented by various means. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination thereof.
  • the technical processes may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
  • ASICs application specific integrated circuits
  • DSPs digital signal processors
  • DSPDs digital signal processing devices
  • PLDs programmable logic devices
  • FPGAs field programmable gate arrays
  • processors controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
  • implementation can be through modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein.
  • the software codes may be stored in a
  • aspects of the claimed subject matter may be implemented as a method, apparatus, system, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer or computing components to implement various aspects of the claimed subject matter.
  • article of manufacture as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device, carrier, or media.
  • computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips,, ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD),, ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive” ).
  • magnetic storage devices e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips,,
  • optical disks e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD),,
  • smart cards e.g., card, stick, key drive
  • a component may be, but is not limited to, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
  • an application running on a server and the server can be a component.
  • One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed among two or more computers.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Vascular Medicine (AREA)
  • Ultra Sonic Daignosis Equipment (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Appareil (120) pour détecter une fracture osseuse d'un sujet sur la base d'images ultrasonores, comprenant :
    un premier détecteur de fracture (122) configuré pour recevoir une première image ultrasonore d'une région du sujet et pour identifier un os dans la première image ultrasonore ;
    caractérisé en ce que
    le premier détecteur de fracture (122) est en outre configuré pour identifier au moins une zone de focalisation dans la région sur la base de l'os identifié, pour générer des informations de zone de focalisation indiquant la position de la au moins une zone de focalisation, et pour ordonner une acquisition d'une seconde image ultrasonore sur la base des informations de zone de focalisation générées ;
    l'appareil comprenant en outre un second détecteur de fracture (124) configuré pour recevoir la seconde image ultrasonore de la région et pour détecter une fracture osseuse sur la base de la seconde image ultrasonore ; et
    la seconde image ultrasonore présente une résolution plus élevée dans la au moins une zone de focalisation que dans le reste de la région, et la résolution de la au moins une zone de focalisation dans la seconde image ultrasonore est plus élevée que la résolution de la au moins une zone de focalisation dans la première image ultrasonore.
  2. Appareil selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le premier détecteur de fracture (122) est en outre configuré pour détecter un hématome adjacent à l'os identifié sur la base de la première image ultrasonore, et la au moins une zone de focalisation est générée sur la base de l'hématome détecté.
  3. Appareil selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le premier détecteur de fracture est en outre configuré pour ordonner à une unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore d'acquérir la seconde image ultrasonore en transmettant des faisceaux ultrasonores supplémentaires au moins vers la au moins une zone de focalisation et le second détecteur de fracture est en outre configuré pour recevoir la seconde image ultrasonore en provenance de l'unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore.
  4. Appareil selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la première détection de fracture est en outre configurée pour ordonner à une unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore d'acquérir la seconde image ultrasonore à l'aide, au moins dans la au moins une zone de focalisation, d'un second réglage ultrasonore différent d'un premier réglage de faisceau ultrasonore utilisé pour acquérir la première image ultrasonore et le premier réglage de faisceau ultrasonore et le second réglage de faisceau ultrasonore sont différents dans au moins l'un des éléments suivants : (a) fréquence de transmission ; (b) longueur d'impulsion de transmission ; (c) angle de braquage ; (d) zone focale.
  5. Appareil selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le premier détecteur de fracture (122) est en outre configuré pour détecter une fracture osseuse sur la base de la première image ultrasonore.
  6. Appareil selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre un dispositif de commande (126) configuré pour commuter entre un premier mode de détection et un second mode de détection, et pour commander, dans le premier mode de détection, une unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore pour acquérir la première image ultrasonore et pour commander, dans le second mode de détection, l'unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore, soit pour acquérir la seconde image ultrasonore, soit pour acquérir à la fois les première et seconde images ultrasonores.
  7. Appareil selon la revendication 6, dans lequel le dispositif de commande (126) est en outre configuré pour commuter entre le premier mode de détection et le second mode de détection sur la base d'une entrée utilisateur reçue d'une interface utilisateur (130).
  8. Appareil selon la revendication 1, dans lequel
    le premier détecteur de fracture (122) est en outre configuré pour recevoir une pluralité de premières images ultrasonores acquises lorsqu'un transducteur à ultrasons se déplace par rapport au sujet, et une première information de position sur le transducteur à ultrasons par rapport au sujet correspondant à chacune de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores ;
    le premier détecteur de fracture (122) est en outre configuré pour identifier un os, pour détecter la présence d'un hématome adjacent à l'os dans chacune de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores, et identifier un sous-ensemble de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores dans lequel l'hématome adjacent à l'os est présent ; et
    le premier détecteur de fracture (122) est en outre configuré pour générer des secondes informations de position sur le transducteur à ultrasons par rapport au sujet correspondant à chaque image du sous-ensemble de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores.
  9. Appareil selon la revendication 8, comprenant en outre une interface utilisateur (130) configurée pour présenter les secondes informations de position.
  10. Système à ultrasons (100) pour détecter une fracture osseuse d'un sujet, comprenant :
    une unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore (110) comprenant un transducteur à ultrasons configuré pour transmettre un signal ultrasonore à une région du sujet et pour recevoir un signal d'écho ultrasonore provenant de la région ; et
    un appareil (120) selon la revendication 1 couplé à l'unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore ; et
    dans lequel l'unité d'acquisition d'image ultrasonore est configurée pour acquérir la première image ultrasonore et la seconde image ultrasonore.
  11. Procédé (200) mis en oeuvre par un appareil tel que défini dans l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 10, comprenant :
    la réception (210) d'une première image ultrasonore d'une région du sujet ;
    l'identification (220) d'un os dans la première image ultrasonore ;
    l'identification (240) d'au moins une zone de focalisation dans la région sur la base de l'os identifié ;
    le fait d'ordonner une acquisition d'une seconde image ultrasonore de la région, la seconde image ultrasonore présentant une résolution plus élevée dans la au moins une zone de focalisation que dans le reste de la région, la résolution de la au moins une zone de focalisation dans la seconde image ultrasonore étant plus élevée que la résolution de la au moins une zone de focalisation dans la première image ultrasonore ;
    la réception (250) de la seconde image ultrasonore ; et
    la détection (260) d'une fracture osseuse sur la base de la seconde image ultrasonore.
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 11, dans lequel un hématome adjacent à l'os identifié est
    détecté sur la base de la première image ultrasonore et la au moins une zone de focalisation est identifiée sur la base de l'hématome détecté.
  13. Procédé selon la revendication 11, dans lequel la seconde image ultrasonore est acquise en transmettant des faisceaux ultrasonores supplémentaires au moins vers la au moins une zone de focalisation.
  14. Procédé selon la revendication 11, comprenant en outre :
    la réception d'une pluralité de premières images ultrasonores acquises lorsqu'un transducteur à ultrasons se déplace par rapport au sujet, et une première information de position sur le transducteur à ultrasons par rapport au sujet correspondant à chacune de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores ;
    l'identification d'un os et la détection de la présence d'un hématome adjacent à l'os dans chacune de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores ;
    l'identification d'un sous-ensemble de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores dans lesquelles l'hématome adjacent à l'os est présent ; et
    la génération d'une seconde information de position sur le transducteur à ultrasons par rapport au sujet correspondant à chaque image du sous-ensemble de la pluralité de premières images ultrasonores.
  15. Support lisible par ordinateur comprenant des instructions exécutables qui, lorsqu'elles sont exécutées, amènent un processeur informatique à effectuer les étapes consistant à :
    recevoir (210) une première image ultrasonore d'une région du sujet ;
    identifier (220) un os dans la première image ultrasonore ;
    identifier (240) au moins une zone de focalisation dans la région sur la base de l'os identifié ;
    ordonner une acquisition d'une seconde image ultrasonore de la région, la seconde image ultrasonore présentant une résolution plus élevée dans la au moins une zone de focalisation que dans le reste de la région, la résolution de la au moins une zone de focalisation dans la seconde image ultrasonore étant plus élevée que la résolution de la au moins une zone de focalisation dans la première image ultrasonore ;
    recevoir (250) la seconde image ultrasonore ; et
    détecter (260) une fracture osseuse sur la base de la seconde image ultrasonore.
EP19808625.8A 2018-11-30 2019-11-28 Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses Active EP3886718B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2018118629 2018-11-30
EP19151811.7A EP3682811A1 (fr) 2019-01-15 2019-01-15 Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses
PCT/EP2019/083001 WO2020109519A1 (fr) 2018-11-30 2019-11-28 Appareil et procédé de détection de fracture osseuse

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3886718A1 EP3886718A1 (fr) 2021-10-06
EP3886718B1 true EP3886718B1 (fr) 2025-01-08

Family

ID=68653483

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19808625.8A Active EP3886718B1 (fr) 2018-11-30 2019-11-28 Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US12138113B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3886718B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP6994608B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN113164158B (fr)
WO (1) WO2020109519A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113592768A (zh) * 2021-06-15 2021-11-02 阿里巴巴新加坡控股有限公司 肋骨骨折检测方法、肋骨骨折检测信息的显示方法及系统

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4798210A (en) * 1984-03-28 1989-01-17 National Biomedical Research Foundation Three-dimensional imaging system
US5426684A (en) * 1993-11-15 1995-06-20 Eastman Kodak Company Technique for finding the histogram region of interest for improved tone scale reproduction of digital radiographic images
JPH0928711A (ja) * 1995-07-18 1997-02-04 Shimadzu Corp 超音波像観察装置
AU2003206103A1 (en) * 2002-01-07 2003-07-24 Medson Ltd. Systems and methods of 3 dimensional ultrasonic imaging of hard tissue
US20070043290A1 (en) 2005-08-03 2007-02-22 Goepp Julius G Method and apparatus for the detection of a bone fracture
JP4608458B2 (ja) * 2006-04-21 2011-01-12 アロカ株式会社 超音波診断装置
JP4908915B2 (ja) * 2006-05-15 2012-04-04 日立アロカメディカル株式会社 超音波診断装置
WO2008110013A1 (fr) * 2007-03-15 2008-09-18 Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal Segmentation d'image
WO2009025766A2 (fr) * 2007-08-18 2009-02-26 Spectral Energetics Système de capteur non invasif et procédé de détection de pathologies internes
CN101756712A (zh) * 2008-11-19 2010-06-30 李祥 Ct图像颅内血肿体积测量方法的研究
US20110046517A1 (en) 2009-05-15 2011-02-24 Roth Sanford A Method and system for monitoring skeletal defects
KR101113217B1 (ko) * 2009-08-20 2012-02-20 삼성메디슨 주식회사 태아의 늑골 수를 측정하는 초음파 시스템 및 방법
EP2563229B1 (fr) 2010-04-28 2019-07-24 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Appareil pour déterminer une propriété d'un objet
WO2012097294A1 (fr) 2011-01-13 2012-07-19 Ultrasonic Medical Mapping, Llc Système d'évaluation de diagnostics et de test à ultrasons basse fréquence sans formation d'image
CN102293668B (zh) 2011-06-16 2013-09-25 华南理工大学 一种骨折实时监护方法及装置
CA2845044C (fr) 2011-08-12 2023-03-28 Jointvue, Llc Dispositif et procedes d'echographie en 3d
CN102749053A (zh) * 2012-06-06 2012-10-24 内蒙古科技大学 基于三维可视化和蒙特卡罗方法的体积测量方法
KR102176319B1 (ko) * 2012-08-21 2020-11-09 마우이 이미징, 인코포레이티드 초음파 이미징 시스템 메모리 아키텍처
US10835202B2 (en) 2013-11-23 2020-11-17 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology System and method for analyzing tissue using shear waves
KR102582540B1 (ko) * 2015-06-16 2023-09-25 삼성메디슨 주식회사 초음파 장치 및 그 동작 방법
US10976433B2 (en) * 2015-09-10 2021-04-13 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasound system with wide depth and detailed viewing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3886718A1 (fr) 2021-10-06
WO2020109519A1 (fr) 2020-06-04
CN113164158B (zh) 2025-04-11
US12138113B2 (en) 2024-11-12
JP6994608B2 (ja) 2022-01-14
CN113164158A (zh) 2021-07-23
JP2021534934A (ja) 2021-12-16
US20220096047A1 (en) 2022-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6994494B2 (ja) エラストグラフィ測定システム及びその方法
JP7431729B2 (ja) 超音波胸部画像と他の撮像モダリティの胸部画像とを相関させる超音波システム及び方法
JP6430498B2 (ja) 超音波剪断波エラストグラフィ測定のマッピングのためのシステムおよび方法
CN112386278B (zh) 用于相机辅助超声扫描设置和控制的方法和系统
KR101984824B1 (ko) 초음파를 이용하여 조직의 탄성을 분석하는 방법 및 장치
KR101821520B1 (ko) 수술 부위 내 프로브 위치를 판단하는 방법 및 시스템
CN103781424A (zh) 超声波诊断装置以及图像处理方法
US10762631B2 (en) Apparatus and method for characterizing a tissue of a subject
Beigi et al. Needle trajectory and tip localization in real-time 3-D ultrasound using a moving stylus
JP5836735B2 (ja) 対象体のスライス映像表示超音波診断装置およびその方法
CN112545551B (zh) 用于医学成像设备的方法和系统
EP3886718B1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses
Hussain et al. Strain-initialized robust bone surface detection in 3-D ultrasound
CN115551416B (zh) 对髋部进行测量
EP3682811A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de détection de fractures osseuses
KR102106542B1 (ko) 초음파를 이용하여 조직의 탄성을 분석하는 방법 및 장치
JP2024006836A (ja) 医用情報提供装置及び医用情報の提供方法
Taki et al. Int J CARS (2009) 4 (Suppl 1): S17–S21
KR20110126390A (ko) 이미지의 두께를 측정하는 초음파 검사기 및 초음파 검사기의 동작 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210630

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20240718

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602019064670

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602019064670

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 746

Effective date: 20250331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20250108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1757803

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250508

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250508

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250409

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602019064670

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250108

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20251009