EP3645790A1 - Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment - Google Patents
Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipmentInfo
- Publication number
- EP3645790A1 EP3645790A1 EP18740885.1A EP18740885A EP3645790A1 EP 3645790 A1 EP3645790 A1 EP 3645790A1 EP 18740885 A EP18740885 A EP 18740885A EP 3645790 A1 EP3645790 A1 EP 3645790A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- composition
- equipment
- wet strength
- papermaking
- surfactant
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
- D21H21/02—Agents for preventing deposition on the paper mill equipment, e.g. pitch or slime control
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- D21C9/00—After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
- D21C9/008—Prevention of corrosion or formation of deposits on pulp-treating equipment
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
- D21H21/02—Agents for preventing deposition on the paper mill equipment, e.g. pitch or slime control
- D21H21/04—Slime-control agents
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
- D21H21/14—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by function or properties in or on the paper
- D21H21/18—Reinforcing agents
- D21H21/20—Wet strength agents
Definitions
- This invention relates to compositions and methods for cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment and/or for preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment.
- wet strength resins are major additives used in the papermaking process.
- Use of wet strength resins for example, polyamide-epichlorohydrin (PAE)
- PAE polyamide-epichlorohydrin
- Paper mills spend time and money to clean the fouled felts and even have to change the felts frequently.
- Chemical products that are currently used for wet press felt cleaning or cleaning wet strength resin contamination are either highly caustic or highly acidic. These chemical products are corrosive, not renewable or biodegradable, and are inappropriate for safe handling. Additionally, the products not only remove the wet strength resin contamination but may also damage the felt itself.
- One objective of the present invention is to provide solutions to or alleviate the problems encountered in the prior art.
- one objective of the present invention is to provide a substantially biodegradable, safe and efficient composition for cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment and/or preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment.
- a typical composition according to the present invention for cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment and/or for preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment comprises an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably nonionic surfactant; a divalent metal ion containing catalyst; and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent.
- a typical method according to present invention of cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment comprises the steps of contacting the equipment with a composition comprising an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant; a divalent metal ion containing catalyst and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent.
- a typical method according to the present invention of preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment of a papermaking process comprises the steps of contacting the equipment with a composition comprising an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant; a divalent metal ion containing catalyst and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent, before and/or during and/or after addition of the wet strength resin in the papermaking process.
- compositions of the current invention have multiple advantages.
- the compositions are renewable, environmentally friendly and substantially biodegradable.
- the cleaning compositions are FDA compliant and thus are suitable for cleaning equipment used in making paper, board or the like to be used with food contact.
- the compositions are stable and highly efficient in cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment and in preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment, without damaging the equipment.
- the components of the composition may also show synergistic effect, wherein the composition may have higher cleaning efficiency or capacity than the individual components.
- the present invention provides stable, renewable, environmentally friendly, FDA compliant and safe to handle composition for cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment and/or preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment.
- compositions for cleaning wet strength resin contamination from papermaking equipment and/or preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment comprising an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant; a divalent metal ion containing catalyst, and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent.
- the weak organic acid is selected from a group consisting of citric acid, adipic acid, glycolic acid and combinations thereof, preferably citric acid.
- glycol ether containing solvent is selected from a group consisting of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and a combination thereof.
- the surfactant is selected from a group consisting of isotridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecanol ethoxylate, ethoxylated 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5- decyne-4,7-diol, polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether, polysorbates, ethoxylated secondary alcohols containing surfactants and combinations thereof.
- the divalent metal ion is selected from a group consisting of Ca +2 , Mg +2 , Ba +2 , Fe +2 , Cu +2 , Ni +2 , Mn +2 and Co +2 , preferably Fe +2 , Ca +2 , Cu +2 or Ni +2 .
- the weak organic acid concentration is within 15%-45%, preferably 20%- 30%.
- the glycol ether containing solvent concentration is within 0%-15%, preferably 3%-8%.
- the surfactant concentration is within 2%-25%, preferably 5%-13%.
- the divalent metal ion containing catalyst concentration is within 0.01%-5%, preferably 0.25% - 3%.
- such cleaning compositions are further diluted with one or more diluting agents wherein diluting agent:composition, weight:weight, ratio is in range 500: 1 - 0: 1, preferably 200: 1- 9:1.
- Certain embodiments of the invention are related to methods of cleaning wet strength resins contamination from a papermaking equipment, the method comprising the steps of contacting the equipment with a composition comprising an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant; a divalent metal ion containing catalyst, and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent.
- the weak organic acid is selected from a group consisting of citric acid, adipic acid, glycolic acid and combinations thereof, preferably citric acid.
- the glycol ether containing solvent is selected from a group consisting of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and a combination thereof.
- the surfactant is selected from a group consisting of isotridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecanol ethoxylate, ethoxylated 2,4,7, 9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether, polysorbates, ethoxylated secondary alcohols containing surfactants and combinations thereof.
- the divalent metal ion is selected from a group consisting of Ca +2 , Mg +2 , Ba +2 , Fe +2 , Cu +2 , Ni +2 , Mn +2 and Co +2 , preferably Fe +2 , Ca +2 , Cu +2 or Ni +2 .
- the weak organic acid concentration is within 15%-45%, preferably 20%-30%.
- the glycol ether containing solvent concentration is within 0%-15%, preferably 3%-8%.
- the surfactant concentration is within 2% -25%, preferably 5%-13%.
- the divalent metal ion containing catalyst concentration is within 0.01%-5%, preferably 0.25%-3%.
- such cleaning compositions are further diluted with one or more diluting agents wherein diluting agent:composition, weight:weight, ratio is in range 500: 1-0: 1, preferably 200: 1-9: 1. In certain embodiments cleaning is performed at elevated temperatures.
- contact time is between 0.1 second to 5 hours, preferably between 30 seconds to 1 hour, more preferably 1 minute to 30 minutes.
- the papermaking equipment is wet press felts, dryer fabric, papermaking equipment used in a papermaking process that uses wet strength resins or other papermaking machine surface.
- the wet strength resin is polyamide-epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin.
- Certain embodiments of the invention are related to methods of preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment of a papermaking process, the method comprising the steps of contacting the equipment with a composition comprising an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant, a divalent metal ion containing catalyst, and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent, before and/or during and/or after addition of the wet strength resin in the papermaking process.
- the weak organic acid is selected from a group consisting of citric acid, adipic acid, glycolic acid and combinations thereof, preferably citric acid.
- the glycol ether containing solvent is selected from a group consisting of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and a combination thereof.
- the surfactant is selected from a group consisting of isotridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecanol ethoxylate, ethoxylated 2,4,7,9- tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether, polysorbates, ethoxylated secondary alcohols containing surfactants and combinations thereof.
- the divalent metal ion is selected from a group consisting of Ca +2 , Mg +2 , Ba +2 , Fe +2 , Cu +2 , Ni +2 , Mn +2 and Co +2 , preferably Fe +2 , Ca +2 , Cu +2 or Ni +2 .
- the weak organic acid concentration is within 15%-45%, preferably 20%- 30%.
- the glycol ether containing solvent concentration is within 0%-15%, preferably 3%-8%.
- the surfactant concentration is within 2%-25%, preferably 5%-13%.
- the divalent metal ion containing catalyst concentration is within 0.01%-5%, preferably 0.25%-3%.
- cleaning compositions are further diluted with one or more diluting agents wherein diluting agent:composition, weight:weight, ratio is in range 500: 1-0: 1, preferably 200: 1- 9:1.
- contact time is between 0.1 second to 5 hours, preferably between 30 seconds to 1 hour, more preferably 1 minute to 30 minutes.
- the papermaking equipment is wet press felts, dryer fabric, papermaking equipment used in a papermaking process that uses wet strength resins or other papermaking machine surface.
- the wet strength resin is polyamide- epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin.
- Certain embodiments of the invention are related to use of a composition, comprising an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant; a divalent metal ion containing catalyst, and optionally a glycol ether containing solvent, for cleaning an equipment by contacting the equipment with the composition.
- the weak organic acid is selected from a group consisting of citric acid, adipic acid, glycolic acid and combinations thereof, preferably citric acid.
- the glycol ether containing solvent is selected from a group consisting of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and a combination thereof.
- the surfactant is selected from a group consisting of isotridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecanol ethoxylate, ethoxylated 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5- decyne-4,7-diol, polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether, polysorbates, ethoxylated secondary alcohols containing surfactants and combinations thereof.
- the divalent metal ion is selected from a group consisting of Ca +2 , Mg +2 , Ba +2 , Fe +2 , Cu +2 , Ni +2 , Mn +2 and Co +2 , preferably Fe +2 , Ca +2 , Cu +2 or Ni +2 .
- the weak organic acid concentration is within 15%-45%, preferably 20%- 30%.
- the glycol ether containing solvent concentration is within 0%-15%, preferably 3%-8%.
- the surfactant concentration is within 2%-25%, preferably 5%-13%.
- the divalent metal ion containing catalyst concentration is within 0.01%-5%, preferably 0.25%-3%.
- such cleaning compositions are further diluted with one or more diluting agents wherein diluting agent: composition, weight: weight, ratio is in range 500: 1-0: 1, preferably 200: 1- 9:1. In certain embodiments cleaning is performed at elevated temperatures.
- contact time is between 0.1 second to 5 hours, preferably between 30 seconds to 1 hour, more preferably 1 minute to 30 minutes.
- the equipment is a paper making equipment.
- the papermaking equipment is wet press felts, dryer fabric, papermaking equipment used in a papermaking process that uses wet strength resins or other papermaking machine surface.
- the papermaking equipment contains contamination formed from use of wet strength resins in a papermaking process.
- the wet strength resin is polyamide-epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin.
- PAE polyamide-epichlorohydrin
- the equipment is a paper making equipment.
- the papermaking equipment contains contamination formed from use of wet strength resins in a papermaking process.
- the composition according to invention comprises an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid.
- the use of weak organic acid makes the composition more benign and safe, both for process operators and workers as well as for equipment which is to be cleaned. At the same time, however, it promotes the unexpectedly sufficient cleaning effect which is obtained with the composition.
- the organic acid concentration in the composition is within 10 -45 , preferably 20 -30 .
- Weak organic acid of the current invention may have pKa greater than 1.5, preferably greater than 2, more preferably greater than 3.
- the weak organic acid may be dibasic or tribasic acid and it may have at least one pKa value in the range from 3 to 6.
- the weak organic acid may be selected from a group consisting of citric acid, adipic acid, glycolic acid and any combinations thereof.
- the weak organic acid is citric acid.
- the composition comprises further a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant.
- the surfactant concentration in the composition may preferably be within 2%-25%, preferably 5%-13%.
- a surfactant as referred in this disclosure, contains a hydrophilic head group and a hydrophobic tail group.
- Nonionic surfactants are surfactants with an uncharged hydrophilic head group and do not dissociate into ions in aqueous solutions.
- Preferable nonionic surfactants include ethoxylates, especially fatty alcohol ethoxylates, alkoxylates and cocamides.
- a surfactant useful for the current invention makes the components of the claimed composition miscible with each other, keeps them well dispersed and forms a micro-emulsion.
- the surfactants may also enhance the cleaning efficiency of the individual components of the composition.
- surfactant may be selected from a group consisting of isotridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, dodecanol ethoxylate, ethoxylated 2,4,7,9- tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol, polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether, polysorbates, ethoxylated secondary alcohols-containing surfactants and any combinations thereof.
- Suitable dodecanol ethoxylates are nonionic surfactants containing one or more moles of ethylene oxide per mole of dodecanol. In certain embodiments mole ratio of ethylene oxide and dodecanol is 7: 1.
- Suitable isotridecyl alcohol ethoxylates are nonionic surfactants containing one or more moles of ethylene oxide per mole of isotridecyl alcohol. In certain embodiments mole ratio of ethylene oxide and isotridecyl alcohol is 9: 1.
- Suitable polysorbates are nonionic surfactants composed of fatty acid esters of polyoxyethylene sorbitan.
- polysorbates are polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, polysorbate sorbitan monopalmitate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate.
- suitable polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether may be polyoxyethylene 2,6,8-trimethyl-4-nonyl ether.
- the composition comprises further a divalent metal ion containing catalyst.
- the divalent metal ion containing catalyst concentration in the composition may be within 0.01%-5%, preferably 0.25%-3%.
- the divalent metal ion may be selected from a group consisting of Ca +2 , Mg +2 , Ba +2 , Fe +2 , Cu +2 , Ni +2 , Mn +2 , and Co +2 , preferably from a group of Fe +2 , Ca +2 , Cu +2 and Ni +2 .
- the divalent metal ion containing catalyst may be in form of salt, where the counterion is any suitable organic or inorganic, divalent or monovalent anion, preferably citrate, acetate, maleate, sulphate or chloride, even more preferably sulphate or chlorate.
- the composition comprises a glycol ether containing solvent.
- the glycol ether containing solvents may be selected from the group consisting of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, ethylene glycol monophenyl ether, diethylene glycol monophenyl ether, polyethylene glycol monophenyl ether, triethylene glycol monophenyl ether containing solvents and any combination thereof.
- the glycol ether containing solvent is selected from the group consisting of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and any combinations thereof.
- the glycol ether containing solvent concentration in the composition may be within 0 -15 , preferably 0.01%- 15%, more preferably 3%-8%.
- compositions of the current invention remove wet strength resin contamination and/or prevent wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment through removal, prevention or reduction of formation of crosslinked chemicals from wet strength resins on the papermaking equipment.
- the cleaning composition may be diluted before it is used for cleaning the papermaking equipment and brought into contact with the said equipment.
- Diluting agent may be selected from the group consisting of water, compatible chemicals, compatible chemical mixtures or premixtures, compatible liquids, compatible solids or combinations thereof, preferably water.
- "Compatible” are those that do not result in separation between the components of compositions and/or precipitation, and maintain the micro-emulsion state of the composition while and/or after adding and/or mixing those to the composition.
- diluting agent:composition ratio, given weight:weight is in range 500: 1 - 0: 1, preferably 200: 1-9: 1.
- the composition is contacted with an equipment, preferably with a papermaking equipment.
- the contacting may be carried out by spraying the composition onto the equipment surface, by soaking or immersing the equipment into the composition or by applying the composition to a circulating process flow, which comes into contact with the equipment.
- the cleaning is performed at an elevated temperature. This means that the composition and/or the equipment are at an elevated temperature at the time of cleaning. Cleaning at elevated temperatures is performed through heating the cleaning composition or equipment being cleaned, or both, at elevated temperature before and/or while in contact with each other.
- the cleaning compositions or equipment being cleaned, or both are heated to temperatures between above room temperature to below 130 ° C, preferably between 45 ° C to 70 ° C, more preferably between 50 C to 60 C.
- Contact time depends on the area of the equipment being cleaned, the type of equipment surface being cleaned and/or contamination level of the equipment.
- Contact method depends on the equipment being cleaned. The contact method may be soaking, spraying or any other suitable contact method, as described above. Contact time is optimized such that optimum cleaning is obtained with minimum loss in production time. According to one embodiment the contact time may be between 0.1 second to 5 hours, preferably between 30 seconds to 1 hour, more preferably 1 minute to 30 minutes.
- the composition of the present invention is preferably used for cleaning papermaking equipment, especially papermaking equipment that contains contamination formed from use of wet strength resins in a papermaking process.
- the equipment to be cleaned may be wet press felt, dryer fabric or any papermaking equipment used in a papermaking process that uses wet strength resins, or other papermaking machine surface. Preferably the composition is used for cleaning wet press felts or dryer fabrics.
- composition according to the invention is preferably used for cleaning contamination caused by wet strength resin, especially when the wet strength resin is polyamide- epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin.
- PAE polyamide- epichlorohydrin
- Percentages of components in compositions described throughout this application are weight percentages of the components in the compositions. Weight percentages are calculated with the assumption that the components contain no impurities. Examples
- composition A (Table 1). The composition was diluted with tap water. The other felt sample from each set was washed with tap water and was used as control for comparison.
- the felts were placed in separate washing containers and were placed in the tergotometer. The tergotometer was run at 60°C for 30 minutes for the first washing step; pH was checked and recorded for each container. The container contents were then poured over a vacuum sieve to collect the felt samples and the loose fibers. The samples and container were rinsed with tap water and the samples were placed back in the container for the rinse cycle at the same temperature for 15 minutes; pH was checked and recorded for each container. Again, the contents of these containers were poured over a vacuum sieve to collect the felt samples and the loose fibers.
- the mass of each felt sample was recorded pre- and post-wash.
- the felt fiber loss was collected at the end of each wash and rinse cycle and weighed as a fiber loss percentage. This fiber loss percentage indicates how harsh the chemical treatment was for the felt. Fiber loss was partially due to the harshness of the chemical treatment and partially due to the fact the felts were used felts from mills used in wash studies and were not brand new. After accounting for fiber loss, the remaining difference in felt mass between pre- and post-wash measurements is attributed to contaminant removal and reported as such. Ideally, the chemical treatment removes the greatest amount of contaminant without causing too much fiber loss and damage to the felt. Percentage contaminant removed and fiber loss percentages are reported in Table 2 and 3, respectively and were calculated as
- Porosity (or air permeability) test was conducted on pre- and post- wash felts using a Gurley Precision Porosity tester with a digital timer. The test was conducted with air passing through the individual felt sample. A digital timer records the length of time for a controlled volume of air to pass through the sample. The pre-wash porosity accounts for any contamination of felts, which would block the felt pores. The post- wash test indicates the porosity after targeted contaminant removal. Thus, comparing pre- and post- wash porosity is indicative of overall contaminant removal. The porosity time was recorded in Gurley seconds and was compared for pre- and post-wash. The lower the Gurley porosity seconds, the more porous the felts are. Cleaner felts should have higher porosity, thus lower Gurley porosity seconds indicate better cleaning ability. Gurley porosity seconds are reported in Table 4.
- Results in Table 2 show that wash with 5% of Composition A removes significantly higher percentage of contaminants compared to the control.
- Results in Table 3 show fiber loss percentage for wash with 5% of Composition A, for all types of tested felts, were very low, and were similar to that of the control.
- Results in Table 4 show porosity of the felts increased (Gurley porosity seconds decreased) more compared to the control, by washing with 5% of Composition A.
- Results in Table 5 show water absorption speed of the felts increased (water absorption seconds decreased) significantly compared to the control, by washing with 5% of Composition A.
- Composition A cleans contaminants from the felts (Tables 2, 4 and 5) without appreciably damaging the felts (Table 3).
- Example 2 Preventing wet strength resins from contaminating wet press felts.
- Percentage weight increased, fiber loss, Gurley porosity seconds and water absorption seconds are reported in Table 6. Percentage weight increased, for felts that were placed in 10% aqueous solution of Composition A were lower compared to control felts (felts that were placed in water instead of 10% aqueous solution of Composition A). Porosity and water absorption speed of felts that were placed in 10% aqueous solution of Composition A were higher (Gurley porosity seconds and water absorption seconds lower) compare to the control. These results show Composition A prevents PAE from contaminating the felts. Fiber loss percentages for felts that were placed in 10% aqueous solution of Composition A were lower compared to the control. This shows that the Composition A does not damage the felts.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Paper (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
Abstract
L'invention concerne des compositions et des procédés permettant de nettoyer un équipement de fabrication de papier contaminé par une résine résistante à l'humidité et/ou d'empêcher des résines résistantes à l'humidité de contaminer un équipement de fabrication de papier à l'aide des compositions. Les compositions comprennent une solution aqueuse d'un acide organique faible ; un tensioactif, de préférence un tensioactif non ionique, un catalyseur contenant des ions métalliques divalents et éventuellement un solvant contenant un éther de glycol.Compositions and methods for cleaning moisture-resistant resin-containing paper-making equipment and / or for preventing moisture-resistant resins from contaminating paper-making equipment are disclosed. help of the compositions. The compositions comprise an aqueous solution of a weak organic acid; a surfactant, preferably a nonionic surfactant, a catalyst containing divalent metal ions and optionally a solvent containing a glycol ether.
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201762527027P | 2017-06-29 | 2017-06-29 | |
| FI20175707 | 2017-08-01 | ||
| PCT/FI2018/050500 WO2019002682A1 (en) | 2017-06-29 | 2018-06-26 | Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3645790A1 true EP3645790A1 (en) | 2020-05-06 |
| EP3645790B1 EP3645790B1 (en) | 2022-10-12 |
Family
ID=62916710
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18740885.1A Active EP3645790B1 (en) | 2017-06-29 | 2018-06-26 | Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP3645790B1 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR102657232B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN110785524B (en) |
| BR (1) | BR112019026638B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA3066027C (en) |
| CL (1) | CL2019003733A1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2932649T3 (en) |
| PL (1) | PL3645790T3 (en) |
| RU (1) | RU2762277C2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR200493445Y1 (en) * | 2021-02-18 | 2021-04-01 | 주식회사 알파인랩 | Device for tilting solar battery module |
Family Cites Families (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU1004466A1 (en) * | 1980-06-13 | 1983-03-15 | Предприятие П/Я А-1785 | Detergent for cleaning metal surface |
| CA2079282C (en) * | 1992-09-28 | 2000-09-19 | Alan George Seech | Composition and method for dehalogenation and degradation of halogenated organic contaminants |
| PL187384B1 (en) * | 1996-03-06 | 2004-06-30 | Colgate Palmolive Co | Liquid-crystalline detergent compositions |
| JPH1053800A (en) * | 1996-06-03 | 1998-02-24 | Lion Corp | Liquid detergent composition |
| CN1240409A (en) * | 1996-11-08 | 2000-01-05 | 索卡尔有限公司 | water treatment method |
| US6051108A (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2000-04-18 | Nalco Chemical Company | Method of removing and preventing the buildup of contaminants in papermaking processes |
| KR100408627B1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2003-12-06 | 주식회사 자경케미칼 | Pollution control material for paper |
| JP2004176159A (en) * | 2002-11-28 | 2004-06-24 | Panac Co Ltd | Method for cleaning metal surface |
| CN101186402B (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2011-06-01 | 华泰集团有限公司 | Fenton Two-step Oxidation Process of Papermaking Pulping Wastewater |
| US8652301B2 (en) * | 2011-10-27 | 2014-02-18 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Method and composition for enzymatic treatment of fiber for papermaking, and paper products made therewith |
| CN102505557B (en) * | 2011-12-28 | 2013-11-27 | 王祥槐 | Chemical composition for controlling organic pollutant deposition in pulping papermaking production and papermaking method |
| CN103422382A (en) * | 2012-05-21 | 2013-12-04 | 埃科莱布美国股份有限公司 | A method and a composition for reducing viscosity of organic contaminants in pulp processes and papermaking processes |
| CN102875406B (en) * | 2012-10-16 | 2014-07-23 | 山东省环境保护科学研究设计院 | Special composite mimic enzyme for advanced treatment of pulping and paper-making waste water, and preparation method and application thereof |
| JP6245595B2 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2017-12-13 | 株式会社ネオス | Decontamination method of contaminated silt generated by classification of radioactive material contaminated soil cleaner and radioactive material contaminated soil |
| JP6201129B2 (en) | 2013-05-14 | 2017-09-27 | 株式会社片山化学工業研究所 | Low foaming antifouling agent and antifouling method for paper and pulp manufacturing process |
| CN103708647B (en) * | 2013-12-27 | 2015-02-18 | 同济大学 | A method for the advanced treatment of industrial wastewater by catalyzing H2O2 oxidation with natural pyrite |
-
2018
- 2018-06-26 PL PL18740885.1T patent/PL3645790T3/en unknown
- 2018-06-26 CA CA3066027A patent/CA3066027C/en active Active
- 2018-06-26 CN CN201880042209.0A patent/CN110785524B/en active Active
- 2018-06-26 BR BR112019026638-0A patent/BR112019026638B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2018-06-26 RU RU2019144011A patent/RU2762277C2/en active
- 2018-06-26 EP EP18740885.1A patent/EP3645790B1/en active Active
- 2018-06-26 ES ES18740885T patent/ES2932649T3/en active Active
- 2018-06-26 KR KR1020197037512A patent/KR102657232B1/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-12-18 CL CL2019003733A patent/CL2019003733A1/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA3066027A1 (en) | 2019-01-03 |
| PL3645790T3 (en) | 2023-02-20 |
| RU2762277C2 (en) | 2021-12-17 |
| RU2019144011A3 (en) | 2021-07-29 |
| EP3645790B1 (en) | 2022-10-12 |
| BR112019026638A2 (en) | 2020-06-30 |
| ES2932649T3 (en) | 2023-01-23 |
| CN110785524B (en) | 2022-09-06 |
| KR102657232B1 (en) | 2024-04-15 |
| CA3066027C (en) | 2024-05-07 |
| RU2019144011A (en) | 2021-07-29 |
| KR20200023292A (en) | 2020-03-04 |
| CN110785524A (en) | 2020-02-11 |
| BR112019026638B1 (en) | 2023-11-21 |
| CL2019003733A1 (en) | 2020-06-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111705323A (en) | Environment-friendly stainless steel cleaning agent and method for cleaning stainless steel parts | |
| JP2002521588A (en) | Methods for removing and preventing contaminant accumulation in papermaking processes | |
| US10626355B2 (en) | Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment | |
| JP6684793B2 (en) | Felt conditioners and cleaners | |
| CA3066027C (en) | Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment | |
| RU2473724C2 (en) | Method of textile processing | |
| WO2019002682A1 (en) | Composition, its use and method for removing and preventing wet strength resins from contaminating papermaking equipment | |
| WO2014111267A1 (en) | System for the removal of iron oxide from surfaces | |
| JP4447370B2 (en) | Cleaning composition for CIP | |
| CN117448093A (en) | Pretreatment detergent composition and preparation method and application method thereof | |
| CN111155135A (en) | Semi-water-based cleaning agent for cleaning stretching black marks and application method thereof | |
| EP3555256B1 (en) | Cleaning compositions and methods of cleaning equipment | |
| WO2018109273A1 (en) | Cleaning compositions and methods of cleaning equipment | |
| KR20170142655A (en) | Composition for Removing Residue Materials on PCB and Washing Apparatus Using the Composition | |
| JP7504652B2 (en) | Water-decomposable sheet | |
| KR101732366B1 (en) | Tissue for laundry using recycled waste polyvinylalcohol and method for preparing the same | |
| EP0279089A1 (en) | Paper mill wire and felt cleaning | |
| CN109023406A (en) | A kind of metal cleaner that cleaning rate is high | |
| JP4663543B2 (en) | Cleaning method for textile products for cleaning | |
| JPH0525792A (en) | Paper sheet having high strength when inpregnated in water-containing organic solvent | |
| JP4004927B2 (en) | Felt cleaner for papermaking | |
| JP2006257162A (en) | Pretreatment agent for drycleaning, and pretreatment method for drycleaning | |
| CN111440672A (en) | Oil stain cleaning agent and preparation method thereof | |
| JP2004016847A (en) | How to clean tile carpet | |
| JP2005314580A (en) | Cleaning composition for CIP |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20191213 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20220510 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602018041683 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1524237 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20221115 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2932649 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20230123 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1524237 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230213 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230112 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230212 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230113 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602018041683 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20230713 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20230630 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230626 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230626 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230626 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230626 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230630 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230630 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221012 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20250613 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250618 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20250618 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20250626 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20180626 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20250617 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20180626 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20250728 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20250619 Year of fee payment: 8 |