EP3178562A1 - Procédé de démontage d'objet et dispositif de démontage - Google Patents

Procédé de démontage d'objet et dispositif de démontage Download PDF

Info

Publication number: EP3178562A1
Authority: EP; European Patent Office
Prior art keywords: discharge; substrate; disassembly; discharge current; discharging
Prior art date: 2015-12-08
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.): Granted

Application number

EP16196409.3A

Other languages

German (de)

English (en)

Other versions

EP3178562B1 (fr

Inventor

Yuichi Hata

Syougo Utumi

Genichiro Matsuda

Takao Namihira

Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)

Panasonic Corp

Original Assignee

Panasonic Corp

Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)

2015-12-08

Filing date

2016-10-28

Publication date

2017-06-14

2016-10-28 Application filed by Panasonic Corp filed Critical Panasonic Corp

2017-06-14 Publication of EP3178562A1 publication Critical patent/EP3178562A1/fr

2018-03-14 Application granted granted Critical

2018-03-14 Publication of EP3178562B1 publication Critical patent/EP3178562B1/fr

Status Active legal-status Critical Current

2036-10-28 Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Images

Classifications

- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C19/00—Other disintegrating devices or methods
- B02C19/18—Use of auxiliary physical effects, e.g. ultrasonics, irradiation, for disintegrating
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C19/00—Other disintegrating devices or methods
- B02C19/18—Use of auxiliary physical effects, e.g. ultrasonics, irradiation, for disintegrating
- B02C2019/183—Crushing by discharge of high electrical energy
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C2201/00—Codes relating to disintegrating devices adapted for specific materials
- B02C2201/06—Codes relating to disintegrating devices adapted for specific materials for garbage, waste or sewage

Definitions

the present disclosure relates to an object disassembly method and an object disassembly device which disassemble a substrate or an object including the substrate by causing pulse power discharging in liquid.
PTL 1 discloses a method in which objects to be recycled, including ceramic components such as a battery and a fuse, computer components, and capacitors are placed still in a reaction container filled with liquid, and pulse discharge is generated between a plurality of electrode rods and a container substrate provided in the liquid so as to destroy plastic exteriors and the like.
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of the conventional object disassembly device disclosed in PTL 1.
Device 101 includes container 102 filled with liquid for housing a recycle material.
Container 102 includes, for example, container body 103 made of stainless steel in a particularly simple exemplary embodiment.
Container body 103 includes a cover side (upper) flange, a bottom side (lower) flange, container cover 104a, and container substrate 104b.
Three electrodes 105 are preferably inserted into or integrated with container cover 104a at positions equally spaced from each other. Electrodes 105 each include a part extending in the vertical direction, in other words, a part extending substantially parallel to a cylindrical wall of container body 103.
Container cover 104a and container substrate 104b are connected with the corresponding flanges of container body 103 through a large number of connecting parts uniformly distributed on their peripheral parts.
Capacitor 107 is charged by charger 108 through resistor 109.
Electrodes 105 are connected with capacitor 107 through high-voltage switchgear 106a and safety switchgear breaker 106b connected with earth or ground potential. The connection between capacitor 107 and electrodes 105 generates pulse discharge, which disassembles an object to be recycled that is introduced to a liquid medium.
the disassembly proceeds as a high voltage pulse is applied a plurality of times within a predetermined number of repetitions at a predetermined time interval (hereinafter referred to as "continuous discharging" in short).
the present disclosure is intended to solve the above-described conventional problem and an object thereof is to provide an object disassembly method and an object disassembly device which enable disassembly of an object through a prescribed number of times of discharging in accordance with change in the electric conductivity of liquid and change in the shape of the processed object during disassembly processing.
an object disassembly method disassembles a substrate or an object including the substrate by performing discharging in liquid a plurality of times, and is characterized as follows.
the method includes, when a positive electrode and a ground electrode are provided in liquid held in a container and a substrate or an object including the substrate is placed on a discharge path between the positive electrode and the ground electrode in the liquid or in a region to which shock wave generated by discharging travels in the liquid, measuring a peak value of discharge current flowing through the discharge path during discharging, and controlling a discharge condition so that the measured peak value of the discharge current is maintained constant.
An object disassembly device is configured to disassemble a substrate or an object including the substrate by performing discharging in liquid a plurality of times, and is characterized as follows.
the object disassembly device includes a container holding the liquid, a positive electrode and a ground electrode disposed in the liquid in the container, a pulse power source configured to apply a high voltage pulse between the positive electrode and the ground electrode, and an electric current meter configured to measure discharge current flowing between the positive electrode and the ground electrode during discharging.
the object disassembly device further includes a discharge condition adjustment device configured to adjust a discharge condition between the positive electrode and the ground electrode, and a controller.
the object disassembly device further includes at least one of an inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism configured to change a distance (inter-electrode distance) between the positive electrode and the ground electrode and a discharge voltage adjustment mechanism configured to adjust a discharge voltage.
the controller performs such control that a peak value of the discharge current is maintained constant by adjusting at least one of the inter-electrode distance and the discharge voltage through a corresponding one of the inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism and the discharge voltage adjustment mechanism while measuring the peak value of the discharge current through the electric current meter.
the above-described aspects of the present disclosure enable disassembly of an object through a prescribed number of times of discharging in accordance with change in the electric conductivity of liquid and change in the shape of the processed object during disassembly processing.
An object disassembly device and an object disassembly method generate pulse discharging between electrodes placed still in liquid and perform object disassembly utilizing discharging or shock wave induced by the discharging.
FIG. 1 illustrates an aspect of an object disassembly device according to a first exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.
Object disassembly device 1 includes container 3 holding liquid 2 (for example, filled with water), positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 disposed facing each other at an interval therebetween in liquid 2, pulse power source 6 configured to apply high voltage pulse to positive electrode 4, electric current meter 7 configured to measure discharge current, and inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 configured to move at least positive electrode 4 in a vertical direction. Ground electrode 5 is grounded. Inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 serves as an exemplary discharge condition adjustment device.
liquid 2 for example, filled with water
pulse power source 6 configured to apply high voltage pulse to positive electrode 4
electric current meter 7 configured to measure discharge current
inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 configured to move at least positive electrode 4 in a vertical direction.
Ground electrode 5 is grounded.
Inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 serves as an exemplary discharge condition adjustment device.
Object 9 is a target to be disassembled, and is held in liquid 2 between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5.
object 9 is placed on ground electrode 5 but may be supported so as not to make contact with positive electrode 4 or ground electrode 5 by a supporting member.
Controller 10 is connected with pulse power source 6, electric current meter 7, and inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8. Controller 10 controls inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 so as to adjust a distance (inter-electrode distance) between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5.
Pulse power source 6 is capable of applying an optional voltage.
pulse power source 6 may be a Marx generator. Discharging occurs between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5. Object 9 held between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 is disassembled through discharging or shock wave induced by the discharging.
FIG. 1 illustrates an example in which a leading end of positive electrode 4 has a circular cone shape, and ground electrode 5 has a flat plate shape. Since the disassembly proceeds through discharging, these electrodes may have various shapes in accordance with a shape or a material of object 9 or a shape to be achieved after disassembly.
Ground electrode 5 may have, for example, a reticular shape, a lattice shape, or a spiral shape instead of the flat plate shape.
positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 are disposed facing each other with object 9 interposed therebetween, but positions of the electrodes are not particularly limited because discharging occurs in the liquid as long as at least one positive electrode 4 and one ground electrode 5 are provided and a nearest distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 is smaller than 100 mm.
positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 may be placed above object 9.
a plurality of positive electrodes 4 or a plurality of ground electrodes 5 may be provided, or a plurality of positive electrodes 4 and a plurality of ground electrodes 5 may be provided.
Directions to which the leading ends of positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 point are not limited because generation of discharging is hardly affected by these directions.
Inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 is capable of changing the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 by moving the electrodes.
inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 is a mechanism capable of changing a height of positive electrode 4 in FIG. 1
a mechanism capable of changing a height of ground electrode 5 is applicable.
a movement distance depends on a size of object 9 to be processed or a discharge condition and thus cannot be particularly specified, but an exemplary movement stroke is 100 mm, which is an upper limit allowing generation of pulse discharging in the liquid with the present configuration, so as to deal with a large change in an electric conductivity of liquid 2.
Exemplary movement accuracy is set to be not larger than 1 mm, which is a thickness of an electric component, so as to follow change in a distance between an electrode and a processed object, which occurs when the electric component is separated from a substrate.
Object 9 to be disassembled is not particularly limited but is preferably a thin object so that the entire object is equally provided with an effect of the shock wave due to discharge.
the object include an electrical product such as a cellular phone, a game machine, or a flat-panel television, an electronic substrate, and a solar battery.
the configuration of the disassembly device for object 9 enables such adjustment that the discharge current measured by electric current meter 7 is maintained constant in accordance with change in the electric conductivity of liquid 2 and change in the shape of object 9 along disassembly.
FIG. 2 illustrates a process of changing the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 so that a peak value of the discharge current is maintained constant in a predetermined range allowing disassembly of a component on the substrate, from the substrate or object 9 including the substrate, without destroying the component.
the peak value of the discharge current is a maximum value of current flowing at discharging operation. The maximum value of the current may be set upon removal of a noise component depending on a condition. The peak value of the discharge current allowing disassembly of a component on the substrate without destroying the component from the substrate or object 9 including the substrate will be described in detail later.
step S001 in which positive electrode 4 or ground electrode 5 is moved to an initial position, an optional discharge voltage, and step S002 in which discharging is performed at a width of the discharge current (hereinafter referred to as a pulse width) that is a time from rise of the discharge current until its return to zero voltage.
a pulse width a width of the discharge current
the process further includes step S003 in which controller 10 determines whether a total number of times of discharging after step S002 has reached a predetermined target number of times of discharging, step S004 in which controller 10 determines whether the peak value of the discharge current at the discharging in step S002 is in a predetermined range, and step S005 in which controller 10 determines whether the peak value of the discharge current at the discharging in step S002 is smaller than a predetermined value.
the process further includes step S006 in which inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 reduces the inter-electrode distance under control of controller 10 if it is determined in step S005 that the peak value of the discharge current is smaller than the predetermined value, and step S007 in which inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 increases the inter-electrode distance under control of controller 10 if it is determined in step S005 that the peak value of the discharge current is not smaller than the predetermined value.
the process includes the above-described seven steps.
step S001 positive electrode 4 or ground electrode 5 is moved to an initial position.
the initial position to which the electrode is moved needs to be in such a range that the peak value of the discharge current does not exceed the predetermined value but discharging occurs.
step S002 discharging is performed at an optional discharge voltage and the width of the discharge current (hereinafter referred to as the pulse width) that is a time from rise of the discharge current until its return to zero voltage.
the discharge voltage and the pulse width are preferably set in advance based on a material or hardness of a processed object, or a target disassembly state and a target number of times of discharging. In particular, a preferable pulse width will be described in detail later.
step S003 controller 10 determines whether the total number of times of discharging after step S002 has reached the predetermined target number of times of discharging. If controller 10 determines that the total number of times of discharging has reached the predetermined target number of times of discharging, the process is ended. If controller 10 determines that the total number of times of discharging has not reached the predetermined target number of times of discharging, the process proceeds to step S004.
the target number of times of discharging is optionally determined but preferably determined in advance as appropriate because an insufficient number of times of discharging results in insufficient disassembly of the substrate or object 9 including the substrate, and an excessive number of times of discharging generates minute dust or the like of the substrate or object 9 including the substrate, which requires, for example, cleaning of the liquid.
step S004 controller 10 determines whether the peak value of the discharge current at the discharging in step S002 is smaller than the predetermined value, in other words, whether the peak value of the discharge current is in the predetermined range. If controller 10 determines that the peak value of the discharge current is not in the predetermined range, the process proceeds to step S005. If controller 10 determines that the peak value of the discharge current is in the predetermined range, the process returns to step S002.
step S005 controller 10 determines whether the peak value of the discharge current is smaller than the predetermined value, in other words, whether the peak value of the discharge current is in the predetermined range. If controller 10 determines that the peak value of the discharge current is in the predetermined range, the process proceeds to step S006. If controller 10 determines that the peak value of the discharge current is not in the predetermined range, the process proceeds to step S007.
inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 reduces the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 under control of controller 10.
a resistance along the discharge current is reduced and the peak value of the discharge current increases accordingly, so that the peak value of the discharge current is more likely to be in the predetermined range at subsequent discharging.
step S006 the process returns to step S002 again, in which discharging is performed.
Measurement of the peak value of the discharge current may be performed by measuring current flowing through part of a circuit, instead of current between the discharging electrodes, such as current flowing through a wire between the ground electrode and GND.
step S005 if controller 10 determines that the peak value of the discharge current is not smaller than the predetermined value (is not within the predetermined range), it is determined, based on the determination in step S004 performed before step S005, that the peak value of the discharge current is larger than the predetermined value.
inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 increases the inter-electrode distance under control of controller 10. When the inter-electrode distance is increased, a resistance between the electrodes is increased accordingly, thereby reducing the peak value of the discharge current. After step S007, the process returns to step S002 again to perform discharging.
the peak value of the discharge current can be maintained constant in the predetermined range.
FIG. 3 illustrates a process of changing the discharge voltage through pulse power source 6 so that the peak value of the discharge current is maintained constant in the predetermined range.
Pulse power source 6 serves as an exemplary discharge condition adjustment device such as a discharge voltage adjustment mechanism.
step S005 Processing content in steps S001 to S005 is the same as that in FIG. 2 , and thus a detailed description thereof will be omitted. If controller 10 determines that the peak value of the discharge current is smaller than the predetermined value (within the predetermined range) in step S005, step S008 is performed in which pulse power source 6 increases its voltage under control of controller 10. When the voltage is increased, the discharge current is increased at the same inter-electrode distance, thereby increasing the peak value of the discharge current. After step S008, the process returns to step S002 again, in which discharging is performed.
step S005 pulse power source 6 reduces its voltage under control of controller 10 in step S009 so as to reduce the peak value of the discharge current. Thereafter, the process returns to step S002 again, in which discharging is performed.
the peak value of the discharge current can be maintained constant in the predetermined range.
the following describes the peak value of the discharge current allowing separation of a component from a substrate without destroying the substrate.
a disassembly processing test using the object disassembly device illustrated in FIG. 1 was performed on a substrate on which a component is mounted by soldering.
a producing condition of object 9 is as follows.
Such a substrate was used on which a 16-pin IC element as a component was mounted by soldering all 16 pins of the element so as to have a soldering intensity of 1 kgf per substrate.
the mounted element had a height of 5 mm. With this condition, five IC elements were mounted on one substrate.
object 9 was disassembled by the device illustrated in FIG. 1 through discharging at a discharge voltage of 250 kV, a pulse frequency of 1 Hz, and 10 times of pulsing.
the peak value of the discharge current was maintained constant at an arbitrary value between 7 kA and 34 kA inclusive by changing the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5.
Object 9 was processed while being placed on ground electrode 5.
FIG. 4 illustrates evaluation results of separation of the IC element from the substrate and disassembly of the substrate at different peak values of the discharge current in this test.
"satisfactory” indicates that five IC elements were all separated from the substrate after discharging, and "unsatisfactory” indicates that not all of the five IC elements were separated.
FIG. 4 indicates that the component can be separated from the substrate without disassembly of the substrate when the peak value of the discharge current is in a range from 10 kA to 30 kA inclusive.
the following describes the peak value of the discharge current allowing separation of a component from a substrate without disassembly of the substrate in an object including the substrate, for example, an object in which the substrate, on which the component is mounted by soldering, is fixed in a resin case.
a disassembly processing test using the object disassembly device illustrated in FIG. 1 was performed on an object including a substrate.
a producing condition of object 9 is as follows.
Object 9 was produced with two kinds of samples of sample 1 and sample 2 described below.
a substrate was fastened by a screw in an ABS resin case having a dimension of 50 mm x 100 mm x t30 mm, and a lid of the ABS case in which the substrate is placed was fastened by screws at four positions.
Such a substrate was used on which a 16-pin IC element as a component was mounted by soldering all 16 pins of the element so as to have a soldering intensity of 1 kgf per substrate.
the mounted element had a height of 5 mm. With this condition, five IC elements were mounted on one substrate.
sample 2 a substrate same as that used in sample 1 was fastened by a screw in an ABS resin case having a dimension of 50 mm x 100 mm x t30 mm, and a lid of the ABS case in which the substrate is placed was fixed by engagement.
This object to be processed was disassembled by the device illustrated in FIG. 1 through discharging at a discharge voltage of 250 kV and a pulse frequency of 1 Hz.
the peak value of the discharge current was maintained constant at an arbitrary value in a range from 8 kA to 34 kA inclusive by changing the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5.
Object 9 was processed while being placed on ground electrode 5.
Disassembly processing was performed at 30 times of pulsing and at 50 times of pulsing.
the number of times of pulsing was 30 for test conditions 1 to 7 and 50 for test conditions 8 to 14.
the test was performed under a total of 14 conditions.
disassembly of the resin case separation of the component from the substrate, and disassembly of the substrate occur sequentially or simultaneously depending on the condition.
FIG. 5 illustrates evaluation results of disassembly of the resin case, separation of the IC element from the substrate, and disassembly of the substrate at different peak values of the discharge current and different numbers of times of discharging.
the disassembly of the substrate “satisfactory” indicates that the substrate was not disassembled into two pieces or more, and “unsatisfactory” indicates that the substrate was disassembled into two pieces or more.
the lid of the ABS case was removed to check the state of the substrate inside for the evaluation.
FIG. 5 indicates that destruction of the resin case was not affected by the peak value of the discharge current, and when not disassembled, the resin case can be disassembled at a larger number of times of pulsing.
FIG. 5 also indicates that, when the peak value of the discharge current is in a range from 10 kA to 30 kA inclusive, the IC element can be separated from the substrate without disassembly of the substrate.
the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 was 10 mm, 20 mm, or 30 mm.
the discharge voltage was 100 kV, 230 kV, or 350 kV.
FIG. 6 illustrates a result.
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the influence of the voltage and the inter-electrode distance on the peak value of the discharge current in pulse power discharging.
the peak value of the discharge current can be controlled based on FIG. 6 through the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 and the discharge voltage.
the peak value of the discharge current can be reduced by increasing the inter-electrode distance, or can be increased by reducing the inter-electrode distance.
the peak value of the discharge current can be increased by increasing the discharge voltage, or can be reduced by reducing the discharge voltage.
a represents a gradient of an approximated straight line obtained for each inter-electrode distance, and varies depending on presence and kind of object 9.
constants b, c, and d have the following values.
b ⁇ 1.64 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5
a unit of Imax is kA
a unit of the voltage is kV
a unit of the inter-electrode distance is mm.
the peak value of the discharge current can be maintained constant by obtaining constants b, c, and d in Expression (3) through the above procedure and performing feedback to at least one of the inter-electrode distance and the discharge voltage.
Constants b, c, and d vary with change in the shape of object 9 or change in the electric conductivity of the liquid along the disassembly processing.
the following describes a pulse width preferable for disassembling an object including a substrate, for example, an object in which a substrate on which a component is mounted by soldering is fixed in a resin case.
a disassembly processing test using the object disassembly device illustrated in FIG. 1 was performed on an object including a substrate.
the disassembly processing test was evaluated for each object after the test, in terms of disassembly of the resin case, separation of the component from the substrate, and excessive disassembly of the resin case for different widths of the discharge current.
Sample 2 used in the disassembly processing test illustrated in FIG. 5 was used as object 9. Detailed description of the producing condition is already provided above and thus is omitted here.
Sample 2 was disassembled through discharging at 30 times of pulsing in the device illustrated in FIG. 1 .
the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 was 25 mm.
the object was processed while being placed on ground electrode 5.
the disassembly processing was performed while the maximum value of the discharge current was maintained constant at 23 kA but the pulse width was changed by changing the discharge voltage in a range from 150 kV to 350 kV, a number of capacitors in a circuit of the device illustrated in FIG. 1 and capacitances thereof, and an impedance of an entire discharging circuit.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating evaluation results of separation of the component from the substrate, disassembly of the resin case, and excessive disassembly of the resin case for different widths of the discharge current.
the excessive disassembly of the resin case does not occur in view of a need to segregate of the resin material after disassembly.
the disassembly of the resin case “satisfactory” indicates that the lid of the resin case was separated from the resin case, and “unsatisfactory” indicates that the lid was not separated from the resin case.
the separation of the IC element from the substrate “satisfactory” indicates that the five IC elements were all separated from the substrate after discharging, and “unsatisfactory” indicates that not all of the five IC elements were separated.
the excessive disassembly of the resin case “satisfactory” indicates that the resin case was not disassembled in two pieces or more, and “unsatisfactory” indicates that the resin case was disassembled in two pieces or more. The excessive disassembly of the resin case does not include separation of the lid from the resin case.
FIG. 7 indicates that the disassembly of the resin case hardly proceeded when the peak value of the discharge current was constant but a waveform of the discharge current had a width of 0.8 ⁇ s or smaller.
FIG. 7 also indicates that the excessive disassembly of the resin case occurred when the waveform of the discharge current had a width of 12 ⁇ s or larger.
FIG. 7 also indicates that the resin case was disassembled while the excessive disassembly of the resin case was prevented when the waveform of the discharge current has a width of 1 ⁇ s to 9 ⁇ s inclusive.
a substrate or object 9 including the substrate can be disassembled through a prescribed number of times of discharging in liquid 2 in accordance with change in the electric conductivity of liquid 2 and change in the shape of a processed object during disassembly processing. Even when the substrate or object 9 including the substrate has various shapes or is made of various materials, the disassembly can be performed under a condition appropriate for a shape and a material of a processed object, thereby achieving disassembly of object 9 through a prescribed number of times of discharging.
Object disassembly device 11 according to a second exemplary embodiment in FIG. 8 is obtained by adding object moving and holding mechanism 12 to the device illustrated in FIG. 1 .
Object moving and holding mechanism 12 has a transfer function for moving unprocessed object 9 to a place where disassembly through discharging is performed. With this function, in addition to the above-described effect, such an effect is achieved that object 9 is continuously transferred to a place where disassembly through discharging is performed, which allows continuous disassembly processing.
Object moving and holding mechanism 12 can hold object 9 at a particular position with respect to positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5. In this case, object moving and holding mechanism 12 may directly hold object 9 or may hold a holder or a container holding object 9.
Controller 10 is connected with pulse power source 6, electric current meter 7, inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8, and object moving and holding mechanism 12. Controller 10 controls inter-electrode distance adjustment mechanism 8 to adjust the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5 based on data of the distance between positive electrode 4 and ground electrode 5.
each exemplary embodiment or modification can be achieved by combining optional exemplary embodiments or modifications among the above-described various exemplary embodiments or modifications as appropriate.
a combination of exemplary embodiments, a combination of examples, or a combination of an exemplary embodiment and an example is possible, and also a combination of features in different exemplary embodiments or examples is possible.
a disassembling method and a disassembly device which disassemble a substrate or an object including the substrate allow a disassembled state and a destroyed state after processing to be maintained constant irrespective of change in an electric conductivity of liquid and change in a shape of a processed object during processing, and are applicable to an object disassembly method and an object disassembly device for small information appliances for recycling, such as a cellular phone and a game machine, and an electronic substrate.

Landscapes

Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
Toxicology (AREA)
Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
Food Science & Technology (AREA)
Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)
Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

EP16196409.3A 2015-12-08 2016-10-28 Procédé de démontage d'objet et dispositif de démontage Active EP3178562B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number	Priority Date	Filing Date	Title
JP2015239598A JP6404808B2 (ja)	2015-12-08	2015-12-08	物品の分解方法

Publications (2)

Publication Number	Publication Date
EP3178562A1 true EP3178562A1 (fr)	2017-06-14
EP3178562B1 EP3178562B1 (fr)	2018-03-14

Family

ID=57280979

Family Applications (1)

Application Number	Title	Priority Date	Filing Date
EP16196409.3A Active EP3178562B1 (fr)	2015-12-08	2016-10-28	Procédé de démontage d'objet et dispositif de démontage

Country Status (3)

Country	Link
EP (1)	EP3178562B1 (fr)
JP (1)	JP6404808B2 (fr)
CN (1)	CN106853411B (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
US12290821B2 (en)	2021-04-13	2025-05-06	Honda Motor Co., Ltd.	Electric pulse decomposition method, composite material, and composite material decomposition method

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
JP6857363B2 (ja) *	2018-11-02	2021-04-14	学校法人早稲田大学	電気パルス解体方法
JP7721082B2 (ja) *	2021-09-03	2025-08-12	学校法人早稲田大学	易解体方法および易解体可能な構造体
CN118541225A (zh)	2022-01-14	2024-08-23	学校法人早稻田大学	降低粘接层粘接强度的方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
JPH10180133A (ja) *	1996-12-25	1998-07-07	Kobe Steel Ltd	高電圧パルス破砕装置
DE10302867B3 (de) *	2003-01-25	2004-04-08	Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh	Verfahren zur rechnergestützten Prozessführung einer Fragmentieranlage
WO2013060403A1 (fr) *	2011-10-26	2013-05-02	Adensis Gmbh	Procédé et dispositif de décomposition d'un article à recycler

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
AU554866B2 (en) *	1982-05-21	1986-09-04	De Beers Industrial Diamond Division (Proprietary) Limited	High voltage disintegration
JPH1057832A (ja) *	1996-08-21	1998-03-03	Komatsu Ltd	放電衝撃破壊方法及び放電衝撃破壊装置
JP3825889B2 (ja) *	1997-07-23	2006-09-27	日鉄鉱業株式会社	電気破砕方法及び装置
JPH1147625A (ja) *	1997-08-05	1999-02-23	Kobe Steel Ltd	パルス放電式破砕方法
JP2000037622A (ja) *	1998-05-20	2000-02-08	Kobe Steel Ltd	接合体の分離方法及び分離装置
JP2000246132A (ja) *	1999-02-26	2000-09-12	Kobe Steel Ltd	放電処理装置
JP4068972B2 (ja) *	2001-05-15	2008-03-26	泰関根	炭化水素、含酸素化合物の液相リフォーミング方法及び装置
JP2003334464A (ja) *	2002-05-15	2003-11-25	Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd	放電破砕用ケーブル及びその使用方法
JP2006051441A (ja) *	2004-08-11	2006-02-23	Ebara Corp	放電処理装置及び放電処理方法
JP4902842B2 (ja) *	2005-09-16	2012-03-21	国立大学法人東北大学	プラズマ発生方法およびプラズマ発生装置
RU2397814C2 (ru) *	2008-09-23	2010-08-27	Юрий Васильевич Григорьев	Способ разрушения железобетонных изделий и устройство для его осуществления
FR2949356B1 (fr) *	2009-08-26	2011-11-11	Camille Cie D Assistance Miniere Et Ind	Procede et systeme de valorisation de materiaux et / ou produits par puissance pulsee
MX2010007658A (es) *	2010-07-08	2012-01-23	Sabino Rodriguez Rodriguez	Generador multiple de vacio.
CN104984807B (zh) *	2015-07-08	2017-10-31	温州科技职业学院	一种用于连续放电破碎矿石的装置及其破碎矿石的方法

2015
- 2015-12-08 JP JP2015239598A patent/JP6404808B2/ja active Active
2016
- 2016-10-28 EP EP16196409.3A patent/EP3178562B1/fr active Active
- 2016-11-28 CN CN201611071447.3A patent/CN106853411B/zh active Active

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
JPH10180133A (ja) *	1996-12-25	1998-07-07	Kobe Steel Ltd	高電圧パルス破砕装置
DE10302867B3 (de) *	2003-01-25	2004-04-08	Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh	Verfahren zur rechnergestützten Prozessführung einer Fragmentieranlage
WO2013060403A1 (fr) *	2011-10-26	2013-05-02	Adensis Gmbh	Procédé et dispositif de décomposition d'un article à recycler
JP2014532548A (ja)	2011-10-26	2014-12-08	アデンシスゲゼルシャフトミットベシュレンクテルハフツングＡｄｅｎｓｉｓＧｍｂＨ	リサイクル可能な物品を分解するための方法および装置

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
US12290821B2 (en)	2021-04-13	2025-05-06	Honda Motor Co., Ltd.	Electric pulse decomposition method, composite material, and composite material decomposition method

Also Published As

Publication number	Publication date
EP3178562B1 (fr)	2018-03-14
JP2017104796A (ja)	2017-06-15
JP6404808B2 (ja)	2018-10-17
CN106853411A (zh)	2017-06-16
CN106853411B (zh)	2018-11-09

Publication	Publication Date	Title
EP3178562B1 (fr)	2018-03-14	Procédé de démontage d'objet et dispositif de démontage
CN107430975B (zh)	2019-06-28	可变压力环境中的平衡阻挡放电中和
KR102068735B1 (ko)	2020-01-21	플라즈마 처리 장치 및 프로브 장치
KR940020497A (ko)	1994-09-16	플라즈마 처리장치(plasma processing apparatus)
JP5369888B2 (ja)	2013-12-18	静電容量センサの電極構造及びそれを用いた車両用近接センサ
KR101283360B1 (ko)	2013-07-08	플라즈마 처리장치 및 플라즈마 처리방법
EP3215842A1 (fr)	2017-09-13	Appareil et procédé de mesure d'odeurs
JP2007250755A5 (fr)	2009-03-05
US7455030B2 (en)	2008-11-25	Plasma generating apparatus
Zhang et al.	2021	Critical study of partial discharge inception in voids: statistical behavior to stochastic nature
Kovalchuk et al.	2013	High-voltage pulsed generators for electro-discharge technologies
Mizeraczyk et al.	2018	Controlled generation of a single Trichel pulse and a series of single Trichel pulses in air
WO2016042481A1 (fr)	2016-03-24	Procédé et système pour déterminer une densité de fluide
Ebihara et al.	2003	Application of the dielectric barrier discharge to detect defects in a teflon coated metal surface
CN111669885A (zh)	2020-09-15	等离子体处理装置
US20090015263A1 (en)	2009-01-15	Ion Control Sensor
KR102316591B1 (ko)	2021-10-25	유도결합형 플라즈마 발생장치용 안테나 및 그의 제어방법과 그를 포함하는 유도결합 플라즈마 발생장치
Sack et al.	2017	Design considerations for electroporation reactors
Gohain et al.	2025	Impact of applied voltage, air gap, and ground arrangement on discharge power and dielectric capacitance in a volume DBD plasma
WO2015128844A1 (fr)	2015-09-03	Procédé et système de mesure de la tension superficielle
JP6725938B2 (ja)	2020-07-22	イオン生成装置
Bouzerar et al.	2016	Electrodynamics of magnetic pulse welding machines: global and local electrical analogues
RU2597938C1 (ru)	2016-09-20	Датчик для непрерывного контроля изоляции проводов
Rossi et al.	1999	A hard tube type pulse generator for plasma immersion ion implantation
Sikora et al.	2017	On the possibility of use of fractional order derivatives to eddy current non-destructive testing

Legal Events

Date	Code	Title	Description
2017-05-12	PUAI	Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012
2017-05-12	STAA	Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent	Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED
2017-06-14	AK	Designated contracting states	Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR
2017-06-14	AX	Request for extension of the european patent	Extension state: BA ME
2017-07-21	STAA	Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent	Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE
2017-08-23	17P	Request for examination filed	Effective date: 20170713
2017-08-23	RBV	Designated contracting states (corrected)	Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR
2017-12-19	GRAP	Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1
2017-12-19	STAA	Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent	Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED
2018-01-03	RIC1	Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant	Ipc: B02C 19/18 20060101AFI20171128BHEP
2018-01-17	INTG	Intention to grant announced	Effective date: 20171220
2018-01-31	GRAS	Grant fee paid	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3
2018-02-09	GRAA	(expected) grant	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210
2018-02-09	STAA	Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent	Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED
2018-03-14	AK	Designated contracting states	Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR
2018-03-14	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D
2018-03-15	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 978321 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180315
2018-04-04	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D
2018-04-05	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602016002027 Country of ref document: DE
2018-07-18	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180314
2018-07-25	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D
2018-07-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180614 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314
2018-08-15	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 978321 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180314
2018-08-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180615 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180614
2018-10-23	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 3
2018-10-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314
2018-11-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314
2018-12-17	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602016002027 Country of ref document: DE
2018-12-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180716
2019-01-18	PLBE	No opposition filed within time limit	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261
2019-01-18	STAA	Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent	Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT
2019-01-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314
2019-02-20	26N	No opposition filed	Effective date: 20181217
2019-06-26	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181031
2019-06-28	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181028
2019-07-24	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A
2019-08-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181031
2019-10-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181028
2020-01-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181028
2020-03-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314
2020-05-29	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL
2020-06-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180314 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20161028
2020-07-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191031 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191031 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180714
2020-11-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181028
2021-06-23	GBPC	Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee	Effective date: 20201028
2021-08-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201028
2025-01-10	PGFP	Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20241021 Year of fee payment: 9
2025-01-23	PGFP	Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20241030 Year of fee payment: 9

EP3178562A1 - Procédé de démontage d'objet et dispositif de démontage - Google Patents

Info

Links

Images

Classifications

Definitions

Landscapes

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=57280979

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (3)

Cited By (1)

Families Citing this family (3)

Citations (3)

Family Cites Families (14)

Patent Citations (4)

Cited By (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events