[go: up one dir, main page]

EP2647235B1 - Dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers - Google Patents

Dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2647235B1
EP2647235B1 EP10785064.6A EP10785064A EP2647235B1 EP 2647235 B1 EP2647235 B1 EP 2647235B1 EP 10785064 A EP10785064 A EP 10785064A EP 2647235 B1 EP2647235 B1 EP 2647235B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
communication system
carrier
carrier aggregation
request
signaling message
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10785064.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2647235A1 (en
Inventor
Jani Matti Johannes Moilanen
Antti Anton Toskala
Timo Erkki Lunttila
Sabine Roessel
Woonhee Hwang
Mikko Saily
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Original Assignee
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy filed Critical Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Publication of EP2647235A1 publication Critical patent/EP2647235A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2647235B1 publication Critical patent/EP2647235B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/14Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/52Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on load

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers.
  • the present invention relates to dynamic spectrum refarming (DSR) where two radio access technologies (RATs) share same spectrum and the spectrum shares are assigned based on cell load as illustrated in Fig. 1 .
  • DSR dynamic spectrum refarming
  • RATs radio access technologies
  • a communication system of a radio access technology 1 (RAT1) which shares spectrum blocks with the RAT2 communication system may use all of the shared spectrum blocks (i.e. all of the bandwidth shared between the communication systems).
  • the shared spectrum blocks should be assigned more and more to the RAT2 communication system.
  • Dynamic adjustment of bandwidth between different RATs can be problematic even though different bandwidths are supported by the RATs.
  • LTE long term evolution
  • MIB master information block
  • SIB system information block
  • GSM Global System for Mobile communications
  • IS-IF appears only at edges of the LTE spectrum as show in Fig. 2 .
  • IS-IF can be still very harmful for LTE control channels which are wide band transmissions, i.e. transmitted over entire LTE bandwidth.
  • LTE Release-10 also known as LTE-Advanced
  • CA carrier aggregation
  • CCs component carriers
  • Fig. 3 The basic principle of CA in LTE is illustrated in Fig. 3 .
  • LTE-Advanced carrier aggregation shown in Fig. 3 , an intra-band aggregation of carriers 1 and 2, and an inter-band aggregation of carrier 3 combined with carriers 1 and 2 are performed.
  • carrier aggregation is that a network may grant resources for a UE on multiple CCs instead of just one which is the case in LTE Release-8 and -9.
  • the WO 2010/091713 A1 relates to radio resource allocation between fourth-generation Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Networks (E-UTRANs) and second-generation radio access networks according to the GSM/EDGE standard (herein also referred to as GERANs), and more particularly to a mechanism which allows GERAN and LTE radio resource management to share the same spectrum allocation in both co-channels and adjacent channels.
  • E-UTRANs Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Networks
  • GERANs GSM/EDGE standard
  • the US 2010/098012 A1 discloses transmitting uplink control information (UCI) for Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) using carrier aggregation.
  • UCI uplink control information
  • LTE-A Long Term Evolution-Advanced
  • Methods for UCI transmission in the uplink control channel, uplink shared channel or uplink data channel are disclosed.
  • the methods include transmitting channel quality indicators (CQI), precoding matrix indicators (PMI), rank indicators (RI), hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) acknowledgement/non-acknowledgement (ACK/NACK), channel status reports (CQI/PMI/RI), source routing (SR) and sounding reference signals (SRS).
  • CQI channel quality indicators
  • PMI precoding matrix indicators
  • RI rank indicators
  • HARQ hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement/non-acknowledgement
  • CQI/PMI/RI channel status reports
  • SRS sounding reference signals
  • the present invention aims at overcoming the problems related to dynamic change of bandwidth between communication systems of different radio access technologies sharing blocks of spectrum or bandwidth, and inter-system interference.
  • the present invention aims at establishing signaling mechanisms with minimal complexity, which enable a smart interaction between the communication systems, making it possible to utilize carrier aggregation for smooth and seamless spectrum refarming in dynamic / semi-static manner.
  • a bandwidth of a first communication system of a first radio access technology such as LTE can be dynamically changed without cell reset.
  • backwards compatibility can be provided since carrier aggregation related changes are invisible to Release-10 UEs due to using standard carrier aggregation functionality, and legacy UEs may operate on a dedicated LTE carrier without any impact or potentially be handed over to one of shared carriers.
  • Release-10 LTE carrier aggregation mechanisms allow basically for deactivation / de-configuration of some of CCs for all
  • eNodeB eNodeB
  • eNB eNodeB
  • signaling mechanisms enabling smart interaction between a first communication system of a first radio access technology providing carrier aggregation mechanisms such as LTE and a second communication system of a second radio access technology such as GSM and TD-SCDMA (time division synchronous code division multiple access).
  • first and second communication systems are not limited to LTE and GSM / TD-SCDMA.
  • FIG. 4 For illustrating a simplified block diagram of various electronic devices that are suitable for use in practicing the exemplary embodiments of this invention.
  • a control unit 10 of the first communication system includes processing resources 11, memory resources 12 that may store a program, and interfaces 13 which may include a suitable radio frequency transceiver coupled to one or more antennas for bidirectional wireless communications over one or more wireless links.
  • the processing resources 11, memory resources 12 and interfaces 13 may be coupled by a bus 14.
  • the control unit 10 may function as part of network elements providing access for user equipments to the first communication system. According to an embodiment of the invention, the control unit 10 may function as part of eNBs, 3G (third generation) NodeBs, or BTSs (base transceiver stations).
  • a control unit 20 of the second communication system includes processing resources 21, memory resources 22 that may store a program, and interfaces 23 which may include a suitable radio frequency transceiver coupled to one or more antennas for bidirectional wireless communications over one or more wireless links.
  • the processing resources 21, memory resources 22 and interfaces 23 may be coupled by a bus 24.
  • the control unit 20 may function as part of network elements providing access for user equipments to the second communication system. According to an embodiment of the invention, the control unit 20 may function as part of BSCs (base station controllers), 3G NodeBs, or BTSs.
  • BSCs base station controllers
  • 3G NodeBs 3G NodeBs
  • BTSs BTSs
  • the interfaces 13 and 23 may be used for signaling messages between the control units 10 and 20.
  • connection means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements, and may encompass the presence of one or more intermediate elements between two elements that are “connected” or “coupled” together.
  • the coupling or connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof.
  • two elements may be considered to be “connected” or “coupled” together by the use of one or more wires, cables and printed electrical connections, as well as by the use of electromagnetic energy, such as electromagnetic energy having wavelengths in the radio frequency region, the microwave region and the optical (both visible and invisible) region, as non-limiting examples.
  • Programs stored by the memory resources 12, 23 are assumed to include program instructions that, when executed by the associated processing resources, enable the electronic device to operate in accordance with the exemplary embodiments of this invention, as detailed below.
  • Inherent in the processing resources 11, 21 is a clock to enable synchronism among the various apparatus for transmissions and receptions within the appropriate time intervals and slots required, as the scheduling grants and the granted resources/subframes are time dependent.
  • the transceivers of the interfaces 13, 23 include both transmitter and receiver, and inherent in each is a modulator/demodulator commonly known as a modem.
  • the interfaces 13, 23 may also include a modem to facilitate communication over (hardwire) links.
  • the exemplary embodiments of this invention may be implemented by computer software stored in the memory resources 12, 22 and executable by the processing resources 11, 21 of the control units 10, 20, or by hardware, or by a combination of software and/or firmware and hardware in any or all of the devices shown.
  • the memory resources 12, 22 may be of any type suitable to the local technical environment and may be implemented using any suitable data storage technology, such as semiconductor-based memory devices, magnetic memory devices and systems, optical memory devices and systems, fixed memory and removable memory.
  • the processing resources 11, 21 may be of any type suitable to the local technical environment, and may include one or more of general purpose computers, special purpose computers, microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs) and processors based on a multi-core processor architecture, as non-limiting examples.
  • carrier aggregation of an LTE system is used to adjust overall LTE bandwidth for DSR purposes.
  • a load of a second communication system of a second radio access technology e.g. a GSM system
  • additional LTE carrier(s) that are at least partly shared with the GSM system are activated for the cell and they are aggregated by using LTE carrier aggregation.
  • LTE bandwidth is down-scaled.
  • additional LTE carrier(s) and the corresponding carrier aggregation are deactivated, i.e. LTE bandwidth is down-scaled.
  • LTE bandwidth is down-scaled.
  • it may be decided per sector on a unique primary cell, i.e. PCell or primary component carrier (PCC), per UE connected to the LTE system.
  • This decision can be based on neighbor cell interference as estimated from measurement reports of the UEs connected to the LTE system.
  • this decision can be based on signaling from the GSM system to the LTE system on which GSM carriers are most active.
  • RRC radio resource control
  • the need/possibility to disable/enable LTE carriers and carrier aggregation is communicated between the GSM system and the LTE system.
  • a network node of the LTE system e.g. an eNB, provides it in a dedicated message when it configures the secondary carrier for carrier aggregation, changing of MIB or SIB contents can be applied right away in the UE.
  • FIG. 5 An example solution with two 5MHz component carriers is illustrated in Fig. 5 .
  • the two 5MHz component carriers are aggregated, one of which is a dedicated carrier of the first communication system (LTE in this example), and the other is an additional carrier corresponding to a spectrum block shared between the first and second communication systems.
  • the load of the GSM system is high, the additional carrier and the carrier aggregation are deactivated so that the shared spectrum block can be used by the GSM system.
  • the LTE carrier aggregation may be used together with HSPA multi-carrier to provide a similar dynamic spectrum refarming solution for HSPA-LTE.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates an example solution of dynamic spectrum refarming with LTE carrier aggregation used together with HSPA multi-carrier.
  • the LTE system comprises a dedicated spectrum block of 5MHz
  • the HSPA system comprises a dedicated spectrum block of 5MHz.
  • a dedicated carrier corresponding to the dedicated spectrum block of the LTE system and an additional carrier corresponding to the shared spectrum block may be aggregated and used by the LTE system.
  • the additional carrier and the carrier aggregation may be deactivated so that the shared spectrum block can be used by the HSPA system.
  • the first communication system e.g. an eNB of LTE
  • the first communication system may be informed about a level of inter-system interference on each of carriers which may be carriers shared between the first and second communication systems.
  • the inter-system interference may be controlled by utilizing at least one of the following methods:
  • first a component carrier of a particular bandwidth may be deactivated and reactivated with a smaller or larger bandwidth.
  • the first and second communication systems are not limited to LTE and GSM.
  • the second communication system may comprise TD-SCDMA which may provide the corresponding signaling of the spectrum need.
  • Fig. 7 shows a schematic block diagram illustrating signaling between first and second communication systems according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a communication system performs load monitoring.
  • the second communication system 30 adopts a radio access technology (second radio access technology), such as GSM or TD-SCDMA, for example.
  • the second communication system 30 may comprise the control unit 20 shown in Fig. 4 , which may function as part of a BSC.
  • the second communication system 30 determines an availability of spectrum blocks shared between the second communication system and a first communication system 40 of a first radio access technology based on the load. In step S2 the second communication system 30 sends a request in a first signaling message to the first communication system 40 which is capable of performing carrier aggregation mechanisms, the request including information on the availability of the spectrum blocks.
  • the second communication system 30 may calculate a level of inter-system interference between the first and second communication systems, at least on carriers shared between the first and second communication systems, and include interference information on the inter-system interference into the request.
  • the first communication system 40 receives the request and, in step S3, performs carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems, which is included in the request, with respect to the spectrum blocks.
  • the first communication system 40 adopts a radio access technology (first radio access technology, which is different from the second radio access technology), such as LTE, for example.
  • the first communication system 40 may comprise the control unit 10 shown in Fig. 4 , which may function as part of an eNB.
  • the first communication system 40 activates at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and aggregates the at least one additional carrier using the carrier aggregation mechanisms. In case the information indicates unavailability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, the first communication system 40 deactivates at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and deactivates the corresponding carrier aggregation using the carrier aggregation mechanisms.
  • the first communication system 40 may deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a larger bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block, and for deactivating the at least one additional carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation, the first communication system 40 may deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a smaller bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block.
  • the first communication system 40 may control the inter-system interference based on the interference information included in the request received from the second communication system 30.
  • the first communication system 40 may allow carrier aggregation only for user equipments of the first communication system 40 that have signal quality that is high enough to cope with the inter-system interference, and/or adjust signal quality estimates of the first communication system based on the level of inter-system interference.
  • step S4 the first communication system 40 informs a UE 50 about the activation of the at least one additional carrier. That is, the first communication system 40 provides system information to access the at least one additional carrier to the UE 50 in a dedicated message when it configures the at least one additional carrier for the carrier aggregation.
  • the first communication system 40 decides per sector on a unique primary carrier for the user equipment 50, and performs an intra-cell handover of the user equipment 50 to the unique primary carrier when the user equipment 50 is connected to a primary carrier different from the unique primary carrier (step S4).
  • the first communication system 40 may decide the unique primary carrier based on neighbor cell interference estimated from measurement reports of user equipments connected to the first communication system, which may include the user equipment 50, and/or based on signaling from the second communication system 30 on activities of carriers of the second communication system.
  • step S5 the first communication system 40 transmits a response to the request in a second signaling message to the second communication system 30, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of the at least one additional carrier and/or the corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • the first signaling message sent in step S1 may be a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message sent in step S5 may be a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  • Fig. 8 shows an example implementation of an embodiment of the invention with LTE carrier aggregation, and specifically the case where LTE carrier aggregation is activated in response to the request from the second communication system (GSM in this example), i.e. LTE bandwidth is up-scaled.
  • GSM second communication system
  • step C1 the GSM system, e.g. a BSC, monitors its load, and the load monitoring indicates that a spectrum block can be released.
  • the GSM system sends an indication to the first communication system (LTE in this example), e.g. an eNB of an E-UTRAN (evolved universal terrestrial radio access network), of spectrum block availability.
  • the eNB configures an SCell (secondary cell, secondary/additional component carrier) to UEs of the LTE system which are carrier aggregation enabled.
  • LTE long-term evolution
  • SCell secondary cell, secondary/additional component carrier
  • the example implementation shown in Fig. 8 may be further enhanced by adding a fourth step where the LTE eNB acknowledges the activation of carrier aggregation to the BSC of the GSM system.
  • Deactivation of a carrier aggregation may be implemented in a similar manner. That is, the GSM system, e.g. the BSC, monitors its load, and sends an indication to the eNB of spectrum block unavailability.
  • the LTE system e.g. the eNB deactivates the carrier aggregation and sends an acknowledgement for the deactivation to the BSC.
  • inter-system handover signaling may be used in order to minimize the amount of changes to the specifications. That is, the BSC sends a "virtual HO (handover) request" to the eNB, which further may include an indication of inter-system interference. The eNB sends a "virtual HO response" to acknowledge the activation/deactivation of additional carriers, and/or carrier aggregation.
  • the virtual HO request and the virtual HO response refer to picky-bagged inter-system HO messages that are known by both entities (BSC and eNB) to indicate LTE carrier (or carrier aggregation) activation/deactivation instead of actual handover. Furthermore, load balancing messages or information exchange messages may be sent between the BSC and eNB in order to exchange load information.
  • the communication between the BSC and eNB may be implemented through a proprietary interface between GSM BTS (base station) and LTE eNB.
  • GSM BTS has to communicate with BSC via a proprietary interface.
  • some communication between neighboring BSCs may be implemented.
  • an apparatus of a first communication system of a first radio access technology comprises receiving means for receiving a request in a first signaling message from a second communication system of a second radio access technology, the request including information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems, and performing means for performing carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information with respect to the spectrum blocks.
  • the apparatus may further comprise activating means and aggregating means for, in case the information indicates availability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, activating at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and aggregating the at least one additional carrier using the carrier aggregation mechanisms.
  • the apparatus may further comprise deactivating means for, in case the information indicates unavailability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, deactivating at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and deactivating the corresponding carrier aggregation using the carrier aggregation mechanisms.
  • the apparatus may further comprise deactivating and reactivating means which, for activating and aggregating the at least one additional carrier, deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a larger bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block.
  • deactivating and reactivating means may deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a smaller bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block.
  • the apparatus may further comprise transmitting means for transmitting a response to the request in a second signaling message to the second communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of the at least one additional carrier and/or the corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • the first signaling message may be a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message may be a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  • the receiving means may receive the request from a network node of the second communication system, wherein the apparatus may comprise the network node.
  • the request may further include interference information on a level of inter-system interference between the first and second communication systems, at least on carriers shared between the first and second communication systems, and the apparatus may further comprise controlling means for controlling the inter-system interference based on the interference information.
  • the apparatus may further comprise allowing means for allowing carrier aggregation only for user equipments of the first communication system that have signal quality that is high enough to cope with the inter-system interference, and/or adjusting means for adjusting signal quality estimates of the first communication system based on the level of inter-system interference.
  • the apparatus may further comprise deciding means for deciding per sector on a unique primary carrier per user equipment, and performing means for performing an intra-cell handover of each of user equipments connected to a primary carrier different from the unique primary carrier to the unique primary carrier.
  • the deciding means may decide the unique primary carrier based on neighbor cell interference estimated from measurement reports of the user equipments and/or based on signaling from the second communication system on activities of carriers of the second communication system.
  • an apparatus of the second communication system of the second radio access technology such as the communication system 30 of Fig. 7 or the control unit 20 shown in Fig. 4 , for example, comprises monitoring means for monitoring a load of the apparatus, determining means for determining an availability of spectrum blocks shared between the second communication system and the first communication system of the first radio access technology based on the load, and sending means for sending a request in a first signaling message to the first communication system which is capable of performing carrier aggregation mechanisms, the request including information on the availability of the spectrum blocks.
  • the apparatus may further comprise calculating means for calculating a level of inter-system interference between the first and second communication systems, at least on carriers shared between the first and second communication systems, and including means for including interference information on the inter-system interference into the request.
  • the apparatus may further comprise signaling means for signaling activities of carriers of the second communication system to the first communication system.
  • the apparatus may further comprise receiving means for receiving a response to the request in a second signaling message from the first communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of at least one additional carrier and/or a corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • the apparatus may further comprise limiting means for limiting a transmit power of the second communication system on at least one carrier shared between the first and second communication systems.
  • a request is received in a first signaling message S2 from a second communication system 30 of a second radio access technology, the request including information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems.
  • the availability of the spectrum blocks may have been determined based on a load of the second communication system 30.
  • the first communication system 40 performs carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information with respect to the spectrum blocks, and may transmit a response to the request in a second signaling message S5 to the second communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of at least one additional carrier and/or a corresponding carrier aggregation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers.
  • In particular, the present invention relates to dynamic spectrum refarming (DSR) where two radio access technologies (RATs) share same spectrum and the spectrum shares are assigned based on cell load as illustrated in Fig. 1. In case the cell load of a communication system of a radio access technology 2 (RAT2) is low in a particular cell of a cellular communications system, a communication system of a radio access technology 1 (RAT1) which shares spectrum blocks with the RAT2 communication system may use all of the shared spectrum blocks (i.e. all of the bandwidth shared between the communication systems). With an increasing cell load of the RAT2 communication system, the shared spectrum blocks should be assigned more and more to the RAT2 communication system.
  • Main motivations for dynamic spectrum refarming are
    • smooth migration to newer technologies (no need to worry when is the cross-over point to do refarming, or what is the right capacity balance),
    • higher user throughputs & lower call blocking (bandwidth optimized according to instantaneous load), and
    • power saving (putting to sleep excess capacity).
  • Dynamic adjustment of bandwidth between different RATs can be problematic even though different bandwidths are supported by the RATs.
  • An example of different RATs are GSM (global system for mobile communication) and LTE (long term evolution) systems. For example, LTE supports different bandwidths from 1.4 MHz to 20 MHz and it is possible to indicate a bandwidth change with a broadcasted master information block (MIB) and related system information block (SIB). It will however take some time before all LTE UEs (user equipments) have an opportunity to receive the new MIB and SIBs. In the worst case this takes 40s depending on a length of modification period (=modificationPeriodCoeff * defaultPagingCycle in frames). And more importantly, since the system has not been designed for dynamic spectrum adjustments it can not be guaranteed that legacy UEs would be able to follow such bandwidth adjustments, as any changes in MIB should be done via cell reset.
  • Another problem arises if spectrum shares differ between neighboring cells of the cellular communications system. GSM has significantly higher power spectral density, e.g. ∼13.5dB in case of 5MHz LTE, and therefore it will cause severe inter-system interference (IS-IF) towards LTE.
  • It is possible to assign the spectrum shares in such a way that IS-IF appears only at edges of the LTE spectrum as show in Fig. 2. However, IS-IF can be still very harmful for LTE control channels which are wide band transmissions, i.e. transmitted over entire LTE bandwidth.
  • LTE Release-10 (also known as LTE-Advanced) describes carrier aggregation (CA) providing a capability to aggregate together up to five LTE carriers referred to as component carriers (CCs). The basic principle of CA in LTE is illustrated in Fig. 3. According to the example of LTE-Advanced carrier aggregation shown in Fig. 3, an intra-band aggregation of carriers 1 and 2, and an inter-band aggregation of carrier 3 combined with carriers 1 and 2 are performed.
  • The idea of carrier aggregation is that a network may grant resources for a UE on multiple CCs instead of just one which is the case in LTE Release-8 and -9.
  • The WO 2010/091713 A1 relates to radio resource allocation between fourth-generation Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Networks (E-UTRANs) and second-generation radio access networks according to the GSM/EDGE standard (herein also referred to as GERANs), and more particularly to a mechanism which allows GERAN and LTE radio resource management to share the same spectrum allocation in both co-channels and adjacent channels.
  • In A. Mihovska et al.: "Multi-Operator Resource Sharing Scenario in the Context of IMT-Advanced Systems", 2009, IEEE, a framework for efficient integration of functionalities for dynamic spectrum use, e.g. spectrum aggregation, and cooperative radio resource management in the scope of IMT-Advanced candidate systems is investigated.
  • The US 2010/098012 A1 discloses transmitting uplink control information (UCI) for Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) using carrier aggregation. Methods for UCI transmission in the uplink control channel, uplink shared channel or uplink data channel are disclosed. The methods include transmitting channel quality indicators (CQI), precoding matrix indicators (PMI), rank indicators (RI), hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) acknowledgement/non-acknowledgement (ACK/NACK), channel status reports (CQI/PMI/RI), source routing (SR) and sounding reference signals (SRS). In addition, methods for providing flexible configuration in signaling UCI, efficient resource utilization, and support for high volume UCI overhead in LTE-A are disclosed.
  • The present invention aims at overcoming the problems related to dynamic change of bandwidth between communication systems of different radio access technologies sharing blocks of spectrum or bandwidth, and inter-system interference.
  • Moreover, the present invention aims at establishing signaling mechanisms with minimal complexity, which enable a smart interaction between the communication systems, making it possible to utilize carrier aggregation for smooth and seamless spectrum refarming in dynamic / semi-static manner.
  • This is achieved by the apparatuses and methods as defined in the appended claims. The invention may also be implemented by a computer program product.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention, a bandwidth of a first communication system of a first radio access technology such as LTE can be dynamically changed without cell reset.
  • Moreover, backwards compatibility can be provided since carrier aggregation related changes are invisible to Release-10 UEs due to using standard carrier aggregation functionality, and legacy UEs may operate on a dedicated LTE carrier without any impact or potentially be handed over to one of shared carriers.
  • In addition, there is a possibility to control IS-IF efficiently. There is always a "clean" LTE carrier that can be used as an escape carrier for UEs that otherwise would be suffering too much from IS-IF. It is especially worth to notice that control channels on the clean carrier do not suffer from IS-IF.
  • In the following the invention will be described by way of embodiments thereof taking into account the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram illustrating an example of dynamic spectrum refarming.
    • Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram illustrating an example of inter-system interference with GSM-LTE DSR.
    • Fig. 3 shows a schematic diagram illustrating an example of LTE-Advanced carrier aggregation of both intra-band and inter-band.
    • Fig. 4 shows a schematic block diagram illustrating an arrangement of control units according to an embodiment of the invention.
    • Fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram illustrating an example of dynamic spectrum refarming with LTE carrier aggregation according to an embodiment of the invention.
    • Fig. 6 shows a schematic diagram illustrating an example of dynamic spectrum refarming with LTE carrier aggregation according to another embodiment of the invention.
    • Fig. 7 shows a schematic diagram illustrating signaling between first and second communication systems according to an embodiment of the invention.
    • Fig. 8 shows a schematic diagram illustrating an example implementation of LTE spectrum increase according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Release-10 LTE carrier aggregation mechanisms allow basically for deactivation / de-configuration of some of CCs for all
  • UEs, after which an eNodeB (eNB) can ramp down those CCs. However, there are no signaling mechanisms enabling smart interaction between a first communication system of a first radio access technology providing carrier aggregation mechanisms such as LTE and a second communication system of a second radio access technology such as GSM and TD-SCDMA (time division synchronous code division multiple access).
  • In the following embodiments of the invention will be described which define a signaling framework between the first and second communication systems, which allows for smooth and seamless dynamic spectrum refarming.
  • It is to be noted that the first and second communication systems are not limited to LTE and GSM / TD-SCDMA.
  • As a preliminary matter before exploring details of various implementations, reference is made to Fig. 4 for illustrating a simplified block diagram of various electronic devices that are suitable for use in practicing the exemplary embodiments of this invention.
  • A control unit 10 of the first communication system includes processing resources 11, memory resources 12 that may store a program, and interfaces 13 which may include a suitable radio frequency transceiver coupled to one or more antennas for bidirectional wireless communications over one or more wireless links. The processing resources 11, memory resources 12 and interfaces 13 may be coupled by a bus 14.
  • The control unit 10 may function as part of network elements providing access for user equipments to the first communication system. According to an embodiment of the invention, the control unit 10 may function as part of eNBs, 3G (third generation) NodeBs, or BTSs (base transceiver stations). Similarly, a control unit 20 of the second communication system includes processing resources 21, memory resources 22 that may store a program, and interfaces 23 which may include a suitable radio frequency transceiver coupled to one or more antennas for bidirectional wireless communications over one or more wireless links. The processing resources 21, memory resources 22 and interfaces 23 may be coupled by a bus 24.
  • The control unit 20 may function as part of network elements providing access for user equipments to the second communication system. According to an embodiment of the invention, the control unit 20 may function as part of BSCs (base station controllers), 3G NodeBs, or BTSs.
  • The interfaces 13 and 23 may be used for signaling messages between the control units 10 and 20.
  • The terms "connected," "coupled," or any variant thereof, mean any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements, and may encompass the presence of one or more intermediate elements between two elements that are "connected" or "coupled" together. The coupling or connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. As employed herein two elements may be considered to be "connected" or "coupled" together by the use of one or more wires, cables and printed electrical connections, as well as by the use of electromagnetic energy, such as electromagnetic energy having wavelengths in the radio frequency region, the microwave region and the optical (both visible and invisible) region, as non-limiting examples.
  • Programs stored by the memory resources 12, 23 are assumed to include program instructions that, when executed by the associated processing resources, enable the electronic device to operate in accordance with the exemplary embodiments of this invention, as detailed below. Inherent in the processing resources 11, 21 is a clock to enable synchronism among the various apparatus for transmissions and receptions within the appropriate time intervals and slots required, as the scheduling grants and the granted resources/subframes are time dependent. The transceivers of the interfaces 13, 23 include both transmitter and receiver, and inherent in each is a modulator/demodulator commonly known as a modem. The interfaces 13, 23 may also include a modem to facilitate communication over (hardwire) links.
  • In general, the exemplary embodiments of this invention may be implemented by computer software stored in the memory resources 12, 22 and executable by the processing resources 11, 21 of the control units 10, 20, or by hardware, or by a combination of software and/or firmware and hardware in any or all of the devices shown.
  • The memory resources 12, 22 may be of any type suitable to the local technical environment and may be implemented using any suitable data storage technology, such as semiconductor-based memory devices, magnetic memory devices and systems, optical memory devices and systems, fixed memory and removable memory. The processing resources 11, 21 may be of any type suitable to the local technical environment, and may include one or more of general purpose computers, special purpose computers, microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs) and processors based on a multi-core processor architecture, as non-limiting examples.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention, carrier aggregation of an LTE system (first communication system of first radio access technology) is used to adjust overall LTE bandwidth for DSR purposes. When a load of a second communication system of a second radio access technology, e.g. a GSM system, is low in a cell of a cellular communications system, additional LTE carrier(s) that are at least partly shared with the GSM system are activated for the cell and they are aggregated by using LTE carrier aggregation.
  • When a load of the GSM system is high, additional LTE carrier(s) and the corresponding carrier aggregation are deactivated, i.e. LTE bandwidth is down-scaled. For this purpose, it may be decided per sector on a unique primary cell, i.e. PCell or primary component carrier (PCC), per UE connected to the LTE system. This decision can be based on neighbor cell interference as estimated from measurement reports of the UEs connected to the LTE system. Alternatively or in addition, this decision can be based on signaling from the GSM system to the LTE system on which GSM carriers are most active. Intra-cell handover of all UEs of the LTE system is performed which are RRC_CONNECTED (RRC = radio resource control) to a non-selected primary cell to have RRC_CONNECTED of all UEs on the unique primary cell.
  • The need/possibility to disable/enable LTE carriers and carrier aggregation is communicated between the GSM system and the LTE system.
  • As a UE of the LTE system does not need to read system information to access the additional carrier (i.e. secondary carrier) but a network node of the LTE system, e.g. an eNB, provides it in a dedicated message when it configures the secondary carrier for carrier aggregation, changing of MIB or SIB contents can be applied right away in the UE.
  • An example solution with two 5MHz component carriers is illustrated in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 5, in case a load of the second communication system (GSM in this example) is low, the two 5MHz component carriers are aggregated, one of which is a dedicated carrier of the first communication system (LTE in this example), and the other is an additional carrier corresponding to a spectrum block shared between the first and second communication systems. In case the load of the GSM system is high, the additional carrier and the carrier aggregation are deactivated so that the shared spectrum block can be used by the GSM system.
  • As mentioned above, dynamic spectrum refarming is possible also for other technologies than GSM-LTE. For example, the LTE carrier aggregation may be used together with HSPA multi-carrier to provide a similar dynamic spectrum refarming solution for HSPA-LTE.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates an example solution of dynamic spectrum refarming with LTE carrier aggregation used together with HSPA multi-carrier. As shown in Fig. 6, the LTE system comprises a dedicated spectrum block of 5MHz, and the HSPA system comprises a dedicated spectrum block of 5MHz. There also is a spectrum block of 5MHz shared between the LTE and HSPA systems. When a cell load of the HSPA system is low, a dedicated carrier corresponding to the dedicated spectrum block of the LTE system and an additional carrier corresponding to the shared spectrum block may be aggregated and used by the LTE system. In case the cell load of the HSPA system is high, the additional carrier and the carrier aggregation may be deactivated so that the shared spectrum block can be used by the HSPA system.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention, the first communication system (e.g. an eNB of LTE) may be informed about a level of inter-system interference on each of carriers which may be carriers shared between the first and second communication systems.
  • The inter-system interference may be controlled by utilizing at least one of the following methods:
    • allow carrier aggregation only to UEs of the first communication system (e.g. LTE) that have high enough signal quality to cope with the inter-system interference,
    • adjust signal quality estimates of the first communication system based on the level of inter-system interference, which leads to usage of more robust modulation and coding schemes on a shared carrier, and
    • limit transmit power of the second communication system (e.g. GSM) on shared carriers, e.g. if they are known to interfere the first communication system.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention, depending on the need for spectrum for GSM system use, first a component carrier of a particular bandwidth may be deactivated and reactivated with a smaller or larger bandwidth.
  • Again it is noted that the first and second communication systems are not limited to LTE and GSM. The second communication system may comprise TD-SCDMA which may provide the corresponding signaling of the spectrum need.
  • Fig. 7 shows a schematic block diagram illustrating signaling between first and second communication systems according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • In step S1, a communication system (second communication system 30) performs load monitoring. The second communication system 30 adopts a radio access technology (second radio access technology), such as GSM or TD-SCDMA, for example. The second communication system 30 may comprise the control unit 20 shown in Fig. 4, which may function as part of a BSC.
  • The second communication system 30 determines an availability of spectrum blocks shared between the second communication system and a first communication system 40 of a first radio access technology based on the load. In step S2 the second communication system 30 sends a request in a first signaling message to the first communication system 40 which is capable of performing carrier aggregation mechanisms, the request including information on the availability of the spectrum blocks.
  • The second communication system 30 may calculate a level of inter-system interference between the first and second communication systems, at least on carriers shared between the first and second communication systems, and include interference information on the inter-system interference into the request.
  • The first communication system 40 receives the request and, in step S3, performs carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems, which is included in the request, with respect to the spectrum blocks. The first communication system 40 adopts a radio access technology (first radio access technology, which is different from the second radio access technology), such as LTE, for example. The first communication system 40 may comprise the control unit 10 shown in Fig. 4, which may function as part of an eNB.
  • In case the information indicates availability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, the first communication system 40 activates at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and aggregates the at least one additional carrier using the carrier aggregation mechanisms. In case the information indicates unavailability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, the first communication system 40 deactivates at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and deactivates the corresponding carrier aggregation using the carrier aggregation mechanisms.
  • For activating and aggregating the at least one additional carrier, the first communication system 40 may deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a larger bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block, and for deactivating the at least one additional carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation, the first communication system 40 may deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a smaller bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block.
  • The first communication system 40 may control the inter-system interference based on the interference information included in the request received from the second communication system 30. The first communication system 40 may allow carrier aggregation only for user equipments of the first communication system 40 that have signal quality that is high enough to cope with the inter-system interference, and/or adjust signal quality estimates of the first communication system based on the level of inter-system interference.
  • In step S4, the first communication system 40 informs a UE 50 about the activation of the at least one additional carrier. That is, the first communication system 40 provides system information to access the at least one additional carrier to the UE 50 in a dedicated message when it configures the at least one additional carrier for the carrier aggregation.
  • When the at least one carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation are to be deactivated by the first communication system 40, the first communication system 40 decides per sector on a unique primary carrier for the user equipment 50, and performs an intra-cell handover of the user equipment 50 to the unique primary carrier when the user equipment 50 is connected to a primary carrier different from the unique primary carrier (step S4).
  • The first communication system 40 may decide the unique primary carrier based on neighbor cell interference estimated from measurement reports of user equipments connected to the first communication system, which may include the user equipment 50, and/or based on signaling from the second communication system 30 on activities of carriers of the second communication system.
  • In step S5, the first communication system 40 transmits a response to the request in a second signaling message to the second communication system 30, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of the at least one additional carrier and/or the corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • The first signaling message sent in step S1 may be a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message sent in step S5 may be a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  • Fig. 8 shows an example implementation of an embodiment of the invention with LTE carrier aggregation, and specifically the case where LTE carrier aggregation is activated in response to the request from the second communication system (GSM in this example), i.e. LTE bandwidth is up-scaled.
  • In step C1, the GSM system, e.g. a BSC, monitors its load, and the load monitoring indicates that a spectrum block can be released. In step C2, the GSM system sends an indication to the first communication system (LTE in this example), e.g. an eNB of an E-UTRAN (evolved universal terrestrial radio access network), of spectrum block availability. In step C3, the eNB configures an SCell (secondary cell, secondary/additional component carrier) to UEs of the LTE system which are carrier aggregation enabled.
  • The example implementation shown in Fig. 8 may be further enhanced by adding a fourth step where the LTE eNB acknowledges the activation of carrier aggregation to the BSC of the GSM system.
  • Deactivation of a carrier aggregation may be implemented in a similar manner. That is, the GSM system, e.g. the BSC, monitors its load, and sends an indication to the eNB of spectrum block unavailability. The LTE system, e.g. the eNB deactivates the carrier aggregation and sends an acknowledgement for the deactivation to the BSC.
  • In order to support multi-vendor deployments, changes to the GSM and LTE specifications are required to introduce the necessary signaling between GSM (BSC) and LTE (eNB).
  • For this purpose, inter-system handover signaling may be used in order to minimize the amount of changes to the specifications. That is, the BSC sends a "virtual HO (handover) request" to the eNB, which further may include an indication of inter-system interference. The eNB sends a "virtual HO response" to acknowledge the activation/deactivation of additional carriers, and/or carrier aggregation.
  • The virtual HO request and the virtual HO response refer to picky-bagged inter-system HO messages that are known by both entities (BSC and eNB) to indicate LTE carrier (or carrier aggregation) activation/deactivation instead of actual handover. Furthermore, load balancing messages or information exchange messages may be sent between the BSC and eNB in order to exchange load information.
  • In case of single vendor deployment with co-located GSM and LTE base stations, the communication between the BSC and eNB may be implemented through a proprietary interface between GSM BTS (base station) and LTE eNB. In addition, GSM BTS has to communicate with BSC via a proprietary interface. Also some communication between neighboring BSCs may be implemented.
  • With the present invention it is possible to implement dynamic spectrum refarming without requiring a cell reset. In addition, performance of the dynamic spectrum refarming is improved via enhanced inter-system interference control.
  • According to an aspect of the invention, an apparatus of a first communication system of a first radio access technology, such as the first communication system 40 shown in Fig. 7 or the control unit 10 shown in Fig. 4, for example, comprises receiving means for receiving a request in a first signaling message from a second communication system of a second radio access technology, the request including information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems, and performing means for performing carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information with respect to the spectrum blocks.
  • The apparatus may further comprise activating means and aggregating means for, in case the information indicates availability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, activating at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and aggregating the at least one additional carrier using the carrier aggregation mechanisms. The apparatus may further comprise deactivating means for, in case the information indicates unavailability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, deactivating at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and deactivating the corresponding carrier aggregation using the carrier aggregation mechanisms.
  • The apparatus may further comprise deactivating and reactivating means which, for activating and aggregating the at least one additional carrier, deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a larger bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block. For deactivating the at least one additional carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation, the deactivating and reactivating means may deactivate a carrier of a particular bandwidth and reactivate the carrier with a smaller bandwidth corresponding to the at least one spectrum block.
  • The apparatus may further comprise transmitting means for transmitting a response to the request in a second signaling message to the second communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of the at least one additional carrier and/or the corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • The first signaling message may be a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message may be a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  • The receiving means may receive the request from a network node of the second communication system, wherein the apparatus may comprise the network node.
  • The request may further include interference information on a level of inter-system interference between the first and second communication systems, at least on carriers shared between the first and second communication systems, and the apparatus may further comprise controlling means for controlling the inter-system interference based on the interference information.
  • The apparatus may further comprise allowing means for allowing carrier aggregation only for user equipments of the first communication system that have signal quality that is high enough to cope with the inter-system interference, and/or adjusting means for adjusting signal quality estimates of the first communication system based on the level of inter-system interference.
  • For deactivating the at least one additional carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation, the apparatus may further comprise deciding means for deciding per sector on a unique primary carrier per user equipment, and performing means for performing an intra-cell handover of each of user equipments connected to a primary carrier different from the unique primary carrier to the unique primary carrier.
  • The deciding means may decide the unique primary carrier based on neighbor cell interference estimated from measurement reports of the user equipments and/or based on signaling from the second communication system on activities of carriers of the second communication system.
  • According to an aspect of the invention, an apparatus of the second communication system of the second radio access technology, such as the communication system 30 of Fig. 7 or the control unit 20 shown in Fig. 4, for example, comprises monitoring means for monitoring a load of the apparatus, determining means for determining an availability of spectrum blocks shared between the second communication system and the first communication system of the first radio access technology based on the load, and sending means for sending a request in a first signaling message to the first communication system which is capable of performing carrier aggregation mechanisms, the request including information on the availability of the spectrum blocks.
  • The apparatus may further comprise calculating means for calculating a level of inter-system interference between the first and second communication systems, at least on carriers shared between the first and second communication systems, and including means for including interference information on the inter-system interference into the request.
  • The apparatus may further comprise signaling means for signaling activities of carriers of the second communication system to the first communication system.
  • The apparatus may further comprise receiving means for receiving a response to the request in a second signaling message from the first communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of at least one additional carrier and/or a corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • The apparatus may further comprise limiting means for limiting a transmit power of the second communication system on at least one carrier shared between the first and second communication systems.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention, at a first communication system 40 of a first radio access technology, a request is received in a first signaling message S2 from a second communication system 30 of a second radio access technology, the request including information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems. The availability of the spectrum blocks may have been determined based on a load of the second communication system 30. The first communication system 40 performs carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information with respect to the spectrum blocks, and may transmit a response to the request in a second signaling message S5 to the second communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of at least one additional carrier and/or a corresponding carrier aggregation.
  • It is to be understood that the above description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (12)

  1. An apparatus comprising:
    a control unit (10) of a first communication system (40) of a first radio access technology, the control unit being configured to
    receive (S2) a request in a first signaling message from a second communication system of a second radio access technology, the request including information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems,
    characterized in that
    the control unit (10) is configured to perform (S3) carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information with respect to the spectrum blocks, wherein
    in case the information indicates availability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, the control unit is configured to activate at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and aggregate the at least one additional carrier using the carrier aggregation mechanisms, and
    in case the information indicates unavailability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, the control unit is configured to deactivate at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and deactivate the corresponding carrier aggregation using the carrier aggregation mechanisms, and wherein
    the control unit is configured to transmit (S5) a response to the request in a second signaling message to the second communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of the at least one additional carrier and/or the corresponding carrier aggregation, and
    the first signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein for deactivating the at least one additional carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation the control unit is configured to decide per sector on a unique primary carrier per user equipment, and perform an intra-cell handover of each of user equipments connected to a primary carrier different from the unique primary carrier to the unique primary carrier.
  3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the control unit is configured to decide the unique primary carrier based on neighbor cell interference estimated from measurement reports of the user equipments and/or based on signaling from the second communication system on activities of carriers of the second communication system.
  4. An apparatus comprising:
    a control unit (20) of a second communication system (30) of a second radio access technology, the control unit being configured to
    monitor (S1) its load,
    determine an availability of spectrum blocks shared between the second communication system and a first communication system (40) of a first radio access technology based on the load, and
    send (S2) a request in a first signaling message to the first communication system which is capable of performing carrier aggregation mechanisms, the request including information on the availability of the spectrum blocks,
    characterized in that
    the control unit (20) is configured to receive (S5) a response to the request in a second signaling message from the first communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of at least one additional carrier and/or a corresponding carrier aggregation, wherein
    the first signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the control unit is configured to limit a transmit power of the second communication system on at least one carrier shared between the first and second communication systems.
  6. A method comprising:
    receiving (S2), at a first communication system of a first radio access technology, a request in a first signaling message from a second communication system of a second radio access technology, the request including information on availability of spectrum blocks shared between the first and second communication systems,
    characterized by:
    performing (S4) carrier aggregation mechanisms based on the information with respect to the spectrum blocks,
    in case the information indicates availability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, activating at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and aggregating the at least one additional carrier using the carrier aggregation mechanisms; and in case the information indicates unavailability of at least one of the spectrum blocks, deactivating at least one additional carrier corresponding to the at least one spectrum block and deactivating the corresponding carrier aggregation using the carrier aggregation mechanisms, and
    transmitting (S5) a response to the request in a second signaling message to the second communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of the at least one additional carrier and/or the corresponding carrier aggregation, wherein
    the first signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  7. The method of claim 6, comprising:
    for deactivating the at least one additional carrier and the corresponding carrier aggregation, deciding per sector on a unique primary carrier per user equipment, and performing an intra-cell handover of each of user equipments connected to a primary carrier different from the unique primary carrier to the unique primary carrier.
  8. The method of claim 7, comprising:
    deciding the unique primary carrier based on neighbor cell interference estimated from measurement reports of the user equipments and/or based on signaling from the second communication system on activities of carriers of the second communication system.
  9. A method comprising:
    monitoring (S1) a load of a second communication system of a second radio access technology;
    determining an availability of spectrum blocks shared between the second communication system and a first communication system of a first radio access technology based on the load; and
    sending (S2) a request in a first signaling message to the first communication system which is capable of performing carrier aggregation mechanisms, the request including information on the availability of the spectrum blocks,
    characterized by:
    receiving (S5) a response to the request in a second signaling message from the first communication system, the response including an acknowledgment of an activation/deactivation of at least one additional carrier and/or a corresponding carrier aggregation, wherein
    the first signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover request message and the second signaling message is a virtual inter-system handover response message.
  10. The method of claim 9, comprising:
    limiting a transmit power of the second communication system on at least one carrier shared between the first and second communication systems.
  11. A computer program product including a program for a processing device, comprising software code portions for performing the steps of any one of claims 6 to 10 when the program is run on the processing device.
  12. The computer program product according to claim 11, wherein the computer program product comprises a computer-readable medium on which the software code portions are stored.
EP10785064.6A 2010-11-30 2010-11-30 Dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers Active EP2647235B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2010/068545 WO2012072118A1 (en) 2010-11-30 2010-11-30 Dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2647235A1 EP2647235A1 (en) 2013-10-09
EP2647235B1 true EP2647235B1 (en) 2015-09-30

Family

ID=44080468

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10785064.6A Active EP2647235B1 (en) 2010-11-30 2010-11-30 Dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US9204450B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2647235B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012072118A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20240037368A (en) 2010-12-06 2024-03-21 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 Method to enable wireless operation in license exempt spectrum
CN102118758B (en) * 2011-01-28 2015-06-03 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Frequency spectrum sharing method for GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication) system and LTE (Long Term Evolution) system and systems thereof
US9504034B2 (en) 2011-07-05 2016-11-22 Tait Limited Overlay of bearers in a radio communication system
KR20160055977A (en) * 2011-09-29 2016-05-18 노키아 솔루션스 앤드 네트웍스 오와이 Method and apparatus for a reconfiguration
US20150016365A1 (en) * 2011-11-22 2015-01-15 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Carrier Aggregation Optimization
US10462674B2 (en) * 2013-01-28 2019-10-29 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Methods and apparatus for spectrum coordination
CN104105141B (en) * 2013-04-02 2020-03-17 索尼公司 Radio resource management apparatus, method and system
EP3035726B1 (en) 2013-08-12 2019-08-07 Sony Corporation Communication control apparatus, communication control method and radio communication system
WO2015022016A1 (en) * 2013-08-13 2015-02-19 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Anonymization of asa/lsa repository data
EP3044997B1 (en) 2013-09-10 2017-11-08 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Method for selecting an access network based on carrier aggregation information
ES2532518B1 (en) * 2013-09-27 2016-01-19 Vodafone España, S.A.U. Network element and procedure to coordinate the use of radio resources between radio access networks
US20150264703A1 (en) * 2014-03-11 2015-09-17 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Method for Interference Management and Mitigation for LTE-M
EP3139554B1 (en) * 2014-05-06 2019-08-07 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Multiflow transmission method and device
CN105917691B (en) * 2014-12-24 2019-10-22 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for sharing wireless resources
CN105007595B (en) * 2015-07-24 2019-08-02 辽宁邮电规划设计院有限公司 Determine the system and method for the buffer area GSM Refarming
WO2017039496A1 (en) * 2015-08-31 2017-03-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Network node and method for handling of downlink bandwidth in a multi-rat environment
CA3009728C (en) * 2016-01-27 2024-01-09 Sony Corporation Communication control device, communication control method, program, and wireless communication device
US20190159146A1 (en) * 2016-05-12 2019-05-23 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Radio Access Network Node, Radio Node, And Methods Performed Therein
US10045219B2 (en) 2016-10-10 2018-08-07 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Spectrum access sharing front-end processor for mobile management entities
CN108738024A (en) * 2017-04-18 2018-11-02 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 A kind of method, apparatus and network for realizing that frequency spectrum is backsetted
EP3619898A1 (en) 2017-06-16 2020-03-11 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Control device, network node and methods thereof
CN116528370A (en) 2017-06-16 2023-08-01 华为技术有限公司 Communication method and device
US12250561B2 (en) 2021-12-22 2025-03-11 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Visual refarming of telecommunications spectrum blocks

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040047312A1 (en) * 2002-04-29 2004-03-11 Peter Muszynski Method and apparatus for UL interference avoidance by DL measurements and IFHO
US8036702B2 (en) * 2007-05-14 2011-10-11 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for multicarrier communication in wireless systems
US20090059856A1 (en) * 2007-08-10 2009-03-05 Nokia Corporation Spectrum sharing
US8040815B2 (en) * 2007-11-28 2011-10-18 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Spectrum coordination controller
GB0801534D0 (en) * 2008-01-28 2008-03-05 Fujitsu Lab Of Europ Ltd Communications systems
KR101328790B1 (en) 2008-10-20 2013-11-13 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 Carrier aggregation
WO2010091713A1 (en) * 2009-02-10 2010-08-19 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Radio resource allocation for geran-lte co-existence and co-location
US8385832B2 (en) * 2009-03-13 2013-02-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Inter-cell interference control in an uplink multi-carrier radio communications system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9204450B2 (en) 2015-12-01
WO2012072118A1 (en) 2012-06-07
US20130294415A1 (en) 2013-11-07
EP2647235A1 (en) 2013-10-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2647235B1 (en) Dynamic spectrum refarming with multiple carriers
US11159289B2 (en) Sounding reference signals with collisions in asymmetric carrier aggregation
US12127238B2 (en) Quasi-colocation prioritization for secondary cell group change with different numerology or asynchronization
JP6479963B2 (en) User terminal, radio base station, and radio communication method
US20150163794A1 (en) Uplink control information feedback method, base station, and user equipment
US11611424B2 (en) Slot format indicator (SFI) and beam information exchange in a dynamic time division duplex (TDD) scheme with carrier aggregation across millimeter wave bands
KR20170127577A (en) Method and apparatus for enhancing cell-edge user performance and signaling radio link failure conditions via downlink cooperative component carriers
US11991688B2 (en) In-band interleaved uplink and downlink communication in full-duplex operation
EP3413669A1 (en) User terminal, wireless base station, and wireless communication method
US11997052B2 (en) Interleaved uplink-downlink transmissions in full-duplex using unlicensed resources
US12395982B2 (en) Uplink skipping and uplink control information multiplexing for wireless communication
WO2018186967A1 (en) Priority indication for communication over shared access systems
US20240039671A1 (en) Adaptive pdsch and dmrs pattern for hst deployment
WO2016121916A1 (en) User terminal, wireless base station, and wireless communication method
JP2018201253A (en) User terminal and wireless communication method
KR20230154862A (en) Contention-free RIS handover through inhibition
US20220377843A1 (en) Managing slot format based on duplex mode switching
CN116235605A (en) Associating transmission and reception points with a set of control resources
US11943761B2 (en) SRS management for adaptive TX/RX diversity
US20230300820A1 (en) Radio frequency shared path information
US11627575B2 (en) Physical layer security with component carrier switching
US20230179344A1 (en) Skip harq feedback for sps pdsch
WO2022193204A1 (en) Pathloss rs and beam determination in unified tci framework

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130701

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20140630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602010027923

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04W0016140000

Ipc: H04W0072040000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 72/04 20090101AFI20150327BHEP

Ipc: H04W 16/14 20090101ALI20150327BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150520

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 753082

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010027923

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151231

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 753082

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160130

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160201

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151130

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010027923

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20160729

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20101130

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230527

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20241001

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20241001

Year of fee payment: 15