[go: up one dir, main page]

EP2278559A2 - Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits - Google Patents

Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2278559A2
EP2278559A2 EP20100011637 EP10011637A EP2278559A2 EP 2278559 A2 EP2278559 A2 EP 2278559A2 EP 20100011637 EP20100011637 EP 20100011637 EP 10011637 A EP10011637 A EP 10011637A EP 2278559 A2 EP2278559 A2 EP 2278559A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
banknotes
authenticity
paid
criteria
documents
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP20100011637
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2278559A3 (fr
Inventor
Hermann Dr. Weilacher
Helmut-Karl Dr. Reinisch
Lukas Dr. Löffler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=7645540&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2278559(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Publication of EP2278559A2 publication Critical patent/EP2278559A2/fr
Publication of EP2278559A3 publication Critical patent/EP2278559A3/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D11/00—Devices accepting coins; Devices accepting, dispensing, sorting or counting valuable papers
    • G07D11/20—Controlling or monitoring the operation of devices; Data handling
    • G07D11/30—Tracking or tracing valuable papers or cassettes

Definitions

  • the invention relates to the tracking of forged banknotes. Furthermore, methods and devices for checking the authenticity of documents, in particular banknotes, securities or security documents, are described below.
  • the examination of the authenticity of documents is generally carried out by measuring certain authenticity features, for example optical, electrical or magnetic characteristics, on a document to be tested and subsequent testing of the measured authenticity features on the basis of predefined authenticity criteria. For example, as an authenticity feature, the optical reflection behavior of the document is measured and then checked as to whether the measured reflection behavior falls below or exceeds a specific threshold value as an associated authenticity criterion. Depending on the test result, the document is classified as genuine or incorrect.
  • authenticity features for example optical, electrical or magnetic characteristics
  • An increase in falsification detection reliability can be achieved, inter alia, by tightening the authenticity criteria when checking certain authenticity features, for example by raising or lowering thresholds.
  • the authenticity criteria can not be tightened arbitrarily, since otherwise the proportion of genuine documents not recognized as genuine - and possibly rejected or incorrectly classified - would become too high.
  • banknote processing machines which are used in particular in commercial banks for deposit verification and billing, to an increased effort in the manual and possibly further machine post-processing of not recognized as genuine banknotes.
  • At least two different authenticity classes each having one or more Authenticity criteria provided, wherein the individual authenticity classes differ from each other in at least one authenticity criterion.
  • an authentication class from the different authentication classes is selected and the document is checked against the authenticity criteria of the selected authenticity class.
  • the selected authenticity class is assigned to the document if its authenticity criteria are met by the document.
  • the authenticity criteria are, for example, threshold values or intervals for the authenticity features used for the test.
  • authenticity features for example, optical, magnetic, electrical or physical characteristics can be used, eg optical reflection, transmission or emission, magnetic permeability, electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, thickness and format of the document as well as watermarks.
  • the invention is based on the idea to combine different authenticity criteria in the authentication of documents in several authenticity classes, the requirements for authenticity depending on the authenticity class are different high, since each authenticity class ia include a different number of authenticity criteria and / or different strict authenticity criteria. If, for example, an authenticity class with high requirements for authenticity is selected, for example with very high threshold values for the optical reflection or transmission, the authenticity of documents which fulfill the authenticity criteria of this selected authenticity class can be affirmed with high probability. Documents which do not meet the authenticity criteria of a selected authenticity class can be checked against further selected authenticity classes with lower requirements for authenticity, for example lower threshold values, whereby their authenticity can be affirmed with correspondingly lower probability.
  • the state and / or the denomination of the document is determined and then the selection of the authenticity class is made as a function of the state and / or the denomination of the document.
  • the denomination is the value or currency of the document under review.
  • the condition of the document is generally given by state characteristics, such as degree of soiling, limpness, damage, such as cracks, holes or imperfections in the printed image, as well as foreign objects, such as adhesive strips.
  • the authentication class selection of a document can be selected depending on the degree of contamination of the document, whereby clean and undamaged documents with much stricter authenticity criteria, eg higher thresholds, can be checked than heavily soiled or damaged documents. This significantly increases the reliability of counterfeit detection of clean or slightly soiled documents. Overall, this condition-based authentication can identify documents in very good condition with high reliability as true or false. Since only the examination of documents in very good condition At the same time, the proportion of genuine documents not recognized as genuine remains low.
  • a further aspect of the invention according to claim 14 is that a part of the authenticity criteria used for the authenticity check is determined on the basis of forged documents.
  • the authenticity check with defined authenticity criteria is extended by an additional authenticity check with additional authenticity criteria, the additional authenticity criteria being determined on the basis of forged documents.
  • the determination of the additional authenticity criteria is generally carried out in a separate method, e.g. in specially designed facilities where forged documents are examined in particular for characteristic differences to genuine documents. From the differences found additional authenticity criteria are determined, which are then fed to the authentication process. In this case, documents continue to be tested on the basis of fixed authenticity criteria and classified as genuine if the authenticity criteria are met.
  • counterfeits can be detected if the documents examined do not meet the additional authenticity criteria established on known counterfeits, which preferably relate to characteristic differences between a found counterfeit and genuine documents. In this way, an increased reliability in the detection of counterfeiting, especially with regard to known and circulating counterfeits achieved.
  • FIG. 1 shows the schematic structure of an apparatus for authenticity verification of documents according to the invention.
  • the documents 10 provided in an input device 11, for example bank notes, are withdrawn individually from the input device 11 and conveyed by means of a transport system 14 to the output device 12.
  • the documents 10 are sorted into three different sorting classes and output to corresponding output bins 13.
  • On the way between input device 11 and output device 12, a document 10 to be tested is transported past a measuring device 15.
  • the measuring device 15 in this case measures the authenticity features of the document 10 to be tested. If necessary, the condition of the document 10 characterizing state features are also measured.
  • the dashed line in the measuring device 15 is intended to indicate that the measuring device 15 can have two or, if appropriate, a plurality of subassemblies, in which authenticity and possibly status features can be measured separately. In principle, it is also possible to measure both authenticity and state characteristics together in a measuring device.
  • the measuring device 15 is used to measure only one side of the document 10 to be tested. In general, however, the device can also be designed in such a way that that the document 10 can be measured from both sides, for example by two measuring devices 15 arranged opposite one another, through which the document 10 is transported.
  • Information about the measured features in the measuring device 15 are transmitted to an evaluation device 16, in which the authenticity check according to the invention takes place.
  • the selection of a certain authenticity class and their assignment to the document 10 to be checked is hereby preferably realized by a computer program.
  • the computer program for example, it is checked whether an authenticity feature measured on the document 10 to be checked, e.g. the optical reflection is greater than an optical reflection threshold associated with the particular authenticity class. If the result of the test is positive, document 10 is assigned the particular authentication class, e.g. by writing a number identifying the authenticity class into a variable characterizing the authenticity of the document 10. If the test result is negative, the computer program sets the test of the measured authenticity feature based on lower thresholds belonging to other authenticity classes, i.
  • the state of the document 10 is additionally determined from the measured state features.
  • the document 10 then becomes one of several status classes which are characteristic for the respective state of the document to be checked are assigned.
  • three state classes are provided, namely for a useless (unfit), useable (fit) or very good (ATM-fit) state.
  • the selection of the authenticity class in the subsequent authenticity check then takes place as a function of the conditional class assigned to the document 10 to be checked.
  • banknotes in very good condition (ATM-fit) are subjected to very strict authenticity criteria, while banknotes in unusable or usable condition (unfit or fit) must satisfy less stringent authenticity criteria of other authenticity classes in order to be classified as genuine.
  • an additional authenticity check is also possible for an additional authenticity check to be carried out on documents 10 of a specific condition class, for example on banknotes in a usable (fit) or very good (ATM-fit) state.
  • Such an additional authenticity check can be carried out, for example, on the basis of already measured data for individual authenticity features.
  • the determination of the denomination can in principle also take place via the measuring device 15 and the evaluation device 16, but if appropriate this can also be carried out in separate measuring and evaluation devices.
  • the documents 10 are divided into one or more sorting classes and output to corresponding output bins 13.
  • the output device 12 is controlled by the evaluation device 16 so that in a first of the output compartments 13 banknotes - possibly of only a desired denomination - are issued, the very good (ATM-fit) State, to which an authenticity class with high demands on the authenticity, ie strict authenticity criteria, was assigned and which are in a desired position, ie a specific print pattern is visible from above and optionally aligned in a certain way.
  • ATM-fit very good
  • a second output tray the so-called reject tray
  • those banknotes are issued to which no authenticity class could be assigned and / or are in an undesirable location and / or may not belong to the desired denomination.
  • erroneously drawn in and / or transported banknotes eg double copies or folded banknotes, are also dispensed into this output compartment.
  • all remaining bills are issued to a third output bin, ie fit, unfit and banknotes, which have been assigned a passphrase with less stringent requirements for authenticity, ie less stringent authenticity criteria.
  • banknotes of a specific denomination are entered in a mixed position, then with this sorting mode, those banknotes of a particular denomination can be sorted out, which are in all probability real, have a very good condition (ATM-fit) and at the same time have a desired position. Banknotes meeting these criteria may then be provided for immediate reissue, eg in a self-service recycling machine.
  • ATM-fit very good condition
  • FIG. 2 shows the schematic structure of a system for authentication on the basis of authenticity criteria, which were determined on counterfeit documents.
  • the functioning of such a system differs from that in FIG. 1 illustrated example mainly by the fact that carried out in the evaluation device 16 authenticity check is carried out in two steps.
  • the authenticity check is carried out by using - preferably in authenticity classes divided - authenticity criteria.
  • the selection of the authenticity class can here, as already in connection with FIG. 1 has been explained, depending on the determined state of the document 10 to be checked. If the measured authenticity features fulfill the given authenticity criteria, the document 10 is assigned the corresponding authenticity class.
  • an additional check is carried out using authenticity criteria which were determined on known forged documents.
  • the determination of these authenticity criteria takes place here in suitable for this purpose banknote testing machines, eg in a central bank or at a corresponding service provider. For reasons of data reduction, these are preferably authenticity criteria which are characteristic of the difference between a forged and a genuine document.
  • the authenticity criteria used in the second sub-step of the authenticity check are transmitted in the example shown by a control device 31, eg from a server of a central bank or a central service provider, via a wired or wireless connection 32 to one or more test stations 30 simultaneously.
  • the transmission of the corresponding data can also be done by means of suitable data carriers, for example by flash card, memory modules, floppy, CD or DVD.
  • the document 10 can be identified as a counterfeit with a high degree of probability, even if it fulfills the authenticity criteria in the first partial step of the authenticity check.
  • the chronological order of the two sub-steps can be chosen as desired.
  • this system allows a simple and rapid update of features and criteria for checking the authenticity of banknotes in any number of test stations 30 simultaneously, so that a high reliability the detection of circulating counterfeit notes is guaranteed.
  • FIG. 3 shows the schematic structure of a system for applying the authenticity test according to the invention.
  • Documents 10 in this example banknotes, are deposited by a depositor at a commercial bank 39.
  • the deposit can be made, for example, at the terminal of a self-service recycling machine.
  • the inspection station 30 which may be part of the terminal, the banknotes are checked for authenticity. If the bills meet the very strict authenticity criteria of a selected authenticity class, they may be provided for immediate further issue, for example at the same terminal, at other issuing terminals 34 and / or at a bank counter 36.
  • All banknotes which do not meet these very strict authenticity criteria are supplied to a central checking device 35, for example in a central bank 40, in order to be subjected to a further authenticity check, whereby so-called high-security features are also used there for the purpose of checking particularly reliable recognition counterfeit banknotes is guaranteed.
  • Banknotes meeting these criteria can now be re-circulated by being returned to a commercial bank 39 for disbursement at issuing terminals 34 or at a bank counter 36.
  • a control unit 31 is also provided, in which - as in the description to FIG. 2 specifying additional authenticity criteria based on counterfeit banknotes which relate to characteristic differences between genuine banknotes and banknotes detected as counterfeit in the central checking device 35.
  • the counterfeits can in this case be transmitted directly from the test device 35 to the control unit 31.
  • the authenticity criteria determined there are then transmitted via the connection 32 to the test station 30 and can there - possibly additionally in addition to the authenticity criteria divided into different authenticity classes - be used to check the authenticity of banknotes.
  • characteristic data e.g. Printed images and / or serial numbers
  • data to the depositor e.g. Account number and / or personal identification number (PIN)
  • PIN personal identification number
  • characteristic data e.g. Print images and / or serial numbers
  • the control unit 31 can either be installed inside the commercial bank 39 as shown or outside of it, for example at a central service provider.
  • the illustrated system exemplifies the application of the inventive method in the authentication of banknotes to a deposit machine of a commercial bank.
  • the authenticity check can also take place in a banknote processing machine in which banknotes-for example, after payment at the counter of a commercial bank-are entered by an employee for checking and / or sorting.
  • the authenticity check and the subsequent procedure during sorting, re-issuing and / or forwarding for checking in a central bank are carried out analogously.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
EP20100011637 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits Ceased EP2278559A3 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10029051A DE10029051A1 (de) 2000-06-13 2000-06-13 Verfahren zur Echtheitsprüfung von Dokumenten
EP01962728.0A EP1295262B2 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01962728.0A Division-Into EP1295262B2 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents
EP01962728.0 Division 2001-06-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2278559A2 true EP2278559A2 (fr) 2011-01-26
EP2278559A3 EP2278559A3 (fr) 2012-06-06

Family

ID=7645540

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100011637 Ceased EP2278559A3 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits
EP01962728.0A Expired - Lifetime EP1295262B2 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01962728.0A Expired - Lifetime EP1295262B2 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US7552864B2 (fr)
EP (2) EP2278559A3 (fr)
AU (1) AU2001283852A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE10029051A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2001097180A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4012423B2 (ja) * 2002-03-26 2007-11-21 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 紙幣取扱装置
JP4349849B2 (ja) 2003-06-17 2009-10-21 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 預金自動預け払い機及び紙幣の追跡方法
DE10346635A1 (de) * 2003-10-08 2005-05-12 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh System zur Prüfung von Sicherheitsmerkmalen von Wertdokumenten
DE10360862A1 (de) * 2003-12-23 2005-07-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Identifizierung von gefälschten Banknoten
DE10360859A1 (de) 2003-12-23 2005-07-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Banknotenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren für das Erkennen von gefälschten Banknoten
DE102004024620A1 (de) * 2004-05-18 2005-12-08 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung von Banknoten
DE102004049998A1 (de) * 2004-10-14 2006-04-20 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur visuellen Darstellung von Meßwerten
DE102005044092A1 (de) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-22 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Banknotenerkennung
DE102005055682A1 (de) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten
DE102006042186A1 (de) * 2006-09-08 2008-03-27 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Vernichtung von Banknoten
CN101536047B (zh) 2006-11-06 2012-05-30 光荣株式会社 纸币识别装置、纸币处理装置以及纸币识别方法
DE102008020208A1 (de) * 2008-04-22 2009-10-29 Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Speicherung von Informationen über Gegenstände, die einem SB-Terminal zugeführt wurden
US7941378B2 (en) * 2008-05-16 2011-05-10 Siemens Industry, Inc. Stamp testing and monitoring
KR101414440B1 (ko) 2008-08-08 2014-07-01 글로리 가부시키가이샤 지엽류 관리 시스템, 지엽류 식별장치, 지엽류 관리장치, 지엽류 관리방법 및 지엽류 관리 프로그램을 기록한 컴퓨터로 읽을 수 있는 기록매체
US8818071B2 (en) 2009-03-19 2014-08-26 Glory Ltd. Banknote recognition and counting machine and banknote recognition and counting method
DE102009044881A1 (de) * 2009-12-14 2011-06-16 Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Rückverfolgung von Banknoten
DE102009058438A1 (de) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-22 Giesecke & Devrient GmbH, 81677 Verfahren zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten
DE102010045879A1 (de) * 2010-09-17 2012-03-22 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Banknoten
GB201100803D0 (en) * 2011-01-18 2011-03-02 Innovative Technology Ltd Apparatus and method for generating dataset for items of currency
NL2006766C2 (en) * 2011-05-11 2012-11-13 Nl Bank Nv Quantitative examination of counterfeits.
US8937712B2 (en) 2012-08-16 2015-01-20 Eastman Kodak Company Authentication device with access control and calibration
US8619245B1 (en) 2012-08-16 2013-12-31 Eastman Kodak Company Authentication device with access control and calibration
US11526821B2 (en) * 2013-08-29 2022-12-13 Ncr Corporation Managing media replenishment
US9256809B2 (en) 2014-03-06 2016-02-09 Eastman Kodak Company Enabling an authentication device with temporary target
US9165418B2 (en) 2014-03-06 2015-10-20 Eastman Kodak Company Authentication device with temporary enabling target
CN105989658A (zh) * 2015-02-12 2016-10-05 湖南求真电子有限公司 一种识别伪造票据和变造克隆票据的方法及装置
JP7043967B2 (ja) * 2018-05-14 2022-03-30 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 同一性判定装置、同一性判定システムおよびプログラム
US10769263B1 (en) * 2019-05-07 2020-09-08 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Certificate verification
CN116931487B (zh) * 2023-07-25 2024-07-26 西安宇速防务集团有限公司 一种应用于军工企业的数据采集监控系统

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0537513A1 (fr) * 1991-10-15 1993-04-21 URMET S.p.A. Costruzioni Elettro-Telefoniche Appareil de validation de billets de banque

Family Cites Families (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52150699A (en) 1976-06-09 1977-12-14 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Bank note, etc. identifying apparatus
JPS58221490A (ja) * 1982-06-16 1983-12-23 株式会社東芝 入出金装置
NL8202920A (nl) 1982-07-20 1984-02-16 Tno Inrichting voor het herkennen en onderzoeken van bladvormige voorwerpen zoals bankbiljetten of dergelijke.
JPS59149564A (ja) * 1983-02-15 1984-08-27 Toshiba Corp 自動取引システム
JPH0666074B2 (ja) * 1983-04-04 1994-08-24 株式会社東芝 区分集積装置
DE3889698T2 (de) * 1987-08-04 1994-10-06 Toshiba Kawasaki Kk Papierbogenverarbeitungsvorrichtung.
DE3807727A1 (de) * 1988-03-09 1989-09-21 Robot Foto Electr Kg Ueberwachungsvorrichtung zum sichern von automaten
US5201395A (en) * 1990-09-27 1993-04-13 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Bill examination device
JP2639766B2 (ja) * 1991-04-10 1997-08-13 ローレルバンクマシン株式会社 貨幣選別装置
US5430664A (en) * 1992-07-14 1995-07-04 Technitrol, Inc. Document counting and batching apparatus with counterfeit detection
CH684856A5 (de) * 1992-11-30 1995-01-13 Mars Inc Verfahren zur Klassifizierung eines Musters - insbesondere eines Musters einer Banknote oder einer Münze - und Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens.
GB2279796B (en) † 1993-06-28 1996-09-25 Mars Inc Validating value carriers
GB9326440D0 (en) * 1993-12-24 1994-02-23 Ncr Int Inc Neutral network for banknote recongnition and authentication
EP0805408B1 (fr) 1994-03-08 2002-07-24 Cummins-Allison Corporation Procédé et appareil pour identifier et compter des documents
DE4411403A1 (de) * 1994-03-31 1995-10-05 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Sortieren und Stapeln von Blattgut
KR0182242B1 (ko) * 1995-04-19 1999-04-15 사토 후미오 복수의 기기 사이에서 취급매체를 수수하는(주고받는)장치, 이를 구비한 현금처리시스템 및 거래매체의 수수방법
WO1996036931A2 (fr) * 1995-05-11 1996-11-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Dispositif et procede pour le traitement d'objets sous forme de feuilles tels que des billets de banque
US6157895A (en) 1996-01-25 2000-12-05 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Method of judging truth of paper type and method of judging direction in which paper type is fed
US5757001A (en) * 1996-05-01 1998-05-26 The Regents Of The University Of Calif. Detection of counterfeit currency
US6573983B1 (en) * 1996-11-15 2003-06-03 Diebold, Incorporated Apparatus and method for processing bank notes and other documents in an automated banking machine
GB9624895D0 (en) * 1996-11-29 1997-01-15 Ncr Int Inc Automatic teller machines
GB9707243D0 (en) * 1997-04-09 1997-05-28 Ncr Int Inc Self-service deposit method and apparatus
US6065672A (en) * 1997-07-24 2000-05-23 Currency Systems International Method for currency distribution and management
GB2346246B (en) † 1997-10-31 2002-02-27 Cummins Allison Corp Currency evaluation and recording system
DE19750644A1 (de) * 1997-11-14 1999-05-27 Leicher Gmbh & Co Einzahlungsautomat
US6493461B1 (en) * 1998-03-17 2002-12-10 Cummins-Allison Corp. Customizable international note counter
SE514260C2 (sv) * 1998-10-22 2001-01-29 Nybohov Dev Ab Anläggning för hantering av sedlar inom ett geografiskt begränsat område
EP1324282B1 (fr) * 2001-12-28 2008-12-17 MEI, Inc. Méthode et appareil pour trier de la monnaie

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0537513A1 (fr) * 1991-10-15 1993-04-21 URMET S.p.A. Costruzioni Elettro-Telefoniche Appareil de validation de billets de banque

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2001283852A1 (en) 2001-12-24
US20090242627A1 (en) 2009-10-01
US8006898B2 (en) 2011-08-30
US20030168849A1 (en) 2003-09-11
DE10029051A1 (de) 2001-12-20
EP1295262B1 (fr) 2012-11-21
WO2001097180A3 (fr) 2002-05-30
EP1295262B2 (fr) 2021-01-20
WO2001097180A2 (fr) 2001-12-20
US7552864B2 (en) 2009-06-30
EP1295262A2 (fr) 2003-03-26
EP2278559A3 (fr) 2012-06-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1295262B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents
DE2824849C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Feststellung des Zustandes und/oder der Echtheit von Blattgut
DE69708673T2 (de) Verfahren zur halbkontinuierlichen handhabung von geldscheinen mit hilfe von trennkarten
EP1810251B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de traitement de billets de banque
DE60117151T2 (de) Banknotenspezifische geldverarbeitung
EP2617016B1 (fr) Procédé de traitement de billets de banque
EP1195725B1 (fr) Méthode pour le traitement de feuilles
EP1576553B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour controler des billets de banque
EP1754204A1 (fr) Dispositif et procede pour verifier des billets de banque
EP1652153B1 (fr) Dispositif de determination de l'etat de billets de banque
WO2002029736A1 (fr) Element de separation pour separer et traiter des produits sous forme de feuilles
EP1297498B1 (fr) Dispositif de traitement de produits en feuille
DE69405105T2 (de) Echtheitsprüfung von wertträgern
DE10360862A1 (de) Verfahren für die Identifizierung von gefälschten Banknoten
DE102004033092A1 (de) Verfahren für den Nachweis der Herkunft von Banknoten
DE102008011664A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bearbeiten von Wertdokumenten
EP1700276B1 (fr) Machine de traitement des billets de banque et procede pour reconnaitre des faux billets de banque
DE102004036229A1 (de) Verfahren für die Prüfung von Banknoten
WO2002031782A2 (fr) Procede pour le traitement d'articles sous forme de feuilles
WO2005109354A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour le traitement de billets de banque
DE19946536A1 (de) Verfahren für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten und Vorrichtung insbesondere zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE102008053365A1 (de) Verfahren zum Sortieren von Banknoten in einem Banknoten-Recycler sowie Banknoten-Recycler
DE102009017232A1 (de) Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Blattgut

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1295262

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G07D 11/00 20060101ALI20120503BHEP

Ipc: G07D 7/00 20060101AFI20120503BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121206

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20130409

APBK Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE

APBN Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E

APBR Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E

APAF Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH

APBT Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20200817