[go: up one dir, main page]

EP1682899A2 - Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue - Google Patents

Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue

Info

Publication number
EP1682899A2
EP1682899A2 EP04797588A EP04797588A EP1682899A2 EP 1682899 A2 EP1682899 A2 EP 1682899A2 EP 04797588 A EP04797588 A EP 04797588A EP 04797588 A EP04797588 A EP 04797588A EP 1682899 A2 EP1682899 A2 EP 1682899A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
aml
numbers
value
inv
expression
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP04797588A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Torsten Haferlach
Martin Dugas
Wolfgang Kern
Alexander Kohlmann
Susanne Schnittger
Claudia Schoch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Roche Diagnostics GmbH
Original Assignee
F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Roche Diagnostics GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by F Hoffmann La Roche AG, Roche Diagnostics GmbH filed Critical F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Priority to EP04797588A priority Critical patent/EP1682899A2/fr
Publication of EP1682899A2 publication Critical patent/EP1682899A2/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/574—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • G01N33/57407—Specifically defined cancers
    • G01N33/57426—Specifically defined cancers leukemia
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
    • C12Q1/6886—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/112—Disease subtyping, staging or classification
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/158—Expression markers

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to a method for distinguishing AML subtype inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) (abbreviated: AML_inv(3)) from other AML subtypes, in particular from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(l lq23)/MLL (abbreviated: AML_llq23), AML_normal (normal karyotype) and/or AML_CA (complex aberrant karyotype) by determining the expression level of selected marker genes.
  • Leukemias are classified into four different groups or types: acute myeloid (AML), acute lymphatic (ALL), chronic myeloid (CML) and chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL). Within these groups, several subcategories can be identified further using a panel of standard techniques as described below. These different subcategories in leukemias are associated with varying clinical outcome and therefore are the basis for different treatment strategies. The importance of highly specific classification may be illustrated in detail further for the AML as a very heterogeneous group of diseases. Effort is aimed at identifying biological entities and to distinguish and classify subgroups of AML which are associated with a favorable, intermediate or unfavorable prognosis, respectively.
  • the FAB classification was proposed by the French-American-British co-operative group which was based on cytomorphology and cytochemistry in order to separate AML subgroups according to the morphological appearance of blasts in the blood and bone marrow.
  • genetic abnormalities occurring in the leukemic blast had a major impact on the morphological picture and even more on the prognosis.
  • the karyotype of the leukemic blasts is the most important independent prognostic factor, regarding response to therapy as well as survival.
  • leukemia diagnostics Analysis of the morphology and cytochemistry of bone marrow blasts and peripheral blood cells is necessary to establish the diagnosis, hi some cases the addition of immunophenotyping is mandatory to separate very undifferentiated AML from acute lymphoblastic leukemia and CLL.
  • Leukemia subtypes investigated can be diagnosed by cytomorphology alone, only if an expert reviews the smears.
  • a genetic analysis based on chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization or RT- PCR and immunophenotyping is required in order to assign all cases into the right category. The aim of these techniques besides diagnosis is mainly to determine the prognosis of the leukemia.
  • CML chronic myeloid leukemia
  • CLL chronic lymphoblastic
  • AML acute myeloid leukemia
  • the new therapeutic drug (STI571, Imatinib) inhibits the CML specific chimeric tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL generated from the genetic defect observed in CML, the BCR-ABL-rearrangement due to the translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 (t(9;22) (q34; qll)).
  • the therapy response is dramatically higher as compared to all other drugs that had been used so far.
  • Another example is the subtype of acute myeloid leukemia AML M3 and its variant M3v both with karyotype t[15;17)(q22; ql l-12).
  • the introduction of a new drug has improved the outcome in this subgroup of patient from about 50% to 85 % long-term survivors.
  • diagnostics today must accomplish sub-classification with maximal precision. Not only for these subtypes but also for several other leukemia subtypes different treatment approaches could improve outcome. Therefore, rapid and precise identification of distinct leukemia subtypes is the future goal for diagnostics.
  • the technical problem underlying the present invention was to provide means for leukemia diagnostics which overcome at least some of the disadvantages of the prior art diagnostic methods, in particular encompassing the time-consuming and unreliable combination of different methods and which provides a rapid assay to unambiguously distinguish one AML subtype from another, e.g. by genetic analysis.
  • WO-A 03/039443 discloses marker genes the expression levels of which are characteristic for certain leukemia, e.g. AML subtypes and additionally discloses methods for differentiating between the subtype of AML cells by determining the expression profile of the disclosed marker genes.
  • WO-A 03/039443 does not provide guidance which set of distinct genes discriminate between two subtypes and, as such, can be routineously taken in order to distinguish one AML subtype from another.
  • the problem is solved by the present invention, which provides a method for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes in a sample, the method comprising determining the expression level of markers selected from the markers identifiable by their Affymetrix Identification Numbers (affy id) as defined in Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4, wherein a lower expression of at least one polynucleotide defined by at least one of the numbers 1 to 50 of Table 1.1 having a negative fc value, and/or a higher expression of at least one polynucleotide defined by at least one of the numbers 1 to 50 of Table 1.1 having a positive fc value, is indicative for the presence of AML_1 lq23 when AML_1 lq23 is distinguished from all other subtypes , and/or wherein a lower expression of at least one polynucleotide defined by at least one of the numbers 1 to 50 of Table 1.2 having a negative fc value, and/or a higher expression of at least one
  • AML_inv(3) AML with inversion 3
  • AML_t(8;21) AML with t(8;21) translocation
  • AML_t(15;17) AML with t(15;17) translocation
  • AML_inv(16) AML with inversion 16
  • AML_l lq23 t(llq23)/MLL
  • AMLjtiormal AML with normal karytype.
  • all other subtypes refer to the subtypes of the present invention, the one which is under investigation versus the all others being included in the present invention.
  • a sample means any biological material containing genetic information in the form of nucleic acids or proteins obtainable or obtained from an individual.
  • the sample includes e.g. tissue samples, cell samples, bone marrow and/or body fluids such as blood, saliva, semen.
  • the sample is blood or bone marrow, more preferably the sample is bone marrow.
  • a general method for isolating and preparing nucleic acids from a sample is outlined in Example 3.
  • the term "lower expression” is generally assigned to all by numbers and Affymetrix Identification Numbers (ID), definable polynucleotides the t-values and fold change (fc) values of which are negative, as indicated in the Tables. Accordingly, the term “higher expression” is generally assigned to all by numbers and Affymetrix Id. definable polynucleotides the t- values and fold change (fc) values of which are positive.
  • ID Affymetrix Identification Numbers
  • fc fold change
  • the term "expression” refers to the process by which mRNA or a polypeptide is produced based on the nucleic acid sequence of a gene, i.e.illerexpression" also includes the formation of mRNA upon transcription.
  • the term crizdetermining the expression level preferably refers to the determination of the level of expression, namely of the markers.
  • marker refers to any genetically controlled difference which can be used in the genetic analysis of a test versus a control sample, for the purpose of assigning the sample to a defined genotype or phenotype.
  • markers refer to genes which are differentially expressed in, e.g., different AML subtypes.
  • the markers can be defined by their gene symbol name, their encoded protein name, their transcript identification number (cluster identification number), the data base accession number, public accession number or GenBank identifier or, as done in the present invention, Affymetrix identification number, chromosomal location, UniGene accession number and cluster type, LocusLink accession number (see Examples and Tables).
  • the Affymetrix identification number (affy id) is accessible for anyone and the person skilled in the art by entering the "gene expression omnibus" internet page of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).
  • NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information
  • the affy id's of the polynucleotides used for the method of the present invention are derived from the so-called U133 chip.
  • the expression level of a marker is determined by the determining the expression of its corresponding "polynucleotide" as described hereinafter.
  • the term “bigpolynucleotide” refers, generally, to a DNA, in particular cDNA, or RNA, in particular a cRNA, or a portion thereof or a polypeptide or a portion thereof.
  • the polynucleotide is formed upon transcription of a nucleotide sequence which is capable of expression.
  • the polynucleotide fragments refer to fragments preferably of between at least 8, such as 10, 12, 15 or 18 nucleotides and at least 50, such as 60, 80, 100, 200 or 300 nucleotides in length, or a complementary sequence thereto, representing a consecutive stretch of nucleotides of a gene, cDNA or mRNA.
  • polynucleotides include also any fragment (or complementary sequence thereto) of a sequence derived from any of the markers defined above as long as these fragments unambiguously identify the marker.
  • the determination of the expression level may be effected at the transcriptional or translational level, i.e. at the level of mRNA or at the protein level.
  • Protein fragments such as peptides or polypeptides advantageously comprise between at least 6 and at least 25, such as 30, 40, 80, 100 or 200 consecutive amino acids representative of the corresponding full length protein. Six amino acids are generally recognized as the lowest peptidic stretch giving rise to a linear epitope recognized by an antibody, fragment or derivative thereof.
  • the proteins or fragments thereof may be analysed using nucleic acid molecules specifically binding to three-dimensional structures (aptamers).
  • the determination of the expression levels may be effected by a variety of methods.
  • the polynucleotide, in particular the cRNA is labelled.
  • the labelling of the polynucleotide or a polypeptide can occur by a variety of methods known to the skilled artisan.
  • the label can be fluorescent, chemiluminescent, bioluminescent, radioactive (such as 3 H or 32 P).
  • the labelling compound can be any labelling compound being suitable for the labelling of polynucleotides and/or polypeptides.
  • fluorescent dyes such as fluorescein, dichlorofluorescein, hexachlorofluorescein, BODIPY variants, ROX, tetramethylrhodamin, rhodamin X, Cyanine-2, Cyanine-3, Cyanine-5, Cyanine-7, IRD40, FluorX, Oregon Green, Alexa variants (available e.g. from Molecular Probes or Amersham Biosciences) and the like, biotin or biotinylated nucleotides, digoxigenin, radioisotopes, antibodies, enzymes and receptors.
  • fluorescent dyes such as fluorescein, dichlorofluorescein, hexachlorofluorescein, BODIPY variants, ROX, tetramethylrhodamin, rhodamin X, Cyanine-2, Cyanine-3, Cyanine-5, Cyanine-7, IRD40, FluorX, Oregon Green, Alexa variants (available e
  • the detection is done via fluorescence measurements, conjugation to streptavidin and/or avidin, antigen-antibody- and/or antibody-antibody- interactions, radioactivity measurements, as well as catalytic and/or receptor/ligand interactions.
  • Suitable methods include the direct labelling (incorporation) method, the amino-modified (amino-allyl) nucleotide method (available e.g. from Ambion), and the primer tagging method (DNA dendrimer labelling, as kit available e.g. from Genisphere).
  • Particularly preferred for the present invention is the use of biotin or biotinylated nucleotides for labelling, with the latter being directly incorporated into, e.g. the cRNA polynucleotide by in vitro transcription.
  • cDNA may be prepared into which a detectable label, as exemplified above, is incorporated. Said detectably labelled cDNA, in single-stranded form, may then be hybridised, preferably under stringent or highly stringent conditions to a panel of single-stranded oligonucleotides representing different genes and affixed to a solid support such as a chip. Upon applying appropriate washing steps, those cDNAs will be detected or quantitatively detected that have a counterpart in the oligonucleotide panel.
  • the mRNA or the cDNA may be amplified e.g.
  • the cDNAs are transcribed into cRNAs prior to the hybridisation step wherein only in the transcription step a label is incorporated into the nucleic acid and wherein the cRNA is employed for hybridisation.
  • the label may be attached subsequent to the transcription step.
  • proteins from a cell or tissue under investigation may be contacted with a panel of aptamers or of antibodies or fragments or derivatives thereof.
  • the antibodies etc. may be affixed to a solid support such as a chip.
  • Binding of proteins indicative of an AML subtype may be verified by binding to a detectably labelled secondary antibody or aptamer.
  • a detectably labelled secondary antibody or aptamer For the labelling of antibodies, it is referred to Harlow and Lane, "Antibodies, a laboratory manual", CSH Press, 1988, Cold Spring Harbor.
  • a minimum set of proteins necessary for diagnosis of all AML subtypes may be selected for creation of a protein array system to make diagnosis on a protein lysate of a diagnostic bone marrow sample directly.
  • Array Systems for the detection of specific protein expression profiles already are available (for example: Bio-Plex, BIORAD, M ⁇ nchen, Germany).
  • antibodies against the proteins have to be produced and immobilized on a platform e.g. glasslides or microtiterplates.
  • the immobilized antibodies can be labelled with a reactant specific for the certain target proteins as discussed above.
  • the reactants can include enzyme substrates, DNA, receptors, antigens or antibodies to create for example a capture sandwich immunoassay.
  • the expression of more than one of the above defined markers is determined.
  • the statistical significance of markers as expressed in q or p values based on the concept of the false discovery rate is determined. In doing so, a measure of statistical significance called the q value is associated with each tested feature.
  • the q value is similar to the p value, except it is a measure of significance in terms of the false discovery rate rather than the false positive rate (Storey JD and
  • markers as defined in Tables 1- 4 having a q- value of less than 3E-06, more preferred less than 1.5E-09, most preferred less than 1.5E-11, less than 1.5E-20, less than 1.5E-30, are measured.
  • the expression level of at least two, preferably of at least ten, more preferably of at least 25, most preferably of 50 of at least one of the Tables of the markers is determined.
  • the expression level of at least 2, of at least 5, of at least 10 out of the markers having the numbers 1 - 10, 1-20, 1-40, 1-50 of at least one of the Tables are measured.
  • the level of the expression of the penalmarker i.e. the expression of the polynucleotide is indicative of the AML subtype of a cell or an organism.
  • the level of expression of a marker or group of markers is measured and is compared with the level of expression of the same marker or the same group of markers from other cells or samples. The comparison may be effected in an actual experiment or in silico.
  • expression level also referred to as expression pattern or expression signature (expression profile)
  • the difference at least is 5 %, 10% or 20%, more preferred at least 50% or may even be as high as 75% or 100%. More preferred the difference in the level of expression is at least 200%, i.e. two fold, at least 500%, i.e. five fold, or at least 1000%, i.e. 10 fold.
  • the expression level of markers expressed lower in a first subtype than in at least one second subtype, which differs from the first subtype is at least 5 %, 10% or 20%, more preferred at least 50% or may even be 75% or 100%, i.e.
  • the expression level of markers expressed higher in a first subtype than in at least one second subtype, which differs from the first subtype is at least 5 %, 10% or 20%, more preferred at least 50% or may even be 75% or 100%, i.e. 2-fold higher, preferably at least 10-fold, more preferably at least 50-fold, and most preferably at least 100-fold higher in the first subtype.
  • the sample is derived from an individual having leukaemia, preferably AML.
  • the polynucleotide the expression level of which is determined is in form of a transcribed polynucleotide.
  • a particularly preferred transcribed polynucleotide is an mRNA, a cDNA and/or a cRNA, with the latter being preferred.
  • Transcribed polynucleotides are isolated from a sample, reverse transcribed and/or amplified, and labelled, by employing methods well-known the person skilled in the art (see Example 3).
  • the step of determining the expression profile further comprises amplifying the transcribed polynucleotide.
  • the method comprises hybridizing the transcribed polynucleotide to a complementary polynucleotide, or a portion thereof, under stringent hybridization conditions, as described hereinafter.
  • hybridizing means hybridization under conventional hybridization conditions, preferably under stringent conditions as described, for example, in Sambrook, J., et al, in "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual” (1989), Eds. J. Sambrook, E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis, Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour, NY and the further definitions provided above.
  • Such conditions are, for example, hybridization in 6x SSC, pH 7.0 / 0.1% SDS at about
  • the salt concentration in the washing step can for example be chosen between 2x SSC/0.1% SDS at room temperature for low stringency and 0.2x SSC/0.1% SDS at 50°C for high stringency.
  • the temperature of the washing step can be varied between room temperature, ca. 22°C, for low stringency, and 65 °C to 70° C for high stringency. Also contemplated are polynucleotides that hybridize at lower stringency hybridization conditions.
  • Changes in the stringency of hybridization and signal detection are primarily accomplished through the manipulation, preferably of formamide concentration (lower percentages of formamide result in lowered stringency), salt conditions, or temperature.
  • washes performed following stringent hybridization can be done at higher salt concentrations (e.g. 5x SSC).
  • Variations in the above conditions may be accomplished through the inclusion and/or substitution of alternate blocking reagents used to suppress background in hybridization experiments.
  • the inclusion of specific blocking reagents may require modification of the hybridization conditions described above, due to problems with compatibility.
  • "Complementary” and “complementarity”, respectively, can be described by the percentage, i.e. proportion, of nucleotides which can form base pairs between two polynucleotide strands or within a specific region or domain of the two strands.
  • complementary nucleotides are, according to the base pairing rules, adenine and thymine (or adenine and uracil), and cytosine and guanine.
  • Complementarity may be partial, in which only some of the nucleic acids' bases are matched according to the base pairing rules. Or, there may be a complete or total complementarity between the nucleic acids. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands has effects on the efficiency and strength of hybridization between nucleic acid strands.
  • Two nucleic acid strands are considered to be 100% complementary to each other over a defined length if in a defined region all adenines of a first strand can pair with a thymine (or an uracil) of a second strand, all guanines of a first strand can pair with a cytosine of a second strand, all thymine (or uracils) of a first strand can pair with an adenine of a second strand, and all cytosines of a first strand can pair with a guanine of a second strand, and vice versa.
  • the degree of complementarity is determined over a stretch of 20, preferably 25, nucleotides, i.e.
  • a 60% complementarity means that within a region of 20 nucleotides of two nucleic acid strands 12 nucleotides of the first strand can base pair with 12 nucleotides of the second strand according to the above ruling, either as a stretch of 12 contiguous nucleotides or interspersed by non-pairing nucleotides, when the two strands are attached to each other over said region of 20 nucleotides.
  • the degree of complementarity can range from at least about 50% to full, i.e. 100% complementarity.
  • Two single nucleic acid strands are said to be "substantially complementary" when they are at least about 80% complementary, preferably about 90% or higher. For carrying out the method of the present invention substantial complementarity is preferred.
  • Preferred methods for detection and quantification of the amount of polynucleotides i.e. for the methods according to the invention allowing the determination of the level of expression of a marker, are those described by Sambrook et al. (1989) or real time methods known in the art as the TaqMan® method disclosed in WO92/02638 and the corresponding U.S. 5,210,015, U.S.
  • the (at least one) target nucleic acid component is detected by a process comprising contacting the sample with an oligonucleotide containing a sequence complementary to a region of the target nucleic acid component and a labeled oligonucleotide containing a sequence complementary to a second region of the same target nucleic acid component sequence strand, but not including the nucleic acid sequence defined by the first oligonucleotide, to create a mixture of duplexes during hybridization conditions, wherein the duplexes comprise the target nucleic acid annealed to the first oligonucleotide and to the labeled oligonucleotide such that the 3 '-end of the first oligonucleotide is adjacent to the 5 '-end of the labeled oligonucleotide.
  • this mixture is treated with a template-dependent nucleic acid polymerase having a 5' to 3' nuclease activity under conditions sufficient to permit the 5' to 3' nuclease activity of the polymerase to cleave the annealed, labeled oligonucleotide and release labeled fragments.
  • the signal generated by the hydrolysis of the labeled oligonucleotide is detected and/ or measured.
  • TaqMan® technology eliminates the need for a solid phase bound reaction complex to be formed and made detectable.
  • Example 3 A preferred protocol if the marker, i.e. the polynucleotide, is in form of a transcribed nucleotide, is described in Example 3, where total RNA is isolated, cDNA and, subsequently, cRNA is synthesized and biotin is incorporated during the transcription reaction.
  • the purified cRNA is applied to commercially available arrays which can be obtained e.g. from Affymetrix.
  • the hybridized cRNA is detected according to the methods described in Example 3.
  • the arrays are produced by photolithography or other methods known to experts skilled in the art e.g. from U.S. 5,445,934, U.S. 5,744,305, U.S. 5,700,637, U.S. 5,945,334 and EP 0 619 321 or EP 0 373 203, or as decribed hereinafter in greater detail.
  • the polynucleotide or at least one of the polynucleotides is in form of a polypeptide.
  • the expression level of the polynucleotides or polypeptides is detected using a compound which specifically binds to the polynucleotide of the polypeptide of the present invention.
  • specifically binding means that the compound is capable of discriminating between two or more polynucleotides or polypeptides, i.e. it binds to the desired polynucleotide or polypeptide, but essentially does not bind unspecifically to a different polynucleotide or polypeptide.
  • the compound can be an antibody, or a fragment thereof, an enzyme, a so-called small molecule compound, a protein-scaffold, preferably an anticalin.
  • the compound specifically binding to the polynucleotide or polypeptide is an antibody, or a fragment thereof.
  • an "antibody” comprises monoclonal antibodies as first described by Kohler and Milstein in Nature 278 (1975), 495-497 as well as polyclonal antibodies, i.e. antibodies contained in a polyclonal antiserum.
  • Monoclonal antibodies include those produced by transgenic mice. Fragments of antibodies include F(ab') , Fab and Fv fragments. Derivatives of antibodies include scFvs, chimeric and humanized antibodies. See, for example Harlow and Lane, loc. cit.
  • the person skilled in the art is aware of a variety of methods, all of which are included in the present invention.
  • Examples include immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, Enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA), Enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (RIA), dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluoro immuno assay (DELFIA), scintillation proximity assay (SPA).
  • ELISA Enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay
  • RIA Enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay
  • DELFIA dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluoro immuno assay
  • SPA scintillation proximity assay
  • the method for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(l lq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal is carried out on an array.
  • an "array” or “microarray” refers to a linear or two- or three dimensional arrangement of preferably discrete nucleic acid or polypeptide probes which comprises an intentionally created collection of nucleic acid or polypeptide probes of any length spotted onto a substrate/solid support.
  • a collection of nucleic acids or polypeptide spotted onto a substrate/solid support also under the term "array”.
  • a microarray usually refers to a miniaturised array arrangement, with the probes being attached to a density of at least about 10, 20, 50, 100 nucleic acid molecules referring to different or the same genes per cm 2 .
  • an array can be referred to as "gene chip”.
  • the array itself can have different formats, e.g. libraries of soluble probes or libraries of probes tethered to resin beads, silica chips, or other solid supports.
  • the process of array fabrication is well-known to the person skilled in the art.
  • the process for preparing a nucleic acid array comprises preparing a glass (or other) slide (e.g. chemical treatment of the glass to enhance binding of the nucleic acid probes to the glass surface), obtaining DNA sequences representing genes of a genome of interest, and spotting sequences these sequences of interest onto glass slide.
  • Sequences of interest can be obtained via creating a cDNA library from an mRNA source or by using publicly available databases, such as GeneBank, to annotate the sequence information of custom cDNA libraries or to identify cDNA clones from previously prepared libraries.
  • the liquid containing the amplified probes can be deposited on the array by using a set of microspotting pins. Ideally, the amount deposited should be uniform.
  • the process can further include UV-crosslinking in order to enhance immobilization of the probes on the array.
  • the array is a high density oligonucleotide (oligo) array using a light-directed chemical synthesis process, employing the so-called photolithography technology.
  • oligo arrays are a high density oligonucleotide (oligo) array using a light-directed chemical synthesis process, employing the so-called photolithography technology.
  • oligo arrays are a high density oligonucleotide (oligo) array using a light-directed chemical synthesis process, employing the so-called photolithography technology.
  • oligo arrays Unlike common cDNA arrays, oligo arrays
  • the sequence can be synthesized directly onto the array, thus, bypassing the need for physical intermediates, such as PCR products, required for making cDNA arrays.
  • the marker, or partial sequences thereof can be represented by 14 to 20 features, preferably by less than
  • oligonucleotide which is a perfect match (PM) to a segment of the respective gene.
  • PM oligonucleotide are paired with mismatch (MM) oligonucleotides which have a single mismatch at the central base of the nucleotide and are used as
  • controls The chip exposure sites are defined by masks and are deprotected by the use of light, followed by a chemical coupling step resulting in the synthesis of one nucleotide. The masking, light deprotection, and coupling process can then be repeated to synthesize the next nucleotide, until the nucleotide chain is of the specified length.
  • the method of the present invention is carried out in a robotics system including robotic plating and a robotic liquid transfer system, e.g. using microfluidics, i.e. channelled structured.
  • a particular preferred method according to the present invention is as follows:
  • RNA preferably mRNA
  • the present invention is directed to the use of at least one marker selected from the markers identifiable by their Affymetrix Identification
  • AML_inv(3) Numbers (affy id) as defined in Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4, for the manufacturing of a diagnostic for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(l lq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal.
  • the use of the present invention is particularly advantageous for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(l lq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal in an individual having AML.
  • markers for diagnosis of WHO classified leukemia subtypes preferably based on microarray technology, offers the following advantages: (1) more rapid and more precise diagnosis, (2) easy to use in laboratories without specialized experience, (3) abolishes the requirement for analyzing viable cells for chromosome analysis (transport problem), and (4) very experienced hematologists for cytomorphology and cytochemistry, immunophenotyping as well as cytogeneticists and molecularbiologists are no longer required.
  • the present invention refers to a diagnostic kit containing at least one marker selected from the markers identifiable by their Affymetrix Identification Numbers (affy id) as defined in Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4, for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(l lq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal, in combination with suitable auxiliaries.
  • suitable auxiliaries include buffers, enzymes, labelling compounds, and the like.
  • the marker contained in the kit is a nucleic acid molecule which is capable of hybridizing to the mRNA corresponding to at least one marker of the present invention.
  • the at least one nucleic acid molecule is attached to a solid support, e.g. a polystyrene microtiter dish, nitrocellulose membrane, glass surface or to non-immobilized particles in solution.
  • the diagnostic kit contains at least one reference for an AML subtype AML_inv(3) and/or any other AML subtype, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(llq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal.
  • the reference can be a sample or a data bank.
  • the present invention is directed to an apparatus for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(l lq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal in a sample, containing a reference data bank obtainable by comprising (a) compiling a gene expression profile of a patient sample by determining the expression level at least one marker selected from the markers identifiable by their Affymetrix Identification Numbers (affy id) as defined in Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4 and (b) classifying the gene expression profile by means of a machine learning algorithm.
  • a reference data bank obtainable by comprising (a) compiling a gene expression profile of a patient sample by determining the expression level at least one marker selected from the markers identifiable by their Affymetrix Identification Numbers (affy id) as defined in Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4 and (b) classifying the gene expression profile by means of a machine learning
  • the "machine learning algorithm” is a computational-based prediction methodology, also known to the person skilled in the art as “classifier”, employed for characterizing a gene expression profile.
  • the signals corresponding to a certain expression level which are obtained by the microarray hybridization are subjected to the algorithm in order to classify the expression profile.
  • Supervised learning involves "training” a classifier to recognize the distinctions among classes and then “testing” the accuracy of the classifier on an independent test set. For new, unknown samples the classifier shall predict into which class the sample belongs.
  • the machine learning algorithm is selected from the group consisting of Weighted Voting, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree Induction, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Feed-Forward Neural Networks.
  • the machine learning algorithm is Support Vector Machine, such as polynomial kernel and Gaussian Radial Basis Function-kernel SVM models.
  • the classification accuracy of a given gene list for a set of microarray experiments is preferably estimated using Support Vector Machines (SVM), because there is evidence that SVM-based prediction slightly outperforms other classification techniques like k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN).
  • SVM Support Vector Machines
  • the LIB SVM software package version 2.36 was used (SVM-type: C-SVC, linear kernel (http://www.csie.nm.edu.tw/ ⁇ cjlin/libsvm )).
  • SVM-type C-SVC, linear kernel (http://www.csie.nm.edu.tw/ ⁇ cjlin/libsvm )).
  • the skilled artisan is furthermore referred to Brown et al., Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci., 2000; 97: 262-267, Furey et al, Bioinformatics. 2000; 16: 906-914, and Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory. New York:
  • the classification accuracy of a given gene list for a set of microarray experiments can be estimated using Support Vector Machines (SVM) as supervised learning technique.
  • SVMs are trained using differentially expressed genes which were identified on a subset of the data and then this trained model is employed to assign new samples to those trained groups from a second and different data set. Differentially expressed genes were identified applying ANOVA and t-test-statistics (Welch t-test). Based on identified distinct gene expression signatures respective training sets consisting of 2/3 of cases and test sets with 1/3 of cases to assess classification accuracies are designated. Assignment of cases to training and test set is randomized and balanced by diagnosis. Based on the training set a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model is built.
  • SVM Support Vector Machine
  • the apparent accuracy i.e. the overall rate of correct predictions of the complete data set was estimated by lOfold cross validation.
  • This means that the data set was divided into 10 approximately equally sized subsets, an SVM-model was trained for 9 subsets and predictions were generated for the remaining subset. This training and prediction process was repeated 10 times to include predictions for each subset. Subsequently the data set was split into a training set, consisting of two thirds of the samples, and a test set with the remaining one third. Apparent accuracy for the training set was estimated by lOfold cross validation (analogous to apparent accuracy for complete set). A SVM-model of the training set was built to predict diagnosis in the independent test set, thereby estimating true accuracy of the prediction model. This prediction approach was applied both for overall classification (multi-class) and binary classification (diagnosis X > yes or no). For the latter, sensitivity and specificity were calculated:
  • the reference data bank is backed up on a computational data memory chip which can be inserted in as well as removed from the apparatus of the present invention, e.g. like an interchangeable module, in order to use another data memory chip containing a different reference data bank.
  • the apparatus of the present invention containing a desired reference data bank can be used in a way such that an unknown sample is, first, subjected to gene expression profiling, e.g. by microarray analysis in a manner as described supra or in the art, and the expression level data obtained by the analysis are, second, fed into the apparatus and compared with the data of the reference data bank obtainable by the above method.
  • the apparatus suitably contains a device for entering the expression level of the data, for example a control panel such as a keyboard.
  • the results, whether and how the data of the unknown sample fit into the reference data bank can be made visible on a provided monitor or display screen and, if desired, printed out on an incorporated of connected printer.
  • the apparatus of the present invention is equipped with particular appliances suitable for detecting and measuring the expression profile data and, subsequently, proceeding with the comparison with the reference data bank.
  • the apparatus of the present invention can contain a gripper arm and/or a tray which takes up the microarray containing the hybridized nucleic acids.
  • the present invention refers to a reference data bank for distinguishing AML subtype AML_inv(3) from other AML subtypes, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(llq23)/MLL, and/or AMLjtiormal in a sample obtainable by comprising (a) compiling a gene expression profile of a patient sample by determining the expression level of at least one marker selected from the markers identifiable by their Affymetrix Identification Numbers (affy id) as defined in Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4, and (b) classifying the gene expression profile by means of a machine learning algorithm.
  • affymetrix Identification Numbers affy id
  • the reference data bank is backed up and/or contained in a computational memory data chip.
  • Tables 1.1-4.10 show AML subtype analysis of AML subtype AML_inv(3) and other AML subtypes, preferably from t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), t(llq23)/MLL, and/or AML_normal.
  • the analysed markers are ordered according to their q- values, beginning with the lowest q-values.
  • Tables 1.1 to 4.10 are accompanied with explanatory tables (Table 1.1 A to 4.10 A) where the numbering and the Affymetrix Id are further defined by other parameters, e.g. gene bank accession number.
  • the inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) can be found in about 1-2% of all unselected AML and MDS RAEB-1 and RAEB-2. Although these 3q21q26 aberrations are correlated with characteristic features such as thrombocytosis, micromegakaryocytes, trilineage dysplasia, and with an unfavourable prognosis, they are not strictly correlated with an FAB subtype. The breakpoints in 3q21 as well as in 3q26 vary considerably at the molecular level. Long range activation of the EVI1 gene, residing in 3q26, was reported to be involved in the pathogenetic mechanism of these AML.
  • inv(3)/t(3;3) positive AML can be characterized by distinct gene expression patterns as recently demonstrated for other AML with balanced chromosomal aberrations.
  • Distinct expression signatures accurately distinguish the 3q21q26 AML from all other AML subtypes with 100% accuracy, both by supervised and by unsupervised analysis.
  • one of the differentially expressed genes was EVIL
  • Two different microarray probesets revealed absence of EVI1 expression in t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16), and low or absent expression in normal and complex aberrant karyotypes. High expression was found in t(llq23)/MLL AML and even 4-fold higher in 3q21q26 leukemias.
  • the EVI1 expression was confirmed with a real time LightCycler assay in all 3q21q26 AML and in 205 selected cases of all other groups.
  • the methods section contains both information on statistical analyses used for identification of differentially expressed genes and detailed annotation data of identified microarray probesets.
  • sequence data are omitted due to their large size, and because they do not change, whereas the annotation data are updated periodically, for example new information on chromomal location and functional annotation of the respective gene products. Sequence data are available for download in the NetAffx Download Center (www.affymetrix.com)
  • Microarray probesets for example found to be differentially expressed between different types of leukemia samples are further described by additional information.
  • the fields are of the following types:
  • HG-U133 ProbeSet_ID describes the probe set identifier. Examples are: 200007_at, 20001 l_s_at, 200012_x_at.
  • GeneChip probe array name where the respective probeset is represented. Examples are: Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array or Affymetrix Human Genome U133B Array.
  • the Sequence Type indicates whether the sequence is an Exemplar, Consensus or Control sequence.
  • An Exemplar is a single nucleotide sequence taken directly from a public database. This sequence could be an mRNA or EST.
  • a Consensus sequence is a nucleotide sequence assembled by Affymetrix, based on one or more sequence taken from a public database.
  • Transcript ID The cluster identification number with a sub-cluster identifier appended.
  • accession number of the single sequence, or representative sequence on which the probe set is based Refer to the "Sequence Source” field to determine the database used.
  • Affymetrix annotational data come from the UniGene record. There is no indication which species-specific databank was used, but some of the possibilities include for example HUGO: The Human Genome Organization. MapLocation:
  • the map location describes the chromosomal location when one is available.
  • Cluster type can be "full length” or “est”, or " — “ if unknown.
  • LocusLink This information represents the LocusLink accession number.
  • the field contains the ID and description for each entry, and there can be multiple entries per probeSet.
  • Example 3 Sample preparation, processing and data analysis
  • Microarray analyses were performed utilizing the GeneChip ® System (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, USA). Hybridization target preparations were performed according to recommended protocols (Affymetrix Technical Manual). In detail, at time of diagnosis, mononuclear cells were purified by FicoU-Hypaque density centrifugation. They had been lysed immediately in RLT buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), frozen, and stored at -80°C from 1 week to 38 months. For gene expression profiling cell lysates of the leukemia samples were thawed, homogenized (QIAshredder, Qiagen), and total RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen).
  • RNA isolated from 1 x 10 7 cells was used as starting material for cDNA synthesis with oligo [(dT) 2 T7 ⁇ romotor] 65 primer (cDNA Synthesis System, Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). cDNA products were purified by phenol/clilorophorm/IAA extraction (Ambion,
  • cRNA was fragmented by alkaline treatment (200 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.2/500 mM potassium acetate/150 mM magnesium acetate) and added to the hybridization cocktail sufficient for five hybridizations on standard GeneChip microarrays (300 ⁇ l final volume). Washing and staining of the probe arrays was performed according to the recommended Fluidics Station protocol (EukGE-WS2v4).
  • Affymetrix Microarray Suite software version 5.0.1 extracted fluorescence signal intensities from each feature on the microarrays as detected by confocal laser scanning according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
  • Expression analysis quality assessment parameters included visiual array inspection of the scanned image for the presence of image artifacts and correct grid alignment for the identification of distinct probe cells as well as both low 375' ratio of housekeeping controls (mean: 1.90 for GAPDH) and high percentage of detection calls (mean: 46.3% present called genes).
  • the 3' to 5' ratio of GAPDH probesets can be used to assess RNA sample and assay quality. Signal values of the
  • 3' probe sets for GAPDH are compared to the Signal values of the corresponding 5' probe set.
  • the ratio of the 3' probe set to the 5' probe set is generally no more than 3.0.
  • a high 3' to 5' ratio may indicate degraded RNA or inefficient synthesis of ds cDNA or biotinylated cRNA (GeneChip ® Expression Analysis Technical Manual, www.affymetrix.com).
  • Detection calls are used to determine whether the transcript of a gene is detected (present) or undetected (absent) and were calculated using default parameters of the Microarray Analysis Suite MAS 5.0 software package.
  • Bone marrow (BM) aspirates are taken at the time of the initial diagnostic biopsy and remaining material is immediately lysed in RLT buffer (Qiagen), frozen and stored at -80 C until preparation for gene expression analysis.
  • RLT buffer Qiagen
  • RNA extracted RNA extracted from 1 x 107 cells is used as starting material in the subsequent cDNA-Synthesis using Oligo-dT-T7-Promotor Primer (cDNA synthesis Kit, Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
  • the cDNA is purified by phenol-chlorophorm extraction and precipitated with 100% Ethanol over night.
  • biotin-labeled ribonucleotides are incorporated during the in vitro transcription reaction (Enzo® BioArrayTM HighYieldTM RNA Transcript Labeling Kit, ENZO). After quantification of the purified cRNA (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen), 15 ug are fragmented by alkaline treatment (200 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.2, 500 mM potassium acetate, 150 mM magnesium acetate) and added to the hybridization cocktail sufficient for 5 hybridizations on standard GeneChip microarrays. Before expression profiling Test3 Probe Arrays (Affymetrix) are chosen for monitoring of the integrity of the cRNA.
  • cRNA-cocktails which showed a ratio of the messured intensity of the 3' to the 5' end of the GAPDH gene less than 3.0 are selected for subsequent hybridization on HG-U133 probe arrays (Affymetrix). Washing and staining the Probe arrays is performed as described ( founded Affymetrix-Original- Literatur (LOCKHART und LIPSHUTZ).
  • the Affymetrix software (Microarray Suite, Version 4.0.1) extracted fluorescence intensities from each element on the arrays as detected by confocal laser scanning according to the manufacturers recommendations .
  • OVA One-Versus-AII
  • _s_ a CBFA2T1 -13.48 6.51 E-07 4.00E-04 -1.63 -7.44 8q22 22 212895.
  • _s_ at ABR 3.03 3.97E-07 3.50E-04 1.38 7.38 17p13.3 23 223534.
  • _at PTPN12 2.76 6.85E-07 4.00E-04 1.39 7.29 7q11.23 27 220974.
  • _s_ at ATP1B1 5.21 2.00E-06 7.03E-04 1.50 7.27 1q22-q25 29 201938.
  • CDK2AP1 2.10 7.57E-08 1.28E-04 1.27 7.26 12q24.31 30 207839.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention a trait à un procédé pour établir la distinction entre le sous-type inv(3) de la leucémie myélomonocytaire aiguë et d'autre types de leucémie myélomonocytaire aiguë dans un échantillon par la détermination du niveau d'expression de marqueurs, ainsi qu'à une trousse de diagnostic et un appareil contenant les marqueurs.
EP04797588A 2003-11-04 2004-11-04 Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue Withdrawn EP1682899A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04797588A EP1682899A2 (fr) 2003-11-04 2004-11-04 Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03025345 2003-11-04
EP04797588A EP1682899A2 (fr) 2003-11-04 2004-11-04 Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue
PCT/EP2004/012461 WO2005045438A2 (fr) 2003-11-04 2004-11-04 Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1682899A2 true EP1682899A2 (fr) 2006-07-26

Family

ID=34560152

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04797588A Withdrawn EP1682899A2 (fr) 2003-11-04 2004-11-04 Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1682899A2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005045438A2 (fr)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6647341B1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2003-11-11 Whitehead Institute For Biomedical Research Methods for classifying samples and ascertaining previously unknown classes
AU2002351828A1 (en) * 2001-11-05 2003-05-19 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Novel genetic markers for leukemias
EP1308522A1 (fr) * 2001-11-05 2003-05-07 Haferlach, Torsten, PD Dr. Dr. Nouveaux marqueurs pour des leucèmies

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2005045438A3 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005045438A3 (fr) 2005-08-11
WO2005045438A2 (fr) 2005-05-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070198198A1 (en) Methods and apparatuses for diagnosing AML and MDS
EP1470247A2 (fr) Nouveaux marqueurs genetiques pour leucemies
US20090118132A1 (en) Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
US20070148648A1 (en) Method for distinguishing who classified aml subtypes
US20070292970A1 (en) Method for Distinguishing Aml-Specific Flt3 Length Mutations From Tkd Mutations
WO2005045434A2 (fr) Methode pour distinguer les sous-types aml presentant des aberrations genetiques recurrentes
EP1682899A2 (fr) Procede pour etablir une distinction entre le sous-type inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21q26) de la leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue et d'autres sous-types de leucemie myelomonocytaire aigue
US20070207459A1 (en) Method For Distinguishing Immunologically Defined All Subtype
WO2006048266A2 (fr) Profil d'expression genetique de leucemies a rearrangements geniques mll
WO2005043162A2 (fr) Procede pour faire la distinction entre l'aml mll-ptd-positive et d'autres sous-types d'aml
US20070099190A1 (en) Method for distinguishing leukemia subtypes
WO2005043164A2 (fr) Procede de differenciation entre les sous-types aml a cbf positif et les sous-types aml a cbf negatif
US20070275380A1 (en) Method for Distinguishing Aml Subtypes With Aberrant and Prognostically Intermediate Karyotypes
US20070212734A1 (en) Method for Distinguishing T(11Q23)/Mll-Positive Leukemias From t(11Q23)/Mll Negative Leukemia
US20070128607A1 (en) Method for distinguishing aml subtypes with different gene dosages
US20070122814A1 (en) Methods for distinguishing prognostically definable aml
EP1815012A2 (fr) Classification de leucemie avec translocation (9;22)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060606

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071016

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20090806