[go: up one dir, main page]

EP1096063B1 - Method and device for fractionating a paper fibre suspension - Google Patents

Method and device for fractionating a paper fibre suspension Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1096063B1
EP1096063B1 EP00121414A EP00121414A EP1096063B1 EP 1096063 B1 EP1096063 B1 EP 1096063B1 EP 00121414 A EP00121414 A EP 00121414A EP 00121414 A EP00121414 A EP 00121414A EP 1096063 B1 EP1096063 B1 EP 1096063B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
wire
clearer
sieve
sweeper
suspension
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP00121414A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1096063A1 (en
Inventor
Samuel Dr. Schabel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Voith Patent GmbH
Original Assignee
Voith Paper Patent GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=7927027&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1096063(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Voith Paper Patent GmbH filed Critical Voith Paper Patent GmbH
Publication of EP1096063A1 publication Critical patent/EP1096063A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1096063B1 publication Critical patent/EP1096063B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21DTREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
    • D21D5/00Purification of the pulp suspension by mechanical means; Apparatus therefor
    • D21D5/02Straining or screening the pulp
    • D21D5/023Stationary screen-drums
    • D21D5/026Stationary screen-drums with rotating cleaning foils

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 and a fractionation device according to the preamble of claim 8.
  • aqueous paper fiber suspensions by wet sieving can be fractionated.
  • sorting i.e. the removal of unwanted components from the paper fiber suspension
  • Fiber fractionation i.e. division of the paper fibers themselves into several fractions.
  • Fiber fractionation certain Properties of paper fibers, e.g. Length, thickness or flexibility as Separation characteristic used.
  • Such a process enables extraction of fiber materials with special properties from fiber mixtures such as Waste paper.
  • native raw materials can also be fractionated according to their fiber properties become.
  • a concentration of the Long fibers in the overflow of the sieve and a concentration of the short fibers in the Pass of the sieve reached. So far there have been processes for fiber fractionation Selectivity and / or throughput are inadequate in many cases.
  • the devices used for sorting on the one hand and for fiber fractionation on the other hand are very similar in structure. As is known, almost always a screen clearer moves close to the screen to clear the blockage to prevent the sieve and thereby enable a large sieve throughput.
  • a sorting device i.e. Separate unwanted components a fiber suspension is described in EP-A-0 299 258.
  • Throughput To be able to increase, it is proposed that the surface of the screen clearer with webs provided due to their size and shape, e.g. inclined side surfaces, suction and Generate pressure pulses. These are intended in particular in cooperation with grooved Seven improve their freedom.
  • the invention is based on the object of creating a method with which it succeeds in achieving a greater separation effect when fractionating - even from problematic ones Components such as Long fibers and stickies - to achieve.
  • the inventive method leads to a Drag flow at the scraper, which is essentially parallel to the screen surface Moves circumferentially.
  • the fibers in the suspension are therefore evenly oriented and the separation based on their length and / or their Flexibility is possible with a better effect. This is especially true for across Sorting columns aligned in parallel flow. Keeping the sieve openings clear is due to the surface structure of the sieve in cooperation with the Drag flow caused micro vortices and / or small-scale turbulence reached.
  • the gentle sieve clearance according to the invention is cheaper.
  • the scraper can be roughened, e.g. with a Be provided with a plurality of grooves. Even a felt placed on the surface can Develop a drag effect.
  • the advantages of the invention are best with such rooms achievable, the surface of which faces the sieve is predominantly continuous, which is not e.g. have a number of foils, wings, or bumps. In other cases it may be useful to find a compromise between the Separation effect and throughput. For technical / physical reasons namely that are often accepted that when generating a pure Parallel flow throughput through the screen is reduced compared to one Prior art methods with high turbulence. It must then be weighed up between the parallel flow which is as rectified as possible or a limited one Generation of vortices. Weak vortices can be created by e.g. a sieve and / or a reamer with profile grooves or strips is used.
  • Fig. 1 the relationships are shown that occur when performing the method in the area of sieve 1, scraper 5 and the paper fiber-containing moving in between Play suspension S.
  • the suspension S is passed through the sieve 1 fractionated by a fraction flowing through the sieve openings 6, while a other part is rejected and ultimately in a designated place the equipment used for the process is removed.
  • the scraper 5 is in Distance A from and relative to sieve 1 in the direction shown by arrow Movement direction 3 moves. Since the surface 8 of the reamer 5 is rough, e.g. like here shown, provided with a number of grooves 7, the suspension is almost dragged along without slip, so that a parallel flow 4 arises. This Parallel flow 4 is not strictly parallel to that facing the suspension Surface of the sieve.
  • the grooves 7 provided to form the rough surface are dimensioned.
  • Their width B at the widest point is advantageously less than 3 mm and theirs Height H at a maximum of 2 mm.
  • other dimensions can also be useful his.
  • this scraper as many as possible to accommodate such grooves, i.e. they have a small distance C at surface 8 from each other. They can be straight parallel, but it is also a diamond or Conceivable wave pattern.
  • the sieve 1 'used according to FIG. 3 has a profile structure on its inlet side:
  • the tops of the sieve bars 12 are opposite to the direction of movement 3
  • Angle a slightly inclined so that it is spatially narrow at the inlet into the sieve openings can form limited micro-vortices. Due to the inclination, protrusions form the sieve columns with the height E. It is also possible to use groove-like depressions with a appropriate depth in the sieve.
  • FIG. 4 shows part of a further sieve with which the method can be carried out.
  • the sieve is provided with a plurality of sieve openings 6, which are designed as narrow slots with a slot width D between 0.1 and 0.4 mm, preferably 0.15 to 0.25 mm.
  • Their longitudinal extent has an angle of attack ⁇ of 100 ° with respect to the direction of movement 3 in the case shown. In general, however, it is 90 °.
  • Fig. 5 shows schematically a fractionation device in a view from above. It contains a housing 13 with a partially drawn cover 14.
  • the sieve 1 is cylindrical Sieve basket, and the reamer 5 is designed as a cylindrical rotor.
  • the rough one Surface 8 is indicated as a thick circular line.
  • the suspension flows through the Inlet 15 between screen 1 and rotor.
  • the sieve pass is through the Fine fraction outlet 16 and the sieve overflow through the coarse fraction outlet 17 dissipated.
  • more than these two fractions can be formed e.g. several fine fractions with the help of differently designed Screen openings.
  • Sieve and rotor are arranged concentrically to each other, but they are other embodiments are also conceivable.
  • Fig. 6 shows a geometric representation of a circular cylindrical rotor trained reamer 5 with substantially axially parallel grooves 7.
  • a shape inserted concentrically in a circular cylindrical sieve, has a very gentle Effect, i.e. generates no significant pressure / suction impulses.
  • pressure / suction pulses are to be generated with Profile strips 18 are provided. These can also generate the Support parallel flow, e.g. with the help of a steep leading edge.
  • the Profile strips 18 have only a small height F (Fig. 8). Your number can too be small, e.g. two to five spread over the circumference.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Preliminary Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)

Abstract

To divide a suspension (S) of paper fibers into fractions, especially a suspension of used paper fibers, a sieve (1) separates it into two fractions, such as according to fiber length. A parallel flow (4) is generated by a sweeper (5) with a rough surface, so that the suspension (S) is dragged through by the sweeper (5) with virtually no slip. In a contact zone of up to 1 mm from the sweeper (5), the suspension is moved at a speed of at least 90% of the sweeper (5) speed. The sweeper (5) is moved along the line of the sieve (1), with a gap (A) between the sweeper (5) and the flow side of the sieve (1) of max. 20 mm. The sweeper (5) movement speed is at least 10 m/sec. in relation to the sieve or 20 m/sec. The sweeper (5) exerts little or no pressure or suction pulses towards the surface of the sieve (1). The surface (8) of the sweeper (5) carries a number of longitudinal recesses and pref. grooves (7), or it has a felt covering over the surface (8) which has high absorbency. The openings (6) in the sieve (1) are longitudinal, to separate a fiber fraction, set at an angle of 70-110 degrees to the direction of sweeper (5) movement. Spaced eddies are formed through projections or recesses at the sieve (1), working with the parallel flow (4). An Independent claim is included for an appts. to separate a paper fiber suspension into fractions, where the sweeper (5) has a roughened surface (8). Preferred Features: The grooves (7) at the surface (8) of the sweeper (5) have a height of max. 3 mm, at intervals of max. 3 mm. The projections or recesses at the sieve (1) have a max. height/depth of 2 mm. The sieve (1) is a cylinder, with an inner rotor as the sweeper (5), concentric to each other.

Description

Die Erfindung bezieht sich auf ein Verfahren gemäß dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 sowie eine Fraktioniervorrichtung gemäß dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 8.The invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 and a fractionation device according to the preamble of claim 8.

Es ist bekannt, dass wässrige Papierfasersuspensionen durch Nasssiebverfahren fraktioniert werden können. Dabei können unterschiedliche Verfahrensziele verfolgt werden, und zwar erstens die sogenannte Sortierung, d.h. die Entfernung von unerwünschten Bestandteilen aus der Papierfasersuspension oder zweitens die Faserfraktionierung, also Aufteilung der Papierfasern selbst auf mehrere Fraktionen. Während der Sortiervorgang bei vielen Störstoffen mit sehr gutem Trenneffekt möglich ist, ergeben sich bei den weichen, klebenden Verunreinigungen, den Stickies, erhebliche Probleme bezüglich des Trenneffektes. Bei der Faserfraktionierung werden bestimmte Eigenschaften der Papierfasern, z.B. Länge, Dicke oder Flexibilität als Trenncharakteristikum herangezogen. Ein solches Verfahren ermöglicht die Gewinnung von Faserstoffen mit speziellen Eigenschaften aus Fasergemischen wie z.B. Altpapier. Aber auch native Rohstoffe können entsprechend ihren Fasereigenschaften fraktioniert werden. In der Regel wird bei der Faserfraktionierung eine Aufkonzentrierung der Langfasern im Überlauf des Siebes und eine Aufkonzentrierung der Kurzfasern im Durchlauf des Siebes erreicht. Bisher sind bei Verfahren zur Faserfraktionierung Trennschärfe und/oder Durchsatz in vielen Fällen nicht ausreichend.It is known that aqueous paper fiber suspensions by wet sieving can be fractionated. Different procedural goals can be pursued firstly, the so-called sorting, i.e. the removal of unwanted components from the paper fiber suspension or secondly the Fiber fractionation, i.e. division of the paper fibers themselves into several fractions. Possible during the sorting process for many contaminants with a very good separation effect is, there are considerable stickies with the soft, sticky contaminants Separation problems. In fiber fractionation, certain Properties of paper fibers, e.g. Length, thickness or flexibility as Separation characteristic used. Such a process enables extraction of fiber materials with special properties from fiber mixtures such as Waste paper. But native raw materials can also be fractionated according to their fiber properties become. As a rule, a concentration of the Long fibers in the overflow of the sieve and a concentration of the short fibers in the Pass of the sieve reached. So far there have been processes for fiber fractionation Selectivity and / or throughput are inadequate in many cases.

Die Vorrichtungen, die man zum Sortieren einerseits und zum Faser-Fraktionieren andererseits einsetzt, sind in ihrem Aufbau sehr ähnlich. Bekanntlich wird fast immer ein Siebräumer relativ zum Sieb in dichtem Abstand vorbeibewegt, um das Verstopfen des Siebes zu verhindern und dadurch einen großen Siebdurchsatz zu ermöglichen.The devices used for sorting on the one hand and for fiber fractionation on the other hand, are very similar in structure. As is known, almost always a screen clearer moves close to the screen to clear the blockage to prevent the sieve and thereby enable a large sieve throughput.

Eine Vorrichtung zum Sortieren, d.h. Abscheiden von unerwünschten Bestandteilen aus einer Fasersuspension wird in der EP-A-0 299 258 beschrieben. Um den Durchsatz erhöhen zu können, wird vorgeschlagen, die Oberfläche des Siebräumers mit Stegen zu versehen, die auf Grund ihrer Größe und Form, z.B. geneigte Seitenflächen, Saug- und Druckimpulse erzeugen. Diese sollen insbesondere im Zusammenwirken mit genuteten Sieben deren Freihaltung verbessern.A sorting device, i.e. Separate unwanted components a fiber suspension is described in EP-A-0 299 258. Throughput To be able to increase, it is proposed that the surface of the screen clearer with webs provided due to their size and shape, e.g. inclined side surfaces, suction and Generate pressure pulses. These are intended in particular in cooperation with grooved Seven improve their freedom.

Ein anderes Dokument, die DE-A-198 36 318, zeigt ebenfalls einen Drucksortierer mit einem Rotor, dessen Wirkung auf der Relativgeschwindigkeit zur ihn umgebenden Suspension beruht. Er enthält eine große Anzahl von Vertiefungen in der Form z.B. von Kugelabschnitten. Die in der US 3,411,721 gezeigte Vorrichtung kombiniert die Funktion des Mahlens mit der des Siebens. Der Rotor ist mit einer Vielzahl von Erhebungen versehen, die dem Faserstoff Stoßimpulse vermitteln sollen, um z.B. enthaltene Splitter zu zerkleinern.Another document, DE-A-198 36 318, also shows a pressure sorter with a rotor, the effect of which on the relative speed to the surrounding Suspension is based. It contains a large number of depressions in the form e.g. of Ball sections. The device shown in US 3,411,721 combines the Function of grinding with that of sieving. The rotor comes with a variety of Provide surveys that are intended to impart shock impulses to the pulp, e.g. to shred contained fragments.

Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zu Grunde, ein Verfahren zu schaffen, mit dem es gelingt, eine größere Trennwirkung beim Fraktionieren - auch von problematischen Bestandteilen, wie z.B. Langfasern und Stickies - zu erreichen.The invention is based on the object of creating a method with which it succeeds in achieving a greater separation effect when fractionating - even from problematic ones Components such as Long fibers and stickies - to achieve.

Diese Aufgabe wird durch die im Kennzeichen des Anspruchs 1 genannten Merkmale gelöst.This object is achieved by the features mentioned in the characterizing part of claim 1 solved.

Günstige Fraktioniervorrichtungen werden in den Ansprüchen 8 bis 11 beschrieben.Favorable fractionation devices are described in claims 8 to 11.

Während bei den bekannten Verfahren die Räumer dazu dienen, durch wechselnde Druck- und Saugimpulse oder durch Erzeugung von Turbulenzen das Sieb von Verstopfungen freizuhalten, führt das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren zu einer Schleppströmung am Räumer, die sich im wesentlichen parallel zu der Siebfläche in Umfangsrichtung bewegt. Die sich in der Suspension befindenden Fasern werden daher gleichmäßig orientiert und die Trennung auf Grund ihrer Länge und/oder ihrer Flexibilität ist mit einem besseren Effekt möglich. Das gilt besonders bei quer zur Parallelströmung ausgerichteten Sortierspalten. Die Freihaltung der Sieböffnungen wird durch von der Oberflächenstruktur des Siebes im Zusammenwirken mit der Schleppströmung hervorgerufene Mikrowirbel und/oder kleinräumige Turbulenzen erreicht. Auch bei der Aussortierung von empfindlichen, leicht zu zerkleinernden Störstoffen, wie Stickies, ist die erfindungsgemäße schonende Siebfreihaltung günstiger. Um die Schleppströmung zu erzeugen, kann der Räumer aufgerauht, z.B. mit einer Vielzahl von Rillen versehen sein. Auch ein an der Oberfläche aufgelegter Filz kann die Schleppwirkung entfalten.While in the known methods the reamer is used by changing Pressure and suction impulses or by creating turbulence the sieve of To keep blockages free, the inventive method leads to a Drag flow at the scraper, which is essentially parallel to the screen surface Moves circumferentially. The fibers in the suspension are therefore evenly oriented and the separation based on their length and / or their Flexibility is possible with a better effect. This is especially true for across Sorting columns aligned in parallel flow. Keeping the sieve openings clear is due to the surface structure of the sieve in cooperation with the Drag flow caused micro vortices and / or small-scale turbulence reached. Even when sorting out sensitive, easy-to-shred Contaminants such as stickies, the gentle sieve clearance according to the invention is cheaper. To generate the drag flow, the scraper can be roughened, e.g. with a Be provided with a plurality of grooves. Even a felt placed on the surface can Develop a drag effect.

In vielen Fällen sind die Vorteile der Erfindung am besten mit solchen Räumem erzielbar, deren zum Sieb zugewandte Fläche überwiegend stetig ist, die also nicht z.B. eine Anzahl von foils, Flügeln oder bumps (Erhebungen in Kugelabschnittsform) haben. In anderen Fällen kann es von Nutzen sein, einen Kompromiss zu finden zwischen der Trennwirkung und dem Durchsatz. Aus technisch/physikalischen Gründen muss nämlich oft in Kauf genommen werden, dass bei Erzeugung einer reinen Parallelströmung der Durchsatz durch das Sieb reduziert wird im Vergleich zu einem Verfahren aus dem Stand der Technik mit hoher Turbulenz. Es ist dann also abzuwägen zwischen der möglichst gleichgerichteten Parallelströmung oder einer begrenzten Erzeugung von Wirbeln. Schwache Wirbel lassen sich erzeugen, indem z.B. ein Sieb und/oder ein Räumer mit Profilnuten oder Leisten verwendet wird.In many cases, the advantages of the invention are best with such rooms achievable, the surface of which faces the sieve is predominantly continuous, which is not e.g. have a number of foils, wings, or bumps. In other cases it may be useful to find a compromise between the Separation effect and throughput. For technical / physical reasons namely that are often accepted that when generating a pure Parallel flow throughput through the screen is reduced compared to one Prior art methods with high turbulence. It must then be weighed up between the parallel flow which is as rectified as possible or a limited one Generation of vortices. Weak vortices can be created by e.g. a sieve and / or a reamer with profile grooves or strips is used.

Bei den bisher beschriebenen Formen des Verfahrens wurde von einem feststehenden Sieb und einem bewegten Räumer ausgegangen. Auch die kinematische Umkehrung, also bewegtes Sieb und feststehender oder entgegen bewegter Räumer, sind ohne weiteres vorstellbar, um das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren auszuführen.In the forms of the method described so far, a fixed Sieve and a moving scraper. The kinematic reversal, too moving sieve and fixed or counter-moving scraper are easily conceivable to carry out the inventive method.

Die Erfindung und ihre Vorteile werden erläutert an Hand von Zeichnungen.

Fig. 1
schematisch dargestellt: Vorgänge des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens am Siebeinlauf;
Fig. 2
Oberfläche eines erfindungsgemäßen Räumers;
Fig. 3
Beispiel mit einem variierten Sieb;
Fig. 4
Teil eines geeigneten Siebes in Aufsicht;
Fig. 5
Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens, Ansicht von oben;
Fig. 6 + 7
verschiedene als Räumer verwendbare Rotoren;
Fig. 8
Detail eines speziellen Räumers.
The invention and its advantages are explained with reference to drawings.
Fig. 1
shown schematically: processes of the inventive method at the sieve inlet;
Fig. 2
Surface of a scraper according to the invention;
Fig. 3
Example with a varied sieve;
Fig. 4
Part of a suitable sieve under supervision;
Fig. 5
Device for carrying out the method, top view;
Fig. 6 + 7
various rotors that can be used as scrapers;
Fig. 8
Detail of a special scraper.

In der Fig. 1 sind die Verhältnisse dargestellt, die sich bei Durchführung des Verfahrens im Bereich von Sieb 1, Räumer 5 und der dazwischen bewegten papierfaserhaltigen Suspension S abspielen. Wie an sich bekannt, wird die Suspension S durch das Sieb 1 fraktioniert, indem eine Fraktion durch die Sieböffnungen 6 abfließt, während ein anderer Teil abgewiesen wird und letztendlich an einer dafür vorgesehenen Stelle aus der für das Verfahren verwendeten Apparatur entfernt wird. Der Räumer 5 wird im Abstand A vom und relativ zum Sieb 1 in der durch Pfeil dargestellten Bewegungsrichtung 3 bewegt. Da die Oberfläche 8 des Räumers 5 rauh ist, z.B. wie hier dargestellt, mit einer Anzahl von Rillen 7 versehen ist, wird die Suspension nahezu schlupffrei mitgeschleppt, so dass eine Parallelströmung 4 entsteht. Diese Parallelströmung 4 ist nicht streng parallel zu der der Suspension zugewandten Oberfläche des Siebes. Sie wird z.B. in Nähe des Einlaufes in die Sieböffnungen 6 in Richtung zum Sieb 1 umgelenkt. Dennoch ist ihre Ausrichtung ein entscheidender Unterschied zu den sehr unruhigen Wirbelströmungen, die üblicherweise zur Siebräumung erzeugt werden. Insbesondere ist die neue Art der Strömung stationär, d.h. zeitlich konstant, während übliche Räumer zu einer instationären Strömung mit zeitlich schwankender Druckpuls- und Turbulenzintensität führen. Das am rechten Rand dargestellte Geschwindigkeitsprofil mit der Kurve 10 macht die Schleppwirkung des erfindungsgemäß gestalteten Räumers deutlich. In Räumernähe hat die Suspension etwa dieselbe Geschwindigkeit VR wie der Räumer 5 selbst. In Richtung zum Sieb fällt dann die Kurve 10 ab, wobei auch am Sieb 1 noch eine deutliche Parallelkomponente erhalten bleibt. Auf diese Weise entsteht eine Strömung, in der lange Fasern, aber auch Störstoffe etwa parallel zur Siebfläche orientiert werden, sodass sie eine starke Tendenz haben, an der Sortieröffnung abgewiesen zu werden.In Fig. 1, the relationships are shown that occur when performing the method in the area of sieve 1, scraper 5 and the paper fiber-containing moving in between Play suspension S. As is known per se, the suspension S is passed through the sieve 1 fractionated by a fraction flowing through the sieve openings 6, while a other part is rejected and ultimately in a designated place the equipment used for the process is removed. The scraper 5 is in Distance A from and relative to sieve 1 in the direction shown by arrow Movement direction 3 moves. Since the surface 8 of the reamer 5 is rough, e.g. like here shown, provided with a number of grooves 7, the suspension is almost dragged along without slip, so that a parallel flow 4 arises. This Parallel flow 4 is not strictly parallel to that facing the suspension Surface of the sieve. It will e.g. near the inlet to the screen openings 6 in Redirected towards sieve 1. However, their direction is crucial Difference to the very restless eddy currents that are usually used for Sieve clearing are generated. In particular, the new type of flow is stationary, i.e. constant in time, while usual clearers to an unsteady flow with time fluctuating pressure pulse and turbulence intensity. The one on the right speed profile shown with curve 10 makes the towing effect of Clearer designed according to the invention clearly. The suspension has about in the vicinity same speed VR as the scraper 5 itself. Then falls towards the sieve curve 10, with a clear parallel component also on screen 1 preserved. This creates a flow in the long fibers, but also Impurities are oriented approximately parallel to the screen surface, so that they have a strong tendency have to be rejected at the sorting opening.

Fig. 2 zeigt als Detailansicht einen Schnitt durch die Oberfläche eines Räumers 5. Insbesondere sind die zur Bildung der rauhen Oberfläche vorgesehenen Rillen 7 vermaßt. Ihre Breite B an der breitesten Stelle liegt mit Vorteil unter 3 mm und ihre Höhe H bei maximal 2 mm. Je nach Anwendungsfall können auch andere Maße sinnvoll sein. Um einen guten Effekt mit diesem Räumer zu erreichen, sind möglichst viele solcher Rillen unterzubringen, d.h. sie haben an der Fläche 8 einen geringen Abstand C voneinander. Sie können geradlinig parallel sein, es ist aber auch ein Rauten- oder Wellenmuster vorstellbar.2 shows a detail view of a section through the surface of a reamer 5. In particular, the grooves 7 provided to form the rough surface are dimensioned. Their width B at the widest point is advantageously less than 3 mm and theirs Height H at a maximum of 2 mm. Depending on the application, other dimensions can also be useful his. To achieve a good effect with this scraper, as many as possible to accommodate such grooves, i.e. they have a small distance C at surface 8 from each other. They can be straight parallel, but it is also a diamond or Conceivable wave pattern.

Das gemäß Fig. 3 verwendete Sieb 1' hat auf seiner Zulaufseite eine Profilstruktur: Die Oberseiten der Siebstäbe 12 sind gegenüber der Bewegungsrichtung 3 um den Winkel a leicht geneigt, so dass sich am Einlauf in die Sieböffnungen räumlich eng begrenzte Mikrowirbel bilden können. Durch die Neigung bilden sich Vorsprünge über den Siebspalten mit der Höhe E. Es können auch nutartige Vertiefungen mit einer entsprechenden Tiefe in das Sieb eingelassen sein. The sieve 1 'used according to FIG. 3 has a profile structure on its inlet side: The tops of the sieve bars 12 are opposite to the direction of movement 3 Angle a slightly inclined so that it is spatially narrow at the inlet into the sieve openings can form limited micro-vortices. Due to the inclination, protrusions form the sieve columns with the height E. It is also possible to use groove-like depressions with a appropriate depth in the sieve.

Einen Teil eines weiteren Siebes, mit dem das Verfahren durchführbar ist, zeigt die Fig. 4. Die vorgesehene Bewegungsrichtung 3, mit der ein mit diesem Sieb 1 zusammenwirkender nicht gezeigter Räumer bewegt wird, ist ebenfalls eingezeichnet. Das Sieb ist mit einer Vielzahl von Sieböffnungen 6 versehen, welche als enge Schlitze mit einer Schlitzweite D zwischen 0,1 und 0,4 mm, vorzugsweise 0,15 bis 0,25 mm, ausgebildet sind. Ihre Längserstreckung hat gegenüber der Bewegungsrichtung 3 bei dem gezeigten Fall einen Anstellwinkel β von 100°. Im allgemeinen ist er jedoch 90°.FIG. 4 shows part of a further sieve with which the method can be carried out. The intended direction of movement 3, with which a reamer (not shown) which interacts with this sieve 1, is also shown. The sieve is provided with a plurality of sieve openings 6, which are designed as narrow slots with a slot width D between 0.1 and 0.4 mm, preferably 0.15 to 0.25 mm. Their longitudinal extent has an angle of attack β of 100 ° with respect to the direction of movement 3 in the case shown. In general, however, it is 90 °.

Fig. 5 zeigt schematisch eine Fraktioniervorrichtung in Ansicht von oben. Sie enthält ein Gehäuse 13 mit teilweise gezeichnetem Deckel 14. Das Sieb 1 ist als zylindrischer Siebkorb, und der Räumer 5 ist als zylindrischer Rotor ausgebildet. Die rauhe Oberfläche 8 ist als dicke Kreislinie angedeutet. Die Suspension strömt durch den Einlauf 15 zwischen Sieb 1 und Rotor. Der Siebdurchlauf wird durch den Feinfraktionsauslauf 16 und der Siebüberlauf durch den Grobfraktionsauslauf 17 abgeführt. In Spezialfällen können auch mehr als diese beiden Fraktionen gebildet werden, z.B. mehrere Feinfraktionen mit Hilfe von unterschiedlich ausgestalteten Sieböffnungen. Sieb und Rotor sind konzentrisch zueinander angeordnet, es sind aber auch andere Ausführungsformen denkbar.Fig. 5 shows schematically a fractionation device in a view from above. It contains a housing 13 with a partially drawn cover 14. The sieve 1 is cylindrical Sieve basket, and the reamer 5 is designed as a cylindrical rotor. The rough one Surface 8 is indicated as a thick circular line. The suspension flows through the Inlet 15 between screen 1 and rotor. The sieve pass is through the Fine fraction outlet 16 and the sieve overflow through the coarse fraction outlet 17 dissipated. In special cases, more than these two fractions can be formed e.g. several fine fractions with the help of differently designed Screen openings. Sieve and rotor are arranged concentrically to each other, but they are other embodiments are also conceivable.

Fig. 6 zeigt in geometrischer Darstellung einen als kreiszylindrischer Rotor ausgebildeten Räumer 5 mit im wesentlichen achsparallelen Rillen 7. Eine solche Form, konzentrisch in einem kreiszylindrischen Sieb eingesetzt, hat eine sehr schonende Wirkung, d.h. erzeugt keine nennenswerten Druck-/Saug-Impulse.Fig. 6 shows a geometric representation of a circular cylindrical rotor trained reamer 5 with substantially axially parallel grooves 7. Such a shape, inserted concentrically in a circular cylindrical sieve, has a very gentle Effect, i.e. generates no significant pressure / suction impulses.

Falls, z.B. um den Durchsatz am Sieb zu erhöhen, mit dem Räumer wenigstens schwache Druck-/Saug-Impulse erzeugt werden sollen, kann dieser gemäß Fig. 7 mit Profilleisten 18 versehen werden. Diese können auch die Erzeugung der Parallelströmung unterstützen, z.B. mit Hilfe einer steilen Vorderkante.If, e.g. in order to increase the throughput at the sieve, at least weak with the scraper According to FIG. 7, pressure / suction pulses are to be generated with Profile strips 18 are provided. These can also generate the Support parallel flow, e.g. with the help of a steep leading edge.

Um den gewünschten Effekt der Erfindung nicht zu beeinträchtigen, sollten die Profilleisten 18 nur eine geringe Höhe F (Fig. 8) aufweisen. Ihre Anzahl kann auch gering sein, z.B. zwei bis fünf auf den Umfang verteilt.In order not to impair the desired effect of the invention, the Profile strips 18 have only a small height F (Fig. 8). Your number can too be small, e.g. two to five spread over the circumference.

Claims (11)

  1. Method for fractionating a paper fibre-containing suspension, in which the suspension (S) is divided by a wire (1, 1') into at least two fibre fractions, a clearer (5), which is movable relative to the latter, being used to keep the wire clear,
    characterised in that
    a parallel flow (4) is produced by means of a rough surface (8) of the clearer (5) on the inflow side (2) of the wire (1, 1'),
    a clearer (5) being used which is provided on its surface (8) with a multiplicity of oblong recesses, preferably grooves (7), or with a felt-like, readily wettable layer, and
    the suspension (S) being entrained by the clearer (5) virtually without slippage, said suspension being moved in the contact region extending up to one millimetre from the surface of the clearer (5) at at least 90% of the clearer speed.
  2. Method according to claim 1,
    characterised in that
    the clearer (5) is moved along at a spacing (A) of at most 20 mm on the inflow side (2) of the wire (1, 1').
  3. Method according to claim 1 or 2,
    characterised in that
    the clearer (5) is moved at a speed of at least 10 m/s relative to the wire (1, 1').
  4. Method according to claim 3,
    characterised in that
    the clearer (5) is moved at a speed of at least 20 m/s relative to the wire (1, 1').
  5. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
    characterised in that
    the clearer (5) produces no pressure or suction pulses towards the wire (1, 1').
  6. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
    characterised in that
    fractionation takes place with a wire (1, 1'), the wire openings (6) of which are oblong, with a longitudinal extension which is at an angle of incidence (β) between 70° and 110° relative to the direction of movement (3) of the clearer (5).
  7. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
    characterised in that
    fractionation takes place with a wire (1, 1') on which, by means of projections or recesses, spatially limited turbulences are produced in cooperation with the parallel flow (4).
  8. Device for implementation of the method according to one of the preceding claims, having a housing (13), in which at least one wire (1, 1') is located, on which a clearer (5) can be moved along on the inflow side in order to prevent blockage of the wire openings (6) of the wire (1, 1'),
    characterised in that
    the clearer (5) has a closed, rough surface (8) which is formed by a layer of felt.
  9. Device according to claim 8,
    characterised in that
    the wire (1') is provided with projections or recesses of at most 2 mm height or respectively depth.
  10. Device according to claim 8 or 9,
    characterised in that
    the wire (1, 1') is a cylindrical wire in which a cylindrical rotor is disposed rotatably as clearer (5).
  11. Device according to claim 10,
    characterised in that
    the wire basket and rotor are concentric.
EP00121414A 1999-10-27 2000-09-29 Method and device for fractionating a paper fibre suspension Revoked EP1096063B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19951711 1999-10-27
DE19951711A DE19951711A1 (en) 1999-10-27 1999-10-27 Method and device for fractionating a suspension containing paper fibers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1096063A1 EP1096063A1 (en) 2001-05-02
EP1096063B1 true EP1096063B1 (en) 2004-08-11

Family

ID=7927027

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00121414A Revoked EP1096063B1 (en) 1999-10-27 2000-09-29 Method and device for fractionating a paper fibre suspension

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6409023B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1096063B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE273415T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2324338A1 (en)
DE (2) DE19951711A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007029805A1 (en) 2007-06-27 2009-01-02 Voith Patent Gmbh Process for producing multi-ply cardboard or wrapping paper from waste paper
DE102007029806A1 (en) 2007-06-27 2009-01-02 Voith Patent Gmbh Process for the treatment of waste paper
CN114932652B (en) * 2022-04-11 2024-09-27 青岛天物金佰包装制品有限公司 Curing equipment for fully curing EPS foam

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3411721A (en) * 1966-09-02 1968-11-19 Ingersoll Rand Canada Refining and screening apparatus
FI77279C (en) * 1987-04-30 1989-02-10 Ahlstroem Oy FOERFARANDE OCH ANORDNING FOER BEHANDLING AV FIBERSUSPENSION.
KR890701835A (en) * 1987-06-26 1989-12-21 스벤 웨스터홀름, 카제 헨릭슨 Pulp Screening Apparatus and Screening Method of Pulp Suspension
FI92227C (en) * 1992-04-23 1994-10-10 Ahlstroem Oy Apparatus for processing the fiber suspension
US5307939A (en) * 1992-07-13 1994-05-03 Ingersoll-Rand Company Screening apparatus for papermaking pulp
US5385240A (en) * 1993-04-30 1995-01-31 The Black Clawson Company Screening apparatus with adjustable hydrofoil portion
DE19836318A1 (en) * 1998-08-11 1999-07-15 Voith Sulzer Papiertech Patent Rotor for fiber suspension pressure sorter for papermaking

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE19951711A1 (en) 2001-05-03
ATE273415T1 (en) 2004-08-15
US6409023B1 (en) 2002-06-25
DE50007359D1 (en) 2004-09-16
EP1096063A1 (en) 2001-05-02
CA2324338A1 (en) 2001-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69424661T2 (en) SCREENING DEVICE FOR PAPER-FREE
DE69610078T2 (en) SCREEN WITH INCLINED SLOTS FOR USE IN A CONTINUOUS DIGESTOR
DE3686950T2 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING BODIES FROM A LIQUID.
EP1059377B1 (en) Suction device for a textile machine, in particular for a hydroentangling machine
EP1036879B1 (en) Pressure screen for fibre suspensions and a cleaning rotor for such a screen
EP1096063B1 (en) Method and device for fractionating a paper fibre suspension
DE69511772T2 (en) Disc filter feed device
EP1799903A1 (en) Method for fractionating an aqueous paper fibre suspension and hydrocyclone for carrying out said method
DE69103602T3 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING A FIBER SUSPENSION.
DE69808945T2 (en) Squeegee arrangement for a fiber screening device
DE2018510A1 (en) Method and apparatus for fractionating wood pulp or the like
EP1884588A2 (en) Cleaning device
DE3025270A1 (en) DEVICE FOR CLEANING AND REPROCESSING PAPER PULP OR PAPER PAPER
DE4006633A1 (en) Fibre suspension sieve - has projecting blades at mantle with downwards angled ends to give two fractions without clogging
AT514845A1 (en) Rotor element and rotor for a screening device
DE202011108856U1 (en) scree
EP1039021B1 (en) Method for wet screening fibrous suspensions in pressure screens and pressure screen
DE19805448C2 (en) Method and device for cleaning and feeding a paper stock suspension into the headbox of a paper machine
DE10112478A1 (en) Paper fibres lifted from grading sieve by relative motion between grooved wing profile and sieve surface
DE2355768C2 (en) Sieving device for sorting suspensions
DE19736127A1 (en) Fiber suspension sorting sieve
DE1442501A1 (en) Process for separating foreign bodies from a fluid medium by means of a cyclone and a cyclone for carrying out the process
DE3831845A1 (en) SORTING DEVICE FOR FIBER SUSPENSIONS
DE2847109B2 (en) Device for scattering a fleece
EP2893078B1 (en) Fibre sorting system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT DE FI FR GB SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011102

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT DE FI FR GB SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20031016

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT DE FI FR GB SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20040811

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50007359

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040916

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

ET Fr: translation filed
PLAQ Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to despatch of communication + time limit deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE2

PLAR Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to receipt of reply deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE4

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAQ Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to despatch of communication + time limit deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE2

PLAR Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to receipt of reply deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE4

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES (AFT) OY

Effective date: 20050509

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES (AFT) OY

Effective date: 20050509

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20050823

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20050912

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20050914

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20050915

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20050919

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20050919

Year of fee payment: 6

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20051106

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 20051106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC