EP0617727A1

EP0617727A1 - Process for glueing two non-metallic substrates by means of an adhesive

Info

Publication number: EP0617727A1
Application number: EP93917511A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Tatjana Berce; Michel Kornmann; Jacques Vermot-Gaud; Guy Negaty-Hindi
Original assignee: Battelle Memorial Institute Inc
Current assignee: Battelle Memorial Institute Inc
Priority date: 1992-08-24
Filing date: 1993-08-17
Publication date: 1994-10-05
Also published as: JPH07500629A; CH685942A5; US5447592A; WO1994004623A1

Abstract

Ce procédé de collage consiste à répartir des charges ferromagnétiques dans un adhésif voire dans le substrat et à les chauffer par induction dans un champ magnétique compris entre 10 kHz et 1 MHz. On choisit soit un matériau à résistivité comprise entre et 108 ohm . m avec un champ coercitif <60 A/m un champ magnétique induit <1000 mT et une taille de particules de 1500 à 100.000 mum3 soit un matériau à résistivité comprise entre 10 et 108 ohm . m avec un champ coercitif entre 60 et 12.000 A/m, un champ magnétique induit entre 1000 et 10.000 mT et une taille de particules entre 1 et 1500 mum3 de sorte que l'addition des pertes par courant de Foucault et par hystérésis permette de produire une puissance de 1000 à 10.000 W/cm3 de ces charges. On limite la température de chauffage aux environs de la température maximum de polymérisation de l'adhésif en fixant la durée à <40s pour que la température à l'interface corresponde au moins à la température minimum de polymérisation.This bonding process consists in distributing ferromagnetic charges in an adhesive or even in the substrate and in heating them by induction in a magnetic field between 10 kHz and 1 MHz. We choose either a material with resistivity between and 108 ohm. m with a coercive field <60 A / m an induced magnetic field <1000 mT and a particle size of 1500 to 100,000 mum3 is a material with resistivity between 10 and 108 ohm. m with a coercive field between 60 and 12,000 A / m, an induced magnetic field between 1,000 and 10,000 mT and a particle size between 1 and 1,500 mum3 so that the addition of the eddy current and hysteresis losses makes it possible to produce a power of 1000 to 10,000 W / cm3 of these loads. The heating temperature is limited to around the maximum polymerization temperature of the adhesive by setting the time at <40 s so that the temperature at the interface corresponds at least to the minimum polymerization temperature.

Description

PROCESS FOR BONDING TWO NON-METALLIC SUBSTRATES

USING ADHESIVE

The present invention relates to a process for bonding two non-metallic substrates using a heat-curing resin.

It has already been proposed to add ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic fillers to hot polymerizable resins to heat them by induction.

For such a heating process to be of economic interest compared to heating in an oven in which the resin substrate assembly is gradually brought to the upper resin polymerization temperature, this heating must allow to bring into a time less than one minute the entire mass of resin and especially the resin substrate interface at the polymerization temperature, the temperature of the latter not falling below the lower polymerization limit. This heating time must not involve very high frequencies, the use of which on an industrial scale poses too many problems, both with regard to the installation and to safety; it must not involve too large proportions of fillers under penalty of damaging the mechanical properties of the resin. Given the low thermal conductivity of both the resin and the substrate to be bonded, the temperature of the particles heated by induction must not significantly exceed the upper polymerization temperature, otherwise the resin will burn in contact with the particles. This means that the temperature rise of the particles must be relatively slow to allow the diffusion of heat towards the resin and the substrate. Heating is interrupted as soon as the upper polymerization temperature is reached. If this temperature rise is too rapid, it must also be interrupted as soon as the upper polymerization temperature is reached to allow the heat to diffuse but then reapply the alternating induction field until the energy necessary for the polymerization is transmitted.

It is known that the thermal energy generated by induction in a magnetic field can be the result of three types of losses, the losses by eddy current which increase with the dimensions of the conductive element, and are all the more high that the resistivity is low, the losses by hysteresis which are almost independent of the size, but dependent on the shape of the ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic particles and which are more important than the losses by eddy current when it is a question of fine particles , and residual losses which involve phenomena such as dielectric losses or "magnetic viscosity" which represent a significant part of the losses in the case of ferrites. The eddy current and hysteresis losses increase with the square of the frequency and the frequency respectively.

In the case of the heating of a resin by incorporation of charges capable of heating by induction, according to the state of the art, we have already been concerned with losses by hysteresis and we have sought for this purpose the particles capable of mounting the faster in temperature thanks to these losses.

Such is in particular the teaching which emerges from EP-A2- 403276 in which we sought particles having high coercive magnetic fields associated with magnetic induction fields of 1 to 15 times the coercive force of the heating particles. This leads to choosing very fine particles <1μm with very high resistivities in high concentration and to applying magnetic fields which can go up to 480 kA / m. No information is given on the mechanical properties obtained when this process is used to bond two non-metallic substrates using a resin heated by induction.

US 5,075,034 relates to a solution according to which conductive carbon black is combined with ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic particles in an adhesive composition. The aim of carbon black is to lower the volume resistivity of the adhesive mixture to allow rapid induction heating at relatively low frequency, probably by eddy current. This solution leads to putting a relatively large proportion of solid matter in the resin, capable of damaging its bonding properties. e

The aim of the present invention is to show that it is possible to work at frequencies below 250 kHz, to poly erise or prepolymerize the resin in less than 60 s with a shear strength> 50 56 of the bond strength by oven polishing using a small proportion of ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic charges.

To this end, the subject of this invention is a process for bonding two non-metallic substrates using a heat-polymerizable resin according to claim 1.

The advantage of the present invention is to make it possible to obtain results equivalent to, or even superior to, those obtained according to the state of the art without having the above-mentioned disadvantages. It will be seen in the following description that the choice of parameters according to the invention allows good transmission of energy to the resin and to the resin-substrate interface without the duration exceeding the time set according to industrial requirements. .

This invention highlights several factors which do not seem to have received attention so far, namely:

the uselessness or even the disadvantage of having too rapid heating of the ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic charges in an environment having a low thermal conductivity,

- the need to heat not only the resin but also the substrate resin interface, that is to say at least part of the substrate, without which one can have a perfectly polymerized resin in the middle of the joint and negligible shear strength ,

- the possibility of having few charges without having very high coercive field and maximum induction values, despite the frequencies to which the process is limited for industrial requirements,

- the fact that it is not necessary to choose ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic particles solely according to the losses by hysteresis, but that the other losses by eddy current and residual allow to obtain the desired energy even if the losses by hysteresis are not optimal.

All of these reflections led to the choice of parameters for the bonding process which is the subject of the invention.

Other advantages of this invention will appear in the following description, as well as in the examples which accompany it.

To carry out the tests, an induction coil 40 mm long was used comprising 6 oval turns of 20 x 30 mm supplied by a generator of 6 kW and 200 kHz, voltage regulated.

The samples to be bonded consist of two substrates 25 mm wide and 3 mm thick overlapping 25 mm and the space provided between the substrates for the adhesive is 2 mm. In the case of composite glass fiber polyester substrates molded into a sheet known under the sign SMC (sheet molding compound), the adhesive used is either of the polyurethane type or of the one-component epoxy type.

Other hot-polymerizable adhesives can be used depending on the nature of the substrate. The fillers are always added to the resin. However, they can also be placed in the substrates to be bonded to reduce the temperature difference between the middle of the joint and the substrate and guarantee a sufficient polymerization temperature at the substrate-adhesive interface. Tests have shown that it is not essential, but that it can be useful. When the thickness of the adhesive is very small, in particular of the order of 0.1 mm, the charges can be placed either in the substrate, in the adhesive, or in both, but the latter alternative is not not very useful given the small thickness of adhesive to be heated, it can be heated with such a thickness, both from the inside and from the outside.

According to a variant, one can also imagine in the case of a composite substrate reinforced with glass fibers, to simply replace the glass fibers with fibers of ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic materials obtained in particularly by an extraction technique from the molten material. In addition to the reinforcing effect of the resin comparable to that of glass fibers, these fibers are capable of heating by induction and can be sized and / or the composition suitable for exhibiting resin heating properties comparable to other types of fillers. .

On this subject it should be noted that the shape of the charges has an important influence on the demagnetization factor and therefore on the real magnetic field inside the material and that this influence increases with the increase in the relative permeability μ _r of the material. . Thus the magnetic field and magnetic induction (B) inside a well oriented fiber are larger than inside a spherical or flat portion particle.

If we now examine the parameters influencing the different losses when the charges are subjected to a magnetic field, let us recall that the eddy current losses are proportional to the squares of the amplitude of the induced magnetic field B _m , of the size D of the particles and of the frequency f and inversely proportional to the resistivity, f of these particles. These losses are therefore appreciable for relatively large particles (50 - 100 μm typically) with a resistivity <10 ^* 10 ~ ⁸ ohm "m and the amplitude of induction B _Q > 0.01 Tesla. It should also be noted that this is only valid when the skin effect is negligible, that is to say when its depth is greater than the radius of the particle. As an indication, at 200 kHz this depth is 0.14 mm for iron.

For hysteresis losses, remember that when a magnetic material is subjected to an alternating field, induction B describes a hysteresis loop as a function of the field. The surface of this loop is roughly equal to 4 B _m ITlα _QV X H_ where B _m fUC _α - _v Λ is the maximum induction in Tesla and H___ is the coercive field in A / m. This surface is an energy per unit of volume (J / m ³ ). When the hysteresis loop is completely traversed, that is to say when the maximum excitation field is greater than the coercive field H _c , the energy dissipated is equal to this area. The dissipated power is proportional to the frequency which corresponds to the number of times that the hysteresis loop is traversed per unit of time.

Apart from the skin effect which must be greater than the radius of the particles, the size of these particles has no influence on the losses by hysteresis when H _c is constant.

On the other hand, the shape of the particles has a great importance on these losses by hysteresis due to the influence of this shape on the real magnetic field inside the particles as explained above. Taking into account the demagnetization factor with spherical particles, the magnetic permeability is limited to 3, while with acicular particles typically having a length-width ratio of 10, the demagnetization factor decreases and the effective permeability is typically between 30 and 50 for μ _r equal to 100, respectively 1000. Consequently, the value of the maximum induction field B _maχ is 10 times higher for acicular particles with a width-length ratio of 10 having a relative permeability μ _r > 100 only for spherical particles.

To heat the adhesive composition to its polymerization temperature, a power is required which takes into account the volume to be heated, the density of the resin, its specific heat, the temperature for polyerizing it, the thermal yield taking into account the losses in the substrate and heating time. This power for the above tests is of the order of 8 - 20 W per joint. To select the loads to add to the adhesive, it is important to determine the specific powers relative to the weight of adhesive loaded or the weight of loads. The specific power relative to the weight of adhesive loaded varies from 9.6 W per gram of adhesive to 4.8 W / g depending on whether the thermal efficiency is 50% or 100%. The specific power for loads varies from 1000 to 10000 W per cm ³ of loads depending on the yields and the concentrations of loads.

For efficient heating of the adhesive which is a medium with low thermal conductivity, it is important that the particles are not too large, that is to say that they have a high exchange surface relative to their volume otherwise the heat of the particles increases rapidly and i There is a risk of burning the adhesive in contact with these particles before the mass of the adhesive reaches the polymerization temperature.

The geometry of the samples used during the tests has already been indicated above. The following examples were carried out under the following conditions: before applying the adhesive, the surfaces of the substrates to be bonded were cleaned with trichloroethane. The adhesive of the polyurethane type is Togocoll FPM 500/24566, FMP 500/90096 from EMS Togo CH-8590 Romanshorn. These are adhesives whose polymerization temperature ranges from 90 "to 120 ^* C. The epoxy, 1C component used is Naftotec 1361 from Chemetal1 whose polymerization temperature ranges from 120 to 140 ° C. .

The samples were obtained by mixing the fillers in the adhesive until the dispersion was homogeneous. The adhesive was then applied to one of the substrates which was then placed on a template intended to obtain assemblies of reproducible substrates, then the second substrate was placed on the template and pressed so that the spacing of approximately 2 mm between the substrates is formed thanks to the template. The adhesive that protrudes from the surface of the substrates is removed.

As indicated, the losses of the charges subjected to the magnetic field of given amplitude and frequency depend on the nature of the material, the concentration, the dimension and the shape of the particles.

Under these conditions, certain charges were used as delivered. Others have been sieved beforehand. Finally, ceramic materials are not available in powder form, so they were ground in a ball mill and sieved to keep only particles <45 μm.

Adhesive samples of different charge concentrations were prepared to determine the concentration load capable of obtaining the desired temperature in <45 s.

For securing the heating time, it was observed evolution of smoke release which occurs above 130 ° C and the measured heating time, then gradually reduced this time to reach 120 ^° C.

The temperature measurement was carried out using a thermocouple. Since this heats up in an alternating magnetic field, the measurement was made when the magnetic field was stopped.

The rise in temperature in the adhesive is almost linear over time. The higher the supply voltage of the inductor, the shorter the heating time.

The distribution of the temperature in the adhesive bond may not be uniform in the event of poor dispersion of the charges as well as in the presence of agglomerates, so that certain zones could be overheated and others not sufficiently polymerized. The risk of forming agglomerates is manifested in particular for particles <5 μm. The more the adhesive has a low thermal conductivity, the more important it is not to mix particles of too different sizes which do not heat and cool in the same way, so that the adhesive is not polymerized uniformly.

It has been found that the shorter the temperature rise time, the more the cooling is. This means that the total energy transmitted to the adhesive, represented by the surface formed by the heating-cooling curve as a function of time, is lower when the temperature rise is rapid than when it is slower.

This shows that it is not necessarily desirable to choose charges with the greatest hysteresis losses and to apply a very high magnetic field to them, as previously believed. Consequently, metallic materials having a resistivity lower than ferrites and low or even very low hysteresis losses, such as iron, are not necessarily devoid of interest, as will be seen in the examples. Taking into account that the eddy current losses are lower with fine particles, it is recommended in this case to increase the particle size between 75 and 150 μm, an area in which the eddy current losses become significant.

With rapidly heating particles, the maximum polymerization temperature is reached quickly. Since the energy transmitted to the adhesive and substrate is insufficient, it is then necessary to re-heat the charges as soon as the temperature has dropped by a certain value, without allowing it to cool to room temperature for do not stop the polymerization reaction. This reheating obtained by re-feeding the induction coil can be repeated until the energy transmitted to the adhesive and to the substrate is sufficient to obtain a polymerization giving a joint resistance> 50% of the resistance resulting from oven polymerization.

There is a third way to limit the heating power while guaranteeing the production of the necessary energy over a period <45 s, this means consists in choosing particles whose Curie point is slightly higher than the maximum polymerization temperature of the adhesive, so that even if the temperature rises quickly, there is no risk of the adhesive overheating, so it suffices to adjust the heating time to the energy required.

Example 1

10% by weight of magnetite was added from Norsk Hydro in the above mentioned adhesive FPM 500/24566. The average particle size was of the order of 10 μm and the magnetic field of induction of the order of 60.4 kA / m (supply voltage 5kV). The heating time for heating the adhesive to 120 ^° C and the temperature of the substrate close to the adhesive does not drop below 90 ^° G, lower limit of polymerization, is 30 s. The shear strength is 60% of the resistance obtained by heating in an oven is 60%. The coercive field of particles at room temperature is 12000 A / m and the maximum induction Bs of 800 mT. The resistivity of the material whose particles are made is 10 ~ ⁴ Ohm • m.

Example 2

Norsk Hydro magnetite was used in the form of fibers obtained by extraction from the molten material and having an L / D ratio of 50 with a diameter of

20 μm. By applying the same field as in Example 1 and with the same proportion of 5 SE by weight, the heating time is 15 s.

Example 3

Cerac magnetite with spherical grains of uniform size of the order of 3 μm with a purity of 99.5%. With a concentration of 5% by weight and a magnetic field of 60.4 kA / m heating time at 120 ^° C is 25s. It goes down to 15s with a field of 65.6 kA / m and to 8s with 10% by weight and the same field of 65.6 kA / m. The resistance of the bond to shear is in the first two cases, of the order of 75% of the resistance obtained by heating in an oven. The magnetic and electrical properties of the pigment are the same as those of Example 1.

Example 4

Ferrite FeMnZn from TDK, type PQ 32. This ferrite was first crushed and sieved to obtain a particle size <45 μm. The resistivity of the material is 6.5 Ohm m, the coercive field Hc at room temperature is 14 A / m and the maximum induction Bs is 510 mT. The adhesive used is of the FPM 90096 type, the proportion of fillers by weight is 10%, the applied field 65.6 kA / m. The time to reach 120 ° C is 28 s and the shear strength compared to the resistance by heating in an oven is 84%.

Example 5

We used a FeMnZn ferrite from Philips type 3B1, having a resistivity of 0.2 Ohm • m a coercive field of 30 A / m a maximum induction Bs of 400 mT, with a Curie point of the order of 160 ^* C These particles have a size of around 20 μm. These fillers were added to one of the components of an epoxy resin to a component Naftotec 1361 from Chemetall in an amount re .0% by weight of the final mixture. These components were then mixed. It is a resin whose upper point ιe polymerization is 160 ° C. To reach 120 ° C, the heating time in a field of 65.6 kA / m is 25 s. Was reached 148 ° C after 45s, 60s after 158'C and 160 ^° C after 1 min 30s. This shows that the choice of materials for the fillers having a Curie point close to the adhesive polymerization temperature makes it possible to automatically limit the temperature without risk of overheating.

Example 6

We took Hoganas iron particles type NC 100.24 elongated with a length-width ratio 3, of a spongy structure of a dimension at least 74 μm smaller with a resistivity of 10 ^" 'Ohm" m maximum induction of 1000 mT, a coercive field Hc of 10 A / m. These particles mainly produce eddy current losses, hence their relatively large size. They were mixed at 20% by weight in a Togocoll type adhesive. With a field of 60.4 kA / m the heating time at 120 "C with the temperature at the interface with the substrate not falling below 90 ^* C is 20s. The resistance obtained is 51.5% of the resistance obtained by heating in an oven.

Example 7

In this example, stainless steel fibers from Bekaert * ^R 'are used as fillers in a proportion of 2.5% by weight. Their resistivity is 74-10 ^-8 Ohm "m, the coercive field of 20 A / m, the residual induction of 0.9 mT, and the fiber size of 2000/8 μm. The applied field is 56 kA / m. The heating time at 120 ^° C is 26s and the bonding strength is 55%. Example 8

We mix 5% of Novamet nickel flakes of 25 x 0.4 μm with a resistivity of 10 ~ ⁷ Ohm • m a coercive field of 10 A / m, an induction of 700 T. With an applied magnetic field of 65, 4 kA / m the heating time to reach 120'C is 20 s with 5 * by weight of charges and 12 s with 10% by weight. The shear strength of the bond is 60% compared to the oven polymerization.

Example 9

Nickel was used in the form of sponge particles of Sheritt Gordon of a dimension <30 μm in a proportion of 10% by weight. With an applied magnetic field of 65.4 kA / m heating time at 120 ^° C is 22s and the shear strength of the binding is 68% of that obtained by polymerization in the oven.

Example 10

As mentioned above, if the temperature rise is too rapid to supply the necessary energy, the heating can be repeated after a certain cooling.

The magnetite of Example 1 was taken up in a proportion of 5% by weight, it was heated in a magnetic field of 60.4 kA / m for 30 s to reach 120 ° C. it was allowed to cool for less than 60 s and reheated for 15s. The shear strength of the bond is 80%.

. Example 11 The Ni flakes from Novamet from Example 9 were used in the same proportion. After the first heating of 20s, it is allowed to cool to around 100 ° C for less than 30s and it is reheated for 10s. The shear strength obtained is then 82%.

Example 12

In this example, it is a question of making a laminate by gluing two sheets of paper 20 μm thick each. of which being coated with a layer of polyethylene 35 μm thick, the paper contains 2% by weight of Cerac magnetite as in Example 3. The magnetic field applied is 60.4 kA / m. The temperature of the polyethylene rose to 90 ° C. in 10 seconds. The peel strength was 3.5 N / 15 mm at a peel speed of 127 mm / min.

Example 13

As in Example 13, it involves sticking two sheets of paper. In this case, 1% by weight of Cerac magnetite is mixed with the polyethylene and the paper is coated by extrusion at 280 ° C. and on an aluminum-paper composite. Two pieces of these sheets thus covered are joined by their faces coated with charged polyethylene and are subjected to a magnetic field of 57.6 kA / m. After 5s the pieces are glued. Immediately after the peel resistance test is carried out and gives about 2.5 N / 15 mm at a peeling speed of 127 mm / min.

Example 14

This example relates to the bonding of SMC type substrates in which the substrate is loaded with ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic particles or fibers so that the substrate heats up at the same time as the adhesive, which makes it possible to reduce the temperature gradient.

A sheet 4 mm thick is produced by adding 2.5% by weight of fiber magnetite obtained by extraction from the molten material (ratio L / D = 100 and D = 50 μ) in an epoxy adhesive with two components polymerized at 180 ° C in the oven. Two pieces intended to be glued by overlap as explained above are cut. Between them, as in the previous examples, a one-component epoxy adhesive is placed in which 7.5% by weight of ferrite from Example 4 has been added and a 3 mm thick joint is formed between the SMC sheets. 'We heat with a magnetic field of 49.6 kA / m. After 15s the substrate temperature is 90 ^° C and the adhesive of the 140 ^* C. The shear strength is 80% of the resistance oven polymerization.

The change of substrate and adhesive makes it possible to reduce the heating time, to increase the resistance of the bonding and the charges of the substrate can serve at the same time to reinforce it when they are in the form of fibers.

Claims

1. A method neck ^"age of two non-metallic substrates using an adhesive. ^ Lymérisable hot, the thermal conductivity of the substrates. T of the adhesive being <0.9 ^w / M'c that are distributed in , s 1 and 20% by weight of charges of ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic materials in at least one of the elements, adhesive substrates and which the assembly is subjected to a magnetic field of a frequency between 10 kHz and 1 MHz for heat the charges by induction, characterized in that one chooses either a material with resistivity between 10 and 10 ^{~ 8} ohm • m with a coercive field <60 A / m an induced magnetic field <1000 mT and a particle size of 1500 to 100,000 μm ^3, ie a material with a resistivity between 10 and 10 ⁸ ohm-m with a coercive field between 60 and 12,000 A / m, an induced magnetic field between 1000 and 10,000 mT and a particle size between 1 and 1500 μm ³ so that the addition of the losses by current of Fo ucault and by hysteresis makes it possible to produce a power of 1000 to 10,000 W / cm ^{3 of} said charges, and in that the heating temperature is limited to around the maximum polymerization temperature of the adhesive by setting the duration at <60 s , preferably <40 s, so that the energy thus produced heats the adhesive and that the temperature at the adhesive-substrate interface corresponds at least to the minimum polymerization temperature in order to obtain a shear strength> 50% of the resistance of bonding of substrates when the adhesive is polymerized in the oven.

2. Bonding method according to claim 1, characterized in that one chooses particles in needle-like form in particular in the form of fibers.

3. The bonding method according to claim 1, characterized in that a coercive magnetic field of between 10 and 100 kA / m is applied.

4. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that for the ferromagnetic metallic charges one chooses the resistivity <10 ^{~ 6} Ohm • m.

5. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that that charges are chosen in the form of flakes, one of the dimensions of which does not exceed 30 μm.

6. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the particles are chosen in the form of fibers.

7. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that particles are chosen.

8. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the heating temperature is limited by choosing fillers whose Curie point is close to the maximum polymerization temperature.

9. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that it heats up to the upper polymerization temperature of the adhesive, it is allowed to cool to about the lower polymerization temperature and it is reheated at least a second time. up to the upper polymerization temperature.