[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0364067B1 - High-carbonate automatic dishwashing detergent with decreased calcium salt deposition - Google Patents

High-carbonate automatic dishwashing detergent with decreased calcium salt deposition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0364067B1
EP0364067B1 EP89305572A EP89305572A EP0364067B1 EP 0364067 B1 EP0364067 B1 EP 0364067B1 EP 89305572 A EP89305572 A EP 89305572A EP 89305572 A EP89305572 A EP 89305572A EP 0364067 B1 EP0364067 B1 EP 0364067B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
acid
alkali
composition
group
carbonate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89305572A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0364067A2 (en
EP0364067A3 (en
Inventor
William L. Smith
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Clorox Co
Original Assignee
Clorox Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Clorox Co filed Critical Clorox Co
Publication of EP0364067A2 publication Critical patent/EP0364067A2/en
Publication of EP0364067A3 publication Critical patent/EP0364067A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0364067B1 publication Critical patent/EP0364067B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/08Silicates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/10Carbonates ; Bicarbonates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3746Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3757(Co)polymerised carboxylic acids, -anhydrides, -esters in solid and liquid compositions
    • C11D3/3761(Co)polymerised carboxylic acids, -anhydrides, -esters in solid and liquid compositions in solid compositions

Definitions

  • the invention relates to machine ware washing compositions, and particularly to such compositions having high levels of alkali-metal carbonate as the sole builder.
  • ADWDs Automatic dishwashing detergents
  • Surfactants may be present for detergency and/or as rinse aids.
  • Silicates act to provide alkalinity and to prevent corrosion. Bleaches are often included for oxidizing power.
  • Abrasives may be included to provide scouring action.
  • Builders are important to improve washing performance, and must be selected to avoid precipitation of calcium salts on wares. Typically, silicates, carbonates, phosphates or mixtures thereof are employed as builders.
  • the builder materials may provide alkalinity and buffering capacity, prevent flocculation, maintain ionic strength, extract metals from soils and remove alkaline-earth metal ions from washing solutions.
  • Phosphates are extremely effective in these applications, however, there is a relatively high cost associated with their use. Additionally, phosphates are disfavored owing to their eutrophication effect on lakes and streams, and may be regulated in some states. Silicates are not preferred as the sole, or primary builder because they are costly, and at the generally high levels required, are potentially toxic.
  • Schroeder discloses a granular ADWD with 50-70% sodium carbonate, a poly (alpha-hydroxy acrylic acid), phosphonate threshold inhibitors and alkyl phosphate esters.
  • Becker et al, GB 1536136 describes a laundry detergent including a phosphonic or polyacrylic acid sequestrant, a protective colloid and a maximum of 30% phosphate builder, with an optional carbonate builder.
  • Unsubstituted polyacrylic acids used with 20-60% sodium carbonate are described in US 3579455 issued to Sabatelli and US 3627686 issued to Brungs .
  • Brungs and Sabatelli use relatively high levels of NTA and hexametaphosphate, respectively, to complex calcium Sabatelli includes pyrophosphate as part of the complexing system US 4539144, to de Ridder et al describes ADWDs with no or low phosphates and with 5-50% of a sequestrant, 0.05-5% of poly (maleic acid) and may have a sodium carbonate builder.
  • Low molecular weight polyacrylates without other chelating agents are used to inhibit calcium carbonate deposition by ADWDs in Chakrabarti, US 4203858.
  • US 4687592 to Collins et al describes carbonate, polyacrylate, phosphonates, and a calcium sequestering agent which is an ether polycarboxylate and comprises a major part of the formula.
  • the polyacrylate is added to disperse soils and the phosphonate is added to chelate iron and manganese.
  • Phosphonates and polyacrylates are also mentioned as possible co-builders in GB 2194546 to Laitem et al and US 4588515 to Schuh et al. In both patents, STPP is the preferred builder.
  • a low phosphate machine dishwashing composition consisting essentially of a maleic acid-acrylic acid copolymer, an alkaline condensed phosphate salt, a blend of non-ionic surfactants, an alkaline carbonate compound within the range of 20-40 percent, the balance being conventional machine dishwashing composition additives in normal amounts.
  • EP-A-0289312 there is described the preparation of a granular detergent composition in which separate slurries of a crystal-growth modified carbonate-based structurant salt and of a main detergent composition are prepared in different vessels, then mixed and spray dried.
  • the maximum proportion of sodium carbonate salts is 35%.
  • EP-A-0353562 and WO 90/01534 there is disclosed a builder salt composition which is primarily silicate based and contains washing soda, as well as sodium tripolyphosphate and an acrylic or methacrylic acid polymer or copolymer.
  • high carbonate detergents are not preferred in the art.
  • high carbonate levels are used, relatively high levels of complexing agents are used to prevent the formation of calcium carbonate precipitates. Often the complexing agents themselves offset any advantages gained by use of carbonates as builders.
  • the invention provides a dry detergent composition for use in an automatic dishwasher comprising
  • a halogen or peroxygen bleaching species can be included for oxidizing power.
  • the automatic dishwashing detergent of the present invention is primarily comprised of sodium or potassium carbonates and silicates, low levels of an inhibition system comprising a low molecular weight polycarboxylic acid and a threshold inhibition agent, and a low foaming surfactant.
  • Polyacrylic an polymethacrylic acids with weight average molecular weights between 1,000 and 10,000 are used as polycarboxylic acids.
  • Suitable threshold inhibition agents (TIAs) include the monomeric phosphonate-containing organic compounds specified above, and mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred TIAs include polyphosphonates such as the Monsanto Company's trademarked DEQUEST series, phosphonated polycarboxylic acids such as Mobay Chemicals trademarked BAYHIBIT series, and phosphonocarboxylic acids. No other calcium complexing agents or builders such as sodium tripolyphosphate are present in the detergent.
  • composition of the present invention provides superior starchy soil removal without appreciable precipitation of calcium salts.
  • composition is more cost-effective than other builder systems.
  • the alkali-metal carbonate is the sole builder material of the composition of the present invention.
  • Alkali-metal carbonates, sesquicarbonates and bicarbonates are suitable, and preferred are sodium and/or potassium carbonates. At least 40%, preferably 60% carbonate is needed. As used herein unless otherwise stated all percentages are weight percentages. Higher levels of carbonates will function, however, at levels greater than 80% there is insufficient room for the other ingredients which contribute to the overall effectiveness of the composition.
  • the carbonate acts as a builder to remove calcium and additionally provides alkalinity and aids in soil removal. At the high levels disclosed herein, the alkali-metal carbonate provides superior starchy soil removal compared to other builders such as phosphates.
  • alkali-metal silicate specifically one having the formula: M2O(SiO2)n where M represents an alkali-metal, and n is between 1 and 4.
  • Preferred alkali-metal silicates are sodium, potassium and lithium silicates, with sodium silicate being the most preferred, and with a preferred n value of 2.0-2.4.
  • a most preferred maximum value for n is 3.2 in order to minimize insoluble silicates during storage. It is further preferred that at least 10% of the total silicates have an n value of greater than 1.6 to impart suitable anti-corrosive properties.
  • suitable silicates include sodium or potassium orthosilicates and metasilicates. As used hereinafter, the term "silicate" will be taken to mean any of these alkali-metal silicates, individually or combined.
  • alkali-metal silicates Mixtures of any of the foregoing alkali-metal silicates are also suitable.
  • the alkali-metal silicate is present in an amount of from 2% to 10%. A minimum of 2% silicate is necessary to provide adequate corrosion resistance.
  • Preferred commercially available sodium silicates are sold by the Philadelphia Quartz Corporation under the Trademarks RU, as a 47% solution, and D, as a 44.1% solution.
  • the silicates provide alkalinity and serve as granulating aids to increase particle size of the agglomerates.
  • Sodium silicates are known to be very effective at cleaning, especially when used on oil and grease stains.
  • the polycarboxylic acid in fully neutralized form, e.g. as a sodium or potassium salt, however, the acid form is equally effective in preventing the deposition of calcium salts.
  • the acid forms are equivalent to the salt forms except where the acid has limited solubility.
  • the acid and salt forms are used interchangeably.
  • the required weight percentage range will be higher than that of the acid, owing to the presence of the counterion. For example a 30% greater weight percentage of sodium polyacrylate is needed compared to the acid form.
  • polycarboxylic acids An example of a commercial source of the polycarboxylic acids is the Rohm and Haas Company's ACRYSOL polyacrylates. Preferred are ACRYSOL LMW-20N and LMW-45N, fully neutralized polyacrylic acids, sodium salts, having weight average molecular weights of 2,000 and 4,500 g/mole, respectively. 0.1-10% polycarboxylic acid is present, preferably 3-8%. Higher levels of polycarboxylic can be added, but they do not appear to correspondingly improve inhibition of calcium precipitates.
  • the other component of the inhibitor system is the threshold inhibition agent, (TIA), which at the low levels, i.e. 0.1-5 percent present in the composition, synergistically acts with the polycarboxylate to prevent the formation of calcium precipitates on wares washed with the composition.
  • the TIAs are poly phosphonates/carboxylates of mono-, di-, and tri- alkylamines having at least one phosphonate group;1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP); aminotri-(methylenephosphonic acid) (ATMP); 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic -tricarboxylic acid (PBTC); phosphonohydroxy acetic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • HEDP 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid
  • ATMP aminotri-(methylenephosphonic acid)
  • PBTC 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic -tricarbox
  • TIAs are most preferably HEDP, ATMP, PBTC, and mixtures thereof.
  • a preferred level for TIA is 0.1-3.5%, and more preferred is 0.3-2.0%.
  • the TIA generally should be kept at low levels for to minimize the amount of phosphorus in the system and to minimize cost. Two percent TIA corresponds to a level in the wash (assuming 10 L of wash water) of 60 ppm. Generally, increasing TIA levels in the main wash above 60 ppm does not yield a corresponding increase in effectiveness, thus the lower levels are more cost-effective. Finally, if too much phosphonate is present, it can form a precipitate with calcium.
  • the TIA/polymer system is effective at preventing observable calcium precipitates on wares in waters having hardness levels at least to 400 ppm.
  • the TIA may be added as an acid, or as salt, such as sodium or potassium.
  • the inhibitor system is added at a level necessary to inhibit the precipitation of calcium salts on the wares.
  • the exact level will vary with water hardness and type of polycarboxylic acid and TIA. It is noted that generally, increasing the level of polycarboxylic acid allows for a decrease in the level of TIA, and vice versa. It is again noted that the acid and salt forms are equivalent except where the acid has limited solubility. It is also again noted that the foregoing TIA weight percentage ranges are based on the acid forms.
  • a low-foaming surfactant is included to provide detergency during the wash phase of the machine wash cycle, and to promote "sheeting" during rinse, i.e. uniform runoff of the rinse water.
  • the surfactant further acts to emulsify oily soils and suspends solids to prevent their redeposition. Since machine dishwashers utilize the mechanical effects of water sprays to remove a significant amount of solids, the surfactant must not produce foams, which impair this mechanical cleaning action. Preferably the surfactant will reduce or inhibit foams which are produced by food soils.
  • Preferred surfactants are nonionics, especially C1 ⁇ 4 alkoxylated aliphatic alcohols and C1 ⁇ 4 alkoxylated alkyl phenols. Particularly preferred are ethoxylated/propoxylated C8 ⁇ 14 alcohols. There should be at least ten alkoxy groups per alcohol, preferably at least twenty. Examples of preferred ethoxylated/propoxylated aliphatic alcohols are BASF Corporation's trademarked INDUSTROL, and PLURAFAC. Certain C1 ⁇ 4 alkylene oxide copolymers such as ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers are also preferred as surfactants. These are exemplified by BASF's trademarked PLURONIC series.
  • terminal hydroxyls of any of the foregoing can be replaced by an ether, e.g. a C1 ⁇ 4 alkyl or a benzyl ether, or by a halogen, to further reduce foaming.
  • an ether e.g. a C1 ⁇ 4 alkyl or a benzyl ether
  • a halogen e.g. a C1 ⁇ 4 alkyl or a benzyl ether
  • low-foaming surfactant will be taken to mean an individual low-foaming surfactant, or a mixture of two or more surfactants, or surfactants and foam suppressants, yielding low foaming.
  • the surfactant is added at a level of up to 10 percent, preferably 1-5 percent.
  • adjuncts can be added, as known in the art.
  • examples include fragrances, dyes or pigments, enzymes such as proteases, lipases and amylases, additional corrosion inhibitors.
  • Water may be present up to 15%, and can be present as free water or as water of hydration of the inorganic salts such as sodium carbonate. Some water may be deliberately added as a filler.
  • filler materials include inorganic salts such as sodium or potassium sulfates, nitrates, borates and chlorides, and organic materials like sugars.
  • an electrolyte/buffer it may be desirable to adjust the pH of the wash water by including an electrolyte/buffer.
  • these are alkali-metal inorganic acid salts, hydroxides or oxides. It may also be suitable to use such materials as aluminates and organic materials, such as gluconates, citrates, succinates, maleates, and their alkali metal salts.
  • the electrolyte/ buffer should maintain the wash pH range within a range of between 8.0 to 13.0, more preferably 9.0 to 12.0. Sodium hydroxide is preferred as it does not interact adversely with any other ingredients, and is very cost effective. It is noted that the silicates and carbonates can also act to keep the wash pH range within the desired limits.
  • the amount of electrolyte/buffer added solely for purposes of buffering can vary up to 10%.
  • a particularly preferred adjunct is a bleach, which may be selected from various halogen, peroxide or peracid bleaches.
  • the bleach can remove organic stains, aids in soil removal and helps to prevent spotting and filming. Most bleaches, in fact, perform well in the relatively high temperatures associated with automatic dishwashers.
  • halogen bleaches include the alkali metal and alkaline earth salts of hypohalite, haloamines, haloimines, haloimides and haloamides. All of these are believed to produce hypohalous bleaching species in situ . Hypochlorite and compounds producing hypochlorite in aqueous solution are preferred, although hypobromite is also suitable.
  • hypochlorite-producing compounds include sodium, potassium, lithium and calcium hypochlorite, chlorinated trisodium phosphate, potassium and sodium dicholoroisocyanurate, trichlorocyanuric acid, and their hydrates.
  • hydantoins such as dibromo and dichloro dimethyl-hydantoin, chlorobromodimethyl hydantoin, N-chlorosulfamide (haloamide), chloramine (haloamine), N-brominated and N-chlorinated succinimide, malonimide, pthalimide and napthalimide.
  • Peroxygen bleaches also are effective.
  • Sodium perborate is a particularly useful bleach source, and may be formulated as a mono- or tetrahydrate.
  • Preferred peroxygen bleaches are available in solid form and include sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, sodium phosphate peroxyhydrate, potassium permonosulfates and metal peroxides.
  • Bleach activators also known as peracid precursors can be included with the peroxygen compounds. Examples of activators include tetraacetyl ethylenediamine (TAED), and nonanoyloxy benzenesulfonate (NOBS).
  • Peracid bleaches including monoperacids and diperacids may be advantageous in terms of bleaching performance.
  • Suitable peracid bleaching species include C8 ⁇ 12 alkyl peracids, especially perazelaic and diperazelaic acids, diperoxydodecanedioic acid (DPDDA), and alkyl monoperoxysuccinic acid.
  • Peracid bleaching species, and a method for their production, are described in U. S. patent 4,337,213 issued June 29, 1982 to Marynowski et al DPDDA is particularly preferred for use in the composition of the present invention as it is relatively storage stable and produces desirable bleaching results.
  • the bleach is present in an amount sufficient to provide effective bleaching, e.g., up to 10% by weight active, more preferably from 0.05 to 5% by weight active and most preferably from 1 to 3% by weight active depending on the bleaching species chosen.
  • the dishwashing detergent composition is prepared by any means known in the art to yield a dry, free-flowing granular mixture, such as agglomeration or spray drying. Agglomeration is preferred.
  • An O'Brien rotary drum agglomerator was used in the following agglomeration example.
  • Sodium carbonate and sodium sulfate filler (if desired) is initially charged to the agglomerator. Three liquid additions are made during each batch. Spray rates and atomizing air pressures can be set for each liquid addition to suit desired finished product properties.
  • the first liquid to be sprayed is the low-foaming surfactant, sprayed at a rate of 0.227 kgs (0.5 pounds)/min.
  • the second liquid addition is a preblend consisting of the TIA, polymer, and sodium hydroxide, and is applied at a preferred rate of 0.453 kg (1.0 pound)/min.
  • the final liquid addition is sodium silicate, which can be applied at ambient or elevated temperature, and at a rate of 0.453 kg (1.0 pound)/min.
  • the product may be dried/ conditioned at the completion of the agglomeration. Static drying, fluid bed drying, and rotary drum conditioning may all be applied. Static drying typically consists of holding the agglomerated product at 60°C (140°F) for 24 hours while fluid bed drying may be performed for 30 minutes at 60°C/(140°F). Finished product densities range between 0.6g/cm3 to 1.0 g/cm3. An example formula is shown below.
  • the various soils of TABLES I-IV were tested, generally, by the procedure of cooking the soil, applying it to dishes or glasses, and allowing it to cool and dry.
  • the oatmeal and starch soils were prepared in accordance with their package directions and/or intended use, spread onto plates, and allowed to dry.
  • Milk and pudding soils were cooked into beakers, and allowed to dry. Soil removal was visually graded, against photographic standards, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being complete removal of soil. All soil removal evaluations herein were performed after one wash cycle.
  • Machine dishwashing filming and spotting evaluated in Tables I-IV was measured by ASTM Tentative Method D3556-76T (CSMA DCC-05), the disclosure of which is fully incorporated by reference herein.
  • ASTM Tentative Method D3556-76T CSMA DCC-05
  • clean glass tumblers are loaded into an automatic dishwasher, along with 4 plates, each soiled with 10g of a standard soil comprising powdered nonfat milk, margarine, and a cereal solution. Thirty grams of detergent was added to the closed cup for release in the main wash.
  • the main wash utilizes 7-12 liters of water, which dissolves the detergent.
  • the wares were washed in the dishwasher for 5 cycles, with the soils and detergent renewed after each cycle.
  • the tumblers were rated visually in a light box, on a 5 point scale, for filming and spotting. The results were scored as follows: Rating Spotting Filming 1 glass spotless no film 2 spots at random barely perceptible 3 1/4 of glass covered with spots slight film 4 1/2 of glass covered with spots moderate film 5 glass completely covered with spots heavy film TABLE I compares soil removal of three builders: sodium carbonate, sodium citrate and an acrylic/maleic copolymer. The effect of high carbonate levels on various soils is advantageously shown herein.
  • Table II-B composition also included 1.4-11.9% Na2SO4 filler, and 0.5% NaOH. Wash conditions were 30 grams of detergent added to the main wash, and 60°C (140°F)wash water, with the hardness as indicated in each Table. The glasses were graded after 5 cycles using the ASTM D3556-76T method.
  • Examples 1-4 show that both polymer and TIA are effective in reducing filming. Some TIA is, however, necessary to inhibit film formation, as shown by example 7, with no TIA.
  • Table III shows the performance benefit that the high carbonate levels have on soil removal, with particular emphasis on starch and pudding soil removal, compared to a phosphorus-containing formula of the art. Also shown is the added soil removal benefit imparted by the polyacrylate of Formula C on starchy soil removal.
  • Table IV demonstrates the great difference in spotting/filming made by the inclusion of the inhibitor system of the present invention.
  • Formula B with no inhibitor system, resulted in spotting and filming grades of more than five, a wholly unacceptable result from a commercial viewpoint.
  • Formula C of the present invention yielded very good results, with the aggregate scores of Formula C being about equal to those of Formula A, a prior art phosphorus formulation.
  • Tables V-VII illustrate the effectiveness of the inhibitor system of the present invention as measured by turbidity of the detergent solutions. Turbidities were measured using a Hach 2100A turbidimeter, 30 minutes after detergent in 7 L of water with hardnesses as indicated below. Results are shown in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU).
  • the acrylic acid polymer had a weight average molecular weight of 2734 g/mole.
  • Example 1-4 of Table V without polymer, resulted in relatively high turbidities, indicating the presence of calcium precipitates.
  • Example 5 having no TIA, similarly yielded a high turbidity, while Examples 6-9 resulted in acceptably low turbidities.
  • Table VI shows the effect of various types and amounts of polycarboxylic acid polymer and of TIA on calcium precipitation in hard (400ppm) water. Generally, lower turbidities reflect fewer calcium precipitates.
  • Table VII exemplifies an appropriate molecular weight range of effectiveness of the polymers herein. It can be seen that acceptable turbidities result from the use of sodium polyacrylate with a molecular weight range of about 2000-5800. At a molecular weight of 20,000, however, the turbidity increases, indicating observable calcium precipitation.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Abstract

An automatic dishwashing detergent primarily comprised of an alkali-metal carbonate as the sole builder, alkali-metal silicates, and a calcium precipitation inhibitor system consisting of a low foaming surfactant, a low molecular weight polycarboxylic acid, and a small amount of a threshold inhibition agent. Optionally halogen, peroxygen or peracid bleaching species enzymes, fragrances, dyes and other adjuncts may be included. The composition provides good cleaning performance especially on starchy soils, and no appreciable calcium precipitates results, even in water having a hardness of at least about 400 ppm.

Description

  • The invention relates to machine ware washing compositions, and particularly to such compositions having high levels of alkali-metal carbonate as the sole builder.
  • Automatic dishwashing detergents (ADWDs) typically include a variety of specialized components for specific purposes during the multi-step wash cycle. Surfactants may be present for detergency and/or as rinse aids. Silicates act to provide alkalinity and to prevent corrosion. Bleaches are often included for oxidizing power. Abrasives may be included to provide scouring action. Builders are important to improve washing performance, and must be selected to avoid precipitation of calcium salts on wares. Typically, silicates, carbonates, phosphates or mixtures thereof are employed as builders. For ware washing applications, the builder materials may provide alkalinity and buffering capacity, prevent flocculation, maintain ionic strength, extract metals from soils and remove alkaline-earth metal ions from washing solutions. Phosphates are extremely effective in these applications, however, there is a relatively high cost associated with their use. Additionally, phosphates are disfavored owing to their eutrophication effect on lakes and streams, and may be regulated in some states. Silicates are not preferred as the sole, or primary builder because they are costly, and at the generally high levels required, are potentially toxic. High levels of alkali-metal carbonates have been found to be very effective in ware washing applications, and have proven to be superior in performance to phosphates in the removal of starchy soils, one of the principal soils found on tablewares. A drawback associated with such high carbonate levels, however, is that calcium ions present in the washing water readily form precipitates with the carbonates. Various approaches have been employed to combat the formation of calcium precipitates. Complexing agents such as zeolites can be added and can be effective at removing calcium. These have limited use in ware washing compositions, however, as these zeolites are substantially insoluble, and may themselves deposit on tablewares. Polymeric sequestering agents such as polyacrylates and polyether carboxylates can also be employed, but since these also act to complex the calcium, generally high levels are required. Sequestering and complexing agents tend to be expensive, adding significantly to the overall cost. Schroeder, DE 3001937, discloses a granular ADWD with 50-70% sodium carbonate, a poly (alpha-hydroxy acrylic acid), phosphonate threshold inhibitors and alkyl phosphate esters. Becker et al, GB 1536136, describes a laundry detergent including a phosphonic or polyacrylic acid sequestrant, a protective colloid and a maximum of 30% phosphate builder, with an optional carbonate builder.
  • Unsubstituted polyacrylic acids used with 20-60% sodium carbonate are described in US 3579455 issued to Sabatelli and US 3627686 issued to Brungs. Brungs and Sabatelli use relatively high levels of NTA and hexametaphosphate, respectively, to complex calcium Sabatelli includes pyrophosphate as part of the complexing system US 4539144, to de Ridder et al describes ADWDs with no or low phosphates and with 5-50% of a sequestrant, 0.05-5% of poly (maleic acid) and may have a sodium carbonate builder. Low molecular weight polyacrylates without other chelating agents are used to inhibit calcium carbonate deposition by ADWDs in Chakrabarti, US 4203858.
  • In EP 266904 (Frankena) sodium carbonate is combined with polyacrylate, phosphonates, and a dipicolinic acid complexing agent. Similarly, in US 3850852 issued to Neillie et al sodium carbonate can be combined with polyacrylates, phosphonates, and a calcium sequestering agent.
  • US 4687592 to Collins et al describes carbonate, polyacrylate, phosphonates, and a calcium sequestering agent which is an ether polycarboxylate and comprises a major part of the formula. The polyacrylate is added to disperse soils and the phosphonate is added to chelate iron and manganese. Phosphonates and polyacrylates are also mentioned as possible co-builders in GB 2194546 to Laitem et al and US 4588515 to Schuh et al. In both patents, STPP is the preferred builder.
  • In US-A-4608188, there is described a low phosphate machine dishwashing composition consisting essentially of a maleic acid-acrylic acid copolymer, an alkaline condensed phosphate salt, a blend of non-ionic surfactants, an alkaline carbonate compound within the range of 20-40 percent, the balance being conventional machine dishwashing composition additives in normal amounts.
  • In EP-A-0289312 there is described the preparation of a granular detergent composition in which separate slurries of a crystal-growth modified carbonate-based structurant salt and of a main detergent composition are prepared in different vessels, then mixed and spray dried. The maximum proportion of sodium carbonate salts is 35%.
  • In US-3579455 also mentioned above there is described a machine dishwashing composition containing 20-60 parts by weight of an alkali metal carbonate and a ternary calcium salt precipitation system made up of a tetra-alkali metal pyrophosphate, an alkali metal hexametaphosphate and a water soluble polymer which may be a polyacrylic acid.
  • In US-3627686 there is also described a machine dishwashing composition containing 20 to 60 parts by weight of an alkali metal carbonate and a ternary calcium salt precipitation system made up of a tetra-alkali metal pyrophosphate, an alkali metal nitrilotriacetate and a water soluble polymer which may be a polyacrylic acid.
  • In EP-A-0353562 and WO 90/01534 there is disclosed a builder salt composition which is primarily silicate based and contains washing soda, as well as sodium tripolyphosphate and an acrylic or methacrylic acid polymer or copolymer.
  • Generally, high carbonate detergents are not preferred in the art. When high carbonate levels are used, relatively high levels of complexing agents are used to prevent the formation of calcium carbonate precipitates. Often the complexing agents themselves offset any advantages gained by use of carbonates as builders.
  • In view of the art, there remains a need for an alkali-metal carbonate based ware washing composition which prevents the deposition of calcium salts by inhibiting the formation of calcium precipitates, rather than by sequestering or complexing.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a high carbonate ware washing composition having acceptably low levels of calcium precipitates.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide a ware washing composition which is superior in performance in removing starchy soils.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide a highly effective dishwashing detergent which avoids the use of potentially toxic materials.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide a ware washing composition which does not utilize high levels of phosphate builders.
  • It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a highly cost-effective detergent composition.
  • SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • In one embodiment, the invention provides a dry detergent composition for use in an automatic dishwasher comprising
    • (a) 40-80% of an alkali-metal carbonate as the sole builder;
    • (b) 2-10% of an alkali-metal silicate, having a SiO₂/M₂O ratio of between 1 and 4;
    • (c) a low-foaming surfactant; and
    • (d) a calcium crystal growth-inhibiting amount of an inhibitor system, comprising 0.1-10% of a polycarboxylic acid or salt selected from the group consisting of polyacrylic or polymethacrylic acids having a molecular weight of between 1,000 and 10,000 g/mole; and 0.1-5% of a threshold inhibiting agent selected from the group consisting of polyphosphonates/carboxylates of mono-, di, and trialkylamines having at least one phosphonate group; 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid; aminotri(methylenephosphonic acid); 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4- tricarboxylic acid; phosphonohydroxy acetic acid; and mixtures thereof.
  • Optionally, a halogen or peroxygen bleaching species can be included for oxidizing power.
  • The automatic dishwashing detergent of the present invention is primarily comprised of sodium or potassium carbonates and silicates, low levels of an inhibition system comprising a low molecular weight polycarboxylic acid and a threshold inhibition agent, and a low foaming surfactant. Polyacrylic an polymethacrylic acids with weight average molecular weights between 1,000 and 10,000 are used as polycarboxylic acids. Suitable threshold inhibition agents (TIAs) include the monomeric phosphonate-containing organic compounds specified above, and mixtures thereof. Preferred TIAs include polyphosphonates such as the Monsanto Company's trademarked DEQUEST series, phosphonated polycarboxylic acids such as Mobay Chemicals trademarked BAYHIBIT series, and phosphonocarboxylic acids. No other calcium complexing agents or builders such as sodium tripolyphosphate are present in the detergent.
  • It is another advantage of the composition of the present invention that the carbonate builder provides superior starchy soil removal without appreciable precipitation of calcium salts.
  • It is a further advantage of the present invention that the composition is more cost-effective than other builder systems.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Alkali-Metal Carbonate
  • The alkali-metal carbonate is the sole builder material of the composition of the present invention. Alkali-metal carbonates, sesquicarbonates and bicarbonates are suitable, and preferred are sodium and/or potassium carbonates. At least 40%, preferably 60% carbonate is needed. As used herein unless otherwise stated all percentages are weight percentages. Higher levels of carbonates will function, however, at levels greater than 80% there is insufficient room for the other ingredients which contribute to the overall effectiveness of the composition. The carbonate acts as a builder to remove calcium and additionally provides alkalinity and aids in soil removal. At the high levels disclosed herein, the alkali-metal carbonate provides superior starchy soil removal compared to other builders such as phosphates.
  • Alkali-Metal Silicate
  • One component of the present invention is an alkali-metal silicate, specifically one having the formula: M₂O(SiO₂)n where M represents an alkali-metal, and n is between 1 and 4. Preferred alkali-metal silicates are sodium, potassium and lithium silicates, with sodium silicate being the most preferred, and with a preferred n value of 2.0-2.4. A most preferred maximum value for n is 3.2 in order to minimize insoluble silicates during storage. It is further preferred that at least 10% of the total silicates have an n value of greater than 1.6 to impart suitable anti-corrosive properties. Examples of other suitable silicates include sodium or potassium orthosilicates and metasilicates. As used hereinafter, the term "silicate" will be taken to mean any of these alkali-metal silicates, individually or combined.
  • Mixtures of any of the foregoing alkali-metal silicates are also suitable. The alkali-metal silicate is present in an amount of from 2% to 10%. A minimum of 2% silicate is necessary to provide adequate corrosion resistance. Preferred commercially available sodium silicates are sold by the Philadelphia Quartz Corporation under the Trademarks RU, as a 47% solution, and D, as a 44.1% solution. In addition to their anti-corrosive effects, the silicates provide alkalinity and serve as granulating aids to increase particle size of the agglomerates. Sodium silicates are known to be very effective at cleaning, especially when used on oil and grease stains.
  • Inhibitor System
  • The inhibitor system, comprising a polycarboxylic acid, or salt, in conjunction with low levels of a threshold inhibition agent, acts to inhibit significant calcium precipitates, resulting in aesthetically pleasing tablewares. The polycarboxylic acid is a polyacrylic or polymethacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight range of 1000-10,000 g/mole, preferably 2000-5000 g/mole.
  • It is preferred to add the polycarboxylic acid in fully neutralized form, e.g. as a sodium or potassium salt, however, the acid form is equally effective in preventing the deposition of calcium salts. It is noted that for the purpose of the present invention the acid forms are equivalent to the salt forms except where the acid has limited solubility. It is also noted that except where explicitly stated or implied from the context, the acid and salt forms are used interchangeably. It is further noted that if added as salt, the required weight percentage range will be higher than that of the acid, owing to the presence of the counterion. For example a 30% greater weight percentage of sodium polyacrylate is needed compared to the acid form. An example of a commercial source of the polycarboxylic acids is the Rohm and Haas Company's ACRYSOL polyacrylates. Preferred are ACRYSOL LMW-20N and LMW-45N, fully neutralized polyacrylic acids, sodium salts, having weight average molecular weights of 2,000 and 4,500 g/mole, respectively. 0.1-10% polycarboxylic acid is present, preferably 3-8%. Higher levels of polycarboxylic can be added, but they do not appear to correspondingly improve inhibition of calcium precipitates.
  • The other component of the inhibitor system is the threshold inhibition agent, (TIA), which at the low levels, i.e. 0.1-5 percent present in the composition, synergistically acts with the polycarboxylate to prevent the formation of calcium precipitates on wares washed with the composition. The TIAs are poly phosphonates/carboxylates of mono-, di-, and tri- alkylamines having at least one phosphonate group;1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP); aminotri-(methylenephosphonic acid) (ATMP); 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic -tricarboxylic acid (PBTC); phosphonohydroxy acetic acid, and mixtures thereof. TIAs are most preferably HEDP, ATMP, PBTC, and mixtures thereof. A preferred level for TIA is 0.1-3.5%, and more preferred is 0.3-2.0%. The TIA generally should be kept at low levels for to minimize the amount of phosphorus in the system and to minimize cost. Two percent TIA corresponds to a level in the wash (assuming 10 L of wash water) of 60 ppm. Generally, increasing TIA levels in the main wash above 60 ppm does not yield a corresponding increase in effectiveness, thus the lower levels are more cost-effective. Finally, if too much phosphonate is present, it can form a precipitate with calcium. The TIA/polymer system is effective at preventing observable calcium precipitates on wares in waters having hardness levels at least to 400 ppm. The TIA may be added as an acid, or as salt, such as sodium or potassium. The inhibitor system is added at a level necessary to inhibit the precipitation of calcium salts on the wares. The exact level will vary with water hardness and type of polycarboxylic acid and TIA. It is noted that generally, increasing the level of polycarboxylic acid allows for a decrease in the level of TIA, and vice versa. It is again noted that the acid and salt forms are equivalent except where the acid has limited solubility. It is also again noted that the foregoing TIA weight percentage ranges are based on the acid forms.
  • Low Foaming Surfactant
  • A low-foaming surfactant is included to provide detergency during the wash phase of the machine wash cycle, and to promote "sheeting" during rinse, i.e. uniform runoff of the rinse water. The surfactant further acts to emulsify oily soils and suspends solids to prevent their redeposition. Since machine dishwashers utilize the mechanical effects of water sprays to remove a significant amount of solids, the surfactant must not produce foams, which impair this mechanical cleaning action. Preferably the surfactant will reduce or inhibit foams which are produced by food soils.
  • Preferred surfactants are nonionics, especially C₁₋₄ alkoxylated aliphatic alcohols and C₁₋₄ alkoxylated alkyl phenols. Particularly preferred are ethoxylated/propoxylated C₈₋₁₄ alcohols. There should be at least ten alkoxy groups per alcohol, preferably at least twenty. Examples of preferred ethoxylated/propoxylated aliphatic alcohols are BASF Corporation's trademarked INDUSTROL, and PLURAFAC. Certain C₁₋₄ alkylene oxide copolymers such as ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers are also preferred as surfactants. These are exemplified by BASF's trademarked PLURONIC series. Optionally, the terminal hydroxyls of any of the foregoing can be replaced by an ether, e.g. a C₁₋₄ alkyl or a benzyl ether, or by a halogen, to further reduce foaming. Other suitable surfactants are disclosed in US 4306987 and 4272394 both issued to Kaneko and assigned to BASF Wayandotte Corporation.
  • It is also within the scope of the invention herein to utilize a mixture of surfactants all of which may not be low-foaming as long as the mixture is low-foaming by, e.g. including a foam suppressant such as monostearyl phosphate or other materials as known in the art. As used hereinafter, "low-foaming surfactant" will be taken to mean an individual low-foaming surfactant, or a mixture of two or more surfactants, or surfactants and foam suppressants, yielding low foaming. The surfactant is added at a level of up to 10 percent, preferably 1-5 percent.
  • Optional Ingredients
  • Various adjuncts can be added, as known in the art. Examples include fragrances, dyes or pigments, enzymes such as proteases, lipases and amylases, additional corrosion inhibitors. Water may be present up to 15%, and can be present as free water or as water of hydration of the inorganic salts such as sodium carbonate. Some water may be deliberately added as a filler. Additionally, filler materials include inorganic salts such as sodium or potassium sulfates, nitrates, borates and chlorides, and organic materials like sugars.
  • It may be desirable to adjust the pH of the wash water by including an electrolyte/buffer. Generally, these are alkali-metal inorganic acid salts, hydroxides or oxides. It may also be suitable to use such materials as aluminates and organic materials, such as gluconates, citrates, succinates, maleates, and their alkali metal salts. The electrolyte/ buffer should maintain the wash pH range within a range of between 8.0 to 13.0, more preferably 9.0 to 12.0. Sodium hydroxide is preferred as it does not interact adversely with any other ingredients, and is very cost effective. It is noted that the silicates and carbonates can also act to keep the wash pH range within the desired limits. The amount of electrolyte/buffer added solely for purposes of buffering can vary up to 10%.
  • A particularly preferred adjunct is a bleach, which may be selected from various halogen, peroxide or peracid bleaches. The bleach can remove organic stains, aids in soil removal and helps to prevent spotting and filming. Most bleaches, in fact, perform well in the relatively high temperatures associated with automatic dishwashers. Examples of halogen bleaches include the alkali metal and alkaline earth salts of hypohalite, haloamines, haloimines, haloimides and haloamides. All of these are believed to produce hypohalous bleaching species in situ. Hypochlorite and compounds producing hypochlorite in aqueous solution are preferred, although hypobromite is also suitable. Representative hypochlorite-producing compounds include sodium, potassium, lithium and calcium hypochlorite, chlorinated trisodium phosphate, potassium and sodium dicholoroisocyanurate, trichlorocyanuric acid, and their hydrates. Also suitable are hydantoins, such as dibromo and dichloro dimethyl-hydantoin, chlorobromodimethyl hydantoin, N-chlorosulfamide (haloamide), chloramine (haloamine), N-brominated and N-chlorinated succinimide, malonimide, pthalimide and napthalimide. Peroxygen bleaches also are effective. Sodium perborate is a particularly useful bleach source, and may be formulated as a mono- or tetrahydrate. Preferred peroxygen bleaches are available in solid form and include sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, sodium phosphate peroxyhydrate, potassium permonosulfates and metal peroxides. Bleach activators, also known as peracid precursors can be included with the peroxygen compounds. Examples of activators include tetraacetyl ethylenediamine (TAED), and nonanoyloxy benzenesulfonate (NOBS). Peracid bleaches (including monoperacids and diperacids) may be advantageous in terms of bleaching performance. Suitable peracid bleaching species include C₈₋₁₂ alkyl peracids, especially perazelaic and diperazelaic acids, diperoxydodecanedioic acid (DPDDA), and alkyl monoperoxysuccinic acid. Peracid bleaching species, and a method for their production, are described in U. S. patent 4,337,213 issued June 29, 1982 to Marynowski et al DPDDA is particularly preferred for use in the composition of the present invention as it is relatively storage stable and produces desirable bleaching results. If added, the bleach is present in an amount sufficient to provide effective bleaching, e.g., up to 10% by weight active, more preferably from 0.05 to 5% by weight active and most preferably from 1 to 3% by weight active depending on the bleaching species chosen.
  • The dishwashing detergent composition is prepared by any means known in the art to yield a dry, free-flowing granular mixture, such as agglomeration or spray drying. Agglomeration is preferred. An O'Brien rotary drum agglomerator was used in the following agglomeration example. Sodium carbonate and sodium sulfate filler (if desired) is initially charged to the agglomerator. Three liquid additions are made during each batch. Spray rates and atomizing air pressures can be set for each liquid addition to suit desired finished product properties. The first liquid to be sprayed is the low-foaming surfactant, sprayed at a rate of 0.227 kgs (0.5 pounds)/min. The second liquid addition is a preblend consisting of the TIA, polymer, and sodium hydroxide, and is applied at a preferred rate of 0.453 kg (1.0 pound)/min. The final liquid addition is sodium silicate, which can be applied at ambient or elevated temperature, and at a rate of 0.453 kg (1.0 pound)/min. The product may be dried/ conditioned at the completion of the agglomeration. Static drying, fluid bed drying, and rotary drum conditioning may all be applied. Static drying typically consists of holding the agglomerated product at 60°C (140°F) for 24 hours while fluid bed drying may be performed for 30 minutes at 60°C/(140°F). Finished product densities range between 0.6g/cm³ to 1.0 g/cm³. An example formula is shown below.
  • Example I
  • Ingredient Wt.% Active
    Alkali metal carbonate 40-80
    Low-foaming surfactant added up to 10
    Bleaching agent 0-10
    Alkali metal silicate (SiO₂/M₂O = 2-3) 2-10
    Filler (sulfate, chloride, nitrate salts) 0-50
    Polycarboxylic acid 0.1-10
    TIA 0.1-5
    Water 0-15
  • EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
  • The various soils of TABLES I-IV were tested, generally, by the procedure of cooking the soil, applying it to dishes or glasses, and allowing it to cool and dry. Thus, the oatmeal and starch soils were prepared in accordance with their package directions and/or intended use, spread onto plates, and allowed to dry. Milk and pudding soils were cooked into beakers, and allowed to dry. Soil removal was visually graded, against photographic standards, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being complete removal of soil. All soil removal evaluations herein were performed after one wash cycle.
  • Machine dishwashing filming and spotting evaluated in Tables I-IV was measured by ASTM Tentative Method D3556-76T (CSMA DCC-05), the disclosure of which is fully incorporated by reference herein. To summarize, clean glass tumblers are loaded into an automatic dishwasher, along with 4 plates, each soiled with 10g of a standard soil comprising powdered nonfat milk, margarine, and a cereal solution. Thirty grams of detergent was added to the closed cup for release in the main wash. Typically, the main wash utilizes 7-12 liters of water, which dissolves the detergent. The wares were washed in the dishwasher for 5 cycles, with the soils and detergent renewed after each cycle. The tumblers were rated visually in a light box, on a 5 point scale, for filming and spotting. The results were scored as follows:
    Rating Spotting Filming
    1 glass spotless no film
    2 spots at random barely perceptible
    3 1/4 of glass covered with spots slight film
    4 1/2 of glass covered with spots moderate film
    5 glass completely covered with spots heavy film
    TABLE I compares soil removal of three builders: sodium carbonate, sodium citrate and an acrylic/maleic copolymer. The effect of high carbonate levels on various soils is advantageously shown herein. All formulas have 7.5% sodium silicate (SiO₂/Na₂O = 2.4), 4% low-foaming surfactant (an ethoxylated/propoxylated C₉ aliphatic alcohol), 1% sodium dichloroiscocyanurate, and water. Wash conditions included 30 grams of detergent added to the main wash, 49°C (120°F) wash water having a 125 ppm water hardness (as CaCO₃; Ca/Mg = 3).
    Figure imgb0001
    Tables IIA-B illustrate the beneficial absence of spotting/ filming on wares washed with the composition herein. The effects of polycarboxylate and TIA on inhibition of calcium precipitation was measured by evaluating spotting and filming on glassware washed with two compositions of the present invention. The compositions included Na₂CO₃ (68% in the composition of IIA and 60% in that of II-B), 8% sodium silicate (SiO₂/Na₂O = 2.4), 4% low-foaming surfactant, 2% sodium dichloroiscocyanurate, with the remainder water. The Table II-B composition also included 1.4-11.9% Na₂SO₄ filler, and 0.5% NaOH. Wash conditions were 30 grams of detergent added to the main wash, and 60°C (140°F)wash water, with the hardness as indicated in each Table. The glasses were graded after 5 cycles using the ASTM D3556-76T method.
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
  • A comparison of examples 1-4 shows that both polymer and TIA are effective in reducing filming. Some TIA is, however, necessary to inhibit film formation, as shown by example 7, with no TIA. Example 5 with no polymer, in 100 ppm hardness water, resulted in a spotting grade of 2.1, not significantly different from the control at the 95% confidence level. With harder water, however, the absence of polymer results in pronounced spotting, as seen in example 14. The polymer thus is of greater importance in harder water.
  • Table III shows the performance benefit that the high carbonate levels have on soil removal, with particular emphasis on starch and pudding soil removal, compared to a phosphorus-containing formula of the art. Also shown is the added soil removal benefit imparted by the polyacrylate of Formula C on starchy soil removal.
  • Table III also shows the effects of polycarboxylates and TIA's on washing efficacy with respect to four types of soils. Wash conditions include 30 g of detergent added to the main wash, 49°C (120°F) wash water and 125 ppm hardness (Ca/Mg = 3).
    Figure imgb0004
    Figure imgb0005
    Table IV demonstrates the great difference in spotting/filming made by the inclusion of the inhibitor system of the present invention. Formula B, with no inhibitor system, resulted in spotting and filming grades of more than five, a wholly unacceptable result from a commercial viewpoint. Formula C of the present invention yielded very good results, with the aggregate scores of Formula C being about equal to those of Formula A, a prior art phosphorus formulation.
    Figure imgb0006
    Figure imgb0007
    Tables V-VII illustrate the effectiveness of the inhibitor system of the present invention as measured by turbidity of the detergent solutions. Turbidities were measured using a Hach 2100A turbidimeter, 30 minutes after detergent in 7 L of water with hardnesses as indicated below. Results are shown in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU).
    Figure imgb0008
    Figure imgb0009
  • The formulas of Table V contain about 75% sodium carbonate, 8% sodium silicate (SiO₂/Na₂O = 2.4), 4% low-foaming surfactant, 2% dichloroisocyanurate, and water. The acrylic acid polymer had a weight average molecular weight of 2734 g/mole. Water hardness was 250 ppm as CaCO₃ (Ca/Mg = 3). All solutions were kept at 49°C (120°F) in a heated water bath.
  • Examples 1-4 of Table V, without polymer, resulted in relatively high turbidities, indicating the presence of calcium precipitates. Example 5, having no TIA, similarly yielded a high turbidity, while Examples 6-9 resulted in acceptably low turbidities.
  • Table VI shows the effect of various types and amounts of polycarboxylic acid polymer and of TIA on calcium precipitation in hard (400ppm) water. Generally, lower turbidities reflect fewer calcium precipitates.
    Figure imgb0010
    Figure imgb0011
    Figure imgb0012
  • The formulas of Table VI, above, also contain about 8% sodium silicate (SiO₂/Na₂O = 2.4), 4% low-foaming surfactant, 2% dichloroisocyanurate, and water. Water hardness was 400 ppm as CaCO₃ (Ca/Mg = 3). All solutions were kept at 60°C (140°F) in a heated water bath.
    Figure imgb0013
    Table VII exemplifies an appropriate molecular weight range of effectiveness of the polymers herein. It can be seen that acceptable turbidities result from the use of sodium polyacrylate with a molecular weight range of about 2000-5800. At a molecular weight of 20,000, however, the turbidity increases, indicating observable calcium precipitation.

Claims (8)

  1. A dry detergent composition for use in an automatic dishwasher comprising
    (a) 40-80% of an alkali-metal carbonate as the sole builder;
    (b) 2-10% of an alkali-metal silicate, having a SiO₂/M₂O ratio of between 1 and 4;
    (c) a low-foaming surfactant; and
    (d) a calcium crystal growth-inhibiting amount of an inhibitor system, comprising 0.1-10% of a polycarboxylic acid or salt selected from the group consisting of polyacrylic or polymethacrylic acids having a molecular weight of between 1,000 and 10,000 g/mole; and 0.1-5% of a threshold inhibiting agent selected from the group consisting of poly-phosphonates/carboxylates of mono-, di, and trialkylamines having at least one phosphonate group; 1- hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid; aminotri(methylenephosphonic acid); 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4- tricarboxylic acid; phosphonohydroxy acetic acid; and mixtures thereof.
  2. A composition as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the low-foaming surfactant is selected from the group consisting of C₁₋₄ alkoxylated aliphatic alcohols, C₁₋₄ alkoxylated alkyl phenols, copolymers of C₁₋₄ alkylene oxides and mixtures thereof.
  3. A composition as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 characterized in that it further includes a bleachingeffective amount of a bleach.
  4. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1-3 characterized in that the surfactant is an ethoxylated or propoxylated C₈₋₁₄ aliphatic alcohol.
  5. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1-4 characterized in that the alkali-metal carbonate is sodium carbonate and the alkali-metal silicate is sodium silicate having a SiO₂/M₂O ratio of 3.2.
  6. An automatic dishwashing detergent composition as claimed in claim 1 consisting essentially of
    (a) 60-80% of a sodium carbonate as the sole builder;
    (b) 5-10% of a sodium silicate having a SiO₂/M₂O ratio of between 1 and 4;
    (c) 3-8% of a polyacrylic acid selected from the group consisting of polyacrylic or polymethacrylic acid having a molecular weight of between 2,000-5,000 g/mole;
    (d) 0.3-2% of a threshold inhibiting agent selected from the group consisting of polyphosphonates/carboxylates of mono-, di-, and trialkylamines having at least one phosphonate group; 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid; aminotri- (methylenephosphonic acid); 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4- tricarboxylic acid; phosphonohydroxy acetic acid; and mixtures thereof; and
    (e) 1-5% of a low foaming non-ionic surfactant.
  7. A composition as claimed in claim 6 characterized in that the low-foaming surfactant is selected from the group consisting of C₁₋₄ alkoxylated aliphatic alcohols, C₁₋₄ alkoxylated alkyl phenols, copolymers of C₁₋₄ alkylene oxides and mixtures thereof.
  8. A method for washing wares comprising
    contacting the wares with a cleaning effective amount of a detergent composition, in aqueous solution, as claimed in any of claims 1-7.
EP89305572A 1988-10-12 1989-06-02 High-carbonate automatic dishwashing detergent with decreased calcium salt deposition Expired - Lifetime EP0364067B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US25687588A 1988-10-12 1988-10-12
US256875 1988-10-12

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0364067A2 EP0364067A2 (en) 1990-04-18
EP0364067A3 EP0364067A3 (en) 1991-01-30
EP0364067B1 true EP0364067B1 (en) 1996-01-24

Family

ID=22973957

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89305572A Expired - Lifetime EP0364067B1 (en) 1988-10-12 1989-06-02 High-carbonate automatic dishwashing detergent with decreased calcium salt deposition

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0364067B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE133446T1 (en)
CA (1) CA1322703C (en)
DE (1) DE68925509T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2082776T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2115425C (en) * 1991-08-13 1997-12-16 Mary E. Raleigh Process for making granular automatic dishwashing detergent
US5281351A (en) * 1991-12-06 1994-01-25 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Processes for incorporating anti-scalants in powdered detergent compositions
CA2161083C (en) * 1993-04-27 2000-06-13 Eugene Steven Sadlowski Liquid or granular automatic dishwashing detergent compositions
ES2126754T3 (en) * 1993-04-27 1999-04-01 Procter & Gamble LIQUID OR GRANULAR DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS FOR AUTOMATIC DISHWASHERS.
EP0726935B1 (en) * 1993-11-03 2000-08-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Control of calcium carbonate precipitation in automatic dishwashing
AU7932094A (en) * 1993-11-03 1995-05-23 Procter & Gamble Company, The Control of calcium carbonate precipitation in automatic dishwashing
GB2285053A (en) * 1993-12-23 1995-06-28 Procter & Gamble Rinse aid composition
GB2285052A (en) * 1993-12-23 1995-06-28 Procter & Gamble Detergent composition
GB2285051A (en) * 1993-12-23 1995-06-28 Procter & Gamble Rinse aid composition
FR2726002B1 (en) * 1994-10-21 1997-01-17 Rhone Poulenc Chimie BUILDER COMPOSITION WITHOUT ZEOLITHS OR PHOSTATES COMPRISING A SYSTEM REDUCING CALCIUM INCRUST, USE THEREOF IN DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS AND DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
FR2732032B1 (en) * 1995-03-20 1997-06-13 Rhone Poulenc Chimie DETERGENT ADJUVANT COMPOSITION REDUCING CALCIUM INCLUSIVE, USE THEREOF IN DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS AND DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
FR2732033B1 (en) * 1995-03-20 1997-04-30 Rhone Poulenc Chimie DETERGENT ADJUVANT COMPOSITION REDUCING CALCIUM INCLUSIVE, USE THEREOF IN DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS AND DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS
US6156715A (en) * 1997-01-13 2000-12-05 Ecolab Inc. Stable solid block metal protecting warewashing detergent composition
US6177392B1 (en) * 1997-01-13 2001-01-23 Ecolab Inc. Stable solid block detergent composition
WO2001036576A1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2001-05-25 Unilever Plc Machine dish wash compositions
GB0502056D0 (en) * 2005-02-01 2005-03-09 Unilever Plc Modified sodium carbonate carrier meterial
US20100197545A1 (en) 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 Ecolab USA High alkaline detergent composition with enhanced scale control
FR3009831B1 (en) * 2013-08-23 2015-09-04 Hlg Man PLASTIC COMPOSITION CHARGED WITH SODIUM SULFATE AND SODIUM CARBONATE
WO2019005720A1 (en) 2017-06-26 2019-01-03 Ecolab Usa Inc. Method of dishwashing comprising detergent compositions substantially free of polycarboxylic acid polymers
EP4110891B1 (en) 2020-02-28 2025-01-08 Unilever IP Holdings B.V. Dishwash detergent product
DE102022131906A1 (en) 2022-12-01 2024-06-06 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Dishwasher cleaner with improved grease removal and additional limescale removal

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3579455A (en) * 1968-08-02 1971-05-18 Grace W R & Co Machine dishwashing compositions containing sodium polyacrylate
US3627686A (en) * 1968-09-30 1971-12-14 Chemed Corp Machine dishwashing compositions containing sodium polyacrylate and nta
US3925228A (en) * 1973-01-11 1975-12-09 Colgate Palmolive Co Carbonate built detergents
GB1575094A (en) * 1977-03-24 1980-09-17 Pennwalt Corp Detergent compositions
US4298493A (en) * 1979-10-04 1981-11-03 Colgate-Palmolive Company Method for retarding gelation of bicarbonate-carbonate-silicate crutcher slurries
DE3447291A1 (en) * 1984-12-24 1986-06-26 Henkel KGaA, 4000 Düsseldorf PHOSPHATE-FREE AGENT FOR MACHINE DISHWASHER
US4608188A (en) * 1985-04-12 1986-08-26 Basf Corporation Dishwashing composition
DE3644808A1 (en) * 1986-12-31 1988-07-14 Henkel Kgaa PHOSPHATE-FREE DETERGENT WITH REDUCED FOAM PRIORITY
GB8710290D0 (en) * 1987-04-30 1987-06-03 Unilever Plc Preparation of granular detergent composition
GB8710291D0 (en) * 1987-04-30 1987-06-03 Unilever Plc Preparation of granular detergent composition
DE3825858A1 (en) * 1988-07-29 1990-02-01 Henkel Kgaa LOW-PHOSPHATE BUILDER SALT COMBINATION

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0364067A2 (en) 1990-04-18
DE68925509D1 (en) 1996-03-07
ATE133446T1 (en) 1996-02-15
DE68925509T2 (en) 1996-05-30
CA1322703C (en) 1993-10-05
EP0364067A3 (en) 1991-01-30
ES2082776T3 (en) 1996-04-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0364067B1 (en) High-carbonate automatic dishwashing detergent with decreased calcium salt deposition
US4203858A (en) Phosphate-free machine dishwashing composition
US5279756A (en) Non-phosphate machine dishwashing detergents
US5152910A (en) Low-phosphate machine dishwashing detergents
US3764559A (en) Detergent compositions
US5232622A (en) Chlorine-free machine dishwashing
CA1251115A (en) Dishwashing composition
EP0551670A1 (en) Processes for preparing powdered detergent compositions
US5205954A (en) Automatic dishwasher powder detergent composition
AU721478B2 (en) Polycarboxylates for automatic dishwashing detergents
CA2190235A1 (en) High alkali-containing cleaning concentrates
EP0082564A2 (en) Dishwashing composition
EP3204477B1 (en) Additive for reducing spotting in automatic dishwashing systems
GB2234980A (en) Detergent composition for machine dishwashers
US5545348A (en) Non-Phosphate high carbonate machine dishwashing detergents containing maleic acid homopolymer
EP0423014B1 (en) Nonaqueous liquid automatic dishwasher detergent composition containing a dual bleach system
US5281352A (en) Low-phosphate machine dishwashing detergents
US5164106A (en) Nonaqueous liquid automatic dishwasher detergent composition containing a dual bleach system
JP3383669B2 (en) Chlorine-free detergent composition for dishwashers
EP0395186A2 (en) Automatic dishwasher detergent composition containing dual bleach system
EP1149144A1 (en) Dish washing process and compositions relating thereto
JPH05132696A (en) Composition and method for preventing sticking of textile
US6310023B1 (en) Machine dish wash compositions
EP0430818A2 (en) Automatic dishwasher powder detergent composition
EP0463802B1 (en) Method of preventing fabric encrustation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19910502

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19940223

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19960124

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19960124

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19960124

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19960124

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19960124

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19960124

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 133446

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19960215

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68925509

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19960307

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2082776

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19960424

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19960630

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20000517

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20000518

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20000519

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20000706

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010604

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20010602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020403

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20030303

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050602