EP0065544B1 - Procedure and device for measurement of degree of compaction - Google Patents
Procedure and device for measurement of degree of compaction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0065544B1 EP0065544B1 EP81903202A EP81903202A EP0065544B1 EP 0065544 B1 EP0065544 B1 EP 0065544B1 EP 81903202 A EP81903202 A EP 81903202A EP 81903202 A EP81903202 A EP 81903202A EP 0065544 B1 EP0065544 B1 EP 0065544B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- compaction
- function
- reference value
- foundation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 60
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 12
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008846 dynamic interplay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/02—Improving by compacting
- E02D3/046—Improving by compacting by tamping or vibrating, e.g. with auxiliary watering of the soil
Definitions
- the present invention refers to a procedure and a device for measuring the degree of compaction achieved when compacting a foundation by means of a vibrating compaction tool.
- the compaction tool may be a roller with at least one cylindrical drum which is caused to oscillate by means of an eccentric weight rotating inside it.
- the invention is based on sensing at least the vertical component of the movement of that part of the compaction tool which rests on the foundation and carries out compaction. If the compaction tool is moved across a flat, homogeneous, extremely soft and completely resilient foundation, the aforementioned vertical component of the movement would be a purely sinusoidal movement with respect to time for the majority of conventional compaction tools. On the other hand, if the compaction tool is moved back and forth across a stretch of the foundation consisting of soil or asphalt then at least initially a gradual increase in rigidity would be achieved in the foundation. Owing to the dynamic interaction between the compaction tool and the foundation the vertical movement would increasingly deviate in shape from the purely sinusoidal form with increasing rigidity of the foundation. This deviation from a sinusoidal form is-if all parameters in the compaction tool remain constant- directly related to the dynamic characteristics of the foundation and primarily its rigidity.
- compaction meters according to US patent 4103554 often work well, at least in certain connections, they do have certain disadvantages. For example, if it is desired to vary the vibration frequency of the compaction tool it is necessary to have either exchangeable bandpass filters or bandpass filters with controllable passband frequencies, which renders the meter more complicated and more expensive. Another drawback is that it is based on the concept that the basic frequency of the vibration is the lowest frequency in the movement performed by the vibrating and compacting part of the compaction tool.
- the present invention is based on the insight that the relative magnitudes of the time intervals between at least certain successive passages through the zero point of the said movement, or signals from the transducer sensing the movement, display a relationship with the degree of compaction of the foundation.
- the invention is also based on the insight that the basic frequency of the vibration is not the lowest frequency of the movement performed by the vibrating and compacting part of the compaction tool.
- lower frequencies may exist in the movement, including those depending on the degree of compaction of the foundation as well as those having poor relationship with the degree of compaction and stemming principally from the design and operation of the compaction tool.
- the magnitude of the time interval between two or more successive passages through the zero point of a signal from a transducer which senses the movement of a vibrating part of the compaction tool which comes into contact with and compacts the foundation is measured.
- a quantity is formed which comprises a measure of the degree of compaction achieved in the foundation.
- the invention does not utilize the absolute amplitude of the movement, with the result that any changes in the sensitivity of the transducer or the amplification of the signal on account of aging varying, temperature, etc. are of no significance.
- the relative amplitude of the movement can be utilized in certain versions of the invention.
- the compaction tool consists of a roller with a cylindrical drum which is caused to oscillate by means of a weight rotating inside it which is eccentrically located in relation to the symmetric axis of the drum.
- the acceleration of the drum in a vertical direction is recorded by an accelerometer mounted on one of the bearing houses of the eccentric shaft, cf. the previously mentioned US patents 3599543 and 4103554.
- Fig. 1 Shown in Fig. 1 are examples of signals recorded in this way during the first, sixth and twelfth pass on a foundation consisting of non- cohesive soil. Owing to the dynamic interaction between the various parts of the roller and the foundation the signal will increasingly deviate in shape from the sinusoidal form obtained when the roller moves across a soft and completely resilient foundation as the rigidity of the foundation increases. This deviation from sinusoidal form is-if all roller parameters are constant-related to the dynamic properties of the foundation and primarily its rigidity.
- the magnitude 1-T1/T2 or T2/T1-1 as in Fig. 1 shows good significance when correlated with the degree of compaction according to studies that have been conducted. An advantage of this quantity is also that it can be calculated to a high degree of accuracy with a comparatively simple electronic device.
- the parameter value is calculated as a mean value of a certain number of periods of the oscillation in order to get away from the effect of cyclic variations in the zero level of the signal and random variations in the signal.
- Fig. 2 shows the parameters 1 T1/T2 (curve A) and T2/T1-1 (curve B) as a function of the number of passes calculated from the recorded signals as shown in Fig. 1.
- the respective parameters have here been calculated as mean values over two periods.
- the result shows a parameter value increase which in principle corresponds to the compaction degree increase with an increasing number of passes completed.
- roller parameters produce oscillation sequences like those in Fig. 3, which may be due to the drum performing double jumps or entering a state of rocking oscillation. In the latter case this effect can be eliminated for the most part by recording the acceleration of both sides of the drum simultaneously and carrying out the analysis on the mean value of the two signals, i.e. the movement of the centrepoint of the drum is analysed. In these cases it is under all circumstances important to calculate the parameter in question as the mean value of two periods or a multiple of two periods. Normally, the parameter is calculated as a mean value of a large number of periods in order to reduce the risk of random variations.
- a device which calculates and presents the result according to the invention can be arranged in several different ways. Two different main versions may be distinguished, one which is based solely on analogue signal processing and one in which the actual calculation of the relevant parameter takes place digitally.
- Fig. 4 shows in block diagram form the configuration of a device according to this latter version.
- transducer (1) which may suitably consist of an accelerometer mounted vertically on the vibrating part of the compaction tool. In certain cases it may be advantageous for the two transducers to be averaged in such a manner that a signal corresponding to the vertical movement of the centre of gravity of the vibrating portion is generated.
- Disturbing low-frequency and high-frequency oscillations are filtered out in block (2). Low-frequency oscillations arise by the compaction tool travelling lover an uneven surface, for example, or by the frame of the tool entering a state of oscillation. High-frequency disturbances arise as a result of reasonance in the structure and bearing play.
- Block (3) detects passages through the zero point in the signal.
- This block also contains a device which blocks the zero detector for a length of time corresponding to half the shortest period that can occur. This is to avoid spurious zero detection occurring on account of superposed high-frequency disturbances remaining after (2).
- Two outgoing signals which control two gates (5) and (6) go out from (3).
- Gate (5) is open and allows pulses from the clock (4) to pass through when the signal from (2) is above the zero level and gate (6) lets through clock pulses when the signal level is below zero.
- the pulses from the gates are counted for a definite period of time and stored in two registers (10) and (11). After the predetermined time the contents of the registers are transferred to a digital divider section (9), following which the registers are reset to zero and begin to count pulses afresh.
- the predetermined time for forming the mean value can be generated by the transducer signal so that it comprises a definite multiple of the periodicity of the main oscillation, which can be implemented with a counter (7) or, alternatively, the average time is determined by the clock via a counter (8) so that mean value formation takes place for a definite time asynchronously with the periodicity of the oscillations of the compaction tool.
- the two digital values are divided by each other, following which the parameter value (1 ratio) is calculated in block (12).
- the digital parameter value is presented on a display and/or a printer ((13) and (14)).
- the digital parts of the device (15) can be constructed from standard TTL or CMOS components but may to advantage consist of a microprocessor.
- the output signal from a transducer which senses a part of the movement of the compaction tool at least after a certain signal processing comprises a distorted sinusoidal signal, in which the distortion is due to the rigidity, etc of the foundation.
- other transducers are conceivable which generate a sinusoidal signal superposed on a constant or nearly constant signal. In theory at least, such a signal could in electrical form always be of the same polarity but of varying amplitude.
- a superposed signal arises on account of the compaction tool moving up or down an incline.
- the passages through the zero point of the signal to the extent that they occur, naturally do not constitute a good point of departure for measuring the degree of compaction.
- the same technique can be applied as in the case of the distorted sinusoidal signal if times when the submovement signal coincides with a reference value or when it rises above or falls below a reference value are sensed or detected instead of the passages through the zero point of the signal.
- the reference value comprises the arithmetical mean value of the submovement signal calculated or obtained over suitable length of time.
- One method of ensuring that such a reference value coincides with zero is of course high-pass filtration of the submovement signal.
- the passband of the high-pass filter should then allow signals with a considerably lower frequency than the fundamental frequency of the vibration to pass through, and preferably also signals with a frequency which is a fraction of the fundamental frequency of the vibration.
- zero frequency and direct current components i.e. chiefly stationary components of the submovement signal, should be filtered out effectively.
- the simplest version of a procedure or a device according to the invention is based on the quantity 1 minus the relationship between the magnitudes of two consecutive time intervals.
- the transducer should preferably be oriented so that the polarity of the signal will be as in the example in Fig. 1.
- the ratios T1/T2 and T3/T4 will then be less than one if T1 and T3 are defined as times during which the signal level is above zero and a certain reference value respectively and T2 and T4 are defined as times during which the signal level is below the said level.
- T1 and T3 are defined as times during which the signal level is above zero and a certain reference value respectively
- T2 and T4 are defined as times during which the signal level is below the said level.
- the quantity used as a measure of the degree of compaction is then formed as an arithmetical and/or geometrical mean value of the sub- quantities.
- all time intervals during which the signal is above zero or a reference value and the corresponding time interval during which the signal is below the said value can first be summed individually for a definite period of time or a definite number of cycles, following which the desired quantity is calculated as 1 minus the ratio between the two sums.
- a more complicated version of the invention than those so far described is based on also measuring and utilizing the relative amplitudes of the acceleration motion as well.
- the relative amplitudes of the acceleration motion are understood in this connection to be the size relationship H between the maximum amplitudes of the motion, or deviations from the mean value in the event that the mean value is not zero over an entire period, during the time interval between consecutive passages through the zero point and times when the momentary value coincides with the mean value respectively in the said cases.
- Fig. 1 the absolute amplitudes A1 and A2 during the time intervals T1 and T2 respectively are shown. According to the invention, although the absolute values A1 and A2 in the accelerometer signal are measured, it is the relative magnitude which is of significance for the degree of compaction.
- the movement of the drum is sensed and filtered by means of a transducer 16 and a filter 17 as in Fig. 5 in the manner described with reference to the version as in Fig. 4.
- Passage of the signal through the zero point or other reference level is detected by a threshold detector 18.
- the maximum value of the signal between two passages through the signal zero point is determined in a peak value detector 19 which is reset every time the signal passes the reference level which is detected by the threshold detector 18.
- the maximum value is converted into a digital value by analogue-to-digital converter 20.
- the minimum value of the signal between two passages of the reference level is sensed in block 21.
- the minimum value is converted by the analogue-to-digital converter 22 into a digital value.
- Detected passages through the reference level in the form of pulses from 18 reset the maximum value detector 19 and the minimum value detector 21 to zero.
- the pulses from threshold detector 18 and the digital values from the converters 20 and 21 are connected to a processor 23.
- the value of the output quantity in question is calculated in processor 23, after which the value is presented on display unit 24.
- transducers for sensing the movement of the compaction tool can be mounted. From these, examples of usable transducers are also evident as well as how more than one transducer can be used simultaneously in order to reduce the effect of certain disturbances. It is therefore probably unnecessary to specify components and circuits in detail.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
- Road Paving Machines (AREA)
- Measurement Of Levels Of Liquids Or Fluent Solid Materials (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention refers to a procedure and a device for measuring the degree of compaction achieved when compacting a foundation by means of a vibrating compaction tool. The compaction tool may be a roller with at least one cylindrical drum which is caused to oscillate by means of an eccentric weight rotating inside it.
- If the degree of compaction achieved with a vibrating compacting tool can be measured simply and continuously, and if the frequency and amplitude of the vibration of the compaction tool, as well as the speed with which the tool is moved across the foundation, can be varied, it would be possible to control the compaction tool with the aim of attaining optimal compaction. The danger of terminating compaction before a sufficient degree of compaction has been attained, or continuing compaction although a sufficient degree of compaction has already been attained, could be minimized. There has therefore long existed a need for a simple, inexpensive and reliable continuously measuring compaction degree meter for vibrating tools. In the patent literature there are many more or less different proposed designs of compaction degree meters. Among those that may be of interest as a background to the present invention, the ones described in British patent 1372567 and US patents 3599543, 3775019 and 4103554, for example, may be mentioned.
- The invention is based on sensing at least the vertical component of the movement of that part of the compaction tool which rests on the foundation and carries out compaction. If the compaction tool is moved across a flat, homogeneous, extremely soft and completely resilient foundation, the aforementioned vertical component of the movement would be a purely sinusoidal movement with respect to time for the majority of conventional compaction tools. On the other hand, if the compaction tool is moved back and forth across a stretch of the foundation consisting of soil or asphalt then at least initially a gradual increase in rigidity would be achieved in the foundation. Owing to the dynamic interaction between the compaction tool and the foundation the vertical movement would increasingly deviate in shape from the purely sinusoidal form with increasing rigidity of the foundation. This deviation from a sinusoidal form is-if all parameters in the compaction tool remain constant- directly related to the dynamic characteristics of the foundation and primarily its rigidity.
- Through the aforementioned US patent 4103554 it is already known that from the output signal of a transducer which senses the aforementioned movement it is possible to filter out subsignals the frequency of which essentially coincides with the basic frequency of the vibration and its harmonics. According to the aforementioned patents there exists a relationship between the amplitudes of these subsignals and the degree of compaction.
- Even though compaction meters according to US patent 4103554 often work well, at least in certain connections, they do have certain disadvantages. For example, if it is desired to vary the vibration frequency of the compaction tool it is necessary to have either exchangeable bandpass filters or bandpass filters with controllable passband frequencies, which renders the meter more complicated and more expensive. Another drawback is that it is based on the concept that the basic frequency of the vibration is the lowest frequency in the movement performed by the vibrating and compacting part of the compaction tool.
- These and other disadvantages are overcome by the present invention as defined in
1 and 6.claims - The present invention is based on the insight that the relative magnitudes of the time intervals between at least certain successive passages through the zero point of the said movement, or signals from the transducer sensing the movement, display a relationship with the degree of compaction of the foundation. The invention is also based on the insight that the basic frequency of the vibration is not the lowest frequency of the movement performed by the vibrating and compacting part of the compaction tool. Depending on the type of compaction tool, lower frequencies may exist in the movement, including those depending on the degree of compaction of the foundation as well as those having poor relationship with the degree of compaction and stemming principally from the design and operation of the compaction tool.
- According to the invention the magnitude of the time interval between two or more successive passages through the zero point of a signal from a transducer which senses the movement of a vibrating part of the compaction tool which comes into contact with and compacts the foundation is measured. By means of the relative magnitudes of the said time intervals a quantity is formed which comprises a measure of the degree of compaction achieved in the foundation. Without further explanation it will no doubt be realized that when using suitable time measurement devices it is not necessary to reset the compaction degree meter or adapt it to the vibrations frequency.
- The invention does not utilize the absolute amplitude of the movement, with the result that any changes in the sensitivity of the transducer or the amplification of the signal on account of aging varying, temperature, etc. are of no significance. On the other hand, the relative amplitude of the movement can be utilized in certain versions of the invention.
- The invention will be described mainly with reference to a version for cases where the compaction tool consists of a roller with a cylindrical drum which is caused to oscillate by means of a weight rotating inside it which is eccentrically located in relation to the symmetric axis of the drum. The acceleration of the drum in a vertical direction is recorded by an accelerometer mounted on one of the bearing houses of the eccentric shaft, cf. the previously mentioned US patents 3599543 and 4103554.
- Fig. 1 shows examples of signals from a transducer
- Fig. 2 shows the values of quantities formed by the relative magnitudes of successive time intervals between passages through the zero point
- Fig. 3 shows examples of signals from a transducer when the roller has such a combination of parameters (static load, dynamic load, total weight, frame rigidity, power transmission, etc) that a state of oscillation arises
- Fig. 4 shows in block diagram form the configuration of a version of a device according to the invention
- Fig. 5 shows in block diagram form the configuration of an additional version of a device according to the invention
- Shown in Fig. 1 are examples of signals recorded in this way during the first, sixth and twelfth pass on a foundation consisting of non- cohesive soil. Owing to the dynamic interaction between the various parts of the roller and the foundation the signal will increasingly deviate in shape from the sinusoidal form obtained when the roller moves across a soft and completely resilient foundation as the rigidity of the foundation increases. This deviation from sinusoidal form is-if all roller parameters are constant-related to the dynamic properties of the foundation and primarily its rigidity. The magnitude 1-T1/T2 or T2/T1-1 as in Fig. 1 shows good significance when correlated with the degree of compaction according to studies that have been conducted. An advantage of this quantity is also that it can be calculated to a high degree of accuracy with a comparatively simple electronic device. In practice, the parameter value is calculated as a mean value of a certain number of periods of the oscillation in order to get away from the effect of cyclic variations in the zero level of the signal and random variations in the signal. Fig. 2 shows the
parameters 1 T1/T2 (curve A) and T2/T1-1 (curve B) as a function of the number of passes calculated from the recorded signals as shown in Fig. 1. The respective parameters have here been calculated as mean values over two periods. The result shows a parameter value increase which in principle corresponds to the compaction degree increase with an increasing number of passes completed. - Certain combinations of roller parameters produce oscillation sequences like those in Fig. 3, which may be due to the drum performing double jumps or entering a state of rocking oscillation. In the latter case this effect can be eliminated for the most part by recording the acceleration of both sides of the drum simultaneously and carrying out the analysis on the mean value of the two signals, i.e. the movement of the centrepoint of the drum is analysed. In these cases it is under all circumstances important to calculate the parameter in question as the mean value of two periods or a multiple of two periods. Normally, the parameter is calculated as a mean value of a large number of periods in order to reduce the risk of random variations.
- A device which calculates and presents the result according to the invention can be arranged in several different ways. Two different main versions may be distinguished, one which is based solely on analogue signal processing and one in which the actual calculation of the relevant parameter takes place digitally. Fig. 4 shows in block diagram form the configuration of a device according to this latter version.
- An electrical signal which describes the movement of the drum is generated in transducer (1), which may suitably consist of an accelerometer mounted vertically on the vibrating part of the compaction tool. In certain cases it may be advantageous for the two transducers to be averaged in such a manner that a signal corresponding to the vertical movement of the centre of gravity of the vibrating portion is generated. Disturbing low-frequency and high-frequency oscillations are filtered out in block (2). Low-frequency oscillations arise by the compaction tool travelling lover an uneven surface, for example, or by the frame of the tool entering a state of oscillation. High-frequency disturbances arise as a result of reasonance in the structure and bearing play. Block (3) detects passages through the zero point in the signal. This block also contains a device which blocks the zero detector for a length of time corresponding to half the shortest period that can occur. This is to avoid spurious zero detection occurring on account of superposed high-frequency disturbances remaining after (2). Two outgoing signals which control two gates (5) and (6) go out from (3). Gate (5) is open and allows pulses from the clock (4) to pass through when the signal from (2) is above the zero level and gate (6) lets through clock pulses when the signal level is below zero. The pulses from the gates are counted for a definite period of time and stored in two registers (10) and (11). After the predetermined time the contents of the registers are transferred to a digital divider section (9), following which the registers are reset to zero and begin to count pulses afresh. The predetermined time for forming the mean value can be generated by the transducer signal so that it comprises a definite multiple of the periodicity of the main oscillation, which can be implemented with a counter (7) or, alternatively, the average time is determined by the clock via a counter (8) so that mean value formation takes place for a definite time asynchronously with the periodicity of the oscillations of the compaction tool. In the divider section the two digital values are divided by each other, following which the parameter value (1 ratio) is calculated in block (12). The digital parameter value is presented on a display and/or a printer ((13) and (14)). The digital parts of the device (15) can be constructed from standard TTL or CMOS components but may to advantage consist of a microprocessor.
- So far it has been assumed that the output signal from a transducer which senses a part of the movement of the compaction tool at least after a certain signal processing comprises a distorted sinusoidal signal, in which the distortion is due to the rigidity, etc of the foundation. Theoretically, other transducers are conceivable which generate a sinusoidal signal superposed on a constant or nearly constant signal. In theory at least, such a signal could in electrical form always be of the same polarity but of varying amplitude. Theoretically, it is also conceivable that a superposed signal arises on account of the compaction tool moving up or down an incline. In such cases the passages through the zero point of the signal, to the extent that they occur, naturally do not constitute a good point of departure for measuring the degree of compaction. According to the invention, however, the same technique can be applied as in the case of the distorted sinusoidal signal if times when the submovement signal coincides with a reference value or when it rises above or falls below a reference value are sensed or detected instead of the passages through the zero point of the signal. The requirement here is that the reference value comprises the arithmetical mean value of the submovement signal calculated or obtained over suitable length of time. One method of ensuring that such a reference value coincides with zero is of course high-pass filtration of the submovement signal. The passband of the high-pass filter should then allow signals with a considerably lower frequency than the fundamental frequency of the vibration to pass through, and preferably also signals with a frequency which is a fraction of the fundamental frequency of the vibration. On the other hand, zero frequency and direct current components, i.e. chiefly stationary components of the submovement signal, should be filtered out effectively.
- The simplest version of a procedure or a device according to the invention is based on the
quantity 1 minus the relationship between the magnitudes of two consecutive time intervals. The transducer should preferably be oriented so that the polarity of the signal will be as in the example in Fig. 1. The ratios T1/T2 and T3/T4 will then be less than one if T1 and T3 are defined as times during which the signal level is above zero and a certain reference value respectively and T2 and T4 are defined as times during which the signal level is below the said level. In certain connections it is preferable to measure several time intervals and form sub- quantities as above. - The quantity used as a measure of the degree of compaction is then formed as an arithmetical and/or geometrical mean value of the sub- quantities. Alternatively, all time intervals during which the signal is above zero or a reference value and the corresponding time interval during which the signal is below the said value can first be summed individually for a definite period of time or a definite number of cycles, following which the desired quantity is calculated as 1 minus the ratio between the two sums.
- A more complicated version of the invention than those so far described is based on also measuring and utilizing the relative amplitudes of the acceleration motion as well. The relative amplitudes of the acceleration motion are understood in this connection to be the size relationship H between the maximum amplitudes of the motion, or deviations from the mean value in the event that the mean value is not zero over an entire period, during the time interval between consecutive passages through the zero point and times when the momentary value coincides with the mean value respectively in the said cases. In Fig. 1 the absolute amplitudes A1 and A2 during the time intervals T1 and T2 respectively are shown. According to the invention, although the absolute values A1 and A2 in the accelerometer signal are measured, it is the relative magnitude
which is of significance for the degree of compaction. Several different functions of H and the relative magnitude of time intervals T1 and T2 are conceivable as an output quantity and measure of the degree of compaction achieved, for example Other powers of H and T1/T2 besides 1 are also conceivable. Shown in Fig. 2 as an example is the quantity (H.T2-T1 )/T1 as curve C. One version of an alternative version is described below. - The movement of the drum is sensed and filtered by means of a
transducer 16 and afilter 17 as in Fig. 5 in the manner described with reference to the version as in Fig. 4. Passage of the signal through the zero point or other reference level is detected by athreshold detector 18. The maximum value of the signal between two passages through the signal zero point is determined in apeak value detector 19 which is reset every time the signal passes the reference level which is detected by thethreshold detector 18. The maximum value is converted into a digital value by analogue-to-digital converter 20. In a corresponding manner the minimum value of the signal between two passages of the reference level is sensed inblock 21. The minimum value is converted by the analogue-to-digital converter 22 into a digital value. Detected passages through the reference level in the form of pulses from 18 reset themaximum value detector 19 and theminimum value detector 21 to zero. The pulses fromthreshold detector 18 and the digital values from the 20 and 21 are connected to aconverters processor 23. The value of the output quantity in question is calculated inprocessor 23, after which the value is presented ondisplay unit 24. - It is easy for the expert to construct a device or carry out a procedure according to the invention with commercially available discrete components and integrated circuits. From manuals, data sheets and other information supplied by manufacturers and/or sellers of electronic components such as Texas Instruments, Fairchild, Motorola, etc it is evident which components can be used, such as threshold detectors, comparators, counters, dividers, multipliers, filters, amplifiers, clocks, etc. It is also evident which modifications and additions are needed to adapt the components to different frequency ranges. From information supplied by manufacturers and/or sellers of vibrating compaction tools such as vibratory rollers the data which the expert needs in order to apply the invention when compacting with them will be evident. From the aforementioned patents it is evident how transducers for sensing the movement of the compaction tool can be mounted. From these, examples of usable transducers are also evident as well as how more than one transducer can be used simultaneously in order to reduce the effect of certain disturbances. It is therefore probably unnecessary to specify components and circuits in detail.
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT81903202T ATE7057T1 (en) | 1980-11-26 | 1981-11-25 | METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR MEASURING THE DEGREE OF COMPACTION. |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE8008299A SE424455B (en) | 1980-11-26 | 1980-11-26 | PROCEDURE AND DEVICE FOR SEATING THE PACKING DEGREE OPENED BY PACKING A SUBSTRATE WITH A PACKAGING TOOL |
| SE8008299 | 1980-11-26 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP0065544A1 EP0065544A1 (en) | 1982-12-01 |
| EP0065544B1 true EP0065544B1 (en) | 1984-04-11 |
Family
ID=20342331
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP81903202A Expired EP0065544B1 (en) | 1980-11-26 | 1981-11-25 | Procedure and device for measurement of degree of compaction |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4467652A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0065544B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH0314963B2 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU545719B2 (en) |
| BR (1) | BR8108882A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3163111D1 (en) |
| SE (1) | SE424455B (en) |
| SU (1) | SU1609459A3 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1982001905A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE3590610C2 (en) * | 1984-11-19 | 1997-09-04 | Thurner Geodynamik Ab | Degree of compaction of bed estimating method |
Families Citing this family (27)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE432792B (en) * | 1982-04-01 | 1984-04-16 | Dynapac Maskin Ab | PROCEDURE AND DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING OPTIMAL PACKAGING DEVICE WHEN PACKING DIFFERENT MATERIALS LIKE ASPHALT, EARTH ETC Means a vibrating roller |
| DE3421824C2 (en) * | 1984-06-13 | 1986-07-17 | CASE VIBROMAX GmbH & Co KG, 4000 Düsseldorf | Device for checking the compaction in vibration compaction equipment |
| ES2045843T3 (en) * | 1990-05-28 | 1994-01-16 | Caterpillar Paving Prod | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A VIBRATORY TOOL. |
| DE69003530T2 (en) * | 1990-05-28 | 1994-04-28 | Caterpillar Paving Prod | Device and method for monitoring the vibration frequency of a compression machine. |
| SE501040C2 (en) * | 1993-03-08 | 1994-10-24 | Thurner Geodynamik Ab | Method and apparatus for controlling the vibration movement of a roller when packing a support such as soil, road banks, asphalt, etc. |
| US5426972A (en) * | 1993-04-20 | 1995-06-27 | Gas Research Institute | Monitoring soil compaction |
| SE501234C2 (en) * | 1993-04-29 | 1994-12-12 | Thurner Geodynamik Ab | Method and apparatus for measuring and documenting packing results and control of a roller when packing a laid substrate |
| SE502079C2 (en) * | 1993-10-14 | 1995-08-07 | Thurner Geodynamik Ab | Control of a packing machine measuring the properties of the substrate |
| EP0722044B1 (en) * | 1995-01-11 | 2002-05-15 | Micropump Incorporated | Integral pump and flow meter device |
| GB9504345D0 (en) * | 1995-03-03 | 1995-04-19 | Compaction Tech Soil Ltd | Method and apparatus for monitoring soil compaction |
| US6912903B2 (en) * | 1996-02-01 | 2005-07-05 | Bbnt Solutions Llc | Soil compaction measurement |
| ATE298082T1 (en) * | 1996-02-01 | 2005-07-15 | Bbnt Solutions Llc | SHEAR MODULE MEASUREMENT OF SOILS |
| WO1998017865A1 (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1998-04-30 | Ammann Verdichtung Ag | Method of measuring mechanical data of a soil, and of compacting the soil, and measuring or soil-compaction device |
| ES2232150T3 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2005-05-16 | Micro Materials Limited | SURFACE AND METHOD TEST EQUIPMENT. |
| US6460006B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2002-10-01 | Caterpillar Inc | System for predicting compaction performance |
| US6188942B1 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2001-02-13 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of a compaction machine based on energy transfer |
| US7110884B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2006-09-19 | Earthworks Solutions, Inc. | Methods in the engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
| US20120078515A1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2012-03-29 | Earthwork Solutions, Llc | Engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
| US20080004809A1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2008-01-03 | Earthwork Solutions, Inc. | Engineering design and construction of earthen fills |
| US7073374B2 (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2006-07-11 | Bbnt Solutions Llc | Soil compaction measurement on moving platform |
| US7191062B2 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2007-03-13 | Caterpillar Inc | Method and system of forecasting compaction performance |
| CN100370250C (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2008-02-20 | 重庆交通学院 | Comprehensive Electroseismic Imaging Diagnosis Method of Compaction Quality of Soil-rock Mixed Subgrade |
| US7623951B2 (en) * | 2006-04-06 | 2009-11-24 | Caterpillar Inc. | Machine and method of determining suitability of work material for compaction |
| US7908062B2 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2011-03-15 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for preparing a worksite based on soil moisture map data |
| US20100129152A1 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2010-05-27 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Method of covering an area with a layer of compressible material |
| JP5342900B2 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2013-11-13 | 株式会社小松製作所 | Construction machine, construction machine control method, and program for causing computer to execute the method |
| DE102014203585A1 (en) * | 2014-02-27 | 2015-08-27 | Hamm Ag | Method for determining a slip state of the compactor roller of a soil compactor caused by an oscillatory movement of a compactor roller |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3599543A (en) * | 1964-12-02 | 1971-08-17 | Stothert & Pitt Ltd | Vibratory machines |
| DE2018219C3 (en) * | 1970-04-16 | 1979-02-22 | Losenhausen Maschinenbau Ag, 4000 Duesseldorf | Device for generating a display or control signal for the drive of a dynamic soil compactor |
| DE2057279C3 (en) * | 1970-11-21 | 1979-06-07 | Losenhausen Maschinenbau Ag, 4000 Duesseldorf | Soil compacting device |
| US4103554A (en) * | 1976-03-12 | 1978-08-01 | Thurner Heinz F | Method and a device for ascertaining the degree of compaction of a bed of material with a vibratory compacting device |
-
1980
- 1980-11-26 SE SE8008299A patent/SE424455B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1981
- 1981-11-25 JP JP57500020A patent/JPH0314963B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1981-11-25 DE DE8181903202T patent/DE3163111D1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-11-25 EP EP81903202A patent/EP0065544B1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-11-25 AU AU78997/81A patent/AU545719B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1981-11-25 WO PCT/SE1981/000343 patent/WO1982001905A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1981-11-25 US US06/403,761 patent/US4467652A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1981-11-25 BR BR8108882A patent/BR8108882A/en unknown
-
1982
- 1982-07-26 SU SU823467046A patent/SU1609459A3/en active
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE3590610C2 (en) * | 1984-11-19 | 1997-09-04 | Thurner Geodynamik Ab | Degree of compaction of bed estimating method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| BR8108882A (en) | 1982-10-26 |
| US4467652A (en) | 1984-08-28 |
| JPH0314963B2 (en) | 1991-02-28 |
| WO1982001905A1 (en) | 1982-06-10 |
| SE8008299L (en) | 1982-05-27 |
| AU545719B2 (en) | 1985-07-25 |
| SE424455B (en) | 1982-07-19 |
| DE3163111D1 (en) | 1984-05-17 |
| SU1609459A3 (en) | 1990-11-23 |
| JPS57501871A (en) | 1982-10-21 |
| EP0065544A1 (en) | 1982-12-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0065544B1 (en) | Procedure and device for measurement of degree of compaction | |
| CA1120157A (en) | Vibratory compactors | |
| CN105203132B (en) | A kind of output frequency detection method of resonance type vibration gyro | |
| US4870601A (en) | Method to estimate the degree of compaction obtained at compaction and means to measure the degree of compaction for carrying out the method | |
| CN1042992A (en) | The vehicle-mounted test method and apparatus of compactness | |
| US6631641B1 (en) | Device and method for determining frequency and amplitude of an oscillating structure, especially for measuring acceleration or rotational rates | |
| CA1168470A (en) | Procedure and device for measurement | |
| SU412513A1 (en) | DEVICE FOR DETERMINATION OF PARAMETER-OPTIMIZED-FREQUENCY CHARACTERISTIC CONSTRUCTIVE ELEMENTS OF MACHINE MECHANISMS 12 | |
| SU961550A3 (en) | Method and device for automatically controlling vibratory roll compactor (modifications) | |
| US3757565A (en) | Non-contact vibration velocity apparatus | |
| SU1428939A1 (en) | Ultrasonic vibration meter | |
| RU1805296C (en) | Vibration parameters metering device | |
| CN1056000C (en) | Fast nondestructive surface wave tester for construction quality | |
| SU1552044A1 (en) | Method of diagnosis of condition of friction pair | |
| SU1742475A1 (en) | Device for rock mass shock hazard control using acoustic signals | |
| SU1392386A1 (en) | Device for measuring parameters of resonance oscillations | |
| JP2505507B2 (en) | Worker operating condition measuring device | |
| SU746204A1 (en) | Ultrasonic vibration meter | |
| SU591764A1 (en) | Method of inspecting concrete mixture consolidation at vibromoulding of concrete articles | |
| SU913077A1 (en) | Device for determination of distance in touch-free measuring of mechanical oscillations | |
| JPS6291825A (en) | Seismic type vibration measuring instrument | |
| SU894367A1 (en) | Method of determination of basement mechanical resistance | |
| JPH08178948A (en) | Accelerometer | |
| SU651193A1 (en) | Loose material rate-of-flow meter | |
| SU1651124A1 (en) | Electrodynamic calibrating shaker unit |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19820614 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT DE FR GB |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT DE FR GB |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 7057 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19840415 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3163111 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19840517 |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed | ||
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 19971113 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19971117 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19981125 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19981125 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19981125 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20001110 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20001120 Year of fee payment: 20 |