[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0045017A1 - Procédé pour le traitement des surfaces de tôle d'acier inoxydable - Google Patents

Procédé pour le traitement des surfaces de tôle d'acier inoxydable Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0045017A1
EP0045017A1 EP81105614A EP81105614A EP0045017A1 EP 0045017 A1 EP0045017 A1 EP 0045017A1 EP 81105614 A EP81105614 A EP 81105614A EP 81105614 A EP81105614 A EP 81105614A EP 0045017 A1 EP0045017 A1 EP 0045017A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
treatment
stainless steel
steel sheet
phosphoric acid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP81105614A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0045017B1 (fr
Inventor
Tomoge Hitomi
Takehisa Konishi
Tetsutaro Ogushi
Kazuaki Hatakeyama
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP10155680A external-priority patent/JPS5847478B2/ja
Priority claimed from JP10155580A external-priority patent/JPS5847477B2/ja
Priority claimed from JP11586580A external-priority patent/JPS5847479B2/ja
Priority claimed from JP56085952A external-priority patent/JPS5912755B2/ja
Application filed by Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Kinzoku Co Ltd
Publication of EP0045017A1 publication Critical patent/EP0045017A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0045017B1 publication Critical patent/EP0045017B1/fr
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D9/00Electrolytic coating other than with metals
    • C25D9/04Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials
    • C25D9/08Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes
    • C25D9/10Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes on iron or steel

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet (including a stainless steel strip) according to which electrochemical treatment is performed using the stainless steel sheet as a cathode for forming a noncorroding film on the surface thereof.
  • Chrome plating is known as a process for surface treatment of this type.
  • Chrome plating is a kind of electroplating according to which a surface film of pure chrome is formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet by electrodeposition oi metal chrome.
  • This surface film is advantageous in that it is noncorroding and has excellent gloss.
  • This film is utilized for treating stainless steel sheets which are inexpensive but are not sufficiently noncorroding, such as sheets according to JIS SUS430.
  • this chrome plating adopts as a treatment solution a mixture of sulfuric acid and chromic acid of high concentration. For this reason, the waste solution from the treatment contains a large amount of chromic acid and thus requires costly treatment for prevention of pollution.
  • Chrome plating further requires a large current of over several amperes per dm and a long treatment time. This plating process thus results in great power consumption (e.g., integrated current density 6,000 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 ) and higher treatment cost.
  • This process is advantageous in that the concentration of residual chromic acid in the solution is low, and the treatment of the waste solution is easy. Furthermore, a corrosion resistance comparable to that obtained with chromic plating may be obtained with a smaller current density and a shorter conduction time.
  • the present invention has been made in view of this and has for its object to provide a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet wherein the treatment solution is improved so that gloss and resistance to sulfurous acid are improved.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA (bright annealing) film or a passive film in a treatment solution and carrying out cathodic treatment under conditions of 1 to 600 Aosec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, said treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2% by weight of a member selected from-the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof.
  • BA blue annealing
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of a molybdate, and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet characterized by, before or after dipping a stainless steel having a BA film or a passive film in a first treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, and 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature, dipping the stainless sheet in a second treatment solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid and 0.1 to 10% by weight of a molybdate and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 Aosec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a treatment solution containing 0.1 to 50.0% by weight of phosphoric acid, 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of chromic acid, 0.1 to 2.0% by weight of a member selected from the group consisting of magnesium oxide, sodium silicate and mixtures thereof, and 0.1 to 10.0% by weight of a molybdate, and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 Aosec/dm2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • a process for surface treatment of a stainless steel sheet characterized by dipping a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film in a 0.1 to 70% by weight aqueous solution of phosphoric acid, and carrying out cathodic treatment under the conditions of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 integrated current density and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, utilizing the stainless steel as a cathode and metal molybdenum as an anode.
  • a BA (bright annealing) film or a passive film must be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet to be treated.
  • the BA film or the passive film is a film which renders the surface of the stainless steel sheet inactive.
  • the BA film may be obtained by bright heat- treatment according to which the sheet is heated in a vacuum, an inert gas, a reducing gas, or a hot salt.
  • the passive film may be obtained by leaving to the sheet in air or dipping the stainless steel sheet in a 20% (by volume) aqueous solution of nitric acid at room ' temperature for 30 minutes or at 65°C for 10 minutes.
  • the reason why the BA film or the passive film should be formed before the treatment according to the present invention is that if such a film is not formed in advance,-corrosion resistance may not be improved even if cathodic treatment is conducted according to this invention. This has been confirmed by experiments to be described later (Example 1).
  • a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film formed thereon undergoes cathodic treatment in a treatment solution containing phosphoric acid, chromic acid, magnesium oxide and/or sodium silicate.
  • Phosphoric acid. and chromic acid contained in this treatment solution are necessary components for forming a noncorroding film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet.
  • the lower limit of the amount of phosphoric acid to be used has been set at 0.1% by weight since with smaller amounts of phosphoric acid, satisfactory corrosion resistance may not be obtained.
  • the upper limit of phosphoric acid to be used has also been set to 50% by weight, since larger amount of phosphoric acid result in loss of gloss at the surface of the stainless steel sheet and a greater waste of solution.
  • the preferable range of the amount of phosphoric acid to be used herein is 5 to 20% by weight.
  • the range for the amount of chromic acid has also been set between 0.1 and 10.0% by weight for the same reason as in the case of phosphoric acid.
  • the amount of chromic acid is not in this range, satisfactory corrosion resistance may not be obtained.
  • the amount of chromic is out of this range, surface gloss is lost and the amount of the waste solution will be great.
  • the preferable range'of the amount of chromic acid is 0.5 to 1.8% by weight.
  • Magnesium oxide and sodium silicate are components for preventing loss of gloss at the surface of the stainless steel sheet.
  • the range of the amount of magnesium oxide has been limited since satisfactory gloss may not be obtained below 0.1% or above 2.0% by weight.
  • the preferable range of the amount of magnesium oxide is 0.5 to 1.5% by weight.
  • the amount of sodium silicate has been limited between 0.1 and 2% by weight. When this amount is less than 0.1% by weight, satisfactory gloss may not be obtained. When the amount of sodium silicate exceeds 2% by weight, it precipitates in the form of gel from the solution, so that it may not exhibit the advantageous effects of sodium silicate.
  • the preferable range of sodium silicate is 0.1 to 0.8% by weight.
  • the amounts of magnesium oxide or sodium silicate have been limited to within the range of 0.1 to 2% by weight. When the amount of either of these is below 0.1% by weight, the satisfactory effects provided by addition of these members may not be obtained. When the amount exceeds 2% by weight, the surface gloss may not be obtained.
  • the preferable range of the amount of magnesium oxide or sodium silicate is 1.0 to 1.8% by weight.
  • the treating conditions for cathodic treatment in such a treatment solution are 1 to 600 Aosec/dm2 integrated current density and 0 to 90°C solution temperature.
  • the integrated current density has been limited to the range of 1 to 600 Aosec/dm2 since a lower integrated current density than 1 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 results in insufficient corrosion resistance and a higher integrated current density than 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 results in unsatisfactory surface gloss and higher cost.
  • the preferable range of integrated current density is 60 to 360 Aosec/dm 2 .
  • the solution temperature has been limited to the range of 0 to 90°C since the solution temperature below 0°C results in a longer treating time and difficulty in maintaining the temperature of the treatment solution; a higher solution temperature than 90°C results in degradation in quality of the treatment solution.
  • the preferable range of solution temperature is 50 to 70°C.
  • a stainless steel sheet with a BA film or a passive film formed thereon undergoes cathodic treatment or dipping treatment in a treatment solution containing phosphoric acid and molybdate.
  • the phosphoric acid contained in this treatment solution is a necessary component for forming a noncorroding film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet as in the case of the first aspect of the present invention.
  • the lower limit of the amount of phosphoric acid has been set to 0.1% by weight since a smaller amount of phosphoric acid results in unsatisfactory corrosion resistance.
  • the upper limit of phosphoric acid has been set to 70% by weight since larger amount results in loss of surface gloss at the surface of the stainless steel sheet and a greater solution loss.
  • the preferable range of the amount of phosphoric acid is 5 to 50% by weight.
  • the molybdate is effective in improving resistance to sulfurous acid by forming the corrosion resistant film on the surface of the stainless steel sheet and in maintaining excellent gloss.
  • the molybdate may be included in the form of ammonium molybdate, sodium molybdate and so on.
  • the amount of the molybdate to be used herein has been set as described above since a smaller amount of the molybdate does not provide satisfactory effects and a larger amount results in loss of surface gloss.
  • the preferable range of the amount of the molybdate is 1 to 3% by weight.
  • the treating conditions for this treatment are the same as those as have been described with reference to the first aspect of the present invention except that the lower limit of the solution temperature may be lowered to 0°C in this case.
  • the third aspect of the present invention provides three options:
  • the mixing ratio of the respective components in the first treatment solution is the same as that described before with reference to the first aspect of the present invention.
  • the mixing ratio of the respective components of the second treatment solution is the same as that described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • the cathodic treatment conditions in the first treatment solution are 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 in integrated current density, and 0 to 90°C in solution temperature, preferably 10 to 30°C.
  • the integrated current density has been limited to this range for the reasons as described below. When the integrated current density is below 1 Aosec/dm 2 , the gloss may be maintained but the resistance to corrosion, such as resistance to sulfurous acid, salt damage (table 1) and so on, is not satisfactory.
  • the integrated current density exceeds 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 , the gloss may not be maintained and the process is uneconomical.
  • it. is preferable to set the integrated current density of 10 to 80 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 .
  • the temperature of this treatment solution should be controlled between 0 and 90°C for the reasons to be.described below. When the solution temperature is below 0°C, the treatment time becomes longer and maintenance of the temperature of treatment solution becomes difficult.
  • the solution temperature exceeds 90°C, the effects of improving resistance to corrosion may not be obtained.
  • the treatment time may be shortened and the power consumption may be reduced with an increase in temperature of the treatment solution.
  • a solution temperature ranging from 70 to 90°C, a film of sufficient corrosion resistance may be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet with an integrated current density of below 1 Aosec/dm 2 , or even at 0 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 (dipping in the solution with no electric current flowing through the stainless steel sheet).
  • the cathodic treatment conditions in the second treatment solution are 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 integrated current density, and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, preferably 40 to 60°C.
  • the integrated current density has been set within the range of 1 to 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 for the reasons to be described below. When the integrated current density is below 1 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 , the gloss may be maintained but the corrosion resistance may not be sufficient. When the integrated current density exceeds 600 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 , the surface gloss may not be obtained, discoloration may occur, and the process is uneconomical. Particularly for improving the resistance to sulfurous acid, it is preferable to set the integrated current density within the range of 60 to 200 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 .
  • the integrated current density is preferable to set within the range of 40 to 80 Aosec/dm 2 .
  • the integrated current density is preferably set within the range of 60 to 80 Aesec/dm 2 .
  • the solution temperature of the second treatment solution has been set to be within the range of 0 to 90°C for the same reasons described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • the treatment time may be shortened and the power consumption may be reduced with a higher solution temperature.
  • a solution temperature ranging from 70 to 90°C
  • a corrosion resistant film may be formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet with an integrated current density of below 1 Aesec/dm 2 , or even at 0 A ⁇ sec/dm 2 (dipping in the solution with no electric current flowing through the stainless steel sheet).
  • the cathodic treatment conditions with a solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions may be substantially the same as those described with reference to the cathodic treatment with either the first or second treatment solution, and may be appropriately selected accordingly.
  • a stainless steel sheet having a BA film or a passive film formed thereon is dipped in an aqueous solution containing 0.1 to 70% by weight of phosphoric acid, preferably 5 to 50% by weight, and cathodic treatment of the stainless steel sheet is carried out under the treatment conditions of 1 to 600 A'sec/dm2 integrated current density, and 10 to 90°C solution temperature, preferably 40 to 60°C, using the stainless steel sheet as a cathode and metal molybdenum as an anode.
  • the reasons for setting the phosphoric acid amount and the cathodic protection conditions are the same as those described with reference to the second aspect of the present invention.
  • Metal molybdenum is used as the anode in this process for electrolytically eluting the metal molybdenum during electrolysis.
  • This metal molybdenum improves the resistance to sulfurous acid of the noncorroding film formed on the surface of the stainless steel sheet. It also maintains excellent gloss.
  • Metal molybdenum of higher purity is preferable for improving the corrosion resistance to thereby prevent degradation of the treatment solution.
  • the metal molybdenum as the anode since the metal molybdenum as the anode is electrolytically eluted, the molybdate need not be incorporated in advance, thus improving the workability of the treatment. Furthermore, since the metal molybdenum does not contain a large amount of impurities, it prevents degradation in quality of the treatment solution and prolongs the life of the treatment solution.
  • the treatment time may be shortened with a higher solution temperature and a greater current density.
  • a corrosion resistant film may be formed, generally, in 10 seconds to 10 minutes.
  • a film having corrosion resistance may be formed on the surface of a stainless steel sheet, and its corrosion resistance will not be degradated for a long period of time after treatment.
  • This film is rich in gloss and improves the resistance to corrosion of a stainless steel sheet having insufficient resistance to corrosion, thus improving its product value.
  • JIS SUS 430 No. 1
  • JIS SUS 434 No. 2
  • JIS SUS 304 No. 3
  • the treatment solution contained 9.25% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 0.10% by weight of sodium silicate.
  • the stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment for 3 minutes at a current density of 2.0 A/dm 2 and a solution temperature of 20°C.
  • Stainless steel sheet raw materials were used which were obtained by bright annealing the sheets according to JIS SUS 430, JIS SUS 434, and JIS SUS 420J2 to form BA films, and by hair-line treating (forming a passive film on) the sheet according to JIS SUS 304.
  • the treatment solution contained 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1.34% by weight of sodium molybdate.
  • a stainless steel sheet as in the above example was similarly subjected to cathodic treatment with a treatment solution which contained phosphoric acid but which did not contain a molybdate.
  • the results of the corrosion resistance test on this stainless steel sheet are also shown in Table 4.
  • Example 3 The surface gloss of the stainless steel sheet (JIS SUS 430) obtained in Example 3 was compared with that of the stainless steel sheet having the BA film formed thereon. The presence or absence of gloss was evaluated. The obtained results are shown in Table 5.
  • Stainless steel sheets were used which were obtained by bright annealing sheets according to JIS SUS 430 to form BA films thereon.
  • the first treatment solution ' contained 9.25% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 0.10% by weight of sodium silicate.
  • the stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment by varying the treatment conditions within the ranges according to the present invention.
  • the second treatment solution contained 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid and 1.34% by weight of sodium molybdate.
  • the stainless steel sheets were subjected to cathodic treatment again by varying the treatment conditions within the ranges according to the present invention.
  • the stainless steel sheets surface-treated in this manner were subjected to the corrosion resistance test according to the method shown in Table 1 (the resistance to sulfurous acid was evaluated according to the sulfurous acid gas corrosion test as defined in Dln, and the resistance to salt damage was evaluated according to the Dip and Dry method (GM conditions)).
  • the obtained results are shown in Table 6.
  • Observations were made on gloss and discoloration of the surfaces of the sheets, and the obtained results are also shown in Table 6.
  • stainless steel sheets were subjected to various treatment methods. Some stainless steel sheets were subjected to the first and second treatments wherein the treatment conditions deviated from the ranges according to the present invention (Nos. 9 to 12). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to cathodic treatment in the first treatment solution but not to the second treatment (No. 13). Stainless steel sheets were subjected to the first treatment but not to the second treatment (Nos. 14 and 15). A stainless steel sheet which did not have a BA film was subjected to the first and second treatments (No. 16). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to the second treatment first and to the first treatment thereafter (No. 17). A stainless steel sheet was subjected to a treatment with a solution mixture of the first and second treatment solutions (No. 18). These stainless steel sheets were subjected to the corrosion resistance test and were evaluated for gloss and discoloration. The results are shown in Table 6.
  • the composition of the solution mixture was 9.37% by weight of phosphoric acid, 1.68% by weight of chromic acid, 0.78% by weight of magnesium oxide, and 1.34% by weight of a molybdate.
  • the treatment conditions were 1 A/dm 2 current density, 60 second treatment time, and 50°C solution temperature.
  • stainless steel sheets were subjected to dipping (without conduction of current) instead of cathodic treatment in the first and second treatment solutions (Nos. 19 to 21). These stainless steel sheets were subjected to the corrosion resistance test and were evaluated for gloss and discoloration. The results are shown in Table 6.
  • Stainless steel sheets were obtained by bright annealing the sheets according to JIS SUS 430 to form BA films thereon. A treatment was carried out using these sheets as cathodes and metal molybdenum plates of 99.0% by weight purity as anodes in a treatment solution containing 10% by weight of phosphoric acid.
  • the stainless steel sheet having a BA film was also subjected to the corrosion resistance test and the obtained results are shown in Table 7.
  • the stainless steel sheet having neither the BA film nor the passive film was subjected to cathodic treatment under the same conditions as in the example.
  • the results of the corrosion resistance test of this sheet are also shown in Table 7.
  • a treatment solution containing sodium molybdenum also results in good corrosion resistance of the resultant sheet. However, as will be made clear in Example 8, degradation in quality of the treatment solution is significant with this composition.
  • the surface gloss of the stainless steel sheet (JIS SUS 430) obtained in Example 6 was compared with that of the stainless steel sheet having a BA film formed thereon. Evaluations were made as to the presence or absence of gloss. The obtained results are shown in Table 8.
  • Example 6 To the treatment solution used in Example 6 was added 0.5% by weight of sodium molybdate. Cathodic treatment was carried out using a ferrite anode. Degradation in quality of the treatment solution was evaluated. Degradation in quality of the treatment solution was first observed after 25 hours.
  • a belt-shaped plate of a sample 100 mm in width was continuously treated in 1 liter of the electrolytic solution.
  • the solution was judged to have been degraded when the rusting rate according to the sulfurous acid resistance test exceeded 10%.
  • corrosion resistance particularly resistance tc sulfurous acid is excellent and excellent gloss may be maintained, providing an excellent process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheets for automobiles.
  • preparation for the treatment is easy and degradation in the treatment solution may be prevented for a long period of time.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
EP81105614A 1980-07-24 1981-07-17 Procédé pour le traitement des surfaces de tôle d'acier inoxydable Expired EP0045017B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP10155680A JPS5847478B2 (ja) 1980-07-24 1980-07-24 ステンレス鋼の表面処理方法
JP101556/80 1980-07-24
JP10155580A JPS5847477B2 (ja) 1980-07-24 1980-07-24 ステンレス鋼の表面処理方法
JP101555/80 1980-07-24
JP11586580A JPS5847479B2 (ja) 1980-08-25 1980-08-25 ステンレス鋼の表面処理方法
JP115865/80 1980-08-25
JP56085952A JPS5912755B2 (ja) 1981-06-04 1981-06-04 ステンレス鋼の表面処理方法
JP85952/81 1981-06-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0045017A1 true EP0045017A1 (fr) 1982-02-03
EP0045017B1 EP0045017B1 (fr) 1985-10-16

Family

ID=27467188

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP81105614A Expired EP0045017B1 (fr) 1980-07-24 1981-07-17 Procédé pour le traitement des surfaces de tôle d'acier inoxydable

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0045017B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE3172671D1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993010278A1 (fr) * 1991-11-15 1993-05-27 Instituttet For Produktudvikling - Ipu Procede de traitement ulterieur d'un article a surface metallique, et solution de traitement associee
WO2001071067A3 (fr) * 2000-03-22 2003-02-06 Elisha Technologies Co Llc Procede a energie accrue pour traiter une surface conductrice et produits obtenus par ce procede
TWI427159B (zh) * 2007-04-27 2014-02-21 不鏽鋼製導電性構件及其製造方法
CN110904489A (zh) * 2019-12-03 2020-03-24 天津理工大学 一种低碳钢表面制备高耐蚀涂层的微弧氧化电解液及其制备方法及用途

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6322687B1 (en) 1997-01-31 2001-11-27 Elisha Technologies Co Llc Electrolytic process for forming a mineral
US6599643B2 (en) 1997-01-31 2003-07-29 Elisha Holding Llc Energy enhanced process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby
CN1692178A (zh) 2002-02-05 2005-11-02 以利沙控股有限公司 一种处理金属表面的方法以及由此形成的产品

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1356111A (en) * 1970-03-23 1974-06-12 South London Elect Equip Vacuum ovens comprising shelves or trays
GB1437762A (en) * 1973-05-07 1976-06-03 Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) Process for coating metal parts
GB1482546A (en) * 1973-11-17 1977-08-10 Kawasaki Steel Co Coating compositions
GB1563979A (en) * 1977-03-16 1980-04-02 Pyrene Chemical Services Ltd Process for treating metal surfaces
US4213792A (en) * 1977-03-09 1980-07-22 Centro Sperimentale Metallurgico S.P.A. Coating solution for applying tensioning coatings to electrical steel strip

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5330434A (en) * 1976-09-01 1978-03-22 Toyohito Tomonaga Surface treatment of stainless steel by chromic acids

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1356111A (en) * 1970-03-23 1974-06-12 South London Elect Equip Vacuum ovens comprising shelves or trays
GB1437762A (en) * 1973-05-07 1976-06-03 Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) Process for coating metal parts
GB1482546A (en) * 1973-11-17 1977-08-10 Kawasaki Steel Co Coating compositions
US4213792A (en) * 1977-03-09 1980-07-22 Centro Sperimentale Metallurgico S.P.A. Coating solution for applying tensioning coatings to electrical steel strip
GB1563979A (en) * 1977-03-16 1980-04-02 Pyrene Chemical Services Ltd Process for treating metal surfaces

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993010278A1 (fr) * 1991-11-15 1993-05-27 Instituttet For Produktudvikling - Ipu Procede de traitement ulterieur d'un article a surface metallique, et solution de traitement associee
US5607521A (en) * 1991-11-15 1997-03-04 Ipu Instituttet For Produktudvikling Method for post-treatment of an article with a metallic surface as well as a treatment solution to be used in the method
WO2001071067A3 (fr) * 2000-03-22 2003-02-06 Elisha Technologies Co Llc Procede a energie accrue pour traiter une surface conductrice et produits obtenus par ce procede
TWI427159B (zh) * 2007-04-27 2014-02-21 不鏽鋼製導電性構件及其製造方法
CN110904489A (zh) * 2019-12-03 2020-03-24 天津理工大学 一种低碳钢表面制备高耐蚀涂层的微弧氧化电解液及其制备方法及用途

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3172671D1 (en) 1985-11-21
EP0045017B1 (fr) 1985-10-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2913377A (en) Aqueous electrolytic process
EP0045017B1 (fr) Procédé pour le traitement des surfaces de tôle d'acier inoxydable
US4874480A (en) Process for treatment of titanium and titanium alloys
US4427499A (en) Process for surface treatment of stainless steel sheet
US4249999A (en) Electrolytic zinc-nickel alloy plating
US4356069A (en) Stripping composition and method for preparing and using same
US2453757A (en) Process for producing modified electronickel
US4466865A (en) Trivalent chromium electroplating process
US3912601A (en) Surface treatment of tin-plated steel sheets
CN107208298B (zh) 镀Sn钢板和化学转化处理钢板以及它们的制造方法
US2436244A (en) Metalworking and strippingplating process
US4617095A (en) Electrolytic post treatment of chromium substrates
EP0088192B1 (fr) Contrôle d'évolution de gaz d'anode dans un bain de placage à base de chrome trivalent
US2769774A (en) Electrodeposition method
US4615773A (en) Chromium-iron alloy plating from a solution containing both hexavalent and trivalent chromium
US4806226A (en) Process for electrolytically coloring aluminum material
US5246563A (en) Process for the electrolytic zinc coating of stainless steel
US4160703A (en) Nonplating cathode and method for producing same
US3898139A (en) Process for surface treatment of zinc-plated steel plates
JP2626151B2 (ja) 明度及び光沢度の優れた電気亜鉛めっき鋼板の製造方法
JP3405669B2 (ja) 耐食性と表面外観に優れたニッケルメッキ鋼板およびその製造方法
JP4093675B2 (ja) 耐水素脆性及び耐食性が優れた塗装用鋼板の製造方法
US2847373A (en) Electroplating zinc on basis metal
Spooner et al. Phosphoric acid anodizing of aluminium and its application to electroplating
JPH07166371A (ja) 耐食性、耐パウダリング性、耐低温衝撃剥離性、摺動性及びリン酸塩処理性にすぐれるZn−Ni系合金めっき鋼板及びその製造方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19820305

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3172671

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19851121

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19920623

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19920706

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19920720

Year of fee payment: 12

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19920925

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19930717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19930718

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19930717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19940331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19940401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 81105614.2

Effective date: 19940210