[go: up one dir, main page]

CN110359903A - A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir - Google Patents

A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110359903A
CN110359903A CN201810312336.XA CN201810312336A CN110359903A CN 110359903 A CN110359903 A CN 110359903A CN 201810312336 A CN201810312336 A CN 201810312336A CN 110359903 A CN110359903 A CN 110359903A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
boundary
model
gas
gas reservoir
well
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201810312336.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
游良容
兰义飞
徐运动
谭中国
姜艳东
刘华林
张建国
何磊
吕建
张保国
何依林
刘志军
袁继明
艾庆琳
田敏
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Petrochina Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Petrochina Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Petrochina Co Ltd filed Critical Petrochina Co Ltd
Priority to CN201810312336.XA priority Critical patent/CN110359903A/en
Publication of CN110359903A publication Critical patent/CN110359903A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for determining an irregular geometric boundary of a closed gas reservoir, which comprises the steps of firstly selecting a plurality of groups of boundary models for fitting according to the pressure recovery log-log curve characteristics of gas wells distributed on the boundary and combining the existing reliable geological knowledge of boundary wells; then, screening a boundary model according to a fitting result; then, establishing a gas well production dynamic analysis model according to the screened boundary model, circularly debugging key parameters to fit m (RNP) and derivatives thereof, PI (proportional integral) and point (Point) and derivatives thereof, and finally determining a gas well model and a boundary form; and finally combining the boundary forms of all boundary gas wells to obtain the irregular geometric boundary of the gas reservoir. The invention adopts the edge-exploring test interpretation technology, and repeatedly interprets and verifies the pressure recovery data of the wells around the boundary in combination with the production dynamic data to obtain the irregular boundary of the gas reservoir, thereby solving the problem that the actual boundary of the gas reservoir is complex and cannot be accurately interpreted, and providing an important basis for determining the gas field development scheme and the development mode.

Description

一种封闭气藏不规则几何边界的确定方法A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir

技术领域technical field

本发明属于气田开发技术领域,具体涉及一种封闭气藏不规则几何边界的确定方法。The invention belongs to the technical field of gas field development, and in particular relates to a method for determining the irregular geometric boundary of a closed gas reservoir.

背景技术Background technique

确定边界的性质和大小,解决边界的复杂性问题,是确定开发方案和开发方式的重要依据。本发明主要采用了探边测试结合生产动态来确定气藏不规则边界。Determining the nature and size of the boundary and solving the complexity of the boundary is an important basis for determining the development plan and method. The present invention mainly adopts the edge detection test combined with the production dynamics to determine the irregular boundary of the gas reservoir.

探边测试是在1956年由Jones首先提出的,一般是指“limited well test”或“Extended well test”。Jones为探边测试提供了完整的理论基础,其后有许多研究者在这一领域作了大量的工作。由于计算机技术的发展,国际上70年代后期探边测试发展较快,在油田开发试井技术的基础上有了进一步的发展。通过探边测试气藏工程师对动态资料的解释更加深刻,主要表现在对气藏边界类型和边界大小的认识更清楚,但目前常用模型,在探边测试中只能解决规则几何边界问题,实际气藏的边界是多种多样的,是常规测试模型所不能完全描述或近似的。因此,要解决边界的复杂性问题,必须发展新的模型和解决问题的手段。The edge test was first proposed by Jones in 1956, and generally refers to "limited well test" or "Extended well test". Jones provided a complete theoretical basis for the edge test, after which many researchers have done a lot of work in this field. Due to the development of computer technology, the international edge detection test developed rapidly in the late 1970s, and further development was made on the basis of oilfield development and well testing technology. Through edge testing, gas reservoir engineers can interpret dynamic data more profoundly, mainly because they have a clearer understanding of gas reservoir boundary types and boundary sizes. However, currently commonly used models can only solve regular geometric boundary problems in edge testing. The boundaries of gas reservoirs are varied and cannot be fully described or approximated by conventionally tested models. Therefore, to solve the complexity of the boundary, new models and problem-solving methods must be developed.

此次提出的探边测试与常规测试探边的重要区别在于边界的性质、形状和大小的区别,可以给出任意形状气藏在不同边界条件下的数值试井模型,分析不同边界性质对试井理论曲线的影响以及边界距离的影响,从而解释出气藏的不规则几何边界。The important difference between the edge detection test proposed this time and the conventional edge detection lies in the difference in the nature, shape and size of the boundary. It can give the numerical well test model of gas reservoirs with arbitrary shapes under different boundary conditions, and analyze the impact of different boundary properties on the test. The influence of the theoretical well curve and the influence of the boundary distance can explain the irregular geometric boundary of the gas reservoir.

发明内容Contents of the invention

本发明所要解决的技术问题在于针对上述现有技术中的不足,提供一种封闭气藏不规则几何边界的确定方法,解决三角形气藏、任意四边形气藏以及任意不规则几何边界气藏的探边解释问题。The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method for determining the irregular geometric boundaries of closed gas reservoirs to solve the problems of triangular gas reservoirs, arbitrary quadrilateral gas reservoirs, and gas reservoirs with arbitrary irregular geometric boundaries. Explain the problem.

本发明采用以下技术方案:The present invention adopts following technical scheme:

一种封闭气藏不规则几何边界的确定方法,包括以下步骤:A method for determining the irregular geometric boundary of a closed gas reservoir, comprising the following steps:

S1、采集现场的压力数据、日产量数据、测井解释数据、高压物性数据以及井径数据,根据分布于边界的气井压力恢复双对数曲线特征,结合边界井现有可靠的地质认识,选取多组边界模型进行拟合;S1. Collect on-site pressure data, daily production data, logging interpretation data, high-pressure physical property data and well diameter data, restore the double-logarithmic curve characteristics according to the pressure of the gas wells distributed on the boundary, and combine the existing reliable geological understanding of the boundary wells to select Multiple sets of boundary models are fitted;

S2、根据拟合的结果筛选边界模型;S2. Screening the boundary model according to the fitting result;

S3、根据步骤S2筛选的边界模型建立气井生产动态解析模型,循环调试关键参数,以拟合m(RNP)及其导数、PI,PIint及其导数曲线,最终确定气井模型及边界形态;S3. Establish a gas well production dynamic analysis model according to the boundary model screened in step S2, and cyclically debug key parameters to fit m(RNP) and its derivative, PI, PIint and its derivative curve, and finally determine the gas well model and boundary shape;

S4、组合所有边界气井的边界形态得到气藏的不规则几何边界。S4. Combining the boundary forms of all boundary gas wells to obtain the irregular geometric boundary of the gas reservoir.

具体的,步骤S1中,边界模型包括:均质地层+三条不流动边界、径向复合地层+无限大边界、径向复合地层+三条不流动边界、均质地层+封闭边界。Specifically, in step S1, the boundary model includes: homogeneous formation + three immobile boundaries, radial composite formation + infinite boundary, radial composite formation + three immobile boundaries, homogeneous formation + closed boundary.

具体的,步骤S2中,针对封闭气藏内的每一口井的压力恢复双对数曲线特征,选取多组边界模型进行拟合,根据拟合的形态以及得到的试井解释结果,选取与井区地层厚度图以及地质认识匹配80%以上的模型,得到符合的边界模型。Specifically, in step S2, according to the pressure recovery log-logarithmic curve characteristics of each well in the closed gas reservoir, multiple sets of boundary models are selected for fitting, and according to the fitted shape and the obtained well test interpretation results, the The regional stratigraphic thickness map and geological knowledge match more than 80% of the models, and a consistent boundary model is obtained.

具体的,步骤S3中,结合生产动态数据的压力和产量,将筛选后边界模型的压力恢复解释参数应用到生产动态资料分析中,将压力恢复解释结果作为动态分析模型的输入参数建立气井生产动态解析模型。Specifically, in step S3, combined with the pressure and production of the production dynamic data, the pressure recovery interpretation parameters of the screened boundary model are applied to the production performance data analysis, and the pressure recovery interpretation results are used as the input parameters of the dynamic analysis model to establish the production performance of the gas well Analytical model.

进一步的,关键参数包括地层系数、污染系数、边界距离和边界长度,m(RNP)为产量数据,PI为地层压力数据,PIint为地层压力针对时间的积分数据,针对m(RNP)及其导数曲线、PI,PIint及其导数曲线进行拟合,用于验证筛选后的边界模型是否符合生产动态特征,从而确定气井模型。Further, the key parameters include formation coefficient, pollution coefficient, boundary distance and boundary length, m(RNP) is the production data, PI is the formation pressure data, PIint is the integral data of the formation pressure against time, for m(RNP) and its derivative Fitting curves, PI, PIint and their derivative curves are used to verify whether the screened boundary model conforms to the production performance characteristics, so as to determine the gas well model.

具体的,步骤S4中,根据每一口井与边界的距离、边界长短以及边界夹角,对边界进行绘制并进行交叉连接,得到整个封闭气藏的不规则几何边界。Specifically, in step S4, according to the distance between each well and the boundary, the length of the boundary, and the angle between the boundary, the boundary is drawn and cross-connected to obtain the irregular geometric boundary of the entire closed gas reservoir.

与现有技术相比,本发明至少具有以下有益效果:Compared with the prior art, the present invention has at least the following beneficial effects:

本发明采用探边测试解释技术,针对边界周围井的压力恢复资料结合生产动态资料进行反复的解释印证,求取气藏的不规则边界,解决了实际气藏边界复杂无法精准解释的问题,为确定气田开发方案和开发方式的提供重要依据。The present invention adopts the edge detection test interpretation technology, and repeatedly interprets and confirms the pressure recovery data of the wells around the boundary combined with the production dynamic data to obtain the irregular boundary of the gas reservoir, which solves the problem that the actual gas reservoir boundary is complex and cannot be accurately interpreted, and provides Provide an important basis for determining the gas field development plan and development method.

进一步的,根据气田的特征选取初步的多组边界模型来进行拟合的时候,这只是第一步,会得到很多的拟合形态,同样也会得到同样多的解释结果,需要进一步结合地层厚度图以及地质特征来初步排除一些不符合的组合边界,这样有利于后边确定符合的唯一边界。Furthermore, when selecting a preliminary multi-group boundary model for fitting according to the characteristics of the gas field, this is only the first step, and many fitting shapes will be obtained, as well as the same amount of interpretation results, which need to be further combined with the formation thickness Figures and geological features to preliminarily exclude some non-compliant combination boundaries, which is beneficial to determine the only consistent boundary later.

进一步的,一般压力恢复解释结果会得到多种解释结果,为了确定解释结果的唯一性,需要进一步验证,所以才需要结合气井的动态数据,建立气井生产动态解析模型确定符合的解释结果模型。Furthermore, the general pressure recovery interpretation results will get a variety of interpretation results. In order to determine the uniqueness of the interpretation results, further verification is required. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the dynamic data of the gas well to establish a gas well production dynamic analysis model to determine the corresponding interpretation result model.

进一步的,根据最后确定的压力解释结果模型就能得到井周围边界的的条数,以及长短,夹角程度,同样也得到了每一口井的位置与边界的距离关系,这是由压力解释模型就能得到的,无需自己计算与绘制。把解释的每一口井的边界进行绘制交叉连接,得到整个封闭气藏的不规则几何边界。Further, according to the finally determined pressure interpretation result model, the number of boundaries around the well, as well as the length and angle degree can be obtained, as well as the distance relationship between the position of each well and the boundary, which is determined by the pressure interpretation model You can get it without calculating and drawing yourself. The boundaries of each well explained are drawn and cross-connected to obtain the irregular geometric boundaries of the entire closed gas reservoir.

综上所述,本发明方法适用简便,可节省大量人力、财力,具有较大的实用价值和经济价值。In summary, the method of the present invention is easy to apply, can save a lot of manpower and financial resources, and has great practical value and economic value.

下面通过附图和实施例,对本发明的技术方案做进一步的详细描述。The technical solutions of the present invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

附图说明Description of drawings

图1为本发明实施例S224井压力恢复双对数诊断曲线示意图;Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a double-logarithmic diagnosis curve of pressure recovery in well S224 according to an embodiment of the present invention;

图2为本发明实施例S224井各模型解释模型示意图,其中,(a)为均质地层+三条不流动边界图,(b)为径向复合地层+无限大边界图,(c)为径向复合地层+三条不流动边界图,(d)为均质地层+封闭边界图;Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of each model interpretation model of well S224 in the embodiment of the present invention, wherein, (a) is a homogeneous formation + three immobile boundary maps, (b) is a radial composite formation + an infinite boundary map, and (c) is a radial Composite strata + three no-flow boundary maps, (d) is a homogeneous stratum + closed boundary map;

图3为本发明实施例S224井各模型拟合曲线示意图;Fig. 3 is the schematic diagram of each model fitting curve of well S224 of the embodiment of the present invention;

图4为本发明实施例m(RNP)及其导数双对数拟合曲线示意图;Fig. 4 is the embodiment of the present invention m (RNP) and its derivative bilogarithmic fitting curve schematic diagram;

图5为本发明实施例PI、PI积分及其导数双对数拟合曲线示意图;Fig. 5 is the embodiment of the present invention PI, PI integral and its derivative bilogarithmic fitting curve schematic diagram;

图6为本发明实施例陕224储气库内部动态边界及外部岩性变化边界示意图。Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of the internal dynamic boundary and the external lithological change boundary of the Shan 224 gas storage according to the embodiment of the present invention.

具体实施方式Detailed ways

本发明一种封闭气藏不规则几何边界的确定方法,包括以下步骤:A method for determining the irregular geometric boundary of a closed gas reservoir of the present invention comprises the following steps:

S1、采集现场的压力数据、日产量数据、测井解释数据、高压物性数据以及井径数据,根据分布于边界的气井压力恢复双对数曲线特征,结合边界井现有可靠的地质认识,选取多组暂时符合的模型进行拟合;S1. Collect on-site pressure data, daily production data, logging interpretation data, high-pressure physical property data and well diameter data, restore the double-logarithmic curve characteristics according to the pressure of the gas wells distributed on the boundary, and combine the existing reliable geological understanding of the boundary wells to select Multiple sets of temporally consistent models are fitted;

边界模型包括:均质地层+三条不流动边界、径向复合地层+无限大边界、径向复合地层+三条不流动边界、均质地层+封闭边界。Boundary models include: homogeneous formation + three immobile boundaries, radial composite formation + infinite boundary, radial composite formation + three immobile boundaries, homogeneous formation + closed boundary.

S2、根据拟合的结果筛选边界模型;S2. Screening the boundary model according to the fitting result;

针对封闭气藏内的每一口井的压力恢复双对数曲线特征,选取了上面多组边界模型进行拟合,根据拟合的形态以及得到的试井解释结果,选取与井区地层厚度图以及地质认识匹配80%以上的模型,从而得到符合的边界模型。Aiming at the pressure recovery double-logarithmic curve characteristics of each well in the closed gas reservoir, the above multiple sets of boundary models were selected for fitting. The geological understanding matches more than 80% of the models, resulting in a conforming boundary model.

S3、将筛选后边界模型的压力恢复解释参数应用到该井的生产动态资料分析中,结合生产动态数据的压力和产量,将压力恢复解释结果作为动态分析模型的输入参数,建立气井生产动态解析模型,循环调试各关键参数,以拟合m(RNP)及其导数、PI,PIint及其导数曲线,使得实际产量与压力曲线与理论曲线均达到80%以上匹配的拟合效果,最终确定气井模型及边界形态;S3. Apply the pressure recovery interpretation parameters of the screened boundary model to the analysis of the production performance data of the well, combine the pressure and production of the production dynamic data, and use the pressure recovery interpretation results as the input parameters of the dynamic analysis model to establish a gas well production dynamic analysis Model, cyclically debug each key parameter to fit m(RNP) and its derivative, PI, PIint and its derivative curve, so that the actual production and pressure curve and the theoretical curve can achieve a matching effect of more than 80%, and finally determine the gas well Model and boundary shape;

关键参数包括:地层系数kh、污染系数S及边界距离Ri或边界长度L。The key parameters include: formation factor kh, pollution factor S and boundary distance Ri or boundary length L.

m(RNP)及其导数曲线、PI,PIint及其导数曲线是Topaze软件里面气井生产动态解析模型的拟合曲线:m(RNP)为产量数据,PI为地层压力数据,PIint为地层压力针对时间的积分数据,针对m(RNP)及其导数曲线、PI,PIint及其导数曲线进行拟合,主要是为了验证筛选后的边界模型哪套更符合生产动态特征,从而确定气井模型。m(RNP) and its derivative curve, PI, PIint and its derivative curve are the fitting curves of the gas well production dynamic analysis model in Topaze software: m(RNP) is production data, PI is formation pressure data, PIint is formation pressure against time The integral data of m(RNP) and its derivative curve, PI, PIint and its derivative curve are fitted, mainly to verify which set of the screened boundary model is more in line with the production performance characteristics, so as to determine the gas well model.

动态分析采用Topaze软件。Dynamic analysis uses Topaze software.

S4、组合所有边界气井的边界形态得到气藏的不规则几何边界。S4. Combining the boundary forms of all boundary gas wells to obtain the irregular geometric boundary of the gas reservoir.

确定单口气井模型及边界形态,根据每一口井与边界的距离、边界长短以及边界夹角,对边界进行绘制并且进行交叉连接起来,从而得到整个封闭气藏的不规则几何边界。Determine the single gas well model and boundary shape, draw the boundary and cross-connect it according to the distance between each well and the boundary, the length of the boundary, and the angle between the boundary, so as to obtain the irregular geometric boundary of the entire closed gas reservoir.

为使本发明实施例的目的、技术方案和优点更加清楚,下面将结合本发明实施例中的附图,对本发明实施例中的技术方案进行清楚、完整地描述,显然,所描述的实施例是本发明一部分实施例,而不是全部的实施例。通常在此处附图中的描述和所示的本发明实施例的组件可以通过各种不同的配置来布置和设计。因此,以下对在附图中提供的本发明的实施例的详细描述并非旨在限制要求保护的本发明的范围,而是仅仅表示本发明的选定实施例。基于本发明中的实施例,本领域普通技术人员在没有作出创造性劳动前提下所获得的所有其他实施例,都属于本发明保护的范围。In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments It is a part of embodiments of the present invention, but not all embodiments. The components of the embodiments of the invention generally described and illustrated in the drawings herein may be arranged and designed in a variety of different configurations. Accordingly, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the invention provided in the accompanying drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention, but merely represents selected embodiments of the invention. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by persons of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

靖边气田陕224储气库边界比较复杂,以边界上的S224井为例The boundary of the Shan 224 gas storage in the Jingbian gas field is relatively complicated, taking Well S224 on the boundary as an example

根据压力恢复双对数曲线特征如图1,选取了多组模型进行拟合。According to the characteristics of the double-logarithmic curve of pressure recovery, as shown in Figure 1, several sets of models were selected for fitting.

边界模型包括:1、均质地层+三条不流动边界;2、径向复合地层+无限大边界;3、径向复合地层+三条不流动边界;4、均质地层+封闭边界,如图2所示。The boundary model includes: 1. Homogeneous formation + three immobile boundaries; 2. Radial composite formation + infinite boundary; 3. Radial composite formation + three immobile boundaries; 4. Homogeneous formation + closed boundary, as shown in Figure 2 shown.

对每种模型进行压力恢复双对数曲线拟合如图3,依据原特征曲线筛选出1、2、4模型。For each model, the pressure recovery logarithmic curve is fitted as shown in Figure 3, and models 1, 2, and 4 are selected based on the original characteristic curve.

筛选模型拟合后获得的具体参数见下表:The specific parameters obtained after screening model fitting are shown in the table below:

为了进一步验证气井边界特征,我们将以上筛选出的模型压力恢复解释参数应用到该井的生产动态资料分析中。In order to further verify the boundary characteristics of the gas well, we applied the model pressure recovery interpretation parameters selected above to the analysis of the production performance data of this well.

请参阅图4和图5,动态分析采用Topaze软件,结合压力恢复测试解释的气井关键参数,建立气井生产动态解析模型,不断循环调试各关键参数,对m(RNP)及其导数、PI,PIint及其导数曲线进行拟合,得到如下拟合效果。Please refer to Figure 4 and Figure 5. The dynamic analysis uses Topaze software, combined with the key parameters of the gas well explained by the pressure recovery test, to establish a dynamic analysis model of the gas well production, and to continuously debug the key parameters. For m(RNP) and its derivatives, PI, PIint And its derivative curve is fitted, and the following fitting results are obtained.

最后选择矩形封闭边界模型,拟合程度较好,以下为得到的气井控制范围内的关键参数表。Finally, the rectangular closed boundary model is selected, and the fitting degree is good. The following is the obtained key parameter table within the control range of the gas well.

S224井关键参数确定表如下:The determination table of key parameters of Well S224 is as follows:

用同样的方法可以得到储气库边界上另外井的边界,根据每一口井与边界的距离、边界长短以及边界夹角,对边界进行绘制并且进行交叉连接起来,从而得到陕224储气库的不规则几何边界如图6所示,图中三口井在生产过程中在井区内部形成动态边界(内部箭头的边界线),井筒距离动态边界和岩性变化边界的距离已经通过Topaze软件确认,动态边界和岩性边界共同构成了每口井的泄气范围,也确定了每口井的动态储量。The boundary of other wells on the boundary of the gas storage can be obtained in the same way. According to the distance between each well and the boundary, the length of the boundary, and the angle between the boundary, the boundary is drawn and cross-connected to obtain the boundary of the Shan 224 gas storage. The irregular geometric boundary is shown in Fig. 6. The three wells in the figure formed a dynamic boundary (the boundary line of the inner arrow) inside the well area during the production process. The distance between the wellbore and the dynamic boundary and the lithological change boundary has been confirmed by Topaze software. The dynamic boundary and lithological boundary together constitute the gas drainage range of each well, and also determine the dynamic reserves of each well.

本发明方法已经用于靖边气田,靖边气田沟槽十分密集复杂,采用本方法能准确判断沟槽的形态及走向,使气田钻井成功率从70%提高到了85%,1口井就能节省1328万元(按照直井钻井成本计算),仅2016年靖边节省钻井费用1.06亿,其中靖边计划钻井35口,少打井8口。The method of the present invention has been used in the Jingbian Gas Field, where the grooves are very dense and complex. The method can accurately judge the shape and direction of the grooves, and the success rate of drilling in the gas field has been increased from 70% to 85%. One well can Saved 13.28 million yuan (calculated according to the cost of vertical well drilling), and Jingbian saved 106 million yuan in drilling costs in 2016 alone, of which Jingbian planned to drill 35 wells and drilled 8 fewer wells.

以上内容仅为说明本发明的技术思想,不能以此限定本发明的保护范围,凡是按照本发明提出的技术思想,在技术方案基础上所做的任何改动,均落入本发明权利要求书的保护范围之内。The above content is only to illustrate the technical ideas of the present invention, and cannot limit the protection scope of the present invention. Any changes made on the basis of the technical solutions according to the technical ideas proposed in the present invention shall fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention. within the scope of protection.

Claims (6)

1. a kind of determination method for closing the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir, which comprises the following steps:
S1, the pressure data of collection site, daily output data, log analysis data, high pressure property data and hole diameter data, root It is chosen more according to the gas well pressure recovery double logarithmic curve feature for being distributed in boundary in conjunction with the existing reliable geological knowledge of borderline well Group boundary model is fitted;
S2, boundary model is screened according to the result of fitting;
S3, gas well liquid loading dynamic analysis model, circulation debugging key parameter, with quasi- are established according to the boundary model that step S2 is screened M (RNP) and its derivative, PI, PIint and its derivative curve are closed, it is final to determine gas well model and border motif;
S4, the border motif for combining all boundary gas wells obtain the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir.
2. a kind of determination method for closing the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir according to claim 1, which is characterized in that step In S1, boundary model includes: homogeneous formation+three not flow boundary, radial compound stratum+infinity boundary, radial compound Layer+three not flow boundary, homogeneous formation+closed boundary.
3. a kind of determination method for closing the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir according to claim 1, which is characterized in that step In S2, for the pressure recovery double logarithmic curve feature of the every mouth well in closing gas reservoir, chooses multiple groups boundary model and intended It closes, is matched as a result, choosing with wellblock formation thickness figure and geological knowledge according to the form of fitting and obtained well test analysis 80% or more model, the boundary model met.
4. a kind of determination method for closing the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir according to claim 1, which is characterized in that step In S3, in conjunction with the pressure and yield of Production development data, the pressure buildup interpretation parameter for screening back boundary model is applied to life It produces in dynamic data analysis, establishes gas well liquid loading dynamic for pressure buildup interpretation result as the input parameter of model for dynamic analysis Analytic modell analytical model.
5. a kind of determination method for closing the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir according to claim 4, which is characterized in that crucial Parameter includes formation capacity, contamination factor, frontier distance and boundary length, and m (RNP) is yield data, and PI is strata pressure number According to, PIint is the integration data that strata pressure is directed to the time, for m (RNP) and its derivative curve, PI, PIint and its derivative Curve is fitted, for verifying whether the boundary model after screening meets characteristic of production dynamic, so that it is determined that gas well model.
6. a kind of determination method for closing the irregular geometrical boundary of gas reservoir according to claim 1, which is characterized in that step In S4, according to every mouth well at a distance from boundary, boundary length and boundary angle, boundary is drawn and carries out intersection company It connects, obtains the irregular geometrical boundary for entirely closing gas reservoir.
CN201810312336.XA 2018-04-09 2018-04-09 A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir Pending CN110359903A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810312336.XA CN110359903A (en) 2018-04-09 2018-04-09 A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810312336.XA CN110359903A (en) 2018-04-09 2018-04-09 A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110359903A true CN110359903A (en) 2019-10-22

Family

ID=68212010

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810312336.XA Pending CN110359903A (en) 2018-04-09 2018-04-09 A Method for Determining the Irregular Geometric Boundary of a Closed Gas Reservoir

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110359903A (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050119911A1 (en) * 2003-12-02 2005-06-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system and program storage device for generating an SWPM-MDT workflow in response to a user objective and executing the workflow to produce a reservoir response model
US20090070086A1 (en) * 2007-09-06 2009-03-12 Mickaele Le Ravalec Method for updating a geological model using dynamic data and well tests
WO2009114463A2 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-09-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for well test design, interpretation and test objectives verification
CN103413030A (en) * 2013-07-24 2013-11-27 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A method and system for dynamic analysis of fractured-cavity carbonate gas reservoirs
CN104422959A (en) * 2013-09-05 2015-03-18 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for detecting curvature property of reservoir boundary
CN104500030A (en) * 2014-11-21 2015-04-08 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Diagnosis and Correction Method of Abnormal Production Performance Data of Ultra-high Pressure Gas Reservoirs

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050119911A1 (en) * 2003-12-02 2005-06-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system and program storage device for generating an SWPM-MDT workflow in response to a user objective and executing the workflow to produce a reservoir response model
US20090070086A1 (en) * 2007-09-06 2009-03-12 Mickaele Le Ravalec Method for updating a geological model using dynamic data and well tests
WO2009114463A2 (en) * 2008-03-10 2009-09-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for well test design, interpretation and test objectives verification
CN103413030A (en) * 2013-07-24 2013-11-27 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A method and system for dynamic analysis of fractured-cavity carbonate gas reservoirs
CN104422959A (en) * 2013-09-05 2015-03-18 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for detecting curvature property of reservoir boundary
CN104500030A (en) * 2014-11-21 2015-04-08 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Diagnosis and Correction Method of Abnormal Production Performance Data of Ultra-high Pressure Gas Reservoirs

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ALAIN C.GRINGARTEN: ""Analysis of an extended well test to assess connectivity between adjacent compartments in a north sea reservoir"", 《SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS》 *
兰义飞,等: ""靖边气田基于气藏动态监测的建模数模一体化技术"", 《油气藏监测与管理国际会议论文集》 *
王飞,等: ""试井及生产资料在储气库早期评价中的应用"", 《特种油气藏》 *
马晓伟,等: ""生产数据分析技术在普光M1井的应用"", 《内蒙古石油化工》 *
黄登峰,等: ""数值试井在描述油气藏复杂边界中的应用"", 《油气井测试》 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104775810B (en) A kind of shale gas reservoir compressibility evaluation method
CN113901681A (en) A three-dimensional compressibility evaluation method for double sweet spots in shale gas reservoirs with full life cycle
CN104948176B (en) A kind of method based on infiltration Magnification identification carbonate reservoir crack
CN105117511A (en) Fracture-cavity reservoir inter-well communication passage and flow parameter characterization method
CN105760645B (en) A kind of Well Test Data Analysis Method based on the extensive well testing of pressure and creation data well testing
CN106150477A (en) A kind of method determining single well controlled reserves
CN110593865A (en) Well testing interpretation method for characteristic parameters of oil reservoir fracture hole
CN105678082B (en) A double pressure drop method for identifying reservoir types connected with acid fracturing in oil and gas wells
CN104975852A (en) Diagnosis method of oil/gas output positions of multi-segment fracturing horizontal well and diagnosis system thereof
CN109555515A (en) Formation collapsed pressure determines method and apparatus
CN108150149A (en) A kind of stress sensitive reservoir water-producing gas well dynamic playback method
CN104199097A (en) Novel quantitative judgment method for potential fractures of extrusion structural system
CN110863814B (en) Method and device for determining single-well subsection specific fluid production index of ultra-thick type cuttings limestone oil reservoir
CN109190218B (en) A Dynamic Identification Method of Effective Fracture Network in Tight Reservoir
CN108374657A (en) Well breakpoint automatic identifying method
CN107503739A (en) A kind of pressure monitoring method that inflow direction is differentiated for horizontal well
CN111155980B (en) Water flow dominant channel identification method and device
CN105785445A (en) Fracture pattern recognition method and device
CN107895092A (en) A kind of interwell communication quantitative evaluation method that modeling is adopted based on complex nonlinear note
CN106199690B (en) The prediction technique in mud shale crack
CN110644975B (en) Fracture-cavity type oil reservoir tracer curve quantitative interpretation method
CN110159260B (en) Method and device for judging main water supply direction of fracture part closed fracturing vertical well
CN108222916A (en) The Fractal Identification method of the sand body between wells connectivity of magnitude relation is adopted based on note
CN107725035B (en) Pressure monitoring method for judging water incoming direction of non-uniform liquid production horizontal well
CN110390154A (en) A method of improving Complex reservoir reservoir numerical simulation efficiency

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20191022

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication