Detailed Description
The process for the preparation of the compounds of the general formula I or of the general formula II according to the invention is described below in connection with specific examples, which, however, do not constitute any limitation of the invention. The compounds of the present invention may also be conveniently prepared by optionally combining the various synthetic methods described in this specification or known in the art, such combinations being readily apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains.
The starting materials, reagents, etc. used in the examples of the present invention are all commercially available. The invention can be prepared into salt form by adopting a salt forming method commonly used in the field, for example, the compound is dissolved in ethanol hydrochloride at room temperature to react to form hydrochloride, or benzenesulfonic acid is added into the compound to react to form benzenesulfonate.
The design concept of the compounds of the general formula I and the general formula II is as follows, paclitaxel is coupled with photosensitizer 5-aminolevulinic acid and derivatives thereof through different redox-responsive connecting arms, and a prodrug combined with photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy is generated. In the compound of the invention, the connection site of the taxol is taxol C-2', the site is connected with one end of a redox-responsive connecting arm, and the other end of the redox-responsive connecting arm is connected with the amino group of 5-aminolevulinic acid and derivatives thereof. Wherein the redox responsive linkage arm is a disulfide or thioether bond. The photosensitizer 5-aminolevulinic acid and its derivatives include 5-aminolevulinic acid, methyl 5-aminolevulinate, ethyl 5-aminolevulinate, propyl 5-aminolevulinate, butyl 5-aminolevulinate, pentyl 5-aminolevulinate and hexyl 5-aminolevulinate.
The thioether prodrugs of the invention are shown in the general formula I:
wherein R 1 is selected from hydrogen and C 1-C6 is n-alkyl.
The disulfide bond prodrug of the invention is shown in a general formula II:
Wherein R 2 is selected from C 1-C6 n-alkyl.
The synthetic route of the compound shown in the general formula I is as follows:
Dropwise adding thionyl chloride into an alcohol (R 1 -OH) solution in an ice bath, then adding 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA HCl) for reaction, and obtaining a 5-aminolevulinate derivative (5-ALA-R 1) after the reaction is finished;
Paclitaxel (PTX), thiohydroxy acetic anhydride, triethylamine (TEA) and 4-Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) are added into Dichloromethane (DCM) to react, and the reaction is finished to obtain an intermediate PTX-S-COOH;
Adding an intermediate PTX-S-COOH, 2- (7-aza-benzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyl urea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), DIPEA and a 5-aminolevulinate derivative (5-ALA-R 1) into dichloromethane, stirring and reacting to obtain a target product after the reaction is finished;
wherein R 1 is selected from C 1-C6 n-alkyl.
When R 1 is hydrogen, the synthetic route of the compound shown in the general formula I is as follows:
Adding an intermediate PTX-S-COOH, N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and 1-ethyl- (3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) into dichloromethane for reaction, and obtaining an active ester intermediate after the reaction is finished;
Adding the active ester intermediate, 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride and N, N-Diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) into a dichloromethane solution for reaction, and obtaining a target product after the reaction is finished.
The synthetic route of the compound shown in the general formula II is as follows:
2,2' -dithio diacyl diacetic acid, acetyl chloride and nitrogen are added for protection reaction, and the target product 1,4, 5-oxo dithiophene-2, 7-diketone (DTDPA) is obtained after the reaction is finished;
Paclitaxel (PTX), DTDPA, triethylamine and DMAP are added into DCM to react overnight, and an intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH is obtained after the reaction is finished;
The intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH, 2- (7-aza-benzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyl urea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), DIPEA and 5-amino levulinate derivative (5-ALA-R 2) are added into dichloromethane, and stirred for reaction, and the target product is obtained after the reaction is finished, wherein R 2 is selected from C 1-C6 N-alkyl.
Synthesis of intermediates
The synthesis of the intermediate related to the embodiment of the invention is as follows:
1. Synthesis of 2- (((1S, 2R) -1-benzoylamino-3- (((2 aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -6,12 b-diacetoxy-12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2 a,3, 4a,5,6,9,11,12 a,12 b-dodecahydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxo-9-yl) oxy) -3-oxo-1-phenylpropane-2-oxoethoxy) -2-oxoethyl) thioacetic acid (PTX-S-COOH)
50 Mg of paclitaxel, 15 mg of thiohydroxy acetic anhydride, 10. Mu.l of triethylamine, 1.5 mg of 4-dimethylaminopyridine were weighed out and 2 ml of methylene chloride was added. The reaction was at room temperature overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give intermediate PTX-S-COOH,51 mg, as a yellow solid. 88% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.03 – 7.97 (m, 2H), 7.85 – 7.79 (m, 2H), 7.63 (dd,J= 8.2, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.58 – 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.49 – 7.40 (m, 6H), 7.40 – 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.27 (ddt,J= 8.2, 6.9, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (p,J= 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dddt,J= 7.3, 6.2, 2.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d,J= 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (dd,J= 7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 5.53 – 5.46 (m, 1H), 4.82 (ddt,J= 6.4, 3.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.42 – 4.32 (m, 2H), 4.30 (d,J= 12.2 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (d,J= 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dt,J= 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (d,J= 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (d,J= 1.4 Hz, 2H), 2.45 (s, 1H), 2.40 – 2.31 (m, 2H), 2.25 – 2.16 (m, 6H), 2.02 (ddd,J= 12.3, 7.7, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (t,J= 1.2 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d,J= 1.0 Hz, 5H).
Electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) calculated C 51H55NO17S (M-H)- m/z 984.3, found 984.3.
2. Synthesis of ethyl 5-aminolevulinate
600 Μl of thionyl chloride was added dropwise to 8 ml of ethanol in an ice bath at 0deg.C. Stirring for 10min. Deicing 1g of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride are added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 1 hour. Heated to 78 ℃ and refluxed for 2 hours. Cooling, adding diethyl ether, precipitating solid, grinding, and pulping. Filtered with diethyl ether and acetonitrile and washed. 0.85 g of ethyl 5-aminolevulinate is obtained as the target product. White solid. 89% yield .1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ4.13 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (t,J= 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (q,J= 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.75 – 2.68 (m, 2H), 2.63 – 2.56 (m, 2H), 1.24 (t,J= 6.6 Hz, 3H).ESI-MS calculated C 7H13NO3 (M+H)+ m/z 160.2, found 160.2.
3. Synthesis of propyl 5-aminolevulinate
600 Μl of thionyl chloride was added dropwise to 8 ml of n-propanol in an ice bath at 0deg.C. Stirring for 10min. Deicing 1 g of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride are added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 1 hour. Heated to 98 ℃ and refluxed for 2 hours. Cooling, adding diethyl ether, precipitating solid, grinding, and pulping. Filtered with diethyl ether and acetonitrile and washed. 0.97 g of intermediate propyl 5-aminolevulinate was obtained. White solid. 93.85% yield .1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ4.07 (t,J= 5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (t,J= 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.75 – 2.68 (m, 2H), 2.63 – 2.56 (m, 2H), 1.77 – 1.67 (m, 2H), 0.97 (t,J= 8.0 Hz, 3H).ESI-MS calculated C 8H15NO3(M+H)+ m/z 174.2, found 174.2.
4. Synthesis of butyl 5-aminolevulinate
600 Μl of thionyl chloride was added dropwise to 8 ml of n-butanol in an ice bath at 0deg.C. Stirring for 10min. Deicing 1g of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride are added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 1 hour. Heated to 118 ℃ and refluxed for 2 hours. Cooling, adding diethyl ether, precipitating solid, grinding, and pulping. Filtered with diethyl ether and acetonitrile and washed. 1.01 g of intermediate butyl 5-aminolevulinate was obtained. White solid. 90% yield .1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ4.07 (t,J= 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (t,J= 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.75 – 2.68 (m, 2H), 2.63 – 2.56 (m, 2H), 1.61 (p,J= 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (dt,J= 14.0, 7.0 Hz, 2H), 0.97 (t,J= 7.0 Hz, 3H).ESI-MS calculated C 9H17NO3 (M+H)+ m/z 188.2, found 188.2.
5. Synthesis of 5-aminolevulinic acid pentyl ester
600 Μl of thionyl chloride was added dropwise to 8 ml of n-pentanol in an ice bath at 0deg.C. Stirring for 10min. Deicing 1g of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride are added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 1 hour. Heated to 139 ℃ and refluxed for 2 hours. Cooling, adding diethyl ether, precipitating solid, grinding, and pulping. Filtered with diethyl ether and acetonitrile and washed. 1.13 g of intermediate amyl 5-aminolevulinate was obtained. White solid. Yield .1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ4.06 (t,J= 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (t,J= 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.75 – 2.68 (m, 2H), 2.63 – 2.56 (m, 2H), 1.71 – 1.62 (m, 2H), 1.42 – 1.31 (m, 4H), 0.95 – 0.85 (m, 3H).ESI-MS calculated 94% C 10H19NO3(M+H)+ m/z 202.3, found 202.3.
6. Synthesis of hexyl 5-aminolevulinate
600 Μl of thionyl chloride was added dropwise to 8 ml of n-hexanol in an ice bath at 0deg.C. Stirring for 10min. Deicing 1g of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride are added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 1 hour. Heated to 159 ℃ and refluxed for 2 hours. Cooling, adding diethyl ether, precipitating solid, grinding, and pulping. Filtered with diethyl ether and acetonitrile and washed. 1.19 g of intermediate hexyl 5-aminolevulinate was obtained. White solid. 93% yield .1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ4.06 (t,J= 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (t,J= 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (q,J= 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.75 – 2.68 (m, 2H), 2.63 – 2.56 (m, 2H), 1.68 – 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.46 – 1.25 (m, 6H), 0.92 – 0.86 (m, 3H).ESI-MS calculated C 11H21NO3(M+H)+ m/z 216.3, found 216.3.
7. Synthesis of 1,4, 5-oxo-dithiophene-2, 7-dione (DTDPA)
0.5 G of 2,2' -dithiodiacetic acid, 2ml of acetyl chloride are added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 2 hours under nitrogen protection. Add 20 ml toluene three times, spin dry, remove solvent. Adding diethyl ether, pulping, and separating out solid. Suction filtration yields 270 mg of the target product 1,4, 5-oxo-dithiophene-2, 7-dione (DTDPA). White solid, yield 47%.
8. Synthesis of 2- (((1S, 2R) -1-benzoylamino-3- (((2 aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -6,12 b-diacetoxy-12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2 a,3, 4a,5,6,9,11,12 a,12 b-dodecahydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxo-9-yl) oxy) -3-oxo-1-phenylpropane-2-oxoethoxy) -dithio) acetate (PTX-S-S-COOH)
50 Mg of paclitaxel, 15 mg DTDPA,10 μl triethylamine, 1.5 mg DMAP were added to 2ml DCM. The reaction was carried out overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to obtain intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,40 mg. Yellow solid, 67% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.03 – 7.97 (m, 2H), 7.85 – 7.79 (m, 2H), 7.63 (dd,J= 8.3, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.58 – 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.49 – 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.44 (s, 2H), 7.40 – 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.27 (ddt,J= 8.2, 6.9, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (p,J= 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dddt,J= 7.3, 6.2, 2.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d,J= 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (dd,J= 7.6, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 5.53 – 5.46 (m, 1H), 4.82 (ddt,J= 6.4, 3.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.42 – 4.32 (m, 2H), 4.30 (d,J= 12.2 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (d,J= 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.80 – 3.68 (m, 2H), 3.70 – 3.61 (m, 3H), 2.45 (s, 1H), 2.40 – 2.31 (m, 2H), 2.25 – 2.16 (m, 6H), 2.02 (ddd,J= 12.3, 7.7, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (t,J= 1.2 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d,J= 1.0 Hz, 5H).
ESI-MS calculated C 51H55NO17S2(M-H)- m/z 1016.3, found 1016.3.
EXAMPLE 1 Synthesis of Compound 1
(3S, 4R) -4- (((2 aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -6,12 b-diacetoxy-12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2 a,3, 4a,5,6,9,10,11,12 a,12 b-dodecahydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodeca [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-9-yl) oxycarbonyl) -1,6,10,13-tetraoxo-1, 3-diphenyl-5-oxa-8-thia-2, 11-diazahexadecane-16-oic acid
60 Mg of the intermediate PTX-S-COOH, 8mg of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), 14 mg of 1-ethyl- (3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) were added to 2 ml of dichloromethane in an ice bath, and after half an hour of reaction, the reaction was resumed at room temperature for 24 hours. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure to give an active ester intermediate.
Then, 12 mg of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride, 26. Mu.l of N, N-Diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) and the active ester were added to the mixture and reacted overnight in 2ml of methylene chloride. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective product 1,21 mg. White solid. 31% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.18 – 8.14 (m, 2H), 7.87 – 7.71 (m, 2H), 7.64 – 7.56 (m, 1H), 7.55 – 7.28 (m, 11H), 7.15 (d,J= 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.33 – 6.21 (m, 2H), 6.07 (dd,J= 9.4, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (d,J= 3.3 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd,J= 9.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.35 – 4.16 (m, 2H), 4.07 (d,J= 5.1 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.75 – 3.35 (m, 3H), 3.20 (t,J= 14.7 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (s, 4H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 2.44 – 2.14 (m, 7H), 1.94 (d,J= 1.4 Hz, 3H), 1.89 – 1.78 (m, 1H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.44 – 1.32 (m, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.93, 203.47, 173.43, 171.63, 170.35, 168.23, 168.00, 167.09, 162.57, 142.85, 136.93, 133.82, 133.69, 132.86, 131.99, 130.40, 129.40, 129.11, 128.89, 128.55, 127.81, 127.03, 84.56, 81.28, 79.23, 75.83, 75.68, 75.21, 72.18, 58.56, 52.88, 49.35, 45.79, 43.32, 35.95, 34.43, 32.64, 31.27, 29.84, 26.91, 25.91, 22.91, 22.33, 21.02, 14.93, 9.80.
High resolution mass spectrum HRMS (ESI) calculated C 56H62N2O19S (M+Na)+ m/z 1121.3559, found 1121.3558.
EXAMPLE 2 Synthesis of Compound 2
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12aR,12bS) -9- ((R) -15- (((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -3,6,9,13-tetraoxo-2, 14-dioxa-11-thio-8-azahexadecan-16-yl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,9,10, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodeca [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of methyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective product 2,30 mg as a yellow solid. The yield thereof was found to be 53%. Purity of 97%.1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.26 (d,J= 9.4 Hz, 1H), 8.22 – 8.10 (m, 2H), 7.90 – 7.82 (m, 2H), 7.65 – 7.56 (m, 1H), 7.52 (dd,J= 8.4, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 7.50 – 7.27 (m, 8H), 7.11 (t,J= 5.3 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.11 (dd,J= 9.5, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d,J= 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d,J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.26 – 4.12 (m, 3H), 3.83 (d,J= 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (d,J= 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.73 – 3.67 (m, 2H), 3.65 (s, 4H), 3.51 (d,J= 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.24 – 3.10 (m, 4H), 2.93 (s, 1H), 2.80 – 2.54 (m, 6H), 2.53 (s, 4H), 2.42 (dd,J= 15.7, 9.5 Hz, 2H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.17 (s, 1H), 1.96 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ204.04, 203.87, 172.61, 171.40, 170.06, 169.13, 168.71, 168.18, 167.86, 167.15, 143.00, 137.10, 133.77, 132.86, 131.83, 130.43, 129.41, 129.04, 128.88, 128.45, 128.40, 127.88, 127.00, 84.60, 81.21, 79.28, 76.60, 75.87, 75.76, 75.27, 72.27, 72.18, 66.73, 58.64, 52.69, 49.34, 45.70, 43.33, 38.76, 35.75, 35.67, 34.85, 34.71, 32.05, 27.92, 26.92, 22.94, 22.35, 22.04, 20.96, 14.98, 10.46, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 57H64N2O19S (M+H)+ m/z 1113.3897, found 1113.3906.
EXAMPLE 3 Synthesis of Compound 3
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -4,8,11,14-tetraoxo-3, 15-dioxa-6-thio-9-azaheptadecanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,9,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecanoic acid [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diyldiacetic acid ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,16 mg of ethyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2 ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 3,29 mg as a yellow solid in 50% yield. The purity is 98%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.27 (d,J= 9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.21 – 8.14 (m, 2H), 7.90 – 7.83 (m, 2H), 7.62 – 7.57 (m, 1H), 7.51 (dd,J= 8.2, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.45 – 7.31 (m, 8H), 7.08 (t,J= 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.13 (dd,J= 9.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d,J= 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d,J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (dd,J= 8.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (q,J= 7.1 Hz, 3H), 3.86 – 3.76 (m, 2H), 3.51 (d,J= 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (dd,J= 14.7, 4.2 Hz, 2H), 2.83 (s, 2H), 2.81 – 2.69 (m, 1H), 2.71 – 2.66 (m, 1H), 2.64 (dq,J= 3.1, 2.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 2.44 (dd,J= 15.5, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 5H), 1.97 (d,J= 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.27 – 1.21 (m, 9H), 1.14 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.72, 203.56, 172.20, 171.09, 169.74, 168.79, 168.40, 167.86, 167.53, 166.84, 142.68, 136.78, 133.46, 132.55, 131.52, 130.11, 129.09, 128.72, 128.57, 128.14, 128.09, 127.56, 126.68, 84.28, 80.89, 78.98, 75.56, 75.44, 74.96, 71.95, 71.87, 60.80, 58.33, 52.37, 49.02, 45.39, 43.02, 38.51, 35.44, 35.36, 34.55, 34.38, 31.76, 29.52, 27.65, 26.60, 22.64, 22.05, 20.65, 14.67, 13.96, 9.45.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 58H66N2O19S (M+H)+ m/z 1127.4053, found 1127.4050.
EXAMPLE 4 Synthesis of Compound 4
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -4,8,11,14-tetraoxo-3, 15-dioxa-6-thio-9-azaoctadecanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,9,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,18 mg of propyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2 ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 4,30 mg as a yellow solid in 50% yield. The purity is 95%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.28 (d,J= 9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.21 – 8.15 (m, 2H), 7.89 – 7.83 (m, 2H), 7.63 – 7.56 (m, 1H), 7.51 (dd,J= 8.3, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.45 – 7.31 (m, 8H), 7.08 (t,J= 5.2 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.13 (dd,J= 9.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d,J= 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d,J= 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.25 – 4.12 (m, 3H), 4.01 (t,J= 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.87 – 3.74 (m, 2H), 3.51 (d,J= 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (dd,J= 14.7, 4.8 Hz, 2H), 2.81 (s, 7H), 2.54 (s, 4H), 2.44 (dd,J= 15.5, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (s, 4H), 1.96 (d,J= 1.4 Hz, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.63 (q,J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 1H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 0.92 (t,J= 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ 204.04, 203.89, 172.64, 171.40, 170.09, 169.15, 168.77, 168.24, 167.91, 167.12, 142.97, 137.06, 133.77, 132.85, 131.84, 130.40, 129.41, 129.04, 128.87, 128.45, 128.42, 127.85, 127.03, 84.58, 81.18, 79.23, 76.59, 75.87, 75.76, 75.26, 72.25, 72.18, 65.31, 58.62, 55.86, 52.78, 49.33, 45.70, 43.80, 43.33, 38.75, 35.71, 34.85, 34.68, 32.08, 28.35, 28.11, 27.92, 26.90, 22.92, 22.41, 22.34, 20.96, 18.72, 17.33, 14.96, 14.07, 12.65, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 59H68N2O19S (M+H)+ m/z 1141.4210, found 1141.4211.
EXAMPLE 5 Synthesis of Compound 5
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -4,8,11,14-tetraoxo-3, 15-dioxa-6-thio-9-azanonadecanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,10,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecanoic acid [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diyldiacetic acid ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,19 mg of butyl 5-aminolevulinate were admixed. To 2 ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give 5,32 mg of the objective compound as a yellow solid in 54% yield. The purity was 96%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.27 (d,J= 9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d,J= 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d,J= 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d,J= 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (t,J= 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.46 – 7.31 (m, 8H), 7.07 (t,J= 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.13 (dd,J= 9.1, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d,J= 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.03 – 4.95 (m, 1H), 4.46 (dd,J= 11.0, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d,J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.27 – 4.13 (m, 3H), 4.06 (t,J= 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.87 – 3.75 (m, 2H), 3.51 (d,J= 13.8 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (dd,J= 14.7, 4.9 Hz, 2H), 2.72 – 2.61 (m, 4H), 2.54 (s, 4H), 2.45 (dd,J= 15.5, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 4H), 1.97 (s, 3H), 1.93 – 1.85 (m, 1H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.60 (q,J= 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.36 (h,J= 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (s, 4H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 0.92 (t,J= 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ204.04, 203.89, 172.64, 171.40, 170.09, 169.15, 168.77, 168.24, 167.91, 167.12, 142.97, 137.06, 133.77, 132.85, 131.84, 130.40, 129.41, 129.04, 128.87, 128.45, 128.42, 127.85, 127.03, 84.58, 81.18, 79.23, 76.59, 75.87, 75.76, 75.26, 72.25, 72.18, 65.31, 58.62, 55.86, 52.78, 49.33, 45.70, 43.80, 43.33, 38.75, 35.71, 34.85, 34.68, 32.08, 28.35, 28.11, 27.92, 26.90, 22.92, 22.41, 22.34, 20.96, 18.72, 17.33, 14.96, 14.07, 12.65, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 60H70N2O19S (M+H)+ m/z 1155.4366, found 1155.4368.
EXAMPLE 6 Synthesis of Compound 6
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -4,8,11,14-tetraoxo-3, 15-dioxa-6-thio-9-azaeicosyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,10,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,21 mg of amyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2 ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 6,34 mg as a yellow solid in 56% yield. The purity was 96%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.27 (d,J= 9.4 Hz, 1H), 8.20 – 8.16 (m, 2H), 7.89 – 7.84 (m, 2H), 7.60 (t,J= 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (dd,J= 8.4, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.45 – 7.31 (m, 8H), 7.09 (t,J= 5.2 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.12 (dd,J= 9.5, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d,J= 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (dd,J= 11.0, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d,J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.25 – 4.13 (m, 3H), 4.04 (t,J= 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.87 – 3.76 (m, 2H), 3.51 (d,J= 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (t,J= 5.1 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (s, 4H), 2.64 (p,J= 2.4 Hz, 2H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 2.43 (dd,J= 15.5, 9.3 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 4H), 1.96 (d,J= 1.4 Hz, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.60 (q,J= 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.45 (dd,J= 17.5, 6.6 Hz, 6H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H), 0.90 (d,J= 6.7 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ204.04, 203.89, 172.64, 171.40, 170.09, 169.15, 168.77, 168.24, 167.91, 167.12, 142.97, 137.06, 133.77, 132.85, 131.84, 130.40, 129.41, 129.04, 128.87, 128.45, 128.42, 127.85, 127.03, 84.58, 81.18, 79.23, 76.59, 75.87, 75.76, 75.26, 72.25, 72.18, 65.31, 58.62, 55.86, 52.78, 49.33, 45.70, 43.80, 43.33, 38.75, 35.71, 34.85, 34.68, 32.08, 28.35, 28.11, 27.92, 26.90, 22.92, 22.41, 22.34, 20.96, 18.72, 17.33, 14.96, 14.07, 12.65, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 61H72N2O19S (M+H)+ m/z 1169.4523, found 1169.4519.
EXAMPLE 7 Synthesis of Compound 7
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -4,8,11,14-tetraoxo-3, 15-dioxa-6-thio-9-azaeicosanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,10,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxo-6, 12b (2 aH) -diyldiacetic acid ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,23 mg of hexyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2 ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give 7,31 mg of the objective compound as a yellow solid in 51% yield. The purity was 97%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.34 (d,J= 9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.23 – 8.18 (m, 2H), 7.91 – 7.86 (m, 2H), 7.64 – 7.58 (m, 1H), 7.54 (dd,J= 8.3, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.47 – 7.34 (m, 8H), 7.14 – 7.10 (m, 1H), 6.32 (d,J= 4.7 Hz, 2H), 6.15 (dd,J= 9.5, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 5.72 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (d,J= 3.0 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (dd,J= 9.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (s, 1H), 4.26 (s, 3H), 4.07 (t,J= 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (d,J= 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 3.54 (d,J= 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (s, 2H), 2.66 (d,J= 2.3 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (s, 3H), 2.52 – 2.39 (m, 2H), 2.25 (s, 4H), 1.99 (d,J= 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.92 (ddd,J= 13.9, 11.0, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.66 – 1.56 (m, 3H), 1.45 (d,J= 1.6 Hz, 1H), 1.39 (s, 2H), 1.28 (s, 5H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 0.91 – 0.89 (m, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ204.05, 203.87, 172.63, 171.42, 170.05, 169.12, 168.70, 168.17, 167.83, 167.16, 143.03, 137.10, 133.76, 132.83, 131.83, 130.43, 129.38, 129.03, 128.88, 128.44, 128.39, 127.89, 127.00, 84.60, 81.19, 79.30, 76.60, 75.90, 75.76, 75.26, 72.28, 72.17, 65.35, 58.64, 52.66, 49.34, 45.69, 43.32, 35.74, 35.66, 34.82, 34.71, 32.06, 32.02, 31.64, 31.57, 31.52, 30.44, 30.32, 30.26, 29.83, 28.63, 27.93, 26.91, 25.65, 22.96, 22.83, 22.66, 22.36, 20.97, 15.00, 14.14, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 61H72N2O19S (M+H)+ m/z 1183.4679, found 1183.4677.
EXAMPLE 8 Synthesis of Compound 8
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -16- ((S) -benzoylamino (phenyl) methyl) -3,6,9,14-tetraoxo-2, 15-dioxa-11, 12-dithio-8-azaheptadec-17-yl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5, 4a,5,6,9,11,12 a-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethylurea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of methyl 5-aminolevulinate were admixed. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 8,24 mg as a yellow solid in 43% yield. The purity was 96%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.16 – 8.09 (m, 2H), 7.87 – 7.81 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d,J= 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.67 – 7.59 (m, 1H), 7.58 – 7.35 (m, 9H), 7.28 (d,J= 3.3 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t,J= 4.7 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.21 – 6.13 (m, 1H), 5.91 (dd,J= 8.5, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d,J= 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 – 3.99 (m, 4H), 3.76 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.61 – 3.50 (m, 2H), 3.42 – 3.20 (m, 2H), 2.85 (s, 3H), 2.75 – 2.56 (m, 4H), 2.51 (ddd,J= 14.6, 9.7, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.22 (s, 4H), 2.14 (dd,J= 15.6, 9.3 Hz, 2H), 2.09 – 1.99 (m, 1H), 1.95 – 1.84 (m, 5H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.46 (dd,J= 22.6, 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.13 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.86, 203.51, 173.11, 171.18, 170.11, 169.12, 168.89, 168.40, 167.61, 167.05, 142.60, 136.93, 134.24, 133.86, 132.98, 131.98, 130.35, 129.42, 129.15, 128.79, 128.66, 127.60, 127.25, 84.57, 81.17, 79.13, 76.54, 75.74, 75.68, 75.11, 72.14, 71.96, 58.48, 53.73, 52.19, 49.65, 45.88, 43.27, 42.36, 40.82, 38.84, 35.80, 35.34, 34.72, 27.58, 26.86, 22.99, 22.14, 20.98, 18.78, 17.44, 15.01, 9.75.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 57H64N2O19S2(M+H)+ m/z 1145.3617, found 1145.3615.
EXAMPLE 9 Synthesis of Compound 9
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzamide (phenyl) methyl) -4,9,12,15-tetraoxo-3, 16-dioxa-6, 7-dithio-10-octadecanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5, 4a,5,6,9,10,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diyldiacetic acid ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethylurea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of ethyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 9,24 mg as a yellow solid in 42% yield. The purity was 97%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.17 – 8.09 (m, 2H), 7.87 – 7.80 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d,J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.68 – 7.58 (m, 1H), 7.57 – 7.33 (m, 10H), 6.97 (t,J= 5.7 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.22 – 6.08 (m, 1H), 5.92 (dd,J= 8.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d,J= 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 – 4.16 (m, 3H), 4.12 – 4.00 (m, 3H), 3.77 (d,J= 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.64 – 3.46 (m, 2H), 3.42 – 3.20 (m, 2H), 2.73 – 2.66 (m, 2H), 2.60 (ddd,J= 7.4, 5.8, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.34 – 2.10 (m, 5H), 1.97 – 1.86 (m, 6H), 1.68 (s, 4H), 1.42 (d,J= 5.5 Hz, 2H), 1.37 (s, 1H), 1.33 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.88, 203.56, 172.67, 171.19, 170.10, 169.10, 168.83, 168.38, 167.63, 167.08, 142.63, 136.95, 134.27, 133.86, 133.00, 132.00, 130.37, 129.43, 129.16, 128.81, 128.68, 127.61, 127.24, 84.60, 81.20, 79.17, 75.74, 75.13, 72.16, 71.99, 61.18, 58.51, 53.70, 49.70, 45.89, 43.29, 42.40, 40.80, 35.81, 35.37, 34.74, 32.07, 31.58, 30.46, 30.34, 29.84, 29.51, 27.88, 26.88, 23.01, 22.84, 22.16, 20.99, 15.03, 14.27, 14.24, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 58H66N2O19S2(M+H)+ m/z 1159.3774, found 1159.3773.
EXAMPLE 10 Synthesis of Compound 10
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzamide (phenyl) methyl) -4,9,12,15-tetraoxo-3, 16-dioxa-6, 7-dithio-10-azanonanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,9,10, 12-12 a-decahydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodeca [3,4] benzo [1,2b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethyluronium Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of propyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 10,27 mg as a yellow solid in 47% yield. The purity is 95%.
1H NMR (300 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.17 – 8.07 (m, 2H), 7.86 – 7.82 (m, 2H), 7.74 – 7.30 (m, 11H), 7.28 (t,J= 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t,J= 4.6 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.16 (t,J= 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.91 (dd,J= 8.5, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (d,J= 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (d,J= 5.6 Hz, 1H), 5.02 – 4.90 (m, 1H), 4.44 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 – 4.06 (m, 4H), 3.98 (t,J= 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.76 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.66 – 3.47 (m, 2H), 3.43 – 3.17 (m, 2H), 2.74 – 2.48 (m, 5H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 1.91 (d,J= 9.9 Hz, 4H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.59 (p,J= 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 0.90 (t,J= 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.88, 203.57, 172.77, 171.17, 170.09, 169.11, 168.76, 168.40, 167.64, 167.05, 142.62, 136.93, 134.26, 133.87, 132.96, 131.98, 130.36, 129.39, 129.14, 128.80, 128.65, 127.61, 127.25, 84.57, 81.16, 79.12, 75.68, 75.09, 72.14, 66.76, 58.46, 53.72, 52.73, 49.68, 45.88, 43.25, 42.35, 40.74, 36.94, 35.33, 34.73, 30.51, 29.85, 29.82, 29.77, 27.81, 26.86, 22.99, 21.99, 20.98, 17.83, 15.02, 10.46, 9.74.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 59H68N2O19S2(M+H)+ m/z 1173.3931, found 1173.3934.
EXAMPLE 11 Synthesis of Compound 11
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzamide (phenyl) methyl) -4,9,12,15-tetraoxo-3, 16-dioxa-6, 7-dithio-10-azacycloalkyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8,13, 5-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,10,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diyldiacetic acid ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethylurea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of butyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 11,26 mg as a yellow solid in 45% yield. The purity was 96%.
1H NMR (300 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.18 – 8.06 (m, 2H), 7.87 – 7.28 (m, 14H), 6.98 (t,J= 4.6 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.22 – 6.08 (m, 1H), 5.91 (dd,J= 8.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (d,J= 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (dd,J= 9.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (t,J= 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.33 – 4.06 (m, 4H), 4.03 (t,J= 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.76 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.64 – 3.49 (m, 2H), 3.45 – 3.20 (m, 2H), 2.75 – 2.48 (m, 6H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.14 (dd,J= 15.6, 9.3 Hz, 1H), 1.90 (d,J= 11.1 Hz, 4H), 1.67 (s, 4H), 1.61 – 1.50 (m, 2H), 1.23 (d,J= 12.5 Hz, 5H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.91 (t,J= 7.3 Hz, 4H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.88, 203.58, 172.77, 171.18, 170.09, 169.11, 168.85, 168.40, 167.66, 167.06, 142.63, 136.93, 134.26, 133.57, 132.97, 132.07, 130.36, 129.40, 129.14, 128.79, 128.66, 127.61, 127.24, 84.33, 81.17, 79.13, 75.73, 74.77, 71.80, 71.42, 65.08, 58.47, 54.98, 49.69, 45.88, 43.26, 42.29, 40.98, 35.91, 34.74, 30.65, 29.96, 29.75, 29.38, 27.84, 26.87, 22.99, 21.93, 20.99, 19.20, 15.03, 13.83, 9.76.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 60H70N2O19S2(M+H)+ m/z 1187.4087, found 1187.4087.
EXAMPLE 12 Synthesis of Compound 12
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzamide (phenyl) methyl) -4,9,12,15-tetraoxo-3, 16-dioxa-6, 7-dithio-10-azaeicosanoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,9,10,12 a-decahydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethylurea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of amyl 5-aminolevulinate were admixed. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 12,28 mg as a yellow solid in 48% yield. The purity was 96%.
1H NMR (300 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.17 – 8.10 (m, 2H), 7.75 – 7.68 (m, 2H), 7.65 – 7.30 (m, 12H), 7.10 (d,J= 9.4 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (s, 1H), 6.01 (dd,J= 9.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 5.67 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (d,J= 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.01 – 4.93 (m, 1H), 4.43 (dd,J= 10.8, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.34 – 4.15 (m, 2H), 3.80 (d,J= 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (s, 2H), 2.55 (ddd,J= 15.4, 9.6, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.34 (dd,J= 15.6, 9.0 Hz, 2H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.18 – 1.99 (m, 3H), 1.89 (d,J= 1.3 Hz, 4H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.42 (d,J= 4.4 Hz, 2H), 1.33 (s, 3H), 1.27 (d,J= 4.8 Hz, 6H), 1.21 (s, 4H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.86 (dt,J= 8.6, 6.2 Hz, 4H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ203.94, 203.82, 171.19, 169.89, 169.28, 168.60, 168.50, 168.33, 167.75, 167.21, 142.61, 137.70, 136.71, 134.09, 133.61, 133.06, 132.26, 130.37, 129.30, 128.85, 128.35, 127.30, 126.86, 83.76, 81.21, 79.25, 75.68, 74.98, 72.03, 69.94, 68.01, 58.63, 52.85, 51.22, 43.31, 40.43, 39.25, 39.17, 35.78, 34.98, 31.94, 31.55, 30.80, 29.84, 26.94, 23.30, 22.44, 20.47, 20.06, 14.95, 13.88, 9.80.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 61H72N2O19S2(M+Na)+ m/z 1223.4063, found 1223.4056.
EXAMPLE 13 Synthesis of Compound 13
(2 AR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12 aR,12 bS) -9- (((R) -2- ((S) -benzamide (phenyl) methyl) -4,9,12,15-tetraoxo-3, 16-dioxa-6, 7-dithio-10-azabehenoyl) oxy) -12- (benzoyloxy) -4, 11-dihydroxy-4 a,8, 13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-3, 4a,5,6,10,11, 12-dehydro-1H-7, 11-methoxycyclodecyl [3,4] benzo [1,2-b ] oxa-6, 12b (2 aH) -diacetic acid diethyl ester
51 Mg of intermediate PTX-S-S-COOH,24 mg of 2- (7-azabenzotriazol) -N, N, N ', N' -tetramethylurea Hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 20. Mu.l of DIPEA,15 mg of hexyl 5-aminolevulinate. To 2ml of dichloromethane was added. Stir overnight. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After the reaction was completed, the organic solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted (ethyl acetate was dissolved, and washed with water and saturated sodium chloride in this order). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the objective compound 13,28 mg as a yellow solid in 47% yield. The purity is 98%.
1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ8.13 (dt,J= 7.0, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.88 – 7.82 (m, 2H), 7.79 (d,J= 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.68 – 7.60 (m, 1H), 7.59 – 7.29 (m, 10H), 6.96 (t,J= 4.5 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 6.17 (t,J= 9.0 Hz, 1H), 5.92 (dd,J= 8.5, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (d,J= 7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d,J= 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (dd,J= 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd,J= 10.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 – 4.15 (m, 4H), 4.11 – 3.98 (m, 4H), 3.77 (d,J= 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.64 – 3.51 (m, 3H), 3.42 3.21 (m, 2H), 2.77 (dd,J= 7.3, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.72 – 2.58 (m, 5H), 2.56 – 2.48 (m, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.14 (dd,J= 15.5, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 1.94 – 1.89 (m, 4H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.62 – 1.55 (m, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.93 – 0.85 (m, 6H).
13C NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d)δ204.19, 203.88, 173.07, 171.48, 170.41, 169.41, 169.15, 168.70, 167.94, 167.39, 142.96, 137.27, 134.59, 134.18, 133.30, 132.29, 130.69, 129.74, 129.47, 129.12, 128.98, 127.93, 127.57, 84.91, 81.50, 79.48, 76.06, 76.01, 75.44, 72.47, 72.28, 65.71, 65.55, 58.81, 54.04, 50.02, 46.21, 43.59, 43.14, 42.70, 41.09, 36.14, 35.66, 35.07, 31.86, 31.85, 30.15, 28.97, 28.92, 28.24, 28.17, 27.20, 26.00, 25.96, 23.31, 22.97, 22.46, 21.29, 15.34, 14.58, 14.45, 10.07.
HRMS (ESI) calculated C 62H74N2O19S2(M+H)+ m/z 1215.4400, found 1215.4404.
EXAMPLE 14 Compound prodrug Release assay
Compound 2 was formulated as a stock solution of 10 millimoles per liter (mM) using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as vehicle and stored in a-20 ℃ refrigerator. An appropriate amount of the compound stock solution was diluted with Phosphate Buffer (PBS) to a final concentration of 100 μmol per liter, and then H 2O2 (0, 1,2,10 mm) was added and incubation was performed at 37 ℃ and repeated 3 times. Samples were collected at appropriate time intervals (0, 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24 h) and analyzed directly by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Mass Spectrometry (MS). Agilent 1100 HPLC and UV detector were used with Agilent C18 column (4.6X105 mm,3.5 μm), mobile phase 85% methanol 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, flow rate 1.0 ml/min.
As shown in FIG. 1, the prodrug did not substantially decompose in the case of 0mmol/LH 2O2 after 24 hours incubation, showing good stability. As ROS concentration increases, the rate and extent of prodrug release increases significantly, exhibiting a positive correlation. Low concentration (1 mmol/L) of monosulfur prodrug released 50.07% + -0.02 and disulfide prodrug released 53.06% + -0.06. High concentration (10 mmol/L) of the monosulfur prodrug released 68.83% + -0.02 and disulfide prodrug released 69.23% + -0.02.
The high-low concentration gap mono-sulfur prodrug releases 18.76% ± 0.04 more and disulfide prodrug releases 16.17% ± 0.03 more. These data indicate that the release of such prodrugs is ROS-responsive.
Example 15 anti-cell proliferation assay (MTT assay)
MDA MB-231 cells in the logarithmic growth phase (the cells were purchased from the cell bank of the institute of Kagaku-Han virus, academy of China) were taken, digested with 0.25% pancreatin in an ultra clean bench, and the digestion was stopped. The culture medium is sucked by a pipetting gun, the adherent cells are blown down and then transferred into a 10ml centrifuge tube, the supernatant is discarded after centrifugation for five minutes at 1000 revolutions per minute (rpm), then a proper amount of culture medium is added for blowing and beating uniformly to prepare single cell suspension, 20 microlitres of the single cell suspension is sucked and added into a cell counting plate, and after counting, the cell concentration is diluted by the culture medium and adjusted to reach 3000/hole. 200 microliters of each well is inoculated in a 96-well plate, after the inoculation is completed, the conventional culture is carried out for 12 h hours, after the cells are attached to the wall, the culture medium is sucked out, 200 microliters of culture medium containing 1 mu M of medicine is added again, 3 parallel wells are arranged for each compound concentration, and the same amount of blank culture medium is added into a control group. After 24h of administration, 20. Mu.l of MTT was added to each well, incubation and culture were continued for 3h, and then the mixture was removed, and the mixture was shaken on a shaker for 10 min, and the absorbance of each well was measured by using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 490/570 nm, and the cell viability (%) = (1-A experimental group /A Control group ). Times.100% after the effect of the test compound at different concentrations was calculated according to the corresponding formula, wherein A experimental group represents the absorbance of the experimental group and A Control group represents the absorbance of the control group. The experimental results are shown in Table 1. The data indicate that the prodrugs exhibit similar or even stronger killing effects on cancer cells. Preferably compound 13 exhibits 9% greater inhibition than the positive drug.
Table 1 antiproliferative activity of prodrugs on breast cancer cells
Inhibition (1 μm) data results are the average of three replicates, ±represents Standard Deviation (SD);
example 16 acute toxicity detection of Compounds in mice
ICR mice were kept normally for approximately five weeks, and then the mice were randomly assigned to 6 dose groups of compound 2 and paclitaxel, each group corresponding to a different dose (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg), each group having 6 mice (male and female halves). The compound was injected via the tail vein. Abnormal behavior and death were recorded within two weeks after dosing. The maximum tolerance (MTD value) was used as an indicator of acute toxicity determination, i.e., the maximum dose that allowed mice of the entire dose group to remain viable after a single administration.
The MTD value of the positive drug paclitaxel group was 20 mg/kg. It was observed that 20 mg/kg mice had a significant weight loss for two weeks after dosing, whereas the paclitaxel prodrug group did not die even at the highest 200 mg/kg dose, and the low dose group had no significant change in body weight. The result shows that the MTD value of the taxol prodrug in ICR mice is at least 10 times higher than that of taxol which is a positive medicine, and the in-vivo safety is greatly improved.
EXAMPLE 17 in vivo imaging experiments of Compound 2 in mice
The purpose of this example was to explore the fluorescence imaging ability of compounds on tumor-bearing mice. Following tumor formation in mice subcutaneously implanted with 4T1 tumor cells, compound 2 was administered intravenously as well as orally and then scanned with Tanon ABL imaging systems at various time points (0, 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24,36,48,72 h). After 12h, 24h, 36h, 48h and 72h of administration, a significant near infrared fluorescence signal was observed at the tumor site, as shown in fig. 2-6. The quantitative values of fluorescence signals of in vivo imaging of mice are shown in Table 2. Notably, 12h after injection, near infrared fluorescence signals in tumors of the tail vein injection group have been clearly recognized, in contrast to certain fluorescence signals that can be recognized by tumor-bearing mice 24h of the oral administration group. This suggests that compound 2 has an accumulating effect on tumors in mice and has a certain oral activity.
Table 2 quantitative response values for in vivo imaging of compound 2 mice
As described above, although the present invention has been shown and described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, it is not to be construed as limiting the invention itself. Various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.