Detailed Description
The invention will now be described in detail by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The Beidou InSAR DEM error compensation method based on multi-star data combination specifically comprises the following steps:
Step one, full scene DEM error estimation
For position G under any multi-satellite observation, it is assumed that it can be observed by K different satellites simultaneously. Since DEM errors of different satellites observing the same point are basically consistent, and atmospheric errors are basically consistent, the difference between the observed phases of different satellites is mainly caused by different system configurations of different satellites, and different K dem results in different DEM error phases, namely:
Writing the above into a matrix form:
wherein: is a Kx1 matrix containing the observed phase, and beta is a2 x 1 matrix containing the DEM error and the atmospheric phase of the position G to be estimated; Representing phase noise, K dem is a DEM coefficient, and the expression is:
wherein, the
T k denotes the aperture center time of the kth day image, t n is the reference time, Q 'denotes the position of the target Q after imaging, P S(tk) is the position of the satellite at time t k, P S(tn) is the position of the satellite at time t n, P s(tk,tn) denotes the average of the satellite positions at time t k and time t n, P Q′(tn) denotes the three-dimensional coordinates of Q', P E denotes the three-dimensional coordinates of the echo antenna, and V s denotes the satellite speed.
Where the number of the elements in the process is,The deformation phase is included, but can be removed through subsequent DEM filtering, and the estimation result of the DEM is not affected.
Further, the exact DEM error at the correlated pair G position may be obtained by least squares:
the first term in β is the exact DEM error at position G.
For all correlation results for the first day, the DEM error for PS points on all correlations for that day can be estimated.
NL filtering
Because the signal-to-noise ratio of the Beidou InSAR system is low, meanwhile, the estimation accuracy of the DEM error is directly related to the number of the point-associated satellites. When the number of associated satellites is small, a large deviation in the estimation results of this point occurs. Therefore, further processing of the preliminarily obtained DEM errors is required to improve accuracy.
The initially obtained DEM error is processed here by NL filtering. Conventional filtering methods include Lee filtering, post filtering, non-local filtering (NL, nonlocal filter), and the like. The NL filter fully considers the similarity and redundancy of the data, and applies the data to the denoising process. The main idea is to extend a local or semi-local model into a non-local model based on the similarity of the data, so that the weighted average value of all pixels similar to the current pixel in structure is used as the gray level estimation value of the current pixel.
In conventional image filtering, the main steps can be expressed as:
let the discretized image be p= { p (i) |i e Ω }, where Ω is the support domain. The DEM error value of any pixel i in the image is obtained by weighted average of adjacent pixels:
Where S (i) denotes a search window centered at pixel i. w (i, j) represents a weight function which is determined by the similarity between pixel i and pixel j, while satisfying 0≤w (i, j). Ltoreq.1. Let N (i) denote a neighborhood of fixed size centered on pixel i, typically square, and the weights w (i, j) can be expressed as:
wherein h represents an attenuation factor, The Euclidean distance under Gaussian weighting is shown, and α is the standard deviation of the Gaussian kernel.
However, for filtering DEM errors in beidou InSAR, a conventional NL filter cannot be directly used, and a certain improvement is required. First, the preliminary estimation result of the DEM error is a discrete point, and only the position P ΔG corresponding to the correlation pair G can obtain the error estimation result. Therefore, in equation 8, the gaussian kernel needs to be rewritten into a discrete form:
Wherein Z 1 (i, j) is a normalization function.
Meanwhile, for a long-time PS point, each interference pair can obtain an estimation result of DEM errors. However, there is random jitter due to the presence of focus position errors, i.e., P ΔG. Even for a sequence of PS points, the position of each day is different, varying randomly over a small range. The conventional kernel function takes the form of an index, where coefficients fall off faster, whereas in Beidou InSAR, more weight should be given to the neighborhood. Meanwhile, since the DEM error does not have spatial coherence after a certain distance, the coefficient should be rapidly reduced with the increase of N 1 (i, j). Based on this, further modification of the kernel function of the weights is required. Here, a new kernel function is defined as:
wherein h 1 is a new smoothness index, which has:
Second, in a conventional NL filter, the neighborhood of picture elements, i.e. N (i), is typically chosen to be square. However, for the Beidou InSAR system, the system is spatially resolved differently. Therefore, the effect of the shape of the resolving element on the spatial position distribution should also be taken into account in the filtering algorithm. Here, the shape of the neighborhood is changed to an ellipse based on two-dimensional resolution, a schematic view of which is shown in fig. 1. In the figure, the square area is a search area, and the elliptical area is a neighborhood. ρ r,ρa is the resolution in the distance and azimuth directions, respectively, and α NL represents the expansion coefficient. The coefficient depends on the density of the scene PS points, and is lower when the point density is higher, and vice versa. In this way, the number of points of the region N in each direction can be made equal, and the average of the scene is ensured.
Through the NL filter, the preliminary estimated DEM error of the first day may be converted into the final DEM error of the first day scene, i.e.:
ΔDEM=NL_filter(ΔDEMcoa) (12)
For long-time monitoring, the DEM information of the scene is unchanged, so after a period of DEM error estimation, the estimated value can be used as correction compensation of the DEM to the DEM information, and then the DEM error estimation is not performed.
Step three, DEM error compensation
For any PS point Q, the DEM error estimation result can be obtained from the full-scene DEM error estimation result estimated in the step two, and then the phase error introduced by the DEM error can be expressed as;
Traversing all PS points in the scene, the DEM phase error result of each PS point can be obtained, and the final differential phase is the phase caused by deformation:
In this embodiment, a deformation scene of 1200 m×1200 m is selected, 8 beidou IGSO satellites are selected as the transmitter, and the experiment time is 22 days in total. In this embodiment, the result of phase error compensation is shown by taking the processing result of Beidou2 IGSO3 as an example.
Two PS points were selected, the positions of which were [157,218], [304,266], the positions of which are shown as white points in fig. 2. The interferometric phase precision before two exemplary point compensations is shown in fig. 3 and 4, and the average precision of two PS points is 23.0525mm and 16.9324mm. The result of DEM error compensation is shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, and the accuracy of the two PS points is 17.4168mm and 7.5528mm.
Table 1 precision comparison
According to the results of table 1, it can be seen that the deformation inversion accuracy after being processed by the multi-star data combined Beidou InSAR DEM error compensation method provided by the invention is improved compared with that before being processed, and the effectiveness of the invention is proved.
In summary, the above embodiments are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.