CN107884149A - Shake test structure in one kind top destroys recognition methods - Google Patents
Shake test structure in one kind top destroys recognition methods Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107884149A CN107884149A CN201610871982.0A CN201610871982A CN107884149A CN 107884149 A CN107884149 A CN 107884149A CN 201610871982 A CN201610871982 A CN 201610871982A CN 107884149 A CN107884149 A CN 107884149A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mrow
- shake
- tolerance
- msub
- response spectrum
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 claims 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M7/00—Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
本发明提供一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法,包括:在颠震试验的试验件上安装加速度传感器,所述加速度传感器的测量方向与颠震方向相同;获取所述加速度传感器采集的加速度信号,并对所述加速度信号进行冲击响应谱计算;计算所述冲击响应谱与基准冲击响应谱之间的容差,根据所述容差判断所述试验件是否破坏以及破坏的时间;解决了传统人工检测方法和数据判断不规范,难以判定破坏时间的问题。
The invention provides a method for identifying structural damage in a shaking test, comprising: installing an acceleration sensor on a test piece of the shaking test, the measurement direction of the acceleration sensor is the same as the shaking direction; acquiring the acceleration signal collected by the acceleration sensor, And calculate the shock response spectrum of the acceleration signal; calculate the tolerance between the shock response spectrum and the reference shock response spectrum, and judge whether the test piece is damaged and the time of damage according to the tolerance; solve the problem of traditional artificial The detection method and data judgment are not standardized, and it is difficult to determine the problem of destruction time.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及环境试验技术领域,尤其涉及一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法。The invention relates to the technical field of environmental testing, in particular to a structural damage identification method for a jolting test.
背景技术Background technique
颠震试验结构破坏的检测是颠震试验中的一个比较繁琐和复杂的技术,试验件是否破坏是衡量试验件是否正常的一个重要参数,在产品颠震环境适应性的评估方面具有重要参考价值。The detection of structural damage in the shaking test is a relatively cumbersome and complicated technology in the shaking test. Whether the test piece is damaged is an important parameter to measure whether the test piece is normal, and it has important reference value in the evaluation of the product's adaptability to the shaking environment .
目前,工程上确定试验件试验后结构是否破坏的方法,首先在试验前进行人工检测,确保试验之前是完好的,然后在试验后进行人工检查,确认是否完好,该方法存在一些缺点,如试验结构完好性检查完全靠人工方法,效率比较低,同时试验中无法判别结构破坏的时间,只能通过加速度峰值是否异常来判断,这种传统方法难以准确定位破坏时间。At present, the method of determining whether the structure of the test piece is damaged after the test in engineering is firstly to carry out manual inspection before the test to ensure that it is intact before the test, and then carry out manual inspection after the test to confirm whether it is intact. This method has some shortcomings, such as test Structural integrity checks are completely manual, and the efficiency is relatively low. At the same time, the time of structural damage cannot be judged during the test, and it can only be judged by whether the acceleration peak value is abnormal. This traditional method is difficult to accurately locate the time of damage.
发明内容Contents of the invention
在下文中给出关于本发明的简要概述,以便提供关于本发明的某些方面的基本理解。应当理解,这个概述并不是关于本发明的穷举性概述。它并不是意图确定本发明的关键或重要部分,也不是意图限定本发明的范围。其目的仅仅是以简化的形式给出某些概念,以此作为稍后论述的更详细描述的前序。A brief overview of the invention is given below in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. It should be understood that this summary is not an exhaustive overview of the invention. It is not intended to identify key or critical parts of the invention nor to delineate the scope of the invention. Its purpose is merely to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is discussed later.
为解决上述问题,本发明提出一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法。In order to solve the above problems, the present invention proposes a damage identification method for a shaking test structure.
一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法,包括:A damage identification method for a shaking test structure, comprising:
在颠震试验的试验件上安装加速度传感器,所述加速度传感器的测量方向与颠震方向相同;An acceleration sensor is installed on the test piece of the jolt test, and the measurement direction of the acceleration sensor is the same as the jolt direction;
获取所述加速度传感器采集的加速度信号,并对所述加速度信号进行冲击响应谱计算;Obtain the acceleration signal collected by the acceleration sensor, and perform shock response spectrum calculation on the acceleration signal;
计算所述冲击响应谱与基准冲击响应谱之间的容差,根据所述容差判断所述试验件是否破坏以及破坏的时间。Calculating the tolerance between the shock response spectrum and the reference shock response spectrum, and judging whether the test piece is destroyed and the time of destruction according to the tolerance.
本发明提供的颠震试验结构破坏识别方法,解决了传统人工检测方法和数据判断不规范,难以判定破坏时间的问题。The damage identification method of the shaking test structure provided by the invention solves the problem that the traditional manual detection method and data judgment are not standardized, and it is difficult to judge the damage time.
附图说明Description of drawings
为了更清楚地说明本发明实施例或现有技术中的技术方案,下面将对实施例或现有技术描述中所需要使用的附图作简单地介绍,显而易见地,下面描述中的附图仅仅是本发明的一些实施例,对于本领域普通技术人员来讲,在不付出创造性劳动的前提下,还可以根据这些附图获得其他的附图。In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the following will briefly introduce the drawings that need to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the accompanying drawings in the following description are only These are some embodiments of the present invention. Those skilled in the art can also obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative work.
图1为本发明提供的一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法一种实施例的流程图。Fig. 1 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for identifying damage of a shaking test structure provided by the present invention.
图2为本发明提供的一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法第二种实施例的流程图。Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a second embodiment of a method for identifying damage to a structure in a jolt test provided by the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面参照附图来说明本发明的实施例。在本发明的一个附图或一种实施方式中描述的元素和特征可以与一个或者更多个其他附图或实施方式中示出的元素和特征相结合。应当注意,为了清楚目的,附图和说明中省略了与本发明无关的、本领域普通技术人员已知的部件和处理的表示和描述。Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. Elements and features described in one drawing or one embodiment of the present invention may be combined with elements and features shown in one or more other drawings or embodiments. It should be noted that representation and description of components and processes that are not relevant to the present invention and known to those of ordinary skill in the art are omitted from the drawings and descriptions for the purpose of clarity.
参考图1,本实施例提供一种颠震试验结构破坏识别方法,包括:Referring to Fig. 1, the present embodiment provides a method for identifying damage of a shaking test structure, including:
步骤S101,在颠震试验的试验件上安装加速度传感器,所述加速度传感器的测量方向与颠震方向相同;Step S101, installing an acceleration sensor on the test piece for the jolt test, the measurement direction of the acceleration sensor is the same as the jolt direction;
步骤S102,获取所述加速度传感器采集的加速度信号,并对所述加速度信号进行冲击响应谱计算;Step S102, acquiring the acceleration signal collected by the acceleration sensor, and performing shock response spectrum calculation on the acceleration signal;
步骤S103,计算所述冲击响应谱与基准冲击响应谱之间的容差,根据所述容差判断所述试验件是否破坏以及破坏的时间。Step S103 , calculating the tolerance between the shock response spectrum and the reference shock response spectrum, and judging whether the test piece is damaged and the time of failure according to the tolerance.
具体地,在颠震试验开始之前,在试验件上布置加速度传感器,加速度传感器的选择与使用要求参见《冲击与振动手册》,加速度传感器的工作频率范围覆盖10Hz-2000Hz,测量方向与颠震方向相同,加速度传感器的安装位置优选为试验件易损坏位置,加速度传感器与试验件的连接方式采用胶粘。Specifically, before the start of the jolt test, an acceleration sensor is arranged on the test piece. For the selection and use requirements of the acceleration sensor, refer to the "Shock and Vibration Handbook". Similarly, the installation position of the acceleration sensor is preferably the vulnerable position of the test piece, and the connection method between the acceleration sensor and the test piece is glued.
利用通用数采系统,对试验整个过程的加速度信号进行采集,采样频率不小于10KHz,数采系统的选择与使用要求参见《冲击与振动手册》。Use a general-purpose data acquisition system to collect acceleration signals throughout the test process, and the sampling frequency is not less than 10KHz. For the selection and use requirements of the data acquisition system, please refer to the Shock and Vibration Manual.
颠震试验中颠震次数一般为1000次,首先将颠震的的加速度信号进行分离,形成独立的加速度信号,每个加速度信号的前后顺序保持不变,对每个加速度信号分别进行冲击响应谱计算,冲击响应谱的计算方法见《冲击与振动手册》。In the vibration test, the number of vibrations is generally 1000 times. First, the acceleration signals of the vibrations are separated to form independent acceleration signals. The sequence of each acceleration signal remains unchanged, and the shock response spectrum is performed on each acceleration signal Calculation, see the Shock and Vibration Handbook for the calculation method of the shock response spectrum.
基准冲击响应谱SRS0(f)是指试验件完好时的冲击响应谱,一般可在试验调试中获取,作为一种优选的实施方式,基准冲击响应谱为试验中第一次颠震获得的冲击响应谱。The reference shock response spectrum SRS 0 (f) refers to the shock response spectrum when the test piece is intact, which can generally be obtained during test debugging. As a preferred implementation, the reference shock response spectrum is obtained from the first jolt in the test Shock Response Spectrum.
进一步地,所述容差通过以下公式进行计算:Further, the tolerance is calculated by the following formula:
其中,f为采样频率,SRS0为基准冲击响应谱,SRSi为第i次颠震的冲击响应谱,δi为第i次颠震的容差。Among them, f is the sampling frequency, SRS 0 is the reference shock response spectrum, SRS i is the shock response spectrum of the i-th jolt, and δ i is the tolerance of the i-th jolt.
进一步地,参考图2,根据所述容差判断所述试验件是否破坏,包括:Further, referring to FIG. 2, judging whether the test piece is damaged according to the tolerance includes:
将所述容差与预设阈值进行比较,若所述容差大于或等于预设阈值,则确定所述试验件已经破坏,反之,若小于预设阈值,则表示试验件正常。The tolerance is compared with a preset threshold, and if the tolerance is greater than or equal to the preset threshold, it is determined that the test piece has been damaged; otherwise, if it is smaller than the preset threshold, it indicates that the test piece is normal.
作为一种优选的实施方式,预设阈值为6dB。As a preferred implementation manner, the preset threshold is 6dB.
进一步地,根据试验件破坏时的颠震次数,确定所述试验件破坏的时间,当容差大于或等于预设阈值时,记录下此时的颠震次数,即从第i次颠震开始破坏,从而确定破坏时的时间。Further, according to the number of vibrations when the test piece is damaged, determine the time when the test piece is damaged, and when the tolerance is greater than or equal to the preset threshold, record the number of vibrations at this time, that is, start from the i-th vibration Destruction, thereby determining the time of destruction.
本发明提供的颠震试验结构破坏识别方法,解决了传统颠震试验中人工检测和难以确定破坏时间的问题,经过工程实践检验,具有原理简单、物理意义明确等优点。The damage identification method of the shaking test structure provided by the invention solves the problems of manual detection and difficulty in determining the failure time in the traditional shaking test, and has the advantages of simple principle and clear physical meaning after being tested in engineering practice.
虽然已经详细说明了本发明及其优点,但是应当理解在不超出由所附的权利要求所限定的本发明的精神和范围的情况下可以进行各种改变、替代和变换。而且,本申请的范围不仅限于说明书所描述的过程、设备、手段、方法和步骤的具体实施例。本领域内的普通技术人员从本发明的公开内容将容易理解,根据本发明可以使用执行与在此所述的相应实施例基本相同的功能或者获得与其基本相同的结果的、现有和将来要被开发的过程、设备、手段、方法或者步骤。因此,所附的权利要求旨在它们的范围内包括这样的过程、设备、手段、方法或者步骤。Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not limited to the specific embodiments of the procedures, devices, means, methods and steps described in the specification. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention that existing and future devices that perform substantially the same function or obtain substantially the same results as the corresponding embodiments described herein can be used in accordance with the present invention. The developed process, device, means, method or steps. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, means, means, methods or steps.
Claims (5)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610871982.0A CN107884149A (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2016-09-30 | Shake test structure in one kind top destroys recognition methods |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610871982.0A CN107884149A (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2016-09-30 | Shake test structure in one kind top destroys recognition methods |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107884149A true CN107884149A (en) | 2018-04-06 |
Family
ID=61770029
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610871982.0A Pending CN107884149A (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2016-09-30 | Shake test structure in one kind top destroys recognition methods |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107884149A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110954413A (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2020-04-03 | 苏州苏试试验集团股份有限公司 | Control device and control method of impact response spectrum test bed |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102466554A (en) * | 2010-11-17 | 2012-05-23 | 西北机器有限公司 | Impact response spectrum testing machine |
| US20120271603A1 (en) * | 2011-04-21 | 2012-10-25 | The Boeing Company | System and method for simulating high-intensity pyrotechnic shock |
| CN202793733U (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2013-03-13 | 贵州航天计量测试技术研究所 | Calibrating device for shock response spectrum testing machine based on PXI |
| CN103389197A (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2013-11-13 | 苏州世力源科技有限公司 | Drive device of horizontal impacting test bed and bi-directional multifunctional horizontal impacting test bed |
-
2016
- 2016-09-30 CN CN201610871982.0A patent/CN107884149A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102466554A (en) * | 2010-11-17 | 2012-05-23 | 西北机器有限公司 | Impact response spectrum testing machine |
| US20120271603A1 (en) * | 2011-04-21 | 2012-10-25 | The Boeing Company | System and method for simulating high-intensity pyrotechnic shock |
| CN202793733U (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2013-03-13 | 贵州航天计量测试技术研究所 | Calibrating device for shock response spectrum testing machine based on PXI |
| CN103389197A (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2013-11-13 | 苏州世力源科技有限公司 | Drive device of horizontal impacting test bed and bi-directional multifunctional horizontal impacting test bed |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 《振动与冲击手册》编辑委员会: "《振动与冲击手册》", 30 November 1990, 国防工业出版社 * |
| 郑秋双: "基于LabVIEW的无人机落震台数据采集系统的研制与实现", 《中国学位论文全文数据库》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110954413A (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2020-04-03 | 苏州苏试试验集团股份有限公司 | Control device and control method of impact response spectrum test bed |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| TWI449883B (en) | Method for analyzing structure safety | |
| CN103900826B (en) | The method of Real-Time Monitoring automobile chassis structures fatigue damage | |
| WO2009088816A8 (en) | Systems and methods for well data analysis | |
| Alves et al. | A fast and efficient feature extraction methodology for structural damage localization based on raw acceleration measurements | |
| CN109190272B (en) | Concrete structure defect detection method based on elastic waves and machine learning | |
| JPWO2019111841A1 (en) | Damage diagnostic equipment, damage diagnostic methods, and damage diagnostic programs | |
| CN110470738B (en) | Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function | |
| Fasel et al. | Active sensing using impedance‐based ARX models and extreme value statistics for damage detection | |
| CN103913512A (en) | Damage positioning system and damage positioning method for stay cable periodic detection | |
| Cremona | Dynamic monitoring applied to the detection of structural modifications: a high‐speed railway bridge study | |
| KR20170067292A (en) | Device and method for estimating remaining life of mechanical system | |
| CN104897353A (en) | Member damage detection method | |
| CN112131781B (en) | Steel structure damage detection method based on fully-connected neural network and transfer rate function | |
| Sitton et al. | Damage scenario analysis of bridges using crowdsourced smartphone data from passing vehicles | |
| Yu et al. | Structural damage prognosis on truss bridges with end connector bolts | |
| CN109670143B (en) | Method for detecting statistical law of vibration frequency domain response signals of civil engineering structure under environmental excitation | |
| CN103218277A (en) | Automatic detection method and device for server environment | |
| CN107884149A (en) | Shake test structure in one kind top destroys recognition methods | |
| CN106596025A (en) | Highway tunnel hanging fan base stability detection method and system based on impulse response | |
| Yajima et al. | Probabilistic damage identification for bridges using multiple damage-sensitive features and FE model update | |
| CN108984866A (en) | A kind of preparation method of test load spectrum | |
| CN102901611A (en) | Rapid checking method for damage of modal test-based spaceborne antenna structure | |
| CN103911958B (en) | The damage reason location system of suspension bridge and arch bridge suspender periodic detection and method thereof | |
| KR101558085B1 (en) | Method for evaluating bridge using input-output relationship of load and record media recorded program for implement thereof | |
| CN107124195A (en) | A kind of car-mounted terminal communication performance detection method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180406 |