CN104605162A - Application of aspergillus oryzae as beef cattle intestinal tract and excrement methane inhibitor - Google Patents
Application of aspergillus oryzae as beef cattle intestinal tract and excrement methane inhibitor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104605162A CN104605162A CN201510036906.3A CN201510036906A CN104605162A CN 104605162 A CN104605162 A CN 104605162A CN 201510036906 A CN201510036906 A CN 201510036906A CN 104605162 A CN104605162 A CN 104605162A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- methane
- aspergillus oryzae
- beef cattle
- intestinal tract
- application
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 122
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 240000006439 Aspergillus oryzae Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 235000002247 Aspergillus oryzae Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 235000015278 beef Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 24
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 19
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 15
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 10
- 241000282849 Ruminantia Species 0.000 description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000010871 livestock manure Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000005431 greenhouse gas Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000021050 feed intake Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 210000004767 rumen Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000014590 basal diet Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004817 gas chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010792 warming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010015137 Eructation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003674 animal food additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000027687 belching Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000019577 caloric intake Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019621 digestibility Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000005264 electron capture Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002555 ionophore Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000236 ionophoric effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013586 microbial product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002808 molecular sieve Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000007524 organic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000005985 organic acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000419 plant extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000700 radioactive tracer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229930182490 saponin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 235000017709 saponins Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000007949 saponins Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- URGAHOPLAPQHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium aluminosilicate Chemical compound [Na+].[Al+3].[O-][Si]([O-])=O.[O-][Si]([O-])=O URGAHOPLAPQHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y02P60/56—
Landscapes
- Fodder In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域 technical field
本发明涉及温室气体减排技术领域,具体涉及米曲霉作为肉牛肠道及粪便甲烷抑制剂的应用。 The invention relates to the technical field of greenhouse gas emission reduction, in particular to the application of Aspergillus oryzae as an inhibitor of beef cattle intestinal tract and feces methane.
背景技术 Background technique
甲烷是一种重要的温室气体,其温室效应是二氧化碳的20~30倍,甲烷对全球气候变暖的影响作用占所有影响气候变暖因素作用的15%~20%。而其中很大一部分来源于反刍动物。甲烷是反刍动物消化过程中的产物,其化学性质稳定,一般很难在体内消化吸收,它主要以嗳气的方式排出体外,此外,反刍动物粪便所产生的甲烷量也不容忽视。甲烷的排放意味着能量的所失,研究表明,反刍动物以甲烷的形式所损失的能量占摄入总能量的2%~15%,因此,对反刍动物甲烷抑制剂的研究具有环境和经济双重效益。 Methane is an important greenhouse gas, and its greenhouse effect is 20-30 times that of carbon dioxide. The effect of methane on global warming accounts for 15%-20% of all factors affecting climate warming. And a large part of it comes from ruminants. Methane is a product of the digestion process of ruminants. Its chemical properties are stable, and it is generally difficult to digest and absorb in the body. It is mainly excreted in the form of belching. In addition, the amount of methane produced by ruminant feces cannot be ignored. The emission of methane means the loss of energy. Studies have shown that the energy lost by ruminants in the form of methane accounts for 2% to 15% of the total energy intake. Therefore, the research on methane inhibitors for ruminants has both environmental and economic advantages. benefit.
随着人们生活水平的提高,对牛肉的需求量在不断增加,因此,肉牛养殖数量不断增加,而由此带来的环境问题也逐步受到人们的关注。目前常见的甲烷抑制剂主要分为多卤化合物、离子载体化合物,有机酸,微生物制剂、植物提取物、皂甙和油脂等几类物质。各类甲烷抑制剂都处于研究初期,有些甲烷抑制剂效果不稳定或者破坏瘤胃内环境,造成饲料利用率降低等弊端,因此研发有效的反刍动物甲烷抑制剂是必要的。米曲霉是FAO/WHO公认安全的食品级菌种,是可以直接饲喂给动物的微生物产品,以往研究表明米曲霉可以提高奶牛日粮中纤维的消化率,但也有结果与其不一致。现有技术中亦有在关于米曲霉作为饲料添加剂的报道,其中,米曲霉主要通过改善反刍动物瘤胃的发酵性能从而改善反刍动物的生产性能及体况。而关于米曲霉是否能减少肉牛肠道及粪便甲烷的排放量以及最适的添加效果,还未见报道。 With the improvement of people's living standards, the demand for beef is constantly increasing. Therefore, the number of beef cattle breeding continues to increase, and the resulting environmental problems have gradually attracted people's attention. At present, the common methane inhibitors are mainly divided into polyhalogen compounds, ionophore compounds, organic acids, microbial agents, plant extracts, saponins and oils and other substances. All kinds of methane inhibitors are in the initial stage of research. Some methane inhibitors have unstable effects or damage the rumen environment, resulting in disadvantages such as reduced feed utilization. Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective ruminant methane inhibitors. Aspergillus oryzae is a food-grade strain recognized as safe by FAO/WHO. It is a microbial product that can be directly fed to animals. Previous studies have shown that Aspergillus oryzae can improve the digestibility of fiber in dairy cow diets, but there are also inconsistent results. There are also reports about Aspergillus oryzae as a feed additive in the prior art, wherein Aspergillus oryzae mainly improves the production performance and body condition of ruminants by improving the fermentation performance of rumen of ruminants. However, there is no report about whether Aspergillus oryzae can reduce the emission of methane in the intestinal tract and manure of beef cattle and the optimal addition effect.
发明内容 Contents of the invention
本发明的目的在于通过给肉牛补饲一定量的甲烷抑制剂,从而减少肉牛粪便及肠道甲烷排放。 The purpose of the present invention is to reduce beef cattle manure and intestinal methane emission by supplementing a certain amount of methane inhibitor to beef cattle.
本发明的目的可以通过以下技术方案实现。 The purpose of the present invention can be achieved through the following technical solutions.
米曲霉作为肉牛肠道及粪便甲烷抑制剂的应用。 Use of Aspergillus oryzae as an inhibitor of intestinal and fecal methane in beef cattle.
使用方法:将米曲霉添加到肉牛全混合饲料中,每日单位体重饲喂剂量为8-12mg/kg体重。 Method of use: Add Aspergillus oryzae to the whole mixed feed of beef cattle, and the daily unit weight feeding dosage is 8-12mg/kg body weight.
本发明的有益效果:给试验肉牛每天补饲8-12mg/kgBW(体重)的米曲霉使其肠道的日均甲烷产量、单位体重产甲烷量和甲烷能分别降低了18.77%、20%和18.73%。此外,使试验肉牛粪便在自然堆放贮存过程中(0-45d)的甲烷日均排放通量降低了55.55%。将米曲霉作为肉牛肠道及粪便甲烷抑制剂的应用具有环境和经济双重效益。 Beneficial effects of the present invention: the daily average methane output of the intestinal tract, the methane production per unit weight and the methane energy of the test beef cattle are respectively reduced by 18.77%, 20% and 18.73%. In addition, the average daily methane emission flux of the experimental beef cattle manure during natural stacking and storage (0-45 days) was reduced by 55.55%. The application of Aspergillus oryzae as an inhibitor of intestinal and fecal methane in beef cattle has both environmental and economic benefits.
附图说明 Description of drawings
图1是粪便甲烷排放速率随时间变化图。 Figure 1 is a plot of fecal methane emission rate versus time.
具体实施方式 Detailed ways
米曲霉对肉牛肠道及粪便甲烷排放及生产性能的影响 Effects of Aspergillus oryzae on intestinal and fecal methane emission and production performance of beef cattle
1 材料与方法 1 Materials and methods
1. 1实验动物的选择及饲养管理 1.1 Selection and feeding management of experimental animals
试验在河南农业大学毛庄实习基地进行。选择体重、月龄、日增重接近,健康无病的西门塔尔杂交肉牛8头,随机分为两组(对照、米曲霉),栓系饲养,自由饮水,各组每日6:00和18:00饲喂相同的全混日粮。 The experiment was carried out at the Maozhuang practice base of Henan Agricultural University. Select 8 healthy and disease-free Simmental crossbred beef cattle with similar body weight, monthly age, and daily gain, and randomly divide them into two groups (control, Aspergillus oryzae). At 18:00, the same full mixed ration was fed.
1.2试验设计 1.2 Experimental design
饲养试验于2014年4月—5月进行,共37天(7天预试期,30天正试期)。对照组饲喂基础日粮;米曲霉组饲喂基础日粮8-12mg/kg体重的米曲霉添加剂;试验的最后5天利用SF6示踪法测定试验牛甲烷肠道排放量。 The feeding experiment was carried out from April to May 2014, with a total of 37 days (7-day pre-trial period, 30-day main trial period). The control group was fed with basal diet; the Aspergillus oryzae group was fed with 8-12 mg/kg body weight of Aspergillus oryzae additive in the basal diet; in the last 5 days of the test, the intestinal methane emission of test cattle was measured by SF 6 tracer method.
粪便甲烷排放试验于2014年5月-7月进行,共45天。在饲养试验后期,收集对照组和米曲霉组试验牛所排泄的粪便,分别堆成长×宽×高为2.00×1.00×0.10m的粪堆,露天贮存,用静态箱-气象色谱法测定两试验组肉牛所排泄粪便的甲烷排放通量,每个试验组三个测定点。堆放前9天每天8:30-9:00采集两组粪便的甲烷排放通量,之后每隔一天测定一次。 The fecal methane emission test was conducted from May to July 2014 for a total of 45 days. At the later stage of the feeding experiment, the feces excreted by the test cows in the control group and the Aspergillus oryzae group were collected, and they were respectively piled up in manure piles with a length × width × height of 2.00 × 1.00 × 0.10m, stored in the open air, and measured by static box-gas chromatography. The methane emission fluxes excreted by beef cattle in the three groups were measured at three points for each test group. The methane emission flux of the two groups of feces was collected from 8:30 to 9:00 every day for 9 days before stacking, and then measured every other day.
1.3 试验材料 1.3 Test materials
甲烷抑制剂为米曲霉。 The methane inhibitor is Aspergillus oryzae.
1.4 试验测定指标及方法 1.4 Test indicators and methods
1.4.1生产性能 1.4.1 Production performance
平均日增重:在预试期开始和试验结束时分别用地磅测定每头牛的体重,按以下公式计算平均日增重。 Average daily gain: measure the weight of each cow with a weighbridge at the beginning of the pre-test period and at the end of the test, and calculate the average daily gain according to the following formula.
计算公式: Calculation formula:
采食量:每隔5天测量一次牛的采食量,与此同时采集全混日粮饲料样品,测定干物质含量(70℃),计算平均每头牛每天的干物质采食量。 Feed intake: Measure the feed intake of the cattle every 5 days, and at the same time collect samples of the total mixed ration, measure the dry matter content (70°C), and calculate the average daily dry matter intake of each cow.
1.4.2 肠道甲烷排放量 1.4.2 Enteric methane emissions
1.4.2.1 气体采集 试验开始将已知渗透速率的SF6渗透管投入到瘤胃中,正式期的后5天每天利用自制牛扼收集试验牛所呼出的气体,以24h为一周期。收集的样品当天送回试验测定SF6和CH4的浓度,根据以下公式计算试验牛肠道甲烷的排放量: 1.4.2.1 At the beginning of the gas collection test, the SF 6 permeation tube with known permeation rate was put into the rumen, and the gas exhaled by the test cow was collected every day in the last 5 days of the official period, with 24 hours as a cycle. The collected samples were sent back to the test on the same day to measure the concentration of SF 6 and CH 4 , and the intestinal methane emission of the test cattle was calculated according to the following formula:
(1) (1)
式中: In the formula:
RCH4 -反刍动物甲烷排放速率,L/d; R CH4 -Ruminant methane emission rate, L/d;
RSF6 -SF6的渗透速率,mg/d; R SF6 - permeation rate of SF 6 , mg/d;
6.518-SF6的密度,kg/m3; 6.518 - the density of SF 6 , kg/m 3 ;
[CH4 ]-样品气中CH4的浓度,10-6(摩尔分数); [ CH 4 ] - the concentration of CH 4 in the sample gas, 10 -6 (mol fraction);
[SF6 ]-样品气中SF6的浓度,10-12(摩尔分数)。 [ SF 6 ] - the concentration of SF 6 in the sample gas, 10 -12 (mole fraction).
1.4.2.2 气体浓度测定 1.4.2.2 Gas concentration measurement
SF6浓度测定: Determination of SF6 concentration:
采用配有电子捕获检测器(ECD)的气相色谱,5Å分子筛色谱柱。柱温50℃,进样口温度100℃,检测器温度250℃。进样量: 1mL。 A gas chromatograph equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD) was used on a 5Å molecular sieve column. The column temperature was 50°C, the inlet temperature was 100°C, and the detector temperature was 250°C. Injection volume: 1mL.
CH4浓度测定: CH4 Concentration Determination:
采用配有氢火焰离子检测器(FID)的气相色谱,PQ填充色谱柱。柱温55℃,进样口温度150℃,检测器温度200℃。进样量:1mL。 A gas chromatograph equipped with a hydrogen flame ionization detector (FID) was used, and the PQ packed column. The column temperature was 55°C, the inlet temperature was 150°C, and the detector temperature was 200°C. Injection volume: 1 mL.
1.4.3 粪便甲烷排放通量 1.4.3 Fecal methane emission flux
1.4.3.1气体采样 采样时,扣上箱盖儿,用水密封。分别在扣盖儿后的0、10、20、30min时,用50mL注射器从导气管取气,将采集的气体注入0.1L的全塑开关阀铝箔复合膜采气袋中,将其带回实验室用气相色谱分析气体样品的甲烷的浓度。采样结束后打开箱盖儿,保持自然通风状态。 1.4.3.1 Gas sampling When sampling, fasten the lid of the box and seal it with water. At 0, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after buckling the lid, take air from the airway with a 50mL syringe, inject the collected air into a 0.1L all-plastic switching valve aluminum foil composite film air collection bag, and bring it back to the experiment The chamber analyzes the gas samples for the concentration of methane using a gas chromatograph. After sampling, open the box cover and maintain natural ventilation.
用以下公式计算粪便的排放通量: Calculate the discharge flux of manure with the following formula:
式中:R为温室气体排放通量(mg.m-2.min-1);M为气体摩尔质量(g.mol-1);V0为标准状态下(0℃,1013hPa)气体摩尔体积,(22.41×10-3 m3. mol-1);T0和P0分别为标准状态下空气的绝对温度(K)和气压(hPa);T和P0分别为采样时箱内的实际温度(K)和实际气压(hPa);dCt/dt为观测时间内箱内温室气体浓度随时间变化的回归直线斜率,Ct为t时刻箱内被测气体的体积混合比浓度(v/v); t为时间(min);h为采样箱高度(m)。 In the formula: R is the greenhouse gas emission flux (mg.m -2 .min -1 ); M is the gas molar mass (g.mol -1 ); V 0 is the gas molar volume under standard conditions (0°C, 1013hPa) , (22.41×10 -3 m 3 .mol -1 ); T 0 and P 0 are the absolute temperature (K) and air pressure (hPa) of the air in the standard state, respectively; T and P 0 are the actual temperature (K) and actual air pressure (hPa); dC t /d t is the slope of the regression line of the greenhouse gas concentration in the box during the observation period, and C t is the volume mixing ratio concentration of the measured gas in the box at time t (v /v); t is the time (min); h is the height of the sampling box (m).
1.4.3.2 气体样品分析 利用气象色谱测定甲烷含量。检测器温度(F1D)200℃;进样口温度120℃;柱温65℃;标样浓度20.1ppm。 1.4.3.2 Gas sample analysis The methane content was determined by gas chromatography. Detector temperature (F1D) 200°C; inlet temperature 120°C; column temperature 65°C; standard sample concentration 20.1ppm.
1.4.3.3环境指标测定 1.4.3.3 Determination of environmental indicators
采集气体的同时用气压表测量试验场地的实际气压,用于计算粪便甲烷的排放通量。并用自动温湿度测量仪每隔5min记录试验期间的环境温度。 While collecting gas, a barometer was used to measure the actual air pressure of the test site, which was used to calculate the emission flux of fecal methane. And use the automatic temperature and humidity measuring instrument to record the ambient temperature during the test every 5 minutes.
1.5数据处理 1.5 Data processing
数据统计采用spss17.0对各组数据进行单因素方差分析,结果均以平均数±标准差(Mean+SD)表示。 Data statistics using spss17.0 to conduct one-way analysis of variance for each group of data, the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean+SD).
2 结果与分析 2 Results and Analysis
2.1 试验牛日增重及采食量 2.1 Daily gain and feed intake of experimental cattle
表1 试验牛日增重 Table 1 Daily gain of test cattle
注:同列肩注大写字母不同表示差异极显著(p<0.01),小写字母不同表示差异显著(p<0.05),含相同字母与未注明表示差异不显著(p>0.05)。 Note: Different uppercase letters in the same column indicate extremely significant differences ( p <0.01), different lowercase letters indicate significant differences ( p <0.05), and same letters and no note indicate no significant differences ( p >0.05).
从表1可以看出,对照组与米曲霉组的初始体重、末重、平均日增重和干物质采食量的差异均不显著(p>0.05),但米曲霉组平均日增重和干物质采食量比对照组分别高出11.11%和0.94%。说明米曲霉有提高肉牛平均日增重和干物质采食量的趋势。 It can be seen from Table 1 that the differences in initial body weight, final weight, average daily gain and dry matter intake between the control group and the Aspergillus oryzae group were not significant (p>0.05), but the average daily gain and The dry matter intake was 11.11% and 0.94% higher than that of the control group, respectively. It shows that Aspergillus oryzae has a tendency to increase the average daily gain and dry matter intake of beef cattle.
2.2 试验牛肠道甲烷排放量 2.2 Intestinal methane emission of test cattle
试验牛日均甲烷排放量见表2。可以看出,对照组与米曲霉组试验牛肠道的日均甲烷产量、单位体重产甲烷量和甲烷能的差异达到了极显著水平(p<0.01),且米曲霉组试验牛肠道的日均甲烷产量、单位体重产甲烷量和甲烷能分别比对照组降低了18.77%、20%和18.73%。由此看见,米曲霉作为肉牛肠道甲烷抑制剂有显著的效果。 The average daily methane emissions of the test cattle are shown in Table 2. It can be seen that the differences between the control group and the Aspergillus oryzae group in the daily average methane production, methane production per unit weight, and methane energy in the intestinal tract of the test cattle reached a very significant level (p<0.01), and the intestinal tract of the test cattle in the Aspergillus oryzae group The average daily methane production, methane production per unit weight and methane energy were 18.77%, 20% and 18.73% lower than those of the control group, respectively. It can be seen that Aspergillus oryzae has a significant effect as a beef cattle intestinal methane inhibitor.
表2 试验牛甲烷排放量
注:同列肩注大写字母不同表示差异极显著(p<0.01),小写字母不同表示差异显著(p<0.05),含相同字母与未注明表示差异不显著(p>0.05)。 Note: Different uppercase letters in the same column indicate extremely significant differences ( p <0.01), different lowercase letters indicate significant differences ( p <0.05), and same letters and no note indicate no significant differences ( p >0.05).
2.3 粪便甲烷排放通量 2.3 Fecal methane emission flux
图1显示了试验期间,粪便甲烷排放速率随时间变化图。试验期内,外界环境的日均温度为27.63℃,且呈波动性变化。对照组与米曲霉组粪便甲烷日均排放通量分别为2683.33和1165.86mg·m-2·d-1 。米曲霉组比对照组粪便甲烷日均排放通量降低了55.55%,且二者随着堆放时间的延长所表现出的变化幅度不一致。堆放的前15d,二者变化趋势基本一致,但15d之后,对照组出现甲烷排放高峰,随后,甲烷排放通量逐步降低。 Figure 1 shows the plot of fecal methane emission rate as a function of time during the test period. During the test period, the daily average temperature of the external environment was 27.63°C and fluctuated. The average daily fecal methane emission fluxes of the control group and the Aspergillus oryzae group were 2683.33 and 1165.86 mg·m -2 ·d -1 , respectively . The average daily fecal methane emission flux of the Aspergillus oryzae group was 55.55% lower than that of the control group, and the range of change between the two groups was inconsistent with the prolongation of the stacking time. In the first 15 days of stacking, the change trends of the two were basically the same, but after 15 days, the peak of methane emission appeared in the control group, and then the methane emission flux gradually decreased.
3 小结 3 Summary
肉牛日粮中每天添加适量米曲霉(8-12mg/kg体重),对肉牛的日增重和干物质采食量的影响不显著,但有提高的趋势;米曲霉可显著降低肉牛肠道及粪便的甲烷排放量。 Adding an appropriate amount of Aspergillus oryzae (8-12mg/kg body weight) to the diet of beef cattle has no significant effect on the daily gain and dry matter intake of beef cattle, but there is a tendency to increase; Aspergillus oryzae can significantly reduce the intestinal and Methane emissions from manure.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510036906.3A CN104605162A (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2015-01-26 | Application of aspergillus oryzae as beef cattle intestinal tract and excrement methane inhibitor |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510036906.3A CN104605162A (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2015-01-26 | Application of aspergillus oryzae as beef cattle intestinal tract and excrement methane inhibitor |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN104605162A true CN104605162A (en) | 2015-05-13 |
Family
ID=53140038
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510036906.3A Pending CN104605162A (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2015-01-26 | Application of aspergillus oryzae as beef cattle intestinal tract and excrement methane inhibitor |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN104605162A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106036080A (en) * | 2016-06-08 | 2016-10-26 | 中国农业科学院饲料研究所 | A methane regulator containing Candida tropicalis and its application |
| CN107144647A (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2017-09-08 | 兰州大学 | The assay method of sheep methane emission is hidden under a kind of grazing condition |
| WO2019102279A1 (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2019-05-31 | Biopremix Technologies Llc | Procedure for the production of a multiplier and modulator additive of the ruminal microbiote |
| CN111815073A (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2020-10-23 | 内蒙古工业大学 | Prediction method and device, electronic device and storage medium for grassland biomass |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102106462A (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2011-06-29 | 塔里木大学 | Additive for reducing methane release of ruminant rumen |
| CN103547168A (en) * | 2011-05-23 | 2014-01-29 | 格拉斯普工商业有限公司 | Use of encapsulated nitrates and sulfates to reduce methane emission derived from ruminal fermentation |
| CN103637004A (en) * | 2013-12-03 | 2014-03-19 | 广西壮族自治区水牛研究所 | Feed capable of reducing methanogenesis of gastrointestinal tracts of buffalos |
| CN103829090A (en) * | 2014-02-21 | 2014-06-04 | 四川农业大学 | Application of red yeast rice to reduction of methane discharged by ruminant such as sheep |
-
2015
- 2015-01-26 CN CN201510036906.3A patent/CN104605162A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102106462A (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2011-06-29 | 塔里木大学 | Additive for reducing methane release of ruminant rumen |
| CN103547168A (en) * | 2011-05-23 | 2014-01-29 | 格拉斯普工商业有限公司 | Use of encapsulated nitrates and sulfates to reduce methane emission derived from ruminal fermentation |
| CN103637004A (en) * | 2013-12-03 | 2014-03-19 | 广西壮族自治区水牛研究所 | Feed capable of reducing methanogenesis of gastrointestinal tracts of buffalos |
| CN103829090A (en) * | 2014-02-21 | 2014-06-04 | 四川农业大学 | Application of red yeast rice to reduction of methane discharged by ruminant such as sheep |
Non-Patent Citations (9)
| Title |
|---|
| 乔国华等: "直接饲喂微生物培养物对奶牛瘤胃发酵产甲烷及生产性能的影响", 《中国畜牧兽医》 * |
| 华金玲等: "瘤胃内甲烷生成的影响因素及其调控", 《饲料博览》 * |
| 李美群等: "产甲烷菌的研究进展", 《酿酒科技》 * |
| 李艳玲等: "环境友好型反刍动物的日粮设计", 《饲料广角》 * |
| 毛华明等: "反刍动物甲烷排放量营养调控规的研究进展", 《饲料研究》 * |
| 潘军等: "奶牛饲喂活菌剂和酵母的前景", 《饲料博览》 * |
| 程胜利等: "反刍动物甲烷排放现状及调控技术研究进展", 《中国草食动物科学》 * |
| 胡红莲等: "反刍动物甲烷的排放及其减排调控技术", 《畜牧与饲料科学》 * |
| 赵玉华等: "反刍动物甲烷生成的调控", 《中国饲料》 * |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106036080A (en) * | 2016-06-08 | 2016-10-26 | 中国农业科学院饲料研究所 | A methane regulator containing Candida tropicalis and its application |
| CN107144647A (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2017-09-08 | 兰州大学 | The assay method of sheep methane emission is hidden under a kind of grazing condition |
| WO2019102279A1 (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2019-05-31 | Biopremix Technologies Llc | Procedure for the production of a multiplier and modulator additive of the ruminal microbiote |
| CN111372464A (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2020-07-03 | 生物预混合技术有限责任公司 | Procedure for the production of multiplier and regulator additives for the rumen microflora |
| CN111372464B (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2023-08-22 | 生物预混合技术有限责任公司 | Procedure for the production of a multiplier and regulator additive for the rumen microbiota |
| CN111815073A (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2020-10-23 | 内蒙古工业大学 | Prediction method and device, electronic device and storage medium for grassland biomass |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| McDonnell et al. | Effect of divergence in phenotypic residual feed intake on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and apparent whole-tract digestibility of beef heifers across three contrasting diets | |
| Yadav et al. | Effect of simulated heat stress on digestibility, methane emission and metabolic adaptability in crossbred cattle | |
| Wims et al. | Effect of pregrazing herbage mass on methane production, dry matter intake, and milk production of grazing dairy cows during the mid-season period | |
| Zhang et al. | Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value, fermentation and methane characteristics | |
| Dini et al. | Using highly nutritious pastures to mitigate enteric methane emissions from cattle grazing systems in South America | |
| Banik et al. | In vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and methane production differ in selected key pasture species in Australia | |
| Getabalew et al. | Methane production in ruminant animals: Implication for their impact on climate change | |
| Molano et al. | Fumaric acid supplements have no effect on methane emissions per unit of feed intake in wether lambs | |
| CN104605162A (en) | Application of aspergillus oryzae as beef cattle intestinal tract and excrement methane inhibitor | |
| Na et al. | Effects of forage type and dietary concentrate to forage ratio on methane emissions and rumen fermentation characteristics of dairy cows in China | |
| Zhao et al. | Effects of breed, sex, and concentrate supplementation on digestibility, enteric methane emissions, and nitrogen utilization efficiency in growing lambs offered fresh grass | |
| Zhao et al. | Enteric methane emissions and nitrogen utilisation efficiency for two genotype of hill hoggets offered fresh, ensiled and pelleted ryegrass | |
| Alemu et al. | 3-Nitrooxypropanol supplementation of a forage diet decreased enteric methane emissions from beef cattle without affecting feed intake and apparent total-tract digestibility | |
| Meale et al. | Including essential oils in lactating dairy cow diets: Effects on methane emissions1 | |
| Ahn et al. | Effect of Allicin and Illite Supplementation on the Methane Production and Growth Performance of the Beef Cattle. | |
| Xiao et al. | Effects of quercetin on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters, gas production and microflora of beef cattle | |
| Du et al. | Substitution of leguminous forage for oat hay improves nitrogen utilization efficiency of crossbred Simmental calves | |
| Liu et al. | Long-term effects of ensiled cornstalk diet on methane emission, rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and weight gain in sheep | |
| Jonova et al. | Methane mitigation possibilities and weight gain in calves fed with prebiotic inulin | |
| Ramin | Predicting methane production in dairy cows | |
| CN103766653B (en) | Application of lanthanum chloride to inhibition of rumen methane emission in ruminant feeds | |
| CN109349221B (en) | Method for determining energy and protein demand of Tibet white cashmere goats in growth period | |
| Klevenhusen et al. | The methanogenic potential and C-isotope fractionation of different diet types represented by either C3 or C4 plants as evaluated in vitro and in dairy cows | |
| CN109965112A (en) | A feed for reducing methane emissions from cows during peak lactation | |
| Miltimore et al. | Relationship between in vivo rumen gas composition and feed efficiency of calves |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20150513 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |