CA2434387A1 - Selectable marker for genetically engineered cells and tissues - Google Patents
Selectable marker for genetically engineered cells and tissues Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2434387A1 CA2434387A1 CA002434387A CA2434387A CA2434387A1 CA 2434387 A1 CA2434387 A1 CA 2434387A1 CA 002434387 A CA002434387 A CA 002434387A CA 2434387 A CA2434387 A CA 2434387A CA 2434387 A1 CA2434387 A1 CA 2434387A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- gene
- ires
- expression vector
- interest
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 92
- 108010031325 Cytidine deaminase Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 82
- 102100026846 Cytidine deaminase Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 79
- OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N cytosine Chemical compound NC=1C=CNC(=O)N=1 OPTASPLRGRRNAP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 229940104302 cytosine Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 265
- 206010059866 Drug resistance Diseases 0.000 claims description 37
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 claims description 35
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 claims description 32
- 108020004684 Internal Ribosome Entry Sites Proteins 0.000 claims description 26
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000001177 retroviral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 18
- 210000003958 hematopoietic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000003098 myoblast Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000840 anti-viral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002777 nucleoside Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000009889 Herpes Simplex Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 108060003951 Immunoglobulin Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010063738 Interleukins Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000015696 Interleukins Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001772 anti-angiogenic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001093 anti-cancer Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000798 anti-retroviral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000692 anti-sense effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960000182 blood factors Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- -1 cytosine nucleoside Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000122 growth hormone Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000018358 immunoglobulin Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940072221 immunoglobulins Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003387 muscular Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003488 releasing hormone Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000000601 blood cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002463 transducing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 abstract description 32
- 108010043121 Green Fluorescent Proteins Proteins 0.000 abstract description 31
- 102000004144 Green Fluorescent Proteins Human genes 0.000 abstract description 31
- 239000005090 green fluorescent protein Substances 0.000 abstract description 31
- 238000001415 gene therapy Methods 0.000 abstract description 18
- 101150028326 CD gene Proteins 0.000 abstract description 17
- 238000010361 transduction Methods 0.000 abstract description 17
- 230000026683 transduction Effects 0.000 abstract description 15
- 229940127073 nucleoside analogue Drugs 0.000 abstract description 9
- 101000777693 Homo sapiens Cytidine and dCMP deaminase domain-containing protein 1 Proteins 0.000 abstract description 4
- 101000912053 Homo sapiens Cytidine deaminase Proteins 0.000 abstract description 4
- 108700008625 Reporter Genes Proteins 0.000 abstract description 4
- 108010048367 enhanced green fluorescent protein Proteins 0.000 abstract description 4
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 abstract description 2
- UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-CCXZUQQUSA-N Cytarabine Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-CCXZUQQUSA-N 0.000 description 64
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 33
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 26
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 24
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 18
- 210000004271 bone marrow stromal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 16
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 15
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 15
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 13
- SDUQYLNIPVEERB-QPPQHZFASA-N gemcitabine Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@H]1C(F)(F)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 SDUQYLNIPVEERB-QPPQHZFASA-N 0.000 description 13
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 11
- 210000002536 stromal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 10
- 239000012909 foetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000001566 pro-viral effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 8
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000002105 Southern blotting Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 6
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 6
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 229910052754 neon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- GKAOGPIIYCISHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N neon atom Chemical compound [Ne] GKAOGPIIYCISHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 239000002246 antineoplastic agent Substances 0.000 description 5
- UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-XVFCMESISA-N cytidine Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-XVFCMESISA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000002845 virion Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 208000009329 Graft vs Host Disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 4
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 4
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N Thymidine Chemical compound O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001952 enzyme assay Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001943 fluorescence-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 208000024908 graft versus host disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 230000009036 growth inhibition Effects 0.000 description 4
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 230000002458 infectious effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000036457 multidrug resistance Effects 0.000 description 4
- RXWNCPJZOCPEPQ-NVWDDTSBSA-N puromycin Chemical compound C1=CC(OC)=CC=C1C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](N2C3=NC=NC(=C3N=C2)N(C)C)O[C@@H]1CO RXWNCPJZOCPEPQ-NVWDDTSBSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-beta-D-Xylofuranosyl-NH-Cytosine Natural products O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1C1C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-PSQAKQOGSA-N Cytidine Natural products O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1 UHDGCWIWMRVCDJ-PSQAKQOGSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000005778 DNA damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 231100000277 DNA damage Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 108010025815 Kanamycin Kinase Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 231100000002 MTT assay Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 238000000134 MTT assay Methods 0.000 description 3
- ZMXDDKWLCZADIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N N,N-Dimethylformamide Chemical compound CN(C)C=O ZMXDDKWLCZADIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 239000004098 Tetracycline Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000340 anti-metabolite Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229940100197 antimetabolite Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000002256 antimetabolite Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000001185 bone marrow Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000002659 cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940127089 cytotoxic agent Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008105 immune reaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229930101283 tetracycline Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 229960002180 tetracycline Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000019364 tetracycline Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 150000003522 tetracyclines Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 241001430294 unidentified retrovirus Species 0.000 description 3
- IAKHMKGGTNLKSZ-INIZCTEOSA-N (S)-colchicine Chemical compound C1([C@@H](NC(C)=O)CC2)=CC(=O)C(OC)=CC=C1C1=C2C=C(OC)C(OC)=C1OC IAKHMKGGTNLKSZ-INIZCTEOSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000023275 Autoimmune disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- DWRXFEITVBNRMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Beta-D-1-Arabinofuranosylthymine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 DWRXFEITVBNRMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000283724 Bison bonasus Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010010099 Combined immunodeficiency Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000701022 Cytomegalovirus Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010053759 Growth retardation Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229920000209 Hexadimethrine bromide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 101000908713 Homo sapiens Dihydrofolate reductase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010047620 Phytohemagglutinins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000884281 Rattus norvegicus Signal transducer CD24 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000006146 Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 108010022394 Threonine synthase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000044209 Tumor Suppressor Genes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108700025716 Tumor Suppressor Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- DRTQHJPVMGBUCF-XVFCMESISA-N Uridine Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C=C1 DRTQHJPVMGBUCF-XVFCMESISA-N 0.000 description 2
- 201000009628 adenosine deaminase deficiency Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229940100198 alkylating agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000002168 alkylating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003432 anti-folate effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940127074 antifolate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 229940041181 antineoplastic drug Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000003416 augmentation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000036556 autosomal recessive T cell-negative B cell-negative NK cell-negative due to adenosine deaminase deficiency severe combined immunodeficiency Diseases 0.000 description 2
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-L-thymidine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1OC(CO)C(O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000000172 cytosol Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000009615 deamination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006481 deamination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000004419 dihydrofolate reductase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 2
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000035475 disorder Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004052 folic acid antagonist Substances 0.000 description 2
- IRSCQMHQWWYFCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N ganciclovir Chemical compound O=C1NC(N)=NC2=C1N=CN2COC(CO)CO IRSCQMHQWWYFCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229960002963 ganciclovir Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000032839 leukemia Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003211 malignant effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002071 myeloproliferative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001885 phytohemagglutinin Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229950010131 puromycin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000008707 rearrangement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003705 ribosome Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 2
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940104230 thymidine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 2
- MXHRCPNRJAMMIM-SHYZEUOFSA-N 2'-deoxyuridine Chemical compound C1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C=C1 MXHRCPNRJAMMIM-SHYZEUOFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CKTSBUTUHBMZGZ-SHYZEUOFSA-N 2'‐deoxycytidine Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)C1 CKTSBUTUHBMZGZ-SHYZEUOFSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QRBLKGHRWFGINE-UGWAGOLRSA-N 2-[2-[2-[[2-[[4-[[2-[[6-amino-2-[3-amino-1-[(2,3-diamino-3-oxopropyl)amino]-3-oxopropyl]-5-methylpyrimidine-4-carbonyl]amino]-3-[(2r,3s,4s,5s,6s)-3-[(2s,3r,4r,5s)-4-carbamoyl-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)- Chemical compound N=1C(C=2SC=C(N=2)C(N)=O)CSC=1CCNC(=O)C(C(C)=O)NC(=O)C(C)C(O)C(C)NC(=O)C(C(O[C@H]1[C@@]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)(C)O[C@H]1[C@@H]([C@](O)([C@@H](O)C(CO)O1)C(N)=O)O)C=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)C1=NC(C(CC(N)=O)NCC(N)C(N)=O)=NC(N)=C1C QRBLKGHRWFGINE-UGWAGOLRSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WVKOPZMDOFGFAK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide Chemical compound OOC1=NP(O)(N(CCCl)CCCl)OCC1 WVKOPZMDOFGFAK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OPIFSICVWOWJMJ-AEOCFKNESA-N 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta-D-galactoside Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1OC1=CNC2=CC=C(Br)C(Cl)=C12 OPIFSICVWOWJMJ-AEOCFKNESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000030507 AIDS Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000005369 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020002663 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000796998 Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) Methylated-DNA-protein-cysteine methyltransferase, inducible Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000017420 CD3 protein, epsilon/gamma/delta subunit Human genes 0.000 description 1
- KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-K Citrate Chemical compound [O-]C(=O)CC(O)(CC([O-])=O)C([O-])=O KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 102100022641 Coagulation factor IX Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000012422 Collagen Type I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010022452 Collagen Type I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100025621 Cytochrome b-245 heavy chain Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000000311 Cytosine Deaminase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010080611 Cytosine Deaminase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000011724 DNA Repair Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010076525 DNA Repair Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000007399 DNA isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007067 DNA methylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006820 DNA synthesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108020005199 Dehydrogenases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- CKTSBUTUHBMZGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Deoxycytidine Natural products O=C1N=C(N)C=CN1C1OC(CO)C(O)C1 CKTSBUTUHBMZGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- YQYJSBFKSSDGFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Epihygromycin Natural products OC1C(O)C(C(=O)C)OC1OC(C(=C1)O)=CC=C1C=C(C)C(=O)NC1C(O)C(O)C2OCOC2C1O YQYJSBFKSSDGFO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000003951 Erythropoietin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000394 Erythropoietin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101900095660 Escherichia coli Cytosine deaminase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010076282 Factor IX Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010054218 Factor VIII Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000001690 Factor VIII Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920001917 Ficoll Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 208000015872 Gaucher disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229930182566 Gentamicin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N Gentamicin Chemical compound O1[C@H](C(C)NC)CC[C@@H](N)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](NC)[C@@](C)(O)CO2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000031220 Hemophilia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000009292 Hemophilia A Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100220044 Homo sapiens CD34 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001002657 Homo sapiens Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000884271 Homo sapiens Signal transducer CD24 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000801254 Homo sapiens Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 16 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004388 Interleukin-4 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000978 Interleukin-4 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- ZQISRDCJNBUVMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N L-Histidinol Natural products OCC(N)CC1=CN=CN1 ZQISRDCJNBUVMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZQISRDCJNBUVMM-YFKPBYRVSA-N L-histidinol Chemical compound OC[C@@H](N)CC1=CNC=N1 ZQISRDCJNBUVMM-YFKPBYRVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FBOZXECLQNJBKD-ZDUSSCGKSA-N L-methotrexate Chemical compound C=1N=C2N=C(N)N=C(N)C2=NC=1CN(C)C1=CC=C(C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(O)=O)C=C1 FBOZXECLQNJBKD-ZDUSSCGKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010058467 Lung neoplasm malignant Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010025323 Lymphomas Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108700041567 MDR Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010047230 Member 1 Subfamily B ATP Binding Cassette Transporter Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100025825 Methylated-DNA-protein-cysteine methyltransferase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229930193140 Neomycin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108700019961 Neoplasm Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000048850 Neoplasm Genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930012538 Paclitaxel Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 206010034133 Pathogen resistance Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- LTQCLFMNABRKSH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phleomycin Natural products N=1C(C=2SC=C(N=2)C(N)=O)CSC=1CCNC(=O)C(C(O)C)NC(=O)C(C)C(O)C(C)NC(=O)C(C(OC1C(C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1)OC1C(C(OC(N)=O)C(O)C(CO)O1)O)C=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)C1=NC(C(CC(N)=O)NCC(N)C(N)=O)=NC(N)=C1C LTQCLFMNABRKSH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010035235 Phleomycins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710132082 Pyrimidine/purine nucleoside phosphorylase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012980 RPMI-1640 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000700584 Simplexvirus Species 0.000 description 1
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 108700012920 TNF Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000002903 Thalassemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000006601 Thymidine Kinase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004440 Thymidine kinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100031372 Thymidine phosphorylase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- GLNADSQYFUSGOU-GPTZEZBUSA-J Trypan blue Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].C1=C(S([O-])(=O)=O)C=C2C=C(S([O-])(=O)=O)C(/N=N/C3=CC=C(C=C3C)C=3C=C(C(=CC=3)\N=N\C=3C(=CC4=CC(=CC(N)=C4C=3O)S([O-])(=O)=O)S([O-])(=O)=O)C)=C(O)C2=C1N GLNADSQYFUSGOU-GPTZEZBUSA-J 0.000 description 1
- 108010084455 Zeocin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001789 adipocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000246 agarose gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000735 allogeneic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000719 anti-leukaemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000259 anti-tumor effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000063 antileukemic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940045719 antineoplastic alkylating agent nitrosoureas Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 206010003246 arthritis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001130 astrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- DRTQHJPVMGBUCF-PSQAKQOGSA-N beta-L-uridine Natural products O[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C=C1 DRTQHJPVMGBUCF-PSQAKQOGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000002798 bone marrow cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000010322 bone marrow transplantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940098773 bovine serum albumin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001506 calcium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000389 calcium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011010 calcium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000711 cancerogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000315 carcinogenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 210000004413 cardiac myocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002458 cell surface marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006285 cell suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001767 chemoprotection Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000973 chemotherapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001612 chondrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002759 chromosomal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000016532 chronic granulomatous disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003776 cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004186 co-expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960001338 colchicine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 206010009887 colitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000433 cytotoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000002254 cytotoxic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000599 cytotoxic agent Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001472 cytotoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000135 cytotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003013 cytotoxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- MXHRCPNRJAMMIM-UHFFFAOYSA-N desoxyuridine Natural products C1C(O)C(CO)OC1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C=C1 MXHRCPNRJAMMIM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- VHJLVAABSRFDPM-QWWZWVQMSA-N dithiothreitol Chemical compound SC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CS VHJLVAABSRFDPM-QWWZWVQMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940105423 erythropoietin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960004222 factor ix Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960000301 factor viii Drugs 0.000 description 1
- XRECTZIEBJDKEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N flucytosine Chemical compound NC1=NC(=O)NC=C1F XRECTZIEBJDKEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960004413 flucytosine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000000799 fluorescence microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940014144 folate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OVBPIULPVIDEAO-LBPRGKRZSA-N folic acid Chemical compound C=1N=C2NC(N)=NC(=O)C2=NC=1CNC1=CC=C(C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(O)=O)C=C1 OVBPIULPVIDEAO-LBPRGKRZSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019152 folic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011724 folic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001476 gene delivery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002518 gentamicin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108020002326 glutamine synthetase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000009422 growth inhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003394 haemopoietic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 210000000777 hematopoietic system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000034737 hemoglobinopathy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000044489 human CD24 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005847 immunogenicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002757 inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000018337 inherited hemoglobinopathy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010255 intramuscular injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007927 intramuscular injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000005296 lung carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000004962 mammalian cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010534 mechanism of action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- MIKKOBKEXMRYFQ-WZTVWXICSA-N meglumine amidotrizoate Chemical compound C[NH2+]C[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO.CC(=O)NC1=C(I)C(NC(C)=O)=C(I)C(C([O-])=O)=C1I MIKKOBKEXMRYFQ-WZTVWXICSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000002901 mesenchymal stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960000485 methotrexate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001035 methylating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002438 mitochondrial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000002273 mucopolysaccharidosis II Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000022018 mucopolysaccharidosis type 2 Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 231100000219 mutagenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003505 mutagenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N n'-amino-n-iminomethanimidamide Chemical compound N\N=C\N=N VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960004927 neomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000005170 neoplastic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003472 neutralizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011164 ossification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000963 osteoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960001592 paclitaxel Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000005259 peripheral blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011886 peripheral blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000144 pharmacologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- CWCMIVBLVUHDHK-ZSNHEYEWSA-N phleomycin D1 Chemical compound N([C@H](C(=O)N[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@H](O)C)C(=O)NCCC=1SC[C@@H](N=1)C=1SC=C(N=1)C(=O)NCCCCNC(N)=N)[C@@H](O[C@H]1[C@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)O[C@@H]1[C@H]([C@@H](OC(N)=O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1)O)C=1N=CNC=1)C(=O)C1=NC([C@H](CC(N)=O)NC[C@H](N)C(N)=O)=NC(N)=C1C CWCMIVBLVUHDHK-ZSNHEYEWSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940080469 phosphocellulose Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium;[2-butyl-5-chloro-3-[[4-[2-(1,2,4-triaza-3-azanidacyclopenta-1,4-dien-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazol-4-yl]methanol Chemical compound [K+].CCCCC1=NC(Cl)=C(CO)N1CC1=CC=C(C=2C(=CC=CC=2)C2=N[N-]N=N2)C=C1 OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229940002612 prodrug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000651 prodrug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002731 protein assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N renifolin D Natural products CC(=C)[C@@H]1Cc2c(O)c(O)ccc2[C@H]1CC(=O)c3ccc(O)cc3O BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003345 scintillation counting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007017 scission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013207 serial dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011537 solubilization buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000000596 systemic lupus erythematosus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- RCINICONZNJXQF-MZXODVADSA-N taxol Chemical compound O([C@@H]1[C@@]2(C[C@@H](C(C)=C(C2(C)C)[C@H](C([C@]2(C)[C@@H](O)C[C@H]3OC[C@]3([C@H]21)OC(C)=O)=O)OC(=O)C)OC(=O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(=O)C=1C=CC=CC=1)C=1C=CC=CC=1)O)C(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 RCINICONZNJXQF-MZXODVADSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000002303 tibia Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H tricalcium bis(phosphate) Chemical compound [Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- NOYPYLRCIDNJJB-UHFFFAOYSA-N trimetrexate Chemical compound COC1=C(OC)C(OC)=CC(NCC=2C(=C3C(N)=NC(N)=NC3=CC=2)C)=C1 NOYPYLRCIDNJJB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001099 trimetrexate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000004614 tumor growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000689 upper leg Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- DRTQHJPVMGBUCF-UHFFFAOYSA-N uracil arabinoside Natural products OC1C(O)C(CO)OC1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C=C1 DRTQHJPVMGBUCF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940045145 uridine Drugs 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
- G01N33/5008—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
- G01N33/5044—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics involving specific cell types
- G01N33/5047—Cells of the immune system
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/65—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression using markers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
- C12N9/14—Hydrolases (3)
- C12N9/78—Hydrolases (3) acting on carbon to nitrogen bonds other than peptide bonds (3.5)
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
- G01N33/5008—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
- G01N33/5008—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
- G01N33/5011—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics for testing antineoplastic activity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K48/00—Medicinal preparations containing genetic material which is inserted into cells of the living body to treat genetic diseases; Gene therapy
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2799/00—Uses of viruses
- C12N2799/02—Uses of viruses as vector
- C12N2799/021—Uses of viruses as vector for the expression of a heterologous nucleic acid
- C12N2799/027—Uses of viruses as vector for the expression of a heterologous nucleic acid where the vector is derived from a retrovirus
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to selectable marker gene, method of producing genetically modified cells allowing expression of a bicistronic vector, and ex vivo gene therapy applications. The invention also relates to selection of genetically engineered cells from the mixed population, prior to implantatio n in vivo. The invention describes the human cytidine deaminase (CD) gene as a n ex vivo dominant selectable marker in gene-modified primary cells with cytosine nucleoside analogues. A bicistronic retrovector comprising the huma n CD coding sequence and the enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene is used for the transduction of cells. The invention describes the introduction of CD gene in cell and gene therapy applications for the ex viv o dominant selection of genetically engineered cells.
Description
SELECTABLE MARKER FOR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CELLS
AND TISSUES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(a) Field of the Invention The invention relates to novel expression vector for selection of transduced and/or transfected cells expressing gene of interest. The invention particularly relates to a selectable marker gene for genetically engineered cells. Also disclosed is a method of selecting transduced and/or transfected cells for ex vivo gene therapy.
(b) Description of Prior Art High gene transfer efficiency and transgene expression in target primary cells is an essential but challenging aspiration in gene therapy applications. A remedy may be to dominantly select and enrich ex vivo the cells concomitantly expressing the therapeutic gene and an attached selectable marker gene.
Numerous investigators have employed dominant selection strategies utilising drug resistance genes, such as the prokaryotic neomycin phosphotransferase II (Neon) drug resistance gene, the human multidrug resistance (MDR) gene, the mutated human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene, and the human 06-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene. However, disadvantages have been noted with some drug selectable markers. For instance, cells modified with the prokaryotic Neon gene may elicit an immune reaction in vivo, MDR-transduced hematopoietic stem cells, when transplanted in mice, will lead to a myeloproliferative syndrome and MGMT genetically engineered cells require selection with the DNA
damaging alkylating agents. Several investigators have revealed the utility of bone marrow stromal cells, the progenitor cells for nonhematopoietic tissues, in cell and gene therapy strategies. These autologous cells, which are easily isolated from bone marrow aspirates, expanded in culture, and gene modified, have been genetically engineered for the expression of an exogenous gene product and/or for the secretion of therapeutic proteins in vitro and in vivo.
Numerous investigations have reported the use of drug resistance genes for in vivo selection of genetically altered cells. The disadvantages of in vivo drug selection, such as the systemic side-effects of chemotherapeutic agent administration, are not encountered with in vitro drug selection, since enrichment of the population of strong transgene expressing cells is conducted prior to transplantation.
Gene transfer studies regularly employ drug resistance genes for the in vitro selection of genetically engineered cells. For instance, the neomycin phosphotransferase 1l (NeoR) drug resistance gene confers to transduced cells the ability to be selectively expanded through treatment with neomycin or its analogue 6418. The Neon gene however is not a suitable selectable marker for clinical applications since it is prokaryotic and immunogenic. Moreover, one study reported the adverse efFect of the Neon gene on the concomitant expression of a second gene product (Apperley et al., 1991, Blood 78:310-317). °
The human multidrug resistance gene (MDR) which codes for the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein has been extensively described and utilised as a dominant selectable marker with MDR-responsive chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel and colchicine (Licht et al., 2000, Gene Therapy 7:348-358). Nonetheless, some investigators observed a myeloproliferative syndrome in mice transplanted with MDR-transduced hematopoietic stem cells.
Another drug resistance gene, the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene codes for a DNA repair enzyme that when overexpressed renders normal mammalian cells resistant to 06-alkylating agents, such as the nitrosoureas and related methylating compounds. Since these antineoplastic drugs produce DNA damage which can have toxic, mutagenic, transforming, and carcinogenic repercussions, their use for dominant selection of gene-modified cells may be hazardous.
_3_ Alternative dominant selectable markers that are well-defined and widely utilised comprise the mutant variants of the human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene which maintain a role in folate metabolism when introduced into cells but confer drug resistance against the cytotoxicity of antifolates, such as methotrexate and trimetrexate. Several investigators have accomplished in vitro drug selection of mutant DHFR-transduced cells.
However, for the untransduced cells to be eradicated by antifolate toxicity, depletion of thymidine from the cell media is required and may be achieved through thymidine phosphorylase treatment of the media or by the utilisation of dialysed thymidine free serum. Moreover, one study demonstrated that retroviral transfer of the human aldehyde dehydrogenase class-I gene permits in vitro selection with 4-hydroperoxy cyclophosphamide of transduced IC562 leukemia cells (Moreb et al., 1998, Human Gene Therapy 9:611-619). Other selectable markers in transfected or transduced cells include the glutamine synthetase gene, the hygromycin resistance gene, the zeocin resistance , gene, as well as the puromycin, histidinol D, and phleomycin drug resistance genes.
Retroviral transfer of a selectable drug resistance gene may in some cases confer lower expression of the therapeutic transgene or raise an immune reaction against gene-modified cells, ultimately reducing the effectiveness of the gene therapy approach. The immunogenicity of certain drug selectable genes such as Neon, led to their removal.
It would be highly desirable to be provided with an efficient selectable marker gene which allow for preparing transduced or non immunogen transfected cells producing a protein of interest, and for ex viva gene therapy and protein delivery.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide an expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells expressing a nucleotitic sequence of interest. The expression vector comprises:
- a suitable promoter compatible with the transfected cells;
- an internal ribosome entry site (IRES);
- a marker nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, operably linked to the IRES; and - an endogenous or exogenous nucleotidic sequence of interest operably linked to the IRES;
wherein the marker nucleotidic sequence when detected in cells, indicates that the cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing the nucleotidic sequence of interest, the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked upstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked downstream of the IRES, and the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked downstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked upstream of the IRES.
The expression vector of the invention may further be flanked by retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence at 5' and/or 3' ends of the vector.
The expression vector may be composed of DNA or RNA
selected from the group consisting of eukaryotic, viral, adenoviral, adeno-associated, Simliclei, and Herpes simplex expression vectors.
The cells of the present invention may be selected from the group consisting of stromal, epithelial, fibroblasts, myoblasts, muscular, stem, progenitor, blood, and hematopoietic cells.
The nucleotidic sequence of interest may for example encodes a protein selected from the group consisting of cytokine, interleukin, growth hormones, hormones, blood factors, marker proteins, immunoglobulins, antigens, releasing hormone, anticancer product, antiviral product, antiretroviral product, an antisense, an antiangiogenic product, and a replication inhibitor.
The promoter may be a cytomegalo-virus (CMV) promoter.
In accordance with the present invention there is also provided an expression vector, wherein the nucleotidic sequence encoding for drug resistance cytidine deariiinase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a host cell transduced and/or transfected with the expression vector of the invention, and uses thereof in the preparation of a medicament for ex vivo treatment.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of identifying genetically transduced or transformed cells expressing a nucleotidic sequence of interest. The method comprises the steps of:
a) providing an expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells expressing a nucleotidic sequence of interest, the expression vector comprising:
- a suitable promoter compatible with the transfected cells;
- an internal ribosome entry site (IRES);
- a marker nucleotidic sequence encoding for drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, operably linked to the IRES; and - a nucleotidic sequence of interest operably linked to the IRES;
wherein the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked upstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked downstream of the IRES, and the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked downstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked upstream of the IRES;
b) transducing and/or transfecting cells with the expression vector of step a);
c) culturing the cells of step b) under conditions suitable for the expression vector to express the marker nucleotidic sequence encoding the drug resistance cytidine deaminase, and the nucleotidic sequence of interest, the nucleotidic sequence of interest coding for a protein of interest; and d) treating cells with cytosine nucleoside analogs;
wherein the cells living after the treating step d) are indicative that the cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing the nucleotidic sequence of interest.
For the purpose of the present invention the following terms are defined below.
The term "functional fragment " as used herein is intended to mean any portion of the gene encoding for a peptide or protein having the activity of the cytidine deaminase (CD).
The term "analogs " as used herein is intended to mean any functional modified form of the cytidine deaminase. The modification may become from a mutated or modified form of the nucleotidic sequence encoding CD.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of the murine stem cell virus (MSCV) derived retroviral plasmids;
Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of DNA integrated retrovector;
Fig. 3 illustrates southern blot analysis of CD-IRES-EGFP
transduced A549 cells;
Fig. 4 illustrates the effect of ARA-C on the proliferation of genetically engineered A549 cells;
Fig. 5 illustrates the efFect of dFdC on the proliferation of genetically engineered A549 cells;
Fig. 6 illustrates the resistance of CD gene-modified primary human lymphocytes to growth inhibition by ARA-C;
Fig. 7 illustrates the percent GFP positive cells assessed by flow cytometry analysis after in vitro enrichment of CD-IRES-EGFP transduced primary mouse marrow stromal cells;
Fig. 8 illustrates the flow cytometry analysis of one representative experiment demonstrating dose-dependent selective expansion of CD-IRES-EGFP transduced stromal cells; and Fig. 9 illustrates the mean GFP fluorescence plotted against ARA-C concentration. Average ~ SEM (n=3).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a drug resistance gene (CD) that can serve as an in vitro or ex vivo positive selectable marker in genetically engineered cells, preferably primary autologous cells.
In one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a human cytidine deaminase gene for ex vivo selective enrichment of genetically engineered primary cells, for cell and gene therapy purposes.
The present invention also provide with an efficient selectable marker when linked to therapeutic exogenous nucleic acid sequences for treatment of genetic, malignant, immune, and viral diseases. For example, for patients implanted with ex vivo drug selected cells. the method of the present invention would provide engrafted cells constituted entirely by genetically engineered cells, thus improving therapeutic outcome.
-g_ In another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a drug resistance gene with potential as a novel drug selectable marker. This drug resistance gene is the human cytidine deaminase (CD) gene. CD catalyses the deamination of cytidine or deoxycytidine to uridine or deoxyuridine, respectively and in addition, can deaminate cytosine nucleoside analogues causing their pharmacological inactivation. The CD drug resistance gene has recently shown promise for protecting normal hematopoietic cells from the dose-limiting myelotoxicity of anti-cancer drugs to thereby permit dose escalation for enhanced chemotherapeutic effectiveness. This chemoprotection approach using the human CD gene is the antithesis of a suicide gene therapy strategy utilising the prokaryotic cytosine deaminase.
Unlike human CD or other optimal drug resistance genes, suicide genes code for non-mammalian enzymes, such as Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase and Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase (HSV-TK), which are introduced into malignant cells to convert inactive prodrugs, such as 5-fluorocytosine and gancyclovir, respectively, into cytotoxic agents.
In the present invention, the human CD cDNA which consists of 910bp encoding a 146 amino acid protein of 48.7 kilodaltons was cloned and expressed. The small size of the CD cDNA is a favourable feature endorsing its utility for gene therapy applications. It has demonstrated enhanced CD
expression as well as cytosine nucleoside analogue drug resistance pursuant to retroviral gene transfer of the CD cDNA in mouse fibroblast and primary hematopoietic cells. Furthermore, CD proviral DNA persistence and long-term expression in various tissues has been determined in mice transplanted with CD gene-modified hematopoietic cells.
The human CD gene of the present invention possesses assets as a drug selectable marker. It is not a mutated variant nor prokaryotic, thereby indicating that drug selected CD gene-modified cells when implanted in vivo will not induce an immune response. Moreover, it has a small coding sequence and the agents that it efficiently confers resistance to, and which are to be utilised for ex vivv selection, are antimetabolites that _g_ will not cause DNA damage in CD-enriched cells. The main mechanism of action of ARA-C, an effective antileukemic drug, and dFdC, a promising antitumor agent, is via inhibition of DNA synthesis, whereas that of 5-AZA-CdR, which has shown antileukemic and interesting antitumor activity, is via inhibition of DNA methylation and ensuing activation of tumor suppressor genes. The human CD gene may serve as an ex vivo positive selectable marker with cytosine nucleoside analogues in genetically engineered primary autologous cells, There is also provided with the invention an efficient in vitro drug selection of gene-modified primary marine marrow stromal cells. Bone marrow constitutes a source of stem cells for hematopoietic progenitors, and a provenance of mesenchymal stem cells or marrow stromal cells which have the ability to differentiate into several cell types including chondrocytes, osteoblasts, adipocytes, myoblasts, cardiomyocytes, and astrocytes. Marrow stromal is thus an autologous tissue that .is an ideal target for cell and gene therapy strategies due to its capacity for self-renewal and differentiation.
Dominant selection of gene-modified marrow stromal cells ex vivo may allow a greater proportion of cells to express therapeutically relevant levels of the beneficial gene product in vivo thus enhancing clinical effectiveness.
In one embodiment af,the present invention, there is provided bicistronic vector containing CD or the GFP reporter gene as marker operably linked to a gene encoding a protein of interest, generated retroparticles, and human A549 cells as well as primary human lymphocytes that can be transduced with these retrovirions in vitro and consequently may acquire the cytosine nucleoside analogue drug resistance or green fluorescence phenotype as indicators of efficient expression of the protein of interest. Primary marine marrow stromal cells may be also transduced and showed in vitro dose-dependent selection of CD gene-modified stromal cells using ARA-C.
Therefore, the introduction of a dominant selectable marker in marrow stromal allows selection and enrichment of genetically engineered cells ex vivo to ensure sufficient levels of the therapeutic protein for a favourable clinical outcome. The human CD gene possesses the potential to enhance the proportion of gene modified marrow stromal cells expressing a therapeutic transgene, such as type I collagen in children with osteogenesis imperfect. Furthermore, CD gene transfer may permit the ex vivo expansion of cells genetically engineered to express optimal amounts of therapeutic soluble proteins such as Factor VIII and Factor IX in hemophilia and Erythropoietin in hemoglobinopathies, such as ~3-thalassemia. Marrow stromal cells may thus serve as a gene delivery vehicle in diseases where clinical improvement is possible through the systemic secretion of a therapeutic gene product.
In one embodiment, target primary cells for selectable marker gene transfer may include bone marrow stromal cells and lymphocytes but also hematopoietic cells, myoblasts and/or fibroblasts. Gene transfer of human CD into hematopoietic stem cells and/or lymphocytes may be valuable in the treatment of disorders that afflict the hematopoietic system, such as adenosine deaminase deficiency and chronic granulomatous disease, as well as storage disorders such as Gaucher disease and Hunter syndrome. Additionally, CD for ex vivo selection may be used to augment the proportion of hematopoietic cells transduced with anti-HIV-I genes, such as RevMlO, and consequently give rise to an enriched population of mature T-lymphocytes and monocytic cells with high level antiviral gene expression.
Furthermore, the human CD gene may serve as a dominant selectable marker in cancer gene therapy applications employing a non-selectable therapeutic transgene such as a tumor-suppressor gene to inhibit tumor growth or a cytokine gene to strengthen the immune response against neoplastic cells. The human CD gene may also be utilised as a positive selectable marker for the therapy of autoimmune diseases such as arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and colitis, by selectively enhancing cells genetically engineered to express regulatory cytokine genes such as IL-4 and IL-10, or inflammatory cytokine inhibitory genes such as 1L-I, IL-2, TNFa, and IFNy.
In contrast to selectable markers of prokaryotic origin, the CD
gene, because of its human origin is not anticipated to be immunogenic in clinical applications, and as it is demonstrated in the present invention, has not impeded but enhanced the expression of a second transgene from a bicistronic retrovector.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Cell Lines GP+E86 ecotropic and GP+envAM12 amphotropic retrovirus packaging cell lines, kindly supplied by A. Bank (Columbia University, New York) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM) (Canadian Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario) supplemented with 10°!°
heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Wisent Technologies, St.
Bruno, Quebec) and 5~,glml gentamicin (Canadian Life Technologies) The 293GPG retrovirus-packaging cell line, generously provided by R.C. Mulligan (Children's Hospital, Boston, MA) was grown in 293GPG
media [DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 0.3mg/ml 6418 (Mediatech, Herndon, VA), 2~,g/ml puromycin (Sigma, Oakville, Ontario), 1 ~.g/ml tetracycline (Fisher Scientific, Nepean, Ontario), and 50units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Pen/Strep) (Wisent)].
A549 human lung carcinoma cells, obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Canadian Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS.
NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells, from ATCC, were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 50U/ml Pen/Strep. All cells were grown in a humidified incubator with 5% C02. (All cells were incubated at 37°C
with 5% C02).
_12_ Retroviral vector design and virus-producing cell line generation The murine stem cell virus (MSCV) derived retroviral vector pIRES-EGFP, a bicistronic construct comprising a multiple cloning site linked by an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES), to the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter, was kindly provided by Robert Hawley.
The retroviral vector pCD-IRES-EGFP (Fig. 1, pIRES-EGFP comprises a multiple cloning site (mcs) and the EGFP reporter gene parted by an internal ribosomal entry site (fRES). pNeoR-IRES-EGFP is a derivative of pIRES-EGFP where the Neon gene is inserted in the mcs. Likewise, pCD-IRES-EGFP contains the human CD cDNA in. the mcs upstream of the IRES) was synthesised by retrieving the human cytidine deaminase (CD) cDNA
sequence by Ncol/Klenow and BamHl digest of the pMFG-CD construct, and ligating it with a Xhol/Klenow and BamHl digest of pIRES-EGFP. The retrovector pNeoR-IRES-EGFP, encompassing the neomycin phosphotransferase II drug resistance gene, was similarly constructed to serve as an additional control plasmid.
The pCD-IRES-EGFP vector (10pg) was introduced into GP+E86 packaging cells by calcium phosphate transfection utilising the Cell Phect~' kit (Pharmacia) and cells were subsequently selected for 3 weeks in complete media supplemented with 2.5p,M cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C) (Upjohn, Don Mills, Ontario). The ensuing stable polyclonal producer cell population was used to supply virus for the transinfection (or transduction) of GP+envAM12 amphotropic packaging cells. Briefly, for 3 consecutive days, retrovirus-containing supernatant was harvested from subconfluent ecotropic producer cells, filtered with a 0.45pm syringe mounted filter (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbour, MI) and applied with 8pg/ml Polybrene~' (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) over target GP+envAM12 cells. Three days later, these amphotropic producers commenced a 2-week drug selection by culturing in media including 2.5pM ARA-C, thence generating the polyclonal population GP+envAM12-CD-IRES-EGFP.
As a control, the GP+AM12-Neon-IRES-EGFP polyclonal producer was created in an almost identical manner to that described above, the exception being that drug selection was performed with 400~,g/ml G418-containing media. In addition, GP+E86-Lac Z cells were generated by transinfection of the GP+E86 cell line with filtered retroviral supernatant from the 293GPG-LacZ producer (kind gift from R.C. Mulligan, Children's Hospital, MA) twice a day for 3 consecutive days. Moreover, utilising Lipofectamine~' (Gibco-BRL, Gaithesbug, MD), the pantropic 293GPG
packaging ,cell line is co-transfected with 5~.g pCD-IRES-EGFP and 70ng pJ6S2Bleo graciously given by R.C. Mulligan (Children's Hospital, MA).
These cells then underwent 4-week selection in 293GPG media supplemented with 100~,g/ml ZeocinT"~ (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) consequently generating the stable polyclonal producer 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP. By this same approach, the control 293GPG-IRES-EGFP producer was also conceived. Flow cytometry analysis of cells for GFP expression was conducted using an Epics XL/MCL Coulter analyzer and gating live cells based on FSC/SSC profile. Retroparticles from virus producers were noted to be free from replication competent retrovirus (RCR) by GFP marker rescue assay employing supernatant from transduced target cells.
Titration of retrovirus-producers To determine the titer of GP+E86 and GP+envAM12 producers, NIH 3T3 cells were utilised, whereas A549 cells were used for titering 293GPG producers. These target cells were plated at a density of 2 to 4 x 104 cells per well in 6-well tissue culture dishes and the following day, cells from one test well were trypsinized and counted to ascertain the baseline cell number at time of virus addition. For transduction, serial dilutions of retroviral supernatants (0.01 to 1001 in a final volume of 1 ml complete media, supplemented with 8gg/ml polybrene, were placed over the adherent target cells. Flow cytometry analysis was realised 72 hours post-transduction to disclose the percentage of GFP-expressing cells. The titer was calculated utilising the equation below by considering the virus dilution that led to 10-40% GFP positive cells.
Titer (infectious particles/ml) _ (% GFP positive cells) x (number of cells at initial virus exposure)/(volume of virus in the 1 ml applied to cells).
Transduction of human A549 cells analysis and drug selection Retroviral supernatant from 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP cells grown to confluence in 293GPG media devoid of tetracycline for over 72 hours to allow VSVG-pseudotyped retroparticle production were placed in a 25cm2 flask of subconfluent A549 cells with 3~,g/ml PolybreneT"~. This transduction procedure was executed once a day for 3 consecutive days yielding A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells. As a control, A549 cells were likewise transduced with viral particles from 293GPG-IRES-EGFP producers hence giving rise to A549-IRES-EGFP cells. Five days following the last transduction round, flow cytometry analysis was performed to determine gene transfer efficiency and transgene expression as evaluated by GFP fluorescence. Stably transduced A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells were subsequently expanded in complete media only, as well as in the presence of two different concentrations of ARA-C, 1 ~,M and 2.5~,M, for 12 days.
Southern Blot Analysis Genomic DNA was isolated from CD-IRES-EGFP stably transduced A549 cells untreated or treated with ARA-C as well as from control cells, using a QIAGEN'" genomic DNA isolation kit. For Southern blot analysis, 5~,g of genomic DNA was digested with Nhel and separated by ~ agarose gel electrophoresis. Following UV photography with a fluorescent ruler, the gel was immersed in denaturing solution (0.5M NaOH; 1.5M NaCI) and then in neutralising buffer (0.5M Tris-HCI pH7; 1.5M NaCI, pH7), each for 45 minutes. The DNA in the gel was transferred onto a Hybond-NTM
nylon membrane (Amersham, Oakville, Ontario) using 10X Standard Saline Citrate (SSC) for an approximately 48 hour downward transfer with the Turbo Blotter'" device (Schleicher & Shuell, Keene, NH). The membrane was then irradiated in a Bioslink~' UV linker with 0.3 J/cm2 and hybridised in Express Hyb~' solution (Clontech) containing PCR-amplified 32P-labeled cDNA for human CD. The membrane was washed and exposed using a Phosphor Imagery'.
Growth inhibition assay (MTT) of Gene-modified A549 cells , Gene-modified A549 cells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture dishes at a density of 1500 cells per well. Various concentrations of ARA-C or dFdC (Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana) were added to cells in a final volume of 1001 RPMI/10% FBS. Cells were placed at 37°C and 4 days later exposed to 20,1 of a solution containing 3-(4,5-deimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, i.e. MTT, for 4 hours at 37°C, and subsequently to 100p,1 of a solubilization buffer (50% N,N-dimethylformamide, 20% SDS) for approximately 15 hours. The optical density was then measured at 570nm with reference at 630nm using a multi-well plate reader, thus providing an assessment of the percentage of surviving cells based on the cleavage of MTT by the mitochondrial dehydrogenases of living cells to the detectable formazan. Percent cell survival was ascertained using the following equation:
~OD570I630 test well - OD57o/630 media Only well] x 100.
cell survival =
[OD5~oi63o cells only well - OD5~o~63o media only well]
CD enzyme assay Stably transduced test and control A549 cells were assayed for CD enzyme activity. Concisely, these adherent cells (2-5 x 10' cells) were trypsinized, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 5mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.4) and 5mM dithiothreitol. The cell suspension was freeze-thawed rapidly three times, centrifuged at high speed (12 000 rpm) for 15 minutes and the supernatant consisting of the cytosolic extract was collected. For CD enzyme assay, various dilutions of the cytosol were utilised in a reaction mixture with 50mM Tris-HCI and 0.5~.Ci 3H-cytidine (ICN
Biomedicals, Irvine, California). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 30 minutes at 37°C and then stopped with cold HCI (0.001 N). The mixture was subsequently poured onto Whatman~' P-81 phosphocellulose discs and the quantity of radioactivity bound to the 'discs determined by scintillation counting. Oniy cytosine nucleosides, and not the deaminated uracil nucleosides, are bound to the discs. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyses the deamination of one nmole of 3H-cytidine per minute at 37°C. Total protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad~' protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, Ontario) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Transduction of primary human lymphocytes and Growth suppression assay Primary human lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood by Ficoll Hypaque~' centrifugation and plated at a cell density of ~1 x 106 cells/ml in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 50U/ml Pen/Strep, and 200U/ml human IL-2. The next day, lymphocytes were activated with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) for 72hrs and subsequently co-cultivated over.
subconfluent 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP or control 293GPG-IRES-EGFP
virus producers tetracycline withdrawn three days earlier for optimal high titer virion generation. Lipofectamine~' was added for a final concentration of 6~g/ml, and co-cultivation permitted to proceed for 48 hours. Lymphocytes were then carefully collected and three days later plated at a density of 600 000 cells per well of 48-well tissue culture dishes in the absence or presence of various concentrations of ARA-C in a final volume of 800p,1 complete media. After a two week period, viable cells were enumerated by trypan blue exclusion and cell survival measured as such: % cell survival = (number of cells in test well/number of cells grown in media only) x 100. (Flow cytometry analysis for CD3 expression was conducted and all cells confirmed to be lymphocytes.) Harvest expansion and transduction of primary/ mouse bone marrow stoma One female C57B1/6 mouse was sacrificed by C02 inhalation and bone marrow cells harvested by flushing the hind leg femurs and tibias with DMEM~' supplemented with 10% FBS and 50Ulml Pen/Strep. Whole marrow was plated in 10cm (diameter) tissue culture dishes and five days later, the nonadherent hematopoietic cells were discarded and the adherent bone marrow stromal cells cultured (for ~3 months) at 37°C with 5% C02.
Supernatant containing virions from subconfluent GP+envAM12-CD-IRES-EGFP or from control GP+envAM12-Neon-IRES-EGFP producers was placed over marrow stromal cells plated at subconfluence. Transduction was carried out twice a day for three successive days in the presence of 6pg/ml LipofectamineTM. Over 72 hours pursuing to the last transduction round, flow cytometry analysis for GFP expression was performed to evaluate the gene transfer efficiency.
In vitro selection and enrichment assay of CD Gene-modified marrow stoma CD-IRES-EGFP transduced stromal cells were mixed in various proportions with untransduced stromal cells and plated at a density of 25 000 cells/well of 6-well plates without ARA-C and with ARA-C at a final concentration of 2.5wM. Drug exposure was ceased 7 days later, and cells expanded for an additional week in DMEMn'' with 10°!° FBS and 50U/ml Pen/Strep and analysed by flow cytometry analysis. Moreover, the cell combination where CD-IRES-EGFP modified stroma constituted 10% of total cell number was plated at 25 000 cells/well in 6-well dishes with a range of ARA-C concentrations. Pursuant to a 1-week drug exposure (preventing total confluence by cell passaging) and subsequent week of cell expansion, percent GFP positive cells and mean GFP fluorescence were evaluated by flow cytometry analysis.
RESULTS
GFP expression and titer determination of virus-producers In order to evaluate gene transfer efficiency and transgene expression in~stably transfected and transinfected virus producers, flow cytometry analysis for GFP expression was conducted. The percentage of GFP positive cells in the polyclonal producer populations GP+envAM12-CD-IRES-EGFP, GP+envAM12-Neon-IRES-EGFP, 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP, and 293GPG-IRES-EGFP were revealed to be 99.2, 100, 50.4, and 65.2, respectively, as compared to values of less than 3% for parental unaltered cells. To estimate the amount of infectious particles released by these cells, their retroviral supernatant was utilised in a titration assay and the extrapolated viral titers were 1.5 x 106, 1.3 x 106, 1 x 106, and 0.5 x 106 infectious particles per ml. (The titer of LacZ-GP+E86 virus producers estimated through X-gal staining of transduced NIH 3T3 cells, was ~1.1 x 105 infectious particles/ml.) GFP e~ression of CD gene-modified A549 cells Flow cytometry analysis was first executed on A549 cells succeeding their transduction and the percentage of cells expressing GFP
was 95.9 for A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells and 92.4 for A549-IRES-EGFP
cells, in contrast to 0.2 for untransduced A549 cells.
Southern blot analysis In order to demonstrate that the recombinant retroviral construct CD-IRES-EGFP did not sustain any rearrangements or deletions before integration as proviral DNA into the genome of transduced cells, Southern blot analysis was carried out on gene-modified A549 cells. This procedure revealed a DNA band corresponding to the 3683bp fragment expected from Nhel digest of integrated unrearranged CD-IRES-EGFP proviral DNA (Fig.
AND TISSUES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(a) Field of the Invention The invention relates to novel expression vector for selection of transduced and/or transfected cells expressing gene of interest. The invention particularly relates to a selectable marker gene for genetically engineered cells. Also disclosed is a method of selecting transduced and/or transfected cells for ex vivo gene therapy.
(b) Description of Prior Art High gene transfer efficiency and transgene expression in target primary cells is an essential but challenging aspiration in gene therapy applications. A remedy may be to dominantly select and enrich ex vivo the cells concomitantly expressing the therapeutic gene and an attached selectable marker gene.
Numerous investigators have employed dominant selection strategies utilising drug resistance genes, such as the prokaryotic neomycin phosphotransferase II (Neon) drug resistance gene, the human multidrug resistance (MDR) gene, the mutated human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene, and the human 06-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene. However, disadvantages have been noted with some drug selectable markers. For instance, cells modified with the prokaryotic Neon gene may elicit an immune reaction in vivo, MDR-transduced hematopoietic stem cells, when transplanted in mice, will lead to a myeloproliferative syndrome and MGMT genetically engineered cells require selection with the DNA
damaging alkylating agents. Several investigators have revealed the utility of bone marrow stromal cells, the progenitor cells for nonhematopoietic tissues, in cell and gene therapy strategies. These autologous cells, which are easily isolated from bone marrow aspirates, expanded in culture, and gene modified, have been genetically engineered for the expression of an exogenous gene product and/or for the secretion of therapeutic proteins in vitro and in vivo.
Numerous investigations have reported the use of drug resistance genes for in vivo selection of genetically altered cells. The disadvantages of in vivo drug selection, such as the systemic side-effects of chemotherapeutic agent administration, are not encountered with in vitro drug selection, since enrichment of the population of strong transgene expressing cells is conducted prior to transplantation.
Gene transfer studies regularly employ drug resistance genes for the in vitro selection of genetically engineered cells. For instance, the neomycin phosphotransferase 1l (NeoR) drug resistance gene confers to transduced cells the ability to be selectively expanded through treatment with neomycin or its analogue 6418. The Neon gene however is not a suitable selectable marker for clinical applications since it is prokaryotic and immunogenic. Moreover, one study reported the adverse efFect of the Neon gene on the concomitant expression of a second gene product (Apperley et al., 1991, Blood 78:310-317). °
The human multidrug resistance gene (MDR) which codes for the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein has been extensively described and utilised as a dominant selectable marker with MDR-responsive chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel and colchicine (Licht et al., 2000, Gene Therapy 7:348-358). Nonetheless, some investigators observed a myeloproliferative syndrome in mice transplanted with MDR-transduced hematopoietic stem cells.
Another drug resistance gene, the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene codes for a DNA repair enzyme that when overexpressed renders normal mammalian cells resistant to 06-alkylating agents, such as the nitrosoureas and related methylating compounds. Since these antineoplastic drugs produce DNA damage which can have toxic, mutagenic, transforming, and carcinogenic repercussions, their use for dominant selection of gene-modified cells may be hazardous.
_3_ Alternative dominant selectable markers that are well-defined and widely utilised comprise the mutant variants of the human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene which maintain a role in folate metabolism when introduced into cells but confer drug resistance against the cytotoxicity of antifolates, such as methotrexate and trimetrexate. Several investigators have accomplished in vitro drug selection of mutant DHFR-transduced cells.
However, for the untransduced cells to be eradicated by antifolate toxicity, depletion of thymidine from the cell media is required and may be achieved through thymidine phosphorylase treatment of the media or by the utilisation of dialysed thymidine free serum. Moreover, one study demonstrated that retroviral transfer of the human aldehyde dehydrogenase class-I gene permits in vitro selection with 4-hydroperoxy cyclophosphamide of transduced IC562 leukemia cells (Moreb et al., 1998, Human Gene Therapy 9:611-619). Other selectable markers in transfected or transduced cells include the glutamine synthetase gene, the hygromycin resistance gene, the zeocin resistance , gene, as well as the puromycin, histidinol D, and phleomycin drug resistance genes.
Retroviral transfer of a selectable drug resistance gene may in some cases confer lower expression of the therapeutic transgene or raise an immune reaction against gene-modified cells, ultimately reducing the effectiveness of the gene therapy approach. The immunogenicity of certain drug selectable genes such as Neon, led to their removal.
It would be highly desirable to be provided with an efficient selectable marker gene which allow for preparing transduced or non immunogen transfected cells producing a protein of interest, and for ex viva gene therapy and protein delivery.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide an expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells expressing a nucleotitic sequence of interest. The expression vector comprises:
- a suitable promoter compatible with the transfected cells;
- an internal ribosome entry site (IRES);
- a marker nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, operably linked to the IRES; and - an endogenous or exogenous nucleotidic sequence of interest operably linked to the IRES;
wherein the marker nucleotidic sequence when detected in cells, indicates that the cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing the nucleotidic sequence of interest, the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked upstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked downstream of the IRES, and the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked downstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked upstream of the IRES.
The expression vector of the invention may further be flanked by retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence at 5' and/or 3' ends of the vector.
The expression vector may be composed of DNA or RNA
selected from the group consisting of eukaryotic, viral, adenoviral, adeno-associated, Simliclei, and Herpes simplex expression vectors.
The cells of the present invention may be selected from the group consisting of stromal, epithelial, fibroblasts, myoblasts, muscular, stem, progenitor, blood, and hematopoietic cells.
The nucleotidic sequence of interest may for example encodes a protein selected from the group consisting of cytokine, interleukin, growth hormones, hormones, blood factors, marker proteins, immunoglobulins, antigens, releasing hormone, anticancer product, antiviral product, antiretroviral product, an antisense, an antiangiogenic product, and a replication inhibitor.
The promoter may be a cytomegalo-virus (CMV) promoter.
In accordance with the present invention there is also provided an expression vector, wherein the nucleotidic sequence encoding for drug resistance cytidine deariiinase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a host cell transduced and/or transfected with the expression vector of the invention, and uses thereof in the preparation of a medicament for ex vivo treatment.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of identifying genetically transduced or transformed cells expressing a nucleotidic sequence of interest. The method comprises the steps of:
a) providing an expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells expressing a nucleotidic sequence of interest, the expression vector comprising:
- a suitable promoter compatible with the transfected cells;
- an internal ribosome entry site (IRES);
- a marker nucleotidic sequence encoding for drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, operably linked to the IRES; and - a nucleotidic sequence of interest operably linked to the IRES;
wherein the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked upstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked downstream of the IRES, and the nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked downstream of the IRES when the nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked upstream of the IRES;
b) transducing and/or transfecting cells with the expression vector of step a);
c) culturing the cells of step b) under conditions suitable for the expression vector to express the marker nucleotidic sequence encoding the drug resistance cytidine deaminase, and the nucleotidic sequence of interest, the nucleotidic sequence of interest coding for a protein of interest; and d) treating cells with cytosine nucleoside analogs;
wherein the cells living after the treating step d) are indicative that the cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing the nucleotidic sequence of interest.
For the purpose of the present invention the following terms are defined below.
The term "functional fragment " as used herein is intended to mean any portion of the gene encoding for a peptide or protein having the activity of the cytidine deaminase (CD).
The term "analogs " as used herein is intended to mean any functional modified form of the cytidine deaminase. The modification may become from a mutated or modified form of the nucleotidic sequence encoding CD.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of the murine stem cell virus (MSCV) derived retroviral plasmids;
Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of DNA integrated retrovector;
Fig. 3 illustrates southern blot analysis of CD-IRES-EGFP
transduced A549 cells;
Fig. 4 illustrates the effect of ARA-C on the proliferation of genetically engineered A549 cells;
Fig. 5 illustrates the efFect of dFdC on the proliferation of genetically engineered A549 cells;
Fig. 6 illustrates the resistance of CD gene-modified primary human lymphocytes to growth inhibition by ARA-C;
Fig. 7 illustrates the percent GFP positive cells assessed by flow cytometry analysis after in vitro enrichment of CD-IRES-EGFP transduced primary mouse marrow stromal cells;
Fig. 8 illustrates the flow cytometry analysis of one representative experiment demonstrating dose-dependent selective expansion of CD-IRES-EGFP transduced stromal cells; and Fig. 9 illustrates the mean GFP fluorescence plotted against ARA-C concentration. Average ~ SEM (n=3).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a drug resistance gene (CD) that can serve as an in vitro or ex vivo positive selectable marker in genetically engineered cells, preferably primary autologous cells.
In one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a human cytidine deaminase gene for ex vivo selective enrichment of genetically engineered primary cells, for cell and gene therapy purposes.
The present invention also provide with an efficient selectable marker when linked to therapeutic exogenous nucleic acid sequences for treatment of genetic, malignant, immune, and viral diseases. For example, for patients implanted with ex vivo drug selected cells. the method of the present invention would provide engrafted cells constituted entirely by genetically engineered cells, thus improving therapeutic outcome.
-g_ In another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a drug resistance gene with potential as a novel drug selectable marker. This drug resistance gene is the human cytidine deaminase (CD) gene. CD catalyses the deamination of cytidine or deoxycytidine to uridine or deoxyuridine, respectively and in addition, can deaminate cytosine nucleoside analogues causing their pharmacological inactivation. The CD drug resistance gene has recently shown promise for protecting normal hematopoietic cells from the dose-limiting myelotoxicity of anti-cancer drugs to thereby permit dose escalation for enhanced chemotherapeutic effectiveness. This chemoprotection approach using the human CD gene is the antithesis of a suicide gene therapy strategy utilising the prokaryotic cytosine deaminase.
Unlike human CD or other optimal drug resistance genes, suicide genes code for non-mammalian enzymes, such as Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase and Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase (HSV-TK), which are introduced into malignant cells to convert inactive prodrugs, such as 5-fluorocytosine and gancyclovir, respectively, into cytotoxic agents.
In the present invention, the human CD cDNA which consists of 910bp encoding a 146 amino acid protein of 48.7 kilodaltons was cloned and expressed. The small size of the CD cDNA is a favourable feature endorsing its utility for gene therapy applications. It has demonstrated enhanced CD
expression as well as cytosine nucleoside analogue drug resistance pursuant to retroviral gene transfer of the CD cDNA in mouse fibroblast and primary hematopoietic cells. Furthermore, CD proviral DNA persistence and long-term expression in various tissues has been determined in mice transplanted with CD gene-modified hematopoietic cells.
The human CD gene of the present invention possesses assets as a drug selectable marker. It is not a mutated variant nor prokaryotic, thereby indicating that drug selected CD gene-modified cells when implanted in vivo will not induce an immune response. Moreover, it has a small coding sequence and the agents that it efficiently confers resistance to, and which are to be utilised for ex vivv selection, are antimetabolites that _g_ will not cause DNA damage in CD-enriched cells. The main mechanism of action of ARA-C, an effective antileukemic drug, and dFdC, a promising antitumor agent, is via inhibition of DNA synthesis, whereas that of 5-AZA-CdR, which has shown antileukemic and interesting antitumor activity, is via inhibition of DNA methylation and ensuing activation of tumor suppressor genes. The human CD gene may serve as an ex vivo positive selectable marker with cytosine nucleoside analogues in genetically engineered primary autologous cells, There is also provided with the invention an efficient in vitro drug selection of gene-modified primary marine marrow stromal cells. Bone marrow constitutes a source of stem cells for hematopoietic progenitors, and a provenance of mesenchymal stem cells or marrow stromal cells which have the ability to differentiate into several cell types including chondrocytes, osteoblasts, adipocytes, myoblasts, cardiomyocytes, and astrocytes. Marrow stromal is thus an autologous tissue that .is an ideal target for cell and gene therapy strategies due to its capacity for self-renewal and differentiation.
Dominant selection of gene-modified marrow stromal cells ex vivo may allow a greater proportion of cells to express therapeutically relevant levels of the beneficial gene product in vivo thus enhancing clinical effectiveness.
In one embodiment af,the present invention, there is provided bicistronic vector containing CD or the GFP reporter gene as marker operably linked to a gene encoding a protein of interest, generated retroparticles, and human A549 cells as well as primary human lymphocytes that can be transduced with these retrovirions in vitro and consequently may acquire the cytosine nucleoside analogue drug resistance or green fluorescence phenotype as indicators of efficient expression of the protein of interest. Primary marine marrow stromal cells may be also transduced and showed in vitro dose-dependent selection of CD gene-modified stromal cells using ARA-C.
Therefore, the introduction of a dominant selectable marker in marrow stromal allows selection and enrichment of genetically engineered cells ex vivo to ensure sufficient levels of the therapeutic protein for a favourable clinical outcome. The human CD gene possesses the potential to enhance the proportion of gene modified marrow stromal cells expressing a therapeutic transgene, such as type I collagen in children with osteogenesis imperfect. Furthermore, CD gene transfer may permit the ex vivo expansion of cells genetically engineered to express optimal amounts of therapeutic soluble proteins such as Factor VIII and Factor IX in hemophilia and Erythropoietin in hemoglobinopathies, such as ~3-thalassemia. Marrow stromal cells may thus serve as a gene delivery vehicle in diseases where clinical improvement is possible through the systemic secretion of a therapeutic gene product.
In one embodiment, target primary cells for selectable marker gene transfer may include bone marrow stromal cells and lymphocytes but also hematopoietic cells, myoblasts and/or fibroblasts. Gene transfer of human CD into hematopoietic stem cells and/or lymphocytes may be valuable in the treatment of disorders that afflict the hematopoietic system, such as adenosine deaminase deficiency and chronic granulomatous disease, as well as storage disorders such as Gaucher disease and Hunter syndrome. Additionally, CD for ex vivo selection may be used to augment the proportion of hematopoietic cells transduced with anti-HIV-I genes, such as RevMlO, and consequently give rise to an enriched population of mature T-lymphocytes and monocytic cells with high level antiviral gene expression.
Furthermore, the human CD gene may serve as a dominant selectable marker in cancer gene therapy applications employing a non-selectable therapeutic transgene such as a tumor-suppressor gene to inhibit tumor growth or a cytokine gene to strengthen the immune response against neoplastic cells. The human CD gene may also be utilised as a positive selectable marker for the therapy of autoimmune diseases such as arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and colitis, by selectively enhancing cells genetically engineered to express regulatory cytokine genes such as IL-4 and IL-10, or inflammatory cytokine inhibitory genes such as 1L-I, IL-2, TNFa, and IFNy.
In contrast to selectable markers of prokaryotic origin, the CD
gene, because of its human origin is not anticipated to be immunogenic in clinical applications, and as it is demonstrated in the present invention, has not impeded but enhanced the expression of a second transgene from a bicistronic retrovector.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Cell Lines GP+E86 ecotropic and GP+envAM12 amphotropic retrovirus packaging cell lines, kindly supplied by A. Bank (Columbia University, New York) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM) (Canadian Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario) supplemented with 10°!°
heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Wisent Technologies, St.
Bruno, Quebec) and 5~,glml gentamicin (Canadian Life Technologies) The 293GPG retrovirus-packaging cell line, generously provided by R.C. Mulligan (Children's Hospital, Boston, MA) was grown in 293GPG
media [DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 0.3mg/ml 6418 (Mediatech, Herndon, VA), 2~,g/ml puromycin (Sigma, Oakville, Ontario), 1 ~.g/ml tetracycline (Fisher Scientific, Nepean, Ontario), and 50units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Pen/Strep) (Wisent)].
A549 human lung carcinoma cells, obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Canadian Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS.
NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells, from ATCC, were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 50U/ml Pen/Strep. All cells were grown in a humidified incubator with 5% C02. (All cells were incubated at 37°C
with 5% C02).
_12_ Retroviral vector design and virus-producing cell line generation The murine stem cell virus (MSCV) derived retroviral vector pIRES-EGFP, a bicistronic construct comprising a multiple cloning site linked by an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES), to the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter, was kindly provided by Robert Hawley.
The retroviral vector pCD-IRES-EGFP (Fig. 1, pIRES-EGFP comprises a multiple cloning site (mcs) and the EGFP reporter gene parted by an internal ribosomal entry site (fRES). pNeoR-IRES-EGFP is a derivative of pIRES-EGFP where the Neon gene is inserted in the mcs. Likewise, pCD-IRES-EGFP contains the human CD cDNA in. the mcs upstream of the IRES) was synthesised by retrieving the human cytidine deaminase (CD) cDNA
sequence by Ncol/Klenow and BamHl digest of the pMFG-CD construct, and ligating it with a Xhol/Klenow and BamHl digest of pIRES-EGFP. The retrovector pNeoR-IRES-EGFP, encompassing the neomycin phosphotransferase II drug resistance gene, was similarly constructed to serve as an additional control plasmid.
The pCD-IRES-EGFP vector (10pg) was introduced into GP+E86 packaging cells by calcium phosphate transfection utilising the Cell Phect~' kit (Pharmacia) and cells were subsequently selected for 3 weeks in complete media supplemented with 2.5p,M cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C) (Upjohn, Don Mills, Ontario). The ensuing stable polyclonal producer cell population was used to supply virus for the transinfection (or transduction) of GP+envAM12 amphotropic packaging cells. Briefly, for 3 consecutive days, retrovirus-containing supernatant was harvested from subconfluent ecotropic producer cells, filtered with a 0.45pm syringe mounted filter (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbour, MI) and applied with 8pg/ml Polybrene~' (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) over target GP+envAM12 cells. Three days later, these amphotropic producers commenced a 2-week drug selection by culturing in media including 2.5pM ARA-C, thence generating the polyclonal population GP+envAM12-CD-IRES-EGFP.
As a control, the GP+AM12-Neon-IRES-EGFP polyclonal producer was created in an almost identical manner to that described above, the exception being that drug selection was performed with 400~,g/ml G418-containing media. In addition, GP+E86-Lac Z cells were generated by transinfection of the GP+E86 cell line with filtered retroviral supernatant from the 293GPG-LacZ producer (kind gift from R.C. Mulligan, Children's Hospital, MA) twice a day for 3 consecutive days. Moreover, utilising Lipofectamine~' (Gibco-BRL, Gaithesbug, MD), the pantropic 293GPG
packaging ,cell line is co-transfected with 5~.g pCD-IRES-EGFP and 70ng pJ6S2Bleo graciously given by R.C. Mulligan (Children's Hospital, MA).
These cells then underwent 4-week selection in 293GPG media supplemented with 100~,g/ml ZeocinT"~ (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) consequently generating the stable polyclonal producer 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP. By this same approach, the control 293GPG-IRES-EGFP producer was also conceived. Flow cytometry analysis of cells for GFP expression was conducted using an Epics XL/MCL Coulter analyzer and gating live cells based on FSC/SSC profile. Retroparticles from virus producers were noted to be free from replication competent retrovirus (RCR) by GFP marker rescue assay employing supernatant from transduced target cells.
Titration of retrovirus-producers To determine the titer of GP+E86 and GP+envAM12 producers, NIH 3T3 cells were utilised, whereas A549 cells were used for titering 293GPG producers. These target cells were plated at a density of 2 to 4 x 104 cells per well in 6-well tissue culture dishes and the following day, cells from one test well were trypsinized and counted to ascertain the baseline cell number at time of virus addition. For transduction, serial dilutions of retroviral supernatants (0.01 to 1001 in a final volume of 1 ml complete media, supplemented with 8gg/ml polybrene, were placed over the adherent target cells. Flow cytometry analysis was realised 72 hours post-transduction to disclose the percentage of GFP-expressing cells. The titer was calculated utilising the equation below by considering the virus dilution that led to 10-40% GFP positive cells.
Titer (infectious particles/ml) _ (% GFP positive cells) x (number of cells at initial virus exposure)/(volume of virus in the 1 ml applied to cells).
Transduction of human A549 cells analysis and drug selection Retroviral supernatant from 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP cells grown to confluence in 293GPG media devoid of tetracycline for over 72 hours to allow VSVG-pseudotyped retroparticle production were placed in a 25cm2 flask of subconfluent A549 cells with 3~,g/ml PolybreneT"~. This transduction procedure was executed once a day for 3 consecutive days yielding A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells. As a control, A549 cells were likewise transduced with viral particles from 293GPG-IRES-EGFP producers hence giving rise to A549-IRES-EGFP cells. Five days following the last transduction round, flow cytometry analysis was performed to determine gene transfer efficiency and transgene expression as evaluated by GFP fluorescence. Stably transduced A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells were subsequently expanded in complete media only, as well as in the presence of two different concentrations of ARA-C, 1 ~,M and 2.5~,M, for 12 days.
Southern Blot Analysis Genomic DNA was isolated from CD-IRES-EGFP stably transduced A549 cells untreated or treated with ARA-C as well as from control cells, using a QIAGEN'" genomic DNA isolation kit. For Southern blot analysis, 5~,g of genomic DNA was digested with Nhel and separated by ~ agarose gel electrophoresis. Following UV photography with a fluorescent ruler, the gel was immersed in denaturing solution (0.5M NaOH; 1.5M NaCI) and then in neutralising buffer (0.5M Tris-HCI pH7; 1.5M NaCI, pH7), each for 45 minutes. The DNA in the gel was transferred onto a Hybond-NTM
nylon membrane (Amersham, Oakville, Ontario) using 10X Standard Saline Citrate (SSC) for an approximately 48 hour downward transfer with the Turbo Blotter'" device (Schleicher & Shuell, Keene, NH). The membrane was then irradiated in a Bioslink~' UV linker with 0.3 J/cm2 and hybridised in Express Hyb~' solution (Clontech) containing PCR-amplified 32P-labeled cDNA for human CD. The membrane was washed and exposed using a Phosphor Imagery'.
Growth inhibition assay (MTT) of Gene-modified A549 cells , Gene-modified A549 cells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture dishes at a density of 1500 cells per well. Various concentrations of ARA-C or dFdC (Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana) were added to cells in a final volume of 1001 RPMI/10% FBS. Cells were placed at 37°C and 4 days later exposed to 20,1 of a solution containing 3-(4,5-deimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, i.e. MTT, for 4 hours at 37°C, and subsequently to 100p,1 of a solubilization buffer (50% N,N-dimethylformamide, 20% SDS) for approximately 15 hours. The optical density was then measured at 570nm with reference at 630nm using a multi-well plate reader, thus providing an assessment of the percentage of surviving cells based on the cleavage of MTT by the mitochondrial dehydrogenases of living cells to the detectable formazan. Percent cell survival was ascertained using the following equation:
~OD570I630 test well - OD57o/630 media Only well] x 100.
cell survival =
[OD5~oi63o cells only well - OD5~o~63o media only well]
CD enzyme assay Stably transduced test and control A549 cells were assayed for CD enzyme activity. Concisely, these adherent cells (2-5 x 10' cells) were trypsinized, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 5mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.4) and 5mM dithiothreitol. The cell suspension was freeze-thawed rapidly three times, centrifuged at high speed (12 000 rpm) for 15 minutes and the supernatant consisting of the cytosolic extract was collected. For CD enzyme assay, various dilutions of the cytosol were utilised in a reaction mixture with 50mM Tris-HCI and 0.5~.Ci 3H-cytidine (ICN
Biomedicals, Irvine, California). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 30 minutes at 37°C and then stopped with cold HCI (0.001 N). The mixture was subsequently poured onto Whatman~' P-81 phosphocellulose discs and the quantity of radioactivity bound to the 'discs determined by scintillation counting. Oniy cytosine nucleosides, and not the deaminated uracil nucleosides, are bound to the discs. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyses the deamination of one nmole of 3H-cytidine per minute at 37°C. Total protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad~' protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, Ontario) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Transduction of primary human lymphocytes and Growth suppression assay Primary human lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood by Ficoll Hypaque~' centrifugation and plated at a cell density of ~1 x 106 cells/ml in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 50U/ml Pen/Strep, and 200U/ml human IL-2. The next day, lymphocytes were activated with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) for 72hrs and subsequently co-cultivated over.
subconfluent 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP or control 293GPG-IRES-EGFP
virus producers tetracycline withdrawn three days earlier for optimal high titer virion generation. Lipofectamine~' was added for a final concentration of 6~g/ml, and co-cultivation permitted to proceed for 48 hours. Lymphocytes were then carefully collected and three days later plated at a density of 600 000 cells per well of 48-well tissue culture dishes in the absence or presence of various concentrations of ARA-C in a final volume of 800p,1 complete media. After a two week period, viable cells were enumerated by trypan blue exclusion and cell survival measured as such: % cell survival = (number of cells in test well/number of cells grown in media only) x 100. (Flow cytometry analysis for CD3 expression was conducted and all cells confirmed to be lymphocytes.) Harvest expansion and transduction of primary/ mouse bone marrow stoma One female C57B1/6 mouse was sacrificed by C02 inhalation and bone marrow cells harvested by flushing the hind leg femurs and tibias with DMEM~' supplemented with 10% FBS and 50Ulml Pen/Strep. Whole marrow was plated in 10cm (diameter) tissue culture dishes and five days later, the nonadherent hematopoietic cells were discarded and the adherent bone marrow stromal cells cultured (for ~3 months) at 37°C with 5% C02.
Supernatant containing virions from subconfluent GP+envAM12-CD-IRES-EGFP or from control GP+envAM12-Neon-IRES-EGFP producers was placed over marrow stromal cells plated at subconfluence. Transduction was carried out twice a day for three successive days in the presence of 6pg/ml LipofectamineTM. Over 72 hours pursuing to the last transduction round, flow cytometry analysis for GFP expression was performed to evaluate the gene transfer efficiency.
In vitro selection and enrichment assay of CD Gene-modified marrow stoma CD-IRES-EGFP transduced stromal cells were mixed in various proportions with untransduced stromal cells and plated at a density of 25 000 cells/well of 6-well plates without ARA-C and with ARA-C at a final concentration of 2.5wM. Drug exposure was ceased 7 days later, and cells expanded for an additional week in DMEMn'' with 10°!° FBS and 50U/ml Pen/Strep and analysed by flow cytometry analysis. Moreover, the cell combination where CD-IRES-EGFP modified stroma constituted 10% of total cell number was plated at 25 000 cells/well in 6-well dishes with a range of ARA-C concentrations. Pursuant to a 1-week drug exposure (preventing total confluence by cell passaging) and subsequent week of cell expansion, percent GFP positive cells and mean GFP fluorescence were evaluated by flow cytometry analysis.
RESULTS
GFP expression and titer determination of virus-producers In order to evaluate gene transfer efficiency and transgene expression in~stably transfected and transinfected virus producers, flow cytometry analysis for GFP expression was conducted. The percentage of GFP positive cells in the polyclonal producer populations GP+envAM12-CD-IRES-EGFP, GP+envAM12-Neon-IRES-EGFP, 293GPG-CD-IRES-EGFP, and 293GPG-IRES-EGFP were revealed to be 99.2, 100, 50.4, and 65.2, respectively, as compared to values of less than 3% for parental unaltered cells. To estimate the amount of infectious particles released by these cells, their retroviral supernatant was utilised in a titration assay and the extrapolated viral titers were 1.5 x 106, 1.3 x 106, 1 x 106, and 0.5 x 106 infectious particles per ml. (The titer of LacZ-GP+E86 virus producers estimated through X-gal staining of transduced NIH 3T3 cells, was ~1.1 x 105 infectious particles/ml.) GFP e~ression of CD gene-modified A549 cells Flow cytometry analysis was first executed on A549 cells succeeding their transduction and the percentage of cells expressing GFP
was 95.9 for A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells and 92.4 for A549-IRES-EGFP
cells, in contrast to 0.2 for untransduced A549 cells.
Southern blot analysis In order to demonstrate that the recombinant retroviral construct CD-IRES-EGFP did not sustain any rearrangements or deletions before integration as proviral DNA into the genome of transduced cells, Southern blot analysis was carried out on gene-modified A549 cells. This procedure revealed a DNA band corresponding to the 3683bp fragment expected from Nhel digest of integrated unrearranged CD-IRES-EGFP proviral DNA (Fig.
3). Genomic DNA from the indicated cell lines was digested with Nhel, which cuts once in each flanking LTR, and fractionated on 1 % .agarose gel.
Hybridisation of the blot with a 32P-labeled CD cDNA probe permits detection of integrated, unrearranged proviral DNA of the predicted 3683bp size.
Molecular weights are indicated). In A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells selected with 2.5~,M ARA-C, the DNA band detected was of higher intensity than that of cells exposed to 1 ~,M ARA-C, and notably more so than that of CD-transduced cells which were not drug selected (Fig. 3).
Expression of CD enzyme activity in gene-modified A549 cells To evaluate the CD activity in genetically engineered cells, enzyme assay was performed on the cytosolic extract of A549 cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP retroviral particles and on that of control cells, i.e. untransduced A549 cells, as well as A549 cells modified with IRES-EGFP virions. As detailed in Table 1, parental A549 cells as well as A549-IRES-EGFP cells showed low CD activity, specifically 0.29 ~ 0.07 and 0.53 ~ 0.07 Units/mg of protein, respectively. In contrast, the CD activity of A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells was 515 ~ 31 Units/mg of protein, representing an over 1000=fold augmentation. CD enzyme assay was also conducted on the cytosol obtained from CD-IRES-EGFP transduced A549 cells exposed to 2.5p,M ARA-C for 12 days, and the CD enzyme activity measured was 524 ~ 41 Units/mg of protein. In Table 1, CD activity was measured in cytosolic extracts of the different cell lines. Units of enzyme activity are defined as nmoles of cytidine deaminated per minute.
Table 1 Cytidine deaminase (CD) activity in gene-modified A549 cells.
Cell line Enzyme Activity A549 0.29 ~ 0.07 A549-IRES-EGFP 0.53 ~ 0.07 A549-CD-IRES-EGFP 515 ~ 31 A549-CD-IRES-EGFP 524 ~ 41 (selected in 2,5 mM ARA-C) Values represent average ~ SEM, n= 4-12.
Growth inhibition by ARA-C and dFdC of Gene-modified A549 Cells (or:
Drua sensitivity of gene-modified A549 cells) The sensitivity of genetically engineered A549 cells to the toxicity of cytosine nucleoside analogues ARA-C and dFdC was evaluated by MTT
assay. As depicted in Fig. 8 (Parental A549 cells, A549 cells transduced with control IRES-EGFP retroparticles, and A549 cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP virions and expanded without ARA-C, with 1 ~M ARA-C, or 2.5~,M
ARA-C for 12 days, were subsequently exposed to ARA-C for 4 days and cell survival quantified by MTT assay. Percent survival is plotted against drug concentration (log scale). Average ~ SEM, n >_ 8), ARA-C at a concentration of 1 p,M caused a substantial decrease in the % cell survival of untransduced A549 and A549-IRES-EGFP cells to values of 15.3 ~ 0.6 and 10.6 ~ 0.4, respectively. However, at this same drug concentration, survival by A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells was over 3-fold greater at 47.4 ~ 1.9%. To demonstrate a relationship between in vitro drug selection pressure and resulting drug resistance magnitude, the sensitivity of the A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells previously treated with 1~,M, as well as 2.5p,M ARA-C was also assessed. At the ARA-C concentration of 1 ~,M, the % survival of the 2.5p,M
ARA-C-selected CD-modified cells was 70.7 ~ 1.3, thus significantly higher than the above-mentioned 47.4 ~ 1.9% cell survival of A549-CD-IRES-EGFP
cells which had not undergone post-transduction drug selection (Fig. 4).
To ascertain that these CD gene-modified human cells are not resistant uniquely to ARA-C but have conjointly acquired cross-resistance to other cytosine nucleoside analogues, growth suppression by dFdC was also evaluated. Treatment with 0.1 wM dFdC greatly suppressed cell survival of control A549 and A549-IRES-EGFP cells to 15.1 ~ 0.5% and 10.7 ~ 0.4%, respectively (Parental A549 cells, A549 cells transduced with control IRES-EGFP retroparticles, and A549 cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP virions and expanded without ARA-C, with 1 ~,M ARA-C, or 2.5p,M ARA-C for 12 days, were subsequently exposed to dFdC for 4 days and cell survival quantified by MTT assays. Percent survival is plotted against drug concentration (log scale). Average ~ SEM, n >_ 8). In contrast however, A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells demonstrated considerably less drug sensitivity, with 86.4 ~ 2.4% survival at the same concentration of dFdC. Likewise, the 2.5pM ARA-C selected CD-IRES-EGFP modified cells revealed at 0.1 pM
dFdC, 92.1 ~ 1.7% cell survival. Furthermore, treatment with the highest concentration of 1 pM dFdC considerably reduced cell survival of unselected A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells to 17.2 ~ 0.7% whereas the 2.5~,M ARA-C
selected cells showed 53.3 ~ 1.8% survival (Fig. 5).
Effect of ARA-C on growth of genetically-engineered primary human Iymphocytes In vitro growth inhibition assay was performed to evaluate the sensitivity of gene-modified primary human lymphocytes to increasing concentrations of ARA-C. As illustrated in Fig. 6, treatment with 1 wM ARA-C
practically abolished cell survival of human lymphocytes transduced with IRES-EGFP retrovirions (5.5 ~ 1.7% survival), whereas did not significantly affect that of lymphocytes transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP viral particles (87.5 ~ 7.2% cell survival). In addition, at the ARA-C concentration of 5~.M, growth of IRES-EGFP-modified lymphocytes was suppressed (0.1 ~ 0.1%), in vast contrast to CD-IRES-EGFP transduced lymphocytes which demonstrated virtually complete drug resistance (98.1 ~ 4.2% survival).
Ex vivo enrichment of CD gene-modified primary mouse marrow stromal cells Flow cytometry analysis was initially conducted on primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells 72 hours following their transduction, and the percentage of GFP positive cells was 98.4% for stroma engineered with CD-IRES-EGFP retroparticles and 96.3% for cells modified with Neon-IRES-EGFP virus, as compared to 2.1 % for untransduced stromal cells.
To determine if in vitro selection and enrichment of CD-expressing stroma can occur, CD-IRES-EGFP transduced stromal cells were mixed at 10, 20, 30, and 100% proportions with untransduced stroma, cultured in 2.5p.M ARA-C for 7 days, and expanded for one additional week.
Subsequently, flow cytometry analysis revealed, as indicated in Fig. 7, selective expansion of GFP expressing cells to over 99% for all cell combinations exposed to ARA-C. (This ARA-C concentration of 2.5~,M was noted to completely eradicate untransduced as well as Neon-IRES-EGFP
modified stroma). The average green fluorescence of CD-IRES-EGFP
engineered stromal cells also rose ensuing drug selection (Fig. 7).
Moreover, to determine if in vitro enrichment of CD gene-modified marrow stroma is dose-dependent, a cell mixture consisting of 10% CD-IRES-EGFP vector-bearing stromal cells within a population of untransduced marrow stroma was exposed to increasing concentrations of ARA-C for one week and subsequently cultured for another week. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the degree of selective expansion of the GFP positive cells ~ was dependent on the dose of ARA-C (Fig. 6). As illustrated in Fig. 8, the 11.7% GFP + cells without ARA-C escalated to 51.5% and 99.6% when .
selected in 0.25 and 2.5~,M ARA-C, respectively (Fig. 8). Drug dose had an impact on the level of transgene expression, as perceived by the mean GFP
fluorescence rising from 13.0 ~ 3.0 in the absence of ARA-C to 48.3 ~ 6.5 and 99.3 ~ 3.3 in cells selected in 1 and 2.5~,M ARA-C, respectively (Fig. 9).
In vivo enaraftment of ex vivo drug selected Gene-modified stroma To determine that ex-vivo drug selection of CD engineered stroma does not alter in vivo engraftment capacity, 10% CD-IRES-EGFP positive mouse stroma enriched to >99% by ARA-C exposure was thereafter gene-modified to also express a-galactosidase and implanted by intramuscular injection in immunocompetent syngeneic mice. As evidenced in the present experiment, sections of muscle harvested 2 weeks post-implantation contain engrafted ex vivo drug selected, transgene expressing cells.
Retroviral gene transfer permits stable and efficient integration of a foreign gene in the chromosomal .DNA of the host cell and subsequently in all progeny cells. However, high level and long term expression of a beneficial exogenous gene is difficult to achieve in gene therapy studies.
Nevertheless, gene therapy of many hereditary and acquired affliction commands that the desired therapeutic gene be efficiently translated in the majority of target cells. Accordingly, it is anticipated that if the genetically engineered cells represent only a small portion of the target cells, their outnumbering by the unaltered cells will ultimately ensue. One possible means to overcome this obstacle may be to expand the proportion of gene-modified cells in vitro through dominant selection relying on the co-expression of a drug resistance gene.
A bicistronic retroviral vector enclosing the human CD cDNA and the GFP reporter gene is generated. It is noted that its expression lead to functional levels of CD in genetically engineered human cell line A549, primary human lymphocytes, and primary murine bone marrow stromal cells. The convenience of this CD-IRES-EGFP retroviral construct (Fig. 1 ), where GFP represents the non-selectable therapeutic gene, was the accorded ability to track the gene-modified cells via the green fluorescence (emitted at 507nm following blue light excitation at 488nm) which was visualised by fluorescence microscopy and quantified by flow cytometry analysis. Therefore, GFP expression here reflected CD expression.
The CD-IRES-EGFP retrovector is integrated as an intact proviral DNA in the genome of transduced cells, since no rearrangements, nor deletions are revealed by Southern blot analysis of gene-modified cells (Fig. 3). The more intense cDNA signal detected with CD gene-modified A549 cells selected with 2.5~,M ARA-C, versus that with 1 ~,M ARA-C
treated cells, or the weakest band seen with unselected cells, indicates an augmented copy number of the proviral sequences. This higher copy number suggests selection and enrichment of the CD positive cells with multiple integrants and/or amplification of the CD gene by ARA-C exposure of genetically-engineered cells. It was discovered that it is possible to increase CD expression via amplification of the proviral CD gene with ARA-C exposure of CD-transduced fibroblast cells.
Quantification of functional CD expression in CD-IRES-EGFP
transduced A549 cells, as compared to corresponding control IRES-EGFP-modified cells, disclosed an over 1000-fold increment (Table 1 ). Thus, CD
activity is markedly augmented in cells following stable transduction with CD-encoding retroparticles.
It has been established that CD gene transfer bestowed A549 cells with resistance to the growth inhibitory effect of ARA-C and dFdC, an over 10-fold increase in. ICSO noted for both antimetabolites (Fig. 3).
Proliferation of CD-IRES-EGFP modified cells was considerably less inhibited by ARA-C and dFdC at concentrations that exhibited a pronounced cytotoxic effect on control IRES-EGFP altered A549 cells. In addition, selection of CD gene modified cells with ARA-C succeeding transduction further elevated their survival. These findings indicate that ARA-C treatment of cells ensuing transduction serves not only to eradicate the non-altered cells but also the low CD-expressers, thusly enriching the proportion of cells with the superior CD expression and consequently stronger drug resistance phenotype.
The ability to successfully genetically engineer and confer cytosine nucleoside analogue drug resistance -to primary human cells is demonstrated, specifically in primary human lymphocytes which are transduced with CD-containing retrovirions and cultured in vitro in various concentrations of ARA-C. This is the first study to show CD gene transfer in primary human cells. Survival of CD-IRES-EGFP gene-modified lymphocytes is not significantly affected by ARA-C, even at a high dose which entirely suppressed cell survival by control IRES-EGFP transduced lymphocytes (Fig. 6). Therefore, the introduction of the CD cDNA into the drug sensitive primary human lymphocytes rendered these lymphocytes drug resistant and thus capable of surviving and even expanding in media comprising ARA-C concentrations that usually eradicate drug sensitive cells.
These results propose the potential of the human CD gene for the positive selection of genetically engineered human lymphocytes, which may be a valuable tool in numerous cell and gene therapy studies. The transfer of therapeutic genes into lymphocytes may be used in the treatment of cancer, graft versus host disease (GVHD), AIDS, and autoimmune diseases.
Enhancing with the CD gene the population of transduced lymphocytes expressing a second non-selectable therapeutic gene may be beneficial, particularly in situations where poor transfer efficiency into lymphocytes is the limiting factor for successful gene therapy applications. For instance, ex vivo enrichment of gene-modified lymphocytes may be useful for the therapy of patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency and for the modulation of GVHD following hematopoietic cell transplantation for leukemia and lymphoma. Specifically, for controlling ~GVHD, the ex vivo enrichment using CD of donor T lymphocytes co-expressing the HSV-TK suicide gene may allow in vivo elimination with gancyclovir of all alloreactive donor cells following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Mouse marrow stromal cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP retroparticles and subsequently combined with untransduced stroma so as to constitute 10, 20, 30, and 100%
of total cells were in all cases enriched with 2.5~,M ARA-C treatment to >99% gene-modified populations, as assessed by flow cytori~etry analysis for the linked GFP expression (Fig. 7). It was established that the selective in vitro expansion of transgene expressing cells was drug dose dependent, as observed by exposing the 10% CD-IRES-EGFP-containing stromal cells to a range of ARA-C concentrations (Fig. 6). It has been noted not only the dose-dependent enrichment of the retrovector positive stromal cells but also the dose-dependent enrichment of the cells possessing the strongest levels of transgene expression. Accordingly, as illustrated in Fig. 9, ARA-C dose escalation for in vitro selection of gene-modified stromal cells brought about expression augmentation, as evidenced by GFP fluorescence increments.
Even though a high percentage of CD-IRES-EGFP positive cells were attained with the use of moderate drug concentrations, the more powerful doses of ARA-C selected the cells with the superior CD expression, thus strongest drug resistance phenotype. Amplification of the CD proviral DNA
has also occurred with intensive ARA-C treatment of CD-IRES-EGFP
transduced marrow stromal cells. Characteristics of an optimal drug resistance gene as a potential positive selectable marker comprise its effectiveness at imparting significant drug resistance,' its small cDNA not imposing size constraints on the therapeutic gene included in the bicistronic vector, and very importantly its inability to raise an immune response.
Studies have demonstrated that genetically engineered primary cells, such as lymphocytes and hematopoietic cells can be dominantly selected not only through the concomitant expression of a drug resistance gene but also of a cell-surface reporter. Human and mouse hematopoietic cells have been gene-modified to express the cell surface protein human CD24 and were subsequently selected by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). Retroviral gene transfer of the murine cell surface marker Heat Stable Antigen (HSA) or a truncated variant of human CD34 into human cells has also allowed the enrichment of gene-modified cells through FACS
or immunoaffinity columns, respectively. In clinical applications it is very likely that the expression of a non-human selectable marker by transduced human cells will raise an immune reaction. Another selectable protein is the human low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor for which cell sorting is utilised to enrich genetically engineered cells based on cell-surface marking.
However, with cell surface reporters the possibility exists that untransduced cells may be co-selected with gene-modified cells due to intercellular exchange of proteins on the surface of cells. This obstacle may be overcome with the use of cytoplasmic reporter proteins such as the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Many investigators have utilised the GFP reporter for the in vitro selection through FRCS of transfected or transduced cells expressing high degree of fluorescence. Nevertheless, FACS may impose significant physical stress on gene-modified cells that may be detrimental particularly to sorted primary cells.
A further advantage of the human CD gene as a positive selectable marker is that the drugs that it confers resistance to, cytosine nucleoside analogues, and which are required for ex vivo selection, are antimetabolites that will not cause DNA damage in CD-enriched cells.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any varia-tions, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as follows in the scope of the appended claims.
Hybridisation of the blot with a 32P-labeled CD cDNA probe permits detection of integrated, unrearranged proviral DNA of the predicted 3683bp size.
Molecular weights are indicated). In A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells selected with 2.5~,M ARA-C, the DNA band detected was of higher intensity than that of cells exposed to 1 ~,M ARA-C, and notably more so than that of CD-transduced cells which were not drug selected (Fig. 3).
Expression of CD enzyme activity in gene-modified A549 cells To evaluate the CD activity in genetically engineered cells, enzyme assay was performed on the cytosolic extract of A549 cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP retroviral particles and on that of control cells, i.e. untransduced A549 cells, as well as A549 cells modified with IRES-EGFP virions. As detailed in Table 1, parental A549 cells as well as A549-IRES-EGFP cells showed low CD activity, specifically 0.29 ~ 0.07 and 0.53 ~ 0.07 Units/mg of protein, respectively. In contrast, the CD activity of A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells was 515 ~ 31 Units/mg of protein, representing an over 1000=fold augmentation. CD enzyme assay was also conducted on the cytosol obtained from CD-IRES-EGFP transduced A549 cells exposed to 2.5p,M ARA-C for 12 days, and the CD enzyme activity measured was 524 ~ 41 Units/mg of protein. In Table 1, CD activity was measured in cytosolic extracts of the different cell lines. Units of enzyme activity are defined as nmoles of cytidine deaminated per minute.
Table 1 Cytidine deaminase (CD) activity in gene-modified A549 cells.
Cell line Enzyme Activity A549 0.29 ~ 0.07 A549-IRES-EGFP 0.53 ~ 0.07 A549-CD-IRES-EGFP 515 ~ 31 A549-CD-IRES-EGFP 524 ~ 41 (selected in 2,5 mM ARA-C) Values represent average ~ SEM, n= 4-12.
Growth inhibition by ARA-C and dFdC of Gene-modified A549 Cells (or:
Drua sensitivity of gene-modified A549 cells) The sensitivity of genetically engineered A549 cells to the toxicity of cytosine nucleoside analogues ARA-C and dFdC was evaluated by MTT
assay. As depicted in Fig. 8 (Parental A549 cells, A549 cells transduced with control IRES-EGFP retroparticles, and A549 cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP virions and expanded without ARA-C, with 1 ~M ARA-C, or 2.5~,M
ARA-C for 12 days, were subsequently exposed to ARA-C for 4 days and cell survival quantified by MTT assay. Percent survival is plotted against drug concentration (log scale). Average ~ SEM, n >_ 8), ARA-C at a concentration of 1 p,M caused a substantial decrease in the % cell survival of untransduced A549 and A549-IRES-EGFP cells to values of 15.3 ~ 0.6 and 10.6 ~ 0.4, respectively. However, at this same drug concentration, survival by A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells was over 3-fold greater at 47.4 ~ 1.9%. To demonstrate a relationship between in vitro drug selection pressure and resulting drug resistance magnitude, the sensitivity of the A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells previously treated with 1~,M, as well as 2.5p,M ARA-C was also assessed. At the ARA-C concentration of 1 ~,M, the % survival of the 2.5p,M
ARA-C-selected CD-modified cells was 70.7 ~ 1.3, thus significantly higher than the above-mentioned 47.4 ~ 1.9% cell survival of A549-CD-IRES-EGFP
cells which had not undergone post-transduction drug selection (Fig. 4).
To ascertain that these CD gene-modified human cells are not resistant uniquely to ARA-C but have conjointly acquired cross-resistance to other cytosine nucleoside analogues, growth suppression by dFdC was also evaluated. Treatment with 0.1 wM dFdC greatly suppressed cell survival of control A549 and A549-IRES-EGFP cells to 15.1 ~ 0.5% and 10.7 ~ 0.4%, respectively (Parental A549 cells, A549 cells transduced with control IRES-EGFP retroparticles, and A549 cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP virions and expanded without ARA-C, with 1 ~,M ARA-C, or 2.5p,M ARA-C for 12 days, were subsequently exposed to dFdC for 4 days and cell survival quantified by MTT assays. Percent survival is plotted against drug concentration (log scale). Average ~ SEM, n >_ 8). In contrast however, A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells demonstrated considerably less drug sensitivity, with 86.4 ~ 2.4% survival at the same concentration of dFdC. Likewise, the 2.5pM ARA-C selected CD-IRES-EGFP modified cells revealed at 0.1 pM
dFdC, 92.1 ~ 1.7% cell survival. Furthermore, treatment with the highest concentration of 1 pM dFdC considerably reduced cell survival of unselected A549-CD-IRES-EGFP cells to 17.2 ~ 0.7% whereas the 2.5~,M ARA-C
selected cells showed 53.3 ~ 1.8% survival (Fig. 5).
Effect of ARA-C on growth of genetically-engineered primary human Iymphocytes In vitro growth inhibition assay was performed to evaluate the sensitivity of gene-modified primary human lymphocytes to increasing concentrations of ARA-C. As illustrated in Fig. 6, treatment with 1 wM ARA-C
practically abolished cell survival of human lymphocytes transduced with IRES-EGFP retrovirions (5.5 ~ 1.7% survival), whereas did not significantly affect that of lymphocytes transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP viral particles (87.5 ~ 7.2% cell survival). In addition, at the ARA-C concentration of 5~.M, growth of IRES-EGFP-modified lymphocytes was suppressed (0.1 ~ 0.1%), in vast contrast to CD-IRES-EGFP transduced lymphocytes which demonstrated virtually complete drug resistance (98.1 ~ 4.2% survival).
Ex vivo enrichment of CD gene-modified primary mouse marrow stromal cells Flow cytometry analysis was initially conducted on primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells 72 hours following their transduction, and the percentage of GFP positive cells was 98.4% for stroma engineered with CD-IRES-EGFP retroparticles and 96.3% for cells modified with Neon-IRES-EGFP virus, as compared to 2.1 % for untransduced stromal cells.
To determine if in vitro selection and enrichment of CD-expressing stroma can occur, CD-IRES-EGFP transduced stromal cells were mixed at 10, 20, 30, and 100% proportions with untransduced stroma, cultured in 2.5p.M ARA-C for 7 days, and expanded for one additional week.
Subsequently, flow cytometry analysis revealed, as indicated in Fig. 7, selective expansion of GFP expressing cells to over 99% for all cell combinations exposed to ARA-C. (This ARA-C concentration of 2.5~,M was noted to completely eradicate untransduced as well as Neon-IRES-EGFP
modified stroma). The average green fluorescence of CD-IRES-EGFP
engineered stromal cells also rose ensuing drug selection (Fig. 7).
Moreover, to determine if in vitro enrichment of CD gene-modified marrow stroma is dose-dependent, a cell mixture consisting of 10% CD-IRES-EGFP vector-bearing stromal cells within a population of untransduced marrow stroma was exposed to increasing concentrations of ARA-C for one week and subsequently cultured for another week. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the degree of selective expansion of the GFP positive cells ~ was dependent on the dose of ARA-C (Fig. 6). As illustrated in Fig. 8, the 11.7% GFP + cells without ARA-C escalated to 51.5% and 99.6% when .
selected in 0.25 and 2.5~,M ARA-C, respectively (Fig. 8). Drug dose had an impact on the level of transgene expression, as perceived by the mean GFP
fluorescence rising from 13.0 ~ 3.0 in the absence of ARA-C to 48.3 ~ 6.5 and 99.3 ~ 3.3 in cells selected in 1 and 2.5~,M ARA-C, respectively (Fig. 9).
In vivo enaraftment of ex vivo drug selected Gene-modified stroma To determine that ex-vivo drug selection of CD engineered stroma does not alter in vivo engraftment capacity, 10% CD-IRES-EGFP positive mouse stroma enriched to >99% by ARA-C exposure was thereafter gene-modified to also express a-galactosidase and implanted by intramuscular injection in immunocompetent syngeneic mice. As evidenced in the present experiment, sections of muscle harvested 2 weeks post-implantation contain engrafted ex vivo drug selected, transgene expressing cells.
Retroviral gene transfer permits stable and efficient integration of a foreign gene in the chromosomal .DNA of the host cell and subsequently in all progeny cells. However, high level and long term expression of a beneficial exogenous gene is difficult to achieve in gene therapy studies.
Nevertheless, gene therapy of many hereditary and acquired affliction commands that the desired therapeutic gene be efficiently translated in the majority of target cells. Accordingly, it is anticipated that if the genetically engineered cells represent only a small portion of the target cells, their outnumbering by the unaltered cells will ultimately ensue. One possible means to overcome this obstacle may be to expand the proportion of gene-modified cells in vitro through dominant selection relying on the co-expression of a drug resistance gene.
A bicistronic retroviral vector enclosing the human CD cDNA and the GFP reporter gene is generated. It is noted that its expression lead to functional levels of CD in genetically engineered human cell line A549, primary human lymphocytes, and primary murine bone marrow stromal cells. The convenience of this CD-IRES-EGFP retroviral construct (Fig. 1 ), where GFP represents the non-selectable therapeutic gene, was the accorded ability to track the gene-modified cells via the green fluorescence (emitted at 507nm following blue light excitation at 488nm) which was visualised by fluorescence microscopy and quantified by flow cytometry analysis. Therefore, GFP expression here reflected CD expression.
The CD-IRES-EGFP retrovector is integrated as an intact proviral DNA in the genome of transduced cells, since no rearrangements, nor deletions are revealed by Southern blot analysis of gene-modified cells (Fig. 3). The more intense cDNA signal detected with CD gene-modified A549 cells selected with 2.5~,M ARA-C, versus that with 1 ~,M ARA-C
treated cells, or the weakest band seen with unselected cells, indicates an augmented copy number of the proviral sequences. This higher copy number suggests selection and enrichment of the CD positive cells with multiple integrants and/or amplification of the CD gene by ARA-C exposure of genetically-engineered cells. It was discovered that it is possible to increase CD expression via amplification of the proviral CD gene with ARA-C exposure of CD-transduced fibroblast cells.
Quantification of functional CD expression in CD-IRES-EGFP
transduced A549 cells, as compared to corresponding control IRES-EGFP-modified cells, disclosed an over 1000-fold increment (Table 1 ). Thus, CD
activity is markedly augmented in cells following stable transduction with CD-encoding retroparticles.
It has been established that CD gene transfer bestowed A549 cells with resistance to the growth inhibitory effect of ARA-C and dFdC, an over 10-fold increase in. ICSO noted for both antimetabolites (Fig. 3).
Proliferation of CD-IRES-EGFP modified cells was considerably less inhibited by ARA-C and dFdC at concentrations that exhibited a pronounced cytotoxic effect on control IRES-EGFP altered A549 cells. In addition, selection of CD gene modified cells with ARA-C succeeding transduction further elevated their survival. These findings indicate that ARA-C treatment of cells ensuing transduction serves not only to eradicate the non-altered cells but also the low CD-expressers, thusly enriching the proportion of cells with the superior CD expression and consequently stronger drug resistance phenotype.
The ability to successfully genetically engineer and confer cytosine nucleoside analogue drug resistance -to primary human cells is demonstrated, specifically in primary human lymphocytes which are transduced with CD-containing retrovirions and cultured in vitro in various concentrations of ARA-C. This is the first study to show CD gene transfer in primary human cells. Survival of CD-IRES-EGFP gene-modified lymphocytes is not significantly affected by ARA-C, even at a high dose which entirely suppressed cell survival by control IRES-EGFP transduced lymphocytes (Fig. 6). Therefore, the introduction of the CD cDNA into the drug sensitive primary human lymphocytes rendered these lymphocytes drug resistant and thus capable of surviving and even expanding in media comprising ARA-C concentrations that usually eradicate drug sensitive cells.
These results propose the potential of the human CD gene for the positive selection of genetically engineered human lymphocytes, which may be a valuable tool in numerous cell and gene therapy studies. The transfer of therapeutic genes into lymphocytes may be used in the treatment of cancer, graft versus host disease (GVHD), AIDS, and autoimmune diseases.
Enhancing with the CD gene the population of transduced lymphocytes expressing a second non-selectable therapeutic gene may be beneficial, particularly in situations where poor transfer efficiency into lymphocytes is the limiting factor for successful gene therapy applications. For instance, ex vivo enrichment of gene-modified lymphocytes may be useful for the therapy of patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency and for the modulation of GVHD following hematopoietic cell transplantation for leukemia and lymphoma. Specifically, for controlling ~GVHD, the ex vivo enrichment using CD of donor T lymphocytes co-expressing the HSV-TK suicide gene may allow in vivo elimination with gancyclovir of all alloreactive donor cells following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Mouse marrow stromal cells transduced with CD-IRES-EGFP retroparticles and subsequently combined with untransduced stroma so as to constitute 10, 20, 30, and 100%
of total cells were in all cases enriched with 2.5~,M ARA-C treatment to >99% gene-modified populations, as assessed by flow cytori~etry analysis for the linked GFP expression (Fig. 7). It was established that the selective in vitro expansion of transgene expressing cells was drug dose dependent, as observed by exposing the 10% CD-IRES-EGFP-containing stromal cells to a range of ARA-C concentrations (Fig. 6). It has been noted not only the dose-dependent enrichment of the retrovector positive stromal cells but also the dose-dependent enrichment of the cells possessing the strongest levels of transgene expression. Accordingly, as illustrated in Fig. 9, ARA-C dose escalation for in vitro selection of gene-modified stromal cells brought about expression augmentation, as evidenced by GFP fluorescence increments.
Even though a high percentage of CD-IRES-EGFP positive cells were attained with the use of moderate drug concentrations, the more powerful doses of ARA-C selected the cells with the superior CD expression, thus strongest drug resistance phenotype. Amplification of the CD proviral DNA
has also occurred with intensive ARA-C treatment of CD-IRES-EGFP
transduced marrow stromal cells. Characteristics of an optimal drug resistance gene as a potential positive selectable marker comprise its effectiveness at imparting significant drug resistance,' its small cDNA not imposing size constraints on the therapeutic gene included in the bicistronic vector, and very importantly its inability to raise an immune response.
Studies have demonstrated that genetically engineered primary cells, such as lymphocytes and hematopoietic cells can be dominantly selected not only through the concomitant expression of a drug resistance gene but also of a cell-surface reporter. Human and mouse hematopoietic cells have been gene-modified to express the cell surface protein human CD24 and were subsequently selected by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). Retroviral gene transfer of the murine cell surface marker Heat Stable Antigen (HSA) or a truncated variant of human CD34 into human cells has also allowed the enrichment of gene-modified cells through FACS
or immunoaffinity columns, respectively. In clinical applications it is very likely that the expression of a non-human selectable marker by transduced human cells will raise an immune reaction. Another selectable protein is the human low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor for which cell sorting is utilised to enrich genetically engineered cells based on cell-surface marking.
However, with cell surface reporters the possibility exists that untransduced cells may be co-selected with gene-modified cells due to intercellular exchange of proteins on the surface of cells. This obstacle may be overcome with the use of cytoplasmic reporter proteins such as the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Many investigators have utilised the GFP reporter for the in vitro selection through FRCS of transfected or transduced cells expressing high degree of fluorescence. Nevertheless, FACS may impose significant physical stress on gene-modified cells that may be detrimental particularly to sorted primary cells.
A further advantage of the human CD gene as a positive selectable marker is that the drugs that it confers resistance to, cytosine nucleoside analogues, and which are required for ex vivo selection, are antimetabolites that will not cause DNA damage in CD-enriched cells.
While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any varia-tions, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as follows in the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (23)
1. An expression vector for identifying transduced and/or transfected cells expressing a nucleotidic sequence of interest, said expression vector comprising:
- a suitable promoter;
- an internal ribosome entry site (IRES);
- a marker nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, operably linked to said IRES; and - a nucleotidic sequence of interest operably linked to said IRES;
wherein said marker nucleotidic sequence when detected in cells, indicates that said cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing said nucleotidic sequence of interest, said nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked upstream of said IRES when said nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked downstream of said IRES, and said nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked downstream of said IRES when said nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked upstream of said IRES.
- a suitable promoter;
- an internal ribosome entry site (IRES);
- a marker nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, operably linked to said IRES; and - a nucleotidic sequence of interest operably linked to said IRES;
wherein said marker nucleotidic sequence when detected in cells, indicates that said cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing said nucleotidic sequence of interest, said nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked upstream of said IRES when said nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked downstream of said IRES, and said nucleotidic sequence encoding drug resistance cytidine deaminase (CD), a functional fragment or an analog thereof, being operably linked downstream of said IRES when said nucleotidic sequence of interest is operably linked upstream of said IRES.
2. The expression vector of claim 1, which is further, flanked. by retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence at 5' and/or 3' ends of said vector.
3. The expression vector of claim 1, wherein said nucleotidic sequence of interest is endogenous or exogenous.
4. The expression vector of claim 1, which is composed of DNA or RNA.
5. The expression vector of claim 1, wherein said vector is selected from the group consisting of eukaryotic, viral, adenoviral, adeno-associated, Simliclei, and Herpes simplex expression vectors.
6. The expression vector of claim 1, wherein said cells are selected from the group consisting of stromal, epithelial, fibroblasts, myoblasts, muscular, stem, progenitor, blood., and hematopoietic cells.
7. The expression vector of claim 1, wherein said cells are autologous or heterologous cells of a patient.
8. The expression vector of claim 1, wherein said nucleotidic sequence of interest encodes for a protein selected from the group consisting of cytokine, interleukin, growth hormones, hormones, blood factors, marker proteins, immunoglobulins, antigens, releasing hormone, anticancer product, antiviral product, antiretroviral product, an antisense, an antiangiogenic product, and a replication inhibitor.
9. The expression vector of claim 1, wherein said promoter comprises a CMV promoter.
10. A host cell transduced and/or transfected with the expression vector of claim 1.
11. A method of identifying genetically transduced or transformed cells expressing a nucleotidic sequence of interest, said method comprising the steps of:
a) providing an expression vector as defined in claim 1;
b) transducing and/or transfecting cells with said expression vector of step a);
c) culturing the cells of step b) under conditions suitable for said expression vector to express said marker nucleotidic sequence and the nucleotidic sequence of interest, said nucleotidic sequence of interest coding for a protein of interest; and d) treating said cells with cytosine nucleoside analogs;
wherein said cells living after the treating step d) are indicative that said cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing said nucleotidic sequence of interest.
a) providing an expression vector as defined in claim 1;
b) transducing and/or transfecting cells with said expression vector of step a);
c) culturing the cells of step b) under conditions suitable for said expression vector to express said marker nucleotidic sequence and the nucleotidic sequence of interest, said nucleotidic sequence of interest coding for a protein of interest; and d) treating said cells with cytosine nucleoside analogs;
wherein said cells living after the treating step d) are indicative that said cells are transduced and/or transfected and capable of expressing said nucleotidic sequence of interest.
12. The expression vector of claim 11, which is further flanked by retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) sequence at 5' and/or 3' ends of said vector.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein said nucleotidic sequence of interest is endogenous or exogenous.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein said production of protein is performed in vitro, and/or in vivo.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein said expression vector is composed of DNA or RNA.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein said vector is selected from the group consisting of eukaryotic, viral, adenoviral, adeno-associated, Simliclei, and Herpes simplex expression vectors.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein said cells are selected from the group consisting of stromal, epithelial, fibroblasts, myoblasts, muscular, stem, progenitor, blood, and hematopoietic cells.
18. The method of claim 11, wherein said cells are autologous or heterologous cells of a patient.
19. The method of claim 11, wherein said patient is a human or an animal.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein said nucleotidic sequence of interest encodes for a protein selected from the group consisting of cytokine, interleukin, growth hormones, hormones, blood factors, marker proteins, immunoglobulins, antigens, releasing hormone, anticancer product, antiviral product, antiretroviral product, an antisense, an antiangiogenic product, and a replication inhibitor.
21. The method of claim 11, wherein said promoter comprises a CMV promoter.
22. A host cell transfected and/or transduced with the expression vector of claim 1.
23. Use of a host cells of claim 22 in the manufacture of a medicament for an ex vivo treatment.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US26119001P | 2001-01-16 | 2001-01-16 | |
| US60/261,190 | 2001-01-16 | ||
| PCT/CA2002/000042 WO2002057472A1 (en) | 2001-01-16 | 2002-01-16 | Selectable marker for genetically engineered cells and tissues |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2434387A1 true CA2434387A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 |
Family
ID=22992262
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002434387A Abandoned CA2434387A1 (en) | 2001-01-16 | 2002-01-16 | Selectable marker for genetically engineered cells and tissues |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1352078A1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2434387A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002057472A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5770428A (en) * | 1993-02-17 | 1998-06-23 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Chimeric retrovial expression vectors and particles containing a simple retroviral long terminal repeat, BLV or HIV coding regions and cis-acting regulatory sequences, and an RNA translational enhancer with internal ribsome entry site |
| GB9524973D0 (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1996-02-07 | Lynxvale Ltd | Viral vectors |
| JP2002511257A (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2002-04-16 | カイロン コーポレイション | Non-cloning technology for expressing the gene of interest |
| WO2001068667A1 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2001-09-20 | The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine | Arrest of proliferation of highly glycolytic tumors |
-
2002
- 2002-01-16 WO PCT/CA2002/000042 patent/WO2002057472A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-01-16 EP EP02711670A patent/EP1352078A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-01-16 CA CA002434387A patent/CA2434387A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2002057472A1 (en) | 2002-07-25 |
| EP1352078A1 (en) | 2003-10-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Allay et al. | Retroviral transduction and expression of the human alkyltransferase cDNA provides nitrosourea resistance to hematopoietic cells | |
| Moolten et al. | Curability of tumors bearing herpes thymidine kinase genes transfered by retroviral vectors | |
| Galipeau et al. | Vesicular stomatitis virus G pseudotyped retrovector mediates effective in vivo suicide gene delivery in experimental brain cancer | |
| US5470730A (en) | Method for producing TH -independent cytotoxic T lymphocytes | |
| JP6894236B2 (en) | Retroviral vector with immunostimulatory activity | |
| Zhang et al. | Evaluation of γ-retroviral vectors that mediate the inducible expression of IL-12 for clinical application | |
| Paquin et al. | Retrovector encoding a green fluorescent protein–herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase fusion protein serves as a versatile suicide/reporter for cell and gene therapy applications | |
| EP2669378A1 (en) | Cytochrome P450 suicide gene system | |
| RU2185821C2 (en) | Retroviral vectors transducing cytochrome p450 | |
| Larochelle et al. | Genetic manipulation of hematopoietic stem cells | |
| US20040115800A1 (en) | Selectable marker for genetically engineered cells and tissues | |
| Brenner et al. | Gene transfer into human hemopoietic progenitor cells | |
| METZ et al. | Bicistronic and two-gene retroviral vectors for usingMDR1 as a selectable marker and a therapeutic gene | |
| CA2434387A1 (en) | Selectable marker for genetically engineered cells and tissues | |
| JPH11507244A (en) | Retroviral vector pseudotyped with SRV-3 envelope glycoprotein sequence | |
| US6500421B1 (en) | In vivo selection of primitive hematopoietic cells | |
| CA2371216A1 (en) | Pseudotyped retroviral vector for gene therapy of cancer | |
| CA2392941A1 (en) | Drug inducible system and use thereof | |
| Lee et al. | Cellular gene therapy | |
| Burt et al. | Herpes simplex thymidine kinase (HStk) transgenic donor lymphocytes | |
| Stripecke et al. | Lentiviral and retroviral vector systems | |
| Brenner | Gene transfer in haematological malignancy | |
| Baum et al. | New perspectives for cancer chemotherapy by genetic protection of haematopoietic cells | |
| EP1268812A2 (en) | Vectors for gene therapy | |
| Di Ianni et al. | Retroviral transfer of herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase and beta-galactosidase genes into U937 cells with bicistronic vector |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |