CA2424255A1 - Immunotoxins - Google Patents
Immunotoxins Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2424255A1 CA2424255A1 CA002424255A CA2424255A CA2424255A1 CA 2424255 A1 CA2424255 A1 CA 2424255A1 CA 002424255 A CA002424255 A CA 002424255A CA 2424255 A CA2424255 A CA 2424255A CA 2424255 A1 CA2424255 A1 CA 2424255A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- immunotoxin
- eta
- tumor
- cam
- 4d5mocb
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000002596 immunotoxin Substances 0.000 title claims description 92
- 229940051026 immunotoxin Drugs 0.000 title claims description 91
- 231100000608 immunotoxin Toxicity 0.000 title claims description 90
- 230000002637 immunotoxin Effects 0.000 title claims description 90
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 105
- 108010066687 Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 102000018651 Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 108010065896 immunotoxin 4D5MOCB-ETA Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 102000008394 Immunoglobulin Fragments Human genes 0.000 claims description 5
- 108010053187 Diphtheria Toxin Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000016607 Diphtheria Toxin Human genes 0.000 claims description 4
- -1 bouganin Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 claims 5
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 claims 5
- 108090000829 Ribosome Inactivating Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101000669426 Aspergillus restrictus Ribonuclease mitogillin Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- BWGNESOTFCXPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen disulfide Chemical compound SS BWGNESOTFCXPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 1
- 108700004714 Gelonium multiflorum GEL Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 claims 1
- 241000589516 Pseudomonas Species 0.000 claims 1
- 108010039491 Ricin Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 108010084592 Saporins Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 108010003723 Single-Domain Antibodies Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 108010049223 bryodin Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000539 dimer Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002158 endotoxin Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 abstract description 43
- 230000000259 anti-tumor effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 14
- 201000009030 Carcinoma Diseases 0.000 abstract description 11
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 abstract description 11
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000001243 protein synthesis Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 206010009944 Colon cancer Diseases 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000003013 cytotoxicity Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 231100000135 cytotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 229940051173 recombinant immunotoxin Drugs 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000011275 oncology therapy Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 5
- 206010058467 Lung neoplasm malignant Diseases 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 210000001072 colon Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 4
- 210000000981 epithelium Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 4
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-YFKPBYRVSA-N L-leucine Chemical compound CC(C)C[C@H](N)C(O)=O ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-YFKPBYRVSA-N 0.000 abstract description 2
- ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Leucine Natural products CC(C)CC(N)C(O)=O ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 2
- 201000005296 lung carcinoma Diseases 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000007910 systemic administration Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 206010041823 squamous cell carcinoma Diseases 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 55
- 210000004881 tumor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 20
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 16
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 14
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 14
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 14
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 12
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 12
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000001472 cytotoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 9
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 108010093488 His-His-His-His-His-His Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 231100000433 cytotoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 210000000952 spleen Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 7
- 208000001333 Colorectal Neoplasms Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 201000010989 colorectal carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 6
- RAXXELZNTBOGNW-UHFFFAOYSA-N imidazole Natural products C1=CNC=N1 RAXXELZNTBOGNW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 6
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 6
- 108010077519 Peptide Elongation Factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 208000037844 advanced solid tumor Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 5
- 210000001865 kupffer cell Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 5
- 208000000587 small cell lung carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 5
- OTLLEIBWKHEHGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[5-[[5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-3,4-dihydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy]-3,4-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-4-phosphonooxyhexanedioic acid Chemical compound C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1C(C(C1O)O)OC1COC1C(CO)OC(OC(C(O)C(OP(O)(O)=O)C(O)C(O)=O)C(O)=O)C(O)C1O OTLLEIBWKHEHGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 206010006187 Breast cancer Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 102100031334 Elongation factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010021625 Immunoglobulin Fragments Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 241000699660 Mus musculus Species 0.000 description 4
- 101000762949 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain ATCC 15692 / DSM 22644 / CIP 104116 / JCM 14847 / LMG 12228 / 1C / PRS 101 / PAO1) Exotoxin A Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100030086 Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 102000003929 Transaminases Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090000340 Transaminases Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100040247 Tumor necrosis factor Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 239000002246 antineoplastic agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000002095 exotoxin Substances 0.000 description 4
- 231100000776 exotoxin Toxicity 0.000 description 4
- MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate Chemical compound O1C(=O)C2=CC(N=C=S)=CC=C2C21C1=CC=C(O)C=C1OC1=CC(O)=CC=C21 MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000037865 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 231100000304 hepatotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 4
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 4
- 208000026310 Breast neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 102000003846 Carbonic anhydrases Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000209 Carbonic anhydrases Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101710082714 Exotoxin A Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108010001336 Horseradish Peroxidase Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 206010067125 Liver injury Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 231100000002 MTT assay Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 238000000134 MTT assay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 206010027476 Metastases Diseases 0.000 description 3
- ZMXDDKWLCZADIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N N,N-Dimethylformamide Chemical compound CN(C)C=O ZMXDDKWLCZADIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108091005804 Peptidases Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000004365 Protease Substances 0.000 description 3
- 208000000102 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001042 affinity chromatography Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940024606 amino acid Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229940098773 bovine serum albumin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 210000004899 c-terminal region Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- FOOBQHKMWYGHCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N diphthamide Chemical compound C[N+](C)(C)C(C(N)=O)CCC1=NC=C(CC(N)C([O-])=O)N1 FOOBQHKMWYGHCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 3
- 201000000459 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 210000003494 hepatocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000009169 immunotherapy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 3
- VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N n'-amino-n-iminomethanimidamide Chemical compound N\N=C\N=N VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 208000002154 non-small cell lung carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 238000011580 nude mouse model Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000137 peptide hydrolase inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 3
- BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N renifolin D Natural products CC(=C)[C@@H]1Cc2c(O)c(O)ccc2[C@H]1CC(=O)c3ccc(O)cc3O BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000005730 ADP ribosylation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000007698 Alcohol dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010021809 Alcohol dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 206010065553 Bone marrow failure Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102000001301 EGF receptor Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108060006698 EGF receptor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 2
- WZUVPPKBWHMQCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Haematoxylin Chemical compound C12=CC(O)=C(O)C=C2CC2(O)C1C1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1OC2 WZUVPPKBWHMQCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 206010019670 Hepatic function abnormal Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010019851 Hepatotoxicity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 101000904196 Homo sapiens Pancreatic secretory granule membrane major glycoprotein GP2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101001012157 Homo sapiens Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000017727 Immunoglobulin Variable Region Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010067060 Immunoglobulin Variable Region Proteins 0.000 description 2
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 206010033128 Ovarian cancer Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 101150030083 PE38 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100024019 Pancreatic secretory granule membrane major glycoprotein GP2 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010076504 Protein Sorting Signals Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101710100968 Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000007056 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010008281 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100037486 Reverse transcriptase/ribonuclease H Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 206010041067 Small cell lung cancer Diseases 0.000 description 2
- PXIPVTKHYLBLMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium azide Chemical compound [Na+].[N-]=[N+]=[N-] PXIPVTKHYLBLMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108060008682 Tumor Necrosis Factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- AVKUERGKIZMTKX-NJBDSQKTSA-N ampicillin Chemical compound C1([C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H]3SC([C@@H](N3C2=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)=CC=CC=C1 AVKUERGKIZMTKX-NJBDSQKTSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229960000723 ampicillin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005349 anion exchange Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000000481 breast Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000562 conjugate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940042399 direct acting antivirals protease inhibitors Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000002889 endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002523 gelfiltration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009036 growth inhibition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000234 hepatic damage Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000007686 hepatotoxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- HNDVDQJCIGZPNO-UHFFFAOYSA-N histidine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CN=CN1 HNDVDQJCIGZPNO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 125000000487 histidyl group Chemical group [H]N([H])C(C(=O)O*)C([H])([H])C1=C([H])N([H])C([H])=N1 0.000 description 2
- CGIGDMFJXJATDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N indomethacin Chemical compound CC1=C(CC(O)=O)C2=CC(OC)=CC=C2N1C(=O)C1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1 CGIGDMFJXJATDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008611 intercellular interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010253 intravenous injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- BPHPUYQFMNQIOC-NXRLNHOXSA-N isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside Chemical compound CC(C)S[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O BPHPUYQFMNQIOC-NXRLNHOXSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008818 liver damage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003908 liver function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007056 liver toxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 201000005202 lung cancer Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000020816 lung neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100000683 possible toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000159 protein binding assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000017854 proteolysis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003127 radioimmunoassay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052713 technetium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- GKLVYJBZJHMRIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N technetium atom Chemical compound [Tc] GKLVYJBZJHMRIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011830 transgenic mouse model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004614 tumor growth Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000029729 tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 11 Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 210000000689 upper leg Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 2
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acetate Chemical compound CC([O-])=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 101100295756 Acinetobacter baumannii (strain ATCC 19606 / DSM 30007 / JCM 6841 / CCUG 19606 / CIP 70.34 / NBRC 109757 / NCIMB 12457 / NCTC 12156 / 81) omp38 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004625 Aspartate Aminotransferases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010003415 Aspartate Aminotransferases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100038080 B-cell receptor CD22 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 231100000699 Bacterial toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 101000782236 Bothrops leucurus Thrombin-like enzyme leucurobin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bromide Chemical compound [Br-] CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 102100021935 C-C motif chemokine 26 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000011740 C57BL/6 mouse Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000000905 Cadherin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050007957 Cadherin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100021849 Calretinin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000005623 Carcinogenesis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010078791 Carrier Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000251204 Chimaeridae Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007260 Deoxyribonuclease I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010008532 Deoxyribonuclease I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100031940 Epithelial cell adhesion molecule Human genes 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 208000002250 Hematologic Neoplasms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- 101000884305 Homo sapiens B-cell receptor CD22 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000897493 Homo sapiens C-C motif chemokine 26 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000898072 Homo sapiens Calretinin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000920667 Homo sapiens Epithelial cell adhesion molecule Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001041393 Homo sapiens Serine protease HTRA1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000588 Interleukin-2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000010789 Interleukin-2 Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010038453 Interleukin-2 Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000011782 Keratins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010076876 Keratins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 206010025323 Lymphomas Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000000440 Melanoma-associated antigen Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050008953 Melanoma-associated antigen Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003735 Mesothelin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000015 Mesothelin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000003505 Myosin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108060008487 Myosin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- PKFBJSDMCRJYDC-GEZSXCAASA-N N-acetyl-s-geranylgeranyl-l-cysteine Chemical compound CC(C)=CCC\C(C)=C\CC\C(C)=C\CC\C(C)=C\CSC[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(C)=O PKFBJSDMCRJYDC-GEZSXCAASA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010028851 Necrosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010061309 Neoplasm progression Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108091034117 Oligonucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010061535 Ovarian neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000035195 Peptidases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 231100000742 Plant toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 229940124158 Protease/peptidase inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108700033844 Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012980 RPMI-1640 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010070308 Refractory cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000007660 Residual Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000630486 Robertus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101900094902 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Elongation factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100021119 Serine protease HTRA1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229940122618 Trypsin inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 101710162629 Trypsin inhibitor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108060008683 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000852 Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Human genes 0.000 description 1
- JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-hydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methyl [5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-3-yl] hydrogen phosphate Polymers Cc1cn(C2CC(OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)C(COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3CO)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)O2)c(=O)[nH]c1=O JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001093 anti-cancer Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940121363 anti-inflammatory agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002260 anti-inflammatory agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009830 antibody antigen interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940125644 antibody drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000611 antibody drug conjugate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011230 antibody-based therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005975 antitumor immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006907 apoptotic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101150042295 arfA gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000688 bacterial toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001185 bone marrow Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 201000008274 breast adenocarcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000008275 breast carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000014121 butter Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000036952 cancer formation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012830 cancer therapeutic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000504 carcinogenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000011712 cell development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002701 cell growth assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000022534 cell killing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006037 cell lysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004663 cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001516 cell proliferation assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003570 cell viability assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006364 cellular survival Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004700 cellular uptake Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002512 chemotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007012 clinical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003021 clonogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000029742 colonic neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000007398 colorimetric assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000035250 cutaneous malignant susceptibility to 1 melanoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001151 cytotoxic T lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 231100000050 cytotoxic potential Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000002784 cytotoxicity assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000263 cytotoxicity test Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000005695 dehalogenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011033 desalting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 1
- 230000008034 disappearance Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960001776 edrecolomab Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002472 endoplasmic reticulum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- YQGOJNYOYNNSMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N eosin Chemical compound [Na+].OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1C1=C2C=C(Br)C(=O)C(Br)=C2OC2=C(Br)C(O)=C(Br)C=C21 YQGOJNYOYNNSMM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007929 epithelial cell-cell adhesion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008472 epithelial growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008029 eradication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013613 expression plasmid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005194 fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001502 gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003365 glass fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000010536 head and neck cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000014829 head and neck neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 231100000753 hepatic injury Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960000905 indomethacin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001802 infusion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000936 intestine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003834 intracellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010189 intracellular transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108091005979 iodinated proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150008974 iolD gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 231100000636 lethal dose Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 208000032839 leukemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 231100000832 liver cell necrosis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011866 long-term treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006166 lysate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012139 lysis buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006674 lysosomal degradation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000036210 malignancy Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003211 malignant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000006178 malignant mesothelioma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010534 mechanism of action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000001441 melanoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000005033 mesothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009401 metastasis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001394 metastastic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000037819 metastatic cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000011575 metastatic malignant neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010061289 metastatic neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229960000485 methotrexate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002625 monoclonal antibody therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036457 multidrug resistance Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002703 mutagenesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000017074 necrotic cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017095 negative regulation of cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003472 neutralizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940021182 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 101150087557 omcB gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150115693 ompA gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000001672 ovary Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000915 pathological change Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000036285 pathological change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000001539 phagocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003123 plant toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000002264 polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000654 protein toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000163 radioactive labelling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010837 receptor-mediated endocytosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000000443 refractory hairy cell leukemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000016691 refractory malignant neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012266 salt solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000013341 scale-up Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003345 scintillation counting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001235 sensitizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000847 severe hepatotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000161 signs of toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000001542 size-exclusion chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005063 solubilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007928 solubilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011272 standard treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003637 steroidlike Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002784 stomach Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000010254 subcutaneous injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002626 targeted therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000003831 tetrazolyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000816 toxic dose Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000035160 transmembrane proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091005703 transmembrane proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000004684 trihydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002753 trypsin inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004565 tumor cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000003390 tumor necrosis factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000003298 tumor necrosis factor receptor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000005751 tumor progression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008728 vascular permeability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/705—Receptors; Cell surface antigens; Cell surface determinants
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
- C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
- C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
- C07K16/30—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants from tumour cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/505—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies comprising antibodies
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
- C07K2317/20—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin
- C07K2317/24—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin containing regions, domains or residues from different species, e.g. chimeric, humanized or veneered
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
- C07K2317/60—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by non-natural combinations of immunoglobulin fragments
- C07K2317/62—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by non-natural combinations of immunoglobulin fragments comprising only variable region components
- C07K2317/622—Single chain antibody (scFv)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K2319/00—Fusion polypeptide
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
- Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
Abstract
Ep-CAM is a tumor-associated antigen overexpressed in many solid tumors but shows limited expression in normal epithelial tissues. To exploit this favorable expression pattern for targeted cancer therapy an Ep-CAM-specific recombinant immunotoxin was developed and its antitumor activity investigated. The immunotoxin 4D5MOCB-ETA was developed by genetically fusing a truncated form of ETA (ETA252-608KDEL) to the highly stable humanized scFv 4D5MOCB.
Cytotoxicity of 4D5MOCB-ETA was measured in cell growth and leucine incorporation assays in vitro Tumor localization and antitumor activity were assessed in athymic mice bearing established human tumor xenografts. Fusion of the toxin moiety to the scFv did neither affect its thermal stability nor its antigen binding affinity. In vitro, 4D5MOCB-ETA
potently and specifically inhibited protein synthesis and reduced the viability of Ep-CAM-positive carcinoma cells of diverse histological origins with IC50 values ranging from 0.005 to 0.2 pM. Upon systemic administration in mice,4D5MOCB-ETA showed similar organ distribution as the scFv 4D5MOCB and preferentially localized to Ep-CAM-positive tumor xenografts with a tumorblood ratio of 5.4. The potent antitumor activity of 4D5MOCB-ETA was demonstrated by its ability to strongly inhibit the growth and induce regression of relatively large tumor xenografts derived from lung, colon or squamous cell carcinomas
Cytotoxicity of 4D5MOCB-ETA was measured in cell growth and leucine incorporation assays in vitro Tumor localization and antitumor activity were assessed in athymic mice bearing established human tumor xenografts. Fusion of the toxin moiety to the scFv did neither affect its thermal stability nor its antigen binding affinity. In vitro, 4D5MOCB-ETA
potently and specifically inhibited protein synthesis and reduced the viability of Ep-CAM-positive carcinoma cells of diverse histological origins with IC50 values ranging from 0.005 to 0.2 pM. Upon systemic administration in mice,4D5MOCB-ETA showed similar organ distribution as the scFv 4D5MOCB and preferentially localized to Ep-CAM-positive tumor xenografts with a tumorblood ratio of 5.4. The potent antitumor activity of 4D5MOCB-ETA was demonstrated by its ability to strongly inhibit the growth and induce regression of relatively large tumor xenografts derived from lung, colon or squamous cell carcinomas
Description
Immunotoxin FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of cancer therapy and particularly to targeted therapy using immunotoxms.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The lack of significant advances in the treatment of metastatic or refractory cancers has stimulated the design of novel approaches to targeted cancer therapy such as the use of antibody~~
based cancer therapeutics Despite favorable initial responses, most advanced solid tumors develop resistance to standard treatments and relapse as incurable metastatic diseases ( 1 ). Since increasing the dose of conventional anticancer agents results in unacceptable side effects, the design of novel therapies based on the use of tumor selective targeting ligands and effector domains employing different mechanisms of action is of great rmportance. Antibodres targeting tumor-associated antigens and equipped with intrinsic cytotoxic or rmmunostimulatory effector functions have shown promising antitumor activity in preclinical and clinical studies (2-4).
Because of their different mechanism of action and especially because of their built-in targeting function that conventional anti-cancer agents do not have, immunotoxins may add new options for the treatment of malignancies resistant to conventional treatments (26,28). ETA and its homologues irreversibly block protein synthesis in cells by ADP-ribosylating a posttranslationally modified histidine residue of elongation factor 2, called diphthamide, which ultimately triggers apoptosis (48). Although resistance of°cells to ET'A was described as a consequence of the mutation of the crucial histidine residue or loss of enzyme activity required for diphthamide synthesis (49,5(1), this is a rather uncommon event and has not been confirmed in other cell systems. Nevertheless, the loss of the tumor antigen used for uptake of the antibody-toxin tizsion protein by the tumor cell is another conceivable mechanism of resistance.
An immunotoxin is a chimeric protein in which a toxin moiety is chemically or genetically linked to a monoclonal or recombinant antibody Antibodies with speciticities for various tumor-associated antigens have been investigated as carriers of"toxins, and the majority of those that target solid tumors have employed the effector function ot'truncated ET'A
(.ETA) which lacks the cell binding domain I (aa 1-252) (20), F.T A irreversibly inhibits protein synthesis by ADP-ribosylation caf elongation factor 2 and therefore has to gain access to its intracellular target in tire Immunotoxin cytoplasm (20,21 ). Thus, the most promising antigens for immunotoxin therapy are those that are efficiently internalized into tumor cells upon antibody binding by receptor-mediated endocytosis (22-25 ).
A number of chemical and recombinant immunotoxins that employ either plant or bacterial toxins as eff'eetor domains and that target distinct cell surface antigens associated with tumor cells have been shown to be potent and selective anti-cancer agents in preclinical studies (28). However, only few of them proved to be promising candidates for clinical use.
Several immunotoxins, either as chemically~linked first generation or recombinant second generation formats, have been tested in animal models and in patients with advanced solid tumors (20,26). Although early clinical data using imrnunotoxrn therapy for refractory tumors remains promising, the induction of neutralizing antibodies and dose-limiting side effects associated with VL,S or liver toxicity still remain obstacles to effective therapy (27-29). To overcome these limitations, more promising tumor-associated antigens have to be validated as targets for nc:w irnmunotoxin generations which are equipped with rationally engineered effector functions (2,30,31 ).
Mayor responses have been reported so far only for leukemias. In phase I
studies using LMI3-2, an FTA based scFv immunotoxin which targets lL-2 receptor p-chain, responses have been observed treating hematologic malignancies (51,52). Moreover, two thirds of the patients with refractory hairy-cell leukemia involved in a phase I study showed complete remission after treatment with 81.22, a recombinant F.'fA-based dsFv immunotoxin specific for the CD22 surface antigen (53)0 Both immunotoxins showed minor or reversible toxic side effects and thus merited to be involved in phase I studies for which currently a 'larger number of patients are being recruited.
T wo recombinant F;TA-based dsfv immunotoxins are also currently being evaluated for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. The immunotoxin SSI(dsFv)-PE3R is directed against cells expressing mesothelin, a protein normally produced by mesothelial cells and expressed also on malignant mesotheliomas and ovarian carcinomas (54). The immunotoxin LMB-9 has been derived from the monoclonal antibody B3 that targets the LewisY antigen (55), which is also widely expressed in epithelial tissues, a fact that contributes to safety concerns. LMB-9 and SS I (dsfv)-PE3R are currently being tested in phase 1 clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors and first results are eagerly awaited. In a previous study with 3H patients suffering from advanced carcinomas the chemical conjugate of~monoclonal antibody B3 and ETA induced one complete and one partial response (S6). In these studies vascular leakage due to capillary lmmunotoxin 4 damage was found to be dose-limiting, and subserauent preclinical investigations revealed significant binding of the B3 antibody to LewisY expressed on endothelial cells (57).
In addition to HER-2/neu (25), Ep-CAM represents another more promising target for antibody-based therapy of solid tumors due to its abundant expression in many carcinomas and its limited distribution in normal epithelial tissues (5). Although, Ep-C.AM expression is not exclusively restricted to tumor cells, Riethmuller and co-workers found that application of the anti-Ep-CAM
monoclonal antibody 17-1 A in patients with resected colorectal carcinoma or minimal residual disease reduced the overall mortality by 32%, decreased the recurrence rate by 23% (1), and reduced the number of distant metastases (8).
Ep-CAM t is a 40 kDa transmembrane protein overexpressed in many solid tumors including carcinomas of the lung, breast, ovary, colorectum and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (5). The limited expression of Ep-c"AM in normal epithelial tissues (5,6) makes this antigen an attractive target for cellular and antibody-based immunotherapy (7-9).
Recently, a transgenic mouse model mimicking the Ep-(:SAM expression pattern in humans further validated the suitability of this target for imrnunotherapy by showing no localization of the monoclonal antibody MfW'31 in Ep-CAM-positive ruormal tissues ( 10).
The role of Ep-('AM in carcinogenesis and malignant progression is still unclear, but there is increasing evidence that it modulates cell-cell interactions ( 1 1 ) and that its expression correlates with the rate of cell proliferation ( 12) In addition, a promoting role of Ep-CAM in tissue invasion and metastasis has been suggested ( 13), and a strong correlation between Ep-CAM expression and tumor progression has been found in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck'. Ep-C.'AM-specific antibodies have been used in imaging studies to detect primary tumors and localize distant. metastases in patients mth SCL,C (14) and NS("LC (15), to trigger antitumor immune responses ( 16), and to deliver cytotoxic effector molecules to tumors in preclinical models ( 17,18) and in patients ( 19).
~ The abbreviations used are: Ep-C'AM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule;
S('LC, ,mall cell lung cancer; NSC'L.C, non small cell lung cancer; ETA, P.ceudvmona.v aemn,s;lnacu exotoxin A; VL..S, vascular lean syndrome; seFv, single chain antibody fragment: dsFv, disulfide-stabilized ,ingle-chain antibody fragment;
FBS, fetal bovine serum; IMA(', innnobilized ion-metal affinity chromatography.; PAGE, polyacryiamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; MT'f, i-14,5-dimethylthiazol-?-yl]-?,5-etiphenyltetrazolium bromide;
F1TC' fluorescein isothiocyanate, MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; E(.iF, epithelial growth factor AI.T, alanme aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor D. Tschudi, unpubLshed observation.
lmmunotoxin Although in a previous study we reported the ability of the chemically conjugated immunotoxin lYIO('31-ET'A to eradicate small tumor xenografts in mice as well as its failure to delay the growth of larger tumors ( 18), we concluded that, due to its relatively large size of 200 kDa, the immunotoxin was unable to homogeneously distribute wrthin the tumor mass and thus could only affect an insufficiently small proportion of clonogenic tumor cells. Support for this hypothesis is promded by others who reported an inverse correlation between immunotoxin size and efficacy (32j. The tumor targeting and tissue distribution properties of ammunotoxins can be substantially improved by using small scFv as targeting ligands (22,2ni,25,3:3-37). We have recently described the enhanced tumor localization of scFv 4DSM0('.B, which was derived by grafting the hypervariable loops of monoclonal antibody MO('3 l onto the humanized framework of'the anti-HF:R-2ineu scl~'v 4DS and by additionally changing eight critical care residues to obtain a high molecule stability (3H). We have now teound that the development ofa fully recombinant Ep-t."AM-specific single-chain immunotoxin based on 4DSMOCB, can be employed to achieve favorable tumor localization and potent antitumor activity against carcinomas of diverse histologrcal ongins in vivo.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is predicated on the finding that 4DSMO CB-ETA exerts significant growth inhibition upon systemic administration to mice bearing large established tumor xenografts ( 160 mm;' from colorectal, small cell lung or squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The present invention reports on two dose schedules that were well-tolerated and proved to be very effective in inhibiting tumor growth. The three-week treatments with a total dose of 45 trg eradicated a significant fraction of°the tumors, and some mrce remained tumor-free during the whole study. However, in contrast, after completion of the shorter one week treatment with a total dose of 30 lrg 4DSMOCB-ETA, HT29 tr.unors rapidly resumed their growth.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Thz present invention is illustrated but not limited by the attached drawings of which:
Frgure l A is a schematic representation of the scFv-toxin fusion protein precursor, which includes the ompA signal sequence for periplasmic expression. 'The scFv antibody fragment ~4D~M()(~B is fused to the Pseudomonas exotoxin A (ET'A;52_~os) by the linker shown. The protern is tlanked by two hexahiscidine tags, the C.'-terminal of' which precedes the ER retention signal 1CDEL.
lmmunotoxin 6 Figure ( B is a three-dimensional model of the mature 4DSMOCB-ETA., The structure of the scFv (VL in red, VH in orange), of ET'A;52..~r,x (domain II in light-blue, domain Ib in green and domain III in violet) and of the linking peptide (green) are shown. Both hexahistidine tags are indicated in yellow.
Figure 1 (.' is a copy of a chromatogram. 'Total extract of SB536 bacterial culture samples before (-) and after (+) IPTG induction and 10 p,g of 4DSMOCB-ETA immunotoxin purified by Ni2+-IDA and anion exchange affinity chromatography columns coupled in series, were analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions Figure I D shows the immunotoxm proteins present in the same samples as visualized on a Western blot using a HRP-conjugated anti-tetrahistidine antibody. Markers are shown in lane M:
myosin ( M~ 20H,000), w-galactosidase (Mr 1 19,000), bovine serum albumin (M,.
94,000), ovalbumm (Mr 51,100), carbonic anhydrase (Mr 35,400) and soyabean trypsin inhibitor (M~
2H,so0) Figure 2 shows the chromatograms before (0 h) and after 2 h, 4 h, H h, 10 h and 20 h incubation were recc'~rded at 2H0 nm. The monomers eluted at approximately l.4 ml as verified by calibration with the molecular weight standards alcohol dehydrogenase (A, M~ I 50,000), bovine serum albumin (B, M, H6,000) and carbonic anhydrase (C', M,29,000). which eluted at 1.31 ml, 1.38 ml and 1.54 ml, respectively (retentiun volumes shown by arrows). The stability of 4D5MOCB-ETA was assessed by size exclusion chromatography. 'The immunotoxin was incubated at a concentration of 200 ugiml at 37"C: in PBS and samples were analysed by gel filtration at different time points for comparison.
Figure 3 is a graphic depiction of cell growth measured in MTT assays as described in the "Material anc~ Methods" section. Data represent mean values of at least six independent determinations each carried out in quadruplicates (overall SD<5'%). Four Ep-(:AM-positive tumor cell lines were incubated for 72 h with 4DSMO('B-ETA at concentrations ranging from 0.0001 to 100 pM.
Figure 4 is a graphic representation of impairment of liver function upon treatment with 4DSMOC'B-ETA. C'S7BL/6 mice were treated every other day with escalating doses of 4D5MOC'B-ETA Two groups received 5 pg (?50 pg.kg-l ) or 10 pg (500 pg.kg-1 ) doses for three cycles, while another group was treated twice with 20 yg ( 1000 ltg.kg-1 ).
Twenty-four hours after Immunotoxin the last challenge the activities of plasma transaminases were determined and compared to mice treated with PBS (0 pg.kg-1 ). The transaminase activities of mice treated with a single lethal dose of wild-type E'TA- (85 pg.kg-1), as described by Schumann et al. (47)., are also shown. Data are expressed as the mean t SD (n = 3).
Figure 5 is a graphic representation of tumor growth illustrating the antitumor effect of ~DSMOCB-ETA in mice. Athymic mice bearing large tumor xenograf'ts ( 160 mm; in average) derived from the Ep-CAM-positive cell lines HT29, SW2 and (.'AC.27 remained untreated ( ? -) or were treated by i.v. injections every second day with either nine doses of 5 pg 4DSMOCB-ETA each for three weeks (-; -), or with three doses of 10 tig each (-'? -).
In a control experiment, mice bearing Ep-CAM-negative (.'OLO320 xenografts were also treated with 4DSMOCB-E.TA
according to the dose schedules mentioned above. 'The tumor size is given relative to the initial median tumor size of 160 mm3 at the start of treatment and data represent the mean values pSD
of'the various groups (n - 7).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The immunotoxin 4DSMOC:B-ETA was developed by fusing the highly stable humanized scFv 4DSMO('B (38) to a truncated form of hTA comprising amino acids 2.52-608 and the C-terminal eukaryotic ER retention sequence KDEI.. The 4DSMOCB-ETA is extremely potent in the femtomolar range and potently inhibits the growth of°carcinoma cells of diverse histological origins in a highly antigen-specific manner as demonstrated by an increase in the cytotoxic potency by more than four orders of magnitude, compared to antigen-negative cells. Moreover, the antigen-specific action of 4DSMOCE~-ETA was further corroborated in competition assays using an excess of scFv 4D5M0('B. Similar to the findings reported from immunotoxins targeting other tumor-associated antigens including HER-2/neu and E(iF
receptor (25,59), the cytotoxic activity of 4D5M0(:B-f=TA did not correlate with the amount of target antigen expressed on the tumor cell surface. Thus, it is likely that other cell type-specific parameters, such as rate of internalization, intracellular trafficking and fate of the enzyme domain are further determinants of immunotoxin efficacy. In terms of its in vitro cytotoxicity 4DSMOCB-ETA is the most potent Ep-C'AM specific iinmunotoxin that has been reported in the literature and was 1000-fold more potent than the chemical immunotoxin conjugate MOC'31-E:TA ( 18).
~, prerequisite for the optimal binding of antibody-based therapeutics to target antigens expressed an the surface of tumor cells and for efficient tumor localization is protein stability under physiological conditions. The extremely potent cytotoxicity shown by 4D5MOCB-ETA may at lmmunotoxin least partly be due to the stability of the targeting scF'v (38). The immunotoxin itself was obtained to more than 90% from the soluble fraction of°ter bacterial lysis, was monomeric and could be expressed and purified with a yield of approximately 0.5 mg per liter bacterial culture from simple shake flasks. These are excellent prospects for scale-up by high cell density fermentation (60). The high stability of the immunotoxin was confirmed by the large proportion of molecules that eluted in monomeric form after 20 h incubation at 37°C in PBS, a result that was also obtained by incubating the radioactive-labeled immunotoxin in serum. Addition of protease inhibitors prolonged the stability for more than 48 h, indicating that protein degradation was not due to intrinsic molecule instability, but rather was a side effect occurring during purification.
The addition of ETA and a second hexahistidine tag at the N-terminal end of the scFv did not interfere with the binding properties of this ligand.
In viva, the systemically administered 4DSMOCB-ETA was cleared from the blood with slightly slower kinetics when compared to the sc:Fv, probably as a consequence of its increased molecular size. The blood clearance rate inversely correlated with the amount of'radioactivity in the kidney which was lower for the immunotoxin than for the scFv (ID/g tissue 22.79% vs.
300%).
Although all doses of immunotoxin were well-tolerated and mice did not show any signs o.f illness such as weight loss, the accumulation of 4I)5M0C'B-ETA in liver, spleen and bone raised the issue of potential toxicity to these tissues. The inhibitory effect of ETA
on protein synthesis is known t<> induce severe hepatotoxicity by sensitizing hepatocytes to the action of TNF, which is released by Kupffer cells upon E'fA mediated T cell stimulation and induces liver cell necrosis (46,47 ). 'To assess the degree of liver damage upon 4DSMOCB-ETA treatment, immunocompetent mice received repeated doses of 5 pg (250 p,g.kg-I ) or 10 pg (500 pg.kg-1 ) immunotoxin every other day for three cycles. In both cases, the level of AC,TiAST activity in the plasma of~ treated mice did not change significantly compared to untreated controls. First signs of impaired liver function only appeared after treatment with a 20 pg ( 1 mg.kg-1 ) dose given twice every other day (7.5-fold increase over control). In line with these findings, histological analysis of liver specimens did not reveal any signs of E'TA-induced pathological changes, except for the two 20 pg treatments, which induced moderate hepatocyte necrosis. A recent report has shown that E'T'A-induced hepatotoxicity and VLS can be circumvented and enlarge the therapeutic window by pre-treatment with anti-inflammatory agents, such as indomethacin or soluble TNF
receptor and non-steroidal drugs, respectively (27,29). 'The lack of correlation between organ specific accumulation and toxicity of thc: tmmunotoxin strongly suggests that the radioactivity in these highly perfused organs simply reflects the presence o1'non-cell bound and noninternalized ~mmunotoxin in the large blood pool and capillary network. On the other hand, it is unclear tmmunotoxin 9 whether in specialized phagocytes such as Kupffer cells of the liver, internalized proteins <;an escape into the cytoplasm, e.g. to interact with the elongation factor-2, or are rapidly directed to lysosomal degradation (61). In addition, it remains to be determined whether hexahistidine tags can affect the biodistribution behaviour of recombinant proteins in viva. In the kidney the level of radioactivity is always higher with metal-labeled than with iodinated proteins which are prone to dehalogenation (6~,). Therefore, metal-labeled proteins probably more accurately reflect the real picture of in viva biodistribution (63).
(,onstruction and purification of 4DSM(.)(."B-ETA
To make the Ep-CAM-specific scFv 4DSMOCB into an immunotoxin, this scFv antibody was fused to a truncated ETA (ETAZsz_~,>H) by means of a ~0 amino acid long peptide linker (Figure 1 A). The C-terminal original ER retention sequence REDLK of wild-type ETA (aa 609-613) was replaced by the mammalian counterpart KDEL which increases the cytotoxic potency of the toxin m tumor cells (38, 45). Furthermore, we added a second hexahistidine sequence at the N-terminus of 4DSM()('B to increase the efficiency of purification by Ni2+-1DA affinity chromatography (Figure l A) The final construct encoded a protein of 64R amino acids with a theoretical isoelectric point of 5.9. figure lB show; a computer model of the mature 4DSM0C.'B-ETA
immunotoxin molecule.
During 1P'f(~ induction, more than 90% of the total immunotoxin detected by Western blot was found in the periplasmic soluble fraction of E. coli and was released upon cell fractionation. The Bnal product yield was 0.5 mg of a 95°/.. pure immunotoxin preparation per liter bacterial culture in standard shake t7asks. The product mtgrated at the expected size of approximately 70 kDa on SDS-PAGE (Figure 1C) and the theoretical M~ of 69,737 Da was verified by mass spectrometry.
I'he absence oi' proteolytic degradation was conftrmed by Western blot analysis (Figure l D).
lmmunoreactivity and stability of 4DSMOCB-ETA
Thermal stability and resistance to protease degradation of an nnmunotoxin is of paramount importance for its tumor targeting properties, and thus for therapeutic efficacy. To investigate the stability of 4DSMOC:B-E'TA, the fusion protein was incubated in PBS for different time periods at 37°(.' and the rate of degradation was analyzed by gel filtration essentially as described (38). As shown in Figure 2, upon a 4 h incubation at 37°C, 91°i~ of the immunotoxin molecules still eluted as monomers at the retention volume of 1.4 ml, corresponding to a M~ of approximately 66 kDa.
The amount of 4DSMOC B-ETA only slowly decreased with time and approximately 47% of the Immunotoxin 10 initial protein still eluted in monomeric form after 20 h at 37°C.
Similar results were obtained upon incubation of ''''"'Tc-labeled 4DSMOCB-ETA in human serum, further corroborating the suitability of the immunotoxin for in vivo application.
To assess the effect of the additional N-terminal hexahistidine tag on the antigen binding affinity., we determined the amount of immunoreactive immunotoxin in a binding assay as described (43).
Upon a 1 h incubation at 37°C, the y''"'TC-triearbonyl quantitatively bound to the histidine t;~gs of the immunotoxin. As determined in cell binding assays, g0-90% of the immunotoxin retained its binding activity for Ep-(."AM after the labeling procedure. The K" of the immunotoxin to Ep-C.'AM expressed on SW2 cells was determined to be 4 nM, which was essentially the same as observed for the scFv 4DSMOCB assessed in a similar test system (3H). The low level of immunotoxin degradation could he completely prevented by the addition of protease inhibitors even after a 48 h incubation at 37°C in PBS (data not shown). Thus, the immunotoxin 4DSM0<.'B-ETA retained all the favorable biophysical properties of the parental scFv.
Ep-CAM expression on tumor cell lines Ep-CAM is overexpressed in many solid tumors of diverse histological origins (5). As shown in Table t, the highest level of Ep-C'AM was expressed on HT29 cells (MFI 696.1 ), followed by MC'F7 (MFi 419.5), CAL27 (MF1 415.3) and SW2 cells (MFI 372.4). The cell tines RL and COLO320 cells did not express Ep-CAM and were used as antigen-negative controls.
Tumor cell line Tissue of origin Staining Controlb MFI"
Tumor cell line Tissue of' origin Staining Control' SW2 lung 372.4 t 4.0 3.4 ~ 0.5 HT29 colon 696.1 t 1 1.4 5.4 f 0.4 C AL27 tongue 415.3 t 4.8 5.6 t 0.3 MCF7 breast 419.5 ~ 1.1 4.5 t 0.6 RL B lymphoblast 4.2 t 0.2 4.0 t 0.2 COL0320 colon 5.5 t 0.1 5.1 t 0.1 " The values are expressed as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI t SD) of three independent FAC S analyses of tumor cell lines stained with the Ep-CAM-specific antibody KS 1 ~4.
~' lJnspecitic staining was assessed by incubation of cells with the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody alone.
Immunotoxin 1 1 C.'ytotoxicity of 4DSMOCB-ETA against tumor cells in vitro To determine the ability of 4DSMOCBI?TA to specifically inhibit the growth of Ep-CAM-positive tumor cells, MTT assays were performed. The immunotoxm was specifically cytotoxic against Ep-CAM-positive cell lines and did not affect the growth of'the Ep-(:AM-negative cells RL and C OLO320 in the broad range of concentrations tested (Figure 3). SW2, CAL2'7 and MCF7 cells were found to be equally sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of 4D5MOGB-ETA and their proliferation was inhibited with an IC50 of only 0.00 pM. Despite the highest level of Ep-CAM expression (Table 1 ), HT29 cells were found to be the least sensitive (IC50 of 0.2 pM). In the range of concentrations tested, the cyt.otoxicity of the immunotoxin was completely blocked by an excess of scFv 4DSMOC.B (data not shown)..
As determined in [3H]leucine incorporation assays (data not shown), treatment of SW2 cells with 4DSMOCB-ETA inhibited protein synthesis with an IC50 of 0.01 pM, and this effect showed the same doseresponse relationship as measured in the cell viability assays described above. Protein synthesis was not inhibited in the antigen-negative control cell line RL.
Tumor localization of 4DSMOCB-ETA in mice (n order to spare normal tissues from cytotoxic damage and employ the full cytotoxic potential of 4DSMO('B-ET'A demonstrated ire vitro for targeted cancer therapy, the selective and preferential localization of the immunotoxin to Ep-(."AM-positive tumors is a prerequisite.
We assessed the tumor localization properties of 4DSMOC'B-ETA in a biodistr~bution experiment in mice bearing established Ep-CAM-positive SW2 and Ep-C'AM-negative COLO320 xenografts at the contralateral flanks As shown in Table ?, the maximum dose of radiolabeled 4DSMOCB-E,TA
detected in SW2 tumors was 2.93'% ID/g after 4 h, which then gradually decreased to 1.95°~o ID/g after 24 h. After 48 h radioactivity was still 1.13°/> ID~g tumor tissue. In COL,O320 control tumors 4DSM0(~B-ETA localized with a maximum dose of 1.65% ID/g after 30 min, which then rapidly declined to 1.06% II)ig after 4 h and showed only background levels after 48 h. As expected from its larger size, 4DSMOCB-FT'A showed a slower blood clearance than the parental scFv 4DSMOCB (data shown in Table 2 for comparison).. After 24 h the total dose of 4DSM()CB-ETAin the blood was 0.42°r« ID~g, which was l.~-fold more than measured for the scFv (0.28% ID/g). Moreover, localization of the immunotoxin in SW2 tumors was also delayed compared to the scF'v, and the distribution of 4DSMOCB-ETA revealed a tumor:blood ratio of 5.38 after 48 h, which was comparable tc~ the ratio obtained with the scFv after 24 h.
Immunotoxin I 2 At each time point 4DSMOCB-ETA preferentially accumulated in Ep-CAM-positive tumors compared to COLO320 control tumor with a SW2:COL0320 ratio varying between 1.28 and 2.95. This indicates that. 4DSMOCB-ET'A was retained in Ep-CAM-positive tumors by specitic antibody-antigen interactions and cellular uptake, and suggests that its marginal accumulation in COLO320 control tumors may be do to the increase in vascular permeability often found in tumors. Analysis of normal tissues revealed that 4DSMOCB-ETA
localized also in the kidney, spleen, liver and to a lower extent in the bone tissue of the femur.
Biodistribution of f''~~"TcJ-labeled 41)SMOC'B-ETA in micc3 bearing SW2 and COL0320 tumor xenografts immunotoxin scFv ' 1l.) 30 min 1 h 4 h 16 h 24 h 48 h 24 h min (~~-;) (n=3) (n-:..3)(n=-3) (n3) (n:r-3) (n=3) (n=3) ~issw ~uID/g<'iolD/g %ID/g oID/g %IDlg ~olD/g %ID/g %ID/g Blood 27.21 17.46 10.08 2.23 f 0.57 0.42 0.21 f 0.28 f 4.26 t 3.28 t 2.89 0.:32 f (1.14 t 0.04 0.02 t 0.06 Heart 10.84 6.69 6.20 2.23 f 1.14 0.64 0.52 t 0.28 t 1.96 f 3.88 +. 1.10 0. I f 0.04 t 0.47 0 05 t 0.09 Lung t 1.56 8.38 6.21 2.59 f 1.25 0.97 0.77 t i..14 f 1.66 t ) r 0.71 0.26 f 0.13 ~ 0.12 0.22 t 0.60 Spleen 735 f 12.17 I 1.64 7.70 f 8.81 6.24 4.07 f 0.70 1.50 f 1.70 t 1.74 5.65 ~ 1.26 t 0.68 1.69 f 0.13 Kidney 22.49 32.68 33.50 42.54 32.98 22.79 16.54 300.(1 f: 8.28 f. 1.49 t 2.32 f 6.(11 .t 1.14 f 1.76 f 0.39 t 85 Stomach 0.92 1.2 3 2.72 0.85 r I .15 0.63 0.45 t 0.24 f ().30 f ().40 + I 0. I ~ ().69 ~ 0.09 0.09 f_ .3 3 3 0.24 Intestine 1.78 2. I 2.31 2.30 t 1.21 0.90 0.58 t 0.30 ~ (1.52 9 t i: 0.5'21.09 t f).22 t 0.09 0.06 ~ 0.07 (1.05 Liver I 5.47 20.44 I 9.97 20.2() 16.28 ( 3.70 8.44 f 2.38 t 3.24 f 0.70 t 3.77 f 1.26 t 2.51 f 1.83 0.49 t 0.52 Muscle 0.63 0.8() 0.57 0.58 ~ 0.37 0.26 0.16 f 0.10 t 1).14 ~ (1.15 i 0.07 0.19 ~ f1,()3~ 0.05 0.02 t 0.02 Bone (femur) 3.91 6.24 3.96 3.76 t 3.(15 2.85 I .08 0.06 f 0.97 t (1.96 .z 0.23 0.43 ~ ().37 t 0.49 ~ 0.20 t (').05 COL0320 tumor0.79 I .65 1.26 I .19 1.06 0.66 0 55 f ND
t 0.10 f (1.33 t: 0. t. 0.05 ~- 0.20 f 0.03 0.14 SW2 tumor 1.01 2.45 2.45 2.93 t 2.26 I .95 I 13 t 1.47 t 0.22 t 0.3:3 -r. 0.80 ~ 0.53 t 0.37 0.08 t 0.32 0.47 Ratios COL0321) tumor/blood(1.03 0. l0 0.13 0.48 2.09 1.57 2 61 ND
SW2 tumor/blood(1.04 0.14 0.24 1.31 3.97 4.(i4 5-38 5.25 SW2 tumor/COL.03201.28 1.48 1.94 2.76 1.9(l 2.95 2 05 ND
tumor " Biodistribution of9g"'Tc-labeled 4DSMOCB-ETA immunotoxin was determined following i.v injection in mice bearing SW2 and COL0320 tumor xenografts at contralateral site. Data represent the percentages of injected dose (ID t SD) per gram tissue. ND, not determined.
'' Ratios presented were calculated from averages of tumor: blood or tumoraumor ratios of Individual mice.
Taken from Willuda et al~ ( 1999) for comparison.
~mmunotoxin I :i Toxicity of 4DSMOCB-ETA in mice 'The unexpected high localization of radioactivity in liver., spleen and bone raised the issue of potential toxicity to these tissues under immunotoxin therapy. To assess the toxicity of escalating doses of 4DSMOCB-ETA, C57BL/6 mice were used as immunocompetent hosts which, in contrast to athymic mice, are more sensitive to wild-type E'TA-mediated liver damage (46,47).
Interestingly, the determination of ALT AST levels in the plasma of C57Bt./6 mice 24 h after treatment with three cycles of either 5 lig or i 0 pg immunotoxin given every other day, did not reveal immunotoxin mediated impairment of liver function (Figure 4). Elevated transaminase activity was only observed upon administration of two 20 pg doses of immunotoxin which equaled the activity measured in control mice upon administration of a toxic dose of wild-type ETA (46). In line with these results, few sites with necroriC hepatocytes were only found upon treatment with the highest immunotoxin dose. At all doses tested, analysis of the spleen and the cellular components of whole blood samples did not show any signs of histopathological changes or myelosuppression, respectively (data not shown). Thus, the accumulation of radioactivity in liver, spleen and bone does not reflect the amount of cell-bound or internalized immunotoxin in khese tissues Antitumor activity of 4DSMOCB-ETA
An essential requirement for the clinical use of anti-cancer agents is a significant antitumor activity demonstrated in animal models of human tumor xenografts. To investigate whether the potent in vitro cytotoxicity and the favorable tumor localization properties of 4DSMOCB-E:TA
translate into antitumor activity, mice bearing large established SW2, HT29 or CAL27 tumor xenogralts were treated by i.v. injection of the immunotoxin with two different dose schedules: (i) 45 pg total, with .5 p.g given every second day for B weeks, (ii) ~i0 pg total, with 10 lig given every second day for I week. Mice bearing Ep--CAM-negative ('O'L.O320 tumor xenogratts were used as controls. All treatment doses were well tolerated and mice did not show any signs of toxicity such as weight loss or impaired liver function (Figure 4).
As depicted in Figure 5, a significant inhibition of the growth of all Ep-CAM-positive tumors was achieved by treating mice with either the 5 p.g or the 10 wg dose schedule.
Treatment of mice bearing SW2 xenografts resulted m a shrinkage of the tumor volume to maximal 20% of' the initial size and a slight resumption of growth to a final 2.6-fold size increase at the end of the monitored period. A similar effect was achieved upon treatment of ('AL27 tumors, which were reduced to maximal 60% of the initial volume. Fifty days after start ot'treatment the median tmmunotoxin 14 tumor volume did not exceed 1.4-fold the initial size. 'Two mice out of 7 treated with the S pg dose showed complete tumor regression and remained tumor free. Neither CAL27 nor SW2 tumors showed a significant difference Gn their tumor response to the two treatment schedules.
For HT29 tumors strong growth inhibition was achieved with the 5 pg dose given for 3 weeks when sizes decreased to 0.7-fold of the initial volume. As already observed for CAL27 tumors, ~
out of 7 mice showed complete regression of their HT29 tumors. Unexpectedly, the efficacy of the 10 ltg schedule was comparatively luwer, indicating that for these tumors a long-term treatment is more effective. No antitumor effect ot'4DSMOCB-ETA was seen in mice bearing Ep-CAM-negative COLO320 control tumors (Figure 5).
Tumor cell lines The colorectal carcinoma cell lines HT29 (HTB-38), COL0320 (CL-220), the breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF7 (HTB-22) and the non-Hodgkin"s lymphoma cell line RL (CRL,-2261 ) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). The squamc.~us cell carcinoma cell line' of the tongue CAL27 was kindly provided by Dr. S. D. Bernal., Dana-farber C.."ancer Institute, Boston, MA The small cell lung carcinoma cell line SW2 was raised in our laboratory. Except for C'Af.27, which was maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Life 'Technologies, Grand Island, NY), cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 (Life Technologies Inc., Grand Island, NY). Both media were supplemented with 10%
FBS (Hyclone, Europe Ltd. ), 2 mM L-glutamine., 50 IU~ ml penicillin and 50 pg/ml streptomycin. Cell cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5°~~ C02.
Construction of the 4DSMOCB-ETA expression vector 'The sequence encoding a truncated form of ETA ('E'TA~s~.~,"H) was amplified by PCR from plasmid pSW200 (25) and cloned as an 1 164 by EcoRI-Hinc~III fragment downstream of the Ep-C.'AM-binding 4DSMOC'B scFv sequence present in the pIG6-based (39) 4I)SMOCB
scFv expression vector (38) The primers (Tox 1 ~
('TCGGAATT('GOTG(~(.'GCGGCGGAGTTCCCG
AAACCGTC'C: ACC'C.'CCJCC GGGTTCTTC: TGGT'TTA; Tox2: GTC'AAGCTTC.'TAC.'AGTTCGT
CTTTATGGTGATGCiTGGTGATCiCG(.'C"GGTT'TC('C'CK,GC"TG) introduced an EcoRI
lmmunotoxin ] 5 restriction site between scFv and toxin and a C-terminal hexahistidine tag followed by the endoplasmic reticulum ( ER) retention signal KDEL, a stop colon and a HindIII
restriction site.
To improve purity and yield during IMAC, a second hexahistidine tag was added at the N-terminus between the periplasmic signal sequence and the 4D5MOC'B coding region. To this end, two pairs of oligonucleotides (Xbal 5': ('TAGATAACG.AGGC~CAAAAAATGAAAAAGACAG
C'TA'TCGCGA'TTGCAGTGGCACTGGC'TGGTTTCGCTACCGT: Xbal 3': GCCACTGC'AAT
CGCGATAG("TGTCTTTTTCATTTT TTGCCCTCGT'fA'T; and EcoRV 5': AGCGCAG(~CCG
AC.CACCATC ATCACCATCA("CAT; ~;coRV 3': 'T("GTGATGGTGATGATGGTGGTCGGCC.
TGCGC".TACGGTAGCGAAACCAGCCAGT) were heated to 80°(', allowed to anneal by gradually cooling to room temperature and then ligated between the Xbal and EcoRV sites of pIG6-4DSM0('BETAH6KDEL. The sequence was experimentally confirmed.
F',XAMPLE 3 Expression and purification of 4D5MO('B-ETA
F'or periplasmic; expression of 4D5MOC'B-ETA the vector pIG6 was used, which places the gene under lac promoter control in SB536, an ~'. coli strain devoid of the periplasmic proteases HhoA
and HhoB (40). Five ml 2YT medium containing ampicillin (100 pgiml) were inoculated with a single bacterial colony containing the 41)SMOCB-E'TA expression plasmid and grown overnight at 25°C. The bacteria were diluted in one liter of 2YT' medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose and ampicillin ( 100 pg/ml) to reach an fi5s~, nm between 0~ 1 and 0.2 and transferred to 3-liter baffled shake flasks. The culture was further grown at 25°(' to an A~5"
nm of 0.5 and immunotoxin production was induced for 4 h by adding a final Concentration of 1 mM isopropyl-p-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Sigma). The harvested pellet derived from a bacterial culture with a 6na1 ,A55~ nm of 6 was stored at -80°(' For purification, the pellet obtained from a one liter culture was resuspended in 25 ml lysis buffer, containing SO mM Tris-HC1 (pH
7.5), 300 mM
NaCI, 2 mM MgSO4 and supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and DNase I. The bacterial suspension was lysed with two cycles m a French Pressure Cell press (SL.S Instruments, Urbana, IL), centrifuged at 48'000 g in a SS-:34 rotor for 30 min at 4°C" and subsequently filter-sterilized (0.22 pin). The immunotoxxn present in the cleared supernatant was pin°i~ed by chromatography using a BIOCAD-System (Perceptive BioSystems) with a NiZ+-iminodiacetic (IDA) column and a HQ/M-anion-exch;~nge column coupled in-line as described (41 ). Before the lysate was loaded, the Niz+-IDA column was equilibrated with 20 mM Tras (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaC:I_ After loading, the column was washed three times with different salt solutions, all buffered with 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), in the lmmunotoxin t 6 order 300 mM, 510 mM and 90 mM NaC'1. Subsequently, the column was washed with 20 mM
Tris (pH 7.5), l0 mM imidazole, 90 mM NaCI, before the bound immunotoxin was eluted with the same solution containing 200 mM imidazole (pH 7.5). 'The eluate was directly loaded onto the HQ/M-anion-exchange column and the bound immunotoxin was eluted with a salt gradient of 90a 1000 mM NaCI, buffered with 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5). The fractions containing were collected and concentrated using a 10 kDa cutoff filter by centrifugation at 2000 g and 4°C
(Ultrafree-MC low protein binding, Millipore). The quality of purified 4DSMOCB-ETA was analyzed by a l0% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and Western blotting using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-tetrahistidine antibody (QIAGEN, Elilden, Germany) diluted 1:5000 according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Analytical gel tiltration and determination of thermal stability Ten micrograms of purified 4DSMOCB-EVTA were diluted in 50 pl PBS pH 7.4 containing 0.005°~o T'ween-20 and subsequently incubated at 37°C. Samples were analyzed at different time points (after 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 10 h and 20 h) by gel Eltration using the Smart system (Pharmaczaj Uppsala) with a Superose-12 PC3.2!30 column. The column was calibrated in the same buffer with three protein standards: alcohol dehydrogenase (M~ 150,000), bovine serum albumin ( M, 66,000) and carbonic anhydrase (M,-29,000). 'The same analytical setting was used to assess the thermal stability of the '''''"Tc-labeled immunotoxin after a 20 h incubation at 37°C in human serum. The amount of immunotoxin monomers was determined by ~-scintillation counting of the eluted fractions.
EXAMPL.,E S
Radiolabeling and determination of antigen binding affinity 4DSMOCB-ETA was radioactively labeled by stable site-specific coordination of ''~"'Tc-tricarbonyl trihydrate to the hexahistidine tags present in the protein sequence (42); This spontaneous reaction was induced by mixing 30 pl of immunotoxin solution ( 1 mg/ml) with one third volume of 1 M 2-[N-morpholinojethanesulfomc acid (MES) pH 6.H and one third volume of freshly synthesized ''''"'Tc-tricarbonyl compound. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C and the reaction was stopped by desalting over a Biospin-6 column (BioRad, Hercules, CA) equilibrated with PBS containing O.OOS°,~~~ Tween-20q according to the manufacturer's Immunotoxm I 7 recommendation. The percentage of immunoreactive immunotoxin was assessed as described by Lindmo and co-workers (43). The binding affinity of the ''y"'Tc-labeled immunotoxin was determined on SW2 cells in a radio-immunoassay (R1A), essentially as described for the scFv 4DSMOC'B (3H).
Cell growth assay Inhibition of cell growth upon treatment with 4DSMOCB-ETA was determined in standard MTT
assays based on the reduction of tetrazolium salt to formazan by the enzymes from viable cells (44). Briefly, 5,000 tumor cells were seeded in 9fi-well ELISA microplates in a total volume of 50 gl culture medium per well Immunotoxin concentrations ranging from 0.0001-100 pM were added m a total volume of 100 pl per well and cells were incubated fc7r 72 h under standard cell culture conditions. Ten microliters of a 10 mg%ml MTT (Fluka) solution were added to each well and the plates were incubated for further 90 min at 37°C. Cell lysis and formazan solubilization were achieved by addition of l00 pl lysis butter containing 20% SDS in 50%
dimethylformamide (pH 4.7 adjusted with a solution consisting of 80% acetate, 20% I M HCl) and the released formazan crystals were allowed to dissolve overnight at 37°C.
Absorption was quantified at 590 nm using a SPE.,(.'TRAmax 340 rnicroplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). To demonstrate that the cytotoxicity of4D5MOCK-E'fA was due to inhibition of protein synthesis in oells, [3H]leuc~ne incorporation assays were performed as described ( 18).
Briefly, 2 x 104 <:ells per well in leucine-free cell culture medmm were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated with increasing concentrations of 4DSMOC.B-ETA diluted in leucine-free medium to a final volume of 200 pl. Cells incubated in leucine-free medium without immunotoxin were used as control. Upon a 24 h incubation at 37°(. under standard cell culture conditions, cells were pulsed with 10 p.l medium containing 1 yCi [4,5-;3HJleucine (specific radioactivity 5 TBq/mmol) per well for 6 h and harvested onto glass-fiber filters using a Harvester 96 (Tomtec, Hamden, CT). The radioactivity incorporated into cells was quantified m a Trilux 1450 Icquid scintillation MicroBeta counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Wellesley, MA) and expressed as percentages relative to untreated controls.
~mmunotoxin I H
Flow cytometry Cell surface expression of Ep-CAM was quantified by flow cytometry using the mouse IgC~~a KS114 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, ('A). As secondary antibody a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse F(ab')2 IgG (H+L) (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) was used. All staining steps were performed in a staining buffer consisting of PBS supplemented with 1 %
(w/v) BSA and 0.04% (w/v) sodium azide. Cells (5 x 105) were harvested, washed twice with ice-cold staining buffer and incubated on ice for 45 min ire a total volume of l00 lrl staining buffer containing l Irg of the first antibody. Cells were washed and further incubated with 400 ng of FITC-labeled antibody in a final volume of 100 pl. After 30 min on ice, cells were washed and resuspended in 300 p.l staining buffer for analysis. Fluorescence intensity was measured at 430 nm using a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) and quantified using the CellQuestPro software (Becton Dickinsc7n, San Jose, CA ).
Mice Six to R weeks old female CD-1 (ICR nu/nu) mice (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany) were used. They were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions according to the guidelines of the Veterinary Office of'the Kanton Zurich. Tumors were raised at the lateral flank by s.c. injection of 107 cells and randomized to constitute groups with an average tumor si~:e of l60 mm3 Ten weeks old female (.'S7Bl.,i6 mice (Janvier, Saint Isle. France) were used to determine immunotoxin-specific toxicity in immunocompetent animals, which are more sensitive to the f?TA-mediated T cell stimulation that results in the production of TNF
by Kupffer cells and perform by cytotoxic T cells.
Biodistribution study of 4DSMOC'B-ETA
To investigate the distribution of 4DSMO CB-ETA m mice, 6 wg yy'"Te-labeled (specific radioactivity of 98.y TBq/mmo() were diluted in a total volume of 150 pl PBS and were injected r.v.. mto mice bearing established SW2 and ("010320 tumor xenografts at the contralateral lmmunotoxin 19 flanks. Mice were sacrificed at different time points ( 10 min, 30 mm, 1 h, 4h, 16h, 24h and 48 h) after treatment and organs were removed to measure the accumulated radioactivity using a p-counter. 'The amount of radioactivity per gram organ was given as percentage of the total injected dose which was arbitrarily set to l00%, Cn viva toxicity of 4DSMOC'B-ET'A
Toxicity of the immunotoxin was determined in C'S7BL/6 mice by measuring ALT/AST acaivity in plasma upon repeated injections of escalating doses of 4D5MOC'B-ETA given every other day for three cycles (S Itg and 10 pg dose) or for two cycles (20 p,g dose). Whole blood samples were taken to assess the degree of myelosuppression based on alterations of' cellular components. In addition, tissue specimens from the livers and spleens of immunotoxin treated mice were analyzed for hcstopathological changes upon hematoxylin/eosin staining.
Antitumor activity of 4DSMOCB-ETA
Mice bearing tumor xenografts derived from the Ep-("AM-positive cell lines C'AL27, HT29 and SW2, and the Ep-C'AM-negative cell line COL0320 were treated i.v. every second day with either S ltg 4DSM()CB-ETA for a total of 9 applications (total dose 4S ltg), or with l0 lug every second day for a total of a applications (total dose 30 pg) in a volume of l00 pl PBS. Tumor xenografts from untreated mice were used as control Tumor size was calculated by measurement of the shortest and longest perpendicular diameter using digital calipers according to the formula (short diameter)' x (long diameter) x 0.s, lmmunotoxin REFERENCES
1. Gottesman, M. M. and Pastan, I. Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multidrug transporter Annu. Rev. Biochem., 62: 385-427, 1993.
The present invention relates to the field of cancer therapy and particularly to targeted therapy using immunotoxms.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The lack of significant advances in the treatment of metastatic or refractory cancers has stimulated the design of novel approaches to targeted cancer therapy such as the use of antibody~~
based cancer therapeutics Despite favorable initial responses, most advanced solid tumors develop resistance to standard treatments and relapse as incurable metastatic diseases ( 1 ). Since increasing the dose of conventional anticancer agents results in unacceptable side effects, the design of novel therapies based on the use of tumor selective targeting ligands and effector domains employing different mechanisms of action is of great rmportance. Antibodres targeting tumor-associated antigens and equipped with intrinsic cytotoxic or rmmunostimulatory effector functions have shown promising antitumor activity in preclinical and clinical studies (2-4).
Because of their different mechanism of action and especially because of their built-in targeting function that conventional anti-cancer agents do not have, immunotoxins may add new options for the treatment of malignancies resistant to conventional treatments (26,28). ETA and its homologues irreversibly block protein synthesis in cells by ADP-ribosylating a posttranslationally modified histidine residue of elongation factor 2, called diphthamide, which ultimately triggers apoptosis (48). Although resistance of°cells to ET'A was described as a consequence of the mutation of the crucial histidine residue or loss of enzyme activity required for diphthamide synthesis (49,5(1), this is a rather uncommon event and has not been confirmed in other cell systems. Nevertheless, the loss of the tumor antigen used for uptake of the antibody-toxin tizsion protein by the tumor cell is another conceivable mechanism of resistance.
An immunotoxin is a chimeric protein in which a toxin moiety is chemically or genetically linked to a monoclonal or recombinant antibody Antibodies with speciticities for various tumor-associated antigens have been investigated as carriers of"toxins, and the majority of those that target solid tumors have employed the effector function ot'truncated ET'A
(.ETA) which lacks the cell binding domain I (aa 1-252) (20), F.T A irreversibly inhibits protein synthesis by ADP-ribosylation caf elongation factor 2 and therefore has to gain access to its intracellular target in tire Immunotoxin cytoplasm (20,21 ). Thus, the most promising antigens for immunotoxin therapy are those that are efficiently internalized into tumor cells upon antibody binding by receptor-mediated endocytosis (22-25 ).
A number of chemical and recombinant immunotoxins that employ either plant or bacterial toxins as eff'eetor domains and that target distinct cell surface antigens associated with tumor cells have been shown to be potent and selective anti-cancer agents in preclinical studies (28). However, only few of them proved to be promising candidates for clinical use.
Several immunotoxins, either as chemically~linked first generation or recombinant second generation formats, have been tested in animal models and in patients with advanced solid tumors (20,26). Although early clinical data using imrnunotoxrn therapy for refractory tumors remains promising, the induction of neutralizing antibodies and dose-limiting side effects associated with VL,S or liver toxicity still remain obstacles to effective therapy (27-29). To overcome these limitations, more promising tumor-associated antigens have to be validated as targets for nc:w irnmunotoxin generations which are equipped with rationally engineered effector functions (2,30,31 ).
Mayor responses have been reported so far only for leukemias. In phase I
studies using LMI3-2, an FTA based scFv immunotoxin which targets lL-2 receptor p-chain, responses have been observed treating hematologic malignancies (51,52). Moreover, two thirds of the patients with refractory hairy-cell leukemia involved in a phase I study showed complete remission after treatment with 81.22, a recombinant F.'fA-based dsFv immunotoxin specific for the CD22 surface antigen (53)0 Both immunotoxins showed minor or reversible toxic side effects and thus merited to be involved in phase I studies for which currently a 'larger number of patients are being recruited.
T wo recombinant F;TA-based dsfv immunotoxins are also currently being evaluated for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. The immunotoxin SSI(dsFv)-PE3R is directed against cells expressing mesothelin, a protein normally produced by mesothelial cells and expressed also on malignant mesotheliomas and ovarian carcinomas (54). The immunotoxin LMB-9 has been derived from the monoclonal antibody B3 that targets the LewisY antigen (55), which is also widely expressed in epithelial tissues, a fact that contributes to safety concerns. LMB-9 and SS I (dsfv)-PE3R are currently being tested in phase 1 clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors and first results are eagerly awaited. In a previous study with 3H patients suffering from advanced carcinomas the chemical conjugate of~monoclonal antibody B3 and ETA induced one complete and one partial response (S6). In these studies vascular leakage due to capillary lmmunotoxin 4 damage was found to be dose-limiting, and subserauent preclinical investigations revealed significant binding of the B3 antibody to LewisY expressed on endothelial cells (57).
In addition to HER-2/neu (25), Ep-CAM represents another more promising target for antibody-based therapy of solid tumors due to its abundant expression in many carcinomas and its limited distribution in normal epithelial tissues (5). Although, Ep-C.AM expression is not exclusively restricted to tumor cells, Riethmuller and co-workers found that application of the anti-Ep-CAM
monoclonal antibody 17-1 A in patients with resected colorectal carcinoma or minimal residual disease reduced the overall mortality by 32%, decreased the recurrence rate by 23% (1), and reduced the number of distant metastases (8).
Ep-CAM t is a 40 kDa transmembrane protein overexpressed in many solid tumors including carcinomas of the lung, breast, ovary, colorectum and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (5). The limited expression of Ep-c"AM in normal epithelial tissues (5,6) makes this antigen an attractive target for cellular and antibody-based immunotherapy (7-9).
Recently, a transgenic mouse model mimicking the Ep-(:SAM expression pattern in humans further validated the suitability of this target for imrnunotherapy by showing no localization of the monoclonal antibody MfW'31 in Ep-CAM-positive ruormal tissues ( 10).
The role of Ep-('AM in carcinogenesis and malignant progression is still unclear, but there is increasing evidence that it modulates cell-cell interactions ( 1 1 ) and that its expression correlates with the rate of cell proliferation ( 12) In addition, a promoting role of Ep-CAM in tissue invasion and metastasis has been suggested ( 13), and a strong correlation between Ep-CAM expression and tumor progression has been found in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck'. Ep-C.'AM-specific antibodies have been used in imaging studies to detect primary tumors and localize distant. metastases in patients mth SCL,C (14) and NS("LC (15), to trigger antitumor immune responses ( 16), and to deliver cytotoxic effector molecules to tumors in preclinical models ( 17,18) and in patients ( 19).
~ The abbreviations used are: Ep-C'AM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule;
S('LC, ,mall cell lung cancer; NSC'L.C, non small cell lung cancer; ETA, P.ceudvmona.v aemn,s;lnacu exotoxin A; VL..S, vascular lean syndrome; seFv, single chain antibody fragment: dsFv, disulfide-stabilized ,ingle-chain antibody fragment;
FBS, fetal bovine serum; IMA(', innnobilized ion-metal affinity chromatography.; PAGE, polyacryiamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; MT'f, i-14,5-dimethylthiazol-?-yl]-?,5-etiphenyltetrazolium bromide;
F1TC' fluorescein isothiocyanate, MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; E(.iF, epithelial growth factor AI.T, alanme aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor D. Tschudi, unpubLshed observation.
lmmunotoxin Although in a previous study we reported the ability of the chemically conjugated immunotoxin lYIO('31-ET'A to eradicate small tumor xenografts in mice as well as its failure to delay the growth of larger tumors ( 18), we concluded that, due to its relatively large size of 200 kDa, the immunotoxin was unable to homogeneously distribute wrthin the tumor mass and thus could only affect an insufficiently small proportion of clonogenic tumor cells. Support for this hypothesis is promded by others who reported an inverse correlation between immunotoxin size and efficacy (32j. The tumor targeting and tissue distribution properties of ammunotoxins can be substantially improved by using small scFv as targeting ligands (22,2ni,25,3:3-37). We have recently described the enhanced tumor localization of scFv 4DSM0('.B, which was derived by grafting the hypervariable loops of monoclonal antibody MO('3 l onto the humanized framework of'the anti-HF:R-2ineu scl~'v 4DS and by additionally changing eight critical care residues to obtain a high molecule stability (3H). We have now teound that the development ofa fully recombinant Ep-t."AM-specific single-chain immunotoxin based on 4DSMOCB, can be employed to achieve favorable tumor localization and potent antitumor activity against carcinomas of diverse histologrcal ongins in vivo.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is predicated on the finding that 4DSMO CB-ETA exerts significant growth inhibition upon systemic administration to mice bearing large established tumor xenografts ( 160 mm;' from colorectal, small cell lung or squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The present invention reports on two dose schedules that were well-tolerated and proved to be very effective in inhibiting tumor growth. The three-week treatments with a total dose of 45 trg eradicated a significant fraction of°the tumors, and some mrce remained tumor-free during the whole study. However, in contrast, after completion of the shorter one week treatment with a total dose of 30 lrg 4DSMOCB-ETA, HT29 tr.unors rapidly resumed their growth.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Thz present invention is illustrated but not limited by the attached drawings of which:
Frgure l A is a schematic representation of the scFv-toxin fusion protein precursor, which includes the ompA signal sequence for periplasmic expression. 'The scFv antibody fragment ~4D~M()(~B is fused to the Pseudomonas exotoxin A (ET'A;52_~os) by the linker shown. The protern is tlanked by two hexahiscidine tags, the C.'-terminal of' which precedes the ER retention signal 1CDEL.
lmmunotoxin 6 Figure ( B is a three-dimensional model of the mature 4DSMOCB-ETA., The structure of the scFv (VL in red, VH in orange), of ET'A;52..~r,x (domain II in light-blue, domain Ib in green and domain III in violet) and of the linking peptide (green) are shown. Both hexahistidine tags are indicated in yellow.
Figure 1 (.' is a copy of a chromatogram. 'Total extract of SB536 bacterial culture samples before (-) and after (+) IPTG induction and 10 p,g of 4DSMOCB-ETA immunotoxin purified by Ni2+-IDA and anion exchange affinity chromatography columns coupled in series, were analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions Figure I D shows the immunotoxm proteins present in the same samples as visualized on a Western blot using a HRP-conjugated anti-tetrahistidine antibody. Markers are shown in lane M:
myosin ( M~ 20H,000), w-galactosidase (Mr 1 19,000), bovine serum albumin (M,.
94,000), ovalbumm (Mr 51,100), carbonic anhydrase (Mr 35,400) and soyabean trypsin inhibitor (M~
2H,so0) Figure 2 shows the chromatograms before (0 h) and after 2 h, 4 h, H h, 10 h and 20 h incubation were recc'~rded at 2H0 nm. The monomers eluted at approximately l.4 ml as verified by calibration with the molecular weight standards alcohol dehydrogenase (A, M~ I 50,000), bovine serum albumin (B, M, H6,000) and carbonic anhydrase (C', M,29,000). which eluted at 1.31 ml, 1.38 ml and 1.54 ml, respectively (retentiun volumes shown by arrows). The stability of 4D5MOCB-ETA was assessed by size exclusion chromatography. 'The immunotoxin was incubated at a concentration of 200 ugiml at 37"C: in PBS and samples were analysed by gel filtration at different time points for comparison.
Figure 3 is a graphic depiction of cell growth measured in MTT assays as described in the "Material anc~ Methods" section. Data represent mean values of at least six independent determinations each carried out in quadruplicates (overall SD<5'%). Four Ep-(:AM-positive tumor cell lines were incubated for 72 h with 4DSMO('B-ETA at concentrations ranging from 0.0001 to 100 pM.
Figure 4 is a graphic representation of impairment of liver function upon treatment with 4DSMOC'B-ETA. C'S7BL/6 mice were treated every other day with escalating doses of 4D5MOC'B-ETA Two groups received 5 pg (?50 pg.kg-l ) or 10 pg (500 pg.kg-1 ) doses for three cycles, while another group was treated twice with 20 yg ( 1000 ltg.kg-1 ).
Twenty-four hours after Immunotoxin the last challenge the activities of plasma transaminases were determined and compared to mice treated with PBS (0 pg.kg-1 ). The transaminase activities of mice treated with a single lethal dose of wild-type E'TA- (85 pg.kg-1), as described by Schumann et al. (47)., are also shown. Data are expressed as the mean t SD (n = 3).
Figure 5 is a graphic representation of tumor growth illustrating the antitumor effect of ~DSMOCB-ETA in mice. Athymic mice bearing large tumor xenograf'ts ( 160 mm; in average) derived from the Ep-CAM-positive cell lines HT29, SW2 and (.'AC.27 remained untreated ( ? -) or were treated by i.v. injections every second day with either nine doses of 5 pg 4DSMOCB-ETA each for three weeks (-; -), or with three doses of 10 tig each (-'? -).
In a control experiment, mice bearing Ep-CAM-negative (.'OLO320 xenografts were also treated with 4DSMOCB-E.TA
according to the dose schedules mentioned above. 'The tumor size is given relative to the initial median tumor size of 160 mm3 at the start of treatment and data represent the mean values pSD
of'the various groups (n - 7).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The immunotoxin 4DSMOC:B-ETA was developed by fusing the highly stable humanized scFv 4DSMO('B (38) to a truncated form of hTA comprising amino acids 2.52-608 and the C-terminal eukaryotic ER retention sequence KDEI.. The 4DSMOCB-ETA is extremely potent in the femtomolar range and potently inhibits the growth of°carcinoma cells of diverse histological origins in a highly antigen-specific manner as demonstrated by an increase in the cytotoxic potency by more than four orders of magnitude, compared to antigen-negative cells. Moreover, the antigen-specific action of 4DSMOCE~-ETA was further corroborated in competition assays using an excess of scFv 4D5M0('B. Similar to the findings reported from immunotoxins targeting other tumor-associated antigens including HER-2/neu and E(iF
receptor (25,59), the cytotoxic activity of 4D5M0(:B-f=TA did not correlate with the amount of target antigen expressed on the tumor cell surface. Thus, it is likely that other cell type-specific parameters, such as rate of internalization, intracellular trafficking and fate of the enzyme domain are further determinants of immunotoxin efficacy. In terms of its in vitro cytotoxicity 4DSMOCB-ETA is the most potent Ep-C'AM specific iinmunotoxin that has been reported in the literature and was 1000-fold more potent than the chemical immunotoxin conjugate MOC'31-E:TA ( 18).
~, prerequisite for the optimal binding of antibody-based therapeutics to target antigens expressed an the surface of tumor cells and for efficient tumor localization is protein stability under physiological conditions. The extremely potent cytotoxicity shown by 4D5MOCB-ETA may at lmmunotoxin least partly be due to the stability of the targeting scF'v (38). The immunotoxin itself was obtained to more than 90% from the soluble fraction of°ter bacterial lysis, was monomeric and could be expressed and purified with a yield of approximately 0.5 mg per liter bacterial culture from simple shake flasks. These are excellent prospects for scale-up by high cell density fermentation (60). The high stability of the immunotoxin was confirmed by the large proportion of molecules that eluted in monomeric form after 20 h incubation at 37°C in PBS, a result that was also obtained by incubating the radioactive-labeled immunotoxin in serum. Addition of protease inhibitors prolonged the stability for more than 48 h, indicating that protein degradation was not due to intrinsic molecule instability, but rather was a side effect occurring during purification.
The addition of ETA and a second hexahistidine tag at the N-terminal end of the scFv did not interfere with the binding properties of this ligand.
In viva, the systemically administered 4DSMOCB-ETA was cleared from the blood with slightly slower kinetics when compared to the sc:Fv, probably as a consequence of its increased molecular size. The blood clearance rate inversely correlated with the amount of'radioactivity in the kidney which was lower for the immunotoxin than for the scFv (ID/g tissue 22.79% vs.
300%).
Although all doses of immunotoxin were well-tolerated and mice did not show any signs o.f illness such as weight loss, the accumulation of 4I)5M0C'B-ETA in liver, spleen and bone raised the issue of potential toxicity to these tissues. The inhibitory effect of ETA
on protein synthesis is known t<> induce severe hepatotoxicity by sensitizing hepatocytes to the action of TNF, which is released by Kupffer cells upon E'fA mediated T cell stimulation and induces liver cell necrosis (46,47 ). 'To assess the degree of liver damage upon 4DSMOCB-ETA treatment, immunocompetent mice received repeated doses of 5 pg (250 p,g.kg-I ) or 10 pg (500 pg.kg-1 ) immunotoxin every other day for three cycles. In both cases, the level of AC,TiAST activity in the plasma of~ treated mice did not change significantly compared to untreated controls. First signs of impaired liver function only appeared after treatment with a 20 pg ( 1 mg.kg-1 ) dose given twice every other day (7.5-fold increase over control). In line with these findings, histological analysis of liver specimens did not reveal any signs of E'TA-induced pathological changes, except for the two 20 pg treatments, which induced moderate hepatocyte necrosis. A recent report has shown that E'T'A-induced hepatotoxicity and VLS can be circumvented and enlarge the therapeutic window by pre-treatment with anti-inflammatory agents, such as indomethacin or soluble TNF
receptor and non-steroidal drugs, respectively (27,29). 'The lack of correlation between organ specific accumulation and toxicity of thc: tmmunotoxin strongly suggests that the radioactivity in these highly perfused organs simply reflects the presence o1'non-cell bound and noninternalized ~mmunotoxin in the large blood pool and capillary network. On the other hand, it is unclear tmmunotoxin 9 whether in specialized phagocytes such as Kupffer cells of the liver, internalized proteins <;an escape into the cytoplasm, e.g. to interact with the elongation factor-2, or are rapidly directed to lysosomal degradation (61). In addition, it remains to be determined whether hexahistidine tags can affect the biodistribution behaviour of recombinant proteins in viva. In the kidney the level of radioactivity is always higher with metal-labeled than with iodinated proteins which are prone to dehalogenation (6~,). Therefore, metal-labeled proteins probably more accurately reflect the real picture of in viva biodistribution (63).
(,onstruction and purification of 4DSM(.)(."B-ETA
To make the Ep-CAM-specific scFv 4DSMOCB into an immunotoxin, this scFv antibody was fused to a truncated ETA (ETAZsz_~,>H) by means of a ~0 amino acid long peptide linker (Figure 1 A). The C-terminal original ER retention sequence REDLK of wild-type ETA (aa 609-613) was replaced by the mammalian counterpart KDEL which increases the cytotoxic potency of the toxin m tumor cells (38, 45). Furthermore, we added a second hexahistidine sequence at the N-terminus of 4DSM()('B to increase the efficiency of purification by Ni2+-1DA affinity chromatography (Figure l A) The final construct encoded a protein of 64R amino acids with a theoretical isoelectric point of 5.9. figure lB show; a computer model of the mature 4DSM0C.'B-ETA
immunotoxin molecule.
During 1P'f(~ induction, more than 90% of the total immunotoxin detected by Western blot was found in the periplasmic soluble fraction of E. coli and was released upon cell fractionation. The Bnal product yield was 0.5 mg of a 95°/.. pure immunotoxin preparation per liter bacterial culture in standard shake t7asks. The product mtgrated at the expected size of approximately 70 kDa on SDS-PAGE (Figure 1C) and the theoretical M~ of 69,737 Da was verified by mass spectrometry.
I'he absence oi' proteolytic degradation was conftrmed by Western blot analysis (Figure l D).
lmmunoreactivity and stability of 4DSMOCB-ETA
Thermal stability and resistance to protease degradation of an nnmunotoxin is of paramount importance for its tumor targeting properties, and thus for therapeutic efficacy. To investigate the stability of 4DSMOC:B-E'TA, the fusion protein was incubated in PBS for different time periods at 37°(.' and the rate of degradation was analyzed by gel filtration essentially as described (38). As shown in Figure 2, upon a 4 h incubation at 37°C, 91°i~ of the immunotoxin molecules still eluted as monomers at the retention volume of 1.4 ml, corresponding to a M~ of approximately 66 kDa.
The amount of 4DSMOC B-ETA only slowly decreased with time and approximately 47% of the Immunotoxin 10 initial protein still eluted in monomeric form after 20 h at 37°C.
Similar results were obtained upon incubation of ''''"'Tc-labeled 4DSMOCB-ETA in human serum, further corroborating the suitability of the immunotoxin for in vivo application.
To assess the effect of the additional N-terminal hexahistidine tag on the antigen binding affinity., we determined the amount of immunoreactive immunotoxin in a binding assay as described (43).
Upon a 1 h incubation at 37°C, the y''"'TC-triearbonyl quantitatively bound to the histidine t;~gs of the immunotoxin. As determined in cell binding assays, g0-90% of the immunotoxin retained its binding activity for Ep-(."AM after the labeling procedure. The K" of the immunotoxin to Ep-C.'AM expressed on SW2 cells was determined to be 4 nM, which was essentially the same as observed for the scFv 4DSMOCB assessed in a similar test system (3H). The low level of immunotoxin degradation could he completely prevented by the addition of protease inhibitors even after a 48 h incubation at 37°C in PBS (data not shown). Thus, the immunotoxin 4DSM0<.'B-ETA retained all the favorable biophysical properties of the parental scFv.
Ep-CAM expression on tumor cell lines Ep-CAM is overexpressed in many solid tumors of diverse histological origins (5). As shown in Table t, the highest level of Ep-C'AM was expressed on HT29 cells (MFI 696.1 ), followed by MC'F7 (MFi 419.5), CAL27 (MF1 415.3) and SW2 cells (MFI 372.4). The cell tines RL and COLO320 cells did not express Ep-CAM and were used as antigen-negative controls.
Tumor cell line Tissue of origin Staining Controlb MFI"
Tumor cell line Tissue of' origin Staining Control' SW2 lung 372.4 t 4.0 3.4 ~ 0.5 HT29 colon 696.1 t 1 1.4 5.4 f 0.4 C AL27 tongue 415.3 t 4.8 5.6 t 0.3 MCF7 breast 419.5 ~ 1.1 4.5 t 0.6 RL B lymphoblast 4.2 t 0.2 4.0 t 0.2 COL0320 colon 5.5 t 0.1 5.1 t 0.1 " The values are expressed as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI t SD) of three independent FAC S analyses of tumor cell lines stained with the Ep-CAM-specific antibody KS 1 ~4.
~' lJnspecitic staining was assessed by incubation of cells with the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody alone.
Immunotoxin 1 1 C.'ytotoxicity of 4DSMOCB-ETA against tumor cells in vitro To determine the ability of 4DSMOCBI?TA to specifically inhibit the growth of Ep-CAM-positive tumor cells, MTT assays were performed. The immunotoxm was specifically cytotoxic against Ep-CAM-positive cell lines and did not affect the growth of'the Ep-(:AM-negative cells RL and C OLO320 in the broad range of concentrations tested (Figure 3). SW2, CAL2'7 and MCF7 cells were found to be equally sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of 4D5MOGB-ETA and their proliferation was inhibited with an IC50 of only 0.00 pM. Despite the highest level of Ep-CAM expression (Table 1 ), HT29 cells were found to be the least sensitive (IC50 of 0.2 pM). In the range of concentrations tested, the cyt.otoxicity of the immunotoxin was completely blocked by an excess of scFv 4DSMOC.B (data not shown)..
As determined in [3H]leucine incorporation assays (data not shown), treatment of SW2 cells with 4DSMOCB-ETA inhibited protein synthesis with an IC50 of 0.01 pM, and this effect showed the same doseresponse relationship as measured in the cell viability assays described above. Protein synthesis was not inhibited in the antigen-negative control cell line RL.
Tumor localization of 4DSMOCB-ETA in mice (n order to spare normal tissues from cytotoxic damage and employ the full cytotoxic potential of 4DSMO('B-ET'A demonstrated ire vitro for targeted cancer therapy, the selective and preferential localization of the immunotoxin to Ep-(."AM-positive tumors is a prerequisite.
We assessed the tumor localization properties of 4DSMOC'B-ETA in a biodistr~bution experiment in mice bearing established Ep-CAM-positive SW2 and Ep-C'AM-negative COLO320 xenografts at the contralateral flanks As shown in Table ?, the maximum dose of radiolabeled 4DSMOCB-E,TA
detected in SW2 tumors was 2.93'% ID/g after 4 h, which then gradually decreased to 1.95°~o ID/g after 24 h. After 48 h radioactivity was still 1.13°/> ID~g tumor tissue. In COL,O320 control tumors 4DSM0(~B-ETA localized with a maximum dose of 1.65% ID/g after 30 min, which then rapidly declined to 1.06% II)ig after 4 h and showed only background levels after 48 h. As expected from its larger size, 4DSMOCB-FT'A showed a slower blood clearance than the parental scFv 4DSMOCB (data shown in Table 2 for comparison).. After 24 h the total dose of 4DSM()CB-ETAin the blood was 0.42°r« ID~g, which was l.~-fold more than measured for the scFv (0.28% ID/g). Moreover, localization of the immunotoxin in SW2 tumors was also delayed compared to the scF'v, and the distribution of 4DSMOCB-ETA revealed a tumor:blood ratio of 5.38 after 48 h, which was comparable tc~ the ratio obtained with the scFv after 24 h.
Immunotoxin I 2 At each time point 4DSMOCB-ETA preferentially accumulated in Ep-CAM-positive tumors compared to COLO320 control tumor with a SW2:COL0320 ratio varying between 1.28 and 2.95. This indicates that. 4DSMOCB-ET'A was retained in Ep-CAM-positive tumors by specitic antibody-antigen interactions and cellular uptake, and suggests that its marginal accumulation in COLO320 control tumors may be do to the increase in vascular permeability often found in tumors. Analysis of normal tissues revealed that 4DSMOCB-ETA
localized also in the kidney, spleen, liver and to a lower extent in the bone tissue of the femur.
Biodistribution of f''~~"TcJ-labeled 41)SMOC'B-ETA in micc3 bearing SW2 and COL0320 tumor xenografts immunotoxin scFv ' 1l.) 30 min 1 h 4 h 16 h 24 h 48 h 24 h min (~~-;) (n=3) (n-:..3)(n=-3) (n3) (n:r-3) (n=3) (n=3) ~issw ~uID/g<'iolD/g %ID/g oID/g %IDlg ~olD/g %ID/g %ID/g Blood 27.21 17.46 10.08 2.23 f 0.57 0.42 0.21 f 0.28 f 4.26 t 3.28 t 2.89 0.:32 f (1.14 t 0.04 0.02 t 0.06 Heart 10.84 6.69 6.20 2.23 f 1.14 0.64 0.52 t 0.28 t 1.96 f 3.88 +. 1.10 0. I f 0.04 t 0.47 0 05 t 0.09 Lung t 1.56 8.38 6.21 2.59 f 1.25 0.97 0.77 t i..14 f 1.66 t ) r 0.71 0.26 f 0.13 ~ 0.12 0.22 t 0.60 Spleen 735 f 12.17 I 1.64 7.70 f 8.81 6.24 4.07 f 0.70 1.50 f 1.70 t 1.74 5.65 ~ 1.26 t 0.68 1.69 f 0.13 Kidney 22.49 32.68 33.50 42.54 32.98 22.79 16.54 300.(1 f: 8.28 f. 1.49 t 2.32 f 6.(11 .t 1.14 f 1.76 f 0.39 t 85 Stomach 0.92 1.2 3 2.72 0.85 r I .15 0.63 0.45 t 0.24 f ().30 f ().40 + I 0. I ~ ().69 ~ 0.09 0.09 f_ .3 3 3 0.24 Intestine 1.78 2. I 2.31 2.30 t 1.21 0.90 0.58 t 0.30 ~ (1.52 9 t i: 0.5'21.09 t f).22 t 0.09 0.06 ~ 0.07 (1.05 Liver I 5.47 20.44 I 9.97 20.2() 16.28 ( 3.70 8.44 f 2.38 t 3.24 f 0.70 t 3.77 f 1.26 t 2.51 f 1.83 0.49 t 0.52 Muscle 0.63 0.8() 0.57 0.58 ~ 0.37 0.26 0.16 f 0.10 t 1).14 ~ (1.15 i 0.07 0.19 ~ f1,()3~ 0.05 0.02 t 0.02 Bone (femur) 3.91 6.24 3.96 3.76 t 3.(15 2.85 I .08 0.06 f 0.97 t (1.96 .z 0.23 0.43 ~ ().37 t 0.49 ~ 0.20 t (').05 COL0320 tumor0.79 I .65 1.26 I .19 1.06 0.66 0 55 f ND
t 0.10 f (1.33 t: 0. t. 0.05 ~- 0.20 f 0.03 0.14 SW2 tumor 1.01 2.45 2.45 2.93 t 2.26 I .95 I 13 t 1.47 t 0.22 t 0.3:3 -r. 0.80 ~ 0.53 t 0.37 0.08 t 0.32 0.47 Ratios COL0321) tumor/blood(1.03 0. l0 0.13 0.48 2.09 1.57 2 61 ND
SW2 tumor/blood(1.04 0.14 0.24 1.31 3.97 4.(i4 5-38 5.25 SW2 tumor/COL.03201.28 1.48 1.94 2.76 1.9(l 2.95 2 05 ND
tumor " Biodistribution of9g"'Tc-labeled 4DSMOCB-ETA immunotoxin was determined following i.v injection in mice bearing SW2 and COL0320 tumor xenografts at contralateral site. Data represent the percentages of injected dose (ID t SD) per gram tissue. ND, not determined.
'' Ratios presented were calculated from averages of tumor: blood or tumoraumor ratios of Individual mice.
Taken from Willuda et al~ ( 1999) for comparison.
~mmunotoxin I :i Toxicity of 4DSMOCB-ETA in mice 'The unexpected high localization of radioactivity in liver., spleen and bone raised the issue of potential toxicity to these tissues under immunotoxin therapy. To assess the toxicity of escalating doses of 4DSMOCB-ETA, C57BL/6 mice were used as immunocompetent hosts which, in contrast to athymic mice, are more sensitive to wild-type E'TA-mediated liver damage (46,47).
Interestingly, the determination of ALT AST levels in the plasma of C57Bt./6 mice 24 h after treatment with three cycles of either 5 lig or i 0 pg immunotoxin given every other day, did not reveal immunotoxin mediated impairment of liver function (Figure 4). Elevated transaminase activity was only observed upon administration of two 20 pg doses of immunotoxin which equaled the activity measured in control mice upon administration of a toxic dose of wild-type ETA (46). In line with these results, few sites with necroriC hepatocytes were only found upon treatment with the highest immunotoxin dose. At all doses tested, analysis of the spleen and the cellular components of whole blood samples did not show any signs of histopathological changes or myelosuppression, respectively (data not shown). Thus, the accumulation of radioactivity in liver, spleen and bone does not reflect the amount of cell-bound or internalized immunotoxin in khese tissues Antitumor activity of 4DSMOCB-ETA
An essential requirement for the clinical use of anti-cancer agents is a significant antitumor activity demonstrated in animal models of human tumor xenografts. To investigate whether the potent in vitro cytotoxicity and the favorable tumor localization properties of 4DSMOCB-E:TA
translate into antitumor activity, mice bearing large established SW2, HT29 or CAL27 tumor xenogralts were treated by i.v. injection of the immunotoxin with two different dose schedules: (i) 45 pg total, with .5 p.g given every second day for B weeks, (ii) ~i0 pg total, with 10 lig given every second day for I week. Mice bearing Ep--CAM-negative ('O'L.O320 tumor xenogratts were used as controls. All treatment doses were well tolerated and mice did not show any signs of toxicity such as weight loss or impaired liver function (Figure 4).
As depicted in Figure 5, a significant inhibition of the growth of all Ep-CAM-positive tumors was achieved by treating mice with either the 5 p.g or the 10 wg dose schedule.
Treatment of mice bearing SW2 xenografts resulted m a shrinkage of the tumor volume to maximal 20% of' the initial size and a slight resumption of growth to a final 2.6-fold size increase at the end of the monitored period. A similar effect was achieved upon treatment of ('AL27 tumors, which were reduced to maximal 60% of the initial volume. Fifty days after start ot'treatment the median tmmunotoxin 14 tumor volume did not exceed 1.4-fold the initial size. 'Two mice out of 7 treated with the S pg dose showed complete tumor regression and remained tumor free. Neither CAL27 nor SW2 tumors showed a significant difference Gn their tumor response to the two treatment schedules.
For HT29 tumors strong growth inhibition was achieved with the 5 pg dose given for 3 weeks when sizes decreased to 0.7-fold of the initial volume. As already observed for CAL27 tumors, ~
out of 7 mice showed complete regression of their HT29 tumors. Unexpectedly, the efficacy of the 10 ltg schedule was comparatively luwer, indicating that for these tumors a long-term treatment is more effective. No antitumor effect ot'4DSMOCB-ETA was seen in mice bearing Ep-CAM-negative COLO320 control tumors (Figure 5).
Tumor cell lines The colorectal carcinoma cell lines HT29 (HTB-38), COL0320 (CL-220), the breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF7 (HTB-22) and the non-Hodgkin"s lymphoma cell line RL (CRL,-2261 ) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). The squamc.~us cell carcinoma cell line' of the tongue CAL27 was kindly provided by Dr. S. D. Bernal., Dana-farber C.."ancer Institute, Boston, MA The small cell lung carcinoma cell line SW2 was raised in our laboratory. Except for C'Af.27, which was maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Life 'Technologies, Grand Island, NY), cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 (Life Technologies Inc., Grand Island, NY). Both media were supplemented with 10%
FBS (Hyclone, Europe Ltd. ), 2 mM L-glutamine., 50 IU~ ml penicillin and 50 pg/ml streptomycin. Cell cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5°~~ C02.
Construction of the 4DSMOCB-ETA expression vector 'The sequence encoding a truncated form of ETA ('E'TA~s~.~,"H) was amplified by PCR from plasmid pSW200 (25) and cloned as an 1 164 by EcoRI-Hinc~III fragment downstream of the Ep-C.'AM-binding 4DSMOC'B scFv sequence present in the pIG6-based (39) 4I)SMOCB
scFv expression vector (38) The primers (Tox 1 ~
('TCGGAATT('GOTG(~(.'GCGGCGGAGTTCCCG
AAACCGTC'C: ACC'C.'CCJCC GGGTTCTTC: TGGT'TTA; Tox2: GTC'AAGCTTC.'TAC.'AGTTCGT
CTTTATGGTGATGCiTGGTGATCiCG(.'C"GGTT'TC('C'CK,GC"TG) introduced an EcoRI
lmmunotoxin ] 5 restriction site between scFv and toxin and a C-terminal hexahistidine tag followed by the endoplasmic reticulum ( ER) retention signal KDEL, a stop colon and a HindIII
restriction site.
To improve purity and yield during IMAC, a second hexahistidine tag was added at the N-terminus between the periplasmic signal sequence and the 4D5MOC'B coding region. To this end, two pairs of oligonucleotides (Xbal 5': ('TAGATAACG.AGGC~CAAAAAATGAAAAAGACAG
C'TA'TCGCGA'TTGCAGTGGCACTGGC'TGGTTTCGCTACCGT: Xbal 3': GCCACTGC'AAT
CGCGATAG("TGTCTTTTTCATTTT TTGCCCTCGT'fA'T; and EcoRV 5': AGCGCAG(~CCG
AC.CACCATC ATCACCATCA("CAT; ~;coRV 3': 'T("GTGATGGTGATGATGGTGGTCGGCC.
TGCGC".TACGGTAGCGAAACCAGCCAGT) were heated to 80°(', allowed to anneal by gradually cooling to room temperature and then ligated between the Xbal and EcoRV sites of pIG6-4DSM0('BETAH6KDEL. The sequence was experimentally confirmed.
F',XAMPLE 3 Expression and purification of 4D5MO('B-ETA
F'or periplasmic; expression of 4D5MOC'B-ETA the vector pIG6 was used, which places the gene under lac promoter control in SB536, an ~'. coli strain devoid of the periplasmic proteases HhoA
and HhoB (40). Five ml 2YT medium containing ampicillin (100 pgiml) were inoculated with a single bacterial colony containing the 41)SMOCB-E'TA expression plasmid and grown overnight at 25°C. The bacteria were diluted in one liter of 2YT' medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose and ampicillin ( 100 pg/ml) to reach an fi5s~, nm between 0~ 1 and 0.2 and transferred to 3-liter baffled shake flasks. The culture was further grown at 25°(' to an A~5"
nm of 0.5 and immunotoxin production was induced for 4 h by adding a final Concentration of 1 mM isopropyl-p-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, Sigma). The harvested pellet derived from a bacterial culture with a 6na1 ,A55~ nm of 6 was stored at -80°(' For purification, the pellet obtained from a one liter culture was resuspended in 25 ml lysis buffer, containing SO mM Tris-HC1 (pH
7.5), 300 mM
NaCI, 2 mM MgSO4 and supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and DNase I. The bacterial suspension was lysed with two cycles m a French Pressure Cell press (SL.S Instruments, Urbana, IL), centrifuged at 48'000 g in a SS-:34 rotor for 30 min at 4°C" and subsequently filter-sterilized (0.22 pin). The immunotoxxn present in the cleared supernatant was pin°i~ed by chromatography using a BIOCAD-System (Perceptive BioSystems) with a NiZ+-iminodiacetic (IDA) column and a HQ/M-anion-exch;~nge column coupled in-line as described (41 ). Before the lysate was loaded, the Niz+-IDA column was equilibrated with 20 mM Tras (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaC:I_ After loading, the column was washed three times with different salt solutions, all buffered with 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), in the lmmunotoxin t 6 order 300 mM, 510 mM and 90 mM NaC'1. Subsequently, the column was washed with 20 mM
Tris (pH 7.5), l0 mM imidazole, 90 mM NaCI, before the bound immunotoxin was eluted with the same solution containing 200 mM imidazole (pH 7.5). 'The eluate was directly loaded onto the HQ/M-anion-exchange column and the bound immunotoxin was eluted with a salt gradient of 90a 1000 mM NaCI, buffered with 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5). The fractions containing were collected and concentrated using a 10 kDa cutoff filter by centrifugation at 2000 g and 4°C
(Ultrafree-MC low protein binding, Millipore). The quality of purified 4DSMOCB-ETA was analyzed by a l0% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and Western blotting using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-tetrahistidine antibody (QIAGEN, Elilden, Germany) diluted 1:5000 according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Analytical gel tiltration and determination of thermal stability Ten micrograms of purified 4DSMOCB-EVTA were diluted in 50 pl PBS pH 7.4 containing 0.005°~o T'ween-20 and subsequently incubated at 37°C. Samples were analyzed at different time points (after 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 10 h and 20 h) by gel Eltration using the Smart system (Pharmaczaj Uppsala) with a Superose-12 PC3.2!30 column. The column was calibrated in the same buffer with three protein standards: alcohol dehydrogenase (M~ 150,000), bovine serum albumin ( M, 66,000) and carbonic anhydrase (M,-29,000). 'The same analytical setting was used to assess the thermal stability of the '''''"Tc-labeled immunotoxin after a 20 h incubation at 37°C in human serum. The amount of immunotoxin monomers was determined by ~-scintillation counting of the eluted fractions.
EXAMPL.,E S
Radiolabeling and determination of antigen binding affinity 4DSMOCB-ETA was radioactively labeled by stable site-specific coordination of ''~"'Tc-tricarbonyl trihydrate to the hexahistidine tags present in the protein sequence (42); This spontaneous reaction was induced by mixing 30 pl of immunotoxin solution ( 1 mg/ml) with one third volume of 1 M 2-[N-morpholinojethanesulfomc acid (MES) pH 6.H and one third volume of freshly synthesized ''''"'Tc-tricarbonyl compound. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C and the reaction was stopped by desalting over a Biospin-6 column (BioRad, Hercules, CA) equilibrated with PBS containing O.OOS°,~~~ Tween-20q according to the manufacturer's Immunotoxm I 7 recommendation. The percentage of immunoreactive immunotoxin was assessed as described by Lindmo and co-workers (43). The binding affinity of the ''y"'Tc-labeled immunotoxin was determined on SW2 cells in a radio-immunoassay (R1A), essentially as described for the scFv 4DSMOC'B (3H).
Cell growth assay Inhibition of cell growth upon treatment with 4DSMOCB-ETA was determined in standard MTT
assays based on the reduction of tetrazolium salt to formazan by the enzymes from viable cells (44). Briefly, 5,000 tumor cells were seeded in 9fi-well ELISA microplates in a total volume of 50 gl culture medium per well Immunotoxin concentrations ranging from 0.0001-100 pM were added m a total volume of 100 pl per well and cells were incubated fc7r 72 h under standard cell culture conditions. Ten microliters of a 10 mg%ml MTT (Fluka) solution were added to each well and the plates were incubated for further 90 min at 37°C. Cell lysis and formazan solubilization were achieved by addition of l00 pl lysis butter containing 20% SDS in 50%
dimethylformamide (pH 4.7 adjusted with a solution consisting of 80% acetate, 20% I M HCl) and the released formazan crystals were allowed to dissolve overnight at 37°C.
Absorption was quantified at 590 nm using a SPE.,(.'TRAmax 340 rnicroplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). To demonstrate that the cytotoxicity of4D5MOCK-E'fA was due to inhibition of protein synthesis in oells, [3H]leuc~ne incorporation assays were performed as described ( 18).
Briefly, 2 x 104 <:ells per well in leucine-free cell culture medmm were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated with increasing concentrations of 4DSMOC.B-ETA diluted in leucine-free medium to a final volume of 200 pl. Cells incubated in leucine-free medium without immunotoxin were used as control. Upon a 24 h incubation at 37°(. under standard cell culture conditions, cells were pulsed with 10 p.l medium containing 1 yCi [4,5-;3HJleucine (specific radioactivity 5 TBq/mmol) per well for 6 h and harvested onto glass-fiber filters using a Harvester 96 (Tomtec, Hamden, CT). The radioactivity incorporated into cells was quantified m a Trilux 1450 Icquid scintillation MicroBeta counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Wellesley, MA) and expressed as percentages relative to untreated controls.
~mmunotoxin I H
Flow cytometry Cell surface expression of Ep-CAM was quantified by flow cytometry using the mouse IgC~~a KS114 (BD PharMingen, San Diego, ('A). As secondary antibody a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse F(ab')2 IgG (H+L) (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) was used. All staining steps were performed in a staining buffer consisting of PBS supplemented with 1 %
(w/v) BSA and 0.04% (w/v) sodium azide. Cells (5 x 105) were harvested, washed twice with ice-cold staining buffer and incubated on ice for 45 min ire a total volume of l00 lrl staining buffer containing l Irg of the first antibody. Cells were washed and further incubated with 400 ng of FITC-labeled antibody in a final volume of 100 pl. After 30 min on ice, cells were washed and resuspended in 300 p.l staining buffer for analysis. Fluorescence intensity was measured at 430 nm using a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) and quantified using the CellQuestPro software (Becton Dickinsc7n, San Jose, CA ).
Mice Six to R weeks old female CD-1 (ICR nu/nu) mice (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany) were used. They were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions according to the guidelines of the Veterinary Office of'the Kanton Zurich. Tumors were raised at the lateral flank by s.c. injection of 107 cells and randomized to constitute groups with an average tumor si~:e of l60 mm3 Ten weeks old female (.'S7Bl.,i6 mice (Janvier, Saint Isle. France) were used to determine immunotoxin-specific toxicity in immunocompetent animals, which are more sensitive to the f?TA-mediated T cell stimulation that results in the production of TNF
by Kupffer cells and perform by cytotoxic T cells.
Biodistribution study of 4DSMOC'B-ETA
To investigate the distribution of 4DSMO CB-ETA m mice, 6 wg yy'"Te-labeled (specific radioactivity of 98.y TBq/mmo() were diluted in a total volume of 150 pl PBS and were injected r.v.. mto mice bearing established SW2 and ("010320 tumor xenografts at the contralateral lmmunotoxin 19 flanks. Mice were sacrificed at different time points ( 10 min, 30 mm, 1 h, 4h, 16h, 24h and 48 h) after treatment and organs were removed to measure the accumulated radioactivity using a p-counter. 'The amount of radioactivity per gram organ was given as percentage of the total injected dose which was arbitrarily set to l00%, Cn viva toxicity of 4DSMOC'B-ET'A
Toxicity of the immunotoxin was determined in C'S7BL/6 mice by measuring ALT/AST acaivity in plasma upon repeated injections of escalating doses of 4D5MOC'B-ETA given every other day for three cycles (S Itg and 10 pg dose) or for two cycles (20 p,g dose). Whole blood samples were taken to assess the degree of myelosuppression based on alterations of' cellular components. In addition, tissue specimens from the livers and spleens of immunotoxin treated mice were analyzed for hcstopathological changes upon hematoxylin/eosin staining.
Antitumor activity of 4DSMOCB-ETA
Mice bearing tumor xenografts derived from the Ep-("AM-positive cell lines C'AL27, HT29 and SW2, and the Ep-C'AM-negative cell line COL0320 were treated i.v. every second day with either S ltg 4DSM()CB-ETA for a total of 9 applications (total dose 4S ltg), or with l0 lug every second day for a total of a applications (total dose 30 pg) in a volume of l00 pl PBS. Tumor xenografts from untreated mice were used as control Tumor size was calculated by measurement of the shortest and longest perpendicular diameter using digital calipers according to the formula (short diameter)' x (long diameter) x 0.s, lmmunotoxin REFERENCES
1. Gottesman, M. M. and Pastan, I. Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multidrug transporter Annu. Rev. Biochem., 62: 385-427, 1993.
2. Pai, L. H. and Pastan, I. Clinical trials with Pseudomonas exotoxin immunotoxins. Curr. 'I'op~
Microbial. Immunol., ?~4: 83-96, 1998 3~ Eccles, S. A. Monoclonal antibodies targeting cancer: 'magic bullets" or just the trigger? Breast Cancer Res., 3: 86-90, 2001.
Microbial. Immunol., ?~4: 83-96, 1998 3~ Eccles, S. A. Monoclonal antibodies targeting cancer: 'magic bullets" or just the trigger? Breast Cancer Res., 3: 86-90, 2001.
4. Penichet, M. L. and Morrison, S L Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins for the therapy of cancer. J. Immunol. Methods, ?48: 91-101, 2001.
5. Balzar, M., Winter, M. .1., de Boer, C J., and Litvinov, S. V The biology of the 17-IA antigen (Ep-CAM). J. Mol. Med., 77: 699-712, 1999.
6. Beverley, P C., Olabiran, Y., I~,ederrnann, J. A., Bobrow, L. G., and Souhami, R. L. Results of the central data analysis. Br. J. C"ancer 5uppl, 14: 10-19, 1991.
Z Riethmuller., G., Holzm E., Schlimok, G.., Schmiegel, W., Raab, R., Hoffken, K., Gruber, R.;
Funke, L., Pichlmaier, H., Hirche, H., Buggisch, P., Witte, J., and Pichlmayr, R. Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes" C colorectal cancer: seven-year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial J Clin. Oncol. , / 6: 1788-1794, 1998.
8. Braun, Se, Hepp, F., Kentenich., C. R , Janni, W_= Pantel, K., Riethmuller, G., Willgeroth, F., and Sommer, H. L. Monoclonal antibody therapy with edrecolomab in breast cancer patients:
monitoring of elimination of disseminated cytokeratin-positive tumor cells in bone marrow Clin Cancer Res., 5. 3999-4004, 1999 9. Mellstedt, H., Fagerberg, J., Frodin, .1. E., Hjelm-Skog, A. L., Liljefors, M., Markovic, K., Mosolits. S., and Ragnhammar, P. Ga733/EpC'AM as a target for passive and active specific immunotherapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sei., 9I0: 254-261, 2000:
10. McLaughlin, P. M., Harmsen, M. C' , Dokter, W H., Kroesen, B. J., van der, M. H., Brinker, M. G., Hollema, H., Ruiters, M. H., Buys, C'. H., and de Leij, L,. f. 'The epithelial glycoprotetn 2 (EGP-2) promoter-driven epithelial-specific expression of EGP-'2 in transgenic mice: a new model to study carcinoma-directed immunotherapy~ Cancer Res., 6Iv 4105-4111, 2001.
l 1. Litvinov, S. V., Bakker, H. A., Gouremtch, M M..; Velders, M. P_, and Warnaar, S. O.
Evidence for a role of the epithelial glycoprotein 40 (Ep-CAM) in epithelial cell-cell adhesion Cell Adhes. Commun., ?: 417-428, 1994 12. Litvinov, S. V., van Driel, W.~ van Rhijn, C.. M., Bakker, H. A., van Krieken, H., Fleurc:n, G.
J., and Warnaar, S. O. Expression of Ep~-CAM in cervical squamous epithelia correlates with an Immunotoxin 21 increased proliferation and the disappearance of markers for terminal differentiation.. Am. J.
Pathol., 148: 865-875, 1996. Antitumor activity of an Ep-CAM specific immunotuxin 23 13_ Litvinov, S. V., Balzar, M., Winter, M. J., Bakker, H. A.., Briaire-de Bruijn, I. H., Prins, h., Fleuren, G. J.., and Warnaar, S. O. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule lEp-CAM) modulates cell-cell interactions mediated by classic cadherins. J. Cell Biol., /39: 1337-1348, 1997.
14. Kosterink, J. G., de Jonge, M. W., Smit, F:. F., Piers, D. A., Kengen, R.
A., Postmus, P. f;., Shochat, D., Ciroen, H. J., The, H. T., and de Leij, L Pharmacokinetics and scintigraphy of indium-1 l I-DTPA-MOC."-31 in small-cell lung carcinoma J Nucl. Med., 36: 2356-2362, 1995.
I5. Vansant, J. P., Johnson, D. H., O'Donnell, D. M., Stewart, J. R., Sonin, A. H., McCook, B.
M., Powers, T. A., Salk, D. J., Frist, W. H., and Sandler, M P. Staging lung carcinoma with a '''''"Tc-labeled monoclonal antibody. Clin. Nucl. Med., /7: 431-438, 1992.
I6. Hjelm, S. A., Ragnhammar, P.. Fagerberg, J., Frodin, J., Goldinger, M., Koldestam, H., Liljefors, M., Nilsson, B., Shetye, J., Wersall, P., and Mellstedt, H.
Clinical effects of monoclonal antibody 17-1 A combined with granulocyteimacrophage-colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Cancer Immunol.
ltnmunother., 48: 463-470, 1999.
17. Derbyshire, E. J., Henry, R. V.., Stahel, R. A., and Wawrzynczak, E. J.
Potent cytotoxic action of the immunotoxin SWAI 1-ricin A chain against human small cell lung cancer cell lines. Br. J.
Cancer. 66: 444-45 I , 1992.
18 Zimmetrnann, S., Wels, W., Froesch, B. A., Gerstmayer, B., Stahel, R. A., and Zangemeister-~Vittke, U. A novel immunotoxin recognising the epithelial glycoprotein-2 has potent antitumoural activity on chemotherapy-resistant lung cancer Cancer lmmunol.
Immunother., 44:
1-9, -1997.
19. Elias, D. J., Hirschowitz, L., Kline, L. E., Kroener, J. h._ Dilhnan, R.
O., Walker, L. E., Robb, J= A., and 'Timms, R. M. Phase I clinical comparative study of monoclonal antibody KS 1/4 and KS li4-methotrexate immunconjugate in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res., _50: 4154-4159, 1990.
20 Kreitman, R. .l. and Pastan, 1. Accumulation of a recombinant immunotoxin in a tumor in vivo: fewer than (000 molecules per cell are sufficient for complete responses. Cancer Res" _58:
968-975, 1998.
21 Perentesis, .1. P., Miller, S. P., and Bodley, J. W Protein toxin inhibitors of protein synthesis.
Biofactors, 3: 173-184, 1992.
22 Brinkmann, Ll., Pai, L. H., FitzGerald, D. J., Willingham, M., and Pastan, 1. B3(Fv)-PE38KDEL, a single-chain immunotoxin that causes complete regression of a human carcinoma in mice. Proc. Natl.. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 8N: 8616-8620, 1991 tmmunotoxin 22 23. Wels, W., Harwerth, I. M., Mueller, M., Groner, B., and Hynes, N. E.
Selective inhibition of tumor cell growth by a recombinant single-chain antibody-toxin specific for the erbB-2 receptor.
Cancer Res., 5?: 6310-6317, 1992 24. Kreitman, R. J., Bailon, P., Chaudhary, V. K., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. Recombinant immunotoxins containing anti-Tac(Fv) and derivatives of Pseudomonas exotoxin produce complete regression in mice of an interleukin-2 receptor-expressing human carcinoma. Blood, 8.3:
426-434, 1994.
25. Wels, W., Beerli, R., Hellmann, P., Schmidt, M., Marte, B. M., Kornilova, E. S., Hekele, A., Mendelsohn, J., Groner, B., and Hynes, N. E, EGF receptor and p185erbB-2-specific single-chain antibody toxins differ in their cellkilling activity on tumor cells expressing both receptor proteins.
Int. J. Cancer, 60: 137-144, 1995.
26. Zangemeister-Wittke, U. and Wels, W Targeted cytotoxicity: antibody-drug and antibody-toxin conjugates. In S. Matzko and A. Rolf (eds.), Antibodies in diagnosis and therapy:
technologies, mechanism and clinical data., pp. 81114. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.
27. Siegall, C'. B., Liggitt, D., Chace, D., Mixan, B., Sugai, .L, Davidson, T., and Steinitz, M:
Characterization of vascular leak syndrome induced by the toxin component of Pseudomonas exotoxin-based immunotoxins and its potential inhibition with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 339-si45, 199'7 28. Kreitman, R. J. Immunotoxins Expert. Opin. Pharmacother., f: I 117-1129, 2000.
29. Onda, M., Willingham, M., Wang, Q C., Kreitman, R. J., Tsutsumi, Y., Nagata, S., and Pastan, 1. inhibition of TNFalpha produced by Kupffer cells protects against the nonspecific liver toxicity of immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PI38, L.MB-2: .1. Immunol., 165: 7150-7156, 2000.
30. Fitzgerald, D., Pastan, L, and Robertus~ J. Clinical applications ol'immunotoxins.
Introduction Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., ?34: 1-1 I, 1998. Antitumor activity of an Ep-C'AM .spac;i~c immacnotoxin 24 31. Kuska, B. First responses seen in cancer patients to a recombinant immunotoxin. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst.. 9I; 1997, 1999.
32. Debinskt, W, and Pastan, I. Recombinant F(ab') C242- Pseudomonas exotoxin, but not the whole antibody-based immunotoxin, causes regression of a human colorectal tumor xenograft.
Clin. C.'ancer Res~, l: 1015-1022, 1995.
33. Chaudhary, V. K., Queen, C., Junghans, R. P., Waldmann, T. A., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. A recombinant immunotoxin consisting of two antibody variable domains fused to Pseudomonus exotoxin.. Nature, _139: 394-397, 1989.
lmmunotoxin 23 34. Benhar, I. and Pastan, I. Characterization of B1(Fv)PE38 and B1(dsFv)PE38:
single-chain and disulfide-stabilized Fv immunotoxins with increased activity that cause complete remissions of established human carcinoma xenograf'ts in nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res., /;
1023-1029, 1995.
35. Reiter, Y~., Wright, A. F., 'Tonge, D. W., and Pastan,1. Recombinant single-chain and disulfide-stabilized Fvimmunotoxins that cause complete regression of a human colon cancer xenograft in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer, 67: 1 13-123, 1996 36. Schmidt, M. and Wels, W. Targeted inhibition of tumour cell growth by a bispeciftc single-chain toxin containing an antibody domain and TGF alpha Br. .1. Cancer, 74:
853-862, 1996.
37. Kreitman, R. J. Immunotoxins in cancer therapy. Curr.Opin. Immunol., Il:
570-578, 1999.
:38, Willuda, J., Honegger, A., Waibel, R., Schubiger, P A., Stahel, R., Zangemeister-Wittkf:, U~, and Pluckthun, A. High thermal stability is essential for tumor targeting of antibody fragments:
engineering of a humanized anti-epithelial glycoprotein-2 (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) single-chain Fv fragment. Cancer Res., S9: 5758-5767, 1999 39~ Ge, L., Pliickthun, A., Pack, P., Freund, C., and Pluekthun, A. Expressing antibodies in E'scherichia coli. In C. A. K. Bon-ebaeck (ed.), Antibody engineering, pp. 229-261. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1995.
40. Bass, S., Gu, Q., and Christen. A. Multicopy suppressers of prc mutant E.scheYichia coli include two HtrA (DegP) protease homologs (HhoAB), DksA, and a truncated RIpA.
J.
Bacteriol., 178: 1154-1 '161, 1996_ 41 Pliickthun, A., Krebber, A., Krebber, C., Horn, U., Knupfer, U., Wenderoth, R., Nieba, L., Proba, K., and Riesenberg, D. Producing antibodies in E.scherichia C:'oli:
from PCR to fermentation. !n J. McCafferty, H. R.
Hoogenboom, and D. .I. Chiswell (eds.), Antibody engineering, pp. 203-252.
Oxford: IRL Press, ~2. Waibel, R..; Alberto, R., Willuda, J., Finnern, R., Schibli, R., Stichelberger, A., Egli, A."
Abram, Ll., Mach, J. P., Pliickthun, A., and Schubiger, P. A Stable one-step technetium 9~'"
labeling of His-tagged recombinant proteins with a novel Tc(I)-carbonyl complex. Nat Biotechnol., /7: 897-901, 1999.
43. Lindmo, T., Boven, E., C"uttitta, F., Fedorko, J., and Burin, P. A., Jr.
Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess. J.. Immunol. Methods, 7.?: 77-89, 1984.
44. Mosmann, T Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival:
application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Cmmunol. Methods. 65: 55-6.'3, 1983.
45 Seetharam, S., Chaudhary, V K., Fitzgerald, D., and Pastan, I. Increased cytotoxic activity of P.sc~udomonus exotoxin and two chimer~c toxins ending in KDEL. J. Biol. Chem., 266 : 17376-17381. 1991.
1 rnmunotox in 24 46. Schumann, J., Angermiiller, 5., Bang, R., Lohoff, M., and Tiegs, G. Acute hepatotoxicity of P.seudvmvna.s aeruginosa exotoxin A in mice depends on T cells and TNF. J.
Immunol., X61:
5745-5754, 1998.
47. Schiimann, J., Wolf; D., Pahl, A., Brune, K., Papadopoulos, T., van Rooijen, N., and Tiegs, O..
Importance of°Kupffer cells for T-cell-dependent liver injury in mice.
Am. J. Pathol., 157: 1671 1683, 2000.
48. Oppenheimer, N. J. and Bodley, J. W . Diphtheria toxin. Site and configuration of ADP
ribosylation ofdiphthamide in elongation factor-2. .I. Biol. Chem., 2_56: 8579-8581, 1981.
49. Phan, L. D., Perentesis, J, P., and Bodley, J. W. Saccharomyces cerevisiae elongation factor-2. Mutagenesis of the histidine precursor of diphthamide yields a functional protein that is resistant to diphtheria toxin. J. Biol. Chem., 268: 8665-8668, 1993.
50. Foley, B T., Moehring, J. M., and Moehring, T. J. Mutations in the elongation factor 2 gene which confer resistance to diphtheria toxin and P.seudvmvncr.s exotoxin A.
Genetic and biochemical analyses. J. Biol. C.hem., 270: 23218-23225, 1995.
Antr'tumvr activity of an Ep-CAM-specificv immunotoxin 25 51. Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., Robbins, D., Margulies, L, Stetler-Stevenson, M., Waldrnann., T. A., and Pastan, I. Responses in retiactory hairy cell leukemia to a recombinant immunotoxin.
Blood, 94: 3340-3348, 1999.
52. Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., White, J. D., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Jaffe, E. S., Giardina, S., Waldmann, T. A., and Pastan, I. Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PE38 (LMB-2) in patients with hematologic malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 1622-1636, 2000.
53. Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., Bergeron, K., Raggio, M., Stetler-Stevenson, M., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. Efficacy of the anti-(."D22 recombinant immunotoxin BL22 in chemotherapy resistant hairy-cell leukemia. N. E;ngl. J. Med., 345: 241-247, 2001.
54. Chang, K., Pai, L. H., Batra, J, K., Pastan, l., and Willingham, M. C.
Characterization of the antigen (C'AK I ) recognized by monoclonal antibody K 1 present on ovarian cancers and normal mesothelium. C: ancer Res., S2: 1 R I -186, I 992.
5S. Benhar, l., Reiter, Y., Pai, L. H., and Pastan, I. Administration of disulfide-stabilized Fv-immunotoxins B1(dsFv)-PE38 and B3(dsFvl-PE38 by continuous infusion increases their efficacy in curing large tumor xenografts in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer, 62:
351-355, 1995.
56. Pai, L. H., W ittes, R., Setser, A., Willingham, M. C'., and Pastan, 1.
Treatment of advanced solid tumors with immunotoxin LMB-1 an antibody linked to P.seudvmvnas exotoxin. Nat.. Med.., 2: 350-353, 1996.
57. Kuan, C T., Pai, L. H., and Pastan, 1 Immunotoxins containing Pseudvmonas exotoxin that target LeY damage human endothelial cells in an antibody-specific mode:
relevance to vascular leak syndrome. C'lin. Cancer Res., /: 1589-1594, 1995.
lmmunotoxin 25 58 Myklebust, A. T., Godal, A., Pharo, A., Juell, S., and Fodstad, O.
Eradication of small cell lung cancer cells from human hone marrow with immunotoxins. Cancer Res., 53:
3784-3788, t 993.
59. Azemar, M., Schmidt, M., Arlt, F., Kennel, P., Brandt, B., Papadimitriou, A., Groner, B., and Wels, W. Recombinant antibody toxins specific for ErbB2 and EGF receptor inhibit the in vitro growth of human head and neck cancer cells and cause rapid tumor regression in vivo. Int. J.
('.ancer, 86: 269-275, 2000.
60. Horn, U., Strittmatter, W., Krebber, .A., Knupfer, L1., Kujau, M., Wenderoth, R., Miiller, K., Matzku, S., Pliickthun, A., and Riesenberg, D. High volumetric yields of functional dimeric mzniantibodies m Escherichia coli, using an optimized expression vector and high-cell-density fermentation under non-limited growth conditions. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol., 46: 524-532, 1996.
61. Tsai, S. W., Li, L., Williams, L. E., Anderson, A. r.., Raubitschek, A.
A., and Shively, J. E.
Metabolism and renal clearance of I I I Irn-labeled DO"fA-conjugated antibody fragments.
Biocon~ug. C'hem., l2: 264-270, 2001.
62. Kang, N,., Hamilton, S., C)dili, J., Wilson, Ci., and Kupsch, J. In vivo targeting of malignant melanoma by 1251odine and ''9"'Technetium-labeled single-chain Fv fragments against high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen. CIin.C"ancer Res., 6~ 4921-4931, 2000.
63 Schott, M. E.., Milenic, D. F'., Yokota, T., Whitlow, M., Wood, J. F.., Fordyce, W. A., Cheng, R. C'., and Schlom, J.Differential metabolic patterns of iodinated versus radiometal chelated anticarcinoma single-chain Fv molecules. Cancer Res., 52: 6413-6417, 1992.
Z Riethmuller., G., Holzm E., Schlimok, G.., Schmiegel, W., Raab, R., Hoffken, K., Gruber, R.;
Funke, L., Pichlmaier, H., Hirche, H., Buggisch, P., Witte, J., and Pichlmayr, R. Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes" C colorectal cancer: seven-year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial J Clin. Oncol. , / 6: 1788-1794, 1998.
8. Braun, Se, Hepp, F., Kentenich., C. R , Janni, W_= Pantel, K., Riethmuller, G., Willgeroth, F., and Sommer, H. L. Monoclonal antibody therapy with edrecolomab in breast cancer patients:
monitoring of elimination of disseminated cytokeratin-positive tumor cells in bone marrow Clin Cancer Res., 5. 3999-4004, 1999 9. Mellstedt, H., Fagerberg, J., Frodin, .1. E., Hjelm-Skog, A. L., Liljefors, M., Markovic, K., Mosolits. S., and Ragnhammar, P. Ga733/EpC'AM as a target for passive and active specific immunotherapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sei., 9I0: 254-261, 2000:
10. McLaughlin, P. M., Harmsen, M. C' , Dokter, W H., Kroesen, B. J., van der, M. H., Brinker, M. G., Hollema, H., Ruiters, M. H., Buys, C'. H., and de Leij, L,. f. 'The epithelial glycoprotetn 2 (EGP-2) promoter-driven epithelial-specific expression of EGP-'2 in transgenic mice: a new model to study carcinoma-directed immunotherapy~ Cancer Res., 6Iv 4105-4111, 2001.
l 1. Litvinov, S. V., Bakker, H. A., Gouremtch, M M..; Velders, M. P_, and Warnaar, S. O.
Evidence for a role of the epithelial glycoprotein 40 (Ep-CAM) in epithelial cell-cell adhesion Cell Adhes. Commun., ?: 417-428, 1994 12. Litvinov, S. V., van Driel, W.~ van Rhijn, C.. M., Bakker, H. A., van Krieken, H., Fleurc:n, G.
J., and Warnaar, S. O. Expression of Ep~-CAM in cervical squamous epithelia correlates with an Immunotoxin 21 increased proliferation and the disappearance of markers for terminal differentiation.. Am. J.
Pathol., 148: 865-875, 1996. Antitumor activity of an Ep-CAM specific immunotuxin 23 13_ Litvinov, S. V., Balzar, M., Winter, M. J., Bakker, H. A.., Briaire-de Bruijn, I. H., Prins, h., Fleuren, G. J.., and Warnaar, S. O. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule lEp-CAM) modulates cell-cell interactions mediated by classic cadherins. J. Cell Biol., /39: 1337-1348, 1997.
14. Kosterink, J. G., de Jonge, M. W., Smit, F:. F., Piers, D. A., Kengen, R.
A., Postmus, P. f;., Shochat, D., Ciroen, H. J., The, H. T., and de Leij, L Pharmacokinetics and scintigraphy of indium-1 l I-DTPA-MOC."-31 in small-cell lung carcinoma J Nucl. Med., 36: 2356-2362, 1995.
I5. Vansant, J. P., Johnson, D. H., O'Donnell, D. M., Stewart, J. R., Sonin, A. H., McCook, B.
M., Powers, T. A., Salk, D. J., Frist, W. H., and Sandler, M P. Staging lung carcinoma with a '''''"Tc-labeled monoclonal antibody. Clin. Nucl. Med., /7: 431-438, 1992.
I6. Hjelm, S. A., Ragnhammar, P.. Fagerberg, J., Frodin, J., Goldinger, M., Koldestam, H., Liljefors, M., Nilsson, B., Shetye, J., Wersall, P., and Mellstedt, H.
Clinical effects of monoclonal antibody 17-1 A combined with granulocyteimacrophage-colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Cancer Immunol.
ltnmunother., 48: 463-470, 1999.
17. Derbyshire, E. J., Henry, R. V.., Stahel, R. A., and Wawrzynczak, E. J.
Potent cytotoxic action of the immunotoxin SWAI 1-ricin A chain against human small cell lung cancer cell lines. Br. J.
Cancer. 66: 444-45 I , 1992.
18 Zimmetrnann, S., Wels, W., Froesch, B. A., Gerstmayer, B., Stahel, R. A., and Zangemeister-~Vittke, U. A novel immunotoxin recognising the epithelial glycoprotein-2 has potent antitumoural activity on chemotherapy-resistant lung cancer Cancer lmmunol.
Immunother., 44:
1-9, -1997.
19. Elias, D. J., Hirschowitz, L., Kline, L. E., Kroener, J. h._ Dilhnan, R.
O., Walker, L. E., Robb, J= A., and 'Timms, R. M. Phase I clinical comparative study of monoclonal antibody KS 1/4 and KS li4-methotrexate immunconjugate in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res., _50: 4154-4159, 1990.
20 Kreitman, R. .l. and Pastan, 1. Accumulation of a recombinant immunotoxin in a tumor in vivo: fewer than (000 molecules per cell are sufficient for complete responses. Cancer Res" _58:
968-975, 1998.
21 Perentesis, .1. P., Miller, S. P., and Bodley, J. W Protein toxin inhibitors of protein synthesis.
Biofactors, 3: 173-184, 1992.
22 Brinkmann, Ll., Pai, L. H., FitzGerald, D. J., Willingham, M., and Pastan, 1. B3(Fv)-PE38KDEL, a single-chain immunotoxin that causes complete regression of a human carcinoma in mice. Proc. Natl.. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 8N: 8616-8620, 1991 tmmunotoxin 22 23. Wels, W., Harwerth, I. M., Mueller, M., Groner, B., and Hynes, N. E.
Selective inhibition of tumor cell growth by a recombinant single-chain antibody-toxin specific for the erbB-2 receptor.
Cancer Res., 5?: 6310-6317, 1992 24. Kreitman, R. J., Bailon, P., Chaudhary, V. K., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. Recombinant immunotoxins containing anti-Tac(Fv) and derivatives of Pseudomonas exotoxin produce complete regression in mice of an interleukin-2 receptor-expressing human carcinoma. Blood, 8.3:
426-434, 1994.
25. Wels, W., Beerli, R., Hellmann, P., Schmidt, M., Marte, B. M., Kornilova, E. S., Hekele, A., Mendelsohn, J., Groner, B., and Hynes, N. E, EGF receptor and p185erbB-2-specific single-chain antibody toxins differ in their cellkilling activity on tumor cells expressing both receptor proteins.
Int. J. Cancer, 60: 137-144, 1995.
26. Zangemeister-Wittke, U. and Wels, W Targeted cytotoxicity: antibody-drug and antibody-toxin conjugates. In S. Matzko and A. Rolf (eds.), Antibodies in diagnosis and therapy:
technologies, mechanism and clinical data., pp. 81114. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.
27. Siegall, C'. B., Liggitt, D., Chace, D., Mixan, B., Sugai, .L, Davidson, T., and Steinitz, M:
Characterization of vascular leak syndrome induced by the toxin component of Pseudomonas exotoxin-based immunotoxins and its potential inhibition with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 339-si45, 199'7 28. Kreitman, R. J. Immunotoxins Expert. Opin. Pharmacother., f: I 117-1129, 2000.
29. Onda, M., Willingham, M., Wang, Q C., Kreitman, R. J., Tsutsumi, Y., Nagata, S., and Pastan, 1. inhibition of TNFalpha produced by Kupffer cells protects against the nonspecific liver toxicity of immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PI38, L.MB-2: .1. Immunol., 165: 7150-7156, 2000.
30. Fitzgerald, D., Pastan, L, and Robertus~ J. Clinical applications ol'immunotoxins.
Introduction Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., ?34: 1-1 I, 1998. Antitumor activity of an Ep-C'AM .spac;i~c immacnotoxin 24 31. Kuska, B. First responses seen in cancer patients to a recombinant immunotoxin. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst.. 9I; 1997, 1999.
32. Debinskt, W, and Pastan, I. Recombinant F(ab') C242- Pseudomonas exotoxin, but not the whole antibody-based immunotoxin, causes regression of a human colorectal tumor xenograft.
Clin. C.'ancer Res~, l: 1015-1022, 1995.
33. Chaudhary, V. K., Queen, C., Junghans, R. P., Waldmann, T. A., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. A recombinant immunotoxin consisting of two antibody variable domains fused to Pseudomonus exotoxin.. Nature, _139: 394-397, 1989.
lmmunotoxin 23 34. Benhar, I. and Pastan, I. Characterization of B1(Fv)PE38 and B1(dsFv)PE38:
single-chain and disulfide-stabilized Fv immunotoxins with increased activity that cause complete remissions of established human carcinoma xenograf'ts in nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res., /;
1023-1029, 1995.
35. Reiter, Y~., Wright, A. F., 'Tonge, D. W., and Pastan,1. Recombinant single-chain and disulfide-stabilized Fvimmunotoxins that cause complete regression of a human colon cancer xenograft in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer, 67: 1 13-123, 1996 36. Schmidt, M. and Wels, W. Targeted inhibition of tumour cell growth by a bispeciftc single-chain toxin containing an antibody domain and TGF alpha Br. .1. Cancer, 74:
853-862, 1996.
37. Kreitman, R. J. Immunotoxins in cancer therapy. Curr.Opin. Immunol., Il:
570-578, 1999.
:38, Willuda, J., Honegger, A., Waibel, R., Schubiger, P A., Stahel, R., Zangemeister-Wittkf:, U~, and Pluckthun, A. High thermal stability is essential for tumor targeting of antibody fragments:
engineering of a humanized anti-epithelial glycoprotein-2 (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) single-chain Fv fragment. Cancer Res., S9: 5758-5767, 1999 39~ Ge, L., Pliickthun, A., Pack, P., Freund, C., and Pluekthun, A. Expressing antibodies in E'scherichia coli. In C. A. K. Bon-ebaeck (ed.), Antibody engineering, pp. 229-261. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1995.
40. Bass, S., Gu, Q., and Christen. A. Multicopy suppressers of prc mutant E.scheYichia coli include two HtrA (DegP) protease homologs (HhoAB), DksA, and a truncated RIpA.
J.
Bacteriol., 178: 1154-1 '161, 1996_ 41 Pliickthun, A., Krebber, A., Krebber, C., Horn, U., Knupfer, U., Wenderoth, R., Nieba, L., Proba, K., and Riesenberg, D. Producing antibodies in E.scherichia C:'oli:
from PCR to fermentation. !n J. McCafferty, H. R.
Hoogenboom, and D. .I. Chiswell (eds.), Antibody engineering, pp. 203-252.
Oxford: IRL Press, ~2. Waibel, R..; Alberto, R., Willuda, J., Finnern, R., Schibli, R., Stichelberger, A., Egli, A."
Abram, Ll., Mach, J. P., Pliickthun, A., and Schubiger, P. A Stable one-step technetium 9~'"
labeling of His-tagged recombinant proteins with a novel Tc(I)-carbonyl complex. Nat Biotechnol., /7: 897-901, 1999.
43. Lindmo, T., Boven, E., C"uttitta, F., Fedorko, J., and Burin, P. A., Jr.
Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess. J.. Immunol. Methods, 7.?: 77-89, 1984.
44. Mosmann, T Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival:
application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Cmmunol. Methods. 65: 55-6.'3, 1983.
45 Seetharam, S., Chaudhary, V K., Fitzgerald, D., and Pastan, I. Increased cytotoxic activity of P.sc~udomonus exotoxin and two chimer~c toxins ending in KDEL. J. Biol. Chem., 266 : 17376-17381. 1991.
1 rnmunotox in 24 46. Schumann, J., Angermiiller, 5., Bang, R., Lohoff, M., and Tiegs, G. Acute hepatotoxicity of P.seudvmvna.s aeruginosa exotoxin A in mice depends on T cells and TNF. J.
Immunol., X61:
5745-5754, 1998.
47. Schiimann, J., Wolf; D., Pahl, A., Brune, K., Papadopoulos, T., van Rooijen, N., and Tiegs, O..
Importance of°Kupffer cells for T-cell-dependent liver injury in mice.
Am. J. Pathol., 157: 1671 1683, 2000.
48. Oppenheimer, N. J. and Bodley, J. W . Diphtheria toxin. Site and configuration of ADP
ribosylation ofdiphthamide in elongation factor-2. .I. Biol. Chem., 2_56: 8579-8581, 1981.
49. Phan, L. D., Perentesis, J, P., and Bodley, J. W. Saccharomyces cerevisiae elongation factor-2. Mutagenesis of the histidine precursor of diphthamide yields a functional protein that is resistant to diphtheria toxin. J. Biol. Chem., 268: 8665-8668, 1993.
50. Foley, B T., Moehring, J. M., and Moehring, T. J. Mutations in the elongation factor 2 gene which confer resistance to diphtheria toxin and P.seudvmvncr.s exotoxin A.
Genetic and biochemical analyses. J. Biol. C.hem., 270: 23218-23225, 1995.
Antr'tumvr activity of an Ep-CAM-specificv immunotoxin 25 51. Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., Robbins, D., Margulies, L, Stetler-Stevenson, M., Waldrnann., T. A., and Pastan, I. Responses in retiactory hairy cell leukemia to a recombinant immunotoxin.
Blood, 94: 3340-3348, 1999.
52. Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., White, J. D., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Jaffe, E. S., Giardina, S., Waldmann, T. A., and Pastan, I. Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin anti-Tac(Fv)-PE38 (LMB-2) in patients with hematologic malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 1622-1636, 2000.
53. Kreitman, R. J., Wilson, W. H., Bergeron, K., Raggio, M., Stetler-Stevenson, M., FitzGerald, D. J., and Pastan, I. Efficacy of the anti-(."D22 recombinant immunotoxin BL22 in chemotherapy resistant hairy-cell leukemia. N. E;ngl. J. Med., 345: 241-247, 2001.
54. Chang, K., Pai, L. H., Batra, J, K., Pastan, l., and Willingham, M. C.
Characterization of the antigen (C'AK I ) recognized by monoclonal antibody K 1 present on ovarian cancers and normal mesothelium. C: ancer Res., S2: 1 R I -186, I 992.
5S. Benhar, l., Reiter, Y., Pai, L. H., and Pastan, I. Administration of disulfide-stabilized Fv-immunotoxins B1(dsFv)-PE38 and B3(dsFvl-PE38 by continuous infusion increases their efficacy in curing large tumor xenografts in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer, 62:
351-355, 1995.
56. Pai, L. H., W ittes, R., Setser, A., Willingham, M. C'., and Pastan, 1.
Treatment of advanced solid tumors with immunotoxin LMB-1 an antibody linked to P.seudvmvnas exotoxin. Nat.. Med.., 2: 350-353, 1996.
57. Kuan, C T., Pai, L. H., and Pastan, 1 Immunotoxins containing Pseudvmonas exotoxin that target LeY damage human endothelial cells in an antibody-specific mode:
relevance to vascular leak syndrome. C'lin. Cancer Res., /: 1589-1594, 1995.
lmmunotoxin 25 58 Myklebust, A. T., Godal, A., Pharo, A., Juell, S., and Fodstad, O.
Eradication of small cell lung cancer cells from human hone marrow with immunotoxins. Cancer Res., 53:
3784-3788, t 993.
59. Azemar, M., Schmidt, M., Arlt, F., Kennel, P., Brandt, B., Papadimitriou, A., Groner, B., and Wels, W. Recombinant antibody toxins specific for ErbB2 and EGF receptor inhibit the in vitro growth of human head and neck cancer cells and cause rapid tumor regression in vivo. Int. J.
('.ancer, 86: 269-275, 2000.
60. Horn, U., Strittmatter, W., Krebber, .A., Knupfer, L1., Kujau, M., Wenderoth, R., Miiller, K., Matzku, S., Pliickthun, A., and Riesenberg, D. High volumetric yields of functional dimeric mzniantibodies m Escherichia coli, using an optimized expression vector and high-cell-density fermentation under non-limited growth conditions. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol., 46: 524-532, 1996.
61. Tsai, S. W., Li, L., Williams, L. E., Anderson, A. r.., Raubitschek, A.
A., and Shively, J. E.
Metabolism and renal clearance of I I I Irn-labeled DO"fA-conjugated antibody fragments.
Biocon~ug. C'hem., l2: 264-270, 2001.
62. Kang, N,., Hamilton, S., C)dili, J., Wilson, Ci., and Kupsch, J. In vivo targeting of malignant melanoma by 1251odine and ''9"'Technetium-labeled single-chain Fv fragments against high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen. CIin.C"ancer Res., 6~ 4921-4931, 2000.
63 Schott, M. E.., Milenic, D. F'., Yokota, T., Whitlow, M., Wood, J. F.., Fordyce, W. A., Cheng, R. C'., and Schlom, J.Differential metabolic patterns of iodinated versus radiometal chelated anticarcinoma single-chain Fv molecules. Cancer Res., 52: 6413-6417, 1992.
Claims (8)
1. A method of treating a mammal, including a human, in need of such treatment with an immunotoxin, said immunotoxin comprising an antigen binding polypeptide; which specifically recognizes Ep-CAM conjugated to a toxin selected from the group comprised of gelonin, bouganin, saporin, pseudomonas endotoxin (PE), ricin A chain, bryodin, diphtheria toxin or restrictocin, said method comprising administering the immunotoxin at least every 2nd day, for at least 12 days, preferably l4-28 days, in an amount of at least 5 pg per kg per dose, preferably at least approximately 7.5 pg per kg per dose.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein at least 7, 8, 9 or 10 doses are administered in an amount of 7.5 pg per kg.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said toxin is a ribosome inactivating protein.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein said ribosome inactivating protein is PE.
5. A method according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein said antigen binding polypeptide is preferably selected from the group comprising Fab, Fab, scFv, single domain antibody fragments, disulfide stabilized Fvs, and dimers of the foregoing.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein said antigen binding polypeptide is a scFv.
7 A method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein said antigen binding polypeptide competitively inhibits 4D5MOCB-ETA from binding to Ep-CAM.
8. The use of an immunotoxin comprising an antigen binding polypeptide which specifically binds to Ep-CAM for preparing an immunotoxin for treatment of cancer according to the method defined in claim 1.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002424255A CA2424255A1 (en) | 2003-03-26 | 2003-03-26 | Immunotoxins |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002424255A CA2424255A1 (en) | 2003-03-26 | 2003-03-26 | Immunotoxins |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2424255A1 true CA2424255A1 (en) | 2004-09-26 |
Family
ID=33034986
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002424255A Abandoned CA2424255A1 (en) | 2003-03-26 | 2003-03-26 | Immunotoxins |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2424255A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014166002A1 (en) * | 2013-04-12 | 2014-10-16 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Compositions and methods for detection and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma |
| US20150018526A1 (en) * | 2004-03-19 | 2015-01-15 | Merck Patent Gmbh | Cytotoxins comprising modified bouganin toxin for the treatment of cancer |
| US9822182B2 (en) | 2013-10-02 | 2017-11-21 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Anti-EPCAM antibodies and methods of use |
| US10576163B2 (en) | 2015-03-12 | 2020-03-03 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Methods of treatment for EpCAM positive bladder cancer |
| US10583198B2 (en) | 2015-03-12 | 2020-03-10 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Dosing strategies for targeting EPCAM positive bladder cancer |
| US10858429B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2020-12-08 | University Of Zurich | Methods for treating cancer using an immunotoxin |
-
2003
- 2003-03-26 CA CA002424255A patent/CA2424255A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10858429B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2020-12-08 | University Of Zurich | Methods for treating cancer using an immunotoxin |
| US20150018526A1 (en) * | 2004-03-19 | 2015-01-15 | Merck Patent Gmbh | Cytotoxins comprising modified bouganin toxin for the treatment of cancer |
| WO2014166002A1 (en) * | 2013-04-12 | 2014-10-16 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Compositions and methods for detection and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma |
| CN105188762A (en) * | 2013-04-12 | 2015-12-23 | 维文蒂阿生物公司 | Compositions and methods for detection and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma |
| US9822182B2 (en) | 2013-10-02 | 2017-11-21 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Anti-EPCAM antibodies and methods of use |
| US10576163B2 (en) | 2015-03-12 | 2020-03-03 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Methods of treatment for EpCAM positive bladder cancer |
| US10583198B2 (en) | 2015-03-12 | 2020-03-10 | Viventia Bio Inc. | Dosing strategies for targeting EPCAM positive bladder cancer |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Di Paolo et al. | A recombinant immunotoxin derived from a humanized epithelial cell adhesion molecule-specific single-chain antibody fragment has potent and selective antitumor activity | |
| US11713351B2 (en) | Immunotoxin for treating cancer | |
| Reiter | Recombinant immunotoxins in targeted cancer cell therapy | |
| Hamblett et al. | Effects of drug loading on the antitumor activity of a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate | |
| Fan et al. | Therapeutic application of anti-growth factor receptor antibodies | |
| Rosenblum et al. | Design, expression, purification, and characterization, in vitro and in vivo, of an antimelanoma single-chain Fv antibody fused to the toxin gelonin | |
| KR102099593B1 (en) | Anti-Human Interleukin-2 Antibodies and Uses thereof | |
| MXPA04003535A (en) | Direct targeting binding proteins. | |
| EP0590067A1 (en) | Microbially-produced antibody fragments and their conjugates | |
| Dunn et al. | Antigen binding and cytotoxic properties of a recombinant immunotoxin incorporating the lytic peptide, melittin | |
| Schaedel et al. | Antibodies and their fragments as anti-cancer agents | |
| Li et al. | Immunotoxins and cancer therapy | |
| Kreitman et al. | Properties of chimeric toxins with two recognition domains: interleukin 6 and transforming growth factor. alpha. at different locations in Pseudomonas exotoxin | |
| CA2424255A1 (en) | Immunotoxins | |
| Akbari et al. | Construction, expression, and activity of a novel immunotoxin comprising a humanized antiepidermal growth factor receptor scFv and modified Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A | |
| Kreitman | Recombinant immunotoxins for the treatment of haematological malignancies | |
| Tur et al. | An anti-GD2 single chain Fv selected by phage display and fused to Pseudomonas exotoxin A develops specific cytotoxic activity against neuroblastoma derived cell lines | |
| Brinkmann et al. | Recombinant immunotoxins for cancer therapy | |
| EP1848462B1 (en) | Methods for treating cancer using an immunotoxin comprising an exotoxin a moiety having a furin cleavage site replaced with a cancer-associated protease site cleaved by mmp-2 or mmp-9 | |
| EP4601702A1 (en) | Linker-payload compound, conjugates and applications thereof | |
| Gottstein et al. | Generation and characterization of recombinant vascular targeting agents from hybridoma cell lines | |
| Zhu et al. | A new recombinant immunotoxin hscFv-ETA’demonstrates specific cytotoxicity against chronic myeloid leukemia cells in vitro | |
| Rybak et al. | Immunotoxins and beyond: targeted RNases | |
| Orlik et al. | Amatoxin-based antibody-drug conjugates induce immunogenic cell death and improve the anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in humanized mouse models | |
| Passeri et al. | Immunoconjugates: Magic Bullets for Cancer Therapy? |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Dead |