CA2238160A1 - Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms - Google Patents
Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2238160A1 CA2238160A1 CA 2238160 CA2238160A CA2238160A1 CA 2238160 A1 CA2238160 A1 CA 2238160A1 CA 2238160 CA2238160 CA 2238160 CA 2238160 A CA2238160 A CA 2238160A CA 2238160 A1 CA2238160 A1 CA 2238160A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- camera
- installation
- mantle
- framework
- gape
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 12
- 241000237852 Mollusca Species 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 35
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 abstract description 11
- 241000237536 Mytilus edulis Species 0.000 abstract description 6
- 235000020638 mussel Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 6
- 241000237503 Pectinidae Species 0.000 abstract description 3
- 235000020637 scallop Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 3
- 241000237519 Bivalvia Species 0.000 abstract description 2
- 235000020639 clam Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 2
- 241000237502 Ostreidae Species 0.000 abstract 1
- 235000020636 oyster Nutrition 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 18
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000003542 behavioural effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 244000144974 aquaculture Species 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009360 aquaculture Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013535 sea water Substances 0.000 description 2
- ODPOAESBSUKMHD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 6,7-dihydrodipyrido[1,2-b:1',2'-e]pyrazine-5,8-diium;dibromide Chemical compound [Br-].[Br-].C1=CC=[N+]2CC[N+]3=CC=CC=C3C2=C1 ODPOAESBSUKMHD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 206010000117 Abnormal behaviour Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010011224 Cough Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000005630 Diquat Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000282320 Panthera leo Species 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003653 coastal water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006854 communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000009189 diving Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003344 environmental pollutant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004634 feeding behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003031 feeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003292 glue Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 231100000518 lethal Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001665 lethal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000719 pollutant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000004417 polycarbonate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000515 polycarbonate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000384 rearing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000014102 seafood Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000013049 sediment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004062 sedimentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000015170 shellfish Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002341 toxic gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/18—Water
- G01N33/1886—Water using probes, e.g. submersible probes, buoys
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/18—Water
- G01N33/186—Water using one or more living organisms, e.g. a fish
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Farming Of Fish And Shellfish (AREA)
Abstract
An installation for in situ monitoring the quality of a habitat of aquatic organism with minimal disturbance to the aquatic organisms. In a first aspect of the present invention, the monitoring installation uses invertebrate sentinel species such as mussels, clams, oysters and scallops.
The monitoring installation comprises broadly, a buoy; a mooring and a monitoring apparatus comprising; a framework having an upper end connected to the buoy and a lower end connected to the mooring. There is also provided a camera attached to the framework. The camera is adapted for underwater operation and has image data generating and transmitting capabilities for transmitting a number of images to a remote receiver. A support structure is detachably mounted to the framework and has rotary retainers for movably supporting one or more socks of mollusks in front of the camera.
The monitoring installation comprises broadly, a buoy; a mooring and a monitoring apparatus comprising; a framework having an upper end connected to the buoy and a lower end connected to the mooring. There is also provided a camera attached to the framework. The camera is adapted for underwater operation and has image data generating and transmitting capabilities for transmitting a number of images to a remote receiver. A support structure is detachably mounted to the framework and has rotary retainers for movably supporting one or more socks of mollusks in front of the camera.
Description
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 TITLE: INSTALLATION FOR IN SITU MONITORING THE
QUALITY OF HABITAT OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to early warning systems for monitoring coastal water quality, and more particularly, it relates to a portable submersible apparatus for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic org~ni.sms, or for in situ detecting lethal and sublethal pollution 5 in inland or sea water.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A good understanding of the coastal ecosystems and the monitoring of water quality have become essential to the success of any aquaculture program. Therefore, in recent years there have been several proposals 10 developed for monitoring the quality of water at fish rearing installations and around natural shellfish habitats to ensure a healthy condition of the cultivated species.
Although these systems were developed primarily for the aquaculture industry, other applications include: the provision for an early 15 warning of the onset of toxic bloom events that affect seafood crops designated for human consumption; the detection of pollution at point-source discharges around industrial operations such as pulp & paper; and the detection of pollution and sediment re-suspension during offshore oil & gas operations and marine construction projects.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 In a first example of the prior art systems, the US Patent 4,626,992, issued on Dec. 2, 1986 to J. Greaves; R.S. Wilson; and E.H. Smith, discloses a water quality early warning system wherein aquatic org~ni.sms are placed in monitoring tanks and are exposed to the water from a selected S source. These org~ni.sms are observed by cameras. A computer and software are used for analysing the org~nisms' movements and for comparing the observed movements with the set of prediction parameters.
When the org~nisms' observed movements do not correspond to the predicted pararneters, a warning message is generated. Other apparatus for 10 monitoling the behaviour of fish in a fish tank using a camera and an image analysis software are also disclosed in US Patent 4,888,703 issued on Dec.
19,1989 to K. Baba et al., and in US Patent 5,222,458 issued on Jun. 29, 1993 to J.H.C. Pippy.
Another example of the water quality monitoring systems of the prior art using a fish tank is described in the US Patent 4,723,511, issued on February 9, 1988 to A.J. Solman and G.P. Evans. In the described system, the behaviour of fish is monitored by measuring the voltage from a pair of electrodes mounted in the fish tank in which water to be monitored is circulated. This system monitors a small oscillating voltage 20 which is produced by the fish in ventilation. A rise in ventilation frequencyor an increase in the frequency of abnormal behaviour such as coughing is indicative of the conl~min~ted water.
In that respect, a method and a processor for i~ter~ g the ventilation frequency of fish and for generating an alarm when the 25 ventilation frequency reaches a threshold value is disclosed in US Patent 5,469,144, issued on Nov. 21, 1995 to P. Gradzki, M. Kaynor, and D.
Gruber.
A further system for monitoring the quality of water in situ is disclosed in US Patent 4,744,331, issued on May 17, 1988 to D.E. Whiffin.
The system uses cameras mounted in a sea pen for monitoring the weight gain and diseases in fish retained in the sea pen. The cameras in this 5 installation are controllable from a remote location, by an operator using a monitor screen and a control panel.
Most water quality monitoring systems of the prior art rely on the behaviour of fish confined in a fish tank or in a floating enclosure. In the case of the fish tank systems, the monitoring of water quality relies on 10 discrete field sampling followed by laboratory analysis. In the case of the fish pen installation, the equipment is complex, expensive and the image analyses are better interpreted by marine biologists. Furthermore, the fish specimens in both cases are monitored while moving about in a restrained mode, and therefore, a certain deviation factor must be considered when 15 defining a normal behaviour.
Therefore, it is believed that there is still an important market demand for a portable monitoring apparatus, which is reliable, relatively inexpensive, which can be transported and deployed using a small boat, which can be interpreted by a fish farmer having little knowledge of an 20 aquatic org~nism behaviour when the organism is under stress, and most importantly, which can be used for monitoring in situ, one or more aquatic organisms in a true natural environment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the present invention, however, there is provided an installation 25 for in situ monitoring the quality of a habitat of aquatic org~nism~ with CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 minim~l disturbance to the aquatic org~nism~. In a first aspect of the present invention, the installation of the present invention uses invertebrate sentinel species such as mussels, clams and scallops. These species are somewhat passive ~nim~l~ and are easily observable. Furthermore it has 5 been found that bivalve behaviour reliably reflects water quality.
Individual or a sock of bivalves are suspended on a substrate that mimics their natural habitat. They are allowed to seffle along the sock with their byssus threads, and no sensors are mounted to their shells. The bivalves may also be attached with glue or ear-hung on ropes or nylon strips.
The installation of the present invention comprises broadly, a buoy, a mooring and a portable monitoring apparatus comprising: a framework having an upper end connected to the buoy and a lower end connected to the mooring. There is also provided a camera attached to the framework.
The camera is adapted for underwater operation and has data storage 15 capabilities for registering a number of images. An instrument enclosure is also attached to the framework, and contains a variety of instruments relative to characteristics of the body of water, and a power supply battery for operating the instruments during a nominal test period. The monitoring apparatus further has a support structure mounted on the framework and 20 extending in front of the camera. The support structure comprises rotary retainers retaining the aquatic org~ni~m specimen in front of the camera.
The installation of the present invention can be deployed in the form of an inexpensive mooring in situ, such that the test ~nim~l~ are in their natural environment. The specimens are monitored by the underwater 25 camera, and both normal and stressed behaviour patterns are established and recorded. For example, the behavioural factors observed on bivalve specimens generally include various filtering modes, that is: a bivalve which is not pu~ g; open but not feeding; feeding; or severely stressed.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 Other behavioural indicators generally considered to determine behavioural indices include events such as the number of clapping of the valves together to clear i~ allts particles from the mantle cavity per hour;
the amount of faeces/pseudo faeces produced, or the amount of moving 5 about to get into a better position. By observing several specimens, it is possible to determine the period of time each bivalve spends in each activity, as well as the response of the specimens to particular events.
Deviations from normal behaviour caused by environmental stressors are compared with predefined alarm-thresholds values.
The principal advantage of the installation of the present invention is found in its ability to observe in situ a submarine region, to observe the behaviour of invertebrate specimens and to register certain observations related to the compor~nent of these specimens. The recorded data can then be analysed and combined to determine one or more denominate 15 mathematical factors hereinafter referred to as the behavioural, or 'activity' indices of the invertebrate specimens in this submarine region. These indlces are a direct indicative of the quality of water in this submarine reglon.
In another aspect of the installation of the present invention, there 20 are also provided a first light mounted to the framework of the monitoring apparatus, and which is oriented to emit light toward the aquatic organism specimen for lighting the aquatic org~ni.sm specimen during an operation of the camera; and a second light mounted to the support structure and oriented to emit light in a direction perpendicular to a line of sight of the 25 camera. The operation of the second light causes reflections on suspended CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 particles near the aquatic org~nism specimen, and causes the particles to become visible to the camera. Hence, the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the present invention is a single instrument package capable of recording both the floc dynamics of a submarine region and/or the 5 behaviour of invertebrate species such as mollusks, exposed to the conditions of that region.
Other functions of the monil(~ g apparatus of the installation of the present invention includes the ability to measure and record several marine life supporting characteristics of the aquatic site. The variation in current 10 speed over the tidal cycle is known to change the settling of sedimentation on the site, to bring in particles of nutrients from different parts of a bay (e.g. on-shore or off-shore) or to re-suspend particles from the bottom.
Therefore, the measurement of marine snow, amorphous macro-aggregates suspended in seawater, combined with the measurement of physical 15 parameters such as tidal current, salinity and temperature, are provided by the instrumentation of the monitoring al)pal~Lus, for recording valuable data which are directly related to the compatibility of a site with the culture of aquatic species for example.
Although the in.ct~ ion of the present invention is advantageously 20 usable as an aquaculture management tool, it is also useful for detecting pollution in a body of water. It is known by marine life scientists that fish and other aquatic ~nim~l.s are very sensitive to pollution and are often used as bio-sensors for detecting quantities of pollutants which are too dilute for conventional testing. Therefore, sublethal environmental effects on 25 invertebrates can be monitored with the installation of the present inventionby observing the behaviour of the ~nim~ls over a relatively short period of time (days), without having to examine time-consuming effects such as CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 growth rate of the shell or soft body tissue. It is thereby possible to observe specimens of one or several species, to detect stressful conditions at a given site or to detect capacity problems before growth has been stunted. For pollution monitoring, several individuals from more than one 5 species, a mixed collection of mollusks cont~ining more and less sensitive species for example, are placed in the field of view of the camera of the apparatus of the present invention, such as the old-time method of nurturing a canaly in coal mine for detecting toxic gases, to detect pollution at levels which are sublethal to humans. Hence, the observation of the 10 invertebrate specimens provides an integrated synopsis of the overall quality of an aquatic environment.
In this respect, and according with another aspect of the installation of the present invention, the camera of the monitoring apparatus is adapted to generate digital images and the buoy contains data tr~n~mitting 15 equipment for transmitting the digital images of the camera to a remote location. A number of installations deployed at key locations and all transmitting data in a real-time mode to a common control station is a reliable early warning system for monitoring pollution in a body of water.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The preferred embodiment of the present invention will be further understood from the following description, with reference to the drawings in which:
- Figure 1 illustrates the installation of a first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 2 is a partial close-up view of the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 - Figure 3 is a close-up view of a rotary retainer for adjustablyretaining a sock of mollusk to the monitoring apparatus, as seen in detail circle 3 in Figure 2.
- Figure 4 is a partial top view of the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 5 illustrates a view of the mollusk specimens as seen through the camera of the mol~ilo~ g apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 6 shows a chart of typical aquatic parameters recorded by the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 7 illustrates an installation of a second preferred embodiment comprising an instrument buoy;
- Figure 8 shows a side view of the instrument buoy used with the installation of the second preferred embodiment;
- Figure 9 is a vertical cross-section view of the instrument buoy shown in Figures 7 and 8.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PR:EFERRED EMBODIMENT
A monitoring installation of a first preferred embodiment is 20 illustrated in Figure 1. The mollilol~llg installation comprises a monitoring CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 apparatus 20 which is suspended in a body of water 22 to be monitored.
The apparatus 20 is suspended by means of a buoy 24, buoy rope 26, a mooring 28 resting on the bottom 30 of the body of water and a mooring rope 32. The buoy 24 and the mooring 28 each has a swivel joint 34,36 respectively for preventing t~n~ling of the ropes from the effect of waves and current on the buoy 24 and on the apparatus 20.
The monitoring apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment may be deployed at any depth in the body of water 22 by adjusting the length of the buoy rope 26. When the monitoring apparatus 20 is submerged at a preferred depth, the mooring rope 32 is then pulled tight through a block pulley 38 on the mooring swivel 36 and attached to the buoy 24 for retaining the monitoring apparatus 20 at the preferred depth.
The monitoring apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment also has a rudder 37 attached to a rudder frame 39 extending behind the monitoring apparatus, for keeping the monitoring apparatus 20 in alignment with the Cullell~s present at the test site.
Referring now to Figures 2-5, the monitoring apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment comprises essentially a framework 40 enclosing a camera 42 and an instrumentation enclosure 44 containing a battery and various instruments for monitoring the characteristics of the submarine habitat to be evaluated. The nature of these instruments will be explained in greater details in the following pages of this disclosure and especially when m~king reference to Figure 6.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 Although the framework 40 of the apparatus 20 is illustrated as having has a cubical shape, it will be appreciated that an oblong or cylindrical framework is also considered within the scope of the present invention, and the shape depends solely upon the preference of the 5 manufacturer of the apparatus.
The preferred camera 42 mounted in the framework 40 of the apparatus of the first preferred embodiment is a self-contained, battery powered and water-resistant camera having image storage capability and battery power for operations during 48-hour or longer periods. A
o camcorder-type camera having means for controlling an intermittent operation thereof is quite appro~liate for discreetly monitoring the behaviour of mollusks. The lens on the camera 42 is preferably a wide angle marine-type lens having a refractive index suitable for use in water.
Typical underwater camera units for this application are:
15 camcorders Hi-8 units, such as Sony TR 555 TM or equivalent; or digital camcorders, such as Sony DCR-VX 1OOOTM, or Canon OpturaTM . The camera is preferably mounted in a pressure resistant housing having a viewing window made of acrylic, polycarbonate, optical quality glass or the like.
The apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment also comprises a structure 46 extending from the framework 40 and being disposed in front of the camera 42. The structure 46 is used for supporting a representative sample of aquatic org~nisms in the submarine site to be evaluated. The preferred representative sample of aquatic org~nism~ are bivalves 48, such as a sock of mussels, ear-hung scallops or other mollusks of the like, or bivalves placed in a fixed position on a frame.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 The framework 40 of the a~ al~lus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment is affixed to the buoy rope 26 by a first set of stabilizing ropes 50 and to the mooring rope 32 by a second set of stabilizing ropes 52. Both sets of stabilizing ropes 50,52 are attached to S eyed tabs 54 on the upper and lower outside corners of the framework 40 respectively. The length of each stabilizing rope is preferably adjusted such that the buoy rope 26 and mooring rope 32 are aligned with the centre of gravity of the apparatus 20 and the apparatus 20 is suspended horizontally. It will be appreciated that several diving weights may also be l O attached to the framework 40 to counterbalance the weight of the mollusks 48 and supporting structure 46, for m~int~ining the apparatus 20 in a horizontal alignment.
The sock support structure 46 of the apparatus 20 is pivotally supported on a pair of arms 60. The arms 60 are telescopically mounted 15 into a pair of tubular sockets 62, one on the upper portion of the framework 40 and the other being on the lower portion of the framework 40. The arms 60 are thereby extensible and retractable relative to the camera 42 for obtaining an ideal focal distance between the sock of mollusks 48 and the lens of the camera 42.
Each arm 60 has a clevis joint 64 connected to the sock support structure 46. The plane of the structure 46 can thereby be tilted from side to side about the vertical axis of both clevises 64, to vary the angle of the structure 46 relative to the line of sight of the camera 42. This articulation is particularly advantageous for varying the perspective view of the images to be generated by the camera 42.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 Another important advantage of the mounting clevises 64 is that the sock support structure 46 is detachable from the clevises 64 and from the monitoring apparatus 20. This feature is particularly advantageous for growing various test specimens in a remote location under controlled 5 conditions for example, on a number of support structures 46, and for carrying and mounting one of these support structures 46 to the monitoring apparatus when needed and with a specific test specimen 48 having some affinity for a site to be monitored.
The support structure 46 is preferably rectangular in shape having a height of about 16 inches (40 cm) and a length of about 24 inches (60 cm). The support structure 46 is thereby easily manipulated from the remote growing site to the test site by one person, and easily installed on the monitoring apparatus 20 with minimum disturbance to the test speclmens.
The apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment also has a first light 70 for illllmin~ting the sock of mollusks 48 during the operation of the camera 42. A second light 72 is also provided for illllmin~tin~ marine snow in the vicinity of the sock of 20 mollusks 48. The first light 70 is generally oriented to ill -min~te a region on the sock of mollusks 48 corresponding to the scope of view of the camera 42. On the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment the length of the arms 60 and the height of the structure 46 are about 12-16 inches (30-40 cm). The first light 70 is set at 25 an angle of about 45~ with the sock of mollusks 48 in order to provide an ideal illumin~tion. The first light 70 operates simultaneously with the camera 42 for observing the behaviour of the mollusks 48.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 It has been found that red light disturbs the mollusk specimens the least. For this reason, the first light 70 preferably has a tinted lens or othermeans for emitting red light.
The second light 72 is preferably mounted to the sock support 5 structure 46 and is oriented transversally to the sock of mollusks 48. The second light 72 has a Fresnel lens for generating a collimated beam of light having known cross-section dimensions. The second light 72 also operates simultaneously with the camera 42 for creating reflections on suspended particles near the sock of mollusks 48, and causing these particles to 10 become visible on the images taken by the camera 42.
Referring now particularly to Figures 2, 4 and 5, the second light 72 is mounted on the front side of the support structure 46 and the light beam thereof is oriented toward a front region of the structure 46. The sock of mollusks 48 is attached to mounting brackets 76 on the front side 15 of the support structure 46, at a distance 'D' from the support structure 46 such that its position is aligned with the collimated light beam of the second light 72. The mollusks are thereby at a same focal distance from the camera 42 as the particles ill~lmin~ted by the second light 72.
A baffle plate 77 is affixed to and between both telescoping arms 60 20 and extends between the sock of mollusks 48 and the second light 72 for blocking the light beam of the second light 72, and preventing areas of great light intensity on the mollusk specimens 48, which could adversely disturb the mollusks or affect the quality of the images taken by the camera 42.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 The mounting brackets 76 further comprises a pair of rotary retainers 78 that are adjustable angularly about the axis of the sock. The sock of mollusks 48 is thereby adjustable relative to the support structure 46 so that a greatest number of specimens are visible by the camera 42.
The size of the images taken by the camera 42 is preferably the size of the sock support structure 46 as illustrated in Figure 5. The area min~ted by the first light 70 is represented by the area defined inside the ellipse 80 . The thickness of the collimated light beam of the second light 72 is represented by the space between lines 82,84 in Figure 4. The height o of the collimated light beam is represented by the distance between lines 86,88 in Figure 5.
The structure 46 of the apparatus of the preferred embodiment further has a pair of parallel wires 90,92 oriented vertically at a known distance from one-another inside the area define by the structure. The pair of parallel wires 90,92, define a longitudinal segment of the collimated light beam. The volume defined between lines 82,84,86,88 and between two vertical transversal planes relative to the collim~te~ light beam, passing through wires 90,92 respectively is a slab of known dimensions. The number of particles observed in this slab, when the second light 72 is lit, can be extrapolated to obtain a representative amount of marine snow in the submarine region being tested.
The operation of both the first and second lights 70,72 is restricted to the time when the camera is recording images, and is preferably of a short duration (less than 2 minutes) so that the mollusks 48 are disturbed as little as possible. The intervals between image sequences being registered by the camera 42 is preferably between about 10 to 30 minutes.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 The instrumentation enclosed in the enclosure 44 preferably comprises sensors for measuring the conductivity of water, the water temperature and water pressure. The instrumentation also preferably comprises an electronic clock and data storing means for recording the 5 information of the sensors as functions of time, and an electronic compass for recording the alignment of the rudder 37, or the current directions. The instrumentation in the enclosure 44 also preferably contains a time interval programmer and circuitry for operating the first and second lights 70,72 and the camera 42 at random or specified intervals. This feature is 0 particularly advantageous for preventing the mollusks 48 from getting accustomed to the flashes of light and modifying their behaviour accordingly.
When a test is completed in a submarine region and the apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment is pulled out of the 15 water, the data storing means in the form of a disk or a cassette for example, are transferred into a computer for analysis. One example of a software used for analysing images is the image processing system commercialized under the trade name OPTIMASTM. This software is especially useful for obtaining the density, fractal dimension and number 20 of particle per sample of the marine snow visible in the aforesaid light slab of each image.
Other software are also used to inlel~r~l and consolidate all the information registered by the apparatus. Pressure readings registered by the instrumentation of the apparatus 20 are used to track the tidal 25 movements. Temperature, salinity, pressure and current records are used to d~ --~ine the probable origin of the particles being carried through the site. Therefore, the analysis of all the data provides an integrated CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 indication as to whether or not a site will be appropliate for the culture of a specific species of mollusks.
lel~lion of images is effected to delelll~ine several behavioural indices which permit to evaluate a normal or stressed condition of one or 5 more mollusk specimens. The Activity Index for example is calculated from observations of shell gape, mantle extension and mantle position.
Shell gape position is assigned a number from lowest to highest: closed (0), slit (1), half open (3) or open (5). Mantle state is also assigned a number from lowest to highest: retracted (0), half retracted (3), full (5), and 10 extended (10). Mantle position is recorded as meshed (1) or open (2). The Activity Index is the sum of the values for shell gape, mantle extension and mantle position. The Activity Index is calculated from the average values of as many ~nim~l.s as possible (usually 10-25), given the orientation of mussels in the sock. In addition to the above, the Number Open Index is 15 recorded. The Number Open Index is the percent of mussels that have a mantle position visibly open. The Number Open Index is usually recorded for a much larger number of ~nim~l.s (between 50 and 100). The higher Activity Index with a high Number Open Index indicate healthy conditions, and a lower Activity Index indicate stressful conditions.
Typical graphs generated from the data registered over a 36-hour period by the a~a~us of the installation of the first preferred embodiment are illustrated in Figure 6. This illustration represents the relation between mussel behaviour, floc dynamics and tidal cycles. Black boxes below each graph indicate periods of darkness. Open boxes indicate times of daylight.
Dashed vertical lines show dawn and dusk. Data were plotted against time, and smoothed using LOWESSTM, a smoothing algorithm that is useful for observing trends in relationships. Dashed lines in all three graphs indicate water pressure, which describes the tidal cycle.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 In the top panel, the 'T' line is temperature, and the 'S' line is salinity. On the second panel, the 'F' line is the fractal dimension of marine snow particles, and the 'N' line is the number marine snow particles in each sample. On the bottom panel, the 'A' line is the Activity Index, and 5 the 'Nl ' line is again the number of marine snow particles in each sample, shown in a reverse mode for easier visual comprehension. Depth, current, temperature, salinity and local underwater chemistry are stimuli that modify the behaviour of many aquatic org~ni.cm~7 including the feeding behaviour of mollusks. Therefore, the apparatus of the installation of the 10 first preferred embodiment provides hard records of these factors and invertebrate behaviours to enable a better management of marine resources.
The images provided by the apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment are preferably intellJret~d by scientists in the field marine biology, to determine according to established parameters the 15 behavioural indices of the observed mollusks 48. For example, in order to determine the feeding mode of bivalves, it is necessary to quantify the temporal changes in both the marine snow density and feeding activity of the mollusks. Filtering activity of mollusks can be grossly approximated by valve gape and mantle states as captured on the images registered by the 20 monitoring apparatus.
Another advantage of the monitoring installation of the preferred embodiment is easily deployed by an aquaculture producer for example.
The digital or analog data collected by the apparatus are easily transmitted electronically to an inle~ el~lion center where marine scientists can 25 prepare and forward back a detailed report of their analyses to the aquaculture producer. This method is highly reliable, quick, easily performed and reasonably inexpensive.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 It will be appreciated that while the afore-mentioned disclosure is about monitoring installations comprising a self-contained monitoring apparatus where the data are recorded and retrieved at the completion of a test period, the present technology is available to transmit the information 5 on a real time basis to a remote receiver and inlell~reled using a personal computer. This latter method is preferred for applications where the monitoring installation is used to provide early warning of a pollution problem for example. In this respect, the monitoring apparatus in the installation of the second preferred embodiment 94 is connected by 10 comlllul~ication cable 96 to an instrument buoy 98 as illustrated in Figures 7, 8 and 9.
The preferred instrument buoy 98 is solar powered from a solar panel 100, and contains a data tr~n.cmitter 102 which receives data from the instrumentation 44 and camera 42 through the collln~ ication cable 96 and which transmits the data in a wireless mode through an antenna 104, to a remote receiver. The preferred instrument buoy also contains a battery charger 106 and a battery 108 supplying power to the instruments in the buoy, or to both the instruments in the buoy and the instruments in the 20 monitoring apparatus.
The mo~ olillg apparatus of the installation of the second preferred embodiment 94 can be used with or without the second light 72. When the installation is used as an early warning system especially, the second light 72 is not required, and the support structure 46 is preferably adapted to 25 support a number of socks of mollusks such that the monitoring is carried out with a test sample preferably cont~ining as many as one hundred animals, and in specific cases, a mixture of species or different sizes of individuals.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 A continuous status signal travels by cable 96 to the solar-powered instrument buoy 98, from where it is transmitted by wireless communi-cation mode to the operation manager's desktop computer (not shown).
There, a~ op,iate visl~ali.~ahon software presents the information from one 5 or more monitoring installation in a format that permits immediate decision-making.
It will be appreciated that the installation of the second preferred embodiment may also be used with the accessories comprised in the monitoring al)pal~lus 20 of the first preferred embodiment, and vice versa.
lo The monitoring installations of both preferred embodiments comprise portable apparatus, which are relatively inexpensive to m~mlf~cture, which can be transported and deployed using a small boat, a skiff or a dory for example. The in~t~ tions of the preferred embodiments allow the monitoring of aquatic organisms that are at ease with their 15 monitored conditions, such that a variation between a normal and stressed behaviour patterns is as large as possible, and the reliability of each test is high.
While the above description provides a full and complete disclosure of the ~ led embodiments of the monitoring installations of the present 20 invention, various modifications and equivalents may be employed without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Such changes might involve alternate structural arr~ng~ment~, sizes, construction features and the like. Therefore, the above description and the illustrations should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention which is 25 defined by the appended claims.
QUALITY OF HABITAT OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to early warning systems for monitoring coastal water quality, and more particularly, it relates to a portable submersible apparatus for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic org~ni.sms, or for in situ detecting lethal and sublethal pollution 5 in inland or sea water.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A good understanding of the coastal ecosystems and the monitoring of water quality have become essential to the success of any aquaculture program. Therefore, in recent years there have been several proposals 10 developed for monitoring the quality of water at fish rearing installations and around natural shellfish habitats to ensure a healthy condition of the cultivated species.
Although these systems were developed primarily for the aquaculture industry, other applications include: the provision for an early 15 warning of the onset of toxic bloom events that affect seafood crops designated for human consumption; the detection of pollution at point-source discharges around industrial operations such as pulp & paper; and the detection of pollution and sediment re-suspension during offshore oil & gas operations and marine construction projects.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 In a first example of the prior art systems, the US Patent 4,626,992, issued on Dec. 2, 1986 to J. Greaves; R.S. Wilson; and E.H. Smith, discloses a water quality early warning system wherein aquatic org~ni.sms are placed in monitoring tanks and are exposed to the water from a selected S source. These org~ni.sms are observed by cameras. A computer and software are used for analysing the org~nisms' movements and for comparing the observed movements with the set of prediction parameters.
When the org~nisms' observed movements do not correspond to the predicted pararneters, a warning message is generated. Other apparatus for 10 monitoling the behaviour of fish in a fish tank using a camera and an image analysis software are also disclosed in US Patent 4,888,703 issued on Dec.
19,1989 to K. Baba et al., and in US Patent 5,222,458 issued on Jun. 29, 1993 to J.H.C. Pippy.
Another example of the water quality monitoring systems of the prior art using a fish tank is described in the US Patent 4,723,511, issued on February 9, 1988 to A.J. Solman and G.P. Evans. In the described system, the behaviour of fish is monitored by measuring the voltage from a pair of electrodes mounted in the fish tank in which water to be monitored is circulated. This system monitors a small oscillating voltage 20 which is produced by the fish in ventilation. A rise in ventilation frequencyor an increase in the frequency of abnormal behaviour such as coughing is indicative of the conl~min~ted water.
In that respect, a method and a processor for i~ter~ g the ventilation frequency of fish and for generating an alarm when the 25 ventilation frequency reaches a threshold value is disclosed in US Patent 5,469,144, issued on Nov. 21, 1995 to P. Gradzki, M. Kaynor, and D.
Gruber.
A further system for monitoring the quality of water in situ is disclosed in US Patent 4,744,331, issued on May 17, 1988 to D.E. Whiffin.
The system uses cameras mounted in a sea pen for monitoring the weight gain and diseases in fish retained in the sea pen. The cameras in this 5 installation are controllable from a remote location, by an operator using a monitor screen and a control panel.
Most water quality monitoring systems of the prior art rely on the behaviour of fish confined in a fish tank or in a floating enclosure. In the case of the fish tank systems, the monitoring of water quality relies on 10 discrete field sampling followed by laboratory analysis. In the case of the fish pen installation, the equipment is complex, expensive and the image analyses are better interpreted by marine biologists. Furthermore, the fish specimens in both cases are monitored while moving about in a restrained mode, and therefore, a certain deviation factor must be considered when 15 defining a normal behaviour.
Therefore, it is believed that there is still an important market demand for a portable monitoring apparatus, which is reliable, relatively inexpensive, which can be transported and deployed using a small boat, which can be interpreted by a fish farmer having little knowledge of an 20 aquatic org~nism behaviour when the organism is under stress, and most importantly, which can be used for monitoring in situ, one or more aquatic organisms in a true natural environment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the present invention, however, there is provided an installation 25 for in situ monitoring the quality of a habitat of aquatic org~nism~ with CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 minim~l disturbance to the aquatic org~nism~. In a first aspect of the present invention, the installation of the present invention uses invertebrate sentinel species such as mussels, clams and scallops. These species are somewhat passive ~nim~l~ and are easily observable. Furthermore it has 5 been found that bivalve behaviour reliably reflects water quality.
Individual or a sock of bivalves are suspended on a substrate that mimics their natural habitat. They are allowed to seffle along the sock with their byssus threads, and no sensors are mounted to their shells. The bivalves may also be attached with glue or ear-hung on ropes or nylon strips.
The installation of the present invention comprises broadly, a buoy, a mooring and a portable monitoring apparatus comprising: a framework having an upper end connected to the buoy and a lower end connected to the mooring. There is also provided a camera attached to the framework.
The camera is adapted for underwater operation and has data storage 15 capabilities for registering a number of images. An instrument enclosure is also attached to the framework, and contains a variety of instruments relative to characteristics of the body of water, and a power supply battery for operating the instruments during a nominal test period. The monitoring apparatus further has a support structure mounted on the framework and 20 extending in front of the camera. The support structure comprises rotary retainers retaining the aquatic org~ni~m specimen in front of the camera.
The installation of the present invention can be deployed in the form of an inexpensive mooring in situ, such that the test ~nim~l~ are in their natural environment. The specimens are monitored by the underwater 25 camera, and both normal and stressed behaviour patterns are established and recorded. For example, the behavioural factors observed on bivalve specimens generally include various filtering modes, that is: a bivalve which is not pu~ g; open but not feeding; feeding; or severely stressed.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 Other behavioural indicators generally considered to determine behavioural indices include events such as the number of clapping of the valves together to clear i~ allts particles from the mantle cavity per hour;
the amount of faeces/pseudo faeces produced, or the amount of moving 5 about to get into a better position. By observing several specimens, it is possible to determine the period of time each bivalve spends in each activity, as well as the response of the specimens to particular events.
Deviations from normal behaviour caused by environmental stressors are compared with predefined alarm-thresholds values.
The principal advantage of the installation of the present invention is found in its ability to observe in situ a submarine region, to observe the behaviour of invertebrate specimens and to register certain observations related to the compor~nent of these specimens. The recorded data can then be analysed and combined to determine one or more denominate 15 mathematical factors hereinafter referred to as the behavioural, or 'activity' indices of the invertebrate specimens in this submarine region. These indlces are a direct indicative of the quality of water in this submarine reglon.
In another aspect of the installation of the present invention, there 20 are also provided a first light mounted to the framework of the monitoring apparatus, and which is oriented to emit light toward the aquatic organism specimen for lighting the aquatic org~ni.sm specimen during an operation of the camera; and a second light mounted to the support structure and oriented to emit light in a direction perpendicular to a line of sight of the 25 camera. The operation of the second light causes reflections on suspended CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 particles near the aquatic org~nism specimen, and causes the particles to become visible to the camera. Hence, the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the present invention is a single instrument package capable of recording both the floc dynamics of a submarine region and/or the 5 behaviour of invertebrate species such as mollusks, exposed to the conditions of that region.
Other functions of the monil(~ g apparatus of the installation of the present invention includes the ability to measure and record several marine life supporting characteristics of the aquatic site. The variation in current 10 speed over the tidal cycle is known to change the settling of sedimentation on the site, to bring in particles of nutrients from different parts of a bay (e.g. on-shore or off-shore) or to re-suspend particles from the bottom.
Therefore, the measurement of marine snow, amorphous macro-aggregates suspended in seawater, combined with the measurement of physical 15 parameters such as tidal current, salinity and temperature, are provided by the instrumentation of the monitoring al)pal~Lus, for recording valuable data which are directly related to the compatibility of a site with the culture of aquatic species for example.
Although the in.ct~ ion of the present invention is advantageously 20 usable as an aquaculture management tool, it is also useful for detecting pollution in a body of water. It is known by marine life scientists that fish and other aquatic ~nim~l.s are very sensitive to pollution and are often used as bio-sensors for detecting quantities of pollutants which are too dilute for conventional testing. Therefore, sublethal environmental effects on 25 invertebrates can be monitored with the installation of the present inventionby observing the behaviour of the ~nim~ls over a relatively short period of time (days), without having to examine time-consuming effects such as CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 growth rate of the shell or soft body tissue. It is thereby possible to observe specimens of one or several species, to detect stressful conditions at a given site or to detect capacity problems before growth has been stunted. For pollution monitoring, several individuals from more than one 5 species, a mixed collection of mollusks cont~ining more and less sensitive species for example, are placed in the field of view of the camera of the apparatus of the present invention, such as the old-time method of nurturing a canaly in coal mine for detecting toxic gases, to detect pollution at levels which are sublethal to humans. Hence, the observation of the 10 invertebrate specimens provides an integrated synopsis of the overall quality of an aquatic environment.
In this respect, and according with another aspect of the installation of the present invention, the camera of the monitoring apparatus is adapted to generate digital images and the buoy contains data tr~n~mitting 15 equipment for transmitting the digital images of the camera to a remote location. A number of installations deployed at key locations and all transmitting data in a real-time mode to a common control station is a reliable early warning system for monitoring pollution in a body of water.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The preferred embodiment of the present invention will be further understood from the following description, with reference to the drawings in which:
- Figure 1 illustrates the installation of a first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 2 is a partial close-up view of the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 - Figure 3 is a close-up view of a rotary retainer for adjustablyretaining a sock of mollusk to the monitoring apparatus, as seen in detail circle 3 in Figure 2.
- Figure 4 is a partial top view of the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 5 illustrates a view of the mollusk specimens as seen through the camera of the mol~ilo~ g apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 6 shows a chart of typical aquatic parameters recorded by the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment;
- Figure 7 illustrates an installation of a second preferred embodiment comprising an instrument buoy;
- Figure 8 shows a side view of the instrument buoy used with the installation of the second preferred embodiment;
- Figure 9 is a vertical cross-section view of the instrument buoy shown in Figures 7 and 8.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PR:EFERRED EMBODIMENT
A monitoring installation of a first preferred embodiment is 20 illustrated in Figure 1. The mollilol~llg installation comprises a monitoring CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 apparatus 20 which is suspended in a body of water 22 to be monitored.
The apparatus 20 is suspended by means of a buoy 24, buoy rope 26, a mooring 28 resting on the bottom 30 of the body of water and a mooring rope 32. The buoy 24 and the mooring 28 each has a swivel joint 34,36 respectively for preventing t~n~ling of the ropes from the effect of waves and current on the buoy 24 and on the apparatus 20.
The monitoring apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment may be deployed at any depth in the body of water 22 by adjusting the length of the buoy rope 26. When the monitoring apparatus 20 is submerged at a preferred depth, the mooring rope 32 is then pulled tight through a block pulley 38 on the mooring swivel 36 and attached to the buoy 24 for retaining the monitoring apparatus 20 at the preferred depth.
The monitoring apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment also has a rudder 37 attached to a rudder frame 39 extending behind the monitoring apparatus, for keeping the monitoring apparatus 20 in alignment with the Cullell~s present at the test site.
Referring now to Figures 2-5, the monitoring apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment comprises essentially a framework 40 enclosing a camera 42 and an instrumentation enclosure 44 containing a battery and various instruments for monitoring the characteristics of the submarine habitat to be evaluated. The nature of these instruments will be explained in greater details in the following pages of this disclosure and especially when m~king reference to Figure 6.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 Although the framework 40 of the apparatus 20 is illustrated as having has a cubical shape, it will be appreciated that an oblong or cylindrical framework is also considered within the scope of the present invention, and the shape depends solely upon the preference of the 5 manufacturer of the apparatus.
The preferred camera 42 mounted in the framework 40 of the apparatus of the first preferred embodiment is a self-contained, battery powered and water-resistant camera having image storage capability and battery power for operations during 48-hour or longer periods. A
o camcorder-type camera having means for controlling an intermittent operation thereof is quite appro~liate for discreetly monitoring the behaviour of mollusks. The lens on the camera 42 is preferably a wide angle marine-type lens having a refractive index suitable for use in water.
Typical underwater camera units for this application are:
15 camcorders Hi-8 units, such as Sony TR 555 TM or equivalent; or digital camcorders, such as Sony DCR-VX 1OOOTM, or Canon OpturaTM . The camera is preferably mounted in a pressure resistant housing having a viewing window made of acrylic, polycarbonate, optical quality glass or the like.
The apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment also comprises a structure 46 extending from the framework 40 and being disposed in front of the camera 42. The structure 46 is used for supporting a representative sample of aquatic org~nisms in the submarine site to be evaluated. The preferred representative sample of aquatic org~nism~ are bivalves 48, such as a sock of mussels, ear-hung scallops or other mollusks of the like, or bivalves placed in a fixed position on a frame.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 The framework 40 of the a~ al~lus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment is affixed to the buoy rope 26 by a first set of stabilizing ropes 50 and to the mooring rope 32 by a second set of stabilizing ropes 52. Both sets of stabilizing ropes 50,52 are attached to S eyed tabs 54 on the upper and lower outside corners of the framework 40 respectively. The length of each stabilizing rope is preferably adjusted such that the buoy rope 26 and mooring rope 32 are aligned with the centre of gravity of the apparatus 20 and the apparatus 20 is suspended horizontally. It will be appreciated that several diving weights may also be l O attached to the framework 40 to counterbalance the weight of the mollusks 48 and supporting structure 46, for m~int~ining the apparatus 20 in a horizontal alignment.
The sock support structure 46 of the apparatus 20 is pivotally supported on a pair of arms 60. The arms 60 are telescopically mounted 15 into a pair of tubular sockets 62, one on the upper portion of the framework 40 and the other being on the lower portion of the framework 40. The arms 60 are thereby extensible and retractable relative to the camera 42 for obtaining an ideal focal distance between the sock of mollusks 48 and the lens of the camera 42.
Each arm 60 has a clevis joint 64 connected to the sock support structure 46. The plane of the structure 46 can thereby be tilted from side to side about the vertical axis of both clevises 64, to vary the angle of the structure 46 relative to the line of sight of the camera 42. This articulation is particularly advantageous for varying the perspective view of the images to be generated by the camera 42.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 Another important advantage of the mounting clevises 64 is that the sock support structure 46 is detachable from the clevises 64 and from the monitoring apparatus 20. This feature is particularly advantageous for growing various test specimens in a remote location under controlled 5 conditions for example, on a number of support structures 46, and for carrying and mounting one of these support structures 46 to the monitoring apparatus when needed and with a specific test specimen 48 having some affinity for a site to be monitored.
The support structure 46 is preferably rectangular in shape having a height of about 16 inches (40 cm) and a length of about 24 inches (60 cm). The support structure 46 is thereby easily manipulated from the remote growing site to the test site by one person, and easily installed on the monitoring apparatus 20 with minimum disturbance to the test speclmens.
The apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment also has a first light 70 for illllmin~ting the sock of mollusks 48 during the operation of the camera 42. A second light 72 is also provided for illllmin~tin~ marine snow in the vicinity of the sock of 20 mollusks 48. The first light 70 is generally oriented to ill -min~te a region on the sock of mollusks 48 corresponding to the scope of view of the camera 42. On the monitoring apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment the length of the arms 60 and the height of the structure 46 are about 12-16 inches (30-40 cm). The first light 70 is set at 25 an angle of about 45~ with the sock of mollusks 48 in order to provide an ideal illumin~tion. The first light 70 operates simultaneously with the camera 42 for observing the behaviour of the mollusks 48.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 It has been found that red light disturbs the mollusk specimens the least. For this reason, the first light 70 preferably has a tinted lens or othermeans for emitting red light.
The second light 72 is preferably mounted to the sock support 5 structure 46 and is oriented transversally to the sock of mollusks 48. The second light 72 has a Fresnel lens for generating a collimated beam of light having known cross-section dimensions. The second light 72 also operates simultaneously with the camera 42 for creating reflections on suspended particles near the sock of mollusks 48, and causing these particles to 10 become visible on the images taken by the camera 42.
Referring now particularly to Figures 2, 4 and 5, the second light 72 is mounted on the front side of the support structure 46 and the light beam thereof is oriented toward a front region of the structure 46. The sock of mollusks 48 is attached to mounting brackets 76 on the front side 15 of the support structure 46, at a distance 'D' from the support structure 46 such that its position is aligned with the collimated light beam of the second light 72. The mollusks are thereby at a same focal distance from the camera 42 as the particles ill~lmin~ted by the second light 72.
A baffle plate 77 is affixed to and between both telescoping arms 60 20 and extends between the sock of mollusks 48 and the second light 72 for blocking the light beam of the second light 72, and preventing areas of great light intensity on the mollusk specimens 48, which could adversely disturb the mollusks or affect the quality of the images taken by the camera 42.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 The mounting brackets 76 further comprises a pair of rotary retainers 78 that are adjustable angularly about the axis of the sock. The sock of mollusks 48 is thereby adjustable relative to the support structure 46 so that a greatest number of specimens are visible by the camera 42.
The size of the images taken by the camera 42 is preferably the size of the sock support structure 46 as illustrated in Figure 5. The area min~ted by the first light 70 is represented by the area defined inside the ellipse 80 . The thickness of the collimated light beam of the second light 72 is represented by the space between lines 82,84 in Figure 4. The height o of the collimated light beam is represented by the distance between lines 86,88 in Figure 5.
The structure 46 of the apparatus of the preferred embodiment further has a pair of parallel wires 90,92 oriented vertically at a known distance from one-another inside the area define by the structure. The pair of parallel wires 90,92, define a longitudinal segment of the collimated light beam. The volume defined between lines 82,84,86,88 and between two vertical transversal planes relative to the collim~te~ light beam, passing through wires 90,92 respectively is a slab of known dimensions. The number of particles observed in this slab, when the second light 72 is lit, can be extrapolated to obtain a representative amount of marine snow in the submarine region being tested.
The operation of both the first and second lights 70,72 is restricted to the time when the camera is recording images, and is preferably of a short duration (less than 2 minutes) so that the mollusks 48 are disturbed as little as possible. The intervals between image sequences being registered by the camera 42 is preferably between about 10 to 30 minutes.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 The instrumentation enclosed in the enclosure 44 preferably comprises sensors for measuring the conductivity of water, the water temperature and water pressure. The instrumentation also preferably comprises an electronic clock and data storing means for recording the 5 information of the sensors as functions of time, and an electronic compass for recording the alignment of the rudder 37, or the current directions. The instrumentation in the enclosure 44 also preferably contains a time interval programmer and circuitry for operating the first and second lights 70,72 and the camera 42 at random or specified intervals. This feature is 0 particularly advantageous for preventing the mollusks 48 from getting accustomed to the flashes of light and modifying their behaviour accordingly.
When a test is completed in a submarine region and the apparatus 20 of the installation of the first preferred embodiment is pulled out of the 15 water, the data storing means in the form of a disk or a cassette for example, are transferred into a computer for analysis. One example of a software used for analysing images is the image processing system commercialized under the trade name OPTIMASTM. This software is especially useful for obtaining the density, fractal dimension and number 20 of particle per sample of the marine snow visible in the aforesaid light slab of each image.
Other software are also used to inlel~r~l and consolidate all the information registered by the apparatus. Pressure readings registered by the instrumentation of the apparatus 20 are used to track the tidal 25 movements. Temperature, salinity, pressure and current records are used to d~ --~ine the probable origin of the particles being carried through the site. Therefore, the analysis of all the data provides an integrated CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 indication as to whether or not a site will be appropliate for the culture of a specific species of mollusks.
lel~lion of images is effected to delelll~ine several behavioural indices which permit to evaluate a normal or stressed condition of one or 5 more mollusk specimens. The Activity Index for example is calculated from observations of shell gape, mantle extension and mantle position.
Shell gape position is assigned a number from lowest to highest: closed (0), slit (1), half open (3) or open (5). Mantle state is also assigned a number from lowest to highest: retracted (0), half retracted (3), full (5), and 10 extended (10). Mantle position is recorded as meshed (1) or open (2). The Activity Index is the sum of the values for shell gape, mantle extension and mantle position. The Activity Index is calculated from the average values of as many ~nim~l.s as possible (usually 10-25), given the orientation of mussels in the sock. In addition to the above, the Number Open Index is 15 recorded. The Number Open Index is the percent of mussels that have a mantle position visibly open. The Number Open Index is usually recorded for a much larger number of ~nim~l.s (between 50 and 100). The higher Activity Index with a high Number Open Index indicate healthy conditions, and a lower Activity Index indicate stressful conditions.
Typical graphs generated from the data registered over a 36-hour period by the a~a~us of the installation of the first preferred embodiment are illustrated in Figure 6. This illustration represents the relation between mussel behaviour, floc dynamics and tidal cycles. Black boxes below each graph indicate periods of darkness. Open boxes indicate times of daylight.
Dashed vertical lines show dawn and dusk. Data were plotted against time, and smoothed using LOWESSTM, a smoothing algorithm that is useful for observing trends in relationships. Dashed lines in all three graphs indicate water pressure, which describes the tidal cycle.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 In the top panel, the 'T' line is temperature, and the 'S' line is salinity. On the second panel, the 'F' line is the fractal dimension of marine snow particles, and the 'N' line is the number marine snow particles in each sample. On the bottom panel, the 'A' line is the Activity Index, and 5 the 'Nl ' line is again the number of marine snow particles in each sample, shown in a reverse mode for easier visual comprehension. Depth, current, temperature, salinity and local underwater chemistry are stimuli that modify the behaviour of many aquatic org~ni.cm~7 including the feeding behaviour of mollusks. Therefore, the apparatus of the installation of the 10 first preferred embodiment provides hard records of these factors and invertebrate behaviours to enable a better management of marine resources.
The images provided by the apparatus of the installation of the first preferred embodiment are preferably intellJret~d by scientists in the field marine biology, to determine according to established parameters the 15 behavioural indices of the observed mollusks 48. For example, in order to determine the feeding mode of bivalves, it is necessary to quantify the temporal changes in both the marine snow density and feeding activity of the mollusks. Filtering activity of mollusks can be grossly approximated by valve gape and mantle states as captured on the images registered by the 20 monitoring apparatus.
Another advantage of the monitoring installation of the preferred embodiment is easily deployed by an aquaculture producer for example.
The digital or analog data collected by the apparatus are easily transmitted electronically to an inle~ el~lion center where marine scientists can 25 prepare and forward back a detailed report of their analyses to the aquaculture producer. This method is highly reliable, quick, easily performed and reasonably inexpensive.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 It will be appreciated that while the afore-mentioned disclosure is about monitoring installations comprising a self-contained monitoring apparatus where the data are recorded and retrieved at the completion of a test period, the present technology is available to transmit the information 5 on a real time basis to a remote receiver and inlell~reled using a personal computer. This latter method is preferred for applications where the monitoring installation is used to provide early warning of a pollution problem for example. In this respect, the monitoring apparatus in the installation of the second preferred embodiment 94 is connected by 10 comlllul~ication cable 96 to an instrument buoy 98 as illustrated in Figures 7, 8 and 9.
The preferred instrument buoy 98 is solar powered from a solar panel 100, and contains a data tr~n.cmitter 102 which receives data from the instrumentation 44 and camera 42 through the collln~ ication cable 96 and which transmits the data in a wireless mode through an antenna 104, to a remote receiver. The preferred instrument buoy also contains a battery charger 106 and a battery 108 supplying power to the instruments in the buoy, or to both the instruments in the buoy and the instruments in the 20 monitoring apparatus.
The mo~ olillg apparatus of the installation of the second preferred embodiment 94 can be used with or without the second light 72. When the installation is used as an early warning system especially, the second light 72 is not required, and the support structure 46 is preferably adapted to 25 support a number of socks of mollusks such that the monitoring is carried out with a test sample preferably cont~ining as many as one hundred animals, and in specific cases, a mixture of species or different sizes of individuals.
CA 02238160 1998-0~-21 A continuous status signal travels by cable 96 to the solar-powered instrument buoy 98, from where it is transmitted by wireless communi-cation mode to the operation manager's desktop computer (not shown).
There, a~ op,iate visl~ali.~ahon software presents the information from one 5 or more monitoring installation in a format that permits immediate decision-making.
It will be appreciated that the installation of the second preferred embodiment may also be used with the accessories comprised in the monitoring al)pal~lus 20 of the first preferred embodiment, and vice versa.
lo The monitoring installations of both preferred embodiments comprise portable apparatus, which are relatively inexpensive to m~mlf~cture, which can be transported and deployed using a small boat, a skiff or a dory for example. The in~t~ tions of the preferred embodiments allow the monitoring of aquatic organisms that are at ease with their 15 monitored conditions, such that a variation between a normal and stressed behaviour patterns is as large as possible, and the reliability of each test is high.
While the above description provides a full and complete disclosure of the ~ led embodiments of the monitoring installations of the present 20 invention, various modifications and equivalents may be employed without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Such changes might involve alternate structural arr~ng~ment~, sizes, construction features and the like. Therefore, the above description and the illustrations should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention which is 25 defined by the appended claims.
Claims (20)
1. An apparatus for in situ monitoring a quality of habitat of aquatic organisms, comprising:
a framework having an upper end connectable to a buoy and a lower end connectable to a mooring, a camera attached to said framework, said camera being adapted for underwater operation and having data storage capabilities for registering a number of images;
an instrument enclosure also attached to said framework, said enclosure containing instrumentation relative to characteristics of said body of water and a power supply means connected to said instrumentation for operating said instrumentation; and a support structure mounted on said framework and extending in front of said camera, said structure having means for supporting an aquatic organism specimen in front of said camera;
such that said framework is submersible at a set depth in a body of water and a behaviour of an aquatic organism specimen is observable by said camera when said apparatus is submerged in said body of water, and said aquatic organism specimen is attached to said support structure.
a framework having an upper end connectable to a buoy and a lower end connectable to a mooring, a camera attached to said framework, said camera being adapted for underwater operation and having data storage capabilities for registering a number of images;
an instrument enclosure also attached to said framework, said enclosure containing instrumentation relative to characteristics of said body of water and a power supply means connected to said instrumentation for operating said instrumentation; and a support structure mounted on said framework and extending in front of said camera, said structure having means for supporting an aquatic organism specimen in front of said camera;
such that said framework is submersible at a set depth in a body of water and a behaviour of an aquatic organism specimen is observable by said camera when said apparatus is submerged in said body of water, and said aquatic organism specimen is attached to said support structure.
2. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said support structure comprises a pair of spaced apart telescopic arms extending away from said camera, and a rectangular frame affixed to said telescopic arms and defining a plane perpendicular to a line of sight of said camera, said rectangular frame having anchor means for retaining said aquatic organism specimen in front of said camera.
3. The apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein said telescopic arms each has a clevis, and said clevises have means for pivotally and detachably retaining said rectangular frame to said telescopic arms.
4. The apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein said anchor means comprises an upper and lower rotary retainers mounted on said rectangular frame for adjustably retaining said aquatic organism specimen to said rectangular frame.
5. An installation for in situ monitoring a quality of habitat of aquatic organisms in a body of water, comprising:
a buoy floating on said body of water;
a mooring resting on a bottom surface of said body of water; and a monitoring apparatus comprising:
a framework being submersed in said body of water, and having an upper end connected to said buoy and a lower end connected to said mooring;
a camera attached to said framework said camera being adapted for underwater operation and having data storage capabilities for registering a number of images;
an instrument enclosure also attached to said framework, said enclosure containing instrumentation relative to characteristics of said body of water and a power supply means connected to said instrumentation for operating said instrumentation; and a support structure mounted to said framework and extending in front of said camera, said structure having means for supporting an aquatic organism specimen in front of said camera; and an aquatic organism specimen mounted to said means for supporting an aquatic organism specimen;
such that a behaviour of said aquatic organism specimen is observable and registrable by said camera for interpretation relative to said quality of habitat.
a buoy floating on said body of water;
a mooring resting on a bottom surface of said body of water; and a monitoring apparatus comprising:
a framework being submersed in said body of water, and having an upper end connected to said buoy and a lower end connected to said mooring;
a camera attached to said framework said camera being adapted for underwater operation and having data storage capabilities for registering a number of images;
an instrument enclosure also attached to said framework, said enclosure containing instrumentation relative to characteristics of said body of water and a power supply means connected to said instrumentation for operating said instrumentation; and a support structure mounted to said framework and extending in front of said camera, said structure having means for supporting an aquatic organism specimen in front of said camera; and an aquatic organism specimen mounted to said means for supporting an aquatic organism specimen;
such that a behaviour of said aquatic organism specimen is observable and registrable by said camera for interpretation relative to said quality of habitat.
6. The installation as claimed in claim 5, wherein said aquatic organism specimen comprises a sock of mollusks.
7. The installation as claimed in claim 6, wherein said support structure comprises a pair of spaced apart telescopic arms extending away from said camera, and a rectangular frame affixed to said telescopic arms and defining a plane perpendicular to a line of sight of said camera, said rectangular frame having anchor means for retaining said sock of mollusks in front of said camera.
8. The installation as claimed in claim 7, wherein said telescopic arms each has means for detachably retaining said rectangular frame thereto.
9. The installation as claimed in claim 7 wherein said anchor means comprises an upper and lower rotary retainers mounted on said rectangular frame for adjustably retaining said sock of mollusks in front of said camera.
10. The installation as claimed in claim 9, further comprising a first light for illuminating said aquatic specimens during an operation of said camera.
11. The installation as claimed in claim 5, wherein said monitoring apparatus also comprises a rudder affixed thereto.
12. The installation as claimed in claim 5, further comprising:
a first light mounted to said framework and oriented to emit light toward said aquatic organism specimen for lighting said aquatic organism specimen during an operation of said camera; and a second light mounted to said support structure and oriented to emit light in a direction perpendicular to a line of sight of said camera during an operation of said camera, for creating reflections on suspended particles near said aquatic organism specimen, and causing said particles to become visible to said camera, such that a floc dynamic of a submarine region is observable by said camera together with a behaviour of said aquatic organism specimen exposed to conditions of said submarine region.
a first light mounted to said framework and oriented to emit light toward said aquatic organism specimen for lighting said aquatic organism specimen during an operation of said camera; and a second light mounted to said support structure and oriented to emit light in a direction perpendicular to a line of sight of said camera during an operation of said camera, for creating reflections on suspended particles near said aquatic organism specimen, and causing said particles to become visible to said camera, such that a floc dynamic of a submarine region is observable by said camera together with a behaviour of said aquatic organism specimen exposed to conditions of said submarine region.
13. The installation as claimed in claim 12, wherein said second light has means for emitting a collimated light beam having a nominal height and nominal thickness relative to a sight of said camera.
14. The installation as claimed in claim 13 wherein said rectangular frame further comprises a pair of spaced apart parallel wires attached thereto and being oriented perpendicularly to said beam of light and defining a nominal longitudinal segment of said beam of light relative to said sight of said camera.
15. The installation as claimed in claim 14, wherein said first and second lights have means for emitting red light.
16. The installation as claimed in claim 5, wherein said camera also has means for generating digital images, and said buoy comprises transmitter means mounted therein and being connected to said means for generating digital images, for transmitting digital images of a behaviour of said aquatic organism specimen observed by said camera, to a remote location.
17. The installation as claimed in claim 16, wherein said framework comprises means for detachably supporting said support structure thereto, and said aquatic organism specimen comprises a plurality of socks of bivalves.
18. The installation as claimed in claim 17, wherein said buoy further comprises a solar panel, a battery charger connected to said solar panel, and a battery connected to said battery charger, to said camera and to said transmitter means.
19. A method for defining an activity index representative of a behaviour of mollusks in a body of water; comprising the steps of:
observing, using a camera, a plurality of mollusk specimens in a body of water;
observing a shell gape, mantle extension and mantle position of said plurality of mollusk specimens, from an image generated by said camera;
assigning a shell gape first number to an observed shell gape in a closed position; a shell gape second number, larger than said shell gape first number, to an observed shell gape in a slit position; a shell gape third number, larger than said shell gape second number, to an observed shell gape in a half open position, a shell gape fourth number larger than said shell gape third number, to an observed shell gape in an open position;
assigning a mantle state first number to an observed mantle in a retracted state; a mantle state second number, larger than said mantle state first number, to an observed mantle in a half retracted state, a mantle state third number, larger than said mantle state second number, to an observed mantle in a full state, and a mantle state fourth number, larger than said mantle state third number, to an observed mantle in an extended state;
assigning a mantle position first number to an observed meshed mantle position, and a mantle position second number, larger than said mantle position first number, to an observed open mantle position; and adding said shell gape first, second, third and fourth numbers; said mantle state first, second, third, fourth numbers; said mantle position first and second numbers to one another for said observed image.
observing, using a camera, a plurality of mollusk specimens in a body of water;
observing a shell gape, mantle extension and mantle position of said plurality of mollusk specimens, from an image generated by said camera;
assigning a shell gape first number to an observed shell gape in a closed position; a shell gape second number, larger than said shell gape first number, to an observed shell gape in a slit position; a shell gape third number, larger than said shell gape second number, to an observed shell gape in a half open position, a shell gape fourth number larger than said shell gape third number, to an observed shell gape in an open position;
assigning a mantle state first number to an observed mantle in a retracted state; a mantle state second number, larger than said mantle state first number, to an observed mantle in a half retracted state, a mantle state third number, larger than said mantle state second number, to an observed mantle in a full state, and a mantle state fourth number, larger than said mantle state third number, to an observed mantle in an extended state;
assigning a mantle position first number to an observed meshed mantle position, and a mantle position second number, larger than said mantle position first number, to an observed open mantle position; and adding said shell gape first, second, third and fourth numbers; said mantle state first, second, third, fourth numbers; said mantle position first and second numbers to one another for said observed image.
20. The method as claimed in claim 19 wherein said plurality of mollusk specimens comprises between about 10 to about 25 specimens.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2238160 CA2238160A1 (en) | 1997-05-26 | 1998-05-21 | Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2206103 | 1997-05-26 | ||
| CA2,206,103 | 1997-05-26 | ||
| CA 2238160 CA2238160A1 (en) | 1997-05-26 | 1998-05-21 | Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2238160A1 true CA2238160A1 (en) | 1998-11-26 |
Family
ID=25679371
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2238160 Abandoned CA2238160A1 (en) | 1997-05-26 | 1998-05-21 | Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2238160A1 (en) |
Cited By (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110069745A (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2019-07-30 | 山东省科学院海洋仪器仪表研究所 | A kind of active calculation method of bivalve shellfish biological life |
| CN110346523A (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2019-10-18 | 重庆工商大学融智学院 | Wetland Ecology Safety method for early warning based on spatial information |
| CN111264463A (en) * | 2020-03-25 | 2020-06-12 | 杭州师范大学 | Observation device and observation method for field in-situ research of tadpole development |
| CN111486304A (en) * | 2020-03-31 | 2020-08-04 | 中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所 | A shoot support for making benthonic animal activity |
| CN111999456A (en) * | 2020-08-11 | 2020-11-27 | 莱西市鑫喆工程技术服务中心 | Emergency biological early-warning type water quality monitoring method |
| CN113252861A (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-08-13 | 深之蓝(天津)水下智能科技有限公司 | Water quality detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113341098A (en) * | 2021-07-15 | 2021-09-03 | 武汉永清环保科技工程有限公司 | Buoy type water quality monitoring system for mobile sewage treatment plant |
| CN114005064A (en) * | 2021-11-01 | 2022-02-01 | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所 | A biological water pollution early warning method and device based on machine vision technology |
| CN114313119A (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2022-04-12 | 上海遥程信息科技有限公司 | Real-time water quality monitoring unmanned ship |
| CN115056927A (en) * | 2022-03-16 | 2022-09-16 | 中国科学院水生生物研究所 | Ship-based fixed type mobile acoustic investigation device for monitoring aquatic organisms |
| CN118005156A (en) * | 2023-11-27 | 2024-05-10 | 中国人民解放军空军军医大学 | A water quality detection and optimization device for high-cold areas |
| CN118794953A (en) * | 2024-09-14 | 2024-10-18 | 浙江清盛检测技术有限公司 | A plankton multi-viewing angle in-situ detection device and detection method |
-
1998
- 1998-05-21 CA CA 2238160 patent/CA2238160A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110069745A (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2019-07-30 | 山东省科学院海洋仪器仪表研究所 | A kind of active calculation method of bivalve shellfish biological life |
| CN110346523A (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2019-10-18 | 重庆工商大学融智学院 | Wetland Ecology Safety method for early warning based on spatial information |
| CN111264463A (en) * | 2020-03-25 | 2020-06-12 | 杭州师范大学 | Observation device and observation method for field in-situ research of tadpole development |
| CN111486304A (en) * | 2020-03-31 | 2020-08-04 | 中国水产科学研究院东海水产研究所 | A shoot support for making benthonic animal activity |
| CN111999456A (en) * | 2020-08-11 | 2020-11-27 | 莱西市鑫喆工程技术服务中心 | Emergency biological early-warning type water quality monitoring method |
| CN113252861B (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-10-01 | 深之蓝(天津)水下智能科技有限公司 | Water quality detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113252861A (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-08-13 | 深之蓝(天津)水下智能科技有限公司 | Water quality detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113341098A (en) * | 2021-07-15 | 2021-09-03 | 武汉永清环保科技工程有限公司 | Buoy type water quality monitoring system for mobile sewage treatment plant |
| CN114005064A (en) * | 2021-11-01 | 2022-02-01 | 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所 | A biological water pollution early warning method and device based on machine vision technology |
| CN114313119A (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2022-04-12 | 上海遥程信息科技有限公司 | Real-time water quality monitoring unmanned ship |
| CN115056927A (en) * | 2022-03-16 | 2022-09-16 | 中国科学院水生生物研究所 | Ship-based fixed type mobile acoustic investigation device for monitoring aquatic organisms |
| CN118005156A (en) * | 2023-11-27 | 2024-05-10 | 中国人民解放军空军军医大学 | A water quality detection and optimization device for high-cold areas |
| CN118794953A (en) * | 2024-09-14 | 2024-10-18 | 浙江清盛检测技术有限公司 | A plankton multi-viewing angle in-situ detection device and detection method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6119630A (en) | Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms | |
| Willis et al. | A baited underwater video system for the determination of relative density of carnivorous reef fish | |
| Honjo et al. | Direct optical assessment of large amorphous aggregates (marine snow) in the deep ocean | |
| Cowen et al. | In situ ichthyoplankton imaging system (ISIIS): system design and preliminary results | |
| Fabi et al. | An assessment of biomass and diel activity of fish at an artificial reef (Adriatic Sea) using a stationary hydroacoustic technique | |
| Bortone et al. | Environmental assessment and monitoring of artificial habitats | |
| CA2238160A1 (en) | Installation for in situ monitoring the quality of habitat of aquatic organisms | |
| O'Connor et al. | The use of REMOTS® technology in monitoring coastal enrichment resulting from mariculture | |
| US10690646B2 (en) | Underwater camera and water quality monitoring system | |
| Breen et al. | A review of possible mitigation measures for reducing mortality caused by slipping from purse-seine fisheries | |
| CN115265657A (en) | A comprehensive monitoring system for deep sea aquaculture cages | |
| Jamieson | Landers: baited cameras and traps | |
| KR20150000054A (en) | u-AUV FOR MANAGING AQUACULTURE OF FISHES | |
| CN214748140U (en) | Deep sea aquaculture monitoring system | |
| Sherman et al. | Deep-sea benthic boundary layer communities and food supply: A long-term monitoring strategy | |
| Strasburg et al. | Use of a small submarine for biological and oceanographic research | |
| Price et al. | Future studies of zooplankton behavior: questions and technological developments | |
| RU101838U1 (en) | AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM OF OPERATIONAL BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INDICATION (OPTIONS) | |
| Lien et al. | Inferences about perception in large cetaceans, especially humpback whales, from incidental catches in fixed fishing gear, enhancement of nets by “alarm” devices, and the acoustics of fishing gear | |
| KR101631260B1 (en) | Management system of fishery | |
| Smith Jr et al. | 9 laboratory and in situ methods for studying deep-Sea fishes | |
| KR102466516B1 (en) | A device for measuring catches and aquatic resources by depth of the fishery | |
| Wardle et al. | Marine video | |
| Kilpatrick et al. | Autonomous video camera system for monitoring impacts to benthic habitats from demersal fishing gear, including longlines | |
| KR100532715B1 (en) | Light trap for collecting of the fry (fish larvae) at the different depth |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Dead |