CA2178032A1 - Glazing panel having solar screening properties - Google Patents

Abstract

A glazing panel having beneficial anti-solar properties for use in vehicle glazing, an in particular in vehicle roof windows, comprises a vitreous substrate carrying a spray-formed pyrolytic tin/antimony oxide coating layer having a thickness of at least 400 nm and containing tin and antimony in a Sb/Sn molar ratio of from 0.05 to 0.5, whereby the coated substrate has a luminous transmittance (TL) of less than 35% and a selectivity (TL/TE) of at least 1.3.

Description

A glazing panel having solar screening properties.

The present invention relates to a glazing panel having solar screening properties. The panel according to the invention takes the form of a substrate carrying a spray-formed pyrolytic coating containing tin and antimony.
sReflective transparent solar control glazing has become much used in vehicle windows, where the objective is to protect the vehicle occupants against solar radiation. It has been used in railway carriages as sidewindows and in road vehicles for side, rear and roof windows. It has further been proposed to form the whole roof area of a motor car. It serves to provide 10protection against solar radiation by reflection and/or absorption and by eliminating the dazzling effects of intense sunshine, thereby giving an effective screen against glare, enhancing visual comfort and reducing eye fatigue.
The properties of the coated substrate discussed herein are based on the standard definitions of the International Commission on Illumination -15Commission Intemationale de l~clairage ("CIE").
The standard illuminants quoted herein are CIE Illuminant C and Illuminant A. Illuminant C (mostly used for evaluating the optical properties ofglazing panels for buildings) represents average daylight having a colour temperature of 6700K. Illuminant A (which equates to the light emitted by car 20headlamps and is there~ore generally used to evaluate the optical properties of glazing panels for motor vehicles~ represents the radiation of a Planck radiatorat a temperature of about 2856K.
The "luminous transmittance" (TL) is the luminous flux transmitted through a substrate as a percentage of the incident luminous flux.
25The "luminous reflectance" (RL) is the luminous flux reflected from a substrate as a percentage of the incident luminous flux.

2 1 730~2 The "energy transmission" (TE) is the total radiant energy directly transmitted through a substrate as a percentage of the incident radiantenergy.
The "energy reflection" (RE) is the radiant energy reflected from s a substrate as a percentage of the incident radiant energy.
The "solar &ctor" (FS) is the ratio of the sum of the total energy directly transmitted through a substrate (TE) and the energy which is absorbed and re-r~ t~rl on the side away from the energy source (AE) as a proportion of the total radiant energy incident on the substrate.
The "selectivity" of the coated substrate relates to the balance between luminous transmission and energy transmission. In the case of building glass it is often defined as the ratio of the luminous transmittance tothe solar factor (TVFS), but for vehicle glass it commonly refers to the ratio of the luminous transmittance to the energy transmission (TUTE).
The "dominant wavelength" (~D) is the peak wavelength in the range transmitted or reflected by the coated substrate.
The "purity" (p) of the colour of the substrate refers to the excitation purity measured with Illuminant C. It is specified according to a linear scale on which a defined white light source has a purity of zero and the 20 pure colour has a purity of 100%. The purity of the coated substrate is measured from the side opposite the coated side.
The "emissivity" (~) is the ratio of the energy emitted by a given surface at a given temperature to that of a perfect emitter (black body with emissivity of 1.0) at the same temperature.
From a technical point of view, it is desired that in sunny conditions the glazing shall not pass too great a proportion of total incident solar radiation in order that the interior of the vehicle or building shall not become overheated. The transmission of total incident solar radiation may be expressed in terms of the "solar factor" (defined above).In the case of vehicles30 the main energy factor to be considered is the total energy directly transmitted (TE), since the energy which is internally absorbed and re-r~ t~-l (AE) is sir~tQ-l by the movement of the vehicle.
Our earlier patent GB 2200139 describes and claims a method of forming a pyrolytic tin oxide coating on a hot glass substrate by spraying a soluffon containing a ffn compound and addiffves which produce in the coaffng s both fluorine and such materials as antimony, arsenic, vanadium, cobalt, zinc,cadmium, tungsten, tellurium and manganese so as to give the coating a low emissivity and a low specific intemal haze factor. While the resultant coating has many desirable properties it falls short of the combinaffon of properffes now being sought for solar-resistant vehicle window glass.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a glazing panel having a high level of solar screening properties in combination with other desirable properffes of luminous transmission and high selectivity.
We have discovered that this and other useful objectives can be achieved by a vitreous substrate bearing a thick pyrolytically sprayed coating 15 Co~ liaillg tin and anffmony oxides in a specific relative ratio.
Thuâ, according to the present invention, there is provided a glazing panel co~ iâillg a vitreous substrate carrying a spray-fommed pyrolytic tin/antimony oxide coaffng layer having a thickness of at least 400 nm and containing tin and antimony in a Sb/Sn molar raffo of from 0.05 to 0.5, 20 whereby the coated substrate has a luminous transmittance (TL) of less than 35% and a selecffvity (TLITE) of at least 1.3.
A number of techniques are known for fomming coatings on a vitreous substrate, including pyrolysis and cathode sputtering. Pyrolysis generally has the advantage of producing a hard coating, which precludes the 25 need for a protective layer. The coatings fommed by pyrolysis have durable abrasive- and corrosion-resistant properties. It is believed that this is due inparticular to the fact the process involves depositing of coating material onto a substrate which is hot. Pyrolysis is also generally cheaper than alternative coating processes such as sputtering, particularly in temms of the investment in30 plant.
The substrate is preferably in the fomm of a ribbon or sheet of 2 1 7~32 vitreous material, such as glass or some other transparent rigid material. In view of the proportion of incident solar radiation which is absorbed by the glazing panel, especially in environments where the panel is exposed to strong or long-term solar radiation, there is a heating effect on the panel which may s require that the substrate be subsequently subjected to a toughening process.
However, the durability of the coating enables the panel to be mounted with the coated face outermost, thus reducing the heating effect.
Preferably the substrate is formed of coloured glass. It is found that the combination of coloration within the material of the glass and a coating 10 according to the invention f~ilit~t~ the achievement of the required low luminous transmission and high selectivity. The generally p,~r~l~ed colours for glass used in vehicle roofs, side or rear windows are grey and green.
The tin/antimony oxide coating preferably has a thickness of from 400 to 800 nm, most preferably 450 to 700 nm. Such thicknesses permit 15 the achievement of a low total transmitted energy factor (TE) while retaining a sufficient level of light transmission. Thick layers of tin/antimony oxide, particularly layers having a low Sb/Sn molar ratio, can not only provide a glazing panel with the required low luminous transmission and high selectivity but also with the advantageous combination of a low solar factor FS and low 20 emissivity.
It may be useful to prevent interaction between the glass of the substrate and the tin/antimony oxide coating layer. As an example, it has been found that in the pyrolytic formation of a tin oxide coating from tin chloride on a soda-lime glass substrate, sodium chloride tends to become incorporated into 25 the coating as a result of reaction of the glass with the coating precursor material or its reaction products, and this leads to haze in the coating. Thus, an intermediate haze-reducing coating layer may if desired be positioned between the substrate and the tin/antimony oxide coating layer. Such an intermediate layer is generally unnecessary for low luminous transmission panels since the 30 haze is not noticeable to any significant extent. If used it may comprise a silicon oxide having a geometric thickness such as about 100 nm. The presence of a silicon oxide undercoating on soda-lime glass has the benefit of inhibiting the migration of sodium ions from the glass whether by diffusion or otherwise into the tin/antimony oxide coating layer either during formation of that upper layeror during a subsequent high temperature treatment.
Panels according to the invention are particularly well suited to use as vehicle roof panels, for example to tilting or sliding sunroofs, or even to forrn substantially the whole of the vehicle roof area. They may also advantageously be used as vehicle rear or rear side windows.
Glazing with a luminous transmittance of less than 35 % is advantageous as a vehicle roof panel, most particularly if the panel is to forrnmost or all of the roof area. While such a low level of luminous transmission isrequired according to the invention, it is also desirable that the glazing panelshall transmit some visible light in order to give a contribution to the naturalillumination of the interior of the vehicle.
A high level of selectivity of the coating in combination with a low level of luminous transmission allows a low solar energy transmission. The selectivity provided by the invention is essentially at least 1.3 and preferably at least 1.5. It is a particular beneflt of the invention that in practice it permits the achievement of selectivity values close to 2.
The energy transmission (TE) is therefore preferably less than 15%, most preferably less than 10~. Such low energy transmission assists in reducing the load on a vehicle air conditioning system.
For a whole-roof panel it may be advantageous to employ a panel with a luminous transmittance as low as 10% and energy transmission of 2s just 5%, giving a selectivity of 2. For an opening roof panel somewhat higher transmission is generally ~ulere,-ed, for example luminous transmittance of about 20% and energy transmission of about 12 ~, again giving a selectivity approaching 2.
The Sb/Sn molar ratio in the coating is preferably in the range 0.07 to 0.20, most preferably 0.08 to 0.15. The ~rerel.ed ranges arise from the need to have sufficient antimony to be effective in giving the required low 21 78~32 -transmission properties while not being present in sufficient amounts to affect the opffcal quality.
Conveniently the coating comprises simply a single layer of tin/antimony oxide. However, it is possible to provide one or more further 5 coating layers, whether applied by pyrolysis or by other coating methods, to achieve certain desired optical qualities. It should be noted however, that the tin/antimony oxide layer when applied by pyrolysis has sufficient mechanical durability and chemical resistance to suitably serve as the exposed layer.
Alternatively the said layer can be applied to the surface of the substrate that is 10 to face the interior of a vehicle.
The panels according to the invention have properties of low reflectivity of visible light which are particularly advantageous for vehicle glazing. Preferably the reflectivity of visible light (RL) is lower than 12%, and may typically be between 5 and 12%.
The panels according to the invention may be installed in single or multi-glazed assemblies. The coating layers are applied to the hot substrate by spraying reactants in a liquid state, for example by means of a spray nozle.
While liquid spraying lacks the precision of alternative pyrolytic method of chemical vapour deposition (CVD), it is a convenient and inexpensive method 20 for deposition of a thick coating layer, as in the present case. Indeed CVD is generally not a convenient method for the formation of thick coatings.
Especially in the ~r~"ed instance of applying the coating to a coloured substrate any variations, resulting from the use of a spray method, in thickness or uniformity of the coating are barely visible. Preferably the source2s of tin is SnC12 and the source of antimony is SbCl3, both materials being added to water for the spraying operation. Dissolved organometallic material may also be used.
When it is desired to manllf~ctllre pyrolytically coated flat glass, it is best to do so when the glass is newly formed. To do so has economic 30 benefits in that there is no need to reheat the glass for the pyrolytic reactions to take place, and it also has benefits as to the quality of the coating, since it is -assured that the surface of the glass is in pristine condition. Preferably, therefore, said coating precursor material is brought into contact with an upperface of a hot glass substrate concfftllt~-l by freshly-formed flat glass.
Thus, the glazing panels according to the invention may be 5 manufactured as follows. The pyrolytic coating step may be carried out at a temperature of at least 400C, ideally from 550C to 750C.
To form each coating, the substrate is brought into contact, in a coating chamber, with a spray of droplets containing the antimony- and tin-containing reactants. The spray is applied by one or more spray nozles 0 arranged to follow a path which provides the coating across the width of the ribbon to be coated.
In a spray-pyrolysis method the Sb/Sn molar ratio in the finished coating is not directly proportional to the ratio in the reactant mixture, and indeed is usually substantially different therefrom. The level of incorporation of 15 antimony into the coating is significantly affected by such parameters as thespray rate, the type of glass and the glass temperature. ALlemL~I~ to compute the coating proportions from the starting proportions are therefore unreliable and it is usually necess~ry to undertake preliminary trials to determine the starting proportions to meet the required coating proportions in a specific 20 instance.
Following deposition the coatings are preferably polished, using any desired conventional polishing means. The coated product may also if desired be subjected to tempering.
The invention will now be described in more detail with 2~ reference to the following non-limiting examples.
In the Examples the Sb/Sn molar ratio in the coating layers was determined by an X-ray analysis technique in which the number of X-ray counts of the respective elements was compared. While this technique is not as precise as if a calibration by chemical dosage were made, the similarity of 30 antimony and tin means that they respond similarly to X-rays. The ratio of the measured number of observed counts of the respective elements thus provides 2~ 7~32 -a close approximation to their molar ratio.
EXAMPT F~ 1-21 In all the examples a Sb/Sn mixture was applied in an aqueous mixture to a moving ribbon of hot glass substrate having a thickness of 4 mm.
s Several different types of glass were employed, as shown in Table A below.
The initials in the headings to this and the other following tables (TL, TE etc.) have the meanings described above. The columns FS pl and FS p2 in Table C
refer to the solar factor at, respectively, the side of the glass facing the light source (position 1) and the side remote from the light source (position 2).
Unless otherwise in~ic~t~l the properties shown in the tables were measured under illuminant C. Under the conditions described the difference in TL
between using illuminant C and illuminant A (more generally used in the field of automobile vehicles) was minimal, being of the same order of magnitude as routine errors of measurement.
In each case the mixture was a coating precursor solution containing approximately 1000g (in total) of SnCl2 and SbCl3 per litre of the mixture and in the proportions shown in Table B below. The solution was applied to the substrate by a reciprocating spray nozle which followed a path across the width of the ribbon.
Table A
Glass Type ~ Clear~ Green~A ~ ~ Green~C~ Grey~ Med. Grey l ~Med. Grey~2 ~D in transmission 505.4/508.5 509.7/510.2470.1/493.9 49 .2/502.7 494.6/502.8 (nm) [Illllmin~nt C/A]
Purity (%) 2.9/3.4 3.2/4.0 1.5/0.8 5.6/5.1 9.9/9.3 TL (%) 89.072.66/71.1267.36/65.6955.65/55.5636.8/35.8 37.07/35.13[Illumin~nt: C/A]
TE (%) (CIE) 83.044.0 37.1 56.9 25.9 20.9 TL/TE (CIE C) 1.071.65 1.81 0.98 1.42 1.77 FSpl (CIE)(%) 86.056.8 51.7 66.3 43.4 39.7 TL/FS 1.031.28 1.30 0.84 0.85 0.93 The sprayed tin and antimony components reacted to forrn a pyrolytic tin oxide coating on the glass. The parameters employed and the results obtained are shown in Tables B and C.
It will be noted that Examples 4 and 5 do not satisfy the requirements of the claims herein in respect of the required coating thickness and selectivity and in the case of Example 5 also in respect of the required 5 luminous transmission. These examples are included for comparison to show how operating outside the scope of the claims produces inferior results.
Table B
:F.~rlP ~ Glass ~ Sb~Sn~ $blSn ~ ~ Coating ~ TL
Type ~ o-react~nt cfco-hng ~ thlc~ness Clear 0.20 C. 1 5~5 23.0 10.0 2 Clear 0.20 0.12 470 27.0 10.0 3 Clear 0.30 0.14 670 13.0 10.0 4 Clear 0.30 0.16 306 27.0 11.0 Clear 0.30 0.19 119 56.0 10.0 6 Green A 0.30 0.17 670 10.4 9.9 7 Green C 0.30 0.14 670 9.6 9.9 8Med. Grey 2 0.30 0.14 520 6.4 10.5 9Med. Grey 2 0.30 0.14 520 6.5 10.5 10Green A 0.20 0.11 530 15.7 10.3 11Green C 0.20 0.11 530 17.3 10.3 12Med. Grey 1 0.20 0.11 530 9.5 10.2 13Med. Grey 2 0.20 0.11 530 9.6 10.2 14 Grey 0.175 0.11 640 15.0 10.0 15 Grey 0.175 0.11 530 19.0 10.0 16Green A 0.175 0.11 640 19.0 10.0 17Green A 0.175 0.11 530 25.0 10.0 18Green C 0.175 0.11 640 17.8 10.0 19Green C 0.175 0.11 530 23.0 10.0 20Med. Grey 1 0.175 0.11 640 10.0 10.0 21Med. Grey 2 0.175 0.11 530 12.6 10.0 -Table C
-~Exannp e~ TE~ FUE ~ FS~pl~ p2~ miss vity ~ TLrrE~ TLfFC
1 17.0 11.0 35.0 ~ .0 0.35 1.35 0.66 2 21.0 11.0 38.0 39.0 1.29 0.71 3 10.0 11.0 30.0 26.0 1.30 0.43 4 25.0 13.0 41.0 42.0 0.53 1.08 0.66 51.0 13.0 60.0 61.0 0.76 1.14 0.97 6 5.8 10.9 26.8 22.9 0.35 1.80 0.39 7 5.1 10.9 26.3 22.3 0.35 1.90 0.36 8 4.2 10.9 25.6 22.0 0.40 1.52 0.25 9 3.5 10.9 25.1 21.5 0.40 1.86 0.26 10.0 11.1 29.9 25.8 0.35 1.87 0.62 11 8.7 11.1 28.9 24.8 0.35 1.99 0.60 12 5.5 11.0 26.6 22.3 0.35 1.73 0.36 13 4.8 11.0 26.0 21.7 0.35 2.00 0.37 14 10.0 11.0 30.0 1.50 0.50 14.0 11.0 33.0 1.36 0.58 16 9.8 11.0 29.8 1.94 0.64 17 13.0 11.0 32.0 1.92 0.78 18 8.6 11.0 28.9 2.07 0.62 19 11.0 11.0 31.0 2.09 0.74 5.4 11.0 26.5 1.85 0.38 21 7.7 11.0 27.7 1.77 0.45 As variations to Examples 14 and 20, coatings were obtained having a thickness of 730 nm and an Sb/Sn ratio of 0.10. In both cases the resulting properties were substantially the same as the original Examples 14 5 and 20.
The product coated substrate in all the examples had a blue tint in transmission, with a dominant wavelength (~D) between 470 and 490 nm, and a haze value between 0.7 and 1.1.

Claims (13)

1. A glazing panel comprising a vitreous substrate carrying a spray-formed pyrolytic tin/antimony oxide coating layer having a thickness of at least 400 nm and containing tin and antimony in a Sb/Sn molar ratio of from 0.05 to 0.5, whereby the coated substrate has a luminous transmittance (TL) of less than 35% and a selectivity (TL/TE) of at least 1.3.

2. A glazing panel according to claim 1, in which the vitreous substrate is made of coloured glass.

3. A glazing panel according to claim 1 or claim 2, in which the tin/antimony oxide coating has a thickness of from 400 nm to 800 nm.

4. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, in which the tin/antimony oxide coating has a thickness of from 450 nm to 700 nm.

5. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, wherein the coated substrate has a selectivity of at least 1.5.

6. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, wherein the coated substrate has an energy transmission factor (TE) of less than 15%.

7. A glazing panel according to claim 6, wherein the coated substrate has an energy transmission (TE) of less than 10%.

8. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, wherein the Sb/Sn molar ratio is in the range from 0.07 to 0.20.

9. A glazing panel according to claim 8, wherein the Sb/Sn molar ratio is in the range from 0.08 to 0.15.

10. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, wherein the tin/antimony oxide coating is a single layer.

11. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, wherein said tin/antimony oxide coating is an exposed coating layer.

12. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, wherein the reflectivity of visible light (RL) is lower than 12%

13. A glazing panel according to any preceding claim, for use as a vehicle roof panel