CA1062039A - Molten metal sampling device and method with germanium killing agent - Google Patents
Molten metal sampling device and method with germanium killing agentInfo
- Publication number
- CA1062039A CA1062039A CA255,744A CA255744A CA1062039A CA 1062039 A CA1062039 A CA 1062039A CA 255744 A CA255744 A CA 255744A CA 1062039 A CA1062039 A CA 1062039A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- sample
- germanium
- steel
- molten
- molten steel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 229910052732 germanium Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- GNPVGFCGXDBREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N germanium atom Chemical compound [Ge] GNPVGFCGXDBREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 49
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 239000003139 biocide Substances 0.000 title claims description 17
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 83
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 83
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 46
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 46
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 46
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 23
- YBMRDBCBODYGJE-UHFFFAOYSA-N germanium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Ge]=O YBMRDBCBODYGJE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 229940119177 germanium dioxide Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010937 tungsten Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- ZSLUVFAKFWKJRC-IGMARMGPSA-N 232Th Chemical compound [232Th] ZSLUVFAKFWKJRC-IGMARMGPSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Molybdenum Chemical compound [Mo] ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910001347 Stellite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052776 Thorium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- AHICWQREWHDHHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromium;cobalt;iron;manganese;methane;molybdenum;nickel;silicon;tungsten Chemical compound C.[Si].[Cr].[Mn].[Fe].[Co].[Ni].[Mo].[W] AHICWQREWHDHHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011133 lead Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011733 molybdenum Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010955 niobium Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- GUCVJGMIXFAOAE-UHFFFAOYSA-N niobium atom Chemical compound [Nb] GUCVJGMIXFAOAE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 claims 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims 1
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 18
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 17
- 239000005350 fused silica glass Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 9
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000010453 quartz Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 5
- QCWXUUIWCKQGHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zirconium Chemical compound [Zr] QCWXUUIWCKQGHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000006223 plastic coating Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 238000009749 continuous casting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000004767 nitrides Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000010079 rubber tapping Methods 0.000 description 3
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910001209 Low-carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011819 refractory material Substances 0.000 description 2
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000655 Killed steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007872 degassing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005069 ears Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012212 insulator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 231100000614 poison Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000007096 poisonous effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004080 punching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007711 solidification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008023 solidification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009628 steelmaking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- -1 titanium nitrides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
- G01N1/10—Devices for withdrawing samples in the liquid or fluent state
- G01N1/12—Dippers; Dredgers
- G01N1/125—Dippers; Dredgers adapted for sampling molten metals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
- G01N1/10—Devices for withdrawing samples in the liquid or fluent state
- G01N1/14—Suction devices, e.g. pumps; Ejector devices
- G01N1/1409—Suction devices, e.g. pumps; Ejector devices adapted for sampling molten metals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/20—Metals
- G01N33/205—Metals in liquid state, e.g. molten metals
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Molten metal sampling device for and method of sampling molten unkilled metal, especially steel, to produce a sound, non-porous, solidified test sample suitable for analysis in which metallic germanium is present in the sampling device in a quantity sufficient to kill the molten metal of the sample.
Molten metal sampling device for and method of sampling molten unkilled metal, especially steel, to produce a sound, non-porous, solidified test sample suitable for analysis in which metallic germanium is present in the sampling device in a quantity sufficient to kill the molten metal of the sample.
Description
106'~039 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION ~`:
'~` -It has been the practice when sampling molten unkilled steel to use in the sampling device a killing agent such as aluminum, zirconium, silicon or titanium. The unkilled steel is introduced into a cavity in the sampling device where the killing -agent is present in sufficient quantity to combine with the avail-able oxygen of the molten sample so that upon freezing of the sample there will be no substantial loss of oxygen content and no porosity which will interfere with analysis. When used in this sense, the terms "killed" and "killing" do not have the same meaning that they would have in refining operations where such terms indicate deoxidation of the molten steel to such an extent that it will lie quiescent when poured into an ingot mold.
Obviously, such a deoxidation procedure would not be used if one intended to analyze the oxygen content of a sample of the molten `
steel since it would be self-defeating. Therefore, when used in the present disclosure, the terms "killed" or "killing"
should be construed as the chemical combination of a metal with available, i.e., free, oxygen in a sample.
The use of previously known killing agents in sampling has many attendant problems. For example, when aluminum or silicon are used, two samples must be taken since the analysis of steel usually seeks silicon and aluminum content. The same is often true in the case of zirconium and titanium. Zirconium has the additional disadvantage of making the solidified sample hard and therefore more difficult to work with. Titanium also has an additional disadvantage ~n that it makes the sample tough and more difficult to work with. Perhaps most disadvantageous, titanium is difficult to melt in sampling devices and unmelted concentrations of titanium throw the analysis results off. Even when it does melt, titanium, and other previously known killing agents, will react with at least a portion of the available nitrogen in the sample to form higher melting nitrides and thus promote inaccurate nitrogen readings.
, _ U. S. Patent No. 3,704,621 proposes the use of magnesium in lieu of the above killing agents in sampling molten unkilled steel and it does an excellent job. However, its use is limited, and special care is required to avoid the propinquity of the magnesium to combine with air at molten steel temperatures and create explosive conditions.
As a result of all the foregoing, the steel industry has lacked a satisfactory killing agent for use in the sampling of molten steel.
'-.,' f 10 SUMMARY OF TH~ INVENTION
Applicant has made the discovery that germanium is the answer to the steel industry's problem in killing molten samples for the following reasons.
Germanium is not an element which is looked for in analysis in steel and eliminates the need for taking extra samples such as where aluminum, silicon, zirconium and titanium are used. Germanium melts at about two-thirds the melting point of iron and boils at about the same temperature as iron; consequently germanium would melt rapidly and remain molten for maximum diffusion through the molten metal better ".
r~ than the killing elements now in use, other than aluminum.
By the same token, germanium would not prematurely boil out , j , .
, or solidify. Germanium has a density much closer to iron than any of the other elements used in testing and this should result in less problems of loss by flotation. The natural valence of the element results in less quantity by weight required to kill the steel. Germanium has a thermal con-ductivity nearly identical to that of iron. The addition :, of germanium to a molten sample will not toughen the steel, even though it may harden the steel slightly like silicon, thereby eliminating many punching and cutting problems asso-, ciated with titanium. Germanium is not poisonous, dangerous . :
and explosive to handle. Germanium is available on the market s. at a reasonable price if purchased in quantity; it can be formed and cut to special shapes and may be alloyed with ~ -other elements.
' 5 Applicant has discovered that oxides formed by~ -germanium readily react with hot graphite to eliminate com-bustion problems in oxygen determinators, which discovery is the subject matter of applicant's United States Patent No.
4,098,576 issued July 4, 1978.
~;,, .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
In the accompanying drawings which illustrate specific embodiments of applicant's invention:
Figure 1 is a view of an embodiment in the environment . ' of use;
. 15 Figure 2 is a perspective view of the embodiment of Figure 1 with parts broken away for better illustration;
, Figure 3 is a view in cross section taken on the line 3--3 of Figure 2;
; Figure 4 is a view of another embodiment in the : j .
~ 20 environment of use; :
; Figure 5 is a perspective view of the embodiment of " Figure 4;
,, ..~ Figure 6 is a vertical cross-sectional view of the sampling device of Figure 5;
,. 25 Figures 7 and 9 are graphs illustrating the method :':; of the invention.
~; DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
. This invention may be utilized in the analysis of ,' molten metal in general. Howev~er, when utilizing the pin and disc sampler described hereinafter the invention is particularly . useful in the analysis of metals having a melting point up to . - 4 -106Z~39 about 3200F (1760C), including, for example, STELLITE~
(alloys containing 40 to 80~ cobalt, 20 to 35% chromium, 0 to 25~ tungsten, 0.75 to 2.5% carbon, and 0 to 3~ silicon), ,.
as well as lead, copper, titanium, tungsten, molybdenum, columbium and thorium based alloys. In a preferred embodi-ment, as indicated in the ensuing discussion, the method and apparatus of this invention are utilized in the analysis of I steel.
Referring to the drawing and especially Figure 1, a bath or pool of molten steel 10 having on its surface a layer of slag or casting powder 12 is held within a refractory lined receptacle, treating vessel or tundish 14. Where the receptable is a continuous casting mold the refractory of course is not ~`
present. A sampling device indicated generally at 18 is shown projecting through the layer of slag 12 into the bath of molten metal 14. The sampling device is carried on the lower end of a long, rigid conduit or pipe 20 which has attached to its upper end by means of a flexible hose 22 an evacuating device 24 such as a mechanical roughing vacuum pump. The portion of pipe 20 projecting into the bath is protected by a refractory sheath 26.
~ Referring to Figure 2, the sampling mold component ; of sampling device 18 is indicated generally at 28. This mold is made up of a hollow, flat metallic section indicated at 30 ; for forming the desired disc sample, a fused quartz tube 31 for .,, forming the desired pin sample and a cylindrical metallic holder 32 for the quartz tube carried by section 30. Where desired the sample mold need not include provision for forming a disc sample. The metallic portion of mold 28 is made up of two identical halves each half being made up of a semi-cylindrical portion 36, a pan shape portion 38 and projecting ear means 40 for holding the component halves together but sufficiently spaced so as to place the interior of the disc shaped mold in gaseous communication with the space surrounding the disc shaped .
.
1(~6ZV39 mold. Ear means 40 are formed from a couple of slightly tapered ears which are spot welded together, the resulting structure being wedgeable into the lower end of pipe 20 to ~ -hold sample mold 28 rigidly in place at the lower end of pipe 20.
The two pan shaped elements 38 form the disc sample mold section and the semi-cylindrical elements 36 carried by `
pan shaped elements 38 embrace and hold fused quartz tube 31 which is at least as long as a desired pin sample. The open .~ , upper end of quartz tube 31 opens into the interior of disc sample mold 30 and therefore the interior of quartz tube 31 is in open communication with the interior of disc sample mold 30.
Preferably integrally molded on the lower end of refractory sheath 26 is an impervious refractory casing indi-.. . .
cated generally at 48 formed of a section 50 surrounding and in spaced relation to disc sample mold 30 and an integral ~r depending tubular portion 52 preferably molded around the cylindrical metallic holder section 36 with the lower portion ~, of tubular portion 52 molded around and holding quartz tube 31 .'~ 20 in place while leaving the lowermost portion of quartz tube 31 exposed. Since casing 48 is integrally molded onto sheath 26 and tubular extension 52 is integrally molded onto enlarged portion 50 of casing 48 and since tubular extension 52 of the refractory casing is molded onto and in sealing relation with quartz tube 31, the interior of refractory casing 48 can be , subjected to the vacuum generated at means 24 between mold section 30 and section 50 of the refractory casing. Space 54 acts as thermal insulator and conduit for applying vacuum to mold 30 interior. This last is because the pan shaped halves of mold 30 are slightly spaced and not in sealing contact with each other and when subatmospheric gas pressure is present in ~'' the cavity 54 it is present within the disc sample mold 30 and the interior of fused quartz tube 44.
In order to preserve the interior of the sample molds free from contamination prior to taking a sample, the lower open end of quartz tube 31 is closed by a metal cap 60, which in turn is enveloped by a plastic coating 62 entirely covering the cap and extending beyond the cap around and in continuous sealing contact with the exterior surface of fused quartz tube 31 in the neighborhood of the cap 60 so as to seal cap 60 to the lower end of quartz tube 31 and thereby maintain the interior of the entire system under subatmospheric pressure generated at means 24. Metal cap 60 is preferably formed of a metal, such as mild steel, which has no constituents which would interfere with test results.
The coating 62 is a continuous, homogeneous plastic coating, The composition of this plastic and the thickness of the plastic coating enter into the present invention in addition to the sealing function of the plastic. The composi-tion of this plastic material and the thickness of the plastic coating is such that introduction and movement of the sampling device into and through the surface layer of slag or fluxing material on the molten metal and thence into the body of .~ molten metal to be sampled will result in the plastic material decomposing into gaseous form at a rate and in a quantity to remove completely from proximity to the exterior walls of the i~ lower end portion of the fused quartz tube any slag or fluxing material which otherwise would be adhering to the lower end portion of the fused quartz tube so as to contaminate the sample entering the mold.
The pin and disc sampling device of Figures 1 to 3 as so far described does not constitute part of the present invention, this sampling device being covered by United States Patent No. 3,915,014 which issued on October 28, 1975 ` in the name of James R. Judge and Van L. Vierbicky.
i -` 106'~()3~
Shown in the lower end of fused quartz tube 31 are solid buttons 25 of metallic germanium. The germanium may be present in different forms, the illustrated buttons being a -convenient form although powdered germanium metal, germanium metal shavings, germanium metal wire could be used. Upon entry of the molten steel to be sampled into the lower end of fused quartz tube 31, the suction supplied by means 24 will draw the molten metal into contact with the metallic germanium buttons ;~ ~
which are melted by the heat of the molten steel and mix or --alloy with the molten steel which then passes up through the fused quartz tube and into disc sample mold 30. The germanium kills the molten steel sample by reacting with the available oxygen in the steel and forming germanium dioxide (GeO2), or germanic oxide as it is sometimes called. Since germanic oxide ~m.p. 1389 ~ 4K) is stable at the temperature of the molten steel it will remain in the sample. Upon cooling, the sample is then prepared for analytic procedures. Previously, it had been impossible to obtain a satisfactory killing of pin and disc samples because conventional killing agents which may be accept-able in other respects, such as titanium, will not melt and mix entirely in this type of sampler. However, germanium, because ; of its low melting point and density, will melt and mix thoroughly with the molten steel, at least in the cavity of mold section 30, and it will not float on the surface of the steel as the steel rises up into the cavities of mold 28.
Figures 4 to 6 show a different type sampling device, namely, a "bomb" of the kind disclosed in U. S. Patent 3,705,621.
As illustrated in Figure 4, the molten steel sample ; enters the cavity in this type of sampler by hydrostatic pressure.
In this embodiment, the sampling device, intended generally by reference numeral 110, includes an upright steel tubular member 111 which is open at its upper end and is closed off at its lower end by steel chill plate 112. The tubular member 111 and chill plate 112 define a cavity 114 for receiving the sample of molten i - 8 -106'~039 steel, which is introduced through the opening 115. A steel tubular handle 116 is attached at its inner end to tubular member 111, and extends outward at a suitable angle to maintain the member 111 in an upright position when the sampling bomb 110 is immersed in a heat of steel to be sampled. The outer surfaces of tubular member 111, chill plate 112 and tubular handle 116 are coated with a layer of refractory material 117 such as fire clay. The opening 115 is sealed off by closure 118 which is adhesively attached along its marginal edge 119 to the refractory material 117. The closure 118 is constructed of a material which melts, decomposes or otherwise disintegrates when the sampling bomb 110 , is immersed in a heat of molten unkilled steel, allowing a sample ; of molten unkilled steel to be introduced into cavity 114.
Examples of suitable materials for use in constructing closure 5 15 . 118 include metallic materials such as sheet steel, which do not ', contaminate the sample, and heat resistant paper which is prefer-ably multilayered and sufficiently thick to withstand the temper-ature of the heat of steel for a period of time sufficient to ' allow the sampling bomb 110 to be immersed to the position illustrated in Figure 4 of the drawings.
- As is best seen in Figure 4, the steel handle 116 and .;) .:, -' the refractory layer 117 thereon are sufficiently long to remain above the slag layer 120 when the sampling bomb 110 is immersed ;
to a depth suitable for taking a sample of the heat of unkilled steel 121. A rod-like steel handle 123 is inserted into the outer end of tubular handle 116, and extends outward through opening 124 a distance suitable for allowing the sa-mpling bomb 110 to be ' immersed within the heat of unkilled steel 121 by a workman.
This sampling device 110 incorporates solid buttons of metallic germanium 125 in the cavity 114. The germanium may be ; present in different forms, the illustrated buttons being a convenient form although powdered germanium metal, germanium metal shavings, germanium metal wire could be used.
: _ 9 _ `` 106'~l)39 The metallic germanium illus~rated within the cavities of the two sampling devices shown in the drawings and described above is in an amount sufficient to kill the sample of molten -unkilled steel flowing into each cavity. As a general rule, -the molten unkilled steel sample introduced into the cavity of tube 31 and mold section 30 or into cavity 14 should be contacted -with between about 0.01 and 1.0 percent by weight of metallic `~ -germanium, and preferably with between about 0.05 and 0.5 per-cent by weight. Usually the present invention is most effective at oxygen levels of 20 ppm to 500 ppm but higher oxygen levels may be present up to 2000 ppm. The amount of metallic germanium to be used in a given instance to achieve the best results will depend upon the oxygen level in the steel sample. For the best results, at least about 0.01 percent by weight of metallic ger-' 15 manium should be used for each 15 parts per million of oxygen in the unkilled steel sample. For example, when the unkilled steel ~! sample is known to contain about 150 parts per million of oxygen, then at least about 0.1 percent by weight of metallic germanium should be contacted therewith; in the case of the Figures 4-6 sampling device, the sample weighs about 600 gms and the ger-manium metal button or buttons should thus weigh about 0.6 grams.
, .
t' At higher oxygen levels of 300, 450, 600, 750 and 1500 parts per million, the molten unkilled steel sample should be contacted .. . ..
i. with at least about 0.2%, 0.3~, 0.4~, 0.5% and l.0~ by weight ~ 25 of metallic germanium, respectively, to achieve the best results.
.~.
It is understood that the molten steel sample is contacted with ' sufficient metallic germanium to produce a solidified test ingot which is killed. Except for the cost of the germanium metal, which is not excessive when purchased in quantity, the use of excess germanium metal is not objectionable since the germanium does not contaminate the sample with an element of analytical interest nor analytical detriment. When the metallic germanium is present in the quantities set out above, a properly killed `` 10~ 039 test ingot can be produced which is solid and homogeneous and upon metallurgically polishing has no pin holes, inclusions and other imperfections.
Referring now to Figure 7, two sampling devices of the type shown in Figures 4 to 6 carried in side-by-side relation by the same sampling lance were inserted into a ladle of steel from a basic oxygen furnace approximately two minutes after the regu-1 lar post-tapping sample was taken. The two side-by-side sampling devices were loaded, one with the usual 1.88 grams of 1/32nd inch titanium wire, which is the usual titanium killing agent used, and the other with a 1 gram metal button of germanium. The post-~;, tapping samples taken right after tapping of the furnace showed that the oxygen content of the steel was 222 parts per million.
, Each sample was sectioned in small increments along the effective length of the sample in order to define clearly the shape of the ` oxygen distribution curve along the effective length of the " sample. Figure 7 shows the results. Both curves are of the ... ..
',~ usual shape with the oxygen content being indicated as low below , , .
~, the normal zone of analysis and the oxygen content increasing 20 rapidly above the normal zone of oxygen analysis. This varying -, oxygen content is due to the difference in cooling rate between ,, the lowermost part of the sample and the higher portions of the sample with a substantially true picture of the oxygen content appearing in the section of the sample starting at 3/4ths of an -,,:
,, 25 inch from the bottom and extending to slightly above an inch :.,; , above the bottom. From there on up the oxides lighter in weight than steel rising in the slower freezing metal and the occlusions , being forced upwardly by the advancing face of the freezing metal ; result in a higher overall oxygen content which is not a true ,:~
~10~;~039 ` ~
picture of the oxygen content of the molten steel taken into the , sampling device. In other words, the metal in the zone of oxygen ana:Lysis has gained oxygen content from the metal below the zone :, ....
and lost oxygen content to the metal above the zone with experi-~ 5 ence indicating that the zone of oxygen analysis chosen is repre- -s sentative of the oxygen content of the molten steel entering the ' sampling device. The curves of the graph of Figure 7 show that ~-~ metallic germanium indicates the oxygen distribution in the sample just as well as titanium does.
Referring now to Figure 8, three samples were taken using germanium in the sampling device of Figures 4 to 6, the .~, sampling point in this case being at the continuous casting mold ~';, after a degassing step. The oxygen content of the steel at this point, as is normal, was much lower and generally is decreasing slightly as the casting progresses. The curves M-lD, M-2D and , M-3D show the oxygen content of each sample along the effective ` length of the sample. Since the samples were taken in the , -chronological order M-lD, M-2D, M-3D, the oxygen content would be " expected to remain the same or decrease slightly and the three curves show this to be true. On the other hand, three titanium ,, ~, ~, killed samples were taken at the same times in the same chrono-s;l logical order and were given the same identification, the average ~,`, oxygen content of each of these samples in the normal sampling area being shown on the right-hand side of Figure 8. It will be noted that the titanium killed samples have a higher oxygen con-tent. This verifies the fact that titanium introduces extrane-ous oxygen into samples, due to the presence of surface oxides on the titanium, whereas metallic germanium does not introduce - extraneous oxygen or if it does, the quantity is measurably less ~' ;:, -~`" 106'~039 ` :
than that introduced by titanium. It will also be noted that in the titanium killed samples, the M-3D sample, which should have the least oxygen content, has nearly as much as the M-lD sample and considerably more than the M-2D sample. This indicates that the titanium killed sample M-3D did not give the proper oxygen content for the molten steel in the continuous casting mold.
It is understood that the term "unkilled steel," as ; used in this patent application is intended to embrace partially killed steel and steel in general which has a dissolved oxygen content that is too high to produce a solidified test ingot suit-able for analyzing without adding a killing agent to the molten -, steel sample prior to solidification. -The foregoing detailed description and the following ,, .
speciic example are for purpose of illustration only.
EXAMPLE
A heat of low carbon steel is prepared by a basic ' oxygen process following prior art steel making practices and the heat is tapped into a ladle. The steel has a temperature of about 2900 and the oxygen content in the steel as tapped is about 500 parts per million. An elongated bar of aluminum is -dissolved in the molten steel in the ladle as the steel enters the ladle from the furnace and the oxygen content of the steel following this aluminum addition is approximately 250 parts per million.
The sampling device illustrated in Figures 3 to 6 is inserted into the ladle through the layer of slag on the surface of the molten steel and into the body of the molten steel to obtain a sample. The cavity in the sampling device contains 0.167 percent by weight of metallic germanium in the form of a ,.~
~ -13-~06'~039 button. Since the sample weighs approximately 600 grams, the button of germanium weighs one gram. The resulting killed sample is removed from the sampling device and sent to the laboratory whe~re a slice across the longitudinal axis of the sample about a quarter of an inch thick is used as the source of specimens for testing to determine the oxygen content of the steel in the ladle. Of course, other tests are also performed on the sample.
A further advantage of this invention should be noted.
It is quite common to find discrepancies in comparing the nitrogen analysis of finished steel with the nitrogen analysis of a sample 'i of that same steel taken at the molten stage and killed with previously known killing agents. These discrepancies arise ' because in killing the molten steel sample, with titanium for example, the titanium reacts with at least a portion of the ~ available nitrogen to form titanium nitrides which have melting points far in excess of the molten steel, and in fact so high ~r that even at the high temperatures of the analytical procedure, p (i.e., around 5000F) it is unlikely that the nitrides will break down to liberate available nitrogen. Thus, since part ' 20 of the nitrogen in the sample will be tied up as nitrides, a false reading will be given indicating a nitrogen content in the sample below its true value. This is not the case where ! ' germanium is used as in the present invention since any possible '~ reaction product, i.e., germanium dinitride (Ge3N2), would ; 25 sublimate at the temperature of the molten metal. Thus, the total amount of nitrogen in the sample is available for analysis.
`~ The above embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive since the invention ~, may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from ;.
30 - its spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the scope of the invention is indicated by the claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of the equivalents of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.
'~` -It has been the practice when sampling molten unkilled steel to use in the sampling device a killing agent such as aluminum, zirconium, silicon or titanium. The unkilled steel is introduced into a cavity in the sampling device where the killing -agent is present in sufficient quantity to combine with the avail-able oxygen of the molten sample so that upon freezing of the sample there will be no substantial loss of oxygen content and no porosity which will interfere with analysis. When used in this sense, the terms "killed" and "killing" do not have the same meaning that they would have in refining operations where such terms indicate deoxidation of the molten steel to such an extent that it will lie quiescent when poured into an ingot mold.
Obviously, such a deoxidation procedure would not be used if one intended to analyze the oxygen content of a sample of the molten `
steel since it would be self-defeating. Therefore, when used in the present disclosure, the terms "killed" or "killing"
should be construed as the chemical combination of a metal with available, i.e., free, oxygen in a sample.
The use of previously known killing agents in sampling has many attendant problems. For example, when aluminum or silicon are used, two samples must be taken since the analysis of steel usually seeks silicon and aluminum content. The same is often true in the case of zirconium and titanium. Zirconium has the additional disadvantage of making the solidified sample hard and therefore more difficult to work with. Titanium also has an additional disadvantage ~n that it makes the sample tough and more difficult to work with. Perhaps most disadvantageous, titanium is difficult to melt in sampling devices and unmelted concentrations of titanium throw the analysis results off. Even when it does melt, titanium, and other previously known killing agents, will react with at least a portion of the available nitrogen in the sample to form higher melting nitrides and thus promote inaccurate nitrogen readings.
, _ U. S. Patent No. 3,704,621 proposes the use of magnesium in lieu of the above killing agents in sampling molten unkilled steel and it does an excellent job. However, its use is limited, and special care is required to avoid the propinquity of the magnesium to combine with air at molten steel temperatures and create explosive conditions.
As a result of all the foregoing, the steel industry has lacked a satisfactory killing agent for use in the sampling of molten steel.
'-.,' f 10 SUMMARY OF TH~ INVENTION
Applicant has made the discovery that germanium is the answer to the steel industry's problem in killing molten samples for the following reasons.
Germanium is not an element which is looked for in analysis in steel and eliminates the need for taking extra samples such as where aluminum, silicon, zirconium and titanium are used. Germanium melts at about two-thirds the melting point of iron and boils at about the same temperature as iron; consequently germanium would melt rapidly and remain molten for maximum diffusion through the molten metal better ".
r~ than the killing elements now in use, other than aluminum.
By the same token, germanium would not prematurely boil out , j , .
, or solidify. Germanium has a density much closer to iron than any of the other elements used in testing and this should result in less problems of loss by flotation. The natural valence of the element results in less quantity by weight required to kill the steel. Germanium has a thermal con-ductivity nearly identical to that of iron. The addition :, of germanium to a molten sample will not toughen the steel, even though it may harden the steel slightly like silicon, thereby eliminating many punching and cutting problems asso-, ciated with titanium. Germanium is not poisonous, dangerous . :
and explosive to handle. Germanium is available on the market s. at a reasonable price if purchased in quantity; it can be formed and cut to special shapes and may be alloyed with ~ -other elements.
' 5 Applicant has discovered that oxides formed by~ -germanium readily react with hot graphite to eliminate com-bustion problems in oxygen determinators, which discovery is the subject matter of applicant's United States Patent No.
4,098,576 issued July 4, 1978.
~;,, .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
In the accompanying drawings which illustrate specific embodiments of applicant's invention:
Figure 1 is a view of an embodiment in the environment . ' of use;
. 15 Figure 2 is a perspective view of the embodiment of Figure 1 with parts broken away for better illustration;
, Figure 3 is a view in cross section taken on the line 3--3 of Figure 2;
; Figure 4 is a view of another embodiment in the : j .
~ 20 environment of use; :
; Figure 5 is a perspective view of the embodiment of " Figure 4;
,, ..~ Figure 6 is a vertical cross-sectional view of the sampling device of Figure 5;
,. 25 Figures 7 and 9 are graphs illustrating the method :':; of the invention.
~; DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
. This invention may be utilized in the analysis of ,' molten metal in general. Howev~er, when utilizing the pin and disc sampler described hereinafter the invention is particularly . useful in the analysis of metals having a melting point up to . - 4 -106Z~39 about 3200F (1760C), including, for example, STELLITE~
(alloys containing 40 to 80~ cobalt, 20 to 35% chromium, 0 to 25~ tungsten, 0.75 to 2.5% carbon, and 0 to 3~ silicon), ,.
as well as lead, copper, titanium, tungsten, molybdenum, columbium and thorium based alloys. In a preferred embodi-ment, as indicated in the ensuing discussion, the method and apparatus of this invention are utilized in the analysis of I steel.
Referring to the drawing and especially Figure 1, a bath or pool of molten steel 10 having on its surface a layer of slag or casting powder 12 is held within a refractory lined receptacle, treating vessel or tundish 14. Where the receptable is a continuous casting mold the refractory of course is not ~`
present. A sampling device indicated generally at 18 is shown projecting through the layer of slag 12 into the bath of molten metal 14. The sampling device is carried on the lower end of a long, rigid conduit or pipe 20 which has attached to its upper end by means of a flexible hose 22 an evacuating device 24 such as a mechanical roughing vacuum pump. The portion of pipe 20 projecting into the bath is protected by a refractory sheath 26.
~ Referring to Figure 2, the sampling mold component ; of sampling device 18 is indicated generally at 28. This mold is made up of a hollow, flat metallic section indicated at 30 ; for forming the desired disc sample, a fused quartz tube 31 for .,, forming the desired pin sample and a cylindrical metallic holder 32 for the quartz tube carried by section 30. Where desired the sample mold need not include provision for forming a disc sample. The metallic portion of mold 28 is made up of two identical halves each half being made up of a semi-cylindrical portion 36, a pan shape portion 38 and projecting ear means 40 for holding the component halves together but sufficiently spaced so as to place the interior of the disc shaped mold in gaseous communication with the space surrounding the disc shaped .
.
1(~6ZV39 mold. Ear means 40 are formed from a couple of slightly tapered ears which are spot welded together, the resulting structure being wedgeable into the lower end of pipe 20 to ~ -hold sample mold 28 rigidly in place at the lower end of pipe 20.
The two pan shaped elements 38 form the disc sample mold section and the semi-cylindrical elements 36 carried by `
pan shaped elements 38 embrace and hold fused quartz tube 31 which is at least as long as a desired pin sample. The open .~ , upper end of quartz tube 31 opens into the interior of disc sample mold 30 and therefore the interior of quartz tube 31 is in open communication with the interior of disc sample mold 30.
Preferably integrally molded on the lower end of refractory sheath 26 is an impervious refractory casing indi-.. . .
cated generally at 48 formed of a section 50 surrounding and in spaced relation to disc sample mold 30 and an integral ~r depending tubular portion 52 preferably molded around the cylindrical metallic holder section 36 with the lower portion ~, of tubular portion 52 molded around and holding quartz tube 31 .'~ 20 in place while leaving the lowermost portion of quartz tube 31 exposed. Since casing 48 is integrally molded onto sheath 26 and tubular extension 52 is integrally molded onto enlarged portion 50 of casing 48 and since tubular extension 52 of the refractory casing is molded onto and in sealing relation with quartz tube 31, the interior of refractory casing 48 can be , subjected to the vacuum generated at means 24 between mold section 30 and section 50 of the refractory casing. Space 54 acts as thermal insulator and conduit for applying vacuum to mold 30 interior. This last is because the pan shaped halves of mold 30 are slightly spaced and not in sealing contact with each other and when subatmospheric gas pressure is present in ~'' the cavity 54 it is present within the disc sample mold 30 and the interior of fused quartz tube 44.
In order to preserve the interior of the sample molds free from contamination prior to taking a sample, the lower open end of quartz tube 31 is closed by a metal cap 60, which in turn is enveloped by a plastic coating 62 entirely covering the cap and extending beyond the cap around and in continuous sealing contact with the exterior surface of fused quartz tube 31 in the neighborhood of the cap 60 so as to seal cap 60 to the lower end of quartz tube 31 and thereby maintain the interior of the entire system under subatmospheric pressure generated at means 24. Metal cap 60 is preferably formed of a metal, such as mild steel, which has no constituents which would interfere with test results.
The coating 62 is a continuous, homogeneous plastic coating, The composition of this plastic and the thickness of the plastic coating enter into the present invention in addition to the sealing function of the plastic. The composi-tion of this plastic material and the thickness of the plastic coating is such that introduction and movement of the sampling device into and through the surface layer of slag or fluxing material on the molten metal and thence into the body of .~ molten metal to be sampled will result in the plastic material decomposing into gaseous form at a rate and in a quantity to remove completely from proximity to the exterior walls of the i~ lower end portion of the fused quartz tube any slag or fluxing material which otherwise would be adhering to the lower end portion of the fused quartz tube so as to contaminate the sample entering the mold.
The pin and disc sampling device of Figures 1 to 3 as so far described does not constitute part of the present invention, this sampling device being covered by United States Patent No. 3,915,014 which issued on October 28, 1975 ` in the name of James R. Judge and Van L. Vierbicky.
i -` 106'~()3~
Shown in the lower end of fused quartz tube 31 are solid buttons 25 of metallic germanium. The germanium may be present in different forms, the illustrated buttons being a -convenient form although powdered germanium metal, germanium metal shavings, germanium metal wire could be used. Upon entry of the molten steel to be sampled into the lower end of fused quartz tube 31, the suction supplied by means 24 will draw the molten metal into contact with the metallic germanium buttons ;~ ~
which are melted by the heat of the molten steel and mix or --alloy with the molten steel which then passes up through the fused quartz tube and into disc sample mold 30. The germanium kills the molten steel sample by reacting with the available oxygen in the steel and forming germanium dioxide (GeO2), or germanic oxide as it is sometimes called. Since germanic oxide ~m.p. 1389 ~ 4K) is stable at the temperature of the molten steel it will remain in the sample. Upon cooling, the sample is then prepared for analytic procedures. Previously, it had been impossible to obtain a satisfactory killing of pin and disc samples because conventional killing agents which may be accept-able in other respects, such as titanium, will not melt and mix entirely in this type of sampler. However, germanium, because ; of its low melting point and density, will melt and mix thoroughly with the molten steel, at least in the cavity of mold section 30, and it will not float on the surface of the steel as the steel rises up into the cavities of mold 28.
Figures 4 to 6 show a different type sampling device, namely, a "bomb" of the kind disclosed in U. S. Patent 3,705,621.
As illustrated in Figure 4, the molten steel sample ; enters the cavity in this type of sampler by hydrostatic pressure.
In this embodiment, the sampling device, intended generally by reference numeral 110, includes an upright steel tubular member 111 which is open at its upper end and is closed off at its lower end by steel chill plate 112. The tubular member 111 and chill plate 112 define a cavity 114 for receiving the sample of molten i - 8 -106'~039 steel, which is introduced through the opening 115. A steel tubular handle 116 is attached at its inner end to tubular member 111, and extends outward at a suitable angle to maintain the member 111 in an upright position when the sampling bomb 110 is immersed in a heat of steel to be sampled. The outer surfaces of tubular member 111, chill plate 112 and tubular handle 116 are coated with a layer of refractory material 117 such as fire clay. The opening 115 is sealed off by closure 118 which is adhesively attached along its marginal edge 119 to the refractory material 117. The closure 118 is constructed of a material which melts, decomposes or otherwise disintegrates when the sampling bomb 110 , is immersed in a heat of molten unkilled steel, allowing a sample ; of molten unkilled steel to be introduced into cavity 114.
Examples of suitable materials for use in constructing closure 5 15 . 118 include metallic materials such as sheet steel, which do not ', contaminate the sample, and heat resistant paper which is prefer-ably multilayered and sufficiently thick to withstand the temper-ature of the heat of steel for a period of time sufficient to ' allow the sampling bomb 110 to be immersed to the position illustrated in Figure 4 of the drawings.
- As is best seen in Figure 4, the steel handle 116 and .;) .:, -' the refractory layer 117 thereon are sufficiently long to remain above the slag layer 120 when the sampling bomb 110 is immersed ;
to a depth suitable for taking a sample of the heat of unkilled steel 121. A rod-like steel handle 123 is inserted into the outer end of tubular handle 116, and extends outward through opening 124 a distance suitable for allowing the sa-mpling bomb 110 to be ' immersed within the heat of unkilled steel 121 by a workman.
This sampling device 110 incorporates solid buttons of metallic germanium 125 in the cavity 114. The germanium may be ; present in different forms, the illustrated buttons being a convenient form although powdered germanium metal, germanium metal shavings, germanium metal wire could be used.
: _ 9 _ `` 106'~l)39 The metallic germanium illus~rated within the cavities of the two sampling devices shown in the drawings and described above is in an amount sufficient to kill the sample of molten -unkilled steel flowing into each cavity. As a general rule, -the molten unkilled steel sample introduced into the cavity of tube 31 and mold section 30 or into cavity 14 should be contacted -with between about 0.01 and 1.0 percent by weight of metallic `~ -germanium, and preferably with between about 0.05 and 0.5 per-cent by weight. Usually the present invention is most effective at oxygen levels of 20 ppm to 500 ppm but higher oxygen levels may be present up to 2000 ppm. The amount of metallic germanium to be used in a given instance to achieve the best results will depend upon the oxygen level in the steel sample. For the best results, at least about 0.01 percent by weight of metallic ger-' 15 manium should be used for each 15 parts per million of oxygen in the unkilled steel sample. For example, when the unkilled steel ~! sample is known to contain about 150 parts per million of oxygen, then at least about 0.1 percent by weight of metallic germanium should be contacted therewith; in the case of the Figures 4-6 sampling device, the sample weighs about 600 gms and the ger-manium metal button or buttons should thus weigh about 0.6 grams.
, .
t' At higher oxygen levels of 300, 450, 600, 750 and 1500 parts per million, the molten unkilled steel sample should be contacted .. . ..
i. with at least about 0.2%, 0.3~, 0.4~, 0.5% and l.0~ by weight ~ 25 of metallic germanium, respectively, to achieve the best results.
.~.
It is understood that the molten steel sample is contacted with ' sufficient metallic germanium to produce a solidified test ingot which is killed. Except for the cost of the germanium metal, which is not excessive when purchased in quantity, the use of excess germanium metal is not objectionable since the germanium does not contaminate the sample with an element of analytical interest nor analytical detriment. When the metallic germanium is present in the quantities set out above, a properly killed `` 10~ 039 test ingot can be produced which is solid and homogeneous and upon metallurgically polishing has no pin holes, inclusions and other imperfections.
Referring now to Figure 7, two sampling devices of the type shown in Figures 4 to 6 carried in side-by-side relation by the same sampling lance were inserted into a ladle of steel from a basic oxygen furnace approximately two minutes after the regu-1 lar post-tapping sample was taken. The two side-by-side sampling devices were loaded, one with the usual 1.88 grams of 1/32nd inch titanium wire, which is the usual titanium killing agent used, and the other with a 1 gram metal button of germanium. The post-~;, tapping samples taken right after tapping of the furnace showed that the oxygen content of the steel was 222 parts per million.
, Each sample was sectioned in small increments along the effective length of the sample in order to define clearly the shape of the ` oxygen distribution curve along the effective length of the " sample. Figure 7 shows the results. Both curves are of the ... ..
',~ usual shape with the oxygen content being indicated as low below , , .
~, the normal zone of analysis and the oxygen content increasing 20 rapidly above the normal zone of oxygen analysis. This varying -, oxygen content is due to the difference in cooling rate between ,, the lowermost part of the sample and the higher portions of the sample with a substantially true picture of the oxygen content appearing in the section of the sample starting at 3/4ths of an -,,:
,, 25 inch from the bottom and extending to slightly above an inch :.,; , above the bottom. From there on up the oxides lighter in weight than steel rising in the slower freezing metal and the occlusions , being forced upwardly by the advancing face of the freezing metal ; result in a higher overall oxygen content which is not a true ,:~
~10~;~039 ` ~
picture of the oxygen content of the molten steel taken into the , sampling device. In other words, the metal in the zone of oxygen ana:Lysis has gained oxygen content from the metal below the zone :, ....
and lost oxygen content to the metal above the zone with experi-~ 5 ence indicating that the zone of oxygen analysis chosen is repre- -s sentative of the oxygen content of the molten steel entering the ' sampling device. The curves of the graph of Figure 7 show that ~-~ metallic germanium indicates the oxygen distribution in the sample just as well as titanium does.
Referring now to Figure 8, three samples were taken using germanium in the sampling device of Figures 4 to 6, the .~, sampling point in this case being at the continuous casting mold ~';, after a degassing step. The oxygen content of the steel at this point, as is normal, was much lower and generally is decreasing slightly as the casting progresses. The curves M-lD, M-2D and , M-3D show the oxygen content of each sample along the effective ` length of the sample. Since the samples were taken in the , -chronological order M-lD, M-2D, M-3D, the oxygen content would be " expected to remain the same or decrease slightly and the three curves show this to be true. On the other hand, three titanium ,, ~, ~, killed samples were taken at the same times in the same chrono-s;l logical order and were given the same identification, the average ~,`, oxygen content of each of these samples in the normal sampling area being shown on the right-hand side of Figure 8. It will be noted that the titanium killed samples have a higher oxygen con-tent. This verifies the fact that titanium introduces extrane-ous oxygen into samples, due to the presence of surface oxides on the titanium, whereas metallic germanium does not introduce - extraneous oxygen or if it does, the quantity is measurably less ~' ;:, -~`" 106'~039 ` :
than that introduced by titanium. It will also be noted that in the titanium killed samples, the M-3D sample, which should have the least oxygen content, has nearly as much as the M-lD sample and considerably more than the M-2D sample. This indicates that the titanium killed sample M-3D did not give the proper oxygen content for the molten steel in the continuous casting mold.
It is understood that the term "unkilled steel," as ; used in this patent application is intended to embrace partially killed steel and steel in general which has a dissolved oxygen content that is too high to produce a solidified test ingot suit-able for analyzing without adding a killing agent to the molten -, steel sample prior to solidification. -The foregoing detailed description and the following ,, .
speciic example are for purpose of illustration only.
EXAMPLE
A heat of low carbon steel is prepared by a basic ' oxygen process following prior art steel making practices and the heat is tapped into a ladle. The steel has a temperature of about 2900 and the oxygen content in the steel as tapped is about 500 parts per million. An elongated bar of aluminum is -dissolved in the molten steel in the ladle as the steel enters the ladle from the furnace and the oxygen content of the steel following this aluminum addition is approximately 250 parts per million.
The sampling device illustrated in Figures 3 to 6 is inserted into the ladle through the layer of slag on the surface of the molten steel and into the body of the molten steel to obtain a sample. The cavity in the sampling device contains 0.167 percent by weight of metallic germanium in the form of a ,.~
~ -13-~06'~039 button. Since the sample weighs approximately 600 grams, the button of germanium weighs one gram. The resulting killed sample is removed from the sampling device and sent to the laboratory whe~re a slice across the longitudinal axis of the sample about a quarter of an inch thick is used as the source of specimens for testing to determine the oxygen content of the steel in the ladle. Of course, other tests are also performed on the sample.
A further advantage of this invention should be noted.
It is quite common to find discrepancies in comparing the nitrogen analysis of finished steel with the nitrogen analysis of a sample 'i of that same steel taken at the molten stage and killed with previously known killing agents. These discrepancies arise ' because in killing the molten steel sample, with titanium for example, the titanium reacts with at least a portion of the ~ available nitrogen to form titanium nitrides which have melting points far in excess of the molten steel, and in fact so high ~r that even at the high temperatures of the analytical procedure, p (i.e., around 5000F) it is unlikely that the nitrides will break down to liberate available nitrogen. Thus, since part ' 20 of the nitrogen in the sample will be tied up as nitrides, a false reading will be given indicating a nitrogen content in the sample below its true value. This is not the case where ! ' germanium is used as in the present invention since any possible '~ reaction product, i.e., germanium dinitride (Ge3N2), would ; 25 sublimate at the temperature of the molten metal. Thus, the total amount of nitrogen in the sample is available for analysis.
`~ The above embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive since the invention ~, may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from ;.
30 - its spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the scope of the invention is indicated by the claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of the equivalents of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.
Claims (9)
1. A molten metal sampling device for obtaining a test specimen of molten metal so as to determine an oxygen content in the metal comprising means forming a mold cavity for the reception of molten metal being sampled and the formation of a solid sample, a killing agent for the molten metal in the cavity, the killing agent having as an essential ingredient metallic germanium in quantity sufficient to kill the molten metal in at least part of the cavity so as to form a sound sample for analysis.
2. A molten steel sampling device as claimed in claim 1 wherein said metallic germanium is present in an amount between about 0.01 and about 1.0% by weight of the sample.
3 A molten steel sampling device as claimed in claim 1 wherein said metallic germanium is present in an amount sufficient to combine with between 20 to 2000 ppm of oxygen in the molten steel.
4. A method of sampling a bath of molten metal to obtain a test specimen comprising providing a sampling device having a mold cavity for receiving molten metal to be solidified to form a sample, introducing molten metal from the bath into the mold cavity, contacting the molten metal in the mold cavity with a killing agent having as an essential ingredient metallic germanium in quantity sufficient to combine with the oxygen in the molten metal forming germanium dioxide to kill the metal in at least a portion of the cavity, and solidifying the killed molten metal to form a sample from which a test specimen can be obtained.
5. A method as defined in claim 4 wherein the metal is an alloy having a melting point up to 3200°F.
6. A method as defined in claim 5 wherein the metal is an alloy selected from the group consisting of STELLITE, lead, copper, titanium, tungsten, molybdenum, columbium and thorium based alloys.
7. A method as defined in claim 4 wherein the molten metal is steel.
8. A method of sampling a bath of molten steel to obtain a test specimen comprising providing a sampling device having a mold cavity for receiving molten steel to be solidified to form a sample, introducing molten steel from the bath into the mold cavity, contacting the molten steel in the mold cavity with a killing agent having as an essential ingredient metallic germanium in quantity between 0.01 and 0.50% by weight of the sample, the contact between the killing agent and the molten steel in the cavity being such as to obtain thorough mixing of the two in at least a portion of the cavity to form germanium dioxide and thereby kill the molten steel, and solidifying the killed molten steel to form a sample from which a test specimen can be obtained.
9. A method of sampling a bath of molten steel as claimed in claim 4 wherein said metallic germanium is added in a quantity suffici-ent to combine with between 20 and 2000 ppm of oxygen in the molten steel so as to form germanium dioxide, the contact between the killing agent and the molten steel in the cavity being such as to obtain thorough mixing of the two in at least a portion of the cavity.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US05/653,911 US4067242A (en) | 1974-11-19 | 1976-01-30 | Molten metal sampling device and method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1062039A true CA1062039A (en) | 1979-09-11 |
Family
ID=24622773
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA255,744A Expired CA1062039A (en) | 1976-01-30 | 1976-06-25 | Molten metal sampling device and method with germanium killing agent |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS5294191A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1062039A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE2632993A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111366551A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2020-07-03 | 中核北方核燃料元件有限公司 | Method for determining carbon content in uranium zirconium alloy |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE4435327C1 (en) * | 1994-10-01 | 1996-01-25 | Wieland Werke Ag | Device for removing samples from molten metal bath |
| DE102011121183B4 (en) * | 2011-05-18 | 2014-02-27 | Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V. | Sampler for sampling from melts with a melting point greater than 600 ° C and method for sampling |
-
1976
- 1976-06-25 CA CA255,744A patent/CA1062039A/en not_active Expired
- 1976-07-22 DE DE19762632993 patent/DE2632993A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1976-08-02 JP JP9144076A patent/JPS5294191A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111366551A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2020-07-03 | 中核北方核燃料元件有限公司 | Method for determining carbon content in uranium zirconium alloy |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS5294191A (en) | 1977-08-08 |
| DE2632993A1 (en) | 1977-08-04 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3369406A (en) | Molten material sampling apparatus and method | |
| US3452602A (en) | Metal sampling device | |
| US3686949A (en) | Sampling devices and powder diffusion containers for use with molten metal | |
| US3367189A (en) | Apparatus for preparing metal test samples from molten metal baths | |
| GB1158537A (en) | Improvements in or relating to an Expendable Lance | |
| AP589A (en) | Sensor array for measuring temperature | |
| US4067242A (en) | Molten metal sampling device and method | |
| US3315529A (en) | Method and apparatus for taking samples from melts in order to obtain the gases evolved during solidification | |
| US3994172A (en) | Molten metal sampler | |
| CA1062039A (en) | Molten metal sampling device and method with germanium killing agent | |
| US3915014A (en) | Sampling device for molten metal | |
| US3295171A (en) | Frangible ceramic test mold | |
| CA1168902A (en) | Apparatus for sampling molten metal | |
| US4105191A (en) | Crucible for the thermal analysis of aluminum alloys | |
| US4125024A (en) | Molten metal sampling device | |
| US4002069A (en) | Measuring lance for molten metal such as steel | |
| US3656338A (en) | Device and method for sampling molten metal | |
| US4170139A (en) | Sampling device for analysis of molten metal for hydrogen | |
| US3704621A (en) | Sampling bomb and method of sampling and analyzing a heat of unkilled steel | |
| US4499777A (en) | Molten metal samplers | |
| EP3311157B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for analysis of molten metals | |
| US3321978A (en) | Molten metal sampling apparatus | |
| US1933425A (en) | Method and apparatus for sampling liquid metals | |
| US4237734A (en) | Device for obtaining a sample of liquid | |
| US4362562A (en) | Method for taking samples from pig-iron melts |