[go: up one dir, main page]

AU2010207300B2 - Process for manufacturing granular iron - Google Patents

Process for manufacturing granular iron Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2010207300B2
AU2010207300B2 AU2010207300A AU2010207300A AU2010207300B2 AU 2010207300 B2 AU2010207300 B2 AU 2010207300B2 AU 2010207300 A AU2010207300 A AU 2010207300A AU 2010207300 A AU2010207300 A AU 2010207300A AU 2010207300 B2 AU2010207300 B2 AU 2010207300B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
iron
agglomerates
amount
fixed carbon
granular
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2010207300A
Other versions
AU2010207300A1 (en
Inventor
Shuzo Ito
Shoichi Kikuchi
Takeshi Sugiyama
Osamu Tsuge
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Publication of AU2010207300A1 publication Critical patent/AU2010207300A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2010207300B2 publication Critical patent/AU2010207300B2/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B13/00Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes
    • C21B13/10Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes in hearth-type furnaces
    • C21B13/105Rotary hearth-type furnaces
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B13/00Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes
    • C21B13/0046Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes making metallised agglomerates or iron oxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B13/00Making spongy iron or liquid steel, by direct processes
    • C21B13/0073Selection or treatment of the reducing gases
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/10Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions
    • Y02P10/134Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions by avoiding CO2, e.g. using hydrogen

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)

Abstract

A process for manufacturing granular iron, which comprises introducing agglomerates formed from a raw material mixture comprising both an iron oxide-containing substance and a carbonaceous reducing agent onto a hearth with a coal-based material laid thereon, and heating the agglomerates to reduce and melt the iron oxide contained in the agglomerates, characterized in that: the temperature of the agglomerates in the furnace is controlled within a range of 1200 to 1500°C; the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas when heating the agglomerates is adjusted to 2.0 × 10

Description

METHOD FOR PRODUCING GRANULAR IRON Technical Field 5 This invention relates to a method for producing granular iron. Background Art The direct reduced iron producing method has been 10 developed for making granular metallic iron from a raw material mixture which contains an iron oxide source such as iron ore or iron oxide (hereinafter referred to as iron oxide-containing substance) and a carbonaceous reducing agent. With this producing method, the granular metallic 15 iron is made by: charging the raw material mixture onto a hearth of a heating furnace; heating the raw material mixture with the heat transferred by gas from burners in the furnace or radiant heat to thereby reduce iron oxides in the raw material mixture by the carbonaceous reducing 20 agent into reduced iron, carburize 1l1-05-28;02:16PM;$Wi i @ 8_ F. B. RICE 4-XKUT ;0789929757 # 6/ 50 and melt the reduced iron, followed by coalesce it to granules while separating it from subgenerated slag; and then cooling and solidifying it. This producing method has been the subject of considerable practical research 5 of late, because it requires no large-scale facility such as a blast furnace, and because it affords greater flexibility in terms of resources such as not requiring coke. However, the producing method has various problems to be solved in order to be applied on an industrial 10 scale, including stability of operation, safety, cost, quality of the granular iron (product), and so forth. Since the granular iron made by the above-mentioned direct reduced iron producing method is sent to an existing steelmaking facility (such as an electric 15 furnace or a converter) and is used as an iron source, it preferably has a low content of impurity elements. The carbon content of the granular iron is preferably as high as possible, without excessive range, in order to increase its applicability as an iron source. 20 In an effort to improve the quality of granular iron, the present applicant has proposed a granular iron having a high Fe purity of 94 mass% or more and a carbon content adjusted to between 1.0 and 4.5 mass% in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-339009 25 (Patent Document 1). This granular iron is further adjusted to have a sulfur content of 0.20 mass% or less, 2 11-05-28;02:16PM;4Whi f)f F. B. RICE 4-; 7 0789929757 # 7/ 50 a silicon content of 0.02 to 0.5 mass and a manganese content of less than 0.3 mass. However, adjusting the phosphorus content of the granular iron is not disclosed in Patent Document 1. The reason for this is as follows: 5 since the behavior of phosphorus in the reduction process of iron oxide is already clear from the chemical reaction mechanism in blast furnace, it is recognized that almost all phosphorus sourced from a material to be reduced (that is, raw material) remains in a reduced product 10 (that is, metallic iron) under reductive atmosphere and that the phosphorus does not move into subgenerated slag, and thus it is also recognized that the phosphorus content in the raw material has to be decreased, and/or that the granular iron made by the producing method 15 disclosed in Patent Document 1 has to be subjected to a further dephosphorization, in order to reduce the phosphorus content of the granular iron. In recent years, the grade of iron ore has tended to be on the decline, and the amount of phosphorus contained 20 in mined iron ore is on the rise. Therefore, in the future it will be increasingly difficult to procure raw materials with a low phosphorus content. However, a further dephosphorization subjected to the granular iron made by the producing method disclosed in Patent Document 25 1 for reducing its phosphorus content leads to higher cost. 3 Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or the like which has been included in the present specification is not to be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form part of the prior art base or were 5 common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present disclosure as it existed before the priority date of each claim of this application. Throughout this specification the word "comprise", or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising", will be 10 understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps. Disclosure of the Invention 15 The present invention is directed to a method for producing granular iron having a low phosphorus content by: charging agglomerates formed from a raw material mixture containing an iron oxide containing substance and a carbonaceous reducing agent onto a carbonaceous material 20 spread on a hearth of a furnace; and heating the agglomerates to thereby reduce and melt iron oxides in the agglomerates. One aspect of the present invention is directed to a method for producing granular iron comprising: charging 25 agglomerates formed from a raw material mixture containing an iron oxide-containing substance and a carbonaceous reducing agent onto a carbonaceous material spread on a hearth of a furnace; and heating the agglomerates to thereby reduce and melt iron oxides in the agglomerates, wherein the 30 temperature of the agglomerates in the furnace is set in a 4 range between 1200*C and 15000C; the oxygen partial pressure in atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are reduced and melted is set to 2.0 x 10-13 atm or more at standard state; and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas in the 5 furnace is set to 4.5 cm/second or more. Features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become clearer through reference to the following detailed description and drawings. 10 Brief Description of the Drawings Fig. 1 is a graph showing the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the gas linear speed under different oxygen partial pressures. Fig. 2 is a graph showing the relation between the 15 dephosphorization ratio and the gas linear speed. Fig. 3 is a graph showing the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the oxygen partial pressure. Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the discharging time. 20 Fig. 5 is a graph showing the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material mixture. 25 Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The metallurgical process of producing granular iron by: charging agglomerates formed from a raw material mixture containing an iron oxide-containing substance and a carbonaceous reducing agent onto a carbonaceous material 30 spread on a hearth of a furnace; and heating the agglomerates to thereby reduce and melt iron oxides in 5 11-05-28;02:1SPM; $E if f F. B. RICE 4-; 0789929757 # 10/ 50 the agglomerates is usually carried out under reductive atmosphere. The reason for this is as follows: when the process is performed under oxidative atmosphere, the reduction of the iron oxides contained in the 5 agglomerates comes to a standstill during the heating of the agglomerates, and reduced iron cannot be obtained at a high yield. on the other hand, when the process is performed under reductive atmosphere, reduction of the iron oxides proceeds well. However, almost none of the 10 phosphorus contained in the reduced iron move to slag subgenerated in the reduction, and still remain in the granular iron made by melting the reduced iron due to this melting under reductive atmosphere. As a result, granular iron with a high phosphorus content is obtained. 15 To lower the phosphorus content of granular iron, the obtained granular iron is required to be supplied to an electric furnace, for example, and subjected to a further dephosphorization. During reducing and melting the above-mentioned 20 agglomerates at a high temperature between 1200 and 1500*C, the carbonaceous reducing agent causes reductive gas to spew out of the interior of the agglomerates while the iron oxides *in the agglomerates are being reduced, in contrast, almost no reductive gas is generated after the 25 reduction of the iron oxides are almost over and the reduced iron melts and separates to granular iron and . 6 11-05-28;02:1BPM;4 E i " 95 F. B. RICE ;-J 0789929757 # 11/ 50 subgenerated slag. Accordingly, the inventors considered that the composition of the granular iron during the period in which the reduced iron melts and separates to granular iron and subgenerated slag is greatly influenced 5 by the composition of its atmospheric gas. In view of this, the inventors conducted diligent study in the vision that the suitable control of the atmospheric gas under which the reduced iron melts and separates to granular iron and subgenerated slag can adjust the 10 composition of the granular iron. As a result, the inventors found that (I) charging the agglomerates onto a carbonaceous material spread on a hearth of a furnace and then heating the agglomerate of which temperature is to be in a range 15 between 1200 0 C and 1500 0 C, (II) setting the oxygen partial pressure in atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated to 2.0 x 101 atm or more at standard state, and (III) setting the linear speed of the atmospheric 20 gas in the furnace to 4.5 cm/second or more make the phosphorus contained in the reduced iron move to slag subgenerated in the reduction while the reduced iron is melting. The inventors also found that granular iron with a low phosphorus content can be produced based on 25 this knowledge, and thus accomplished the present 7 11-05-28;02:16PM;4PNW R F. B. RICE ;- )7 0789929757 # 12/ 50 invention. The present invention will now be described in terms of the procedure of producing granular iron. (I) Agglomerates are formed by agglomerating a raw 5 material mixture that contains a carbonaceous reducing agent and an iron oxide-containing substance. The above-mentioned iron oxide-containing substance can be, for 'example, iron ore, iron sand, nonferrous smelting slag, and so forth. The above-mentioned 10 carbonaceous reducing agent can be, for example, a carbon-containing substance, more specifically, coal, coke, or the like. Other components can also be added to the above mentioned raw material mixture, such as a binder, an MgO 15 supplying substance, or a CaO supplying substance. Binders can be, for example, polysaccharides (such as wheat gluten and other starches). MgO supplying substances can be, for example, MgO powder, magnesium containing substances extracted from natural ore, 20 seawater, or the like, and magnesium carbonate (MgCO 3 ), CaO supplying substances can be, for example, burnt lime (Cao) and limestone (whose main component is CaCO 3
)
There are no particular limitations on the shape of the agglomerates. For example, it can be in the form of 25 a pellet or a briquette. Nor are there any particular limitations on the size of the agglomerates. In terms of 8 11-05-28;02:16PM,4i1 Wh 5 F. B. RICE 4-7h5YT ;0789929757 # 13/ 50 operations, the agglomerate size (maximum diameter) is preferably 50 mm or smaller, and it is preferably about 5 mm or larger. This is because too large agglomerate size decreases heat transfer to the lower part of the pellet 5 and results in poor productivity, additionally decreasing agglomerating efficiency. Therefore, the agglomerate size is preferably 50 mm or less. Carbonaceous material is spread on the hearth in advance in order to reduce the agglomerates. This is 10 because the carbonaceous material serves as a carbon supply source when not enough carbon is contained in the agglomerates, and also acts to protect the hearth. It is recommended that the carbonaceous material that is spread on the hearth have a maximum particle size 15 of 2 mm or less. Using a carbonaceous material with a maximum particle size of 2 mm or less, can suppress that molten slag runs down into the gaps in the carbonaceous material. As a result, this prevents the molten slag from reaching the surface of the hearth and corroding the 20 hearth. The lower limit to the maximum particle size of the carbonaceous material is preferably about 0.5 mm, for example. Using a carbonaceous material in which lower limit to the maximum particle size is about 0.5 mm can suppress that the agglomerates sink into the carbonaceous 25 material layer. As a result, this prevents a drop in heating rate and a decrease in productivity. Spreading 9 11-05-28;02:16PM;VWNh i ] F. 8. RICE 4- 7 ;0789929757 # 14/ 50 the carbonaceous material on the hearth is preferably in a thickness of about 1 to 5 mm, for example. Then, the agglomerates that have been prepared'are charged to a hearth on which the carbonaceous material 5 spreads and heated so that the temperature of the agglomerates becomes between 1200 and 1500 0 C, thereby the iron oxides in the raw material mixture are reduced and melted. The temperature of the agglomerates is preferably 1250 0 C or more. Setting the temperature to 10 1250"C or more shortens the melting time of the granular iron and slag, and also accelerates the separation of the slag from the granular iron, allowing granular iron with a higher iron purity to be obtained. On the other hand, the temperature of the agglomerates is preferably 1450*C 15 or less. Setting the temperature to 1450"C or less does not require the heating furnace to be a complicated structure, and can suppress a decrease in thermal efficiency. From the standpoints of the heating furnace structure and energy use, the targeted metallic iron 20 nuggets are preferably produced at lower temperature. When burners are used as the heating means in the furnace, the temperature of the agglomerates can be adjusted by controlling the combustion conditions of these burners. There are no particular limitations on the type of 25 furnace used in the present invention, for example, a 10 11-05-28;02:16PM; i W ]f 5 F. B. RICE 4-2 J7 ;0789929757 # 15/ 50 heating furnace or a moving hearth furnace can be used. A rotary hearth furnace can be used, for example, as a moving hearth furnace. (II and III) The oxygen partial pressure in 5 atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated is set to 2.0 x 10-13 atm or more at standard state, and that the linear speed of this gas is set to 4.5 cm/second or more. As a result of various experiments, the inventors found the followings: when the reduced iron is 10 melted under a slightly oxidative atmosphere, the phosphorus contained in the reduced iron is oxidized, and this phosphorus moves to the slag, and this decreases the phosphorus content of the granular iron. More specifically, when the oxygen partial pressure of the 15 atmospheric gas is less than 2.0 x 10' atm, or when the gas linear speed is less than 4.5 cm/second, the dephosphorization of the granular iron cannot be accelerated, since not enough oxidative gas is contained in the atmospheric gas near the surface of the 20 agglomerates. Therefore, the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated is set to 2.0 x 10-1 atm or more at standard state, and the gas linear speed is set to 4.5 cm/second or more. The oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas 25 is preferably 2.8 x 10~1 atm or more at standard state. 11 11-05-28;02:16PM;5M Wtf F. B. RICE 4- ')T ;0789929757 # 16/ 50 The higher is the oxygen partial pressure, the more the dephosphorization of the granular iron is accelerated. However, excessively high oxygen partial pressure causes the granular iron to be re-oxidized, and this decreases 5 the iron purity (metallization ratio). Therefore, the oxygen partial pressure is preferably 4.8 x 10-13 atm or less at standard state, and more preferably 4.0 x 10' atm or less at standard state. The linear speed of the atmospheric gas in the 10 furnace is preferably 5 cm/second or more. The higher is the gas linear speed, the more the dephosphorization of the granular iron is accelerated. However, excessively high gas linear speed causes the granular iron to be re oxidized, and this decreases the iron yield. Therefore, 15 the gas linear speed is preferably 13.5 cm/second or less, and more preferably 9 cm/second or less. The phrase "atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated" means the atmospheric gas near the surface of the agglomerates. The phrase "near the 20 surface of the agglomerates" means the area up to a height of 50 mm from the surface of the agglomerates. Since the oxygen partial pressure and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas in the furnace are often different at the bottom portion of the furnace (near the hearth) and 25 the top portion of the furnace (near the roof), the 12 11-05-28;02:16PM;$W~ i f%9 F. B. RICE ;-)7 0789929757 # 17/ 50 above-mentioned oxygen partial pressure and gas linear speed are specified for the atmospheric gas near the surface of the agglomerates, which affect the redox reaction of the agglomerates. 5 The oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated can be calculated by taking a sample of the atmospheric gas near the surface of the agglomerates, and analyzing the gas composition. The linear speed of the atmospheric gas can 10 be measured with a pitot tube or the like. The oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas can be controlled, for example, by: adjusting the amount of oxygen fed to the burners; adjusting the amount of fuel fed to the burners or the air ratio, etc.; or 15 adjusting the injection of reductive gas. The linear speed of the atmospheric gas can be controlled, for example, by: adjusting the amount of gas fed to the burners; adjusting the injection angle of the burners; or varying the roof height. 20 The oxygen partial pressure and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas are adjusted so as to be within the above-mentioned ranges at latest from the point when the melting of the reduced iron begins. This is because the composition of the granular iron is actually affected by 25 the atmospheric gas composition more during melting than during solid reduction. 13 11-05-28;02:16PM;PW if W EM F. 2. RICE 4-;)? 0789929757 # 18/ 50 Preferably, the linear speed of the atmospheric gas, under which the agglomerates are heated, is controlled to 5.4 cm/second or less (including 0 cm/second) until the iron oxides, which are contained in the raw material 5 mixture, begins to melt; and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas, under which the agglomerates are heated, is controlled to 4.5 cm/second or more, once the iron oxides begins to melt. In the period before the iron oxides begins to melt, the reduction reaction is very 10 actively occurring within the agglomerates, this causes a difficult change in the composition of the atmospheric gas near the surface of the agglomerates or inside the agglomerates, even if the composition of the atmospheric gas in the furnace is changed. Meanwhile, as the solid 15 reduction nears completion, melting of iron begins due to the beginning of carburization in iron and the decrease of the melting point of the resulting iron. When the iron begins to melt, almost no gas is generated from the agglomerates, and thus the composition of the iron is 20 greatly affected by the composition of the atmospheric gas. Therefore, the linear speed of the atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated is preferably controlled to suitable levels up in the period before the iron oxides begins to melt and after the melting begins 25 respectively. Incidentally, the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas in the period before the iron 14 11-05-28;02:16PM; i i @t f F.8.RICE 4-75 )7 ;0789929757 # 19/ 50 oxides contained in the raw material mixture begins to melt is preferably 2.8 x 101 atm or less. Thus, in the present invention, it is preferable to control the oxygen partial pressure and the linear speed 5 of the atmospheric gas at the time until the iron oxides begins to melt and after the melting begins, for example, when a moving hearth furnace is used as the heating furnace, partitions can be suspended from the furnace roof so that the inside of the furnace is divided into a 10 plurality of zones, and the oxygen partial pressure and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas is controlled for each of these zones. As discussed above, suitable controlling of the oxygen partial pressure and the linear speed of the 15 atmospheric gas in the period of reducing and melting can proceed the dephosphorization of the granular iron more effectively, and can produce granular iron with a lower phosphorus content than reducing and melting just under reductive atmosphere. 20 In the present invention, it is preferred to adjust the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material mixture to be in a range between 98 mass% and 102 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon 25 needed to reduce the iron oxides contained in the iron oxide-containing substance. The reason for this is as 15 11-05-28;02:16PM; 1 iW WtJ F. B. RICE 4-;)? ;0789929757 # 20/ 50 follows: when the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is less than 98 mass with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides, this makes lack 5 of carbon, and leads an inadequate reduction of the iron oxides, even though reductive gas (CO gas) rises up from the carbonaceous material spread on the hearth, as discussed below. The required percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing 10 agent is preferably 98 mass* or more, and more preferably 98.5 mass% or more, with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. However, when the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is excessively large, the reductive gas 15 (CO gas) still continues to rise up from the agglomerates by reacting with the atmospheric gas even after the reduction is finished. This decreases the oxygen partial pressure in melting the reduced iron, as discussed below, and thus makes the dephosphorization ratio of the reduced 20 iron be lower. Therefore, the required percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is preferably 102 mass% or less, and more preferably 101 mass or less, with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. 25 In the present invention, it is especially recommended that the amount of fixed carbon contained in 16 11-05-28;02:16PM ; j IW]M F. B. RICE 4-7')' ;0789929757 #21/ 50 the carbonaceous reducing agent be adjusted somewhat on the low side with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. The reason for this is as follows: the unreduced portions of the iron oxides are 5 reduced by the carbonaceous material spread on the hearth, since the agglomerates are on the carbonaceous material in the present invention, although an insufficient amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent seems to cause inadequate reduction of the granular 10 iron. Specifically, the iron oxides (FeO,) contained in the agglomerates are reduced by the carbon (C) contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent and by the carbonaceous material spread on the hearth, according to the reduction 15 reactions in the following formulas (1) and (2), to form granular iron. FeO + xCO -+ Fe + xCO 2 (1) FeOx + xC -+Fe + xCO (2) As a result of various experiments, the inventors 20 found that the reduction reaction proceeds in the proportions indicated by the following formula (3) when a moles of the FeOx of Formula (1) react, and when b moles of the FeOx of Formula (2) react. That is, Formula (3) indicates the number of oxygen atoms reduced by one 25 carbon atom. In the reduction of FeO,, the inventors 17 11-05-28;02:16PM;OPMii WM F. S. RICE 4- 7 ;0789929757 # 22/ 50 estimate that about 38% of the total occurs by direct reduction by carbon (C) , and about 72% of the total occurs by indirect reduction by reducing gas (CO gas). 1.0 5 1 + a/(a + b) S 1.5 (3) 5 Therefore, even though the amount of carbon, which is calculated as one carbon atom needed to reduce one oxygen atom contained in iron oxide, is slightly on the low side (for example, by blending carbonaceous reducing agent a little less into the raw material mixture), iron 10 oxides in agglomerates are still adequately reduced. Also, adjusting the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent on the lower side with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides causes to form more iron oxides (FeO) 15 contained in subgenerated slag in the reduction, and drives the dephosphorization reaction faster in melting the reduced iron. Therefore, the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is more preferably 100 mass or less with 20 respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. The amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxide may be calculated from the composition of the raw material mixture. 25 The granular iron is required to be carburized so that it contains about 3 mass% carbon in order to 18 11-05-28;02:16PM;A 6% @@9 F. B. RICE 4-7F5T ;0789929757 # 23/ 50 decrease the melting point of the granular iron during separating the melted granular iron from the slag. However, when the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material 5 mixture is set to be slightly insufficient with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides, the granular iron does not contain enough fixed carbon, and this results that the granular iron cannot be melted. Accordingly, spreading a carbonaceous material 10 on the hearth and setting the amount of fixed carbon contained in this carbonaceous material to be in excess over the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides increase the amount of fixed carbon supplied to the granular iron, and this can make the molten granular 15 iron be separated from the slag. The percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous material that is spread on the hearth is preferably adjusted to within a range between 2 mass% and 5 mass with respect to the amount of 20 fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. There are no particular limitations on the type of carbonaceous material that is spread on the hearth, for example, the carbon-containing material used as the above-mentioned carbonaceous reducing agent can be used. 25 In the present invention, the above-mentioned agglomerates is also preferred to adjust the composition 19 11-05-28;02:16PM;4PYiW W%9 F. B. RICE 4- ')7 ;0789929757 # 24/ 50 of the raw material mixture so that the basicity of slag subgenerated in reducing the iron oxides is in a range between 1.0 and 1.6. The reason for this is as follows: when the slag basicity is less than 1.0, the 5 dephosphorization reaction in melting the reduced iron does not proceed and thus the phosphorus content of the granular iron cannot be reduced. Therefore, the basicity is preferably 1.3 or more, and more preferably 1.4 or more. However, too high slag basicity causes too high 10 melting point of the slag, and the resulting slag does not melt when the reduced iron is melted, making it difficult to separate the granular iron from the slag. As a result, the slag ends up being mixed in the granular iron, and this degrades in quality of the granular iron. 15 Therefore, the basicity is preferably 1.6 or less. The basicity of slag is the value [(CaO)/(SiO2)I calculated from the CaO content and the SiO 2 content in the slag. 20 Examples The present invention will now be described in further detail through examples. These examples are not intended to limit the present invention, various modifications are possible without departing from the 25 scope of the invention described above and below, and these modifications are included in the technical scope 20 11-05-28;02:16PM;-Wi )]W F. B. RICE ;-')T 0789929757 # 25/ 50 of the present invention. In the examples, each agglomerates were made from raw material mixtures each containing a carbonaceous reducing agent and an iron oxide-containing substance, 5 and then, each granular irons were made by; charging each agglomerates onto a carbonaceous material spread on a hearth of a heating furnace; and heating the agglomerates to thereby reduce and melt the iron oxides in the agglomerates in a laboratory. The compositions of the 10 agglomerates and the conditions of reduction and melting were varied. Specifically, as follows. Two kinds of iron oxide-containing substance were used: iron ore (n) with a low phosphorus content; and iron ore (hpb) with a high phosphorus content. Table 1 15 below shows the compositions of the iron ore (n) and the iron ore (hpb). Two kinds of carbonaceous 'reducing agent were also used: coal (p) with a low phosphorus content; and coal (b) with a high phosphorus content. Table 2 below shows the compositions of the coal (p) and the coal 20 (b). The iron ore each shown in Table 1 and the coal each shown in Table 2 were blended with additives, and then, each pelletized agglomerates (test material) with particle sizes of 18 to 20 mm were produced. The blended 25 additives were wheat gluten that was added as a binder, MgO, CaO, etc. Table 3 below shows the blending ratio of 21 11-05-28;02:16PM;VW i @@9 F. B. RICE 4-.. )7 ;0789929757 # 26/ 50 each test materials (percentages of weight values). Table 3 shows the target values for the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material 5 mixture with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. Table 3 also shows the target values for the basicity of slag subgenerated during reduction. Table 4 below shows the compositions of the test 10 materials. In Table 4, test material (1) is pellets with a low phosphorus content, and test materials (2) to (5) are pellets with a high phosphorus content. Each granular irons were produced by; charging each test materials shown in Table 4 into the furnace of which 15 hearth was spread with a carbonaceous material; heating them to thereby reduce and melt the iron oxides in the raw material mixture; and discharging products to a cooling zone at the point when the granular iron and slag had completely separated. The number of samples of each 20 test materials charged into the furnace was 30. 130 g of smokeless coal with a maximum particle size of 2 mm or less was spread over the hearth as a carbonaceous material. Extra carbonaceous material was spread around the edges to protect the hearth. 25 The test materials charged into the furnace were heated with a heater provided to the furnace, so that the 22 11-05-28;02:16PM; JW~ Wtf F, B. RICE 4- =7h')7 ;0789929757 # 27/ 50 temperature of the test materials would reach 1450 0 C. Inside the furnace, the linear speed of the atmospheric gas under which the test materials were heated (the linear speed of the atmospheric gas near the 5 test materials) was controlled to be in a range between 1.35 and 20.27 cm/second, and the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas under which the test materials were heated (the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas near the test materials) was controlled 10 to be in a range between 0 and 5.057 x 10~" atm. Tables 5 and 6 below show the gas linear speeds and oxygen partial pressures. The gas linear speeds were the value at standard state. The gas linear speeds were calculated from- the 15 amount of gas supplied and the cross sectional area at the sample placement portion inside the furnace. The oxygen partial pressures were calculated by the following procedure. The following formula (4) expresses a carbon 20 combustion reaction, and the standard generation free energy AF in this reaction is expressed by the following formula (5). C (graphite) + 02 (g) = CO 2 (g) (4) AF = -94640 + 0.05 x T (cal/mol) (5) 25 Meanwhile, the standard generation free energy AF of 23 11-05-28;02:16PM;$ @ i n ff F.8. RICE 4-2 )7 ;0789929757 # 28/ 50 this reaction is expressed by the following formula (6), using the partial pressure P= 2 of the atmospheric gas accounted for by carbon dioxide gas, and the partial pressure P 02 of the atmospheric gas accounted for by 5 oxygen gas. AF = -RT x log (Pc02/Po 2 ) (6) The absolute temperature of 1450 0 C is: 1450 ("C) + 273 = 1723 (K) , therefore the relation between the carbon dioxide partial 10 pressure and the oxygen partial pressure in the atmospheric gas at 1450 0 C is found as follows from the above formulas (5) and (6). -94640 + 0.05 x 1723 -4.575 x 1723 x log(Pc 02
/P
02 ) log(PC 0 2 /Po 2 ) = 11.995 15 PC 2 /POa = 9.887 x 1011 Here, the partial pressure of the atmospheric gas accounted for by carbon dioxide gas is measured, for example, when Pco2 = 0.5 is measured, then
P
0 2 = 5.0571 x 10 20 is obtained as the partial pressure of the atmospheric gas accounted for by oxygen gas. Tables 5 and 6 show the compositions of the resulting granular irons, and the compositions of the subgenerated slags when granular irons were produced. Of 25 the compositions of the granular irons shown in Tables 5 24 11-05-28;02:18PM;4 iM WM F. B. RICE ;- )7 0789929757 # 29/ 50 and 6, each amount of iron is the value calculated by subtracting the amount of alloy elements and impurities from the total (100 masst. In Table 6, No. 30 is the result of discharging the 5 granular iron one minute before the point at which the separation of slag and granular iron was complete, and No. 31 is the result of discharging the granular iron from the furnace after waiting for three minutes from the point at which the separation of slag and granular iron 10 was complete. In Tables 5 and 6, everything other than Nos. 30 and 31 is the result of discharging the granular iron from the furnace at the point when one minute had elapsed from the point at which the separation of slag and granular iron was complete. 15 The center temperatures of the test materials were measured and found to be: approximately 1300 0 C at the point one minute before the separation of slag and granular iron was complete (No. 30); approximately 1400 0 C at the point when one minute had elapsed since the 20 completion of the separation of slag and granular iron; and approximately 1450 0 C at a point three minutes after the completion of the separation of slag and granular iron (No. 31). Also, the C0 2 gas proportion near the test materials 25 was substantially constant from the point one minute 25 11-05-28;02:1SPM;VW~ i ft F. B. RICE 4- r)7 ;0789929757 # 30/ 50 before the completion of the separation of slag and granular iron, up to the point three minutes after the completion of the separation of slag and granular iron. Meanwhile, some CO gas was noted to rise up from the test 5 material at a point one minute before the completion of the separation of slag and granular iron, but no CO gas was seen to rise up from the test material once the separation of slag and granular iron was partially completed. 10 The dephosphorization ratio was calculated from the composition of the granular iron and the composition of the test material by the following formula. Dephosphorization ratio (%) = [3 - (amount of phosphorus 15 contained in the resulting granular iron/total amount of iron contained in the resulting granular iron)/(amount of phosphorus contained in test material/total amount of iron contained in test material)] x 100 20 Fig. 1 shows the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the gas linear speed under different oxygen partial pressures, based on the data in Tables 4 and 5. In Fig. 1, the mark 0 indicates the result at an oxygen partial pressure of 0 atm, the mark A 25 indicates the result at an oxygen partial pressure of 26 11-05-28;02:16PM;G W J i 9 F. 3. RICE 4-7 )7 ;0789929757 # 31/ 50 1. 011 x 10~3 atm, the mark x indicates the result at an oxygen partial pressure of 1.517 x 1013 atm, the mark 0 indicates the result at an oxygen partial pressure of 3.034 x 10-33 atm, and the mark U indicates the result at 5 an oxygen partial pressure of 5.057 x 10-13 atm. As is clear from Fig. 1, when the atmospheric gas contains oxygen, the higher is the linear speed of the atmospheric gas under which the test material is heated, the higher is the dephosphorization ratio. For example, 10 with test material 3, which had a gas linear speed of 5.41/sec, it can be seen that the dephosphorization ratio rises when the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas is increased from 1.517 x 10~ atm to 3.034 x 10-3 atm, and that with a given test material and at a given 15 gas linear speed, the dephosphorization ratio rises when the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas is increased. When the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas is 0 atm (that is, under a nitrogen gas atmosphere), the dephosphorization is not affected by the 20 gas linear speed. When the gas linear speed is less than 5 cm/second, the result for dephosphorization ratio is reversed from that when the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas is 1.517 x 10-13 atm, but these are considered to be affected by sample variance or 25 phosphorus analysis error. 27 11-05-28;02:16PM; AMI 9kE F. 8. RICE 4-701)7 ;0789929757 # 32/ 50 Based on the above results, increasing the gas linear speed and the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas to the specified values or higher is an effective way to raise the dephosphorization ratio. 5 Fig. 2 shows the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the gas linear speed in Nos. 24, 25 and 32, out of the results in Table 6 when the oxygen partial pressure was 3.034 x 10'" atm. A comparison of Fig. 2 with Fig. I reveals that even though 10 the amount of phosphorus contained in the test material changes, at the condition that the oxygen partial pressure is constant, the dephosphorization ratio rises along with the gas linear speed. Although not shown in the drawings, the same thing can be understood from Nos. 15 2, 4 and 6, for example. Fig. 3 shows the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the oxygen partial pressure in Nos. 25, 27, 28 and 29, out of the results in Table 6 when the gas linear speed was 5.41 cm/second. As is 20 clear from Fig. 3, when the gas linear speed is constant, the dephosphorization ratio rises along with the oxygen partial pressure. Also, when the oxygen partial pressure is 1.517 x 10-1 atm, it can be seen that there is almost no change in the dephosphorization ratio. Although not 25 shown in the drawings, it can be understood from Nos. 3, 28 11-05-28;02:16PM; 1W i f@j F. B. RICE 4-h5')T ;0789929757 # 33/ 50 4 and 5, for example, that when the gas linear speed is constant, the dephosphorization ratio rises along with the oxygen partial pressure. Fig. 4 shows the relation between the 5 dephosphorization ratio and the time discharging granular iron in Nos. 25, 30 and 31, out of the results in Table 6 when the oxygen partial pressure was 3.034 x 10-13 atm and the gas linear speed was 5.41 cm/second. Fig. 4 shows the dephosphorization ratio of variation compared with 10 the variation of the time discharging the granular iron which was separated from the slag out of the furnace from the clock time when the slag and granular iron had been completely separated was set 0 minute, after the reduced irons were melted. As is clear from Fig. 4, the 15 dephosphorization ratio drops when heating is continued after the slag and granular iron have been separated. The highest dephosphorization ratio in Fig. 4 is when the discharging time is "-1 minute," and this "--1 minute" means that the granular iron was discharged from 20 the furnace before the granular and slag were separated, which is a condition that cannot be employed in actual practice. Fig. 5 shows the relation between the dephosphorization ratio and the amount of fixed carbon 25 contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material mixture for Nos. 21, 22 and 25, out of 29 11-05-28;02:16PM;4 il W@f F. B. RICE 4-7 1)7' ;0789929757 # 34/ 50 the results shown in Table 6. As is clear from Fig. 5, the dephosphorization ratio is advantageously higher when the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material mixture is set 5 on the low side with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. On the other hand, it can be seen that there is a further drop in the dephosphorization ratio when the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the 10 carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material mixture is over 102 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. This is considered to be attributable to the fact that since a large amount of reductive gas rises up even in the 15 process of melting the reduced iron, the effect of increasing the gas linear speed is lost. As is clear from the results for No. 22, even though the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent blended to the raw material mixture is set 20 on the low side with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides contained in the test material, adjusting the amount of carbon contained in the carbonaceous material spread on the hearth to be in a range between 2 and 5 mass* with respect to the 25 amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides causes stable reduction of the iron oxides remaining 30 11-05-28;02:169M;V | 0M5 F. B. RICE ;-')T 0789929757 # 35/ 50 after dephosphorization has proceeded by the carbonaceous material spread on the hearth. Table 1 IRON COMPOSITION (mass%) ORE TOTAL TYPE AMOUNT FeO Si0 2 CaO A1203 MgO S P .--- _I OF IRON_ (n) 67.64 29.13 4.85 0.44 0.23 0.47 0.004 0.018 (hpb) 62.97 0.47 3.25 0.04 2.08 0.04 0.030 0.13 Table 2 COAL TYPE COMPOSITION (mass%) VOLATILE ASH FIXED TOTAL TOTAL TOTALAMOUNT CONTENT CONTENT CARBON AMOUNT AMOUNT OF PHOSPHORUS COTN- OTETCRO OF-SURFR OF CAO(CALCULATED VALUE) 16.79 4.64 78.57 0.595 86.46 0.00243 COMPOSITION OF ASH CONTENT (mass%) Fe 2 0 3 SiO 2 CaO A10. MgO TIO 2 P20 15.75 43.55 3.98 27.03 1.85 1.67 0.12 COAL TYPE COMPOSmON (mass%) VOTLlE AS FIXED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT VLTL AS IXE AM___ O UNU AMOUNT OF PHOSPHORUS CONTENT CONTENT CARBON 0_SU__R OFCARBON (CALULA1EDVALUE 14.03 4.75 81.22 0.458 83.31 0.03254 Wb) COMPOSITION OF ASH CONTENT (mass%) Fe2O3 SiO2 CaO Al203 MgO T102 P 2 03 4.26 57.25 2.16 23.93 0.59 0.87 1.57 Table 3 31 11-05-28;02:16PM;O W i a-15 F. 8. RICE 4-7 0789929757 # 36/ 50 BLENDING RATIO (mass%) TARGET VALUE TEST IRON ORE TYPE COAL TYPE AMOUNT OF M ADDITIVES CARBON BASICITY (n) (hpb) (p) I (b) (1) 71.581 - 16.871 - 11.55 101.00 1.26 (2) - 72.470 - 17.098 10.43 103.20 1.26 (3) - 73.454 - 16.102 10.44 101.00 1.26 (4) - 74.327 - 15.209 10.46 99.00 1.26 (5) - 72.668 16.972 - 10.36 103.20 1.26 Table 4 COMPOSMON (mass%) MATERIAL TOTAL TOT1 AMONTFMUN F niO2 A' Cao MgO F _ ; ___CARBON PO I~ 0 Im I_ _ I__ I__ (1) 15.62 48.60 4.01 0.48 5.96 0.97 0.35 0.017 0.104 (2) 1590 46.01 2.92 1.67 4.17 0.87 0.36 0.100 0.094 (3) 15.89 46.63 3.31 1.75 4.11 0.60 0.32 0.099 0.094 (4) 14.32 47.29 2.98 1.72 4.20 0.07 0.36 0.100 0.087 (5) 16.14 46.55 3.41 1.72 4.31 0.84 0.36 0.094 0.133 Table 5 32 11-05-28;02:16PM;,MI) f]J F. 3. RICE 4- J7X5' ;0789929757 # 37/ 50 TEST GAS LINEAR pYE COMPOSMON OF GRANULAR IRON (mass COMPOSITION OF SLAG (mass) No. MASEAL PPEED ASSURE -ASClTY x10(cm'sec) "x10(atm) c P { S Fe I FeO P S (% 1 (1) 20.27 5.057 2.9 0.005 0.134 96.92 4.96 0.110 0.244 1.47 85.25 2 (1) 20.27 3.034 3.04 0.007 O.12 96.77 2.84 0.099 0.313 1.53 79.32 3 (1) 9.01 5.057 3.18 0.014 0.114 98.64 1.9 0.068 0.379 1.52 58.59 4 (1) 9.01 3.034 3 0.018 0.091 96.83 0.98 0.037 0.486 1.43 46.86 5 (1) 9.01 1.011 3.49 0.027 0.039 98.39 0.27 0.011 0.712 1.54 19.92 6 (1) 5.41 3.034 323 0.023 0.056 96.53 0.45 0.020 0.589 1.43 31.95 7 (1) 1.35 1.011 3,4 0.031 0.028 96.21 0.24 0.007 0.762 157 7.89 8 (1) 20.27 5.057 2.15 0.005 0.164 97.55 6.83 0.08 0.292 1.41 85.36 9 (1) 2027 3.034 2.53 0.005 0.155 97.28 3.5 0.090 0.317 1.47 85.31 10 (1) 9.01 3.034 2.65 0.019 0.111 97.19 0.72 0.032 0.501 1.44 44.11 11 (1) 5.41 3.034 2.97 0.024 0.079 96.89 0.43 0.014 0.668 1.42 29.18 Table 6 No 7EST I PAR7OAL COMPOSmON OF GRANULAR IRON (ms4 COMPOSMON OF SLAG (mas) 6A C OYME x 10'1 (utm) C P Fe FeI P S (% 21 (2) 5.41 3.034 3.00 0.16 0.089 96.72 0.17 0.180 0.336 1.52 23.89 22 (4) 5.41 3.034 2.90 0.07 0.121 96.89 3.94 0.640 0.198 1.50 64.85 23 (5) 5.41 3.034 2.66 0.14 0.110 97.06 0.46 0.240 0.453 1.62 23.57 24 (3) 1.35 3.034 2.96 0.16 0.073 96.78 0.47 0.136 0.378 1.47 22.13 25 (3) 5.41 3.034 287 0.14 0.113 96.85 0.42 0.150 0.514 1.61 31.91 26 (3) 20.27 1034 2.91 0.15 0.103 96.81 0.81 0.250 0.292 0.68 27.02 27 (3) 5.41 1.517 2.62 0.16 0,081 97.11 0.54 0.181 0.367 1.48 22.39 28 (3) 5.41 0 2.78 0.16 0.063 96.95 0.44 0.110 0.487 1.49 22.27 29 (3) 5.41 5.057 2.79 0.11 0.109 96.96 2.16 0.390 0.225 1.48 46.55 30 (3) 5.41 3.034 1.79 0.13 0.091 97.86 1.41 0.300 0.312 1.49 37.43 31 (3) 5.41 3.034 3.29 0.15 0.111 95.42 0.80 0.200 0.237 1.47 26.72 32 () 9.01 3.034 2.69 0.11 0.113 97.06 2.2 0.510 0.223 1.48 46.62 33 (5) 5.41 3.034 2.82 0.14 0.113 96.88 0.48 0.140 0.554 1.61 28.44 5 As described above, one aspect of the present 33 11-05-28;02:16PM;$ iW ft F. B. RICE 4-;) 0789929757 # 38/ 50 invention is a method for producing granular iron comprising: charging agglomerates formed from a raw material mixture containing an iron oxide-containing substance and a carbonaceous reducing agent onto a 5 carbonaceous material spread on a hearth of a furnace; and heating the agglomerates to thereby reduce and melt iron oxides in the agglomerates, wherein the temperature of the agglomerates in the furnace is set in a range between 1200 0 C and 1500"C; the oxygen partial pressure in 10 atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated is set to 2.0 x 10-13 atm or more at standard state; and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas in the furnace is set to 4.5 cm/second or more. According to the present invention, since the 15 reduced agglomerates are melted in a state in which the oxygen partial pressure of the atmospheric gas and the gas linear speed and are controlled to the above mentioned conditions, the phosphorus contained in the reduced iron can be moved to the subgenerated slag during 20 reduction. As a result, the granular iron made by melting the reduced iron contains less phosphorus. In the above-mentioned method for producing granular iron, it is preferable that the composition of the raw material mixture is adjusted so that the percentage of 25 the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous 34 11-05-28;02:16PM;4p i f]%l F. B. RICE 4-W') ;0789929757 # 39/ 50 reducing agent is in a range between 98 mass% and 102 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. This causes the reduction of iron oxides to proceed more actively and the granular 5 iron with lower phosphorus content to be produced. In the above-mentioned method for producing granular iron, it is preferable that the composition of the raw material mixture is adjusted so that the basicity of slag subgenerated in reducing the iron oxides is in a range 10 between 1.0 and 1.6. This causes the dephosphorization reaction to proceed faster and the granular iron with lower phosphorus content to be produced. In the above-mentioned method for producing granular iron, it is preferable that the percentage of the amount 15 of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is in a range between 98 mass* and 100 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. This causes the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent to be on the 20 low side with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides, and thus more iron oxides (FeO) contained in the subgenerated slag during reduction to be produced. As a result, this accelerates the dephosphorization reaction during the melting of the 25 reduced iron, therefore, the dephosphorization ratio of the reduced iron can be further increased. 35 11-05-28;02:16PM;OWid W9f F. B. RICE 4-;)7 0789929757 # 40/ 50 In the above-mentioned method for producing granular iron, it is preferable that the linear speed of the atmospheric gas is set to 5.4 cm/second or less (including 0 cm/second) until the iron oxides begins to 5 melt; and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas is set to 4.5 cm/second or more after the iron oxides begins to melt. Adjusting the linear speed of the atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are heated, both until the iron oxides begins to melt and after the melting has 10 begun, allows the reduction reaction to proceed actively in the agglomerates up until the melting of the iron oxide begins, and allows the melting of the iron to proceed stably after melting has begun. In the above-mentioned method for producing 15 granular iron, it is preferable that the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous material which is spread on the hearth is set in a range between 2 mass% and 5 mass with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides; and the 20 maximum particle size of the carbonaceous material is set to 2 mm or less. This increases the amount of fixed carbon supplied to the granular iron, allows the molten granular iron to separate from slag, and also prevents the molten slag from running down into the crevices in 25 the carbonaceous material and corroding the hearth. 36 11-05-28;02:16PM;W~i $t f F.9. RICE 4-7U5') ;0789929757 # 41/ 50 Industrial Applicability Granular iron with a low phosphorus content can be made stably by using the method of the present invention for producing granular iron. 37

Claims (3)

1. A method for producing granular iron comprising: charging agglomerates formed from a raw material 5 mixture containing an iron oxide-containing substance and a carbonaceous reducing agent onto a carbonaceous material spread on a hearth of a furnace; and heating the agglomerates to thereby reduce and melt iron oxides in the agglomerates, wherein 10 the temperature of the agglomerates in the furnace is set in a range between 12000C and 1500*C; the oxygen partial pressure in atmospheric gas under which the agglomerates are reduced and melted is set to
2.0 x 10-1 atm or more at standard state; and 15 the linear speed of the atmospheric gas in the furnace is set to 4.5 cm/second or more. 2. The producing method according to claim 1, wherein 20 the composition of the raw material mixture is adjusted so that the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is in a range between 98 mass% and 102 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. 25 38
11-05-28;02:16PM;#$P i M1 F. B. RICE 4- 1)7 ;0789929757 # 43/ 50 3. The producing method according to claim 1, wherein the composition of the raw material mixture is adjusted so that the basicity of slag subgenerated in 5 reducing the iron oxides is in a range between 1.0 and 1.6. 4. The producing method according to claim 1, wherein the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon 10 contained in the carbonaceous reducing agent is in a range between 98 mass% and 100 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides. 5. The producing method according to claim 1, 15 wherein the linear speed of the atmospheric gas is set to 5.4 cm/second or less (including 0 cm/second) until the iron oxides begins to melt; and the linear speed of the atmospheric gas is set to 20 4.5 cm/second or more after the iron oxides begins to melt. 6. The producing method according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein 25 the percentage of the amount of fixed carbon contained in the carbonaceous material which is spread on 39 the hearth is set in a range between 2 mass% and 5 mass% with respect to the amount of fixed carbon needed to reduce the iron oxides; and 5 the maximum particle size of the carbonaceous material is set to 2 mm or less. 7. A method for producing granular iron according to claim 1 and substantially as hereinbefore described. 40
AU2010207300A 2009-01-23 2010-01-15 Process for manufacturing granular iron Ceased AU2010207300B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009013378 2009-01-23
JP2009-013378 2009-01-23
PCT/JP2010/050373 WO2010084822A1 (en) 2009-01-23 2010-01-15 Process for manufacturing granular iron

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2010207300A1 AU2010207300A1 (en) 2011-06-23
AU2010207300B2 true AU2010207300B2 (en) 2013-05-09

Family

ID=42355876

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2010207300A Ceased AU2010207300B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2010-01-15 Process for manufacturing granular iron

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20110265603A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2010189762A (en)
CN (1) CN102272337A (en)
AU (1) AU2010207300B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2745763A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2484145C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2010084822A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5408369B2 (en) * 2012-01-19 2014-02-05 Jfeスチール株式会社 Hot metal pretreatment method
CN104136633B (en) * 2012-02-28 2016-05-11 株式会社神户制钢所 The manufacture method of reduced iron agglomerate
JP6294152B2 (en) * 2014-05-15 2018-03-14 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Manufacturing method of granular metallic iron
JP6250482B2 (en) * 2014-06-13 2017-12-20 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Manufacturing method of granular metallic iron
JP6460531B2 (en) 2015-05-28 2019-01-30 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for producing reduced iron
JP7476871B2 (en) * 2021-11-30 2024-05-01 Jfeスチール株式会社 Metal manufacturing methods
JP7388594B2 (en) * 2021-11-30 2023-11-29 Jfeスチール株式会社 Metal iron manufacturing method
JP7476872B2 (en) * 2021-11-30 2024-05-01 Jfeスチール株式会社 Metal manufacturing methods

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11217615A (en) * 1997-11-27 1999-08-10 Kobe Steel Ltd Production of reduced iron
JP2001181719A (en) * 1999-12-24 2001-07-03 Kawasaki Steel Corp Method for producing reduced metal from metal content
JP2002030319A (en) * 2000-06-28 2002-01-31 Midrex Internatl Bv Method for producing granular metallic iron
JP2007246970A (en) * 2006-03-15 2007-09-27 Jfe Steel Kk Operation method of mobile hearth furnace

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE69720606T2 (en) * 1996-01-26 2004-03-04 Nippon Steel Corp. METHOD FOR OPERATING A SHAFT
JP3845893B2 (en) * 1996-03-15 2006-11-15 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Metal iron manufacturing method
DE69717609T2 (en) * 1996-03-15 2003-05-22 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho, Kobe Process for producing reduced iron-containing compact bodies and such bodies
EP1770175A1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2007-04-04 JFE Steel Corporation Rotary hearth furnace for reducing oxides
JP3513832B2 (en) * 1997-09-30 2004-03-31 Jfeスチール株式会社 Operating method of movable hearth furnace and movable hearth furnace
DE60144072D1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2011-03-31 Kobe Seiko Sho Kobe Steel Kk Process for producing metallic iron in a moving-sole smelting reduction furnace
JP2001323310A (en) * 2000-05-15 2001-11-22 Kobe Steel Ltd Method for producing reduced iron
JP4774611B2 (en) * 2001-03-19 2011-09-14 Jfeスチール株式会社 Operation method of mobile hearth furnace
JP4691827B2 (en) * 2001-05-15 2011-06-01 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Granular metal iron
JP4976822B2 (en) * 2006-11-14 2012-07-18 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Production method and apparatus of granular metallic iron

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11217615A (en) * 1997-11-27 1999-08-10 Kobe Steel Ltd Production of reduced iron
JP2001181719A (en) * 1999-12-24 2001-07-03 Kawasaki Steel Corp Method for producing reduced metal from metal content
JP2002030319A (en) * 2000-06-28 2002-01-31 Midrex Internatl Bv Method for producing granular metallic iron
JP2007246970A (en) * 2006-03-15 2007-09-27 Jfe Steel Kk Operation method of mobile hearth furnace

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110265603A1 (en) 2011-11-03
CA2745763A1 (en) 2010-07-29
AU2010207300A1 (en) 2011-06-23
RU2011135038A (en) 2013-02-27
JP2010189762A (en) 2010-09-02
CN102272337A (en) 2011-12-07
WO2010084822A1 (en) 2010-07-29
RU2484145C2 (en) 2013-06-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2010207300B2 (en) Process for manufacturing granular iron
JP5503420B2 (en) Method for producing granular metal
EP1307596B1 (en) Method for producing metallic iron
JP4691827B2 (en) Granular metal iron
AU2009234752B2 (en) Titanium oxide-containing agglomerate for producing granular metallic iron
JP2003073717A (en) Method for manufacturing metallic iron
US10407744B2 (en) Production method of granular metallic iron
JP4540172B2 (en) Production of granular metallic iron
WO2009125736A1 (en) Process for production of granular metallic iron
JP6043271B2 (en) Method for producing reduced iron
AU2006335814B2 (en) Method for manufacturing metallic iron
JP5000593B2 (en) Manufacturing method of granular metallic iron and manufacturing method of molten steel using the metallic iron
JP2014062321A (en) Method of manufacturing reduced iron agglomerated product
KR101448607B1 (en) Method for manufacturing iron
JPH10251724A (en) Production of metallic iron and producing equipment therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired