AU2008201799A1 - Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals - Google Patents
Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2008201799A1 AU2008201799A1 AU2008201799A AU2008201799A AU2008201799A1 AU 2008201799 A1 AU2008201799 A1 AU 2008201799A1 AU 2008201799 A AU2008201799 A AU 2008201799A AU 2008201799 A AU2008201799 A AU 2008201799A AU 2008201799 A1 AU2008201799 A1 AU 2008201799A1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- concentrate
- chalcopyrite
- minerals
- chalcocite
- copper
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 86
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 title claims description 86
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 title claims description 50
- BWFPGXWASODCHM-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper monosulfide Chemical compound [Cu]=S BWFPGXWASODCHM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title description 5
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 111
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 claims description 102
- 229910052951 chalcopyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 69
- DVRDHUBQLOKMHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N chalcopyrite Chemical compound [S-2].[S-2].[Fe+2].[Cu+2] DVRDHUBQLOKMHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 69
- 229910052947 chalcocite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 55
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 52
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 50
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 48
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 229910052948 bornite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000011143 downstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000003723 Smelting Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- ZOOODBUHSVUZEM-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethoxymethanedithioic acid Chemical compound CCOC(S)=S ZOOODBUHSVUZEM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000012991 xanthate Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 32
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 4
- 150000004763 sulfides Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002516 radical scavenger Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002000 scavenging effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- JCYZMTMYPZHVBF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Melarsoprol Chemical compound NC1=NC(N)=NC(NC=2C=CC(=CC=2)[As]2SC(CO)CS2)=N1 JCYZMTMYPZHVBF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001779 copper mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001451 polypropylene glycol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- XOFYZVNMUHMLCC-ZPOLXVRWSA-N prednisone Chemical compound O=C1C=C[C@]2(C)[C@H]3C(=O)C[C@](C)([C@@](CC4)(O)C(=O)CO)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 XOFYZVNMUHMLCC-ZPOLXVRWSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052683 pyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- NIFIFKQPDTWWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyrite Chemical compound [Fe+2].[S-][S-] NIFIFKQPDTWWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011028 pyrite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B15/00—Obtaining copper
- C22B15/0002—Preliminary treatment
- C22B15/0004—Preliminary treatment without modification of the copper constituent
- C22B15/0008—Preliminary treatment without modification of the copper constituent by wet processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
- B03D1/06—Froth-flotation processes differential
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Description
00
O
C(K AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 (Nc COMPLETE SPECIFICATION Standard Patent 00 Applicant(s): Heyes Consulting Pty Ltd Invention Title: DIFFERENTIAL FLOTATION OF MIXED COPPER SULPHIDE MINERALS The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method for performing it known to me/us: P71419AU.1 PalSet_Filng Application 2008-4-23 doc (M) 00 -2 00 0 DIFFERENTIAL FLOTATION OF MIXED COPPER SULPHIDE MINERALS The present invention relates to separating r copper-containing sulphide minerals from an ore that contains two or more than two different copper-containing sulphide minerals.
The present invention also relates to producing Scopper from an ore that contains two or more than two 00 10 different copper-containing sulphide minerals.
The term "ore" is understood herein to include blends of ores mined from different locations.
The present invention relates particularly, although by no means exclusively, to separating coppercontaining sulphide minerals in the form of chalcopyrite and chalcocite (and optionally other copper-containing sulphide minerals, such as bornite) from a mixed sulphide ore that contains these minerals to form at least a chalcopyrite-rich concentrate with a first, lower Cu:S ratio and a chalcocite-rich concentrate with a second, higher Cu:S ratio.
The present invention also relates particularly, although by no means exclusively, to producing copper from mixed sulphide ores that contain chalcopyrite and chalcocite (and optionally other copper-containing sulphide minerals such as bornite) in the ores.
One particular application for the present invention is the Olympic Dam Operations of BHP Billiton Limited. The ore contains chalcopyrite, chalcocite, bornite and other copper sulphide minerals. While in the past the mined ore has contained approximately equal amounts of chalcopyrite, chalcocite, and bornite, currently the Cu:S ratio is steadily decreasing and this N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotationdoc -O 3 00 O trend is likely to continue with proposed expansions of Sthe mining operations. This downward trend in the Cu:S ratio indicates an increase in the level of chalcopyrite Srelative to the other two above-mentioned minerals in the ore.
The downward trend in Cu:S ratio is relevant because the smelting process currently used at Olympic Dam SOperations requires a concentrate having a Cu:S ratio well 00 10 above that of chalcopyrite. The blister smelter currently Sbeing used at Olympic Dam Operations was designed for a minimum Cu:S ratio of 1.6:1. Operating the smelter below a Cu:S ratio of 1.6:1 results in significant loss of copper recovery and increased smelter costs. A selective mining method is currently used at Olympic Dam Operations to control the Cu:S ratio at the mine and supply the smelter with ore having a controlled Cu:S ratio. However, the cost of selective mining is high and it is clear that such selective mining is increasingly a less viable option, particularly with the trend of increasing levels of chalcopyrite in the ore, and is a problem that needs to be solved as part of the proposed expansion of the mine.
The present invention is concerned with addressing the above problem.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of separating copper-containing minerals in an ore that contains two or more than two different copper-containing sulphide minerals, which method includes processing a slurry of the ore in a series of flotation stages and controlling the flotation stages to separate the minerals in the ore selectively based on the mineral type and thereby producing at least a first concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having a comparatively low Cu:S ratio and a second concentrate of the coppercontaining minerals having a higher Cu:S ratio.
N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotationdoc 00 4 SThe present invention is based on a realisation that different inherent flotabilities of copper-containing Sminerals, such as chalcopyrite and chalcocite, provide an opportunity to separate the minerals from a mixed sulphide mineral ore that contains the minerals on the basis of mineral type.
O Hence, in the case of a mixed sulphide mineral 00 10 ore containing chalcopyrite, chalcocite and other copper Ssulphide minerals, the present invention processes an ore in a series of flotation stages that are controlled to separate minerals from the ore selectively based on the mineral type and produces a first concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having a comparatively low Cu:S ratio in which chalcopyrite is a major component of the concentrate and a second concentrate of the coppercontaining minerals having a higher Cu:S ratio in which chalcocite is a major component of the concentrate.
Hence, in the case of a mixed sulphide mineral ore containing chalcopyrite and chalcocite (and optionally other minerals such as bornite), preferably the method includes processing the slurry and producing the above-mentioned first concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having the comparatively low Cu:S ratio in which chalcopyrite is a major component of the concentrate (hereinafter referred to as "the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate") and (ii) the above-mentioned second concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having the higher Cu:S ratio in which chalcocite is a major component of the concentrate (hereinafter referred to as "the second chalcocite-based concentrate").
The second chalcocite-based concentrate has a Cu:S ratio well above the minimum of 1.6:1 required by the current blister smelter at the Olympic Dam Operations and N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc
I
5 00 can be used as a feedstock for the smelter without Sdifficulty.
M The first chalcopyrite-based concentrate having the comparatively lower Cu:S ratio can be used as a feedstock for another downstream processing operation for recovering copper from the concentrate. For example, the 'first concentrate can be used in a known 2-stage smelter Sthat requires a Cu:S ratio of 0.9:1 to 1.3:1 in the 00 10 feedstock for the furnace.
The method may include exploiting the natural floatability of some minerals versus other minerals.
Specifically, the method may include controlling at least one flotation stage on the basis that chalcopyrite has greater natural floatability than chalcocite (and bornite).
The method may include controlling at least one flotation stage to exploit the natural floatability of some minerals versus other minerals.
For example, the method may include controlling collector addition to the slurry in at least one flotation stage to exploit the natural floatability of some minerals versus other minerals and thereby selectively float a particular mineral type.
For example, the method may include aerating the slurry in a flotation stage or stages to control the environment of the slurry to float chalcopyrite.
For example, the method may include adding collectors, such as a xanthate, to at least one flotation stage to promote/enhance flotation of chalcocite versus chalcopyrite.
N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patcnt\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\DifferentiaI Flotation~doc 00 6
O
0 SOne embodiment of the present invention includes processing the slurry in a first flotation stage under Cconditions that exploit the natural floatability of chalcopyrite and floating the chalcopyrite to form the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate and an output slurry containing chalcocite and other copper-containing minerals, processing the output slurry in a second O flotation stage under conditions that enhance/promote 00 10 floatability of chalcocite and other copper-containing Sminerals and floating the chalcocite and forming the second chalcocite-based concentrate.
Another, although not the only other, embodiment of the present invention includes the steps described in the preceding paragraph and further includes the steps of forming a bulk concentrate of the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate and the second chalcocite-based concentrate, treating the bulk concentrate by grinding and/or leaching the bulk concentrate, and processing the treated bulk concentrate in another flotation stage under conditions that exploit the floatability of chalcopyrite and floating the chalcopyrite and forming a chalcopyrite-based concentrate and an output slurry containing chalcocite and other copper-containing minerals.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of producing copper from an ore that contains two or more than two different copper-containing minerals, which method includes: processing a slurry of the ore in a series of flotation stages and controlling the flotation stages to separate the minerals in the ore selectively based on the mineral type and thereby producing at least two concentrates which have different Cu:S ratios; and N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\SpeciS\Differentia1 Flotationdoc -O 7 O 00 O processing the first concentrate and the Ssecond concentrate and producing copper.
M In the case of a mixed sulphide mineral ore containing chalcopyrite and chalcocite (and optionally other minerals such as bornite), preferably the method produces a first concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having a comparatively low Cu:S ratio in which Schalcopyrite is a major component of the concentrate and a 00 10 second concentrate of the copper-containing minerals Shaving a higher Cu:S ratio in which chalcocite is a major component of the concentrate.
The downstream processing of step may include concentrate smelting, such as via a blister smelter or a 2-stage smelter.
The downstream processing of step may include other options such as hydrometallurgical-based processing such as leaching.
Preferably the downstream processing of step (b includes smelting at least one concentrate and hydrometallurgically processing at least another of the concentrates.
The present invention is described further by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which: Figure 1 is a flowsheet of one embodiment of a method of separating copper-containing minerals in a mixed sulphide ore in accordance with the present invention; Figure 2 is a flowsheet of another embodiment of the method of separating copper-containing minerals in a mixed sulphide ore in accordance with the present N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotationdoc
I
00 8 00 C invention; and Figure 3 is a flowsheet of another, although not Sthe only other, embodiment of the method of separating copper-containing minerals in a mixed sulphide ore in accordance with the present invention.
The following description of the flowsheets of SFigures 1 to 3 is in the context of processing an ore or 00 10 blend of ores containing two particular copper-containing Sminerals, namely chalcopyrite and chalcocite.
However, the present invention is not confined to these particular minerals and extends generally to coppercontaining minerals.
With reference to Figure 1, a slurry of an ore that contains chalcopyrite and chalcocite, with a Cu:S ratio of 1.2:1, is supplied to a first flotation stage, which may be of any suitable type of mechanical or pneumatic cell, and is processed in the stage. The first stage is operated to take advantage of the greater natural floatability of chalcopyrite compared to chalcocite. In particular, collectors are not required to promote/enhance flotation of chalcopyrite.
The concentrate produced in the first stage contains chalcopyrite as a major component of the concentrate and has a low Cu:S ratio of the order of 0.9- 1.3:1.
The concentrate produced in the first stage is transferred from the first stage for further processing in a leach circuit to recover other metals from the concentrate.
The tailing from the first stage is transferred N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc 00 Sto a second stage. A suitable collector, such as a Sxanthate, to promote/enhance flotation of chalcocite is added to the pulp either upstream of or in the second stage and the cell is operated in this second stage of the method to float the remaining copper-containing minerals in the pulp.
The concentrate produced in the second stage Scontains chalcocite as a major component of the 00 10 concentrate and has a higher Cu:S ratio than the first Sstage of the order of 2.4:1.
The concentrate is transferred from the second stage for further processing in a leach circuit to recover other metals from the concentrate.
The tailings are discharged from the second stage as a final tails stream.
In the Figure 1 flowsheet the concentrates from the first and the second stages are processed separately, with the selection of the processing options being based at least in part on the Cu:S ratios of the concentrates.
The method shown in the Figure 2 flowsheet includes the same basic method steps as the method shown in the Figure 1 flowsheet, save that the concentrates from the two cells are combined together and processed as shown in the Figure.
Specifically, the resultant bulk concentrate slurry is passed through a grinding mill and ground to reduce the size of particles in the concentrate.
Thereafter, the bulk concentrate is transferred to a cleaner stage and this stage is operated to exploit the natural floatability of chalcopyrite compared to chalcocite.
N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AI.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotation.doc 00 10 0D 00 SThe resultant concentrate produced in the cleaner stage contains chalcopyrite as a major component of the M concentrate and has a Cu:S ratio of the order of 0.9- 1.3:1.
The resultant pulp produced in the cleaning stage contains chalcocite as a major component of the concentrate and has a Cu:S ratio of the order of 2.4:1.
(N
00 SThe products from the cleaner stage are then processed separately, with the selection of the processing options based at least in part on the Cu:S ratios of the concentrates.
The method shown in the Figure 3 flowsheet includes the same basic method steps as the method shown in the Figure 2 flowsheet, save that differential flotation is performed after production and leaching of a final mixed sulphide concentrate.
In order to test the method of the present invention a number of ore samples were collected with the Cu:S ratio varying over a range of 1.0:1 to 1.8:1.
One of the samples, with a Cu:S ratio of 1.4:1, was chosen for a preliminary study.
The selected sample contained chalcocite at about 20% of the copper-containing minerals in the sample and chalcopyrite at the remainder of the copper-containing minerals in the sample.
PRELIMINARY TESTS GENERAL DISCUSSION The selected sample used was prepared for flotation test work.
N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc 11 00
O
0 e, 00
C
a a>
O
i^
O-
o
(N
A suitable grind time was established. The grind size required for the flotation tests was a Peo of microns. Initially grinding was done in a standard 5 laboratory mill. Grinding was done at a pulp density of 60% solids.
A series of flotation tests were carried out in a Galigher laboratory flotation cell, operating at 950 RPM.
10 Roughing was done in a 5L cell and cleaning in a cell. Air was used as the flotation gas and laboratory tap water was used in all tests. The pulp level was set constant for each test and the froth was removed at a constant rate using a preset scraper.
The reagent scheme for the tests was similar to that being used at Olympic Dam Operations: i.e. pH 8.2 and collector, SEX, at about 50 g/t, total addition. The frother used was the one in common use in the laboratory; namely Teric H407 a polypropylene glycol type frother.
The results of the tests are summarised in Table Table 1 TEST 1 Wt Assay% Distribution Cu:S Fract Cu S Fe Cu S Fe Con 1 0.060 15.9 12.1 31.2 78.5 71.2 7.4 1.26 Con 2 0.077 2.33 2.26 21.6 15.6 17.0 7.9 1.03 Tail 0.863 0.08 0.14 24.9 5.9 11.8 84.7 Calc Hd 1.000 1.156 1.02 25.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 1.13 Assay 1.29 1.20 25.6 1.08 Hd TEST 2 Wt Fract Assay% Cu S Distribution S Fe Cu:S N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotationdoc 00 12 0 0 Con 1 0.105 8.65 8.53 29.4 71.2 79.5 11.7 1.01 Con 2 0.010 28.7 10.7 20.4 22.5 9.5 0.8 2.68 Tail 0.885 0.09 0.14 26.1 6.3 11.0 87.5 Calc Hd 1.000 1.28 1.13 26.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 1.13 Assay 1.29 1.20 25.6 1.08 C Hd SIn Table 1 the test products are grouped into two 00 concentrates, one with a Cu:S ratio close to chalcopyrite Sand the other containing the rest of the copper-containing minerals.
SUMMARY OF TESTS TEST 1. This was a reference test using a standard procedure with roughing/scavenging and cleaning.
Grinding was done in a standard laboratory mill.
TEST 2. For this test the natural floatability of the chalcopyrite mineral was exploited to try and achieve separation. Grinding was done in a standard laboratory mill.
DISCUSSION PRELIMINARY TESTS It is understood that the two major coppercontaining minerals are chalcopyrite and chalcocite, with minor amounts of bornite.
The Cu:S ratios for these minerals are as follows: 0.99:1 for chalcopyrite, 2.48:1 for bornite, and 3.87:1 for chalcocite.
The smelter requires a concentrate with a Cu:S ratio of 1.6:1 or higher. Simplistically, assuming that only chalcopyrite and chalcocite are present in the ore, N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specia\Differentia1 Flotation.doc 00 13 0 O this means that a concentrate containing chalcopyrite and Schalcocite in a ratio of 60:40 is required by the smelter to achieve 1.8:1 Cu:S ratio. Such a product would have an assay of 52% Cu, 20% Fe and 29% S, assuming no other contamination, a Cu:Fe ratio of 2.6:1, and a S:Fe ratio of 1.45:1.
In test 1, where the sample was treated in a 0 standard procedure, i.e. roughing, scavenging and 00 10 cleaning, the first stage of the cleaner concentrate did Sappear to show some selectivity with respect to chalcocite with a Cu:S ratio of 1.26:1. However, to put this in perspective, it should be noted that the rougher/scavenger concentrate had a Cu:S ratio of 1.21:1. That is, the upgrading of the concentrate relative to the head was probably due to rejection of pyrite (or similar) to the tail.
For test 2, an attempt was made to exploit the natural floatability of the two minerals; i.e.
chalcopyrite floats naturally in the normal environment of a flotation cell whereas chalcocite does not float in this environment. The results in Table 1 show that it was possible to recover about 23% of the copper into a product with a Cu:S ratio of 2.68:1 and about 71% of the copper into a product with a Cu:S ratio very close to that of chalcopyrite.
CONCLUSIONS PRELIMINARY TESTS The preliminary tests indicates that it is possible to make a separation of chalcopyrite from chalcocite and other copper sulphides in the ore from Olympic Dam.
FURTHER TESTS N: \Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419AU.1\Specis\Differentia Flotation.doc 14 00 O O e, C m Following the above preliminary tests another 3 tests were carried out on a different sample of ore in accordance with the procedure summarised below.
The results of the tests are presented in Table 2.
The concentrate was cleaned once (product called chalcopyrite con in Table 2) and then the other sulphides were collected in a separate rougher concentrate (product called chalcocite con in the Table). In Table 2 set out below these two products are combined (product called Ro/Sc con) to show how the process compares, overall, with the present concentrator operation at Olympic Dam Operations.
The Ro/Sc concentrate had an average grade of 13.3% Cu and the average recovery of Cu for each of these tests was 94.1%, making it comparable with the current concentrator flowsheet for Olympic Dam Operations.
Table 2.
Separation of chalcopyrite from the other sulphides in Olympic Dam Operations ore.
Test 1 Product Weight Cu Cu/S Recovery Cu Chalcopyrite Con 4.32 27.0 1.29 45.71 Chalcocite Con 12.68 9.68 2.38 48.07 Ro/Sc Con 17.00 14.0 1.67 93.78 Ro/Sc Tail 83.00 0.19 6.22 Calc Head 100.00 2.55 1.69 100.00 Assay Head 2.76 N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc 15 00
O
o e,
C
m Test 2 Product Weight Cu Cu/S Recovery Cu Chalcopyrite Con 4.43 27.1 1.26 46.21 Chalcocite Con 14.65 8.51 2.37 48.01 Ro/Sc Con 19.08 12.8 1.65 94.22 Ro/Sc Tail 80.92 0.19 5.78 Calc Head 100.00 2.60 1.67 100.00 Assay Head 2.76 Test 3 Product Weight Cu Cu/S Recovery Cu Chalcopyrite Con 4.51 26.7 1.30 45.56 Chalcocite Con 14.67 8.77 2.40 48.71 Ro/Sc Con 19.18 13.0 1.70 94.26 Ro/Sc Tail 80.82 0.19 5.74 Calc Head 100.00 2.64 1.71 100.00 Assay Head 2.76 It is evident from Table 2 that the results of the three tests are remarkably similar, showing that the separation is very robust.
As well, the separation was very effective. The chalcopyrite concentrate had a Cu/S ratio of about 1.28:1 and the chalcocite concentrate had a Cu/S ratio of about 2.38:1, compared to the bulk product which has a Cu/S ratio of about 1.69:1.
Since chalcopyrite has a Cu/S ratio of about 1.00:1, it is probable that further cleaning of the chalcopyrite concentrate would improve the grade and the Cu/S ratio.
Also, given that the combined concentrate is N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.l\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc 00 16
O
O similar to the current concentrator rougher/scavenger Sconcentrate produced at Olympic Dam Operations, it follows that the chalcocite rich concentrate could be upgraded to San acceptable final concentrate.
The results in Table 2 show that the mixed sulphides present in Olympic Dam Operations ore were separated into a chalcopyrite rich concentrate with a Cu/S 0 ratio of 1.28:1 and another concentrate containing the 00 10 other sulphides with a Cu/S ratio of 2.38:1, while Smaintaining the recovery expected using the present separation process of Olympic Dam Operations.
In addition, the preliminary and further test work showed that the separation is independent of the Cu:S ratio of the copper minerals in the feed.
Many modifications may be made to the embodiments of the method of separating copper-containing minerals in a mixed sulphide ore in accordance with the present invention shown in the Figures without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
References Heyes, G.W. and Trahar, 1977. The natural flotability of chalcopyrite. Intl. J. Miner. Process., 4:317-344.
Heyes, G.W. and Trahar, 1979. Oxidation-reduction effects in the flotation of chalcocite and cuprite. Intl.
J. Miner. Process., 6:229-252.
N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc
Claims (16)
- 2. The method defined in claim 1 wherein, in the case of a mixed sulphide mineral ore containing chalcopyrite and chalcocite (and optionally other minerals such as bornite), the method includes processing the slurry and producing the first concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having the comparatively low Cu:S ratio in which chalcopyrite is a major component of the concentrate (hereinafter referred to as "the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate") and (ii) the above- mentioned second concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having the higher Cu:S ratio in which chalcocite is a major component of the concentrate (hereinafter referred to as "the second chalcocite-based concentrate").
- 3. The method defined in claim 2 wherein the second chalcocite-based concentrate has a Cu:S above 1.6:1.
- 4. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes using the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate having the comparatively lower Cu:S ratio as a feedstock for another downstream processing operation for recovering copper from the concentrate. The method defined in claim 4 includes using the N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotation.doc 00 18 0 O first concentrate in a 2-stage smelter that requires a _Cu:S ratio of 0.9:1 to 1.3:1 in the feedstock for the furnace.
- 6. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes exploiting the natural floatability of some minerals versus other minerals.
- 7. The method defined in any one of the preceding 00 10 claims includes controlling at least one flotation stage Son the basis that chalcopyrite has greater natural floatability than chalcocite (and bornite).
- 8. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes controlling at least one flotation stage to exploit the natural floatability of some minerals versus other minerals.
- 9. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes controlling collector addition to the slurry in at least one flotation stage to exploit the natural floatability of some minerals versus other minerals and thereby selectively float a particular mineral type. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes aerating the slurry in a flotation stage or stages to control the environment of the slurry to float chalcopyrite.
- 11. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes adding collectors, such as a xanthate, to at least one flotation stage to promote/enhance flotation of chalcocite versus chalcopyrite.
- 12. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims includes processing the slurry in a first flotation N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotationdoc 00 19 0 O stage under conditions that exploit the natural Sfloatability of chalcopyrite and floating the chalcopyrite to form the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate and an M output slurry containing chalcocite and other copper- containing minerals, processing the output slurry in a second flotation stage under conditions that enhance/promote floatability of chalcocite and other copper-containing minerals and floating the chalcocite and 0 forming the second chalcocite-based concentrate. 00
- 13. The method defined in claim 12 further includes the steps of forming a bulk concentrate of the first chalcopyrite-based concentrate and the second chalcocite- based concentrate, treating the bulk concentrate by grinding and/or leaching the bulk concentrate, and processing the treated bulk concentrate in another flotation stage under conditions that exploit the floatability of chalcopyrite and floating the chalcopyrite and forming a chalcopyrite-based concentrate and an output slurry containing chalcocite and other copper-containing minerals.
- 14. A method of producing copper from an ore that contains two or more than two different copper-containing minerals, which method includes: processing a slurry of the ore in a series of flotation stages and controlling the flotation stages to separate the minerals in the ore selectively based on the mineral type and thereby producing at least two concentrates which have different Cu:S ratios; and processing the first concentrate and the second concentrate and producing copper. The method defined in claim 14 wherein, in the case of a mixed sulphide mineral ore containing N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differential Flotation.doc 00 20 0 O chalcopyrite and chalcocite (and optionally other minerals Ssuch as bornite), the method produces a first concentrate of the copper-containing minerals having a comparatively M low Cu:S ratio in which chalcopyrite is a major component S 5 of the concentrate and a second concentrate of the copper- containing minerals having a higher Cu:S ratio in which chalcocite is a major component of the concentrate.
- 16. The method defined in claim 14 or claim 00 10 wherein the downstream processing of step includes Sconcentrate smelting, such as via a blister smelter or a 2-stage smelter.
- 17. The method defined in claim 14 or claim wherein the downstream processing of step includes other options such as hydrometallurgical-based processing such as leaching.
- 18. The method defined in claim 14 or claim wherein the downstream processing of step (b includes smelting at least one concentrate and hydrometallurgically processing at least another of the concentrates.
- 19. A method of separating copper-containing minerals in an ore that contains two or more than two different copper-containing sulphide minerals substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- 20. A method of producing copper from an ore that contains two or more than two different copper-containing minerals substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings. N:\Melbourne\Cases\Patent\71000-71999\P71419.AU.1\Specis\Differentia1 Flotation.doc
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2008201799A AU2008201799B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2008-04-23 | Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2007902141A AU2007902141A0 (en) | 2007-04-23 | Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals | |
| AU2007902141 | 2007-04-23 | ||
| AU2008201799A AU2008201799B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2008-04-23 | Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU2008201799A1 true AU2008201799A1 (en) | 2008-11-06 |
| AU2008201799B2 AU2008201799B2 (en) | 2012-04-05 |
Family
ID=40030483
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2008201799A Ceased AU2008201799B2 (en) | 2007-04-23 | 2008-04-23 | Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU2008201799B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9885095B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2018-02-06 | Goldcorp Inc. | Process for separation of at least one metal sulfide from a mixed sulfide ore or concentrate |
| EP3507387A4 (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2020-05-27 | BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd | INTEGRATED HYDROMETALLURGIC AND PYROMETALLURGIC METHOD FOR PROCESSING ORE |
| CN112191370A (en) * | 2020-08-27 | 2021-01-08 | 中国恩菲工程技术有限公司 | Flotation method for copper minerals |
| CN112337652A (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2021-02-09 | 沈阳有色金属研究院有限公司 | Collecting agent for flotation of copper sulfide from copper oxide ore and application |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103894294A (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2014-07-02 | 玉门大昌矿业有限公司 | Copper oxide ore flotation agent |
| CN107812617B (en) * | 2017-10-25 | 2019-06-21 | 江西理工大学 | A method for improving beneficiation index of fine-grained refractory copper sulfide ore |
| CN110614167A (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2019-12-27 | 长春黄金研究院有限公司 | Flotation method of gold-bearing sulfide ore |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4460459A (en) * | 1983-02-16 | 1984-07-17 | Anschutz Mining Corporation | Sequential flotation of sulfide ores |
| US5110455A (en) * | 1990-12-13 | 1992-05-05 | Cyprus Minerals Company | Method for achieving enhanced copper flotation concentrate grade by oxidation and flotation |
| US5902474A (en) * | 1993-07-29 | 1999-05-11 | Cominco Engineering Services Ltd. | Chloride assisted hydrometallurgical extraction of metal |
| AUPO788297A0 (en) * | 1997-07-14 | 1997-08-07 | Boc Gases Australia Limited | Recovery of pgm bearing minerals |
-
2008
- 2008-04-23 AU AU2008201799A patent/AU2008201799B2/en not_active Ceased
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9885095B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2018-02-06 | Goldcorp Inc. | Process for separation of at least one metal sulfide from a mixed sulfide ore or concentrate |
| US10370739B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2019-08-06 | Goldcorp, Inc. | Stabilization process for an arsenic solution |
| US11124857B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2021-09-21 | Goldcorp Inc. | Process for separation of antimony and arsenic from a leach solution |
| EP3507387A4 (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2020-05-27 | BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd | INTEGRATED HYDROMETALLURGIC AND PYROMETALLURGIC METHOD FOR PROCESSING ORE |
| AU2017326764B2 (en) * | 2016-09-19 | 2023-05-25 | BHP Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd | Integrated hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical method for processing ore |
| CN112191370A (en) * | 2020-08-27 | 2021-01-08 | 中国恩菲工程技术有限公司 | Flotation method for copper minerals |
| CN112337652A (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2021-02-09 | 沈阳有色金属研究院有限公司 | Collecting agent for flotation of copper sulfide from copper oxide ore and application |
| CN112337652B (en) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-06-03 | 沈阳有色金属研究院有限公司 | Collecting agent for flotation of copper sulfide from copper oxide ore and application |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2008201799B2 (en) | 2012-04-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU2008201799B2 (en) | Differential flotation of mixed copper sulphide minerals | |
| Bulatovic | Flotation behaviour of gold during processing of porphyry copper-gold ores and refractory gold-bearing sulphides | |
| JP7273254B2 (en) | Metal recovery from metal-bearing materials | |
| CN111790517A (en) | Method for sorting copper oxide and copper sulfide mixed ore | |
| Phetla et al. | A multistage sulphidisation flotation procedure for a low grade malachite copper ore | |
| US9028782B2 (en) | Processing nickel bearing sulphides | |
| CN102049352B (en) | Mineral processing technology for polymetallic sulfide ore containing arsenic, copper and zinc | |
| CN106345607A (en) | Beneficiation and metallurgy combined process for processing refractory copper and zinc ores | |
| CN112844818B (en) | Beneficiation separation method for copper-zinc sulfide ore | |
| US8753593B2 (en) | Processing nickel bearing sulphides | |
| WO2002092234A1 (en) | Selective recovery of minerals by flotation | |
| CN109499748B (en) | Method for separating cassiterite and gangue in ore grinding circuit by selecting ore | |
| Markovic et al. | Effect of particle size and liberation on flotation of a low grade porphyry copper ore | |
| JP6157870B2 (en) | How to get copper concentrate | |
| CN106573773B (en) | System and method for controlling foaming during atmospheric leaching of metal sulfides using silicates | |
| CA2442523C (en) | Method for recovering components from a feed slurry | |
| CN218531334U (en) | Flotation and heap leaching combined gold extraction system | |
| JP7704357B2 (en) | Flotation method and copper recovery method | |
| Bahrami et al. | A Process Mineralogy Based Approach for Arsenic Removal from Copper Concentrate in Cu–Mo Flotation Circuit | |
| Orlich et al. | The application of froth flotation for gold recovery at Newmont Mining Corporation | |
| CN119972371A (en) | A method for recovering silver-rich stannite, sphalerite and pyrite from complex tin polymetallic ore | |
| WO2025129238A1 (en) | A flotation collector composition and flotation method | |
| AU2002244517B2 (en) | Improved flotation | |
| Araújo et al. | Flotation machines in Brazil—columns versus mechanical cells | |
| MELIS et al. | GOLDEN BEAR—PROCESS ALTERNATIVES TESTING AND FLOWSHEET SELECTION FOR A REFRACTORY BRITISH COLUMBIA GOLD ORE |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
| MK14 | Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired |