AU2004226923B2 - Method for controlling initiation of a detonator - Google Patents

Description

Regulation 3.2 AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT (ORIGINAL) Name of Applicant: Orica Explosives Technology Limited Actual Inventors: JOHNSTON, Peter and RUSSEL, John Keir Address for Service: DAVIES COLLISON CAVE, Patent Attorneys, 1 Nicholson Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000. Invention Title: "Method for controlling initiation of a detonator" Details of Associated Provisional Application No: 2003906228 dated 12 November 2003 The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INITIATION OF A DETONATOR Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the control of 5 explosive detonators. In particular the invention relates to controlling the initiation of an electronic detonator for use in a mining process, and will primarily be described with reference to this context. 10 Background Art In mining processes an explosive blast is conducted to fracture an orebody to enable recovery of the broken rock to obtain its associated minerals. Explosive material and a detonator for initiating the explosion are 15 placed into a series of pre-drilled narrow elongate holes (blast holes) in the orebody, the area is cleared of people and equipment, and an explosion is set off. The optimisation of an explosive blast involves trying to obtain certain physical results from the 20 explosion at minimum cost of explosive, which is a significant expense in many mining operations. The specific positioning of sufficient explosive to achieve a successful blast is a complex task. This task is. complicated by a need to: avoid over-fragmentation of the 25 rock; heave (or move) as much ore as possible into an accessible position; avoid over-vibration of the ground around the area being mined; and to protect the working face (high wall of the. orebody) and nearby floor of the area from collapse. 30 In general the desired physical outcomes of an explosive blast are determined by the initiation time between adjacent blast. holes, and by matching the initiation time to the response time of the particular -2 rock. The rock response time is related to the speed which cracks are generated around a blast hole by the stress/strain waves created by initiation of an explosion therein. Very hard rock usually has a fast response time 5 (typically 1.5 milliseconds/metre of rock away from the hole), whereas very soft rock usually has a very slow response time (soft sandstone could be 6 milliseconds/metre of rock away from the hole). Blasting at above or below the actual response time can result in a 10 less than optimal physical rock breakage performance. Pyrotechnic detonators are typically used to initiate an explosion and can have a scatter (or error) of approximately 5% of the initiation time. More recently electronic detonators have been developed and have a 15 scatter of approximately 0.1% so enable a much more optimal performance. Electronic detonators have a programmable microchip which replaces the traditional pyrotechnic delay element. As well as total timing accuracy, electronic detonators can be timed to initiate 20 at intervals of typically anywhere from 0 to 2,0,0.00ms in lms steps. Such flexibility has provided blast design engineers with the ability to create complex blast timing .designs. In order to optimise the physical results of an 25 explosive blast, blasting engineers usually create blast timing designs based on an assumed position of drill holes and a desired blast outcome. This design is typically done prior to drilling of any blast holes and, out of necessity, assumes certain characteristics of the rock. 30 Detonators are then programmed to go off at a fixed time and in a set sequence. However during drilling of blast holes, complications can arise and a hole may not be able to be drilled in a pre-determined location because of 27541X2.1 -3 varying ground conditions. Thus the pre-determined or designed blast hole pattern and the actual blast hole pattern may be very different. Production constraints mean that operators are under pressure to load, set and 5 fire a blast as quickly as possible. Changes from the original blast design may cause major changes to the timing design, which can be very difficult for operators to implement at the time of blasting. The operators sometimes need to make new timing estimates 10 (milliseconds/metre of rock away from the hole), and replace a pre-timed detonator, but an incorrect new estimate by an operator can result in poor physical rock breakage performance. The alternative method is for an accurate off-site redesign of the timing plan by the 15 blast engineer, however modifications to the blast once the detonators have been programmed may require several hours for redesigning and reprogramming, which is typically not available in a production situation. 20 Summary of the Invention In one aspect the present invention provides a method for controlling the initiation of a plurality of electronic detonators when located in surrounding ground, the method comprising the steps of: 25 - locating said detonators in the ground using a pre determined planned positional relationship this pre determined planned positional relationship having an associated planned timing design for initiation of each of the plurality of detonators; 30 - measuring the deviation between an actual located position and the pre-determined planned position of each 2754082.1 -4 of said detonators in the ground; and - calculating the time of initiation of each of said detonators based upon the deviation and modifying the planned timing design accordingly. 5 By knowing the deviation in the position of the detonators in the actual blast hole pattern from the pre determined planned blast hole pattern, and using this property to manipulate the time for the detonator to initiate, the timing design of an explosion can be 10 readily modified by a blast operator immediately prior to a blast. Preferably the determination of both the pre determined planned positional relationship and the actual located position of the electronic detonator is made in 15 relation to a coordinate reference point. Preferably the deviation is measured with respect to the coordinate reference point. Preferably the pre-determined planned positional relationship and the actual located position of the 20 electronic detonator(s) is/are measured using an electronic positioning system. Preferably the electronic positioning system is one of an inertial positioning system or a global positioning system. 25 Preferably the step of calculating is carried out by a computing device capable of receiving an input such as a calculator, laptop computer, palm or the like. Preferably the said detonator and the adjacent detonators are arranged substantially in one or more 30 rows, the latter arrangement forming a grid. Most preferably the row or rows forming a grid are 2754K2.1 -5 substantially parallel to a working or excavation face of a mine. In another aspect the present invention provides a system for controlling the initiation of a plurality of 5 electronic detonators when located in surrounding ground with one or more adjacent detonators, the system comprising: - measuring means for measuring the deviation distance between an actual located position of each of said 10 detonators and a pre-determined planned position of each of the detonators in the ground this pre-determined planned positional relationship having an associated planned timing design for initiation of each of the plurality of detonators; and 15 - calculating means for calculating a modified time of initiation of each of said detonators based upon the deviation and the planned timing design. Preferably the measuring means is arranged to measure both the pre-determined planned position and the 20 actual located position of the electronic detonator in relation to a coordinate reference point. Preferably the measuring means is arranged to work in conjunction with an electronic positioning system. Preferably the calculating means is a computing 25 device capable of receiving an input such as a calculator, laptop computer, palm or the like. In another aspect the present invention provides a computer program arranged to instruct a computing system to operate as a system in accordance with the method and 30 systems aspects of the present invention.

275082-1 -6 Brief Description of the Drawing Notwithstanding any other forms which may fall within the scope of the present invention, preferred forms of the invention will now be described, by way of 5 example only, with reference to the accompanying drawing in which: Figure 1 shows a block flow diagram of one method for controlling the initiation of an electronic detonator in accordance with the invention. 10 Modes for Carrying out the Invention To locate explosives and detonators in surrounding ground, for example in a bench at the working face of an open cut mine, typically a blast plan is made by a blast 15 design engineer using assumed parameters of orebody hardness, distance between drilled blast holes for insertion of explosive, depth of hole and other input data. A drilling crew subsequently mark out the blast pattern and drill the blast holes as per the design, but 20 the position of those holes may need to be adjusted to take into account on-site variations such as unexpected orebody hardness, breakage of the drill or crumbling or collapse of the hole requiring a new hole to be drilled. Typically the drilled blast holes for loading of 25 explosive and a detonator are arranged substantially in a row or rows within a grid which are generally parallel to a working or excavation face of a mine, and the mine workings thus advance in a direction orthogonal to the row(s).

27540,K2-1 -7 This page has been intentionally left blank Example An example according to the present invention will now be described. Referring to Figure 1, in one form of the method of the 5 present invention, there is no planned blast pattern provided and the time of initiation of an electronic detonator was controlled by a blast operator once the placement of the explosive and detonator in surrounding ground has occurred. 10 The blast operator measured the actual spatial position of the detonator(s) in relation to one or more adjacent detonators by first identifying and logging a known coordinate reference point, which can be one of a survey position, another blast hole or a physical feature such as 15 the corner of the blast pattern area. Then the actual drilled blast hole spatial position was identified relative to that reference point. Each hole was also identified by a unique identity code or name, and its position was entered or logged into a recordal system. 20 The order of identification of the blast holes in a blast pattern was irrelevant. The spatial position of the blast holes was measured using a measuring means in the form of an electronic positioning system, usually an inertial positioning device 25 (IPD) but a global positioning system (GPS) could also be used. The spatial position of each of the detonators was determined using a hand-held IPD (or GPS) unit which recorded a detonator identity and its location when the IPD (or GPS) unit was placed in communication with the 30 detonator (by physical contact, infrared reader, or electronic identification tag) when the detonator was positioned in the surrounding ground. The data from the hand-held unit was then transferred to a computer system -9 for subsequent analysis, calculation of time of detonator initiation and archival. In another variation, the detonators included an electronic positioning unit which was a transponder in 5 communication with a local positioning system or an IPD or GPS which was itself in communication with the computer system. The electronic positioning system alternatively included a laser theodolite tool (or other laser tape measures or 10 electronic tape measures) which was used to manually survey the position of the blast holes for entry (manually or electronically) into a computer or other recording device. Any means of measuring the spatial position of the detonators when in position is within the scope of the .15 invention. A computer program was then used to calculate the time of initiation of any detonator based upon its logged actual spatial position in the blast pattern. Knowledge of. the spatial position of the detonators in the actual blast 20 hole pattern was used to manipulate the time. for the detonator to initiate, rather than pre-programming the initiation time of any given detonator. Whereas the known methodology involved reading the unique identity of a detonator and assigning an initiation time to its assumed 25 position or order of identification (or coding a unique identity and initiation time onto a microchip in the electronic detonator), prior to the actual blast hole pattern being developed, in the present method the timing design of the blast can be calculated (and substantially 30 changed) by the blast operator immediately prior to the blast. In one instance the initiation time was assigned and coded, either by laser scanner or by actively connecting with and interrogating the chip.

- 10 The step of calculating the initiation time of the detonator was carried out by a calculating means in the form of a computing device capable of receiving inputs including actual position coordinate data. Devices 5 employed included one of a calculator, laptop computer, palm or similar portable digital assistant, enabled mobile telephone or other computing device. The coordinate data was entered directly from the electronic positioning system or by manual entry. A computer program was used to 10 instruct the computing device. The computer program was provided on a computer readable medium such as a CD-Rom, computer disc or the like. In another variation where there was a pre-determined planned blast pattern provided by a blast design.engineer, 15 for each particular blast hole in the ground the blast operator located a detonator along with explosives in the hole and then measured the deviation between the actual located position and the pre-determined planned position of the detonator in the ground. The operator then 20 calculated the time of initiation of. the detonator(s) based upon the deviation. As previously described, the blast operator measured both the pre-determined planned positional relationship, and the actual spatial position of the detonator(s) by first 25 identifying and logging a known coordinate reference point, and then the actual drilled blast hole spatial position was identified relative to that reference point. As previously described, each* hole was also identified by a unique identity code or name, and its position was 30 entered or logged into a recordal system. The -order of identification of the blast holes in a blast pattern was irrelevant. The pre-determined planned position of the - 11 blast holes used by the blast design engineer was usually developed by the use of proprietary computer software. The deviation was measured with respect to the coordinate reference point, so that vector details (x, y and z 5 coordinate positional details) were recorded. This meant that both the distance and the direction that the actual spatial position of the detonator was spaced from the pre determined planned positional relationship of that detonator was measured. 10 The spatial position of the blast holes was measured using a measuring means in the form of an electronic positioning system, embodiments of which are described above. A computer program was then used to calculate the time of 15 initiation of any detonator based upon its deviation from the pre-determined planned position of that detonator in the blast pattern. This deviation was used to manipulate the time for the detonator to initiate, rather than pre programming the initiation time of the detonator. The 20 planned timing design of an explosion was readily modified by a blast operator immediately prior to a blast by knowing the deviation in the position of the. detonators in the actual blast hole pattern from the pre-determined planned blast hole pattern, and using this property to 25 manipulate the time for the detonator to initiate. The step of calculating the initiation time of the detonator was carried out by calculating means in the form of a computing device capable of receiving an input including the deviation coordinate data, several possible 30 embodiments of which have been previously described. Different timing plan parameters were used to calculate different blast outcomes. Different blast hole positions were able to be added or deleted to the timing plan to - 12 allow easy modification of a blast or even redirection or reorientation of an entire blast. The timing of initiation of each detonator was a variable and was able to be changed at any time prior to the blast, sometimes 5 even only minutes beforehand. The practical outcome of these method and systems was that the physical results of an explosive blast were optimised by reducing the variability in explosion timing often introduced by blast operators making last minute 10 changes to an original blast design sequence. Initial experiments revealed that an increase in excavator production of around 10-15% could be achieved, both because of improved physical rock breakage performance (more even rock fragmentation, achievement of better 15 heave) as well as other operational time savings including the avoidance of blast redesign, or reprogramming delays, faster ore clearing operations, and more stabilised working faces, reducing likely incidences of collapse and further production delays. At a gold mine, a 10% increase 20 in ore throughput can be worth extra revenue of many thousands of dollars per hour. It is to be understood that, if any prior art information is referred to herein, such reference does not constitute an admission that the information forms a part of 25 the common general knowledge in the art, in Australia or any other country. Whilst the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments it should be appreciated that the invention can be embodied in many 30 other forms.

-13 Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise", and variations such as "comprises" and "comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a 5 stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.

Claims (20)

1. A method for controlling the initiation of a plurality of electronic detonators when located in surrounding ground, 5 the method comprising the steps of: - locating said detonators in the ground using a pre determined planned positional relationship this pre determined planned positional relationship having an associated planned timing design for initiation of each of 10 the plurality of detonators; - measuring the deviation between an actual located position and the pre-determined planned position of each of said detonators in the ground; and - calculating the time of initiation of each of said 15 detonators based upon the deviation and modifying the planned timing design accordingly.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein determination of both the pre-determined planned positional relationship 20 and the actual located position of each of the electronic detonators is made in relation to a coordinate reference point.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the deviation 25 is measured with respect to the coordinate reference point.

4. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the pre-determined planned positional relationship and the actual located position of each of the electronic 30 detonators is measured using an electronic positioning system. -15

5. A method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the electronic positioning system is one of an inertial positioning device or a global positioning system. 5

6. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the step of calculating is carried out by a computing device capable of receiving an input.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the computing 10 device is a calculator, laptop computer or a palm device.

8. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the detonators are arranged substantially in one or more rows, the latter arrangement forming a grid. 15

9. A method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the row- or rows forming a grid are substantially parallel to a working or excavation face of a mine. 20

10. A system for controlling the initiation of a plurality of electronic detonators when located in surrounding ground with one or more adjacent detonators, the system comprising: - measuring means for measuring the deviation distance between an actual located position of each of said 25 detonators and a pre-determined planned position of each of the detonators in the ground this pre-determined planned positional relationship having an associated planned timing design for initiation of each of the plurality of detonators; and 30 - calculating means for calculating a modified time of initiation of each of said detonators based upon deviation and the planned timing design.

2754182-1 -16

11. A system as claimed in claim 10, wherein the measuring means is arranged to measure both the pre-determined planned position and the actual located position of each of the 5 electronic detonators in relation to a coordinate reference point.

12. A system as claimed in claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the measuring means is arranged to work in conjunction with 10 an electronic positioning system.

13. A system as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 12, wherein the calculating means is a computing device capable of receiving an input. 15

14. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the computing device is a laptop computer or a palm device.

15. A computer program arranged to instruct a computing 20 system to operate in accordance with the method of any one of claims 1 to 9.

16. A computer program arranged to instruct a computing system to operate as a system in accordance with any one of 25 claims 10 to 15.

17. A computer readable medium carrying a computer program according to either claim 15 or claim 16. 30

18. A method as claimed in claim 1 substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying examples. 2754(IX2. -17

19. A system as claimed in claim 10 substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying examples.

20. A computer program as claimed in claim 15 or claim 16 5 substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying examples.