[go: up one dir, main page]

OA21062A - Method of treating a cemented carbide mining insert. - Google Patents

Method of treating a cemented carbide mining insert. Download PDF

Info

Publication number
OA21062A
OA21062A OA1202200469 OA21062A OA 21062 A OA21062 A OA 21062A OA 1202200469 OA1202200469 OA 1202200469 OA 21062 A OA21062 A OA 21062A
Authority
OA
OAPI
Prior art keywords
insert
cemented carbide
inserts
mining
binder
Prior art date
Application number
OA1202200469
Inventor
Mirjam LILJA
loannis ARVANITIDIS
Andreas Blomqvist
Erik HOLMSTRÖM
José Luis Garcia
Original Assignee
Sandvik Mining And Construction Tools Ab
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sandvik Mining And Construction Tools Ab filed Critical Sandvik Mining And Construction Tools Ab
Publication of OA21062A publication Critical patent/OA21062A/en

Links

Abstract

A method of redistributing the binder phase of a cemented carbide mining insert comprising a WC hard-phase component, optionally one or more further hard-phase components and a binder comprising the steps of providing a green cemented carbide mining insert; applying at least one binder puller selected from a metal oxide or a metal carbonate to only at least one local area of the surface of the green cemented carbide insert; sintering the green carbide mining insert to form a sintered cemented carbide insert; and subjecting the sintered cemented carbide insert to dry tumbling process executed at an elevated temperature of or above 100°C, preferably at a temperature of or above 200°C, more preferably at a temperature of between 200°C and 450°C.

Description

METHOD OF TREATING A CEMENTED CARBIDE MINING INSERT
TECHNICAL FIELD
The présent invention relates to a method of redistributing the binder within a cemented Carbide mining insert and then subjecting said cemented Carbide mining insert post sintering to a surface hardening process at an elevated température, a cemented Carbide mining insert with a compressive strength produced from said method and the use thereof.
BACKGROUND
Cemented carbide has a unique combination of high eiastic modulus, high hardness, high compressive strength, high wear and abrasion résistance with a good level of toughness. Therefore, cemented carbide is commonly used in products such as mining tools. Cemented carbide mining inserts are commonly treated with an edge deburring and surface hardening process post sintering, such as tumbling, and centreless grinding. The surface hardening process introduces compressive stress into the mining inserts. The presence ofthe compressive stresses improves the fatigue résistance and fracture toughness of the mining insert. Consequently, the threshold energy necessary to fracture the mining insert is higher and so there is a reduced likelihood of chipping, cracking and ! or fracture ofthe component. Therefore, it is désirable to increase the level of compressive stress introduced into the mining insert to increase the lifetime of the insert.
For maximised performance of cemented carbide mining inserts, a combination of these properties is desired and there are different demands on the material in different parts of the product. For example, in inserts for rock drilling and minerai cutting, it is désirable to hâve a tougher interiorto minimize the risk of failure and a barder exteriorto optimise wear résistance.
WO 2010/056191 discloses a method of forming a cemented carbide body comprisîng a hard phase and a binder phase, wherein at least one part ofthe intermediate surface zone has lower average binder content than a part further into the body.
High energy tumbling (HET} methods such as those disclosed in 115725883362 provide a way to increase the level of compressive stresses introduced, however it is désirable to be able to improve this process further by providing a method that can introduce even higher levels of the compressive stresses into the mining inserts without damaging them.
It is an object ofthe présent invention to provide a method of making cemented carbide inserts having optimisée! hardness gradients and high levels of compressive stresses so that they last longer and hâve improved operative performance. It is a further objective that the method could be applied to non-symmetrical cemented Carbide mining inserts and / or starting from a standard
Carbide powder which is stoichiometrically balanced with respect to carbon content or has a high carbon content to enhance the binder pulling effect.
DEFINITIONS
By cemented Carbide is herein meant a material that comprises at least 50 wt% WC, possibly other hard constituents common in the art of making cemented carbides and a metallic binder phase preferably selected from one or more of Fe, Co and Ni.
The term bulk” is herein meant the cemented carbide ofthe innermost part (centre) ofthe rock drill insert and for this disclosure is the zone having the lowest hardness.
The term green refers to a cemented Carbide mining insert produced by milling the hard phase component(s) and the binder together and then pressing the milled powder to form a compact cemented carbide mining insert, which has not yet been sintered.
The term binder puller” refers to a substance which when applied to the surface of the cemented carbide mining insert will cause the binder to migrate towards that surface during the sintering step, i.e. the binder is pulled in the direction towards the surface, where the binder puller” has been applied. The binder puller works by locally consumîng carbon which causes the binder to flow from the areas having normal carbon levels to the local area where the carbon level has been depleted. The binder puller could also act as a WC grain growth inhibitor that also leads to binder migration towards the applied surfaces with smaller WC grain size than the bulk.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
According to one aspect of the present invention is a method of redistributing the binder phase of a cemented carbide mining insert comprising a WC hard-phase component, optionally one or more further hard-phase components and a binder comprising the steps of:
a) providing a green cemented carbide mining insert;
b) applying at least one binder puller selected from a métal oxide or a métal carbonate to at least one local area ofthe surface ofthe green cemented carbide insert;
c) sintering the green carbide mining insert to form a sintered cemented carbide insert; and
d) subiecting the sintered cemented Carbide insert to a dry tumbling process executed at an elevated température of or above 100°C, preferably at a température of or above 200 C, more preferably at a température of between 200°C and 450oC.
This method allows the binderto be re-distributed in a tailored and most favourable manner to provide optimal functionality to the cemented Carbide mining insert in combination with introducing higher levels of compressive stresses into the cemented Carbide mining insert. Applying the binder puller, which is a métal compound that during sintering forms an oxide that consumes carbon. The binder puller is selected from a métal oxide or a métal carbonate, and is applied to the surface of the green cemented Carbide mining insert in at least one local area, that carbon is locally consumed in this area during sintering which causes the formation of a carbon potential. This will promote the migration of the binder phase from areas having normal or higher levels of carbon to the local area which has a depleted carbon level. if the binder puller compound leads to WC grain refining it will also cause binder migration to the surface where the compound was added. This will therefore form a binder rich région on a local area of the surface of the cemented Carbide mining insert. The surface ofthe green cemented Carbide mining insert where the binder puller is applied is referred to as the oxide / carbonate doped surface. It is well known that binder rich régions and binder depleted régions will be in tensile stress and compressive stress respectively after sintering. It would normally not be favourable to introduce tensile stresses. However, the inventors hâve found that after a treatment, such as centrifugal tumbling, high levels of compressive stress, down to at least 1mm depth below tumbled surface, can be introduced to counteract the tensile stresses présent. Therefore, the benefit of applying the binder puller can be gained without the detrimental effect of introducing tensile stresses.
The at least one local area on the surface of the green cemented Carbide mining insert could be at any position on the surface, for example the tîp, the base or the side depending on where the requirement to create an increase in binder content is. The binder puller may be applied to one or more local areas on the surface ofthe cemented Carbide mining insert depending on whether the desired effect is to create a local increase in toughness or wear résistance. Each local area may be 0.5-85% of the total surface area of the cemented Carbide mining insert, preferably 375%.
The sintering température is suitably from about 1000’C to about 1700°C, preferably from about 1200°C to about 1600°C, most preferably from about 1300°C to about 1550°C. The sintering time is suitably from about 15 minutes to about 5 hours, preferably from about 30 minutes to about hours.
The higher level of compressive stress in combination with decreased collision defects will improve the fatigue résistance and fracture toughness of the mining insert and consequently increase the lifetime of the insert. Further advantages of this method are that insert geometries, such as those with a Sharp bottom radius, which were previously prone to excessive damage to the corners and therefore low yields, can now be tumbled without causing edge damage. This opens the possibility to develop mining insert products with different geometries, which were previously not suitable for tumbling. Increasing the surface treatment process température from room température up to températures such as 300 °C results in inserts having improved performance properties, such as increased crush strength. Cemented Carbide toughness increases with température hence tumbling at elevated températures collisions do not resuit in defects such as micro cracks, large cracks or edge chipping.
The cemented Carbide responds better to surface hardening process at elevated température if there îs more binder in the Carbide surface zone and / or if the chromium concentration is higher in the surface zone, therefore increasing the strength and toughness of the cemented Carbide.
A further aspect ofthe present application relates to a cemented carbide mining insert comprising one or more hard-phase components and a binder characterized in that the ratio of % fcc phase Co to % hep phase Co in the top half ofthe insert is >2, preferably >3, more preferably >4.
The hep structure is more close-packed than the fcc structure and is the stable structure of pure Co. Co in the hep phase readily forms twins, which gives it more mechanisms to absorb dislocations without disrupting the crystal fattice. Tumbling at elevated températures allows the fcc phase to stabilize and at the same time achieve high compressive strength, consequently more phase transformation can take place during drilling, which increases the lifetime of the insert.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Figure 1: Plot of crush energy.
Figure 2: Hardness profile for ru ns 11 (comparative) and 12 (invention).
Figure 3: Hardness profile for ru ns 4 (comparative) and 14 (invention).
Figure 4: Plot of cobalt concentration profiles.
Figure 5: Plot of chromium concentration profiles.
Figure 6: Plot of Cr/Co concentration ratios.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In one embodiment of the method, the cemented Carbide mining insert contains a hard phase comprising at least 80 wt% WC, preferably at least 90 wt%.
The metallic binder ofthe cemented Carbide can comprise other éléments that are dissolved în the metallic binder during sintering, such as W and C originating from the WC. Depending on what other types of hard constituées that are present, also other éléments can be dissolved in the binder.
In one embodiment the cemented Carbide comprises hard constituents in a metallic binder phase, and wherein the metallic binder phase content in the cemented Carbide is 4 to 30 wt%, preferably 5 to 15wt%.
The binder phase content needs to be high enough to provide a tough behaviour of the mining insert. The metallic binder phase content is preferably not higher than 30wt%, preferably not higher than 15 wt%. A too high content of binder phase reduces the hardness and wear résistance of the mining insert. The metallic binder phase content is preferably greater than 4wt%, more preferably greater than 6wt%.
In one embodiment metallic binder phase comprises at least 80wt% of one or more metallic éléments selected from Co, Ni and Fe.
Preferably Co and / or Ni, most preferably Co, even more preferably between 3 to 20wt% Co. Optionally, the binder is a nickel chromîum or nickel aluminium alioy. The Carbide mining insert may optionally also comprise a grain refîner compound in an amount of ^20 wt% ofthe binder content. The grain refîner compound is suitably selected from the group of carbides, mixed carbides, carbonitrides or nitrides of vanadium, chromium, tantalum and niobium. With the remainder of the carbide mining insert being made up ofthe one or more hard-phase components.
The one or more further hard-phase components may be selected from TaC, TiC, TiN, TiCN, NbC, CrC. The binder phase may be selected from Co, Ni, Fe or a mixture thereof, preferably Co and / or Ni, most préférable Co. The Carbide mining insert has a suitable binder content of from about 4 to about 30 wt%, preferably from about 5 to about 15 wt%. The carbide mining insert may optionally also comprise a grain refîner compound in anamountof <20 wt% ofthe binder content. The grain refîner compound is suitably selected from the group of carbides, mixed carbides, carbonitrides or nitrides of vanadium, chromium, tantalum and niobium. With the remainder of the carbide mining insert being made up of the one or more hard-phase components.
In one embodiment ofthe method, the binder puller, being a métal oxide or métal carbonate is selected from CrzCb, MnO, MnOz, MoOz, Fe-oxides, NiO, NbOz, V2O3, MnCOj, FeCOs, COCO3, N1CO3, CuCO3 or AgjCOs. It would also be possible to alternatively apply a métal to the surface ofthe green cemented Carbide mining insert which upon heating, during the sintering step, would form an oxide. The sélection of the métal oxide or métal carbonate will influence the properties ofthe cemented Carbide post sintering e.g. deformation hardening, heat résistance and / or corrosion résistance and the sélection can be made to be best suited to the required application. Métal carbonates would be selected if the équivalent métal oxide is toxic and the métal carbonate is not. In this method, there is a high degree of freedom as to where the binder puller is applied, for example it could be applied in or away from the wear zones ofthe Carbide tool, depending on whether the métal in the oxide or carbonate improves the wear résistance of the cemented carbide or not.
In one embodiment of the method, the binder puller is CqOs. Using CrjOs as the binder puller has the advantage that a chromium alloy rich surface layer will form, which has an enhanced response to a tumbling treatment. Therefore, higher compressive stresses will be introduced, and the wear properties of the cemented carbide mining insert will be improved. The Cr3O2 contributes towards grain refinement and hence, a reduced grain size is measured on the side of the insert where the CnO; has been applied.
The métal oxide or métal carbonate is suitably provîded onto the surface or surfaces in an amount of from about 0.1 to about 100 mg/cm2, preferably in an amount of from about 1 to about 50 mg/cm2. The starting cemented carbide powder blend should suitably hâve a carbon balance équivalent to 0.75<Com/%Co<l or hâve an excess of carbon that would compensate for the carbon réduction from the application of the oxide or carbonate. Com(%) is equal to 100*4ποι/4πσ0 where 4πσι [pTms/kg] is the weight spécifie magnetic saturation of the carbide insert and 4no0 =201.9 [pTm3/kg] is the weight spécifie magnetic saturation for pure Co. Com is measured in a Foerster Koerzimat CS. 1097 unit.
In one embodiment of the method, the binder puller is applied to the top of the cemented carbide mining insert. In another embodiment ofthe method, the binder puller is applied to the side of the cemented carbide mining insert. Therefore, the properties of the cemented carbide mining insert can be tailored to be suited to the application. The binder puller is likely chosen to be applied to the position on the surface ofthe cemented carbide mining insert that is exposed to the highest wear.
In one embodiment, the method of applying the binder puller îs selected from pressing, dipping, painting, spraying (air brushing), stamping or 3D printing. Dipping could be done with or without masking. The binder puller may be applied to the surface of green cemented Carbide mining insert in the form of liquid dispersions or a siurry. In such as case, the liquid phase is suitably water, an alcohol or a polymer such as polyethylene glycol. The concentration of the siurry is suitably 5-50 wt% ofthe powder in the liquid phase, such as 10-40 wt%. This range is advantageous so that a sufficient effect of the binder puller is realised. If the powder content is too high, then there may be issues with clogging and lumping within the liquid dispersion or siurry. Alternatively, they could be introduced as a solid substance, for example by adding the powder into the pressing mould in a suitabie position. The powder could be mixed with a hard-phase powder, for example a WC-based powder. The binder puller could also be applied to the cemented Carbide mining insert in any other suitabie way. The compositions and concentration ofthe siurry and the way it îs applied influences the control ofthe redistribution of the binder and therefore allowsthe hardness profile ofthe cemented carbide mining insert to be controlled.
As there is flexibility in where the binder puller is applied, this atlows tailoring of the position of the wear zone, i.e. the position on the surface having the most enhanced combination of strength and wear properties. For example, the wear zone could be on eitherthe top orthe side of the insert depending where the interaction between the cemented carbide mining insert and rock being drilled is the highest. This will vary depending on the application it is being used for and the position ofthe cemented carbide mining insert on the rock drill bit. Further, as Cr alloying improves wear résistance, the doping can be applied to the most région ofthe insert that most exposed to the rock during drifling.
Cemented carbide mining inserts are subjected to high compressive loading. Consequentiy, surface cracking caused by small cracks growing to a critical size through repeated intermittent high loading is a common cause of insert failure. It is known that introducing compressive stress into the surface ofthe insert can reduce this problem as the presence ofthe compressive stress can prevent crack growth and wear of the material. Known methods of introducing compressive stress into surfaces of a cemented carbide mining insert include shot peening, vibration tumbling and centrifugal tumbling. These methods are ail based on mechanical impact or deformation of the outer surface of the body and will increase the lifetime of the cemented carbide mining inserts.
A surface hardening treatment is defined as any treatment that introduces compressive stresses into the material through physical impacts, that results in deformation hardening at and below the surface, for example tumbling or shot peening. The surface hardening treatment is done post sintering and grinding. It has unexpectedly been found, that treating a mining insert with a surface hardening treatment at eievated températures decreases or even éliminâtes the Carbide to Carbide collision damages in terms of chipping and micro fracturing and therefore improving product lifetime. The surface hardening process of the present invention is performed at an eievated température, and this température is herein defined as the température of the mining insert at the start of the surface hardening process, The upper limit for the température, where the surface hardening process is performed, is preferably below the sintering température, more preferably below 900°C. The température ofthe mining insert is measured by any method suitable for measuring température, such as an infrared température measurement.
In one embodiment of the present invention the mining insert is subjected to a surface hardening treatment at a température of between 10Û-600°C, preferably at a température of between 150-500°C, more preferably 200-400°C.
The température is measured on the mining insert using any suitable method for measuring température. Preferably, an infrared température measurement device is used.
In one embodiment the method includes a step of heating the mining inserts and media prior to the surface hardening process and the surface hardening process is performed on heated mining inserts.
The mining insert can be heated in a separate step prior to the surface hardening process step. Severa) methods can be used to create the eievated température of the mining insert, such as induction heating, friction heating, résistance heating, hot air heating, flame heating, pre-heating on a hot surface, in an oven orfurnace or using laser heating.
In an alternative embodiment, the mining inserts are kept heated during the surface hardening process. For examples using an induction coil.
The tumbling treatment could be centrifugal or vibrational. A standard tumbling process would typically be done using a vibrational tumbler, such as a Reni CirrHo RC 650, where about 30 kg inserts would be tumbled at about 50 Hz for about 40 minutes. An alternative typical standard tumbling process would be using a centrifugal tumbler such as the ERBA-120 having a closed lid at the top and has a rotating dise at the bottom. One more method is the centrifugal barrel finishing process. In both centrifugal processes, the rotation causes the inserts to collide with other inserts or with any media added. For standard tumbling using a centrifugal tumbler the tumbling operation would typically be run from 120 RPM for at least 20 minutes. The lining ofthe tumbler may form oxide or métal deposits onto the surface of the inserts.
It may be necessary to modify the lîning of the tumbler to be able to withstand the higher elevated températures that the process is conducted at.
To introduce higher levels of compressive stresses into the cemented carbide mining insert, a high energy tumbling process may be used. There are many different possible process setups that could be used to introduce H ET, including the type of tumbler, the volume of media added (if any), the treatment time and the process set up, e.g. RPM for a centrifugal tumbler etc. Therefore, the most appropriate way to define H ET is in terms of any process set up that introduces a spécifie degree of deformation hardening in a homogenous cemented carbide mining insert consisting of WC-Co, having a mass of about 20g. In the present disclosure, HET is defined as a tumbling treatment that would introduce a hardness change, measured using HV3, after tumbling (ÛHV3%) of at least:
AHV3% = 9.72 - 0.00543*HV3buik (équation 1)
Wherein:
ÛHV3% = lOO*(HV3o.3mm - HV3buik)/HV3bliik (équation 2)
HV3bUik îs an average of at least 30 indentation points measured in the innermost (center) of the cemented carbide mining insert and HV30.3mm îs an average of at least 30 indentation points at 0.3mm below the tumbled surface ofthe cemented carbide mining insert. This is based on the measurements being made on a cemented carbide mining insert having homogenous properties. By homogeneous properties we mean that post sintering the hardness different is no more than 1% from the surface zone to the bulk zone. The tumbling parameters used to achieve the deformation hardening described in équations (1) and (2) on a homogenous cemented carbide mining insert would be applied to cemented carbide bodies having a gradient property.
HETtumbling may typically be performed using an ERBA 120, having a dise size of about 600 mm, run at about 150 RPM if the tumbling operation is either performed without media or with media that is larger in size than the inserts being tumbled, or at about 200 RPM if the media used is smaller in size than the inserts being tumbled; using a Rosier tumbler, having a dise size of about 350 mm, at about 200 RPM if the tumbling operation is either performed without media or with media that is larger in size than the inserts being tumbled, or at about 280 RPM if the media used is smaller in size than the inserts being tumbled. Typically, the parts are tumbled for at least 40-60 minutes.
The effect ofthe surface hardening treatment at elevated températures is enhanced if the process is done in dry conditions. By dry conditions it is meant that no liquid is added to the process. Without being found by this theory, it is thought that, if liquid is introduced to the process.
it will keep the parts at room température . Further, the inclusion of the liquid will reduce the degree of the impact between the parts being tumbling. Liquid prevents the internai friction and collision heat to increase the température in the collision points. If no liquid îs used, then the température at the collision points gets high resulting in a higher toughness ofthe material subjected to the collision points.
Alternatîvely, the tumbler could be pressurized to a pressure that prevents water from boiling so that it would be possible to conduct the high température tumbling in wet conditions.
The tumbling process could be conducted in the presence or absence of tumbling media depending on thegeometry and material composition ofthe mining inserts being tumbled. If it is decided to add tumbling media, the type and ratio of media to inserts is selected to suit the geometry and material composition ofthe mining inserts being tumbled.
Optionally, ai) or part ofthe heat is generated by friction between the inserts and any media added in the tumbling process.
Optionally, the inserts are further subjected to a second surface hardening process. Preferably, if a second surface hardening process performed at room température is done, preferably the second surface hardening process is HET tumbling at room température in wet condition.
A further aspect ofthe présent invention relates to a cemented carbide mining insert comprisîng one or more hard-phase components and a binder characterized in that the ratio of % fcc phase Co to %hcp phase Co in the top half of the insert is >2, preferably greater than 3, more preferably greater than 4. The %fcc Co is the percentage of Co in the face centred cubîc phase and the %hcp Co is the percentage of Co in the hexagonal close packed phase. The percentage of each phase can be measured using EBSD. The increased ratio of %fcc phase Co to %hcp phase Co in the top half ofthe insert results in inserts having a higher crush strength. For pure Co, hep îs the stable phase and fcc is metastable. Most commonly the dominant phase in cemented carbides is fcc due to the alloying ofthe carbon and tungsten during sintering. The surface hardening treatment will induce defects in the binder, i.e. stacking faultsand dislocations. When the tendency offorming stacking faults increases, it improves the mechanical properties in fcc Co. With încreasîng strain, the mobility of defects will be limited and fcc to hep phase transformation will take place in the material. By enabling the fcc Co phase to stabilize this means more fcc to hep transformation will occur during drilling. Therefore it is advantageous to hâve a starting material with a higher ratio of fcc to hep Co.
The surface doping causes Co to migrate during sintering towards the doped areas, in this case the drill insert top. The alloying effect of Cr and the grain growth inhibiting effect by Cr should also affect the magnetic coercivîty and magnetic proportion. Hence, there is a différence in the magnetic properties between the top and the bottom.
In one embodiment:
— 1.5 (ComB - ComT) * (HcT - HcB) 5.5 1000 < Com-Hc 1000 where ComT is the magnetic percentage proportion in the top half of the insert, Corne is the magnetic percentage proportion in the bottom half ofthe insert. HcT is the magnetic coercivîty in the top half of the inserts and HcB is the magnetic coercivîty in the bottom half of the insert. Hc and Com are the magnetic coercivîty and magnetic percentage proportion respectiveîy of the insert before cutting.
%Ctt
In one embodiment 1.2<----- <50 where %CrT is the weight percent of Cr in the top half of %CrB the insert and %CrB is the weight percent of Crin the bottom half ofthe insert. Higher ch romium levels in the tîp of the insert will lead to increased wear résistance which will lead to improved drilling performance.
In one embodiment the hardness measured 150 pm below the surface is at least 20 HV3, preferably at least 3Û HV3 greater than the hardness measured in the bulk. This hardness profile is optimal for rock drilling inserts as it provides a hard surface and tough bulk.
The hardness of the cemented carbide inserts is measured using Vickers hardness automated measurement. The cemented carbide bodies are sectioned along the longitudinal axis and polished using standard procedures. The sectioning is done with a diamond dise cutter under fiowing water. Vickers indentations at a 3 kg load are then distributed over the polished section at the given depths below surface. The hardness of the top surface zone is an average of about 20 indentations (non-doped inserts) or 30 indentations (doped inserts) taken at the given distance 150 pm below the surface underthe dôme. The hardness ofthe bottom surface zone is an average of about 18 indentations (non doped inserts) or 24 indentations (doped inserts) taken at the given distance 150pm below the surface under the bottom.
The hardness measurements are performed using a programmable hardness tester, KB30S by KB Prüftechnik GmbH calibrated against HV1 test blocks issued by Euro Products Calibration
Laboratory, UK. Hardness is measured according to ISO ΕΝ5507Ό1.
” HV3 measurements were done in the following way:
Scanning the edge of the sample.
Programmîng the hardness tester to make indentations at specifîed distances from the edge ofthe sample.
- Indentation with 3 kg load at ail programmed co-ordinates.
The computer moves the stage to each co-ordinate, locates the microscope over each indentation, and runs auto adjust light, auto focus and the automatically measures the size of each indentation.
The user inspects ail the photos of the indentations for focus and other matters that disturb 10 the resuit.
In one embodiment there is a first binder concentration minimum (%binder-min), between the doped surface and the bulk, in percentage ofthe total height ofthe sintered cemented carbide mining insert, at between 1-50% from the doped surface, preferably between 5-40%. The %bindermin is typically at a depth of 0.5-10 mm, preferably 0.8-7 mm from the first part of the surface.
In one embodiment there is a first chromium concentration maximum at the doped surface.
In one embodiment the concentration of cobalt is higher in the top half ofthe mining insert compared to the bottom half ofthe mining insert.
In one embodiment the concentration of chromium is higher in the top half of the mining insert compared to the bottom half ofthe mining insert.
The Chemical concentrations within the cemented carbide mining insert are measured using wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) along the centreline of a cross sectioned cemented carbide mining insert.
In one embodiment the mining insert is uncoated.
Another aspect ofthe present disclosure relates to the use ofthe cemented carbide mining 25 insert as described hereinbefore or hereinafter for rock drilling or oil and gas drilling.
EXAMPLES
Example 1 - Starting materials and tumbling conditions
Design of experiments (DDE) was used for planning the experiments where input factors are varied in asystematic way in the factor space in orderto understand the response ofthe process r studied. In this case the JMP software by SAS was used. Custom design option in the software was chosen and the factors of binder concentration, carbon balance, doping amount and tumbling température were varied. Magnetic coercivity (kA/m) and cobalt magnetic proportion (Com%) were both measured post sintering and grinding and again after tumbling.
Table 1 shows the summary ofthe compositions, dopants and tumbling température ofthe mining inserts tested, as well as the measured magnetic properties. Com does not significantly change during tumbling.
Input factors Magnetic properties after sintering and grinding Magnetic properties after tumbling.
Run % Co* mg Cr2O3 per insert Tumbling température (=C) Com (%) Hc (kA/m) Com/Co Hc (kA/m)
1 6 9.45 25 4.51 9.83 0.75 9.98
2 6 0 25 5.44 9.24 0.91 9.71
3 6 19.76 25 5.60 9.24 0.93 9.89
4 9.5 0 25 7.45 6.71 0.78 7.01
5 9.5 16 25 7.03 7.02 0.74 7.30
6 9.5 8.25 25 9.19 4.72 0.96 5.25
7 (invention) 6 15.2 150 4.41 9.86 0.74 9.99
8 (invention) 6 8.55 150 5.24 9.41 0.87 9.77
9 (invention) 6 8.4 150 5.85 8.89 0.97 9.36
10 (invention) 9.5 9.15 150 8.33 5.47 0.88 6.10
11 6 0 300 4.72 9.74 0.79 9.71
12 (invention) 6 15.4 300 4.39 9.87 0.73 9.92
13 (invention) 6 9 300 5.21 9.50 0.87 9.74
14 (invention) 9.5 9.3 300 7.18 6.93 0.76 7.07
15 9.5 0 300 9.23 4.59 0.97 4.62
16 (invention) 9.5 17.68 300 9.08 4.86 0.95 5.31
10 15 Table 1: Composition of mining inserts tested. *Balance of WC. AH cemented carbide inserts were produced using a WC powder grain size measured as FSSS was before milling between 5 and 18 pm. The WC and Co powders were milled in a bail mill in wet conditions, using éthanol, with an addition of 2 wt% polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000) as organic binder (pressing agent) and cemented carbide milling bodies. After milling, the mixture was spraydried in N2-atmosphere and then uniaxially pressed into GT7S100A mining inserts having a size of about 10 mm in outer diameter (OD) and about 16-20 mm in height with a weight of approximately 17g each with a spherical dôme (cutting edge) on the top. The inserts were doped by vertically
dipping them with the tip downwards to a depth corresponding to half ofthe cylinder part of the insert or about 11mm ofthe total insert height into a slurry comprising Cr2O3 and PEG300. Three different CraOj concentrations, 15, 20 and 26%, were used as detailed in table 1. The 15% Cr2O3 * suspension resulted in 8-10 mg CrzCL per insert, the 20% CrjOa suspension resulted in 15-16 mg Cr20î per insert and the 26% Cr2O3 suspension resulted in 17.5-20 mg Cr2O3 per insert. The samples were then sintered using Sinter-HIP in 55 bar Ar-pressure at 141O°Cfor 1 hour and then ground.
After sintering and grinding, in order to replicate tumbling at an elevated température on a 5 lab scale a hot shaking method has been used. The bot shaking method uses a commercially available paint shaker of trade mark Corob™ Simple Shake 90 with a maximum load of 40 kg and a maximum shaking frequency of 65 Hz. The hot shaking method was conducted at a frequency of 45 Hz. About 800 grams or 50 pièces of inserts and 4.2 kg Carbide media (1560 pièces of about 7mm balls) where placed in a cylindrical Steel container with inner diameter of 10 cm and inner height of
12 cm filling it up to 2/3 ofthe height. The Steel cylinder with the mining insert were heated with media in a furnace to an elevated température of 150 or 300°C, the mining inserts were held at the target température for 120 minutes. After heatîng, the Steel cylinder was transferred straight into the paint shaker and immediately shook for 9 minutes. The transfer time between the furnace until the shaker started was less than 20 seconds. The media was made of the cemented Carbide grade
H10F having 10wt% Co, 0.5 wt% Cr and 89.5 wt% WC that results in sintered HV20 of about 1600. The shaking was performed in dry conditions, i.e. no water was added to the shaking at 150 or 300°C. A laser guided infrared thermometer M7 by MIKRON was used for the température measurements and the température was taken inside the vessel on the inserts. In order to prevent the température from risingfor the runs 1-6, conducted at 25°C, 100 ml amount of water was added to the batch of inserts and media. For ail runs the inserts were left to cool down to room température before they were subjected to a final wet centrîfugai tumbling operation for 50 minutes at 300RPM with 50kg 7mm H10F tumbling media in a Rosier FKS04 tumbler (post tumbling Hc measurements in table 1 are after both tumbling steps).
Example 2 - Edge damage
It is important that the damage to the edges of the mining inserts is low, preferably none at ail, post tumbling in order to hâve the highest yields. The région most prone to chipping is at the Sharp corner between the base and the side of the inserts, where there is typically a radius of about 0.5 mm.
The mining inserts were inspected visually for damages post tumbling and none of the 30 samples surface hardened at 150°C or 300°C showed any edge damage, even at the sharpest radius between the base and sîdes ofthe insert.
Example 3 - Insert Compression test
The insert compression test method involves compressing a drill bit insert between two plane-parallel hard counter surfaces, at a constant displacement rate, until the failure of the insert. A test fixture based on the ISO 4506:2017 (E) standard Hardmetals - Compression test was used, with cemented Carbide anvils of hardness exceeding 2000 HV, while the test method itself was adapted to toughness testing of rock drill inserts. The fixture was fitted onto an Instron 5989 test frame.
The loading axis was identical with the axis of rotational symmetry of the inserts. The counter surfaces ofthe fixture fulfilled the degree of parallelism required in the ISO 4506:2017 (E) standard, i.e. a maximum déviation of 0.5 pm / mm. The tested inserts were loaded at a constant rate of crosshead displacement equal to 0.6 mm / min until failure, while recording the loaddisplacement curve. The compliance ofthe test rig and test fixture was subtracted from the measured load-displacement curve before test évaluation. Five inserts were tested per run. The counter surfaces were inspected for damage before each test. Insert failure was defined to take place when the measured load suddenly dropped by at least 1000 N. Subséquent inspection of tested inserts confirmed that this in ail cases this coincided with the occurrence of a macroscopically visible crack. The material strength was characterized by means ofthe total absorbed deformation energy until fracture. The summary fracture energy (Ec), in Joules (J), required to crush the samples is shown in table 2 below:
Run Fracture energy Ec (J)
1 9.3
2 9.3
3 10.9
4 9.4
5 9.0
6 10.2
7 11.0
8 10.1
9 10.4
10 9.9
11 10.5
12 11.3
13 10.8
14 10.0
15 10.9
16 10.3
Table 2: Fracture energy (J) required to crush the samples
Figure 1 is a plot modelled from the DOE results tables 1 and 2 showing the effect ofthe tumbling température and concentration of CriOsin the dopant on the crush strength for a 6%Co grade with Com/Co=0.9 and a bulk hardness of 1400HV3. It can be seen from Figure 1 that there is an increase in the crush strength as a resuit of increasing the tumbling température and from increasing the amount (concentration) of the Cr20ï slurry used for the doping. The combination of the increased wear résistance due to Cr in the binder and the increased crush strength increases the 5 insert performance.
Example 4 - Hardness measurements
The hardness ofthe cemented carbide inserts is measured using Vickers hardness automated measurement described hereinabove. The cemented carbide bodies were sectioned along the longitudinal axis and polished using standard procedures. The sectioning is done with a diamond dise cutter under flowing water. Vickers indentations at a 3 kg ioad are then distributed over the polished section at the given depths below surface. In the case for non doped runs the distance between the indentations is 0.7mm at depths 0.15 and 0.3mm, 0.6mm at depths 0.6 andl.2mm and 0.4mm at depths 2.4 and 4.8mm. For the doped runs the distance between the indentations is 0.5mm at depths 0.15, 0.3, 0.8,1.3,1.8, 2.3, 2.8, 3.3, 3.8,4.3 and 4.8mm.
1$ The hardness ofthe top surface zone is an average of about 20 indentations for the nondoped inserts or of about 30 indentations for the doped inserts, taken at the given distance 150 pm below the surface under the dôme. The hardness of the bottom surface zone is an average of about 18 indentations for the non doped inserts or of about 24 indentations for the doped inserts, taken at the given distance 150 pm below the surface under the bottom.
The hardness of the bulk is an average of about 30 indentations for the non-doped inserts or of about 60 indentations for the doped inserts, the bulk hardness measurements were taken at the innermost distances. Two samples were measured per run. Table 3 shows a summary of the hardness measurements post tumbling.
Run HV3max 150pm below the top surface (dôme) HV3max 150pm above the bottom surface HV3bUik m middle of the sample (bulk)
1 1522 1488 1401
2 1453 1445 1388
3 1466 1470 1379
4 1196 1181 1136
S 1256 1107 1137
6 1159 1142 1103
7 1536 1490 1399
8 1467 1456 1388
9 1443 1457 1389
10 1131 1122 1108
11 1489 1471 1415
12 1541 1498 1400
13 1459 1455 1400 __
14 1233 1193 1142
15 1148 1138 1101 __
16 1147 __ 1139 1101____
Table 3: hardness measurements
Figure 2 is the hardness profile from the tip to the base of an insert from run 11 (comparative) and 12 (invention) and Figure 3 is a hardness profile from an insert from run 4 (comparative) and 14 (invention). The profiles show that there is a higher hardness at the surfaces 5 compared to the bulk and that the tumbling increases the hardness about the same in bottom and the tip when looking at the non doped runs 4 and 11.
Example 5 - Chemical analysis
The Chemical gradient ofthe sample was investigated by means of wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) analysis using a Jeol JXA-8530F microprobe. Linescans along the centre line 10 were done on cross sections of the sintered materials, prior to tumbling for cemented carbide insert comprisîng 6 wt% Co and 96 wt% WC and for a cemented carbide comprisîng 11 wt% Co and 89 wt% Co that were doped by dipping the samples into a slurry comprisîng 30 wt% CrjOa and 70 wt% PEG300 on its domed surface (corresponding to a concentration of 0.25 -0.28 mg/mm2)· with about 60% ofthe total insert length exposed to the oxide slurry. The samples were prepared using a précision cutter, followed by mechanical grinding and polishing. The final step ofthe sample préparation was carried out by polishing with 1 pm diamond paste on a soft cloth. An accélération voltage of 15kV was used to perform line scans with a step size of 100 pm and a probe diameter of 100 pm. Three line scans per sample were carried out and the average is reported. Figure 4 shows the Chemical profile of the cobalt concentration, Figure 5 shows the Chemical profile for the chromium concentration and Figure 6 shows the Chemical profite for Cr/Co for both 6 and 11 wt% Co samples prior to tumbling. The tumbling treatment will not affect the Chemical composition and so the same Chemical gradient profiles will be présent post tumbling.
Chromium concentrations were measured in the top and bottom halves of the inserts using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Malvern Panaiytical Axios Max Advanced instrument according to 25 ASTM B 890-07. For the chromium measurement, one insert per run was then orthogonally eut into a top half and a bottom half, with each section having about the same height (±0.5mm) using a 1mm diamond dise cutter.
For chromium doped inserts we then express the chromium ratio as:
β = wherein the %CrT is the percentage of Cr in the top half of the insert and the %CrB is the percentage of Cr in the bottom half of the insert.
Run XRF measurement of the samples.
%CrT (wt%) %Cr6 (wt%) β (%CrT/%CrB)
1 0.05 0.03 1.7
2 <0.01 <0.01 Non doped
3 0.07 0.04 1.8
4 <0.01 <0.01 Non doped
5 0.08 0.05 1.6
6 0.04 0.02 2.0
7 0.07 0.04 1.8
8 0.04 0.02 2.0
9 0.04 0.03 1.3
10 0.04 0.02 2.0
11 <0.01 <0.01 Non doped
12 0.07 0.04 1.8
13 0.04 0.02 2.0
14 0.04 0.02 2.0
15 <0.01 <0.01 Non doped
16 0.12 0.05 2.4
Table 4: Chromium concentration measurements
Example 6 - Magnetic pronerties
The magnetic coercivîty, (Hc) and magnetic percentage proportion, Com (%} was measured post tumbling. Three inserts per run were then orthogonally eut into a top half and a bottom half, with each section having about the same height (±0.5mm) using a 1mm diamond dise cutter. Hc and Com were measured again for each half. HcT and HcB are the measured magnetic coercivîty in the top and bottom halves of the inserts respectively. ComT and ComB are the magnetic percentage proportion measured for the top and bottom halves respectively. These measurements are recorded in the table below, along with a, which is calculated from the following équation:
(ComB~ComT)*(Hcy-HcB) Com-Hc
U ne ut inserts Top half Bottom half
Run Hc (kA/m) Com (%) Hct (kA/m) ComT (%) HcB (kA/m) ComB (%) a x 1000
1 9.967 4.484 10.17 4.337 9.999 4.618 1.07
2 9.725 5.426 9.833 5.432 9.842 5.424 0.00
3 9.828 5.643 10.17 5.654 9.808 5.639 -0.10
4 7.016 7.434 7.150 7.466 7.159 7.431 0.01
5 7.333 7.010 7.595 6.691 7.388 7.317 2.53
6 5.296 9.164 5.556 9.157 5.345 9.157 0.00
7 9.991 4.400 10.17 4.192 10.01 4.557 1,33
8 9.752 5.212 9.893 5.232 9.902 5.210 0,00
9 9.321 5.827 9.605 5.886 9.313 5.791 -0.51
10 6.134 8.307 6.442 8.459 6.241 8.192 -1.05
11 9.693 4.718 9.728 4.740 9.779 4.706 0.04
12 9.923 4.411 10.06 4.236 9.945 4.547 0.86
13 9.719 5.191 9.788 5.239 9.824 5.157 0,06
14 7.060 7.188 7.271 6.961 7.111 7.347 1.22
15 4.608 9.229 4.692 9.233 4.683 9.215 -0.00
16 5.567 8.964 6.118 8.914 5.415 8.993 1.12
Table 5: Magnetic measurements post tumbling
Example 7 - Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)
EBSD measurements were made on the samples to produce maps of the sample microstructure at selected positions, These maps were evaluated using the crystallographic 5 information to détermine the phases.
Measurements were made at a depth of 0.5 mm from the surface, to represent the microstructure at top ofthe insert, and at 10 mm from the surface ofthe insert to represent the microstructure in the bulk ofthe insert. The inserts were prepared for EBSD by mechanical polishing of a plan parailel cross section using a diamond 9 pm siurry down to a diamond size of 1 pm followed 10 by an ion polishing step performed in an Hitachi IM 400 in fiat mode. The prepared samples were then mounted onto a sample holder and inserted into the scanning électron microscope (SEM). The samples were tilted 70 degrees with respect to the horizontal plane and towards the EBSD detector. The SEM used for the characterization was a Jeol JSM-7800F, using a 70pm im objective aperture. The used EBSD detector was an Oxford Instruments Nordlys Detector operated using Oxford
Instruments AZtec software version 4.3. EBSD data acquisitions were made by applying a focused électron beam on to the polished surfaces and sequentially acquiring EBSD data using a step size of 0.05 pm for an area of 90pm x 90pm. The SEM settîngs used were: accélération Voltage = 20kV; aperture size = 70 pm; working distance = 15mm; detector insertion distance = 182mm; Optimize Pattern; binning 4x4; static background on, auto background on; Optimize Solver; optimized TKL model; Number of Bands 8; Hough Resolution 60; Apply refînement on. Reference phases used were:
WC (hexagonal}, 41 reflectors, Acta Ctystallogr., [ACCRA9], (1961), vo!.14, pages 200-201.
Co (cubic), 44 reflectors, Z. Angew. Phys., [ZAPHAX], (1967), vol. 23, pages 245-249. Co (hexagonal), 44 reflectors, Fiz. Met. Metalloved, {FMMTAKJ, ¢1968), vol. 26, pages 140-143.
The EBSD data was collected and analyzed in AZtec 3.4. Noise réduction was performed by removing wild spikes and performing zéro solution removal at extrapolation level 3 (low level).
Measurements were taken for 2 samples per run. The table below shows the average proportion of fcc Co vs hep Co measured in the top and bottom halves of the inserts:
Run % fcc Co top half % fcc Co bottom half % fcc Co top / %fcc Co bottom %hcp Co top half %hcp Co bottom half fcc/hcp top half fcc/hcp bottom half
3 2.38 4.18 0.57 1.71 0.62 1.38 6.82
13 (invention) 5.06 4.49 1.13 0.05 0.62 92.83 7.26
6 5.82 11.5 0.50 4.9 0.98 1.20 11.77
16 (invention) 9.52 11.22 0.84 1.71 1.53 5.74 7.49
Table 6: Average Co phase fractions measured using EBSD

Claims (15)

1. A method of redistributing the binder phase of a cemented carbide mining insert comprising a WC hard-phase component, optionally one or more further hard-phase components and a binder, the method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a green cemented carbide mining insert;
b) applying at least one binder puller, being a métal oxide or métal carbonate selected from CrïOs, MnO, MnOz, MoOj, Fe-oxides, NiO, NbOz, V2O3, MnCOj, FeCOj, CoCOs, N1CO3, CuCOj or Ag2CO3 to at least one local area ofthe surface ofthe green cemented carbide insert, wherein the at least one local area is 0.5-85% of the total surface area of the cemented carbide mining insert;
c) sintering the green carbide mining insert to form a sintered cemented carbide insert; and d) subjecting the sintered cemented carbide insert to a surface hardening process comprising a dry tumbiing process executed at an elevated température of or above 100°C.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the binder puller is CraOs.
3. The method according to any of the previous clalms, wherein the method includes a step of heating the mining insert and any media added for the tumbiing process, prior to the surface hardening process and wherein the surface hardening process is performed on the heated mining insert.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the mining insert is kept heated during the surface hardening process.
5. The method according to claim 3, wherein ail or part of the heat is generated by the friction between the insert and any media added in the tumbiing process.
6. The method according to any of the previous daims, wherein the tumbiing process is a High Energy Tumbiing process, wherein post tumbiing a homogenous cemented carbide mining insert has been deformation hardened such that AHV3% > 9.72 - 0.00543*HV3bUih wherein the ÛHV3% is the percentage différence between the HV3 measurement at 0.3 mm from the surface (HV3o.3mm) compared to the HV3 measurement in the bulk (HV3bUik), and wherein HV3bdk is an average of at least 30 indentation points measured in an innermost (center) of the cemented carbide mining insert and HV3o.3mm îs an average of at least 30 indentation points at 0.3mm below a tumbled surface of the cemented carbide mining insert, based on the measurements being made on a cemented carbide mining insert having homogenous properties, and wherein by homogeneous properties is meant that post sintering the hardness différence is no more than 1% from a surface zone to a bulk zone, and wherein the tumbling parameters used to achieve the deformation hardening, described in the équation ÛHV3% > 9.72 - 0.00543*HV3buik, on a homogenous cemented carbide mining insert would be applied to cemented carbide bodies having a gradient property.
7. The method according to any of the previous claims, wherein after the mining insert has been subjected to the surface hardening process at an elevated température, the mining insert is subjected to a second surface hardening process at room température.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the second surface hardening process is high energy tumbling.
9. A cemented carbide mining insert comprising one or more hard-phase components and a binder characterized in that the ratio of % fcc phase Co to % hep phase Co in a top half of the insert is >2, wherein électron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) measurements are made on samples to produce maps ofthe sample microstructure at selected positions and with these maps being evaiuated using crystalîographic information to détermine the phases, with measurements being made at a depth of 0.5 mm from the surface of the insert, to represent the microstructure at the top of the insert, and at 10 mm from the surface of the insert to represent the microstructure in a bulk of the insert, with the inserts being prepared as samples for EBSD by mechanical polîshing of a plan parallel cross section using a diamond 9 pm slurry down to a diamond size of 1 pm followed by an ion polishing step performed in an Hitachi IM 400 in fiat mode, with the prepared samples being mounted onto a sample holder and inserted into a scanning électron microscope (SEM), the samples being tilted 70 degrees with respect to the horizontal plane and towards an EBSD detector, with the SEM used for the characterization being a Jeol JSM-7800F, using a 70pm im objective aperture, with the EBSD detector being an Oxford Instruments Nordlys Detector operated using Oxford Instruments AZtec software version 4.3, with EBSD data acquisitions being made by applying a focused électron beam on to the polished surfaces and sequentially acquiring EBSD data using a step size of 0.05 pm for an area of 90pm x 90pm, with the SEM settings used being: accélération Voltage = 20kV; aperture size = 70 pm; working distance = 15mm; detector insertion distance = 182mm; Optimize Pattern: binning 4x4; static background on, auto background on; Optimize Solver: optimized TKL model; Number of Bands 8; Hough Résolution 60; Apply refinement on, with reference phases used being:
WC (hexagonal), 41 reflectors, Acta Ctystallogr., [ACCRA9], (1961), vol.14, pages 200-201,
Co (cubic), 44 reflectors, Z. Angew. Phys., [ZAPHAX], (1967), vol. 23, pages 245-249,
Co (hexagonal), 44 reflectors, Fiz. Met. Metalloved, {FMMTAKJ, (1968), vol. 26, pages 140143, with EBSD data being coltected and analyzed in AZtec 3.4, with noise réduction being performed by removing wild spikes and performing zéro solution removal at extrapolation level 3 (low level), and with measurements being taken for 2 samples per run.
10. The cemented Carbide according to claim 9 wherein:
%Cogcp %Copc
0.3 <---V —777 < 50 %Co?cp %Co^cc where %Co‘gCP is the average hep Co phase fraction at a distance of 10mm from an insert tip, %Copp is the average hep Co phase fraction at a distance of 0.5mm from the insert tip, %Co£ccis the average fcc Co phase fraction at a distance of 10 mm from the insert tip and %Copc is the average fcc Co phase fraction at a distance of 0.5mm from the insert tip, wherein the hep Co phase fraction and the fcc Co phase fraction are determined using EBSD as described in claim 9.
11. The cemented Carbide mining insert according to claim 9 or 10 wherein:
-1.5 (ComB — ComT) * (HcT - HcB) 5.5
1000 < Com-Hc 1000 where ComT is the magnetic percentage proportion in the top haif of the insert; Coma is the magnetic percentage proportion in a bottom half of the insert; HcT is the magnetic coercivity in the top half of the insert; HcB is the magnetic coercivity in the bottom half of the insert; Hc is the magnetic coercivity prior to cutting the insert into two halves and Com is the magnetic percentage prior to cutting the insert into two halves, wherein the magnetic coercivity, (Hc) and magnetic percentage proportion (Com) were measured post tumbling, with three inserts per run being orthogonally eut into a top half and a bottom half, with each half having about the same height (±0.5mm), using a 1mm diamond dise cutter, with Hc and Com being measured again for each half, with Hcyand Hcb being the measured magnetic coercivity in the top and bottom halves ofthe inserts respectively, with ComT and ComB being the magnetic percentage proportion measured for the top and bottom halves respectively.
12. The cemented Carbide mining insert according to any of claims 9-11 wherein:
1.2 <
%CrT %CrB < 50 where %CrT is the weight percent of Cr in a top half of the insert and %CrB is the weight percent of Cr in a bottom half of the insert, with chromium concentrations being measured in the top and bottom halves of the inserts using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Malvern Panalytical Axios Max Advanced instrument according to A5TM B 890-07, with, for the chromium measurement, one insert per run being orthogonally eut into a top haîf and a bottom half, with each half having about the same height (±0.5mm), using a 1mm diamond dise cutter.
13. The cemented carbide insert according to any of claims 9-12 wherein the hardness measured, using Vickers hardness automated measurement, 150 pm below the surface is at least 20 HV3 greater than the hardness measured in the bulk, wherein the Vickers hardness automated measurement comprises sectioning cemented carbide bodies along a longitudinal axis and polishing them using standard procedures, the sectioning being done with a diamond dise cutter under flowing water, with Vickers indentations at a 3 kg load then being distributed over the polished section at the given depths below surface, with, in the case for non-doped runs the distance between the indentations being 0.7mm at depths 0.15 and 0.3mm, 0.6mm at depths 0.6 and 1.2mm and 0.4mm at depths of 2.4 and 4.8mm, and in the case for the doped runs the distance between the indentations being 0.5mm at depths 0.15, 0.3, 0.8, 1.3, 1.8, 2.3, 2.8, 3.3, 3.8, 4.3 and 4.8mm, with the hardness of the top surface zone being an average of about 20 indentations (non-doped inserts) or 30 indentations (doped inserts) taken at the given distance 150 pm below a domed surface, and with the hardness of the bottom surface zone being an average of about 18 indentations (non-doped inserts) or 24 indentations (doped inserts) taken at the given distance 150pm below a bottom surface, with the hardness of the bulk being an average of about 30 indentations for the non-doped inserts or of about 60 indentations for the doped inserts, the bulk hardness measurements being taken at innermost distances, with the hardness measurements being performed using a programmable hardness tester, KB30S by KB Prüftechnik GmbH caiibrated against HV1 test blocks issued by Euro Products Calibration Laboratory, UK, with the hardness being measured according to ISO EN6507-01, and wherein HV3 measurements are done in the following way:
Scanning the edge ofthe sample,
Programming the hardness tester to make indentations at specified distances from the edge ofthe sample,
Indentation with 3 kg load at ail programmed co-ordinates,
- The computer moves the stage to each co-ordinate, locates the microscope over each indentation, and runs auto adjust light, auto focus and automatically measures the size of each indentation, and
- The user inspecta ali the photos of the indentations for focus and other matters that disturb 5 the resuit.
14. The cemented carbide mining insert according to any of daims 9-13 wherein the location of a first binder concentration minimum, positioned between a surface doped with Cr2Û3 and binder and the bulk, in percentage of the total height of the sintered cemented carbide mining insert, is between 1-50% below the doped surface.
15. A cemented carbide mining insert according to any of daims 9-14, wherein there is a first chromium concentration maximum at a surface doped with Cr2O3 and binder.
OA1202200469 2020-05-14 2021-05-12 Method of treating a cemented carbide mining insert. OA21062A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20174546.0 2020-05-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
OA21062A true OA21062A (en) 2023-10-09

Family

ID=

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3653743A1 (en) Binder redistribution within a cemented carbide mining insert
EP4076801B1 (en) Method of treating a mining insert
US12319990B2 (en) Gradient cemented carbide body and method of manufacturing thereof
EP3909707B1 (en) Method of treating a cemented carbide mining insert
EP4355515B1 (en) Cemented carbide insert with eta-phase core
OA21062A (en) Method of treating a cemented carbide mining insert.
AU2020407868B2 (en) Method of treating a mining insert
EP4370266A1 (en) Cemented carbide insert for mining or cutting applications comprising gamma phase carbide
OA21430A (en) Cemented carbide insert with eta-phase core.
OA20726A (en) Method of treating a mining insert.
RU2799380C2 (en) Redistribution of binder in a cemented carbide drill bit insert
OA20192A (en) Binder redistribution within a cemented carbide mining insert.
OA21468A (en) Cemented carbide insert for mining or cutting applications comprising gamma phase carbide
OA20483A (en) Gradient cemented carbide body and method of manufacturing thereof.