Cubuktepe et al., 2023 - Google Patents
Shared control with human trust and workload modelsCubuktepe et al., 2023
- Document ID
- 298754951927688484
- Author
- Cubuktepe M
- Jansen N
- Topcu U
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Cyber–Physical–Human Systems: Fundamentals and Applications
External Links
Snippet
We synthesize shared control protocols subject to probabilistic temporal logic specifications. Specifically, we develop a framework in which a human and an autonomy protocol can issue commands to carry out a certain task. We blend these commands as a joint input into a …
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/39—Robotics, robotics to robotics hand
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/04—Inference methods or devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B15/00—Systems controlled by a computer
- G05B15/02—Systems controlled by a computer electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | Prodmp: A unified perspective on dynamic and probabilistic movement primitives | |
| Ivanovic et al. | MATS: An interpretable trajectory forecasting representation for planning and control | |
| Liu et al. | Learning to play trajectory games against opponents with unknown objectives | |
| Krasowski et al. | Provably safe reinforcement learning: Conceptual analysis, survey, and benchmarking | |
| Rubies-Royo et al. | A classification-based approach for approximate reachability | |
| Schürmann et al. | Formal safety net control using backward reachability analysis | |
| Hayamizu et al. | Guiding robot exploration in reinforcement learning via automated planning | |
| Cannizzaro et al. | Car-despot: Causally-informed online pomdp planning for robots in confounded environments | |
| De Winter et al. | Autonomous assembly planning of demonstrated skills with reinforcement learning in simulation | |
| Li et al. | Certifiable Reachability Learning Using a New Lipschitz Continuous Value Function | |
| Cubuktepe et al. | Shared control with human trust and workload models | |
| Djeumou et al. | Task-guided inverse reinforcement learning under partial information | |
| Graebener et al. | Flow-based synthesis of reactive tests for discrete decision-making systems with temporal logic specifications | |
| Liu et al. | Learning-Enabled Iterative Convex Optimization for Safety-Critical Model Predictive Control | |
| Sun et al. | Provably correct training of neural network controllers using reachability analysis | |
| Junges et al. | Probabilistic Model Checking for Complex Cognitive Tasks--A case study in human-robot interaction | |
| van der Horst et al. | A Bayesian optimization framework for the automatic tuning of MPC-based shared controllers | |
| Osinenko et al. | An actor-critic framework for online control with environment stability guarantee | |
| Zhou et al. | Cpi: Conservativeness, permissiveness and intervention metrics for shared control evaluation | |
| Lu et al. | Vector Field Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Motion Planning of Mobile Robots | |
| Suresh | Design of Intuitive and Risk-Perception-Aware Robotic Navigation Algorithms | |
| Song et al. | Safe optimal control with synthesized waypoints as guidance | |
| Thumm | Establishing Safe and Preference-Aligned Human-Robot Collaboration in Autonomous Manipulation | |
| Wullt et al. | Robust Convex Model Predictive Control with collision avoidance guarantees for robot manipulators | |
| Bekris et al. | The state of robot motion generation |